|Publication number||US8022329 B2|
|Application number||US 11/885,231|
|Publication date||Sep 20, 2011|
|Filing date||Dec 7, 2005|
|Priority date||Dec 7, 2004|
|Also published as||EP1833292A2, EP1833292A4, EP1833292B1, EP1833619A2, EP1833619A4, EP1836007A2, EP1836007A4, EP1836007B1, EP2374549A2, EP2374549A3, EP2374549B1, US7928336, US8143548, US8326450, US20080164185, US20080230449, US20090005900, US20110095154, WO2006063121A2, WO2006063121A3, WO2006063125A2, WO2006063125A3, WO2006063204A2, WO2006063204A3|
|Publication number||11885231, 885231, PCT/2005/44560, PCT/US/2005/044560, PCT/US/2005/44560, PCT/US/5/044560, PCT/US/5/44560, PCT/US2005/044560, PCT/US2005/44560, PCT/US2005044560, PCT/US200544560, PCT/US5/044560, PCT/US5/44560, PCT/US5044560, PCT/US544560, US 8022329 B2, US 8022329B2, US-B2-8022329, US8022329 B2, US8022329B2|
|Inventors||Denis J. Stemmle, Douglas B. Quine|
|Original Assignee||Lockheed Martin Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (118), Non-Patent Citations (10), Referenced by (3), Classifications (14), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/634,014 filed Dec. 7, 2004 which is also incorporated by reference herein.
The present invention relates generally to mail sorting, and more particularly to one-pass carrier sequence sorting, and multi-pass sorting systems.
Many posts around the world are seeking to develop a more effective mail merging system that automatically merges all mail streams and sorts them to delivery sequence. The system should accomplish this merging at the step of carrier sequence sorting by merging all elements of the mail stream (letters, flats, periodicals, post cards etc) at the final sorting process.
At present, some of the mail streams arrive at the postal branch offices pre-sorted, and some do not. Generally, even when the mail arrives at the branch already sorted by delivery sequence, postal carriers need to merge multiple streams of mail (often as many as 10) from different mail trays—and for this the postal carriers generally use a manual sorting process. When mail does not arrive at the branch pre-sorted, the carriers spend-even more time—several hours—sorting the mail into carrier delivery sequence manually. Often, the carrier on mechanized routes will complete the mail merging while sitting at each post box—merging mail from multiple mail trays on the spot before placing it in the mailbox. This requires carriers to spend substantial time merging and sorting the mail before they can start to deliver it, or else they must complete the merging while they are delivering the mail, thus making the mail delivery process (the last mile) quite inefficient. The instant invention corrects that inefficiency in an automated manner that accommodates not only normal types of mail, but also mail pieces having exceptional physical characteristics.
In 1990, the United States Postal Service (USPS) issued a Request for Proposal for a carrier sequence bar code sorter, type B, a single pass sorter to arrange mail in carrier delivery sequence. To date, 14 years later, no product has been manufactured and delivered to satisfy that need.
Today, many posts sort a percentage of letters to delivery sequence at central sorting facilities. Letters and flats are currently sorted separately on different pieces of sorting equipment designed to sort only a limited range of mail piece types. The sorting is done centrally because the equipment required to automate this process is simply too large to fit in the branches. The cost would be prohibitive for the USPS to install such equipment in each branch. Furthermore, sorting centrally is also much more efficient, since the only sorters available today are multiple pass sorters which may include over a hundred bins and may require two or more sort sequences to get the mail in delivery sequence order. However, when the carrier delivery sequence sorting is done centrally and separately on each different category of mail (letters, flats, and others), and then sent to branch offices, the carriers must still spend the first two to three hours of their day merging and sorting flats, periodicals, brochures, and all the other mail that could not be sorted to delivery sequence automatically. For many posts, all the mail is still sorted by the carriers manually into delivery sequence.
The sorters available today have significant limitations: they are either huge, expensive pieces of equipment with a very large number of bins, and require significant space to operate; or they have a smaller number of bins, but require multiple passes to operate. This multi-pass operation is a very labor-intensive process. So, for example, a sorter with 16 bins, sorting a batch of mail to 600 addresses, will require three passes. That means the operator must load the mail, operate the sorter, then unload the mail from each bin and re-load it into the feeder three times. While this results in some time savings compared to manual sorting, the value proposition is limited because of the high labor content. See, for example, US Patent Application Publication No. 20020139726 entitled Single Feed One Pass Mixed Mail Sequencer, filed Apr. 2, 2001.
Unfortunately, even the best available mail sorting systems are prone to failure, especially when dealing with mail pieces having exceptional physical characteristics (e.g. due to exceptional bulk, size, or weight). Even with standard, conventional letters, the best available sorters can jam and shut down, thereby reducing efficiency.
Another application for the instant invention is for sorting incoming mail in enterprises. The manual method is still the most common method that enterprises use to sort their incoming mail. This is also very labor intensive, but the investment required and the size of available mail sortation equipment is generally prohibitive.
The postal services around the world have been investing heavily in automated mail sorting systems over the past several years. The systems currently planned or currently being used have several limitations with respect to the invention disclosed herein. Such systems are designed to sort letters only, or flats only, but not both in combination. This results in multiple mail streams that must be manually merged by the carriers, making the carrier inefficient. Another limitation is that such systems use conventional, high speed mail handling technology, in which the mail pieces undergo multiple high accelerations, stops, starts, twists, inversions, deflections, and other manipulations; which results in undesirable jams and damage to the mail. A further limitation is that the existing systems require multiple passes (multiple feedings and multiple unloadings of the sorter bins) in order to sort mail to the delivery sequence for a carrier route. This requires a substantial amount of manual labor to load mail into the feeders and unload the sorters multiple times, and increases the risk of jams and damage because of the multiple passes of each mail piece. This also requires careful sequencing during load, which is a process prone to human error.
The address reading and interpretation systems are far from perfect (and probably will be well into the future). So, the automated sorting is usually augmented by a video encoding scheme in which images of the unreadable addresses are captured, transmitted to a remote video encoding site at which a human interprets the addresses and keys in the interpretation, then sends this “correct information” back to the sorter where it is printed in encoded form on the mail. While this encoding operation is happening, the unreadable mail must be stored either in a buffer in the sorter transport, or in a bin for later manual re-loading into the sorter. This system is complex, expensive, and involves multiple extra steps—but is necessary because of the limitations of the address reading technology.
Because the sorting equipment tends to be very large and very expensive, the posts emphasize operating it at very high speeds, and with very high capacities. Thus, the automated sorting operations are only installed in large centralized sorting facilities. The sorted mail is then shipped to the local destination delivery unit (DDU), where it is loaded on the vehicles used by the carriers. Note that a “delivery destination unit” (DDU) is sometimes called a “delivery office,” and therefore a DDU also refers to a “delivery office” throughout this application. However, because the mail is sorted centrally, the carrier must still spend 2.5 to 3 hours each day manually sorting mail that arrived at the DDU and mail that could not be sorted automatically. While on the route, the carrier than merges the mail sorted automatically with the mail sorted manually, which makes the carriers even less efficient.
Because the existing sorting equipment is operated at very high speeds, a large percentage of the current mail streams cannot be handled reliably with the existing equipment. An average of about 20% of mail received at the posts is “non-machinable” with the existing high speed equipment. Often, hundreds of workers are employed to manually identify and cull out this mail for separate handling before the machinable mail is loaded into the high speed sorters. The non-machinable mail requires a significant amount of manual manipulation, storing, transportation, and sorting. It would be very desirable to reduce the amount of non-machinable mail.
Recently, some progress has been made in dealing with the aforementioned problems. For example, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/589,634, filed Jul. 21, 2004 is incorporated herein by reference, and is a previous version of the present invention. That previous version used a folder/divider system for escorting mail through a sortation system, and thus had various drawbacks, such as difficulties with the unload step, and the possibility of jams while moving the mail pieces out of the folder/dividers. That previous version disclosed a method for sorting a wide variety of mail piece sizes and weights in a single pass. The paper handling architecture described therein improved upon previous mail sorters in that during the sorting operation, the mail is contained within folder/dividers, and the mechanism to transport the mail operates on the folder/divider, not the mail itself. Nevertheless a folder/divider system is not an optimum method for efficiently sorting mail, and it would be advantageous to use a different technique that extends the capabilities or Application 60/589,634 while reducing the amount of paper handling required.
One of the features of the USPS Intelligent MailŪ products and services is the ability to track ordinary mail pieces from ingestion into the post to the final delivery. Frequently, the planet codes are employed to enable this process. Planet codes, however, can only be used to track the mail to the last point where the planet code was scanned, usually in a sorting operation. Other special handling items, such as registered mail, can be scanned by the postal carrier using a hand held scanner at the point of delivery. This operation takes considerable time on the part of the carrier, and is not really suitable to use for tracking all intelligent mail pieces.
In U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/589634, filed Jul. 21, 2004, owned by the present assignee, the disclosure addressed the USPS DPP initiative, which proposes to wrap all the mail for each address into a single bundle to facilitate delivery. That disclosure proposed the following solution: An ink jet printer could print a unique bar code on each wrapped packet—and the system software links this code with all of the bar codes, planet codes, Postnet barcodes, and any other scanned and stored information on the surface of the mail piece. When the carrier delivers the entire packet, the carrier scans only the external barcode at each address—and the software links this in the system memory with all the pieces in the packet. So, only one scan is required per delivery point, regardless of the number of coded mail pieces are bundled in the packet. An interesting alternative is possible with the use of RFID tags affixed to the wrapper material either instead of or in addition to the printing subsystem. So, during the wrapping process, the RFID tag could be provided with a unique identifier for each packet, which would be associated and linked with all the information (codes, etc) previously scanned on each or the enclosed mail pieces. This technology will make the carrier even more efficient at the point of each delivery. Instead of a separate action to scan a bar code on the wrapper, the carrier carries an RFID interrogator unit to read the information on each RFID tag as the bundle is being delivered, and provide feedback information to the central database that all the contents of the bundle were delivered at the noted time. Additionally, the RFID interrogator unit could be adapted to include an audio capability so that when the information is extracted from the wrapper by RFID interrogation, and if one or more pieces of mail in the packet requires action on the part of the carrier (example, get the receiver's signature), the carrier can be prompted or alerted audibly by the RFID unit to take the required action.
These concepts for tracking the mail enabled by the information generated during the sorting operations are dependent on the USPS intent to bundle the mail for each delivery point into a single packet. Recently, the USPS has conducted a marketing survey on this concept, and has discovered that the mailers and the mail receivers do not like it. So, there is a real possibility that the USPS will abandon the idea of putting the mail into packets; and therefore, as described in provisional patent application U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/589634, the opportunity to employ the methods previously disclosed to track the mail all the way to the delivery point may be lost.
According to the present invention, each mail piece is singulated, then captured by a clamp. From that point on, all mechanical operations act on the clamp, and the mail piece is not touched by either the operator or the sorter equipment. Because all the clamps are substantially identical in shape and composition, they can be manipulated by the machinery with a high degree of reliability. This configuration overcomes nearly all the limitations of existing sorters. The present system is capable of handling the entire diversity of the shapes, sizes and weights of mail stream with a consistent reliability. The principle of this invention is: do not handle the mail, but instead handle the clamps.
With respect to the drawbacks described above for existing mail sorter systems, the present system has a large variety of advantages. The present system automatically handles letters, flats, postcards, periodicals, odd shaped mail pieces, and even parcels up to a specified, maximum thickness, simultaneously, and intermixed in any order or combination. This system has orders of magnitude wider material handling latitude without adjustments. This capability significantly enhances efficiency.
Also, the present system touches/handles each mail piece only once to singulate and load it into a clamp. After that, there is no more mail handling—only clamp handling. Thus, even with the full gamut of mail piece types, sizes, weights, conditions, etc, the system will be dramatically more reliable (fewer jams) than conventional sorting systems.
Moreover, the present system is capable of sorting all mail into carrier delivery sequence in a single pass. There is no need for manual unloading and reloading the sorter for multiple pass operations. Thus, the present system not only completes the job more quickly than conventional sorters, but requires far less labor in the process.
Additionally, the present system eliminates the need to handle the non-readable mail separately. All mail is handled in exactly the same way. Every mail piece is fed, read, clamped, and moved into the sorter system whether the address is readable or not. Video encoded data is appended to the mail piece location electronically. There is no need to spray on additional information, which saves the cost of the printing subsystem. And there is no need to store the mail during the video encoding step. So, the present sorter is much more compact and less expensive because these subsystems (printing and temporary storage transports) are not required.
Additionally, the present sorter is modular, so it can be configured to any size, capacity, or shape, to fit existing facilities without modification. A relatively small version of this sorter can fit in each DDU and complete the final sort for each route just before the sorted mail is loaded onto the trucks—so that all the mail that arrives at the DDU can be included in the one and only sort operation. This makes the carriers very efficient by eliminating about 2.5 hours or mail sorting each day, and further eliminates time at each address merging multiple streams of mail manually.
Not only is the present machine more reliable because it handles clamps rather than mail in a single pass, but it is also more reliable because it operates at slow speeds while maintaining very high sorting throughput rates. This maximizes system up-time with jam-free operation, and substantially fewer maintenance operations.
The system can process mail from three or more different routes simultaneously: one in the feeding operation, a second route in the sorting operation, and a third route in the unload and traying operation. This significantly reduces job time per route. Only the steps of singulating the mail and transporting it to the clamping operation are not escorted.
For all transporting, sorting, and unloading operations, the system handles and manipulates the clamp, not the mail. After unloading, clamps are retained in the system and re-circulated. The present system is fully modular, so that any capacity or footprint can be easily configured without customizing the design of the component modules.
Various aspects of the present invention improve upon the sorter disclosed in the provisional patent application U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/589634, filed Jul. 21, 2004. One such improvement is loading each mail piece into a clamp, and handling the clamps rather than the mail pieces. Another improvement is recycling empty clamps back to the feeder. Additionally, the present invention employs a single pass system that sorts to carrier sequence by moving unsorted mail on a first transport, and moving sorted mail to a second transport in a specific sequence, using clamps and clamp driving means to convey the mail. Further improvements included in the present invention are: feeding the clamped mail pieces into a queue before starting the sorting step, and also performing three separate operations (feeding, sorting, and unloading) simultaneously with three separate batches of mail associated with three separate routes. The present system handles non-machine readable mail in exactly the same fashion as machine readable mail. (Also, eliminates the need to print additional information on non-readable mail.) Other innovations of the present invention include a clamp management system in which the clamps are oriented upside down for loading, right side up for sorting, then upside down again for unloading; a clamp management system in which the clamps can be moved from one drive system to at least one additional drive system (for sorting); and a clamp management system in which clamps can be initially spaced at a distance from one another, and then subsequently the distance removed so that the clamps abut one another. Also included in the present invention is a sorting system in which the mail pieces are handled in an orientation in which the faces of the mail pieces are perpendicular to the direction of motion throughout all sorting operations in order to reduce the system footprint and operate at slow speeds without reducing the sorting throughput rate.
According to the sorting system of the present invention, the system accepts a group of mail pieces at a loading station, sorts the group of mail pieces into a desired delivery sequence according to delivery information on the mail pieces, and then moves the mail pieces to at least one unloading station. The system includes a reader for retrieving delivery information associated with each mail piece, and also includes clamps dimensioned for receipt of a mail piece into each clamp. The system has means for placing each mail piece into one of the clamps, and means for creating an association between the retrieved delivery information of each mail piece and its respective clamp. The system also has a sorter for moving the clamps which hold the mail pieces, based upon the association of each clamp with the retrieved delivery information, so that the mail pieces held by the clamps are sorted according to the desired sequence. Additionally, the system includes means for opening the sorted clamps to release the mail pieces at the unloading station.
The accompanying drawings illustrate presently preferred embodiments of the invention, and together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention. As shown throughout the drawings, like reference numerals designate like or corresponding parts.
This invention is an automated mail sorter that handles many types of mail (e.g. letters, flats, postcards, periodicals, odd shaped mail pieces, and even parcels up to a specified thickness), in a single sorting operation. It is able to sort to carrier delivery sequence in a single pass and automatically load the sorted mail into mail trays, which can be directly loaded onto the carrier's mail truck. In this embodiment of the invention, the mail is touched only once by the operator and by the sorter. The best mode embodiment described in this section is presented by way of example, and thus does not limit or narrow the claimed invention, but rather explains in detail one way of implementing the invention, among many other ways.
As mentioned, the instant invention provides a significant improvement to the sorter disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/589634, by replacing the folder/divider system for escorting mail with a mail clamping system. Each mail piece is singulated and transported past an image capture station, then loaded into a clamp. While the mail piece is being transported to the clamp loading operation, optional additional steps could also be performed such as measuring the dimensions of the mail piece, weighing it, or printing information on it. After loading, all operations required for moving, sorting, and unloading the mail pieces are performed on the clamp, and not the mail. In fact, the instant sorter is expected to be capable of handling the entire range of mail piece types, including post cards, letters, flats, periodicals, magazines, newspapers, and even parcels up to a specified thickness—all randomly intermixed—with world class performance with respect to shutdown and jam rates. This claim is enabled by the disclosed architecture, especially the aspect of manipulating the clamps without touching the mail.
Besides the overall concept for handling mail using clamps, practical details such as how to get the mail pieces into the clamp, how to remove the mail from the clamp, how to propel the clamps, and how to move the clamps through multiple drive mechanisms for the various functions to be accomplished are important details. This following description addresses those various requirements, as well as providing a clamp that is inexpensive to fabricate, and thin enough to keep the overall footprint of the sorter to a minimum.
The term “full escort” system is based on the principle of “the best way to handle mail is to not handle it.” “Full escort” means capturing the mail (having wide diversity in sizes, shapes, weights, etc) in an escort device (having uniform and controllable shape), and manipulate the escort device without having to touch the mail. Developing reliable and repeatable mechanisms is achievable when the control systems and all mechanical parts can be specified by the design engineer. Developing a reliable system that directly handles the mail itself is far more difficult because the engineer has no control over the parameters associated with the mail pieces. Typically, in current sorters, the range of mail pieces to be handled has been artificially limited to only a portion of the mail stream (letters only, for example, or flats only), and by manually removing mail pieces that are prone to causing shutdowns in the current sorting equipment, in order to achieve some level of mail handling reliability.
To date, no product exists that can successfully handle the wide diversity of mail piece types at any level of reliability. That is one of the goals which the instant invention can help to achieve.
A mail clamp capable of grasping and holding a range of mail piece sizes—from post cards up to a specified thickness for parcels—in order to escort the mail pieces through a “full escort” sorter system is disclosed herein. The clamp used in the present invention includes features for supporting the clamp and mail piece from a set of rails, and for driving the clamp along paths using lead screws on either side of the clamp by engaging one of two tabs on either side of the clamp. The clamp further includes a method for opening the jaws of the clamp for loading and unloading mail pieces, and an additional tab feature for engaging a drive to move the clamps laterally from one drive system to a second drive system. The clamp drive systems include methods for advancing the clamps in a linear direction, moving the clamps laterally for sorting, moving the clamps through a 180 degree turn in a horizontal plane, a 180 degree turn in a vertical plane for inverting the clamp, a 180 degree turn through a helical path, and a 180 degree turn along a path that lifts the clamp from a first level to a second level. The clamps remain captured by the sorter drives at all times, and are re-circulated through the sorter for re-use from one job to the next.
The clamps used in the present invention enable a full escort sorting system in which all mechanical interactions are between the drives and the clamps, and the mail piece itself is not touched after it is singulated. This will result in unprecedented reliability in mail handling without jams or shutdowns.
The disclosed clamp has—in this embodiment—a width of less than 0.2″ in order to compress the mail piece pitch to 0.2″, thereby insuring the sorter has a small footprint.
The clamp used in the present invention is capable of grasping and exerting sufficient force to hold mail pieces as small as a single thickness of paper, and also thick mail piece or parcels up to a specified maximum thickness. This enables intermixing almost the entire mail stream in random order within the sorter.
The clamp and associated drive system further includes the capability to escort the sorted mail pieces directly into a mail tray so that even the sorter unloading is fully automated, thereby saving substantial labor normally associated with postal sorting unloading operations. Such automated unloading is described below.
The clamp and associated drive systems are capable of manipulating the clamp through many different paths of the sorter to achieve sorting in a single pass. The paths include linear segments, curved segments in horizontal and vertical directions, lateral segments in which the drive control is passed from one clamp transport to another, and a helical path in which the clamp and mail piece are vertically inverted. Additionally, drives associated with opening and closing the clamp to acquire, and unload mail pieces are included.
The system and method just described allows the sorter to operate with the major functions overlapping in order to reduce average job time. The queue station after the feeder enables the feeding for the second route to occur simultaneously with the sorting of the first route's mail. The compression of the sorted mail and advancement toward the sort station begins as soon as the last of the unsorted mail moves past the first sorting station—so that the transporting time to move the mail to the unload station occurs simultaneously with the sorting time. And, the unloading operation for a first batch of addresses occurs simultaneously with the sorting for the second batch of addresses. This results in a highly efficient system when multiple routs of mail need to be sorted.
The single tier embodiment just described can be expanded to multiple tiers, in which the operation is similar to a single tier system, except that central transport moves the pre-sorted mail upward from tier to tier in a rectangular upward spiral 201. As shown in
Referring now to
The two flexible jaw elements 347 and 348 have a number of significant features. A spring steel construction is capable of flexing a sufficient amount to hold a parcel of specified thickness (for example, 1″ maximum thickness), and capable of exerting sufficient clamping force on the parcel to support its weight. A means 350 is provided to affix the two jaw elements to the support element 345. Bent tab segments 352 on the end of the jaws allow pieces as thin as a single sheet of paper 354 to be grasped by the jaws with sufficient force to support the mail without damaging it. Two tabs 356 on the edges of each of the jaw elements are suitable for periodically engaging lead screws 358 located on both sides of the clamp simultaneously for purposes of opening the clamp to receive or unload mail pieces 354, as shown in
Additionally, as shown in
The clamp of the present invention is propelled though the sorter by a number of different drive elements. These include the following. The fixed pitch lead screw 340 shown in
The empty clamps 300 are transported to the loading point by the lead screws 410, and at that point the pitch of the lead screw increases to open the jaws of the clamp. Once the mail piece is inserted in the jaws, the lead screw pitch narrows to close the clamp and capture the mail piece. The lead screws 410 mate to the coil springs 420 for inverting the clamped mail 180 degrees, thus turning it upside down for transporting and sorting operations. The coil springs 420 mate to two more lead screws 460 to complete the mail inversion. Drive control of the clamps is passed from the bottom two lead screws to a long lead screw, which transports the clamps and mail past all the sorting stations.
Automated Sorter Unloading and Unique Mail Tray Configuration:
With current mail sorting technology, often the task of unloading the sorter bins—either to re-load mail back into the sorter for a second or third pass, or to load the sorted mail into mail trays for delivery—is a manual process. The cost of operating automated sorting equipment is dominated by the cost of labor, especially the unloading (sweeping) process. This cost contributes to the cost of postage because it is a significant cost of processing the mail.
The challenges of developing a stacking system that automatically unloads mixed mail directly into a mail tray are huge. Prior art is likely to be limited to stackers that work only when the sizes of items to be stacked are relatively uniform (letters or flats, but not intermixed.) These stackers typically take stacked or shingled mail and transport it to the edge of a transport belt, and cascade it into a tray below. For these limited size stackers, the drop distance is limited to slightly less than the height of a typical piece. With mixed mail stackers, however, the sorted mail to be unloaded includes all sizes of mail intermixed in a random fashion. There is no obvious solution for how to cascade the mixed mail from a transport on which the bottom edges of the mail are registered on the transport (as is typical in conventional sorters) into a tray in which the bottom edges of the mail are again registered to the bottom of the tray. With the typical cascading method, the drop distance for the mail must approximate the tallest piece of sorted mail. Thus, there is a high probability that when a shorter mail piece is stacked, the next piece will fall down on the top edge of the previous piece, thus making an untidy stack and probably putting the sorted mail pieces back out of order. It is imperative to keep the mail pieces in the correct order, or the entire sorting operation was a waste of time.
Additionally, the current mail trays used by the USPS have a limited life, and must be replaced frequently. This cost is also contributes to the cost of postage, albeit a more minor contribution. These current mail trays are also awkward to transport. Often, the weight of the mail in the tray will cause the middle of the tray to sag, which requires supporting the center of the tray with hands rather than using the two hand holds on the ends of the trays. It would be preferable to have more rigid trays that do not sag in the middle.
Finally, the USPS has two standard types of mail trays: one for letters, in which the mail is stood on edge in the tray; and the other for flats, in which the mail lays flat in the tray. These two types of trays are different sizes, and each is incompatible with handling the mail of the other type.
The following is a description of the auto-unload process, including the design of mail trays to be compatible with the automatic unloading process. Most of the manual labor required for sweeping the sorter into mail trays is eliminated, thereby saving the postal service billions of labor dollars each year.
The problems associated with cascading a row of mail into a mail tray are avoided by using the mail clamps to drive (escort) the mail into the tray, then releasing the jaws of the clamps once the mail is safely in the tray. Rather than depending on the mail to fall in a predictable fashion once dropped off the end of a transport, the mail is driven to the exact position in the tray where it will be stacked before it is released from the clamps. One benefit of the disclosed method is that the clamps are inverted before reaching the stacking area such that registered edge of the mail (the edge clamped by the clamps) is a very short distance above the bottom of the tray when the clamps are opened. In this way, the mail is in the correct position when released, and it has only a very short distance to settle into the tray. It cannot be mis-stacked, and the mail cannot be disordered from the properly sorted order.
Additionally, the design for the tray used in the present invention extends the life of the mail tray such that the trays do not have to be replaced as frequently, and improve the ergonomics of handling the trays. Both of these improvements will save additional costs to the posts. The trays can also be handled in automated processes for feeding empty trays into the unloading system, and transporting the filled trays to the loading dock.
The disclosed tray configuration will successfully contain the entire range of mail that can be handled by the sorter (postcards, flats, letters, brochures, periodicals, and parcels up to a maximum specified thickness such as 1″). All of these types of mail, randomly intermixed, are stacked in the tray in the sorted order. The mail is optionally stacked in the tray in the orientation preferred by the posts: either standing on edge, or lying flat in the tray. In either orientation, the addresses are face up so they can be read by the carrier. As will now be described in further detail, the present embodiment of the invention uses the first type of stacking—mail pieces standing on edge.
An automated sorted mail unloading system having mail clamps in which the clamps are inverted and driven directly into mail trays. Once in the correct position inside the tray, the jaws of the clamps are opened, thus releasing the mail when it is in its exact stacked position. The mail does not need to free-fall into the tray. Hence, what is disclosed is a full escort mail stacking system which stacks a wide variety of intermixed mail sizes without ever directly handling the mail pieces. The tray translates in a direction parallel with the mail path at a rate compatible with fill rate.
The advantages of such an automated sorted mail unloading system are as follows. The system provides automated stacking of sorted mail of intermixed sizes and types directly into mail trays without the need for a mechanism to touch the mail pieces directly, thereby eliminating significant labor from the mail sorting process. The system provides a more robust mail tray that are easier to handle and will last substantially longer than the current mail trays used by the USPS. The system provides a tray capable of storing the entire range of mixed mail to be delivered by the carriers in an orientation in which the addresses are easily readable.
The elements of an automated sorted mail unloading system in accordance with the present invention include a sorting system in which the mail pieces are first clamped in a mail clamp, and the clamp is driven through the sorting paths by appropriate drive mechanisms. The output of the sorter and the input to the stacker is a line of clamps, each holding a mail piece, sorted into a desired sequence. This aspect of the invention also includes a method for inverting clamps so that the registered edge of the mail is the bottom edge of each piece; thus, the variable height of the mail pieces are on the top side of the row of mail pieces. Also included is a method for driving the clamps holding the mail through a slot in the bottom surface of the tray (i.e. the bottom surface in this embodiment), as well as a method for releasing the jaws of the clamps after the mail is in the correct position of the tray, and a method for moving the tray in the same direction as the clamped mail moves, and at a rate consistent with the fill rate. Furthermore, in this embodiment, the system comprises a clamp path in which a portion of the clamp holding the mail is initially above the bottom of the tray when the mail pieces are moved into the tray, and then the clamp drops to a position below the tray after the jaws of the clamps have been opened to release the mail pieces. The mail tray of this system has three walls, an open end with a lip, a base with a slot cut therein compatible with the path of the clamps, said tray capable of containing the entire range of mail sizes oriented on edge with the addresses oriented top side up so as to be easily readable. The mail tray is designed to be rigid, nestable, and stackable. An alternative tray configuration has four walls and a bottom, with a slot cut in one of the walls of sufficient dimension to be compatible with the dimension of the clamps. In this alternative, mail is moved directly into the tray and released from the clamps in an orientation such that the faces of the mail pieces are parallel with the bottom of the mail tray. This type of mail tray is also designed to be rigid, stackable, and nestable.
Single Pass Sorter and Delivery Scanner:
According to the system of the present invention, the location of mail pieces can be tracked using a clamp-based sorter and delivery scanner. It will be appreciated that with conventional mail sorting equipment in which the mail pieces are unloaded from the sorter and placed in mail trays by hand, the exact identity of the mail pieces in each tray is lost. By contrast, with the automated unloading invention described above, the identity of each mail piece going into each tray can be preserved, and associated in a data base with additional identifiers loaded into the trays or affixed to the trays.
The present invention includes an alternative method of tracking mail beyond the last scanner on the automated sorting equipment, and substantially reduces the amount of carrier time required to physically scan either the mail or the packets. Assuming that mail will not be bundled for each address, and therefore the carrier cannot scan a code or an RFID tag on each packet, the sorter could do one of two things.
First, the sorter could insert dividers to separate the mail for one address and the next, and these dividers could each have a unique bar code printed thereon, or an RFID tag affixed thereto. Since the sorter is configured to remember all the bar codes, planet codes, postnet barcodes, and any other information on the surface of each mail piece, the system software could link that information on each piece for each address with the bar code or RFID tag on the divider. So, the carrier would scan the divider rather than the packet.
The benefits of this approach include full capture of all available information about each mail piece delivered while having to scan only one item per address. The disadvantages are that the carrier will still have to scan once per address, which will take additional time, and therefore make the carrier less efficient. The previously disclosed concept of having an RFID reader capture the information (and provide audible alerts) still apply to this version, and this will save time but cost more capital investment. Another disadvantage is that the carrier must carry the additional weight of the dividers, and deliver them back to the sorting system for re-cycling.
Second, an interesting alternative is to eliminate the dividers and associate all of the information about each mail piece captured by the sorter with a bar code or RFID tag on the mail tray. So, for example, mail for 50 addresses might be loaded into a single tray. While the mail pieces are being stacked in the tray, the system logic would associate the information captured by the sorter for each mail piece being loaded into a tray with the bar code or RFID code on that tray. The carrier would then scan the code (bar code or RFID code) when the tray was emptied (indicating that all the mail for those 50 addresses has been delivered for a mounted route), or while loading a tray's worth of mail into the mail bag for delivery (indicating that all the mail for those 50 addresses is about to be delivered on a walking route.) In either case, the time of delivery is effectively identified within about an hour's time of actual delivery.
For this version, since the carrier already returns empty trays back to the DDU at the end of the route, no additional actions are required for this task as they would be for returning the dividers. Secondly, the total number of bar code scans is limited to the number of trays of mail per route, which is far less inefficient than scanning something at each address. Thirdly, the bar codes or RFID tags could be permanently affixed to the trays, thereby having a long life and saving money.
With either alternative, when the RFID technology is employed (either on dividers or on mail trays), the RFID reader could be a device on the mail truck, or a portable unit mounted on the carrier, or a portable unit employed at a temporary storage box for walking routes, which would capture and record the information when the carrier performs an ordinary movement. For walking routes, this ordinary movement might be an action such as picking mail out of a bag and switching it across the carrier's body from the left hand to the right hand—on a path that brings the mail (and divider) in closer proximity to the RFID reader. Or, it might be the action of moving the divider into a special pouch on the mailbag—and the information is captured by the RFID reader when each divider is stored there. In the case of RFID tags on mail trays on a mounted route, the reader could be located where the carrier places the empty trays, and the code read for each newly emptied tray stacked for storage. These concepts would further reduce the number of actions required of the carrier, and thereby provide the full tracking of the mail without making the carrier less efficient.
A method for capturing delivery time information for Intelligent Mail pieces sorted on the previously disclosed Single Pass Delivery Sequence Mail Sorter system. All the bar codes, planet codes, postnet barcodes, and any other scanned and stored information on the surface of each mail piece when it is fed into the sorter will be remembered after the mail pieces are sorted and loaded into mail trays, and the information for all mail pieces loaded into a tray will be associated with a bar code or RFID tag on the mail tray. Alternatively, the bar code or RFID tag could be on dividers inserted by the sorter to separate mail destined for each delivery point. The carrier scans only the code on the divider at each address, or the code on each mail tray when the tray is emptied—and thereby captures information on the approximate time each piece was delivered. In the tray case, the delivery time is isolated to within a short time window required to deliver one tray full of mail to the addresses for that mail. If RFID technology is deployed, the carrier need not take any extra actions to capture the information.
For the code-on-dividers version, this embodiment tracks all the mail all the way to the delivery point. It requires the carrier to scan only one item per address, but information is captured about all mail pieces delivered. If RFID tags are used, the RFID reader can be positioned to operate without any additional carrier actions, thus preserving the carrier's existing efficiency while capturing time-of-delivery data for all mail pieces.
In contrast, for the code-on-tray version, this embodiment tracks all the mail to the carrier's vehicle or mail bag when the carrier is within a short time frame of the delivery point. It requires the carrier to scan only one item per mail tray, but information is captured about all mail pieces associated with that tray during the sort unload process that have just been, or are about to be, delivered. If RFID tags are used, the RFID reader can be positioned to operate without any additional carrier actions, thus preserving the carrier's efficiency while capturing approximate time-of-delivery data for all mail pieces.
Carrier Video Encoding:
Currently, the USPS uses remote video encoding systems with automated mail sorting systems. Whenever the OCR system associated with the address reader on a mail sorter cannot find, read, or interpret an address on a mail piece, the image of the mail piece is transmitted to a remote site, where a human reads the address and keys in the correct information. The sorter sprays a code on the mail piece and moves the piece out of the main stream of mail pieces whose addresses are readable by the OCR system. Sometimes this temporary storage for the unreadable mail piece is a long serpentine transport, and sometimes it is a sorter bin. Once the video encoded information is interpreted by a human being and transmitted back to the sorter, the stored mail pieces must be re-introduced back into the main sorter transport—either automatically (if the unreadable pieces were stored in a serpentine transport), or manually unloaded from the storage bin and re-fed into the system so they can be sorted.
The problems with that prior art system include that it takes a relatively long time for the remote encoder to read and key in the correct address information. Thus, the capacity for storing unreadable pieces must be large enough to handle the total number of un-readable pieces. This adds cost, job time, and footprint to the sorter system. An additional problem is that, for systems intended to sort to carrier delivery sequence, the remote encoder is prone to more mistakes since the encoder must read and interpret street address and recipient information, and the encoder is not familiar with individual route details like the carrier for that route would be. Also, if we consider a system in which the carrier who will deliver the mail also operates the video encoding system for his/her own route, there are a number of logistics problems to be solved. The sorting is generally done at a centralized facility, and the carrier is generally at a DDU (destination delivery unit). With the very large sorters, multiple routes are sorted simultaneously—and organizing individual carrier availability for providing video encoding information would be difficult to schedule without delaying completing of multiple sorting jobs. The prior art system also has the drawback that, if a postal employee uses key-stroking skills, they are often paid at a higher rate than carriers are paid. Expecting carriers to conduct key-stroking activity while engaged in video encoding operations may require changing the union rules, or require higher pay for the carriers. Additionally, most carriers would probably need training to become “computer literate” to operate the system.
The present invention's full escort mixed mail sorter using mail clamps is small enough to be deployed at the DDU facilities, where the carriers report to work. Many encoding errors would be avoided if the carrier, who is familiar with the route, provided the correct address information for non-machine readable mail pieces. Rather than expect the carrier to be computer literate in order to keystroke in the correct information, this disclosure proposes a visual display of the individual carrier's actual route showing all delivery points, and a “point and click” method of entering the correct address information. The sorter interprets the graphic location clicked on by the carrier into address information, and automatically associates this correct information with the mail piece previously fed into the sorter. With the sorter described above, there is no need to print new information on the envelope. This approach will be substantially faster than the key-stroking method, and is likely to be more accurate when done by the person most familiar with the route, rather than a remote encoder. If the point and click method is used, the union rules related to key-stroking skills may not apply.
Many European posts are far more interested in purchasing carrier sequence sorters for deployment in the DDUs rather than in central sorting facilities. A remote encoding infrastructure is not needed, and the carrier knowledge of the route is used most beneficially in completing the sorting task. The final sort of unreadable mail pieces is completed automatically.
No information needs to be printed on the mail piece. The system software associates the address associated with the screen icon identified as the correct address by the carrier with the unique identifier on the clamp holding the mail piece in the sorter. The piece can then be sorted to the correct delivery point along with all the mail pieces that were machine readable. The unreadable pieces remain intermixed with the readable pieces (without moving them to a storage location), and are sorted to the correct location (using the appended information from the mouse click) along with and in the same time frame as all the readable pieces.
As mentioned, the screen image can be enlarged in the area immediately surrounding the cursor icon, in order to display the entire route on a single screen, but improve readability and cursor pointing accuracy. A further embodiment associated with this method includes another display innovation. For buildings with multiple delivery points such as apartments and office buildings, clicking on the icon representing the building causes the screen to display an enlarged view of all of the delivery points within the building. The carrier can then add an additional click on the correct address displayed on the enlarged view of the delivery points within the building.
This enhanced point and click system is shown in
This same display with point and click technology can further be used to hold mail at the DDU for postal patrons who are traveling, and automatically re-direct mail for postal patrons who have moved. The delivery point icons on the display map can be color coded to display the status of the postal patron (OK to deliver here, hold mail at the DDU, or forward mail to a new address.) The carrier needs only to point and click, and the sorter takes the appropriate action on the mail piece.
The advantages of carrier video encoding are as follows. It uses the route knowledge of the carrier to reduce errors. It is highly efficient in that it eliminates key-stroking for the correct address, which saves time and infrastructure. It occurs in real time while the mail pieces are being fed into the sorter. It may avoid higher pay for the carriers because key-stroking skills are not required. It automatically redirects mail if the patron is traveling, or has moved.
In order to interpret how this embodiment works with the carrier delivery sequence sorter, it will be helpful to remember some key facts from the basic single pass sorting concept. As each mail piece is fed and scanned and introduced into the sorter, the sorter logic remembers the address of the mail piece and knows the exact location of each mail piece throughout the sorter paths. So, the information appended to the location of each piece could be either the address as interpreted by the automated address reader, or the address location associated with each icon location on the route map.
It will be noted that while the intent of this improvement is for use with the sorter described above, this embodiment could also be used in a conventional sorting system. For multiple pass systems, a code printer is normally used to spray a unique code on each unreadable mail piece. When the remote encoded information is available, it is associated with the code on the mail piece. The same system could be used with information provided by the carrier clicking address location icons on a large screen.
It will also be noted that while the preferred implementation is for sorting equipment located at a DDU, with the carriers who will deliver the mail providing the point and click identification of mail that could not be interpreted by an OCR system, there is also considerable benefit for systems in which the sorter is located in a centralized sorting facility, and/or the encoder operator is not the mail deliverer. For example, if the sorting equipment is located in a centralized facility, the captured address image could be sent to a different location and interpreted there by either carrier, and each identified address information sent immediately back to the sorter for association with the associated unreadable mail piece. Likewise, the persons operating the address identification system may also be others who are familiar with the individual routes, but who are not the actual mail delivery persons.
GPS Augmenting Carrier Efficiency:
The USPS is very interested in ways for making mail carriers more efficient. One source of inefficiency by the carriers occurs because they work a five day week, and mail must be delivered six days a week. So, at least one day each week, a substitute carrier must be used on each route to sort and deliver the mail. Also, when a carrier is on vacation, or calls in sick, substitutes must be used. The substitutes are not as familiar with the route as the assigned carrier, so they take longer to sort the mail, learn the route, and finger the mail while in transit.
This invention helps make carriers (and substitute carriers) more efficient by using the information gathered by the delivery sequence sorter, and information about the delivery route, combined with global positioning system (GPS) technology.
Carrier delivery sequence sorters capture information on every mail piece on a route, including how many pieces are to be delivered to each address. Additionally, information from special handling items (registered mail, etc), and parcels can be scanned for each route. This information along with route sequence information can be processed in association with a GPS system. The GPS system can either be a handheld device, or a GPS/map display having verbal instruction capability—such as currently available for cars. The GPS system gives substitute carriers precise information on the delivery sequence of the route while the carrier is delivering the mail.
Additionally, as the carrier approaches each delivery point, software and electronic audio gear associated with the GPS device tells the carrier how many mail pieces to deliver to that address. These might be verbal or visual prompts such as: “Three pieces of mail for this address”, or “no mail for this address, so proceed to the next one”, or “you have two special delivery items for this address.”
This invention eliminates the need for the carrier to finger through the mail to determine how many pieces are to be delivered to each address, eliminates the need for the carrier to be familiar with the route, and eliminates the need to remember when special items and parcels need to be delivered to each address. Thus, it makes both the mail carrier and substitute carriers far more efficient.
These improvements eliminate backtracking to deliver missed items, and it reduces the amount of time the carrier spends at each address fingering through the mail to determine how many pieces are to be delivered to each address.
If this invention is successful in saving each carrier only 10 seconds at each address, and the average route in the US has 600 addresses, each carrier will save 1.67 hours delivering the mail every day. There are about 130,000 routes in the USA, and the mail is delivered 300 days each year. If the average salary for carriers is, say $45,000 per year, this savings of only 10 seconds per address will add up to savings of $1.4 billion each year.
Additional savings will be available to the USPS by enabling substitute carriers to be nearly as efficient as the regularly assigned carriers. The present invention will enable managers at the posts to optimize the routes on a daily basis based on the volume of mail for each address. So, on a given day, if one carrier has a heavier than normal amount of mail to deliver, and another carrier has a lighter than normal amount, the manager can dynamically modify the two routes so that each carrier has about the same amount of work to do. The GPS system along with the information on the mail to be delivered at each stop will enable the carrier with the lighter initial load to be efficient in delivering mail to a portion the other route. This will reduce overtime, and allow the managers to optimize workloads for all carriers each day based on mail volume information.
Key elements of this system and method include a GPS device combined with associated electronic gear having a loadable memory, a display, and/or possibly audible prompts, loaded with information about the carrier route and delivery sequence. The information loaded from the sorter also includes data on the number of pieces to be delivered to each address on the route. The system furthermore includes data from other items to be delivered (registered mail, parcels, etc), which is also loaded into the GPS system.
The GPS system guides carriers unfamiliar with the route through a delivery sequence that matches the delivery sequence into which the mail pieces were sorted. Additionally, at each stop, the GPS system advises the carrier on how many pieces are do be delivered, and if there are any special items to be delivered. Generally, if the GPS says “three pieces for this address”, they will be the next three pieces in the tray or bag—so the carrier will not have to finger through the mail to read each address to determine the number of pieces. This system will save the carrier time at each stop.
It is to be understood that all of the present figures, and the accompanying narrative discussions of best mode embodiments, do not purport to be completely rigorous treatments of the methods and systems under consideration. A person skilled in the art will understand that the steps of the present application represent general cause-and-effect relationships that do not exclude intermediate interactions of various types, and will further understand that the various structures and mechanisms described in this application can be implemented by a variety of different combinations of hardware and software, and in various configurations which need not be further elaborated herein.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US803968||May 7, 1900||Nov 7, 1905||William Barry||Mail-distributing apparatus.|
|US1423952||Jun 9, 1921||Jul 25, 1922||Us Playing Card Company||Paper-conveying mechanism|
|US2446610||Aug 10, 1946||Aug 10, 1948||Renfroe Joseph C||Plate lifting clamp|
|US2852257||Oct 7, 1955||Sep 16, 1958||Sperry Paul A||Work handling apparatus|
|US3032341 *||Dec 19, 1960||May 1, 1962||Reist Walter||Manipulating flat articles|
|US3055480||Jul 22, 1959||Sep 25, 1962||Barry Hyman||Conveyor system|
|US3420368||Sep 14, 1966||Jan 7, 1969||Bunn Co B||Mail sorting machine|
|US3452509||Apr 11, 1966||Jul 1, 1969||Itt||Automatic sorting system for discrete flat articles|
|US3587856||Sep 5, 1967||Jun 28, 1971||Jerome H Lemelson||Coding and routing apparatus and method|
|US3659890||Aug 5, 1970||May 2, 1972||Renfroe & Sons J C||Lifting clamp|
|US3757939||May 12, 1971||Sep 11, 1973||Thompson & Co J||Method and apparatus for sorting articles such as letters|
|US3884370||Sep 28, 1973||May 20, 1975||Burroughs Corp||System for sorting and processing articles including flat mail pieces|
|US3889811||Jun 18, 1973||Jun 17, 1975||Nippon Electric Co||Flat-article sorting apparatus for an automatic mail handling system and the like|
|US3901797||Nov 11, 1974||Aug 26, 1975||Pitney Bowes Inc||Automatic continuous mail handling system|
|US3904027||Jan 2, 1974||Sep 9, 1975||John R Gilles||Document distribution system|
|US3904516||Dec 13, 1973||Sep 9, 1975||Tokyo Shibaura Electric Co||Apparatus for classifying sheet-like written material|
|US3933094||Nov 19, 1973||Jan 20, 1976||United States Envelope Company||Substrate having colored indicia thereon for read-out by infrared scanning apparatus|
|US3960264||Jan 28, 1975||Jun 1, 1976||Burroughs Corporation||Item transport apparatus|
|US4008813||Feb 6, 1975||Feb 22, 1977||Staat Der Nederlanden, Posterijen, Telegrafie En Telefonie||Conveying device for code sorting postal items|
|US4058217||Dec 10, 1975||Nov 15, 1977||Unisearch Limited||Automatic article sorting system|
|US4106636||Nov 24, 1976||Aug 15, 1978||Burroughs Corporation||Recirculation buffer subsystem for use in sorting and processing articles including mail flats|
|US4169529||Feb 27, 1978||Oct 2, 1979||Burroughs Corporation||Item transport apparatus comprising a variable thickness carrier device|
|US4244672||Jun 4, 1979||Jan 13, 1981||Burroughs Corporation||System for sequencing articles including mail|
|US4303503||Jun 30, 1978||Dec 1, 1981||Hotchkiss-Brandt Sogeme H.B.S.||Machine for sorting articles|
|US4507739||May 14, 1982||Mar 26, 1985||Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Sorter system for postal matter|
|US4627540||May 23, 1983||Dec 9, 1986||Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Automatic mail processing apparatus|
|US4632252||Jan 14, 1985||Dec 30, 1986||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Mail sorting system with coding devices|
|US4641753||Dec 26, 1984||Feb 10, 1987||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Mail sorting apparatus|
|US4681213||Oct 23, 1985||Jul 21, 1987||Harris Graphics Corporation||Gripper assembly|
|US4688678||Apr 4, 1984||Aug 25, 1987||G B Instruments, Inc.||Sorter apparatus for transporting articles to releasing locations|
|US4738368||Jul 11, 1983||Apr 19, 1988||Bell & Howell Company||Elevator mechanism for the code reader of a mail sorting machine|
|US4848538||Jul 7, 1988||Jul 18, 1989||Gerber Garment Technology, Inc.||Carrier and variable position carrier body|
|US4868570||Jan 15, 1988||Sep 19, 1989||Arthur D. Little, Inc.||Method and system for storing and retrieving compressed data|
|US4874281||Mar 27, 1987||Oct 17, 1989||Societe Anonyme Dite: Compagnie Generale D'automatisme Cga-Hbs||Method of making up batches of small items, and an installation implementing the method|
|US4878577||Nov 1, 1988||Nov 7, 1989||Investronica, S.A.||Peg for overhead trouser conveyor|
|US4891088||Oct 16, 1987||Jan 2, 1990||Bell & Howell Company||Document forwarding system|
|US4895242||Oct 26, 1987||Jan 23, 1990||G B Instruments, Inc.||Direct transfer sorting system|
|US4921107||Jul 1, 1988||May 1, 1990||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Mail sortation system|
|US4921294 *||Jun 3, 1988||May 1, 1990||Am International Incorporated||Spring wire gripper jaw|
|US4923022||Apr 25, 1989||May 8, 1990||Chien-Hua Chang||Automatic mailing apparatus|
|US4965829||Jun 23, 1987||Oct 23, 1990||Lemelson Jerome H||Apparatus and method for coding and reading codes|
|US4978117||Apr 3, 1989||Dec 18, 1990||Daverio Ag||Apparatus for conveying printing plates|
|US5031223||Oct 24, 1989||Jul 9, 1991||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for deferred processing of OCR scanned mail|
|US5042667||Nov 13, 1989||Aug 27, 1991||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Sorting system for organizing in one pass randomly order route grouped mail in delivery order|
|US5072401||Oct 3, 1989||Dec 10, 1991||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Optimizing mail delivery systems by logistics planning|
|US5119954||Mar 29, 1990||Jun 9, 1992||Bell & Howell Company||Multi-pass sorting machine|
|US5186336||Jan 22, 1991||Feb 16, 1993||Electrocom Automation L.P.||Product sorting apparatus|
|US5291002||May 17, 1993||Mar 1, 1994||Z Mark International Inc.||System for generating machine readable codes to facilitate routing of correspondence using automatic mail sorting apparatus|
|US5470427||Dec 29, 1993||Nov 28, 1995||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Postal automated labeling system|
|US5480032||Feb 9, 1994||Jan 2, 1996||Electrocom Automation, Inc.||Product sorting apparatus for variable and irregularly shaped products|
|US5718321||Jul 7, 1994||Feb 17, 1998||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Sorting apparatus for mail and the like|
|US5838277||Feb 13, 1997||Nov 17, 1998||Trimble Navigation Limited||GPS-based controller module|
|US5880958||Aug 1, 1995||Mar 9, 1999||Qualcomm Incorporated||Method and apparatus for freight transportation using a satellite navigation system|
|US5881890||Jun 21, 1996||Mar 16, 1999||Wiley; Ken||Mail sorting system and process|
|US5981891||Mar 18, 1997||Nov 9, 1999||Hitachi, Ltd.||Apparatus for sorting sheets or the like|
|US6029111||Dec 28, 1995||Feb 22, 2000||Magellan Dis, Inc.||Vehicle navigation system and method using GPS velocities|
|US6126017||Sep 6, 1996||Oct 3, 2000||Mannesmann Dematic Postal Automation S.A.||Device and method for sorting objects using buffer receptacles at sorting outlets|
|US6208910||Apr 23, 1999||Mar 27, 2001||Pitney Bowes Inc.||System and method for determining the location of a mail piece|
|US6227378||Mar 24, 1999||May 8, 2001||The Post Office||Sorting system for groups of items having recirculation|
|US6276509||Dec 3, 1998||Aug 21, 2001||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Sorting device for flat, letter-like postal items|
|US6347710||Dec 13, 1999||Feb 19, 2002||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Storage rack for storing sorted mailpieces|
|US6365862||Jul 28, 2000||Apr 2, 2002||Siemens Electrocom, L.P.||Ergonomic method for sorting and sweeping mail pieces|
|US6394449||Dec 9, 1998||May 28, 2002||Ferag Ag||Device for receiving and/or conveying flat products|
|US6403906||Nov 10, 1999||Jun 11, 2002||Elsag Spa||Method for controlling an accumulating device|
|US6411897||Dec 20, 2001||Jun 25, 2002||Iap Intermodal, Llc||Method to schedule a vehicle in real-time to transport freight and passengers|
|US6435353||Aug 3, 2001||Aug 20, 2002||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Storage rack for storing sorted mailpieces|
|US6443311||Mar 9, 2001||Sep 3, 2002||Northrop Grumman Corporation||Flats bundle collator|
|US6464067||Dec 8, 1998||Oct 15, 2002||Ferag Ag||Method and device for storing transport elements|
|US6555776||Apr 2, 2001||Apr 29, 2003||Lockheed Martin Corporation||Single feed one pass mixed mail sequencer|
|US6561339||Jul 31, 2000||May 13, 2003||Rapistan Systems Advertising Corp.||Automatic tray handling system for sorter|
|US6561360||Mar 8, 2000||May 13, 2003||Rapistan Systems Advertising Corp.||Automatic tray handling system for sorter|
|US6677548||Aug 10, 2001||Jan 13, 2004||Mts Modulare Transport Systeme Gmbh||Sorting method, sorting installation and sorting system|
|US6814210||Apr 16, 2003||Nov 9, 2004||Lockheed Martin Corporation||Self-storing material sortation deflector system|
|US6856860||Jul 2, 2003||Feb 15, 2005||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Systems for and methods of distributing mail|
|US6897395||May 15, 2003||May 24, 2005||Tsubakimoto Chain Co.||Mail sorter|
|US6921875 *||Oct 8, 2002||Jul 26, 2005||Lockheed Martin Corporation||Method for sequentially ordering objects using a single pass delivery point process|
|US6946612||Jan 27, 2003||Sep 20, 2005||Nec Corporation||Mail sequencing system|
|US6953906||Apr 30, 2002||Oct 11, 2005||Rapistan Systems Advertising Corp.||Delivery point sequencing mail sorting system with flat mail capability|
|US6994220||Oct 2, 2001||Feb 7, 2006||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Mixed mail sorting machine|
|US7004396||Dec 29, 2004||Feb 28, 2006||Pitney Bowes Inc.||System and method for grouping mail pieces in a sorter|
|US7111742||Aug 2, 2002||Sep 26, 2006||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Device for separating postal items according to thickness classes|
|US7112031||Mar 29, 2002||Sep 26, 2006||Siemens Energy & Automation Inc.||Method and apparatus for mechanized pocket sweeping|
|US7138596||May 9, 2002||Nov 21, 2006||Pippin James M||Apparatus and method for mail sorting|
|US7170024||Jul 22, 2005||Jan 30, 2007||Siemens Energy & Automation||Delivery point sequencing mail sorting system with flat mail capability|
|US7210893||Oct 23, 2000||May 1, 2007||Bowe Bell + Howell Postal Systems Company||Flats mail autotrayer system|
|US7227094||Sep 26, 2003||Jun 5, 2007||Siemens Ag||Method for processing flat deliveries in delivery containers|
|US7235756||Jul 23, 2004||Jun 26, 2007||Elsag Spa||Mail sorting and sequencing system|
|US7259345||Dec 29, 2004||Aug 21, 2007||Siemens Energy & Automation, Inc.||Method and apparatus for sorting and bundling mail|
|US7259346||Jan 30, 2006||Aug 21, 2007||Bowe Bell & Howell Company||Progressive modularity assortment system with high and low capacity bins|
|US7304260||Sep 24, 2003||Dec 4, 2007||Siemens Schweiz Ag||System and method for filling, removing and transporting containers|
|US7378610||Oct 7, 2004||May 27, 2008||Tsubakimoto Chain Co.||Mail sorting and distributing transfer system|
|US7396011||Jan 23, 2007||Jul 8, 2008||Bowe Bell + Howell Company||Progressive modularity assortment system with high and low capacity bins|
|US7397010||Jan 30, 2004||Jul 8, 2008||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Sorting device for flat mail items|
|US7397011||Sep 7, 2004||Jul 8, 2008||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Device for the sorting of flat mailings|
|US7464822||Jan 5, 2005||Dec 16, 2008||Lockheed Martin Corporation||Transporting and packaging device and method of use|
|US20020053533||Nov 6, 2001||May 9, 2002||Brehm Christopher Scott||Method and system for collecting and pooling unqualified batches of mail for pre-sorting|
|US20020139726||Apr 2, 2001||Oct 3, 2002||Lockheed Martin Corporation||Single feed one pass mixed mail sequencer|
|US20030006174||Mar 29, 2002||Jan 9, 2003||Harres Luiz C.||Method and apparatus for mechanized pocket sweeping|
|US20030038065||May 9, 2002||Feb 27, 2003||Pippin James M.||Apparatus and method for mail sorting|
|US20040030661||Dec 17, 2001||Feb 12, 2004||Amato Michael J.||Just-in-time sort plan creation|
|US20050131576||Oct 29, 2004||Jun 16, 2005||Guido De Leo||Mail delivery support system|
|US20060070929||Sep 8, 2004||Apr 6, 2006||Fry Rick A||System and method for dynamic allocation for bin assignment|
|US20060124512||Oct 19, 2004||Jun 15, 2006||Pitney Bowes Incorporated||System and method for grouping mail pieces in a sorter|
|US20060180520||Dec 9, 2005||Aug 17, 2006||Deutsche Post Ag||Method for processing mail|
|US20060191822||Apr 25, 2006||Aug 31, 2006||United States Postal Service||Apparatus and methods for processing mailpiece information by an identification code server|
|US20070090029||Oct 17, 2006||Apr 26, 2007||United States Postal Service||Apparatus and methods for identifying and processing mail using an identification code|
|US20070131593||Jan 29, 2007||Jun 14, 2007||Siemens Logistics And Assembly Systems, Inc.||Delivery point sequencing mail sorting system with flat mail capability|
|US20070272601||May 23, 2006||Nov 29, 2007||Cameron Lanning Cormack||Method and System for Sorting Incoming Mail|
|US20080011653||Sep 12, 2006||Jan 17, 2008||Pitney Bowes Incorporated||Mail sorter, method, and software product for a two-step and one-pass sorting algorithm|
|US20080012211||Jul 13, 2006||Jan 17, 2008||Pitney Bowes Incorporated||Mailpiece container for stacking mixed mail and method for stacking mail therein|
|US20080027986||Jul 25, 2006||Jan 31, 2008||Pitney Bowes Incorporated||Method and system for sorting mail|
|US20080093273||Jul 21, 2005||Apr 24, 2008||Stemmle Denis J||Carrier Delivery Sequence System And Process Adapted For Upstream Insertion Of Exceptional Mail Pieces|
|US20080093274||Jul 21, 2005||Apr 24, 2008||Stemmle Denis J||One-Pass Carrier Delivery Sequence Sorter|
|US20080164185||Dec 7, 2005||Jul 10, 2008||Stemmle Denis J||Clamp for Mixed Mail Sorter|
|EP0000304B1||Jun 16, 1978||Jan 7, 1981||Hotchkiss-Brandt Sogeme H.B.S.||Sorting machine for articles and installation for handling articles comprising at least one of such sorting machines|
|EP1528496B1||Oct 29, 2004||Aug 23, 2006||Elsag Spa||Mail delivery support system|
|GB2382559A||Title not available|
|WO2003011484A1||Jul 17, 2002||Feb 13, 2003||Siemens Dematic Postal Automation, L.P.||Apparatus and method for mail sorting|
|1||"Development of in-process skew and shift adjusting mechanism for paper handling," American Society of Mechanical Engineers http://www.directtextbook.com, 1998.|
|2||"On the Road to Service," ORMS, Aug. 2000.|
|3||"The Role of Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) in Intermodal Air Cargo Operations," Nexter, Dec. 2000.|
|4||European Search Report dated May 4, 2011 for corresponding EP Appl. No. 05853468.6-2307.|
|5||Final Office Action dated Aug. 24, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/885,242.|
|6||Final Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2011 for corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 11/885,230.|
|7||Industrial Embedded HPC Applications-Supercomputer; G. Deconinck; p. 26-27, 1997.|
|8||Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 29, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/885,242.|
|9||Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/885,242.|
|10||Office Action dated Oct. 12, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/885,230.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US9044786||May 12, 2014||Jun 2, 2015||Lockheed Martin Corporation||System for responding to fulfillment orders|
|US9346169||Oct 3, 2014||May 24, 2016||Frito-Lay North America, Inc.||Apparatus and method for universal, flexible pillow bag pattern creation|
|US9346170||Oct 3, 2014||May 24, 2016||Frito-Lay North America, Inc.||Apparatus and method for universal, flexible pillow bag pattern creation|
|U.S. Classification||209/584, 209/900|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10S209/912, Y10S209/90, G06Q10/08, B07C3/08, B65H29/003, B65H2701/1916, G08G1/202|
|European Classification||B07C3/08, B65H29/00D, G06Q10/08, G08G1/20A|
|Aug 28, 2007||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: PITNEY BOWES INC., CONNECTICUT
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:STEMMLE, DENIS J.;REEL/FRAME:019800/0220
Effective date: 20070827
|Aug 28, 2008||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: PITNEY BOWES INC., CONNECTICUT
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:STEMMLE, DENIS J.;QUINE, DOUGLAS B.;REEL/FRAME:021453/0370
Effective date: 20080603
|Nov 11, 2008||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, MARYLAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PITNEY BOWES INC.;REEL/FRAME:021814/0338
Effective date: 20081103
|Mar 20, 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4