|Publication number||US8081078 B2|
|Application number||US 12/765,445|
|Publication date||Dec 20, 2011|
|Filing date||Apr 22, 2010|
|Priority date||Jan 24, 2007|
|Also published as||US20100225448, WO2011040943A1|
|Publication number||12765445, 765445, US 8081078 B2, US 8081078B2, US-B2-8081078, US8081078 B2, US8081078B2|
|Inventors||Paul R. Arguin|
|Original Assignee||United Security Applications Id, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (23), Classifications (11), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a Continuation-in-Part application of, and claims priority to, U.S. Continuation application Ser. No. 12/571,950 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,724,139) filed Oct. 1, 2009, entitled “UNIVERSAL TRACKING SYSTEM”, which claims the benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/401,441 (abandoned), filed on Mar. 10, 2009, entitled “UNIVERSAL TRACKING ASSEMBLY”, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/871,185, filed Jan. 24, 2007, entitled “UNIVERSAL TRACKING SYSTEM,” U.S. application Ser. No. 12/017,626 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,859,410), filed on Jan. 22, 2008, entitled “UNIVERSAL TRACKING ASSEMBLY”, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/100,502, filed on Sep. 26, 2008, entitled “MULTIPLE PROTOCOL TRACKING ASSEMBLY” and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/103,472, filed on Oct. 7, 2008, entitled “UNIVERSAL TRACKING SYSTEM” all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
The present invention relates, in general, to a universal tracking assembly that is capable of supporting more than one protocol used in electronic article surveillance labels, and deals more particularly with a universal tracking assembly that is capable of responding to both AM and RF interrogation signals.
Bar codes are commonly utilized throughout the commercial and retail worlds in order to accurately determine the nature, cost and other vital data of an individual item. Bar codes, however, are purely passive constructs, and therefore cannot offer or transmit information themselves, instead relying upon known bar code readers to scan and interpret the information stored in the bar code itself. Moreover, the information content of bar codes is static, and cannot be changed or supplemented at will once the bar code is fabricated.
In recent years, differing electronic article surveillance (EAS) platforms/tags have been developed to address the shortcomings of known bar code systems. One such type of EAS is radio frequency identification (RFID) platforms/tags. RFIDs are small (typically) battery-less microchips that can be attached to consumer goods, cattle, vehicles and other objects to track their movement. RFID tags are normally passive, but are capable of transmitting data if prompted by a reader. The reader transmits electromagnetic waves that activate the RFID tag. The tag then transmits information via a predetermined radio frequency, or the like. This information is then captured and transmitted to a central database for suitable processing.
An RFID system typically is made up of a transponder, or tag, which is an integrated circuit (IC) connected to an antenna, which is then generally embedded into labels, a reader which emits an electromagnetic field from a connected antenna, and an enterprise system. The tag draws power from the reader's electromagnetic field to power the IC, and broadcasts a modulated signal which the reader picks up (via the antenna), decodes, and converts into digital information that the enterprise system uses.
There are two main types of RFID devices, including inductively coupled RFID tags, which may be UHF as are the current Gen 2 tags. Typically, there are three main parts to an inductively coupled RFID tag:
Inductive RFID tags are powered by the magnetic field generated by the reader. The tag's antenna picks up the magnetic energy, and the tag communicates with the reader. The tag then modulates the magnetic field in order to retrieve and transmit data back to the reader. Data is transmitted back to the reader, which directs it to the host computer and/or system.
Inductive RFID tags are very expensive on a per-unit basis, costing anywhere from $1 for passive button tags to $200 for battery-powered, read-write tags. The high cost for these tags is due to the silicon, the coil antenna and the process that is needed to wind the coil around the surface of the tag.
Another type of known RFID are capacitively coupled RFID tags. These tags do away with the metal coil and use a small amount of silicon to perform the same function as a inductively coupled tag. A capacitively coupled RFID tag also has three major parts:
By using conductive ink instead of metal coils, the prices of capacitively coupled tags are as low as 50 cents. These tags are also more flexible than the inductively coupled tag. Capacitively coupled tags can be bent, torn or crumpled, and can still relay data to the tag reader. In contrast to the magnetic energy that powers the inductively coupled tag, capacitively coupled tags are powered by electric fields generated by the reader. The disadvantage to this kind of tag is that it has a very limited range.
As the two preceding examples of known RFID devices indicate, there does not presently exist an industry-standard RFID protocol. With different manufacturers utilizing different RFID devices on their disparate products, large department stores, warehouses and/or shipping containers often contain a plurality of differing RFID devices.
Still further, known RFID devices are designed so that they may continue to communicate with extraneous readers well after the time of initial purchase. That is, known RFID devices are designed so that tracking of an item can be accomplished from the time the item leaves the factory, until it rests within the residential dwelling of its purchaser.
The very attributes, however, of known RFID devices that permit these devices to continue to operate and communicate with a reader well after the time of initial purchase, also pose problems for closely nested commercial or retail facilities.
For example, once a purchaser buys an item at a store, the RFID device will communicate with an integrated reader at the checkout. The reader will detect and interrogate the RFID device, and thereafter permit the purchaser to exit the store without setting off an alarm for shoplifting. But because of the resilient nature of the RFID devices, these devices continue to be passively ‘active’ even if the purchaser goes into another retail establishment, as often happens in a mall or shopping center environment. Once the original purchaser leaves the second retail store, the RFID detection equipment in the second store may awaken the RFID tag, and erroneously alert the security system of the second store. This scenario is only worsened by the differing RFID devices and protocols that currently exist in the market.
In addition to the differing RFID technologies mentioned above, other EAS technologies exist having their own operational protocols, such as acousto-magnetic (AM) EAS circuitry. Similar to the problems noted above, the problem for, e.g., manufacturer is the uncertainty of knowing which EAS technology will be employed at various stages of the manufacture, transportation and inventory of items equipped with one of the many differing EAS technologies.
It will therefore be appreciated that the primary EAS protocols in place are the acousto-magnetic (AM) type and the RF type, as discussed above. These differing EAS protocols are each independently used by various major retailers and are currently not compatible technologies. Thus, a manufacturer/distributor must maintain separate inventories of their products for the different EAS protocols incurring the added cost in doing such a practice or the manufacturer/distributor must apply both tags/labels to each of their products incurring the added cost of this alternative practice.
With the forgoing problems and concerns in mind, it is the general object of the present invention to provide a universal tracking system that is capable of harmonizing the use of differing EAS technologies/devices by integrating more than one such technology on a common susbstrate/patform. More preferably, it is the general object of the present invention to provide an integrated EAS label/tag assembly, which is compatible with both AM type and RF (including RFID) systems. The invention more preferably includes the AM type transponder which is composed of one or more amorphous alloy strips with a high magnetic permeability and a magnetic biasing strip which can be cast, die cut, painted, printed, etc. The amorphous strip(s) are packaged such that it (they) can freely resonate and is (are) sized to resonate at the desired frequency of standard AM type EAS.
It is one object of the present invention is to provide a universal tracking assembly.
It is another object of the present invention is to provide a universal tracking assembly that is capable responding to more than one EAS interrogation protocols.
It is another object of the present invention is to provide a universal tracking assembly that integrates differing EAS identification technologies upon a common platform.
It is another object of the present invention is to provide a universal tracking system that integrates both RF and AM EAS identification technologies upon a common platform.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a combined electronic article surveillance (EAS) tag/label assembly which is capable of being detected by, and of responding to, interrogation by either AM or RF technologies/protocols.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a combined electronic article surveillance (EAS) tag/label which is capable of utilizing at least one common element in support of the combined AM and RF technologies/protocols.
It is yet another important aspect of the present invention to provide a combined EAS tag/label wherein the biasing magnet of the AM circuitry is integrated into both the AM and RF circuitry, thereby affecting the capacitance and/or inductance of the combined EAS tag/label.
It is yet another important aspect of the present invention to provide a combined EAS tag/label wherein the biasing magnet of the AM circuitry is positioned adjacent the inductive coil of the RF circuitry, thereby affecting the capacitance and associated inductance of the combined EAS tag/label.
It is yet another important aspect of the present invention to provide an EAS tag/label and combined EAS tag/label including a counter mechanism for counting each time the tag/label is interrogated by a reader.
Thus, it is an object of the present invention is to make a hybrid (i.e., combined) and selectively deactivatable EAS tag/label that can be detected by both AM EAS detectors and RF EAS detectors (also including RFID). The manufacture/design of this hybrid EAS tag/label is such that the intrinsic properties of the components enhance the performance of the overall hybrid label/tag and that the manufacturing efficiencies allow for a less expensive EAS solution for the manufacturer/distributor.
These and other objectives of the present invention, and their preferred embodiments, shall become clear by consideration of the specification, claims and drawings taken as a whole.
Known EAS assemblies, such as RFID tags, can be either active or passive. Active RFID tags include a battery, or the like, and so are capable of transmitting strong response signals even in regions where the interrogating radio frequency field is weak. Thus, an active RFID tag can be detected and transmit at a greater range than is possible with a passive RFID. Batteries, however, are limited in their operable lifetime, and add significantly to the size and cost of the tag. A passive tag derives the energy needed to power the tag from the interrogating radio frequency field, and uses that energy to transmit response codes by modulating the impedance the antenna presents to the interrogating field, thereby modulating the signal reflected back to the reader antenna. Thus, their range is more limited.
Even within known passive RFID tags, there exist significant differences in performance, including significant differences in the performance of their associated antennas and corresponding interrogation and response ranges. While one embodiment of the present invention will be hereafter described in connection with passive tags, it will be readily appreciated that the teachings of the present invention are equally applicable to active tags.
The antenna geometry and properties depend on the desired operating frequency of the RFID portion of the tag. For example, 2.45 GHz (or similar) RFID tags would typically include a dipole antenna, such as the linear dipole antennas 4 a shown in
Regardless of the particular design, the antenna 14 intercepts the radio frequency energy radiated by an interrogation source. This signal energy carries both power and commands to the tag. The antenna enables the RF-responsive element to absorb energy sufficient to power the IC chip and thereby provide the response to be detected. Thus, the characteristics of the antenna must be matched to the system in which it is incorporated. In the case of tags operating in the high MHz to GHz range, the most important characteristic is the antenna length. Typically, the effective length of a dipole antenna is selected so that it is close to a half wavelength or multiple half wavelength of the interrogation signal. In the case of tags operating in the low to mid MHz region (13.56 MHz, for example) where a half wavelength antenna is impractical due to size limitations, the important characteristics are antenna inductance and the number of turns on the antenna coil. For both antenna types, good electrical conductivity is required. Typically, metals such as copper or aluminum would be used, but other conductors, including magnetic metals such as permalloy, are also acceptable.
In sum, therefore, there exists several differing types of RFID tags, which can either incorporate a magnetically responsive element, or a RF responsive element. As will be understood, each of these differing types of tags require differing interrogation devices and protocols so as to effectively interact with each tag type. This situation is difficult for large retailers, or the like, who inevitably accept products from a vast array of manufacturers utilizing differing RFID tag types.
It is therefore an important aspect of the present invention that more than one type of RFID be integrated into a single RFID tag. By doing so the present invention ensures that regardless of the interrogation system utilized at or in any particular location, at least one of the integrated RFID tags will respond to the interrogation with the required information. Thus, a retail store need only buy a single interrogation system, without fear of not being able to communicate with those items having RFID tags of differing types.
It will be readily appreciated that the present invention is not limited to the integration of magnetically-responsive RFIDs and RF-responsive RFIDs together, and extends to the integration of RFID tags of any known, or to be discovered, type.
It is a further object of the present invention that significant elements present in one RFID tag may be universally utilized with respect to the other integrated RFID tags present on the integrated RFID tag 20. For example, should the integrated RFID tag 20 support both the RFID tags of
It will be readily appreciated that the common use of a single component between differing RFID tags is not limited to the sharing of an antenna element. Indeed, the present invention equally contemplates the shared use of any component found in any RFID tag that is jointly mounted on a unitary platform.
As discussed previously, large retailers, or the like, often accept merchandise from a variety of manufacturers who may be located at disparate points around the world. Each of these individual manufacturers may place an RFID tag of their choosing on the item as it is produced. This item is then transported by a shipper who may also place another RFID tag on the item, in accordance with the particular RFID system/configuration the shipper utilizes. Finally, the retailer itself may place yet another RFID tag on the item, again of its own choosing and configuration, and one which operates well with the interrogation system employed by the retailer.
In sum, any given item may have a plurality of differing RFID tags located, glued or otherwise attached thereto. Thus, while the retailer may deactivate their RFID tag placed on the item as the customer leaves the store, a problem exists when the retailer's deactivation system does not communicate with the other types of RFID tags that may also be located in or on the item.
When one or more of the additional RFID tags on a given item are not suitably deactivated, owing to their differing configurations and protocols, it is possible that the consumer may walk into another, non-affiliated store with the first item purchased, only to have the non-deactivated RFIDs set off the security system of the second store.
The integrated nature of the RFID tag 20 shown in
It is therefore another important aspect of the present invention that the integrated nature of the RFID tag 30 enables the complete deactivation of all of the RFID tags 32 anytime when the interrogator is capable of deactivating even one of the RFID tags 32 in the array. Thus, once a consumer purchases an item, and the interrogation system employed by the retail store deactivates the store RFID, the present invention ensures that all other RFIDs (or other types of EAS assemblies, as discussed in more detail later) in the array will also be deactivated. Erroneous indication of shoplifting or the like, as the consumer moves from store to store with a previously purchased item, are thereby avoided.
The communication between the RFID tags 32 may be accomplished through a direct electrical connection, or filament, 44 (as shown in
When employing the combined (or, integrated) RFID tag 30 in accordance with the present invention, none of the existing industries or retail stores need change the protocol by which they interrogate their combined RFID tags, regardless of the technology underpinning each of the differing RFID circuitry supported thereon. That is, regardless of the interrogation or reader apparatuses utilized by the various manufacturing and retail outlets, an integrated and combined EAS tag assembly will always have at least one type of RF circuitry that is capable of communicating with the respective interrogator or reader.
Given the differing technologies currently utilized by various manufacturers of RFID EAS tags, and the anticipated continuing evolution of technology in this area, the integrated RFID tag of the present invention effectively mimics a universal standard of RFID technology and related interrogators/readers, which does not currently exist. Thus, until such a standard is accepted worldwide, the integrated RFID tag of the present invention provides a platform upon which to mask the differences between the competing RFID technologies.
Other embodiments of the present invention can be visualized by a review of the foregoing. As to the integrated RFID tag 20 shown in
In yet another, preferred, embodiment of the present invention, a combined EAS assembly 50 is shown in
The combined EAS tag assembly 50 includes a first portion 52 of a RF component which exhibits inductance, a second portion 54 of a RF component which exhibits capacitance, a third multi-layer portion 56 of an AM component including a resonator and a bias magnet, and a fourth portion 58 acting as the substrate and backing of the combined EAS tag 50. As shown in
Known RF resonators are typically configured as a LC Tank circuit, typically consisting of simply an inductor and capacitor(s). In contrast, the EAS tag assembly 50 will capture the resonant frequency of both the RF and AM components of the label and allow for a space in the center of the RF circuit to place the AM type label. The AM portion can be placed at various locations on the RF circuit, but interactions have to be accounted for and the RF portion must be tuned. Placing the AM components in the center of an open space in a RF circuit will primarily affect the inductance. Placing the AM portion in other locations could affect inductance, depending on the means of attaching or the dielectric, and certainly capacitance. Either way, once the AM portion is positioned in an inactive state, the RF portion is designed around the AM components and tuned to accommodate the interaction for any capacitance or inductance effects. This tuning will account for center frequency and the quality of the circuit.
The RF circuit components can be produced by various manufacturing methods such as die cutting, laser cutting, hot foil printing, embossing, printing with conductive inks, etc. The method of manufacture is secondary in importance to the design of the RF portion of the combined EAS tag assembly 50. The means and location of the AM circuitry portion in relation to the RF circuitry portion will affect effect the advantage of shielding properties. The RF label component in accordance with the embodiment shown in
It is therefore another important aspect of the present invention that the RF subsystem of the EAS tag assembly/label 50 is formed in a way and with specific materials that the combined EAS tag/label assembly 50 resonates at the appropriate frequency as an AM label would.
Similar to known AM labels, the AM subsystem of the EAS tag assembly 50 will continue to include the bias magnet 62, one or more resonators 60 cut from an amorphous alloy such as MetGlas (Metglas 2826 MB3 has been used, however it will be readily appreciated that the present invention is not limited by this particular alloy), and packaging to allow for magnetorestriction and resonance.
It is therefore another important aspect of the present invention that the design of the EAS tag assembly 50 allows for at least one of these AM circuit components to be part of the RF circuit. The balance/tuning of the AM subsystem is effected at least in part by the inclusion of additional resonators and shaping of the primary to not only effect the inductance and capacitance of the RF subsystem, but contribute to the resonance of the AM subsystem. These AM circuit components may also be produced by a variety of manufacturing methods and may include die cutting, printing the bias magnet, etc. It will be readily appreciated that the specific method of manufacture either the RF or AM components of the EAS tag assembly 50 is secondary to the design of the combined EAS tag assembly 50, and that the present invention is not limited by the manner in which the EAS tag assembly is manufactured.
Yet, another important aspect of the present invention is that the design of the EAS tag assembly 50 will allow for only one portion to be active at a given time. Thus, when the tag is activated for AM, it is deactivated for RF. This is coincident with the intrinsic properties of the labels themselves, as expressed:
Thus, in a preferred embodiment, the resonator component (which may be formed from Metglas or from many of the known amorphous alloys, used for the magnetorestrictive resonator) will be employed as not only the resonator in the AM subsystem, but may be a layer or a portion of a layer of the RF subsystem. The bias magnet 62 may also be a layer or a portion of a layer.
Moreover, the resonator component can also be effective for EMF shielding. As such, when a shield is placed behind the RF component, the signal from the RF is not absorbed by the package that it is trying to protect, but is directed outward toward the EAS gate which is meant to detect the signal. The shielding aspect can coexist with the actual performance of both the AM and the RF components when the RF circuit is designed and tuned to accommodate the interaction between the two. However, as stated previously, the means and location of the AM portion in relation to the RF portion will affect the advantage of shielding properties.
It will therefore be readily appreciated that with the combined EAS tag assembly 50, a manufacturer can incorporate the label/tag 50 into a product or packaging during manufacture and maintain a single inventory. When the order for a product comes in, the products are picked and then the appropriate AM or RF component is activated/deactivated. This can be done automatically on a conveyor system or individually. A flow chart depicting the simplicity of this is shown in
Thus, a preferred embodiment of the present invention provides an integrated EAS label/tag assembly 50 which is compatible with both AM type and RF (including RFID) systems. The invention includes the AM type transponder which is composed of one or more amorphous alloy strips with a high magnetic permeability and a magnetic biasing strip which can be cast, die cut, painted, printed, etc. . . . . The amorphous strip(s) are packaged such that it (they) can freely resonate and is (are) sized to resonate at the desired frequency of standard AM type EAS.
The invention also includes the RF (or RFID) component which can be manufactured by any number of known processes. The process of die cutting or laser cutting the material is the preferred method (however, any number of methods may be used), since it minimizes the steps of manufacture, amount of equipment and eases the capability of mass producing a fine tuned RF type EAS tag exhibiting the rectangular shape with open space in its center and/or for fine tuning the interaction between the components regardless of their location and RF antenna type. An open space is preferred when combining the two types of tag/labels (AM and RF) to maximize shielding effects. However, the open space is not necessarily to create a highly functional combined/universal tag, which provides the business benefit of reducing inventory and the associated costs.
Moreover, The RF subsystem of the combined EAS tag/label assembly 50 is characterized as a LC Tank Circuit where the angular frequency is equal to:
in radians/sec; where L is in Henries and C is in Farads; Resonant Frequency is equal to:
in radians/sec; where L is in Henries and C is in Farads;
The AM subsystem of the combined EAS tag/label assembly 50 is characterized by one or more strips or ribbons of an amorphous magnetorestrictive alloy, which is magnetically biased by the placement of the bias magnet. The resonator(s) provide consistent resonant frequency when a given bias field is applied. Although it is common to have multiple resonators, the design of the present invention does not preclude the use of a single resonator or multiple arrangement. In simplistic terms, resonators of the same thickness can be accomplished as long as the length is constant and total width is approximately the same. For approximation, if a single resonator can be designed with a length of approximately 38 mm and a width of 2x, two individual resonators of the same length can be used with a width of x, assuming consistent thickness.
The combined RF (including RFID) and AM label/tag provides the overall system with not only a less expensive means of manufacturing these labels/tags independently, but provides a potential improvement in performance and product shielding. Depending upon the position of the AM portion in relation to the RF portion, shielding may be improved. The resonators, being an amorphous alloy, are intrinsic shielding materials. Customized designs following this method allow that the RF signature will not be absorbed by the product being labeled, since the amorphous alloys used as resonators in the AM tag will shield the product and reflect the signal outward in the desired direction.
It is therefore an important aspect of the present invention that the combined EAS tags described in connection with the embodiments of
It will also be appreciated that the disclosed embodiments as presented in connection with
Referring now to
As shown in
Affixed to the substrate 110 is a coil inductor 130 of the RF circuit, which as discussed above, is an LF tank circuit. As shown, a portion of the coil inductor 130 is overlapped by another section of foil or magnetic ink, thereby forming a plate capacitor 140. As mentioned, the capacitor 140 is preferably a second layer of foil that has been secured to the inductor 130 with dielectric glue. The capacitor 140 also has a plurality of cut-away portions 180 which can be broken or blown out with high-energy RF to disable the RF portion of the inventive tag should the tag be for use with AM readers exclusively.
The coil inductor 130 may itself be manufactured from a foil or a metallic ink. Preferably, the coil inductor 130 is foil and is manufactured using a die cut process in which the inductor 130 and capacitor 140 are cut from a single piece of foil. When cut from a single piece of foil, the die cut foil would include a fold line allowing the ‘capacitor’ portion 140 to be folded over the ‘inductor’ portion 130, and glued in place. The size of the inductor 130 may vary provided that it has a width large enough to accommodate the bias magnet and the resonator strips of the AM circuit, as will be discussed in more detail below.
Referring again to
In its preferred configuration, however, the bias magnet 150 is a single unitary 38 mm×4 mm Arnochrome permanent magnet that is situated so that it overlaps, in superposition, both a portion of the inductor 130 and plate capacitor 140 on top of the inductor 130. Importantly, in this location, the bias magnet 150 increases the capacitance of the RF circuit and becomes, in essence, part of the capacitor 140. Indeed, the area of overlap between the plate capacitor 140 and inductor 130 can be reduced or expanded in accordance with the size of the bias magnet 150 to achieve a desired resonance frequency.
As will be appreciated, the bias magnet 150 is a preferred shared component between the RF circuit and the AM circuit in the inventive hybrid assembly of the present embodiment. The AM portion of the assembly includes the bias magnet 150 and multiple resonator strips 170 located within an insulative bubble-type enclosure or pack 160, preferably manufactured from plastic. The resonator strips 170 may be formed from Metglas or from many known amorphous alloys. The bubble pack 160 is insulative so that the resonator strips do not affect the capacitance of the RF circuit. Preferably, the bubble pack 160 is secured to the bias magnet 150 by gluing the edges of the pack 160 directly to the bias magnet 150.
The use of the bias magnet 150 in the RF circuit is an important aspect of the present invention. The bias magnet 150 effectively increases the capacitance of the RF circuit, while also allowing the AM portion to be stacked directly on top of the RF portion without destroying the functioning of either the AM or RF portions of the universal tracking tag/assembly 100.
Indeed, simply mounting an AM circuit and RF circuit, in close association on the same tag substrate, serves to interfere with the capacitance of the RF circuit, e.g., thereby reducing the resonance frequency from the (e.g.) required 8.2 MHz, and potentially rendering both circuits unsuitable for use.
In sharp contrast, the present invention has determined that by employing the bias magnet 150 (a necessary component of known AM circuitry) in a superpositional orientation over the existing coil inductor of the RF circuitry, the bias magnet 150 actually performs a dual function without harming the operational characteristics of either the AM or RF portions of the universal tag/assembly 100. Thus, an important aspect of the present invention lies in utilizing the biasing magnet 150 of known AM circuitry to act also as a capacitive element for a RF EAS tag, by locating the bias magnet 150 in superposition over at least a portion of the coil inductor of the RF circuitry.
In addition to the concept of integrating the bias magnet 150 in the manner discussed above, it is yet another important aspect of the present invention that the length of the bias magnet may itself be varied in order to alter the total capacitance of the RF circuit, i.e., in order to ‘tune’ the circuit. This eliminates the need to alter the amount of overlap between the foil capacitor and the induction coil, which is more difficult to vary upon manufacture than is the length of the biasing magnet, which is a separate component placed on top of and affixed to the previously manufactured and assembled substrate, inductor and capacitor.
Additionally, the present invention also contemplates that it is possible to simply change the position of the bias magnet 150, relative to the capacitor and inductor portions of the universal tag/assembly 100, so that only a predetermined portion of the bias magnet overlaps these components to alter the capacitance of the RF circuit. For the above reasons, the inventive tag provides an ease of manufacture, and a degree of versatility, previously unknown in the art.
The ability to easily tune the inventive EAS tag/assembly 100 is important, particularly in situations where the specific packaging of a commodity is known to bring an RF tag out of tune. For example, with tobacco products such as cigarettes, the packaging typically includes a foil paper lining. This foil lining affects the capacitance of an RF circuit effectively throwing an RF EAS tag out of tune and rendering it ineffective for its intended purpose. Therefore, separate RF tags are typically manufactured specifically for such packaging, and the resultant customization of such packaging obviously increases the cost of manufacture, as well as increasing the complexity of selecting the proper RF EAS circuitry for the specific commodity being shipped.
Thus, it is yet another important aspect of the present invention that the length of the bias magnet can be selectively altered, thereby changing the capacitance of the RF circuit to take into account the foil lining of the packaging such that the tag 100, when placed on such packaging, provides the proper resonance frequency of 8.2 MHz. This relatively simple modification does away with the need to manufacture a plurality of wholly separate tags, for use with a matching plurality of differing commodities that each have their own ‘capacitance profile’, due to foil packaging or the like.
As stated, the hybrid inventive circuit/assembly 100 may be tuned by selectively varying the length of the bias magnet 150. Typically, both RF and AM circuits are tuned, e.g., the capacitance and inductance are modified, to result in a maximized “Q” value (
Turning back to the stacked configuration of the hybrid RF/AM circuit, it will be appreciated that this configuration is a significant feature of the present invention. There are literally millions of EAS tags deployed by manufacturers, distributors and retailers for inventory tracking and control. Given the high volume of tags, cost savings, ease of manufacture and universal adaptability are of particular importance. With these goals in mind, the stacked hybrid assembly with its shared bias magnet allows for the creation of a single tag with both RF and AM circuits.
In particular, the inventive hybrid assembly 100 of the present invention provides for a significant savings as it eliminates the need for separate RF and AM tags. For example, where the type of EAS reader/interrogator varies from location to location during shipment and sale of goods, it is known to place two wholly separate tags on a package, e.g., one for an RF reader and another for an AM reader. As will be apparent, the deployment of separate tags requires the manufacture and deployment of separate tags. The present invention reduces these costs through the use of a single tag with a hybrid AM/RF circuit.
In addition to reducing costs, the use of a single tag with the inventive hybrid circuit provides a level of adaptability and convenience not available with known EAS tags. Indeed, the hybrid tag, and any accompanying packaging, may be shipped, as shown in
Further, while the present embodiment is an AM/RF hybrid tag that is “passive”, i.e., is incapable of transmitting data itself, merely providing a response (or not) to an interrogating AM or RF signal, it is possible to create other, more complex hybrids using a bias magnet as a shared component between circuits. For example, an AM/RFID hybrid may be created in which an IC/processor, power source and antenna are added to the present arrangement of components. This configuration would allow for the inventive tag to store and potentially transmit additional information apart from the active/inactive information available with exemplary AM/RF hybrid. Thus, with the inclusion of an IC/processor, it is possible for the hybrid/universal tag 100 to actually broadcast product and shipping information, similar to known RFID tags, when interrogated via AM or RF protocols.
It is also possible for the above-described AM/RF tag 100 to function as, or mimic, an RFID tag, even without the inclusion of an IC/processor. This may be accomplished through the placement of multiple resonator strips of varying lengths, and frequencies, in the bubble pack 160. As will be appreciated, different resonator strips, each representing differing types of information, e.g., active/passive, manufacturing location, etc., and having a specific resonant frequency, may be stored within the bubble pack 160 for subsequent AM interrogation. It may also be possible to create resonator strips that have coatings (e.g., organic coatings) that only resonate when certain, very specific conditions cause the organic coatings to deteriorate. In this manner, a plurality of interrogation signals can be broadcast at the hybrid tag/assembly 100, utilizing AM protocols, and the cumulative effect of receiving or not receiving a corresponding signal from each of the resonator strips in the bubble pack 160 effectively mimics the broadcast of multiple data bits from an integrated IC or processor.
As alluded to above, it is often desirable to track an object or group of objects as they move about in commerce. As will be readily appreciated, in today's global marketplace, goods are often manufactured in one location and distributed throughout the world, having many stops along the way before reaching their final destination. Indeed, a cargo shipping container may carry a multitude of goods, which may pass through ports, warehouses and the like throughout the globe during transit, e.g., from China, to India, to Europe and finally to the United States. As a result of the numerous intermediate stops along a particular good's or items's transit route, it is desirable to track such good at each stop in order to maintain the integrity of the goods and ensure security of the goods such that they are not tampered with. As will be readily appreciated, electronic article surveillance tags, such as those taught by the present invention, may be placed on each item or group of items so that the respective items can be tracked throughout transit. Such EAS tags can communicate with readers or interrogators positioned at ports, warehouses and the like to communicate information to the interrogator, and a broader surveillance system as a whole, by having such interrogators read information stored on each tag pertaining to, e.g., serial number of the good, where the good originated, where the good has been, owner of the good, manufacturer of the good, final destination of the good, etc. An example of such an EAS tag and broader surveillance and tracking system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,012,529 and 7,176,800, which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
In addition to the security features provided by such known tags and systems, an additional embodiment of the present invention also provides a tag that is capable of maintaining a count of each stop along an item's transit route. In this embodiment, in its simplest form, the tag may take the form of that disclosed in the above-referenced applications, but preferably that disclosed in
In operation, a tag may be affixed to each item or group of items before it leaves port en route to its final destination. As the cargo ship, airplane, train or the like carrying the items enters each port, an interrogator may excite the RF portion of the tag 200. The counter mechanism 206 detects when the RF portion of the tag is excited and, upon such excitation, the counter mechanism 206 indexes one count, i.e., it counts each time the tag 200 is interrogated/excited, and stores the total count on the tag 200. This process is repeated each time the tag 200 is interrogated such that at the final destination the counter mechanism 206 should indicate that that the tag 200 was indexed a certain number of counts corresponding to the number of times the tag 200 was interrogated, which should also correspond to the number of stops along the transit route. As the tag 200 is interrogated at the final destination, the tag 200 may communicate this count to the interrogator and broader surveillance system. This count can then be cross-referenced with the number of stops displayed on an itinerary or stored in a database.
For example, an item may be manufactured in one country, for example China, having the United States as its ultimate destination but with 8 planned stops along the way. Each time the item arrives at one of the stops, the tag 200 is interrogated and the counter mechanism 206 indexes one count. In addition, the stored total count may be communicated to the interrogator to detect discrepancies at an early stage. In addition, the tag 200 can be interrogated at the item's ultimate destination in the United States so that the total number of counts stored can be read. If the total count stored on the tag and transmitted to the interrogator or broader system is less than the planned number of stops, in this case 8, this indicates either that the tag is non-functional or that the item wasn't present for the entire trip. In the case of the latter, this may indicate that either the item was added at some point along the trip subsequent to leaving the origination port or the like, i.e., it originated at a location different from the expected origination port, or that it was taken off at one location and subsequently put back on at another, which could indicate that the item was tampered with. Moreover, if the number of counts read at a given destination or stop is more than expected, this indicates that the item(s) were routed to an additional port/location that was not on the itinerary. As will be readily appreciated, this could also indicated that the items were intercepted, tampered with or the like.
If any of the above discrepancies in count are detected, the tag 200 may prompt the broader system to issue an alert or alarm such that further investigation may be undertaken. Moreover, if the count detected at a given stop is different from what is expected, the item can be taken out of turn for special inspection. The counter mechanism 206 may be included in any type of EAS tag and is not limited to the inclusion in the RF, AM or combined RF and AM tags discussed in above.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, a combined tag having a counter mechanism is provided. The combined tag may take the form of that disclosed in
In this manner, the tags of the present invention having a counter mechanism are capable of ensuring security and more closely monitoring items during transit than known tags, thereby provided a level of security heretofore unknown in the art.
While the invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various obvious changes may be made, and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof, without departing from the essential scope of the present invention. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but that the invention includes all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4312025||Dec 6, 1978||Jan 19, 1982||Rca Corporation||Magnetic variable capacitor|
|US5452520||Mar 14, 1994||Sep 26, 1995||Ferrofluidics Corporation||Ferrofluid inclinometer|
|US5729200||Aug 28, 1996||Mar 17, 1998||Sensormatic Electronics Corporation||Magnetomechanical electronic article surveilliance marker with bias element having abrupt deactivation/magnetization characteristic|
|US6169483||May 4, 1999||Jan 2, 2001||Sensormatic Electronics Corporation||Self-checkout/self-check-in RFID and electronics article surveillance system|
|US6181245||Aug 15, 1997||Jan 30, 2001||Sensormatic Electronics Corporation||Magnetomechanical electronic article surveillance marker with bias element having abrupt deactivation/magnetization characteristic|
|US6373387||Aug 8, 2000||Apr 16, 2002||Honeywell International Inc.||Integrated hybrid electronic article surveillance marker|
|US7088245||Dec 2, 2002||Aug 8, 2006||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Remote-readable identification tag and method for operating the same|
|US7183917||May 18, 2004||Feb 27, 2007||Checkpoint Systems, Inc.||EAS/RFID identification hard tags|
|US7345583||Apr 7, 2004||Mar 18, 2008||Kma Global Solutions Inc.||Dual security label|
|US7667603 *||Apr 13, 2006||Feb 23, 2010||Tagent Corporation||Embedding items with RFID tags for tracking and calibration|
|US20040201479||Apr 20, 2004||Oct 14, 2004||3M Innovative Properties Company||Applications for radio frequency identification systems|
|US20040233042||May 18, 2004||Nov 25, 2004||Checkpoint Systems, Inc||EAS/RFID identification hard tags|
|US20060012473 *||Dec 9, 2004||Jan 19, 2006||American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.||System and method for authenticating a rf transaction using a radio frequency identification device including a transaction counter|
|US20060214791||Mar 24, 2005||Sep 28, 2006||Sdgi Holdings, Inc.||Button-type RFID tag|
|US20060267737||May 26, 2006||Nov 30, 2006||Colby Steven M||RF Powered Remote Control|
|US20070241865 *||Mar 30, 2007||Oct 18, 2007||Nec Corporation||Wireless IC tag with counter, and information management system|
|DE102004052543A1||Oct 28, 2004||May 18, 2006||Sentronik Gmbh||Goods or item security tag with multiple security features in a single housing but each functioning independently and not affecting each other|
|JP2001521649A||Title not available|
|JP2004506277A||Title not available|
|WO2001033489A2||Nov 6, 2000||May 10, 2001||Max Guntersdorfer||Remote-readable identification tag and method for operating the same|
|WO2002013156A1||Aug 7, 2001||Feb 14, 2002||Honeywell Int Inc||Integrated hybrid electronic article surveillance marker|
|WO2004090843A2||Apr 7, 2004||Oct 21, 2004||Kma Global Solutions Inc||Dual security label|
|WO2006055653A1||Nov 15, 2005||May 26, 2006||Sensormatic Electronics Corp||Combination eas and rfid label or tag|
|U.S. Classification||340/572.1, 340/10.41|
|Cooperative Classification||G08B13/2448, G08B13/242, G08B13/2411, G08B13/2417|
|European Classification||G08B13/24B1G2, G08B13/24B1F2, G08B13/24B3U, G08B13/24B1G1|
|May 24, 2010||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: UNITED SECURITY APPLICATIONS ID, INC., NEW JERSEY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ARGUIN, PAUL R.;REEL/FRAME:024429/0752
Effective date: 20100503
|Jan 16, 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4