|Publication number||US8127141 B2|
|Application number||US 10/493,596|
|Publication date||Feb 28, 2012|
|Filing date||Oct 29, 2002|
|Priority date||Oct 30, 2001|
|Also published as||EP1440362A2, EP1440362B1, EP2101242A1, US20050044425, WO2003038569A2, WO2003038569A3|
|Publication number||10493596, 493596, PCT/2002/12183, PCT/EP/2/012183, PCT/EP/2/12183, PCT/EP/2002/012183, PCT/EP/2002/12183, PCT/EP2/012183, PCT/EP2/12183, PCT/EP2002/012183, PCT/EP2002/12183, PCT/EP2002012183, PCT/EP200212183, PCT/EP2012183, PCT/EP212183, US 8127141 B2, US 8127141B2, US-B2-8127141, US8127141 B2, US8127141B2|
|Original Assignee||F-Secure Oyj|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (16), Non-Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (23), Classifications (19), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a National Stage entry of International Application No. PCT/EP0212183, filed Oct. 29, 2002, the entire specification claims and drawings of which are incorporated herewith by reference.
The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for selecting a password and is applicable in particular, though not necessarily, to mobile devices which lack a physical keyboard, such as one-hand controlled smart phones and stylus driven PDAs.
Many Smart Phone and Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) users need to store valuable confidential information on their systems. User authentication alone is not enough to keep this information safe as an attacker can capture and probe the device offline to retrieve the information, bypassing any authentication system. The only way to protect the stored information is to encrypt it with a cryptographic key. The easiest way to create the key is to generate it from data collected during authentication. The best recognised such methods use cryptographic hash functions and message authentication code algorithms to derive the key indirectly from a passphrase, typically chosen by the user and entered into the device.
The value of a passphrase as a source for a symmetric cipher key can be measured as the amount of entropy that the passphrase contains. For example, regular English words constructed using the Latin alphabet have an entropy of approximately 1 bit per letter, whilst a totally random string of lowercase letters and numbers has an entropy of approximately 5 bits per letter. The following table shows that a proper password should be quite long in order to provide adequate protection against a brute force attack, i.e. an exhaustive search of all possible key values.
Symmetric key length
Time required to break
The times shown in the table correspond with computing performance of equipment worth of $10 million USD. In the light of ever increasing computing power and new processing techniques, a key of around 75 to 90 bits would appear to provide an adequate level of security.
Typically, a passphrase is a sequence of letters, digits and other characters, which the user memorises. These conventional alphanumeric passphrases have several disadvantages. Easy to remember passphrases can be compromised through so called dictionary and brute force attacks, while randomly generated long passphrases that provide high security are difficult for the user to remember. These disadvantages become even more important in smart phone and PDA environments where constraints (e.g. the lack of a traditional keyboard) make textual passphrase entry slow and cumbersome.
There are several ease-of-use requirements for passphrase systems on smart phones and PDAs that have no keyboard, but which rely on a joystick, roller, pen or a special stylus as the input device:
There are however many security requirements relating to the password which contradict the ease-of-use requirements:
These contradictory requirements result in a situation where passwords used on mobile devices are either easy for an attacker to break, or are too difficult for the user to remember and enter.
Many passphrase-based systems, which illustrate the trade-off required between ease of use and security, have been proposed for mobile devices. These include:
The present invention provides a solution to the password selection and use problems noted above. It stems from a number of observations.
Firstly, it can be observed that people find it difficult to memorise random strings of characters, but can easily memorise even long phrases that consist of meaningful words and concepts. The important component here seems to be the semantic content and how easy it is for the user to associate the password with something they have encountered earlier.
A second important observation is that recalling items within a named category is much easier than remembering an item by heart with no associated category. This is evidenced by how people seem to remember more easily multiple words, each from a different category, than a similar number of words from different categories. A simple way to illustrate this is to try to memorise 20 different city names, and then try to list them again in the same order. Many people can memorise most if not all of the cities, but they will usually have trouble listing them in the correct order. If the test is repeated with 20 names but each name is chosen from a different category, e.g. one city name, one country name, one animal name, etc., and the user is then asked to name “the city”, then “the country”, then “the animal”, etc., the user will usually be able to list easily each item correctly. The category names support the user's memory retrieval process, which helps considerably in recalling the names. At the same time, these cues make it possible for the user to recall all the names in the correct order.
A third observation is that pen-driven PDAs and joystick controlled smart phones make it easy and fast to select an entry from an alphabetically ordered list, even if the list contains hundreds of entries. This is helped by the sharp resolution of modem displays and the accuracy of the touch screens. It is worthwhile to note that it is much faster to find an item from an ordered list than from an unordered list.
According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of generating or entering a password or passphrase or encryption key on a computer system, the method comprising:
A domain is defined by one or more characteristics. The values belonging to a given domain share or are mapped to the characteristic(s) of that domain. Human beings are capable of remembering a sequence of elements drawn from respective domains more easily than a sequence of randomly selected elements. It will be appreciated that the stored values are typically binary representations of the respective elements.
In an embodiment of the present invention, a user selects a value by selecting the corresponding element which may be displayed to him graphically. Preferably, the said step of enabling a user to select at least one value from each stored set comprises displaying on a display of the computer system a graphical user interface. In one embodiment, the interface comprises a graphically displayed slider, thumb wheel or the like, which can be operated by the user with a joystick, roller or another input device to scroll through the values of each domain in order to select a value for that domain. More preferably, for each position of the slider or wheel, the value corresponding to that position (or an element mapped to the value) is displayed to provide visual feedback to the user. More preferably, the display of the system is a touch sensitive display, and the graphical interface is operated by a pen, stylus, or the like. More preferably, after selection of a value for a given domain by the user, the value (or mapped element) is hidden from view.
In one embodiment of the invention, a set of sliders is displayed on a display of the system, one slider corresponding to each domain. The user selects a value from each domain in turn, using the corresponding slider.
Preferably, the values of each domain are arranged in a predefined order. In the case of text, the values may be arranged in alphabetical order. In the case of numbers, the values may be arranged in numerical order. In the case of dates, the values may be arranged in chronological order.
It will be appreciated that the values may be digital representations of an element. For example, the values may be ASCII representations of text. Alternatively, the memory may store a mapping between respective values and elements, where the elements are presented to the user for selection, and the values are used to generate the password. For example, values 00000001, 00000010, 00000011, etc, may be mapped to the countries Albania, Algeria, Andorra, etc.
Values belonging to domains may correspond or be mapped to graphical images. The images are displayed on the graphical user interface to allow a user to make a selection. A slider or similar component may be displayed to allow a user to scroll through the image values of a domain in order to make a selection.
Preferably, when employed to generate a password, the method allows the user to select which of the plurality of sets of values shall be used to generate the password, and the order of the selected sets. When the method is subsequently employed to enter a password, the user is presented with the ordered sets from which to make the value selections.
Where the method is employed to generate or enter a password or passphrase, an encryption key may be generated from the password or passphrase using a known mechanism, with the key being used to encrypt and decrypt data. For example, the selected values may be concatenated together to form a data string, the string compressed, and a hash function applied to the compressed string.
In certain embodiments of the invention, it is the computer system which selects values from value sets. This tends to improve the “quality” of a password as compared to a password selected by a user.
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer system comprising:
The computer system may be, for example, a PDA, palmtop or laptop computer, mobile telephone or smart phone. However, the system may be a PC or workstation or other device.
According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer storage medium having stored thereon a computer program for causing a computer system to:
According to a fourth aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of securing data stored on a computer system, the method comprising:
In an embodiment of the present invention, each time said first authorisation level is implemented, it requires the input of a subset of values different from that subset required for the preceding implementation.
Preferably, the subset of values required for each implementation of the first authorisation level is selected from the complete set of values on a round robin basis.
Preferably, said step of generating a password comprises selecting a value from each of a plurality of value categories, each value category comprising a multiplicity of values.
Preferably, when said first authentication level is implemented, an icon grid is displayed for the value category corresponding to each value of the chosen subset of values, the user selecting a value from each icon grid. More preferably, each icon grid displays icons corresponding to a subset of the values contained in a value category.
Preferably, when said second authorisation level is implemented, a textual list of the values contained in a value category is displayed for each category, and the user selects a value from each list.
There is illustrated in
The RAM 5 is arranged to store both program files and user data. Stored in the RAM 5 (or possibly the ROM 4) is program code for encrypting data, typically user data files such as text files, images, contacts, spreadsheets, etc, and which is run by the microprocessor 3. The program may use an algorithm such as DES, Triple DES, AES or RSA, and makes use of a cryptographic key generated by applying a hash function and/or message authentication code algorithm to a passphrase supplied by a user of the device. The passphrase is first selected by the user when the encryption application is installed into the device (or when it is first activated if the encryption application is pre-installed into the PDA 1). The passphrase may subsequently be changed by the user. A mechanism for selecting the passphrase will now be described.
The “Discrete Element Password” scheme employs multiple types of value categories rather than the alphanumeric character set as the elements of the password. One discrete value is picked from each value category, and it is the combination of the values which provide the password (or passphrase). This scheme allows for the random generation of passwords that will be easy for the user to remember.
The scheme can be implemented in several different ways. In the sample system presented below, the user is asked to select values one by one (or rather the element corresponding to a value, as the values are binary data mapped or representing user recognisable elements), each within a value category from respective value sets stored in the RAM 5, using a set of slider controls 6 as illustrated in
By way of example, each slider may allow a value to be selected from one of the following value categories:
Other examples are:
The user is constantly given visual feedback during the selection of values, by displaying the currently selected value for a value category in a small display window 8 at the top of the corresponding slider 6. Fine tuning is made easy by adjusting the value-change threshold by the pen speed: when the user moves the pen fast, the display jumps through the values, and when the user moves the pen slowly, the display scrolls through the values one by one. If a mistake is made, the user will notice this and can reselect the value.
The cryptographic strength of a Discrete Element Password is calculated as follows. Each slider has a resolution of R distinct values. If the value for a slider is set randomly, its entropy is log2(R) bits. When the number of sliders S>1, the numbers produced by the sliders are concatenated to form the final cryptographic key. In binary format, these values can be represented by a concatenated binary number that has S×log2(R) bits.
The Discrete Elements Password scheme thus achieves significantly better security than textual passwords.
Protection against onlookers (using a so-called “shoulder surfing” attack) can be further improved by implementing more categories than sliders, and only requiring the user to enter values for some of the categories during login. The cryptographic key is then constructed using the secret sharing method, resembling the scheme suggested in C. Ellison, C. Hall, R. Milbert, and B. Schneier. Protecting Secret Keys with Personal Entropy. Future Generation Computer Systems, v. 16, pp. 311-318, 2000. This way, a third party observing a single login session will not be able easily to impersonate the user. Security can be further improved by varying the order in which the sliders are displayed on the screen.
There are several issues to consider when selecting the value categories to use in a Discrete Element Password system. Firstly, different kinds of value categories may have a different number of member values and will thus produce a different number of bits. This will affect the combined password length. Secondly, a value category should be sortable to enable the user to find the correct value fast. The obvious sort orders include alphabetical, numeric and chronological, but criteria such as size or weight would be viable for some types of value categories.
Thirdly, it is known that people remember concepts and words by association with things that are already familiar to them. If a user cannot recognise a name as a member of a given value category, it's much more difficult to remember. Here are a couple of examples:
Users should therefore be familiar with each value category and recognise the values within the category easily. Preferably, the user should be able to easily connect an individual value to its category, and to easily name tens of examples of members of the category on request. That is to say that a user should be able easily to master both the “is-a” and “has-a” relationships between the value category and its members.
To overcome these issues, it is suggested that the number of supported value categories (available in a given device) should be larger than the number of discrete values required to complete a password. The user should be allowed to choose which value categories the system should use, and in which order they are presented. The binary password generated by the system will in any case be independent of the choice of value categories.
It should be noted that the Discrete Element Password scheme works well with words of any length as members of the value categories, and the same is true of the human brain. This means that there is no particular reason to try to find as short words as possible to put in the value categories. It should also be noted that the Discrete Element Password scheme is based on point-and-select rather than textual input, which is the case with most other systems that provide sufficient entropy to ensure security.
There now follows a list of modifications or additions which may be made to the DEP scheme described above.
In order to further illustrate the invention, an alternative, graphical, implementation will now be described.
The traditional wisdom in designing user authentication systems is that the user's password is always the weakest link. Users very often choose bad passwords that are easy to guess, too short, or written down where others may discover it. The Discrete Element Password scheme described here addresses these issues by implementing a user authentication system where the password is generated by the system rather than chosen by the user, is long enough to protect against even the most advanced attacks, and is difficult to capture by observing the user enter it. The password is also easy to memorize so that the user will have no reason to write it down.
This Discrete Element Password scheme is designed to be easier, faster and more secure than conventional alphanumeric passwords or numeric PIN codes typically used on smartphones. The authentication is two-level: a full password is required when the device is restarted, but only a short portion of the password is required during the normal first-level authentication which takes place much more often than the second-level authentication. The first-level authentication is used for example when the screen has been locked because of a screensaver turning on, i.e. after an idle time limit has triggered.
The first-level authentication is implemented using a menu of graphical icons representing values (selected from respective value categories) and the second level with a scrolling list of words (again representing values) that constitute the full password. The first-level authentication uses a different part of the full password each time and repeats when all parts of the passwords have been shown. The user will effectively be reminded of the full password but will not be required to enter all of it every time. This enables the user to recall the full password in its entirety when necessary through the second-level authentication system. This system provides a significant improvement over other two-level authentication schemes in which the short password is different from the full password and both must be remembered separately.
The first level authentication cycles through the value categories using a round robin method which ensures that the same categories are never asked twice in a row. This prevents shoulder surfing attacks to which traditional systems (that use the same password every time, such as a numeric PIN) are vulnerable.
The design goals of the scheme include:
When the user starts the application and the relevant (.INI) file does not contain a password, an initiation dialog box is shown. This indicates that the security application will help keep data private by locking the device when it is not in use. This involves the automatic generation of a password by the device. The password will consist of five values chosen from respective value categories. The user is informed that a screen for each value category will now be displayed, each screen containing a set of icons depicting the values for a given value category, with the icon depicting the password value being highlighted. Beneath each icon is a word corresponding to the icon. The series of highlighted icons/words must be memorised by the user.
By way of example, a value category is defined corresponding to female first names. Perhaps 128 such names are defined and stored in the device's memory. The memory also stores 9 icons representing different female faces. The icons need to be sufficiently different from each other so that the user will be able to recognize the familiar icon fast, without always having to read all the names. Each icon must be equally usable with any of the values (names) in the value category. Here are the suggested icon types for other value categories:
Numbers that correspond to the password values are generated randomly and saved to memory (but not yet to the .INI file). The corresponding words from each list are then located, and an icon is assigned to the selected word in each category using modulo arithmetic from among the nine icons available in each category. For example, if the numeric value for the element in a category is 8, then icon number 8 is used. That same icon is also used if the numeric value is 17 (=9+8) or 26 (=2×9+8). This means that it will appear that each element has its own unique icon, as it will always display using the same icon, although there are not more than nine different icons per category.
Another eight words from each list are randomly chosen as decoys. Their icons are assigned randomly from the among remaining icons so that no icon is used twice. The icons are located in the icon grid view sorted by the words attached to them so the grid will be alphabetically ordered. This layout is saved in the .INI file so that the icon grid view for a category will always look the same for the same user. On another device where the password is different, the grid layout will be different. This makes it easy for the user to notice if she unintentionally takes another user's device and tries to use her password there. It is likely that the words her password consists of will not appear in the icon grid view on the “foreign” device, and that the icons will be at different locations. The screen for the first value category is illustrated in
When the user has seen the five password screens, she is given the choice of accepting the password or having another password generated for her. Assuming that the password is accepted, the five screens are again displayed in sequence, but this time the correct value is not highlighted. The user must enter the password she has just seen by choosing the correct icon from each category through the icon grid view. After all of the values have been entered by the user, the device checks if a mistake has been made.
When the user has entered the password correctly using the icon grid view, a dialog box is displayed noting that the password will now be displayed again through a secondary level of textual lists (again, five lists are displayed, one for each value category). Each element of the password is displayed by automatically scrolling to the correct entry in an element list view. The display is “frozen” for three seconds, and then the screen is blanked for half a second before going to the next element category. A textual list is illustrated in
After showing the element values for all five categories, the user is asked to enter the password again using the textual lists. She is also informed that when the device is in normal use, it will only be necessary to perform this procedure if a mistake is made while choosing an icon (nb. Selection from the textual list is more laborious than selection from an icon grid, as a textual list might contain 128 values whilst the icon grid contains only a subset of 9 of these 128 values). When the user has entered the password correctly, the password is saved in the .INI file in numeric obfuscated format. The user is then informed that the device is protected and will be locked automatically when it is not in use. Of course, various mechanisms may be employed to make selection from a list easier. For example, a currently selected word in a list may be highlighted or enlarged, the selected word changing as the user scrolls through the list.
Once the security mechanism has been activated and a password chosen, the user will have to enter the full password correctly, using the textual lists, when the device is next turned on. Assuming that this is done correctly, the device can be used, until such time as a screensaver is activated. The user may set the time period for which the device must be inactive before the screensaver is turned on. Following activation of the screensaver, when the user attempts to use the device, she will be asked to enter a shortened version of the password. The values making up the shortened version are selected by the device from the five values making up the full password. Each time a shortened password is required, the device selects a different two of the five values, e.g. on a round robin basis. The user is presented with the relevant two value category screens, each of which contains one of the selected values. A selection may be made by pressing a number (on a keypad) corresponding to an icon, by touching an icon when the display is touch sensitive, or by any other suitable method. The selected value may or may not be highlighted. Assuming that the user selects correctly, the device is activated. If the user selects incorrectly, she is then requested to enter the complete password using the five textual list screens. This approach helps to foil shoulder surfing attacks, as it is unlikely that an observer will be able to use an observed password to access the device. The level of security afforded by the first authorisation level can be increased or decreased by changing the number of values making up the shortened password and/or by varying the period of inactivity required to activate the screensaver.
A further significant advantage of the two level procedure described here is that each time the first level authentication stage is performed, the user is reminded of a part of the full password. Assuming that the first level procedure is performed on a fairly regular basis, the user will be reminded of the full password for use in the second level authorisation procedure, should it become necessary.
In some cases, a user may wish to synchronise data on a device with a PC or the like. If the device is locked, then the PC must provide the password to the device. This obviously presents difficulties as the PC may not have the security software installed on it and cannot therefore provide the graphical or textual list screens to the user. The device may accept from the PC a textual representation of the password, which can be provided to the PC by the user. Thus for example if the password consists of the elements “Jill”, “Bob”, “Smith”, “Toronto” and “June 14”, the textual equivalent could be the string “jill bob smith toronto june 14” or perhaps a string that contains just the first letter of each word: “jbstj14”.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5465084||Sep 22, 1994||Nov 7, 1995||Cottrell; Stephen R.||Method to provide security for a computer and a device therefor|
|US5588056||Oct 25, 1994||Dec 24, 1996||Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc.||Method and system for generating pronounceable security passwords|
|US5699514||Dec 26, 1995||Dec 16, 1997||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Access control system with lockout|
|US5928364 *||Nov 27, 1996||Jul 27, 1999||Casio Computer Co., Ltd.||Secret data storage device, secret data reading method, and control program storing medium|
|US5991882||Aug 7, 1997||Nov 23, 1999||Electronic Data Systems Corporation||Automated password reset|
|US6212638||Dec 2, 1997||Apr 3, 2001||George C. Lee||Method for generating unpredictable authentication identification symbols|
|US6253248 *||Jun 10, 1998||Jun 26, 2001||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Information processing apparatus and method|
|US6574377 *||Jul 1, 1999||Jun 3, 2003||The Chase Manhattan Bank||Electronic check image storage and retrieval system|
|US7219368 *||Mar 23, 2001||May 15, 2007||Rsa Security Inc.||Robust visual passwords|
|US20010009583||Jan 22, 2001||Jul 26, 2001||Murata Kikai Kabushiki Kaisha||Secret key registration method, secret key register, secret key issuing method, cryptographic communication method and cryptographic communication system|
|EP0947908A2||Mar 23, 1999||Oct 6, 1999||Fujitsu Limited||Electronic information management|
|EP1313027A1||Jul 23, 2001||May 21, 2003||Asahi Business Assist Limited||Secret information recorded medium, secret information protection method, secret information protective storing method, and system for reporting emergency such as theft or confinement when secret information is accessed|
|JP2001211157A||Title not available|
|JP2001282377A||Title not available|
|JP2001282738A||Title not available|
|JPH0224775A||Title not available|
|1||"Passlogix v-GGO 2.0 Offers Effortless Navigation From Registration to Logon," http://www.tech.com/techdocs/TS991008-2.html, Jun. 10, 1999, see also http://www.passlogix.com.|
|2||M. Zviran & W.J. Haga, "Next Decade in Information Technology," Proc. 5th Jewish Conference on Information Technology, 1990, pp. 137-144, "User authentication by cognitive passwords: an empirical assessment".|
|3||PCT International Publication No. WO 92/04671, Publication Date: Mar. 19, 1992|
|4||S.A. Kurzban, et al., "Easily Remembered Passphrases," IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 27, No. 8, Jan. 1985.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8650510||Mar 27, 2012||Feb 11, 2014||Neonode Inc.||User interface|
|US8707219 *||Dec 10, 2012||Apr 22, 2014||Huawei Device Co., Ltd.||Method and apparatus for unlocking screen saver|
|US8756670||May 25, 2010||Jun 17, 2014||Konica Minolta Holdings, Inc.||Information processing apparatus capable of authentication processing achieving both of user convenience and security, method of controlling information processing apparatus, and recording medium recording program for controlling information processing apparatus|
|US8812993||Dec 4, 2011||Aug 19, 2014||Neonode Inc.||User interface|
|US8817981 *||Jul 11, 2011||Aug 26, 2014||Biogy, Inc.||Generation of registration codes, keys and passcodes using non-determinism|
|US9032508 *||Jun 12, 2013||May 12, 2015||Yankey Information Co., Ltd.||Pattern password trajectory configuration system and method using the same|
|US9082121 *||Oct 23, 2013||Jul 14, 2015||Mastercard International Incorporated||System and method for guided passcode entry|
|US9134900 *||Jan 18, 2012||Sep 15, 2015||Qualcomm Incorporated||Traversal of a soft bar to unlock an application|
|US9164654||Jun 17, 2009||Oct 20, 2015||Neonode Inc.||User interface for mobile computer unit|
|US9172692||Mar 12, 2014||Oct 27, 2015||William M. Langley||Systems and methods for securely transferring authentication information between a user and an electronic resource|
|US9178876 *||Oct 20, 2011||Nov 3, 2015||Amazon Technologies, Inc.||Strength-based password expiration|
|US9235697||Mar 5, 2013||Jan 12, 2016||Biogy, Inc.||One-time passcodes with asymmetric keys|
|US9311472||Dec 21, 2012||Apr 12, 2016||Abbott Laboratories||Methods and apparatus for authenticating user login|
|US9646167||Jun 1, 2015||May 9, 2017||Light Cone Corp.||Unlocking a portable electronic device by performing multiple actions on an unlock interface|
|US9698990 *||Jan 29, 2016||Jul 4, 2017||Robert Barry O'Dell||Making unique passwords from the same string of characters, including any string of characters in a web address|
|US20100306842 *||May 25, 2010||Dec 2, 2010||Konica Minolta Holdings, Inc.||Information Processing Apparatus Capable of Authentication Processing Achieving Both of User Convenience and Security, Method of Controlling Information Processing Apparatus, and Recording Medium Recording Program for Controlling Information Processing Apparatus|
|US20110274273 *||Jul 11, 2011||Nov 10, 2011||Michael Stephen Fiske||Generation of registration codes, keys and passcodes using non-determinism|
|US20120105489 *||Oct 28, 2011||May 3, 2012||Marshall Monroe||Method and Apparatus for Organizing and Delivering Digital Media Content and Interactive Elements|
|US20130185788 *||Jan 18, 2012||Jul 18, 2013||Jean-Charles PICARD||Traversal of a soft bar to unlock an application|
|US20130340072 *||Jun 12, 2013||Dec 19, 2013||Yankey Information Co., Ltd.||Pattern password trajectory configuration system and method using the same|
|US20140007008 *||Jun 11, 2012||Jan 2, 2014||Jim S. Baca||Techniques for select-hold-release electronic device navigation menu system|
|US20150112872 *||Oct 23, 2013||Apr 23, 2015||Mastercard International Incorporated||System and method for guided passcode entry|
|US20150287035 *||Jun 8, 2015||Oct 8, 2015||Mastercard International Incorporated||System and method for guided passcode entry|
|U.S. Classification||713/184, 726/28|
|International Classification||H04L29/06, G06F1/00, G07C9/00, G06F21/62, G06F21/46, G06F21/36|
|Cooperative Classification||H04L63/083, G06F21/6209, H04L63/0428, G07C9/00142, G06F21/46, G06F21/36|
|European Classification||G07C9/00C2B, G06F21/46, G06F21/62A, G06F21/36, H04L63/08D|
|Oct 19, 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: F-SECURE OYJ, FINLAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HYPPONEN, ARI;REEL/FRAME:015943/0290
Effective date: 20040916
|Jul 30, 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4