|Publication number||US7979714 B2|
|Application number||US 11/445,571|
|Publication date||Jul 12, 2011|
|Priority date||Jun 2, 2006|
|Also published as||EP1901238A2, EP1901238A3, US20070283159|
|Publication number||11445571, 445571, US 7979714 B2, US 7979714B2, US-B2-7979714, US7979714 B2, US7979714B2|
|Inventors||Bruce T. Borsa, Michael T. Kurdziel, Jeffrey I. Murray, Terence W. O'Brien|
|Original Assignee||Harris Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (66), Non-Patent Citations (3), Referenced by (4), Classifications (11), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Statement of the Technical Field
The inventive arrangements concern secure processing systems, and more particularly apparatus for providing authentication and access control to secure processing systems.
2. Description of the Related Art
Users of secure processing systems are increasingly demanding improved methods for ensuring authentication of users and controlled access to secure systems. Presently, a variety of systems exist for enabling or accessing secure processing systems based on user identification. For example, some systems rely on user passwords for security. Other systems currently in use include biometric scanning, crypto ignition keys (CIK), and common access control (CAC) cards. Still other systems require that cryptographic keys be inserted into a host system in order for the system to send, receive and process secure information. However, it will be appreciated that there are limits to the level of security that each of the foregoing techniques can achieve on its own.
Further, many conventional systems used for authentication of users and for controlling access to secure processing systems generally require physical contact with an information processing system. For example, such physical contact can include card readers or biometric scanners that are wired to the processing system, or an electrical cable that is used to insert a CIK. Moreover, conventional systems usually rely on single mode of access control. For example, a conventional CAC card is used for common access control to a facility, but does not provide biometric scanning. Similarly, conventional biometric scanning devices identify an individual, but do not combine such features with the benefit of a functional CIK.
The invention concerns an authentication and access control device for providing access to a controlled resource. According to one aspect of the invention, the controlled resource is be a data processing device. For example, the data processing device can be a mobile computing system or personal electronic device.
The authentication and access control device includes a first security key sub-system. The first security key sub-system is responsive to an input signal for providing a first key code required for permitting a user access to a controlled resource. The device advantageously also includes a second security key sub-system including at least one electronic circuit for providing a second key code different from the first key code. According to one aspect of the invention, the second key code is used for authenticating the user or can be otherwise useful for secure use of the particular resource.
The device also includes a wireless communication system. The wireless communication system includes at least one wireless transmitter. The wireless transmitter is coupled to at least one of the first security key sub-system and the second security key sub-system. With the foregoing system, the first key code and the second key code are communicated wirelessly to the controlled resource. In this way, the one or more wireless signals is used to enable functionality and/or user access provided by the controlled resource. The first and second key codes can be transmitted as part of a single wireless signal transmission, or can be transmitted separately.
According to an aspect of the invention, the first security key sub-system is selected from the group consisting of (1) a biometric scanner, (2) a keypad configured for entry by a user of at least one of alpha and numeric data, (3) a data store containing a personal identification code for a particular user, (4) a data store containing a cryptographic fill key, and (5) a data store containing a cryptographic ignition key. The second security key sub-system is advantageously selected from the same group. However, the second security key sub-system will generally be a different one of the listed alternatives as compared to the security key sub-system selected for the first security key sub-system.
In the first and second security key sub-systems, if a biometric scanner is used, then the biometric scanner determines the first or second key code based on a biometric scan of a user. Alternatively, if the first or second security key sub-system is a keypad configured for entry by a user of alpha numeric data, then the first or second key code would be some predetermined password entered by a pattern of keystrokes inputted by a user.
If the first or second security key subsystem includes a data store containing a cryptographic key, then the cryptographic key is the key code for that sub-system. According to an aspect of the invention, the cryptographic key is a cryptographic fill key that is predetermined for enabling cryptographic data processing to be performed using the controlled resource. If the first or second security key sub-system includes a data store that contains a cryptographic ignition key, then the key code for that sub-system can be the cryptographic ignition key. The cryptographic ignition key is used to enable at least one data processing function of the controlled resource.
The authentication and access control device of the present invention is not limited to the first and second security key sub-systems. Instead, one or more additional security key subsystems can be provided. All of the security keys are communicated wirelessly to the controlled resource. The third security key sub-system is also be selected from the group consisting of (1) a biometric scanner, (2) a keypad configured for entry by a user of at least one of alpha and numeric data, (3) a data store containing a personal identification code for a particular user, (4) a data store containing a cryptographic fill key, and (5) a data store containing a cryptographic ignition key. The third security key sub-system is advantageously selected so that it is different or exclusive of a security key sub-system selected for the first and second security key sub-systems.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, the authentication and access control device includes a first security key sub-system that includes a biometric scanner. The biometric scanner is used for generating a first key code containing information required for permitting a user access to a controlled resource, such as a personal electronic device. Further, a wireless communication system is provided that includes at least one wireless transmitter coupled to the first security key sub-system for wirelessly transmitting the first key code to the personal electronic device.
The biometric scanner system is advantageously combined with at least a second security key sub-system for generating a second key code different from said first key code. The second key code is provided for authenticating the user to the personal electronic device or enabling a data processing function of the personal electronic device. For example, the second security key sub-system can be selected from the group consisting of (1) a keypad configured for entry by a user of at least one of alpha and numeric data, (2) a data store containing a personal identification code for a particular user, (3) a data store containing a cryptographic fill key, and (4) a data store containing a cryptographic ignition key.
The present invention concerns an authentication and access control device (AACD) for providing access to a controlled resource. Referring to
The controlled resource 102 can include several components. These components can include a human/machine interface 106 and an input/output (I/O) system 108 for communicating data into and out of the device. The human/machine interface 106 can include a keypad for data entry and an LCD or other type of display screen. Advantageously, the I/O system 108 can include a wireless interface. I/O system 108 can be connected to a suitable transducer 109 for wireless communications. If the I/O system is RF based, the transducer can be an antenna. If the system is optically based, a suitable optical transducer can be used. Alternatively, any other suitable wireless transducer can be used. The wireless interface can be based on any of a variety of well known wireless interface standards. Examples of such well known wireless interface standards can include the Bluetooth wireless standard, and the IEEE 802.11 family of standards. However, the invention is not limited in this regard and any other wireless interface standard can be used.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the secure information processing system can be a personal electronic device. Personal electronic devices (PEDs) are well known in the art. For example mobile handheld computers, which are sometimes called personal digital assistants or PDAs, have the ability to store, process and communicate data. PDAs generally fall into one of several categories which can include handheld PCs, palm size PCs, smart phones, and handheld instruments. PDAs typically include some kind of microprocessor with a commercially available operating system such as Linux, Palm OS, or Widows CE (Pocket PC). Many PDAs also have built in LCD displays, touch sensitive screens, and keypads for the human/machine interface. Some PDAs also include wireless networking capabilities. For example, many such devices can communicate with other devices using well known wireless networking. The foregoing capabilities make these compact devices highly useful for various business and personal applications. It is anticipated that recent developments in PDA technology will increasingly facilitate secure processing on these types of devices.
If the controlled resource 102 is an electronic security system that is used to secure physical access to a perimeter, then the controlled resource can be linked to one or more electronically controlled locks (not shown). Other control and surveillance systems, such as video cameras and/or other types of surveillance sensors, can also be used to provide perimeter physical access control. Still, it will be appreciated that the invention is not limited to any particular type of controlled resource.
Referring once again to
According to one embodiment of the invention, each security sub-system which is implemented on the AACD 104 can generate and transmit at least one key code that is associated with that particular sub-system. For example, a first sub-system 110 can include a personal identification code that is associated with a particular user. In this regard, the first sub-system can be similar to conventional common access control cards that are swiped, scanned or otherwise designed to respond to a conventional stimulus signal for generating a security code. Consequently, for this type of sub-system the key code can be any particular code that can be associated with a specified user.
The sub-system 110 can be useful for automatically limiting access to the controlled resource. For example, in response to an interrogation signal 120, the security key subsystem 110 can transmit a key code associated with a particular user. When the key-code is received by the controlled resource 102, it can determine whether the user has privileges to use or access the controlled resource.
Notwithstanding the advantages of central access control type devices which can be included as part of sub-system 110, those devices have their limitations. For example, with a CAC type device, the controlled resource 102 can determine that an individual is present with MCD 104 that has generated a valid user key code. However, the controlled resource cannot know whether the user who possesses the device is the legitimate owner or authorized user of the MCD. Accordingly, it can be advantageous to combine the sub-system 110 with at least a second sub-system. For example, the second sub-system can be used to authenticate that the individual possessing the MCD 104 is in fact the person who is authorized to use the MCD. One method to accomplish such authentication would be to include a biometric scanner sub-system 112 as part of the MCD 104. Another method would be to include a keypad 114 or other data entry device as part of the MCD 104 to allow a user to enter a user password.
Stated in more general terms, a first one of the security key sub-systems 110, 112, 114, 116, 118 can be selected from the group consisting of (1) a biometric scanner, (2) a keypad configured for entry by a user of at least one of alpha and numeric data, (3) a data store containing a personal identification code for a particular user, (4) a data store containing a cryptographic fill key, and (5) a data store containing a cryptographic ignition key. Further, a second one of the security key sub-systems 110, 112, 114, 116, 118 can be selected from the same group. The first and second security key sub-systems can be of the same type, but it can be advantageous to select the second one of the security key subsystems so that it is not the same type of subsystem as the first security key sub-system.
Referring now to
As shown in
Microprocessor 202 is capable of receiving and transmitting data through input/output (I/O) subsystem 204, which can include a wireless transceiver, and any other conventional data communication service. A suitable transducer 212 can be provided for any wireless applications. If the I/O subsystem relies on an RF link, the transducer can be an antenna. Alternatively, for an optical based system, an optical transducer can be used. The wireless interface can be based on any of a variety of well known wireless interface standards. Examples of such well known wireless interface standards can include the Bluetooth wireless standard, and the IEEE 802.11 family of standards. However, the invention is not limited in this regard and any other wireless interface standard can be used.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the wireless data communications between MCD 104 and controlled resource 102 are subject to interception. Accordingly, it can be advantageous to make use of various cryptographic techniques for the purpose of conducting all or part of such communications. Any suitable cryptographic technique or process can be used for preventing unauthorized use of the information that is transmitted between the two devices.
Microprocessor 202 can be any of a variety of commercially available processor. For example, microprocessor 202 can be selected from the StrongARM or XScale processors (e.g., SA-110 or PXA270) available from Intel Corp. of Santa Clara, Calif., the i.MX or Dragonball family of processors available from Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. of Austin, Tex., or the OMAP family of processors offered for sale by Texas Instruments of Dallas, Tex. Microprocessor 202 can utilize any suitable commercially available operating system. Alternatively, in order to reduce energy consumption and costs, processor 202 can be implemented as a microelectronic controller. Suitable commercially available controllers can include the MCS51 family of microcontrollers available from Intel Corp. of Santa Clara, Calif., the MSP430 family of microcontrollers available from Texas Instruments of Dallas, Tex., or the P87LPC 7xx family of microcontrollers available from Philips Electronics of the Netherlands.
Processor 202 can communicate respectively with data store 206. Data stores 206 can be comprised of any suitable data storage system such as flash memory, read-only memory (ROM), EE PROM and/or dynamic random access memory (DRAM). The operating system for the processor can be stored in non-volatile memory in data store 206. Still, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention is not limited with regard to the particular type of data store that is used for the operating system or application software of processor 202.
Suitable data communication links can be provided between the processor 202, data store 206, keypad, 208 and biometric scanner 210. The data communication links can be any suitable type serial or parallel type data channels. For example, if the communication link is a parallel type data link then it can conform to any of a number of well known bus standards, including without limitation ISA, EISA, VESA, PCI, EMIF and so on. Alternatively, if a serial data channel is used, then it can be an I2C, SPI, Microwire, Maxim or other type serial data bus. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention is not limited to any particular data link arrangement among the various components of the AACD 104.
One or more of the authorization access and control sub-systems 110, 112, 114, 116, 118 can be implemented in the AACD 104 that is shown in
Security key sub-system 110 can utilize any conventional key code that can be used to identify a user. However, a security key code for security key sub-system 116 can include a cryptographic ignition key (CIK). Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the CIK can be used to enable a secure device when the CIK is loaded into the secure device. Similarly, certain data processing functions of secure devices can require the insertion of a cryptographic key. Accordingly, such a cryptographic fill key can be stored in data store 206 as part of the secure wireless fill key device 118. The wireless capability of the AACD 104, combined with its secure authorization and access control features ensure that only authorized users will be able to make use of the CIK and wireless fill key.
With regard to biometric scanner 210, the key code can be generated as a result of a biometric scan. According to one embodiment, a data file associated with the biometric scan can be communicated to the processor 202. Processor 202 can cause the data file to be directly transmitted to the controlled resource 102 using I/O subsystem 204. In that case, the data file can be evaluated by controlled resource 102 and compared to a database of biometric scan data for the purpose of determining whether the user should be granted access.
According to an alternative embodiment, the key-code for the biometric scan can also be a digital code that is derived from the biometric scanning process. In that case, the digital code can be transmitted to the controlled resource for comparison to a reference file. According to yet another aspect, the biometric scan data can be compared to a reference file contained in data store 206. If the biometric scan data matches the information contained in the reference file, then microprocessor 202 can cause a specific key code to be transmitted to the controlled resource. One advantage of this arrangement would be that it avoids the need to wirelessly transmit biometric scan data.
Regardless of which arrangement is used for the biometric scanner 210, it will be appreciated that any type of biometric scanner can be used. For example, the biometric scanner can be a fingerprint scanner or a retinal scanner. Other types of scanners are also possible and the invention is not limited to these particular scanning types. For example, voice recognition systems can be used for this purpose. Still, the invention is not limited to any particular type of biometric scanner.
Similarly, keypad 208 can record a series of user key strokes indicating a user password. The key strokes can be communicated to the processor 202. In response, processor 202 can communicate the keystroke information to the I/O subsystem 204, which transmits the data to the controlled resource 102. The password can be evaluated by the controlled resource to determine if the user is authorized to access the controlled resource. Alternatively, the AACD 104 can compare the password entered by a user to a password stored in data store 206. If the password is correct, then processor 202 can cause a key code to be transmitted to the controlled resource. The controlled resource 102 can verify that the key code is sufficient to allow the user to access the controlled resource.
Notably, keypad 208 and biometric scanner 210 each provide a means for establishing that the AACD is being utilized by its proper owner. Accordingly, it can be desirable in some instances to use only one of these types of security key sub-systems. In fact, utilizing the combination of these security key sub-systems provides for substantially enhanced security.
Each of the security key sub-systems 110, 112, 114, 116, 118 that are implemented in the AACD 104 can advantageously be arranged to communicate wirelessly with the controlled resource 102. For example, in
Referring now to
Turning now to
If a keypad 208 is included in the AACD 104, then the process can continue with steps 408 and 410. Otherwise, the process can continue directly to step 414. In step 408, the processor 202 can monitor the keypad for key stroke entry. In step 410, the processor can determine if a valid password has been entered on the key pad. If not, then the processor 202 can return to step 402. However, if a valid password is entered, then the AACD 104 can begin monitoring an input from I/O subsystem 204 to determine if a valid interrogation signal has been received from the controlled resource 102. If, after a period of time, no valid interrogation signal is received in step 414, then the process continues on to step 418. However, if a valid interrogation signal is received, then a common access control (CAC) key code can be automatically transmitted in response by the AACD 104. Alternatively, the AACD can automatically transmit the CAC key code without waiting for an interrogation signal.
In either case, the process can continue on to step 418. In step 418, the processor 202 can determine whether a cryptographic ignition key (CIK) has been requested or is to be transmitted to the controlled resource. A request for the CIK can be transmitted by the controlled resource and received using I/O subsystem 204. Alternatively, the transmission of the CIK can be requested by one or more user keystrokes. Assuming a proper request is received, then the CIK is transmitted in step 420.
Similarly, in step 422, the AACD 104 can determine whether a request has been received for the AACD 104 to transmit a cryptographic fill key. The request can be transmitted to the AACD 104 by the controlled resource, or can be initiated by a series of user keystrokes. If a valid request is received in step 422, then the cryptographic fill key can be transmitted in step 424.
The invention described and claimed herein is not to be limited in scope by the preferred embodiments herein disclosed, since these embodiments are intended as illustrations of several aspects of the invention. Any equivalent embodiments are intended to be within the scope of this invention. Indeed, various modifications of the invention in addition to those shown and described herein will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4227253||Dec 5, 1977||Oct 7, 1980||International Business Machines Corporation||Cryptographic communication security for multiple domain networks|
|US4493031||Aug 25, 1982||Jan 8, 1985||At&T Bell Laboratories||Memory write protection using timers|
|US4918728||Aug 30, 1989||Apr 17, 1990||International Business Machines Corporation||Data cryptography operations using control vectors|
|US5263168||Jun 3, 1991||Nov 16, 1993||Motorola, Inc.||Circuitry for automatically entering and terminating an initialization mode in a data processing system in response to a control signal|
|US5283828||Feb 19, 1993||Feb 1, 1994||Hughes Training, Inc.||Architecture for utilizing coprocessing systems to increase performance in security adapted computer systems|
|US5369702||Oct 18, 1993||Nov 29, 1994||Tecsec Incorporated||Distributed cryptographic object method|
|US5548646||Sep 15, 1994||Aug 20, 1996||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||System for signatureless transmission and reception of data packets between computer networks|
|US5596718||Jul 10, 1992||Jan 21, 1997||Secure Computing Corporation||Secure computer network using trusted path subsystem which encrypts/decrypts and communicates with user through local workstation user I/O devices without utilizing workstation processor|
|US5748744||Jun 3, 1996||May 5, 1998||Vlsi Technology, Inc.||Secure mass storage system for computers|
|US5802178||Jul 30, 1996||Sep 1, 1998||Itt Industries, Inc.||Stand alone device for providing security within computer networks|
|US5887064 *||Sep 8, 1988||Mar 23, 1999||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Cryptographic equipment|
|US5956404||Sep 30, 1996||Sep 21, 1999||Schneier; Bruce||Digital signature with auditing bits|
|US6072202||Sep 24, 1997||Jun 6, 2000||Nec Corporation||II-VI compound semiconductor device with III-V buffer layer|
|US6081895||Oct 10, 1997||Jun 27, 2000||Motorola, Inc.||Method and system for managing data unit processing|
|US6148401||Nov 19, 1997||Nov 14, 2000||At&T Corp.||System and method for providing assurance to a host that a piece of software possesses a particular property|
|US6282653||May 15, 1998||Aug 28, 2001||International Business Machines Corporation||Royalty collection method and system for use of copyrighted digital materials on the internet|
|US6351817||Oct 27, 1999||Feb 26, 2002||Terence T. Flyntz||Multi-level secure computer with token-based access control|
|US6378071||Feb 26, 1998||Apr 23, 2002||Fujitsu Limited||File access system for efficiently accessing a file having encrypted data within a storage device|
|US6378072||Feb 3, 1998||Apr 23, 2002||Compaq Computer Corporation||Cryptographic system|
|US6671804 *||Jun 12, 2000||Dec 30, 2003||Bbnt Solutions Llc||Method and apparatus for supporting authorities in a public key infrastructure|
|US6775778||May 19, 1999||Aug 10, 2004||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Secure computing device having boot read only memory verification of program code|
|US7003674||Jul 31, 2000||Feb 21, 2006||Western Digital Ventures, Inc.||Disk drive employing a disk with a pristine area for storing encrypted data accessible only by trusted devices or clients to facilitate secure network communications|
|US7028149||Mar 29, 2002||Apr 11, 2006||Intel Corporation||System and method for resetting a platform configuration register|
|US7047405||Apr 5, 2001||May 16, 2006||Qualcomm, Inc.||Method and apparatus for providing secure processing and data storage for a wireless communication device|
|US7069447||May 10, 2002||Jun 27, 2006||Rodney Joe Corder||Apparatus and method for secure data storage|
|US7302698||Nov 28, 2000||Nov 27, 2007||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Operation of trusted state in computing platform|
|US7322042||Feb 7, 2003||Jan 22, 2008||Broadon Communications Corp.||Secure and backward-compatible processor and secure software execution thereon|
|US7380275||Jan 31, 2005||May 27, 2008||Broadon Communications Corp.||Secure and backward-compatible processor and secure software execution thereon|
|US7392398||Jun 5, 2000||Jun 24, 2008||Ati International Srl||Method and apparatus for protection of computer assets from unauthorized access|
|US7765399||Jul 27, 2010||Harris Corporation||Computer architecture for a handheld electronic device|
|US7779252||Aug 17, 2010||Harris Corporation||Computer architecture for a handheld electronic device with a shared human-machine interface|
|US20010044886||Sep 25, 1998||Nov 22, 2001||Robert D. Cassagnol||Method and apparatus for controlling access to confidential data by analyzing property inherent in data|
|US20020059238||Nov 2, 2001||May 16, 2002||Mitsubishi Corporation||Data management system|
|US20020099950||Jan 22, 2001||Jul 25, 2002||Smith Kenneth K.||Method of maintaining integrity of an instruction or data set|
|US20020138548||Mar 19, 2002||Sep 26, 2002||Neebe Mark T.||Web-based common use terminal with multiple application servers|
|US20030046589||Aug 29, 2002||Mar 6, 2003||Gregg Richard L.||System and method for securing transactions and computer resources with an untrusted network|
|US20030126434||Sep 3, 2002||Jul 3, 2003||Lim Jae Deok||File security system using a security class and method for managing an encryption key|
|US20030163740||Feb 15, 2001||Aug 28, 2003||Phin Thjai||User interface system|
|US20030204801||Apr 30, 2002||Oct 30, 2003||Motorola, Inc.||Method and apparatus for secure scan testing|
|US20040039924||Jan 14, 2003||Feb 26, 2004||Baldwin Robert W.||System and method for security of computing devices|
|US20040044902||Dec 31, 2002||Mar 4, 2004||Luthi Peter O.||Method and apparatus for multi-level security implementation|
|US20040103288||Nov 27, 2002||May 27, 2004||M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers Ltd.||Apparatus and method for securing data on a portable storage device|
|US20050055524||Sep 4, 2003||Mar 10, 2005||Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.||Computer system employing a trusted execution environment including a memory controller configured to clear memory|
|US20050114687||Nov 21, 2003||May 26, 2005||Zimmer Vincent J.||Methods and apparatus to provide protection for firmware resources|
|US20050132186||Mar 31, 2004||Jun 16, 2005||Khan Moinul H.||Method and apparatus for a trust processor|
|US20050273602||Jun 3, 2004||Dec 8, 2005||Wilson John H||Launching a secure kernel in a multiprocessor system|
|US20060041755 *||Oct 21, 2004||Feb 23, 2006||Netlabs.Com,Inc.||Multichannel device utilizing a centralized out-of-band authentication system (COBAS)|
|US20060059345||Sep 10, 2004||Mar 16, 2006||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for providing dynamically authorized access to functionality present on an integrated circuit chip|
|US20060078109||Sep 19, 2005||Apr 13, 2006||Felica Networks, Inc.||Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and program|
|US20060105740||May 13, 2005||May 18, 2006||Mci, Inc.||Method and apparatus for providing secure wireless communication|
|US20060195907||Dec 23, 2005||Aug 31, 2006||Infineon Technologies Ag||Data processing device|
|US20060248599||Aug 29, 2005||Nov 2, 2006||Oracle International Corporation||Cross-domain security for data vault|
|US20060251258 *||Feb 21, 2006||Nov 9, 2006||Mcafee, Inc.||System, method and computer program product for updating security criteria in wireless networks|
|US20060253711 *||May 5, 2006||Nov 9, 2006||Charles Kallmann||Biometric safety and security system|
|US20070214364 *||Mar 7, 2006||Sep 13, 2007||Roberts Nicole A||Dual layer authentication system for securing user access to remote systems and associated methods|
|US20070226493||Mar 23, 2006||Sep 27, 2007||Harris Corporation||Computer architecture for an electronic device providing SLS access to MLS file system with trusted loading and protection of program execution memory|
|US20070226494||Mar 23, 2006||Sep 27, 2007||Harris Corporation||Computer architecture for an electronic device providing single-level secure access to multi-level secure file system|
|US20070226517||Mar 23, 2006||Sep 27, 2007||Harris Corporation||Computer architecture for an electronic device providing a secure file system|
|US20070250411 *||Mar 29, 2006||Oct 25, 2007||Williams Albert L||System and method for inventory tracking and control of mission-critical military equipment and supplies|
|US20080022136||Dec 21, 2006||Jan 24, 2008||Protegrity Corporation||Encryption load balancing and distributed policy enforcement|
|DE19633919C1||Aug 22, 1996||Jun 5, 1997||Siemens Ag||Program module updating method for mobile communications appts|
|EP0471538A2||Aug 12, 1991||Feb 19, 1992||Gec-Marconi (Holdings) Limited||Data security system|
|EP0657820A1||Dec 1, 1994||Jun 14, 1995||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Method for preventing unauthorised data modification in an apparatus with a non-volatile memory|
|EP1085396A1||Sep 17, 1999||Mar 21, 2001||Hewlett-Packard Company||Operation of trusted state in computing platform|
|GB2336005A||Title not available|
|WO1998039876A1||Mar 5, 1998||Sep 11, 1998||Skylight Software, Inc.||Cryptographic digital identity method|
|1||Schneier, Applied Cryptography Second Edition, 1996, John Wiley & Sons, Second Edition, pp. 513-514.|
|2||Wiki: "Multilevel Security" Wikipedia, [online] Retrieved from the internet: URL://HTTP://en.wikipedia.orq/w/index.php?title=Multilevel-secuirty&oldid=44733265> [retrieved on Aug. 9, 2007].|
|3||Wiki: "Multilevel Security" Wikipedia, [online] Retrieved from the internet: URL://HTTP://en.wikipedia.orq/w/index.php?title=Multilevel—secuirty&oldid=44733265> [retrieved on Aug. 9, 2007].|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8060744||Mar 23, 2006||Nov 15, 2011||Harris Corporation||Computer architecture for an electronic device providing single-level secure access to multi-level secure file system|
|US8127145||Mar 23, 2006||Feb 28, 2012||Harris Corporation||Computer architecture for an electronic device providing a secure file system|
|US9198224 *||Feb 5, 2012||Nov 24, 2015||North Star Innovations Inc.||Cellular modem processing|
|US20120183029 *||Feb 5, 2012||Jul 19, 2012||Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.||Cellular modem processing|
|U.S. Classification||713/182, 380/279, 713/175, 713/179|
|Cooperative Classification||G07C2009/00095, G07C9/00563, G07C9/00039, G07C9/00087|
|European Classification||G07C9/00B6D4, G07C9/00B6B|
|Jul 6, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: HARRIS CORPORATION, FLORIDA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BORSA, BRUCE T.;KURDZIEL, MICHAEL T.;MURRAY, JEFFREY I.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:017890/0584
Effective date: 20060525
|Jan 12, 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4