|Publication number||US8107770 B2|
|Application number||US 11/889,787|
|Publication date||Jan 31, 2012|
|Filing date||Aug 16, 2007|
|Priority date||Feb 5, 2003|
|Also published as||DE602004008681D1, DE602004008681T2, DE602004025298D1, EP1447699A2, EP1447699A3, EP1447699B1, EP1772763A1, EP1772763B1, US7602996, US8478073, US20040184678, US20080055405, US20120120225|
|Publication number||11889787, 889787, US 8107770 B2, US 8107770B2, US-B2-8107770, US8107770 B2, US8107770B2|
|Inventors||John R. Maddison|
|Original Assignee||Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (43), Non-Patent Citations (9), Classifications (14), Legal Events (1)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 10/772,591, filed on Feb. 4, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,602,996 which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The present application claims priority to UK Patent Application No. 03 026 64.8, entitled “Microscope System and Method”, which application was filed on Feb. 5, 2003.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the field of microscopy, and in particular to an aid for a microscope user.
2. Description of the Related Art
Microscopes are commonly used to view images of very small objects. A typical optical microscope has several objective lenses, of different magnifying power, to enable an object on a microscope slide to be viewed at different magnifications.
A problem with viewing an object through a microscope is that only a portion of the object can be seen in the field of view at any one time. The higher the magnifying power of the objective lens, the smaller the area of the object visible in the field of view. Thus, at very high magnifications (e.g. use of a 20× (or above) objective lens), the field of view only contains a very small part of the complete object. Consequently, characteristic features of the object, such as its outline shape, or the distinctive shape of features within the object, are unlikely to be visible in the field of view, or, if visible are unlikely to be of a size sufficient to enable determination of the position of the visible area within the overall object.
When using a microscope for studying a biological specimen, for example, a user will typically look at the specimen on the microscope slide with the naked eye (e.g. by holding the slide up to the light) to get a sense of the outline shape of the specimen and the location of distinctive visible features within the outline. The user may then view the object through the microscope at low magnification to more clearly identify the main distinctive features of the object before viewing the object in detail at high magnification.
When viewing the specimen at high magnification, the user estimates the position of the portion of the specimen in the field of view within the overall specimen based on his or her memory of the shape of the specimen. As a result, even the most experienced microscope users find it difficult to determine the exact position of a part of the specimen contained within a field of view in relation to the overall specimen, especially at high magnifications.
Recently, developments have been made in the field of “virtual microscopy” in which digital images of an object are captured from a microscope by a digital camera and assembled together by image processing software to form an overall image of the object which can be displayed on a display screen. An example of a virtual microscopy technique is described in EP-A-0 994 433 in the name of Fairfield Imaging Limited. In the described technique, adjacent images are captured from a microscope at high magnification/resolution and are assembled together to provide a composite image. A low magnification/resolution copy of the image is obtained by image processing which is displayed on a display screen and used as a “navigation map”. A user can select, from the navigation map, a portion of the low magnification/resolution image for viewing at high resolution. Thus, the user of a virtual microscope has the benefit of knowing the positional relationship of a displayed high magnification image relative to the overall object.
Although virtual microscopy is increasingly used, it necessitates the provision of an expensive, high precision microscope that is dedicated to imaging microscope slides, along with associated equipment including a stage driver, high quality digital or video camera and associated workstation. Such additional equipment can be bulky, and can inhibit normal use of the microscope when not performing imaging for virtual microscopy.
It would be desirable to provide a system and method which can be used with a conventional microscope that provides some of the aforementioned advantages of virtual microscopy. In particular, it would be desirable to provide a method and apparatus that gives an indication of the position of an area of a microscope specimen, contained within the field of view of a microscope, within the complete specimen.
One method for determining the position of an area of a microscope specimen contained within the field of view of a microscope within the complete specimen is to use an expensive robotic microscope stage which has a stage driver and sensors in order to determine the position of the field of view using the stage coordinates; However this technique is complex and requires expensive equipment not readily available to an average microscope user.
The present invention therefore further aims to obviate the need for such expensive equipment when determining the positional information.
According to a first aspect, the present invention provides a method for determining a position of an area of an object within said object, wherein an image of said area of said object is contained within a field of view of a microscope, and wherein image data representing a low magnification image of the complete object is available, the method comprising acquiring high magnification digital image data representing an image of the field of view of a microscope; processing the high magnification digital image data to reduce the resolution thereof; comparing the processed high magnification digital image data with portions of the low magnification image data, and, determining said position to correspond to the position of a closest matched portion of the low magnification image data.
The determined position can thus be provided to the user, for example by displaying an image of the complete specimen, using the low magnification image data, on a display screen and highlighting the area of the image corresponding to the field of view.
Advantageously, the method can be carried out without special equipment. For instance, the low magnification image data may be acquired using a conventional scanner; the high magnification image data may be acquired using a digital camera in conjunction with a conventional microscope, and the processing of the image data may be performed by a conventional computer or similar processing device.
According to a second aspect, the present invention provides a computer readable medium including a computer program comprising: a program step for receiving high magnification image data representing the image of a part of an object contained in the field of view of a microscope; a program step for processing the high magnification image data to reduce the resolution thereof; a program step for comparing the processed high magnification image data with portions of low magnification image data for the complete object stored in a data store, and, a program step for determining the position based on the results of the comparison.
Other preferred features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following description and accompanying claims.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The apparatus comprises a microscope 1 including a movable stage 3, and a digital camera 5 connected to a camera attachment of the microscope 1 for capturing images of the microscope field of view. It should be noted that, as well as the camera attachment, the microscope 1 has a separate eyepiece or eyepieces (not shown) to enable a user to use the microscope 1 whilst the camera 5 is attached thereto.
The digital camera 5 is also coupled to provide digital microscope images to a workstation 7, which may be any conventional computer having a processor and memory, that is capable of receiving and storing the digital image data from the camera 5. The workstation 7 has user interfaces including a display screen 9, a keyboard 11 and a mouse 15, and peripheral devices including a printer 17 (not shown) and a flatbed scanner 19.
The workstation 7 is loaded with a computer program in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. In particular, the computer program implements a method that determines positional information relating to an object under the microscope, namely, the position of an area of an object, the image of which is contained within a field of view of the microscope 1, relative to the complete object. In addition, the computer program provides the determined positional information on the display screen 9, as described in further detail below.
At step 10, low magnification image data of the complete specimen is acquired and stored in memory in workstation 7.
Typically step 10 is performed by scanning the microscope slide 21, containing the specimen, without magnification or enlargement of the image, using the flatbed scanner 19 to achieve the highest possible image resolution for the scanner (e.g. 600, 1200 or 2400 dpi). Since there is no magnification, the quantity of image data is kept to a manageable size (e.g. 4000 pixels square for a specimen of 20 mm×20 mm) for processing. It will be appreciated, however, that any appropriate manner of acquiring high resolution digital image data without significant magnification may be used, for example, scanning using a digital photocopier or taking a single image of the complete specimen using a high quality digital camera that can provide similar resolutions to a scanner, as specified above. It will be further appreciated that low level magnification (e.g. use of 2× objective lens) may be desirable in some circumstances and may be used if the quantity of data is manageable (i.e. it can be processed in a reasonable length of time).
At step 20, the display screen 9 displays an image 23 of the complete specimen (or a significant proportion thereof) on the slide 21 represented in the image data acquired at step 10. This image, labelled 23 in
At step 30, the user places the slide 21 of the specimen, as shown on the display screen 9, under the microscope 1, and positions the stage 3 at an arbitrary starting point for viewing the specimen.
At step 40 the digital camera 5 takes an image of the microscope field of view and forwards to the workstation 7 the high magnification image data thus acquired, which is stored in memory and displayed on the display screen 9 as a field of view image 25, as shown in
At step 50, the workstation 7 processes the high magnification data so as to reduce the resolution thereof. In particular, since the high magnification image data represents only a small area of the complete specimen, the resolution thereof is higher than the resolution of the part of the low magnification image data that represents an area of the specimen of the same size. Accordingly, the high resolution image data is processed by conventional image decimation, or similar techniques, to provide processed reduced resolution image data representing the field of view image. In the embodiment, the reduction in resolution is such that the processed image data has a similar resolution to that of a corresponding portion of the low magnification image data of the complete specimen. The correct reduction in resolution is achieved by pre-calibrating the system, as discussed below.
At step 60, the workstation 7 compares the data for the reduced resolution image of the current field of view with the low magnification image data for the complete specimen to determine if a “possible match” can be found. The comparison may be carried out, for example, using cross correlation techniques, as well known to a person skilled in the art. In the preferred embodiment, the workstation has a predetermined threshold, for each microscope objective lens, that defines the percentage of identical data in the low magnification and high magnification image data necessary in order to for there to be a “possible match”. Each time a possible match is found in the low magnification data, the position thereof is recorded.
Following comparison of the reduced resolution field of view image data with the low magnification image data of the complete specimen, if a single possible match is found, then the location of the area of the specimen in the field of view is determined to correspond to that of the matched area of the image of the complete specimen. In this case, at step 70, the display screen 9 highlights the area of the low magnification image displayed that matched with the field of view data, as shown by a box in
If more than one possible match is found, the best or closest match may be highlighted on the display (i.e. the part of the low magnification image having the highest percentage of identical data to the high magnification field of view image data). If no match is found (i.e. no part of the low magnification image data has a percentage of identical data exceeding the threshold), at step 80, the display screen 9 indicates this on or adjacent to the displayed image of the specimen (e.g. by the words “Position Unknown”).
In a preferred embodiment, at least a part of the method of the present invention, as illustrated in
It is assumed that prior to the start of the program illustrated in
Conventional calibration of each objective lens of the microscope in conjunction with the camera, and calibration of the scanner is necessary, and the skilled person would be familiar with the necessary techniques involved, and a detailed discussion thereof is unnecessary. Briefly, a calibrated graticule is used with the microscope and camera to measure the number of pixels per unit length represented in the high magnification image data, and thus the resolution thereof. Similarly, a calibrated graticule is used with the scanner to measure the number of pixels per unit length represented in the low magnification image data, and thus the resolution thereof. From this calibration information, the program calculates the relative resolutions of the image data for the microscope and the camera.
The program is initiated by a user, and low magnification image data from the flatbed scanner 19 or other image data source is received and stored in the workstation memory and displayed on display screen 9 using conventional software (step 10 of the method of
In accordance with a preferred embodiment, the camera is set up to capture field of view images at its highest speed (e.g. 30 frames per second) and the program runs continuously, following initiation by the user for a particular specimen. Thus, the workstation continuously receives field of view images.
At step 100, the program receives field of view image data from the digital camera 5. Any field of view image data received from camera 5 during subsequent processing steps 110 to 170 are not processed and may be overwritten in workstation memory. The field of view image data currently being processed is retained in memory (and displayed on the display screen 9) until the program returns to step 100, as described below.
At step 110, the program reduces the resolution of the field of view image data to a resolution approximating that of a corresponding area of the image data of the complete specimen received from the scanner 19 and stored in memory, to obtain reduced resolution field of view image data. The reduction in resolution is determined based on the calibration data for the scanner and the objective lens of the microscope and camera from which the image data is acquired, as discussed above.
At step 120, the program performs cross correlation of the reduced resolution field of view image data obtained at step 110 with the low magnification image data of the complete specimen stored in memory, and stores the location of portions of the low magnification image data for each possible match. As explained above, it will be appreciated that a possible match is determined based on the quantity of identical data in both sets of image data, a possible match being identified if the proportion of identical data exceeds a preset threshold for each objective lens of the microscope. For example, a percentage of identical data that may be considered to be a threshold for a potential match may be 25%. In practice, a match is likely to exist if the percentage of identical data is in the range of 50% to 90% (it should be appreciated that a 100% match is statistically improbable). In the preferred embodiment, the user is able to adjust this threshold based on the results, and thus interactively adjust the system to provide the most accurate position determination. Thus, if the threshold is set too high, the system will not be able to locate the position in most cases, and the user is able to reduce the threshold in order to achieve better position determination.
At step 130, the program considers if the cross correlation resulted in at least one possible match between the reduced resolution field of view data and the low magnification data for the complete specimen.
If step 130 determines that the cross correlation resulted in a single possible match of the field of view image data in the overall specimen image data, the program continues with step 140, and sends a signal to the display screen to display an indication of the location of the matched portion of the image of the complete specimen (e.g. by highlighting in colour, or, as shown in
Alternatively, if step 130 determines that the cross correlation did not result in a single match of the image data, the program continues with step 150, by considering whether more than one possible match of the image data was found by the cross correlation at step 120.
If step 150 determines that the cross correlation performed at step 120 did not result in more than one possible match, then no possible match has been found, and at step 170, the program sends a signal to the display screen 9 to display that the location of the field of view cannot be determined, in the present example, by displaying the words “Position Unknown”.
Alternatively, if step 150 determines that the cross correlation performed at step 120 did result in more than one match (which is unlikely for most biological specimens, but may occur for other types of objects), in accordance with the preferred embodiment, at step 160, the program selects the closest matched area of the low magnification image (i.e. the matched area of the low magnification image data with the highest percentage of identical data to the reduced resolution field of view data), and sends a signal to the display screen 9 to highlight this closest matched area in the complete specimen image. In this case, the manner of highlighting is preferably different from the highlighting used in response to step 140 where a single possible match is found.
In another embodiment, step 160 may instead send a signal to the display screen 9 to highlight all the matched portions of the image of the complete specimen. In this case, again, an alternative form of highlighting is desirable to distinguish from the definite match at step 140.
After the program has sent a signal to the display screen 9, at step 140, 160 or 170, the program returns to step 100 and commences processing the next field of view image to be received from the camera 5 which is then immediately displayed on the display screen 9 and stored in memory.
In view of the likelihood of only a single match occurring for certain types of object, in another embodiment, steps 150 and 160 may be omitted. Thus, in this embodiment, if step 130 determines that the cross correlation did result in a (single) match, the program proceeds to step 140, and if step 130 determines that the cross correlation did not result in a (single) match, the program proceeds straight to step 170.
As mentioned above,
As shown in
In the preferred embodiment, and as shown in
As shown in
Whilst one embodiment of the present invention has been described for use with an optical microscope, it will be appreciated that the present invention may be used with other types of microscope.
Various modifications and changes may be made to the described embodiments. It is intended to include all such variations, modifications and equivalents that fall within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4513438||Apr 15, 1982||Apr 23, 1985||Coulter Electronics, Inc.||Automated microscopy system and method for locating and re-locating objects in an image|
|US4673988||Apr 22, 1985||Jun 16, 1987||E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Electronic mosaic imaging process|
|US4742558||Feb 7, 1985||May 3, 1988||Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Public Corporation||Image information retrieval/display apparatus|
|US4757550||May 9, 1985||Jul 12, 1988||Disco Abrasive Systems, Ltd.||Automatic accurate alignment system|
|US4777525||Dec 23, 1985||Oct 11, 1988||Preston Jr Kendall||Apparatus and method for a multi-resolution electro-optical imaging, display and storage/retrieval system|
|US5216596||Jan 5, 1990||Jun 1, 1993||Corabi International Telemetrics, Inc.||Telepathology diagnostic network|
|US5263136||Apr 30, 1991||Nov 16, 1993||Optigraphics Corporation||System for managing tiled images using multiple resolutions|
|US5276550||Apr 15, 1991||Jan 4, 1994||Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.||Optical microscope with variable magnification|
|US5297034||Jan 5, 1993||Mar 22, 1994||Corabi International Telemetrics, Inc.||Telepathology diagnostic network|
|US5394455||Apr 30, 1993||Feb 28, 1995||The Regents Of The University Of California||Digitally aided microfluoroscopy and fluorospot system and method of using the same|
|US5432871||Aug 4, 1993||Jul 11, 1995||Universal Systems & Technology, Inc.||Systems and methods for interactive image data acquisition and compression|
|US5550937||Sep 12, 1994||Aug 27, 1996||Harris Corporation||Mechanism for registering digital images obtained from multiple sensors having diverse image collection geometries|
|US5604344||Oct 4, 1995||Feb 18, 1997||Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd.||Autofocussing microscope having a pattern imaging system|
|US5796861||Jul 11, 1997||Aug 18, 1998||Frim International, Inc.||Mosaic construction, processing, and review of very large electronic micrograph composites|
|US5825532||Mar 12, 1996||Oct 20, 1998||Nhk Engineering Services, Inc.||Microscopic system integrated with wide-screen television|
|US5939278||Aug 12, 1996||Aug 17, 1999||Neuromedical Systems, Inc.||Automated histological specimen classification system and method|
|US6049421||Jan 20, 1998||Apr 11, 2000||Morphometrix Technologies Inc.||Automated scanning of microscope slides|
|US6262838||May 15, 1998||Jul 17, 2001||Genetic Microsystems Inc||Focusing in microscope systems|
|US6272235||Feb 27, 1998||Aug 7, 2001||Bacus Research Laboratories, Inc.||Method and apparatus for creating a virtual microscope slide|
|US6452625||Sep 3, 1997||Sep 17, 2002||Leica Microsystems Wetzlar Gmbh||Compact video microscope|
|US6606413||Jun 1, 1999||Aug 12, 2003||Trestle Acquisition Corp.||Compression packaged image transmission for telemicroscopy|
|US6674881 *||Dec 14, 2001||Jan 6, 2004||Bacus Laboratories, Inc.||Method and apparatus for internet, intranet, and local viewing of virtual microscope slides|
|US6687419 *||Nov 12, 1999||Feb 3, 2004||Synoptics Limited||Automatic image montage system|
|US6711283||May 3, 2000||Mar 23, 2004||Aperio Technologies, Inc.||Fully automatic rapid microscope slide scanner|
|US6716588 *||Dec 8, 2000||Apr 6, 2004||Cellomics, Inc.||System for cell-based screening|
|US6847729||Apr 20, 2000||Jan 25, 2005||Fairfield Imaging Limited||Microscopy|
|US20020061127||Nov 13, 2001||May 23, 2002||Bacus Research Laboratories, Inc.||Apparatus for remote control of a microscope|
|US20020085744||Nov 19, 2001||Jul 4, 2002||Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.||Evaluation of microscope slides|
|US20040184678||Feb 4, 2004||Sep 23, 2004||Maddison John R.||Microscope system and method|
|US20080055405||Aug 16, 2007||Mar 6, 2008||Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.||Microscope system and method|
|CN690384A||Title not available|
|DE4226523A1||Aug 11, 1992||Feb 17, 1994||Bloss Werner Heinz Prof Dr Ing||Automatic focussing on object for image processing of microscopic esp. cytological preparations - deriving focussing device control signals from image contents using dual-out-of-focus principle|
|DE19633997C1||Aug 23, 1996||Mar 26, 1998||Univ Stuttgart||Bildübertragende Objektfernuntersuchungseinrichtung|
|DE19812599A1||Mar 23, 1998||Sep 30, 1999||Leica Microsystems||Verfahren zur Video-Mikroskopie|
|EP0175549A2||Sep 11, 1985||Mar 26, 1986||Branko Palcic||Dynamic microscope image processing scanner|
|EP0380904A1||Feb 1, 1989||Aug 8, 1990||Xillix Technologies Corporation||Solid state microscope|
|EP0994433A1||Sep 24, 1999||Apr 19, 2000||Fairfield Imaging Ltd.||Microscopy|
|JP2002296010A||Title not available|
|WO1997025678A1||Jan 13, 1997||Jul 17, 1997||Neopath, Inc.||Network review and analysis of computer encoded slides|
|WO1998039728A1||Mar 2, 1998||Sep 11, 1998||Bacus Research Laboratories, Inc.||Method and apparatus for creating a virtual microscope slide|
|WO1998044446A1||Mar 2, 1998||Oct 8, 1998||Bacus Research Laboratories, Inc.||Method and apparatus for acquiring and reconstructing magnified specimen images from a computer-controlled microscope|
|WO1999013360A2||Sep 9, 1998||Mar 18, 1999||Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation||Digital telepathology imaging system with bandwidth optimization and virtual focussing|
|WO2000036440A1||Dec 13, 1999||Jun 22, 2000||Sensir Technologies, Llc.||Miniaturized opto-electronic magnifying system|
|1||B. Schneider et al., "A Dual-Laser, Spatially Modulated Illumination Fluorescence Microscope", Institute of Applied Physics, University of Heidelberg, Microscopy and Analysis, Jan. 1999, pp. 5-7.|
|2||Bernhard Schneider et al., "High Precision Localization of Fluorescent Targets in the Nanometer Range by Spatially Modulated Excitation Fluorescence Microscopy", Institute of Applied Physics, University of Heidelberg, Fluorescence Microscopy and Fluorescent Probes, vol. 2, 1998, pp. 63-68.|
|3||Brown, L.G., "A Survey of Image Registration Techniques," ACM Computing Surveys, New York, NY, vol. 24, No. 4, Dec. 1, 1992, pp. 325-376.|
|4||Dr. Joachim Bradl et al., "Mikroskopsteuerung, Bildaufnahme "online" Telemikroskopi", pp. 1-12 (with English-language translation) Nov. 1996.|
|5||Ivar Nordrum, "Real-time Diagnoses in telepathology", 4th European Congress on Telepathology, Norway, Adv Clin Path, 1998, pp. 127-178.|
|6||J. Bradl et al., "Microscope Control, Image Acquisition and Visualization in a Network Environment: Towards "Online" Telemicroscopy", Institute of Applied Physics, University of Heidelberg, vol. 4 No. 2 (1997), pp. 241-242 Cell Vision.|
|7||Matthias Nagorni of Helmstedt, "Implementation of X Window applications for image acquisition and control at the Heidelberg wave field microscope." Faculty of Physics and Astronomy Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Dissertation in the University Course of Physics, Sep. 23, 1996, pp. 1-104 (with English-language translation).|
|8||PACS, "Basic Principles and Applications", Chapters 7, 8 and 12; ISBN: 0-471-25393-6; 1999.|
|9||Renato Ferreira et al., "The Virtual Microscope", American Medical Informatics Association, Oct. 1997, 5 pages.|
|U.S. Classification||382/291, 382/144, 427/2.11, 382/128, 382/108|
|International Classification||G06K9/46, G02B21/00, B05D3/00, G06K9/00, G02B21/36|
|Cooperative Classification||G02B21/002, G02B21/365|
|European Classification||G02B21/36V, G02B21/00M4|