Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUSRE29383 E
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 05/764,339
Publication dateSep 6, 1977
Filing dateJan 31, 1977
Priority dateJan 10, 1974
Publication number05764339, 764339, US RE29383 E, US RE29383E, US-E-RE29383, USRE29383 E, USRE29383E
InventorsRobert A. Gallatin, Addison W. Langill, Jr.
Original AssigneeProcess Systems, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Digital fluid flow rate measurement or control system
US RE29383 E
Abstract
A plurality of individually actuatable, value weighted digital bistable valve elements in parallel interconnect a fluid source to a fluid receiver. A linear relationship is preferably maintained between the resultant fluid flow rate from the source to the receiver and the product of a flow rate determinative fluid parameter times the sum of the weighted values of the digital valve elements in the open state. The fluid parameter is sensed, the states of the digital valve elements are controlled, and a flow rate representative signal is derived from the states of the valve elements and the fluid parameter. If the fluid is liquid, the parameter is the square root of the pressure difference across the valve elements, in the absence of cavitating venturis, and is the square root of the difference between the upstream pressure and the vapor pressure of the liquid in the presence of cavitating venturis. If the fluid is gas, the parameter is the source pressure divided by the square root of the source temperature. For measurement, the states of the digital valve elements are controlled to maintain the value of the fluid parameter constant. For control the states of the digital valve elements are controlled to establish a set point flow rate.
Images(4)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(47)
What is claimed is:
1. A digital fluid flow rate measurement or control system comprising:
a source of fluid at a first pressure;
a fluid receiver at a second pressure lower than the first pressure;
a plurality of individually actuatable, value weighted digital bistable valve elements interconnecting the source to the receiver, each valve element assuming exclusively either an open state in which fluid flows from the source through the valve element to the receiver or a closed state in which no fluid flows from the source through the valve element to the receiver such that the resultant fluid flow rate from the source to the receiver is a function of the product of a flow rate determinative fluid parameter times the sum of the weighted values of the digital valve elements in the open state;
means for sensing the fluid parameter and generating a first signal representative of the value of the fluid parameter;
means responsive to the value of the fluid parameter and the states of the digital valve elements for generating a second signal representative of the value of the resultant fluid flow rate; and
means responsive to one of the signals for controlling the states of the digital valve elements so as to maintain constant the value represented by the one signal.
2. The system of claim 1, in which the fluid is incompressible, the fluid parameter is the square root of the difference between the first and second pressures, and the sensing means senses the square root of the difference between the first and second pressures.
3. The system of claim 1, in which the fluid is incompressible, each digital valve element has a passage from the source to the receiver which includes a converging-diverging nozzle designed to maintain the vapor phase of the fluid at its throat, the fluid parameter is the square root of the difference between the first pressure and the vapor pressure of the fluid, and the sensing means senses the first pressure.
4. The system of claim 1, in which the fluid is compressible, the fluid parameter is the absolute stagnation pressure divided by the square root of the absolute stagnation temperature, the sensing means senses the first pressure and the temperature of the fluid at the source, each digital valve element has a flow passage from the source to the receiver, a flow determining orifice formed in the flow passage, and a region in the flow passage through which the fluid flows at sonic velocity thereby isolating the flow passage upstream of the flow determining orifice from variations in the second pressure.
5. The system of claim 1, in which the fluid is compressible, the fluid parameter is the first pressure divided by the square root of the absolute stagnation temperature, and the sensing means senses the first pressure, the second pressure, and the temperature of the fluid at the source or receiver.
6. The system of claim 1, in which the controlling means comprises means for controlling the states of the valve elements to maintain the value of the fluid parameter constant.
7. The system of claim 6, in which the controlling means additionally comprises:
a source of a third signal proportional to a desired fluid flow rate from the source to the receiver, and means responsive to the difference between the third and second signals for changing the states of the digital valve elements to reduce such difference.
8. The system of claim 6, additionally comprising an indicator responsive to the controlling means for displaying the states of the valve elements as a measurement of the fluid flow rate.
9. The system of claim 1, in which the controlling means comprises:
a source of a third signal proportional to a desired fluid flow rate from the source to the receiver, and means responsive to the difference between the third and second signals for changing the states of the digital valve elements to reduce such difference.
10. The system of claim 9, in which the values of the respective digital valve elements are weighted according to a binary code, the third signal comprises a plurality of binary signals equal in number to the digital valve elements and weighted according to the binary code, and the second signal comprises a plurality of binary signals equal in number to the digital valve elements and weighted according to the binary code.
11. The system of claim 1, in which the fluid flow rate through at least some of the respective digital valve elements in the open state are weighted according to a geometric progression of two.
12. The system of claim 1, additionally comprising means for maintaining a linear function relationship between the resultant fluid flow rate and the product.
13. The system of claim 12, in which the valve elements are arranged so the fluid streams flowing through them are directed at each other.
14. The system of claim 1, in which the one signal is the first signal and the value of the fluid parameter is maintained constant by the controlling means.
15. The system of claim 1, in which the one signal is the second signal and the value of the resultant fluid flow rate is maintained constant by the controlling means.
16. The system of claim 1, additionally comprising switching means for alternatively applying to the controlling means the first signal to measure flow rate or the second signal to control flow rate.
17. The system of claim 1, in which the second signal generating means comprises a signal multiplier responsive to the first signal and the states of the digital valve elements.
18. The system of claim 17, in which the sensing and first signal generating means comprises transducer means for generating a signal proportional to the fluid parameter and a function generator for modifying the signal generated by the transducer means.
19. A digital liquid flow rate measurement or control device comprising:
an upstream liquid manifold;
a downstream liquid manifold;
a plurality of at least three individually actuatable, digital valve elements, each valve element having a liquid flow passage leading from the upstream manifold to the downstream manifold, a sealable orifice in the passage, and a bistable plug positionable exclusively in a first state in which the plug seals the orifice to prevent liquid flow through the passage or a second state in which the plug unseals the orifice to permit liquid flow through the passage;
first liquid pressure sensing means located in the upstream manifold;
second liquid pressure sensing means located in the downstream manifold; and
means responsive to the liquid pressure difference sensed by the first and second pressure sensing means and the states of the digital valve elements for generating a signal representative of the resultant fluid flow rate from the upstream manifold to the downstream manifold.
20. The device of claim 19, additionally comprising means for controlling the states of the respective plugs to maintain the liquid pressure difference sensed by the first and second pressure sensing means at a substantially constant value.
21. The device of claim 20, additionally comprising an indicator responsive to the resultant fluid flow rate representative signal for displaying the liquid flow rate from the upstream manifold to the downstream manifold.
22. The device of claim 19, additionally comprising:
a source of a set point signal proportional to a desired liquid flow rate from the upstream manifold to the downstream manifold, and means responsive to the difference between the resultant flow rate representative and set point signals for changing the plug states of the respective digital valve elements to equalize the desired flow rate and the actual flow rate.
23. The device of claim 19, additionally comprising means for maintaining a linear relationship between the resultant flow rate through the valve elements in the second position and the product of the sensed pressure difference times the sum of the effective cross-sectional areas of the valve elements in the second state.
24. A digital liquid flow measurement or control device comprising:
an upstream liquid manifold;
a downstream liquid manifold;
a plurality of at least three individually actuatable, digital valve elements, each valve element having a liquid flow passage leading from the upstream manifold to the downstream manifold, a sealable orifice in the passage, a bistable plug positioned exclusively in a first state in which the plug seals the orifice to prevent liquid flow through the passage or a second state in which the plug unseals the orifice to permit liquid flow through the passage, and a cavitating venturi in the passage at which the liquid remains in its vapor phase when the plug is in the second state;
liquid pressure sensing means located in the upstream manifold; and
means reponsive to the liquid pressure sensed by the pressure sensing means and the states of the digital valve elements for generating a signal representative of the resultant fluid flow rate from the upstream manifold to the downstream manifold.
25. The device of claim 24, additionally comprising means for controlling the states of the respective plugs to maintain the liquid pressure sensed by the pressure sensing means at a substantially constant value.
26. The device of claim 25, additionally comprising an indicator responsive to the resultant flow rate representative signal for displaying the liquid flow rate from the upstream manifold to the downstream manifold.
27. The device of claim 24, additionally comprising:
a source of a set point signal proportional to a desired liquid flow rate from the upstream manifold to the downstream manifold, and means responsive to the difference between the resultant flow rate representative and set point signals for changing the plug states of the respective digital valve elements to equalize the desired flow rate and the actual flow rate.
28. A digital gas flow measurement or control device comprising:
an upstream gas manifold;
a downstream gas manifold;
a plurality of at least three individually actuatable, digital valve elements, each valve element having a gas flow passage leading from the upstream manifold to the downstream manifold, a sealable orifice in the passage, a bistable plug positionable exclusively in a first state in which the plug seals the orifice to prevent gas flow through the passage or a second state in which the plug unseals the orifice to permit gas flow through the passage, and a critical flow orifice through which gas flow at sonic velocity is maintained when the plug is in the second state;
absolute gas pressure sensing means located in the upstream manifold;
absolute temperature sensing means located in the upstream manifold; and
means responsive to the absolute pressure sensed by the pressure sensing means divided by the square root of the absolute temperature sensed by the temperature sensing means and the states of the digital valve elements for generating a signal representative of the resultant fluid flow rate from the upstream manifold to the downstream manifold.
29. The device of the claim 28, additionally comprising means for controlling the states of the respective plugs to maintain the absolute pressure sensed by the pressure sensing means divided by the square root of the absolute temperature sensed by the temperature sensing means at a substantially constant value.
30. The device of claim 29, additionally comprising an indicator responsive to the resultant flow rate representative signal for displaying the gas flow rate from the upstream manifold to the downstream manifold.
31. The device of claim 28, additionally comprising:
a source of a set point signal proportional to a desired gas flow rate from the upstream manifold to the downstream manifold, and means responsive to the difference between the resultant flow rate representative and set point signals for changing the plug states of the respective digital valve elements to equalize the desired flow rate and the actual flow rate.
32. The device of claim 28, in which the critical flow orifice comprises the throat of a converging-diverging nozzle.
33. A digital gas flow measurement or control device comprising:
an upstream gas manifold;
a downstream gas manifold;
a plurality of at least three individually actuatable, digital valve elements, each valve element having a gas flow passage leading from the upstream manifold to the downstream manifold, a sealable orifice in the passage, and a bistable plug positionable exclusively in a first state in which the plug seals the orifice to prevent gas flow through the passage or a second state in which the plug unseals the orifice to permit gas flow through the passage;
first gas pressure sensing means located in the upstream manifold;
second gas pressure sensing means located in the downstream manifold;
temperature sensing means located in one of the manifolds; and
means responsive to the pressures sensed by the first and second pressure sensing means and the temperature sensed by the temperature sensing means and the states of the digital valve elements for generating a signal representative of the resultant fluid flow rate from the upstream manifold to the downstream manifold.
34. The device of claim 33, additionally comprising means for controlling the states of the respective plugs to maintain the pressure sensed by the first pressure sensing means divided by the square root of the absolute temperature sensed by the temperature sensing means at a substantially constant value.
35. The device of claim 34, additionally comprising an indicator responsive to the resultant flow rate representative signal for displaying the gas flow rate from the upstream manifold to the downstream manifold.
36. The device of claim 33, additionally comprising:
a source of a set point signal proportional to a desired gas flow rate from the upstream manifold to the downstream manifold, and means responsive to the difference between the resultant flow rate representative and set point signals for changing the plug states of the respective digital valve elements to equalize the desired flow rate and the actual flow rate.
37. A method of measuring the flow rate in a fluid line between a source of fluid at a first pressure and a fluid receiver at a second pressure lower than the first pressure, the method comprising the steps of:
interconnecting a plurality of individually actuatable, value weighted digital bistable valve elements in parallel in the fluid line between the source and the receiver, each valve element assuming exclusively either an open state in which fluid flows from the source through the valve element to the receiver or a closed state in which no fluid flows from the source through the valve element to the receiver such that the resultant flow rate through the fluid line is a function of the product of a flow rate determinative fluid parameter times the sum of the weighted values of the digital valve elements in the open state;
sensing the .Iadd.flow rate determinative .Iaddend.fluid parameter;
controlling the states of the digital valve elements to maintain .[.the.]. .Iadd.a .Iaddend.fluid .[.parameter.]. .Iadd.characteristic in the line .Iaddend.constant .[.as the flow rate through the fluid line varies..]..Iadd.;
sensing the digital valve elements in the open state; and
indicating the resultant flow rate through the fluid line from the sensed flow rate determinative fluid parameter and the sensed digital valve elements in the open state. .Iaddend.
38. The method of claim 37, additionally comprising the step of maintaining a linear function relationship between the resultant flow rate through the valve elements in the open state and the product.
39. A digital fluid flow rate measurement or control system comprising:
a source of fluid at a first pressure;
a fluid receiver at a second pressure lower than the first pressure;
a plurality of individually actuatable, value weighted digital bistable valve elements interconnecting the source to the receiver, each valve element assuming exclusively either an open state in which fluid flows from the source through the valve element to the receiver or a closed state in which no fluid flows from the source through the valve element to the receiver;
means for maintaining a linear relationship between the resultant fluid flow rate from the source to the receiver and the product of a flow rate determinative fluid parameter times the sum of the weighted values of the digital valve elements in the open state;
means for sensing the fluid parameter; and
means responsive to the value of the fluid parameter and the states of the digital valve elements for generating a signal representative of the resultant fluid flow rate.
40. The system of claim 39, additionally comprising means for controlling the states of the valve elements to maintain the value of the fluid parameter constant.
41. The system of claim 39, in which the generating means is responsive to the sensed value of the fluid parameter and the states of the digital valve elements, the system additionally comprising means for controlling the states of the digital valve elements responsive to the signal representative of the resultant fluid flow rate.
42. The system of claim 39, in which the fluid is incompressible, the fluid parameter is the square root of the difference between the first and second pressures, the sensing means senses the square root of the difference between the first and second pressures, and the means for maintaining a linear relationship comprises means for establishing a sufficiently low maximum difference between the first and second pressures to prevent formation of vena contractas having pressure dependent cross-sectional areas downstream of the valve elements in the open state.
43. The system of claim 39, in which the fluid is incompressible, the fluid parameter is the square root of the difference between the first and second pressures, the sensing means senses the square root of the difference between the first and second pressures, and the means for maintaining a linear relationship comprises means for directing the streams from the valve elements in the open state at each other to dissipate the vena contractas.
44. The system of claim 39, in which the fluid is incompressible, the fluid parameter is the square root of difference between the first pressure and the vapor pressure of the fluid, the sensing means senses the first pressure, and the means for maintaining a linear relationship comprises a cavitating venturi in each valve element.
45. The system of claim 39, in which the fluid is compressible, the fluid parameter is the absolute stagnation pressure divided by the square root of the absolute stagnation temperature, the sensing means senses the first pressure and the temperature of the fluid at the source, and the means for maintaining a linear relationship comprises a critical flow orifice in each valve element through which fluid flows at sonic velocity.
46. The system of claim 45, in which the orifice is the throat of a converging-diverging nozzle.
47. A method for operating a digital fluid flow control system having a plurality of individually actuatable, value weighted digital bistable valve elements interconnecting a source of fluid at a first pressure to a receiver at a second pressure lower than the first pressure, each valve element assuming exclusively either an open state in which fluid flows from the source through the valve element to the receiver or a closed state in which no fluid flows from the source through the valve element to the receiver such that the resultant fluid flow rate from the source to the receiver is a function of the product of a flow rate determining fluid parameter times the sum of weighted values of the digital valve elements in the open state, the method comprising the steps of:
sensing the fluid parameter and generating a first signal representative of the value of the fluid parameter;
generating a second signal representative of the product of the value of the fluid parameter and the states of the digital valve elements; and
controlling the states of the digital valve elements responsive to one of the signals so as to maintain constant the value representated by the one signal. .Iadd. 48. A digital fluid control system comprising:
a first fluid manifold;
a second fluid manifold;
a plurality of individually actuatable, value weighted digital bistable valve elements interconnecting the first manifold to the second manifold, each valve element assuming exclusively either an open state in which fluid flows from the first manifold through the valve element to the second manifold or a closed state in which no fluid flows from the first manifold through the valve element to the second manifold such that the resultant fluid flow rate from the first manifold to the second manifold is a function of the product of a flow rate determinative fluid parameter times the sum of the weighted values of the digital valve elements in the open state;
means responsive to the value of the flow rate determinative fluid parameter and the states of the digital valve elements for generating a signal representative of the value of the resultant fluid flow rate;
means for sensing a control parameter in the system; and
means responsive to the sensed control parameter for controlling the states of the digital valve elements so as to maintain the sensed control parameter constant. .Iaddend..Iadd. 49. The control system of claim 48, in which the sensed control parameter is the pressure in one of the manifolds. .Iaddend. .Iadd. 50. The control system of claim 49, additionally comprising an indicator responsive to the signal representative of the value of the resultant fluid flow rate. .Iaddend..Iadd. 51. The control system of claim 50, in which the fluid flow rate determinative parameter and the sensed control parameter are identical, the generating means being responsive to the sensing means. .Iaddend..Iadd. 52. The control system of claim 51, in which the fluid is incompressible, each valve element has a passage from the first manifold to the second manifold which includes a converging-diverging nozzle designed to maintain the vapor phase of the fluid at its throat, the fluid parameter is the square root of the difference between the pressure in the first manifold and the vapor pressure of the fluid, and the sensing means senses the pressure in the first manifold. .Iaddend..Iadd. 53. The control system of claim 48, additionally comprising an indicator responsive to the signal representative of the value of the resultant fluid flow rate. .Iaddend..Iadd. 54. The control system of claim 48, in which the fluid flow rate determinative parameter and the sensed control parameter are identical, the generating means being responsive to the sensing means. .Iaddend. .Iadd. 55. A digital fluid control system comprising:
a source manifold;
a receiver manifold;
a plurality of individually actuatable, value weighted digital bistable valve elements interconnecting the source manifold to the receiver manifold, each valve element assuming exclusively either an open state in which fluid flows from the source manifold through the valve element to the receiver manifold or a closed state in which no fluid flows from the source manifold through the valve element to the receiver manifold such that the resultant fluid flow rate from the source manifold to the receiver manifold is a function of the product of a flow rate determinative fluid parameter times the sum of the weighted values of the digital valve elements in the open state;
means for sensing the flow rate determinative fluid parameter;
means responsive to the sensed flow rate determinative fluid parameter and the states of the digital valve elements for generating a signal representative of the value of the resultant fluid flow rate; and
means for controlling the states of the digital valve elements so as to maintain the value of a fluid characteristic in the system constant. .Iaddend..Iadd. 56. The control system of claim 55, in which the fluid characteristic is the pressure in one of the manifolds. .Iaddend. .Iadd. 57. The control system of claim 56, additionally comprising an indicator responsive to the signal representative of the value of the resultant fluid flow rate. .Iaddend..Iadd. 58. The control system of claim 55, in which the fluid is incompressible, the flow rate determinative fluid parameter is the square root of the difference between the pressures in the source manifold and the receiver manifold, and the sensing means senses the square root of said pressure difference. .Iaddend..Iadd. 59. The control system of claim 55, in which the fluid is incompressible, each digital valve element has a passage from the source to the receiver which includes a converging-diverging nozzle designed to maintain the vapor phase of the fluid at its throat, the flow rate determinative fluid parameter is the square root of the difference between the pressure in the source manifold and the vapor pressure of the fluid, and the sensing means senses the pressure in the source manifold. .Iaddend. .Iadd. 60. The control system of claim 55, in which the fluid is compressible, the flow rate determinative fluid parameter is the absolute stagnation pressure divided by the square root of the absolute stagnation temperature, the sensing means senses the pressure and the temperature of the fluid in the source manifold, each digital valve element has a flow passage from the source manifold to the receiver manifold, a flow determining orifice formed in the flow passage, and a region in the flow passage through which the fluid flows at sonic velocity thereby isolating the flow passage upstream of the flow determining orifice from variations in the pressure in the receiver manifold. .Iaddend..Iadd. 61. The method of claim 37, in which the fluid characteristic is the flow rate determinative fluid parameter. .Iaddend. .Iadd. 62. A method for operating a digital fluid flow control system having a plurality of individually actuatable, value weighted digital bistable valve elements interconnecting a source of fluid at a first pressure to a receiver at a second pressure lower than the first pressure, each valve element assuming exclusively either an open state in which fluid flows from the source through the valve element to the receiver or a closed state in which no fluid flows from the source through the valve element to the receiver such that the resultant fluid flow rate from the source to the receiver is a function of the product of a flow rate determinative fluid parameter times the sum of the weighted values of the digital valve elements in the open state, the method comprising the steps of:
sensing the flow rate determinative fluid parameter;
generating a signal representative of the product of the value of the flow rate determinative fluid parameter and the states of the digital valve elements; and
controlling the states of the digital valve elements so as to maintain the value of a fluid characteristic in the system constant. .Iaddend.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the measurement or control of fluid flow rate and, more particularly, to the application of digital techniques thereto.

Conventionally, fluid flow rate is measured by a flowmeter, such as a venturi meter, an orifice meter, or a turbine meter. In a venturi meter and an orifice meter, the flow rate is proportional to the pressure in a fluid passage having fixed cross-sectional dimensions. In a turbine meter, the flow rate is proportional to the angular velocity at which the turbine rotates. For any particular meter, flow rate is proportional to the measured parameter within a limited range of flow rates. Therefore, to make accurate measurements over a wide range of flow rates, a number of particular meters having different dimensions must often be employed, each covering a segment of the range.

In a conventional analog fluid flow control system, the flow rate is controlled by positioning a plug located in the fluid stream. The degree to which the plug impedes flow governs the flow rate. In order to establish a set point value of flow rate, a flowmeter generates a signal representative of the actual value of flow rate, which is compared with a command signal representative of the set point value, and the plug position is adjusted by a control loop until the actual value corresponds to the set point value. In large oil refineries, chemical plants, and other processing facilities, supervisory digital computers run the operations by issuing set point commands to the individual flow control systems and receiving data concerning the status of the operations. The limited range of present flowmeters mentioned in the preceding paragraph, however, restricts the range of set point values that an analog fluid flow control system can accurately accommodate. Further, it is difficult to derive the actual value of flow rate indirectly by calculation because flow rate depends in part on the effective cross-sectional area of the flow passage which is a complex function of the plug position.

In a digital fluid flow control system, a plurality of individually actuatable, value weighted digital bistable valve elements in parallel interconnect an upstream manifold to a downstream manifold. Each valve element exclusively assumes either an open state in which fluid flows from the upstream manifold through the valve element to the downstream manifold, or a closed state in which no fluid flows from the upstream manifold through the valve element to the downstream manifold. The effective cross-sectional orifice areas of the flow passages through the respective valve elements are weighted according to a binary code, e.g. a geometric progression of two, thereby value weighting the digital valve elements. The valve elements are actuated by binary signals weighted according to the same binary code as the respective valve elements to which they are coupled. The sum of the effective orifice areas of the valve elements in the open state is related to the binary number or value represented by the actuating signals in the binary code. Recent improvements in the design of digital fluid flow control systems have virtually eliminated any interaction between valve elements, i.e., any dependence of the effective orifice area of one valve element upon the states of the other valve elements, and minimized the effect of pressure variations and ambient conditions on effective orifice areas. Consequently, the sum of the effective orifice areas of the open valve elements can be made proportional to the binary number represented by the binary actuating signals to a high degree of accuracy.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to the invention, a digital fluid flow control system is employed to measure or control fluid flow rate. A plurality of individually actuatable, value weighted digital bistable valve elements in parallel interconnect an upstream manifold to a downstream manifold. Each valve element exclusively assumes either an open state in which fluid flows from the upstream manifold through the valve element to the downstream manifold, or a closed state in which no fluid flows from the upstream manifold through the valve element to the downstream manifold. The states of the valve elements comprise a binary number representative of the total effective orifice area between the upstream and downstream manifolds, i.e., the sum of the weighted values of the valve elements in the open state. Preferably, means are provided to maintain a linear relationship between the resultant fluid flow rate from the upstream manifold to the downstream manifold and the product of a flow rate determinative fluid parameter times the sum of the weighted values of the digital valve elements in the open state. The fluid parameter is sensed and the states of the digital valve elements are controlled, and a flow rate representative signal is derived from the states of the valve elements and the fluid parameter. In the preferred embodiments, the states of the digital valve elements are controlled partially or wholly responsive to the sensed fluid parameter. The invention may be viewed as functioning as an orifice meter having a plurality of different size orifice plates corresponding to the different possibilities of the sum of the weighted values of the digital valve elements; responsive to the sensed fluid parameter, the "orifice plate" with the appropriate size orifice is selected. The flow rate range of the system can be increased without impairing accuracy by simply adding more valve elements.

If the fluid is incompressible, the sensed parameter is the square root of the pressure difference between the upstream and downstream manifolds. The linear relationship is maintained by establishing a sufficiently low maximum pressure difference to avoid vena contracta effects or by dissipating the vena contractas. In the special case where a cavitating venturi is provided in the flow passage through each valve element to maintain the linear relationship, the sensed parameter is the square root of the difference between the pressure in the upstream manifold and the vapor pressure of the fluid.

If the fluid is compressible, the sensed parameter is the absolute pressure in the upstream manifold divided by the square root of the absolute temperature in the upstream manifold. The linear relationship is maintained by establishing a minimum pressure difference that is sufficiently large so fluid passes through the flow determining orifices of the open valve elements at sonic velocity.

For the preferred embodiment of flow rate measurement, the valve elements are wholly controlled responsive to the fluid parameter such that the valve of the sensed fluid parameter remains constant. The value of the measured flow rate is related to the states of the value elements, i.e., the sum of the cross-sectional areas of the valve elements in the open state. Therefore, the binary actuating signals and the constant fluid parameter are multiplied to derive a signal representative of the value of the measured flow rate, which can be displayed by a digital indicator. Accurate measurement over a wide range of flow rates can be accomplished in this manner.

For the preferred embodiment of flow rate control, the valve elements are partially controlled responsive to the fluid parameter so that actual flow rate equals a set point flow rate. The value of the actual flow rate is related to the product of the sensed fluid parameter times the states of the value elements, i.e., the sum of the effective orifice areas of the valve elements in the open state. Therefore, the binary actuating signals and the signal representative of the sensed fluid parameter are multiplied to derive a signal representative of the value of the actual flow rate. In this manner, a set point value of flow rate can be accurately established by a control loop over a wide range of flow rates with a minimum of sensing transducers and without complex computations.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The features of specific embodiments of the best mode contemplated of carrying out the invention are illustrated in the drawings, in which:

FIGS. 1A, 1B and 1C are schematic diagrams of different embodiments of a digital fluid flow rate measurement or control system incorporating the principles of the invention;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the control circuitry shown in FIGS. 1A, 1B and 1C;

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the sequence circuit shown in FIG. 2;

FIGS. 4A, 4B and 4C are schematic diagrams of the local computer shown in FIG. 2 for the embodiments of FIGS. 1A, 1B and 1C, respectively;

FIG. 4D is a schematic diagram of an alternative version of a portion of the local computer shown in FIG. 2 for the embodiment of FIG. 1C; and

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of an arrangement for monitoring the operation of the disclosed digital fluid flow rate measurement or control system.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS

Reference is made to FIG. 2 for a schematic block diagram of control circuitry used to practice the invention. One or more analog signals representative of a flow rate determinative fluid parameter are coupled by a transmission gate 10 to an input terminal 20 of a local computer 11. A pulse source 12 controls transmission through gate 10. Each time source 12 generates a pulse, the parameter representative analog signal or signals are transmitted to local computer 11. Thus, the value of the parameter is sampled and applied to the input of computer 11 at a rate determined by the frequency of source 12. The heavy broken lead lines in FIG. 2, each represent a plurality of binary signal leads. For the purpose of illustration, it is assumed that each heavy broken lead line and each terminal and switch contact associated therewith represents four binary signal leads weighted according to a binary code comprising a straight geometric progression of 2 i.e., weighted 1, 2, 4 and 8. In practice, there would most likely be many more than four binary signal leads and any binary code could be used. An output terminal 24 of computer 11 (representing four binary signal terminals) is coupled through a contact A of a switch SW-1 (representing four binary signal contacts) to a first input of a digital comparator 13 and is coupled through a contact D of switch SW-1 to a digital indicator 14. An intermediate output terminal 21 of computer 11 is coupled through a contact F of switch SW-1 to a second input of comparator 13. A supervisory computer 15 is coupled through a contact G of a switch SW-2 and a contact E of switch SW-1 to the second input of comparator 13 and is coupled through a contact M of switch SW-1 to an intermediate input terminal 22 of computer 11. Computer 15 is also coupled through contact G of switch SW-2 and contact C of switch SW-1 to indicator 14. Usually the supervisory computer is remotely located from the measurement and control system and oversees the operation of a number of different processes. A digital slewing circuit 16 is coupled through a contact H of switch SW-2 and contact C of switch SW-1 to indicator 14, is coupled through contact H of switch SW-2 and contact M of switch SW-1 to intermediate input terminal 22 of computer 11, and is also coupled through contact H of switch SW-2 and contact E of switch SW-1 to the second input of comparator 13. Circuit 16 could be a four stage counter driven by a pulse source so its four binary output signals continuously step through the 16 states representing each value of the binary code in succession. The output of an adjustable analog signal source 17 is connected to an analog-to-digital converter 18. The output of analog-to-digital converter 18 is coupled through a contact B of switch SW-1 to the first input of comparator 13 and is coupled through a contact N of switch SW-1 to input terminal 22 of computer 11. The output of comparator 13, which indicates whether the value of the binary signals at its first input or the value of the binary signals at its second input is larger, is connected to a sequence circuit 19. The binary output signals produced by sequence circuit 19 are coupled to an input terminal 23 of computer 11 and to the valve elements of a digital fluid flow rate measurement or control system described below.

A schematic block diagram of sequence circuit 19 is depicted in FIG. 3. The output of a pulse source 25 is connected to one input of each of AND gates 26 and 27. Output terminals 28 and 29 of comparator 13 are connected to the other input of AND gates 26 and 27, respectively. The output of AND gate 26 is coupled to an upcounting lead U of a reversible counter 30. The output of AND gate 27 is connected to a downcounting lead D of counter 30. Counter 30 has four binary stages connected so its four binary output signals step through the 16 states representing each value of the binary code in succession responsive to respective stepping pulses. When the value represented by the binary signals applied to the first input of comparator 13 is larger than the value represented by the binary signals applied to the second input of comparator 13, output terminal 29 of comparator 13 is energized and pulses from source 25 are applied by AND gate 27 to lead D of counter 30 to reduce the value represented by the binary output signals of counter 30. Conversely, when the value represented by the binary signals applied to the second input of comparator 13 is larger than the value represented by the binary signals applied to the first input of comparator 13, output terminal 28 of comparator 13 is energized and the pulses from source 25 are applied by AND gate 26 to input U of counter 30 to increase the value represented by the binary output signals of counter 30.

The operation of the circuitry of FIGS. 2 and 3 is controlled by pulse source 12, which governs the frequency of the samples supplied to local computer 11. Each time a new sample is supplied to computer 11, a new value of flow rate is calculated and sequence circuit 19 assumes a new state. The frequency of source 12 is selected to be sufficiently higher than the rate at which the value of the set point flow rate from supervisory computer 15 varies when the system is controlling flow rate, to permit the circuitry to follow changing set point values, and the frequency of source 12 is also sufficiently high when the system is measuring to give the desired response time. The frequency of pulse source 25 is substantially higher than that of pulse source 12 so that sequence circuit 19 is capable of stepping through all of the 16 states between sampling periods. The frequency of the pulse source driving slewing circuit 16 is preferably variable so that a human operator can control the slew rate.

In FIG. 1A is depicted a digital fluid flow rate measurement or control system for an incompressible fluid, such as water. An upstream fluid manifold 35 is interconnected by fluid flow passages 36, 37, 38 and 39 to a downstream manifold 40. Plugs 41, 42, 43 and 44 are disposed in passages 36, 37, 38, and 39, respectively, where they are each positionable in response to an electrical actuating signal exclusively in a first position in which the plug seals an orifice to prevent fluid flow through the passage, or a second position in which the plug unseals the orifice to permit fluid flow through the passage. Each passage and its related plug comprises an individually actuatable, digital bistable valve element. The valve elements are value weighted, i.e., the ratio of their effective cross-sectional orifice areas are equal to the weighting of the respective binary electrical valve actuating signals in a binary code. For the purpose of illustration, it is assumed that the binary code is a straight geometric progression of 2, i.e., 1, 2, 4 and 8. In practice more valve elements would normally be used. Fluid is supplied to manifold 35 by a source in the form of a conduit 45 and removed from manifold 40 by a receiver in the form of a conduit 46. The fluid flows in the direction of the solid arrows.

Although any configuration could be employed for manifolds 35 and 40 and the digital valve elements interconnecting them, it is preferable to employ one of the configurations disclosed in application Ser. No. 111,945, filed Feb. 2, 1971, now U.S. Pat. No. 3,746,041; application Ser. No. 169,930, filed Aug. 9, 1971, now U.S. Pat. No. 3,785,389, or the application Ser. No. 432,153, filed on even date herewith by Harry Friedland and Addison W. Langill, Jr., all of which are assigned to the assignee of the present application. The disclosures of these three applications are incorporated herein by reference. The resultant fluid flow rate from upstream manifold 35 to downstream manifold 40 through all the digital valve elements that are in the open state is expressed by the following equation: ##EQU1## where Q is the mass flow rate of the incompressible fluid, Cv represents the sum of the effective orifice areas of the open valve elements, ΔP is the difference in static pressure between the fluid in manifolds 35 and 40, and SG is the specific gravity of the fluid. The Cv of each individual valve element is defined as the flow rate (Q) of water in gallons per minute (GPM) through such valve element with a pressure difference (ΔP) of one psi; the Cv in equation (1) is the sum of the Cv 's of the individual valve elements in the open state. The fluid flow rate determinative parameter is the square root of the pressure difference (ΔP). The linear relationship in equation (1 ) is maintained in either of two ways. First, there is established a sufficiently low maximum pressure difference (ΔP) to prevent formation of downstream vena contractas having pressure dependent cross-sectional areas. (With reference to the water flow curve of FIG. 5 in a paper by Gordon F. Stiles entitled "Cavitational Tendencies of Control Valves For Paper Pulp Service," which was presented at the 21st Annual Conference of the Instrument Society of America, Oct. 24-27, 1966, in New York, N.Y., the maximum pressure difference should be small enough to operate on the straight portion of the curve for each digital valve element.) Second, if the maximum pressure difference is high enough to form downstream vena contractas having pressure dependent cross-sectional areas then the vena contractas should be dissipated by directing the streams from the different valve elements at each other, as taught in application Ser. No. 64,142, filed Aug. 3, 1970, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Thus, the linear relationship is maintained by preventing dependence of Cv upon ΔP. By definition, the specific gravity of an incompressible fluid is a constant at a constant temperature. In practice, the specific gravity of most liquids, which are the fluids regarded as incompressible, does not vary substantially over a wide range of ambient temperature. Accordingly, the flow rate is proportional to the product of the square root of the pressure difference between manifolds 35 and 40 times the binary number representing the sum of the effective orifice areas of the digital valve elements in the open state and the flow rate can be computed therefrom for a specified fluid. Upstream manifold 35 and downstream manifold 40 are fluidically coupled to a differential pressure transducer 47, which generates an electrical analog signal proportional to the pressure difference between manifolds 35 and 40 Pu - Pd. This signal is coupled to control circuitry 49, which is discussed above and disclosed in FIG. 2 in detail. Control circuitry 49 generates binary output signals that represents the actual flow rate (Q) in the binary code to actuate plugs 41, 42, 43, and 44, respectively, partially or wholly in response to the sensed fluid parameter, i.e., the square root of Pu - Pd.

If the specific gravity of the fluid in the system cannot be regarded as constant, a densitometer 50 is coupled between manifold 35 or 40 and control circuit 49, as depicted by phantom lines in FIG. 1A. In this case, the calculation of flow rate by control circuitry 49 takes into account variations in specific gravity of the fluid, and the square root of specific gravity becomes part of the flow rate determinative parameter. In some cases, changes in specific gravity could be measured indirectly by a thermometer, rather than by a densitometer.

For a description of the operation of the system disclosed in FIG. 1A, reference is made to FIG. 2 in which control circuitry 49 is disclosed, and to FIG. 4A in which local computer 11 for the embodiment of FIG. 1A is disclosed. In FIG. 4A, samples of the analog output signal from transducer 48, which occur at a frequency determined by source 12, are applied to an analog-to-digital converter 55 via input terminal 20. Each heavy broken lead line represents four binary signal leads weighted according to the binary code. The output of analog-to-digital converter 55, which represents the pressure difference between manifolds 35 and 40 in the binary code, is coupled through contacts I and K of switch SW-1 to a square root circuit 56. Analog-to-digital converter 55 is coupled through a contact J of switch SW-1 to output terminal 21 and input terminal 22 is coupled through a contact L of switch SW-1 to square root circuit 56. The output of circuit 56, which represents the square root of the pressure difference is coupled to a first input of a divider circuit 57. The output of a register 58, which represents the square root of the specific gravity of the incompressible fluid being handled, is coupled to a second input of divider circuit 57. If densitometer 50 is employed, its output is coupled through an analog-to-digital converter and a square root circuit (not shown) to register 58, to provide an output that varies in accordance with the square root of the specific gravity. The output of divider circuit 57, which represents the square root of the pressure difference divided by the specific gravity, is connected to a first input of a multiplier circuit 59. The output of sequence circuit 19, which comprises the binary signals actuating plugs 41, 42, 43 and 44 and is thus the binary number representative of the sum of the effective orifice areas of the open valve elements, is connected via terminal 23 to a second input of multiplier circuit 59. The output of multiplier circuit 59, which represents the solution of equation (1), i.e., the flow rate from manifold 35 to manifold 40, is coupled via output terminal 24 to contacts A and D of switch SW-1.

When switches SW-1 and SW-2 are in the position shown, contacts A, C, E, G, I, K, and M are closed and the system operates in its set point control mode. Binary signals representing a set point value of flow rate are coupled from supervisory computer 15 to the second input of comparator 13 and to indicator 14. Responsive to the output of comparator 13, sequence circuit 19 counts up or down, thereby increasing or decreasing the flow rate through the valve elements until the binary signals at output terminal 24 of computer 11 are identical to the binary signals from supervisory computer 15. Then, the actual flow rate from manifold 35 to manifold 40 is at the set point value, which is displayed on indicator 14 for monitoring purposes.

When switch SW-2 is placed in the other position, contact H is closed and the system operates in its manual control mode. Digital slew circuit 16 is connected to the second input of comparator 13, and to indicator 14. The binary output signals of circuit 16 change state in sequence so they represent in turn each possible value of flow rate. When indicator 14 displays the desired value of flow rate to be established, a human operator disables circuit 16. Then, sequence circuit 19 actuates the digital valve elements to establish the actual flow rate from manifold 35 to manifold 40 at this value, as described in the preceding paragraph.

When switch SW-1 is placed in the other position, contacts B, D, F, J, L, and N are closed and the system operates in its measurement mode. The output of analog-to-digital converter 55 is connected through contact J (FIG. 4A) and contact F (FIG. 2) of switch SW-1 to the second input of comparator 13. The output of analog-to-digital converter 18 is connected through contact B of switch SW-1 to the first input of comparator 13. As the flow rate from upstream manifold 35 to downstream manifold 40 changes due to external conditions, the pressure difference between manifolds 35 and 40 also changes. Sequence circuit 19 counts up or down responsive to comparator 13 until the pressure difference indicated by transducer 47 equals the magnitude of the signal from source 17. The signal magnitude of source 17 is adjusted to represent a sufficiently large pressure difference ΔP to cover the entire range of flow rates to be measured. For example, it the fluid is water, the Cv when all the valve elements are open is 15, and the maximum flow rate is 60 GPM, ΔP is 16 psi according to equation (1). Thus, the signal magnitude of source 17 is adjusted to equal the magnitude of the output signal from transducer 48 for a pressure difference of 16 psi. If the signal magnitude of source 17 is too small, the valve elements are all open before the maximum flow rate is reached and the larger flow rates cannot be measured. Moreover, if the fluid is very viscous, a dependence of Cv upon ΔP results in a range of very low pressure differences so this should be avoided by operating above such range. If the signal magnitude of source 17 is too large, too few valve elements are open when the maximum flow rate is reached and the full resolving capacity of the measurement system is not utilized.

In FIG. 1B, is depicted another embodiment of a digital fluid flow rate measurement or control system, for an incompressible fluid, such as water. This embodiment is useful when the minimum pressure difference is about 10% of the upstream pressure or greater. The elements in common with the embodiment of FIG. 1A have the same reference numerals. Flow passages 36, 37, 38, and 39 each have a cavitating venturi. Preferably, the valve body configuration and nozzle design disclosed in FIGS. 4 and 5 of the Friedland and Langill application filed on even date herewith is employed. The resultant fluid flow rate from upstream manifold 35 to downstream manifold 40 through all the digital valve elements that are in the open state is expressed by the following equation: ##EQU2## where Q is the mass flow rate of the incompressible fluid, Cv represents the sum of the effective orifice areas of the open valve elements and is as defined above in connection with FIG. 1A, Pg is the gauge pressure of the fluid in manifold 35, Pv is the vapor pressure of the fluid, and SG is the specific gravity of the fluid. Since the pressure at the throat of a cavitating venturi is the vapor pressure of the fluid, irrespective of pressure variations in downstream manifold 40, the flow rate is proportional to the product of the square root of the difference between the pressure in manifold 35 and the vapor pressure times the sum of the effective orifice areas of the digital valve elements in the open state, and the flow rate can be computed therefrom for a specified fluid. Thus, the fluid flow rate determinative parameter is the square root of the pressure difference (Pu - Pv). The linear relationship in equation (2) is maintained by the cavitating venturis, which eliminate downstream vena contractas by virtue of the controlled fluid divergence in the diverging sections of the venturis. As described in the Friedland and Langill application filed on even data herewith, the maximum Cv of the system must be designed to be small enough vis-a-vis the external "plumbing" to which the system is connected to provide a minimum pressure difference between manifolds 35 and 40, i.e., a pressure difference, when all the valve elements are in the open state, sufficient to sustain cavitation at the throats of the venturis. Upstream manifold 35 is fluidically coupled to a gauge pressure transducer 65, which generates an electrical analog signal proportional to the guage pressure (Pg). This signal is coupled to control circuit 49, which generates binary output signals that represent the actual flow rate (Q) in the binary code, to actuate plugs 41, 42, 43 and 44, respectively partially or wholly in response to the sensed fluid parameter, i.e., the square root of Pg - Pv. Commerically available gauge pressure transducers generate much less noise than commerically available differential pressure transducers, so, other factors being equal, the embodiment of FIG. 1B is capable of measuring and controlling with greater accuracy than the embodiment of FIG. 1A. It should be noted that in the case of water, the vapor pressure is essentially zero pressure and the sensed fluid parameter simply is the square root of Pg. If the specific gravity of the fluid in the system cannot be regarded as constant, a densitometer 50 is coupled between manifold 35 or 40 and control circuit 49, as depicted by phantom lines in FIG. 2A. In this case, the calculation of flow rate by control circuitry 49 takes into account variations in specific gravity of the fluid, and the square root of specific gravity becomes part of the flow rate determinative parameter.

FIG. 4B depicts local computer 11 for the embodiment of FIG. 1A. In FIG. 4B, samples of the analog output signal from transducer 65, which occur at a frequency determined by source 12, are applied to an analog-to-digital converter 66. Each heavy broken lead line represents four binary signal leads weighted according to the binary code. The output of analog-to-digital converter 66, which represents the gauge pressure in manifold 35 in the binary code, is coupled through contacts I and K of switch SW-1 to a first input of a difference circuit 67. The output of analog-to-digital converter 66 is coupled through a contact J of switch SW-1 to output terminal 21 and input terminal 22 is coupled through a contact L of switch SW-1 to the first input of difference circuit 67. The output of a register 68, which represents the vapor pressure of the fluid being handled, is coupled to a second input of difference circuit 67. The output of difference circuit 67, which represents the difference between the gauge pressure in manifold 35 and the vapor pressure of the fluid, is connected to a square root circuit 69. The output of square root circuit 69, which represents the square root of the pressure difference, is connected to a first input of a divider circuit 70. The output of a register 71, which represents the square root of the specific gravity of the fluid being handled, is coupled to a second input of divider circuit 70. If densitometer 50 is employed, its output is coupled through an analog-to-digital converter and a square root circuit (not shown) to register 71, to provide an output that varies in accordance with the square root of the specific gravity. The output of divider circuit 70, which represents the square root of the pressure difference divided by the specific gravity, is connected to a first input of a multiplier circuit 72. The output of sequence circuit 19, which comprises the binary signals actuating plugs 41, 42, 43, and 44 and thus the binary number representing the sum of the effective orifice areas of the open valve elements, is connected via terminal 23, to a second input of multiplier circuit 72. The output of multiplier circuit 72, which represents the solution of equation (2), i.e., the flow rate from manifold 35 to manifold 40, is coupled via output terminal 24 to contacts A and D of switch SW-1 (FIG. 2).

In FIG. 1C is depicted a digital fluid flow rate measurement or control system for a compressible fluid, such as air. The elements in common with the embodiment of FIG. 1A have the same reference numerals. Flow passages 36, 37, 38, and 39 each have a critical flow orifice through which the fluid flows at sonic velocity. Preferably, the configuration with converging-diverging nozzle disclosed in FIG. 1 of the Friedland and Langill application filed on even date herewith is employed. The resultant fluid flow rate from upstream manifold 35 to downstream manifold 40 through all the digital valve elements that are in the open state is expressed by the following equation: ##EQU3## wherein w is the mass flow rate of the compressible fluid, k is a constant depending on the ratio of specific heats and the gas constant of the fluid, PA is the absolute static pressure of the fluid in manifold 35, TA is the absolute temperature of the fluid in manifold 35, Ae is the sum of the effective orifice areas of the open valve elements. Reference is made to the text, The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow, by Ascher H. Shapiro, Vol. I, page 85, equation (4.17), The Ronald Press Co., N.Y. 1953, for the exact relationship between k, the ratio of specific heats, and the gas constant. The effective orifice area Ae of each individual valve element is the value yielded by equation (3) for given values of the other parameters when such valve element alone is open, all other valve elements being closed. The flow rate is proportional to the absolute pressure in manifold 35 divided by the square root of the absolute temperature in manifold 35 times the product of the sum of the effective orifice areas of the digital valve elements in the open state, and the flow rate can be computed therefrom for a specified fluid. Thus, the fluid flow rate determinative parameter is the absolute pressure (PA) divided by the square root of the absolute temperature (TA). The linear relationship in equation (3) is maintained by the critical flow orifices, which eliminate any dependence of flow rate upon the pressure in downstream manifold 40. As described in the Friedland and Langill application filed on even date herewith, the maximum Ae of the system must be designed to be small enough vis-a-vis the external "plumbing" to which the system is connected to provide a minimum pressure difference between manifolds 35 and 40 when all the valve elements are in the open state sufficient to sustain fluid flow at sonic velocity through the critical flow orifices. Upstream manifold 35 is fluidically coupled to a pressure transducer 75, which generates an electrical analog signal proportional to the absolute pressure PA. Similarly, manifold 35 is thermally coupled to an absolute temperature transducer 76, which generates an electrical analog signal proportional to the absolute temperature TA. These signals are coupled to control circuitry 49, which generates binary output signals that represent the actual flow rate (w') in the binary code, to actuate plugs 41, 42, 43 and 44, respectively, partially or wholly in response to the sensed fluid parameter, i.e., PA divided by the square root of TA.

FIG. 4C depicts local computer 11 for the embodiment of FIG. 1C. In FIG. 4C samples of the analog output signals from transducers 75 and 76, which occur at a frequency determined by source 12, are applied to analog-to-digital converters 77 and 78, respectively. Each heavy broken lead line represents four binary signal leads weighted according to the binary code. The output of analog-to-digital converter 78, which represents the absolute temperature of the fluid in manifold 35 in the binary code, is coupled through a square root circuit 79 to a first input of a divider circuit 80. The output of analog-to-digital converter 77, which represents the absolute pressure in manifold 35 in the binary code, is coupled directly to a second input of divider circuit 80. The output of divider circuit 80, which represents the absolute pressure divided by the square root of the absolute temperature in manifold 35, is coupled through contacts I and K of switch SW-1 to a first input of a multiplier circuit 81. Divider circuit 80 is coupled through contact J of switch SW-1 to output terminal 21 and input terminal 22 is coupled through contact L of switch SW-1 to the first input of multiplier circuit 81.

The output of a register 82, which represents the constant (k) characteristic of the particular compressible fluid, is coupled to a second input of multiplier circuit 81. The output of multiplier circuit 81, which represents the fluid constant times the absolute pressure divided by the square root of the absolute temperature, is connected to a first input of a multiplier circuit 83. The output of sequence circuit 19, which comprises the binary signals actuating plugs 41, 42, 43, and 44 and thus the binary number representing the sum of the effective orifice areas of the open valve elements, is connected via terminal 23 to a second input of multiplier circuit 83. The output of multiplier circuit 83, which represents the solution of equation (3), i.e., the flow rate from manifold 35 to manifold 40, is coupled via output terminal 24 to contacts A and D of switch SW-1.

In some cases the available pressure is not sufficient to sustain operation of critical flow orifices in the embodiment of FIG. 1C. Thus the linear relationship of equation (3) cannot be maintained. In this case, an absolute pressure transducer 93 is coupled between manifold 40 and control circuitry 49, as represented by the phantom lines in FIG. 1C. This provides an additional input to establish the non-linear relationship between the flow rate and the product of the flow rate determinative parameter and the states of the valve elements. FIG. 4D is an alternative version of a portion of local computer 11 shown in FIG. 4C. The output of transducer 75 is coupled through an analog-to-digital converter 94 to one input of a divider circuit 95. The output of transducer 93 is coupled through an analog-to-digital converter 96 to the other input of divider circuit 95. The outputs of transducers 75 and 93 are sampled at a rate determined by source 12. Each heavy broken lead line represents four binary signal leads weighted according to the binary code. The output of divider circuit 95, which represents the pressure in the downstream manifold divided by the pressure in the upstream manifold, is connected to the input of a function generator 97. Function generator 97 introduces the well known non-linearity represented by the subsonic portion of the curve in FIG. 4.3 on page 76 of the Shapiro text referenced above. In other words, for an input having a particular value on the abscissa of the curve, the output from function generator 97 has the value of the ordinant of the curve. The output of function generator 97 and the output of register 82 are coupled to respective inputs of multiplier circuit 81 for multiplication with a signal representative of the flow rate determinative parameter, i.e., the absolute stagnation pressure (PA) divided by the square root of the absolute stagnation temperature (TA). The output of multiplier 81 is processed in the manner described above in connection with FIG. 4C, to produce a flow rate representative signal that reflects the nonlinear relationship.

The embodiments of FIGS. 1B and 1C operate in the set point control, manual control, and measurement modes in the same manner described above in connection with the embodiment of FIG. 1A.

In FIG. 5, several functions of control circuitry 49 in FIG. 2 are monitored and displayed on a digital indicator 90. When a contact A of a selector switch SW-3 is closed, indicator 90 displays the value of the first input to comparator 13. When a contact B of switch SW-3 is closed, indicator 90 displays the difference in value between the first and second inputs to comparator 13. When a contact C of switch SW-3 is closed, indicator 90 displays the output of sequence circuit 19.

The ratio of the effective cross-sectional orifice areas of the valve elements could be weighted according to any binary code; for example, they could be weighted to follow a straight geometric progression of two, they could be weighted equally, or they could be weighted so the smaller valve elements follow a geometric progression of two and the larger valve elements are equal. In any case, the binary signals actuating the valve elements are weighted according to the same binary code as the respective valve elements to which they are coupled.

The flow rate measurement or control range of the system can be increased without impairing accuracy by simply adding more valve elements; for example, assuming the valve elements are weighted according to a straight binary progression of two, eight valve elements provide an operating range of 0 to 256 units, 10 valve elements provide an operating range of 0 to 1,024 units, and 12 valve elements provide an operating range of 0 to 4,096 units, where the unit is determined by the Cr or Ae of the valve element with the smallest value in the binary code. In terms of resolution, eight valve elements provide a resolution of 0.4%, 10 valve elements provide a resolution of 0.1%, and 12 valve elements provide a resolution of 0.025%. Accuracy is not impaired as the operating range is expanded because the flow rate remains proportional to the product of the sensed fluid parameter times the sum of the effective orifice areas of the open valve elements. In effect, viewing the invention as an orifice meter, if eight valve elements are employed, there are 255 separate orifice plates, each with a different size orifice; each orifice plate becomes effective at an appropriate flow rate within the range.

The described embodiments of the invention are only considered to be preferred and illustrative of the invention concept; the scope of the invention is not to be restricted to such embodiments. Various and numerous other arrangements may be devised by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention. For example, the calculations performed by local computer 11 could be carried out by an analog computer instead of the digital computing circuits depicted in detail in FIGS. 4A, 4B, and 4C or by a programmed digital computer.

Reference is made to the calibration procedure described on pages 11 through 13 of a copending sole application Ser. No. 432,152 of Robert A. Gallatin, filed on even date herewith and assigned to the assignee of the present application by an assignment recorded on even date herewith. The effective orifice area (Cv or Ae) of each valve element is individually adjusted in the manner described in the sole Gallatin application to establish the correct value weighting.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2627280 *Apr 21, 1949Feb 3, 1953Infilco IncFlow control system
US3776249 *Jul 14, 1972Dec 4, 1973Valve M CoPipeline flow control system and method
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1 *Brochure, "Self Optimizing Digital Flow Meter Calibration System," Process Systems, Inc., 356 W. Seventh South, Salt Lake City, Utah.
2 *Digital Control Valves by Friedland et al., pp. 251-264, ISA Transactions, vol. 8, No. 4, 1969.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4717396 *Sep 15, 1986Jan 5, 1988Phillips Petroleum CompanyFloating pressure control for a gas distribution system
US4821557 *Mar 8, 1988Apr 18, 1989Arkla, Inc.Method and apparatus for determining the accuracy of a gas flow meter
US5150690 *Apr 20, 1990Sep 29, 1992Ortech CorporationFlow control system
US5190068 *Jul 2, 1992Mar 2, 1993Brian PhilbinControl apparatus and method for controlling fluid flows and pressures
US5325884 *Jul 10, 1991Jul 5, 1994Conservair TechnologiesCompressed air control system
US5331995 *Jul 17, 1992Jul 26, 1994Bear Medical Systems, Inc.Flow control system for medical ventilator
US5540077 *Jun 10, 1994Jul 30, 1996Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.Method and gas mixture for calibrating an analyzer
US5570300 *Mar 20, 1995Oct 29, 1996The Foxboro CompanySelf-validating sensors
US5774378 *Aug 30, 1996Jun 30, 1998The Foxboro CompanySelf-validating sensors
US5828567 *Nov 7, 1996Oct 27, 1998Rosemount Inc.Diagnostics for resistance based transmitter
US6298454Feb 22, 1999Oct 2, 2001Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Diagnostics in a process control system
US6311136Jul 8, 1998Oct 30, 2001Invensys Systems, Inc.Digital flowmeter
US6356191Jun 17, 1999Mar 12, 2002Rosemount Inc.Error compensation for a process fluid temperature transmitter
US6370448Oct 12, 1998Apr 9, 2002Rosemount Inc.Communication technique for field devices in industrial processes
US6397114May 3, 1999May 28, 2002Rosemount Inc.Device in a process system for detecting events
US6434504Aug 6, 1999Aug 13, 2002Rosemount Inc.Resistance based process control device diagnostics
US6449574Jul 14, 2000Sep 10, 2002Micro Motion, Inc.Resistance based process control device diagnostics
US6473710Jun 29, 2000Oct 29, 2002Rosemount Inc.Low power two-wire self validating temperature transmitter
US6505517Jul 23, 1999Jan 14, 2003Rosemount Inc.High accuracy signal processing for magnetic flowmeter
US6505519Mar 23, 2001Jan 14, 2003Invensys Systems, Inc.Correcting for two-phase flow in a digital flowmeter
US6507791Aug 17, 2001Jan 14, 2003Invensys Systems, Inc.Digital flowmeter
US6519546Oct 19, 1998Feb 11, 2003Rosemount Inc.Auto correcting temperature transmitter with resistance based sensor
US6532392Jul 28, 2000Mar 11, 2003Rosemount Inc.Transmitter with software for determining when to initiate diagnostics
US6539267May 4, 2000Mar 25, 2003Rosemount Inc.Device in a process system for determining statistical parameter
US6556145Sep 24, 1999Apr 29, 2003Rosemount Inc.Two-wire fluid temperature transmitter with thermocouple diagnostics
US6557118Mar 8, 2001Apr 29, 2003Fisher Rosemount Systems Inc.Diagnostics in a process control system
US6594603Sep 30, 1999Jul 15, 2003Rosemount Inc.Resistive element diagnostics for process devices
US6601005Jun 25, 1999Jul 29, 2003Rosemount Inc.Process device diagnostics using process variable sensor signal
US6609070Nov 13, 2000Aug 19, 2003Rodi Systems CorpFluid treatment apparatus
US6615090Feb 7, 2000Sep 2, 2003Fisher-Rosemont Systems, Inc.Diagnostics in a process control system which uses multi-variable control techniques
US6615149May 23, 2000Sep 2, 2003Rosemount Inc.Spectral diagnostics in a magnetic flow meter
US6629059Mar 12, 2002Sep 30, 2003Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Hand held diagnostic and communication device with automatic bus detection
US6633782Feb 7, 2000Oct 14, 2003Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Diagnostic expert in a process control system
US6654697Aug 27, 1999Nov 25, 2003Rosemount Inc.Flow measurement with diagnostics
US6701274Aug 27, 1999Mar 2, 2004Rosemount Inc.Prediction of error magnitude in a pressure transmitter
US6735484Sep 20, 2000May 11, 2004Fargo Electronics, Inc.Printer with a process diagnostics system for detecting events
US6739205 *Aug 30, 2001May 25, 2004Schneider Automation Inc.Controller for monitoring fluid flow volume
US6754594Aug 17, 2001Jun 22, 2004Invensys Systems, Inc.Digital flowmeter
US6754601Sep 30, 1999Jun 22, 2004Rosemount Inc.Diagnostics for resistive elements of process devices
US6758102Jan 10, 2003Jul 6, 2004Invensys Systems, Inc.Correcting for two-phase flow in a digital flowmeter
US6772036Aug 30, 2001Aug 3, 2004Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Control system using process model
US6907383May 9, 2001Jun 14, 2005Rosemount Inc.Flow diagnostic system
US6917887Aug 11, 2003Jul 12, 2005Invensys Systems, Inc.Digital flowmeter
US6920799Apr 15, 2004Jul 26, 2005Rosemount Inc.Magnetic flow meter with reference electrode
US6950760Mar 31, 2003Sep 27, 2005Invensys Systems, Inc.Startup and operational techniques for a digital flowmeter
US6970003Mar 5, 2001Nov 29, 2005Rosemount Inc.Electronics board life prediction of microprocessor-based transmitters
US6981424Apr 26, 2004Jan 3, 2006Invensys Systems, Inc.Correcting for two-phase flow in a digital flowmeter
US7010459Jun 5, 2003Mar 7, 2006Rosemount Inc.Process device diagnostics using process variable sensor signal
US7018800Aug 7, 2003Mar 28, 2006Rosemount Inc.Process device with quiescent current diagnostics
US7046180Apr 21, 2004May 16, 2006Rosemount Inc.Analog-to-digital converter with range error detection
US7059199Feb 9, 2004Jun 13, 2006Invensys Systems, Inc.Multiphase Coriolis flowmeter
US7065455Jul 30, 2004Jun 20, 2006Invensys Systems, Inc.Correcting frequency in flowtube measurements
US7085610Oct 5, 2001Aug 1, 2006Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Root cause diagnostics
US7124646Aug 22, 2005Oct 24, 2006Invensys Systems, Inc.Correcting for two-phase flow in a digital flowmeter
US7136761May 17, 2005Nov 14, 2006Invensys Systems, Inc.Digital flowmeter
US7146280Jun 29, 2005Dec 5, 2006Invensys Systems, Inc.Startup and operational techniques for a digital flowmeter
US7188534Mar 2, 2005Mar 13, 2007Invensys Systems, Inc.Multi-phase coriolis flowmeter
US7206646Sep 17, 2001Apr 17, 2007Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Method and apparatus for performing a function in a plant using process performance monitoring with process equipment monitoring and control
US7207229Feb 1, 2006Apr 24, 2007Invensys Systems, Inc.Multiphase Coriolis flowmeter
US7221988Sep 20, 2004May 22, 2007Rosemount, Inc.Creation and display of indices within a process plant
US7254518Mar 15, 2004Aug 7, 2007Rosemount Inc.Pressure transmitter with diagnostics
US7272531Sep 20, 2005Sep 18, 2007Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Aggregation of asset use indices within a process plant
US7290450Jul 16, 2004Nov 6, 2007Rosemount Inc.Process diagnostics
US7321846Oct 5, 2006Jan 22, 2008Rosemount Inc.Two-wire process control loop diagnostics
US7346404Mar 1, 2002Mar 18, 2008Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Data sharing in a process plant
US7404336Oct 23, 2006Jul 29, 2008Invensys Systems, Inc.Correcting for two-phase flow in a digital flowmeter
US7502656Jan 26, 2004Mar 10, 2009Invensys Systems, Inc.Methods and apparatus for remote process control
US7505854Jul 18, 2006Mar 17, 2009Invensys Systems, Inc.Startup techniques for a digital flowmeter
US7509219Apr 25, 2006Mar 24, 2009Invensys Systems, Inc.Correcting frequency in flowtube measurements
US7523667Dec 23, 2003Apr 28, 2009Rosemount Inc.Diagnostics of impulse piping in an industrial process
US7557702Feb 28, 2003Jul 7, 2009Evren EryurekIntegrated alert generation in a process plant
US7562135May 21, 2001Jul 14, 2009Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Enhanced fieldbus device alerts in a process control system
US7571062Oct 31, 2006Aug 4, 2009Invensys Systems, Inc.Digital flowmeter
US7590511Sep 25, 2007Sep 15, 2009Rosemount Inc.Field device for digital process control loop diagnostics
US7623932Dec 20, 2005Nov 24, 2009Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Rule set for root cause diagnostics
US7627441Sep 30, 2003Dec 1, 2009Rosemount Inc.Process device with vibration based diagnostics
US7630861May 25, 2006Dec 8, 2009Rosemount Inc.Dedicated process diagnostic device
US7698954Mar 5, 2007Apr 20, 2010Invensys Systems, Inc.Multi-phase Coriolis flowmeter
US7702401Sep 5, 2007Apr 20, 2010Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.System for preserving and displaying process control data associated with an abnormal situation
US7720944Oct 30, 2007May 18, 2010Invensys Systems, Inc.Process control system with networked digital data processors and a virtual machine environment
US7726203Mar 14, 2007Jun 1, 2010Invensys Systems, Inc.Multiphase Coriolis flowmeter
US7739361Oct 30, 2007Jun 15, 2010Thibault Richard LMethods for remote process control with networked digital data processors and a virtual machine environment
US7750642Sep 28, 2007Jul 6, 2010Rosemount Inc.Magnetic flowmeter with verification
US7761923Mar 1, 2005Jul 20, 2010Invensys Systems, Inc.Process control methods and apparatus for intrusion detection, protection and network hardening
US7784360Jul 14, 2008Aug 31, 2010Invensys Systems, Inc.Correcting for two-phase flow in a digital flowmeter
US7849854 *Sep 7, 2004Dec 14, 2010Bird Products CorporationPortable drag compressor powered mechanical ventilator
US7860857Mar 30, 2007Dec 28, 2010Invensys Systems, Inc.Digital data processing apparatus and methods for improving plant performance
US7882197Oct 30, 2007Feb 1, 2011Invensys Systems, Inc.Control system methods that transfer control apparatus information over IP networks in web page-less transfers
US7890927Oct 8, 2008Feb 15, 2011Invensys Systems, Inc.Apparatus and method for configuring and editing a control system with live data
US7899070Oct 30, 2007Mar 1, 2011Invensys Systems, Inc.Control system apparatus with change updates
US7904256Feb 6, 2009Mar 8, 2011Invensys Systems, Inc.Startup techniques for a digital flowmeter
US7921734May 12, 2009Apr 12, 2011Rosemount Inc.System to detect poor process ground connections
US7940189Sep 26, 2006May 10, 2011Rosemount Inc.Leak detector for process valve
US7949495Aug 17, 2005May 24, 2011Rosemount, Inc.Process variable transmitter with diagnostics
US7953501Sep 25, 2006May 31, 2011Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Industrial process control loop monitor
US7979488Oct 30, 2007Jul 12, 2011Invensys Systems, Inc.Control system methods using value-based transfers
US7984420Nov 5, 2008Jul 19, 2011Invensys Systems, Inc.Control systems and methods with composite blocks
US8000906Oct 31, 2007Aug 16, 2011Invensys Systems, Inc.Digital flowmeter
US8005647Sep 30, 2005Aug 23, 2011Rosemount, Inc.Method and apparatus for monitoring and performing corrective measures in a process plant using monitoring data with corrective measures data
US8023500Oct 30, 2007Sep 20, 2011Invensys Systems, Inc.Methods for process control with change updates
US8028272Nov 5, 2008Sep 27, 2011Invensys Systems, Inc.Control system configurator and methods with edit selection
US8028275Nov 5, 2008Sep 27, 2011Invensys Systems, Inc.Control systems and methods with smart blocks
US8044793Mar 22, 2002Oct 25, 2011Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Integrated device alerts in a process control system
US8055479Oct 10, 2007Nov 8, 2011Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Simplified algorithm for abnormal situation prevention in load following applications including plugged line diagnostics in a dynamic process
US8060222Nov 5, 2008Nov 15, 2011Invensys Systems, Inc.Control system configurator and methods with object characteristic swapping
US8073967Apr 15, 2002Dec 6, 2011Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Web services-based communications for use with process control systems
US8081584Oct 30, 2007Dec 20, 2011Invensys Systems, Inc.Control system apparatus and systems using value-based transfers
US8090452Jul 20, 2007Jan 3, 2012Invensys Systems, Inc.Methods and apparatus for control using control devices that provide a virtual machine environment and that communicate via an IP network
US8112565Jun 6, 2006Feb 7, 2012Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Multi-protocol field device interface with automatic bus detection
US8117921Mar 10, 2010Feb 21, 2012Tombs Michael SMulti-phase coriolis flowmeter
US8126661Nov 6, 2009Feb 28, 2012Henry Manus PWet gas measurement
US8127060May 29, 2009Feb 28, 2012Invensys Systems, IncMethods and apparatus for control configuration with control objects that are fieldbus protocol-aware
US8224593Jan 31, 2011Jul 17, 2012Invensys Systems, Inc.Startup techniques for a digital flowmeter
US8225271Nov 6, 2008Jul 17, 2012Invensys Systems, Inc.Apparatus for control systems with objects that are associated with live data
US8229579Nov 5, 2008Jul 24, 2012Invensys Systems, Inc.Control systems and methods with versioning
US8290721Aug 14, 2006Oct 16, 2012Rosemount Inc.Flow measurement diagnostics
US8301676Aug 23, 2007Oct 30, 2012Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Field device with capability of calculating digital filter coefficients
US8368640Feb 14, 2006Feb 5, 2013Invensys Systems, Inc.Process control configuration system with connection validation and configuration
US8417595May 13, 2010Apr 9, 2013Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Economic calculations in a process control system
US8447535Jan 24, 2012May 21, 2013Invensys Systems, Inc.Wet gas measurement
US8463964Oct 14, 2010Jun 11, 2013Invensys Systems, Inc.Methods and apparatus for control configuration with enhanced change-tracking
US8467986Aug 6, 2010Jun 18, 2013Invensys Systems, Inc.Drive techniques for a digital flowmeter
US8483979Jun 26, 2012Jul 9, 2013Invensys Systems, Inc.Startup and operational techniques for a digital flowmeter
US8594814Jun 19, 2009Nov 26, 2013Invensys Systems, Inc.Systems and methods for immersive interaction with actual and/or simulated facilities for process, environmental and industrial control
US8620779May 13, 2010Dec 31, 2013Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Economic calculations in a process control system
US8712731Sep 23, 2011Apr 29, 2014Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.Simplified algorithm for abnormal situation prevention in load following applications including plugged line diagnostics in a dynamic process
US20110120566 *Nov 19, 2010May 26, 2011Fujikin IncorporatedDiscontinuous switching fluid flow rate control method using pressure type flow rate control device
EP0023910A1 *Aug 25, 1980Feb 18, 1981Airco IncFlow control equipment.
EP0056148A1 *Dec 24, 1981Jul 21, 1982Honeywell B.V.Respirator
EP0420599A2 *Sep 26, 1990Apr 3, 1991Ortech CorporationFlow control system
Classifications
U.S. Classification137/14, 73/861.44, 702/47, 137/487, 700/282, 137/599.05, 137/487.5, 137/110
International ClassificationG01F1/88, G01F15/075, G05D7/06, G01F1/36
Cooperative ClassificationG01F15/0755, G01F1/88, G05D7/0635, G01F1/363
European ClassificationG01F1/88, G01F1/36A, G01F15/075B, G05D7/06F4B