Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS8028090 B2
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 12/272,687
Publication dateSep 27, 2011
Filing dateNov 17, 2008
Priority dateNov 17, 2008
Also published asUS8321588, US8458360, US20100125673, US20120066408, US20130013808, US20130268633
Publication number12272687, 272687, US 8028090 B2, US 8028090B2, US-B2-8028090, US8028090 B2, US8028090B2
InventorsDavid R. Richardson, John Cormie, Imran S. Patel, Benjamin W. S. Redman, Richard Sheehan
Original AssigneeAmazon Technologies, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Request routing utilizing client location information
US 8028090 B2
Abstract
A system, method, and computer-readable medium for request routing based on client location information are provided. A content delivery network service provider receives a DNS query from a client computing device. The DNS query corresponds to a resource identifier for requested content from the client computing device. The content delivery network service provider transmits an alternative resource identifier in response to the client computing device DNS query. The alternative resource identifier is selected as a function of client location information. The client location information is obtained from information corresponding to a mapping of at least partial IP addresses to known locations. The client computing device then issues a second DNS query to the same content delivery network service provider. The content delivery network service provider can then either resolve the second DNS query with an IP address of a cache component or transmit another alternative resource identifier that will resolve to the content delivery network service provider. The process can repeat with the content delivery network service provider's network until a DNS server resolves a DNS query from the client computing device.
Images(10)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(64)
1. A method comprising:
obtaining a DNS query from a client computing device at a first DNS server, wherein the DNS query corresponds to a requested resource associated with an original resource identifier provided by a content provider and wherein the first DNS server corresponds to a content delivery network service;
obtaining a query IP address associated with the DNS query at the first DNS server;
obtaining a location-based identifier associated with the query IP address and a confidence factor, the confidence factor corresponding to a degree of confidence associated with the accuracy of the location-based identifier to query IP address association;
determining whether the confidence factor exceeds a threshold value;
if the confidence factor exceeds the threshold value:
determining a destination identifier associated with the DNS query, wherein the destination identifier is determined based on the location-based identifier;
selecting a network point of presence associated with the content delivery network service provider based on the destination identifier;
determining whether the first DNS server is authoritative to the DNS query based on the selected network point of presence; and
if the first DNS server is not authoritative:
obtaining an alternative resource identifier based on the selected network point of presence, wherein the alternative resource identifier includes information for causing a DNS query to resolve to a domain corresponding to the selected network point of presence;
transmitting the alternative resource identifier to the client computing device;
obtaining a subsequent DNS query from the client computing device at a second DNS server, wherein the subsequent DNS query corresponds to the alternative resource identifier provided by the content delivery network service provider;
determining whether the second DNS server is authoritative to the subsequent DNS query;
selecting a cache component for providing content associated with the original resource request if the second DNS server is authoritative to the second DNS query; and
transmitting information identifying the selected cache component if the second DNS server is determined to be authoritative.
2. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising assigning a location-based identifier associated with the first DNS server if the confidence factor does not exceed the threshold value.
3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the destination identifier corresponds to a geographic region encompassing a location associated with the location-based identifier.
4. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising overriding the determined destination identifier based on the original resource identifier, wherein the original resource identifier provides information associated with an alternative destination identifier.
5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein selecting a network point of presence comprises selecting a network point of presence from a set of network points of presence capable of servicing resource requests associated with the determined destination identifier.
6. The method as recited in claim 5, wherein the network point of presence is selected from the set of network points of presence based on a distribution allocation.
7. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising:
determining whether the selected network point of presence is available prior to determining whether the first DNS server is authoritative to the DNS query based on the selected network point of presence;
if the selected network point of presence is available, maintaining the selected network point of presence; and
if the selected network point of presence is not available, selecting an alternative network point of presence.
8. The method as recited in claim 7, wherein the availability of the selected network point of presence is based on health information indicative of the availability of the selected network point of presence to process incoming resource requests.
9. The method as recited in claim 7, wherein selecting an alternative network point of presence comprises selecting an alternative network point of presence from a failover list of alternative network points of presence.
10. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the alternative network point of presence is selected from the failover list based on a distribution allocation.
11. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising:
if the first DNS server is determined to be authoritative:
selecting a cache component for providing content associated with the original resource request; and
transmitting information identifying the selected cache component.
12. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising overriding the determined destination identifier based on an identity of the content provider.
13. The method as recited in claim 12, wherein the determined destination identifier is overridden if the content provider's subscription with the content delivery network service provider does not provide for content to be provided from a destination corresponding to the destination identifier.
14. The method as recited in claim 12, wherein the determined destination identifier is overridden if the content provider's subscription with the content delivery network service provider provides for use of an alternative destination identifier.
15. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the query IP address is associated with the client computing device.
16. The method as recited in claim 15, wherein the query IP address is associated with a DNS resolver component associated with the client computing device.
17. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the location-based identifier corresponds to a physical location associated with the client computing device.
18. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the location-based identifier corresponds to a logical location associated with the client computing device.
19. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the location-based identifier corresponds to a relative location.
20. The method as recited in claim 19, wherein the relative location is inferred based on an association of the relative location to a known location.
21. The method as recited in claim 20, wherein the relative location is inferred based on latency information.
22. A method comprising:
obtaining a DNS query from a client computing device at a first DNS server, wherein the DNS query corresponds to a requested resource associated with an original resource identifier provided by a content provider and wherein the first DNS server corresponds to a content delivery network service;
obtaining a query IP address associated with the DNS query at the first DNS server;
obtaining a location-based identifier associated with the query IP address, wherein the location-based identifier corresponds to physical or logical location information;
selecting a network point of presence associated with the content delivery network service provider based on the location-based identifier;
determining whether the first DNS server is authoritative to the DNS query based on the selected network point of presence; and
if the first DNS server is not authoritative:
obtaining an alternative resource identifier based on the selected network point of presence, wherein the alternative resource identifier includes information for causing a DNS query to resolve to a domain corresponding to the selected network point of presence; and
transmitting the alternative resource identifier to the client computing device.
23. The method as recited in claim 22 further comprising determining a destination identifier associated with the DNS query, wherein selecting a network point of presence is further based on the destination identifier.
24. The method as recited in claim 23, wherein the destination identifier is determined as a function of the location-based identifier.
25. The method as recited in claim 24, wherein the destination identifier corresponds to a geographic region encompassing a location associated with the location-based identifier.
26. The method as recited in claim 23 further comprising overriding the determined destination identifier based on an identity of the content provider.
27. The method as recited in claim 26, wherein the identity of the content provider is obtained based on the original resource identifier.
28. The method as recited in claim 26, wherein the determined destination identifier is overridden if the content provider's subscription with the content delivery network service provider does not provide for content to be provided from a destination corresponding to the destination identifier.
29. The method as recited in claim 26, wherein the determined destination identifier is overridden if the content provider's subscription with the content delivery network service provider provides for use of an alternative destination identifier.
30. The method as recited in claim 23 further comprising overriding the determined destination identifier based on the original resource identifier, wherein the original resource identifier provides information associated with an alternative destination identifier.
31. The method as recited in claim 23, wherein the destination identifier is determined based on an identity of the content provider.
32. The method as recited in claim 31, wherein the destination identifier is further determined based on the obtained location-based identifier.
33. The method as recited in claim 23, wherein selecting a network point of presence comprises selecting a network point of presence from a set of network points of presence capable of servicing resource requests associated with the determined destination identifier.
34. The method as recited in claim 33, wherein the network point of presence is selected from the set of network points of presence based on a distribution allocation.
35. The method as recited in claim 22 further comprising:
determining whether the selected network point of presence is available prior to determining whether the first DNS server is authoritative to the DNS query based on the selected network point of presence;
if the selected network point of presence is available, maintaining the selected network point of presence; and
if the selected network point of presence is not available, selecting an alternative network point of presence.
36. The method as recited in claim 35, wherein the availability of the selected network point of presence is based on health information indicative of the availability of the selected network point of presence to process incoming resource requests.
37. The method as recited in claim 35, wherein selecting an alternative network point of presence comprises selecting an alternative network point of presence from a failover list of alternative network points of presence.
38. The method as recited in claim 37, wherein the alternative network point of presence is selected from the failover list based on a distribution allocation.
39. The method as recited in claim 22 further comprising:
if the first DNS server is determined to be authoritative:
selecting a cache component for providing content associated with the original resource request; and
transmitting information identifying the selected cache component.
40. The method as recited in claim 22 further comprising obtaining a confidence factor corresponding to a degree of confidence associated with the accuracy of the location-based identifier to query IP address association.
41. The method as recited in claim 40, wherein a network point of presence is selected based on the location-based identifier if the confidence factor exceeds a threshold value.
42. The method as recited in claim 22, wherein the location-based identifier is obtained from a data store containing query IP address to location-based identifier mapping entries.
43. The method as recited in claim 42, wherein the data store contains query IP address to location-based identifier mappings only for entries exceeding a minimum threshold confidence factor, the confidence factor corresponding to a degree of confidence associated with the accuracy of the location-based identifier to query IP address association.
44. The method as recited in claim 22, wherein the query IP address is associated with the client computing device.
45. The method as recited in claim 44, wherein the query IP address is associated with a DNS resolver component associated with the client computing device.
46. The method as recited in claim 22, wherein the location-based identifier corresponds to a physical location associated with the client computing device.
47. The method as recited in claim 22, wherein the location-based identifier corresponds to a logical location associated with the client computing device.
48. The method as recited in claim 22, wherein the location-based identifier corresponds to a relative location.
49. The method as recited in claim 48, wherein the relative location is inferred based on an association of the relative location to a known location.
50. The method as recited in claim 49, wherein the relative location is inferred based on latency information.
51. A system for request routing comprising:
a first network point of presence associated with a content delivery network service provider, wherein the first network point of presence includes a DNS server that receives a DNS query from a client computing device, wherein the DNS query corresponds to a requested resource associated with a first resource identifier, and wherein the DNS server in the first network point of presence comprises at least one computing device and is operable to:
obtain a query IP address associated with the DNS query at the first DNS server;
obtain a location-based identifier associated with the query IP address, wherein the location-based identifier corresponds to physical or logical location information;
select a network point of presence associated with the content delivery network service provider based on the location-based identifier;
determine whether the first DNS server is authoritative to the DNS query based on the selected network point of presence; and
if the first DNS server is not authoritative:
obtain an alternative resource identifier based on the selected network point of presence, wherein the alternative resource identifier includes information for causing a DNS query to resolve to a domain corresponding to the selected network point of presence; and
transmit the alternative resource identifier to the client computing device.
52. The system as recited in claim 51, wherein the DNS server in the first network point of presence is further operable to determine a destination identifier associated with the DNS query, wherein selecting a network point of presence is further based on the destination identifier.
53. The system as recited in claim 52, wherein the destination identifier is determined as a function of the location-based identifier.
54. The system as recited in claim 52, wherein the DNS server in the first network point of presence is further operable to override the determined destination identifier based on an identity of the content provider.
55. The system as recited in claim 54, wherein the identity of the content provider is obtained based on the original resource identifier.
56. The system as recited in claim 51, wherein selecting a network point of presence comprises selecting a network point of presence from a set of network points of presence capable of servicing resource requests associated with the determined destination identifier.
57. The system as recited in claim 56, wherein the network point of presence is selected from the set of network points of presence based on a distribution allocation.
58. The system as recited in claim 51, wherein the DNS server in the first network point of presence is further operable to:
determine whether the selected network point of presence is available prior to determining whether the first DNS server is authoritative to the DNS query based on the selected network point of presence;
maintain the selected network point of presence if the selected network point of presence is available; and
select an alternative network point of presence if the selected network point of presence is not available.
59. The system as recited in claim 58, wherein the availability of the selected network point of presence is based on health information indicative of the availability of the selected network point of presence to process incoming resource requests.
60. The system as recited in claim 58, wherein selecting an alternative network point of presence comprises selecting an alternative network point of presence from a failover list of alternative network points of presence.
61. The system as recited in claim 60, wherein the alternative network point of presence is selected from the failover list based on a distribution allocation.
62. The system as recited in claim 51 further comprising:
a second network point of presence associated with a content delivery network service provider, wherein the second network point of presence includes a DNS server component that receives a subsequent DNS query from a client computing device, wherein the subsequent DNS query corresponds to a requested resource associated with the alternative resource identifier, and wherein the DNS server in the second network point of presence is operable to:
resolve the subsequent DNS query to identify a cache component for providing content associated with the original resource request; and
transmit information identifying the identified cache component to the client computing device.
63. A method comprising:
obtaining a DNS query from a client computing device at a first DNS server, wherein the DNS query corresponds to a requested resource associated with an original resource identifier provided by a content provider and wherein the first DNS server corresponds to a content delivery network service;
obtaining a query IP address associated with the DNS query at the first DNS server;
obtaining a location-based identifier associated with the query IP address, wherein the location-based identifier corresponds to physical or logical location information;
obtaining a destination identifier based on the obtained location-based identifier;
determining whether the first DNS server is authoritative to the DNS query based on the destination identifier; and
if the first DNS server is not authoritative:
obtaining an alternative resource identifier based on the selected network point of presence, wherein the alternative resource identifier includes information for causing a DNS query to resolve to a domain corresponding to the selected network point of presence; and
transmitting the alternative resource identifier to the client computing device.
64. A method for request routing comprising:
obtaining a DNS query from a client computing device at a first DNS server, wherein the DNS query corresponds to a requested resource associated with a first resource identifier and wherein the first DNS server corresponds to a content delivery network service provider;
determining that the first resource identifier is associated with an alternative resource identifier based on location information associated with the client computing device, wherein the location information is obtained from information corresponding to a mapping of at least partial IP addresses to known locations;
transmitting the alternative resource identifier to the client computing device, wherein the alternative resource identifier includes information for causing a DNS query to resolve to a domain corresponding to the content delivery service provider and supplemental request routing information not included in the first resource identifier;
obtaining a subsequent DNS query from the client computing device at a second DNS server, wherein the subsequent DNS query corresponds to the alternative resource identifier provided by the content delivery network service provider and wherein the second DNS server corresponds to the content delivery network service provider;
resolving the subsequent DNS query, at the second DNS server, to identify a cache component for providing content associated with the original resource request; and
transmitting information identifying the identified cache component to the client computing device.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/771,679, filed on Jun. 29, 2007, and entitled “Mapping Attributes to Network Addresses,” which is herein incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND

Generally described, computing devices and communication networks can be utilized to exchange information. In a common application, a computing device can request content from another computing device via the communication network. For example, a user at a personal computing device can utilize a software browser application to request a Web page from a server computing device via the Internet. In such embodiments, the user computing device can be referred to as a client computing device and the server computing device can be referred to as a content provider.

Content providers are generally motivated to provide requested content to client computing devices often with consideration of efficient transmission of the requested content to the client computing device and/or consideration of a cost associated with the transmission of the content. For larger scale implementations, a content provider may receive content requests from a high volume of client computing devices which can place a strain on the content provider's computing resources. Additionally, the content requested by the client computing devices may have a number of components, which can further place additional strain on the content provider's computing resources.

With reference to an illustrative example, a requested Web page, or original content, may be associated with a number of additional resources, such as images or videos, which are to be displayed with the Web page. In one specific embodiment, the additional resources of the Web page are identified by a number of embedded resource identifiers, such as uniform resource locators (“URLs”). In turn, software on the client computing devices typically processes embedded resource identifiers to generate requests for the content. Often, the resource identifiers associated with the embedded resources reference a computing device associated with the content provider such that the client computing device would transmit the request for the additional resources to the referenced content provider computing device. Accordingly, in order to satisfy a content request, the content provider would provide client computing devices data associated with the Web page as well as the data associated with the embedded resources.

Some content providers attempt to facilitate the delivery of requested content, such as Web pages and/or resources identified in Web pages, through the utilization of a content delivery network (“CDN”) service provider. A CDN server provider typically maintains a number of computing devices in a communication network that can maintain content from various content providers. In turn, content providers can instruct, or otherwise suggest to, client computing devices to request some, or all, of the content provider's content from the CDN service provider's computing devices.

As with content providers, CDN service providers are also generally motivated to provide requested content to client computing devices often with consideration of efficient transmission of the requested content to the client computing device and/or consideration of a cost associated with the transmission of the content. Accordingly, CDN service providers often consider factors such as latency of delivery of requested content in order to meet service level agreements or to generally improve the quality of delivery service.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrative of content delivery environment including a number of client computing devices, a content provider, and a content delivery network service provider;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the registration of a content provider with a content delivery service provider;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the generation and processing of a content request from a client computing device to a content provider;

FIGS. 4A-4B are block diagrams of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating one embodiment of the generation and processing of a DNS query corresponding to an embedded resource from a client computing device to a content delivery network service provider and the subsequent generation and processing of DNS queries corresponding to a first alternative resource identifier from a client computing device to a content delivery network;

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating another embodiment of the generation and processing of a DNS query corresponding to an embedded resource from a client computing device to a content delivery network service provider;

FIG. 6 is a block diagram of the content delivery environment of FIG. 1 illustrating the generation and processing of embedded resource requests from a client computing device to a content delivery network service provider;

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrative of a request routing routine implemented by a content delivery network service provider utilizing query IP address to location-based identifier mappings to process a resource request; and

FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrative a request routing subroutine implemented by a content delivery network service provider in the illustrative flow diagram of FIG. 7 for determining a network point of presence for servicing a resource request based on an obtained location-based identifier.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Generally described, the present disclosure is directed to routing of DNS queries from a client computing device corresponding to content requests by a network resource, such as content delivery network (“CDN”) service providers. The processing of a DNS query by a CDN service provider is generally referred to as request routing. Specifically, aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to the routing of a client computing device DNS query within a content delivery network service provider domain as a function of client location information associated with the processing of the content request from the client computing device. In one embodiment, a CDN service provider utilizes query IP address to location-based identifier mappings to select components of a CDN network to provide the requested resource. The CDN network component can be selected by identifying a client computing device's location and attempting to improve performance associated with the request routing by transmitting requested resources from a CDN network component in a destination associated with the client's location. Although various aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to illustrative examples and embodiments, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the disclosed embodiments and examples should not be construed as limiting.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrative of content delivery environment 100 for the management and processing of content requests. As illustrated in FIG. 1, the content delivery environment 100 includes a number of client computing devices 102 (generally referred to as clients) for requesting content from a content provider and/or a CDN service provider. In an illustrative embodiment, the client computing devices 102 can correspond to a wide variety of computing devices including personal computing devices, laptop computing devices, hand-held computing devices, terminal computing devices, mobile devices, wireless devices, various electronic devices and appliances and the like. In an illustrative embodiment, the client computing devices 102 include necessary hardware and software components for establishing communications over a communication network 108, such as a wide area network or local area network. For example, the client computing devices 102 may be equipped with networking equipment and browser software applications that facilitate communications via the Internet or an intranet.

Although not illustrated in FIG. 1, each client computing device 102 utilizes some type of local DNS resolver component, such as a DNS name server, that generates the DNS queries attributed to the client computing device. In one embodiment, the local DNS resolver component may be provided by an enterprise network to which the client computing device 102 belongs. In another embodiment, the local DNS resolver component may be provided by an Internet Service Provider (ISP) that provides the communication network connection to the client computing device 102.

The content delivery environment 100 can also include a content provider 104 in communication with the one or more client computing devices 102 via the communication network 108. The content provider 104 illustrated in FIG. 1 corresponds to a logical association of one or more computing devices associated with a content provider. Specifically, the content provider 104 can include a web server component 110 corresponding to one or more server computing devices for obtaining and processing requests for content (such as Web pages) from the client computing devices 102. The content provider 104 can further include an origin server component 112 and associated storage component 114 corresponding to one or more computing devices for obtaining and processing requests for network resources from the CDN service provider. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the content provider 104 can be associated with various additional computing resources, such additional computing devices for administration of content and resources, DNS name servers, and the like. For example, although not illustrated in FIG. 1, the content provider 104 can be associated with one or more DNS name server components that are operative to receive DNS queries related to registered domain names associated with the content provider. The one or more DNS name servers can be authoritative to resolve client computing device DNS queries corresponding to the registered domain names of the content provider 104. A DNS name server component is considered to be authoritative to a DNS query if the DNS name server can resolve the query by providing a responsive IP address.

With continued reference to FIG. 1, the content delivery environment 100 can further include a CDN service provider 106 in communication with the one or more client computing devices 102 and the content providers 104 via the communication network 108. The CDN service provider 106 illustrated in FIG. 1 corresponds to a logical association of one or more computing devices associated with a CDN service provider. Specifically, the CDN service provider 106 can include a number of Point of Presence (“POP”) locations 116, 122, 128 that correspond to nodes on the communication network 108. Each POP 116, 122, 128 includes a DNS component 118, 124, 130 made up of a number of DNS server computing devices for resolving DNS queries from the client computers 102. Each POP 116, 122, 128 also includes a resource cache component 120, 126, 132 made up of a number of cache server computing devices for storing resources from content providers and transmitting various requested resources to various client computers.

Still further, the CDN service provider 106 includes a routing data store 134 for maintaining information regarding query IP address to location-based identifier mappings, as well as confidence factors associated with those mappings, such as disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/771,679, which is herein incorporated by reference. In some embodiments, the location-based identifiers can correspond to locations directly determined based on physical locations or logical locations associated with the origin of the DNS query. In addition or alternatively, the location-based identifier can be inferred based on associating a relative location to known locations. For example, the location-based identifier can be attributed to known locations of POPs (corresponding to the CDN service provider) based on measured latency information associated with request routing between the client computing device or its local DNS resolver and these POPs. The measured latency information can be premeasured, such as through testing procedures or previously observed request routing behavior. Alternatively, the measured latency information can be dynamically measured in a real time basis or semi-real time basis.

The routing data store 134 can also maintain additional location mapping information such as mappings of the location-based identifiers to regional CDN destination identifiers. Even further, the location mapping data store 134 can include information identifying a set of POPs associated with each CDN destination identifier. Yet further, the routing data store 134 can include user profile information from which alternative user location information may be obtained. Yet still further, the routing data store 134 can include content provider routing criteria associated with a content provider identifier (or origin identifier), such as regional service plan information or other routing criteria, utilized by the CDN service provider 106 to route content requests.

In an illustrative embodiment, the routing data store 134 corresponds to a central data store accessible by the POPs 116, 122, 128, such as via a Web service. In another embodiment, each POP 116, 122, 128 can maintain a local version of a routing data store 134 for utilization in request routing as will be explained in greater detail. Additionally, although the routing data store 134 is illustrated as a single data store, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that routing data store 134 may correspond to one or more data stores and may be implemented in a distributed manner.

The DNS components 118, 124 and 130 and the resource cache components 120, 126 132 may further include additional software and/or hardware components that facilitate communications including, but not limited, load balancing or load sharing software/hardware components.

In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS component 118, 124, 130 and resource cache component 120, 126, 132 are considered to be logically grouped, regardless of whether the components, or portions of the components, are physically separate. Additionally, although the POPs 116, 122, 128 are illustrated in FIG. 1 as logically associated with the CDN service provider 106, the POPs will be geographically distributed throughout the communication network 108 in a manner to best serve various demographics of client computing devices 102. Additionally, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the CDN service provider 106 can be associated with various additional computing resources, such additional computing devices for administration of content and resources, and the like.

One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the components and configurations provided in FIG. 1 are illustrative in nature. Accordingly, additional or alternative components and/or configurations, especially regarding the additional components, systems and subsystems for facilitating communications may be utilized.

With reference now to FIGS. 2-6, the interaction between various components of the content delivery environment 100 of FIG. 1 will be illustrated. For purposes of the example, however, the illustration has been simplified such that many of the components utilized to facilitate communications are not shown. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that such components can be utilized and that additional interactions would accordingly occur without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.

With reference to FIG. 2, an illustrative interaction for registration of a content provider 104 with the CDN service provider 106 will be described. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the CDN content registration process begins with registration of the content provider 104 with the CDN service provider 106. In an illustrative embodiment, the content provider 104 utilizes a registration application program interface (“API”) to register with the CDN service provider 106 such that the CDN service provider 106 can provide content on behalf of the content provider 104. The registration API includes the identification of the origin server 112 of the content provider 104 that will provide requested resources to the CDN service provider 106. Additionally, as will be explained in greater detail below, the content provider 104 can also provide additional information, such as regional service plan information or other routing criteria, utilized by the CDN service provider 106 to route content requests. In one embodiment, the routing criteria can include the specification of a particular regional service plan, which may limit the regions from which content requests may be resolved by the CDN service provider 106. In another embodiment, the routing criteria can include a selection by the content provider 104 that the CDN service provider 106 should attempt to service specific resource requests from a particular regional destination or POP or from a particular distribution of regional destinations or POPs.

One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that upon identification of appropriate origin servers 112, the content provider 104 can begin to direct requests for content from client computing devices 102 to the CDN service provider 106. Specifically, in accordance with DNS routing principles, a client computing device request corresponding to a resource identifier would eventually be directed toward a POP 116, 122, 128 associated with the CDN service provider 106. In the event that the resource cache component 120, 126, 132 of a selected POP does not have a copy of a resource requested by a client computing device 102, the resource cache component will request the resource from the origin server 112 previously registered by the content provider 104.

With continued reference to FIG. 2, upon receiving the registration API, the CDN service provider 106 obtains and processes the registration information. In an illustrative embodiment, the CDN service provider 106 can then generate additional information that will be used by the client computing devices 102 as part of the content requests. The additional information can include, without limitation, content provider identifiers, such as content provider identification codes or origin server identifiers, executable code for processing resource identifiers, such as script-based instructions, and the like. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that various types of additional information may be generated by the CDN service provider 106 and that the additional information may be embodied in any one of a variety of formats.

The CDN service provider 106 returns an identification of applicable domains for the CDN service provider (unless it has been previously provided) and any additional information to the content provider 104. In turn, the content provider 104 can then process the stored content with content provider specific information. In one example, as illustrated in FIG. 2, the content provider 104 translates resource identifiers originally directed toward a domain of the origin server 112 to a domain corresponding to the CDN service provider. The translated URLs are embedded into requested content in a manner such that DNS queries for the translated URLs will resolve to a DNS server corresponding to the CDN service provider 106 and not a DNS server corresponding to the content provider 104. Although the translation process is illustrated in FIG. 2, in some embodiments, the translation process may be omitted in a manner described in greater detail below.

Generally, the identification of the resources originally directed to the content provider 104 will be in the form of a resource identifier that can be processed by the client computing device 102, such as through a browser software application. In an illustrative embodiment, the resource identifiers can be in the form of a uniform resource locator (“URL”). Because the resource identifiers are included in the requested content directed to the content provider, the resource identifiers can be referred to generally as the “content provider URL.” For purposes of an illustrative example, the content provider URL can identify a domain of the content provider 104 (e.g., contentprovider.com), a name of the resource to be requested (e.g., “resource.xxx”) and a path where the resource will be found (e.g., “path”). In this illustrative example, the content provider URL has the form of:

    • http://www.contentprovider.com/path/resource.xxx

During an illustrative translation process, the content provider URL is modified such that requests for the resources associated with the translated URLs resolve to a POP associated with the CDN service provider 106. In one embodiment, the translated URL identifies the domain of the CDN service provider 106 (e.g., “cdnprovider.com”), the same name of the resource to be requested (e.g., “resource.xxx”) and the same path where the resource will be found (e.g., “path”). Additionally, the translated URL can include additional processing information (e.g., “additional information”). Specifically, as set forth above, in one illustrative embodiment, the additional information can include a content provider identifier. Additionally, the translated URL can include any additional information utilized by the CDN service provider during the request routing information, including, but not limited to, service plan information, file identifiers, and the like. Such information may be included in the modified URL or may be omitted from the translated URL and obtained by the CDN service provider 106 during the request routing process, such as by a lookup according to a content provider identifier. The translated URL would have the form of:

    • http://additional_information.cdnprovider.com/path/resource.xxx

In another embodiment, the information associated with the CDN service provider 106 is included in the modified URL, such as through prepending or other techniques, such that the translated URL can maintain all of the information associated with the original URL. In this embodiment, the translated URL would have the form of:

    • http://additional_information.cdnprovider.com/www.contentprovider.com/path/resource.xxx

With reference now to FIG. 3, after completion of the registration and translation processes illustrated in FIG. 2, a client computing device 102 subsequently generates a content request that is received and processed by the content provider 104, such as through the Web server 110. In accordance with an illustrative embodiment, the request for content can be in accordance with common network protocols, such as the hypertext transfer protocol (“HTTP”). Upon receipt of the content request, the content provider 104 identifies the appropriate responsive content. In an illustrative embodiment, the requested content can correspond to a Web page that is displayed on the client computing device 102 via the processing of information, such as hypertext markup language (“HTML”), extensible markup language (“XML”), and the like. The requested content can also include a number of embedded resource identifiers, described above, that corresponds to resource objects that should be obtained by the client computing device 102 as part of the processing of the requested content. The embedded resource identifiers can be generally referred to as original resource identifiers or original URLs.

Upon receipt of the requested content, the client computing device 102, such as through a browser software application, begins processing any of the markup code included in the content and attempts to acquire the resources identified by the embedded resource identifiers. Accordingly, the first step in acquiring the content corresponds to the issuance, by the client computing device 102 (through its local DNS resolver), of a DNS query for the original URL resource identifier that results in the identification of a DNS server authoritative to the “.” and the “com” portions of the translated URL. After processing the “.” and “com” portions of the embedded URL, the client computing device 102 then issues a DNS query for the resource URL that results in the identification of a DNS server authoritative to the “.cdnprovider” portion of the embedded URL. The issuance of DNS queries corresponding to the “.” and the “com” portions of a URL are well known and have not been illustrated.

With reference now to FIGS. 4A, in an illustrative embodiment, the successful resolution of the “cdnprovider” portion of the original URL identifies a network address, such as an IP address, of a DNS server associated with the CDN service provider 106. In one embodiment, the IP address can be a specific network address unique to a DNS server component of a POP. In another embodiment, the IP address can be shared by one or more POPs. In this embodiment, a further DNS query to the shared IP address utilizes a one-to-many network routing schema, such as anycast, such that a specific POP will receive the request as a function of network topology. For example, in an anycast implementation, a DNS query issued by a client computing device 102 to a shared IP address will arrive at a DNS server component logically having the shortest network topology distance, often referred to as network hops, from the client computing device. The network topology distance does not necessarily correspond to geographic distance. However, in some embodiments, the network topology distance can be inferred to be the shortest network distance between a client computing device 102 and a POP.

With continued reference to FIG. 4A, in either of the above identified embodiments (or any other embodiment), a specific DNS server in the DNS component 118 of a POP 116 receives the DNS query corresponding to the original URL from the client computing device 102. Once one of the DNS servers in the DNS component 118 receives the request, the specific DNS server attempts to resolve the request. In one illustrative embodiment, as shown in reference to FIG. 5, a specific DNS server resolves the DNS query by identifying an IP address of a cache server component that will process the request for the requested resource. As described above and as will be described further below in reference to FIG. 6, a selected resource cache component can process the request by either providing the requested resource if it is available or attempt to obtain the requested resource from another source, such as a peer cache server computing device or the origin server 112 of the content provider 104.

Returning to FIG. 4A, as an alternative to selecting a resource cache component upon receipt of a DNS query as described in reference to FIG. 5, the CDN service provider 106 can maintain sets of various alternative resource identifiers. The alternative resource identifiers can be provided by the CDN service provider 106 to the client computing device 102 such that a subsequent DNS query on the alternative resource identifier will be processed by a different DNS server component within the CDN service provider's network. In an illustrative embodiment, the alternative resource identifiers are in the form of one or more canonical name (“CNAME”) records. In one embodiment, each CNAME record identifies a domain of the CDN service provider 106 (e.g., “cdnprovider.com” or “cdnprovider-1.com”). As will be explained in greater detail below, the domain in the CNAME does not need to be the same domain found in original URL or in a previous CNAME record. Additionally, each CNAME record includes additional information, such as request routing information, (e.g., “request routing information”). An illustrative CNAME record can have the form of:

    • http://request_routing_information.cdnprovider.com/path/resource.xxx CNAMErequest_routing_information.cdnprovider.com

In an illustrative embodiment, the CNAME records are generated and provided by the DNS servers to identify a more appropriate DNS server of the CDN service provider 106. As used in accordance with the present disclosure, appropriateness can be defined in any manner by the CDN service provider 106 for a variety of purposes. In an illustrative embodiment, as will be described in greater detail below in reference to FIGS. 7 and 8, the CDN service provider 106 will utilize client location information associated with the client computing device 102 or its local DNS resolver, at least in part, to identify the more appropriate DNS server of the CDN service provider 106. In particular, the CDN service provider 106 can utilize an IP address associated with a client computing device DNS query to identify a corresponding location-based identifier representing a possible location of the client computing device. The CDN service provider 106 can then, in turn, utilize the location-based identifier to identify a destination identifier representing a geographic region associated with the CDN service provider 106 from which the resource request should be resolved. Based on the destination identifier, the CDN service provider 106 can then select a POP 116, 122, 128 from a set of POPs that are capable of servicing resource requests for the destination corresponding to the destination identifier. In one example, if more than one POP is identified in the set, the CDN service provider 106 can utilize a distribution allocation for selecting a specific POP associated with the identified destination. In another example, once a POP is selected, the CDN service provider 106 can further use health information to determine whether the selected POP is available to service requests before providing the client computing device with a CNAME corresponding to the selected POP. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the above functionality is illustrative in nature and accordingly should not be construed as limiting.

As described above, in addition to the consideration of client location information (either of the end-client or its associated local DNS resolver component), the CDN service provider 106 can utilize the additional information (e.g., the “additional information”) included in the translated URL to select a more appropriate DNS server. In one aspect, the CDN service provider 106 can utilize the additional information to select from a set of DNS servers identified as satisfying criteria associated with the client location information. In another aspect, the CDN service provider 106 can utilize the additional information to validate the DNS server selected in accordance with the client location information or to select an alternative DNS server previously selected in accordance with the client location information. In one example, the CDN service provider 106 can attempt to direct a DNS query to DNS servers according to additional geographic criteria. The additional geographic criteria can correspond to geographic-based regional service plans contracted between the CDN service-provider 106 and the content provider 104 in which various CDN service provider 106 POPs are grouped into geographic regions. Accordingly, a client computing device 102 DNS query received in a region not corresponding to the content provider's regional plan may be better processed by a DNS server in region corresponding to the content provider's regional plan.

In another example, the CDN service provider 106 can attempt to direct a DNS query to DNS servers according to service level criteria. The service level criteria can correspond to service or performance metrics contracted between the CDN service provider 106 and the content provider 104. Examples of performance metrics can include latencies of data transmission between the CDN service provider POPs and the client computing devices 102, total data provided on behalf of the content provider 104 by the CDN service provider POPs, error rates for data transmissions, and the like.

In still a further example, the CDN service provider 106 can attempt to direct a DNS query to DNS servers according to network performance criteria. The network performance criteria can correspond to measurements of network performance for transmitting data from the CDN service provider POPs to the client computing device 102. Examples of network performance metrics can include network data transfer latencies (measured by the client computing device or the CDN service provider 106, network data error rates, and the like.

In accordance with an illustrative embodiment, the DNS server maintains a data store that defines CNAME records for various original URLs. If a DNS query corresponding to a particular original URL matches an entry in the data store, the DNS server returns a CNAME record as defined in the data store. In an illustrative embodiment, the data store can include multiple CNAME records corresponding to a particular original URL. The multiple CNAME records would define a set of potential candidates that can be returned to the client computing device. In such an embodiment, the DNS server, either directly or via a network-based service, can implement additional logic in selecting an appropriate CNAME from a set of possible of CNAMEs. In an illustrative embodiment, each DNS server component 118, 124, 130 maintains the same data stores that define CNAME records, which can be managed centrally by the CDN service provider 106. Alternatively, each DNS server component 118, 124, 130 can have POP specific data stores that define CNAME records, which can be managed centrally by the CDN service provider 106 or locally at the POP 116, 122, 128. Still further, each DNS server computing device within the DNS server components 118, 124, 130 can utilize shared data stores managed by a respective POP or a local data store specific to an individual DNS server computing device.

The returned CNAME can also include request routing information that is different from or in addition to the information provided in the URL/CNAME of the current DNS query. For example, a specific regional plan can be identified in the “request_routing_information” portion of the specific CNAME record. A similar approach could be taken to identify service level plans and file management by including a specific identifier in the “request_routing_information” portion of the CNAME record. In another embodiment, request routing information can be found in the identification of a CDN service provider 106 domain different from the domain found in the current URL/CNAME. For example, a specific regional plan domain (e.g., “cdnprovder-region1.com”) could be used in the domain name portion of the specific CNAME record. Any additional request routing information can be prepended to the existing request routing information in the current URL/CNAME such that the previous request routing information would not be lost (e.g., serviceplan.regionalplan.cdnprovider.com). One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that additional or alternative techniques and/or combination of techniques may be used to include the additional request routing information in the CNAME record that is selected by the DNS server component 118.

With continued reference to FIG. 4A, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the DNS server may select (or otherwise obtain) a CNAME record that is intended to resolve to a more appropriate DNS server of the CDN service provider 106. It may be possible, however, that the same DNS server would also be authoritative for the subsequent DNS query for the CNAME to be provided to the client computing device. For example, a specific DNS server may be authoritative based on the client location information. Thus, returning a CNAME would still result in the DNS query arriving at the same DNS server (which may also be due in part to the client computing device's geography). In such an embodiment, the DNS server, such as DNS server component 118, may choose to resolve the future DNS query in advance.

With reference now to FIG. 4B, upon receipt of the CNAME from the DNS server component 118, the client computing device 102 generates a subsequent DNS query corresponding to the CNAME. As previously discussed with regard to FIG. 4A, the DNS query process could first start with DNS queries for the “.” and “com” portions, followed by a query for the “cdnprovider” portion of the CNAME. To the extent, however, that the results of a previous DNS queries can be cached (and remain valid), the client computing device 102 can utilize the cached information and does not need to repeat the entire process. However, at some point, depending on whether the CNAME provided by DNS server component 118 (FIG. 4A) and the previous URL/CNAME share common CDN service provider domains, the current CNAME DNS query will be processed by a different POP provided by the CDN service provider 106. As illustrated in FIG. 4B, the DNS server component 124 of POP 122 receives the current CNAME based on the different information in the current CNAME previously provided by the DNS server component 118. As previously described, the DNS server component 124 can then determine whether to resolve the DNS query on the CNAME with an IP address of a cache component that will process the content request or whether to provide another alternative resource identifier selected in the manners described above.

For purposes of illustration, assume that the DNS server component 124 processes the content request by returning an IP address of a resource cache component. In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS server component 124 can utilize a variety of information in selecting a resource cache component. In one example, the DNS server component 124 can default to a selection of a resource cache component of the same POP. In another example, the DNS server components can select a resource cache component based on various load balancing or load sharing algorithms. Still further, the DNS server components can utilize network performance metrics or measurements to assign specific resource cache components. The IP address selected by a DNS server component may correspond to a specific caching server in the resource cache. Alternatively, the IP address can correspond to a hardware/software selection component (such as a load balancer).

With reference now to FIG. 6, in an illustrative example, assume that the DNS server component 124 has selected the resource cache component 126 of POP 122. Upon receipt of the IP address for the resource cache component 126, the client computing device 102 transmits a request for the requested content to the resource cache component 126. The resource cache component 126 processes the request in a manner described above and the requested content is transmitted to the client computing device 102.

With reference now to FIG. 7, one embodiment of a request routine 700 implemented by the CDN service provider 106 for processing a resource request will be described. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that actions/steps outlined for routine 700 may be implemented by one or many computing devices/components that are associated with the CDN service provider 106. Accordingly, routine 700 has been logically associated as being generally performed by the CDN service provider 106, and thus the following illustrative embodiments should not be construed as limiting.

At block 702, one of the DNS server components 118, 124, 130 receives a DNS query corresponding to a resource identifier. As previously discussed, the resource identifier can be a URL that has been embedded in content requested by the client computing device 102 and previously provided by the content provider 104. Alternatively, the resource identifier can also correspond to a CNAME provided by a content provider DNS server in response to a DNS query previously received from the client computing device 102. The receiving DNS server also obtains an IP address associated with the DNS query from the requesting client computing device 102 (“query IP address”) at block 702. The query IP address can correspond to an IP address of the client computing device or any local DNS resolver component associated with the client computing device.

Next, at block 704, the receiving DNS server obtains a location-based identifier associated with the query IP address. Each DNS server maintains (or otherwise has access to) a data store 134 mapping a set of location-based identifiers with at least portions of known IP addresses (e.g., mapping a specific location-based identifier with a specific IP address or specific partial IP address). Utilizing the data store 134, the receiving DNS server attempts to match the IP address associated with the client computing device 102 DNS query (as transmitted via the local DNS resolver component) with the IP addresses in the data store 134. If the query IP address can be partially matched to an IP address in the data store 134, the DNS server identifies a corresponding location-based identifier. As similarly set forth above, the location-based identifiers can correspond to locations directly determined based on physical locations or logical locations associated with the origin of the DNS query. Additionally, the location-based identifier can be inferred based on associating a relative location to known locations. For example, the location-based identifier can be attributed to known locations of POPs (corresponding to the CDN service provider) based on measured latency information associated with request routing between the client computing device or its local DNS resolver and these POPs. The measured latency information can be premeasured, such as through testing procedures or previously observed request routing behavior. Alternatively, the measured latency information can be dynamically measured in a real time basis or semi-real time basis.

In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS server also optionally obtains a confidence factor associated with the location-based identifier from the data store 134 at block 704. The confidence factor corresponds to a degree of confidence in the accuracy of the associated location-based identifier to the query IP address. The optional confidence factor will be further discussed in reference to FIG. 8.

Next, at a block 706, the receiving DNS server determines a POP from a set of one or more POPs associated with the obtained location-based identifier for resolving the resource request. Generally, the set of one or more POPs are capable of servicing resource requests from a region associated with the identified location of the requesting client computing device 102. As will be described further below, FIG. 8 illustrates one embodiment of a request routing subroutine for performing the functionality associated with block 706.

At decision block 708, a test is conducted to determine whether the current DNS server is authoritative to resolve the DNS query. In one illustrative embodiment, the DNS server can determine whether it is authoritative to resolve the DNS query if the determined POP for resolving the resource request corresponds to the same POP associated with the receiving DNS server. If the determined POP indeed corresponds to the same POP associated with the receiving DNS server, then the receiving DNS server is considered to be authoritative, and the receiving DNS server identifies a cache server associated with the resource cache component from the same POP to process a subsequent client resource request (e.g., a request for the embedded resource) at block 710. The receiving DNS server resolves the DNS query by returning the IP address of, for example, a default or specific cache server or a load balancing component (as appropriate) associated with the resource cache component from the same POP. A number of methodologies for selecting an appropriate resource cache component at the POP may be implemented.

Alternatively, if at decision block 708 the determined POP corresponds to another POP of the CDN service provider 106, and hence the receiving DNS server is not authoritative, the receiving DNS server selects and transmits an alternative resource identifier at block 712. Specifically, in one embodiment, the receiving DNS server identifies an appropriate CNAME corresponding to the selected POP and transmits the CNAME to the client computing device 102. At block 714, different DNS server components 118, 124, 130 then receive a DNS query from the client computing device 102 corresponding to the CNAME. The routine 700 then returns to decision block 708 and continues to repeat as appropriate.

Alternative or additional methodologies may also be practiced to determine whether the DNS server is authoritative. In one embodiment, the receiving DNS server may maintain one or more CNAMEs that define various alternatives for request routing processing based on geographic regions of the CDN service provider 106. In this embodiment, instead of determining a POP associated with the obtained location-based identifier at block 706, the receiving DNS server can determine a destination identifier associated with the obtained location of the client computing device, as will be similarly discussed below in reference to FIG. 8 at block 806. The DNS server in this alternative embodiment can then select an appropriate CNAME of an alternative POP based on the determined destination identifier alone or in combination with other request routing criteria.

With reference now to FIG. 8, one embodiment of a request routing subroutine 800 for selecting a POP associated with the location of the requesting client computing device will be described. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that actions/steps outlined for routine 800 may be implemented by one or many computing devices/components that are associated with the CDN service provider 106. Accordingly, routine 800 has been logically associated as being performed by the CDN service provider 106.

At decision block 802, where the receiving DNS server of the CDN service provider 106 has obtained a confidence factor associated with the location-based identifier (from block 704 of FIG. 7), a test is performed to determine whether the confidence factor exceeds a minimum threshold value. If the confidence factor does not exceed a minimum threshold, the DNS server assigns a default location-based identifier at block 804. In one embodiment, the default location-based identifier may correspond to the location of the receiving DNS server. If the confidence factor associated with the obtained location-based identifier exceeds the minimum threshold at block 802 or after a default location-based identifier is assigned at block 804, the receiving DNS server determines a destination identifier for the DNS query at block 806.

However, in an alternative embodiment, the foregoing functionality associated with obtaining and analyzing the confidence factor may be eliminated. In one embodiment, this functionality may instead be implemented as a preprocessing step such that the query IP address to location-based identifier mappings provided in the data store 134 already take a confidence assessment into consideration. For example, prior to generating the query IP address to location-based identifier mappings, any data mapping entry having a low confidence factor may be filtered out of the data mappings. The filtered query IP address to location-based identifier mappings may then be used by the CDN service provider 106 to determine a destination identifier at block 806.

Returning to block 806 of FIG. 8, in one embodiment, the receiving DNS server determines the destination identifier according to a manually generated table from the data store 134 in which the destination identifier is determined as a function of the location-based identifier. However, the receiving DNS server can also provide an alternative destination identifier in accordance with a manually initiated administrative process. One embodiment of the selection of the initial destination identifier and the manually initiated administrative process follows.

In an illustrative embodiment, the receiving DNS server utilizes the manually generated table mapping location-based identifiers to destination identifiers based on vector mapping and additional CDN administrator manipulation. The destination identifier corresponds to a definition of a geographic region encompassing one or more locations (e.g., a West Coast destination encompassing the states of Washington, Oregon and California). However, the DNS server may be configured to override the default destination identifier in accordance with a manually configured exception process determined as a function of the identity of the content provider (as obtained through the content provider identifier included in the DNS query).

In one embodiment, a CDN administrator can override the allocation of a destination identifier for specific content provider identifiers. For example, the DNS server can utilize the content provider identifier to ensure that the content provider's subscription with CDN service provider 106 allows content to be served from the destination identified in the mapping table. As another example, the content provider identifier can be manually designated to be associated with an alternative destination identifier to redistribute at least a portion of incoming resource requests for a particular content provider among several POPs (e.g., to avoid servicing content requests for a single web page via a single destination by offloading to a different destination).

Next, at block 808, based on the selected destination identifier, the receiving DNS server selects a POP from a list of one or more POPs that have been manually determined by the CDN administrator to be capable of servicing resource requests for the identified destination. If more than one POP is identified in the list of POPS, the receiving DNS server can select a specific POP according a specified distribution allocation for the corresponding destination (e.g., POP A (75%); POP B (25%)).

The receiving DNS server then determines whether the selected POP is available at decision block 810. In one embodiment, the DNS server evaluates the availability of the selected POP using POP health information indicative of the availability of the selected POP to process incoming resource requests. If the selected POP is available (as indicated via the POP health information), the receiving DNS server maintains the POP selection from block 808. Accordingly, the process will return to decision block 708 of FIG. 7, where if the receiving DNS server is not authoritative, the receiving DNS server returns a CNAME that will result in the receipt of the DNS query by the selected POP (or one of a set of identified POPs). If, however, the selected POP corresponds to the current POP of the receiving DNS server (i.e., the receiving DNS server is authoritative), the receiving DNS server resolves the DNS query by returning the IP address of the default resource cache component at the POP as the CNAME does not necessarily need to be provided (unless additional request routing processing will be implemented).

If the selected POP is not available (as indicated via the POP health information), the receiving DNS server can select an alternative POP at block 814 to process the DNS query. In one embodiment, the alternative POP can be selected via a failover list of alternative POPs that is manually set by a CDN administrator. Specifically, the receiving DNS server can select a specific alternative POP from the failover list according to a specified distribution. As similarly described above, processing will then return to decision block 708 of FIG. 7, where if the receiving DNS server is not authoritative for the alternative POP, the receiving DNS server returns a CNAME that will result in the receipt of the DNS query by the selected alternative POP (or one of a set of POPs). If, however, the selected alternative POP corresponds to the current POP of the receiving DNS server (i.e., the receiving DNS server is authoritative), the receiving DNS server resolves the DNS query by returning the IP address of the default resource cache component at the alternative POP as the CNAME does not necessarily need to be provided (unless additional request routing processing will be implemented).

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art and others that all of the functions described in this disclosure may be embodied in software executed by one or more processors of the disclosed components and mobile communication devices. The software may be persistently stored in any type of non-volatile storage.

Conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.

Any process descriptions, elements, or blocks in the flow diagrams described herein and/or depicted in the attached figures should be understood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments described herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those skilled in the art. It will further be appreciated that the data and/or components described above may be stored on a computer-readable medium and loaded into memory of the computing device using a drive mechanism associated with a computer readable storing the computer executable components such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, or network interface further, the component and/or data can be included in a single device or distributed in any manner. Accordingly, general purpose computing devices may be configured to implement the processes, algorithms and methodology of the present disclosure with the processing and/or execution of the various data and/or components described above.

It should be emphasized that many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments, the elements of which are to be understood as being among other acceptable examples. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5341477Aug 6, 1993Aug 23, 1994Digital Equipment CorporationBroker for computer network server selection
US5611049Jun 3, 1992Mar 11, 1997Pitts; William M.System for accessing distributed data cache channel at each network node to pass requests and data
US5774660Aug 5, 1996Jun 30, 1998Resonate, Inc.World-wide-web server with delayed resource-binding for resource-based load balancing on a distributed resource multi-node network
US5892914Feb 26, 1997Apr 6, 1999Pitts; William MichaelSystem for accessing distributed data cache at each network node to pass requests and data
US6016512Aug 18, 1998Jan 18, 2000Telcordia Technologies, Inc.Enhanced domain name service using a most frequently used domain names table and a validity code table
US6026452Aug 31, 1998Feb 15, 2000Pitts; William MichaelNetwork distributed site cache RAM claimed as up/down stream request/reply channel for storing anticipated data and meta data
US6052718Jan 7, 1997Apr 18, 2000Sightpath, IncReplica routing
US6085234Jul 23, 1998Jul 4, 2000Inca Technology, Inc.Remote file services network-infrastructure cache
US6098096Dec 9, 1996Aug 1, 2000Sun Microsystems, Inc.Method and apparatus for dynamic cache preloading across a network
US6108703May 19, 1999Aug 22, 2000Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyGlobal hosting system
US6182111May 15, 1998Jan 30, 2001Hitachi, Ltd.Method and system for managing distributed data
US6205475Aug 24, 1999Mar 20, 2001William Michael PittsRequest interceptor in network nodes for determining local storage of file image satisfying predetermined criteria
US6286084Sep 16, 1998Sep 4, 2001Cisco Technology, Inc.Methods and apparatus for populating a network cache
US6304913Nov 9, 1998Oct 16, 2001Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ)Internet system and method for selecting a closest server from a plurality of alternative servers
US6351743May 26, 1999Feb 26, 2002Lucent Technologies Inc.Method and apparatus for operating domain name servers
US6351775May 30, 1997Feb 26, 2002International Business Machines CorporationLoading balancing across servers in a computer network
US6363411Oct 19, 1999Mar 26, 2002Mci Worldcom, Inc.Intelligent network
US6366952Mar 16, 2001Apr 2, 2002Network Caching Technology, L.L.C.Cache channel at network nodes to pass request and data or pointer to shared buffer
US6457047May 8, 2000Sep 24, 2002Verity, Inc.Application caching system and method
US6484143Aug 18, 2000Nov 19, 2002Speedera Networks, Inc.User device and system for traffic management and content distribution over a world wide area network
US6505241Jan 13, 2001Jan 7, 2003Network Caching Technology, L.L.C.Network intermediate node cache serving as proxy to client node to request missing data from server
US6553413Jun 28, 2000Apr 22, 2003Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyContent delivery network using edge-of-network servers for providing content delivery to a set of participating content providers
US6654807Dec 6, 2001Nov 25, 2003Cable & Wireless Internet Services, Inc.Internet content delivery network
US6678791Aug 4, 2001Jan 13, 2004Sun Microsystems, Inc.System and method for session-aware caching
US6694358Aug 23, 2000Feb 17, 2004Speedera Networks, Inc.Performance computer network method
US6732237Aug 29, 2000May 4, 2004Oracle International CorporationMulti-tier caching system
US6754699Jul 19, 2001Jun 22, 2004Speedera Networks, Inc.Content delivery and global traffic management network system
US6754706Aug 11, 2000Jun 22, 2004Speedera Networks, Inc.Scalable domain name system with persistence and load balancing
US6769031Sep 29, 2000Jul 27, 2004Interland, Inc.Dynamically incorporating updates to active configuration information
US6785704 *Jul 3, 2000Aug 31, 2004Fastforward NetworksContent distribution system for operation over an internetwork including content peering arrangements
US6804706Nov 9, 2002Oct 12, 2004Network Caching Technology, L.L.C.Network system for transmitting overwritten portion of client side node cache image to server site through intermediate downstream nodes updating cache images of data requested by client
US6829654Jun 23, 2000Dec 7, 2004Cloudshield Technologies, Inc.Apparatus and method for virtual edge placement of web sites
US6981017Dec 11, 2000Dec 27, 2005Digital River, Inc.Predictive pre-download using normalized network object identifiers
US6990526May 22, 2001Jan 24, 2006Pointred Technologies, Inc.Method and apparatus for web caching
US6996616Apr 17, 2001Feb 7, 2006Akamai Technologies, Inc.HTML delivery from edge-of-network servers in a content delivery network (CDN)
US7003555Jun 23, 2000Feb 21, 2006Cloudshield Technologies, Inc.Apparatus and method for domain name resolution
US7006099Jan 31, 2001Feb 28, 2006Aware, Inc.Cache system and method for generating uncached objects from cached and stored object components
US7007089 *Jun 6, 2002Feb 28, 2006Akarnai Technologies, Inc.Content delivery network map generation using passive measurement data
US7010578Sep 21, 2000Mar 7, 2006Akamai Technologies, Inc.Internet content delivery service with third party cache interface support
US7010598Feb 11, 2003Mar 7, 2006Akamai Technologies, Inc.Method and apparatus for measuring stream availability, quality and performance
US7058706Sep 7, 2000Jun 6, 2006Akamai Technologies, Inc.Method and apparatus for determining latency between multiple servers and a client
US7065587Aug 29, 2001Jun 20, 2006Microsoft CorporationPeer-to-peer name resolution protocol (PNRP) and multilevel cache for use therewith
US7072982Sep 13, 2001Jul 4, 2006Microsoft CorporationUniversal naming scheme for peer to peer resources
US7082476May 24, 2000Jul 25, 2006Cisco Technology, Inc.System and method of optimizing retrieval of network resources by identifying and substituting embedded symbolic host name references with network addresses in accordance with substitution policies
US7086061Aug 1, 2002Aug 1, 2006Foundry Networks, Inc.Statistical tracking of global server load balancing for selecting the best network address from ordered list of network addresses based on a set of performance metrics
US7092997Aug 6, 2001Aug 15, 2006Digital River, Inc.Template identification with differential caching
US7099936Mar 29, 2002Aug 29, 2006International Business Machines CorporationMulti-tier service level agreement method and system
US7103645Apr 17, 2003Sep 5, 2006Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyMethod and system for providing content delivery to a set of participating content providers
US7117262Oct 30, 2001Oct 3, 2006Inktomi CorporationCooperative management of distributed network caches
US7133905Apr 9, 2002Nov 7, 2006Akamai Technologies, Inc.Method and system for tiered distribution in a content delivery network
US7146560May 18, 2001Dec 5, 2006Xerox CorporationSystems and methods for managing identity information
US7152118Feb 25, 2002Dec 19, 2006Broadcom CorporationSystem, method and computer program product for caching domain name system information on a network gateway
US7174382Apr 9, 2002Feb 6, 2007Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Interest-based connections in peer-to-peer networks
US7185063Jun 22, 2001Feb 27, 2007Digital River, Inc.Content delivery network using differential caching
US7188214Aug 7, 2001Mar 6, 2007Digital River, Inc.Efficient compression using differential caching
US7194522Jun 21, 2004Mar 20, 2007Akamai Technologies, Inc.Content delivery and global traffic management network system
US7200667Feb 25, 2005Apr 3, 2007Microsoft CorporationUniversal naming scheme for peer-to-peer resources
US7225254Feb 6, 2004May 29, 2007Akamai Technologies, Inc.Performance computer network method
US7240100Apr 16, 2001Jul 3, 2007Akamai Technologies, Inc.Content delivery network (CDN) content server request handling mechanism with metadata framework support
US7260598May 3, 2002Aug 21, 2007Cisco Technology, Inc.Methods and apparatus for processing client requests in a content distribution network using client lists
US7269784Apr 4, 2001Sep 11, 2007Kasriel StephaneServer-originated differential caching
US7310686Oct 27, 2002Dec 18, 2007Paxfire, Inc.Apparatus and method for transparent selection of an Internet server based on geographic location of a user
US7320131Jun 6, 2001Jan 15, 2008Cisco Technology, Inc.Methods and apparatus for selecting a server to process a request
US7321918Oct 14, 2004Jan 22, 2008Microsoft CorporationServer-side control objects for processing client-side user interface elements
US7363291Mar 29, 2002Apr 22, 2008Google Inc.Methods and apparatus for increasing efficiency of electronic document delivery to users
US7441045 *Feb 16, 2001Oct 21, 2008F5 Networks, Inc.Method and system for balancing load distribution on a wide area network
US7461170Sep 1, 2004Dec 2, 2008Microsoft CorporationZone-based rendering of resource addresses
US7464142Dec 12, 2003Dec 9, 2008International Business Machines CorporationPort type agnostic proxy support for web services intermediates
US7492720May 23, 2001Feb 17, 2009Niksun, Inc.Apparatus and method for collecting and analyzing communications data
US7499998Dec 1, 2004Mar 3, 2009Cisco Technology, Inc.Arrangement in a server for providing dynamic domain name system services for each received request
US7502836Nov 8, 2005Mar 10, 2009Cisco Technology, Inc.System and method for processing a request for information in a network
US7548947Oct 28, 2005Jun 16, 2009Digital River, Inc.Predictive pre-download of a network object
US7552235Dec 11, 2003Jun 23, 2009International Business Machines CorporationAutonomic selection of a request routing policy based upon cache effectiveness
US7624169Nov 10, 2006Nov 24, 2009Akamai Technologies, Inc.Scalable, high performance and highly available distributed storage system for Internet content
US7653700 *Nov 16, 2000Jan 26, 2010Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for performing client-centric load balancing of multiple globally-dispersed servers
US7657622Dec 23, 2003Feb 2, 2010At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P.Unified web hosting and content distribution system and method for assuring predetermined performance levels
US7680897Apr 8, 2003Mar 16, 2010Novell, Inc.Methods and systems for managing network traffic
US7702724May 27, 2004Apr 20, 2010Oracle America, Inc.Web services message broker architecture
US7739400Apr 7, 2003Jun 15, 2010Mirror Image Internet, Inc.Internet communication system
US7747720May 23, 2005Jun 29, 2010Cisco Technology, Inc.Arrangement for selecting a server to provide distributed services from among multiple servers based on a location of a client device
US7756913Aug 2, 2004Jul 13, 2010Cisco Technology, Inc.System and methods for selecting content distribution
US7761572Jul 30, 2004Jul 20, 2010Cisco Technology, Inc.Proximity as an aid to caching and secondary serving of data
US7774342Jul 21, 2008Aug 10, 2010Aol Inc.Resolving queries based on automatic determination of requestor geographic location
US7792989Apr 21, 2005Sep 7, 2010Cisco Technology, Inc.Arrangement for selecting a server to provide distributed services from among multiple servers based on a location of a client device
US7813308Feb 27, 2008Oct 12, 2010Dell Products L.P.System and method for location-based configuration of an information handling system
US7818454 *Sep 15, 2005Oct 19, 2010Hostway CorporationHost migration system
US7836177Dec 22, 2008Nov 16, 2010Digital River, Inc.Network object predictive pre-download device
US7912921Nov 22, 2005Mar 22, 2011Microsoft CorporationMethod and apparatus for selecting cache and proxy policy
US7925782 *Jun 30, 2008Apr 12, 2011Amazon Technologies, Inc.Request routing using network computing components
US7962597Mar 31, 2008Jun 14, 2011Amazon Technologies, Inc.Request routing based on class
US7991910Nov 17, 2008Aug 2, 2011Amazon Technologies, Inc.Updating routing information based on client location
US20010034704Feb 21, 2001Oct 25, 2001Jay FarhatMethod and system to facilitate financial settlement of service access transactions between multiple parties
US20010049741Dec 13, 1999Dec 6, 2001Bryan D. SkeneMethod and system for balancing load distribution on a wide area network
US20010056416Mar 15, 2001Dec 27, 2001J.J. Garcia-Luna-AcevesSystem and method for discovering information objects and information object repositories in computer networks
US20010056500Aug 17, 2001Dec 27, 2001Digital Island, Inc.Optimized network resource location
US20020007413Apr 26, 2001Jan 17, 2002Garcia-Luna-Aceves JjSystem and method for using a mapping between client addresses and addresses of caches to support content delivery
US20020048269Aug 3, 2001Apr 25, 2002Hong Jack L.Intelligent demand driven recognition of URL objects in connection oriented transactions
US20020049608Jun 12, 2001Apr 25, 2002Hartsell Neal D.Systems and methods for providing differentiated business services in information management environments
US20020052942 *Jul 19, 2001May 2, 2002Swildens Eric Sven-JohanContent delivery and global traffic management network system
US20020062372Aug 3, 2001May 23, 2002Jack HongHigh performance server farm with tagging and pipelining
US20020068554Apr 9, 1999Jun 6, 2002Steve DusseMethod and system facilitating web based provisioning of two-way mobile communications devices
US20020078233Jul 9, 2001Jun 20, 2002Alexandros BilirisMethod and apparatus for content distribution network brokering and peering
US20020087374Jan 3, 2001Jul 4, 2002International Business Machines CorporationApparatus and method for verifying categorization of services using canonical service description tests
US20020092026Aug 14, 2001Jul 11, 2002International Business Machines CorporationMethod and apparatus for broadcast delivery of content to a client-side cache based on user preferences
US20020099616Jan 23, 2001Jul 25, 2002Wim SweldensSystem and method for distributing web content on a network
US20020101836Jan 27, 2001Aug 1, 2002Motorola, Inc.Method and apparatus in a portable subscriber unit for minimizing a connection setup time through a communication network
US20030002484 *Jun 6, 2002Jan 2, 2003Freedman Avraham T.Content delivery network map generation using passive measurement data
US20030065739 *Oct 1, 2001Apr 3, 2003J. Mitchell ShnierMethods for independently generating a reference to desired information available from a remote source
US20040030620 *Jun 18, 2003Feb 12, 2004Ivor BenjaminMethod and system for charging a consumer for a packet based telecommunications transmission
US20040044791 *May 22, 2001Mar 4, 2004Pouzzner Daniel G.Internationalized domain name system with iterative conversion
US20040083307 *Oct 27, 2002Apr 29, 2004Mr. Sezen UysalApparatus and method for transparent selection of an internet server based on geographic location of a user
US20040172466 *Feb 25, 2003Sep 2, 2004Douglas Christopher PaulMethod and apparatus for monitoring a network
US20040249975 *Jun 15, 2001Dec 9, 2004Tuck Teo WeeComputer networks
US20060112176 *Oct 31, 2005May 25, 2006Liu Zaide EDomain name resolution using a distributed DNS network
US20060143293 *Feb 27, 2006Jun 29, 2006Akamai Technologies, Inc.Content delivery network map generation using passive measurement data
US20060265508 *May 2, 2005Nov 23, 2006Angel Franklin JSystem for administering a multiplicity of namespaces containing state information and services
US20070174426 *Mar 16, 2007Jul 26, 2007Swildens Eric SContent delivery and global traffic management network system
US20080008089 *Sep 20, 2007Jan 10, 2008Akamai Technologies, Inc.Optimal route selection in a content delivery network
US20080046596 *Oct 30, 2007Feb 21, 2008Afergan Michael MMethod for caching and delivery of compressed content in a content delivery network
US20080086574 *Oct 5, 2006Apr 10, 2008Limelight Networks, Inc.Remote Domain Name Service
US20090086741 *Oct 2, 2007Apr 2, 2009Microsoft CorporationUncovering the differences in backbone networks
US20090103707 *Sep 15, 2008Apr 23, 2009Mcgary FaithSystem and method for enhanced ENUM applications
US20090248893 *Mar 31, 2008Oct 1, 2009Richardson David RRequest routing
US20090327517 *Jun 30, 2008Dec 31, 2009Swaminathan SivasubramanianRequest routing using network computing components
US20100030662 *Jun 26, 2007Feb 4, 2010Steffan Gottfried KleinSystem and method for placing orders via the internet
US20100100629 *Dec 22, 2009Apr 22, 2010Limelight Networks, Inc.Domain name service resolver
US20100217801 *May 10, 2010Aug 26, 2010Akamai Technologies, Inc.Network performance monitoring in a content delivery system
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US8060561Jun 27, 2011Nov 15, 2011Amazon Technologies, Inc.Locality based content distribution
US8065417Nov 17, 2008Nov 22, 2011Amazon Technologies, Inc.Service provider registration by a content broker
US8073940Nov 17, 2008Dec 6, 2011Amazon Technologies, Inc.Managing content delivery network service providers
US8135820Apr 29, 2011Mar 13, 2012Amazon Technologies, Inc.Request routing based on class
US8156243Mar 31, 2008Apr 10, 2012Amazon Technologies, Inc.Request routing
US8219645 *Mar 26, 2010Jul 10, 2012Limelight Networks, Inc.Content delivery network cache grouping
US8219647 *Sep 26, 2011Jul 10, 2012Limelight Networks, Inc.Content delivery network cache grouping
US8331370Dec 17, 2009Dec 11, 2012Amazon Technologies, Inc.Distributed routing architecture
US8331371Dec 17, 2009Dec 11, 2012Amazon Technologies, Inc.Distributed routing architecture
US8356074Aug 9, 2012Jan 15, 2013Limelight Networks, Inc.Inter point of presence split architecture
US8370449 *Jun 18, 2012Feb 5, 2013Limelight Networks, Inc.Content delivery network cache grouping
US8458360 *Sep 15, 2012Jun 4, 2013Amazon Technologies, Inc.Request routing utilizing client location information
US8549531Sep 13, 2012Oct 1, 2013Amazon Technologies, Inc.Optimizing resource configurations
US8577992 *Sep 28, 2010Nov 5, 2013Amazon Technologies, Inc.Request routing management based on network components
US8667127Jan 13, 2011Mar 4, 2014Amazon Technologies, Inc.Monitoring web site content
US8683002 *Jan 2, 2013Mar 25, 2014Limelight Networks, Inc.Content delivery network cache grouping
US8700945 *Sep 23, 2011Apr 15, 2014Amazon Technologies, Inc.Content delivery failover
US8756341 *Mar 27, 2009Jun 17, 2014Amazon Technologies, Inc.Request routing utilizing popularity information
US8762526Sep 15, 2012Jun 24, 2014Amazon Technologies, Inc.Optimizing content management
US20110082982 *Mar 26, 2010Apr 7, 2011Limelight Networks, Inc.Content delivery network cache grouping
US20120072527 *Sep 26, 2011Mar 22, 2012Limelight Networks, Inc.Content delivery network cache grouping
US20120254343 *Jun 18, 2012Oct 4, 2012Limelight Networks, Inc.Content delivery network cache grouping
US20130246555 *Jan 2, 2013Sep 19, 2013Limelight Networks, Inc.Content devliery network cache grouping
Classifications
U.S. Classification709/238, 709/230, 709/217, 709/203, 709/226
International ClassificationG06F15/173
Cooperative ClassificationH04L67/32, H04L61/1511, H04L61/609, H04L29/12066, H04L67/1002, H04L67/1021
European ClassificationH04L29/12A2A1, H04L29/08N9A, H04L29/08N9A1H, H04L61/60K, H04L61/15A1
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Feb 28, 2011ASAssignment
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:RICHARDSON, DAVID R.;CORMIE, JOHN;PATEL, IMRAN S.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090303 TO 20090423;REEL/FRAME:025871/0346
Owner name: AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC., NEVADA