Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS8108128 B2
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 12/415,026
Publication dateJan 31, 2012
Filing dateMar 31, 2009
Priority dateMar 31, 2009
Also published asEP2414659A1, US20100242936, WO2010120533A1
Publication number12415026, 415026, US 8108128 B2, US 8108128B2, US-B2-8108128, US8108128 B2, US8108128B2
InventorsJames Richard Zurlo, Kevin Paul Konkle, Andrew May
Original AssigneeDresser, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Controlling exhaust gas recirculation
US 8108128 B2
Abstract
In controlling an engine, an amount of an intake charge provided, during operation of the engine, to a combustion chamber of the engine is determined. The intake charge includes an air component, a fuel component and a diluent component. An amount of the air component of the intake charge is determined. An amount of the diluent component of the intake charge is determined utilizing the amount of the intake charge, the amount of the air component and, in some instances, the amount of the fuel component. An amount of a diluent supplied to the intake charge is adjusted based at least in part on the determined amount of diluent component of the intake charge.
Images(7)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(21)
1. A method for controlling an engine, comprising:
determining an amount of a fuel in a fuel component of an intake charge using at least a power output of the engine, the fuel component comprising the fuel and a fuel diluent;
determining an amount of an air component of the intake charge based on the determined amount of the fuel;
determining an amount of the intake charge provided, during operation of the engine, to a combustion chamber of the engine, the intake charge comprising the air component, the fuel, and a total amount of diluent comprising the fuel diluent and a diluent flow;
determining the total amount of diluent of the intake charge utilizing the amount of the intake charge, the amount of the air component, and the amount of the fuel; and
adjusting an amount of the diluent flow supplied to the intake charge based at least in part on the determined total amount of the diluent of the intake charge.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining the amount of the fuel component of the intake charge.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein determining the amount of the fuel component of the intake charge comprises utilizing a duty cycle of an air/fuel control device of the engine.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein adjusting an amount of the diluent flow supplied to the intake charge comprises adjusting an amount of exhaust gas introduced into the intake charge.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein determining an amount of the air component of the intake charge comprises utilizing a mass air flow sensor of the engine.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein determining an amount of the air component comprises utilizing a lambda sensor of the engine.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein determining an amount of the intake charge provided, during operation of the engine, to a combustion chamber of the engine comprises calculating the amount of the intake charge as a function of engine volumetric efficiency, a flow rate of the air component, a density of the air component, and engine speed.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein adjusting an amount of the diluent flow supplied to the intake charge comprises adjusting the amount of the diluent flow supplied to the intake charge to be substantially equal to a specified amount.
9. The method od claim 1, wherein the diluent flow comprises a flow of exhaust gas.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the total amount of diluent of the intake charge comprises an amount of diluent in the air component, the fuel diluent, and the diluent flow supplied to the intake charge.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the fuel is a hydrocarbon fuel.
12. The method of claim 1, further comprising measuring the power output of the engine with one or more of a kilowatt sensor, a torque sensor, or an engine speed sensor.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein determining an amount of the intake charge provided, during operation of the engine, to a combustion chamber of the engine comprises calculating the intake charge as a function of absolute intake manifold pressure, absolute intake temperature, engine speed, and volumetric efficiency of the engine.
14. An engine control module comprising:
a processor; and
a memory storing instructions for the processor that cause the processor to perform operations comprising:
determining an amount of a fuel of a fuel component of an intake charge using at least a power output of the engine, the fuel component comprising the fuel and a fuel diluent;
determining an amount of an air component of the intake charge based on the determined amount of the fuel;
determining an amount of the intake charge provided, during operation of the engine, to a combustion chamber of the engine, the intake charge comprising the air component, the fuel, and a total amount of diluent comprising the fuel diluent and an amount of exhaust gas;
determining the total amount of diluent of the intake charge utilizing the amount of the intake charge, the amount of the air component, and the amount of fuel; and
adjusting the amount of the exhaust gas supplied to the intake charge based at least in part on the determined total amount of the diluent of the intake charge and a specified amount of exhaust gas.
15. The engine control module of claim 14, wherein the operations further comprise determining the amount of the fuel component of the intake charge.
16. The engine control module of claim 15, wherein determining the amount of the fuel component of the intake charge comprises utilizing a duty cycle of an air/fuel control device of the engine.
17. The engine control module of claim 14, wherein determining an amount of the air component of the intake charge comprises utilizing a mass air flow sensor of the engine.
18. The engine control module of claim 14, wherein determining an amount of the air component comprises utilizing a lambda sensor of the engine.
19. The engine control module of claim 14, wherein determining the amount of the intake charge provided, during operation of the engine, to a combustion chamber of the engine comprises calculating the amount of the intake charge as a function of engine volumetric efficiency, flow rate of the air component, density of the air component, and engine speed.
20. The engine control module of claim 14, wherein the total amount of diluent of the intake charge comprises an amount of diluent in the air component, the fuel diluent, and the diluent flow supplied to the intake charge.
21. The engine control module of claim 14, wherein determining an amount of the intake charge provided, during operation of the engine, to a combustion chamber of the engine comprises calculating the intake charge as a function of absolute intake manifold pressure, absolute intake temperature, engine speed, and volumetric efficiency of the engine.
Description

The U.S. Government has a paid-up license in this invention and the right in limited circumstances to require the patent owner to license others on reasonable terms as provided for by the terms of DE-FC26-01CH11080 awarded by the Department of Energy.

BACKGROUND

This disclosure relates to internal combustion engines and, more particularly, to operating internal combustion engines having exhaust gas recirculation.

Exhaust gas recirculation (“EGR”) involves introduction of a portion of exhaust gases from an internal combustion engine back into a combustion chamber of the internal combustion engine, such as one or more cylinders of the internal combustion engine. EGR can be used to reduce formation of nitrogen oxides, such as, for example, nitrogen oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) (referred to collectively hereinafter as “NOx”). The exhaust gas is substantially inert. Thus, introducing a portion of the exhaust gas into the combustion chamber of an internal combustion engine dilutes the mixture of fuel and air to be combusted, and resultantly lowers the peak combustion temperature and excess oxygen. As a result, the engine produces reduced amounts of NOx because NOx forms much more quickly at higher temperatures. Thus, EGR reduces or limits the amount of NOx generated during combustion of the engine.

SUMMARY

The present disclosure describes systems and techniques relating to controlling an engine having EGR, for example, by adjusting an air/fuel ratio supplied to the engine, as well as an amount of EGR supplied to the engine.

A method for controlling an engine according to one aspect may include determining an amount of an intake charge provided to a combustion chamber of the engine during operation of the engine. The intake charge may include an air component, a fuel component, and a diluent component. The method may also include determining an amount of the air component of the intake charge and an amount of the diluent component of the intake charge. The amount of diluent component of the intake charge may be determined utilizing the amount of the intake charge and the amount of the air component. The method may further include adjusting an amount of a diluent supplied to the intake charge based at least in part on the determined amount of diluent component of the intake charge.

Another aspect includes an engine control module. The engine control module may include a processor and a memory storing instructions for the processor that cause the processor to perform operations. The operations may include determining an amount of an intake charge provided, during operation of the engine, to a combustion chamber of the engine, the intake charge comprising an air component, a fuel component and a diluent component, and the diluent component comprising exhaust gas. The operations may also include determining an amount of the air component of the intake charge, determining an amount of the diluent component of the intake charge utilizing the amount of the intake charge and the amount of the air component, and adjusting an amount of exhaust gas supplied to the intake charge based at least in part on the determined amount of diluent component of the intake charge and a specified amount of exhaust gas.

A further aspect includes a method for controlling an engine. The method for controlling an engine may include receiving a signal indicative of an amount of air in an intake charge provided, during operation of the engine, to a combustion chamber of the engine, determining an amount of diluent in the intake charge based on the signal indicative of the amount of air in the intake charge, and adjusting an amount of exhaust gas supplied to the intake charge based on the determining amount of diluent.

The various aspects may include one or more of the following features. An amount of the fuel component of the intake charge may be determined. Determining an amount of the diluent component of the intake charge may include determining an amount of the diluent component of the intake charge utilizing the amount of the intake charge, the amount of the air component, and the amount of the fuel component. Adjusting an amount of diluent supplied to the intake charge may include adjusting an amount of exhaust gas introduced into the intake charge. Determining an amount of the fuel component of the intake charge may include measuring a power output by the engine. Determining an amount of the fuel component of the intake charge may include utilizing a duty cycle of an air/fuel control device of the engine. Determining an amount of the air component of the intake charge may include utilizing a mass air flow sensor of the engine. Determining an amount of the air component may include utilizing a lambda sensor of the engine. Determining an amount of an intake charge provided to a combustion chamber of the engine during operation of the engine may include calculating the amount of the intake charge as a function of engine volumetric efficiency, a flow rate of the air component, a density of the air component, and engine speed. Adjusting an amount of a diluent supplied to the intake charge may include adjusting the amount of the diluent supplied to the intake charge to be substantially equal to a specified amount.

The various aspects may also include one or more of the following features. An amount of the fuel component of the intake charge may be determined, and determining an amount of the diluent component of the intake charge may include determining an amount of the diluent component of the intake charge utilizing the amount of the intake charge, the amount of the air component, and the amount of the fuel component. Determining an amount of the fuel component of the intake charge may include measuring a power output by the engine. Determining an amount of the fuel component of the intake charge may include utilizing a duty cycle of an air/fuel control device of the engine. Determining an amount of the fuel component of the intake charge may include utilizing a mass fuel flow sensor or a volume fuel flow sensor. Determining an amount of the air component of the intake charge may include utilizing a mass air flow sensor of the engine. Determining an amount of the air component may include utilizing a lambda sensor of the engine. Determining an amount of an intake charge provided to a combustion chamber of the engine during operation of the engine may include calculating the amount of the intake charge as a function of engine volumetric efficiency, flow rate of the air component, density of the air component, and engine speed.

The various aspects may additionally include one or more of the following features. A signal indicative of an amount of fuel in the intake charge provided, during operation of the engine, to the combustion chamber of the engine may be received. The amount of diluent in the intake charge may be determined based on the signal indicative of the amount of air in the intake charge and the signal indicative of the amount of fuel in the intake charge. Receiving a signal indicative of an amount of fuel in the intake charge provided, during operation of the engine, to the combustion chamber of the engine may include receiving a signal from a load driven by the engine. Determining an amount of diluent in the intake charge based on the signal indicative of the amount of air in the intake charge may include calculating the amount of diluent as a function of engine volumetric efficiency, a flow rate of the air component, a density of the air component, and engine speed.

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic of an illustrative engine system.

FIG. 2 is a schematic of an illustrative engine control module for use in an engine system.

FIG. 3 is a schematic of the functional operation of an illustrative engine controller module (“ECM”).

FIG. 4 is an example implementation of a lambda set-point error determiner.

FIG. 5 is a schematic of the functional operation of an alternate illustrative ECM.

FIG. 6 is another example implementation of a lambda set-point error determiner.

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of an illustrative operation of an ECM.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring first to FIG. 1, one example of an engine system 100 is depicted schematically. The engine system 100 includes an ECM 104 operably coupled to communicate with one or more sensors 106 and one or more actuators 108. The ECM 104 may be a single controller or multiple controllers housed in the same or separate housings. The sensors 106 may be coupled to an internal combustion engine 102 or other component of the engine system 100, and sense one or more operating characteristics of the engine 102 and/or engine system 100 and output a signal representative of the operating characteristic. Some examples of typical engine operating characteristics include engine speed; a torque indicating characteristic, such as Intake Manifold Absolute Pressure (IMAP) or intake manifold density (IMD); a characteristic indicative of the power output of the engine determined from inputs into the engine, such as Brake Mean Effective Pressure (BMEP) or Indicated Mean Effective Pressure (IMEP) or other estimate; a characteristic indicative of the engine's air to fuel ratio, such as exhaust oxygen content; ambient and/or engine temperature; ambient pressure; and others. Some examples of other characteristics that may be measured by sensors 106 include a power output of the engine from outputs of the engine, for example, a generator driven by the engine, a throughput and pressure of a compressor driven by the engine, an engine loading measured with load cell and others. The actuators 108 are adapted to control various engine system components (not specifically shown) used in controlling the engine and other engine system components. Some examples of typical engine components include a throttle, a turbocharger, a turbocharger bypass or wastegate, an ignition system, air/fuel regulating device, such as an adjustable fuel mixer, a fuel pressure regulator, fuel injectors, one or more EGR valves and others. The ECM 104 may also be coupled to communicate with other components 110. Some examples of other components 110 can include a user interface that allows a user to query the ECM 104 or input data or instructions to the ECM 104, one or more external sensors that sense information other than the operating characteristics of the engine or engine system, monitoring or diagnostic equipment to which the ECM 104 can communicate characteristics of the system, a load driven by the engine (e.g., generator, compressor, or other load) and others.

Referring to FIG. 2, the ECM 104 includes a processor 112 operably coupled to a computer readable medium or memory 114. The computer readable medium 114 may be wholly or partially removable from the ECM 104. The computer readable medium 114 contains instructions used by the processor 112 to perform one or more of the methods described herein. The ECM 104 can receive one or more input signals (input1 . . . inputn), such as from the sensors 106, actuators 108, and other components 110 and can output one or more output signals (output1 . . . outputn), such as to the sensors 106, actuators 108 and other components 110.

The ECM 104 operates to accelerate or decelerate the engine 102 (FIG. 1) to a specified operating state, for example a specified speed, torque output, or other specified operating state, and maintain the engine in steady state operation. To this end, the ECM 104 receives input from the sensors 106, including engine state parameters, and determines and outputs one or more actuator control signals adapted to control the actuators 108 to operate the engine 102.

FIG. 3 depicts an illustrative ECM 104 for use in controlling the air/fuel mixture and an amount of EGR supplied to the combustion chamber of an engine 102. Collectively, the air/fuel mixture, the EGR, and any other diluents supplied to the combustion chamber are referred to herein as the intake charge. The illustrative ECM 104 of FIG. 3 receives an input of engine state parameters from the sensors 106, which, in this instance, may include a torque indicating characteristic sensor 316, such as an IMAP or IMD sensor, an engine speed sensor 318, and an engine performance sensor 320 and outputs a signal to the actuators 108. The ECM 104 may also receive additional inputs 500, discussed in more detail below. The additional inputs 500 may include intake manifold pressure and a fuel quality input. Additional, fewer, or different additional inputs may be used in other implementations. The actuators 108 include at least an air/fuel control device 322 operable to control a ratio of air and fuel supplied to the engine 102. Examples of air/fuel control devices 322 include a fuel pressure regulator or air bypass in an engine system using a fixed orifice area air/gas mixer, an adjustable orifice area air/gas mixer, one or more fuel injectors, or other air/fuel control device or combination of devices. The actuators 108 may also include an EGR control device 338 for introducing an amount of EGR to the engine 102. Examples of EGR control devices include vacuum regulators, pressure regulators, a combination pressure and vacuum regulator, servo control valves, combination servo control valve and vacuum regulator, variable area valves (e.g., butterfly valves, gate valves, and ball valves), and combination servo control valve and pressure regulator, or other regulator.

In one implementation, the ECM 104 may include a lambda set-point determiner 324 that receives one or more engine state parameters and determines and outputs a lambda (λ) set-point. The lambda set-point is selected to maintain engine operation substantially in steady state, for example. Lambda is a term that commonly refers to an air-fuel ratio in which a lambda value of 1 refers to a stoichiometric air/fuel mixture. Specifically, lambda is the actual air-fuel ratio divided by the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. The lambda set-point determiner 324 is used to determine an air/fuel actuator control signal operable to control the air/fuel control device 322. Although FIG. 3 illustrates an implementation where the lambda set-point is the only input to control the air/fuel control device 322, additional or different inputs may be used to determine the air/fuel actuator control signal. For example, certain implementations may use a fuel parameter for compensating for variances in fuel quality or type or engine wear, damage, or modification, in combination with the lambda set-point to determine the air/fuel actuator control signal. An engine control system utilizing a fuel parameter as an input to determine an air/fuel actuator control signal is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,117,862. In determining a lambda set-point, the illustrative ECM 104 uses engine speed from the engine speed sensor 318, a torque indicating characteristic (e.g., IMAP or IMD) from the torque indicating characteristic sensor 316 and optionally other inputs 500. In some instances, the optional inputs 500 may include ambient temperature, intake temperature (e.g., intake manifold pressure), and/or a fuel parameter, such as the fuel parameter described above. According to certain implementations, the torque indicating characteristic sensor 316 is operable to determine an expected or estimated torque output of the engine 102. Moreover, the torque indicating characteristic sensor 316 may include any sensor, instrument, or device for sensing or otherwise determining a torque output or power output of the engine 102, since, as discussed in detail below, converting between power output and torque output is possible using known engineering relationships. The ECM 104 may use other sensors alternatively or in combination with those discussed above, such as a mass-air sensor, flow volume sensor or other sensor.

In certain implementations, the lambda set-point determiner 324 may determine the lambda set-point using a look-up table in the memory of the ECM 104 including at least values indicative of engine speed and torque indicating characteristics correlated to lambda set-points determined to maintain a specified engine operation state, such as steady state engine operation. Alternately or in combination with a look-up table, the lambda set-point determiner 324 may determine the lambda set-point using a formulaic calculation as a function of inputs from one or more of the sensors 106, for example, engine speed and torque indicating characteristic. In either instance, the lambda set-point is selected in relation to the respective engine speed and torque indicating characteristic values to provide a specified combustion mixture to the engine 102 to maintain a specified engine operating state, such as steady state operation. Therefore, different lambda set-points may effectuate different engine operating states.

The ECM 104 may also include a lambda set-point error determiner 326 for determining an error or difference between the determined lambda set-point and an input indicative of the actual lambda. For example, an error may be determined when the engine 102 is under transient conditions, e.g., whenever the engine's actual lambda condition does not correspond to the lambda set-point, for example. In certain implementations, the lambda set-point error determiner 326 may determine a lambda adjustment 337, i.e., a signal representative of an amount by which to adjust operation of the engine 102.

The lambda sensor 328 measures the actual lambda condition of the engine 102 at any given time by, for example, measuring the amount of oxygen remaining in exhaust gases and sends a corresponding signal to the lambda set-point error determiner 326. The lambda set-point error determiner 326 then compares the actual lambda condition with a lambda set-point received from the lambda set-point determiner 324. The lambda set-point error determiner 326 then determines the amount by which the actual lambda condition should be adjusted (e.g., increased or decreased) in order to achieve a specified engine performance and generates a lambda adjustment 337. That is, based on the comparison between the actual lambda condition and the lambda set-point, an adjustment may be determined if the comparison indicates a deviation between the two values. The lambda set-point error determiner 326 then outputs the lambda adjustment 337 (a positive or negative value, for example) to an actuator transfer function 336. The actuator transfer function 336 receives at least the lambda adjustment 337 and determines an air/fuel actuator control signal adapted to operate the air/fuel control device 322.

FIG. 4 illustrates an example implementation of the lambda set-point error determiner 326. As shown, the example lambda set-point error determiner 326 may include a summing function 329 and a controller 331. The lambda set-point error determiner 326 may also include a lambda set-point modifier determiner 327. In other implementations, the lambda set-point modifier determiner 327 may be omitted. The lambda set-point modifier determiner 327 receives the set-point from the lambda set-point determiner 324 as well as one or more other inputs 500. For example, the other inputs 500 may be intake manifold pressure and a fuel quality indicator. Other implementations may include additional, fewer, or different inputs. The lambda set-point modifier determiner 327 may be operable to determine a modifier to adjust the lambda set-point from the lambda set-point determiner 324 based on data obtained from the other inputs. Thus, a lambda set-point modifier determiner 327 may be used to alter the determined lambda set-point based on the intake temperature and/or fuel quality.

In some instances, the modifier may be obtained from a look-up table or, alternately, or in combination with a look-up table, the lambda modifier may be determined using a formulaic calculation. The lambda modifier may also be value-specific to a particular lambda set-point. That is, the lambda modifier may be applied only to a single lambda set-point output by the lambda set-point determiner 324 and not to any other lambda set-point subsequently output by lambda set-point determiner 324. According to a further implementation, the lambda modifier may be applied globally to all subsequently determined lambda set-points for a specified period or to a defined group of lambda set-points according to one or more conditions. The lambda set-point modifier determiner 327 applies the determined modifier to the determined set-point and outputs the modified set-point to the summing function 329.

The summing function 329 receives the signal of the actual lambda condition from the lambda sensor 328 and the modified set-point from the lambda set-point modifier determiner 327. The summing function 329 determines whether there is a difference between the actual lambda condition and the determined modified lambda set-point. Any determined difference is sent to the controller 331. For implementations without the lambda set-point modifier determiner 327, the summing function 329 receives the determined set-point from the lambda set-point determiner 324 and the actual lambda condition signal from the lambda sensor 328, determines any difference between the two values, and forwards the difference to the controller 331. According to some implementations, the controller 331 may be a proportional, integral, and derivative (PID) controller. However, any suitable controller may be used. The output of the controller 331 is sent to the actuator transfer function 336, which, as explained above, determines an air/fuel actuator control signal adapted to operate the air/fuel control device 322.

The ECM 104 may further include provisions for transient condition fuel adjustment. In transient conditions, when the engine 102 is accelerated or decelerated in either torque, speed, or both, the air/fuel ratio will tend to lean out (i.e., the lambda will increase) during the acceleration and richen (i.e., the lambda will decrease) during deceleration. To compensate for this effect during acceleration, the ECM 104 may momentarily increase the amount of fuel supplied to the engine when running lean or near stoichiometric (i.e., richens the air/fuel ratio) beyond what is required to operate the engine at the newly specified steady state operating condition. Increasing the amount of fuel supplied during acceleration increases the engine's torque output and produces a more responsive performance and quicker acceptance of an increased torque loading. During deceleration, the ECM 104 may decrease the amount of fuel supplied (i.e., leans air/fuel ratio) below that required by the engine at the newly specified steady state operating condition, helping the engine shed unwanted torque output and prevent over-speeding.

FIG. 5 illustrates an alternate implementation including a lambda set-point error determiner 326 and a torque demand from fuel determiner 520. The lambda set-point error determiner 326 receives an input from the torque demand from fuel determiner 520, the engine speed sensor 318, and engine speed set-point 510. The lambda set-point error determiner 326 may also receive an input from other optional inputs 500. In some instances, the lambda set-point error determiner 326 may also receive an input from the lambda sensor 328 and lambda set-point determiner 324 (not shown in FIG. 5). The lambda set-point error determiner 326 determines an approximation or estimate of the actual lambda condition of the engine 102 and determines an error between the determined lambda set-point and the actual lambda estimate. The determined error is used to increase or decrease the lambda set-point, such as, for example, in response to transient engine operating conditions. The torque demand from fuel determiner 520 determines, based on engine state parameters, such as engine speed and engine speed set-point, the amount of fueling change (momentary increase or decrease in lambda set-point) to be used in achieving the specified acceleration or deceleration in torque or engine speed (hereinafter referred to as “torque from fuel”). According to one implementation, the torque demand from fuel determiner 520 determines the torque from fuel value by utilizing outputs from the engine speed sensor 318 and the engine speed set-point 510. The lambda set-point error determiner 326 utilizes the torque from fuel to determine a lambda adjustment 337, if any, to control operation of the engine 102 under the changing conditions. The lambda set-point error determiner 326 outputs the lambda adjustment 337 to the actuator transfer function 336 to determine an air/fuel actuator control signal adapted to operate the air/fuel control device 322.

A further example of the lambda set-point error determiner 326 is shown in FIG. 6. In this example, the lambda set-point error determiner 326 includes lambda actual lambda approximation determiner 600, controller 331, and summing function 329. The actual lambda approximation determiner 600 may receive inputs from the engine speed sensor 318, engines speed set-point 510, the torque indicating characteristic 316, and the engine torque demand from fuel determiner 520 to determine an actual lambda approximation. The actual lambda approximation may be determined using a look-up table or, alternately, in combination with a look-up table, the actual lambda approximation may be determined using a formulaic calculation. In some implementations, the lambda set-point error determiner 326 may also include the lambda set-point modifier determiner 327. As explained, the lambda set-point modifier determiner 327 may be operable to determine a lambda set-point modifier to modify the determined lambda set-point based on one or more optional inputs 500, such as one or more of the optional inputs listed above. In addition to determining the lambda set-point modifier using a look-up table and/or a formulaic calculation, the lambda modifier may also be value-specific to a particular lambda set-point. That is, the lambda modifier may be applied only to a single lambda set-point output by the lambda set-point determiner 324 and not to any other lambda set-point subsequently output by lambda set-point determiner 324. According to a further implementation, the lambda modifier may be applied globally to all subsequently determined lambda set-points for a specified period or to a defined group of lambda set-points according to one or more conditions. In other implementations, the lambda set-point modifier determiner 327 may be omitted.

The summing function 329 receives the lambda set-point (sent from lambda set-point determiner 324 or as modified by the lambda set-point modifier determiner 327) and the actual lambda approximation from the actual lambda approximation determiner 600. As explained, the summing function 329 determines an error or difference, if any, between the determined lambda set-point and the actual lambda approximation. Any determined difference is sent to the controller 331. The controller 331 may be of a type described above, such as a PID controller. The controller 331 and, hence, the lambda set-point error determiner 326, outputs a lambda adjustment 337 that is sent to the actuator transfer function 336.

As explained above, the actuator transfer function 336 receives at least the lambda adjustment 337 and determines an air/fuel actuator control signal adapted to operate the air/fuel control device 322 (shown, for example, in FIG. 5). The actuator transfer function 336 can receive and account for other inputs in determining the air/fuel actuator control signal, such as the engine state parameters discussed above, fuel pressure, ambient pressure, intake temperature, ambient temperature, and others. The actuator transfer function 336 may determine the air/fuel actuator control signal using a look-up table correlating lambda set-points, fuel parameters, and any other inputs to affect the air/fuel actuator control signals, by calculation as a function of the lambda set-point, and any other inputs, by a combination of a look-up table and a calculation, or by another method. In one illustrative ECM 104, the lambda set-point may be transformed to a pre-signal using a look-up table, and a different parameter applied, such as a fuel parameter, in a calculation to adjust the pre-signal in determining the air/fuel actuator control signal. Alternately, a signal, such as the fuel parameter, may be applied as an adder (negative or positive) or multiplier to the lambda set-point and the air/fuel actuator control signal determined using a look-up table or by calculation as a function of the lambda set-point and any other inputs.

The lambda set-point determiner 324 may optionally include feed forward compensation by communicating with a load or a controller for a load (not shown) applied to the engine to derive a load coming signal. In this instance, the lambda set-point determiner 324 will receive a load coming signal indicating changes in loading, and optionally the magnitude of the load coming, as an optional input 500. Using the load coming signal, the lambda set-point determiner 324 can anticipate engine output requirements based on upcoming changes in load communicated by the load coming signal and adjust the determined air/fuel mixture in anticipation of the upcoming changes in load. An example of a feed forward compensation that can be used in the engine system 100 is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,564,774, entitled Feedforward Engine Control Governing System.

Referring to FIGS. 3 and 5, the ECM 104 may also include an EGR determiner 330 that determines an amount of exhaust gas to recirculate into the combustion chamber of the engine 102. The EGR determiner 330 determines the amount of exhaust gas to recirculate into the engine 102 in relation to a total amount of a diluent component (i.e., the diluent or diluents) in the intake charge supplied to the combustion chamber of the engine. The EGR determiner 330 may utilize a difference between a specified amount of exhaust gas and a determination of the amount of diluent in the intake charge. The specified amount of exhaust gas may be different for different operating conditions. In certain instances, the EGR determiner 330 may determine the specified amount of exhaust gas using a look-up table in the memory of the ECM 104 including values indicative of engine speed and torque indicating characteristics correlated to specified amounts of exhaust gas. Alternately or in combination with a look-up table, the EGR determiner 330 may determine the specified amount of exhaust gas using a formulaic calculation as a function of inputs from one or more of the sensors 106, for example, engine speed and/or torque indicating characteristic.

In certain instances, the EGR determiner 330 may determine the total amount of the diluent component in the intake charge utilizing a determination of a total amount of the intake charge in the combustion chamber of the engine and a determination of a total amount of an air component (i.e., oxygen or air used in combustion) of the intake charge. Optionally, the EGR determiner 330 may also use a determination of a total amount of a fuel component (i.e., the fuel or fuels used in combustion) of the intake charge in determining the total amount of the diluent component in the intake charge. In instances where the fuel component is in the form of a gas, it may be desirable to use the fuel component in determining the total amount of the diluent component. In instances where the fuel component is in the form of liquid, mist and/or vapor, it may be desirable to omit the fuel component in determining the total amount of the diluent component. The total amount of the intake charge is approximately equal to the total amount of the diluent component and the total amount of the air component or approximately equal to the total amount of the diluent component, the total amount of the air component and the total amount of the fuel component. Thus, the total amount of the diluent component can be determined by subtracting the total amount of the air component from the total amount of the intake charge or by subtracting the total amount of the air component and the total amount of the fuel component from the total amount of the intake charge (depending on whether the amount of fuel component is being accounted for).

The total amount of the intake charge and the total amount of the air component or the total amount of the intake charge, the total amount of the air component and the total amount of the fuel component are related by a formulaic calculation based on or derived from the speed/density equation. Thus, various implementations of the EGR determiner 330 need not receive inputs indicative of each of the total amount of the intake charge, the total amount of the air component and the total amount of the fuel component, because given two of the three, the third can be determined by calculation. If the fuel component is not being accounted for, given either the total amount of the air component or the total amount of the intake charge, the other can be determined by calculation. In certain instances, the formulaic calculation can be based on or derived from the following formula:
{dot over (n)} totvm ·P·V d·RPM/(120· R·T), where:

{dot over (n)}tot is the molar flow rate [moles/s] of intake charge,

ηvm is the molar based volumetric efficiency of the engine,

P is the absolute intake manifold pressure [Pa],

Vd is the engine displacement [m3],

RPM is the engine speed [RPM],

R is the ideal gas constant of 8.31434 J/mol*K, and

T is the absolute intake temperature [K].

The EGR determiner 330 of FIG. 3 receives inputs from the torque indicating characteristic sensor 316 and/or the performance sensor 320, the engine speed sensor 318, and the lambda sensor 328 in determining the amount of diluent in the intake charge and, ultimately, an adjustment (i.e., updated set-point) to the EGR control device 338.

If provided, the performance sensor 320 outputs a signal corresponding to a power and/or torque output from the engine 102 measured from outputs of the engine (i.e., for use in determining an output-based determination of power) to the ECM 104. In certain instances, the performance sensor 320 outputs a signal that is directly indicative of power (i.e., from which an absolute (versus relative) value of the power output of the engine 102 can be determined) or that can be combined with state variables from other sensors to be directly indicative of power (e.g., power is function of torque and engine speed and is also a function of BMEP, engine speed and engine displacement). In other instances, the performance sensor 320 outputs a signal that is indirectly indicative of power (e.g., from which an inference can be made about a relative determination (increasing or decreasing) of power output of the engine 102). Some examples of performance sensor 320 include a kilowatt sensor coupled to a generator driven by the engine 102, a sensor adapted to measure the load on the engine, or other power sensor. In an instance where the performance sensor 320 is a kilowatt sensor coupled to a generator driven by the engine 102, the absolute power output by the engine 102 can be determined as a function of the efficiency of the generator. In certain instances, the absolute power output by the engine 102 is the kilowatt sensor output times the efficiency of the generator. The generator efficiency may be a value that is stored in the ECM 104. In certain instances, the generator efficiency may be a user-inputted value.

The input from the torque indicating characteristic sensor 316 and/or the performance sensor 320 is indicative of the performance (e.g., power output) of the engine. The EGR determiner 330 determines the total amount of the fuel component, for example, using a formulaic calculation as a function of the performance of the engine determined from the torque indicating characteristic sensor 316 and/or the performance sensor 320, the engine's efficiency and the energy density of the fuel. For example, the EGR determiner 330 can determine the amount of the fuel component by dividing the power output by the engine by the energy density of the fuel and efficiency of the engine. In certain instances, the engine's efficiency and energy density of the fuel are experimentally determined values stored in a memory of the ECM 104. In certain instances, the energy density of the fuel may be a user-inputted value.

The EGR determiner 330 determines the total amount of the air component, for example, using a formulaic calculation as a function of the air/fuel ratio determined from the lambda sensor 328, the stoichiometric ratio of the fuel and the determined amount of the fuel component. For example, the EGR determiner 330 can determine the amount of the air component by multiplying the air/fuel ratio times the amount of the fuel component. In certain instances, the stoichiometric ratio of the fuel is stored in a memory of the ECM 104. In certain instances, the stoichiometric ratio of the fuel is a user-inputted value.

The EGR determiner 330 determines the total amount of the intake charge based on the total amount of the air component or the total amount of the air component and the total amount of the fuel component using the formulaic calculation based on or derived from the speed/density equation discussed above. The EGR determiner 330 then determines the total amount of diluent in the intake charge from the total amount of intake charge and the total amount of the air component or the total amount of intake charge, the total amount of the air component and the total amount of the fuel component. For example, the EGR determiner 330 can determine the amount of the diluent component by subtracting the total amount of the air component or the total amount of the air component and the total amount of the fuel component (if the fuel component is being accounted for) from the total amount of the intake charge.

Although the EGR determiner 330 described above utilizes inputs from the torque indicating characteristic sensor 316 and/or the performance sensor 320, the engine speed sensor 318, and the lambda sensor 328 in determining the amount of diluent in the intake charge, a number of different combinations of inputs can be used to determine the total amount of diluent in the intake charge. Therefore, other implementations of the EGR determiner 330 can operate similarly to determine the total amount of the diluent component in the intake charge, but using different inputs. For example, the total amount of the air component can be determined by measuring the amount of the air component (e.g., via a mass air flow sensor (MAF) and/or other sensor) and/or from the state of a control device associated with the air component (e.g., via a throttle position sensor and/or other). In certain instances, additional inputs or information may be used in determining the total amount of the air component. The total amount of the fuel component can be determined by measuring the amount of the fuel component (e.g., a fuel mass flow sensor and/or other sensor) and/or from the state of a control device associated with the fuel component (e.g., a pulse width or duty cycle of one or more fuel or air and fuel control devices (collectively “air/fuel control devices”), such as fuel injectors or fuel mixer). In certain instances, additional inputs or information may be used in determining the total amount of the fuel component. In instances where one of the total amount of the air component or the fuel component, the other can be determined using the air/fuel ratio (e.g., determined using a lambda sensor and the stoichiometric ratio of the fuel component and/or other sensors). Therefore, in certain implementations, the EGR determiner 330 can determine the total amount of diluent based on inputs from a torque indicating sensor and/or a power sensor to determine the total amount of the fuel component, as described above, and input from a MAF sensor to determine the total amount of the air component. In certain implementations, the EGR determiner 330 may determine the total amount of diluent based on inputs from a torque indicating sensor and/or a power sensor to determine the total amount of the fuel component, as described above. Also, the EGR determiner may determine the total amount of air component by utilizing input from a lambda sensor in combination with the total amount of the fuel component. In certain implementations, input from a MAF sensor may be used to determine the total amount of the air component and input from a lambda sensor, in combination with the total amount of the air component, can be used to determine the total amount of the fuel component. In like fashion, other combinations of inputs can be used to determine the total amount of the air component and the fuel component. Some additional example combinations include a MAF sensor and a fuel mass flow sensor, a MAF sensor and a duty cycle of one or more fuel injectors or a fuel mixer, a lambda sensor and a fuel mass flow sensor, and/or a lambda sensor and a duty cycle of one or more fuel injectors or a fuel mixer, and other combinations. For example, the duty cycle of one or more fuel injectors or the fuel mixer may be represented by the output from the actuator transfer function 336 (shown as input 334 to the EGR determiner 330 in FIGS. 3 and 5).

Once the total amount of the diluent component is determined, the EGR determiner 330 determines a set-point for the amount of exhaust gas to recirculate into the engine 102 by comparing the total amount of the diluent component in the intake charge to the specified amount of exhaust gas at the current operating conditions of the engine 102. For example, if the total amount of the diluent component is less than the specified amount, the EGR determiner 330 may determine to increase the amount of exhaust gas recirculated into the engine 102 or increase the EGR flow rate. If the total amount of the diluent component is greater than the specified amount, the EGR determiner 330 may determine to decrease the amount of the exhaust gas recirculated into the engine 102 or reduce the EGR flow rate. In certain instances, the EGR determiner 330 may determine an amount to increase or decrease the amount of exhaust gas recirculated to the engine 102 in proportion to the difference between the total amount of the diluent component and the specified amount. In certain instances, the EGR determiner 330 may increase or decrease the amount of exhaust gas recirculated to the engine 102 a set amount, and iteratively adjust (repeatedly performing the operations above) until the total amount of the diluent component is equal to or substantially equal to the specified amount. The EGR determiner 330 outputs an EGR set-point signal corresponding to the determined set-point.

While the amount of NOx emissions produced by an engine are primarily controlled by an amount of EGR (i.e., the amount of EGR present in a combustion chamber of the engine), NOx emissions are also dependent on the Intake Manifold Temperature (IMT), coolant temperature, fuel quality, and ambient or intake manifold humidity. NOx emissions, though, may also be affected (e.g., increased) by higher IMT, coolant temperature, lower humidity, and fuel having a higher flame speed. Thus, to maintain a constant level of NOx emissions with changing IMT, coolant temperature, and humidity, an output of the EGR determiner 330 may be modified by outputs from sensors operable to measure coolant temperature, IMT, fuel quality, or humidity.

Engine knock is potentially damaging to an engine and may be caused by abnormal combustion. One knock mitigation remedy is retarding spark timing. Retarding spark timing, though, increases the IMAP. This, in turn, causes the EGR control method to reduce EGR flow rate, which is counter productive in preventing knock. Thus, according to certain implementations, the output of the EGR determiner 330 may be prevented from changing the EGR rate during a knock event or modified to increase EGR flow rate during a knocking event, since an increased EGR flow rate can inhibit knock. After the knock event has passed, the operation of the EGR determiner 330 may return to normal.

An EGR transfer function 332, that in one implementation is included with the ECM 104, receives at least the EGR set-point signal and determines an EGR actuator control signal adapted to operate the EGR control device 338.

The EGR transfer function 332 may determine the EGR actuator control signal using a look-up table correlating, for example, throttle position, lambda set-points, fuel parameters, and any other inputs to affect the EGR actuator control signals; by calculation as a function of the EGR set-point, and any other inputs; by a combination of a look-up table and a calculation; or by another method. According to one implementation, the EGR set-point can be transformed to a pre-signal using a look-up table, and a different parameter applied, such as a fuel parameter, in a calculation to offset the pre-signal in determining the EGR actuator control signal.

Accordingly, certain implementations include functionality to actively control an amount of EGR introduced into an engine depending upon operating conditions of the engine, such as a torque indicating characteristic, an engine speed, a power output of the engine, an input-based determination of power output of the engine, an air/flow actuator control signal, and others, such as an air/fuel mixture temperature, for example. Further, certain implementations are capable of adjusting the air/fuel mixture and EGR of an engine to operate the engine at high efficiency levels and reduce NOx emission levels when the engine is operating both under steady state conditions or transient conditions.

Moreover, implementations described herein may be used with any spark-ignited internal combustion engine, such as a gasoline-powered engine, or a compression ignition internal combustion engine, such as a Diesel engine. The implementations described herein may also be used with any fuel, such as gasoline, Diesel, biodiesel, natural gas, propane, ethanol, alternative fuels, such as vegetable oils, biogas, pyrolysis gas, and other fuels.

Additionally, the implementations described herein are applicable to an engine 102 having a turbocharger. In such an engine, the EGR may be diverted from exhaust gas prior to entering the turbocharger, after exiting the turbocharger, or a combination of both.

Although the implementations described herein are described in the context of exhaust gas as the diluent being controlled, the concepts herein are applicable to controlling other types of diluent alone or in combination with exhaust gas.

FIG. 7 schematically depicts the operation of the ECM 104 in controlling the exhaust gas recirculated to the engine. At 400, the ECM receives signals indicative of one or more engine state parameters. As described above, the engine state parameters may include engine speed, an engine torque indicating parameter, such as IMAP or IMD, power output of the engine 102, a characteristic indicative of the engine's 102 air to fuel ratio, such as exhaust oxygen content, ambient and/or engine temperature, ambient pressure, and others.

At 410, the ECM utilizes at least one or more of the engine state parameters to determine a lambda set-point. As explained above, the lambda set-point may or may not be modified based on other optional inputs. At 420, the ECM receives an actual lambda measurement, such as using an output from an exhaust oxygen content sensor, e.g., a lambda sensor disposed within an exhaust flow of the engine. As also explained above, an actual lambda approximation may be used. At 430, the ECM compares the actual lambda measurement with the lambda set-point. If the ECM determines a difference between the lambda set-point and the actual lambda measurement, a lambda adjustment is determined at 440, which is used to adjust the air/fuel control device based on the determined difference. Alternatively, the ECM 104 utilizes the torque from fuel in the manner described above to determine any necessary lambda adjustments.

Additionally, the ECM utilizes at least one or more of the engine state parameters to determine an EGR set-point at 460 using lambda adjustment, shown at 450. As explained above, in certain implementations, the EGR set-point may be determined by comparing a determination of the total amount of diluent component in the intake charge to a specified amount. After the ECM determines the EGR set-point at 460, the ECM determines an EGR control signal at 470.

The tasks 410-440 may be performed substantially concurrently with the tasks 460-470, in sequence before or after 460-470, or at any other time. Further, tasks 410-440 and 460-470 may be repeated continually in regular intervals or when changes in engine state parameters are detected.

Implementations of the engine system described herein can include some, all or none of the following features. For example, the engine system may be able to actively control an amount of EGR introduced into an engine so as to improve fuel efficiency. Further, the engine system may be able to reduce NOx emissions by actively controlling the amount of EGR introduced into the engine. Accordingly, the engine system provides for more efficient engine operation and reduced emissions.

A number of implementations have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4184461Sep 26, 1977Jan 22, 1980The Bendix CorporationAcceleration enrichment for closed loop control systems
US4372119May 21, 1980Feb 8, 1983Saab-Scania AktiebolagMethod of avoiding abnormal combination in an internal combination engine and an arrangement for carrying out the method
US4603674Jun 16, 1982Aug 5, 1986Yanmar Diesel Engine Co., Ltd.Gas-diesel dual fuel engine
US4700677Feb 17, 1987Oct 20, 1987Robert Bosch GmbhEngine knock control method and system with fail-safe mode
US4708094Dec 15, 1986Nov 24, 1987Cooper IndustriesFuel control system for dual fuel engines
US4788957Dec 21, 1987Dec 6, 1988Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaIgnition timing control device for internal-combustion engines
US4864991Dec 1, 1987Sep 12, 1989Snyder Warren EMethod and apparatus for controlling air to gas ratio of gaseous fueled engines
US4867127Feb 19, 1987Sep 19, 1989Jenbacher Werke AktiengesellschaftArrangement for regulating the combustion air proportions
US4905649Sep 28, 1988Mar 6, 1990Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaFuel properties detecting apparatus for an internal combustion engine
US5140959Jan 28, 1991Aug 25, 1992Durbin Enoch JMethod and apparatus for operation of a dual fuel compression ignition combustion engine
US5150690Apr 20, 1990Sep 29, 1992Ortech CorporationFlow control system
US5224457Feb 28, 1992Jul 6, 1993Deere & CompanyDual fuel electronic control system
US5237983Nov 6, 1992Aug 24, 1993Ford Motor CompanyMethod and apparatus for operating an engine having a faulty fuel type sensor
US5315973Nov 22, 1991May 31, 1994University Of British ColumbiaIntensifier-injector for gaseous fuel for positive displacement engines
US5400762Aug 24, 1992Mar 28, 1995Chrysler CorporationMethod for determining fuel composition
US5408967Oct 22, 1993Apr 25, 1995Foster; Joseph S.Gaseous fuel injector
US5467755Aug 25, 1994Nov 21, 1995Ford Motor CompanyMethod and system for controlling flexible fuel vehicle fueling
US5469831Nov 10, 1994Nov 28, 1995Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaFuel supply control system for an automotive engine
US5515280Jan 21, 1993May 7, 1996Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaElectronic control device for a multi-fuel internal combustion engine
US5551236May 2, 1994Sep 3, 1996Dresser Industries, Inc.Turbocharger control management system
US5586537Feb 28, 1995Dec 24, 1996Unisia Jecs CorporationFuel property detecting apparatus for internal combustion engines
US5605044Jun 7, 1995Feb 25, 1997Dresser Industries, Inc.Turbocharger control management system
US5611204Jun 27, 1996Mar 18, 1997Cummins Engine Company, Inc.EGR and blow-by flow system for highly turbocharged diesel engines
US5617726Mar 31, 1995Apr 8, 1997Cummins Engine Company, Inc.For an internal combustion engine
US5628296Jan 16, 1996May 13, 1997Borg-Warner Automotive, Inc.Temperature-compensated exhaust gas recirculation system
US5632144Sep 28, 1995May 27, 1997Nippondenso Co., Ltd.Exhaust gas re-circulation control device for internal combustion engines
US5655493Jan 16, 1996Aug 12, 1997Dresser Industries, Inc.Exhaust valve for internal combustion engine
US5657732Jan 17, 1996Aug 19, 1997Deltec Fuel Systems B.V.Method and device for regulating the NOx emission of an internal combustion engine
US5709196Dec 6, 1996Jan 20, 1998Caterpillar Inc.Fuel control system for an internal combustion engine using a low cetane quality fuel
US5711272Nov 26, 1996Jan 27, 1998Denso CorporationFuel property detection for an engine using engine speed
US5713336Jan 24, 1995Feb 3, 1998Woodward Governor CompanyMethod and apparatus for providing multipoint gaseous fuel injection to an internal combustion engine
US5732681Mar 19, 1997Mar 31, 1998Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki KaishaApparatus for detecting properties of fuel in internal combustion engine and method of the same
US5816047Sep 3, 1996Oct 6, 1998Dresser Industries, Inc.Electronically controlled wastegate valve for a turbo charger
US5817923Jan 24, 1997Oct 6, 1998Unisia Jecs CorporationApparatus for detecting the fuel property for an internal combustion engine and method thereof
US5832896Jan 9, 1997Nov 10, 1998Zenith Fuel Systems, Inc.Governor and control system for internal combustion engines
US5832905Dec 22, 1997Nov 10, 1998Woodward Governor CompanyMethod and apparatus for providing multipoint gaseous fuel injection to an internal combustion engine
US5878717 *Mar 20, 1998Mar 9, 1999Cummins Engine Company, Inc.Cylinder pressure based air-fuel ratio and engine control
US5911210Oct 3, 1997Jun 15, 1999Cooper Cameron CorporationMethod and apparatus for supplying fuel to an internal combustion engine
US5929314Nov 6, 1997Jul 27, 1999Dresser Industries, Inc.Method and apparatus for volume determination
US5949146Jul 2, 1997Sep 7, 1999Cummins Engine Company, Inc.Control technique for a lean burning engine system
US5950432Jan 31, 1997Sep 14, 1999Dresser Industries, Inc.For a stationary internal combustion engine fueled by gaseous fuel
US6012431 *Jun 3, 1997Jan 11, 2000Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.Control apparatus for internal combustion engine and estimation apparatus for estimating pressure in intake and discharge system of internal combustion engine
US6032617May 27, 1998Mar 7, 2000Caterpillar Inc.Dual fuel engine which ignites a homogeneous mixture of gaseous fuel, air, and pilot fuel
US6041756Oct 8, 1998Mar 28, 2000Chrysler CorporationActive adaptive EGR and spark advance control system
US6062204Oct 15, 1998May 16, 2000Ford Global Technologies, Inc.Engine control system and method with atmospheric humidity compensation
US6134888Jan 15, 1999Oct 24, 2000Dresser Industries, Inc.Turbocharger control management system
US6161384Feb 2, 1999Dec 19, 2000Waukesha Engine Division, Dresser Equipment Group, Inc.Turbocharger control management system throttle reserve control
US6189523Apr 28, 1999Feb 20, 2001Anr Pipeline CompanyMethod and system for controlling an air-to-fuel ratio in a non-stoichiometric power governed gaseous-fueled stationary internal combustion engine
US6202601Feb 11, 2000Mar 20, 2001Westport Research Inc.Method and apparatus for dual fuel injection into an internal combustion engine
US6227182 *Jun 7, 1999May 8, 2001Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.Exhaust gas recirculation control system for internal combustion engine
US6230683Dec 8, 1999May 15, 2001Cummins Engine Company, Inc.Premixed charge compression ignition engine with optimal combustion control
US6246952Mar 1, 1999Jun 12, 2001Denso CorporationEngine control signal processing system with frequency analysis by fourier transform algorithm
US6246953Oct 15, 1999Jun 12, 2001Visteon Global Technologies, Inc.Internal combustion engine knock detection
US6247448May 17, 1999Jun 19, 2001Ford Global Technologies, Inc.Closed loop spark control method and system utilizing a combustion event sensor to determine borderline knock
US6269300Mar 29, 1995Jul 31, 2001Caterpillar Inc.Method for producing production control software for a natural gas or diesel engine controller
US6279560Oct 28, 1999Aug 28, 2001C.R.F. SOCIETá CONSORTILE PER AZIONIMethod of controlling injection of an internal combustion engine as a function of fuel quality
US6289877Sep 14, 2000Sep 18, 2001Anr Pipeline Co.Method and system for controlling an air-to-fuel ratio in a non-stoichiometric power governed gaseous-fueled stationary internal combustion engine
US6305167Mar 31, 2000Oct 23, 2001Detroit Diesel CorporationMethod of controlling an engine with an EGR system
US6340005Apr 18, 2000Jan 22, 2002Rem Technology, Inc.Air-fuel control system
US6386149May 11, 1999May 14, 2002Clean Fuel Technology, Inc.Method of operating an engine with a mixture of gaseous fuel and emulsified pilot fuel to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions
US6411886Sep 9, 1999Jun 25, 2002C.R.F. Societa Consortile Per AzioniMethod of detecting and controlling detonation of an internal combustion engine
US6427662Dec 1, 2000Aug 6, 2002Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaKnock control apparatus for internal combustion engine
US6439198Mar 5, 2001Aug 27, 2002Robert Bosch GmbhMethod for detecting combustion misfires in an internal combustion engine
US6470868Mar 20, 2001Oct 29, 2002Hitachi, Ltd.Engine self-diagnosis apparatus and control apparatus
US6474308Sep 27, 2001Nov 5, 2002Denso CorporationApparatus for detecting fuel property for internal combustion engine
US6520168Mar 8, 2001Feb 18, 2003Hitachi, Ltd.Air-fuel ratio controller for engine
US6522024Sep 17, 1999Feb 18, 2003Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki KaishaOutput state detector for internal combustion engine
US6522959Oct 5, 2000Feb 18, 2003Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki KaishaControl apparatus for hybrid vehicle
US6529815Dec 5, 2000Mar 4, 2003Detroit Diesel CorporationMethod and system for enhanced engine control
US6543395Jun 11, 2001Apr 8, 2003Gas Technologies, Inc.Bi-fuel control system and retrofit assembly for diesel engines
US6546328Jan 3, 2001Apr 8, 2003Eaton CorporationKnock and misfire detection system
US6564774Apr 12, 2001May 20, 2003Dresser, Inc.Feedforward engine control governing system
US6567709Feb 4, 2000May 20, 2003Rem TechnologyIntegrated monitoring, diagnostics, shut-down and control system
US6591822Jun 14, 2001Jul 15, 2003Denso CorporationAir-fuel ratio controller of internal combustion engines
US6598584Feb 23, 2001Jul 29, 2003Clean Air Partners, Inc.Gas-fueled, compression ignition engine with maximized pilot ignition intensity
US6609496Dec 1, 2000Aug 26, 2003Caterpillar IncEngine controller for an internal combustion engine
US6612269Aug 8, 2001Sep 2, 2003The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaApparatus and method for operating internal combustion engines from variable mixtures of gaseous fuels
US6659090Jan 10, 2002Dec 9, 2003Detroit Diesel CorporationSystem for purging exhaust gases from exhaust gas recirculation system
US6668812Jan 8, 2001Dec 30, 2003General Motors CorporationIndividual cylinder controller for three-cylinder engine
US6694960Jan 24, 2001Feb 24, 2004Robert Bosch GmbhMethod and arrangement for determining cylinder-individual differences of a control variable in a multi-cylinder internal combustion engine
US6697729 *Apr 8, 2002Feb 24, 2004Cummins, Inc.System for estimating NOx content of exhaust gas produced by an internal combustion engine
US6712042Oct 27, 2000Mar 30, 2004Robert Bosch GmbhMethod and arrangement for equalizing at least two cylinder banks of an internal combustion engine
US6725831Dec 26, 2002Apr 27, 2004Hitachi, Ltd.Engine fuel control device and idling air-fuel ratio control method
US6728625Sep 27, 2002Apr 27, 2004Caterpillar IncHumidity compensated charge density control for an internal combustion engine
US6729315Mar 5, 2003May 4, 2004Komatsu Ltd.Exhaust gas recirculation control apparatus for internal combustion engine
US6805095Nov 5, 2002Oct 19, 2004Ford Global Technologies, LlcSystem and method for estimating and controlling cylinder air charge in a direct injection internal combustion engine
US6837227Jan 31, 2001Jan 4, 2005Cummins, Inc.System and method for estimating EGR mass flow and EGR fraction
US6863052May 3, 2004Mar 8, 2005Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Knocking control apparatus and method and engine control unit for variable cylinder internal combustion engine
US6883318Apr 28, 2003Apr 26, 2005Detroit Diesel CorporationMethod of controlling an internal combustion engine
US6915776Oct 15, 2003Jul 12, 2005Cummins Inc.Premixed charge compression ignition engine with optimal combustion control
US7006909Oct 20, 2004Feb 28, 2006Detroit Diesel CorporationEngine delay compensation
US7021298Feb 28, 2005Apr 4, 2006Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.Internal EGR parameter estimating device for internal combustion engine
US7044103Aug 16, 2004May 16, 2006Dresser, Inc.Fuel quantity modulation in pilot ignited engines
US7066144Jul 30, 2004Jun 27, 2006Isuzu Motors LimitedControl device and method for internal combustion engine
US7104260Jun 23, 2005Sep 12, 2006Nissan Motor Co., LtdEGR control unit and method for an internal combustion engine
US7117862May 6, 2004Oct 10, 2006Dresser, Inc.Adaptive engine control
US7124011Aug 20, 2004Oct 17, 2006Dresser, Inc.Engine control module and method for use in engine system manufacture
US7281531 *Oct 18, 2006Oct 16, 2007Brehon Energy PlcSystem and method of stoichiometric combustion for hydrogen fueled internal combustion engines
US7296561Dec 23, 2005Nov 20, 2007Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.Engine control apparatus
US7302884Nov 3, 2005Dec 4, 2007Dresser, Inc.Piston
US7360523 *May 17, 2007Apr 22, 2008Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc.Method and apparatus to control operation of a homogeneous charge compression-ignition engine
US7383816Jan 9, 2006Jun 10, 2008Dresser, Inc.Virtual fuel quality sensor
US7740010 *Oct 13, 2007Jun 22, 2010Eden Innovations Ltd.System and method of stoichiometric combustion for hydrogen fueled internal combustion engines
US20010020465Jan 16, 2001Sep 13, 2001Michael BaeuerleMethod for detecting combustion misfires and cylinder equalization in internal combustion engines with knock control
US20020007816May 8, 2001Jan 24, 2002Zur Loye Axel O.Multiple operating mode engine and method of operation
US20020017269May 8, 2001Feb 14, 2002Zur Loye Axel O.Premixed charge compression ignition engine with variable speed SOC control and method of operation
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1C. Hudson et al., "Knock Measurement for Fuel Evaluation in Spark Ignition Engines" Fuel, IPC Science and Technology Press, Guildford, GB, vol. 80, No. 3, Feb. 3, 2001.
2International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/027185; Nov. 17, 2005 (12 pages).
3International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/000385; Jul. 3, 2007 (11 pages).
4International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/US2010/029443 on Aug. 11, 2010; 10 pages.
5International Search Report issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/016176 mailed Sep. 9, 2005 (7 pages).
6Notification of Transmittal of the International Preliminary Report on Patentability (1 page) and International Preliminary Report on Patentability (15 pages) for International Application No. PCT/US2005/016176 mailed Aug. 3, 2006.
7Notification of Transmittal of the International Preliminary Report on Patentability (14 pages), mailed Apr. 21, 2011, for related international application PCT/US2010/029443.
8Office Action mailed Apr. 11, 2008 in corresponding Chinese Application No. 200580020508.7 (11 pages).
9Office Action mailed Jun. 9, 2009 in corresponding Russian Application No. 2006143052 (7 pages).
10Office Action mailed Nov. 19, 2008 in corresponding European Application No. 05748317.4 (15 pages).
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US8437943 *Jan 28, 2010May 7, 2013Deere & CompanyNOx control during load increases
US8479716 *Apr 21, 2009Jul 9, 2013Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.Exhaust gas re-circulation control unit for a diesel engine
US20100282222 *Apr 21, 2009Nov 11, 2010Kazunari IdeExhaust gas re-circulation control unit for a diesel engine
US20110184631 *Jan 28, 2010Jul 28, 2011Winsor Richard ENOx CONTROL DURING LOAD INCREASES
US20120111000 *Sep 24, 2009May 10, 2012Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki KaishaControl apparatus of an internal combustion engine
US20120253638 *Mar 26, 2012Oct 4, 2012Robert Bosch GmbhMethod for adapting a fuel/air mixture for an internal combustion engine
Classifications
U.S. Classification701/108, 123/674, 701/106, 123/568.21
International ClassificationF02M25/07, F02B47/08, F02D41/26
Cooperative ClassificationY02T10/47, F02D41/0052, F02D41/187, F02D2200/0411
European ClassificationF02D41/00F6B2
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Apr 29, 2009ASAssignment
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ZURLO, JAMES RICHARD;KONKLE, KEVIN PAUL;MAY, ANDREW;REEL/FRAME:022609/0149
Effective date: 20090318
Owner name: DRESSER, INC., TEXAS