|Publication number||US8086080 B2|
|Application number||US 11/781,931|
|Publication date||Dec 27, 2011|
|Filing date||Jul 23, 2007|
|Priority date||Jul 23, 2007|
|Also published as||CA2694309A1, CN101802669A, CN101802669B, EP2179314A2, EP2179314A4, US20090028501, WO2009015139A2, WO2009015139A3|
|Publication number||11781931, 781931, US 8086080 B2, US 8086080B2, US-B2-8086080, US8086080 B2, US8086080B2|
|Inventors||Jefferson L. Wagener, Thomas Andrew Strasser|
|Original Assignee||Nistica, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (21), Referenced by (2), Classifications (12), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/781,940, entitled “High Resolution Digital Optical Encoder/Decoder”, filed on even date herewith, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
As the quantity and speed of data communications over fiber optic systems rapidly increases due to the growing demand from Internet usage and other communications, improved all-optical switching systems are of increased interest to overcome the high cost and slow switching speeds of conventional switches. These conventional switches include, for example, various mechanical switches, electro-optic switches, and thermo-optic switches. In particular, the increased complexity and cost of switching systems that involve switching from an optical signal to an electrical signal and then back to an optical signal have increased the level of interest in improved all-optical switches.
An all-optical switch provides switching of an optical signal from one input path to a selected one of a plurality of different output paths without any intermediate conversion of the optical signal to an electrical signal. This is typically accomplished by applying an electrical signal to a switchable element to cause the optical signal to be selectively switched. These electro-optic switches are responsive to the electrical signal to selectively switch the light of the optical signal from the input path to the selected one of the output paths.
A variety of approaches are known for making all-optical optical switches, such as, for example, described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,687,431, 6,661,948, 6,625,346, and 6,549,699. The switchable element in many of these devices is a Micro-Electromechanical System (MEMS) optical element such as a MEMS mirror. The MEMS mirrors may be individually controllable and movable, e.g., pivotable (or rotatable) under analog (or continuous) control, such that, upon reflection, optical wavelengths are directed from one or more input ports into selected ones of the output ports. In this way, the optical switch may be used to selectively couple the wavelengths between the input and output ports of the system. However, a number of problems arise when such MEMS mirrors operating in an analog manner are used in an optical switch. For example, to avoid instability from mirror structure resonance a means for sensing the precise position of each MEMS mirror may need to be integrated with the MEMS device, which can be difficult and complex to achieve. In addition, switching individual MEMS elements into a MEMS device can cause disturbances in neighboring MEMS elements. In particular, switching MEMS mirrors in a MEMS array has been found to cause an aerodynamic coupling with other mirrors in the array that can disturb mirrors that are intended to remain static. The position of the MEMS mirrors can also drift because the mirrors are generally actuated by a relatively weak electrostatic force that requires a large voltage. The large voltage can cause charging that also disturbs the position of the mirrors. All of these effects become a more significant problem when these devices perform dynamic gain equalization by off-axis alignment of the free space beam as it is coupled into an output port. This technique requires in a much tighter tolerance in the mirror positoning because the attenuation sensitivity as a function of angular positioning level increases nonlinearly as off-axis alignment is extended to achieve higher attenuation levels. The higher sensitivity is the reason complex servo-loops and expensive mirror position sensing systems are disclosed as desirable for this technology.
Digital mirror arrays solve many of the problems with their analog counterparts, and a number of such arrays have become available which include an integrated monolithic switching structure. These devices use relatively low voltages to provide individual mirror elements that can be selectively switched between two or more positions with high precision and stability. One class of such digital mirror arrays are spatial light modulators, often referred to as digital micromirror displays or devices (DMDs). Typically, a DMD consists of an array of tiny mirrors (typically, several million per square inch), wherein the angular position of each mirror element is individually controllable between at least two positions that are angularly offset from one another by approximately 10 to 20 degrees, for instance. A mirror base is located behind the mirror elements. The individually addressable mirror elements are tiltably mounted on mechanical hinges, and typically the array of mirror elements overlays a layer of controlling circuitry in the mirror base, all of which is mounted on a semiconductor chip. The mirror face of the DMD is composed of a generally rectangular grid array of rectangular or square mirror elements. A typical mirror element is about 16 micrometers square, and the individual elements are separated from one another by a distance of about 1 micron. Individually controlled tilting of the mirror elements in the array around at least one axis allows energy that is reflected from the mirror face to be formed into a predetermined pattern. Further, the mirror face can be substantially instantaneously reconfigured in response to digital signals to form a different pattern. Such reconfiguration can generally be achieved in about 25 microseconds or less.
Optical switches incorporating DMDs are known and disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,295,154, and 7,203,398 and U.S. Appl. Serial Nos. 2003/0164959 and 2002/0034356. These switches suffer from a number of limitations in extending the devices to higher levels of functionality to support multiple wavelengths or colors or light on each port, larger numbers of switching ports, or additional functionality such as independent control of the optical power level during switching
Accordingly, it would be advantageous to provide a multiple function DMD switching device that is capable of performing multiple optical processing functions In particular, it would be advantageous to provide a device that integrates a 1×N switch (where N>1) that can control the power levels directed to multiple output ports in a cross-talk free manner.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a multiwavelength switch is provided. The switch includes at least one optical input for receiving an optical beam and at least two optical outputs. A dispersion element receives the optical beam from the optical input and spatially separates the optical beam into a plurality of wavelength components. A collimating element is provided for collimating the plurality of wavelength components. An actuatable optical arrangement receives the collimated plurality of wavelength components from the collimating element. The actuatable optical arrangement includes a digital micromirror device (DMD) from which at least one wavelength component is reflected at least twice before being directed to a selected one of optical outputs.
As detailed below, a wavelength selective switch that employs a DMD is provided. In contrast to the switches described above, the wavelength selective switch described herein includes a dispersive element to separate the different wavelengths of a wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) or dense wavelength division multiplexed (DWDM) signal, thereby enabling the switching of multiple wavelengths from each port. In addition, the switch can perform other functions in addition to or as an alternative to optical switching. For example, unlike the aforementioned switches, when the switch described herein is configured as a 1×N switch with N>1, it can simultaneously perform dynamic gain equalization or power control on a per wavelength basis without undesirable inter-port crosstalk.
It should be noted at the outset that the wavelength selective switch described below operates in a symmetric manner so that any wavelength components directed to any of the output ports can be alternatively directed to any of the input ports. Accordingly, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the switching paths are reciprocal, and thus the terms input and output as used herein are not limited to elements that transmit an optical signal or wavelength component in a single direction relative to the switch. In other words, when light enters the device from any so-called output port, this output port serves as an input port, and similarly, any so-called input port can equally serve as an output port.
Mirror strips 140 1 and 140 2 (“mirror strips 140”) are situated over the surface of the micromirror device 130 and extend in a direction parallel to the axis 150. The mirror strips 140 can be fabricated directly on the lower surface of a transparent window or substrate using conventional lithographic or other techniques. The substrate can be integrated with the micromirror device 130 to form a single optical assembly. An anti-reflective coating may be applied to the upper surface of the window to reduce back reflections. Likewise, an anti-reflective coating may be applied to the nonreflective portions of the lower surface between the individual mirror strips.
Micromirror devices such as micromirror device 130 are generally operated in one of two modes of operation. The first mode of operation is an analog mode, sometimes called beam steering. In this mode of operation the address electrodes, which control the rotation of the individual mirror elements about their respective axes, is charged to a voltage corresponding to the desired deflection of the mirror. Light striking the micromirror device is reflected by the mirror at an angle determined by the deflection of the mirror. The second mode of operation is a digital mode. When operated digitally, each mirror element is fully deflected in either of the two directions about its axis. That is, each mirror element can be positioned in one of three states: two states in which the mirror element are tilted in opposite directions from one another and the off or flat state. Digital operation uses a relatively large voltage to ensure the mirror is fully deflected. For purposes of illustration the present invention will be described in terms of a micromirror device that operates in a digital mode. Such a micromirror device may be conveniently referred to as a digital micromirror device (DMD). In some embodiments of the invention the DMD is preferably selected to have mirror elements sufficiently small so that each wavelength component can reflect off of a relatively large number mirror elements (e.g., 10 or more). Additionally, in some embodiments the spatial fill factor of the mirror elements relative to total area of the mirror array in the DMD is equal to about 85% or more.
The dimensions of the mirror elements in DMD 130 are sufficiently small relative to the optical wavelengths that are employed in the switch 100 so that the light is diffracted off the DMD 130. Accordingly, depending on the tilt angle of the mirror elements upon which wavelength λ1 is incident, the DMD 130 serves as a blazed grating and the light will be diffracted up and to the right along path 160 or, alternatively, up and the left along path 165. The diffracted light will reinforce itself as it reflects back toward mirror strips 140 1 or 140 2, forming a series of points of light at locations represented by various diffraction orders. Likewise, the diffracted light will cancel itself out between the orders. Thus, in order to maximize the light that reaches mirror strips 140 1 or 140 2, the mirror strips should each be located at one of the diffraction orders for the wavelengths. In the particular example shown in
If the light is incident upon mirror strip 140 1, it will be reflected back to the DMD 130 along path 175. On the other hand, if the light is incident upon mirror strip 140 2, it will be reflected back to the DMD 130 along path 170. If the mirror elements upon which light beam 170 or 175 is incident are tilted in the opposite position from the mirror elements upon which the initial incoming wavelength λ1 is incident along path 180, then the light will be reflected back toward the second collimating lens 125 along paths 180 or 182, which are parallel to path 180. This is illustrated in
Referring again to
The individual wavelengths may be switched from the input port 110 4 to one of the output ports 110 3 and 110 5 in either a relatively lossless manner or with a controllable amount of attenuation. The attenuation can be imparted by tilting a selected number of the mirror elements upon which the switching wavelength is received from one of the mirror strips 140 1 and 140 2. This can be illustrated in connection with
As described above in connection with input port 110 4 and output ports 110 3 and 110 5, the wavelength selective switch serves as a 1×2 switch. Many other switch configurations are possible using the 1×2 switch as a fundamental building block. For instance, any number of such 1×2 switches may be formed using a single DMD, provided that the appropriate number of mirror strips 140 are employed. In
The various embodiments of the wavelength selective switch 100 described above may be provided with optical channel monitoring (OCM) capabilities. This can be accomplished using any two adjacent ports, one of which serves as the OCM input and the other of which serves as the output port at which an optical detector can be placed.
Although various embodiments are specifically illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated that modifications and variations of the present invention are covered by the above teachings and are within the purview of the appended claims without departing from the spirit and intended scope of the invention. For example, while the wavelength selective switch as described above employ a fiber array in which the various ports are arranged in parallel with one another, in other embodiments of the invention two or more of the various ports may be arranged to be non-parallel to one another. In this way back reflections into the ports can be avoided when the mirror elements of the DMD are in their off or float state. In addition, while the optical switch has been described as a device that performs switching functionality, the device disclosed herein more generally may be employed for a variety of other purposes instead of, or in addition to, switching. For instance, it has already been mentioned that the device can be used as an optical channel monitor. The device may also be used in applications such as programmable multicasting to direct wavelength components to more than one output port. Another application includes chromatic dispersion control, which can be accomplished by suitably adjusting the path lengths traveled by each of the wavelength components passing through the device.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6115172 *||Jun 30, 1998||Sep 5, 2000||Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd.||Thin film actuated mirror array|
|US6295154||May 12, 1999||Sep 25, 2001||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Optical switching apparatus|
|US6549699||Jan 29, 2002||Apr 15, 2003||Capella Photonics, Inc.||Reconfigurable all-optical multiplexers with simultaneous add-drop capability|
|US6618520||Sep 28, 2001||Sep 9, 2003||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Micromirror optical switch|
|US6625346||Aug 23, 2001||Sep 23, 2003||Capella Photonics, Inc.||Reconfigurable optical add-drop multiplexers with servo control and dynamic spectral power management capabilities|
|US6661948||May 8, 2002||Dec 9, 2003||Capella Photonics, Inc.||Reconfigurable optical add and drop modules with servo control and dynamic spectral power management capabilities|
|US6687431||Nov 7, 2001||Feb 3, 2004||Capella Photonics, Inc.||Reconfigurable optical add-drop multiplexers with servo control and dynamic spectral power management capabilities|
|US6712473 *||Oct 17, 2001||Mar 30, 2004||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Mirror array device and projection type display apparatus using the same|
|US6816640||Sep 28, 2001||Nov 9, 2004||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Optical add drop multiplexer|
|US6819468||Oct 30, 2002||Nov 16, 2004||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Image projection apparatus and method|
|US6842549 *||Aug 20, 2002||Jan 11, 2005||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Optical system and method|
|US7072539||Feb 7, 2005||Jul 4, 2006||The Regents Of The University Of California||Wavelength-selective 1×N2 switches with two-dimensional input/output fiber arrays|
|US7171068||Dec 20, 2002||Jan 30, 2007||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Method to improve an extinction ratio of an optical device|
|US7203398||Mar 20, 2003||Apr 10, 2007||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Compact DMD-based optical module|
|US7324755||Jun 16, 2003||Jan 29, 2008||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||Optical code-division multiple access transmission system and method|
|US7813601||Sep 6, 2002||Oct 12, 2010||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexer|
|US20020034356||Sep 28, 2001||Mar 21, 2002||Tew Claude E.||Micromirror optical switch|
|US20030164959||Mar 14, 2003||Sep 4, 2003||Raytheon Company||Method and apparatus for integrating optical fibers with collimating lenses|
|US20040120049||Dec 20, 2002||Jun 24, 2004||Terry Bartlett||Method to improve an extinction ratio of an optical device|
|US20040196358||Jul 18, 2003||Oct 7, 2004||Igor Murokh||Laser marking using a digital micro-mirror device|
|KR20030097329A||Title not available|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8351789 *||Jul 23, 2007||Jan 8, 2013||Nistica, Inc.||High resolution digital optical encoder/decoder|
|US20090027749 *||Jul 23, 2007||Jan 29, 2009||Wagener Jefferson L||High resolution digital optical encoder/decoder|
|U.S. Classification||385/18, 385/16, 385/15|
|Cooperative Classification||G02B6/352, G02B6/29311, G02B6/356, G02B6/29313|
|European Classification||G02B6/35E2S, G02B6/293D2T, G02B6/293D2V, G02B6/35N8|
|Nov 8, 2007||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NISTICA, INC., NEW JERSEY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WAGENER, JEFFERSON L.;STRASSER, THOMAS A.;REEL/FRAME:020095/0230
Effective date: 20071106
|Sep 13, 2010||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MMV FINANCIAL INC., CANADA
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NISTICA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:024973/0187
Effective date: 20100909
Owner name: RBC BANK (USA), NORTH CAROLINA
Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NISTICA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:024982/0115
Effective date: 20100909
|Jun 29, 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4