|Publication number||US7949616 B2|
|Application number||US 11/138,230|
|Publication date||May 24, 2011|
|Filing date||May 25, 2005|
|Priority date||Jun 1, 2004|
|Also published as||US20050267826, WO2005119554A2, WO2005119554A3|
|Publication number||11138230, 138230, US 7949616 B2, US 7949616B2, US-B2-7949616, US7949616 B2, US7949616B2|
|Inventors||George Samuel Levy, Penny Angel-Levy, Elizabeth Joyce Levy, Sarah Anne Levy, James Alexander Levy|
|Original Assignee||George Samuel Levy, Penny Angel-Levy, Elizabeth Joyce Levy, Sarah Anne Levy, James Alexander Levy|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (41), Non-Patent Citations (7), Referenced by (41), Classifications (19), Legal Events (1)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/576,225 with the same title, “Telepresence by Human-Assisted Remote-Controlled Devices and Robots” filed on Jun. 1, 2004 and which is hereby incorporated by reference. Applicant claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Par 119(e)(i). This invention relates to telepresence, teleimmersion and remote controlled robots. More specifically it relates to methods and systems allowing any user in a network to remotely operate a device located at a remote location on the network, in situations in which these devices have technological and/or legal limitations in their operation and require the assistance of one or more humans at the remote location.
A telepresence system, in its widest sense, allows a user to experience being in a remote environment by perceiving sensory information transmitted to him through a communication channel, by a remotely controlled device. It also allows the user to act on this remote environment by transmitting to this remotely controlled device data that allows the device to operate according to his wish. Such devices provide different degrees of realism depending on the technology used. They range from the simple telephone to remotely controlled robots that allow the user to feel totally immersed in the remote environment. These robots accept from their user complex commands that allow them to move and act in two or three dimensions, and transmit back to the user sensory data such as video, audio and tactile information. Between these two extremes there are a multitude of devices such as:
As one versed in the art appreciates, a multitude of variations exist that include a variety of sensors such as cameras, microphones, tactile sensors, force sensors, etc; actuator means such as speakers, robotic arms etc; communication channels such as telephone lines, radio links, the internet etc), and displays (such as CRTs, LCDs, LEDs, ELDs, Plasma displays, etc, and with varying degrees of resolution such as regular TV or high definition TV, and sometimes capable of stereoscopic, autostereoscopic and 3D.)
In very simple telepresence devices such as the telephone, only sensory data (audio) flows through the communication link between the users; no data capable of commanding motion is present. These devices are typically stationary. They can be mobile as is the case for cell or remote phones, only if the human holding the device moves at the remote location. The movement of the device at the remote location does not present any liability to the user at the proximal location since he cannot affect the movement of this device. In addition the device at the remote location is not nominally at risk since it is under the control of a human.
In more complex telepresence systems the user is allowed to control the mobility and operation of the remote device. In those cases, he exposes himself to liability since the movement of the device can present risks to itself and to its surroundings. This liability stems in part because, given the current state of technology, these devices cannot provide the user with a perfect experience of the remote environment: the sensory information provided to the user is of a quality lower than what he would have received if he was, in person, at the remote location. Sensory shortcomings may originate from factors such as the narrow field of view of the robot's optics; the partial or complete lack of tactile information including pressure, temperature and muscular feedback; the partial or complete lack of directionality information carried by the data (such as audio); and the lack of sense of balance.
In addition, the control that the user exercises on the remote device may also be limited by such factors as bandwidth and latency in the communication channel and by inertia, delay and other electrical and mechanical limitations of the robotic actuators. In addition, latency between an orientation command activated by a head motion of the user and the corresponding change in the display can make the user nauseous if it exceeds approximately 30 milliseconds.
If the user decides, for example, to control the device to cross a busy thoroughfare, he'll put the device at risk and may endanger other people and vehicles on the road because his ability to detect and evade incoming cars and to control the movement of the device is restricted as explained above. Similarly, for a user to drive a car through such a device is currently out of the question.
Thus a telepresence device operated by a user without the help of a remotely located human assistant, in any environment ranging from a crowded urban environment to an unsafe country area may entail increased risk of damage to the device and to surrounding property. Such unassisted operation may also increase the possibility of injury to nearby humans.
In addition, a remotely controlled mobile robot may be incapable of performing repair and maintenance on itself should something go wrong with its mechanism or electronics.
Admittedly, given enough funding and research, it may be possible, in the future, to build a remotely controlled device that solves all these problems. However, given the limited funding that a user can provide, and given the current state of technology, such devices will be limited in their operation in the present and foreseeable future.
Because these remote devices do not embody all the capabilities of a human, they are at risk of damage to themselves, and can endanger the humans and objects in the environment in which they operate, and thereby present a liability to their owners or users. It is therefore clear that given the current state of the technology such remotely controlled devices will require human assistance at the remote location for technological as well as legal reasons.
If human assistants are to be allocated to remote devices in a commercial environment involving a plurality of users as well as a plurality of remote devices and human assistants, then there is also the need for a method of allocating users, devices and human assistants. In particular, there is a need for providing a potential user with a list of telepresence venues from which he can choose.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a method of operation of a remote device that can reduce the risk of damage to property and injury to human. It is also an object of this invention to provide a method of operation of a remote device in which a human is present at the remote location to assist the remote device. It is another object of this invention to provide a method of allocating, interconnecting and assigning users, remote devices and human assistants.
Further features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will be more fully understood when considered with respect to the following detailed description, claims and accompanying drawings.
This invention describes a telepresence system which allows a user located at a proximal location to select a venue located at a remote site and operate a remotely-controlled system with the help of a human assistant located at the remote site. The remotely controlled system comprises an interface for conveying control information sent by the user to the human assistant. The remotely-controlled system is selected or specified from a multiplicity of remotely-controlled systems located at different venues.
The telepresence system also comprises a means for allocating from this multiplicity of remotely controlled systems, one particular remotely controlled system according to the venue specified by the user. The telepresence system also comprises a means for allocating from a pool of persons at least one human assistant located at the remote site whose task is to assist the allocated remote system in its operation.
The telepresence system also comprises a bi-directional communication channel linking the workstation to the allocated remote system. This channel transmits control information from the workstation to the allocated remote system, and sensory information back from the allocated remote system to the workstation for conveyance to the user.
The invention allows for varying degrees of cooperation between the user and the human assistant. In its simplest form, the user holds a first video cell phone and observes through it the environment captured by a second video cell phone or a camera held by the human assistant. The user can control the position and orientation of the second video cell phone or camera by sending voice instructions to the human assistant through the cell phone. More complex implementations involve more elaborate telepresence workstations such as a computer, various communication channels such as the Internet, various sensors built-in the remote device such as video and audio, varying degrees of help by the human assistant, various vehicles and support for carrying the remote device, and a business method for allocating users to devices and to human assistants and organizing the transaction between a telepresence equipment provider, a user and a human assistant. The user of the telepresence service is an end-user of the telepresence service.
The basic description of this invention is shown in
The telepresence workstation which allows the user to conduct telepresence operations, provides the user with the capability of selecting a telepresence venue. The venue is characterized by information such as location, desired type of hardware, duration of service etc. These issues will be discussed below.
The telepresence station collects telepresence control information by and data entry devices such as a keyboard, a mouse, a camera, a joystick, a lever, a touch pad, a light pen, a touch sensitive screen, a cursor ball, a scroll wheel, a sensory glove, an eye tracking device, a head tracking device, a pedal, an electroencephalogram machine, a skin conductivity sensor, and a microphone, for generating said control information. For the purpose of this invention, one must note that the term “control information” is applied to any information that is communicated from the telepresence workstation to the allocated remote system. For example, video image of the user is considered control information.
The telepresence workstation collects control information generated by the user and conveys sensory information to the user. The control information may comprise audio data destined for the human assistant and/or machine readable data for the remotely controlled system. A camera at the telepresence workstation permits images of the user to be captured and transmitted as part of the control information to the remote location to be displayed by the allocated remote system. This function allows the image of the user, for example, of his face, to be displayed at the remote location to enable face-to-face contact with humans at the remote location.
Sensory information collected at the remote location are communicated back to the telepresence workstation and conveyed to the user by implements such as a display, a speaker, a touch device and a smell generating device.
Sensory information can be edited before it is presented to the user to convey to him additional information. For example written text such as transcripted voice data can be added to the display. Translated voice data can be dubbed into the audio. The audio data can be augmented with music or dubbed with a voice translation from the remote location. Translation would be of interest to the user if he does not understand the language spoken at the remote location. Video data can be augmented with a textual transcription of voice data (for example for the hard of hearing) or even with a translated transcription of the voice data. Audio and/or video data can be augmented with touristic information, navigation information, weather data, running rental cost and labor cost for said human assistant.
Similarly, control information can be edited. For example, voice data generated by the user and meant to direct the activities of the human assistant, can be transcribed and/or translated before this information is conveyed to the human assistant. Translation would be of particular interest if the user and human assistant do not speak the same language.
The telepresence system can range from a simple cell phone capable of video streaming to a complex teleimmersion system equipped with sensory gloves and a head-mounted high definition television (HDTV) or three-dimensional display. The reader is referred to the vast scientific and technical literature describing telecommunication terminals, and more specifically telephones, cell phones, video cell phones with video streaming capability, displays, cameras, display/camera combinations that allow eye to eye contact, manual control devices such as mice, joysticks, levers, and the like, tactile devices such as sensory gloves, as well as smell and taste conveyance devices. Of particular interest for the embodiment of a telepresence workstation are several technologies that allow eye to eye contact between participants in teleconferencing. Some of these technologies are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,675,376 by Andersson, U.S. Pat. No. 5,438,357 by McNelley, U.S. Pat. No. 5,359,362 by Lewis et al, U.S. Patent Application 2003/0151658 by Smith, U.S. Pat. No. 5,619,254 by McNelley, U.S. Pat. No. 5,777,665 by McNelley et al, U.S. Patent Application 2001/0038412A1 by McNelley et al, U.S. Pat. No. 4,928,301 by Smoot, U.S. Pat. No. 5,666,155 by Mersereau, U.S. Pat. No. 5,856,842 by Tedesco, U.S. Patent Application 2003/0112325A1 by Boyden et al., U.S. Patent Application 2003/0058334 by Boyden et al., U.S. Patent Application 2002/0041325 A1 by Maggioni., U.S. Patent Application 2003/0058363A1 by Boyden et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,400,725 by Tanigaki, U.S. Pat. No. 5,406,323 by Tanigaki et al, U.S. Pat. No. 5,159,445 by Gitlin and al, U.S. Pat. No. 6,454,414 by Ting, U.S. Pat. No. 6,596,134 by Forrest et al, U.S. Pat. No. 6,469,437 by Parthasarathy, et. al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,420,031 by Parthasarathy, et. al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,264,805 by Forrest et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 5,703,436 by Forrest et al. All the above patents are hereby incorporated by reference.
Telepresence workstations can range in shape, size and portability and include cell phones, palmtops, laptops, desktops. They can be designed for the healthy as well as for the disabled. For example, to accommodate the old and the invalid they may include a wheelchair and/or any device designed to facilitate their use by the sensory impaired or physically disabled
There may be more than one telepresence workstation all connected to a network such as the Internet and each linked to a different remote controlled unit in a multi-user environment.
Remotely Controlled Systems
The remotely controlled systems are located at remote geographic locations from the telepresence workstation. These remote locations can be anywhere the communication network can reach. The remotely controlled systems comprise one or several sensors and possibly, as well, as actuators and displays. In addition, because of technical and/or legal limitations, these remotely controlled systems require human assistance to operate.
Sensors, can be represented in one of the simplest embodiments such as in a cell phone, by just a microphone capable of collecting audio data; a more complex embodiment would include a camera such as in a video cell phone capable of producing video streams; a more complex embodiment yet, can be embodied by a remotely controlled robot equipped with a full array of sensors duplicating human's senses. Information collected by the sensors is packed and communicated to the user via the communication network and the telepresence workstation.
Actuators in one of the simplest embodiments can be represented by at least one audio or video means for converting part of, or all, said control information in a form suitable to be understood by humans (i.e., voice or images) For example a speaker can produce voice command and a display can generate graphic commands, to be executed by a human assistant. Commands communicated by audio or video means would be essential to the control of the human assistant.
In a more complex embodiment, the actuators can be represented by a remotely controlled swivel on top of which a camera would be mounted. The swivel can have one or two degrees of freedom. Such a device would rely on the user to control the orientation of the camera with respect its carrier, and on the human assistant for translational movements as well as orientation of the carrier.
In a more complex embodiment yet, the remote device would be capable of full locomotion and orientation under remote control by the user. As is well known to one versed in the art, there is a multitude of means for locomotion on land, water and air that can be used in this invention. In particular, a four wheel vehicle can provide good stability for a land vehicle. However, an interesting embodiment would include for the purpose of locomotion, a type of vehicle similar to that with the trademark “SEGWAY” as described in Kamen's U.S. Pat. No. 6,651,766. This vehicle would be equipped with one or several cameras as well as a display of the user's face and would be remotely controlled by the user under the supervision of the human assistant.
Another means for locomotion for the remote device can be implemented using mechanical legs instead of wheels. Substantial research has been conducted at companies and institutions such as the University of Michigan by Jessy W. Grizzle and Carnegie Mellon University on legged locomotion, more particularly, bipedal locomotion wherein the robot is maintained upright by a feedback system that operates approximately like a biological cerebellum. It uses a sensor such as a gyroscope to detect the deviation of the robot from the vertical and applies that information to move the legs in a direction such as to correct for this deviation.
An interface (in the form of a graphical user interface for example) can be placed on the remotely controlled system to convey to the human assistant telepresence control commands issued by the user. This interface can also be used by the human assistant to send information back to the user. The actual software running this interface can be located either on the remote controlled system, on the telepresence station or on the server that supports the web site on which the user logs on to obtain telepresence services. In addition, displays can be mounted on the remotely located device for a variety of reasons such as showing the face of the user as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,292,713 titled Robotic telepresence system by Jouppi, et al.
In addition, the remotely controlled system can incorporate audio speakers to convey control information generated by the user to the human assistant.
The remote device can also be endowed with a varying degree of autonomy. In yet another and more complex embodiment, the remote device would be equipped with artificial intelligence capability whereby it can achieve semi-autonomy from said user and said human assistant such as to be able to deal with low level control and maneuverability issues such as “Turn Right” or “Set Speed at 5 Miles per Hour,” leaving to the user the high level commands such as “Climb to the top of the mountain” or “Go to the San Diego Convention Center.”
It should also be noted that the remote device is really a system which does not have to be constructed in a single electronic box. It may consist of several separate components, some of which may be carried by the human assistant and others may be carried in a dolly, cart or alternate convenient motorized or hand-pushed transport. For example, the human assistant can be carrying headphones to listen to the instructions from the user, while pushing the rest of the remote device on a dolly. The headphones may be wirelessly connected, or have a wire connection, to a receiver on board the dolly. Or the headphone may be wirelessly connected, or have a wired connection, to a cell phone attached to the belt of the human assistant. Thus the remote device could be in several mechanically independent parts and the human assistant could be carrying any number of these parts.
It should also be noted that the remote device could comprise biological components including animals. For example navigation instructions could be sent by the user to the remote location and used at the remote location to control the animal's movements.
The remote controlled system could be totally dependent on the human assistant for locomotion. More specifically the human assistant may have to physically carry the remote controlled system. Alternatively the remote controlled system may include a wheeled transport. In this case, the task of the human assistant comprises pushing or driving the wheeled transport.
Means for Allocating a Remotely Controlled System.
The allocation of the remotely controlled system could be performed in a centralized fashion or in a decentralized manner. For example, if the telepresence operation is implemented on the Internet, the allocation process can be centrally run by software running on a server used by the web site on which the telepresence business is run and on which the user must log on to obtain telepresence services. Alternatively, the allocation process may be decentralized and subjected to a bidding process as in E-BAY™ where the decisions between sellers and buyers depend on the sellers and buyers themselves. Thus, the allocation of the remotely controlled systems could be made by the owner of these systems and by the prospective users of telepresence services. Yet another method of allocation could be made by human agents arranging telepresence services for their customers. Still another allocation method is to reserve for each remotely controlled system a fixed venue. The telepresence user would then obtain access to these remote systems on a first-come, first-serve basis or some other predetermined priority scheme.
Means for Allocation of Human Assistants
Since the remotely controlled systems have technical and/or legal limitations, they require the help of human assistants. The allocation of human assistants could approximately follow the same process as the ones outlined above for the allocation of remotely controlled systems.
The human assistant tasks are to support the remotely controlled system in its operation, and in particular in making use of control information generated by the user. The human assistant could be selected for any desirable skills or characteristics such as geographical location, foreign language fluency, engineering ability, touristic knowledge of the remote area or simply labor rate. The human assistant could provide his service freely or charge a fee. He could be a total stranger to, or a friend or family member of, the user. He could be an employee of an employment company who the user or the telepresence hardware rental company hires on a temporary or permanent basis. He could provide a language translation service to the user if the user must interact with people in a language unknown to him. If the environment is unfamiliar to the user, the human assistant could serve as a guide.
One important task of the human assistant is to help the remote device in its movement. He can accomplish this task in a number of ways including but not restricted to, carrying the device; pushing a dolly carrying the device; partially or fully controlling a motorized vehicle carrying the device; supervising the operation of a remotely controlled vehicle that carries the device, only intervening in emergencies and unforeseen, risky or otherwise intractable situations; performing maintenance of the device; or he could simply initiate and terminate the operation of the remotely-controlled device. Thus the tasks of the human assistant include:
The human assistant may also carry at the remote location a live display of the user to enable the user to experience being face-to-face with people at the remote location. Eye to eye contact can be achieved between the user and people at the remote location by equipping the display with two cameras on either side. The two cameras generate independent video streams which when combined can produce a point of view located in the center of the display, thus allowing the user to experience eye to eye contact with people at the remote location. This topic shall be discussed in greater detail below.
Additionally, the human assistant could shield his own face by means of a mask, a hood or burkha to emphasize the virtual presence of the user at the remote location.
As the remote device becomes more and more autonomous, the role of the human assistant becomes more and more supervisory. For simple remote devices incapable of locomotion, the human assistant is relied upon for the movements of the device, such as translation, orientation and elevation. Slightly more complex remote devices may be equipped with a remote controlled swivel to give the user control over orientation and possibly elevation leaving the remote assistant with the task of carrying the remote device and to provide it with translational movement according to the instructions he receives from the user. For yet more complex devices the responsibility of the remote assistant is restricted to tasks such as checking for hazards and unlawful user's behavior, dealing with the unexpected, providing in-the-field maintenance, and guarding against theft of the remote device.
The communication channel could be implemented in a multitude of ways as is well known to those versed in the art. It may be preferable for the remote station and/or human assistant to be connected wirelessly, to allow the device to be unencumbered with wires. However, the user at his workstation is not necessarily dependent on wireless technology. He can use any communication channel to which his workstation is configured provided that the appropriate conversion is eventually performed along the communication line between the format at the workstation and the format at the remote device. Thus the communication channel could also be a chain of communication steps, each step relying on a different technology. These communications links include but are not limited to cellular networks, radio links, a telephone links, a cable links, and the Internet.
One of the simplest embodiments is to establish a telephone link between the user and the remote device and human assistant. The user could use a regular phone or a cell phone while the human assistant and/or remote device would use a wireless phone technology such as cell phones using conventional cellular networks. This phone link would carry voice from the user to instruct the human assistant and/or data to control the device. In return, the user would receive voice information from the human assistant and/or data from the remote device (such as audio or video). Optionally, voice over Internet technology could be used.
Even more interesting is videophone technology, capable of transmitting video streams of the remote environment to the user and transmitting the image of the user's face or body to the remote environment. According to this embodiment, the remote device would comprise a video cell phone; the user's workstation would include video capability such as a video phone, a video cell phone or a computer capable of capturing and displaying streaming video images.
Of particular interest is the use of the newest wide band wireless communication protocols described in the IEEE standard 802.16 called WiMax and the IEEE standard 802.II. These communication systems working together or separately can provide wireless wide band Internet access to the remote device. More advanced and more powerful communication protocols are being developed such as the 802.IIn which may compete with DSL for broadband, yet offer wireless access. Clearly this invention is not tied to any one particular communication method but can benefit from new advances in communication technology. Various combinations and permutations chaining different communication technologies are also clearly possible as is well known in the art.
The use of the internet as a communication medium offers great advantages because of its global reach, its connectivity, and its inherent ability to facilitate the allocation of a plurality of user to a plurality of remote devices and human assistants, for the purpose of business transactions.
Business Transaction Means
The means for conducting a business transaction for a telepresence service could take many forms. For example, in the case where a single user is to be allocated to a single remote device and human assistant, the means for performing the business transaction may be as trivial as a simple oral agreement between the user and the human assistant over a hand-shake or over the telephone. In the case where a plurality of users must be allocated to a plurality of remote devices and human assistants, the allocation may be performed by humans, by computer or by both. The internet, in particular, offers a suitable medium for performing such transactions.
The business transaction process could be very centralized and controlled at a central location such as a car-rental company. For example, the user would phone the telepresence rental company and ask for a telepresence robot at a particular date, time and place. Upon payment, with credit card, for example, the telephone operator would provide the user with the website address and password for a remote device satisfying the user's requirements. The telepresence rental company would also allocate a human assistant for handling the remote device. This human assistant would be selected from a pool of employees at the telepresence rental company or from one or several candidates provided by a separate employment agency.
Alternatively, the business could be run as a free market, independently of any centralized organization, using an auction market conducted over an Internet website such as the one trademarked under the name of E-BAY, where users and human assistants would make business arrangements based on their own requirements and prices. Business transactions could involve outright selling at a fixed price or bidding such that several users are competing to procure a service, or in which several human assistants are competing to provide a service. In addition the owners of the remote controlled system could also use such an auction market to rent or lease hardware. Such internet free market scenario would typically require that users and human assistants post on the web their location, availability, time and date, hardware in their possession, requirements (for users) and qualifications (for human assistants) and price. As in E-BAY, the quality of the service provided by the human assistants would be rated by the users and posted on the web to ensure continuing good service. In addition, payment, by credit card, for example, could be performed by a secure transaction and placed in an escrow deposit before the service is rendered to guarantee that payment is made.
In general, a business transaction for the use of a telepresence device over the internet requires the following steps also shown in
Intake and Reservation
This intake and reservation process requires querying the user for the following information. The query can be done, in person, over the phone or over the internet. Typically the query may comprise some or all of the following information:
Allocation of Remote Device and Human Assistant.
Based on the pertinent information, the user, remote device and human assistant could be allocated to each other by humans, by the software serving the commercial enterprise or by a combination of both. The following steps are required for allocation:
When all requirements for the connection are satisfied, the user may be advised that his telepresence transaction request has been granted. Similarly a notice may be sent to the human assistant. Otherwise, the user is told that his request has been rejected, possibly with the reasons for the rejection, such as incomplete or erroneous data entry, insufficient credit, or unavailability of a remote device or human assistant. Optionally, additional transaction details that had been left undefined in the intake process, may be may be defined or made more precise. These may include for example the name of the human assistant and the exact time of the service.
Optionally the user may then be given the opportunity of performing an additional step in authorizing the transaction, such as, if the transaction is over the internet, by clicking on an icon.
Optionally the user may be sent a password to allow him to operate the remote device and/or be recognized by the human assistant.
The authorization procedure could also be performed by means other than over the internet as for example, over the telephone, with a human user or with a voice recognition system.
Reservation of Remote Device and Human Assistant
Once the authorization is obtained from the user, the remote device and human assistant(s) are reserved for the appropriate time and place. Upon receiving the authorization from the client, a notice is sent to the human assistant confirming the transaction.
Establishing a Connection
Once the transaction has been authorized, the telepresence station and the remote device can be connected. This can be done immediately after authorization if all the requirements are satisfied, or at the appointed time. This connection can be implemented in many possible ways.
If the communication is performed by telephone, videophone, cell phone or video cell phone, then the telephone link can be established, for example, by giving to the user the telephone number of the remote device, or of the human assistant; or giving the telephone number of the user to the human assistant; or remotely instructing the remote device to dial the user; or forwarding the call from to the user to the human assistant or to the device or forwarding the call from the human assistant or remote device to the user.
If the communication medium is the internet as shown in
An alternative method of making the connection between the remote device and the telepresence station is to use the server running the web site as an intermediate communication relay as shown in
Optionally a three way link could be established as shown in
Depending on the type and capability of the remote device, varying degrees of help are required from the human assistant for the user to operate the remote device. In one of its simplest forms, this invention requires both the user and the human assistant to hold a video cell phone. The user can observe on his video cell phone the image captured by the video cell phone held by the human assistant. He can also communicate by voice command how he wants the human assistant to move and orient his video cell phone.
Several alternative designs are possible. For example, the command can be conveyed to the human assistant by means of a display. The remotely controlled device can be held by the human assistant or can be mounted on the shoulder of the human assistant, or on a hand-pushed or motorized vehicle. The range of operation is limited by the communication channel which can use any convenient and available technology such as a cellular network or the Internet or a combination of technologies with the proper conversion hardware and software in between. The human assistant can be selected from a pool for a range of talents and capabilities.
Billing can be performed in a variety of ways such as through the web site software that handles the telepresence transactions, by a telephone user, and/or by the human assistant.
If the communication medium is the internet, then, at the end of the telepresence session, the server running the web site software performs the billing and possibly schedules maintenance by retrieving the amount of time and/or services used up in the transaction, either from its own database (if it has been kept apprised of the operation as in a three way link configuration for example) and/or from the remote device and/or from the telepresence station. Billing is performed according to a predetermined function of the amount of usage.
Prearranged Venues for Business Transaction Means
One of the simplest methods for allocating user to human assistant and hardware is to prearrange the time and place for the telepresence operation. This information would be useful both for the prospective users as well as for the prospective human assistants. For example, one could announce by means of a notice on the web, that tours of the University of California San Diego campus will be available for prospective students from 9 AM to 12 PM every Wednesday from May to September. Prospective students desiring such tours will login as users, at a web site supporting these tours and prospective human assistants will login at the same web site but under an employment page possibly administered by the University or by a student employment firm. These human assistants may be UCSD students carrying with them their own laptop equipped with a wireless card and a webcam. Such arrangements will make use of the wireless network (for example, using the communication standard 802.11b operating at 11 megabits per second or a later standard) that the university is providing to its students. Of course other communication channels may be used if they are available and other remote devices such as video cell phones could be used or handheld computers (palmtops), if they have video streaming capability.
In its simplest case this invention describes a telepresence operation involving a single user operating a single remote device assisted by a single human assistant. In this case the allocation problem is trivial.
More complicated cases arise such as in a business environment where a large pool of users, remote devices and human assistants may have to be allocated to each other. The allocation process may involve allocating a single user to a single device assisted by a single human or by several humans. It may also include a single user operating multiple devices assisted by a single human or by several humans. It could also include multiple users participating in the control of a single remote device assisted by a single human or by several humans; or multiple users controlling multiple remote devices assisted by a single human or by multiple humans.
In addition, the telepresence transaction could be initiated by the user as well as by the human assistant. It is conceivable that a human assistant solicits several users to obtain sponsorship to perform a feat, exploration or adventure in an exciting, dangerous, interesting, romantic, sexual, or hardly accessible environment. For example, adventures such as meeting or having a date with a famous movie star, going on a safari or climbing a tall mountain would be the kind of adventures for which funding could be solicited (within legal parameters).
To express the range of this invention, several versions of preferred embodiments are presented below:
Wireless Videophone Held by Human
A simple version of this invention is illustrated in
Wireless Videophone with Swivel Carried on Shoulder by Human
Another version is shown in
Wireless Videophone with Swivel Carried on Dolly Pushed by Human
Yet another version of this invention is illustrated in
Remotely Controlled Two-Wheeled Transport Supervised by Human
Another version is illustrated in
Remotely Drivable Robot in which a Human Acts as a Backup Driver
Yet another embodiment shown in
Another variation shown in
Clearly the environment, mobility, weight requirement, etc, as well as the application desired of the user affects the type of hardware which should be used in any telepresence application. For example, if the telepresence experience involves climbing a mountain, the best type of remote device may be a simple and light-weight video phone. However, if the experience requires visiting an elder person in a nursing home, a display showing the face of the user may be more suitable. If the experience requires direct acting on the environment, then a remotely controlled robot may be used. Applications of this invention include but are not limited to:
The video data directed to the telepresence workstation can be edited before being displayed by the workstation. This editing may take place either at the remote site, or at the user's workstation, or at a site on the internet included in the communication channel between the remote system and the user's workstation. This third alternative may be implemented in several ways. For example, data collected by the remote device could be first sent to a site on the internet to perform any necessary editing and additions. This site would then send this modified data to the user's workstation.
Editing the data may include adding written or graphical information designed to assist the user in his operation. This information may include maps of the remote environment, textual messages describing the state or nature of the object at the remote environment, general advertisements, or specific advertisement for objects on sale at the remote environment. In effect the display may provide the user with a complete merging of virtual and real data as well as providing the user with a GUI interactive environment.
In addition, the display could include navigation information such as position, orientation and altitude. It could also include weather data. It could also provide the user with touristic information and suggestions such as places to visit, shopping areas, restaurants and hotels as well as historical information about the area.
The display could also include textual information representing a transcription of the voice data detected at the remote site. Voice data would first be processed by a voice recognition system that would produce a text output. The text output could then be added to the display as “subtitles.” This feature would particularly be interesting to hearing impaired users.
The same arrangement as above could also be used to translate voice information. Voice data would first be processed by a voice recognition system that would produce a text output. The text output would then be translated by a language translation system. The text output of the language translation system would then be sent to the user's workstation where it would be displayed as subtitles. Alternatively, the text output from the language translation system could be fed into a voice synthesis system generating an audio output that would be sent to the user's workstation and thereby conveyed to the user.
The workstation display could also be used to provide the user with running cost information for his renting or leasing of the telepresence system and labor cost for the human assistant.
Remote systems could also be in the form of video cell phones in which the screen is twistable to face away from the keyboard, thus allowing people at the remote environment to look at the face of the caller on the video cell phone held by the human assistant.
While the above description contains many specificities, the reader should not construe these as limitations on the scope of the invention, but merely as exemplifications of preferred embodiments thereof. Those skilled in the art will envision many other possible variations within its scope. Accordingly, the reader is requested to determine the scope of the invention by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, and not by the examples which have been given.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4400725||Feb 8, 1982||Aug 23, 1983||Suzuyo Tanigaki||Picture display-image pickup apparatus|
|US4928301||Oct 31, 1989||May 22, 1990||Bell Communications Research, Inc.||Teleconferencing terminal with camera behind display screen|
|US5159445||Dec 31, 1990||Oct 27, 1992||At&T Bell Laboratories||Teleconferencing video display system for improving eye contact|
|US5359362||Mar 30, 1993||Oct 25, 1994||Nec Usa, Inc.||Videoconference system using a virtual camera image|
|US5406323||Jan 28, 1994||Apr 11, 1995||U.S. Philips Corporation||Image display and pick-up apparatus|
|US5438357||Nov 23, 1993||Aug 1, 1995||Mcnelley; Steve H.||Image manipulating teleconferencing system|
|US5619254||Jan 25, 1996||Apr 8, 1997||Mcnelley; Steve H.||Compact teleconferencing eye contact terminal|
|US5666155||Jun 24, 1994||Sep 9, 1997||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Eye contact video telephony|
|US5675376||Dec 21, 1995||Oct 7, 1997||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Method for achieving eye-to-eye contact in a video-conferencing system|
|US5703436||Mar 6, 1996||Dec 30, 1997||The Trustees Of Princeton University||Transparent contacts for organic devices|
|US5777665||Sep 20, 1995||Jul 7, 1998||Videotronic Systems||Image blocking teleconferencing eye contact terminal|
|US5835896 *||Mar 29, 1996||Nov 10, 1998||Onsale, Inc.||Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information|
|US5856842||Aug 26, 1997||Jan 5, 1999||Kaiser Optical Systems Corporation||Apparatus facilitating eye-contact video communications|
|US6264805||Jun 10, 1997||Jul 24, 2001||The Trustees Of Princeton University||Method of fabricating transparent contacts for organic devices|
|US6292713||May 20, 1999||Sep 18, 2001||Compaq Computer Corporation||Robotic telepresence system|
|US6317039 *||Oct 19, 1998||Nov 13, 2001||John A. Thomason||Wireless video audio data remote system|
|US6420031||Apr 3, 1998||Jul 16, 2002||The Trustees Of Princeton University||Highly transparent non-metallic cathodes|
|US6440018 *||Jul 3, 2001||Aug 27, 2002||Carl Lekavich||Game puck with improved glider pin|
|US6449601 *||Dec 30, 1998||Sep 10, 2002||Amazon.Com, Inc.||Distributed live auction|
|US6454414||Sep 13, 2000||Sep 24, 2002||Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation||Device for image output and input|
|US6460018 *||Nov 27, 1998||Oct 1, 2002||Sony Corporation||Program production and transmission apparatus|
|US6469437||Nov 5, 1997||Oct 22, 2002||The Trustees Of Princeton University||Highly transparent organic light emitting device employing a non-metallic cathode|
|US6587046||Oct 30, 2002||Jul 1, 2003||Raymond Anthony Joao||Monitoring apparatus and method|
|US6596134||Dec 21, 1999||Jul 22, 2003||The Trustees Of Princeton University||Method of fabricating transparent contacts for organic devices|
|US6675386||Sep 4, 1997||Jan 6, 2004||Discovery Communications, Inc.||Apparatus for video access and control over computer network, including image correction|
|US7542920 *||Jul 29, 2000||Jun 2, 2009||Catherine Lin-Hendel||System for interactive computer-assisted on-line auctions|
|US20010038412||Feb 5, 2001||Nov 8, 2001||Mcnelley Steve H.||Integrated reflected display teleconferencing eye contact terminal|
|US20020041325||Sep 17, 2001||Apr 11, 2002||Christoph Maggioni||Interaction configuration|
|US20020057279||Jan 15, 2002||May 16, 2002||Compaq Computer Corporation||System and method for displaying images using foveal video|
|US20020113861||Dec 17, 2001||Aug 22, 2002||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Remote monitoring apparatus using a mobile videophone|
|US20020149677||Apr 9, 2002||Oct 17, 2002||Michael Wright||Digital camera with communications functionality|
|US20030046108||Sep 5, 2001||Mar 6, 2003||Iris Labadie||Method of providing visitation services between remotely located parties|
|US20030058334||Sep 26, 2001||Mar 27, 2003||Digeo, Inc.||Camera positioning system and method for eye-to-eye communication|
|US20030058363||Sep 27, 2001||Mar 27, 2003||Boyden James H.||Camera positioning system and method for eye-to eye communication|
|US20030112325||Dec 13, 2001||Jun 19, 2003||Digeo, Inc.||Camera positioning system and method for eye-to-eye communication|
|US20030151658||Feb 11, 2002||Aug 14, 2003||Telbotics Inc.||Video conferencing apparatus|
|US20030163339||Feb 25, 2002||Aug 28, 2003||John Elliot||Process of accessing live activities and events through internet|
|US20050024480 *||Jul 8, 2004||Feb 3, 2005||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Light beam scanner|
|US20050024488 *||Dec 19, 2003||Feb 3, 2005||Borg Andrew S.||Distributed immersive entertainment system|
|US20050278446 *||May 27, 2004||Dec 15, 2005||Jeffery Bryant||Home improvement telepresence system and method|
|US20090276362 *||Jan 15, 2003||Nov 5, 2009||Guerra Eugene J||Real estate commission bid system|
|1||*||Jouppi et al. "First steps towards mutually-immersive mobile telepresence", Proc. 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work table of contents, pp. 354-363.|
|2||N.P Jouppi; First Steps towards Mutually-immersive Mobile Telepresence, Proceedings of the ACM's Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New Orleans, Louisiana, Nov. 2002.|
|3||N.P Jouppi; Mutually-immersive Audio Telepresence, in the Proceedings of the 113th Audio Engineering Society Convention, Los Angeles, California, Oct. 2002.|
|4||N.P Jouppi; S Iyer; W. Mack; S. Thomas; A. Slayden, Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 2004, New York, 2004.|
|5||N.P Jouppi; S Iyer; W. Mack; S. Thomas; A. Slayden, Proceedings of IEEE ICRA 2004, New Orleans, Apr. 2004.|
|6||*||On the Trail of the Paparazzi (http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=124366&page=1&page=1).|
|7||*||Ribbers et al. "Creating Alternative Electronic Trading Mechanisms in Time-Sensitive Transaction Markets", Law and Electronic Commerce, 2002, http://center.kub.nl/staff/kleijnen/emarket.pdf, 1-39.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8471888 *||Dec 11, 2009||Jun 25, 2013||Research In Motion Limited||Methods and systems for mobile telepresence|
|US8520024||May 19, 2008||Aug 27, 2013||Uab Research Foundation||Virtual interactive presence systems and methods|
|US8670017 *||Mar 4, 2010||Mar 11, 2014||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Remote presence system including a cart that supports a robot face and an overhead camera|
|US8676893||Jan 9, 2012||Mar 18, 2014||Google Inc.||Utilizing multiple teleo-operated devices for common teleo-experience sessions|
|US8682486||Jul 17, 2013||Mar 25, 2014||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Medical tele-robotic system with a master remote station with an arbitrator|
|US8823769||Jan 5, 2011||Sep 2, 2014||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Three-dimensional video conferencing system with eye contact|
|US8836751||Nov 8, 2011||Sep 16, 2014||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Tele-presence system with a user interface that displays different communication links|
|US8849679||Nov 25, 2008||Sep 30, 2014||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Remote controlled robot system that provides medical images|
|US8849680||Jan 29, 2009||Sep 30, 2014||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Documentation through a remote presence robot|
|US8897920||Apr 17, 2009||Nov 25, 2014||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Tele-presence robot system with software modularity, projector and laser pointer|
|US8902278||Jul 25, 2012||Dec 2, 2014||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Systems and methods for visualizing and managing telepresence devices in healthcare networks|
|US8965579||Jan 27, 2012||Feb 24, 2015||Intouch Technologies||Interfacing with a mobile telepresence robot|
|US8983174||Feb 19, 2013||Mar 17, 2015||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Mobile robot with a head-based movement mapping scheme|
|US8996165||Oct 21, 2008||Mar 31, 2015||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Telepresence robot with a camera boom|
|US9044863||Feb 6, 2014||Jun 2, 2015||Steelcase Inc.||Polarized enhanced confidentiality in mobile camera applications|
|US9089972 *||Jan 16, 2014||Jul 28, 2015||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Remote presence system including a cart that supports a robot face and an overhead camera|
|US9098611||Mar 14, 2013||Aug 4, 2015||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Enhanced video interaction for a user interface of a telepresence network|
|US9138891||Nov 25, 2008||Sep 22, 2015||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Server connectivity control for tele-presence robot|
|US9160783||May 9, 2007||Oct 13, 2015||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Robot system that operates through a network firewall|
|US9174342||Nov 21, 2014||Nov 3, 2015||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Social behavior rules for a medical telepresence robot|
|US9185343||May 13, 2013||Nov 10, 2015||Blackberry Limited||Methods and systems for mobile telepresence|
|US9193065||Jul 10, 2008||Nov 24, 2015||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Docking system for a tele-presence robot|
|US9198728||Sep 30, 2005||Dec 1, 2015||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Multi-camera mobile teleconferencing platform|
|US9251313||Apr 11, 2012||Feb 2, 2016||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Systems and methods for visualizing and managing telepresence devices in healthcare networks|
|US9264664||Dec 3, 2010||Feb 16, 2016||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Systems and methods for dynamic bandwidth allocation|
|US9265458||Dec 4, 2012||Feb 23, 2016||Sync-Think, Inc.||Application of smooth pursuit cognitive testing paradigms to clinical drug development|
|US9296107||May 10, 2012||Mar 29, 2016||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Protocol for a remotely controlled videoconferencing robot|
|US9323250||Aug 2, 2013||Apr 26, 2016||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Time-dependent navigation of telepresence robots|
|US9361021||Nov 21, 2014||Jun 7, 2016||Irobot Corporation||Graphical user interfaces including touchpad driving interfaces for telemedicine devices|
|US9375843||Jun 18, 2010||Jun 28, 2016||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Protocol for a remotely controlled videoconferencing robot|
|US9380976||Mar 11, 2013||Jul 5, 2016||Sync-Think, Inc.||Optical neuroinformatics|
|US9381654||May 14, 2013||Jul 5, 2016||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Server connectivity control for tele-presence robot|
|US9429934||Oct 15, 2013||Aug 30, 2016||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Mobile videoconferencing robot system with network adaptive driving|
|US9469030||Oct 27, 2015||Oct 18, 2016||Intouch Technologies||Interfacing with a mobile telepresence robot|
|US9479732 *||Nov 10, 2015||Oct 25, 2016||Irobot Corporation||Immersive video teleconferencing robot|
|US20080291271 *||May 21, 2007||Nov 27, 2008||Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ab||Remote viewfinding|
|US20100295921 *||May 19, 2008||Nov 25, 2010||Barton Guthrie||Virtual Interactive Presence Systems and Methods|
|US20110032324 *||Dec 11, 2009||Feb 10, 2011||Research In Motion Limited||Methods and systems for mobile telepresence|
|US20110218674 *||Mar 4, 2010||Sep 8, 2011||David Stuart||Remote presence system including a cart that supports a robot face and an overhead camera|
|US20130110259 *||Dec 18, 2012||May 2, 2013||Roy-G-Biv Corporation||Event Management Systems and Methods for Motion Control Systems|
|US20140135990 *||Jan 16, 2014||May 15, 2014||Intouch Technologies, Inc.||Remote presence system including a cart that supports a robot face and an overhead camera|
|International Classification||B25J9/16, G05B19/00, G06F17/00, H04N7/14, H04N7/18, H04N7/00, G05B15/00, G06F17/20|
|Cooperative Classification||G05B2219/40153, B25J9/1689, G06Q30/04, H04N7/185, G05B2219/40146, H04N7/141|
|European Classification||H04N7/14A, H04N7/18D2, B25J9/16T4, G06Q30/04|