Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS8214498 B2
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 12/582,994
Publication dateJul 3, 2012
Filing dateOct 21, 2009
Priority dateJun 4, 2003
Also published asUS7603464, US7734786, US7814207, US20050021758, US20080256243, US20080263208, US20100042727, WO2004110023A1
Publication number12582994, 582994, US 8214498 B2, US 8214498B2, US-B2-8214498, US8214498 B2, US8214498B2
InventorsPayton R. White
Original AssigneeSony Computer Entertainment, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method and system for managing a peer of a peer-to-peer network to search for available resources
US 8214498 B2
Abstract
A method and apparatus for managing a peer of a peer-to-peer network to search for an available resource includes organizing peers of the peer-to-peer network in a hierarchical structure based upon locality of the peers. A request for the available resource is received at a parent from a peer as a request bit string. An aggregate availability bit string representing an aggregate of resources available at all children associated with the parent is accessed to determine if one or more children of the parent are able to fulfill the resource request. The determination is by performing a logical operation with bits of the request bit string and bits of aggregate availability bit string. When more than one child of the parent is able to provide the requested resource, a child with available resource that is closest to the peer requesting the resource is identified. The available resource of the identified child is used to satisfy the resource request of the peer.
Images(11)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(10)
1. A computer implemented method for managing a peer of a peer-to-peer network to search for an available resource, comprising method operations of:
organizing peers of the peer-to-peer network in a hierarchical structure based upon locality of the peers;
receiving a request for the available resource at a parent, the request received as a request bit string from the peer;
accessing an aggregate availability bit string associated with the parent, the aggregate availability bit string representing an aggregate resource available at all children of the parent;
determining if one or more children of the parent are able to provide the available resource, the determination is by performing a logical operation with bits of the request bit string and bits of the aggregate availability bit string;
when more than one child of the parent is able to provide the available resource, identifying a child with available resource that is closest to the peer to provide resource to satisfy the resource request of the request bit string.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein organizing peers further includes,
when a request for the available resource is received,
identifying the peers in the peer-to-peer network with available resources requested by the request bit string based on the locality; and
dynamically organizing the peers into the hierarchical structure based on the availability of resources and locality of the peers, the peers closest to the peer requesting resources capable of providing at least a portion of the resources requested by the request bit string.
3. The method of claim 1, further includes,
when the parent is unable to provide available resources to satisfy the request bit string,
defining a plurality of sub-request strings from the request bit string;
determining one or more children of the parent to satisfy one or more of the plurality of sub-request strings;
when more than one child of the parent is able to satisfy a sub-request string, selecting a child with available resource that is closest to the peer to provide resource to satisfy the resource requested by the sub-request string.
4. The method of claim 3, further includes,
when the parent is able to satisfy only a portion of the request bit string,
identifying a second parent with one or more children to provide the resource to satisfy one or more of the sub-request strings, the identification of the second parent based on available resources of the one or more children of the second parent, locality of the second parent and locality of one or more children associated with the second parent.
5. The method of claim 4, further includes
selecting the remaining one or more children of the second parent to satisfy the requests of the remaining one or more sub-request strings based on the locality, the available resources to satisfy the one or more sub-request strings satisfying the resources requested by the request string.
6. A computer readable medium having computer readable code which when implemented by a computer system manages a peer of a peer-to-peer network to search for an available resource, comprising:
program code for organizing peers of the peer-to-peer network in a hierarchical structure based upon locality of the peers;
program code for receiving a request for the available resource at a parent, the request received as a request bit string from the peer;
program code for accessing an aggregate availability bit string associated with the parent, the aggregate availability bit string representing an aggregate resource available at all children of the parent;
program code for determining if one or more children of the parent are able to provide the available resource, the determination is by performing a logical operation with bits of the request bit string and bits of the aggregate availability bit string;
when more than one child of the parent is able to provide the available resource, program code for identifying a child with available resource that is closest to the peer to provide resource to satisfy the resource request of the request bit string.
7. The computer readable medium of claim 6, wherein program code for organizing peers further includes,
when a request for the available resource is received,
program code for identifying the peers in the peer-to-peer network with available resources requested by the request bit string based on the locality; and
program code for dynamically organizing the peers into the hierarchical structure based on the availability of resources and locality of the peers such that the peers closest to the peer requesting resources capable of providing at least a portion of the resources requested by the request bit string.
8. The computer readable medium of claim 6, further includes,
when the parent is unable to provide available resources to satisfy the request bit string,
program code for defining a plurality of sub-request strings from the request bit string;
program code for determining one or more children of the parent to satisfy one or more of the plurality of sub-request strings;
when more than one child of the parent is able to satisfy a sub-request string, program code for selecting a child with available resource that is closest to the peer to provide resource to satisfy the resource requested by the sub-request string.
9. The computer readable medium of claim 8, further includes,
when the parent is able to satisfy only a portion of the request bit string,
program code for identifying a second parent with one or more children to provide the resource to satisfy one or more of the sub-request strings, the identification of the second parent based on available resources of the one or more children of the second parent, locality of the second parent and locality of one or more children associated with the second parent.
10. The computer readable medium of claim 9, further includes
program code for selecting the one or more children of the second parent to satisfy the requests of the remaining one or more sub-request strings based on the locality, the available resources to satisfy the one or more sub-request strings satisfy the resources requested by the request string.
Description
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/214,746, filed on Jun. 20, 2008 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,734,786, and entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING AVAILABLE RESOURCES IN A PEER-TO-PEER NETWORK,” from which priority is claimed under 35 USC §120, which is a Divisional Application of Ser. No. 10/857,559, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,603,464, filed on May 27, 2004, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/476,084, filed on Jun. 4, 2003, and entitled “VIRTUAL/REAL WORLD DYNAMIC INTERCOMMUNICATION METHODS AND SYSTEMS,”, all of which are herein incorporated by reference.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/214,617 filed on Jun. 20, 2008, and entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING AVAILABLE RESOURCES IN A PEER-TO-PEER NETWORK,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

BACKGROUND

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to peer-to-peer networks, and more specifically to manipulating and querying arbitrary resources of peers in the peer-to-peer network.

2. Description of the Related Art

Currently, a client can access resources through a server over a network. For example, FIG. 1 is a prior art diagram illustrating a client 140 accessing resources over a network 130. A server 110 interfaced by a proxy server 120 provides access to multiple resources of the server 110. The resources can include a central processing unit (CPU) 112, a memory 114, a disk 116, and a printer 118. Typically, the client 140 requests access to a resource, such as the printer 118 and the proxy server 120 either grants or disallows access. It should be appreciated that in this type of system the available resources are pre-set as being available to the client. That is, the client does not have to search for available resources that may be desired.

In a decentralized network, e.g., a peer-to-peer network, as the number of peers in the network become large, each peer is incapable of notifying each of the other peers of its available resources because of the large number of peers. One barrier for a system having a large number of peers, i.e., hundreds of thousands of peers, is the bandwidth required for handling the publishing of available resources between each of the peers. One technique to address the publishing of resources has been to allow searching for an exact resource and not a range of resources. This type of search is limiting as an exact amount is not the preferable search format, i.e., it is preferable to search for a resource having a minimum or maximum percentage of the resource available. In addition, as resource availability tends to constantly change, the update rate and the bandwidth consumed by the constant updates of the exact available amount of the resource become excessive.

The invention can also be embodied as computer readable code on a computer readable medium. The computer readable medium is any data storage device that can store data, which can be thereafter be read by a computer system. Examples of the computer readable medium include hard drives, network attached storage (NAS), read-only memory, random-access memory, CD-ROMs, CD-Rs, CD-RWs, magnetic tapes and other optical and non-optical data storage devices.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Broadly speaking, the present invention is a method and system for identifying available resources in a peer-to-peer network. It should be appreciated that the present invention can be implemented in numerous ways, such as a process, an apparatus, a system, or a method on a computer readable medium. Several inventive embodiments of the present invention are described below.

In one embodiment, a method for managing a peer of a peer-to-peer network to search for an available resource is provided. The method includes organizing peers of the peer-to-peer network in a hierarchical structure based upon locality of the peers. A request for the available resource is received from the peer at a parent. The request is received as a request bit string. An aggregate availability bit string associated with the parent representing an aggregate resource available at all children of the parent is accessed. A logical operation is performed with bits of the request bit string and bits of aggregate availability bit string to determine if resources from one or more children of the parent are able to provide the requested resource. When more than one child of the parent is able to provide the available resource, a child with available resource that is closest to the peer requesting the resource is identified. The identified child has resources that satisfy the resource request of the request bit string.

In another embodiment, a computer readable medium for managing a peer of a peer-to-peer network to search for an available resource is provided. The computer readable medium for managing the peer includes program code for organizing peers of the peer-to-peer network in a hierarchical structure based upon locality of the peers; program code for receiving a request for the available resource at a parent, wherein the request is received as a request bit string; program code for accessing an aggregate availability bit string associated with the parent, wherein the aggregate availability bit string represents an aggregate of resources available at all children of the parent; program code for performing a logical operation with bits of the request bit string and bits of the aggregate availability bit string to determine if one or more children of the parent are able to provide the requested resource; program code for identifying a child with available resource that is closest to the peer requesting resource when more than one child of the parent is able to provide the available resource, the child with available resource is able to fulfill the resource request of the peer.

Other aspects of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the principles of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, and like reference numerals designate like structural elements.

FIG. 1 is a prior art diagram illustrating a client 140 accessing resources over a network 130.

FIG. 2A is a diagram illustrating a fully connected peer-to-peer network, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 2B is a diagram illustrating a peer publishing resources in a peer-to-peer network, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 2C is a simplified schematic diagram illustrating a scheme for publishing and requesting resources between zones and a peer-to-peer network, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 2D is a simplified schematic diagram illustrating computing devices functioning as peers in one of the zones of the peer-to-peer network illustrated in FIG. 2A.

FIGS. 2E and 2F are simplified schematics illustrating two hierarchical tree structures that may be incorporated to organize the peers of the P2P network in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 3 is a simplified schematic diagram illustrating a method for expressing resource availability in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 4 is a simplified graphical representation of the advantage of using a power law distribution in a large network in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 5A is a simplified schematic diagram illustrating a hierarchical tree structure used for publishing and locating available resources in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 5B is an expanded portion of the hierarchical tree of FIG. 5A.

FIG. 6A is a simplified schematic diagram illustrating a scheme for routing resource queries through the hierarchical tree structure in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 6B is a simplified schematic diagram illustrating a scheme for satisfying aggregate queries in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 7 is a simplified schematic diagram illustrating the block levels associated with the application of the scheme for identifying available resources in a peer-to-peer network in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 8 is a flow chart diagram illustrating the method operations for a search for an available resource performed in a peer-to-peer network in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following embodiments describe a method and apparatus for identifying an available resource in a decentralized network. As used herein, resources can include any physical component of a peer that is connected to the peer-to-peer (P2P) network. Exemplary physical components include processors, co-processors, storage devices, memory, swap space, radio receivers, radio telescopes, image capture devices such as cameras, printers, display devices, security devices, and media-specific devices such as digital video disc (DVD) drives and CD drives. Thus, any physical component is possible, as long as a first peer connected to the P2P network can take command and control of the physical component of a second peer in the P2P network. It will be obvious, however, to one skilled in the art, that the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.

Peer-to-peer networks are decentralized computing systems such that each peer has roughly equivalent capabilities with any other peer. In some exemplary embodiments, a peer can include any computing device, such as a desktop-class computer, a server-class computer, a mobile device, a game machine, and a game console. However, in other embodiments, the peer can be a computing device that is capable of establishing communication with another computing device, as long as the computing devices are connected to the P2P network.

In contrast with centralized computing systems, such as client/server environments, any peer in the P2P network can interact directly with any other peer in the P2P network. Thus, in the P2P network, a first peer is not a “server” for a second peer that is a “client” for applications and devices located on the server. Moreover, P2P networks can have many configurations. For example, FIG. 2A is a diagram illustrating a fully connected peer-to-peer network, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In the fully connected P2P network, first peer 160, second peer 170, third peer 180, and fourth peer 190 communicate directly with one another because each peer has a connection to every other peer. In one exemplary embodiment, a resource of first peer 160, such as a DVD recorder, co-processor, memory, etc., may be accessed by second peer 170, third peer 180, and/or fourth peer 190.

For example, when fourth peer 190 accesses the DVD recorder of first peer 160, first peer 160 interfaces with fourth peer 230 to provide command and control of the DVD recorder to fourth peer 190. The interface can be any suitable graphics interface. Exemplary embodiments can include a web browser, a terminal screen, and a graphics user interface (GUI). Additionally, the interface can be any mechanism, e.g., an application programming interface (API), that permits fourth peer 190 to take command and control of the DVD recorder of first peer 160, as long as the peers are connected in the P2P network. In order to access the resource of first peer 160, the first peer publishes the resource on the P2P network with some or all of the other peers.

FIG. 2B is a diagram illustrating a peer publishing resources in a peer-to-peer network, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The peers in the fully connected P2P network may be connected serially. In one embodiment of a non-fully connected P2P network, first peer 160 can connect to second peer 170. Second peer 170 can then connect to third peer 180, and so on. First peer 160 manages three available resources, such as first resource 162, second resource 164, and third resource 166. Further, the peers can have any number of resources and can also be connected in any network configuration, as long as the peers can communicate with one another in a P2P network. Exemplary resources include processors, co-processors, memory, disk space, video/coding/decoding resources, etc.

To identify the resources of a particular peer, such as first peer 160, the first peer publishes the resource. In one exemplary embodiment, first peer 160 publishes second resource 164 on the P2P network. Specifically, first peer 160 transmits message 172 to publish the second resource to second peer 170. After publication, any peer on the P2P network, such as third peer 180 and fourth peer 190, can access second resource 164 by identifying the peer that manages second resource 164. This identification process is described in more detail below. Because first peer 160 published second resource 164 to second peer 170, the second peer identifies first peer 160 as managing the second resource 164. Subsequently, third peer 170 and fourth peer 180 only need to send a request for second resource 164 to the peers on the P2P network to find out which peer manages second resource 164.

FIG. 2C is a simplified schematic diagram illustrating a scheme for publishing and requesting resources between zones and a peer-to-peer network, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. Zones 222, 224, 226, 228 and 230 represent different local areas containing peers. Each peer, such as peers 200, 212, 214, and 216 may connect to one another and each zone may connect to one another. In one embodiment, peer 200 can publish resources to multiple peers in other zones using multiple messages 218. After publication, if peer 216 desires access to a resource managed by peer 200, then peer 216 may transmit a message request 220 to other peers in zone 228. If a peer in zone 228 cannot identify the peer managing the resource requested by peer 216, then the message request 220 may propagate to other zones. Eventually, a peer in the peer-to-peer network from any of the zones can identify the peer managing the requested resource.

FIG. 2D is a simplified schematic diagram illustrating computing devices functioning as peers in one of the zones of the peer-to-peer network illustrated in FIG. 2A. Here, zone 230 includes peers 232 a through 232 d. Each of peers 232 a-d are in communication with each other as illustrated by lines 234 a-e. It should be appreciated that computing devices 232 a-d may be any suitable computing device such as a general purpose computer, a video game console, a hand-held electronic device, etc. Of course, the communication between peers may occur through a wired connection, a wireless connection, or some combination of the two.

FIGS. 2E and 2F are simplified schematics illustrating two hierarchical tree structures that may be incorporated to organize the peers of the P2P network in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. In FIG. 2E, a regular recursive tree is illustrated. Here each parent is associated with the same number of children. That is, each parent has three children here. It should be appreciated that each parent having three children is shown for exemplary purposes only and is not meant to be limiting as each parent may have any suitable number of children. In FIG. 2F, an irregular self organizing tree structure is illustrated. Here, the parent and children are organized based on a heuristic, such as locality. For example, the peers in this structure may organize themselves based on the network round trip time (rtt). It should be appreciated that each peer of the P2P network includes the required code to create the organized tree structure. That is, each peer is configured to communicate with each other in order to create the organized tree structure that enables the propagation of the low bandwidth bit stream in order to locate available resources within the P2P network.

FIG. 3 is a simplified schematic diagram illustrating a method for expressing resource availability in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. Here, the resource availability for resources such as co-processors, and random access memory (RAM) for peer one is illustrated by bit string 240. Each box within bit string 240 may be represented by a binary value in order to provide the bit string. For example, the eight bits of section 240 b of the bit string are allocated for describing the amount of free RAM. The eight bits of section 240 a represent the availability of co-processors. The available portion of RAM associated with peer one is represented in section 240 b-1. Here, the bits of section 240 b-1 may be a logical high value to indicate free RAM. Of course, a logical low value may be used to represent the free RAM rather than the logical high value. Bit string 242, which corresponds to peer two illustrates the same configuration as bit string 240, with the exception of a different amount of RAM being available and a different amount of co-processors being available. More specifically, the amount of free RAM illustrated in section 242 b-1 is a greater proportion of section 242 b, which represents the total amount of RAM as compared to the corresponding portion of peer one. The amount of available co-processors in section 242 a-1 is a representative portion of the total available co-processors illustrated by region 242 a. Thus, the availability of resources are expressed as an allocation of bits, in which each individual peer pushes out over the network to other peers.

The fixed set of bits represented in FIG. 3 provide the availability of the applicable resource. It should be appreciated that in one embodiment, rather than using a base two distribution, i.e., a one (logical high value) or a zero (logical low value), a power law representation may be used. Under a base two distribution, eight bits will have a limit of representing 256 units. However, under an alternative representation, such as, for example, a power law representation, eight bits may represent billions of units. It should be appreciated that it is not necessary to have a precise availability. That is, if there are gaps between certain numbers as may occur with a power law distribution, the gaps do not affect the scheme provided herein. As the embodiments described herein enable searching for a range of available resources and do not rely on an exact amount, the gaps become irrelevant. Thus, a power law representation may be used where there may be gaps in the numbers represented.

In yet another embodiment, it is possible to provide a hybrid model in which a portion of the bits represent one scheme such as a base two distribution, while the remainder of the bits represent an alternative scheme such as a power law representation. Here, a small number of available resources can be represented accurately through the base two distribution, while the large number of available resources required when dealing with a large number of users can utilize the power law distribution. It should be appreciated that each peer in the peer-to-peer network would have an evaluator to recognize that the first four bits represent a first semantic, while the second four bits are representing a second semantic to describe the available resources. In this embodiment, 24 or 16 units are available to be represented for a small amount of resources, while a power law distribution is used to represent available resources in excess of 16. In the organized/hierarchical tree structure discussed herein, the hybrid scheme is well suited for the aggregation as the higher level peers will be associated with a large amount of resources (power law distribution), while lower level peers are associated with a smaller amount of resources (binary distribution).

In one embodiment, the resource availability expressed in the bit strings of FIG. 3 is compatible with Bloom filters. A Bloom filter consists of two components: a set of hash functions and a bit vector of a given length. The length of the bit vector (number of bits) and the number of hash functions are set dependent upon the number of keys desired to be added and the acceptable error rate. The hash functions in a Bloom filter are configured so that their range matches the length of the bit vector. For example, if the bit vector is 200 bits long, the hash function returns a value between 1 and 200. A key is run through each of the hash functions and the result is treated as an offset into the bit vector to turn on the corresponding bit at that position. The hashing operation normally associated with Bloom filters can be replaced with other semantics, such as assigning semantic meaning to bits (like the binary or power-law values already discussed). This can be understood as a modified Bloom filter representation.

FIG. 4 is a simplified graphical representation of the advantage of using a power law distribution in a large network in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The Y axis represents a number of elements, while the X axis represents a number of events. A power law distribution represents the probability distribution of events as P[X]=y=ax−k where a and k are constants. In one embodiment, the constants are tested to be optimized empirically in order to provide the desired scalability. In another embodiment, the Bloom filter units may include bits evaluated in terms of a power law distribution (modified Bloom filter).

FIG. 5A is a simplified schematic diagram illustrating a hierarchical tree structure used for publishing and locating available resources in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The hierarchical tree structure of FIG. 5A illustrates root 252 at the top of the tree structure and a number of levels in which is defined a parent/child relationship. That is, on bottom level 251, in which each of the boxes represent a peer. The peers of level 251 are children of the corresponding peers represented on the next level. For example, peers 254 a-c are children of peer 254 d. It should be appreciated that the peers at the bottom level of the tree structure may be referred to as leaves. The bit strings represented in each of the peers of the hierarchical tree structure are used to indicate the available resources for the corresponding peer.

Still referring top FIG. 5A, in peer 254 a a bit string of 000101 is used to represent the availability of the resource, e.g., a co-processor, available memory, disc space, network bandwidth, etc. Each child's bit string is communicated to the corresponding parent. The parent of peer 254 a, i.e., peer 254 d, is configured to aggregate the received bit strings from each child and incorporate its own available resources in order to define a bit string for the parent. Thus, the bit string associated with peer 254 d, 100101, represents the aggregate of the bit strings from children 254 a through 254 c of parent 254 d. It should be appreciated that the bit string of parent 254 d may also include information as to available resources of the parent. The aggregation of the bit string may occur through a suitable mathematical operation providing addition up the tree.

One skilled in the art will appreciate that as the parents successively aggregate what the corresponding children are capable of in terms of available resources, the root node 252 will likely have its filter saturated. However, most searches through the hierarchical tree will rarely get to the root node. That is, most providers and users will be searching in the bottom portion of the distribution represented in FIG. 5A. Irrespective of which portion of the tree the search is being performed in, the use of a power law distribution for the upper portion of the tree will enable the embodiments described herein to accommodate peer-to-peer networks having a large number of peers, e.g., networks having 1 million or more peers. It should be further appreciated that the propagation of the bit string through the tree requires a relatively small amount of bandwidth due to the structure of the string. Propagation of the bit string up the tree will occur at regular (tunable) time intervals. Bandwidth use at the top of the tree does not grow proportional to the size of the tree because each tier of the tree fully and opaquely represents its children.

FIG. 5B is an expanded portion of the hierarchical tree of FIG. 5A. Here, children 254 a-254 c and associated bit strings are illustrated along with parent 254 d. The availability bit string associated with parent 254 d, i.e., 000111, is an aggregation of each of the individual availability bit strings of children 254 a through c. In one embodiment, parent 254 d maintains an aggregate bit string and a cache of each child 254 a-c. A request for a certain resource represented in a bit string may then easily be compared to the aggregate of each parent in order to determine if the request may be fulfilled by the parent or the children. For example, if a request bit string was received by parent 254 d of 000001, then parent 254 d will be able to determine that the request may be fulfilled by either child 254 c or child 254 a. Where more than one child may be able to fulfill the request, a heuristic such as locality may be used to determine which child to select. That is, based upon which child is closest to the requesting resource determines which child is selected to provide the resource. In another embodiment, each parent maintains a cache of the corresponding children for that parent.

FIG. 6A is a simplified schematic diagram illustrating a scheme for routing resource queries through the hierarchical tree structure in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. Bit strings 255 and 257 each represent request bit strings from a peer requesting a certain resource. The request bit strings propagate up the hierarchical tree structure until they locate a peer that can satisfy the requests for the resource. For example, request string 257 propagates up to peer 256 at which point it is recognized that the children of peer 256 can fulfill the request for resources. Specifically, child 258 is associated with an availability string that satisfies the request string. Request string 255 is propagated from peer 254 c to peer 254 d. At peer 254 d, a comparison of the request string with the aggregate availability string stored by peer 254 d will yield that request string 255 may be satisfied through the children associated with peer 254 d. In one embodiment, the comparison includes performing a logical operation, e.g., an AND operation with the request string and the aggregate availability string as inputs. Child 254 b has the available resources to satisfy request string 255 in this example. It should be appreciated that once a peer is identified having the available resources, the requester and that peer will communicate directly with each other. That is, it is not necessary to communicate through the parent of the peer providing the resources.

FIG. 6B is a simplified schematic diagram illustrating a scheme for satisfying aggregate queries in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. Here, request 257, which may be a request for one thousand co-processors is issued as an aggregate query, rather than one thousand separate queries for one co-processor. The request propagates through the hierarchical tree structure as explained above with reference to FIG. 6A. It should be appreciated that the query can perform arithmetic operations appropriate to the bit string semantics as the query goes up and down the hierarchical tree to split the query into many sub queries. As illustrated between peer 258 and peers 260, 262 and 264, the query is split into three sub queries, where sub queries each satisfy a portion of the aggregate query. Here a list of peers providing the resources is provided to the requester. That is, a list of peers capable of providing one thousand co-processors is returned to the requester in above example.

In one embodiment, a portion of the resources requested may be fulfilled by a first parent, while the remaining portion of the requested resources is fulfilled by a parent of the first parent. Of course, the application providing this functionality would have to be able to be able to handle a portion of the requested resources being satisfied until the full amount of the requested resources are available. It should be appreciated that the communication protocol enabling communication through the structured tree includes an arbitration and reservation mechanism. The arbitration and reservation mechanism functions to reserve requested available resources so that a subsequent request for the same resources will be denied access to the reserved resources. For example, the first reservation request may generate a virtual reservation request which transforms into a real reservation once the reservation is fulfilled. If the first reservation request fails, then the reservation disappears.

FIG. 7 is a simplified schematic diagram illustrating the block levels associated with the application of the scheme for identifying available resources in a peer-to-peer network in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. Low level topology management block 270 encompasses the functionality required to organize nodes in a hierarchical tree structure as specified in block 276. Here, the peers of the peer-to-peer network are organized in a hierarchical tree structure similar to the tree structures of FIGS. 2E, 2F, 5A, 5B, 6A and 6B. Resource level protocol block 268 includes the functionality for determining resource availability specified in block 272 and for performing resource searches as illustrated in block 274. Here, the children peers propagate their availability strings to the corresponding parent peer up the hierarchical tree structure and then a request string is compared bit by bit to the available resource string in order to determine if a resource is available to fulfill the request. The functionality described above with respect to routing resource queries and determining matches is performed here. Domain level application block 266 then performs the action requested and communicates the results back to the requesting peer. In one embodiment, the resource is accessed as described in application Ser. No. 10/845,508 which has been incorporated by reference.

FIG. 8 is a flow chart diagram illustrating the method operations for a search for an available resource performed in a peer-to-peer network in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The method initiates with operation 278 where local availability of a resource is determined. Here, the amount of an available resource is captured in a bit string as described above. In one embodiment, a Bloom filter is applied here. The method then advances to operation 280 where the availability bit string is sent to a parent of the peer having the available resource. It should be appreciated that operations 278 and 280 provide more detail to the functionality described with respect to block 272 of FIG. 7. It should be appreciated that prior to operation 278, the peers are organized in a hierarchical tree structure as described above.

The method then proceeds to operation 282 where a request string is generated. In operation 282, a peer requesting a resource defines that request as a bit string. The method then moves to operation 284 where the request string is sent to a peer. The peer then tests for the availability to satisfy the request string in operation 286. Here, a bit by bit comparison of the two bit strings may be performed through a logical operation. The method then advances to operation 288 where the resources are provided if the peer is able to satisfy the request string. If the peer cannot satisfy the request string, the request string is propagated up the structured tree to a parent of the peer and continues propagating up the structured tree until a resource satisfying the request is found. It should be appreciated that the resources will be provided directly from the peer identified as being able to provide the resources. That is, if the child of the peer has the available resources, then the requester is provided with the address for the child and communicates directly with the child.

In summary, a method and system enabling identification of an available resource in a manner requiring low bandwidth. The peers of the P2P network are organized in a hierarchical tree structure having a root node where each parent is configured to successively encompass what the corresponding children are capable of supplying in terms of resources. Through the use of bit strings compatible with bloom filters the available resources are captured and aggregated. In order to accommodate the large size of the P2P network a power law distribution may be used to characterize at least a portion of the bit string. One skilled in the art will appreciate that alternative embodiments to the bit string may be used. For example, an extensible markup language (XML) representation may be used to describe the availability of resources. Here, a schema defining XML format that specifies the resource availability is equal to a value. This value may then be propagated and aggregated through the hierarchical tree structure.

It should be appreciated that the embodiments described above may be incorporated into on-line gaming applications with a subscriber base of hundreds of thousands of players located all over the world. Exemplary on-line gaming titles include EVERQUEST, PLANET SIDE and STAR WARS GALAXIES played through the PLAYSTATION 2 video game console. One application incorporating the embodiments described above may occur during video encoding. For example, if a computing device needs to encode 1000 frames of video and does not have the local computing resources to accomplish this in a certain time frame, then the computing device may deputize a number of other computing devices to help encode the video. Thus, the computing device generates a request asking for 100 other processors having a certain bandwidth and storage overhead locally on each of the 100 other processors. The bit stream may be a base two distribution, a power law distribution or some combination of the two. The request is pushed out to the parent and the resource availability algorithm propagates the request to identify the available resources satisfying the request.

It should be appreciated that the bit stream used to represent the resource availability and the resource request is not limited to the specific embodiments referred to above. That is, the bit stream is not limited to only a first portion and second portion, where one portion is a base two representation and the other portion is a power law representation. For example, the entire bit stream may be a single representation. Alternatively, the bit stream may be subdivided into more than two portions. The bit stream is not limited to a base two or power law distribution. For example, a base ten, or any other suitable base distribution that may be represented in the bit stream, can be incorporated into the embodiments described herein. In one embodiment, the lower third of the bit stream may represent fractional values in base two, e.g., these lower third bits can be used to represent 10%, 20%, 50%, etc., availability of a processor. The middle third of the bit stream represents whole processors in a base ten representation, while the upper third of the bit stream represents large groups of processors in a power law representation. Thus, the bit stream may have numerous configurations, i.e., single or multiple subdivisions with a single or multiple representations being used.

As mentioned above, the regular representation of the data in the bit stream enables the ease with which the request may propagate since the bit stream is relatively small, e.g., one kilobyte of bits per node. Thus, each peer automatically publishes and updates its available resources regularly without impacting bandwidth. Once the available resources have been identified, the resources may be accessed as described above. In one embodiment, accounting and usage charges may be incorporated and enforced to provide incentive for peers to share resources.

Embodiments of the present invention may be practiced with various computer system configurations including hand-held devices, microprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, minicomputers, mainframe computers and the like. The invention can also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a wire-based or wireless network.

With the above embodiments in mind, it should be understood that the invention can employ various computer-implemented operations involving data stored in computer systems. These operations are those requiring physical manipulation of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared and otherwise manipulated.

Any of the operations described herein that form part of the invention are useful machine operations. The invention also relates to a device or an apparatus for performing these operations. The apparatus can be specially constructed for the required purpose, or the apparatus can be a general-purpose computer selectively activated or configured by a computer program stored in the computer. In particular, various general-purpose machines can be used with computer programs written in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may be more convenient to construct a more specialized apparatus to perform the required operations.

The invention can also be embodied as computer readable code on a computer readable medium. The computer readable medium is any data storage device that can store data, which can be thereafter be read by a computer system. Examples of the computer readable medium include hard drives, network attached storage (NAS), read-only memory, random-access memory, CD-ROMs, CD-Rs, CD-RWs, magnetic tapes and other optical and non-optical data storage devices. The computer readable medium can also be distributed over a network-coupled computer system so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.

Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications can be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4787051May 16, 1986Nov 22, 1988Tektronix, Inc.Inertial mouse system
US4843568Apr 11, 1986Jun 27, 1989Krueger Myron WReal time perception of and response to the actions of an unencumbered participant/user
US5128671Apr 12, 1990Jul 7, 1992Ltv Aerospace And Defense CompanyControl device having multiple degrees of freedom
US5528265Jul 18, 1994Jun 18, 1996Harrison; Simon J.For delivering input information to a remote computer
US5768531Mar 27, 1995Jun 16, 1998Toshiba America Information SystemsApparatus and method for using multiple communication paths in a wireless LAN
US5812531Jul 24, 1995Sep 22, 1998International Business Machines CorporationMethod and apparatus for bridging wireless LAN to a wired LAN
US5898679Dec 30, 1996Apr 27, 1999Lucent Technologies Inc.Wireless relay with selective message repeat and method of operation thereof
US5995971 *Sep 18, 1997Nov 30, 1999Micdrosoft CorporationApparatus and accompanying methods, using a trie-indexed hierarchy forest, for storing wildcard-based patterns and, given an input key, retrieving, from the forest, a stored pattern that is identical to or more general than the key
US6012096Apr 23, 1998Jan 4, 2000Microsoft CorporationMethod and system for peer-to-peer network latency measurement
US6152824Mar 6, 1998Nov 28, 2000Mpath Interactive, Inc.Online gaming architecture
US6157368Sep 25, 1995Dec 5, 2000Faeger; Jan G.Control equipment with a movable control member
US6375572Feb 24, 2000Apr 23, 2002Nintendo Co., Ltd.Portable game apparatus with acceleration sensor and information storage medium storing a game progam
US6487583Feb 25, 2000Nov 26, 2002Ikimbo, Inc.System and method for information and application distribution
US6487600Aug 9, 1999Nov 26, 2002Thomas W. LynchSystem and method for supporting multimedia communications upon a dynamically configured member network
US6549786May 22, 1998Apr 15, 2003International Business Machines CorporationMethod and apparatus for connecting a wireless LAN to a wired LAN
US6553515Sep 10, 1999Apr 22, 2003Comdial CorporationSystem, method and computer program product for diagnostic supervision of internet connections
US6640241Jul 19, 1999Oct 28, 2003Groove Networks, Inc.Method and apparatus for activity-based collaboration by a computer system equipped with a communications manager
US6641481Nov 17, 2000Nov 4, 2003Microsoft CorporationSimplified matchmaking
US6667972Jan 8, 1999Dec 23, 2003Cisco Technology, Inc.Method and apparatus providing multi-service connections within a data communications device
US6772219Sep 17, 1999Aug 3, 2004Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMessage relaying scheme based on switching in units of flows
US6848997Jan 28, 2000Feb 1, 2005Kabushiki Kaisha Sega EnterprisesNetwork game system, game device terminal used in it and storage medium
US6992982 *Jan 5, 2000Jan 31, 2006Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)Communication device and method
US7120429Aug 13, 2001Oct 10, 2006Qualcomm Inc.System and method for licensing applications on wireless devices over a wireless network
US7123608Mar 17, 2000Oct 17, 2006Array Telecom CorporationMethod, system, and computer program product for managing database servers and service
US7134961Aug 27, 2002Nov 14, 2006Kabushiki Kaisha Square EnixManagement of player information in a multiplayer network game environment
US7155515Feb 6, 2001Dec 26, 2006Microsoft CorporationDistributed load balancing for single entry-point systems
US7197565Oct 3, 2002Mar 27, 2007Sun Microsystems, Inc.System and method of using a pipe advertisement for a peer-to-peer network entity in peer-to-peer presence detection
US7240093Feb 29, 2000Jul 3, 2007Microsoft CorporationUse of online messaging to facilitate selection of participants in game play
US7340500Jan 22, 2002Mar 4, 2008Sun Microsystems, Inc.Providing peer groups in a peer-to-peer environment
US7346015May 30, 2002Mar 18, 2008British Telecommunications Public Limited CompanyMethod and apparatus for routing data with support for changing mobility requirements
US7451490Aug 1, 2003Nov 11, 2008Microsoft CorporationMedia data protection with secure installer
US7457279Mar 17, 2000Nov 25, 2008Vertical Communications Acquisition Corp.Method, system, and computer program product for managing routing servers and services
US7803052Jun 28, 2002Sep 28, 2010Microsoft CorporationDiscovery and distribution of game session information
US20010017856Jan 18, 2001Aug 30, 2001Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd.Address acquisition
US20010044339Feb 20, 2001Nov 22, 2001Angel CorderoMulti-player computer game, system and method
US20020002074May 31, 2001Jan 3, 2002Cyop SystemsMethod for an online player game payment system
US20020013838Sep 25, 2001Jan 31, 2002Takayuki KushidaMethod and system to select the highest speed server among web servers
US20020049810 *Dec 4, 2001Apr 25, 2002Fitzgerald Albion J.Distributed computer network including hierarchical resource information structure and related method of distributing resources
US20020055989Apr 26, 2001May 9, 2002Stringer-Calvert David W.J.Methods and apparatus for scalable, distributed management of virtual private networks
US20020085097Dec 22, 2000Jul 4, 2002Colmenarez Antonio J.Computer vision-based wireless pointing system
US20020119821Dec 21, 2000Aug 29, 2002Sanjoy SenSystem and method for joining a broadband multi-user communication session
US20020184310Jan 22, 2002Dec 5, 2002Traversat Bernard A.Providing peer groups in a peer-to-peer environment
US20020184311Jan 22, 2002Dec 5, 2002Traversat Bernard A.Peer-to-peer network computing platform
US20030027634Aug 3, 2001Feb 6, 2003Matthews William F.Portable wireless game device and method for influencing an application executable from a fixed-location platform
US20030046292Aug 15, 2001Mar 6, 2003International Business Machines CorporationRestructuring view maintenance system and method
US20030055892Sep 19, 2001Mar 20, 2003Microsoft CorporationPeer-to-peer group management and method for maintaining peer-to-peer graphs
US20030079003Oct 18, 2001Apr 24, 2003Intel CorporationMethod for discovery and routing using a priori knowledge in the form of application programme within mobile AD-HOC networks
US20030115258Dec 13, 2001Jun 19, 2003International Business Machines CorporationTime zone difference based locality estimation between web clients and E-business servers
US20030182421Jul 12, 2002Sep 25, 2003Yaroslav FaybishenkoDistributed identities
US20030191828Apr 9, 2002Oct 9, 2003Ramanathan Murali KrishnaInterest-based connections in peer-to-peer networks
US20030217135Jul 31, 2002Nov 20, 2003Masayuki ChataniDynamic player management
US20030220981Apr 30, 2003Nov 27, 2003Pioneer CorporationInformation providing apparatus and method
US20030227939Jun 5, 2003Dec 11, 2003Satoru YukieEstablishing a connection using a hybrid receiver
US20040063497Sep 30, 2002Apr 1, 2004Kenneth GouldGaming server providing on demand quality of service
US20040207880Apr 17, 2003Oct 21, 2004Khageshwar ThakurMethod for reducing migrating residual error in error diffusion halftoning
US20040212589Apr 19, 2004Oct 28, 2004Hall Deirdre M.System and method for fusing and displaying multiple degree of freedom positional input data from multiple input sources
US20050026698Aug 1, 2003Feb 3, 2005Pirich Christopher M.Media data protection with secure installer
US20050113022Mar 11, 2002May 26, 2005Pearson Ian D.Communication relay device
US20080256243 *Jun 20, 2008Oct 16, 2008Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.Method and system for identifying available resources in a peer-to-peer network
US20080263208 *Jun 20, 2008Oct 23, 2008Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.Method and system for identifying available resources in a peer-to-peer network
EP0913965A1Oct 30, 1998May 6, 1999Canon Kabushiki KaishaReduction of the message traffic in a distributed network
EP1107508A1Dec 6, 1999Jun 13, 2001Telefonaktiebolaget Lm EricssonSystem, method and computer program product for sending broadcast messages
WO2002011366A2Jul 31, 2001Feb 7, 2002Boeing CoBroadcasting network
WO2003069495A1Feb 12, 2003Aug 21, 2003Horizon A Glimpse Of TomorrowPeer data protocol
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1"User's Guide HP IPAQ Pocket Prestige Crystal H5100 and H5500, part No. 304926-001" 'Online !May 2003, pp. 6.1-6.4, XP002344472 Retrieved from the Internet: URL:www.hp.org>'retrieved on Sep. 12, 2005!p.6.1-p.6.4.
2"User'S Guide HP IPAQ Pocket Prestige Crystal H5100 and H5500, part No. 304926-001"'Online! May 2003, pp. 6.1-6.4, XP002344472 Retrieved from the Internet: URL:www,hp,org>retrieved on Sep. 12, 2005! p. 6.1-p. 6.4.
3Bolt, R.A., "Put-that-there": voice and gesture at the graphics interface, Computer Graphics, vol. 14, No. 3 (ACM SIGGRAPH Conference Proceedings) Jul. 1980, pp. 262-270.
4DeWitt, Thomas and Edelstein, Phil, "Pantomation: A System for Position Tracking," Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Small Computers in the Arts, Oct. 1982, pp. 61-69.
5Dutkiewicz E Ed-Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: "Impact of transmit range on throughput performance in mobile ad hoc networks" ICC 2001. 2001 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Record. Helsinky, Finland, Jun. 11-14, 2001, IEEE International Conference on Communications, New York, NY: IEEE, US, vol. vol. 1 of 10, Jun. 11, 2001, pp. 2933-2937, XP 010553662 ISBN: 0-7803-7097-1.
6Dutkiewicz E Ed—Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: "Impact of transmit range on throughput performance in mobile ad hoc networks" ICC 2001. 2001 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Record. Helsinky, Finland, Jun. 11-14, 2001, IEEE International Conference on Communications, New York, NY: IEEE, US, vol. vol. 1 of 10, Jun. 11, 2001, pp. 2933-2937, XP 010553662 ISBN: 0-7803-7097-1.
7Kim Y Ed-Association for Computing Machinery: "Simple and Fault-Tolerant Key Agreement by Dynamic Collaborative Groups" Proceedings of the 7TH ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. CS 2000. Athens, Greece, Nov. 1-4, 2000, ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, New Your, NY: ACM, US, vol. CONF. 7, Nov. 1, 2000, pp. 1-38, XP 002951317 ISBN: 1-58113-203-4.
8Kim Y Ed—Association for Computing Machinery: "Simple and Fault—Tolerant Key Agreement by Dynamic Collaborative Groups" Proceedings of the 7TH ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. CS 2000. Athens, Greece, Nov. 1-4, 2000, ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, New Your, NY: ACM, US, vol. CONF. 7, Nov. 1, 2000, pp. 1-38, XP 002951317 ISBN: 1-58113-203-4.
9Song Jiang et al: "FloodTrial: an efficient file search technique in unstructured peer-to-peer systems" GLOBECOM 2003, vol. 5, Dec. 1, 2003, pp. 2891-2895, XP010678188.
10Steven Hessing: "Peer to Peer Messaging Protocol (PPMP)" Internet Draft, Apr. 2002, pp. 1-57, XP015001173.
Classifications
U.S. Classification709/226, 718/104
International ClassificationH04L29/08, G06F15/16, G06F15/173, H04L29/06
Cooperative ClassificationH04L67/104, H04L67/16, H04L67/1089, H04L67/1068
European ClassificationH04L29/08N9P8A, H04L29/08N9P2C, H04L29/08N9P, H04L29/08N15
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Dec 27, 2011ASAssignment
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SONY NETWORK ENTERTAINMENT PLATFORM INC.;REEL/FRAME:027557/0001
Owner name: SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT INC., JAPAN
Effective date: 20100401
Dec 26, 2011ASAssignment
Owner name: SONY NETWORK ENTERTAINMENT PLATFORM INC., JAPAN
Effective date: 20100401
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT INC.;REEL/FRAME:027446/0001