|Publication number||US8216423 B2|
|Application number||US 12/661,907|
|Publication date||Jul 10, 2012|
|Filing date||Mar 26, 2010|
|Priority date||Jul 19, 2001|
|Also published as||CA2450464A1, CA2450464C, CN1250811C, CN1533459A, US20040069427, US20100263815, WO2003008703A1|
|Publication number||12661907, 661907, US 8216423 B2, US 8216423B2, US-B2-8216423, US8216423 B2, US8216423B2|
|Inventors||Eric Chao Xu|
|Original Assignee||Andritz Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (42), Non-Patent Citations (36), Referenced by (3), Classifications (15), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/677,545 filed Oct. 2, 2003 now abandoned , which is a continuation-in-part of International Application No. PCT/US0223078 under 35 U.S.C. §365(c) filed Jul. 19, 2002 (designating the U.S.) which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/306,974 filed Jul. 19, 2001.
The present invention relates to a process for the production of pulp from lignocellulosic material, such as wood chips or the like, by chemical-mechanical refining.
Applying alkaline peroxide chemicals in a mechanical pulping system (APMP) may be traced back as early as 1962. Since then, there have been a number of different process ideas developed to apply the chemicals before or during early stages of refiner pulping. In recent years, an extensive and systematic investigation has been reported on how different chemical treatments in refiner mechanical pulping affect pulp property development and the process consumption. For hardwoods, it was observed that alkaline peroxide pretreatment in general gives better optical properties, better bleachability and higher pulp yield at similar strength properties when compared to other conventional chemical pretreatment, such as alkaline sulfite and cold caustic soda processes. When compared to a peroxide post-bleaching process, applying alkaline peroxide before refining has a tendency to give a higher bulk at a given tensile strength for some hardwood species, such as North American aspen.
In a very broad sense, alkaline peroxide refiner mechanical pulping is a type of pulping process where hydrogen peroxide and alkali in various forms, together with various amounts of different peroxide stabilizers, are applied to the lignocellulosic materials before or during defiberization and fibrillation in a refiner. In the early stage of development of this type of pulping process, two basic concepts were tried. One was to apply alkaline peroxide treatment on chips, to allow the bleaching reactions to complete or to approach completion before refining. The other basic concept was to apply all the alkaline peroxide at the refiner, either with no pretreatment or with stabilizers or other alkaline pretreatment prior to the alkaline peroxide application at the refiner.
Conventionally the inclusion of chemicals such as silicates prior to the refiner leads to a situation where scale forms on the processing equipment. The refiner area itself also can suffer due to the formation of silicate precipitates, especially in processing softwoods, which can lead to a glassing of the refiner plates.
The application of chemicals at a point downstream of the refiner has also been proposed. However these proposals did not encompass the use of chemical pretreatment or conditioning of the chips. In addition such downstream chemical addition appeared incompatible with high pressure refining conditions.
The present invention is directed to the introduction of chemicals to lignocellulosic material immediately after refining in order to achieve, among other things, a comparable bleaching efficiency as when applying chemicals at locations upstream of and/or at the refiner.
The introduction of chemicals downstream of the refiner, wherein the refiner may be a primary, secondary and/or tertiary refiner, is utilized with the concept of applying chemicals such as alkaline peroxide pre-treatment to lignocellulosic material before refining. Preferably, the refiner has a highly pressurized case, for achieving the known benefits of high pressure refining.
The introduction of chemicals downstream of the refiner according to the invention may alternatively be utilized with the process referred to herein as P-RC (Preconditioning followed by Refiner Chemical treatment) for APMP, which combines the concept of applying chemicals such as alkaline peroxide as a pretreatment to lignocellulosic feed material before primary refining with the concept of applying chemicals such as alkaline peroxide at the primary refiner.
The preferred embodiment of the invention includes applying more than one-third of total alkaline peroxide (and/or other chemicals known in the art to bleach or otherwise process lignocellulosic material into pulp or precursors of pulp) at or near the blow valve in the post refiner intermediate line, in combination with chemical addition at the refiner and chemical impregnation of the chips upstream of the refiner, to yield a more energy efficient process and to allow a more efficient bleaching than the application of all the chemicals before discharge from the refiner.
A significant benefit of the invention is better chemical efficiency, by moving a greater number of chemical reactions downstream relative to conventional techniques, resulting from the relatively heavier or more intense addition of chemicals and/or chemical stabilizers at the post refiner blow line.
A further benefit of the invention is the reduction in the detrimental effects of the high temperature and/or other conditions prior to and during high pressure primary refining, which are known to influence pulp brightness and development.
Another benefit of the invention as implemented in a high-pressure system, is the recovery of more and higher quality of steam and/or heat than in other types of P-RC APMP systems, where the primary refiner is either completely atmospheric or atmospheric at the inlet.
The invention will be better understood by reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The preconditioning step(s) as implemented in stages 1 and 2 of
The refining step 3 may include a primary refiner of conventional size, configuration, and operating conditions as known for chemi-mechanical pulping. Depending on such factors as whether chemicals are to be added and what types of chemicals if any are to be added the size, configuration, and operating of the refiner can be tailored so as to not expose the chemicals to excessive temperature or time-temperature combination. In one embodiment of the invention the pressure can be within a range of about 15 psi to pressures greater than 45 psi. Any chemicals added at the refiner will be referred to as the refiner solution.
Steps implemented following the primary refining, may have a level of chemical presence carried downstream from the refiner or other upstream processing. In one embodiment of the invention, the post refining chemical environment is modified by an addition or additions of a intermediate line solution or solutions to the intermediate line. The intermediate line is located between the refiner and the retention tower. For instance, as shown in
Injection of the chemicals at a intermediate line location or locations may be made through simple orifices in the intermediate line and/or by the use of injectors, such as nozzles, associated with the line. The nozzles can be associated with the intermediate line in various ways along and about the intermediate line to desirably control the chemical addition. The control can be dependent, for example, on the effect that the additions have with regard to the bleaching process and/or conditioning process. Chemical profiles within the pulp flow can thus be modified or maintained by, for example, injection sequencing, flow rate, composition, and/or duration. Other variables such as the depth of injector intrusion into the flow path, injector angle, injector orifice configuration, and other properties of the injector installation may be modified to achieve a desired result. Chemical introduction may be modified by varying the introduction location based on the pressure used in refining. For instance, alkaline peroxide chemicals may be introduced immediately (from less than a few inches to a few feet) after the blow valve, especially in low pressure refining where the pressure is less than about 45 psi. The alkaline peroxide chemicals may also be introduced immediately before the cyclone (from less than a few inches to a few feet) after the blow valve, especially in high pressure refining where pressures higher than 45 psi are used. In other cases the alkaline peroxide chemicals may be introduced intermediate the cyclone and the blow valve, or even at the cyclone.
The refiner may be primary, secondary, and/or tertiary, with a pressurized casing or fully pressurized from preheater to refiner discharge. The pressure in the refiner aids in expelling the pulp from the refiner during discharge. The discharge can be modified or controlled by, e.g., the blow valve. The pressure assisted discharge of the pulp into the intermediate line can result in the pulp having a residence time of a few seconds to minutes in portions of the intermediate line. The pulp can achieve high velocities and experience significant turbulence as it flows through the intermediate line. These conditions enhance the mixing between the chemicals and the pulp. The intensive turbulence and a high temperature gradient in the pulp stream may also assist in transferring the chemicals to individual pulp fibers as well into the fiber wall.
As an illustrative example, the pulp may be about 100° C. or higher, and the chemical liquor may be 40° C. or lower. The intermediate line solution may preferably be in the range of about 10° C. to about 25° C. but can be up to 80° C. The application of alkaline peroxide chemicals at the intermediate line reduces the exposure time of the alkaline peroxide chemicals to high temperature, especially when elevated temperature and/or pressure is present at refining. This post refining addition to the pulp flow through injection proximity, facilitates an easier stabilization and an increased efficacy of the peroxide. The use of the invention in an intermediate line with a superatmospheric refiner system also can result in the enhanced or modified recovery of steam/heat/liquid from the pulp. Such steam may be diverted away through a steam pipe 36. These features also allow for the production of high-freeness pulps with low shives content, since it is well known in the industry that the higher refining pressure tends to produce lower shives, or cleaner pulp. In some cases a press may be included in addition to or in place of the cyclone 32. The press could allow for an increase in steam/heat/liquid recovery from the pulp.
In one embodiment of the invention the optimizing process to influence peroxide efficiency and brightness development can be accomplished when the primary refining is fully pressurized. In one particular configuration this may be referred to as P-RC APTMP, which differs from other P-RC APMP configurations where the primary refiner is operated either under completely atmospheric pressure, or with atmospheric pressure at the inlet and low pressure at the casing.
In one embodiment of the invention the pretreatment solutions, the refiner solutions (if present), and the intermediate line solutions act chemically on the lignocellulosic material. It may be advantageous, depending on the lignocellulosic material and the processing equipment, to modify the chemical exposure profile of the material to the chemical agents in order to optimize the process, and/or eliminate or reduce unwanted chemical effects or degradation. Such chemical profile modification may be accomplished by sequential chemical additions throughout the process, and can be combined with other variable conditions such as temperature, concentration, pressure, and duration to further enhance the desired effect.
Lignocellulosic material processed using the P-RC process can be discharged 4 from the primary refiner casing (either atmospheric discharge 20 or overpressure discharge 20 a), as a primary pulp having a measurable freeness and could properly be called a pulp able to form a handsheet. As shown in
In one embodiment of the invention, for example as shown in
The presence of an ample amount of the alkaline peroxide chemicals in the primary refiner (e.g., as by shifting a large proportion of the chemical reactions to the refiner chemical treatment stage) improves efficiency. This is because variations in chip forms and quality, in addition to the natural heterogeneity of wood chips and fibers, often make it difficult, if not impossible, to achieve a good chemical distribution in the chip pretreatment/impregnation stage(s). In these situations, the mixing action at the primary refiner helps to promote chemical distribution, and hence, improves the chemical efficiency.
In accord with one embodiment of the invention, the addition of chemicals into the post refining intermediate line allows, for example, the use of a pressurized refiner and higher temperatures in refining. Addition of chemicals to the intermediate line at, for example, the blow line provides for a fast, and more direct, distribution of chemicals such as peroxide to the chromophore sites for efficient bleaching. This efficiency is achieved because the targeted peroxide reactions are carried out at the reaction site of interest quickly without lengthy exposure to the more heterogeneous environment present in previous portions of the process. Conventionally the temperature at the inlet between the plates of a refiner pushes the chromophore removal and hemicellulose alkali reactions so fast that that pH is lowered prematurely. Using the post refiner intermediate line as the location for chemical mixing according to an aspect of the present invention, distributes the chemicals fast enough, to compete favorably against and counter to a significant extent, the elevated temperature of the pulp. Such elevated temperature can be, for example, from about 80° C. to about 155° C.
In one embodiment of the invention, the pulp can be maintained in an interstage high consistency retention tower. The pulp in the high consistency retention tower may have a consistency of about 20% to a consistency of about 40% consistency, with a preferable consistency of about 30%. The temperature of the pulp in the high consistency retention tower may be from about 60° C. to about 95° C. The pulp can be held in the retention tower from about 30 minutes to more than 2 hours depending on the chemical reaction needed for chemical treatment. The maintenance conditions include but are not limited to temperature, pressure, pH, chemical concentration, solids concentration, and time, that allow for conditioning and/or bleaching of the pulp to continue and limit the degradation of the bleaching agent through reactions that are extraneous to the bleaching of the pulp. Such extraneous reactions may be non-productive, inefficient, and/or harmful to the bleaching of the pulp. Control of some and/or all of the conditions may or may not be needed depending on e.g., the type and condition of the lignocellulosic material used in the process, and the type, size and operating environment of the equipment itself. For example, conditions of temperature may be modified throughout the process by the addition of the chemicals, pressurized gas, and other heating or cooling methods. Temperature modifying means may be employed during transfer of the primary pulp 22 by using a mixing screw with water added while the pulp is mixed and transferred to the tower. The temperature of the primary pulp may also be thermally adjusted within the tower if the primary pulp is discharged directly to the tower 28, by means known in the art. For example, the pulp may be thermally adjusted through addition of liquids or gases, and/or through use of heat transfer components such as tubing, tower jacketing, etc.
As used herein, the term “control” should be understood as including both active and passive techniques. Thus, control could be implemented by a static hardware configuration or by continually measuring one or more process parameters and controlling one or more process variables.
The chemical conditions present anywhere in the inventive process may be modified by additives to prevent extraneous degradation. This modification may be made at, by way of example, the pretreatment step(s) 1 and/or 2, the cross conveyer 10, the ribbon feeder 12, the inlet eye of the refiner disc 14, the plates of the refiner disc 16, the blow valve 20 a, the blow line 30, the separator, 32, and/or after the separator. An example of stabilizers would be chelation agents. A chelation agent refers to a compound that has an ability to form complexes, so called chelates, with metals occurring in the lignocellulosic material, and primary pulp. Such metals may include monovalent metals sodium and potassium, earth-alkali divalent metals calcium, magnesium and barium, and heavy metals such as iron, copper and manganese. The metal ions retained in the material as it is processed makes the bleaching by oxygen chemicals (such as hydrogen peroxide) less effective, and results in excess chemical consumption as well as other problems well known in the art. In order to reduce or eliminate the effect of these metal ions on the process, chelants such as for example diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) and nitriletriacetic acid (NTA) may be used. These and other chelation agents known in the art may be used alone or in combination as needed or desired depending on process conditions. In addition, silicates and sulfates as examples may also be used advantageously as stabilizers as well as serving other functions well known in the art.
Further embodiments and aspects of the invention will be apparent from the examples and description set forth below.
Several general series of pilot plant processes are illustrated in the following examples. The materials and conditions for the following examples, unless specified otherwise are:
Wood: A blend of 50% aspen and 50% basswood was used in this study. The aspen woods had rotten centers, which made it more difficult to bleach than normally expected. The woods were all from Wisconsin USA, and debarked, chipped and screened before further processing.
Chemical Impregnation: Chips were pre-steamed first for 10 minutes, and then pressed using an Andritz 560GS Impressafiner at 4:1 compression ratio before impregnated with alkaline peroxide chemical liquor. The chemical liquor was introduced at the discharge of the press, and allowed for 30 minutes retention time before refining.
Refining: An Andritz 92 cm (36″) Model 401 double disc atmospheric refiner at a conventional speed of 1200 rpm was used for all the refining processes. There was 15 minutes or more retention time between the primary and the secondary, and no dilution after the primary and before the secondary. The refining consistency was 20% at both the primary and the secondary.
Pulp Testing: Tappi Standards were used for all pulp testing except for freeness, which follows Canadian Standard Freeness (CSF) test methods.
In the first of three processes compared, all of the alkaline chemicals were applied, (3.3% total alkalinity, (TA), and 2.4% H2O2, together with 0.2% DTPA, 0.07% MgSO4 and 3% Na2SiO3) at the chip impregnation (preconditioning or pretreatment) stage, (only one stage chip impregnation was applied), then refined at atmospheric pressure. This series was, therefore, named “Chip”. The second series used approximately two thirds of the total alkaline peroxide chemicals, (or 2.4% TA, 1.6% H2O2, 0.08% DTPA, 0.04% MgSO4 and 2.4% Na2SiO3), at the chip impregnation stage, and approximately one third of the total chemicals, (1.0% TA, 1.0% H2O2, 0.19% DTPA, 0.05% MgSO4, and 0.9% Na2SiO3), at the eye of the primary refiner. It is labeled as “Chip+Refiner”, and represents the invention. In the third series, labeled “Refiner”, the chips were first pressed using the same chip press as the first two series, and then all the alkaline peroxide chemicals, (4.2% TA, 3.3% H2O2, 0.36% DTPA, 0.11% MgSO4, 4.3% Na2SiO3), were applied at the eye of the primary refiner. In all the series, the pulp from the primary was allowed 15 minutes retention under cover in drums, (which gave a temperature about 80-90° C.), before the second stage refining. There was no interstage washing.
As to the chemistry, the main difference between “Chip” and “Chip+Refiner” series is that the latter is more aggressive in moving more alkaline peroxide chemicals to the refiner chemical treatment stage.
Graphic presentation of the data gathered from pulp after secondary refining after different investigated processes are shown in
It should be pointed out that in a commercial operation, the SEC in general is lower than that observed at the lab for chemical mechanical pulping of hardwoods. The SEC values in
Because many pulp properties, especially the strength properties, are dependent on handsheet density, this property was also analyzed under SEC, and results are shown in
As for pulp intrinsic property development, there was however, little difference among the three series, as illustrated in
As for pulp optical property development, in mechanical pulping, pulp brightness is often freeness-dependent.
The below examples illustrate a different refining configuration where the primary refiner was maintained at a negligible gauge pressure at the inlet and a low pressure (approximately 140 kPa) at the casing. Advantages of this configuration include:
1) better steam handling at the refiner discharge, especially for high capacity refiners (300 t/d or higher);
2) ease of transfer primary pulp from the refiner to the interstage high consistency (HC) tower;
3) a potential to use some of the steam generated from the primary refining (by using a cyclone to separate steam and pulp fiber);
4) ease of converting existing TMP systems into a P-RC APMP process.
These examples show that running the primary refiner at a low pressure (140 kPa) in the casing and atmospheric at the inlet can give similar bleaching efficiency as that of atmospheric at both the inlet and the casing. Temperatures at the inlet and between the plates in the primary refiner may push the chromophore removal and hemicellulose alkali hydrolysis reactions fast enough that pH was lowered considerably before the pulp reaches the casing out off the refiner plates. The pulps at the cyclone discharge from the primary refiner were measured in the examples below to have pH of 9.3-9.7, at which peroxide is easy to stabilize even under the high temperatures (80-90° C.) observed.
The materials and conditions for the following examples below were as follows:
Wood: Aspen and birch chips from a commercial pulp mill in eastern Canada were used in this study.
Chip Impregnation: A conventional pilot chip impregnation system was used in this study. In all the P-RC APMP runs studied, only DTPA was used in the first stage of chip impregnation. The chips were then impregnated with alkaline peroxide (AP) chemicals at second stage impregnation. The AP treated chips were then allowed for 30 to 45 minutes' retention (without steaming) before being refined.
Atmospheric Refiner System: Andritz 36″ diameter (92 cm) double disc 401 system is typically used for conventional P-RC APMP process investigations. This system consists of an open metering belt, an incline twin-screw feeder, the refiner and an open belt discharge. The system is used for both primary and later stages of refining. When used for the primary, the pulp discharged were collected in drums and kept under cover to maintain a high temperature (typically 80 to 90° C.) for a certain period of time.
Pressurized Refiner System: An Andritz single disc 36″ diameter (92 cm) pressurized system was modified for atmospheric inlet/pressurized casing configuration. The original refiner system has all the standard features of a conventional TMP system. In order to run the system with atmospheric pressure at the inlet, a valve was placed on top of the vertical steaming tube and was kept open during refining. During the trial, the plug screw feeder (PSF) was run at 50 rpm (normal speed for TMP is 10 to 20 rpm) to ensure the chemical impregnated chips were not compressed. The AP impregnated chips were placed in a chip bin, which discharged the chips into a blower. The chips were then blown to a cyclone and discharged to a conveyor, which feeds the PSF. The chips were then dropped into a vertical steam tube before being fed into the refiner. During refining, the primary refiner was controlled to have zero pressure at the inlet and 140 kPa in the casing. From the casing, the primary pulp was blown to a cyclone and discharged and collected in drums, and then treated similarly as in the atmospheric refining runs.
Pulp Tests: TAPPI standard was used for brightness tests. Peroxide residuals were measured using standard iodometric titration.
Running the primary refiner with pressurized casing and atmospheric inlet was compared with conventional atmospheric refining in P-RC APMP pulping of aspen and birch commercial wood chips. The results showed that both refining configurations gave similar bleaching efficiency. For some installations, using pressurized casing can significantly simplify the process, engineering and operation of P-RC APMP process.
The residual pH (8.8-9.0) in both cases were slightly higher than ideal (approximately 7.0-8.5) and the H2O2 residual (1.5 to 2.0% on o.d. pulp) was also higher than normal (0.5 to 1.0%), suggesting that in both cases the pulp property could be further developed had the chemical treatments been further optimized.
It is worth pointing out that the bleaching efficiency shown in Table 1 (3.7 to 3.9% H2O2 and 5.2-5.4% TA consumption to reach 84.2 to 84.7% ISO brightness) is comparable to or better than bleaching efficiency normally observed in H2O2 bleaching of TMP or CTMP pulps from aspen.
This example set shows, among other things, that when the chemical recipe and distributions are optimized, the alkali peroxide chemicals at refiner chemical treatment stage can be applied at the intermediate line in a pressurized refiner system to achieve similar bleaching efficiency as P-RC APMP with conventional atmospheric inlet pressure. Because the residence time is very short in a intermediate line, the same process may also be used in a high pressure refining system, for example a refining system operating at 4 bar or higher.
All the hardwoods (birch and maple) were received in chip form and mixed separately before being further processed. All the softwoods (spruce, pine and softwood blends) were received in log form, and debarked, chipped and mixed prior to further processing.
The wood chips, unless otherwise specified, were impregnated twice with AP chemicals (consisting of sodium hydroxide (NaOH), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), DTPA, Magnesium Sulfate (MgSO4) and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3), utilizing an Andritz 560GS Impressafiner System. In some cases, the RT-Pressafiner was used at the first stage impregnation (steamed at 1.4 bar for 20 seconds before being pressed).
An Andritz 36″ diameter (91 cm) single disc 36-1CP refiner system was used for all pressurized and atmospheric inlet/casing pressurized runs, and an Andritz 36″ diameter (91 cm) double disc 401 system was used for all atmospheric refining runs. Typically, except where stated otherwise, the 401 refiner was used for all secondary and tertiary refining.
The P-RC, (Preconditioning, following by Refiner Chemical treatment, where AP chemicals are distributed between chip pretreatment and refining stages), process was used in all trial runs. For the runs where AP chemicals were charged at the intermediate line, the pulp discharged from the blow line was covered under a plastic bag in drums to maintain a temperature of 85-95° C., depending specific refining energy used at the refiner, the chemical charges, and the nature of the raw materials.
Canadian Standard Freeness (CSF) was used for all freeness tests and standard Tappi methods were used for all optical property tests (brightness Tappi T2180M-83, light scattering, and light absorption coefficient Tappi T425 OM-86 (for handsheet Tappi 205 OM-88)).
For the birch, both series (A1 and A2) used a total of 5.2% H2O2 and 4.6% total alkali (TA), and had a similar amount of H2O2 residuals (1.0%-1.1%) and final pH (8.9-9.0). The final pH's were relatively high, indicating that a higher brightness would be achieved if a longer retention time was used. The series from AP addition at the refiner eye (A1) had a similar brightness to samples where AP chemicals were added at the intermediate line, A2, for example, 84.8 versus 84.2% ISO. The slight difference in the brightness was likely, at least in part, due to the slight difference in their freeness, 285 mL for the former case and 315 ml for the latter. In terms of chemistry, both series gave similar light absorption coefficients, 0.27 m2/kg from the former and 0.25 m2/kg from the latter.
In the case of the maple wood, adding AP chemicals at intermediate line, A4, actually gave a higher brightness, 81.9% ISO, than that, 79.2% ISO, from applying the AP chemicals at refiner eye, A3. The difference in this case was a combination of the lower freeness, (295 vs. 320 mL), and the lower light absorption coefficient, (0.32 vs. 0.5 m2/kg), of the former.
Softwoods, namely spruce and red pine, were also investigated in to examine effects of different AP chemical applications.
In the case of red pine, the blow line series, A8, had a slightly higher brightness, 71.8 vs. 71.2% ISO, lower light absorption coefficient, 0.84 vs. 1.01 m2/kg, but higher freeness, 99 vs. 82 mL, compared to the refiner eye series, A7. As far as its effect on brightness is concerned, in this case, the difference in the light absorption coefficient was likely the difference in their freeness. The amounts of AP chemical treatment were the same for both series.
A softwood blend from spruce and pine was subjected to high pressure refining at the refiner chemical treatment stage as in
In this case, a RT-Pressafiner was used at the first stage impregnation, and Andritz Model 560GS Impressafiner at the second stage. For this chemical treatment 0.4% TA, 0.6% H2O2, 0.18% DTPA, 0.03% MgSO4 and 0.3% Sodium Silicate at 1st stage chip impregnation; 0.4% TA, 0.7% H2O2, 0.15% DTPA, 0.05% MgSO4 and 0.4% Sodium Silicate at 2nd stage chip impregnation; 0.9% TA, 1.5% H2O2, 0.18% DTPA, 0.09% MgSO4 and 1.8% Sodium Silicate at refiner chemical treatment stage, either at the refiner eye as for A9, or the intermediate line as for A10 was used. Series, A9, A10, were performed, and both had similar chemical charges and recipe, but one (A9) had 2.1 bar pressure in the primary refiner and the other, A10, 4.2 bar.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3023140||Nov 24, 1958||Feb 27, 1962||Bauer Brothers Company||Pulp bleaching|
|US4040743||Sep 22, 1975||Aug 9, 1977||Howell Laboratories, Incorporated||Method and apparatus for measuring the brightness of pulp slurry|
|US4187141||Jun 19, 1978||Feb 5, 1980||Alf Societe Anonyme||Method of producing bleached mechanical pulp|
|US4270976||Jul 25, 1979||Jun 2, 1981||Defibrator Ab||Method of producing peroxide bleached pulp|
|US4294653||Apr 11, 1978||Oct 13, 1981||Mo Och Domsjo Aktiebolag||Process for manufacturing chemimechanical cellulose pulp in a high yield within the range from 65 to 95%|
|US4311553||Jan 14, 1980||Jan 19, 1982||Sunds Defibrator Ab||Method for use in the defibration or refining of lignocellulose-containing fibrous materials|
|US4486267||Nov 14, 1983||Dec 4, 1984||Mead Corporation||Chemithermomechanical pulping process employing separate alkali and sulfite treatments|
|US4718980||Dec 30, 1985||Jan 12, 1988||Weyerhaeuser Company||Interstage treatment of mechanical pulp|
|US4756799||Mar 12, 1986||Jul 12, 1988||Eka Ab||Method of manufacturing bleached chemimechanical and semichemical fibre pulp by means of a one-stage impregnation process|
|US4849053 *||Dec 13, 1988||Jul 18, 1989||Scott Paper Company||Method for producing pulp using pre-treatment with stabilizers and defibration|
|US4900399||May 16, 1988||Feb 13, 1990||Eka Ab||Method of manufacturing bleached chemi-mechanical and semichemical fibre pulp by a two-stage impregnation process|
|US5776305||Oct 23, 1996||Jul 7, 1998||Andritz Sprout-Bauer, Inc.||Low-resident, high-temperature, high-speed chip refining|
|US6258207 *||Apr 19, 1999||Jul 10, 2001||Alberta Research Council Inc.||Alkaline peroxide mechanical pulping of non-woody species|
|US6458245||Nov 22, 1996||Oct 1, 2002||Sca Research Ab||CTMP-process|
|US6743332||May 16, 2001||Jun 1, 2004||Weyerhaeuser Company||High temperature peroxide bleaching of mechanical pulps|
|US6881299||Dec 9, 2003||Apr 19, 2005||North American Paper Corporation||Refiner bleaching with magnesium oxide and hydrogen peroxide|
|US7758720||Nov 19, 2007||Jul 20, 2010||Andritz Inc.||High defiberization pretreatment process for mechanical refining|
|US7758721||Nov 19, 2007||Jul 20, 2010||Andritz Inc.||Pulping process with high defiberization chip pretreatment|
|US7892400||Nov 19, 2007||Feb 22, 2011||Andritz Inc.||High defiberization chip pretreatment apparatus|
|US8048263 *||Nov 1, 2011||Andritz Inc.||Four stage alkaline peroxide mechanical pulpings|
|US20010050151||Aug 8, 1997||Dec 13, 2001||Marc J. Sabourin||Method of pretreating lignocellulose fiber-containing material for the pulp making process|
|US20040069427||Oct 2, 2003||Apr 15, 2004||Xu Eric Chao||Multi-stage AP mechanical pulping with refiner blow line treatment|
|US20040200586||Jul 19, 2002||Oct 14, 2004||Martin Herkel||Four stage alkaline peroxide mechanical pulping|
|US20050011622||Jul 16, 2003||Jan 20, 2005||Sabourin Marc J||High defiberization chip pretreatment|
|US20080035286||Jul 18, 2007||Feb 14, 2008||Johann Aichinger||Processes and systems for the pulping of lignocellulosic materials|
|US20080066877||Nov 19, 2007||Mar 20, 2008||Sabourin Marc J||High defiberization pretreatment process for mechanical refining|
|US20080105391||Nov 19, 2007||May 8, 2008||Sabourin Marc J||Pulping process with high defiberization chip pretreatment|
|US20080142181||Nov 19, 2007||Jun 19, 2008||Andritz, Inc.||High defiberization chip pretreatment apparatus|
|US20090151880||Oct 24, 2008||Jun 18, 2009||Andritz Inc.||Method and system to enhance fiber development by addition of treatment agent during mechanical pulping|
|US20090288789||Feb 19, 2009||Nov 26, 2009||Andritz Inc.||Medium consistency refining method of pulp and system|
|US20100186910||Mar 26, 2010||Jul 29, 2010||Martin Herkel||Four stage alkaline peroxide mechanical pulpings|
|US20100224333||Sep 9, 2010||Prasad Duggirala||Method and chemical composition to improve efficiency of mechanical pulp|
|US20100269994||Oct 15, 2008||Oct 28, 2010||Andrey Pranovich||Method for treating ligno-cellulosic materials|
|CA1078558A||Dec 24, 1975||Jun 3, 1980||Elektrokemiska Ab||Process for producing bleached mechanical pulp having high strength and brightness and low discharge of oxygen consuming substances|
|CA1173604A||Jan 20, 1982||Sep 4, 1984||Mead Corp||Production of chemimechanical pulp|
|JP2008045262A||Title not available|
|SE226593C||Title not available|
|SE454185B||Title not available|
|SE7502059A||Title not available|
|WO1995034711A1||Jun 7, 1995||Dec 21, 1995||Roland Baeck||A light drainability, bulky chemimechanical pulp that has a low shive content and a low fine-material content|
|WO2003008703A1||Jul 19, 2002||Jan 30, 2003||Andritz Inc||Four stage alkaline peroxide mechanical pulping|
|WO2005042830A1||Oct 2, 2003||May 12, 2005||Andritz Inc||Multi-stage ap mechanical pulping with refiner flow line treatment|
|1||Bohn, W and Sferrazza, M., "Alkaline peroxide mechanical pulping: a revolution in high yield pulping", 1989 International Mechanical Pulping Conference Proceedings, Helsinki, Finland.|
|2||Cannell, E. and Cockran, R., "The future of BCTMP", Pulp and Paper, May 2000, pp. 61-76.|
|3||*||Cannell, E. and Cockran, R., "The future of BCTMP". Pulp and Paper, May 2000, pp. 61-76.|
|4||Gentile, V.M., Tschichirner, U., and Wilder, H.D., "The Scott Paper Alkaline Peroxide High Yielding Pulping Process", 1991 International Mechanical Pulping Conference Proceedings, p. 199.|
|5||*||Heimburger, S. Quick, T. Sabourin, M., Trmblay, S., and Shaw, G., "One and two stage AP-TMP(TM)-a route to high brightness pulp". Tappi Joumal vol. 79: No. 8 (1996), pp. 139-144.|
|6||*||Heimburger, S. Quick, T. Sabourin, M., Trmblay, S., and Shaw, G., "One and two stage AP-TMP™—a route to high brightness pulp". Tappi Joumal vol. 79: No. 8 (1996), pp. 139-144.|
|7||Heimburger, S., Quick, T., Sabourin, M., Trmblay, S., and Shaw, G., "One and two stage AP-TMP-a route to high brightness pulp", Tappi Journal, vol. 79: No. 8, pp. 139-144, 1996.|
|8||Heimburger, S., Quick, T., Sabourin, M., Trmblay, S., and Shaw, G., "One and two stage AP-TMP—a route to high brightness pulp", Tappi Journal, vol. 79: No. 8, pp. 139-144, 1996.|
|9||Heitner, C., Beatson, R.P., and Atack, D., "Ultra-High Yield Pulping Part V: High Compression Impregnation of Softwood Chips with Sodium Sulphite-A Method of Producing CMP with High Wet and Dry Strength", paperi ja Puu (8): 417 1985.|
|10||Heitner, C., Beatson, R.P., and Atack, D., "Ultra-High Yield Pulping Part V: High Compression Impregnation of Softwood Chips with Sodium Sulphite—A Method of Producing CMP with High Wet and Dry Strength", paperi ja Puu (8): 417 1985.|
|11||Marton, R., Geoff, S., Brown, A.F., and Granzow, S., "Harwood TMP and RMP Modifications", Tappi Journal 62:1, p. 49, 1979.|
|12||Office Action mailed Mar. 22, 2011 issued in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/661,909.|
|13||Office Action mailed Sep. 16, 2010 issued on co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/661,909.|
|14||Sabourin, M. and Presley, J., Low chemical alkaline peroxide TMP-a means for upgrading newsprint mills, 1992 Tappi Pulping Conference Proceeding, Book 3, pp. 1135-114.|
|15||Sabourin, M. and Presley, J., Low chemical alkaline peroxide TMP—a means for upgrading newsprint mills, 1992 Tappi Pulping Conference Proceeding, Book 3, pp. 1135-114.|
|16||Sferraza, M.J. and Bohn, W.L., Alkaline Peroxide Mechanical Pulping: The Pulp of the 1990's, 22nd ABTCP Pulp and Paper Annual Meeting, (San Paulo, Brazil, Nov. 20-24, 1989.|
|17||Sharpe, P.E., and Rothenburg, I., "Refiner Hydrogen Peroxide Bleaching of Thermomechanical Pulps", Tappi Journal 71 (5): 109, 1988.|
|18||*||Smook, Gary A., Handbook for Pulp and Paper Technologists, 2nd ed, Angus Wilde Publications, 1992, p. 98.|
|19||Springer, R., Huang, Y., Davies, D., Kronis, J., and Heimburger, S., "Refiner Peroxide Bleaching at Daishowa Port Angeles", 84th CPPA Annual Meeting Proceedings, p. A11.|
|20||Strunk, W. G. and Meng, T., "Status Report: Pulp Bleaching with Hydrogen Peroxide During Refining", Pulp and Pater 60 (11), 1986.|
|21||Xu, E.C., "A New Concept in Alkaline Peroxide Mechanical Pulping", 1999 International Mechanical Pulping Conference Proceedings, Houston, May 24-26, 1999, p. 5A-3.|
|22||Xu, E.C., "A New Technology for Utilization of South American Eucalyptus in Paper and Board Manufacture", 32nd ABTCP Annual Conference, Sao Paulo, Brazil, Oct. 18-21, 1999.|
|23||Xu, E.C., "Chemical Treatment in Mechanical Pulping, Part 1: South American Eucalyptus (Process and Properties)", 1997 Tappi Pulping Conference Proceedings, p. 985.|
|24||Xu, E.C., "Chemical Treatment in Mechanical Pulping, Part 2: North American Aspen (Process and Properties)". 1998 CPPA Technical Section Annual Meeting Proceedings, p. B51.|
|25||Xu, E.C., "Chemical Treatment in Mechanical Pulping, Part 3: Pulp Yield and Chemical Pretreatment", 1998 Tappi Pulping Conference Proceedings, p. 391.|
|26||Xu, E.C., "Mechanical Pulping of South American Eucalyptus-Technology, Pulp Properties and Application Potential", 1st ABTCP Pulping Technology Conference-San Paulo, Brazil, May 5-7, 1998.|
|27||Xu, E.C., "Mechanical Pulping of South American Eucalyptus—Technology, Pulp Properties and Application Potential", 1st ABTCP Pulping Technology Conference—San Paulo, Brazil, May 5-7, 1998.|
|28||Xu, E.C., "P-RC Alkaline Peroxide Mechanical Pulping of Hardwood Part 1-Aspen, Beech, Birch, Cottonwood and Maple" PATAC annual meeting proceedings, Montreal 2000.|
|29||Xu, E.C., "P-RC Alkaline Peroxide Mechanical Pulping of Hardwood Part 1—Aspen, Beech, Birch, Cottonwood and Maple" PATAC annual meeting proceedings, Montreal 2000.|
|30||Xu, E.C., "P-RC APMP Pulping of Hardwood and its Comparison with Chemical Pulping", Intl. Symp. Environmentally Friendly and Emerging Technologies for a sustainable pulp and Paper Industry Conf. Proceeding, Taiwan, Apr. 25-27, 2000.|
|31||Xu, E.C., "P-RC APMP Pulps from Asian Tropical Hardwoods", Asia Paper conference proceeding, Singapore, Apr. 23-27, 2000.|
|32||Xu, E.C., "Process Selection for Chemical Mechanical Pulping of Aspen" PAPTAC Annual Meeting Montreal, Jan. 29-Feb. 2001.|
|33||Xu, E.C., "Properties and Papermaking Potential of APMP Pulp from Acacia Mangium", 52nd APPITA Annual General Conference Proceedings, (Brisbane, Australia, May 11-16, 1998), pp. 501-508.|
|34||Xu, E.C., Sabourin, M.J., and Cort, J.B., "Evaluation of APMP and BCTMP Processes for Market Pulp Properties from South American Eucalyptus Species", 1996 Tappi Pulping Conference Proceedings, p. 705.|
|35||*||Xu, Eric C., "Chemical Treatment in Mechanical Pulping-Part 3; Pulp Yield and Chemical Pretreatment", 1998 Pulping Conference, TAPPI Proceedings, pp. 391-402.|
|36||*||Xu, Eric C., "Chemical Treatment in Mechanical Pulping—Part 3; Pulp Yield and Chemical Pretreatment", 1998 Pulping Conference, TAPPI Proceedings, pp. 391-402.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US9115468||Sep 27, 2013||Aug 25, 2015||Andritz Inc.||Chemical treatment of lignocellulosic fiber bundle material, and methods and systems relating thereto|
|US9151000 *||Sep 16, 2011||Oct 6, 2015||Titan Wood Limited||Treatment of wood pieces|
|US20130303751 *||Sep 16, 2011||Nov 14, 2013||Titan Wood Limited||Treatment of Wood Pieces|
|U.S. Classification||162/25, 162/26, 8/111, 162/56, 162/52, 8/107, 241/27, 162/261, 241/28|
|International Classification||D21C3/22, D21B1/04, D21B1/02, D21C9/16|
|Mar 26, 2010||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ANDRITZ INC., PENNSYLVANIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:XU, ERIC CHAO;REEL/FRAME:024190/0302
Effective date: 20030929
|Dec 30, 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4