|Publication number||US7901361 B2|
|Application number||US 11/379,187|
|Publication date||Mar 8, 2011|
|Filing date||Apr 18, 2006|
|Priority date||May 7, 1992|
|Also published as||CA2190488A1, CA2190488C, DE69527783D1, DE69527783T2, DE69533708D1, DE69533708T2, EP0759791A1, EP0759791B1, EP1172123A2, EP1172123A3, EP1172123B1, US5490502, US5535739, US5546933, US6299581, US6488634, US6793629, US20030055346, US20050016536, US20070016093, WO1995032016A1|
|Publication number||11379187, 379187, US 7901361 B2, US 7901361B2, US-B2-7901361, US7901361 B2, US7901361B2|
|Inventors||David M. Rapoport, Robert G. Norman|
|Original Assignee||New York University|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (97), Non-Patent Citations (16), Referenced by (22), Classifications (32), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/918,788 filed Aug. 13, 2004, now abandoned which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10,290,936, filed Nov. 7, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,793,629, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/602,158, filed Jun. 22, 2000, (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,488,634), which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/644,371, filed May 10, 1996 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,299,581), which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/482,866, filed Jun. 7, 1995 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,535,739), which is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/246,964, filed May 20, 1994 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,490,502), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 07/879,578, filed May 7, 1992 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,335,654), the contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
This invention relates to a method and apparatus for adjusting the positive airway pressure of a patient to an optimum value in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, and more particularly to a breathing device which maintains constant positive airway pressure and method of use which analyzes an inspiratory flow waveform to titrate such a pressure value.
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a well recognized disorder which may affect as much as 1-5% of the adult population. OSAS is one of the most common causes of excessive daytime somnolence. OSAS is most frequent in obese males, and it is the single most frequent reason for referral to sleep disorder clinics.
OSAS is associated with all conditions in which there is anatomic or functional narrowing of the patient's upper airway, and is characterized by an intermittent obstruction of the upper airway occurring during sleep. The obstruction results in a spectrum of respiratory disturbances ranging from the total absence of airflow (apnea) to significant obstruction with or without reduced airflow (hypopnea and snoring), despite continued respiratory efforts. The morbidity of the syndrome arises from hypoxemia, hypercapnia, bradycardia and sleep disruption associated with the apneas and arousals from sleep.
The pathophysiology of OSAS is not fully worked out. However, it is now well recognized that obstruction of the upper airway during sleep is in part due to the collapsible behavior of the supraglottic segment during the negative intraluminal pressure generated by inspiratory effort. Thus, the human upper airway during sleep behaves as a Starling resistor, which is defined by the property that the flow is limited to a fixed value irrespective of the driving (inspiratory) pressure. Partial or complete airway collapse can then occur associated with the loss of airway tone which is characteristic of the onset of sleep and may be exaggerated in OSAS.
Since 1981, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) applied by a tight fitting nasal mask worn during sleep has evolved as the most effective treatment for this disorder, and is now the standard of care. The availability of this non-invasive form of therapy has resulted in extensive publicity for apnea and the appearance of large numbers of patients who previously may have avoided the medical establishment because of the fear of tracheostomy. Increasing the comfort of the system, which is partially determined by minimizing the necessary nasal pressure, has been a major goal of research aimed at improving patient compliance with therapy. Various systems for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea are disclosed, for example, in “Reversal of Obstructive Sleep Apnea by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Applied Through The Nares”, Sullivan et al, Lancet, 1981, 1:862-865; and “Reversal Of The ‘Pickwickian Syndrome’ By Long-Term Use of Nocturnal Nasal-Airway Pressure”; Rapaport et al., New England Journal of Medicine, Oct. 7, 1982. Similarly, the article “Induction of upper airway occlusion in sleeping individuals with subatmospheric nasal pressure”, Schwartz et al, Journal of Applied Physiology, 1988, 64, pp. 535-542, discusses various polysomnographic techniques. Each of these articles are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Despite its success, limitations to the use of nasal CPAP exist. These mostly take the form of discomfort from the mask and the nasal pressure required to obliterate the apneas. Systems for minimizing the discomfort from the mask are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,655,213, Rapaport et al, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,065,756, Rapaport, as well as in “Therapeutic Options For Obstructive Sleep Apnea”, Garay, Respiratory Management, July/August 1987, pp. 11-15; and “Techniques For Administering Nasal CPAP”, Rapaport, Respiratory Management, July/August 1987, pp. 18-21 (each being hereby incorporated herein by reference). Minimizing the necessary pressure remains a goal of the preliminary testing of a patient in the sleep laboratory. However, it has been shown that this pressure varies throughout the night with sleep stage and body position. Furthermore, the therapeutic pressure may both rise or fall with time in patients with changing anatomy (nasal congestion/polyps), change in weight, changing medication or with alcohol use. Because of this, most sleep laboratories currently prescribe the setting for home use of nasal CPAP pressure based upon the single highest value of pressures needed to obliterate apneas during a night of monitoring in the sleep laboratory. Retesting is often necessary if the patient complains of incomplete resolution of daytime sleepiness, and may reveal a change in the required pressure.
The invention is therefore directed to a method and apparatus, in a system for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, for optimizing the controlled positive pressure to thereby minimize the flow of air from a flow generator while still ensuring that flow limitation in the patient's airway does not occur. In particular, the invention relates to a breathing device and method of use to adjust a controlled positive pressure to the airway of a patient by detecting flow limitation from analysis of an inspiratory flow waveform.
In accordance with the invention, an apparatus for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea is provided, comprising a source of air, and means for directing an air flow from said source to a patient. This part of the system may be of the type disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,065,756. In addition, means are provided for sensing the waveform of said airflow, to detect deviations therein that correspond to flow limitation in the air supplied to the patient. Such deviations may be, for example, deviations from a substantially sinusoidal waveform, flattening, or the presence of plateaus, in the portions of the waveform corresponding to inspiration of the patient. In response to such variations in said airflow, the system of the invention increases or decreases the pressure to the patient.
In accordance with the method of the invention, the controlled positive pressure to the patient is increased in response to the detection of flow waveform portions corresponding to flow limitations in the patient airway. Such pressure increases may be effected periodically. Similarly, the controlled positive pressure may be periodically decreased in the absence of such flow limitation. The system may be provided with a program that periodically decreases the controlled positive pressure in the absence of detection of flow limitations in the patient airway, and that periodically increases the pressure in the presence of detection of such flow limitations.
The method for determining whether to increase or decrease the controlled positive pressure is comprised of several steps. The first step is to detect the presence of a valid breath and store an inspiratory waveform of that breath for further analysis. Next, the waveform of the stored breath is analyzed regarding its shape for presence of flow limitation. Whether flow limitation is present is in part determined by flow limitation parameters calculated from the shape of the waveforms of the current breath and of the immediately preceding breath. Once the presence of flow limitation has been analyzed, the system determines an action to take for adjustment of the controlled positive pressure. The pressure setting is raised, lowered or maintained depending on whether flow limitation has been detected and on the previous actions taken by the system.
The preferred breathing device or apparatus consists of a flow generator, such as a variable-speed blower, a flow sensor, an analog to digital converter, a microprocessor, and a pressure controller, such as a blower motor speed control circuit, a patient connection hose, a nasal coupling, such as a nose mask or similar fitting, and, optionally, a pressure transducer. Alternative patient circuits may be employed, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,655,213 and 5,065,756. For example, a positive pressure breathing gas source may be connected to a pressure control valve proximate the breathing gas source and connected to a nasal mask having a venting means.
In the preferred embodiment, the blower supplies air through the flow sensor to the patient via a hose and nasal coupling. The microprocessor obtains the flow waveform from the digitized output of the flow sensor. Using the method of the present invention described herein, the microprocessor adjusts the speed of the blower via the motor control circuit to change the air pressure in the patient supply hose. A pressure transducer may be provided to measure the actual pressure in the patient hose. In addition, the microprocessor may store measured pressure and flow waveform values in its data memory to provide a history for real-time or off-line processing and analysis.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention.
When the CPAP pressure was decreased to 8 cm H2O, as illustrated in
The waveforms of
The flow tracing of
In accordance with the invention, waveforms of the flow of air, of the type illustrated in
In one embodiment of the invention, as illustrated in
One method for adjusting the CPAP pressure in accordance with the invention is illustrated in
If it is determined that flow limitation has occurred (step 43) and that the CPAP pressure is less than the maximum allowed (step 44), then the CPAP pressure is increased by 0.5 cm H2O (step 45) and the method returns to the settling step 41 for further processing. If at the pressure comparing step 44 the pressure was not less than the maximum allowed CPAP pressure, then the method returns to the settling step 41 without increasing the CPAP pressure.
If it was determined that a flow limitation was not present (step 43), then a determination is made (step 46) whether a predetermined time has elapsed following the last change in the CPAP pressure. The predetermined time may be, for example, two minutes. If the predetermined time has not elapsed, then the method returns to the settling period step 41. If the predetermined minimum time has elapsed, it is determined whether the CPAP pressure is greater than the minimum allowed pressure (step 47). If it is greater than the minimum allowed pressure, then the CPAP pressure is decreased by 0.5 cm H2O (step 48), and the method returns to the settling step 41. Otherwise, the returns to the settling step 41 without decreasing the CPAP pressure.
While the above described example of the method of the invention employed CPAP pressure change steps of 0.5 cm H2O, it is apparent that the invention is not limited to pressure changes of this magnitude. In addition, the pressure changes may not necessarily be equal throughout the range of adjustment.
Similarly, the flow limitation determination step 43 may involve any of a number of waveform analysis procedures. For example, the signal corresponding to the airflow waveform may be differentiated in the portions thereof corresponding to inspiration. A markedly peaked result from such differentiation indicates the presence of flow limitation, as is evident from an analysis of the differentials of the waveforms of
The optimizing method for determining whether to increase or decrease the controlled positive pressure is comprised of several steps. The first step is to detect the presence of a valid breath and store data values corresponding to an inspiratory flow waveform of that breath for further analysis. Alternatively, flow data values may be stored for the entire breath. Next, the stored breath waveform is analyzed regarding its shape for presence of flow limitation. Whether flow limitation is present is in part determined by flow limitation parameters calculated from the shape of the waveforms of the current breath and of the immediately preceding breath. Once the presence of flow limitation has been analyzed, the system determines an action to take for adjustment of the controlled positive pressure. The pressure setting is raised, lowered or maintained depending on whether flow limitation has been detected and on the previous actions taken by the system.
The optimizing method has several input parameters which are used in the determination of the action to be taken during the automatic adjustment mode. For example, the initial controlled positive pressure, or “start value,” must be available for use when power-on occurs in the breathing device. Similarly, the method requires a “therapeutic level” of controlled positive pressure to return to whenever an exception condition is detected, such as high constant flow. If the method cannot determine with reasonable certainty that breathing is present, it returns the controlled positive pressure to the prescribed therapeutic level. Also, a “low limit” and a “high limit” are required to determine the minimum and maximum controlled positive pressure level the system will generate when operating in the automatic adjustment mode. The method cannot cause the controlled positive pressure to exceed the maximum or minimum limits of pressure.
The method for optimizing the controlled positive pressure will now be described in more detail. The first step in the optimizing method is the detection of a valid breath. A valid breath is determined by a cyclical fluctuation in the respiratory signal superimposed on the constant system leak. This detection is implemented using a three phase state machine with states corresponding to the phases of patient respiration. The transition diagram of this state machine is shown in
The total flow signal present within the positive pressure flow generator is used as a basis for the breath detection method steps. The breath detection method produces measured data corresponding to the inspiratory flow waveform. Similarly, the breath detection method estimates the constant leak flow and determines several breath description parameters, which are described in more detail below. These measured and calculated data form the input to the flow limitation detection step of the optimizing method.
As shown in
The four state changes (C1, C2, C3, and C4), are shown in
The average leak value (ALV) is a calculated running average of the actual flow signal modified to reflect the possible absence of an expiratory signal. The estimate of the average leak flow is updated during each of the three phases INSP, EXP, PAUSE. The safety reference value (SAFE) is the level of fluctuation in the flow signal which is considered noise. This is calculated as an average of a fraction of the peak flow in each breath. Alternatively, the total flow signal may be first differentiated and then integrated to remove the constant DC offset component (leak flow) and the value of ALV set to zero. Also, the method steps may be applied to the estimated flow signal output of a CPAP generator (which has the constant leak value subtracted out) and the ALV set equal to zero.
In the second transition (C2), the machine state changes from the INSP state to the PAUSE state. This transition occurs when the system is in the INSP state and the total flow signal drops below the ALV. In the next transition (C3), the state machine changes from the PAUSE state to the EXP state. This transition occurs when the system is in the PAUSE state and the total flow signal drops below the ALV minus SAFE reference value. Lastly, the state machine transitions from the EXP state to the PAUSE state (C4). This transition occurs when the system is in the EXP state and the total flow signal rises above the ALV.
The system performs certain calculations during the phase states (INSP, EXP, PAUSE) and phase transitions (C1, C2, C3, C4). During the inspiratory phase (INSP), the system accumulates and stores measured data of total flow, e.g., in a flow buffer. Also during the inspiratory phase, the system determines the maximum inspiratory flow value and the maximum derivative value for the total flow signal. During the expiratory phase (EXP), the system determines the maximum expiratory flow value.
During the first transition (C1), the system determines whether the current breath meets the valid criteria for time and size. At the same time, the system calculates a new safety value (SAFE) as a fraction of the breath size. During the second transition (C2), the system determines the inspiratory time and calculates the running average of the maximum derivative. During the fourth transition (C4), the system calculates the expiratory time.
The determination of the degree of flow limitation present is based on four shape detection parameters, the sinusoidal index, the flatness index, the respiratory effort index and the relative flow magnitude index. The sinusoidal parameter or index is calculated as a correlation coefficient of the actual total inspiratory flow wave (filtered) to a reference sinusoidal half wave. As shown in
A typical non-flow limited shape 52 and flow limited shape 54 are shown in
The flatness parameter is a representation of the degree of flatness (or curvature) present in the total inspiratory flow signal. This index is calculated as a variance ratio of the actual signal around a calculated regression line (actual curvature) and an ideal half sinusoidal signal around the same regression line (curvature standard). As shown in
The system calculates the respiratory effort index as the ratio of peak derivative (rate of change of flow with respect to time) of the early inspiratory waveform to the peak flow value of the inspiratory waveform.
The system calculates the relative flow magnitude index as the peak flow of the inspiratory flow waveform minus the peak flow of the previous inspiratory flow waveforms showing flow-limitation divided by the running average of the peak flows of the non-limited breaths minus the average of the flow-limited breaths. This parameter is calculated as:
The four shape detection parameters described above are calculated for the current valid breath and the values are combined using a mathematical function, such as a logistic regression sum. Similarly, weighting factors may be used, wherein the weight given to one or more of the indexes may be zero, positive or negative. The combined values provide a flow limitation parameter which has a value between 0 and 1 that characterizes the likelihood that the current breath has a shape characteristic of flow-limitation. The value of the flow limitation parameter is further modified based on the value of the preceding breaths' flow limitation parameters used as a prior probability, allowing calculation of a posterior probability.
The four shape detection parameters (sinusoidal index, flatness index, respiratory effort index and relative flow magnitude index) are used in a mathematical function to determine a likelihood of flow limitation using a logistic regression equation:
Where “p” is the probability of flow limitation; “e” is the base of the natural logarithms; X1, X2, X3 and X4 are the shape detection parameters; B0, B1, B2, B3 and B4 are the weighting coefficients (which may include zero) and
f(x)=B o +B 1 *X 1 +B 2 *X 2 +B 3 *X 3 +B 4 *X 4.
The probability of flow limitation (p) has a limited range from 0 (flow limitation) to 1 (normal) and is valid for all values of the function f(x).
If the flow limitation parameter is between 1 and a predetermined normal reference value, e.g., 0.65-0.8, then the breath is classified as “normal.” If the flow limitation parameter is between 0 and a predetermined flow limited reference value, e.g., 0.4, then the breath is classified as “flow limited.” If the flow limitation parameter is between the normal and flow limited reference values, then the breath is classified as “intermediate.”
As each valid breath is identified, its likelihood of being flow limited is calculated. The flow limitation parameter approaches a value of 1 for a normal breath and 0 for a flow limited breath. In the method of the present invention, a decision is made as to whether to adjust the controlled positive pressure. This decision is dependent on three factors:
Generally, if flow limitation is detected, the controlled positive pressure will be raised. Similarly, if no flow limitation is detected for an interval of time, then the controlled positive pressure is lowered to test for the development of flow limitation. The desired effect of the method of the present invention is for the controlled positive pressure to remain slightly above or below the optimal positive pressure despite changes in the optimal therapeutic level of pressure which may occur over time.
As shown in the flow chart of
If there has been no change (NC) in the controlled positive pressure for the past interval, the present breath is normal (N) and the majority function is normal, then the controlled positive pressure is lowered by a large step (LOWR LG). If, however, the present breath is intermediate (I) and the majority function is intermediate or flow limited (FL), then the controlled positive pressure is raised by a small step (RAISE SM). Similarly, if the present breath is flow limited, then the controlled positive pressure is raised a small step if the majority function is intermediate and by a large step (RAISE LG) if the majority function is flow limited. Else, no change is made to the controlled positive pressure.
If the controlled positive pressure has been lowered in the past interval, the present breath is normal and the majority function is normal, then the controlled positive pressure is lowered by a large step (LOWER LG). If, however, the present breath is intermediate or flow limited and the majority function is intermediate or flow limited, then the controlled positive pressure is raised to the previous level (RAISE PV). Else, no change is made to the controlled positive pressure.
If the controlled positive pressure has been raised in the past interval, no action is taken for a period of time, e.g., 10 breaths. Then if the present breath is normal and the majority function is normal, the controlled positive pressure is lowered by a small step (LOWR SM). Conversely, if the present breath is intermediate or flow limited, then the controlled positive pressure is raised by a small step if the majority function is intermediate and by a large step if the majority function is flow limited. Else, no change is made to the controlled positive pressure.
In addition, the detection of apneas is used to initiate the decision to raise the controlled positive pressure. If two apneas of a duration of ten seconds or longer occur within one minute, then the controlled positive pressure is raised. If one long apnea having a duration of twenty seconds or longer occurs, then the controlled positive pressure is raised. If an apparent apnea is associated with a very high leak flow, implying a condition of mask disconnect, then the controlled positive pressure is returned to a predetermined or preset pressure.
Alternatively, the controlled positive pressure may be continuously adjusted at a rate set by a slope parameter, e.g., 0.1 cm per two seconds. The slope parameter and its sign would then be updated based on each breath's flow limitation parameter. In no event can the controlled positive pressure be set below the low limit or above the high limit reference values.
A microprocessor 80 with associated memory 81 and other peripheral circuits executes computer programs which implement the optimizing methods heretofore described. The microprocessor or similar computing device uses the digital output values from a multiplexer 76 and an analog-to-digital converter 78. The microprocessor produces a speed control signal which adjusts a motor speed control circuit 82 which controls the speed of a blower motor 84. Similarly, the variable-speed motor drives the fan blades of a blower 86 which supplies the air flow to the patient through or past the air flow sensor 72. The speed of the blower determines the pressure in the patient circuit. Thus, the microprocessor is able to adjust the pressure of the patient circuit 70 in response to the data values from the flow sensor.
The breathing device 70 may also incorporate a pressure sensor circuit 90 to allow the microprocessor 80 to obtain a direct measurement of the pressure in the patient tubing 74 via the analog to digital converter circuit 78. Such a configuration would allow the microprocessor to maintain the pressure within the maximum and minimum pressure limits established by the prescribing physician. The actual operating pressure levels can be stored in the memory 81 of the microprocessor every few minutes, thus providing a history of pressure levels during the hours of use when the stored data values are read and further processed by a separate computer program.
A signal representative of the speed of the blower could be stored in memory instead of the pressure data values; however, such speed values do not change as rapidly as measured pressure values. If the blower pressure versus speed characteristics are suitable, i.e., approximately constant pressure at a given speed regardless of the air flow rate, then the pressure sensor circuit may be eliminated, thereby reducing the cost to produce the apparatus and making it affordable by a greater number of patients. Alternatively, a patient circuit having a positive pressure breathing gas source and pressure control valve, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,065,756, may be used.
The methodology for detecting flow limitation can be applied by an automated or manual analysis of the inspiratory flow waveform from the positive pressure generator or from any measurement of the inspiratory flow waveform. Thus the method and apparatus heretofore described may be used for diagnostic purposes in a hospital, sleep lab or the home. Detection and measurement of inspiratory and expiratory flow can be from a standard CPAP system with a flow signal output or by a diagnostic system 100 as shown in
As shown in
An alternative nose fitting may consist of a tight fitting nasal mask such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,065,756. An improved mask seal may be achieved by using a ring of dual sided adhesive tape formed in a ring or oval along the perimeter of the mask where the nasal mask contacts the patient. In addition, the perimeter of the nasal mask may be configured with a pliable material which would conform to the shape of the face of the patient. A vent and flow restrictor may be configured in the mask and placed in fluid communication with a flow and/or pressure sensor or transducer.
Such an analysis can be tabulated in several ways, which permit either diagnosis of subtle elevations of upper airway resistance (not resulting in frank apnea) or to adjust a single prescription pressure of CPAP in a well standardized manner either in the laboratory or on the basis of home studies. Possible tabulations of percent time or numbers of breaths with normal, intermediate, and flow limited contours may include time of night, patient position (which can be recorded simultaneously with a position sensor 112 in the mask or on the patient's body), sleep stage (as recorded separately) and controlled positive pressure.
The controlled positive pressure could be constant throughout the night or varied in several ways to gain diagnostic and therapeutic information of relevance to a patient's condition. For example, the controlled positive pressure could be changed throughout a night manually in the sleep laboratory by a technician. Similarly, the controlled positive pressure could be changed automatically via an automated system, either in response to feedback control or using pre-set ramps or steps in the controlled positive pressure throughout the night (in laboratory or at home). Likewise, the controlled positive pressure could be changed on multiple individual nights, e.g., at home.
As shown in
An alternative nasal connection could be achieved by using a “standard” nasal cannula commonly used for supplying supplemental oxygen therapy to patients. Such a cannula does not provide a seal between the nasal prong and the naris, so it does not capture all the air flowing to and from the patient. However, it does capture the small pressure fluctuations in the nares and transmit them to an attached pressure sensor to provide a signal representative of the actual flow waveform shape.
The recording device may be configured with a microprocessor 110 which uses a sample-and-hold circuit, and an analog-to-digital converter 118 to digitize samples of analog voltage signals at a suitable rate and resolution to capture relevant waveform detail, e.g., fifty samples per second rate and resolution of one part in 256 (“eight bit”) for breathing flow waveforms. The digitized samples are then stored in time-sequential order in a non-volatile memory device 114, e.g. magnetic disk drive, “flash” memory, or battery-backed random-access memory.
In order to record more than one signal, e.g. flow and pressure waveforms and position signal, in time-correlated sequence, the individual signals can be repetitively sequentially connected to the sample-and-hold circuit by a multiplexer circuit 116. All of these recording device circuit and devices are well known to one skilled in the art of electronic circuit design, and can readily be obtained commercially.
In order to enhance the diagnostic potential of this flow waveform sensing and analyzing technique, the flow sensor 104 could be combined with a position sensor 112 to determine the dependence of position attributes of the flow limitation. Likewise, adding pulse oximetry 120, which measures the oxyhemoglobin saturation level in the patient's blood, to the flow and position measurements would provide a very useful combination of diagnostic signals, adequate to diagnose and document the severity of the upper airway obstructions.
The following describes a method of diagnosing and treating obstructive sleep apnea and upper airway resistance syndrome using the methods and apparatus for determining flow limitation in a patient as heretofore described. At present, a patient seeking physician treatment has symptoms of excessive sleepiness and possibly snoring, in spite of the patient apparently spending enough time in bed to provide adequate sleep. Such symptoms may or may not be indicative of obstructive sleep apnea and require further analysis, typically in an overnight stay in a sleep lab. Under the present invention, the physician provides the patient with a diagnostic device for use during sleep at home. The diagnostic system records flow and pressure waveforms as previously described, using a nose mask, nasal cannula or similar nasal fitting having a flow restrictor and a pressure and or flow transducer.
While the patient is using the diagnostic device at home, the digitized waveforms are stored in nonvolatile memory such as flash memory, floppy or hard disk, or battery-powered random-access memory (RAM). One or two additional measurements may optionally be recorded: patient sleeping position from a position sensor on the patient, and blood oxyhemoglobin saturation level (in percent SaO2) from a device such as a pulse oximeter. Since the value of these two measurements do not change relatively rapidly (one value per second for each additional measurement versus fifty values per second for flow), the memory storage requirements would not be increased significantly.
After using the diagnostic device to record the desired parameters while sleeping for one or more nights, the patient returns the device or data storage unit, e.g., a disk or non-volatile memory card, to the physician. The physician extracts the data from the storage, and analyzes it to determine the amount of flow limitation and apnea present, along with the other two parameters, if they were recorded. The resulting analysis is used to determine whether the patient needs a more detailed sleep study (in a sleep lab or in the home), or whether therapy should be started without further studies.
If the decision is to start therapy because sufficient flow limitation and/or apnea is present, the patient is provided with a self-adjusting therapy device for home use of the method of the present invention described heretofore. The home therapy device also incorporates a recording component which records flow, pressure and one or two optional parameters as described above. After using this therapy device during sleep for one or more nights, the data is returned to the physician. The physician analyzes it to document the reduction of flow limitation and apnea achieved by the therapy device, to document the reduction in SaO2 desaturations if the optional parameter was recorded, and to determine whether the patient's condition could be effectively treated by a less expensive therapy device which is not self-adjusting, for example standard continuous positive airway pressure.
The patient is then given the appropriate therapy device, or, if anomalies in the breathing pattern are observed during the recorded therapy nights, the patient may be referred for a more extensive sleep study. After the patient has been using the therapy device for several weeks or months, a repeat use of the self-adjusting therapy device with recording component for a follow-up study should be accomplished. The data are analyzed as above, and the appropriate actions taken.
Prior to the period of diagnostic sleep, the patient puts on the sensor(s), turns on the diagnostic device, and goes to sleep. When the patient awakes in the morning, the patient turns the diagnostic device off. During the period of sleep, the diagnostic device collects the data as described above. If the diagnostic procedure is to be a multi-night period of sleep, then the patient repeats this data collection phase for however many nights are required. At step 154, and after the required number of nights of data collection, the patient returns the diagnostic device with the stored data. If the study will be extended, then the patient removes the data storage module and returns only the module to the physician.
The stored data are analyzed at step 156 to determine the amount and severity of flow limitation, and the number and severity of apneas, if any. This analysis can be performed either manually, or preferably by an automated process such as the methods for determining flow limitation as described heretofore. At step 158, a decision is then made as to whether the patient has flow limitation. If there is no evidence of flow limiting or apnea in the stored data, then the patient is referred at step 160 to a sleep lab for a more comprehensive study to determine whether the patient has other problems such as restless legs syndrome, etc.
If flow limitation is present, or apneas are found, then the patient is instructed how to use the self-adjusting controlled positive pressure therapy device, step 162. The therapy device is equipped with a module which collects and stores flow and pressure data, along with the (optional) position and oximetry data, as described above. Note that this step includes collecting data from a pressure sensor measuring the pressure at the airflow outlet of the therapy device. Such pressure data could also be obtained from a pressure sensor connected to the patient attachment device (ADAM shell or nasal mask, etc.). Although less desirable because of the uncertainty of actual pressure at the patient, the pressure data could be replaced by data representing the blower speed, if the therapy device adjusts pressure by changing blower speed. The patient sleeps at home with the therapy device for the required number of nights. During each night, the therapy device collects and stores the data as described above.
At step 164, the patient returns the therapy device or its data storage module for analysis of the stored data after the required number of nights of data collection. Then, the stored flow data are analyzed at step 166 to determine the amount and severity of flow limitation, and the number and severity of apneas, if any exist. The flow limitation analysis can be performed either manually, or preferably by an automated process such as by the methods described heretofore. The stored pressure data are analyzed at step 168 to determine the pressure required to alleviate flow limitations and apneas, and the distribution of required pressures during the diagnostic period of sleep. When the pressure data values are collected from the outlet of the therapy device, then the data values can be corrected to reflect the estimated pressure at the nasal fitting if the resistance of the hose or tubing between the outlet and the nasal fitting is known. For example,
P nose =P outlet−FLOW*RESISTANCE.
At step 170, a decision is made whether the analysis determines that there are still a significant number of sleep-disordered breathing episodes during the night, and/or that the therapy device is incapable of alleviating such episodes at its highest pressure limit. Such a limit may have been selected by the prescribing physician at a level less than the maximum capability of the therapy device. If the therapy device did not restore normal breathing, then the patient is referred to a sleep lab for a more comprehensive study, step 160.
If the therapy device restores normal breathing patterns for the patient, the pressure data are reviewed at step 172 for the proper prescription of a controlled positive pressure therapy device. If the peak therapy pressures fluctuate significantly, then the patient is provided with a prescription for a self-adjusting controlled positive pressure therapy device for continued home use, step 174. To reduce patient cost, such a device would not necessarily incorporate the data storage capabilities of the therapy device used for the previous steps in this method. If, however, the pressure data show consistent night-to-night peak pressures, and the maximum pressure used to alleviate sleep-disordered breathing events is relatively low, e.g., eight centimeters of water pressure or less, then the patient would be prescribed conventional CPAP (non-self-adjusting) therapy, step 176.
While several particular forms of the invention have been illustrated and described, it will be apparent that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, references to materials of construction and specific dimensions are also not intended to be limiting in any manner and other materials and dimensions could be substituted and remain within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited, except as by the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3675640||Apr 9, 1970||Jul 11, 1972||Gatts J D||Method and apparatus for dynamic health testing evaluation and treatment|
|US3991304||May 19, 1975||Nov 9, 1976||Hillsman Dean||Respiratory biofeedback and performance evaluation system|
|US4077404||Oct 19, 1976||Mar 7, 1978||H. B. W. Medical Instruments Manufacturing Company, Inc.||Breathing equipment such as resuscitators|
|US4365636||Jun 19, 1981||Dec 28, 1982||Medicon, Inc.||Method of monitoring patient respiration and predicting apnea therefrom|
|US4440177||Dec 16, 1981||Apr 3, 1984||Medical Graphics Corporation||Respiratory analyzer system|
|US4444201||Aug 19, 1981||Apr 24, 1984||Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Respiration monitoring apparatus and method|
|US4448192||Mar 5, 1982||May 15, 1984||Hewlett Packard Company||Medical ventilator device parametrically controlled for patient ventilation|
|US4602644||Aug 18, 1982||Jul 29, 1986||Plasmedics, Inc.||Physiological detector and monitor|
|US4655213||Oct 6, 1983||Apr 7, 1987||New York University||Method and apparatus for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea|
|US4686974||Sep 2, 1986||Aug 18, 1987||Tottori University||Breath synchronized gas-insufflation device and method therefor|
|US4723543||Nov 26, 1985||Feb 9, 1988||Beran Anthony V||Endotracheal tube connector|
|US4782832||Jul 30, 1987||Nov 8, 1988||Puritan-Bennett Corporation||Nasal puff with adjustable sealing means|
|US4803997||Jul 14, 1986||Feb 14, 1989||Edentec Corporation||Medical monitor|
|US4811755||Dec 11, 1987||Mar 14, 1989||L'air Liquide||Process for controlling the flow of a gas in a valve and flow generator employing said process|
|US4944310||Dec 29, 1988||Jul 31, 1990||Somed Pty. Ltd.||Device for treating snoring sickness|
|US4957107||May 10, 1988||Sep 18, 1990||Sipin Anatole J||Gas delivery means|
|US5065756||Dec 22, 1987||Nov 19, 1991||New York University||Method and apparatus for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea|
|US5107831||Jun 6, 1991||Apr 28, 1992||Bear Medical Systems, Inc.||Ventilator control system using sensed inspiratory flow rate|
|US5134995||Dec 21, 1990||Aug 4, 1992||Puritan-Bennett Corporation||Inspiratory airway pressure system with admittance determining apparatus and method|
|US5146918 *||Mar 19, 1991||Sep 15, 1992||Medtronic, Inc.||Demand apnea control of central and obstructive sleep apnea|
|US5148802||Sep 22, 1989||Sep 22, 1992||Respironics Inc.||Method and apparatus for maintaining airway patency to treat sleep apnea and other disorders|
|US5161541||Mar 5, 1991||Nov 10, 1992||Edentec||Flow sensor system|
|US5190048||Sep 17, 1991||Mar 2, 1993||Healthdyne, Inc.||Thermistor airflow sensor assembly|
|US5199424||Dec 12, 1991||Apr 6, 1993||Sullivan Colin E||Device for monitoring breathing during sleep and control of CPAP treatment that is patient controlled|
|US5203343||Jun 14, 1991||Apr 20, 1993||Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System||Method and apparatus for controlling sleep disorder breathing|
|US5231979||Feb 14, 1992||Aug 3, 1993||Puritan-Bennett Corporation||Humidifier for CPAP device|
|US5239995||Nov 1, 1991||Aug 31, 1993||Respironics, Inc.||Sleep apnea treatment apparatus|
|US5246995||Jul 11, 1991||Sep 21, 1993||Dow Corning Toray Silicone Co., Ltd.||Film-forming organopolysiloxane composition|
|US5259373||Apr 9, 1992||Nov 9, 1993||Puritan-Bennett Corporation||Inspiratory airway pressure system controlled by the detection and analysis of patient airway sounds|
|US5269296 *||Feb 17, 1993||Dec 14, 1993||Landis Robert M||Nasal continuous positive airway pressure apparatus and method|
|US5275159||Mar 20, 1992||Jan 4, 1994||Madaus Schwarzer Medizintechnik Gmbh & Co. Kg||Method and apparatus for diagnosis of sleep disorders|
|US5313937||Jun 19, 1992||May 24, 1994||Respironics Inc.||Leak compensation method and apparatus for a breathing system|
|US5335654||May 7, 1992||Aug 9, 1994||New York University||Method and apparatus for continuous adjustment of positive airway pressure for treating obstructive sleep apnea|
|US5353788||Sep 21, 1992||Oct 11, 1994||Miles Laughton E||Cardio-respiratory control and monitoring system for determining CPAP pressure for apnea treatment|
|US5365922||Mar 19, 1991||Nov 22, 1994||Brigham And Women's Hospital, Inc.||Closed-loop non-invasive oxygen saturation control system|
|US5413111||Aug 24, 1993||May 9, 1995||Healthdyne Technologies, Inc.||Bead thermistor airflow sensor assembly|
|US5433193||Sep 18, 1992||Jul 18, 1995||Respironics Inc.||Breathing gas delivery method and apparatus|
|US5438980||Jan 12, 1993||Aug 8, 1995||Puritan-Bennett Corporation||Inhalation/exhalation respiratory phase detection circuit|
|US5456264||Mar 31, 1994||Oct 10, 1995||Universite Laval||Accuracy of breath-by-breath analysis of flow volume loop in identifying flow-limited breathing cycles in patients|
|US5458137||Apr 15, 1993||Oct 17, 1995||Respironics, Inc.||Method and apparatus for controlling sleep disorder breathing|
|US5490502||May 20, 1994||Feb 13, 1996||New York University||Method and apparatus for optimizing the continuous positive airway pressure for treating obstructive sleep apnea|
|US5522382||Jan 10, 1995||Jun 4, 1996||Rescare Limited||Device and method for treating obstructed breathing having a delay/ramp feature|
|US5535739||Jun 7, 1995||Jul 16, 1996||New York University||Method and apparatus for optimizing the continuous positive airway pressure for treating obstructive sleep apnea|
|US5540733||Sep 21, 1994||Jul 30, 1996||Medtronic, Inc.||Method and apparatus for detecting and treating obstructive sleep apnea|
|US5546933||Jun 7, 1995||Aug 20, 1996||New York University||Method for optimizing the continuous positive airway pressure for treating obstructive sleep apnea|
|US5549106||Jul 21, 1993||Aug 27, 1996||Puritan-Bennett Corporation||Inspiratory airway pressure system using constant pressure and measuring flow signals to determine airway patency|
|US5630411||Sep 18, 1995||May 20, 1997||Nellcor Puritan Bennett Incorporated||Valve for use with inhalation/exhalation respiratory phase detection circuit|
|US5645053||Jan 29, 1993||Jul 8, 1997||University Technologies International, Inc.||Auto CPAP system and method for preventing patient disturbance using airflow profile information|
|US5664562||Sep 17, 1993||Sep 9, 1997||Pierre Medical S.A.||Breathing aid device|
|US5704345||Nov 4, 1994||Jan 6, 1998||Resmed Limited||Detection of apnea and obstruction of the airway in the respiratory system|
|US5732696||Jul 5, 1994||Mar 31, 1998||New York University||Polysomnograph scoring|
|US5746201||Jan 23, 1997||May 5, 1998||Nellcor Puritan-Bennett||CPAP nose mask|
|US5746697||Feb 9, 1996||May 5, 1998||Nellcor Puritan Bennett Incorporated||Medical diagnostic apparatus with sleep mode|
|US5794614||Jun 7, 1996||Aug 18, 1998||Gruenke; Roger A.||Apparatus for compensating for flow and pressure variances in pneumatic circuits|
|US5803066||Feb 12, 1996||Sep 8, 1998||New York University||Method and apparatus for optimizing the continuous positive airway pressure for treating obstructive sleep apnea|
|US5829441||Jun 24, 1997||Nov 3, 1998||Nellcor Puritan Bennett||Customizable dental device for snoring and sleep apnea treatment|
|US5845636||Aug 16, 1996||Dec 8, 1998||Puritan Bennett Corporation||Method and apparatus for maintaining patient airway patency|
|US5921238||Sep 11, 1995||Jul 13, 1999||Nellcor Puritan Bennett France Developpement||Pressure-controlled breathing aid|
|US5924979||Aug 28, 1997||Jul 20, 1999||Nellcor Puritan Bennett Incorporated||Medical diagnostic apparatus with sleep mode|
|US6032065||Jul 21, 1997||Feb 29, 2000||Nellcor Puritan Bennett||Sensor mask and method of making same|
|US6135106||Aug 22, 1997||Oct 24, 2000||Nellcor Puritan-Bennett, Inc.||CPAP pressure and flow transducer|
|US6283119||Apr 14, 1997||Sep 4, 2001||Nellcor Puritan Bennett France Developpement||Breathing aid apparatus in particular for treating sleep apnoea|
|US6299581||May 10, 1996||Oct 9, 2001||New York University|
|US6341606||May 19, 1999||Jan 29, 2002||Mallinckrodt, Inc.||Disposable respiratory mask with adhesive skin interface|
|US6347631||Nov 9, 1999||Feb 19, 2002||Mallinckrodt, Inc.||Cantilever device and method for breathing devices and the like|
|US6418928||Sep 25, 2000||Jul 16, 2002||Mallinckrodt Inc.||Multi-seal respirator mask|
|US6431172||Oct 20, 2000||Aug 13, 2002||Mallinckrodt Inc.||Nasal cannula with inflatable plenum chamber|
|US6488634||Jun 22, 2000||Dec 3, 2002||New York University|
|US6505623||Jun 4, 1999||Jan 14, 2003||Mallinckrodt Inc.||Hat-held respiratory mask|
|US6516802||May 2, 2001||Feb 11, 2003||Mallinckrodt, Inc.||Method and combination for treating sleep apnea using a cantilever mask attachment device|
|US6530373||Aug 4, 2000||Mar 11, 2003||Mallinckrodt Inc.||Respirator mask|
|US6546930||Sep 29, 2000||Apr 15, 2003||Mallinckrodt Inc.||Bi-level flow generator with manual standard leak adjustment|
|US6571795||Feb 1, 2001||Jun 3, 2003||Nellcor Puritan Bennett France Developpement||Breathing aid apparatus in particular for treating sleep apnoea|
|US6644310||Sep 29, 2000||Nov 11, 2003||Mallinckrodt Inc.||Apparatus and method for providing a breathing gas employing a bi-level flow generator with an AC synchronous motor|
|US6644316||Oct 12, 1999||Nov 11, 2003||Mallinckrodt Inc.||Variable aperture venting for respiratory mask|
|US6668830||Nov 19, 1999||Dec 30, 2003||Mallinckrodt Inc.||Low noise exhalation port for a respiratory mask|
|US6718974||Oct 6, 2000||Apr 13, 2004||Mallinckrodt, Inc.||CPAP humidifier having sliding access door|
|US6761167||Feb 10, 2000||Jul 13, 2004||Mallinckrodt Developpement France||Gas supply device for sleep apnea|
|US6761168||Feb 10, 2000||Jul 13, 2004||Mallinckrodt Developpement France||Gas supply device for sleep apnea|
|US6793629||Nov 7, 2002||Sep 21, 2004||New York University|
|US6814074||Feb 10, 2000||Nov 9, 2004||Mallinckrodt Developpement France||Gas supply for sleep apnea|
|US6866040||May 7, 1999||Mar 15, 2005||Nellcor Puritan Bennett France Developpement||Pressure-controlled breathing aid|
|US6960854||Nov 8, 2002||Nov 1, 2005||Mallinckrodt Developpement France||Centrifugal turbine for breathing-aid devices|
|USRE35339||Aug 28, 1992||Oct 1, 1996||New York University||Method and apparatus for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea|
|DE3306607A1||Feb 25, 1983||Sep 8, 1983||Hewlett Packard Co||Beatmungsgeraet|
|DE4038871A1||Dec 3, 1990||Jun 4, 1992||Peter Dr Sc Techn Schaller||Respirator control using sensor to measure breath vol. or flow - and supplying signal processor also receiving resistance, inverse compliance and any leakage vol. values as well as threshold values to control breathing pressure|
|EP0046570A2||Aug 19, 1981||Mar 3, 1982||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Respiration monitoring apparatus|
|EP0504725A2||Mar 11, 1992||Sep 23, 1992||BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL, INC.||Closed-loop non-invasive oxygen saturation control system|
|EP0504945A2||Mar 23, 1992||Sep 23, 1992||MAP Medizintechnik für Arzt und Patient GmbH||Device for simultaneous diagnosis and quantitative analysis of apnea and other diseases|
|GB2294400A||Title not available|
|WO1988010108A1||Jun 27, 1988||Dec 29, 1988||Travenol Centre For Medical Re||Device for monitoring breathing during sleep and control of cpap treatment|
|WO1989010768A1||May 8, 1989||Nov 16, 1989||Anatole J Sipin||Gas delivery means|
|WO1989011823A1||Jun 8, 1989||Dec 14, 1989||Vital Signals Inc||Method and apparatus for monitoring of infants|
|WO1990014121A1||May 21, 1990||Nov 29, 1990||Puritan Bennett Corp||Inspiratory airway pressure system|
|WO1991006832A1||Oct 30, 1990||May 16, 1991||Clausen Kaldager & Co As||A gas flow measuring system|
|WO1995028874A1||Mar 13, 1995||Nov 2, 1995||Snap Lab L L C||Method of analyzing sleep disorders|
|WO1996008285A1||Sep 11, 1995||Mar 21, 1996||Pierre Medical Sa||Pressure-controlled breathing aid|
|1||"Sleep Apnea-Diagnosis and Treatment", Topics in Primary Care Medicine, The Western Journal of Medicine, 145:249-250, Aug. 1986.|
|2||"Sleep Apnea—Diagnosis and Treatment", Topics in Primary Care Medicine, The Western Journal of Medicine, 145:249-250, Aug. 1986.|
|3||DuBois, "Ventilator", DV Mosby Co., pp. 107-117, 1986.|
|4||Dupuis, Ventilators-Theory and Clinical Application, The C.V.Mosby Co., pp. 107-117, 1986.|
|5||Garay, Therapeutic Options for Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Respiratory Management, pp. 11-15, 1987.|
|6||Guilleminault, C. et al.; "Unattended CPAP Titration: Toward a Smart Machine"; 1992; pp. 342 [Sleep Research, vol. 21], 1992.|
|7||Miles, L.E. et al.; "Development and Application of an Automatic Nasal CPAP Calibration Procedure for Use in the Unsupersized Home Environment"; p. 352 [Sleep Research, vol. 21], 1992.|
|8||Miles, L.E. et al.; "Development and Application of an Automatic Nasal CPAP Calibration Procedures for Use in the Unsupersized Home Environment"; pp. S118-S119 [Supplemental Issue: Sleep and Breathing, vol. 16.], Dec. 1993.|
|9||Miles, L.E. et al.; "Different Roles for an Automatic Nasal CPAP Calibration Procedure and Smart Pap", Sleep Research 21, p. 238, 1993.|
|10||Rapapart et al., Reversal of the Pickwickian Syndrome by Long-term use of Nocturnal Nasal-Airway Pressure, New England Journal of Medicine, vo1. 307, No. 15, pp. 931-933, 1982.|
|11||Rapoport, Techniques for Administering Nasal CPAP, Respiratory Management, pp. 18-21, 1987.|
|12||Remmers J.E., et al., "Sleep and Respiration", Wiley-Liss Inc., pp. 261-271, 1990.|
|13||Remmers, et al.; "Mechanics of the Pharynx in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea"; pp. 261-271 [Sleep and Respiration], 1990.|
|14||Schwartz et al., Induction of Upper Airway Occlusion in Sleeping Individuals with Subatmospheric Nasal Pressure, Journal of Applied Physiology, pp. 535-542, 1988.|
|15||Southworth et al., Digital Computation and Numerical Methods, McGraw-Hill, Inc., pp. 6-10, 1965.|
|16||Sullivan et al., Reversal of Obstructive Sleep Apnea by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Applied Through the Nares, The Lancet, vol. 1, No. 8225, pp. 862-865, 1981.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8136527||Mar 13, 2008||Mar 20, 2012||Breathe Technologies, Inc.||Method and device for non-invasive ventilation with nasal interface|
|US8327846||Sep 26, 2011||Dec 11, 2012||Hancock Medical, Inc.||Positive airway pressure system with head position control|
|US8336546||Sep 26, 2011||Dec 25, 2012||Hancock Medical, Inc.||Positive airway pressure system with head control|
|US8381729||Aug 3, 2007||Feb 26, 2013||Breathe Technologies, Inc.||Methods and devices for minimally invasive respiratory support|
|US8418694||Apr 30, 2010||Apr 16, 2013||Breathe Technologies, Inc.||Systems, methods and apparatus for respiratory support of a patient|
|US8517017||Jan 8, 2010||Aug 27, 2013||Hancock Medical, Inc.||Self-contained, intermittent positive airway pressure systems and methods for treating sleep apnea, snoring, and other respiratory disorders|
|US8567399||Sep 26, 2008||Oct 29, 2013||Breathe Technologies, Inc.||Methods and devices for providing inspiratory and expiratory flow relief during ventilation therapy|
|US8573219||Dec 9, 2011||Nov 5, 2013||Breathe Technologies, Inc.||Method and device for non-invasive ventilation with nasal interface|
|US8677999||Aug 21, 2009||Mar 25, 2014||Breathe Technologies, Inc.||Methods and devices for providing mechanical ventilation with an open airway interface|
|US8739778 *||Nov 3, 2007||Jun 3, 2014||Dräger Medical GmbH||Breathing tube connecting device|
|US8770193||Apr 17, 2009||Jul 8, 2014||Breathe Technologies, Inc.||Methods and devices for sensing respiration and controlling ventilator functions|
|US8776793||Apr 17, 2009||Jul 15, 2014||Breathe Technologies, Inc.||Methods and devices for sensing respiration and controlling ventilator functions|
|US8925545||Sep 26, 2008||Jan 6, 2015||Breathe Technologies, Inc.||Methods and devices for treating sleep apnea|
|US8939152||Sep 30, 2011||Jan 27, 2015||Breathe Technologies, Inc.||Methods, systems and devices for humidifying a respiratory tract|
|US8955518||Feb 3, 2012||Feb 17, 2015||Breathe Technologies, Inc.||Methods, systems and devices for improving ventilation in a lung area|
|US8985099||Feb 17, 2012||Mar 24, 2015||Breathe Technologies, Inc.||Tracheostoma spacer, tracheotomy method, and device for inserting a tracheostoma spacer|
|US9084859||Jan 9, 2012||Jul 21, 2015||Sleepnea Llc||Energy-harvesting respiratory method and device|
|US9132250||Sep 3, 2010||Sep 15, 2015||Breathe Technologies, Inc.||Methods, systems and devices for non-invasive ventilation including a non-sealing ventilation interface with an entrainment port and/or pressure feature|
|US9180270||Apr 2, 2010||Nov 10, 2015||Breathe Technologies, Inc.||Methods, systems and devices for non-invasive open ventilation with gas delivery nozzles within an outer tube|
|US20100043796 *||Sep 6, 2007||Feb 25, 2010||Resmed Limited||Systems for reducing exhalation pressure in a mask system|
|US20100059057 *||Nov 3, 2007||Mar 11, 2010||Drager Medical Ag & Co. Kg||Breathing tube connecting device|
|US20100170513 *||Jul 8, 2010||Bowditch Nathaniel L||Self-contained, intermittent positive airway pressure systems and methods for treating sleep apnea, snoring, and other respiratory disorders|
|U.S. Classification||600/533, 128/204.23, 600/538|
|International Classification||A61B5/1455, A61M16/06, A61B5/00, A61B5/08, G06F17/00, A61B5/085, A61B5/097, A61M16/00, A61M39/22, A61B5/087, A61B5/145|
|Cooperative Classification||A61B5/7239, A61M2230/04, A61M16/0051, A61M2016/0036, A61M39/228, A61M2230/62, A61B5/0002, A61B5/4818, A61B5/6803, A61M2230/08, A61M2230/205, A61M2016/0039, A61M16/0069, A61M16/0677|
|European Classification||A61B5/00B, A61B5/68B1B, A61B5/48C8, A61M16/00K|
|Feb 7, 2008||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NEW YORK UNIVERSITY, NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:RAPOPORT, DAVID M.;NORMAN, ROBERT G.;REEL/FRAME:020479/0294
Effective date: 19940519
|Aug 13, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4