Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS878273 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateFeb 4, 1908
Filing dateMay 25, 1906
Priority dateMay 25, 1906
Publication numberUS 878273 A, US 878273A, US-A-878273, US878273 A, US878273A
InventorsWilliam H Chapman
Original AssigneeWilliam H Chapman
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method of neutralizing static electricity.
US 878273 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)



wYLbqwsey 6M4 M VLC/ I M W LL QWAAAAA 5 m at PATENTED FEB. 4, 1908.



Specification of Letters Patent.

Application filed Kay 25. 1908. Serial No. 818.772.

Patented Feb. 4, 1908.

. To all whom it may concern:

Be it'known that 1, WILLIAM H. CHAPMAN, a citizen of, the United States of America, and a resident of Portland, Maine, have invented certain new and useful Improvements in Methods of Neutralizing Static Electricity, of which the following is a specification.

My invention relates to aprocess of neutralizing static electricity particularly in yarn, roving, sliver and other like material produced during the processes of textile manufacture when it is not essential to remove the entire charge and when it is not practicable to locate the parts of the apparatus used very near the work.

In the manufacture of textile fabrics the cotton, wool or mohair and other fiber is carded, spun, twisted &c. and becomescharged with positive electricity at various points in the process of its manipulation, the charge being usually imparted to it' where it passes through rol The electric charge when itis comparatively low in voltage has little or no bad efie'ct on the fiber but when it reaches ahigh voltage the fibers repel'each other causing unevenness in spinning or twisting &c., or they may stick to the rolls or other arts of the machinery and thus cause'troub e. 1

When the material to be acted upon is paper or other material where it is important to effect the complete neutralization and where the neutrahzing agparatus may be located close to the work make use of an alternating charge of high voltage as set forth in my Patent No. 777,598.

When it is not objectionable to leave a charge of a few hundred volts in the material and where the apparatus cannot be approached near the work I find it advantageous to use a direct current for the reason that the discharge from a direct current carries much farther than that from the alter nating current, the discharge of electric ions which pro duce the neutralization being effective asfar as two feet or more from the discarging point.

. In the present invention I make use of a conductor containing small points or surfaces which is charged with a direct current or charge of high voltage and of a polarity which is of opposite sign to the electricity of the material to be treated. From this conductor takes place a static discharge of electage electricity has s and is subjected toa drawing or compressmg actlon.

tric ions whichradiate to the material and effect its neutralization. Hitherto in using the direct current for this work the dischar ing conductor for discharging the'high vo lbeen. located close to the work and when so located itwas practically impossible to prevent overcharging the material with electricity from the charged conductor. The reason for this was because the amount of electricity was constantly varying in the material and no ordinary means of adjustment would be effective to put just the right quantity into it and if enou neutralize the static electricity there was guite sure to be an over lus. Thus the ifiiculty with this process as been to control or limit the discharge of electric ions so that they would neutralize substantially all the electricity of the material without putting into it an overcharge of electricity of opposite polarity. This limitation or regulation I have accomplished by means of the process set forth in my application No. 292,388 filed fected by locating the charged conductor at a comparatively ng distance from the material to be acted on and locating within the range of influence of the direct charge a grounded conductor which will be in such relation to the charged conductor and the material that the tendency of the ions when the material is charged with static electricity will be to go to the material and so neutralize the contained charge but when the material is neutral or nearly so the ions will go more readily to the grounded conductor leaving the material in a substantially neutral condition. The exact location of these elements.

depends upon the. voltage of the conductor, the speed of the moving material and the position of the grounded conductor but in general it may be said that the charged conductor when its charge is 10,000 volts or over shouldbe at least farther away than 6 to 8 inches and the greater the distance up the 11 was put in to surfaces.

in any desired way so long as it has fine disto come into too intimate contact with it; f

otherwise the material will have when in contact with the grounded conductor, a condenser eitect and its selective power will be thus reduced. The latter must also be located where it will receive the direct discharge from the conductor and should not be screened therefrom. Thus, when the charged conductor is 18 inches or 2 feet away from the yarn, with a voltage of 10,000 volts, the grounded conductor may be near theyarn but not in intimate contact with it and in I the range of the direct discharge of the ions and when the parts are in this position the positive electricity generated in the yarn .will be neutralized without the yarn receiving an overcharge of negative from the charged conductor. The reason is this;So long as the yarn contains any ositive electricity it tends to draw to itsef the negative ions which are being thrown ed by the charged conductor and this tendency is proportional to the square of the difference of the voltage between the two kinds of electricity.

When the yarn becomes neutral the grounded conductor oliers the path of the least resistance and the ions consequently go that way instead of to the neutral yarn.

the yarnreceives a slight overcharge of negative ions it tends to repel these ionsto the grounded conductor and prevent the accumulation of negative ions on the yarn. VVhenthe parts are located at certain rela tive positions there will be a perfect neutralization of the charge in the material but ordinarily in textile work it is not important to take out the entire charge and there is consequently considerable latitude in the arrangement ofparts.

I illustrate my invention by means of the accompanying drawing in which is represented diagramatically an apparatus adapted to carry out my process.

In the drawing a represents a Wimshurst machine or other source of direct current of high voltage electricity connected by a wire I) which may be an insulated cable with a conductor 0 having small radiating points or This conductor 0 may be made up charging points. (i represents a strand of yarn movin charged wit high tension electricity and it is located at a considerable distance from the conductor. The material treated may be yarn in the process of spinning, roving, sliver along through rolls whereby itisor other material containing a static charge which itis desired to remove.

Located adjacent to the yarn d and within the range of influence of the conductor 0 is a conductor e connected to ground by the wire This conductor may be a piece of metal specially used for this purpose or the metal of the machinery may sometimes serve the purpose if it is properly located.

The discharge of the ions is re resented as going from the conductor 0 to t e yarn and as already stated, the tendency of the negative-ions to go to. the positively charged yarn is greater than'it is to go to the grounded conductor but as soon as the yarn is neutralized the conductor e attracts them more readily than the yarn.

It is essential to have the conductor a relatively far away from the yarn for if it is placed too near it tends to overcharge the yarn and it will not be diverted by the grounded conductor.

textile mills, particularly in mill rooms where the atmosphere has to be kept very moist and the temperature very high to prevent the generation of static electricity in the fiber in process of manufacture.

By the use of my invention it is practicable .-to do away with the hot and humid atmosphere in cotton and other textile mills and to (produce better and more uniform work, an a mill equip ed with my apparatus is independent of c limate or weather conditions.

Instead of using a direct current I may use an alternating current composed of alternations which are in greater part of a olarity opposite to that in the material but do not find such a current efiective through so great distance as the direct current.

The herein described process of neutralizing static electricity in yarn or other like moving material which consists of subjecting the material to the action of a charge ofhigh voltage electricity radiated from one or more discharging points, said electricity being of a polarity wholly or in greater part opposite to that of the electricity in the material and placing a grounded conductor at such a point as described with relation to the charged conductor and the material that it will divert or attract the electricity of said charge when the material is in a substantially neutral, condition, but not otherwise.


Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2449972 *Jun 27, 1945Sep 28, 1948Robin BeachElimination of static electricity
US2462487 *Dec 28, 1945Feb 22, 1949Frank H Lee CompanyApparatus for forming felt
US2483542 *Oct 24, 1945Oct 4, 1949Goss Printing Press Co LtdStatic eliminator for printing presses
US2497604 *Jul 15, 1947Feb 14, 1950British Cotton Ind Res AssocMethod of and means for eliminating electrostatic charges in industrial processes
US2515182 *Feb 28, 1947Jul 18, 1950Bennett Willard HApparatus for discharging static electricity from aircraft
US3161479 *Aug 31, 1960Dec 15, 1964Electro Dev Co IncClothes drier static removal apparatus
US3298340 *Dec 10, 1964Jan 17, 1967Burlington Industries IncElectrostatic charge eliminator combined with a tufting machine
US4376964 *Feb 24, 1981Mar 15, 1983Electricite De France (Service National)Electrical treatment of textile yarn or fibers
US4402035 *Sep 2, 1980Aug 30, 1983Polaroid CorporationLow voltage electrostatic charge regulating apparatus
US6368675Apr 6, 2000Apr 9, 20023M Innovative Properties CompanyElectrostatically assisted coating method and apparatus with focused electrode field
US6475572Apr 6, 2000Nov 5, 20023M Innovative Properties CompanyElectrostatically assisted coating method with focused web-borne charges
US6666918Jul 26, 2002Dec 23, 20033M Innovative Properties CompanyElectrostatically assisted coating apparatus with focused web charge field
US6716286Jan 22, 2002Apr 6, 20043M Innovative Properties CompanyElectrostatically assisted coating method and apparatus with focused electrode field
US7553440May 12, 2006Jun 30, 2009Leonard William KMethod and apparatus for electric treatment of substrates
US7758327Jun 3, 2009Jul 20, 2010Leonard William KMethod and apparatus for electric treatment of substrates
US7985060Jun 15, 2010Jul 26, 2011Leonard William KMethod and apparatus for electric treatment of substrates
US8323554Jun 21, 2011Dec 4, 2012Leonard William KMethod and apparatus for electric
US20060254419 *May 12, 2006Nov 16, 2006Leonard William KMethod and apparatus for electric treatment of substrates
US20090272269 *Jun 3, 2009Nov 5, 2009Leonard William KMethod and apparatus for electric treatment of substrates
US20100263696 *Jun 15, 2010Oct 21, 2010Leonard William KMethod and apparatus for electric treatment of substrates
Cooperative ClassificationH05F3/04