|Publication number||US8226185 B2|
|Application number||US 12/208,442|
|Publication date||Jul 24, 2012|
|Filing date||Sep 11, 2008|
|Priority date||Sep 11, 2008|
|Also published as||CN101708670A, CN101708670B, EP2163951A1, US20100060677|
|Publication number||12208442, 208442, US 8226185 B2, US 8226185B2, US-B2-8226185, US8226185 B2, US8226185B2|
|Inventors||Michael Eugene Jones, David Scott Allaway, David L. Knierim|
|Original Assignee||Xerox Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (13), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (2), Classifications (8), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The embodiments disclosed herein relate to the field of printing and specifically to a printing device and related method for detecting the slip of a drive belt in the printing device.
Many printing devices use a rotating imaging member that receives marking material and transfers the marking material to print media. For example, solid ink printers include a rotating imaging drum. The solid ink in the printer is melted and deposited on to the drum. The drum then transfers the ink to paper.
The imaging drum in such printing devices is rotated and the paper comes into contact with the drum as it rotates. An electric motor is used to rotate the drum via a drive mechanism. The drive mechanism may include a gear drive as well as a drive belt which is operably connected between a motor pulley and a drum pulley. The drive belt is typically provided in the form of a v-belt which links the motor pulley to the drum pulley. The motor pulley is grooved to match the belt profile and the drum pulley may be grooved or flat. The v-belt relies on friction to transmit torque between the drive motor and the drum. The torque capacity of the printer is dependent in part on the belt tension and the coefficient of friction between the belt and pulleys.
In certain situations, the friction between the belt and the pulleys is insufficient to drive the imaging drum and the belt slips on one of the pulleys. Excessive belt slip between the motor and the drum may result in belt damage and objectionable noise.
A number of factors can cause variation in the torque capacity of the belt drive system. These factors include, but are not limited to (i) residual mold release agent being left on new belts; (ii) drum release agent (e.g., silicone oil) contaminating the belt or pulleys; (iii) improper belt tension as a result of various factors (e.g., improper spring installation or improper binding of the motor pivot interface); and (iv) belt wear.
Even if the belt is clean from contaminates, relatively new, and properly tensioned, a “normal” belt drive may slip when an unexpected high torque event occurs. Such unexpected high torque events include, but are not limited to (i) pressure roller attempts to climb a leading media edge under an excessive transfix load; (ii) multipick or shingled media delivered to the transfix nip causing the pressure roller to climb the leading edge of the shingled media; (iii) commanding excessive drum accelerations; (iv) a loss of servo control of the drum drive yielding unexpected high accelerations; or (v) an excessive transfix load.
In view of the foregoing, it would be desirable to provide a printing system capable of preventing belt damage or excessive noise due to belt slip. It would also be desirable to provide such a system that may also be used to identify a faulty drive system, worn belt, or events that cause excessive belt slip.
A method of detecting drive belt slip in a printing device comprises driving an imaging member using a motor and a drive belt. During operation of the printing device, a first drive parameter related to the motor is determined, such as, for example, the angular velocity of the motor rotor. Also during operation of the printing device, a second drive parameter related to the imaging member is determined, such as, for example, the angular velocity of the imaging member. A slip of the drive belt is then determined based on the first drive parameter and the second drive parameter. In one embodiment, the slip is a rate of slip determined by subtracting a scaled amount of the first velocity from the second velocity. If the rate of slip exceeds a threshold amount, a slip event is declared.
In at least one embodiment, a printing device configured to detect drive belt slip comprises a motor and a first sensor configured to provide a first signal based on rotation of the motor. The first sensor may be a rotational encoder such as, for example, a hall-effect sensor configured to provide a signal indicative of the angular velocity of the motor rotor. The printing device further comprises a belt operably connected to the motor and an imaging drum operably connected to the belt such that the motor is configured to drive the drum via the belt. A second sensor is configured to provide a second signal based on rotation of the imaging drum. The second sensor may be a rotational encoder such as, for example, an optical or photo-transmissive sensor provided on the imaging drum axis of rotation and configured to provide a signal indicative of an angular velocity of the imaging drum. A controller is configured to receive the first signal and the second signal and determine the slip of the belt based on the first signal and the second signal. In at least one embodiment, the controller is configured to determine a slip velocity by subtracting a scaled amount of the angular velocity of the motor rotor from the angular velocity of the imaging drum. Furthermore, the controller is configured to determine excessive slip velocity exceeding a threshold amount and trigger a response to minimize belt slip noise and belt damage.
The above described features and advantages, as well as others, will become more readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art by reference to the following detailed description and accompanying drawings. While it would be desirable to provide a method and system for detecting drum drive belt slip that provides one or more of these or other advantageous features as may be apparent to those reviewing this disclosure, the teachings disclosed herein extend to those embodiments which fall within the scope of the appended claims, regardless of whether they include or accomplish one or more of the above-mentioned advantages or features.
With reference to
With reference now to
The motor pulley 24 is generally cylindrical with a cross section of external grooves that receives a similar cross section of mating ribs provided along the inner circumferential portion of the belt 22. The motor pulley 24 is connected to the motor shaft 23 and is driven by the electric motor 20. The motor 20 may be any of various electric motors appropriate for use in a printer (such as a three phase synchronous brushless motor).
The drive belt 22 is connected between the motor pulley 24 and the drum pulley 26. In at least one embodiment, the drive belt 22 is a v-belt or multi-ribbed v-belt which may be reinforced with fibers such as steel, Kevlar, or polyester. The “V” section of the belt 22 mates with the grooves on the motor pulley 24 and prevents the belt from tracking off of the motor pulley 24. Belt tension causes the “V” shaped ribs on the belt 22 to wedge into the mating grooves at the motor pulley 24. This wedging action improves the torque transmission capacity of the belt drive system.
The drum pulley 26 is also cylindrical and is mechanically linked to the motor pulley 24 via the belt 22. The v-belt is received by the drum pulley 26 along this flat outer circumferential portion 28. Belt slip may occur at either the motor pulley 24 or the drum pulley 26 to belt interface.
The imaging drum 12 is rigidly connected to the drum pulley 26 such that rotation of the drum pulley 26 directly results in rotation of the imaging drum 12. It will be recognized that the drum pulley 26 as well as the motor pulley 24 and motor 20 are also situated within the housing 18 of the printer 10 along with the imaging drum 12, as shown in
As best seen in
With particular reference now to
The first sensor 40 delivers signals to the controller 44 which are representative of the position of the motor rotor 21. Similarly, the second sensor 42 delivers signals to the controller 44 which are representative of the position of the imaging drum 12. With this information the controller 44 is able to calculate the respective angular velocities of the motor rotor 21 and the imaging drum 12. Furthermore, information about the no load drive ratio between the motor pulley 24 and the drum pulley 26 is stored in the controller 44. The controller 44 can then divide the velocity of the motor 20 by this no load drive ratio and subtract the result from the drum velocity in order to determine the amount of slip occurring. The calculated slip may then be used to trigger a fault condition or capture other measurements (e.g., motor current to determine drive torque). Furthermore, by monitoring both the velocity of the imaging drum 12 and the velocity of the motor 20 independently, a current drive ratio can be determined. As explained in further detail below, a change in the drive ratio over time can be used to provide an indication of belt wear.
During operation of the printing device, the imaging drum 12 is driven by the motor 20 and drive system. As the imaging drum 12 rotates, the controller 44 instructs the printhead 15 to deposit ink on the imaging drum 12. Paper or other media 16 is then passed between a transverse roller 11 and the surface of the imaging drum 12, causing the ink on the imaging drum 12 to be transferred to the media. If a slip event occurs during the printing process, the controller 44 is operable to identify the fault condition and trigger a fault response, such as limiting motor torque.
An exemplary method that may be used by the controller 44 to determine if a slip event is occurring is shown in
At step 54, the controller calculates a belt slip. The belt slip may be calculated in several ways, as will be recognized by those of skill in the art. In at least one embodiment, the belt slip is calculated by comparing the angular velocity of the motor rotor 21 to the angular velocity of the imaging drum 12. Using this method, the angular velocity of the motor rotor 21 is first scaled to the angular velocity of the imaging drum 12 by the no load drive ratio. The difference between the scaled motor rotor velocity and the imaging drum velocity is the slip velocity or rate of slip of the friction drive. In at least one exemplary embodiment, the change in motor rotor 21 and imaging drum 12 positions are sampled at approximately 20 kHz using the sensors 40, 42. The position change per unit time for each is the angular velocity. Dividing the motor rotor velocity by the no load drive ratio (e.g., approximately 10:1) scales it to an equivalent imaging drum velocity. Slip, in units of drum revolutions per second is calculated by the following equation:
Alternately, differences in position can be used to calculate belt slip. Imaging drum angular position may be recorded each time the motor rotor completes some number of revolutions. (This number of motor rotor revolutions may be less than one, such as the fraction of a revolution corresponding to one electrical cycle of the motor encoder signals.) Slip distance, in units of drum position per motor revolution is calculated as:
The graph in
In the example of
In the example of
By measuring belt slip and motor current together, the torque capacity of the belt drive can be determined. A slip event may be created by accelerating the imaging drum 12, thus using imaging drum inertia to create resistive torque to the motor 20. The torque at the motor pulley 24 required to create a given slip is calculated using motor current values that correspond to the slip measured. Total motor torque is the motor current multiplied by the motor torque constant. Motor pulley 24 torque is the total motor torque minus the torque required to accelerate the motor rotor 21. Belt drive torque capacity is equal to the motor pulley 24 torque capacity multiplied by the drive ratio. Accordingly, by detecting belt slip, the belt 22 can be protected from damage caused by excessive slip. In addition, belt slip can be used to identify faulty belt drive assemblies by measuring belt slip and motor current to quantify drive torque capacity.
In addition to providing a system for detecting belt slip, the drive system for the printer described herein may also be used to provide a system for detecting belt wear. In particular, by monitoring both the imaging drum and motor velocities independently, an existing drive ratio for the printer can be determined. By monitoring changes in the drive ratio over time, an indication of belt wear is provided. A worn belt rides lower in the grooves of the pulleys, reducing the effective diameter of the pulleys. A given change in effective pulley diameter has much more relative affect on the smaller motor pulley, so the drive ratio increases. Accordingly, an increase in the drive ratio of motor rotor revolutions to imaging drum revolutions occurs over time. When the mass of the belt is plotted against the drive ratio over time, a relatively linear relationship will be seen between belt mass and drive ratio. In at least one embodiment of the printer described herein, a new belt with a mass of about 21 grams provides a drive ratio of approximately 9.9:1, while a belt worn to near failure with a mass of 11 grams provides a drive ratio of approximately 10.9:1. A relatively linear relationship between belt mass and drive ratio can be seen in between these two points.
In view of the foregoing, the printer disclosed herein may be used to monitor belt wear. For example, with reference again to
It will be recognized that the techniques disclosed herein for determining belt slip and wear may have applications beyond printer technologies. For example, in the automotive industry belt drives are used to transmit power to many peripherals such as the alternator, power steering pump, water pump, air conditioner pump, etc. In one embodiment, a car's on board diagnostics may be utilized to automatically determine excessive belt slip or wear for use in service diagnostics and or to initiate a service required indicator. Many modern engines use an Engine Control Module (ECM) that receives signals from a crank shaft position sensor. Thus, the engine position and velocity information is already available. By adding a sense signal to one or more peripheral devices, here to the belt slip, ratio and wear could be monitored. In one embodiment, the sense signal may be simply and easily implemented within the alternator. A tachometer signal, generated by the alternators internal changing magnetic field, may be routed to the ECU via a single wire using chassis ground as reference.
Although the various embodiments have been provided herein, it will be appreciated by those of skill in the art that other implementations and adaptations are possible. Furthermore, aspects of the various embodiments described herein may be combined or substituted with aspects from other features to arrive at different embodiments from those described herein. Thus, it will be appreciated that various of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations, or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5406359||Sep 24, 1993||Apr 11, 1995||Xerox Corporation||Ultra-high efficiency intermediate transfer with pre-transfer treatment on an imaging drum and an intermediate belt|
|US5418600||Dec 17, 1993||May 23, 1995||Xerox Corporation||Conformable friction drive system for belt or drum transport|
|US5940105 *||Jan 24, 1997||Aug 17, 1999||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Motor drive controlling method for an image forming apparatus and motor drive controlling apparatus in the image forming apparatus using the method|
|US7454150 *||Jan 9, 2006||Nov 18, 2008||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Image forming apparatus having a resist rotary member|
|US8033546 *||Nov 10, 2006||Oct 11, 2011||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Belt drive controller and image forming apparatus provided with same|
|US20010011507 *||May 21, 1998||Aug 9, 2001||Aharon Korem||Apparatus and method for printing|
|US20060024088||Jul 30, 2004||Feb 2, 2006||Xerox Corporation||Photoreceptor belt tensioner providing low variation in belt tension as a function of belt length|
|EP0767055A2||Aug 28, 1996||Apr 9, 1997||MAN Roland Druckmaschinen AG||Monitoring device for the driving device of a printing machine|
|EP1818572A1||Dec 19, 2003||Aug 15, 2007||Van Doorne's Transmissie B.V.||Method for operating a continuously variable transmission|
|JP2002311672A||Title not available|
|JPH01288656A||Title not available|
|JPH09123421A *||Title not available|
|WO2008078980A1||Dec 27, 2006||Jul 3, 2008||Bosch Gmbh Robert||Method for determining slip in a friction-type continuously variable transmission and a transmission equiped with means for carrying out the method|
|1||European Search Report, European Patent Office, Munich, DE, Dec. 29, 2009, 7 pages.|
|2||*||Machine-generated translation of JP 09-123421, published on May 1997.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8534662 *||Dec 5, 2012||Sep 17, 2013||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Image forming apparatus, control method therefor, and computer-readable medium|
|WO2014163884A1 *||Feb 26, 2014||Oct 9, 2014||The Gates Corporation||Enhanced analysis for image-based serpentine belt wear evaluation|
|International Classification||B41F33/00, B41F13/00|
|Cooperative Classification||G03G15/757, G01M13/023, G03G2215/00168|
|European Classification||G03G15/75F, G01M13/02D|
|Sep 11, 2008||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: XEROX CORPORATION,CONNECTICUT
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:JONES, MICHAEL EUGENE;ALLAWAY, DAVID SCOTT;KNIERIM, DAVID L.;REEL/FRAME:021513/0816
Effective date: 20080909
Owner name: XEROX CORPORATION, CONNECTICUT
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:JONES, MICHAEL EUGENE;ALLAWAY, DAVID SCOTT;KNIERIM, DAVID L.;REEL/FRAME:021513/0816
Effective date: 20080909
|Dec 15, 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4