|Publication number||US8083783 B2|
|Application number||US 11/887,746|
|Publication date||Dec 27, 2011|
|Filing date||Apr 10, 2006|
|Priority date||Apr 8, 2005|
|Also published as||CA2603963A1, CA2603963C, CN101193602A, CN101193602B, EP1865865A1, EP1865865A4, EP1865865B1, US20080281363, WO2006107264A1|
|Publication number||11887746, 887746, PCT/2006/429, PCT/SE/2006/000429, PCT/SE/2006/00429, PCT/SE/6/000429, PCT/SE/6/00429, PCT/SE2006/000429, PCT/SE2006/00429, PCT/SE2006000429, PCT/SE200600429, PCT/SE6/000429, PCT/SE6/00429, PCT/SE6000429, PCT/SE600429, US 8083783 B2, US 8083783B2, US-B2-8083783, US8083783 B2, US8083783B2|
|Inventors||Michael Ullman, Carl Ekholm|
|Original Assignee||Swemac Innovation Ab|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (20), Referenced by (2), Classifications (14), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a pin for use in fractured bones in arms or other parts of the body, to bring about support of the fractured bone while it is healing.
2. Description of the Related Art
It is generally known within the health care field that in the treatment of fractured bones means are used to allow reinforcement and support to the area surrounding a fracture in the bone in question.
Fractures of the distal forearm (wrist fractures) are the most common of all fractures (annual incidence about 3,000/1,000,000 inhabitants in the industrialized world) and constitutes by it's abundance a major therapeutic problem. Simple fractures are treated with just a bandage while more complex fractures often require open reduction and plate fixation. For a large number of the intermediate complex fractures the choice of treatment is less obvious; while plate fixation may be a too extensive and expensive procedure bandage immobilization may be insufficient to hold fracture fragments in the desired position while the fracture heals. Other therapeutic modalities also have their drawbacks: classic external fixation immobilizes the wrist joint during treatment and wrist stiffness may ensue. To avoid that, the external fixation is often removed before the fracture is consolidated, which may lead to secondary displacement of the fracture.
Another method is to use straight fine wires (1.5-2.0 mm in diameter) drilled into the fragments or introduced through the fracture site. While that is a simple and minimally invasive procedure it requires power tools. Also, the wires, being left protruding through the skin, have to be removed before the patient is able to mobilize her wrist.
The second bone of the forearm, the ulna, is notoriously difficult to fix, and fractures of the distal ulna are therefore often neglected. Pins have been used, among others, to hold together the bone fragments, or they have been inserted in the bone's inner canal. The pin has then either been allowed to remain in place after the fractured bone has healed, or it has been extracted afterwards. Plates similar to angle iron have also been used and are attached with screws to the bone by the fracture. Examples of such aids are shown in International Publication No. WO 01/56452 A2.
It has been difficult to operate in such supports by the fracture area, and even more difficult to remove them. Neither have those supports constituted an especially good pin in themselves, i.e., they have not interacted with the bone to achieve contact against the same during simultaneous tensioning of the pin. The introduction of the pin in the bone has not been facilitated with similarly known pins, and neither has the screwing of them into the bone been proven to be easy to achieve.
It is difficult to insert pins in the bone, and sometimes a power drill is required. It is also difficult to securely anchor the pin in the bone, which is why they frequently slide out. In addition, they are frequently left protruding from the skin, with the risk of both inflammation around the pin as well as infection, which can spread to the bone and develop into osteomyelitis.
An object of the present invention is thus primarily to produce a pin that is suitable for use in the healing of fractured bones in the arms or other parts of the body, and which solves, among others, the problems identified above, and which is also easy and cost effective to manufacture.
The object is achieved by means of a pin in accordance with the present invention, which pin is essentially characterized in that on opposite ends of the pin, it includes an angled, rounded front section and one double bent extra cortical equipped with an anchor eye, and is formed of spring material.
Previously disclosed in published French application FR 2,728,155-A1 is a so-called intramedullary nail.
The present invention is intended for fixation of moderately complex fractures. The present implants are pins specifically designed for fixation of wrist fractures, but with modifications it can be extended to other fractures. The implant is made of 1.6 mm wire (but other materials or dimensions can be used) with mechanical properties suitable for this particular use. The larger part of the implant is introduced through the fracture line into the intramedullary canal of the main body of the fractured bone and thus becomes stabilized. The lesser part of the implant, anatomically shaped to lie flush against the outer cortex of the distal fragment, stabilizes the fracture by serving as a support. Since the implant is introduced through the fracture line and into the intramedullary canal no power tools are needed. The implant has a low profile and is anatomically shaped and therefore does not normally require removal—a second procedure is thereby avoided, and the fracture is supported during the consolidation period even while normal activity with the wrist and hand is resumed.
The form of the implants is as follows:
Implants for the Radius
The implants meant to fix fractures of the radius have the same basic configuration and functions; small variations in the design are made with respect to variations the anatomy of the specific site where they are used.
The intramedullary portion is straight but has a curved tip with a rounded end to facilitate its introduction into the intramedullary canal.
The extramedullary portion is shaped to follow the anatomy of the outer cortex of the radius. It is constituted of a double wire connected by a 180° distal bend made into the shape of a hoop. That design enlarges the supporting interface between implant and bone.
The extramedullary and intramedullary parts are roughly parallel but not coaxial—they are connected by an intermediate part at about a 90° angle to each of the other parts. The length of the intermediate part corresponds to the thickness of the cortical wall of the radius at the fracture site. The transverse part prevents the implant from sliding out of place.
One of the double wires is extended beyond the connecting part to form a fork with the intramedullary part. That is intended to stabilize the implant against the outer wall of the main fracture body.
The hoop formed at the distal end of the implant is shaped to fit a screw, which can optionally be used to stabilize the distal fragment.
Implants for the Ulna
The ulnar implant differs from the radial implant in the respect that it is intended to be fixed in position with one or two screws.
The intramedullary portion is straight and has a pointed tip to allow its introduction through the distal part of the ulna into the intramedullary canal;
The extramedullary portion has two hoops, the proximal one for screw fixation of the implant itself to the shaft of the ulna, the distal one for optional screw fixation of the distal fragment; and
The distal fragment is fixed in position by being sandwiched between the intramedullary and extramedullary portions of the implant.
The invention is described below in terms of a number of preferred embodiments, whereby reference is made to the appended drawings, in which:
A pin 1 (
In accordance with the invention, the characteristic for all of those pins is that at opposite ends 1A, 1B (see
The rear support parts 6; 106; 206 of the pins are formed by a bend, from the center sections 1C; 101C; 201C, of the pins with respective blunt angle bent sections 8; 108; 208, and from each of the bent sections a respective extending end section, which is double bent with each pair of pin end sections 7A, 7B; 107A, 107B; 207A, 207B lying in tight contact with each other.
Both pin sections 7A, 7B; 107A, 107B; 207A, 207B can be straight (see
A hole-shaped outer eye 5; 105; 205, designed to receive therein a fixation screw 9 or some other fixing device, is located adjacent to the pin end sections' outer ends 10; 110; 210, respectively. In that connection, in the
The rear support part 206 of the pin 201 that includes the above-mentioned screw eyes 205, 211 is bent back at an angle of about 180° so that the reformed section 212 is located parallel with the remaining section 213 of the pin 201 and is kept at the distance B from it, as shown in
The above-mentioned angled, rounded end sections 4; 104; 204 and the above-mentioned bent sections 6; 106; 206 extend along each plane 15,16 (see
The fixation pin is principally of a flat design, with a principally circular cross section, formed from materials such as spring steel, titanium, stainless steel, plastic, resorbing material, or a composite plastic.
Screw 9, which is arranged to secure pins 1; 101; 201 in position, is shown in
A variant of the screw includes threads right up to the screw head 20. The above-mentioned threads are designed to work together with the pin's round cross section part.
As shown for example in
Depending upon the type of fracture on the bone 3 that has occurred at the time of the accident, different pins of the type described above are used, and the application of the same can vary. As shown in
The pin in accordance with the example as shown in
Effective contact and support against bone 3 is achieved with the above-mentioned protruding pin end section through the free end 7C; 107C of one pin end section 7B; 107B of both pin end sections 7A, 7B; 107A, 107B that extends past the bent sections 8; 108 of the pins 1; 101.
On account of the pin's spring properties, the pin stabilizes the fragment of the fracture through the tension between the distal cortex and the proximal medullary canal. The pin is inserted until the transverse section of the pin snaps into the fracture at the fracture line.
An additional advantage offered by the present invention is that the pin in accordance with the invention is anatomically designed so that it lies tight against the bone, and thereby effectively increases the contact surface against the contact section of the bone.
Consequently, the pin is ideal to be utilized both to position the fracture into the right position and to hold together the bone fragments.
French published patent application FR 2,728,155 A1 describes a typical so-called intermedullary nail, i.e., a device designed to stabilize a broken tubular bone through insertion in the medullary canal on each side of the fracture. The insertion in the medullary canal takes place through an artificial channel effected into one end in one of the fragments.
The present invention's radial contour pin and dorsal radius pin are inserted into the fracture site through the existing fracture gap. Accordingly, the pin is only inserted into the medullary canal of only one of the fracture fragments, which secures the pin. In turn, the pin provides support to the other fragment by resting against that fragment's outer area.
The bending (7) of the device described in the French publication has as an object to permit the insertion of the medullary nail into the medullary canal via an (artificial) opening in the bone that does not lie in the medullary canal's longitudinal direction.
The present invention's principle of operation involves the external shank to be connected to the existing anatomy/topography of the outside of the distal fragment, which is why the bend connects to the existing anatomy. In addition, the pin in accordance with the present invention is double bent, with a parallel offset of the extramedullary and the intramedullary parts to create an intermediate shank (8, 108, 208) (intrafocal shank) whose length corresponds to the thickness of the cortical bone at the fracture gap.
The device in the French publication has two parallel intramedullary shanks.
The invention has one intramedullary shank, but different forms on the extramedullary shank, which are chosen depending upon how the fracture appears, and where the pin is to be inserted.
On the device disclosed in the French publication the extra cortical curve is the necessary connection between the two intramedullary shanks.
In the present invention, the extra cortical part is designed to give the greatest possible contact against the distal fragment's surface and by doing so to achieve stability in the same plane as the short shank. That has been achieved through the anatomically designed hooks, and thus an even larger contact surface is achieved extra cortically through doubling and by the ring form of the external shank.
The device disclosed in the French publication has been made securable through different fastening devices that can be connected to the extramedullary curve. That has been done to prevent the device from sliding out of the medullary canal, a problem that is known for straight and slightly angled intramedullary nails.
The pin in accordance with the present invention is stabilized in the skeleton through the intra focal shank (8), i.e., the connection shank between the intra and the extramedullary parts of the pin, which is perpendicular to the fracture line and will hook into the fracture line. Further fixation in the proximal fragment is obtained through the extra cortical shank's returning section being so long that it passes the fracture gap and with that runs in parallel to the intramedullary shank on the way from the fracture gap to the extramedullary shank's tip. This produces a “fork” that straddles the cortex of the proximal fragment. The eye in the pin in accordance with the present invention can also be used to fix the distal fragment to the device with a special screw, through which stability of the distal fragment is increased. The screw is thus not intended to prevent the pin from sliding out of the medullary canal.
A pure intramedullary device like that disclosed in the French publication can not safely stabilize a fractured wrist. The device must be partly inserted through the joint surface, or very close to the joint surface, which could injure the wrist. Further, the contact surface between the device and the distal bone fragment would be so small that stability would be insufficient.
The present invention includes different forms on the extramedullary shank, which are chosen depending upon how the fracture appears and where the pin is to be inserted. In general, at least two pins are used, but sometimes three different pins are used, inserted through separate openings, so that the fracture is stabilized on different planes. The anatomical design of the pin's extra cortical section is a prerequisite for the stabilization of the brittle (osteoporotic) bone, which is usually the cause of fractured wrists in the elderly. The pin's design utilizes the curved form of the cortical bone in the fragment close to the distal joint, so that with a small amount of foreign material a large contact surface is provided, which distributes the pressure from the pin over a greater part of the distal fragment.
The angled front section (3, 4), which is shown in the French publication, is a well-known design solution for all implants that are inserted in the medullary canal. That hook can be said to make up a “ski tip,” which allows the implant to slide down despite the fact that the implant is held angled to the medullary canal's longitudinal axis. The top of that “ski tip” is sharp in order to able to penetrate the cortex during insertion.
The pin in accordance with the present invention has a top with a more rounded design in order to allow maneuvering inside the medullary canal via the fracture gap, without catching against the opposite side of the medullary canal or penetrating the opposite cortex. That characteristic is only utilized at the start of the insertion. Further inside the medullary canal the pin can be rotated when the bend close to the rounded tip is utilized to coax the pin past any unevenness in the medullary canal. That step is impossible with the pin disclosed in the French publication, because due to its design it can not be rotated.
In summary the above shows that, the device disclosed in the French publication and the pin in accordance with the present invention have different designs, different functions, and different areas of application.
There is therefore no motivation for one skilled in the art to invent the structural design in accordance with the present invention.
The present invention is naturally not limited to the above description or to the designs shown in the appended drawings. Modifications are possible, especially with regard to the character of the different parts, or through the use of equivalent technology, without deviating from the restricted area for the invention, such as it is defined in the claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4298299 *||Dec 18, 1978||Nov 3, 1981||Quarles James R||Hairpin cotter key|
|US4483335 *||Jun 2, 1983||Nov 20, 1984||Tornier S.A.||Nails for femoral fractures|
|US4915092 *||Jun 13, 1989||Apr 10, 1990||Interprinderea Industria Technico-Medicala||Flexible implants for stable flexible osteosynthesis of femoral tibia fractures and working instrumentation|
|US5041114 *||Aug 15, 1988||Aug 20, 1991||Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc.||Modular femoral fixation system|
|US5324152 *||May 25, 1993||Jun 28, 1994||Anderson Iv Edmund T||Lockable spring clip II|
|US5709682 *||Jan 24, 1996||Jan 20, 1998||Medoff; Robert J.||Surgical clamp for fixation of bone fragments|
|US5941878 *||Jan 9, 1998||Aug 24, 1999||Medoff; Robert J.||Implantable, surgical buttressing device|
|US6135693 *||Mar 23, 1999||Oct 24, 2000||Pivot Point, Inc.||Bow tie locking cotter|
|US6248109 *||Jul 2, 1999||Jun 19, 2001||Waldemar Link (Gmbh & Co.)||Implant for interconnecting two bone fragments|
|US6358250||Feb 1, 2000||Mar 19, 2002||Hand Innovations, Inc.||Volar fixation system|
|US6364882||Mar 13, 2000||Apr 2, 2002||Hand Innovations, Inc.||Volar fixation system|
|US6379359 *||May 5, 2000||Apr 30, 2002||University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill||Percutaneous intrafocal plate system|
|US6440135||Dec 12, 2000||Aug 27, 2002||Hand Innovations, Inc.||Volar fixation system with articulating stabilization pegs|
|US6579293||Aug 2, 2000||Jun 17, 2003||Rama E. Chandran||Intramedullary rod with interlocking oblique screw for tibio-calcaneal arthrodesis|
|US6767351||May 30, 2002||Jul 27, 2004||Hand Innovations, Inc.||Fixation system with multidirectional stabilization pegs|
|US20050010228 *||Apr 9, 2004||Jan 13, 2005||Medoff Robert J.||Fracture fixation system including buttress pin and post washer|
|*||EP693272A1||Title not available|
|FR2728155A1||Title not available|
|WO2001056452A2||Jan 29, 2001||Aug 9, 2001||Hand Innovations, Inc.||Volar fixation system|
|WO2003068080A1||Jun 7, 2002||Aug 21, 2003||Tri-Med, Inc.||An implant device for applying compression across a fracture site|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8992528 *||Jun 14, 2012||Mar 31, 2015||Amit Gupta||Intramedullary system for managing a bone fracture|
|US20130197518 *||Jun 14, 2012||Aug 1, 2013||Amit Gupta||Intramedullary system for managing a bone fracture|
|International Classification||A61F2/08, A61B17/04, A61B17/86, A61B17/84|
|Cooperative Classification||A61B17/86, A61B17/7291, A61B17/7233, A61B17/6408, A61B17/725, A61B17/7208|
|European Classification||A61B17/64B, A61B17/72B, A61B17/72J|
|Nov 23, 2011||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SWEMAC INNOVATION AB, SWEDEN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ULLMAN, MICHAEL;EKHOLM, CARL;REEL/FRAME:027273/0468
Effective date: 20071004
|Jun 3, 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4