Publication number | US8175900 B2 |

Publication type | Grant |

Application number | US 12/395,941 |

Publication date | May 8, 2012 |

Filing date | Mar 2, 2009 |

Priority date | Mar 2, 2009 |

Fee status | Paid |

Also published as | US20100223077 |

Publication number | 12395941, 395941, US 8175900 B2, US 8175900B2, US-B2-8175900, US8175900 B2, US8175900B2 |

Inventors | Robert G. Danielsen |

Original Assignee | The Trustee and Successor Trustees of RGD 2006 Trust |

Export Citation | BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan |

Patent Citations (74), Non-Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (9), Classifications (16), Legal Events (2) | |

External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet | |

US 8175900 B2

Abstract

The present disclosure includes devices, methods, and systems for determining the strategic value of a life insurance strategy at a future point in time. One device embodiment can include a processor, a memory coupled to the processor, and program instructions stored in the memory and executable by the processor to perform a statistical sampling method to determine a strategic value of a life insurance strategy at a number of particular future points in time using a death benefit value of a life insurance policy, a cash surrender value of the policy, a mortality probability for an insured subject of the policy, and a projected investment return on a reinvestment of the death benefit value, at each of the number of particular future points in time.

Claims(14)

1. A computing device, comprising:

a processor;

a memory coupled to the processor; and

program instructions stored in the memory and executable by the processor to perform a statistical sampling method to calculate a strategic value of a life insurance strategy at a number of particular future points in time over a number of iterations, wherein the processor utilizes:

a death benefit value of a life insurance policy;

a cash surrender value of the policy;

a mortality probability for an insured subject of the policy that simulates mortality outcomes of the insured subject;

a projected investment return on a reinvestment of the death benefit value;

at each of the number of particular future points in time according to the number of iterations;

wherein the program instructions are executable to calculate a numerical index value, based on a ratio of a discounted present value of an amount paid to the policy and a discounted present value of the calculated strategic value for the life insurance strategy; and

wherein the program instructions execute to present the numerical index value of a life insurance policy via a user interface.

2. The device of claim 1 , wherein the projected investment return is based on a previous projected mortality event.

3. The device of claim 1 , wherein the statistical sampling method is a Monte Carlo method.

4. A computing device, comprising:

a processor;

a memory coupled to the processor;

a number of cash surrender values and death benefit values of a life insurance policy stored in the memory, wherein each cash surrender value and death benefit value is associated with a future year; and

program instructions stored in the memory and executable by the processor to perform a statistical sampling method to calculate a number of strategic values of a life insurance strategy at a particular future year over a number of iterations, wherein the processor utilizes:

a death benefit value;

a cash surrender value;

a mortality probability for an insured subject of the policy that simulates mortality outcomes of the insured subject; and

a projected investment return on a reinvestment of the death benefit value based on a previous projected mortality event;

at the particular future year according to the number of iterations;

wherein the program instructions are executable to calculate a numerical index value, based on a ratio of a discounted present value of an amount paid to the policy and a discounted present value of the strategic value for the life insurance strategy; and

wherein the program instructions execute to present the strategic value of a life insurance policy via a user interface.

5. The device of claim 4 , wherein the number of cash surrender values and death benefit values are provided by an insurance carrier associated with the policy.

6. The device of claim 4 , wherein the number of strategic values of the life insurance strategy at the particular future year represent a number of probable amounts of cash accessible from the strategy at the particular future year.

7. The device of claim 4 , wherein the program instructions are executable to determine a number of numerical index values for the strategy at the particular future year using the strategic values and an amount of money paid into the policy up to the particular future year.

8. A computer readable medium having instructions stored in a memory and executable by a processor to cause a device to perform a statistical sampling method, comprising:

performing a statistical sampling method to calculate a strategic value of a life insurance strategy at a number of future points in time over a number of iterations, wherein the processor utilizes:

a death benefit value of a life insurance policy;

a cash surrender value of the policy;

a mortality probability for an insured subject of the policy that simulates mortality outcomes of the insured subject; and

a projected investment return on a reinvestment of the death benefit value at each of the number of future points in time according to the number of iterations;

calculating a numerical index value for the strategy at each of the number of future points in time using the strategic values and amounts paid into the policy up to each of the number of future points in time; and

presenting the strategic values and numerical index values to a consumer via a user interface.

9. The medium of claim 8 , wherein each strategic value represents a probable amount of cash accessible from the strategy at a particular future point in time.

10. The medium of claim 8 , wherein calculating the numerical index value at a particular future point in time includes dividing a discounted present value of the strategic value at the particular future point in time by a discounted present value of an amount of money paid into the policy up to the particular future point in time.

11. The medium of claim 8 , wherein presenting the strategic values and numerical index values to a consumer includes arranging the strategic values and numerical index values in a table.

12. The medium of claim 11 , wherein the table includes a number of rows and a number of columns, wherein:

each row corresponds to one of the number of future points in time; and

a number of columns correspond to a strategic value or a numerical index value associated with a particular percentile ranking.

13. A computer statistical sampling method for calculating a strategic value of a life insurance strategy at a number of particular future points in time by performing a number of iterations, wherein the sampling method comprises:

Using a computer processor to execute instructions, stored in a memory, to perform the steps of:

determining a death benefit value of a number of life insurance policies;

determining a cash surrender value of the number of life insurance policies;

utilizing a mortality probability for an insured subject of the policy that simulates mortality outcomes of the insured subject;

calculating a projected investment return on a reinvestment of the death benefit value;

at each of the number of particular future points in time according to the number of iterations;

calculating a numerical index value, based on a ratio of a discounted present value of an amount paid to the number of life insurance policies and a discounted present value of the strategic value, for the insurance strategy; and

presenting the numerical index value of a life insurance policy via a user interface.

14. The computer statistical sampling method of claim 13 , wherein calculating the projected investment return includes:

calculating a hypothetical investment return rate based on a number of current investment return rates; and

multiplying the death benefit value by (1 +the hypothetical investment return rate).

Description

The present disclosure relates generally to life insurance, and more particularly, to devices, methods, and systems for determining life insurance strategic value.

Life insurance, e.g., a life insurance policy, is a contract between an insurer and an insured subject, wherein the insurer agrees to pay a sum of money to a third party upon the occurrence of the insured subject's death. In return, the insured subject agrees to pay the insurance company a stipulated amount. The insurer may be an insurance company, and the insured subject may be an individual person. The third party may be referred to as a beneficiary, and may be an individual person. The sum of money paid by the insurer may be referred to as a death benefit, and may be paid as a lump sum or at particular intervals. The stipulated amount paid by the insured subject may be referred to as a premium, and may be paid at a particular interval or as a lump sum. A premium paid at a particular interval may remain constant, or may change, e.g., increase, over time.

A beneficiary who receives a death benefit in accordance with a life insurance policy may use the death benefit in a number of ways. For example, the beneficiary may choose to invest the death benefit in a number of investment vehicles, such as stocks, bonds, mutual funds, real estate, and/or commodities, among other investment vehicles.

A life insurance policy may have a cash surrender value associated therewith. A cash surrender value is the amount of money the insured subject receives from the insurer if the insured subject elects to terminate the policy before the insured subject dies. The cash surrender value of a life insurance policy may depend on the amount of the insured subject's premium payments, any crediting to the cash surrender value by the insurance company that may be in the form of interest, dividends, or other credits, and the costs of the policy, all of which may cause the cash surrender value to vary over time. For example, if an insured subject makes premium payments at a particular interval, and the premiums, together with any crediting to the policy, exceed the current costs of the policy, the cash surrender value of the life insurance policy may increase over time. A cash surrender value may be subject to taxation, and may be subject to charges by the insurance company, such as a surrender charge, for example.

A life insurance strategy which includes a life insurance policy may yield a long-term, future strategic value. Such a strategic value may be based on a complex, and often not express, relationship among mortality probabilities, product performance, and investment returns on reinvested death benefits, and may be subject to the uncertainties of mortality projections and economic markets. For example, because it is uncertain when an insured subject will die, the insured subject and/or beneficiary do not know whether, at any given point in the future, the amount of cash accessible from the strategy will be the cash surrender value, the death benefit value, or the death benefit value reinvested from the date of payment. Hence, a strategic value of a life insurance strategy can be difficult to predict.

A life insurance policy strategy having a cash surrender value associated therewith may be illustrated in ledger form, which can include the projected future cash surrender values and the death benefit value. However, the cash surrender values and death benefit value are expressed separately in the ledger, with no evaluation of the probability of which feature of the strategy is likely to represent an amount of the accessible cash at any future point in time. Hence, the ledger does not provide an indication of the strategic value of the strategy at a given future point in time.

The present disclosure includes devices, methods, and systems for determining the strategic value of a life insurance strategy at a future point in time. One device embodiment can include a processor, a memory coupled to the processor, and program instructions stored in the memory and executable by the processor to perform a statistical sampling method to determine a strategic value of a life insurance strategy at a number of particular future points in time using a death benefit value of a life insurance policy, a cash surrender value of the policy, a mortality probability for an insured subject of the policy, and a projected investment return on a reinvestment of the death benefit value, at each of the number of particular future points in time.

In the following detailed description of the present disclosure, reference is made to the accompanying figures that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration how a number of embodiments of the disclosure may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those of ordinary skill in the art to practice the embodiments of this disclosure, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that process, electrical, and/or structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.

As will be appreciated, elements shown in the various embodiments herein can be added, exchanged, and/or eliminated so as to provide a number of additional embodiments of the present disclosure. In addition, as will be appreciated, the proportion and the relative scale of the elements provided in the figures are intended to illustrate the embodiments of the present disclosure, and should not be taken in a limiting sense.

As used herein, “a number of” something can refer to one or more such things. For example, a number of cash surrender values can refer to one or more cash surrender values.

**100** in accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure. The description of

One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that a number of embodiments of the present disclosure can be practiced with computing devices and systems other than the devices and system shown in

In the embodiment shown in **100** includes computing device **102**. Computing device **102** can be, for example, a personal computer (PC) such as a desktop PC, a server, a laptop, a workstation, etc. However, embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited to a particular type of computing device. Computing device **102** includes processor **121** and memory **122**. Processor **121** can include a single central-processing unit (CPU) and/or a plurality of processing units in a parallel processing environment. Memory **122** can include read only memory (ROM), e.g., ROM **124**, and random access memory (RAM), e.g., RAM **125**. However, embodiments of the present disclosure are not so limited, and can include, for example, dynamic random access memory (DRAM), synchronous dynamic random access memory (SDRAM), flash memory, electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM), erasable programmable ROM (EPROM), and phase change random access memory (PCRAM), among other types of memory.

Computing device **102** also includes bus **123** that couples components of computing device **102**, including processor **121** and memory **122**. Bus **123** can be, for example, a memory bus, e.g., memory controller, a peripheral bus, and/or a local bus, and can use a number of bus architectures.

In a number of embodiments, memory **122** can store a number of cash surrender values and death benefit values of a life insurance policy. Each cash surrender value and/or death benefit value can be associated with a future point in time. For example, a first cash surrender value can be associated with a first future year, a second cash surrender value can be associated with a second future year, etc. The cash surrender values and/or death benefit values can be provided by an insurance carrier, e.g., insurance company, associated with the life insurance policy. The cash surrender values can be after-tax cash surrender values, e.g., the cash surrender value after accounting for any taxes applicable to the cash surrender value. For example, an after-tax cash surrender value can be determined by subtracting from the cash surrender value a basis in the policy at the point in time associated with the cash surrender value, multiplying the remainder by an assumed ordinary income tax rate, and subtracting this result from the cash surrender value.

In a number of embodiments, memory **122** can store program instructions executable by processor **121**. The program instructions can include instructions to perform a statistical sampling method to determine a number of strategic values of a life insurance strategy which includes a life insurance policy at a particular future point in time using a death benefit value of the life insurance policy at the particular future point in time, e.g., the death benefit value stored in memory **122** that is associated with the particular future point in time, a cash surrender value of the policy at the particular future point in time, e.g., the cash surrender value stored in memory **122** that is associated with the particular future point in time, a mortality probability for an insured subject of the policy for the particular future point in time, and a projected investment return on a reinvestment of the death benefit value at the particular future point in time. The particular future point in time can be, for example, a particular future year, a particular future month, a particular future day, etc.

A strategic value can represent a probable amount of cash accessible from the strategy utilizing the underlying policy, e.g., an amount of cash available to the insured subject and/or the beneficiary of the policy, at the particular future point in time. The strategic value can be based on probabilities associated with the economic performance of the strategy, the mortality of the insured subject, and/or a return on a reinvestment of a death benefit, as will be described further herein.

For example, the statistical sampling method can include using the mortality probability for the insured subject to determine whether the insured subject is projected to die before, during, or after a particular future point in time. For ease of reference, the particular future point in time will be referred to as a particular future year. If the insured subject is projected to die after the particular future year, the statistical sampling method can use the cash surrender value associated with the particular future year as an interim strategic value of the strategy at the particular future year. If the insured subject is projected to die during the particular future year, the statistical sampling method can use the death benefit value as the interim strategic value of the strategy at the particular future year. If the insured subject is projected to die before the particular future year, the statistical sampling method can determine a projected investment return on a reinvestment of the previously-received death benefit value at the particular point in time, and can use the projected investment return as the interim strategic value of the strategy at the particular future year. This process can then be repeated through a number of iterations, e.g., the statistical sampling method can include repeating this process a number of times to determine a number of interim strategic values of the strategy at the particular future year. The statistical sampling method can then use, e.g., perform a number of statistical analyses on, the number of interim strategic values to determine a number of strategic values of the life insurance strategy at the particular future year. This process can then be repeated for a number of future years.

Each iteration can return a different interim strategic value. That is, a first number of iterations will use the cash surrender value as the interim strategic value, a second number of iterations will use the death benefit value as the interim strategic value, and a third number of iterations will use a projected investment return on a reinvestment of the death benefit value as the interim strategic value. The number of iterations which use the cash surrender value, death benefit value, and projected investment return as the interim strategic value can depend on the mortality probability. For example, if the particular future year is year ten, if the mortality probability indicates the insured subject has an 91% chance of dying after year ten, a 2% chance of dying during year ten, a 7% chance of dying prior to year ten, and if the statistical sampling method includes 10,000 iterations, the statistical sampling method will use the cash surrender value of the policy associated with year ten as the interim strategic value of the strategy at year ten approximately 9,100 times, the death benefit value of the policy as the interim strategic value approximately 200 times, and the death benefit value for the year of death sometime prior to year ten in the iteration plus a projected investment return on a reinvestment of the death benefit value from the year of death as the interim strategic value approximately 700 times. In the iterations in which the statistical sampling method projects the insured subject to die during years one to nine, the projected investment return on the reinvestment of the death benefit value can vary depending on which year the iteration projects the insured subject to die, e.g., depending on whether the death benefit payment will be paid in year one, year two, year three, year four, year five, year six, year seven, year eight, or year nine, as will be further described herein.

A statistical sampling method can include a statistical, mathematical, or computational algorithm, calculation, program, formula, equation, model, or method which can use a number of variables, quantities, or probabilities to determine, calculate, predict, or simulate a value, quantity, or result through a number of iterations. For example, a statistical sampling method can include a Monte Carlo method, an orthogonal sampling method, a Latin Hypercube sampling method, a Poisson sampling method, or a Cluster sampling method, among others.

A mortality probability, e.g., probability of death, for an insured subject for a particular future point in time can be determined by using, e.g., mathematically sampling, a mortality probability distribution. The mortality probability distribution can be based on an actuarial likelihood of whether the insured subject will die at the particular future point in time. The actuarial likelihood of death can be based on a number of statuses of the insured subject, including the age of the insured subject, the gender of the insured subject, and/or the underwriting status of the insured subject, and/or can be based on mortality tables developed by an insurance company, e.g., the insurance company associated with the life insurance policy, or general published mortality tables, e.g., the Commissioners Standard Ordinary tables. The underwriting status of the insured subject can be based on the presence or absence of a number of risk factors associated with the insured subject that the insurance company may consider in determining the amount and/or cost of the life insurance coverage it may provide to the insured subject.

A projected investment return on a reinvestment of the death benefit value at the particular future point in time can be based on a previous projected mortality event. For example, the projected investment return on the reinvestment of the death benefit value at the particular future point in time can be based on a hypothetical investment of the death benefit value made at the time of the previous projected mortality event and continued through the particular future point in time. That is, if an iteration of the statistical sampling method determines that the insured subject will die five years before the particular future point in time, the projected investment return at the particular future point in time can be based on a hypothetical investment of the death benefit value made five years before the particular future point in time and continued through the particular future point in time.

A projected investment return on a reinvestment of the death benefit value can be determined using a hypothetical investment return rate. The hypothetical investment return rate can be based on a number of current investment rates in a number of investment vehicles, such as stocks, bonds, mutual funds, real estate and/or commodities, among other investment vehicles. For example, a hypothetical investment return rate can be determined by using, e.g., statistically sampling, an investment return rate probability distribution that is based on a number of hypothetical returns on a number of hypothetical investments, wherein the number of hypothetical returns are based on current investment returns in a number of investment vehicles. An investment return can then be determined by multiplying the death benefit value by (1+the hypothetical investment return rate).

In a number of embodiments, memory **122** can store a number of amounts of money paid into the life insurance policy. An amount of money paid into the policy can be the amount of money paid by the insured subject to the insurance company, e.g., the amount of the premium(s) paid by the insured subject. Each amount of money paid can be associated with a future point in time, e.g., each amount of money paid can be the amount of money paid by the insured subject up to a future point in time. For example, a first amount of money paid can be associated with a first future year, a second amount of money paid can be associated with a second future year, etc. The number of amounts of money paid can be provided by an insurance carrier, e.g., insurance company, associated with the life insurance policy.

In a number of embodiments, the program instructions stored in memory **122** can include instructions to determine a number of numerical index values for the life insurance strategy at particular future points in time. The numerical index value at a particular future point in time can be determined using the strategic value of the life insurance strategy at the particular future point in time and the amount of money, e.g., premiums, paid into the life insurance policy up to the particular future point in time. For example, the numerical index value at a particular future point in time can be determined by dividing the discounted present value of the strategic value at the particular future point in time by the sum of the discounted present values of the amount of money paid into the life insurance policy up to the particular future point in time. The discounted present value of the strategic value at a particular future point in time and the amount of money paid up to the particular future point in time can be determined by multiplying the strategic value and the amount of money paid, respectively, by a factor equal to one minus the selected discount rate expressed decimally, and repeating this step for the resulting amount for each year since the inception of the policy. The numerical index values can provide a comparison of the economic leverage of the premiums to the strategic value in cases where the compared policies do not have identical premiums or timing of premiums.

In a number of embodiments, the program instructions stored in memory **122** can include instructions to arrange the strategic values of the life insurance strategy for a particular future point in time in an order of strategic value, such as from greatest strategic Value to least strategic value, and the numerical index values in an order of numerical index values, such as from greatest numerical index value to least numerical index value. In a number of embodiments, the program instructions stored in memory **122** can include instructions to determine a percentile ranking of each strategic value and/or numerical index value, a maximum strategic value and/or numerical index value, a minimum strategic value and/or numerical index value, a mean strategic value and/or numerical index value, a median strategic value and/or numerical index value, and/or a mode strategic value and/or numerical index value.

As shown in **122** includes ROM **124** and RAM **125**. ROM **124** can include, e.g., store, a basic input/output system (BIOS) **126**. BIOS **126** can include basic routines, e.g., instructions, that assist the transfer of information between the components of computing device **102**. For example, BIOS **126** can include instructions that assist in the transfer of information between the components of computing device **102** during a start-up operation of computing device **102**.

In the embodiment illustrated in **102** includes hard disk drive **127**, magnetic disk drive **128**, and optical disk drive **130**. Hard disk drive **127** can read from and/or write to a hard disk (not shown in **128** can read from and/or write to a removable magnetic disk, e.g., magnetic disk **129**. Optical disk drive **130** can read from and/or write to a removable optical disk, e.g., optical disk **131**. Optical disk **131** can be, for example, a CD ROM, among other optical media. Hard disk drive **127**, magnetic disk drive **128**, and optical disk drive **130** are coupled with hard disk drive interface **132**, magnetic disk drive interface **133**, and optical disk drive interface **134**, respectively.

Disk drives **127**, **128**, and **130**, and their associated disks, can provide non-volatile storage of computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, and other data for computing device **102**. For example, disk drives **127**, **128**, and **130**, and their associated disks, can provide program instructions in accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure.

One of skill in the art will appreciate that computing system **100** is not limited to disk drives **127**, **128**, and **130**, and their associated disks. Rather, computing system **100** can include any type of drive and associated computer-readable media which can store data, e.g., program instructions in accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure, accessible by computing device **102**. For example, computing system **100** can include a flash drive and associated flash memory card or a solid state drive and associated solid state device.

In a number of embodiments, ROM **124**, RAM **125**, the hard disk associated with hard disk drive **127**, magnetic disk **129**, and/or optical disk **131** can include a number of program modules, such as operating system **135**, application programs **136**, other program modules **137**, and program data **138**. The number of program modules can include program instructions in accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure.

A user of computing device **102** can enter commands, e.g., commands to execute program instructions in accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure, or information, e.g., information associated with or related to a number of embodiments of the present disclosure, into computing device **102** through input devices, such as keyboard **140** and mouse **142**. However, as will be understood by one of skill in the art, computing system **100** is not limited to keyboard **140** and mouse **142**, and can include other types of input devices, such as a microphone, joystick, or game pad. In the embodiment shown in **140** and mouse **142**, are coupled to processor **121** through serial port interface **146** and bus **123**. However, as will be understood by one of skill in the art, the input devices can be coupled to processor **121** through other interfaces, such as a parallel port, game port, or universal serial bus (USB).

As shown in **100** can include a display device, e.g., monitor **147**. The display device can display strategic values of a life insurance strategy and/or numerical index values of a life insurance strategy determined in accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure. As will be appreciated by one of skill in the art, computing system **100** is not limited to monitor **147**, and can include other types of display devices. Monitor **147** can be coupled to processor **121** through an interface, e.g., video adapter **148**, and bus **123**. Monitor **147** can include a graphical user interface (GUI). Additionally, computing system **100** can include a number of peripheral devices, such as printers, facsimile devices, scanners, etc. (not shown in **102**, e.g., to processor **121**.

Computing device **102** can operate in a networked environment using logical connections to a number of remote computing devices, such as remote computing device **149**. Remote computing device **149** can be, for example, a PC such as a desktop or network PC, a server, a laptop, a workstation, a router, a client, a peer device, or other network node. In a number of embodiments, remote computing device **149** can include any or all of the elements described in connection with computing device **102**. For example, computing device **149** can include program instructions in accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure.

As shown in **151** and/or wide area network (WAN) **152**. LAN **151** and/or WAN **152** can include, for example, an office network, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets, or the Internet, among other types of networks. The logical connections, e.g., LAN **151** and WAN **152**, can be achieved by a communication device coupled to or a part of computing device **102**. For example, when used in a LAN-networking environment, computing device **102** can be connected to LAN **151** through a network interface, e.g., adapter, **153**. When used in a WAN-networking environment, computing device **102** can be connected to WAN **152** through modem **154**. As shown in **154** can be coupled to bus **123** through serial port interface **146**. However, as will be understood by one of skill in the art, computing device **102** can be connected to LAN **151** and/or WAN **152** through other communication devices, such as a wireless communication device. Additionally, as will be understood by one of skill in the art, means other than LAN **151** and/or WAN **152** can be used to establish a connection between computing device **102** and remote computing device **149**.

**200** which includes a statistical sampling method in accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure. In a number of embodiments, method **200** can include a statistical sampling method to determine a number of strategic values and/or numerical index values of a life insurance strategy in accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure. The statistical sampling method can include a number of iterations for a number of future points in time, as previously described herein. Unless explicitly stated, the method embodiments described herein are not constrained to a particular order or sequence. Additionally, some of the described method embodiments or elements thereof can occur or be performed at the same point in time.

In a number of embodiments, the method embodiments described herein can be carried out by executable instructions stored in memory, e.g., memory **122** shown in **121** shown in **102** shown in **127** shown in **129** or optical disk **131** shown in

As shown in **220**. Each cash surrender value and/or death benefit value can be associated with a future point in time, as previously described herein. For ease of reference, the future points in time will be referred to as future years. The cash surrender values and/or death benefit values can be provided by an insurance carrier associated with the life insurance policy, and the cash surrender values can be after-tax cash surrender values, as previously described herein.

The cash surrender values and death benefit values for each year of the statistical sampling method are input and stored at **222**. A number of mortality probability distributions, e.g., mortality table data, income tax rates, and probability distributions for returns on investment assets are input and stored at **224**. The mortality probability distributions can be based on an actuarial likelihood of whether the insured subject will die at the particular future point in time, as previously described herein. The probability distributions for returns on investment assets can be based on a number of hypothetical returns on a number of hypothetical investments, as previously described herein.

A determination of whether the insured subject is projected to die before a particular future point in time, e.g., before the present year of this iteration of the statistical sampling method, is made at **226**. This determination can be made by using, e.g., statistically sampling, the mortality probability distributions, e.g., mortality table data, input and stored at **224**.

If the insured subject is projected to die before the present year of this iteration of the statistical sampling method, the probability distributions for returns on investment assets input and stored at **224** are statistically sampled at **228** to determine a hypothetical, e.g., sample, rate of return. The death benefit value associated with the year in which the insured subject was projected to die is multiplied at **230** by (1+the hypothetical rate of return determined at **228**), and the value so determined is stored at **238** as the strategic value of the strategy for the present year of this iteration of the statistical sampling method.

If the insured subject is not projected to die before the present year of this iteration of the statistical sampling method, a determination of whether the insured subject is projected to die during the present year of this iteration is made at **232**. This determination can be made by using, e.g., statistically sampling, the mortality probability distributions, e.g., mortality table data, input and stored at **224**.

If the insured subject is projected to die during the present year of this iteration of the statistical sampling method, the death benefit value of the policy for the present year of this iteration is determined at **234** from the death benefit values input and stored at **222**, and the death benefit value for the present year of this iteration is stored at **238** as the strategic value of the strategy for the present year of this iteration of the statistical sampling method. In a number of embodiments, the amount of any loan secured by the death benefit value can be subtracted at **234** from the death benefit value for the present year of this iteration, and the value so determined can be stored at **238** as the strategic value of the strategy for the present year of this iteration.

If the insured subject is not projected to die before or during the present year of this iteration of the statistical sampling method, e.g., if the insured subject is projected to be alive during the present year of this iteration, the cash surrender value of the policy for the present year of this iteration is determined at **236** from the cash surrender values input and stored at **222**, and the cash surrender value for the present year of this iteration is stored at **238** as the strategic value of the strategy for the present year of this iteration of the statistical sampling method. The cash surrender value can be an after-tax cash surrender value, as previously described herein. In a number of embodiments, the amount of any loan secured by the cash surrender value can be subtracted at **236** from the cash surrender value for the present year of this iteration, and the value so determined can be stored at **238** as the strategic value of the strategy for the present year of this iteration.

The strategic value stored at **238** is divided by the net amount of money paid into the policy up to the present year of this iteration, and the value so determined is stored at **240** as the numerical index value for the strategy for the present year of this iteration of the statistical sampling method. The strategic value stored at **238** can represent a probable amount of cash accessible from the strategy at the present year of the iteration. In a number of embodiments, the discounted present value of the strategic value stored at **238** can be divided by the discounted present value of the net amount of money paid into the policy up to the present year of this iteration, as previously described herein, and the value so determined can be stored at **240** as the numerical index value for the strategy for the present year of this iteration.

A determination of whether the present year of this iteration of the statistical sampling method is the last year of this iteration of the statistical sampling method is made at **242**. If the present year of this iteration is not the last year of this iteration, the statistical sampling method is repeated for the next year of this iteration, e.g., the method returns to **226** for the next year of this iteration.

If the present year of this iteration is the last year of this iteration, a determination of whether the present iteration is the last iteration of the statistical sampling method is made at **246**. If the present iteration is not the last iteration of the statistical sampling method, the strategic value of the strategy is reset to zero at **248**, and the statistical sampling method is restarted, e.g., the method returns to **226** for the next iteration of the statistical sampling method.

If the present iteration is the last iteration of the statistical sampling method, the strategic values of the strategy from each iteration of the statistical sampling method are compiled at **250** and ranked from largest to smallest value. In a number of embodiments, the numerical index values for the strategy from each iteration of the statistical sampling method can also be compiled and ranked from largest to smallest value at **250**.

The strategic values of the strategy for each year of the statistical sampling method are reported at **252** by percentile ranking in the compilation for each year of the statistical sampling method. In a number of embodiments, the numerical index values for the strategy for each year of the statistical sampling method can also be reported at **252** by percentile ranking in the compilation for each year of the statistical sampling method.

The report of the strategic values and/or numerical index values is printed and presented at **254**, and the method is concluded at **256**. The report can be printed using, for example, a printer coupled to computing device **102** shown in

In a number of embodiments, the report can be presented to a consumer, such as the insured subject or a person considering purchasing an insurance policy. A consumer can use the report, e.g., the strategic values and/or numerical index values included in the report, to determine a probable amount of cash accessible from the strategy at a particular future point in time. A consumer can also use the report to compare the strategy with other life insurance strategies and/or an investment vehicle(s) other than life insurance. For example, a consumer considering whether to purchase a particular life insurance policy can use a number of strategic values and/or numerical index values determined in accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure to determine whether it would most beneficial to purchase the particular life insurance policy, to finance the particular life insurance policy in a different manner, or to participate in an investment vehicle(s) other than life insurance.

**300** which includes a statistical sampling method in accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure. As shown in **360**. The statistical sampling method can determine the strategic value of the strategy at the number of future points in time using a death benefit value of a life insurance policy, e.g., a life insurance policy associated with the strategy, a cash surrender value of the policy, a mortality probability for an insured subject of the policy, and a projected investment return on a reinvestment of the death benefit value at each of the number of future points in time, in accordance with a number of embodiments previously described herein.

At **362**, a numerical index value for the strategy at each of the number of future points in time is determined using the strategic values and amounts of money paid into the policy up to each of the number of future points in time, in accordance with a number of embodiments previously described herein. The strategic values and numerical index values can be presented to a consumer, e.g., the insured subject or a person considering purchasing an insurance policy, at **364**. A consumer can use the strategic values and/or numerical index values to determine a probable amount of cash accessible from the strategy at a particular future point in time and/or to compare the strategy with other life insurance strategies and/or an investment vehicle(s) other than life insurance, as previously described herein.

In a number of embodiments, presenting the strategic values and numerical index values can include using a printer to print a report of the strategic values and numerical index values, e.g., a report including a table of the strategic values and numerical index values, as previously described herein and further described in connection with

**400** of strategic values and numerical index values of a life insurance strategy determined in accordance with a number of embodiments of the present disclosure. The insured subject for whom table **400** was generated is a 55 year old male having an underwriting status of non-smoking. The insured subject has a remaining life expectancy of 24.78 years, which can be based on a mortality probability distribution, as previously described herein.

The investment return rate probability distribution used to determine the strategic and numerical index values in table **400** includes a minimum hypothetical investment return rate of (0.2337), e.g., the minimum hypothetical investment return rate is a negative return rate, a maximum hypothetical investment return rate of 0.2667, and a most likely hypothetical investment return rate of 0.0552. These hypothetical investment return rates can be based on a number of current investment rates in a number of investment vehicles, as previously described herein. The discount rate and income tax rate used to determine the strategic and numerical index values in table **400** are 0.0400 and 0.4200, respectively. The statistical sampling method used to determine the strategic and numerical index values in table **400** includes 10,000 iterations.

Column **470** of table **400** includes the future years for which the strategic and numerical index values were determined. That is, each row in table **400** corresponds to a particular future year. Column **472** of table **400** includes the age of the insured subject at each future year.

Columns **474**, **476**, and **478** of table **400** include data relating to the underlying life insurance policy of the life insurance strategy used to determine the strategic and numerical index values in table **400**. Column **474** includes the premium paid into the policy each future year. Column **476** includes the after-tax cash surrender value of the policy for each future year. Column **478** includes the death benefit value of the policy for each future year. The premiums in column **474**, cash surrender values in column **476**, and death benefit values in column **478** can be provided by an insurance carrier associated with the life insurance policy, as previously described herein.

Columns **480**, **484**, and **488** of table **400** include strategic values of the life insurance strategy for each future year determined in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, and columns **482**, **486**, and **490** of table **400** include numerical index values for the life insurance strategy for each future year determined in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure. Each of columns **480**, **482**, **484**, **486**, **488**, and **490** is associated with a percentile ranking. For example, column **480** includes the strategic values of the strategy ranked in the 5th percentile for each future year, and column **482** includes the numerical index values for the strategy ranked in the 5th percentile for each future year. Column **484** includes the strategic values of the strategy ranked in the 50th percentile for each future year, and column **486** includes the numerical index values for the strategy ranked in the 50th percentile for each future year. Column **488** includes the strategic values of the strategy ranked in the 95th percentile for each future year, and column **490** includes the numerical index values for the strategy ranked in the 95th percentile for each future year.

The present disclosure includes devices, methods, and systems for determining the strategic value of a life insurance strategy at a future point in time. One device embodiment can include a processor, a memory coupled to the processor, and program instructions stored in the memory and executable by the processor to perform a statistical sampling method to determine a strategic value of a life insurance strategy at a number of particular future points in time using a death benefit value of a life insurance policy, a cash surrender value of the policy, a mortality probability for an insured subject of the policy, and a projected investment return on a reinvestment of the death benefit value, at each of the number of particular future points in time.

Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that an arrangement calculated to achieve the same results can be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This disclosure is intended to cover adaptations or variations of a number of embodiments of the present disclosure. It is to be understood that the above description has been made in an illustrative fashion, and not a restrictive one. Combination of the above embodiments, and other embodiments not specifically described herein will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the number of embodiments of the present disclosure includes other applications in which the above structures and methods are used. Therefore, the scope of a number of embodiments of the present disclosure should be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full range of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.

In the foregoing Detailed Description, some features are grouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the disclosed embodiments of the present disclosure have to use more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment.

Patent Citations

Cited Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|

US4718009 | May 31, 1985 | Jan 5, 1988 | Default Proof Credit Card System, Inc. | Default proof credit card method system |

US4750121 * | Oct 3, 1985 | Jun 7, 1988 | Halley Gustavo M | Pension benefits system |

US4839804 | Dec 30, 1986 | Jun 13, 1989 | College Savings Bank | Method and apparatus for insuring the funding of a future liability of uncertain cost |

US4876648 | Jan 12, 1988 | Oct 24, 1989 | Lloyd Clarke B | System and method for implementing and administering a mortgage plan |

US5025138 | Jan 6, 1987 | Jun 18, 1991 | Vincent Cuervo | Method and system for providing verifiable line of credit information |

US5136502 | Oct 2, 1991 | Aug 4, 1992 | Fred Van Remortel | System for funding, analyzing and managing health care liabilities |

US5523942 | Mar 31, 1994 | Jun 4, 1996 | New England Mutual Life Insurance Company | Design grid for inputting insurance and investment product information in a computer system |

US5590037 | Sep 17, 1993 | Dec 31, 1996 | The Evergreen Group Incorporated | Digital computer system and methods for computing a financial projection and an illustration of a prefunding program for an employee benefit |

US5673402 | Aug 17, 1992 | Sep 30, 1997 | The Homeowner's Endorsement Plan Incorporated | Computer system for producing an illustration of an investment repaying a mortgage |

US5752236 | Sep 2, 1994 | May 12, 1998 | Sexton; Frank M. | Life insurance method, and system |

US5774881 * | Oct 30, 1995 | Jun 30, 1998 | Efi Actuaries | Method of determining optimal asset allocation utilizing asset cash flow simulation |

US5802500 | Oct 14, 1992 | Sep 1, 1998 | The Evergreen Group Incorporated | System and method for computing a financial projection of a prefunding program for other postretirement employee benefits under FASB statement 106 |

US5806042 * | Oct 11, 1995 | Sep 8, 1998 | Kelly; William Franklin | System for designing and implementing bank owned life insurance (BOLI) with a reinsurance option |

US5839118 | Jan 16, 1996 | Nov 17, 1998 | The Evergreen Group, Incorporated | System and method for premium optimization and loan monitoring |

US5893071 | Oct 24, 1996 | Apr 6, 1999 | Cooperstein; Steve Paul | Annuity value software |

US5926800 | Apr 24, 1995 | Jul 20, 1999 | Minerva, L.P. | System and method for providing a line of credit secured by an assignment of a life insurance policy |

US5956691 * | Jan 7, 1997 | Sep 21, 1999 | Second Opinion Financial Systems, Inc. | Dynamic policy illustration system |

US5966693 | May 7, 1996 | Oct 12, 1999 | Money Accumulation Programs, Inc. | Method for combining loan with key employee life insurance |

US6041304 * | Feb 26, 1997 | Mar 21, 2000 | Meyer-Chatfield, Inc. | System and method for controlling the cash value growth of an insurance policy |

US6205434 | Dec 18, 1995 | Mar 20, 2001 | The Evergreen Group Incorporated | Computerized indenture plan allocation determination management and reporting system |

US6304859 * | Nov 17, 1998 | Oct 16, 2001 | Evergreen Group, Incorporated | System and method for premium optimization and loan monitoring |

US6330541 * | Jan 7, 1998 | Dec 11, 2001 | Bennett Stephen Meyer | System and method for controlling and securitizing the cash value growth and/or death benefits of a large pool of insurance policies |

US6456979 | Oct 24, 2000 | Sep 24, 2002 | The Insuranceadvisor Technologies, Inc. | Method of evaluating a permanent life insurance policy |

US6611815 | Jan 2, 2001 | Aug 26, 2003 | Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. | Method and system for providing account values in an annuity with life contingencies |

US6684189 | Aug 4, 1997 | Jan 27, 2004 | The Ryan Evalulife Systems, Inc. | Apparatus and method using front-end network gateways and search criteria for efficient quoting at a remote location |

US6684190 * | Dec 10, 1998 | Jan 27, 2004 | Financial Profiles, Inc. | Apparatus and method for exposing, evaluating and re-balancing risk for decision-making in financial planning |

US6999935 | Dec 22, 2003 | Feb 14, 2006 | Kiritharan Parankirinathan | Method of calculating premium payment to cover the risk attributable to insureds surviving a specified period |

US7089201 | Sep 24, 1999 | Aug 8, 2006 | Lincoln National Life Insurance Company | Method and apparatus for providing retirement income benefits |

US7376608 * | Mar 12, 2001 | May 20, 2008 | Lincoln National Life Insurance Company | Method and system for providing retirement income benefits |

US7376609 * | Apr 30, 2001 | May 20, 2008 | Aviva Usa Corporation | Maximization of a hedged investment budget for an index-linked insurance product |

US7454379 * | Nov 21, 2000 | Nov 18, 2008 | Future System Advisors, Llc | Process for comprehensive financial and estate planning |

US7603306 * | Sep 13, 2005 | Oct 13, 2009 | Rex Macey | System and method for incorporating mortality risk in an investment planning model |

US7634420 * | Dec 15, 2009 | Efficient Markets Corporation | System for appraising life insurance and annuities | |

US7752120 * | Sep 10, 2004 | Jul 6, 2010 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Auction insurance system |

US7778904 * | Aug 17, 2010 | Lyons John E | Method for providing an affordable housing collateralization pool | |

US20020091610 | Oct 25, 2001 | Jul 11, 2002 | Smith Mark J. | Systems and methods for wealth management |

US20020138386 * | Jul 12, 2001 | Sep 26, 2002 | Maggioncalda Jeff N. | User interface for a financial advisory system |

US20030074231 * | Oct 17, 2001 | Apr 17, 2003 | Johan Renes | Insurance for cessation of legal personal contract |

US20030088444 * | Oct 15, 2002 | May 8, 2003 | Mark Garbin | Structuring and financing a variable insurance product |

US20030110061 * | Aug 14, 2002 | Jun 12, 2003 | Cary Lakenbach | Simplified variable life insurance |

US20030191672 | Dec 21, 2001 | Oct 9, 2003 | Kendall Errol O. | System for appraising life insurance and annuities |

US20040019506 | Jul 23, 2002 | Jan 29, 2004 | Struchtemeyer Brian P. | Method and system for generating endowment for a tax-exempt organization |

US20040064391 * | Sep 26, 2002 | Apr 1, 2004 | Jeffrey Lange | Method and system for life settlement contract securitization and risk management |

US20040128233 * | Oct 15, 2003 | Jul 1, 2004 | Jarzmik Henry J. | Loan financing and investment method |

US20040177021 * | Mar 3, 2004 | Sep 9, 2004 | Carlson Joseph W. | Apparatus and method for achieving enhanced returns on investments |

US20040267647 | Jun 30, 2003 | Dec 30, 2004 | Brisbois Dorion P. | Capital market products including securitized life settlement bonds and methods of issuing, servicing and redeeming same |

US20050071204 | Dec 22, 2003 | Mar 31, 2005 | Kiritharan Parankirinathan | Method of calculating premium payment to cover the risk attributable to insureds surviving a specified period |

US20050149434 | Jan 6, 2005 | Jul 7, 2005 | John Selby | Method for endowing a tax exempt organization |

US20050216316 | Sep 27, 2004 | Sep 29, 2005 | Brisbois Dorion P | Capital market products including SPIA securitized life settlement bonds and methods of issuing, servicing and redeeming same |

US20050234791 * | Apr 4, 2005 | Oct 20, 2005 | Michael Krasnerman | Premium financing method and loan product using life insurance policies and method for administering same |

US20050267785 | Aug 4, 2005 | Dec 1, 2005 | Kiritharan Parankirinathan | Survival risk insurance |

US20060143055 * | Dec 23, 2004 | Jun 29, 2006 | Loy Philip R | Method for increasing liquid assets available to at least partially fund living expenses at an assisted living facility |

US20060206417 | May 24, 2006 | Sep 14, 2006 | Social Capital Insurance Services Inc. | Method for endowing a tax exempt organization using a key member and while increasing net worth of a donor |

US20060224487 * | Oct 25, 2005 | Oct 5, 2006 | Galdi Philip H | Apparatuses, methods, and systems to design, develop, and implement book income indices |

US20070011086 | Sep 13, 2006 | Jan 11, 2007 | Dellinger Jeffrey K | Method and apparatus for providing retirement income benefits |

US20070016455 * | Apr 3, 2006 | Jan 18, 2007 | Ryan Raymond B | Corporate-owned life insurance settlement computer system |

US20070156558 | Mar 14, 2007 | Jul 5, 2007 | Wolzenski Bernard H | Process for Comprehensive Financial and Estate Planning |

US20070162365 * | Jul 27, 2005 | Jul 12, 2007 | Weinreb Earl J | Securities aid |

US20070185741 | Aug 18, 2006 | Aug 9, 2007 | Hebron Robert J | Methods and Systems for Providing and Underwriting Life Insurance Benefits Convertible into Other Benefits |

US20070299760 | Aug 28, 2007 | Dec 27, 2007 | Gallip Llc | Method and system for life settlement contract securitization and risk management |

US20080016099 | Oct 12, 2005 | Jan 17, 2008 | Nissy Information Technology Co., Ltd | Data Management Apparatus And Method Thereof |

US20080040166 * | Aug 13, 2007 | Feb 14, 2008 | Halley Capital Llc | Life insurance investment fund |

US20080052211 * | Jun 14, 2007 | Feb 28, 2008 | Buerger Alan H | Method and system for protecting an investment of a life insurance policy |

US20080071584 * | Nov 20, 2007 | Mar 20, 2008 | Kiritharan Parankirinathan | Method for Using a Survival Risk Insurance Policy as Part of a Separate Account or General Account Investment Option |

US20080133279 | Oct 3, 2007 | Jun 5, 2008 | Pollock Mark G | System and method for financing other post employment benefit (opeb) plans |

US20080162377 * | Dec 19, 2007 | Jul 3, 2008 | Vestwise Llc | System and method of managing cash and suggesting transactions in a multi-strategy portfolio |

US20080183510 | Apr 16, 2008 | Jul 31, 2008 | Pollock Mark G | System and method for financing other post employment benefit (opeb) plans |

US20080249810 * | Apr 3, 2007 | Oct 9, 2008 | Laudato Anthony C | Method and System For Administering A Variable Universal Life Insurance Product Having A Volatility Reduction Feature |

US20080270195 * | Apr 25, 2008 | Oct 30, 2008 | Gottlieb Joshua L | System and method for financing welfare benefits trust |

US20090076861 * | Sep 15, 2008 | Mar 19, 2009 | Rms Holding Co., Llc | Investment style life insurance product with replacable individual policy components |

US20090198526 * | Feb 2, 2009 | Aug 6, 2009 | American Family Life Assurance Company Of Columbus | Payment of benefits for survivors of certain medical conditions |

US20090204442 * | Jan 30, 2007 | Aug 13, 2009 | Logsdon Leslie W | Method of valuation of life settlements and optimizing premium financing |

US20100004957 * | Jan 7, 2010 | Robert Ball | Interactive system and methods for insurance-related activities | |

US20100063853 * | Mar 11, 2010 | Halley Capital Llc | Life insurance investment fund |

Non-Patent Citations

Reference | ||
---|---|---|

1 | * | Sam Rosenfeld, Life Settlements: Signposts to a Principal Asset Class, Working Paper #09-20, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Whatorn Financial Institutions Centre, Feb. 9, 2009. |

Referenced by

Citing Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|

US8370242 | Feb 5, 2013 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a benefit product with periodic guaranteed minimum income | |

US8412545 | Sep 15, 2004 | Apr 2, 2013 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System and process for providing multiple income start dates for annuities |

US8433634 | Apr 30, 2013 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a benefit product with periodic guaranteed income | |

US8612263 | Dec 19, 2008 | Dec 17, 2013 | Genworth Holdings, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a cash value adjustment to a life insurance policy |

US8781929 | Feb 27, 2002 | Jul 15, 2014 | Genworth Holdings, Inc. | System and method for guaranteeing minimum periodic retirement income payments using an adjustment account |

US8799134 | Sep 16, 2011 | Aug 5, 2014 | Genworth Holdings, Inc. | System and method for imbedding a defined benefit in a defined contribution plan |

US9105063 | Feb 4, 2013 | Aug 11, 2015 | Genworth Holdings, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a benefit product with periodic guaranteed minimum income |

US9105065 | Apr 29, 2013 | Aug 11, 2015 | Genworth Holdings, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a benefit product with periodic guaranteed income |

US20090006237 * | Jun 23, 2008 | Jan 1, 2009 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | Method and system for portable retirement investment |

Classifications

U.S. Classification | 705/4, 705/35, 705/38, 705/37, 705/36.00R |

International Classification | G06Q40/00 |

Cooperative Classification | G06Q40/00, G06Q40/04, G06Q40/08, G06Q40/06, G06Q40/025 |

European Classification | G06Q40/08, G06Q40/025, G06Q40/00, G06Q40/06, G06Q40/04 |

Legal Events

Date | Code | Event | Description |
---|---|---|---|

Mar 2, 2009 | AS | Assignment | Owner name: THE TRUSTEE AND SUCCESSOR TRUSTEES OF RGD 2006 TRU Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DANIELSEN, ROBERT G.;REEL/FRAME:022330/0546 Effective date: 20090302 |

Jun 4, 2015 | FPAY | Fee payment | Year of fee payment: 4 |

Rotate