Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUSD656526 S1
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 29/350,008
Publication dateMar 27, 2012
Filing dateNov 10, 2009
Priority dateNov 10, 2009
Fee statusPaid
Also published asUSD681086
Publication number29350008, 350008, US D656526 S1, US D656526S1, US-S1-D656526, USD656526 S1, USD656526S1
InventorsBruce Christie, Edward W. Peterson, Corina van de Pol
Original AssigneeAcufocus, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Ocular mask
US D656526 S1
Abstract  available in
Images(25)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(1)
  1. The ornamental designs for an ocular mask, as shown and described.
Description

FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of an embodiment of an ocular mask according to the present designs;

FIG. 2 is a bottom perspective view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a top-plan view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a bottom-plan view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 5 is a front elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 6 is a rear elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 7 is a left-side elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 8 is a right-side elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional view of FIG. 3 taken through line 9-9 of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view of FIG. 3 taken through line 10-10 of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 11 is a top perspective view of a second embodiment of an ocular mask according to the present designs;

FIG. 12 is a bottom perspective view of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 13 is a top-plan view of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 14 is a bottom-plan view of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 15 is a front elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 16 is a rear elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 17 is a left-side elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 18 is a right-side elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 19 is a cross-sectional view of FIG. 13 taken through line 19-19 of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 20 is a cross-sectional view of FIG. 13 taken through line 20-20 of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 21 is a top perspective view of a third embodiment of an ocular mask according to the present designs;

FIG. 22 is a bottom perspective view of the embodiment of FIG. 21;

FIG. 23 is a top-plan view of the embodiment of FIG. 21;

FIG. 24 is a bottom-plan view of the embodiment of FIG. 21;

FIG. 25 is a front elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 21;

FIG. 26 is a rear elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 21;

FIG. 27 is a left-side elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 21;

FIG. 28 is a right-side elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 21;

FIG. 29 is a cross-sectional view of FIG. 23 taken through line 29-29 of the embodiment of FIG. 21; and,

FIG. 30 is a cross-sectional view of FIG. 23 taken through line 30-30 of the embodiment of FIG. 21.

The broken lines shown in FIGS. 11-20 are included for the purpose of illustration only and form no part of the claimed design.

Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1"Corneal Surgery" by L. Girard, The C.V. Mosby Publishing Company, London 1981 pp. 107-141.
2"Epikeratophakia: Techniques, Compositions, and Clinical Results" by Werblin, Opthalmology, 1983, pp. 45-58.
3"Keratomileusis and Keratophakia in the Surgical Correction of Aphakia" by Barraquer, Cataract Surgery and Special Techniques, prior to 1996 pp. 270-289.
4"Lamellar Corneal Stromectomy for the Operative Treatment of Myopia" by Tadeusz Krwawicz, Notes, Cases, Instruments—1964, pp. 828-833.
5"Refractive Keratoplasty: Acute Morphologic Features," by Baumgarter et al, The CLAO Journal-Apr. 1985, vol. II, No. 2, pp. 163-169.
6Accommodation and Presbyopia. Croft et al., International Opthalmology Clinics: Spring 2001, vol. 41, Issue 2, pp. 33-46.
7Accommodation Responses and Ageing. Heron et al. IOVS, Nov. 1999, vol. 40, No. 12, pp. 2872-2883.
8Accommodation responses to flickering stimuli. Chauhan et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. vol. 16. No. 5, pp. 391-408, 1996.
9Accommodation to perceived depth in stereo tests. Koh et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 279-284, 1998.
10Accommodative responses to anisoaccommodative targets. Koh et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 254-262, 1998.
11Accomodation and acuity under night-driving illumination levels. Arumi et al. Opthal. Physiol. Opt. vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 291-299, 1997.
12Accomodation dynamics as a function of age. Heron et al. Opthal. Physiol. Opt. 2002 22:389-396.
13Age Changes in the Interactions between the Accommodation and Vergence Systems. Heron et al. Optometry and Vision Science. vol. 78, No. 10, Oct. 2001.
14Anterior Ciliary Sclerotomy for Treatment of Presbyopia: A Prospective Controlled Study. Hamilton et al. Ophthalmology, vol. 109, No. 11: Nov. 2002: pp. 1970-1977.
15Binder et al., "Hydrogel keratophakia in non-human primates", Current Eye Research, vol. 1, No. 9, 1981/1982, pp. 535-542.
16Can Accommodation be Surgically Restored in Human Presbyopia Glasser, Adrian. Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 76, No. 9, Sep. 1999.
17Cao et al., "Comparative study of the use of poly(glycolic acid), calcium alginate and pluronics in the engineering of autologous porcine cartilage", Polymers for Tissue Engineering, pp. 315-327, VSP 1998.
18Changes in the static accommodation response with age. Kalsi et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 77-84, 2001.
19Choice of Spatial Frequency for Contrast Sensitivity Evaluation After Corneal Refractive Surgery. Montes-Mico et al. Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 17: Nov./Dec. 2001: pp. 646-651.
20Choyce, P. "Implants with Coloured and Opaque Portions: Implants with Built-In Stenopeic Aperture," Chapter 4, pp. 21-26 "Uniocular Aphakia Corrected by Anterior Chamber Implants with Built-In Stenipeic Aperture," Chapter 17, pp. 132-136, 1964.
21Clinical Characteristics of Lamellar Channel Deposits After Implementation of Intacs. Ruckhofer et al. J Cataract Refract Surg, vol. 26, Oct. 2000: pp. 1473-1479.
22Corneal Topography: The State of the Art, Alignment of Videokeratographs. Mandell et al. Chpt. 2, pp. 17-23, Jan. 1995.
23Dynamic retinoscopy and accomodation. Whitefoot et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. vol. 12, Jan. 1992, pp. 8-17.
24Dynamics of the accommodation response to abrupt changes in target vergence as a function of age. Heron et al. Vision Research 41 (2001) 507-519.
25Eduard Jaeger's Test-Types (Schrift-Scalen) and Historical Development of Vision Tests. Runge, Paul E. Tr. Am. Ophth. Soc. vol. 98, 2000: 375.
26Eight Years Experience with Permalens Intracorneal Lenses in Nonhuman Primates. Werblin et al. Refractive & Corneal Surgery, vol. 8, Jan./Feb. 1992, pp. 12-21.
27Errors in determining the direction of the visual axis in the presence of defocus. Atchison et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 463-467,1998.
28Evaluate surgical routine to determine DLK cause, surgeon advises. Piechocki, Michael. Ocular Surgery News: Refractive Surgery, Jan. 1, 2003: p. 14.
29Explanation for the observation of isogyres in crystalline lenses viewed between crossed polarizers. Opthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 13, Apr. 1993, pp. 209-211.
30Flap Measurements With the Hansatome Microkeratome. Spadea et al. Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 18, Mar./Apr. 2002: pp. 149-154.
31Focused and divided attention in stereoscopic deth. Wickens et al. SPIE, vol. 1256 Stereoscopic Displays and Applications (1990); pp. 28-34.
32Griffith et al.; "Functional Human Corneal Equivalents Constructed from Cell Lines", Science, vol. 286, Dec. 10, 1999 pp. 2169-2172.
33Groppi, J. J. "New Aspects in the Fitting of the Multi-Range Bifocal Contact Lens" Contacto, vol. 15:22-29 1971.
34Holes in Clear Lenses Demonstrate a Pinhole Effect. Zacharia et al. Arch Ophthalmol, vol. 106, Apr. 1988, pp. 511-513.
35Human Visual System—Image Formation, Encyclopedia of Imaging Science and Technology, Roorda, A., 2002, pp. 539-557.
36Hybrid diffractive-refractive achromatic spectacle lenses. Charman, W. N. Opthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 14, Oct. 1994: pp. 389-392.
37Iijima et al. "Formation of a spherical multicellular aggregate (spheroid) of animal cells in the pores of polyurethane foam as a cell culture substratum and its application to a hybrid artificial liver", Polymers for Tissue Engineering , pp. 273-286, VSP 1998.
38Imaging in the 21st century. Charman, W. N. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 210-223,1998.
39Intraocular pressure after excimer laser myopic refractive surgery. Montes-Mico et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 228-235, 2001.
40Intrastromal Crystalline Deposits Following Hydrogel Keratophakia in Monkeys. Parks et al. Cornea 12(1): 29-34,1993.
41Karin R. Slettin, MD et al., "An in Vivo Model of Femtosecond Laser Intrastromal Refractive Surgery", Experimental Science, Opthalmic Surgery and Lasers, Nov./Dec. 1999, vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 742-749.
42Lipid Deposits Posterior to Impermeable Intracornel Lenses in Rhesus Monkeys: Clinical, Histochemical, and Ultrastructural Studies. Rodrigues et al. Refractive & Corneal Surgery, vol. 6, Jan./Feb. 1990: DO. 32-37.
43Mastel Precision: Fiber Optic Ring Illuminator (Product Nos. 3776 & 4050) U.S. Patent No. 5312393 User Manual. Rev: A02: Jan. 11, 1995, pp. 1-25.
44Mastel Precision: The Ring Light. http://www.mastel.com/ring—light.html. Jul. 28, 2003.
45Measurement of the wave-front aberration of the eye by a fast psychophysical procedure. He et al. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, vol. 15, No. 9: Sep. 1998, pp. 2449-2455.
46Microstructural Changes in Polyester Biotextiles During Implantation in Humans. King et al. NC State University: JTATM, vol. 1, Issue 3, Spring 2001, pp. 1-8.
47Miller et al., Perspectives in Refraction: Quantification of the Pinhole Effect. Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 21, No. 4, Jan./Feb. 1977, pp. 347-350.
48Near vision, lags of accommodation and myopia. Charman, W. N. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 126-133, 1999.
49New Visual Acuity Charts for Clinical Research. Ferris et al. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 94: 91-96, 1982.
50Night myopia and driving. Charman, W. N. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 16, No. 6, p. 474-485, 1996.
51Notch in contrast sensitivity function of optical origin: diffraction effects of acrylic filters. Irving et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 13, Apr. 1993: pp. 179-182.
52On modeling the causes of presbyopia. Glasser, A. Vision Research 41(2001) 3083-3087.
53On the linearity of accommodation dynamics. Charman, W. N. Vision Research 40 (2000) 2057-2066.
54Optical Aspects of Tolerances to Uncorrected Ocular Astigmatism. Charman et al. Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 70, No. 2: pp. 111-117, 1993.
55Optical Modeling of Contact Lens Performance Final Report Covering Period Jul. 15, 1994-Mar. 31, 1995. Grivenkamp et al. for Pilkington Barnes Hind, Issued Apr. 5, 1995.
56Optometric Clinical Practice Guideline Care of the Patient With Presbyopia: Reference Guide for Clinicians. Mancil et al. Mar. 20, 1998.
57PermaVision intracorneallens shows promise for hyperopia. Kronemyer, Bob. Ocular Surgery News: Jan. 1, 2003; p. 8.
58Poly(methyl methacrylate) model study of optical surface quality after excimer laser photo refractive keratectomy. Hauge et al. J Cataract Refract Surg., vol. 27, Dec. 2001, pp. 2026-2035.
59Procyon: Marketing Information for Distributors: Pupil Measurement and Refractive Sugery (Samples from Academic Papers 1994 and 2002). pp. 1-17.
60Refractive keratoplasty with intrastromal hydrogel lenticular implants. McCarey et al. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. ScL, Jul. 1981, pp. 107-115.
61Retinal Image Quality in the Human Eye as a Function of the Accommodation. Lopex-Gil et al. Vision Research, vol. 38, No. 19, Jul. 3, 1998, pp. 1-11.
62Rosenbloom "The Controlled-Pupil Contact Lens in Low Vision Problems" Journal of the American Optometric Association, pp. 836, 838, 840 1969.
63Sally Pobojewski, "New U-developed laser performs high-precision corneal surgery", News and Information Services, The University Record, Jul. 16, 1997.
64Simple parametric model of the human ocular modulation transfer function, A. Deeley et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 11, Jan. 1991, pp. 91-93.
65Subjective Depth-of-Focus of the Eye. Atchison et al. Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 74, No. 7, Jul. 1997, pp. 511-520.
66Subjective Sensitivity to Small Changes in the Contrast of a Suprathreshold Grating, The. Walsh et al. Vision Res., vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 163-193, 1990.
67Surface Modification Properties of Parylene for Medical Applications, The. Wolgemuth, Lonny.Business Briefing: Medical Device Manfacturing & Technology 2002, pp. 1-4.
68Surface tension control of collagen biomaterials by the selective hydrolysis of internal carboxyamides of the protein matrix. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Biomedica, v. 15, n. 1-2, p. 55-61, jan/ago 1999.
69Surgeon: Severe corneal lesions after Lasik are not stage 4 DLK. Piechocki, Michael. Ocular SurgeryNews; Jan. 1, 2003, pp. 16-17.
70Swinger et al., "Keratophakia and Keratomileusis—Clinical Results", American Academy of Opthalmology, Aug. 1981, vol. 88, No. 8, pp. 709-715.
71Takahashi, E. "Use and Interpretation of the Pinhole Test" The Optometric Weekly, pp. 83-86 1965.
72Theoretical and practical performance of a concentric bifocal intraocular implant lens. Charman, W.N. Vision Research 38 (1998) 2841-2853.
73Use of a digital infrared pupillometer to assess patient suitability for refractive surgery. Rosen et al. J Cataract Refract Surg., vol. 28: Aug. 2002. pp. 1433-1438.
74Vision and driving—a literature review and commentary. Charman, W.N. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 371-391, 1997.
75Wesley, N. K. "Research on the Multi-Range Lens," pp. 18-24, 1970.
76Yamauchi et al., "Cultivation of fibroblast cells on keratin coated substrata", Polymers for Tissue Engineering, pp. 329-340, VS 1998.
Classifications
U.S. ClassificationD16/101
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Jun 18, 2014FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Nov 8, 2011CCCertificate of correction
Jun 9, 2009ASAssignment
Owner name: APPLE INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PA SEMI, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022793/0565
Effective date: 20090508
Owner name: APPLE INC.,CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PA SEMI, INC.;US-ASSIGNMENT DATABASE UPDATED:20100225;REEL/FRAME:22793/565
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PA SEMI, INC.;US-ASSIGNMENT DATABASE UPDATED:20100316;REEL/FRAME:22793/565
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PA SEMI, INC.;US-ASSIGNMENT DATABASE UPDATED:20100413;REEL/FRAME:22793/565
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PA SEMI, INC.;US-ASSIGNMENT DATABASE UPDATED:20100420;REEL/FRAME:22793/565
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PA SEMI, INC.;US-ASSIGNMENT DATABASE UPDATED:20100427;REEL/FRAME:22793/565
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PA SEMI, INC.;US-ASSIGNMENT DATABASE UPDATED:20100518;REEL/FRAME:22793/565
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PA SEMI, INC.;REEL/FRAME:22793/565