|Publication number||US8019063 B2|
|Application number||US 11/509,037|
|Publication date||Sep 13, 2011|
|Filing date||Aug 24, 2006|
|Priority date||Aug 24, 2006|
|Also published as||CA2660824A1, CA2660824C, EP2060128A2, EP2060128A4, US8638914, US9288332, US20080063158, US20120063575, US20140140491, WO2008024156A2, WO2008024156A3|
|Publication number||11509037, 509037, US 8019063 B2, US 8019063B2, US-B2-8019063, US8019063 B2, US8019063B2|
|Inventors||John Kenneth Gallant|
|Original Assignee||Verisign, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (22), Classifications (17), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Modern telecommunication networks provide services based on call signaling. The network signaling protocol includes a service layer upon which many of the provided services are implemented. Such services include 1-800 and toll free calling, calling cards, private virtual networks, cellular registration and roaming, prepaid calling, etc.
An example of a call signaling-based telecommunication network is the Signaling System 7 (SS7) network. The SS7 network includes telecommunication switches called mobile switching centers (MSC), which are used primarily in mobile telephone networks. The SS7 network includes a signaling system to route call signals using a signal transfer point (STP) as an intermediary routing node. The SS7 network also includes network control elements called mobile service control points (SCP), which provide the mobile services on the network.
A goal of call signaling-based telecommunication networks is to ensure high reliability in the provided services. High reliability is more easily provided for services which involve a single call signal during the life of a telephone call, rather than for services which involve multiple call signals, perhaps from different network components, during the life of the call. However, services which involve multiple call signals tend to provide more capabilities and increased functionality for the caller and are therefore more desirable.
As stated previously, services which involve multiple call signals during the life of a telephone call are provided by network control elements. Typically, a subset of the control elements acts as the primary elements on the network for transmitting, receiving, and processing the call signals for a particular service. For reliability, the remaining control elements are used for backup, in the event that the primary elements fail. Accordingly, there is some logic or a method provided by the control elements to ensure that the call signals are correctly routed and processed during both normal and failure modes.
One method commonly used involves the originator of the call signal, i.e., the telecommunication switch, populating the header of the call signal with a string identifying the network control element to which the call signal is to be routed for processing. An intermediary routing node on the network examines the string, consults a routing table to identify the destination network control element, and then routes the call signal to the identified control element. An advantage of this method is that call signals can be easily partitioned between the network control elements. Also, a control element can be used as both a primary element for so-designated call signals and as a backup element for another control element since it is easy to identify, in a call signal, where the call signal is to be routed (or re-routed in the event of a failure). As such, several control elements may be active concurrently.
For example, in the SS7 network, call signals may be set up to go to SCP A as the primary control element for 1-800 and other toll free calling service having telephone numbers in range A, with SCP B as the backup control element if SCP A fails. Similarly, call signals may be set up to go to SCP B as the primary control element for 1-800 and other toll free calling service having telephone numbers in range B, with SCP A as the backup control element if SCP B fails. When a caller makes a 1-800 or other toll free call, an MSC originates the call signals on the network, including an identifier for either SCP A or B (depending on the range within which the 1-800 number falls) in the header of the call signals. An STP examines the call signals, determines from a routing table based on the identifier that the call signals should go to either SCP A or B, and then routes the signal thereto. SCP A or B then processes the call signals in order to establish and maintain the 1-800 or other toll free call for the caller. In the event of a failure of the primary SCP, the routing node routes the call signal to the backup SCP.
However, this method of populating the header of the call signal with a string identifying the destination network control element does not work very well for services with multiple call signals during the life of a telephone call. This is because the call signals can come from different network components which do not use signal headers at all or do not use the same signal formats or consistent strings identifying the destination control element, for example, as in certain prepaid service. As such, the intermediary routing node may not reliably identify an appropriate destination network control element and properly route the signal thereto.
One solution to this problem has been to use only one network control element for all call signals regardless of the service associated with the signal, with the remaining control elements as backups if the one element fails. The primary control element then gets all the call signals from different sources and groups together those belonging to the same telephone call. If the primary element fails, one of the backup elements then receives all the call signals.
This solution, however, is not very efficient because several of the control elements are idle and are only used when there is a primary element failure, while the primary control element works constantly. This is an inefficient use of network resources. Moreover, after sitting idle, there is no guarantee that a backup control element could take over and operate properly, in the event of a primary element failure. What is needed is a way to effectively balance the signals between the control elements and still be able to reliably group together those call signals belonging to the same telephone call and service. If a backup control element is more active, it is more likely to reliably take over and perform properly.
Accordingly, there is a need in the art for a system and method for reliably handling multiple call signals during the life of a telephone call using several network control elements.
For several network control elements in a call signaling-based telecommunication network to reliably process multiple call signals associated with a telephone call, each control element must be able to tie the call signal it is currently processing with call signals it and other elements previously processed that are associated with the call. To do this, according to embodiments of the present invention, one or more context servers are provided that a control element may access to obtain information about the context of the call signal currently being processed. This context information may come from the previously processed call signals that are stored in the context servers.
As stated previously, call signals may indicate the call status or include a command to be executed by another network component with regard to the call. For example, a call signal may indicate that a call's status as connected, disconnected, busy, forwarded, answered, timed out, etc. A call signal may also command the control elements to update the call's status, start or stop tolling the call, bill the call, etc.
Context information that the context servers may provide to the control elements about a call signal may include the time the call was connected, disconnected, busy, forwarded, answered, timed out, etc., the calling and called telephone numbers, the amount of prepaid funds available for the call, the number of minutes remaining in a prepaid call, the billing address of the calling party, etc. With context information, a control element may better process its present call signal though never having received any preceding call signals from this call.
For example, suppose a call is connected at 2:00 PM. The call signal to update the status of the call to “connect” is processed by control element A. When the call disconnects, the call signal to update the status of the call to “disconnect” is received by control element B. In order to update the status of the correct call, control element B must have context information about the call. Therefore, control element B must determine what call signals went before and what they meant. In embodiments of the present invention, this may be done by control element B accessing context servers to get the context information of the connect call signal, i.e., the calling number and the connected status. From this information, control element B may reliably change the calling number to the disconnected status.
Embodiments of the present invention are directed to high reliability call signaling-based networks. The present invention advantageously enables several network control elements to work concurrently to process multiple call signals during the life of a telephone call, thereby ensuring high reliability of the services provided on the network. The present invention further provides load balancing between the control elements, which is particularly useful during times of unpredictably high network utilization and when there is a network control element failure.
In one embodiment, a method for processing multiple call signals may include receiving a call signal from a telecommunication switch at a network control element. Upon receipt, the network control element may send requests to one or more context servers for information to determine the context of the call signal. One or more context servers may respond to the control element with information about the call signal context. The control element may then process the call signal based on the received context. This advantageously allows any network control element to tie a received call signal with other call signals associated with a telephone call and then process the received signal, without the call signal itself necessarily having an identifier of the call to which it pertains and/or of the particular network control element that is supposed to handle it.
In another embodiment, a method for processing multiple call signals may include receiving a request for context information from a network control element at a context server. Upon receipt, the context server may retrieve information it has about previous call signals associated with the same telephone call. The context server may send the retrieved information to the network control element so that the control element can process the current call signal. This advantageously allows the network control element to use previously processed call signals, which may have been processed by other network control elements, to process the current call signal.
In still another embodiment, a system may provide one or more network control elements to process multiple call signals during the life of a telephone call and one or more context servers to provide context information so that the network control elements can reliably process the call signals. This advantageously allows multiple call signals associated with the same call to be distributed between the network control elements and still tied together by each network control element in order to process its current call signal.
The telecommunication switches 110, the network control elements 130, and the signaling system 120 perform as described above regarding
In an embodiment, an intermediary routing node (not shown) in the signaling system 120 may distribute the call signals originating at the switches 110 between the control elements 130 in a balanced manner. The signals may be distributed by a simple round-robin method. Alternatively, the signals may be distributed by a weighting algorithm according to control element processing capability. Any other method capable of providing a balanced call signal distribution may be used. When a network control element is not available or has failed, the routing node may skip that element when distributing the call signals. After the element becomes available or is repaired, the routing node may resume call signal distribution thereto.
The context servers 250 may receive and store call signals from the network control elements 130. The context server 250 may further retrieve stored call signals and/or information pertaining thereto and forward the same back to the network control elements 130 upon receipt of a request for context information from a network control element 130. The context servers 250 may be any general purpose computer or like device and software capable of performing all or part of the method according to embodiments of the present invention.
A caller may place a call on the telephone 310, the cell phone 320, or the computer 340. A call may also be forwarded from the servers 330. The call may then be connected via the network 200. During the life of the call, call signals may be generated by the telecommunication switch 110 about the status of the call, e.g., connected, disconnected, busy, etc., or to command the network 200 or any network component to perform some operation related to the call, e.g., connect the call, disconnect the call, bill the call, etc.
A network control element may receive (410) a call signal from a telecommunication switch. The network control element may then determine (420) whether context information is needed in order to process the call signal. If context information is not needed, the network control element may process (425) the call signal. An example of when the network control element may not need context information is when the headers of the call signals consistently include control element identifiers because the same control element receives all the call signals associated with the call and can reliably tie the signals together. The network control element also may not need context information to process the first call signal in a call. After processing the call signal, the network control element may broadcast (455) the processed call signal and/or context information to the context servers for storage. Alternatively, the network control element may multicast or otherwise send the processed call signal and/or context information to one or more context servers.
If context information is needed (420), the network control element may broadcast (430) (or multicast or directly send) a request for context information about the call signal to all (or some, respectively) of the active context servers. The request may include a data key, e.g., a telephone number, billing account number, etc., which identifies the call.
After sending the request for context information, the network control element may wait (435) for replies from all or some the context servers, where the replies include the requested context information that matches the data key of the current call signal. This match indicates that the context information and the current call signal are associated with the same call. The context information may include a previously processed call signal and/or information about the previously processed signal. Information about the call signals may include the data key, the timestamp, i.e., the time that the call signal was originally received by a network control element from a telecommunication switch, the nature of the signal, e.g., whether it is a disconnect, connect, status, etc., signal.
If the network control element does not receive replies from all the relevant context servers within a specified time period (440), the network control element may stop waiting and examine the replies received within the time period. On the other hand, if the network control element receives replies from all the context servers before the time period expires (435), the network control element may stop waiting and proceed to examine the replies. Any appropriate method of selecting among one or more replies to consider is encompassed by the present invention.
The network control element may select (445) the received context information that has the most recent timestamp. This is because this context information may reflect the most recent status and activity of the call. As such, the current call signal may logically follow the signal to which the context information pertains, thereby efficiently narrowing the possibilities of what the current call signal means.
The network control element may then process (450) the current call signal based on the selected context information. If the processed call signal and/or its context information is to be used later (455), e.g., either during the current call for context processing of a subsequent call message or after the current call ends to update the call context for later tracing, the network control element may broadcast (460) the processed call signal and/or context information to the context servers for storage. Otherwise, the network control element may omit the broadcasting.
If the request is to store (520) the call signal just processed by the network control element, the context server may store (530) the timestamp, i.e., the time that the network control element received the call signal from a telecommunication switch, and the call signal, which includes the data key. In one embodiment, the context server may generate additional context information associated with the call signal and store that information for later use by the network control elements.
If the request is to retrieve (520) context information about the call signal currently received by the network control element, the context server may check (540) previously processed call signals that are stored in the server database to identify those having the same data key as the request.
If the context server has more than one previously processed call signal that matches the data key of the current call signal, the context server may retrieve (550) context information about the most recent of the previously processed call signals that match. If the context server only has one match, context information about that match may be retrieved. If there are no matches, the context server does not retrieve context information. The context servers may send (560) the retrieved context information to the requesting network control element.
In one embodiment, all the context servers may include at least some of the same context information. This level of redundancy provides the highest network reliability as long as one context server does not fail.
In an alternate embodiment, where there are storage or processor capacity limitations in the servers, for example, a partitioning rule may be applied at the network control elements to designate a subset of context servers to use. For example, a network control element may have assigned thereto context servers A-C; whereas, another network control element may have assigned thereto context servers D-F. Or a network control element may access context servers A-C if the call signal data key is within a certain range and context servers D-F if the call signal data key is within a different range. Other such partitioning rules may also be applied.
In another alternate embodiment, a partitioning rule may be dynamically applied while the system is running in order to provide context server scalability. For example, the number of subsets of context servers and/or the number of servers per subset may increase or decrease based on the performance and transaction requirements for the system.
An example of an implementation of embodiments of this invention is a wireless prepaid service in which multiple network components from multiple vendors work together to provide the prepaid service as set forth in the IS-826 standard in the ANSI-41 body of wireless standards.
The wireless telecommunication system may include telecommunication switches, i.e., mobile switching centers (MSC), network control elements, i.e., service control points (SCP), and context servers.
There are several call stages that a wireless prepaid call may go through during the life of the call. Those relevant for this example include: (a) an analysis stage, in which the MSC receives a mobile originated or terminated call, analyzes the dialed digits, and then awaits instructions from the SCP on whether to complete the call and where to route it once completed; (b) an answer stage, in which the call is routed for connection and the receiving party answers the call; (c) a busy stage, in which the call is routed for connection but, instead of the receiving party answering, the receiving end is busy; and (d) a disconnect stage, in which one of the parties hangs up the call and the MSC informs the SCP that the call is disconnected.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, after receiving a call signal, an SCP may request context information from the context servers about the call. The data key for each signal sent or received is a call id, which ties together multiple messages that are involved in the same call. As such, the SCP and the context server may readily identify messages from the same call via the call id. The data key included in the request can have different parts, such as a billing identification assigned by the MSC, a flag which tells whether the call was a mobile originated or terminated call, etc. In some cases, the billing identification may be sufficient to tie call signals associated with a given call together. In other cases, the mobile originated/terminated flag may be used to ensure that the data key is unique. In practice, the data key can cycle around every so often in a prepaid service. If this is the case, a data key should not continue to be used for longer than that cycle period.
In this example, the following call signals may originate at the MSC and be processed at the SCP during the life of a wireless prepaid call: “store-context-message,” “get-and-update-call-answer-message,” “get-and-update-call-disconnect-message,” “get-and-delete-context-message,” or “get-and-update-prepaid-timer-message.” The “get-and-update” call signal combines two operations “get” and “update” on the context server atomically. This advantageously avoids an out-of-order scenario, where the context server would receive the “update” signal prior to the “get” signal and therefore illogically try to update the call message on the context server before first finding the message thereon. By combining the two operations in one command, the context server may be assured of performing them in the appropriate order. Similarly, the “get-and-delete” call signal combines the “get” and “delete” operations on the context server atomically.
When the prepaid call reaches the analysis stage, the MSC may send a call signal to the SCP. The SCP may then access the prepaid subscriber's information to determine whether the subscriber has sufficient funds to complete the call and, if so, how long the call can last based on the amount of funds. The prepaid subscriber may be the caller, the called party, a third party, or a combination thereof. The SCP may broadcast “store-context-message” to the context servers for storage, where the message indicates the calling and called numbers, the amount of time the call can last, and related information. Since this is the first call signal for this prepaid call, the SCP may not require context information from the context servers in order to process the call signal. If there are sufficient funds to complete the call, the SCP may then send a message to the MSC to continue the call. Otherwise, the SCP may send a message to the MSC to discontinue the call.
When the prepaid call reaches the answer stage, the MSC may send a call signal to the SCP, which may broadcast “get-and-update-call-answer-message” to the context servers. This is a request for context information from the context servers regarding the previous call signal “store-context-message.” The context servers may update the answer time in their databases and return the answer time and the amount of time the call can last to the SCP as context information to use to process “get-and-update-call-answer-message.” The SCP may then process “get-and-update-call-answer-message,” which may cause a prepaid timer for the call to start. The SCP may send a message to the MSC to tear the call down after the timer expires. If the call ends because the prepaid timer is expired, the SCP may broadcast “get-and-update-prepaid-timer-message” to the context servers, which may be accessed by other SCPs so that any backup prepaid timers thereon for the call may be reset.
When the prepaid call reaches the disconnect stage, the MSC may send a call signal to the SCP that the call has been disconnected. The SCP may broadcast “get-and-delete-context-message”after the call is disconnected and the SCP has the information it needs from the context servers. This is a request for context information from the context servers regarding the previous call signal “get-and-update-call-answer-message.” The context servers may update the disconnect time in their databases and return the answer time, the disconnect time, and the calling and called numbers to the SCP as context information to use to process “get-and-delete-context-message.” The SCP may then process “get-and-delete-context-message,” which may cause an appropriate billing event to occur. The context servers may purge the context information from their databases.
Several embodiments of the invention are specifically illustrated and/or described herein. However, it will be appreciated that modifications and variations of the invention are covered by the above teachings and within the purview of the appended claims without departing from the spirit and intended scope of the invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5896441 *||Dec 16, 1996||Apr 20, 1999||Fujitsu Limited||Communication state management system and method in an intelligent network|
|US5933474 *||Dec 24, 1996||Aug 3, 1999||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Telecommunications call preservation in the presence of control failure and high processing load|
|US6205557 *||Jun 9, 1998||Mar 20, 2001||At&T Corp.||Redundant call processing|
|US6393415||Mar 31, 1999||May 21, 2002||Verizon Laboratories Inc.||Adaptive partitioning techniques in performing query requests and request routing|
|US6408063||Oct 5, 1999||Jun 18, 2002||Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd.||Method and arrangement for complementing a telephone connection with additional information|
|US6470081||Apr 21, 1998||Oct 22, 2002||Sprint Communications Company L.P.||Telecommunications resource connection and operation using a service control point|
|US6539082 *||May 7, 1999||Mar 25, 2003||British Telecommunications Public Limited Company||Billing system|
|US6718022 *||Aug 23, 1999||Apr 6, 2004||Aspect Communications Corporation||Method and apparatus for universal call identification|
|US6731730 *||Jul 10, 2000||May 4, 2004||Ectel Ltd.||Method and system for creating combined call detail records databases (CDR) in management systems of communication networks|
|US6760426||Jan 5, 2001||Jul 6, 2004||Sprint Communications Company, L.P.||Method and system for handling operator calls in a communication network|
|US6768793 *||May 30, 2002||Jul 27, 2004||Sprint Communications Company L.P.||Telecommunications resource connection and operation using a service control point|
|US6920320 *||Sep 30, 2002||Jul 19, 2005||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Method and apparatus for stable call preservation|
|US7209964||Apr 5, 2004||Apr 24, 2007||Verizon Business Global Llc||Intelligent network|
|US7529356 *||Apr 26, 2005||May 5, 2009||Cisco Technology, Inc.||Billing for telecommunication calls over decentralized packet networks|
|US7583794 *||Dec 21, 2004||Sep 1, 2009||At&T Corp.||Method and apparatus for providing end-to-end call completion status|
|US20020064149||Jun 14, 2001||May 30, 2002||Elliott Isaac K.||System and method for providing requested quality of service in a hybrid network|
|US20020161804 *||Apr 26, 2001||Oct 31, 2002||Patrick Chiu||Internet-based system for multimedia meeting minutes|
|US20040001517 *||Sep 9, 2002||Jan 1, 2004||Compaq Information Technologies Group, L.P.||Sigtran user adaptation proxy load balancer|
|US20050216421||Apr 28, 2005||Sep 29, 2005||Mci. Inc.||Integrated business systems for web based telecommunications management|
|US20050281399 *||Jun 20, 2005||Dec 22, 2005||Tekelec||Methods, systems, and computer program products for selecting or generating a single call detail record (CDR) from a plurality of CDRs associated with a call having a plurality of legs|
|US20060002534 *||Sep 7, 2005||Jan 5, 2006||Lang Howard L||Method for determining concurrent voice over IP calls|
|US20080063165||Jan 8, 2007||Mar 13, 2008||Verisign, Inc.||System and method for dynamically partitioning context servers|
|U.S. Classification||379/133, 379/134, 379/112.01, 379/230|
|International Classification||H04M15/00, H04M7/00|
|Cooperative Classification||H04Q2213/13106, H04Q3/0029, H04Q2213/13103, H04L65/1066, H04Q2213/13167, H04Q2213/13345, H04M3/42374, H04M7/0057|
|European Classification||H04L29/06M2S, H04M3/42S2, H04Q3/00D3|
|Aug 24, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: VERISIGN, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GALLANT, JOHN KENNETH;REEL/FRAME:018216/0992
Effective date: 20060823
|Mar 13, 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4