|Publication number||US8141437 B2|
|Application number||US 11/393,098|
|Publication date||Mar 27, 2012|
|Filing date||Mar 29, 2006|
|Priority date||Mar 29, 2006|
|Also published as||US8656790, US9248030, US20070234819, US20120179069, US20140243840, WO2007126923A2, WO2007126923A3|
|Publication number||11393098, 393098, US 8141437 B2, US 8141437B2, US-B2-8141437, US8141437 B2, US8141437B2|
|Inventors||Farid Amirouche, Carlos G. Lopez Espina|
|Original Assignee||Ortho Sensing Technologies, Llc|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (33), Referenced by (42), Classifications (17), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application incorporates by reference applicant's co-pending applications U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/393,443, filed concurrently herewith and entitled “Application of Neural Networks to Prosthesis Fitting and Balancing in Joints,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/394,306, filed concurrently herewith and entitled “Device and Method of Spacer and Trial Design During Joint Arthroplasty.”
1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to a monitoring system, and more particularly to a system that monitors forces between bearing surfaces.
2. Related Art
Some medical conditions may result in the degeneration of a human joint, causing a patient to consider and ultimately undergo joint replacement surgery. The long-term success of the surgery oftentimes relies upon the skill of the surgeon and may involve a long, difficult recovery process.
The materials used in a joint replacement surgery are designed to enable the joint to move like a normal joint. Various prosthetic components may be used, including metals and/or plastic components. Several metals may be used, including stainless steel, alloys of cobalt and chrome, and titanium, while the plastic components may be constructed of a durable and wear resistant polyethylene. Plastic bone cement may be used to anchor the prosthesis into the bone, however, the prosthesis may be implanted without cement when the prosthesis and the bone are designed to fit and lock together directly.
To undergo the operation, the patient is given an anesthetic while the surgeon replaces the damaged parts of the joint. For example, in knee replacement surgery, the damaged ends of the bones (i.e., the femur and the tibia) and the cartilage are replaced with metal and plastic surfaces that are shaped to restore knee movement and function. In another example, to replace a hip joint, the damaged ball (i.e., the upper end of the femur) is replaced by a metal ball attached to a metal stem fitted into the femur, and a plastic socket is implanted into the pelvis to replace the damaged socket. Although hip and knee replacements are the most common, joint replacement can be performed on other joints, including the ankle, foot, shoulder, elbow, fingers and spine.
As with all major surgical procedures, complications may occur. Some of the most common complications include thrombophlebitis, infection, and stiffness and loosening of the prosthesis. While thrombophlebitis and infection may be treated medically, stiffness and loosening of the prosthesis may require additional surgeries. One technique utilized to reduce the likelihood of stiffness and loosening relies upon the skill of the physician to align and balance the replacement joint along with ligaments and soft tissue intraoperatively, i.e., during the joint replacement operation.
During surgery, a physician may choose to insert one or more temporary components. For example, a first component known as a “spacer block” is used to help determine whether additional bone removal is necessary or to determine the size of the “trial” component to be used. The trial component then may be inserted and used for balancing the collateral ligaments, and so forth. After the trial component is used, then a permanent component is inserted into the body. For example, during a total knee replacement procedure, a femoral or tibial spacer block and/or trial may be employed to assist with the selection of appropriate permanent femoral and/or tibial prosthetic components, e.g., referred to as a tibia insert.
While temporary components such as spacers and trials serve important purposes in gathering information prior to implantation of a permanent component, one drawback associated with temporary components is that a physician may need to “try out” different spacer or trial sizes and configurations for the purpose of finding the right size and thickness, and for balancing collateral ligaments and determining an appropriate permanent prosthetic fit, which will balance the soft tissues within the body. In particular, during the early stages of a procedure, a physician may insert and remove various spacer or trial components having different configurations and gather feedback, e.g., from the patient. Several rounds of spacer and/or trial implantation and feedback may be required before an optimal component configuration is determined. However, when relying on feedback from a sedated patient, the feedback may not be accurate since it is subjectively obtained under relatively poor conditions. Thus, after surgery, relatively fast degeneration of the permanent component may result.
Some previous techniques have relied on using sensors that are coupled to a temporary component to collect data. In some systems, the sensors are positioned underneath a portion of the monitoring device's surface that has been removed and replaced (e.g., a plug). In such systems, the integrity of the structure may be compromised as a result of plug. This may result in the monitoring device generating false and/or inaccurate measurements. Other systems require a physician to perform a number of different tests to obtain usable data.
Therefore, it would be desirable to obtain enhanced feedback during prosthesis fitting and balancing in joints without increasing the burden imposed upon the physician or the patient. Thus, there is a need for a force monitoring system that will provide enhanced feedback during prosthesis fitting and balancing.
A system monitors dynamic contact forces between bearing surfaces. Based on sensed data, the system may model the forces on the bearing surfaces, analyze these forces, store data relating to these forces, and/or transmit the raw or modeled data to an external data gathering device. The system includes a first body piece and a second body piece which mate together. The first and second body pieces comprise bearing surfaces that contact a material that may exert a force. A protrusion, such as a pole, post, or beam, extends relative to an inside surface of first body piece. At least one sensor is disposed on a pole. The at least one sensor detects a mechanical motion of the pole resulting from a force imposed on the first body piece and/or second body piece, and generates data indicative of the imposed force. A computer communicates with the at least one sensor and senses and/or models the imposed force or a change in the imposed force, analyzes this data, stores this data, and/or may transmit this data to an external data gathering device.
Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the invention will be, or will become, apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the following claims.
The discussion below may be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like referenced numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
When fit together, the external surfaces of first body piece and second body piece 104 and 106 may comprise the bearing surfaces of force monitoring system 100. As forces are applied to or removed from the bearing surfaces, a force representing the algebraic summation of one or more forces, may be transferred from the bearing surfaces to one or more of the poles. The transferred force may cause a measurable mechanical motion in one or more of the poles, such as a displacement and/or deformation. The mechanical motion may comprise rotational motion and/or compression and/or expansion in the longitudinal and/or latitudinal direction of the one or more poles. Monitoring circuitry 108 senses and/or models and/or analyzes the mechanical motion of the one or more poles. Data representative of the mechanical motion of the one or more poles may be used to determine whether modifications to the structure(s) exerting the sensed and/or modeled and/or analyzed dynamic contact force is required.
The sensed electrical signals generated by the one or more sensors 200 may be supplied to conditioning logic 202 through a signal medium, such as a flexible signal medium. The flexible signal medium may comprise a plurality of conductors affixed to or enclosed within a continuous bendable material, such as a flexible printed circuit. The flexible signal medium may overlay some or the entire inner surface of first body piece 104, and may move relative to the movement of first body piece 104 and/or second body piece 106. Alternatively, the sensed electrical signals may be supplied to control logic 202 through a discrete wired signal medium and/or a wireless signal medium.
The sensed electrical signals generated by the one or more sensors 200 may be conditioned by conditioning logic 202 to improve the manner in which the signal content is further processed by monitoring circuitry 108 and/or to improve the quality of the corresponding data content. Signal conditioning may include selecting two or more signals received from sensors 200 and combining the selected signals into a single channel (e.g., multiplexing the received signals one after another into a serial signal) and/or perform logic operations on all or a portion of the received signal (e.g., converting a voltage and/or current signal into data representing an amount of displacement/deformation, or passing the received signal through a Wheatstone bridge) and/or removing a continuous noise signal from the received electrical signal (e.g., filtering) and/or enlarging the waveform of the received intermediate signal or signals (e.g., amplification). The signal conditioning logic 202 may comprise hardware and/or software that is capable of running on one or more processors in conjunction with one or more operating systems.
Computer 204 may be configured to receive data, such as sensed electrical signals, directly from sensors 200 or to receive a conditioned signal. Computer 204 may comprise processor 206, memory (volatile or non-volatile) 208, and/or transceiver 210. Processor 206 may vary in size and performance depending on the tasks. Processor 206 may perform control operations by transmitting control signals to conditioning logic 202. Control operations may comprise determining which electrical signals are multiplexed, and/or altering an amount of noise attenuation, and/or varying an amplifier gain factor. The signals received at processor 206 may be stored in memory 208 without undergoing any additional processing by processor 206 (e.g., raw data).
Alternatively, processor 206 may perform in real-time or delayed time arithmetic and/or logic operations on the received signals to model the forces between the bearing surfaces. The modeled data may be used to determine the magnitude of a dynamic force exerted on different locations of enclosure 102 under different conditions, or to determine where on the enclosure a dynamic contact force is exerted. The modeled data may be stored in memory 208 via a bidirectional bus.
Transceiver 210 is configured to receive from processor 206 data, such as modeled data and/or sensed electrical signals, and forward the received data to a data gathering device 212. Data gathering device 212 may be a fixed device, such as a computer, or a mobile device, such as a handheld computer, personal digital assistant (“PDA”), and/or a mobile communications device. Prior to transmitting data, transceiver 210 may transmit a control message to data gathering device 212. The message may inform data gathering device 212 that data will be transmitted. Data gathering device 212 may then acknowledge its receipt of the control message by sending an acknowledgement message back. The acknowledgement message may inform transceiver 210 to begin transmitting data.
Transceiver 210 may comprise a port configured to receive a transmission wire and transmit/receiver data sequentially or simultaneously through multiple protocols. These protocols may include Extensible Markup Language (“XML”), Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (“HTTP”), Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (“TCP/IP”), as well as other public or proprietary protocols developed in house or by others. Transceiver 210 may additionally be coupled to an antenna and communicate with data gathering devices through wireless protocols. These protocols may include 802.11b, 802.11j, 802.11g, other 802 wireless protocols, Bluetooth®, Zigbee®, or other developing wireless protocols. Based on the modeled data, processor 206 may control the frequency with which transceiver 210 forwards data to a data gathering device.
Poles' 308 geometry relates to an applied strain, and related measurements, as the strain is dependent upon the cross-sectional area of poles 308. Poles' 308 geometry includes a plurality of grooves into which one or more sensors 310 may be disposed. The one or more sensors 310 may be disposed on the surface of poles 308 within the grooved portions. The distance from the base of corresponding pole may for example be about 3 mm. Placement of the one or more sensors 310 within the pole grooves may protect the one or more sensors 310 when first body piece and second body piece 304 and 306 are mated together. Additionally, when the body pieces are mated together, a space may exist between the non-grooved portion of pole 308 and a corresponding receiving recess to permit the first and/or second body pieces 304 and 306 to freely move. This space, for example, may be about 0.015 inches.
One or more sensors 310 may comprise a plurality of strain gages adapted to generate a voltage in response to dynamic contact forces transferred from the bearing surfaces to poles 308. Strain gauges are configured to measure an amount of deformation of a body due to an applied force. More specifically, strain gauges are configured to measure or detect a change of length in a body with respect to the original length of that body. Depending on the number of sensors 310 disposed on a pole 308 and the orientation of the sensors 310, a compression, extension, rotation, and/or bending of a pole 308 may be detected. Data detected or measured by sensors 310, representing a compression; extension; rotation; and/or bending of a pole 308, may be provided to conditioning logic 312 through signal medium 314. Signal medium 314 may generally conform to the shape of first body piece 304 but with a smaller length and width. Signal medium 314 may comprise a plurality of conductors affixed to a flexible continuous bendable material such as a flexible printed circuit. A plurality of holes or openings may be provided in signal medium 314 through which poles 308 may be received. Signal medium 314 may lie loosely on top of the inner surface of first body piece 304, its position being maintained by poles 308 and the remainder of the monitoring circuitry. Alternatively, the signal medium may be affixed to the inner surface of first body piece 304 in a few locations such as to permit signal medium to flex relative to the movement of first assembly 304 and/or second assembly 306.
Conditioning logic 312 may comprise hardware connected through a printed circuit board. Conditioning logic 312 may communicate with flexible signal medium 314. To allow for easy assembly and/or removal, a connector may couple conditioning logic 312 to flexible signal medium 314. For example, an OMRO 0.5-pitch Lock FPC Connector may be affixed to the printed circuit board and used to couple conditioning logic 312 to flexible signal medium 314.
Computer 316 may comprise battery 318. Battery 318 provides power to computer 316, conditioning logic 312, and/or sensors 310. In this embodiment, computer 316 transmits and receives data to/from conditioning logic 312 via a bidirectional bus. The transmission and receipt of data between computer 316 and conditioning logic 312 may occur sequentially or simultaneously.
To keep first body piece and second body piece 304 and 306 mated together each body piece may be configured to receive one or more fasteners along its outer rim. In
The orientation of the sensors along with the principles of beam theory may be utilized to collect data representing the mechanical motion of the one or more poles 308 when the first body piece and second body piece are force against one another.
The materials used in a knee joint replacement surgery are designed to enable the joint to mimic the behavior of a normal knee. Femoral component 1008 may comprise a metal piece that is shaped similar to the end of a femur, e.g., having condyles 1016. Condyles 1016 are disposed in close proximity to a bearing surface of force monitoring system enclosure 1014, and preferably fit closely into corresponding concave surfaces of enclosure 1014. In preferred embodiments, femoral and tibial components 1008 and 1010 comprise several metals, including stainless steel, alloys of cobalt and chrome, titanium, or another suitable material. Plastic bone cement may be used to anchor permanent prosthetic components into femur 1002 and tibia 1006. Alternatively, the prosthetic components may be implanted without cement when the prosthesis and bones are designed to fit and lock together directly, e.g., by employing a fine mesh of holes on the surface that allow the femur 1008 and tibia 1006 to grow into the mesh to secure the prosthetic components to the bone.
As shown, femoral component 1008 preferably resides in close proximity to an exterior surface of force monitoring system enclosure 1014. Contact between femoral component 1008 and the exterior surface of enclosure 1014 generates a force exerted on enclosure 1014. The exerted force is transferred to one or more poles 308 (internal to enclosure 1014) and results in a deformation of one or more of poles 308. One or more sensors 310 embedded within enclosure 1014 sense the deformation and generate a representative output signal.
To assure a good quality measurement, the generated electrical signal is preferably conditioned at act 1104. In an example, conditioning of the electrical signal comprises combining one or more signals from at least one of the sensors, substantially attenuating a noise signal, converting the received electrical signal into a data representative of an amount of displacement/deformation of the monitoring device's structure, and/or multiplying the representative data signal by a static or variable gain.
At act 1106 the conditioned signal is processed by a computer. Processing the data may include performing arithmetic and/or logic operations on the conditioned data to model the force imposed on the bearing surfaces of the monitoring device. The modeled data is preferably stored in memory. The memory may be internal or external to the processing computer. The processing computer accesses the data stored in the memory to perform a statistical analysis.
The data modeled by the computer, the data representing the statistical analysis, and/or the conditioned data prior to any processing at act 1106 (e.g., raw data) may be transmitted at act 1108. The data may be transmitted to a data gathering device through a wired or wireless medium.
Some or all of the method of
A “computer-readable medium,” “machine-readable medium,” “propagated-signal medium,” and/or “signal-bearing medium” comprise any means that contains, stores, communicated, propagated, or transports software for use by or in connection with an instruction executable system, apparatus, or device. The machine-readable medium may selectively be, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, device, or propagation medium. A non-exhaustive list of examples of a machine-readable medium would include: an electrical connections (e.g., electronic) having one or more wires, a portable magnetic or optical disk, a volatile memory such as a Random Access Memory “RAM” (electronic), a Read-Only Memory “ROM” (electronic), an Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EPROM or Flash Memory) (electronic), or an optical fiber (optical). A machine-readable medium may also include a tangible medium upon which software is printed, as the software may be electronically stored as an image or in another format (e.g., through an optical scan), then compiled, and/or interpreted or otherwise processed. The processed medium may then be stored in a computer and/or machine memory.
In some force monitoring systems, computer 316 may comprise a MICA2DOT system that further comprises an ATMEGA128 microcontroller, a Chipcon CC1000 radio, a Panasonic ERT-J1VR103J thermistor, and Flash Memory AT45DB041 memory. The MICA2DOT system may be programmed to operate with a TINY operating system. Other force monitoring systems may use alternative shapes for poles 308, such as cylinders, hexagons, rectangles, or other polygons. The force monitoring system of the present disclosure may be manufactured according to different size specifications. In
As an alternative to the force monitoring system disclosed above, some force monitoring systems may include a fully integrated structure. In these systems, the enclosure containing measurement posts and monitoring circuitry may be formed in layers, such as by injection molding. As the enclosure is being formed (molded), the monitoring circuitry may be inserted and sealed within the enclosure.
While various embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3826145 *||Mar 1, 1973||Jul 30, 1974||Mc Farland K||Electrical ataxiameter|
|US4094192 *||Sep 20, 1976||Jun 13, 1978||The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.||Method and apparatus for six degree of freedom force sensing|
|US4501266||Mar 4, 1983||Feb 26, 1985||Biomet, Inc.||Knee distraction device|
|US4573362 *||Jul 9, 1984||Mar 4, 1986||Eaton Corporation||Multi-axis load transducer|
|US5197488 *||Apr 5, 1991||Mar 30, 1993||N. K. Biotechnical Engineering Co.||Knee joint load measuring instrument and joint prosthesis|
|US5360016 *||Mar 22, 1993||Nov 1, 1994||N. K. Biotechnical Engineering Company||Force transducer for a joint prosthesis|
|US5470354||Aug 10, 1994||Nov 28, 1995||Biomet Inc.||Force sensing apparatus and method for orthopaedic joint reconstruction|
|US5533519||May 9, 1995||Jul 9, 1996||Radke; John C.||Method and apparatus for diagnosing joints|
|US5733292 *||Sep 15, 1995||Mar 31, 1998||Midwest Orthopaedic Research Foundation||Arthroplasty trial prosthesis alignment devices and associated methods|
|US5813406 *||May 3, 1995||Sep 29, 1998||The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University||Strain-sensing goniometers, systems and recognition algorithms|
|US5850044 *||Oct 30, 1997||Dec 15, 1998||Sandia National Laboratories||Load cell|
|US6213958||Oct 7, 1998||Apr 10, 2001||Alan A. Winder||Method and apparatus for the acoustic emission monitoring detection, localization, and classification of metabolic bone disease|
|US6354155 *||Jun 2, 1999||Mar 12, 2002||Bertec Corporation||Multi-component force and moment measuring platform and load transducer|
|US6362768 *||Jan 12, 2000||Mar 26, 2002||Honeywell International Inc.||Architecture for an input and output device capable of handling various signal characteristics|
|US6447448||Dec 30, 1999||Sep 10, 2002||Ball Semiconductor, Inc.||Miniature implanted orthopedic sensors|
|US6758850||Mar 29, 2002||Jul 6, 2004||Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc.||Instruments and methods for flexion gap adjustment|
|US6821299 *||Mar 21, 2003||Nov 23, 2004||Zimmer Technology, Inc.||Implantable prosthesis for measuring six force components|
|US7097662 *||Aug 25, 2004||Aug 29, 2006||Ut-Battelle, Llc||In-vivo orthopedic implant diagnostic device for sensing load, wear, and infection|
|US7179295 *||Dec 2, 2004||Feb 20, 2007||Nebojsa Kovacevic||Prosthetic shock absorber|
|US7188535 *||Jun 13, 2005||Mar 13, 2007||Sandia Corporation||Load cell having strain gauges of arbitrary location|
|US7195645 *||Jul 9, 2004||Mar 27, 2007||Depuy Products, Inc.||In vivo joint space measurement device and method|
|US7381223 *||Dec 13, 2005||Jun 3, 2008||Nebojsa Kovacevic||Dual-tray prosthesis|
|US7470288 *||Mar 31, 2004||Dec 30, 2008||Depuy Products, Inc.||Telemetric tibial tray|
|US20040019382||Mar 19, 2003||Jan 29, 2004||Farid Amirouche||System and method for prosthetic fitting and balancing in joints|
|US20040064073||Sep 22, 2003||Apr 1, 2004||Heldreth Mark A.||Modified system and method for intraoperative tension assessment during joint arthroplasty|
|US20050049603||Jul 11, 2003||Mar 3, 2005||Ortho Development Corporation||Knee balancing block|
|US20050113932||Dec 2, 2004||May 26, 2005||Nebojsa Kovacevic||Prosthetic shock absorber|
|US20050267485||Jun 9, 2005||Dec 1, 2005||Synvasive Technology, Inc.||Dynamic knee balancer with opposing adjustment mechanism|
|US20060009856 *||Jun 29, 2004||Jan 12, 2006||Sherman Jason T||System and method for bidirectional communication with an implantable medical device using an implant component as an antenna|
|US20060062442||Sep 16, 2005||Mar 23, 2006||Imaging Therapeutics, Inc.||System and method of predicting future fractures|
|US20080306413 *||Aug 19, 2008||Dec 11, 2008||Denis Crottet||Device for Measuring Tibio-Femoral Force Amplitudes and Force Locations in Total Knee Arthroplasty|
|US20090005876 *||Jun 29, 2007||Jan 1, 2009||Dietz Terry L||Tibial tray assembly having a wireless communication device|
|WO2005122968A2||Jun 8, 2005||Dec 29, 2005||Theken Disc||Prosthetic intervertebral spinal disc with integral microprocessor|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8603101||Apr 15, 2011||Dec 10, 2013||Zimmer, Inc.||Provisional tibial prosthesis system|
|US8945231 *||Mar 23, 2011||Feb 3, 2015||Depuy (Ireland)||Composite trial prosthesis|
|US8968412||Jun 22, 2012||Mar 3, 2015||Depuy (Ireland)||Trialing system for a knee prosthesis and method of use|
|US9011459||Oct 25, 2013||Apr 21, 2015||Zimmer, Inc.||Provisional tibial prosthesis system|
|US9149206||Mar 15, 2013||Oct 6, 2015||Zimmer, Inc.||Tibial prosthesis systems, kits, and methods|
|US9161717||Sep 23, 2011||Oct 20, 2015||Orthosensor Inc.||Orthopedic insert measuring system having a sealed cavity|
|US9226694||Mar 5, 2014||Jan 5, 2016||Orthosensor Inc||Small form factor medical sensor structure and method therefor|
|US9248030 *||Feb 21, 2014||Feb 2, 2016||Orthos Sensing Technologies||Device and method of spacer and trial design during joint arthroplasty|
|US9259172||Sep 13, 2013||Feb 16, 2016||Orthosensor Inc.||Method of providing feedback to an orthopedic alignment system|
|US9259179||Jun 3, 2014||Feb 16, 2016||Orthosensor Inc.||Prosthetic knee joint measurement system including energy harvesting and method therefor|
|US9265447||Sep 13, 2013||Feb 23, 2016||Orthosensor Inc.||System for surgical information and feedback display|
|US9271675||Jun 3, 2014||Mar 1, 2016||Orthosensor Inc.||Muscular-skeletal joint stability detection and method therefor|
|US9289163||Mar 10, 2014||Mar 22, 2016||Orthosensor Inc.||Prosthetic component for monitoring synovial fluid and method|
|US9339212||Sep 13, 2013||May 17, 2016||Orthosensor Inc||Bone cutting system for alignment relative to a mechanical axis|
|US9345449||Mar 11, 2014||May 24, 2016||Orthosensor Inc||Prosthetic component for monitoring joint health|
|US9345492||Mar 6, 2014||May 24, 2016||Orthosensor Inc.||Shielded capacitor sensor system for medical applications and method|
|US9357964||Dec 26, 2013||Jun 7, 2016||Orthosensor Inc.||Hermetically sealed prosthetic component and method therefor|
|US9358136||Mar 24, 2014||Jun 7, 2016||Orthosensor Inc.||Shielded capacitor sensor system for medical applications and method|
|US9402583||Feb 4, 2014||Aug 2, 2016||Orthosensor Inc.||Orthopedic screw for measuring a parameter of the muscular-skeletal system|
|US9408557||Sep 13, 2013||Aug 9, 2016||Orthosensor Inc.||System and method to change a contact point of the muscular-skeletal system|
|US9414940||Sep 23, 2011||Aug 16, 2016||Orthosensor Inc.||Sensored head for a measurement tool for the muscular-skeletal system|
|US9427337||Mar 17, 2015||Aug 30, 2016||Zimmer, Inc.||Provisional tibial prosthesis system|
|US9456769||Sep 13, 2013||Oct 4, 2016||Orthosensor Inc.||Method to measure medial-lateral offset relative to a mechanical axis|
|US9462964 *||Sep 23, 2011||Oct 11, 2016||Orthosensor Inc||Small form factor muscular-skeletal parameter measurement system|
|US9492115||Feb 17, 2014||Nov 15, 2016||Orthosensor Inc.||Sensored prosthetic component and method|
|US9492116||Dec 8, 2015||Nov 15, 2016||Orthosensor Inc.||Prosthetic knee joint measurement system including energy harvesting and method therefor|
|US9492238||Sep 13, 2013||Nov 15, 2016||Orthosensor Inc||System and method for measuring muscular-skeletal alignment to a mechanical axis|
|US9492290||Mar 15, 2013||Nov 15, 2016||Zimmer, Inc.||Tibial prosthesis systems, kits, and methods|
|US9539116||Dec 12, 2011||Jan 10, 2017||Zimmer, Inc.||User interface related to a surgical provisional|
|US9566020||Sep 13, 2013||Feb 14, 2017||Orthosensor Inc||System and method for assessing, measuring, and correcting an anterior-posterior bone cut|
|US9592133||Sep 23, 2013||Mar 14, 2017||Zimmer, Inc.||Spacer block|
|US9597090||Jun 13, 2014||Mar 21, 2017||Zimmer, Inc.||Cut guide attachment for use in tibial prosthesis systems|
|US9615887||Sep 13, 2013||Apr 11, 2017||Orthosensor Inc.||Bone cutting system for the leg and method therefor|
|US9622701||Feb 5, 2016||Apr 18, 2017||Orthosensor Inc||Muscular-skeletal joint stability detection and method therefor|
|US9638654||Nov 12, 2014||May 2, 2017||Oil States Industries, Inc.||Method and system for health monitoring of composite elastomeric flexible elements|
|US9642676||Sep 13, 2013||May 9, 2017||Orthosensor Inc||System and method for measuring slope or tilt of a bone cut on the muscular-skeletal system|
|US20100331682 *||Jun 29, 2010||Dec 30, 2010||Orthosensor||Device and method for advanced low-power management of a sensor to measure a parameter of the muscular-skeletal system|
|US20130079669 *||Sep 23, 2011||Mar 28, 2013||Orthosensor||Small form factor muscular-skeletal parameter measurement system|
|US20130079675 *||Sep 23, 2011||Mar 28, 2013||Orthosensor||Insert measuring system having an internal sensor assembly|
|US20130103160 *||Mar 23, 2011||Apr 25, 2013||Depuy (Ireland)||Composite trial prosthesis|
|US20130226034 *||Sep 28, 2012||Aug 29, 2013||Orthosensor Inc.||Measurement device for the muscular-skeletal system having load distribution plates|
|US20140243840 *||Feb 21, 2014||Aug 28, 2014||Farid Amirouche||Device and method of spacer and trial design during joint arthroplasty|
|U.S. Classification||73/862.041, 73/862.044, 73/862.043, 73/862.042|
|International Classification||G01L1/22, G01D7/00|
|Cooperative Classification||A61F2/389, A61F2002/30668, G01L1/2225, G01L5/0019, A61F2/4684, A61F2002/4666, A61F2/4657|
|European Classification||G01L1/22B7B, A61F2/38T, A61F2/46M, G01L5/00C4|
|Jun 27, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ORTHO SENSING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ILLINOIS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AMIROUCHE, FARID;LOPEZ ESPINA, CARLOS G.;REEL/FRAME:017972/0557
Effective date: 20060623
|Nov 6, 2015||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Mar 23, 2016||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Mar 23, 2016||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|