|Publication number||US8197544 B1|
|Application number||US 13/406,073|
|Publication date||Jun 12, 2012|
|Filing date||Feb 27, 2012|
|Priority date||Jan 8, 2004|
|Also published as||EP1729672A2, US7789912, US8246630, US8317802, US20050182414, US20110004217, US20120158067, US20120316568, WO2005070071A2, WO2005070071A3|
|Publication number||13406073, 406073, US 8197544 B1, US 8197544B1, US-B1-8197544, US8197544 B1, US8197544B1|
|Inventors||Richard Manzi, Tyler Lipschultz, Peter Barreiro, Mark LoGuidice, Thomas Wilson, Steve Wysocki|
|Original Assignee||Spine Wave, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (136), Non-Patent Citations (10), Classifications (13)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/858,530, now pending, filed on Aug. 18, 2010 which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/031,562, filed on Jan. 7, 2005, and issued on Sep. 7, 2010 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,789,912, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/535,407, filed on Jan. 8, 2004, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.
The present invention involves the field of surgery, and particularly orthopaedic surgery. The invention relates to surgical instruments and procedures involved in the distraction of adjacent tissue surfaces.
A variety of physical conditions involve two tissue surfaces that, for treatment of the condition, need to be distracted from one another and then supported away from one another. Such distraction may be to gain exposure to select tissue structures, to apply a therapeutic pressure to select tissues, to return tissue structures to their anatomic position and form, or in some cases to deliver a drug or growth factor to alter, influence or deter further growth of select tissues. Depending on the condition being treated, the tissue surfaces may be opposed or contiguous and may be bone, skin, soft tissue, or a combination thereof. An optimal treatment method includes distracting and supporting the tissue surfaces simultaneously.
A minimally invasive distraction and support device has significant application in orthopaedic surgical procedures, including acute and elective procedures to treat bone fractures and degenerative changes of the skeletal system and including vertebral compression fractures, interbody fusion, vertebral disc augmentation or replacement, and other compression fractures including, but not limited to tibial plateau compression fractures, calcaneous compression fractures, distal tibia fractures, distal radius (wrist) fractures, crushed or fractured orbit and orthopaedic oncology. Further, a minimally invasive distraction and support device has application in non-orthopaedic surgical procedures in plastic surgery (for example facial reconstruction), gastrointestinal surgery and urological surgery (for example the treatment of incontinence).
Vertebral Compression Fractures
A vertebral compression fracture is a crushing injury to one or more vertebrae. Vertebral fractures are generally associated with osteoporosis (the “brittle bone” disease), metastasis, and/or trauma. Osteoporosis reduces bone density, thereby weakening bones and predisposing them to fracture.
The osteoporosis-weakened bones can collapse during normal activity. In severe cases of osteoporosis, actions as simple as bending forward can be enough to cause a vertebral compression fracture. Vertebral compression fractures are the most common type of osteoporotic fractures according to the National Institute of Health. The mechanism of these fractures is one of flexion with axial compression where even minor events cause damage to the weak bone. While the fractures may heal without intervention, the crushed bone may fail to heal adequately. Moreover, if the bones are allowed to heal on their own, the spine will be deformed to the extent the vertebrae were compressed by the fracture. Spinal deformity may lead to breathing and gastrointestinal complications, and adverse loading of adjacent vertebrae.
Vertebral fractures happen most frequently at the thoracolumbar junction, with a relatively normal distribution of fractures around this point. Vertebral fractures can permanently alter the shape and strength of the spine. Commonly, they cause loss of height and a humped back. This disorder (called kyphosis or “dowager's hump”) is an exaggeration of the spinal curve that causes the shoulders to slump forward and the top of the back to look enlarged and humped. In severe cases, the body's center of mass is moved further away from the spine resulting in increased bending moment on the spine and increased loading of individual vertebrae.
Another contributing factor to vertebral fractures is metastatic disease. When cancer cells spread to the spine, the cancer may cause destruction of part of the vertebra, weakening and predisposing the bone to fracture. Osteoporosis and metastatic disease are common root causes leading to vertebral fractures, but trauma to healthy vertebrae also causes minor to severe fractures. Such trauma may result from a fall, a forceful jump, a car accident, or any event that stresses the spine past its breaking point. The resulting fractures typically are compression fractures or burst fractures.
Vertebral fractures can occur without pain. However, they often cause a severe “band-like” pain that radiates from the spine around both sides of the body. It is commonly believed that the source of acute pain in compression fractures is the result of instability at the fracture site, allowing motion that irritates nerves in and around the vertebrae.
Until recently, treatment of vertebral compression fractures has consisted of conservative measures including rest, analgesics, dietary, and medical regimens to restore bone density or prevent further bone loss, avoidance of injury, and bracing. Unfortunately, the typical patient is an elderly person who generally does not tolerate extended bed rest well. As a result, minimally invasive surgical methods for treating vertebral compression fractures have recently been introduced and are gaining popularity.
One technique used to treat vertebral compression fractures is injection of bone filler into the fractured vertebral body. This procedure is commonly referred to as percutaneous vertebroplasty. Vertebroplasty involves injecting bone filler (for example, bone cement) into the collapsed vertebra to stabilize and strengthen the crushed bone.
In vertebroplasty, physicians typically use one of two surgical approaches to access thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies: transpedicular or extrapedicular. The transpedicular approach involves the placement of a needle or wire through the pedicle into the vertebral body, and the physician may choose to use either a unilateral access or bilateral transpedicular approach. The second approach, the extrapedicular technique, involves an entry point through the posterolateral corner of the vertebral body. The needle entry point is typically 8 cm to 12 cm lateral of the mid-sagittal plane, with the skin incision typically closer to 8 cm in the proximal spine and generally closer to 12 cm in the distal spine. In general, one cannula is placed to fill the vertebral body with the extra-pedicular approach.
Regardless of the surgical approach, the physician generally places a small diameter guide wire or needle along the path intended for the bone filler delivery needle. The guide wire is advanced into the vertebral body under fluoroscopic guidance to the delivery point within the vertebrae. The access channel into the vertebra may be enlarged to accommodate the delivery tube. In some cases, the delivery tube is placed directly and forms its own opening. In other cases, an access cannula is placed over the guide wire and advanced into the vertebral body. After placement, the cannula is replaced with the delivery tube, which is passed over the guide pin. In both cases, a hollow needle or similar tube is placed into the vertebral body and used to deliver the bone filler into the vertebra.
In this procedure, lower viscosities and higher pressures tend to disperse the bone filler throughout the vertebral body. However, such conditions dramatically increase the risk of bone filler extravasation from the vertebral body. The transpedicular approach requires use of a relatively small needle (generally 11 gauge or smaller). In contrast, the extrapedicular approach provides sufficient room to accommodate a larger needle (up to 6 mm internal diameter in the lumbar region and lower thoracic regions). In general, the small diameter needle required for a transpedicular approach necessitates injecting the bone filler in a more liquid (less viscous) state. Further, the pressure required to flow bone filler through a small gauge needle is relatively high. The difficulty of controlling or stopping bone filler flow into injury sensitive areas increases as the required pressure increases. The larger needle used in the extrapedicular approach allows injection of bone filler in a thicker, more controllable viscous state. Therefore, many physicians now advocate the extrapedicular approach so that the bone filler may be delivered through a larger cannula under lower pressure.
Caution must be taken to prevent extravasation, with the greatest attention given to preventing posterior extravasation because it may cause spinal cord trauma. Physicians typically use fluoroscopic imaging to monitor bone filler propagation and to avoid flow into areas of critical concern. If a foraminal leak results, the patient may require surgical decompression and/or suffer paralysis.
Kyphoplasty is a modified vertebral fracture treatment that uses one or two balloons, similar to angioplasty balloons, to attempt to reduce the fracture and restore vertebral height prior to injecting the bone filler. Two balloons are typically introduced into the vertebra via bilateral transpedicular cannulae. The balloons are inflated to reduce the fracture. After the balloon(s) is deflated and removed, leaving a relatively empty cancellous bone, bone cement is injected into the vertebra. In theory, inflation of the balloons restores vertebral height. However, it is difficult to consistently attain meaningful height restoration. It appears the inconsistent results are due, in part, to the manner in which the balloon expands in a compressible media and the structural orientation of the trabecular bone within the vertebra.
Tibial Plateau Compression Fractures
A tibial plateau fracture is a crushing injury to one or both of the tibial condyles resulting in a depression in the articular surface of the condyle. In conjunction with the compression fracture, there may be a splitting fracture of the tibial plateau. Appropriate treatment for compression fractures depends on the severity of the fracture. Minimally displaced compression fractures may be stabilized in a cast or brace without surgical intervention. More severely displaced compression with or without displacement fractures are treated via open reduction and internal fixation.
Typically, the underside of the compression fracture is accessed either through a window cut (a relatively small resection) into the side of the tibia or by opening or displacing a splitting fracture. A bone elevator is then used to reduce the fracture and align the articular surface of the tibial condyle. Bone filler is placed into the cancellous bone under the reduced compression fracture to maintain the reduction. If a window was cut into the side of the tibia, the window is packed with graft material and may be secured with a bone plate. If a splitting fracture was opened to gain access, then the fracture is reduced and may be stabilized with bone screws, bone plate and screws, or a buttress plate and screws.
Spinal Interbody Fusion
Spinal fusion is most frequently indicated to treat chronic back pain associated with instability or degenerative disc disease that has not responded to less invasive treatments. Fusion is also prescribed to treat trauma and congenital deformities. Spinal fusion involves removal of the spinal disc and fusing or joining the two adjacent vertebrae. The primary objective for patients suffering from instability is to diminish the patient's pain by reducing spinal motion.
Spinal fusions are generally categorized into two large groups: instrumented and non-instrumented. In non-instrumented procedures, the physician removes tissue from the unstable disc space and fills it with some form of bone graft that facilitates the fusion of the two adjacent vertebral bodies. Instrumented procedures are similar to non-instrumented procedures, except that implants (generally metallic) are also applied to further stabilize the vertebrae and improve the likelihood of fusion.
Conventional instrumented procedures generally utilize plates, rods, hooks, and/or pedicle screws through various surgical approaches. These conventional implants are secured to the vertebral bodies that are being fused. Interbody fusion devices were introduced in the 1990's as a less invasive surgical alternative, although interbody devices are increasingly being used in conjunction with pedicle screws. Interbody devices are implanted into the disc space to restore the normal disc spacing, utilizing tension in the annulus to stabilize the fusion unit. Interbody fusion provides a large area of the vertebral end plate for establishing bony fusion, a viable blood supply from the decorticated end plates, and dynamic compressive loading of the graft site. The interbody devices are generally filled with a bone filler to facilitate fusion. Interbody devices can be categorized in three primary groups: spinal fusion cages, which are available in a variety of shapes including rectangular, round-faced, and lordotic; allograft bone dowels and wedges (which are also available in various shapes); and titanium mesh (although titanium mesh is not itself a structural spacer).
Interbody fusion is typically completed through a posterior, an anterior, or a lateral inter-transverse approach. Each of these techniques has limitations. Lumbar interbody fusion presents a challenging surgical procedure and relatively high pseudoarthrosis rates. As a result, this approach is increasingly combined with additional internal fixation devices such as pedicle screw fixation.
In all interbody surgical approaches, a relatively large opening is made in the annulus. The nuclear material is removed and the end plates are decorticated to facilitate bony fusion. Overall, the use of interbody devices has resulted in mixed clinical outcomes. Placement of a fixed height device presents challenges in proper tensioning of the annulus. For these and other reasons, there is concern over long-term stability of interbody devices and fusion mass.
Distraction Systems and Methods
One approach to address the concerns in the various surgical procedures discussed above is presented in U.S. Pat. No. 6,595,998, which issued on Jul. 22, 2003, and which is owned by the assignee of the present invention. The disclosure of the '998 patent is expressly incorporated herein by reference. The system in the '998 patent provides a combination of a temporary or long term implantable device and instrumentation to place the device, in which tissue surfaces are distracted along an axis to enable access to the space between the tissues. Generally, the '998 patent discloses solid wafers for stacking upon one another to provide an axially extending column to distract and support tissue surfaces. While a primary use of that invention is to reduce and stabilize vertebral compression fractures, the disclosed devices and methods may be used in any situation where it is desirable to distract two tissue surfaces. The tissues may be bone, skin, soft tissue, or combinations thereof. Further, the surfaces may be opposed surfaces of contiguous elements or surfaces of opposed elements. The '998 patent discloses devices and methods that may be used to treat vertebral compression fractures, for replacement of vertebral discs, as an interbody fusion device, wedge opening high tibial osteotomy, tibial tuberosity elevation, as well as for treating other compression fractures including, but not limited to tibia plateau fractures, calcaneous, distal tibial fractures, or distal radius (wrist) fractures.
The '998 patent concerns a distraction device or solid scaffold or support structure that includes a plurality of stackable wafers designed for insertion between tissue surfaces to form a column. The wafer column is assembled percutaneously in vivo to provide a distraction force as well as support and stabilization of the distracted tissue. Preferably, the wafers place distraction force in one direction only and thus provide directional distraction. The distraction device may be permanently implanted, in which case the wafer column may be used alone or in conjunction with a bone filler material. Alternately, the distraction device may be used temporarily to manipulate tissues and then removed.
In use, the wafers are preferably stacked between two tissue surfaces as they are implanted, thereby distracting and supporting the tissue surfaces simultaneously. Use of the devices and methods of the '998 patent to treat a vertebral compression fracture is depicted in
In one embodiment, the wafers are designed to be beveled at both their leading and trailing edges so that when lined up end-to-end, force on the trailing edge of the trailing wafer causes its leading edge to slide below the trailing edge of the leading wafer, thereby lifting up the leading wafer. Likewise, the bevel of the leading and trailing edges may be reversed enabling insertion of a trailing wafer above a leading wafer. Alternately, the leading and trailing edges may be chevron shaped or curved when viewed from the side, enabling insertion of trailing wafers between any two leading wafers or on the top or bottom of the column. In another embodiment, the wafers may be configured with blunt edges wherein the wafers are stacked with the insertion instrument. In all embodiments, by repeating the process with consecutive wafers, the column height increases to restore vertebral height.
In order to place the wafers between the tissue surfaces, the '998 patent discloses a wafer inserter 12, as depicted in
The wafers disclosed in the '998 patent may be formed from a solid form of bone filler material, and/or any other suitable material such as but not limited to implantable grade alloys (including, but not limited to titanium, cobalt chrome, nitinol, or stainless steel), other medical grade composites (including, but not limited to polyetheretherketone polymer (PEEK), ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, or polyethylene) other ceramics (including, but not limited to zirconia, alumina, or calcium-phosphate based ceramics), and resorbable polymers (for example, polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA), and poly(lactide-coglycolide) (PLGA)). The wafers may be dense or porous, while porous wafers may be filled with resorbable polymers to increase mechanical strength. For soft tissue applications, it may be desirable to manufacture the wafers of woven collagen pads, tissue engineered materials, chitin, urethanes, silicone, or silicone materials. Alternately, the wafers may be manufactured from hydrogel (polyvinyl alcohol) in which the wafer is inserted in a dehydrated form and expands with fluids present at the insertion site. Hydrogel wafers may be particularly desirable for placing in the disc space between vertebrae. For purposes of this disclosure, these materials and their combinations will be collectively defined as the “implant materials.”
Further, the wafers and implant materials may be combined with osteoinductive agents (including BMPs, growth factors, cell therapy, gene therapy, and patient derived factors) and other drug therapies. The osteoinductive agents may be added to initiate and accelerate bone formation while the drug therapies may range from antibiotics to reduce the risk of infection to chemotherapy to treat cancer. Optionally, the wafers may be used with a flowable bone filler material, which may be defined as any substance used to stabilize the bone. Suitable bone filler material includes, but is not limited to, bone cement (polymethyl methacrylate PMMA, or PMA), other composite material, human bone graft (allograft or autograft), synthetic and xenograft derived bone substitutes (calcium phosphate, hydroxylapatite, and/or other ceramic based bone substitutes), collagen, or combinations of these materials.
It is disclosed in the '998 patent that in certain applications, it may be beneficial for the wafers to be secured to one another after insertion. Any suitable method for securing the wafers to one another as known by those skilled in the arts may be used. Wafers may be secured to one another by means of an adhesive bond, a chemical bond, and/or a mechanical interlock (as described above). Applying a generic fluent adhesive, for example cyanoacrylate, around the column provides adhesive bonding. The fluent adhesive hardens and locks the wafers.
Introducing a liquid material that is chemically equivalent to the wafer provides a potential chemical bonding. For example, the wafers may be manufactured from bone cement and bone cement may be injected around the wafers and into the vertebral body. The monomer in the bone cement may initiate a chemical bonding between the wafer and the bone filler, thereby locking the wafers together. A stable construct combined with cement interdigitation is believed to provide stability and pain relief in a crushed vertebra.
The devices and methods of the '998 patent address various inabilities in the prior art to adequately distract opposing tissue surfaces. The devices disclosed in the '998 patent are particularly beneficial in restoring the vertebral body to its intended anatomic height following a compression fracture. However, even with this improvement, there still remains a need for devices and methods for introducing fluent or liquid material into the distraction site, and particularly adjacent to or around the height restoring or load bearing distraction component. The fluent material may itself provide structural or load bearing capabilities, or may be non-structural but still capable of alleviating pain associated with the fracture.
In order to address this need, the present invention contemplates a method for distracting surfaces of a bone comprising the steps of: introducing a solid distraction component within the interior of the bone between opposite surfaces of the bone to maintain the surfaces in a distracted position; introducing an injection cannula directly into the cancellous portion of the bone adjacent the distraction component; and injecting a fluent material through the injection cannula directly into the interior of the bone adjacent the distraction component.
In accordance with this method, the fluent material is injected directly within the cancellous portion of the bone, rather than indirectly at an opening in the cortical bone. Moreover, the fluent material is injected so that it can at least partially surround the distraction component and, in the preferred embodiment, interdigitate with the surrounding cancellous bone.
Preferably, the injecting step includes injecting the fluent material under pressure. However, the pressure is less than a pressure at which extravasion occurs from the bone.
In certain embodiments, the fluent material is a hardenable material, such as a bone cement. In other embodiments, the fluent material is a non-structural fluid, while in other cases, the fluent material is selected from the group containing hydroxyapatite, bone morphogenic protein, osteo-inductive compositions, osteo-conductive compositions and pharmaceutical compositions.
In one aspect of the invention, the method further comprises the step of providing access to the interior of the bone through a working channel cannula. With the addition of this step, the steps of introducing the distraction component and the injection cannula occur through this same working channel cannula. The working channel cannula may be imbedded within an access portal in the cortical portion of the bone, or slightly retracted from the access portal in the cortical bone.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, the injection cannula includes a plurality of openings, and the injecting step includes positioning the injection cannula so that the plurality of openings are oriented so that fluent material is injected therethrough directly adjacent the distraction component. In another aspect, the injection cannula includes a single angled opening at the distal tip of the cannula, and the injecting step includes positioning the injection cannula so that the angled opening is oriented so that fluent material is injected therethrough directly adjacent the distraction component.
In the preferred embodiment, the injecting step includes engaging a syringe containing the fluent material to the injection cannula, and depressing the plunger of the syringe to inject the fluent material through the injection cannula. Multiple syringes may be provided where different or additional fluent material is required.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method is provided for restoring the height of a vertebral body comprising the steps of: engaging a working channel cannula to the vertebral body to access the interior of the vertebral body; introducing the distraction component into the interior of the bone using an inserter extending through the working channel cannula to restore the height of the vertebral body; and injecting a fluent material through the same working channel adjacent the distraction component. In certain embodiments, the inserter is removed from the working channel cannula before the fluent material is injected.
In this embodiment, the distraction component may include a plurality of stacked wafers, and the step of introducing the distraction component may include extending a wafer introducer into the working channel cannula and operating the wafer introducer to introduce the plurality of stacked wafers into the interior space. Accordingly, the step of injecting a fluent material may include extending an injection cannula into the working channel cannula and directly adjacent the distraction component. As with the previous embodiment, the injecting step includes injecting the fluent material under pressure, preferably at a pressure less than a pressure at which extravasion occurs from the bone.
In yet another feature of the invention, a system is contemplated for restoring the height of a vertebral body, comprising: a working channel cannula configured to access the interior of the vertebral body; an inserter for inserting a distraction component through the working channel into the interior of the vertebral body; and an injection cannula configured to extend through the working channel cannula into the interior of the vertebral body, the injection cannula having a proximal end configured to connect to a source of a fluent material and a distal end defining at least one opening for discharge of the fluent material.
The injection cannula may include an orientation marker at a proximal portion thereof, the marker aligned with the at least one opening to provide a visual indication of the orientation of the opening within the interior of the vertebral body. Moreover, the injection cannula may include a plurality of openings at the distal end. In certain embodiments, the distraction component has a length along its insertion direction, and the plurality of openings span a distance along a distal portion of the injection cannula that is substantially equal to the length of the distraction component.
In other embodiments, the injection cannula includes only one opening at the distal tip thereof. This opening is preferably angled relative to the longitudinal axis of the cannula to direct the fluent material at the distraction component.
It is one object of the present invention to provide methods and systems for introducing fluent material into a distraction site, preferably within a bone, like a vertebral body. Another object is achieved by features of the invention that ensure that the fluent material at least partially surround the distraction component. Another object is to inject the fluent material so that it interdigitates or combines with the surrounding cancellous portion of the bone. These and other objects and benefits can be discerned from the following written description and accompanying figures.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and described in the following written specification. It is understood that no limitation to the scope of the invention is thereby intended. It is further understood that the present invention includes any alterations and modifications to the illustrated embodiments and includes further applications of the principles of the invention as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which this invention pertains.
The present invention contemplates an adjunct to the wafer insertion system described in the '998 patent discussed above. However, it should be understood that the devices and methods disclosed herein can be used with other percutaneously introduced distraction systems or tissue filler delivery systems. The following description of the invention focuses on a use in conjunction with the restoration of a vertebral body following a compression fracture. It should be further understood that the devices and methods disclosed herein may also be used in connection with other procedures in which tissue surfaces are distracted.
Referring now to
In one embodiment, the distal end of the cannula 15 may include a beveled surface 19 that engages the cortical bone and helps stabilize the cannula 15 while the wafers 11 are inserted. In addition, the beveled surface 19 helps position the distal opening 17 at an appropriate location within the vertebral body V1 for optimum placement of the wafer stack 10. In a preferred method of the invention, the working channel cannula is driven into an access port cut into the bone. The cannula 15 is driven into the cortical bone until the opening 17 is positioned within the interior of the bone (i.e., the cancellous bone). The working channel cannula can be driven into position by striking the proximal end of the cannula directly with a mallet. Optionally, a tamp can be fed through the cannula 15 and the mallet can strike the handle of the tamp to push the tamp into the bone and then to embed the cannula within the access port in the bone. Once the working channel cannula is in its operative position, as shown in
As shown in
In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the width of the distal opening 17 of the cannula, as well as the working width of the channel within the cannula, is greater than the width of the wafer stack 10. Moreover, the width of the opening 17 is greater than the width of the track 13 of the wafer inserter 12. In certain embodiments, the opening 17 may be made even wider to provide a passageway for a guide wire 25 so that the blunt end 26 of the guide wire may travel immediately adjacent the stack 10, as shown in
Preferably, the proximal end 25 a of the guide wire projects beyond the proximal end of the cannula, as illustrated in
Once the guide wire 25 has been positioned adjacent the wafer stack, the injection cannula 30 may be deployed concentrically over the wire, as shown in
The injection cannula provides an avenue for percutaneous introduction of fluent material into the vertebral body V1, as well as into the cancellous bone C, without the need for more invasive surgery. The injection cannula 30 of the present invention thus provides one advantage of being capable of introduction through the same working channel cannula 15 used to introduce the distraction components into the vertebral body V1. The working channel may be sized to accommodate introduction of the injection cannula even when the wafer insertion components are situated within the working channel.
As shown in
The number and extent of the openings can be set by the nature of the fluent material being injected into the cancellous bone C adjacent the stack 10. In the illustrated embodiment, three openings 35 are provided and are evenly spaced along the distal portion of the injection cannula 30. In this embodiment, the distal opening 31 is situated near the end of the stack and the most proximal of the openings 35 is situated at about one-third of the length of the stack. These openings in this illustrated embodiment are well suited for impregnating the cancellous bone C adjacent the stack with bone cement in an effort to reduce the pain associated with the fracture. In addition, the arrangement of the openings allows introduction of bone cement around at least a portion of the stack 10 to help stabilize the stack. Of course, additional openings can be provided proximal to the last opening shown in
The size of the openings may be calibrated to the type of fluent material, and more particularly to the viscosity of the material, and to the pressure at which the material is injected. It is preferable that the injection pressure be as low as possible while still achieving complete coverage of the stack 10 by the injected material. If the injection pressure is too great, the risk of extravasion increases. In some cases, the pressure and material viscosity can be sufficient to impregnate and interdigitate with the cancellous bone surrounding the stack.
Once the injection cannula is positioned within the cancellous bone C, the guide wire 25 is removed. This frees the channel of the injection cannula 30 for the passage of fluent material. The handle 39 of the injection cannula 30 may be configured to provide an anchor for attachment of a source for the fluent material. In the preferred embodiment, that source is a hypodermic syringe 46 as shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, the syringe is operated manually and the injection pressure is controlled by the amount of pressure applied to the syringe plunger. Nominally, the amount of injection pressure that can be generated by a syringe is less than the pressure at which extravasion becomes a problem. In an alternative, the source of fluent material may be a powered device, such as a pump, although care must be taken to limit the injection pressure, as discussed above.
In one embodiment of the invention, the fluent material is a hardenable material, such as PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate). The PMMA impregnates or integrates with the cancellous bone adjacent the distraction component or stack 10 to help stabilize the fractured body. It is believed that pain associated with certain fractures, such as a vertebral compression fracture, arises due to micro-motion of the fractured bone. Adding a structural support, such as the wafer stack 10, restores the patency and height of the fractured bone, while the addition of the fluent material helps stabilize the bone by reducing this micro-motion. One acceptable PMMA is SIMPLEX™ by Stryker Corp. Other hardenable or “structural” materials, such as HAP (hydroxyapatite), may be injected through the cannula 30 to help stabilize the cancellous bone and/or stabilize the distraction component. These structural materials may or may not augment the structural support or load bearing capabilities of the stack 10.
In other embodiments of the invention, the injected fluent material is a non-load bearing or non-structural material (i.e., the material does not harden into a support column of material). In some cases, the non-structural fluent material will help stabilize the cancellous bone adjacent the stack. In other cases, the fluent material does not provide any stabilizing effect, but is instead provided as a vehicle for other beneficial or therapeutic features. In certain embodiments, the fluent material may be osteo-inductive, such as BMP (bone morphogenic protein), osteo-conductive, such as HAP, or pharmaceutical materials. In one specific embodiment, the fluent material injected through the openings 31 and 35 is a bone filler material, such as OSTEOFIL®, marketed by Medtronic Sofamor, or GRAFTON®, produced by Osteotech, that integrates with the cancellous bone surrounding the stack 10.
In a modification of the method of the present invention, the working channel cannula may be at least partially withdrawn once the guide wire 25 is in position. Thus, as shown in
In a specific embodiment, the guide wire 25 is a standard 1.6 mm diameter wire. Thus, the injection cannula 30 has an inner diameter of at least 1.65 mm, and preferably about 1.8-2.0 mm with an outer diameter of about 3.0-3.5 mm. The size of the opening 17 of the working channel cannula 15 is dictated by the size of the wafers that form the stack 10, which may range from 2 to 12 mm in width and 0.2-6.0 mm in thickness, for example. The wafer size determines the dimensions of the track 13 of the wafer inserter 12, and the cannula 15 must be sized to receive that track therein. Thus, at a minimum, the cannula opening 17 may have a width of about 5 to 15 mm and a height of 2 to 8 mm. In some embodiments, the cannula is sized to simultaneously accommodate the wafer inserter and the injection cannula, so the largest overall width of the opening 17 may range from about 10 mm for the smallest wafers to about 20 mm for the largest wafers.
In a further embodiment of the invention, the injection cannula may be modified to the cannula 50 illustrated in
In yet another variation of the invention, the working channel cannula 15 and the injection cannula 30 is used for bifurcated injection. In other words, the injection cannula may be positioned adjacent one side and then adjacent the opposite side of the stack 10 to inject the fluent material on both sides of the height restoring distraction component. The working channel cannula 15 may have a width sufficient to provide clearance for the wafers 11 and an injection cannula 30 on both sides of the wafers. Alternatively, the two cannulae may be manipulated to position the injection cannula adjacent one side or the other of the stack 10. This manipulation is best accomplished with the working channel cannula offset from the vertebral body V1, as shown in
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same should be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character. It is understood that only the preferred embodiments have been presented and that all changes, modifications and further applications that come within the spirit of the invention are desired to be protected.
For example, while the embodiments described above contemplate injecting the fluent material after the stack 10 has been constructed and the space distracted, the injection step can occur at any point in the distraction process. Thus, the injection tube can be maintained within the working channel cannula 15 as the wafers forming the stack are sequentially introduced. Structural (load-bearing or hardenable) or non-structural material can be introduced at any time. For instance, the fluent material can be a binder composition that binds the wafers upon curing, so an amount of the composition may be introduced as each new wafer is inserted into the stack. Of course, with this approach, the injection cannula 30 and handle 39 may require modification so as to avoid interference with the wafer inserter 13 (
As a further alternative, the positioning of the discharge openings 35 can be modified from that shown in
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3750667||Jan 31, 1972||Aug 7, 1973||Maximov V||Device for intraosseous injection of liquid substances|
|US3893445||Jan 9, 1974||Jul 8, 1975||Becton Dickinson Co||Bone marrow biopsy instrument|
|US4142517||Jul 23, 1976||Mar 6, 1979||Contreras Guerrero De Stavropo||Apparatus for extracting bone marrow specimens|
|US4313434||Oct 17, 1980||Feb 2, 1982||David Segal||Fracture fixation|
|US4492576||Jun 15, 1982||Jan 8, 1985||Dragan William B||Dental syringe and method of packaging and dispensing a dental material|
|US4684363||Jun 13, 1986||Aug 4, 1987||American Hospital Supply Corporation||Rapidly inflatable balloon catheter and method|
|US4736738||May 2, 1985||Apr 12, 1988||Matej Lipovsek||Instrument kit and procedure for performing posterior lumbar interbody fusion|
|US4793351||Jun 15, 1987||Dec 27, 1988||Mansfield Scientific, Inc.||Multi-lumen balloon catheter|
|US4904260||Jul 25, 1988||Feb 27, 1990||Cedar Surgical, Inc.||Prosthetic disc containing therapeutic material|
|US4969888||Feb 9, 1989||Nov 13, 1990||Arie Scholten||Surgical protocol for fixation of osteoporotic bone using inflatable device|
|US5108404||Aug 15, 1990||Apr 28, 1992||Arie Scholten||Surgical protocol for fixation of bone using inflatable device|
|US5219328||Jan 3, 1990||Jun 15, 1993||Cryolife, Inc.||Fibrin sealant delivery method|
|US5300035||Feb 26, 1993||Apr 5, 1994||Mectra Labs, Inc.||Threaded screw trocar with sealing mechanism|
|US5318524||Mar 2, 1992||Jun 7, 1994||Cryolife, Inc.||Fibrin sealant delivery kit|
|US5331975||Mar 2, 1990||Jul 26, 1994||Bonutti Peter M||Fluid operated retractors|
|US5411491||May 28, 1993||May 2, 1995||Abbott Laboratories||Low profile gastrostomy device with one-way cross-slit valve|
|US5431676||Mar 5, 1993||Jul 11, 1995||Innerdyne Medical, Inc.||Trocar system having expandable port|
|US5443514||Oct 1, 1993||Aug 22, 1995||Acromed Corporation||Method for using spinal implants|
|US5468245||Feb 3, 1994||Nov 21, 1995||Vargas, Iii; Joseph H.||Biomedical cement bonding enhancer|
|US5505732||Jun 7, 1995||Apr 9, 1996||Michelson; Gary K.||Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants|
|US5514153||Feb 14, 1994||May 7, 1996||General Surgical Innovations, Inc.||Method of dissecting tissue layers|
|US5549565||Jul 13, 1993||Aug 27, 1996||Symbiosis Corporation||Reusable surgical trocar with disposable valve assembly|
|US5556429||May 6, 1994||Sep 17, 1996||Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc.||Joint resurfacing system|
|US5562736||Oct 17, 1994||Oct 8, 1996||Raymedica, Inc.||Method for surgical implantation of a prosthetic spinal disc nucleus|
|US5645597||Dec 29, 1995||Jul 8, 1997||Krapiva; Pavel I.||Disc replacement method and apparatus|
|US5667520||Aug 29, 1994||Sep 16, 1997||General Surgical Innovations, Inc.||Method of performing balloon dissection|
|US5681289||Aug 14, 1995||Oct 28, 1997||Medicinelodge Inc.||Chemical dispensing system|
|US5685826||Nov 2, 1994||Nov 11, 1997||General Surgical Innovations, Inc.||Mechanically expandable arthroscopic retractors and method of using the same|
|US5697889||May 5, 1995||Dec 16, 1997||Gus J. Slotman||Surgical instruments useful for endoscopic spinal procedures|
|US5702446||Oct 18, 1996||Dec 30, 1997||Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System||Bone prosthesis|
|US5716416||Sep 10, 1996||Feb 10, 1998||Lin; Chih-I||Artificial intervertebral disk and method for implanting the same|
|US5720726||Sep 20, 1996||Feb 24, 1998||Medtronic, Inc.||Balloon catheter having retention enhancements on the balloon|
|US5752969||Jun 16, 1994||May 19, 1998||Sofamor S.N.C.||Instrument for the surgical treatment of an intervertebral disc by the anterior route|
|US5762629||May 2, 1996||Jun 9, 1998||Smith & Nephew, Inc.||Oval cannula assembly and method of use|
|US5800549||Apr 30, 1997||Sep 1, 1998||Howmedica Inc.||Method and apparatus for injecting an elastic spinal implant|
|US5819497||Feb 20, 1997||Oct 13, 1998||Knepper; Richard T.||Method and device for repairing fasteners attached to plaster board|
|US5827318||May 27, 1997||Oct 27, 1998||General Surgical Innovations, Inc.||Method of dissecting tissue layers|
|US5860997||Jun 5, 1995||Jan 19, 1999||General Surgical Innovations, Inc.||Method of dissecting tissue layers|
|US5888220||Jan 23, 1996||Mar 30, 1999||Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc.||Articulating joint repair|
|US5954739||Jun 23, 1997||Sep 21, 1999||General Surgical Innovations, Inc.||Method of dissecting tissue layers|
|US6017305||Jan 29, 1996||Jan 25, 2000||General Surgical Innovations, Inc.||Method of retracting bones|
|US6017350||Oct 3, 1997||Jan 25, 2000||Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc.||Pressurizer apparatus|
|US6030401||Oct 7, 1998||Feb 29, 2000||Nuvasive, Inc.||Vertebral enplate decorticator and osteophyte resector|
|US6039761||Feb 12, 1997||Mar 21, 2000||Li Medical Technologies, Inc.||Intervertebral spacer and tool and method for emplacement thereof|
|US6042596||Sep 25, 1997||Mar 28, 2000||General Surgical Innovations, Inc.||Method of performing balloon dissection|
|US6048346||Aug 13, 1997||Apr 11, 2000||Kyphon Inc.||Systems and methods for injecting flowable materials into bones|
|US6063378||Aug 20, 1998||May 16, 2000||Seikagaku Corporation||Therapeutic agent for herniated intervertebral disc|
|US6083202||Oct 14, 1999||Jul 4, 2000||Syntheon, Llc||Endoscopic needle injection device|
|US6113639||Mar 23, 1999||Sep 5, 2000||Raymedica, Inc.||Trial implant and trial implant kit for evaluating an intradiscal space|
|US6123687||Feb 27, 1998||Sep 26, 2000||Cohesion Technologies, Inc.||Cell separation device and metering syringe|
|US6126682||Sep 15, 1998||Oct 3, 2000||Oratec Interventions, Inc.||Method for treating annular fissures in intervertebral discs|
|US6135999||Feb 12, 1998||Oct 24, 2000||Oratec Internationals, Inc.||Concave probe for arthroscopic surgery|
|US6140452||Nov 18, 1998||Oct 31, 2000||Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc.||Biomaterial for in situ tissue repair|
|US6174311||Oct 28, 1998||Jan 16, 2001||Sdgi Holdings, Inc.||Interbody fusion grafts and instrumentation|
|US6183518||Mar 23, 1999||Feb 6, 2001||Anthony C. Ross||Method of replacing nucleus pulposus and repairing the intervertebral disk|
|US6187023||Jun 5, 1995||Feb 13, 2001||General Surgical Innovations, Inc.||Method of dissecting tissue layers|
|US6187048||May 23, 1995||Feb 13, 2001||Surgical Dynamics, Inc.||Intervertebral disc implant|
|US6206921||Feb 22, 1999||Mar 27, 2001||Peter A. Guagliano||Method of replacing nucleus pulposus and repairing the intervertebral disk|
|US6210376||Apr 8, 1999||Apr 3, 2001||New York University||Cannulated delivery pin|
|US6210397||Jan 13, 1999||Apr 3, 2001||A-Med Systems, Inc.||Sealing cannula device|
|US6224599||Mar 2, 2000||May 1, 2001||Matthew G. Baynham||Viewable wedge distractor device|
|US6224630||May 29, 1998||May 1, 2001||Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc.||Implantable tissue repair device|
|US6245107||May 28, 1999||Jun 12, 2001||Bret A. Ferree||Methods and apparatus for treating disc herniation|
|US6248110||Jun 9, 1997||Jun 19, 2001||Kyphon, Inc.||Systems and methods for treating fractured or diseased bone using expandable bodies|
|US6248131||Sep 5, 1997||Jun 19, 2001||Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc.||Articulating joint repair|
|US6261311||Jul 30, 1999||Jul 17, 2001||Oratec Interventions, Inc.||Method and apparatus for treating intervertebral discs|
|US6264659||Dec 8, 1999||Jul 24, 2001||Anthony C. Ross||Method of treating an intervertebral disk|
|US6277122||Oct 15, 1999||Aug 21, 2001||Sdgi Holdings, Inc.||Distraction instrument with fins for maintaining insertion location|
|US6306177||Dec 18, 1997||Oct 23, 2001||Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc.||Biomaterial system for in situ tissue repair|
|US6312469||Sep 13, 1999||Nov 6, 2001||Medtronic Inc.||Lamina prosthesis for delivery of medical treatment|
|US6312725||Apr 16, 1999||Nov 6, 2001||Cohesion Technologies, Inc.||Rapid gelling biocompatible polymer composition|
|US6332894||Mar 7, 2000||Dec 25, 2001||Zimmer, Inc.||Polymer filled spinal fusion cage|
|US6340369||Aug 14, 2000||Jan 22, 2002||Bret A. Ferree||Treating degenerative disc disease with harvested disc cells and analogues of the extracellular matrix|
|US6344058||Aug 14, 2000||Feb 5, 2002||Bret A. Ferree||Treating degenerative disc disease through transplantation of allograft disc and vertebral endplates|
|US6370420||Nov 17, 1998||Apr 9, 2002||Mark Kraft||System and method for objectively verifying an internal disc disruption|
|US6371990||Oct 16, 2000||Apr 16, 2002||Bret A. Ferree||Annulus fibrosis augmentation methods and apparatus|
|US6395007||Mar 14, 2000||May 28, 2002||American Osteomedix, Inc.||Apparatus and method for fixation of osteoporotic bone|
|US6402750||Apr 4, 2000||Jun 11, 2002||Spinlabs, Llc||Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders|
|US6402784||Jul 10, 1998||Jun 11, 2002||Aberdeen Orthopaedic Developments Limited||Intervertebral disc nucleus prosthesis|
|US6423333||Nov 29, 1999||Jul 23, 2002||Protein Polymer Technologies, Inc.||Sealing or filling tissue defects using polyfunctional crosslinking agents and protein polymers|
|US6425919||Jun 30, 2000||Jul 30, 2002||Intrinsic Orthopedics, Inc.||Devices and methods of vertebral disc augmentation|
|US6428576||Apr 14, 2000||Aug 6, 2002||Endospine, Ltd.||System for repairing inter-vertebral discs|
|US6436143||May 12, 2000||Aug 20, 2002||Anthony C. Ross||Method and apparatus for treating intervertebral disks|
|US6440138||Apr 6, 1998||Aug 27, 2002||Kyphon Inc.||Structures and methods for creating cavities in interior body regions|
|US6443988||Nov 18, 1998||Sep 3, 2002||Disc Dynamics, Inc.||Mold apparatus and kit for in situ tissue repair|
|US6447512||Jan 6, 2000||Sep 10, 2002||Spinal Concepts, Inc.||Instrument and method for implanting an interbody fusion device|
|US6482235||Aug 18, 2000||Nov 19, 2002||Intrinsic Orthopedics, Inc.||Devices and methods of vertebral disc augmentation|
|US6500205||Apr 19, 2000||Dec 31, 2002||Gary K. Michelson||Expandable threaded arcuate interbody spinal fusion implant with cylindrical configuration during insertion|
|US6508839||Oct 25, 2000||Jan 21, 2003||Intrinsic Orthopedics, Inc.||Devices and methods of vertebral disc augmentation|
|US6558390||Feb 13, 2001||May 6, 2003||Axiamed, Inc.||Methods and apparatus for performing therapeutic procedures in the spine|
|US6579291||Oct 10, 2000||Jun 17, 2003||Spinalabs, Llc||Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders|
|US6592625||Sep 5, 2001||Jul 15, 2003||Anulex Technologies, Inc.||Spinal disc annulus reconstruction method and spinal disc annulus stent|
|US6595998||Jun 1, 2001||Jul 22, 2003||Spinewave, Inc.||Tissue distraction device|
|US6726691||Apr 5, 2001||Apr 27, 2004||Kyphon Inc.||Methods for treating fractured and/or diseased bone|
|US6740093||Feb 27, 2001||May 25, 2004||Stephen Hochschuler||Method and apparatus for treating a vertebral body|
|US6805695||Mar 18, 2003||Oct 19, 2004||Spinalabs, Llc||Devices and methods for annular repair of intervertebral discs|
|US6814736||Dec 10, 2001||Nov 9, 2004||Kyphon Inc.||Methods for injecting flowable materials into bones|
|US6981981||Dec 29, 2003||Jan 3, 2006||Kyphon Inc.||Inflatable device for use in surgical protocol relating to fixation of bone|
|US7004945||Oct 29, 2002||Feb 28, 2006||Spinewave, Inc.||Devices and methods for the restoration of a spinal disc|
|US7112205||Jun 17, 2003||Sep 26, 2006||Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc.||Apparatus and methods for delivering compounds into vertebrae for vertebroplasty|
|US7261720||Oct 7, 2002||Aug 28, 2007||Kyphon Inc.||Inflatable device for use in surgical protocol relating to fixation of bone|
|US7294132||Oct 3, 2003||Nov 13, 2007||Wright Medical Technology, Inc.||Radially ported needle for delivering bone graft material and method of use|
|US7338493||Jun 27, 2003||Mar 4, 2008||Biomet Manufacturing Corp.||Method and apparatus for cementing a screw anchor|
|US20010021852||Dec 20, 2000||Sep 13, 2001||Chappius James L.||Fenestrated surgical screw and method|
|US20020032155||Jul 2, 2001||Mar 14, 2002||Ferree Bret A.||Method of treating disc herniation and disc degeneration with concentrated growth and differentiation factors|
|US20020045942||Jul 18, 2001||Apr 18, 2002||Ham Michael J.||Procedure for repairing damaged discs|
|US20020049498||Oct 24, 2001||Apr 25, 2002||Yuksel K. Umit||In situ bioprosthetic filler and methods, particularly for the in situ formation of vertebral disc bioprosthetics|
|US20020049527||Jun 25, 2001||Apr 25, 2002||Atsushi Kohno||Traffic information transmitting system, traffic information collecting and distributing system and traffic information collecting and distributing method|
|US20020099385||Oct 25, 2001||Jul 25, 2002||Kyphon Inc.||Systems and methods for reducing fractured bone using a fracture reduction cannula|
|US20020111688||Mar 1, 2002||Aug 15, 2002||Cauthen Joseph C.||Intervertebral disc annulus stent|
|US20020120337||Apr 30, 2002||Aug 29, 2002||Cauthen Joseph C.||Intervertebral disc annulus repair device|
|US20020123807||Feb 15, 2002||Sep 5, 2002||Cauthen Joseph C.||Spinal disc annulus reconstruction method and spinal disc annulus stent|
|US20020147497||Apr 6, 2001||Oct 10, 2002||Integrated Vascular Systems, Inc.||Methods for treating spinal discs|
|US20020151980||Jun 11, 2002||Oct 17, 2002||Cauthen Joseph C.||Intervertebral disc annulus repair device|
|US20020156531||Jun 11, 2002||Oct 24, 2002||Felt Jeffrey C.||Biomaterial system for in situ tissue repair|
|US20020183761||Jun 1, 2001||Dec 5, 2002||Wes Johnson||Tissue distraction device|
|US20020189622||Apr 29, 2002||Dec 19, 2002||Cauthen Joseph C.||Spinal disc annulus reconstruction method and spinal disc annulus stent|
|US20030009227||Sep 5, 2002||Jan 9, 2003||Lambrecht Gregory H.||Methods of reinforcing an annulus fibrosis|
|US20030033017||May 24, 2002||Feb 13, 2003||The Regents Of The University Of California||Biodegradable/bioactive nucleus pulposus implant and method for treating degenerated intervertebral discs|
|US20030082169||Oct 29, 2002||May 1, 2003||Boyd Lawrence M.||System and method for the pretreatment of the endplates of an intervertebral disc|
|US20030083642||Oct 29, 2002||May 1, 2003||Boyd Lawrence M.||Devices and methods for the restoration of a spinal disc|
|US20030120345||Feb 12, 2003||Jun 26, 2003||Cauthen Joseph C.||Spinal disc annulus reconstruction method and spinal disc annulus stent|
|US20040059339||Sep 19, 2002||Mar 25, 2004||Roehm Thomas E.||Oval dilator and retractor set and method|
|US20040068268||Sep 22, 2003||Apr 8, 2004||Boyd Lawrence M.||Devices and methods for the restoration of a spinal disc|
|US20040073213||Oct 9, 2002||Apr 15, 2004||Hassan Serhan||Device for distracting vertebrae and delivering a flowable material into a disc space|
|US20040098017||Sep 29, 2003||May 20, 2004||Advanced Polymers, Incorporated||Apparatus and methods for bone, tissue and duct dilatation|
|US20040186471||Dec 7, 2002||Sep 23, 2004||Sdgi Holdings, Inc.||Method and apparatus for intervertebral disc expansion|
|US20040229878||Jul 31, 2003||Nov 18, 2004||Depuy Spine, Inc.||Transdiscal administration of specific inhibitors of P38 kinase|
|US20050070913||Jun 22, 2004||Mar 31, 2005||Milbocker Michael T.||Devices and methods for spine repair|
|US20050102030||Dec 10, 2004||May 12, 2005||Cryolife, Inc.||In situ bioprosthetic filler and methods, particularly for the in situ formation of vertebral disc bioprosthetics|
|US20050209602||Nov 9, 2004||Sep 22, 2005||Disc Dynamics, Inc.||Multi-stage biomaterial injection system for spinal implants|
|US20050234425||Apr 16, 2004||Oct 20, 2005||Innospine, Inc.||Spinal diagnostic methods and apparatus|
|EP0277282A1||Oct 24, 1987||Aug 10, 1988||Gebrüder Sulzer Aktiengesellschaft||Joint endoprosthesis|
|FR2639823B1||Title not available|
|WO1991000713A1||Jun 12, 1990||Jan 24, 1991||Martin Nolde||Nucleus prosthesis with an introductory device and probe to determine the size of nucleus prosthesis required|
|WO2001068005A2||Mar 14, 2001||Sep 20, 2001||Sdgi Holdings Inc||Vertebral implant for promoting arthrodesis of the spine|
|1||510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness, "KyphX(TM) Inflatable Bone Tamp", Jan. 25, 2001 (5 pgs).|
|2||510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness, "KyphX™ Inflatable Bone Tamp", Jan. 25, 2001 (5 pgs).|
|3||Boyd, Lawrence M., Mahar, Andrew and Cappello, Joseph, "Injectable Biomaterials for Augmentation of the Nucleus Pulposus", International Symposium-Non fusion techniques in spinal surgery, Feb. 14-15, 2003, (12 pgs).|
|4||Boyd, Lawrence M., Mahar, Andrew and Cappello, Joseph, "Injectable Biomaterials for Augmentation of the Nucleus Pulposus", International Symposium—Non fusion techniques in spinal surgery, Feb. 14-15, 2003, (12 pgs).|
|5||Garfin, Steven R., Yuan, Hansen A. and Reiley, Mark A., "Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty for the Treatment of Painful Osteoporotic Compression Fractures", SPINE, vol. 26, No. 14, 2001, pp. 1511-1515.|
|6||Kitchel, Scott and Cappello, Joseph, "Injectable Biomaterials for Augmentation of the Nucleus Pulposus", http://127.0.0.1:8080/SAS3C1/presentation-list8.php, Apr. 26, 2005, (6 pgs).|
|7||Kitchel, Scott and Cappello, Joseph, "Injectable Biomaterials for Augmentation of the Nucleus Pulposus", http://127.0.0.1:8080/SAS3C1/presentation—list8.php, Apr. 26, 2005, (6 pgs).|
|8||Lieberman, I.H., Dudeney, S., Reinhardt, M.K. and Bell, G., "Initial Outcome and Efficacy of "Kyphoplasty" in the Treatment of Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures", SPINE, vol. 26, No. 14, pp. 1631-1638, 2001, (8 pgs).|
|9||Mahar, Andrew, Oka, Richard, Whitledge, Jon, Cappello, Joseph R., Powell, Jim, McArthur, Tina, Capello, Joseph, "Biomechanical Efficacy of a Protein Polymer Hydrogel for Inter-Vertebral Nucleus Augmentation and Replacement", World Congress on Biomechanics, Calgary, Canada, Aug. 5, 2002, (4 pgs).|
|10||Premarket Notification [510(k)] Summary, Kyphx Directional Inflatable Bone Tamp-Traditional 510(k), Kyphon Inc., Jul. 16, 2003, (5 pgs).|
|U.S. Classification||623/17.11, 606/92, 606/94, 606/90, 606/105|
|International Classification||A61B17/88, A61B17/56, A61B17/58|
|Cooperative Classification||A61B17/8811, A61B17/8852, A61B17/70|
|European Classification||A61B17/88C2, A61B17/88A2C|