|Publication number||US8066713 B2|
|Application number||US 10/405,113|
|Publication date||Nov 29, 2011|
|Filing date||Mar 31, 2003|
|Priority date||Mar 31, 2003|
|Also published as||DE602004007707D1, DE602004007707T2, EP1464292A1, EP1464292B1, US8333773, US20040193171, US20080039856, US20090270872|
|Publication number||10405113, 405113, US 8066713 B2, US 8066713B2, US-B2-8066713, US8066713 B2, US8066713B2|
|Inventors||Thomas M. DiMauro, John Crombie, Richard Pellegrino|
|Original Assignee||Depuy Spine, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (147), Non-Patent Citations (117), Referenced by (8), Classifications (16), Legal Events (2) |
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Remotely-activated vertebroplasty injection device
US 8066713 B2
A remotely-activated injection device for use in vertebroplasty is provided to inject a flourescent probe material into a patient. The injection device includes a pump defining an injection chamber having an exit opening; an actuator; and a cable having a first end coupled to the actuator, and a second end remotely engaging the pump. The actuator remotely controls the pump by responsive movement of the cable to thereby cause injection of a flourescent probe material from the injection chamber of the pump through the exit opening to the patient.
1. A remotely-activated device for injecting a bone cement into a patient, comprising:
a pump defining an injection chamber having an exit opening, the pump having a bone cement for injection being located in the injection chamber, and a piston for driving the bone cement for injection through the exit opening;
a hollow bone needle extending from the exit opening for transferring the bone cement for injection directly to a patient;
a remote actuator, separate from the pump, and including a base and a lever, the lever having a first portion pivotally-connected to the base; and
a housing connecting the actuator to the pump across a distance;
whereby pivotal movements of the lever apply a force across the distance through the housing to cause responsive movement of the piston to drive the bone cement for remote injection through the exit opening and wherein the piston driver includes a gear mechanism.
2. The device of claim 1 further comprising a cable having a first end coupled to the actuator, and a second end engaging the pump, the actuator controlling the pump by mechanical force of the cable on the pump, causing injection of the bone cement from the injection chamber of the pump through the exit opening.
3. The device of claim 2 further comprising a piston driver engaging the piston to allow axial movement of the piston along a first axis defined by first and second end portions of the injection chamber, wherein the second end of the cable engages the piston driver and the actuator controls the piston driver by responsive movement of the cable to thereby cause axial movement of the piston toward the exit opening of the injection chamber, thereby further causing injection of the bone cement through the exit opening.
4. The device of claim 1
wherein the gear mechanism comprises:
a wheel having a perimeter of teeth, the wheel engaging first and second opposing elements;
the first opposing element having an end mounted to the piston;
the second opposing element having an end coupled to the second end of the cable, whereby responsive movement of the cable causes axial movement of the second element, thereby causing rotational movement of the wheel, thereby further causing axial movement of the first element and the piston toward the exit opening of the injection chamber.
5. The device of claim 1, further comprising an anchor for coupling the pump to a patient.
6. The device of claim 5
, further comprising:
a needle coupled to the exit opening in the second end portion of the injection chamber; and
the needle being guided to the patient through the anchor.
7. A method for remotely injecting a bone cement comprising:
guiding a hollow bone needle to a desired location within a patient's vertebral body;
placing a bone cement for injection into an injection chamber of a device, the device comprising:
a pump defining the injection chamber having an exit opening, the device further having a piston for driving the bone cement for injection through the exit opening;
the hollow bone needle extending from the exit opening for transferring the bone cement for injection directly to a patient;
a remote actuator spaced a distance apart from the pump and including a base and a lever, the lever having a first portion pivotally-connected to the base; and
a housing connecting the actuator to the pump;
whereby pivotal movements of the lever apply a force through the housing to cause responsive movement of the piston to drive the bone cement for injection through the exit opening;
pivotally moving the lever to apply a force across the distance through the housing to cause responsive movement of the piston to drive the bone cement for injection through the exit opening applying an imaging device to image the injection of bone cement at least at the desired location; wherein the actuator is outside of an imaging field created by the application of the imaging device.
8. The method of claim 7
, further comprising:
anchoring the device to a patient.
9. The method of claim 7, wherein the imaging device is a fluoroscope.
10. The method of claim 7, wherein the remote actuator base is a handheld based and the remote actuator is configured to be held and activated by hand.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein pivotally moving the lever comprises an operator holding the base and squeezing the lever by hand.
12. The method of claim 7, wherein the remote actuator is proximal with respect to the pump from the perspective of an operator of the device.
13. The method of claim 7, wherein the distance is at least about one foot.
14. The device of claim 1, wherein the distance is between about one foot and ten feet.
15. The device of claim 1, wherein the distance is at least about two feet.
16. The device of claim 1, wherein the distance is at least about five feet.
17. The device of claim 1, wherein the remote actuator is proximal with respect to the pump from the perspective of an operator of the device.
18. The device of claim 1, wherein the remote actuator base is a handheld base and the remote actuator is configured to be held and activated by hand.
19. The device of claim 1, wherein the distance is at least about one foot.
20. The device of claim 1, wherein the distance is between about one foot and ten feet.
21. The device of claim 1, wherein the distance is at least about two feet.
22. The device of claim 1, wherein the distance is at least about five feet.
23. The device of claim 1, wherein the distance is sufficient to allow an operator to operate the remote actuator outside the range of a fluoro-field directed at the pump.
24. The device of claim 1, further comprising an imaging system directed at the pump.
25. The device of claim 24, wherein the imaging system is fluoroscopic.
26. The device of claim 25, wherein the distance is sufficient to allow an operator to operate the remote actuator outside the range of a fluoro-field directed at the pump.
27. The method of claim 7, wherein the bone cement comprises PMMA.
28. The method of claim 7, wherein the bone cement has a paste-like consistency.
29. The device of claim 1, wherein the bone cement comprises PMMA.
30. The device of claim 1, wherein the bone cement has a paste-like consistency.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Over 700,000 vertebral fractures occur each year in the United States. Eighty-five percent of these vertebral fractures are associated with osteoporosis. Osteoporosis causes bone to lose density and strength resulting in porous, weak bones especially susceptible to fracture.
Vertebroplasty is a non-surgical procedure for combating the effects of osteoporosis and the like, in which a vertebral body is structurally reinforced using a special cement-like substance, or bone cement. A typical bone cement for use in vertebroplasty is called “polymethylmethacrylate acrylic cement” (PMMA). Vertebroplasty has been used in the treatment of vertebral lesions (hemangoma), spreadable tumors of the spine (e.g. cancer), and osteoporotic vertebral fracture.
When performing vertebroplasty, the clinician uses fluoroscopy for needle placement and for monitoring the injection of bone cement within the vertebral body. Using a simple syringe, the clinician is exposed to excessive x-ray radiation within a fluoro field produced by a fluoroscope. It is well known that excessive exposure to x-ray radiation is dangerous and even cancer-causing. Thus, in order to reduce such exposure, the clinician should perform this procedure outside the range of the fluoro field.
Known techniques for keeping the clinician outside of the fluoro field typically involve the use of a long extension tube, whereby one end of the tube extends from an injection pump and the other end is coupled to a hollow bone needle. The extension tube is used as a conduit for delivering the bone cement from the pump to the bone needle for injection into the vertebral body. The additional length of the extension tube allows a clinician to perform the vertebroplasty at a distance outside the fluoro field.
A disadvantage of such injection devices is that the extension tube produces a pressure drop, making it more difficult to deliver the bone cement through the tube. Mechanisms can be implemented to increase the pressure for pushing the cement through the tube. However, such mechanisms typically reduce the natural feedback or “feel” of the injection device, resulting in a number of pressure concerns. For example, the lack of natural feedback can cause the clinician to inadvertently leak bone cement into the surrounding tissue or the spinal cord itself, resulting in a number of serious health risks. Furthermore, the additional length of the tube makes such injection devices susceptible to premature curing or hardening, resulting in the tube becoming clogged.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to a device for remotely injecting a fluorescent probe material into a patient. The flourescent probe material can include, for example, a mixture of a bone cement (e.g., PMMA) and a flourescent probe (e.g., barium, tantalum). Embodiments of the invention include a pump defining an injection chamber having an exit opening, an actuator, and a cable. Although not so limited, the cable can be a tensile flexible cable or a rigid rod. The cable has a first end coupled to the actuator and a second end engaging the pump. The actuator controls the pump by responsive movement of the cable, causing injection of the fluorescent probe material from the injection chamber through the exit opening into the patient.
Particular embodiments of the invention include a pump, having a piston disposed within an inner surface of the injection chamber and a piston driver engaging the piston to allow axial movement of the piston along a first axis defined by first and second end portions of the injection chamber. The second end of the cable engages the piston driver such that the actuator can control the piston driver by responsive movement of the cable, thereby causing axial movement of the piston toward the exit opening of the injection chamber. The piston driver can include gear and pulley mechanisms. The piston driver can also include a lever, thereby providing a mechanical advantage in applying a force to the piston. In alternative embodiments, the piston driver may also include hydraulic cylinders or air cylinders.
In operation, an injection pump is anchored to the patient and a hollow bone needle extends from the exit opening of the pump for transferring the fluorescent probe material into the vertebral body of the patient. The needle can be straight or angled. By anchoring the pump directly to the patient, problems typically associated with extension tubes are eliminated.
Such embodiments improve clinician safety because the pump is remotely operated at a safe distance outside the range of the fluoro field. Furthermore, the pump can be anchored directly to the patient, thereby avoiding the use of extension tubes and thereby improving control and reducing pressure concerns.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1A is a diagram illustrating a general prior art procedure for performing vertebroplasty.
FIG. 1B is a representation of a prior art device for injecting a fluorescent probe material into a patient during vertebroplasty.
FIG. 2 is a diagram of a remotely-activated vertebroplasty injection device according to one embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 3 is a detailed schematic diagram of a remotely-activated injection device according to another embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an arrangement of the actuator and the cable according to the embodiment of the invention of FIG. 3.
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram illustrating a piston driver according to another alternative embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 6 is a detailed schematic diagram of a remotely-activated vertebroplasty injection device according to still another alternative embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram illustrating the anchor according to one embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 8A is a diagram illustrating a remotely-activated vertebroplasty injection device according to a further alternative embodiment.
FIG. 8B is a diagram illustrating the piston driver of FIG. 8A in more detail according to one embodiment.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The same number present in different drawings refers to the same item. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
FIG. 1A is a diagram illustrating a general procedure for performing vertebroplasty. In this procedure, anesthetized patient 10 lies on operating table 20 in a downward-facing, horizontal position underneath x-ray machine 30, referred to as a fluoroscope.
The clinician mixes the bone cement along with a flourescent probe to the consistency of a thin paste and prepares the resulting flourescent probe material for injection into the vertebral body through syringe 40, which is also shown in FIG. 1B. Flourescent probe material 42 can be barium, tantalum or other injectable substance that is visible under fluoroscopy. With fluoroscopy, the clinician is able to view the flourescent probe as it is injected into the patient and thereby control the injection process.
Fluoroscopy is a technique for obtaining “live” x-ray images of a patient. X-rays 35, represented in FIG. 1A, are transmitted from fluoroscope 30 through patient 10, striking a flourescent plate. The flourescent plate is coupled to an image intensifier, which is further coupled to a video camera. The camera, in turn, provides a live video feed to video monitor 50, highlighting the flourescent probe within patient 10.
Using video monitor 50 as a visual guide, the clinician positions hollow bone needle 44, shown in FIG. 1B, into the vertebral body in the patient's back and proceeds to inject the flourescent material. After injecting the bone cement, the cement hardens resulting in the stabilization of the vertebral body.
FIG. 2 is a diagram of a remotely-activated vertebroplasty injection device according to one embodiment of the invention. Injection device 10 includes injection pump 100 that is coupled to actuator 200 by cable 300 having a sufficient length to allow a clinician to operate pump 100 at a distance outside the range of the harmful fluoro field. For example, the cable can have a length of between about one (1) foot and about ten (10) feet, preferably at least two (2) feet, more preferably at least five (5) feet. Actuator 200 controls pump 100 by trigger 202, which causes responsive movement of cable 300, thereby injecting the fluorescent probe material from pump 100 through exit opening 106.
In operation, injection pump 100 is anchored to the patient and a hollow bone needle (not shown) extends from exit opening 106 of pump 100 for transferring the fluorescent probe material into the vertebral body of the patient. By anchoring pump 100 directly to the patient, problems typically associated with extension tubes are eliminated.
Remotely-activated injection device 10 can optionally include reservoir 400 for mixing bone cement (e.g., PMMA) and fluorescent probe (e.g., barium, tantalum) and for supplying the resulting fluorescent probe material to the injection chamber of injection pump 100. For more details regarding the reservoir and a particular bone cement, refer to U.S. patent application Publication US2002/0156483 entitled “Vertebroplasty Injection Device and Bone Cement Therefor,” filed Feb. 15, 2001, the entire teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.
FIG. 3 is a detailed schematic diagram of a remotely-activated injection device according to another embodiment of the invention. In this embodiment, pump 100 defines injection chamber 108 having exit opening 106. Piston 110 is disposed within an inner surface of injection chamber 108 for applying a force against the fluorescent probe material in order to push the material from the injection chamber through exit opening 106.
Piston driver 120 engages piston 110 to allow axial movement of the piston along an axis defined by the end portions of injection chamber 108 toward exit opening 106. The second end of flexible cable 300 engages piston driver 120 allowing actuator 200 to control piston driver 120 by responsive movements of cable 300. In particular, the clinician operates actuator 200 at a safe distance outside the range of the harmful fluoro field.
In the illustrated embodiment, piston driver 120 is a gear mechanism, which includes wheel 125 having a perimeter of teeth. Wheel 125 engages the teeth of two diametrically opposing elements 123, 127. Element 127 has one end mounted to an outer surface of piston 110 that is external to injection chamber 108, while element 123 has one end coupled to the engaging end of cable 300.
When actuator 200 is engaged, causing a responsive movement of the cable away from pump 100, element 123 engages wheel 125 causing a rotational movement. This rotational movement in turn causes wheel 125 to engage element 127, causing piston 110 to move axially along the inner surface of injection chamber 108 toward exit opening 106. As piston 110 moves, a force is exerted against the fluorescent probe material, thereby pushing the material through exit opening 106, where it is transferred to the patient through hollow bone needle 600.
FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an arrangement of the actuator and the cable according to one embodiment. In the illustrated embodiment, actuator 200 includes lever 202 pivotally-coupled to handheld base 204. In particular, lever portion 202 a is pivotally-coupled to the base at base portion 204 a, allowing lever 202 to move radially from a steady state position toward base 204. Lever portion 202 b, in turn, is coupled to one end of cable 300. By gripping lever 202 toward base 204, lever portion 202 b moves radially within base 204, thereby causing responsive movement of cable 300. The responsive movement of cable 300 engages pump 100 causing the injection of the fluorescent material into the patient.
Return spring 206 can be employed to cause lever 202 to return back to its original position as the grip on the lever is released. Actuator 200 can also include locking switch 208 for locking the radial position of lever 202, thereby preventing further responsive movement of cable 300. Base 204 can also include indicator 210 which relates the radial position of lever 202 to the volume of material injected into the patient (e.g., zero to 10 cc). Actuator 200 can be implemented in a variety of ways known to those skilled in the art to enable responsive movements of a cable.
In the illustrated embodiment, cable 300 is a tension cable. Semi-rigid housing 302 is coupled to actuator 200 by connector 304. Cable 300 is fed through housing 302 into actuator 200 where it is coupled to lever portion 202 b. According to one embodiment, the cable 300 is fed through a hole in lever portion 202 b and held in place by knob 306. Thus, as lever portion 202 b radially moves within base 204, cable 300 moves in response. The cable can also be implemented using a variety of cable types known to those skilled in the art for engaging a piston driver.
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram illustrating a piston driver according to another alternative embodiment of the invention. In this embodiment, the piston driver is a pulley mechanism, including at least three pulley wheels 130, 132, and 134 positioned relative to piston 110. For example, pulley wheels 130 and 134 are mounted on opposing sides of piston 110, and pulley wheel 132 is positioned at the head end of piston 110 a that is external to injection chamber 108. Cable 300 is fed through the pulley mechanism, such that a force from the cable can be applied to pulley wheel 132 in the direction of the head end of piston 110 a. For example, when actuator 200 causes responsive movement of cable 300 away from pump 100, cable 300 exerts a force against pulley wheel 132 pushing it against the head end of piston 110 a. This allows piston 110 to move axially within injection chamber 108 toward exit opening 106, resulting in the injection of the fluorescent probe material.
The fluorescent probe material can be supplied to injection chamber 108 from reservoir 400 through opening 109, as shown. For more information regarding the fluid communication of the reservoir and the injection chamber, refer to U.S. patent application Publication US2002/0156483 entitled “Vertebroplasty Injection Device and Bone Cement Therefor,” the entire teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.
FIG. 6 is a detailed schematic diagram of a remotely-activated vertebroplasty injection device according to still another alternative embodiment of the invention. In this embodiment, pump 100 includes lever 150, which provides a mechanical advantage in engaging a plunger. The plunger includes shaft 152 mounted to an outer surface of piston 110 that is external to injection chamber 108. For more information regarding the illustrated pump, refer to U.S. patent application Publication US2002/0156483, filed Feb. 15, 2001, the entire teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.
To remotely activate injection pump 100, the cable coupling injection pump 100 to actuator 200 is rigid rod 310. In particular, one end of rod 310 is attached to the lever, while the other end engages actuator 200. In this embodiment, actuator 200 can be implemented using a rachet and pawl design, in which the actuator causes rod 310 to move toward lever 150 when the trigger (i.e., rachet) is applied and engages teeth 315 of rod 310 (i.e., pawl).
As rod 310 pushes against lever 150, a force is exerted against shaft 152, which is attached to piston 110. Thus, the applied force allows piston 110 to move axially in injection chamber 108 toward exit opening 106, through which the flourescent material is injected. Return spring 154 can be employed to return lever 150 back to its original position as rod 310 is retracted back to actuator 300.
As shown in FIGS. 3 and 6, bone needle 600 is inserted through anchor 500, which mounts injection pump 100 to patient 10. The bone needle 600 can be straight as shown or bent at a angle (e.g., 90 degrees) in order to remove the pump 100 outside of the fluoro field. Anchor 500 fixes the positioning of the bone needle 600 within the vertebral body, preventing further movement. By anchoring the pump 100 to the patient, the bone needle 600 for an extension tube is avoided, allowing for greater control and reduced pressure concerns.
FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram illustrating the anchor according to one embodiment. In some embodiments, the anchors that are used are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/259,689, entitled “Novel Device for Advancing a Functional Element, filed on Sep. 30, 2002, the entire teachings of which are incorporated by reference.
FIG. 8A is a diagram illustrating a remotely-activated vertebroplasty injection device according to a further alternative embodiment. In this embodiment, the pump includes a housing 180 which is attached to the patient using an adhesive pad 162. The housing 180 includes a funnel-shaped exit 170, which is coupled to flexible tubing 174. The flexible tubing 174 is further coupled to a bone needle 600 by a needle coupler 176. The housing 180 includes a injection chamber, referred to as cement chamber 108, in which a piston 182 moves axially within the chamber. In the illustrated embodiment, the piston 182 moves vertically toward the funnel-shaped exit 172.
The piston 182 is engaged by a piston driver 184 (shown in more detail in FIG. 8B) to allow axial movement of the piston. A cable 300 is fed into the housing 180 through a cable housing 302. The engaging end of the cable 300 engages the piston driver 184 to control the movement of the piston 182.
In particular, the actuator (not shown) controls the piston driver 184 by responsive movement of the cable 300 to cause axial movement of the piston toward the funnel-shaped exit 172 of the chamber 108. As the piston moves vertically, the flourescent probe cement is forced up into the funnel-shaped exit 172, through flexible tubing 174, and into the needle coupler 176 for injection into the vertebral body of the patient through the bone needle 600.
FIG. 8B is a diagram illustrating the piston driver of FIG. 8A in more detail according to one embodiment. The piston driver 184 includes a screw shaft 170 having one end mounted to a surface of the piston 182, external to the cement chamber 108. The opposite end of the shaft 170 is positioned through the open centers of gear wheels 166 and 168, each having a perimeter of teeth. The engaging end of cable 300 is attached to an element 164 having teeth which can engage either one of the gear wheels 166, 168. When the actuator (not shown) causes a responsive movement away from the pump, the responsive movement causes a rotational movement of the gear wheel 166, 168, which further causes the screw shaft 170 to move in an upward direction toward the cement chamber 108. As the shaft 170 moves, the piston 182 moves in conjunction toward the funnel-shaped exit 172, forcing the material out of the chamber 108. According to one embodiment, the gear wheels 166 and 168 can have different diameters. Thus, the flourescent probe material (e.g., flourescent bone cement) can be injected at different rates.
In some embodiments, the vertebral body is first prepared by lavage to create a porous matrix suitable for accepting the cement under low pressure. In some embodiments, the lavage procedures that are used are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/301,451, entitled “Methods of Performing Embolism-Free Vertebroplasty and Devices Therefor,” filed Nov. 21, 2002, the entire teachings of which are incorporated by reference herein.
In some embodiments, the cements are osteobiologic. In some embodiments, the osteobiologic compositions that are used are disclosed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/448,221, entitled “Omnibus In-Situ Formed Intervertebral Fusion Device,” filed Feb. 14, 2003, the entire teachings of which are incorporated by reference herein.
While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details can be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US229932||Jul 13, 1880||Thomas L||witsil|
|US370335||Apr 14, 1887||Sep 20, 1887|| ||Mixing-machine|
|US408668||Mar 5, 1889||Aug 6, 1889|| ||Island|
|US817973||Jun 6, 1904||Apr 17, 1906||Caspar Friedrich Hausmann||Uterine dilator.|
|US833044||Mar 13, 1906||Oct 9, 1906||Claudius Ash Sons & Company 1905 Ltd||Dental instrument.|
|US843587||Jan 29, 1906||Feb 12, 1907||Henry Hannon De Pew||Surgical instrument.|
|US1175530||Apr 28, 1913||Mar 14, 1916||American Bakers Machinery Company||Cake-mixer.|
|US1612281||Nov 14, 1922||Dec 28, 1926||Columbia Metal Products Compan||Mixing apparatus|
|US1612996||Feb 23, 1926||Jan 4, 1927||Herman Waagbo||Cream-testing device|
|US1733516||Dec 3, 1928||Oct 29, 1929||George G Jamieson||Agitator|
|US1894274||Aug 22, 1930||Jan 17, 1933||Jacques Raynaldo P||Lubricating apparatus|
|US2067458||Jul 13, 1934||Jan 12, 1937||Nat Rubber Machinery Co||Rubber mixing mill|
|US2123712||Apr 29, 1935||Jul 12, 1938||Lubrication Corp||Lubricating device|
|US2283915||Dec 1, 1938||May 26, 1942||Samuel F Cole||Syringe|
|US2394488||May 7, 1943||Feb 5, 1946||Lincoln Eng Co||Lubricating apparatus|
|US2425867||Sep 20, 1945||Aug 19, 1947||Davis Ernest W||Lubricating apparatus|
|US2435647||Feb 21, 1945||Feb 10, 1948||Engseth Martin O||Grease gun|
|US2497762||Oct 4, 1945||Feb 14, 1950||Davis Ernest W||Lubrication gun|
|US2521569||Jul 27, 1945||Sep 5, 1950||Davis Ernest W||Lubricant compressor|
|US2567960 *||Oct 3, 1949||Sep 18, 1951||William R Myers||Plastic extrusion gun|
|US2745575||Oct 15, 1951||May 15, 1956||Spencer Alvin C||Printing ink holder and dispenser, including a cylindrical container and piston|
|US2773500||Jan 26, 1955||Dec 11, 1956||Young Harold S||Intraosseous fluid injection instrument|
|US2808239||Aug 20, 1954||Oct 1, 1957||Reiffen Ernst Alfred||Mixing and kneading machine|
|US2874877||Sep 11, 1956||Feb 24, 1959||Spencer Alvin C||Dispensing device and container therefor|
|US2918841||Nov 1, 1956||Dec 29, 1959||Illinois Tool Works||Blind fastener formed of plastic and containing longitudinal slots which permit rosette type of distortion of shank|
|US2928574 *||Sep 24, 1957||Mar 15, 1960||Josef Wagner||High-pressure gun for grease and oil|
|US2970773||Oct 19, 1959||Feb 7, 1961||Minnesota Mining & Mfg||Fluid mixing and applying apparatus and method|
|US3058413||Oct 28, 1959||Oct 16, 1962||Carle & Montanari Spa||Roller or trough machine for the final working up of chocolate|
|US3063449||May 23, 1961||Nov 13, 1962||Schultz Arthur R P||Syringe holder|
|US3075746||Jul 10, 1958||Jan 29, 1963||Baker Perkins Inc||Mixer for explosive materials|
|US3108593||Mar 13, 1961||Oct 29, 1963||Jacob A Glassman||Surgical extractor|
|US3151847||Mar 19, 1962||Oct 6, 1964||Day J H Co||Vertical mixer construction|
|US3216616||Mar 2, 1964||Nov 9, 1965||Blankenship Jr Homer||Syringe with upper and lower bores|
|US3224744||Mar 30, 1964||Dec 21, 1965||Day J H Co||Vertical mixer construction|
|US3225760||Nov 14, 1962||Dec 28, 1965||Orthopaedic Specialties Corp||Apparatus for treatment of bone fracture|
|US3254494||Nov 10, 1964||Jun 7, 1966||E H Sargent & Co||Temperature control apparatus|
|US3381566||May 6, 1966||May 7, 1968||La Roy B. Passer||Hollow wall anchor bolt|
|US3426364||Aug 25, 1966||Feb 11, 1969||Colorado State Univ Research F||Prosthetic appliance for replacing one or more natural vertebrae|
|US3515873 *||Jan 11, 1968||Jun 2, 1970||Univ Of Kentucky Research Foun||Method and apparatus for analyzing and calibrating radiation beams of x-ray generators|
|US3568885 *||Jul 30, 1969||Mar 9, 1971||Nasa||Thickness measuring and injection device|
|US3572556||Mar 25, 1969||Mar 30, 1971||Peter Pogacar||Apparatus for metering of liquids|
|US3615240 *||Feb 24, 1970||Oct 26, 1971||Micromedic Systems Inc||Micropipette comprising a pawl mechanism for driving a rotary member|
|US3674011 *||Jan 12, 1971||Jul 4, 1972||United Medical Lab Inc||Means for and method of transfering blood from a patient to multiple test tubes within a vacuum|
|US3701350 *||Jul 28, 1970||Oct 31, 1972||Harvey C Guenther||Blood exchanging apparatus and process|
|US3750667||Jan 31, 1972||Aug 7, 1973||Maximov V||Device for intraosseous injection of liquid substances|
|US3789727||Jun 5, 1972||Feb 5, 1974||Eaton Corp||Fastener|
|US3796303||Feb 25, 1972||Mar 12, 1974||Goupil J||Containers|
|US3798982 *||Apr 25, 1973||Mar 26, 1974||Origo||Pump actuator including rotatable cams|
|US3846846||Sep 26, 1973||Nov 12, 1974||Fischer Artur||Hip joint prosthesis|
|US3850158||Jul 9, 1973||Nov 26, 1974||Elias E||Bone biopsy instrument and method|
|US3867728||Apr 5, 1973||Feb 25, 1975||Cutter Lab||Prosthesis for spinal repair|
|US3873008||May 24, 1974||Mar 25, 1975||Kettenbach Fab Chem A||Package type metering device for high viscosity fluid products|
|US3875595||Apr 15, 1974||Apr 8, 1975||Froning Edward C||Intervertebral disc prosthesis and instruments for locating same|
|US3896504||Oct 15, 1973||Jul 29, 1975||Fischer Artur||Hip joint prosthesis|
|US3901408 *||Sep 9, 1974||Aug 26, 1975||Bayer Ag||Machine including means for independently adjusting the dose of two reactive, flowable components into a mixing chamber|
|US3921858||Nov 5, 1973||Nov 25, 1975||Bemm Robert A||Automatic confection decorating system|
|US3931914 *||Jun 3, 1974||Jan 13, 1976||Max Kabushiki Kaisha||Powder ejector|
|US3942407||Aug 6, 1974||Mar 9, 1976||Aackersberg Mortensen||Expandable screw anchoring devices|
|US3976060||Apr 1, 1975||Aug 24, 1976||Messerschmitt-Bolkow-Blohm Gmbh||Extension apparatus, especially for osteotomic surgery|
|US3993250 *||May 19, 1975||Nov 23, 1976||Shure Alan H||Apparatus for spraying liquid materials|
|US4011602||Oct 6, 1975||Mar 15, 1977||Battelle Memorial Institute||Porous expandable device for attachment to bone tissue|
|US4077494||Dec 15, 1976||Mar 7, 1978||Parker-Hannifin Corporation||Grease gun|
|US4079917||Oct 14, 1975||Mar 21, 1978||Popeil Brothers, Inc.||Whipper|
|US4090640 *||Sep 22, 1976||May 23, 1978||Smith Ray V||Hot melt adhesive pumping apparatus having pressure-sensitive feedback control|
|US4093576||Apr 5, 1976||Jun 6, 1978||Sulzer Brothers, Ltd.||Mixture for anchoring bone implants|
|US4105145 *||Sep 16, 1976||Aug 8, 1978||James D. Pauls||Mechanically operated dispensing device|
|US4115346||Jun 22, 1976||Sep 19, 1978||Kulzer & Co. Gmbh||Hydroxy group containing diesters of acrylic acids and their use in dental material|
|US4146334||Sep 9, 1977||Mar 27, 1979||Richard Farrell||Paint mixing and dispensing apparatus|
|US4168787||Nov 18, 1977||Sep 25, 1979||Superior, Inc.||Variable stroke fluid lubricant dispenser|
|US4170990||Jan 27, 1978||Oct 16, 1979||Fried. Krupp Gesellschaft Mit Beschrankter Haftung||Method for implanting and subsequently removing mechanical connecting elements from living tissue|
|US4185072||Feb 17, 1977||Jan 22, 1980||Diemolding Corporation||Orthopedic cement mixer|
|US4189065||Jan 24, 1977||Feb 19, 1980||Espe Fabrik Pharmazeutischer Praeparate Gmbh||Metering dispenser for high-viscosity compositions|
|US4198975 *||Oct 6, 1978||Apr 22, 1980||Haller J Gilbert||Self-injecting hypodermic syringe device|
|US4204531||Dec 19, 1978||May 27, 1980||Yacov Aginsky||Intramedullary nail with expanding mechanism|
|US4239113||Jun 1, 1978||Dec 16, 1980||Kulzer & Co. Gmbh||Composition for the preparation of bone cement|
|US4250887 *||Apr 18, 1979||Feb 17, 1981||Dardik Surgical Associates, P.A.||Remote manual injecting apparatus|
|US4257540 *||Oct 26, 1978||Mar 24, 1981||Mcneil Corporation||Hand-held battery-powered grease gun|
|US4268639||Sep 19, 1979||May 19, 1981||Hartmut Seidel||Self-curing composition based upon polymethylmethacrylate and process for manufacturing said self-curing composition|
|US4274163||Jul 16, 1979||Jun 23, 1981||The Regents Of The University Of California||Prosthetic fixation technique|
|US4276878||Aug 20, 1979||Jul 7, 1981||Karl Storz||Injection syringe|
|US4277184||Aug 14, 1979||Jul 7, 1981||Alan Solomon||Disposable orthopedic implement and method|
|US4298144||Apr 11, 1979||Nov 3, 1981||Jakob Pressl Sohne||Grease gun|
|US4309777||Nov 13, 1980||Jan 12, 1982||Patil Arun A||Artificial intervertebral disc|
|US4312343||Jul 30, 1979||Jan 26, 1982||Leveen Harry H||Syringe|
|US4313434||Oct 17, 1980||Feb 2, 1982||David Segal||Fracture fixation|
|US4326567 *||Dec 26, 1979||Apr 27, 1982||Vercon Inc.||Variable volume, positive displacement sanitary liquid dispensing machine|
|US4338925||Dec 20, 1979||Jul 13, 1982||Jo Miller||Pressure injection of bone cement apparatus and method|
|US4341691||Feb 20, 1980||Jul 27, 1982||Zimmer, Inc.||Low viscosity bone cement|
|US4346708||Apr 20, 1981||Aug 31, 1982||Leveen Harry H||Syringe|
|US4349921||Jun 16, 1980||Sep 21, 1982||Kuntz J David||Intervertebral disc prosthesis|
|US4359049||Mar 23, 1981||Nov 16, 1982||Immuno Aktiengesellschaft Fur Chemisch-Medizinische Produkte||Apparatus for applying a tissue adhesive on the basis of human or animal proteins|
|US4373217||Feb 15, 1980||Feb 15, 1983||Merck Patent Gesellschaft Mit Beschrankter Haftung||Implantation materials and a process for the production thereof|
|US4380398||Sep 16, 1980||Apr 19, 1983||Burgess Basil A||Dispersion mixer|
|US4400170 *||Sep 29, 1981||Aug 23, 1983||Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc.||Implanting device and implant magazine|
|US4403989||Sep 14, 1981||Sep 13, 1983||Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc.||Injection device|
|US4404327||Mar 1, 1982||Sep 13, 1983||Crugnola Aldo M||Orthopaedic cement from acrylate polymers|
|US4405249||Mar 19, 1981||Sep 20, 1983||National Research Development Corporation||Dispensing apparatus and method|
|US4409966||May 29, 1981||Oct 18, 1983||Lambrecht Richard M||Method and apparatus for injecting a substance into the bloodstream of a subject|
|US4453539||Mar 1, 1982||Jun 12, 1984||The University Of Toledo||Expandable intramedullary nail for the fixation of bone fractures|
|US4474572 *||May 5, 1983||Oct 2, 1984||Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc.||Implanting device and implant magazine|
|US4475856||Dec 16, 1980||Oct 9, 1984||Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson||Expansion screw with an expansion sleeve having an outer cylindrical surface and regions of greater and lesser wall thickness|
|US4476866||Aug 6, 1982||Oct 16, 1984||Thomas J. Fogarty||Combined large and small bore syringe|
|US4487602||Sep 13, 1983||Dec 11, 1984||Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc.||Injection device|
|US4494535||Jun 24, 1981||Jan 22, 1985||Haig Armen C||Hip nail|
|US4500658||Jun 6, 1983||Feb 19, 1985||Austenal International, Inc.||Radiopaque acrylic resin|
|US4503169||Apr 19, 1984||Mar 5, 1985||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Radiopaque, low visual opacity dental composites containing non-vitreous microparticles|
|US4522200||Jun 10, 1983||Jun 11, 1985||Ace Orthopedic Company||Adjustable intramedullar rod|
|US4543966||May 16, 1984||Oct 1, 1985||Downs Surgical Plc||Biopsy needle|
|US4546767||Oct 27, 1983||Oct 15, 1985||Smith Carl W||Cement injection device|
|US4554914||Oct 4, 1983||Nov 26, 1985||Kapp John P||Prosthetic vertebral body|
|US4558693||Aug 29, 1983||Dec 17, 1985||Harvey Lash||Penile implant|
|US4562598||Apr 1, 1982||Jan 7, 1986||Mecron Medizinische Produkte Gmbh||Joint prosthesis|
|US4576152||Oct 18, 1983||Mar 18, 1986||Sulzer Brothers Limited||Injector for bone cement|
|US4588583||Oct 25, 1983||May 13, 1986||Beiersdorf Aktiengesellschaft||Surgical material|
|US4593685||Oct 17, 1983||Jun 10, 1986||Pfizer Hospital Products Group Inc.||Bone cement applicator|
|US4595006||Aug 16, 1982||Jun 17, 1986||Burke Dennis W||Apparatus for cemented implantation of prostheses|
|US4600118||Feb 2, 1984||Jul 15, 1986||Martin Gerald D||Ferrule dispenser|
|US4605011 *||Mar 13, 1984||Aug 12, 1986||Naeslund Jan Ingemar||Cell sampling apparatus|
|US4650469 *||Aug 27, 1985||Mar 17, 1987||Deltec Systems, Inc.||Drug delivery system|
|US4668220 *||Oct 15, 1985||May 26, 1987||Infors Gmbh||Infusion pump|
|US4747832 *||May 16, 1986||May 31, 1988||Jacques Buffet||Device for the injection of fluid, suitable for implantation|
|US4762515 *||Jan 6, 1987||Aug 9, 1988||Ivy Laboratories, Inc.||Medicament implant applicator|
|US4767033 *||Jan 6, 1988||Aug 30, 1988||The Drackett Company||Manually operated gear pump spray head|
|US4815454 *||Nov 16, 1987||Mar 28, 1989||Dozier Jr John K||Apparatus and method for injecting bone cement|
|US4815632 *||Feb 26, 1988||Mar 28, 1989||Jencons (Scientific) Limited||Liquid dosing device with digital display|
|US4908017 *||Jul 31, 1987||Mar 13, 1990||Ivion Corporation||Failsafe apparatus and method for effecting syringe drive|
|US4973334 *||Jun 14, 1989||Nov 27, 1990||Allo Pro Ag||Device for ejecting or taking in liquid or paste-like media|
|US5006112 *||Nov 13, 1989||Apr 9, 1991||Mts Schweinfurt Gmbh||Syringe pump|
|US5188259 *||Feb 1, 1991||Feb 23, 1993||Petit Jeffrey D||Caulking gun with belt worn cartridge|
|US5269762 *||Apr 21, 1992||Dec 14, 1993||Sterling Winthrop, Inc.||Portable hand-held power assister device|
|US5387191 *||Oct 21, 1991||Feb 7, 1995||Board Of Regents Of The Univ. Of Okla.||Flushing needle|
|US5468245 *||Feb 3, 1994||Nov 21, 1995||Vargas, Iii; Joseph H.||Biomedical cement bonding enhancer|
|US5558639 *||Jun 10, 1993||Sep 24, 1996||Gangemi; Ronald J.||Ambulatory patient infusion apparatus|
|US5839621 *||Apr 25, 1997||Nov 24, 1998||Mistlon Technology B.V.||Pump dispenser|
|US5902839 *||Dec 2, 1996||May 11, 1999||Northwestern University||Bone cement and method of preparation|
|US5941851 *||Jul 12, 1996||Aug 24, 1999||C.R. Bard, Inc.||Pulsed lavage handpiece with improved handle|
|US6183441 *||May 14, 1999||Feb 6, 2001||Science Incorporated||Variable rate infusion apparatus with indicator and adjustable rate control|
|US6231615 *||Oct 18, 1999||May 15, 2001||Parallax Medical, Inc.||Enhanced visibility materials for implantation in hard tissue|
|US6264659 *||Dec 8, 1999||Jul 24, 2001||Anthony C. Ross||Method of treating an intervertebral disk|
|US6402701 *||Mar 17, 2000||Jun 11, 2002||Fna Concepts, Llc||Biopsy needle instrument|
|US6443334 *||Apr 10, 2001||Sep 3, 2002||Pentalpha Hong Kong Limited||Comestible fluid dispenser apparatus and method|
|US6527144 *||Jul 5, 2001||Mar 4, 2003||Ing. Erich Pfeiffer Gmbh||Discharge apparatus for media|
|US6758837 *||Feb 7, 2002||Jul 6, 2004||Pharmacia Ab||Liquid delivery device and method of use thereof|
|US20020008122 *||Jul 5, 2001||Jan 24, 2002||Stefan Ritsche||Discharge apparatus for media|
|US20020049449 *||Oct 25, 2001||Apr 25, 2002||Mohit Bhatnagar||Apparatus and method for fixation of osteoporotic bone|
|US20020118595 *||Feb 26, 2001||Aug 29, 2002||Miller Scott H.||Enclosed implantable material mixing system|
|USD279499||Feb 18, 1983||Jul 2, 1985||Zimmer, Inc.||Mixing apparatus|
|1||Al-Assir, et al., "Percutaneous Vertebroplasty: A Special Syringe for Cement Injection," AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 21:159-61 (Jan. 2000).|
|2||Amar, Arun P. et al., "Percutaneous Transpedicular Polymethylmethacrylate Vertebroplasty for the Treatment of Spinal Compression Fractures," Neurosurgery 49(5):1105-15 (2001).|
|3||Andersen, M. et al., "Vertebroplastik, ny behandling af osteoporotiske columnafrakturer?", Ugeskr laefer 166/6:463-66 (Feb. 2, 2004).|
|4||Avalione & Baumeister III, Marks' Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers, 10 ed, pp. 5-6 (1996).|
|5||Baroud, G. et al., "Injection Biomechanics of Bone Cements Used in Vertebroplasty," Biomaterials & Eng. 00:1-18 (2004).|
|6||Baroud, G., "Influence of Mixing Method on the Cement Temperature-Mixing Time History and Doughing Time of Three Acrylic Cements for Vertebroplasty," Wiley Periodicals Inc. 112-116 (2003).|
|7||Barr, J.D., "Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for pain Relief and Spinal Stabilization," Spine 25(8):923-28 (2000).|
|8||Belkoff, S. et al., The Biomechanics of Vertebroplasty, the Effect of Cement Volume on Mechanical Behavior, SPINE 26(14):1537-41 (2001).|
|9||Belkoff, S.M. et al., "An Ex Vivo Biomechanical Evaluation of a Hydroxyapatite Cement for Use with Kyphoplasty," Am. J. Neurorad. 22:1212-16 (2001).|
|10||Belkoff, S.M. et al., "An Ex Vivo Biomechanical Evaluation of a Inflatable Bone Tamp Used in the Treatment of Compression Fracture," SPINE 26(2):151-56 (2001).|
|11||Belkoff, S.M. et al., "An In Vitro Biomechanical Evaluation of Bone Cements Used in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty," Bone 25(2):23S-26S (1999).|
|12||Blinc, A et al., "Methyl-methacrylate bone cement surface does not promote platelet aggregation or plasma coagulation in vitro," Thrombosis Research 114:179-84 (2004).|
|13||Bohner, M. et al., "Theoretical and Experimental Model to Describe the Injection of a Polymethacrylate Cement into a Porous Structure," Biomaterials 24(16):2721-30 (2003).|
|14||Breusch, S. et al., "Knochenzemente auf Basis von Polymethylmethacrylat," Orthopade 32:41-50 (2003) w/ abs.|
|15||Canale et al., "Campbell's operative orthopaedic-vol.3-ninth ed", Mosby:P2097,2121,2184-85,2890-96, (1998) abstracts.|
|16||Carrodegus et al., "Injectable Acrylic Bone Cements for Vertebroplasty with Improved Properties," J. Biomed. Materials Res. 68(1):94-104 (Jan. 2004).|
|17||Codman & Shurtleff, "V-MAX(TM) Mixing and Delivery Device," Catalog No. 43-1056.|
|18||Codman & Shurtleff, "V-MAX™ Mixing and Delivery Device," Catalog No. 43-1056.|
|19||Cole et al., "AIM Titanium Humeral Nail System," Surgical Technique. DePuy Orthopaedics 17P (2000).|
|20||Combs, S. et al., "The Effects of Barium Sulfate on the Polymerization Temperature and Shear Strength of Surgical Simplex P," Clin. Ortho. and Related Res. pp. 287-291 (Jun. 4, 1979).|
|21||Cotton, A. et al., "Percutaneous Vertebroplasty: State of the Art," Scientific Exhibit, Radiographics 18:311-20 (1998).|
|22||Dean, J.R. et al., "The Strengthening Effect of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty," Clin Radiol. 55:471-476 (2000).|
|23||Deramond, H. et al, "Percutaneous Vertebroplasty with Polymethylmethacrylate, Technique Indications and Results," Radiologic Clinics of North America 36(3) (May 1988).|
|24||Deramond, H. et al., "Temperature Elevation Caused by Bone cement Polymerization During Vertbroplasty," Bone 25(2):17S-21S (1999).|
|25||DeWijn, J.R., Characterization of Bone Cements, The Institute of Dental Materials Science and Technology and the Dept of Ortho., Catholic University, Netherlands 46:38-51 (1975).|
|26||Edeland, "Some additional suggestions for an intervertebral disc prothesis," J. Biomed. Eng. XP008072822, 7(1):57-62 (1985.|
|27||European Search Report, from EP 10182693.1, mailed Mar. 2, 2011.|
|28||European Search Report, from EP 10182769.9, mailed Mar. 2, 2011.|
|29||European Search Report, from EP 10192300.1, mailed Mar. 24, 2011.|
|30||European Search Report, from EP 10192301.9, mailed Mar. 24, 2011.|
|31||European Search Report, from EP 10192302.7, mailed Mar. 24, 2011.|
|32||European Search Report, from EP05763930.4; mailed Sep. 11, 2008.|
|33||European Search Report, from EP06780252.0, mailed Oct. 29, 2009.|
|34||European Search Report, from EP09151379.6, mailed Oct. 20, 2009.|
|35||Farrar, D.F. et al., "Rheological Properties of PMMA Bone Cements During Curing," Biomaterials 22:3005-13 (2001).|
|36||Feldman, H., "Die Geschichte der Injektionen," Laryngo-Rhino-Othol 79:239-46 (2000).|
|37||Fessler, Richard D. et al., "Vertebroplasty," Neurosurgical Operative Atlas 9:233-240 (2000).|
|38||Gangi, A., "Computed Tomography Ct and Fluoroscopy-Guided Vertebroplasty: Results and Complications in 187 Patients," Seminars in Interventional Radiology 16(2):137-42 (1999).|
|39||Gangi, A., "CT-Guided Interventional Procedures for Pain Management in the Lumbosacral Spine," Radiographics 18:621-633 (1998).|
|40||Gangi, A., "Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Guided by a Combination of CT and Fluoroscopy," AJNR 15:83-86 (1994).|
|41||Garfin, S. R. et al., "New Technologies in Spine, Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty for the Treatment of Painful Osteoporotic Compression Fractures," Spine 26(14:1511-15 (2001).|
|42||Gheduzzi, S. et al., "Mechanical Characterisation of Three Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Biomaterials," J. Mater Sci Mater Med 17(5):421-26 (2006).|
|43||Giannitsios, D. et al., "High Cement Viscosity Reduces Leakage Risk in Vertebroplasty," European Cells & Mat. 10 supp. 3:54 (2005).|
|44||Glasgow Medico-Chirurgical Society, The lancet 1364 (May 18, 1907).|
|45||Grados F. et al.,"Long-Term Observations of Vertebral Osteoporotic Fractures Treated by Percutaneous Vertebroplasty," Rheumatology 39:1410-14 (2000).|
|46||Greenberg, "Filling Root Canals by an Injection Technique," Dental Digest 61-63 (Feb. 1963).|
|47||Greenberg, "Filling Root Canals in Deciduous Teeth by an Injection Technique," Dental Digest 574-575 (Dec. 1961).|
|48||Greig, D., "A New Syringe for Injecting Paraffin," The Lancet 611-12 (Aug 29, 1903).|
|49||Hasenwinkel, J. et al., "A Novel High-Viscosity, Two-Solution Acrylic Bone Cement: Effect of Chemical Composition on Properties," J. Biomed. Materials Research 47(1):36-45 (1999).|
|50||Hasenwinkel, J. et al., "Effect of Initiation Chemistry on the Fracture Toughness, Fatigue Strength, and Residual Monomer Content of a Novel High-Viscosity, Two-Solution Acrylic Bone Cement," J. Biomed. Materials Res. 59(3):411-21 (2001).|
|51||Heini, P. et al., "Augmentation of Mechanical Properties in Osteoporatic Vertebral Bones-a Biomechanical Investigation of Vertebroplasty Efficacy With Different Bone Cements," EUR Spine J. v. 10, pp. 164-171, Springer-Verlag (2001).|
|52||Heini, P. et al., "Augmentation of Mechanical Properties in Osteoporatic Vertebral Bones—a Biomechanical Investigation of Vertebroplasty Efficacy With Different Bone Cements," EUR Spine J. v. 10, pp. 164-171, Springer-Verlag (2001).|
|53||Heini, P., "Percutaneous Transpedicular Vertebroplasty with PMMA: Operative Technique and Early Results," EUR Spine J. v. 9, pp. 445-450, Springer-Verlag (2000).|
|54||Heini, P., "The Use of a Side-Opening Injection Cannula in Vertebroplasty," Spine 27(1):105-109 (2002).|
|55||Heraeus Palacos R, 2008, Palacos R, high Viscosity Bone Cement.|
|56||Hernandez et al., "Influence of Powder Particle Size Distribution on Complex Viscosity and Other Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement for Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty," J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 77B:98-103 (2006).|
|57||Hide, I. et al., "Percutaneous Vertebroplasty: History, Technique and current Perspectives," Clin. Radiology 59:461-67 (2004).|
|58||Hu, M. et al., "Kyphoplasty for Vertebral Compression Fracture Via a Uni-Pedicular Approach," Pain Phys. 8:363-67 (2005).|
|59||International Preliminary Report on Patentability, from PCT/IB06/053014, dated Apr. 10, 2008.|
|60||International Search Report, for PCT/IL07/00808, issued Aug. 22, 2008.|
|61||International Search Report, for PCT/MX03/000027, filed Mar. 14, 2003.|
|62||International Search Report, from corresponding PCT/IL07/01257, dated Jul. 15, 2008.|
|63||International Search Report, from PCT/IB06/052612, mailed Oct. 2, 2007.|
|64||International Search Report, from PCT/IL05/00812, mailed Feb. 28, 2007.|
|65||International Search Report, from PCT/IL06/00239, mailed Jan. 26, 2007.|
|66||International Search Report, from PCT/IL07,00833, mailed Apr. 4, 2008.|
|67||International Search Report, from PCT/IL07/00484, mailed Apr. 17, 2008.|
|68||Ishikawa et al., "Effects of Neutral Sodium Hydrogen Phosphate on Setting Reaction and Mechanical Strength of Hydroxyapatite Putty," J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 44:322-29 (199).|
|69||Ishikawa et al., "Non-Decay Type Fast-Setting Calcium Phosphate Cement: Hydroxyapatite Putty Containing an Increased Amount of Sodium Alginate," J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 36:393-99 (1997).|
|70||Jasper, L.E. et al., "The Effect of Monomer-to-Powder Ratio on the Material Properties of Cranioplastic," Bone 25(2):27S-29S (1999).|
|71||Jensen, Mary E. et al., "Percutaneous Polymethylmethacrylate Vertebroplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Body Compression Fractures: Technical Aspects," AJNR 18:1897-1904 (1997).|
|72||Jensen, Mary E. et al., "Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Compression Fractures," Spine Interventions 10(3):547-568 (2000).|
|73||Johnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, The CEMVAC Method, Raynham, MA.|
|74||Kallmes, D. et al., "Radiation Dose to the Operator During Vertebroplasty: Prospective Comparison of the Use of 1-cc Syringes Versus an Injection Device," AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 24:1257-60 (2003).|
|75||Kaufmann et al, "Age of Fracture and Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty," Am. J. Neuroradiology 22:1860-63 (2001).|
|76||Krause et al., "The Viscosity of Acrylic Bone Cements," J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 16:219-43 (1982).|
|77||Kuhn, Klaus-Dieter, Bone cements-Uptodate Comparison of Physical and Chemical Properties of Commercial Materials, Springer-Verlag Heidelberg Germany (2000).|
|78||Kuhn, Klaus-Dieter, Bone cements—Uptodate Comparison of Physical and Chemical Properties of Commercial Materials, Springer-Verlag Heidelberg Germany (2000).|
|79||Kyphom Medical Professionals, KyphXProducts (Nov. 8, 2001).|
|80||Lake, R., "The Restoration of the Inferior Turbinate Body by Paraffin Injections in the Treatment of Atrophic Rhinitis," The Lancet 168-69 (Jan. 17, 1903).|
|81||Lewis, "Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement: State of the Art Review," J. Biomed. Mat. Res. Appl. Biomaterials 38(2):155-82 (p. 158 s.Viscosity) (1997).|
|82||Lewis, "Toward Standardization of Methods of Determination of Fracture Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement and Statistical Analysis of Test Results," J. Biomed. Research: Appl. Biomaterials 53(6):748-68 (2000).|
|83||Lewis, G. et al., "Rheological Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement During Curing and the Role of the Size of the Powder Particles," J. Biomed. Mat. Res. Appl. Biomat. 63(2):191-99 (2002).|
|84||Li, C. et al., "Thermal Characterization of PMMA-Based Bone Cement Curing," J. Materials Sci.: Materials in Medicine 15:84-89 (2004).|
|85||Liang, B. et al., "Preliminary Clinical Application of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty," Zhong Nan Da Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 31(1):114-9 (2006)(abs. only).|
|86||Lieberman, I.H. et al., "Initial Outcome and Efficiacy of Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of Painful Osteoporatic Vertebral Compression Fractures," Spine 26(14:1631-38 (2001).|
|87||Marks, Standard handbook for mechanical engineers, section 5 (Tenth ed. 1996).|
|88||Mathis, John et al., "Percutaneous Vertebroplasty: A Developing Standard of Care for Vertebral Compression Fractures," AJNR Am. J. Neurorad. 22:373-81 (2001).|
|89||Medsafe Palacos R 2007, Data Sheet : Palacos R Bone cement with Garamycin pp. 1-7; http://www.medsafe.govt.nz/profs/datasheet/p/palacosbonecements.htm.|
|90||Mousa, W.F. et al., "Biological and Mechanical Properties of PMMA-Based Bioactive Bone Cements," Biomaterials 21:2137-46 (2000).|
|91||Noetzel, J. et al., Calcium Phosphate Cements in Medicine and Denistry—A Review of Literature, Schweiz Monatsschr Zehmed 115(12):1148-56 (2005)(abs. only).|
|92||Nussbaum et al., "The Chemistry of Acrylic Bone Cements and Implications for Clinical Use in Image-Guided Therapy," J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 15:121-26 (2004).|
|93||O'Brien, J. et al., "Vertebroplasty in patients with Severe Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Technical Report," AJNR 21:1555-58 (2000).|
|94||Odian, G., "Principles of Polymerization," pp. 20-23.|
|95||Padovani, B. et al., "Pulmonary Embolism Caused by Acrylic Cement: A Rare Complication of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty," AJNR 20:375-77 (1999).|
|96||Paget, S., "The Uses of Paraffin in Plastic Surgery," The Lancet 1354 (May 16, 1903).|
|97||Parallax Medical, Inc., Exflow Cement Delivery System (May 16, 2000).|
|98||Pascual, B. et al., "New Aspects of the Effect of Size and Size Distribution on the Setting Parameters and Mechanical Properties of Acrylic Bone Cements," Biomaterials 17(5):509-16 (1996).|
|99||Rimnac, CM, et al., "The effect of centrifugation on the fracture properties of acrylic bone cements," JB&JS 68A(2):281-87 (1986).|
|100||Robinson, R. et al., "Mechanical Properties of Poly(methyl methacrylate) Bone Cement," J. Biomed. Materials Res. 15(2):203-08 (2004).|
|101||Ryu, K. S. et al., "Dose-Dependent Epidural Leakage of Polymethylmethacrylate after Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures," J. Neuro: Spine 96:56-61 (2002).|
|102||Saha, S. et al., "Mechanical Properties of Bone Cement: A Review," J. Biomed. Materials Res. 18(4):435-62 (1984).|
|103||Serbetci, K. et al., "Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Hydroxyapatite Impregnated Acrylic Bone Cements," Polymer Testing 23:145-55 (2004).|
|104||Shah, T., Radiopaque Polymer Formulations for Medical Devices; Medical Plastics and Biomaterials Special Section; Medical device & Diagnostic Industry pp. 102-111 (2000).|
|105||Steen, "Laser Surface Treatment," Laser Mat. Processing, Springer 2d ed. ch. 6:218-71 (2003).|
|106||Supp. EP Search Report, from EP 07766838.2, dated May 18, 2011.|
|107||Supp. EP Search Report, from EP Appl. No. 05763930.4, dated Sep. 11, 2008.|
|108||Supp. EP Search Report, from EP Appl. No. 06711221.9, dated Sep. 15, 2008.|
|109||Supp. EP Search Report, from EP Appl. No. 07766863.0, dated Apr. 12, 2011.|
|110||U.S. Appl. No. 11/847,488, filed Aug. 30, 2007, DiMauro et al.|
|111||Varela et al., "Closed Intramedullary Pinning of Metacarpal and Phalanx Fractures," Orthopaedics 13(2):213-15 (1990).|
|112||Vasconcelos, C., "Transient Arterial Hypotension Induced by Polymethyacrylated Injection During Percutaneous Vertebroplasty," Letter to the Editor, JVIR (Aug. 2001).|
|113||Walton, A, "Some Cases of Bone Cavities Treated by Stopping With Paraffin," The Lancet 155 (Jan 18, 1908).|
|114||Weissman et al., "Trochanteric Fractures of the Femur Treatment with a Strong Nail and Early Weight-Bearing," Clin. Ortho. & Related Res. 67:143-50 (1969).|
|115||Wimhurst, J.A. et al., "Inflammatory Responses of Human Primary Macrophages to Particulate Bone Cements in Vitro," J. Bone & Joint Surgery 83B:278-82 (2001).|
|116||Wimhurst, J.A., et al., "The Effects of Particulate Bone Cements at the Bone-Implant Interface," J. Bone & Joint Surgery pp. 588-92 (2001).|
|117||Zapalowicz, K. et al., "Percutaneous Vertebroplasty with Bone Cement in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures," Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja NR Jan. 2003.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8663325 *||Jul 8, 2010||Mar 4, 2014||Smith & Nephew, Inc.||Tissue graft anchor assembly and instrumentation for use therewith|
|US8783001 *||Dec 10, 2010||Jul 22, 2014||Tie Not Incorporated||Balloon filling device|
|US8845725 *||Apr 19, 2010||Sep 30, 2014||Lumaca Orthopaedics Pty Ltd||Tenodesis system|
|US8932354 *||Apr 19, 2010||Jan 13, 2015||Shane Barwood||Tenodesis fixation method|
|US20110009885 *||Jul 8, 2010||Jan 13, 2011||Graf Ben K||Tissue Graft Anchor Assembly and Instrumentation For Use Therewith|
|US20120109139 *||Oct 29, 2010||May 3, 2012||Kyphon Sarl||Reduced extravasation of bone cement|
|US20120143053 *||Feb 9, 2012||Jun 7, 2012||Fago Frank M||Hydraulic remote for a medical fluid injector|
|US20120144776 *||Dec 10, 2010||Jun 14, 2012||Wayne Sikorcin||Balloon filling device|
| || |
|U.S. Classification||606/94, 606/92, 606/93|
|International Classification||A61F2/46, A61B17/88, A61B17/00, A61F2/00, A61F2/48|
|Cooperative Classification||A61F2002/30523, A61F2002/48, A61B17/8822, A61F2/4601, A61F2220/0025, A61F2250/0098, A61F2002/3008|
|Jun 24, 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DEPUY ACROMED, INC., MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DIMAURO, THOMAS M.;CROMBIE, JOHN;PELLEGRINO, RICHARD;ANDOTHERS;REEL/FRAME:014194/0624;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030430 TO 20030506
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DIMAURO, THOMAS M.;CROMBIE, JOHN;PELLEGRINO, RICHARD;ANDOTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030430 TO 20030506;REEL/FRAME:014194/0624
Owner name: DEPUY ACROMED, INC., MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DIMAURO, THOMAS M.;CROMBIE, JOHN;PELLEGRINO, RICHARD;ANDOTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030430 TO 20030506;REEL/FRAME:014194/0624
|Dec 4, 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DEPUY SPINE, INC., MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:DEPUY ACROMED, INC.;REEL/FRAME:014760/0975
Effective date: 20031001
Owner name: DEPUY SPINE, INC.,MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:DEPUY ACROMED, INC.;US-ASSIGNMENT DATABASE UPDATED:20100203;REEL/FRAME:14760/975
Owner name: DEPUY SPINE, INC.,MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:DEPUY ACROMED, INC.;REEL/FRAME:014760/0975
Effective date: 20031001
Owner name: DEPUY SPINE, INC.,MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:DEPUY ACROMED, INC.;US-ASSIGNMENT DATABASE UPDATED:20100203;REEL/FRAME:14760/975
Effective date: 20031001