|Publication number||USRE30230 E|
|Application number||US 05/803,601|
|Publication date||Mar 18, 1980|
|Filing date||Jun 6, 1977|
|Priority date||Dec 23, 1970|
|Publication number||05803601, 803601, US RE30230 E, US RE30230E, US-E-RE30230, USRE30230 E, USRE30230E|
|Inventors||Junius M. Jackson, deceased, Betty A. Jackson executrix by|
|Original Assignee||Brinadd Company|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (19), Referenced by (1), Classifications (7), Legal Events (1)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application .Iadd.is a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 3,844,361 which .Iaddend.is a division of Ser. No. 101,177 filed Dec. 23, 1970, now abandoned.
The present invention lies in the field of drilling fluids or muds used in forming wellbores in the earth for the production of oil, gas, water and other minerals. More specifically, the invention applies to a method of formulating such a drilling fluid so that it can be continuously circulated down through the hollow drill string to pick up the cuttings formed by the drill bit, carry them to the surface in the annulus surrounding the bit, and pass them through a series of mechanical devices and settling tanks to remove the drilled solids and return the drilling fluid to the drill string for recirculation--with essentially no loss of either vehicle or additives. Even more specifically, the invention discloses drilling muds eliminating or substantially reducing many of the adjustment steps necessary with prior art muds--discarding a portion of an overladen mud, diluting the retained fraction, and making up to original composition by adding various constituents.
In the prior art of formulating drilling fluids, whether the fluid is to be circulated as in rotary drilling or placed in the bottom of the bore hole as in cable tool drilling, a clay such as bentonite is usually added to water to prepare an aqueous mud. In other cases drilled shales are allowed to accumulate in the mud as drilling progresses in order to build up such properties as weight, viscosity and gel strength. Sometimes muds with oil as the continuous phase are used to prevent hole problems, and in other cases flocculants are added to aqueous mud to aid in dropping out solids at the surface.
The result of using such a clay-based mud system has been a build-up of undesirable solids, either in the circulating mud or in the form of excess mud which is stored in reserve or disposal pits. This build-up, if not properly dealt with, will cause increases in unit weight (specific gravity), viscosity and gel strength to such high levels that a number of undesirable events may occur.
The mud cake on the wellbore wall may become so thick that swabbing occurs in pulling the bit, causing sloughing or caving of the wall and further increases in viscosity and gel strength. Gas bubbles from a drilled formation may become trapped in the mud. Drilling rate may decrease because of the thick filter cake on bottom. The fluid may even become so thick as to be unpumpable.
To avoid such dire results, mud engineers keep a close watch on the circulating mud and take many preventive steps, all rather expensive. Flocculants are added in the settling of pits in attempts to bring about agglomeration and settling of the hydrated and dispersed drilled solids, a step likely to remove some of the originally added bentonite as well. A fraction of the mud is discarded or laid aside, and the balance is thinned to the desired unit weight with water. Of course, in so thinning the concentrations of some if not all constituents of the mud will be reduced below the desired levels. The only recourse available to the mud engineer is to add more of the very materials he has just thrown out in the discarded fraction--primarily bentonite, but also many of the other additives he may be using for fluid loss control and various other properties.
It is the primary object of the present invention to reduce for the operator the cost of the drilling fluid he circulates in his well, and to do this by constantly recirculating the same fluid, discarding virtually nothing but the drilled solids. (Mud must be added with increasing depth, of course, and various changes in the composition of the mud must be made for changes encountered in the formation being drilled, e.g., permeability and formation fluids, but these must be made in any event.)
A second object is to furnish such a drilling fluid having neither gel strength nor structured viscosity, so that drilled solids are readily separable from the drilling fluid at the surface by one or both screening and settling from quiescent drilling fluid.
A third object is to furnish such a drilling fluid which is inhibited against hydration and disintegration of formation solids, either because an oil is used as part of the mud or because an inhibitor is added to a water phase.
A fourth object is to furnish a drilling fluid which enables the driller to obtain higher drilling rates than with clay muds.
A fifth object is to supply a drilling fluid having no tendency to build a thick filter cake on the borewall. Expressed positively, this object is to furnish a drilling fluid which forms a coating, rather than a cake, on the borewall.
A sixth object is to provide a drilling fluid having a filtrate inhibited against hydration and swelling of drilled clays, to avoid hole trouble which may be caused by sloughing clays or heaving shales.
A seventh object is a drilling fluid which reduces the re-startup load on mud pumps after a period of time in which a quiescent column of drilling fluid has been sitting in a wellbore.
An eighth object is a drilling fluid which will permit ready escape of any gas intruding into the fluid during its passage through the wellbore.
The above and other objects are accomplished according to the present invention by the use of a closed circuit mud system wherein the base fluid is an inhibited brine which can be reused indefinitely by disposing of the drilled solids in essentially a dry state. In order to effectively maintain a closed circuit mud system, several conditions must be satisfied, and these may be summarized as follows:
1. The mud must be conditioned so that the drilled solids do not hydrate and then swell or disintegrate into the mud system. Conditioning may be accomplished in various ways, such as adding electrolytes to water. The addition of cationic surfactants to water is also effective as they will be substantive to the cuttings and coat them with a water repelling layer of chemical. Emulsions of water in oil are also effective as the cuttings will not hydrate in oil.
2. The mud must have neither thixotropic properties nor a structured type viscosity, as separation of the cuttings at the surface would be greatly hindered. Thixotropy is also termed gel strength, and is a reversible gel wherein structure builds up when the mud is quiescent and then breaks back down when the gelled fluid is agitated. A structured type viscosity is one wherein viscosity is primarily obtained by physical rather than physico-chemical means. Asbestos and attapulgite are examples of these type materials, each being structured as needles or filaments lacking the chemically active surface groups that characterize, for example, filaments of hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC). Their viscosities are characterized by high flat gel strengths, i.e., there is little change in viscosity when agitated and initial gel strength is high and constant over a period of time.
3. The mud must supply the properties needed for drilling. Some of these properties are carrying capacity, so that cuttings can be removed from the borehole, fluid loss control so that the borehole itself will be stabilized while drilling, and sufficient density to keep formation fluids out of the well during drilling.
As an example of a mud satisfying these conditions, a trouble-free well was recently drilled in England using one of the low-cost mud systems of the present invention. This was Walton No. 1 Well, in Yorkshire, where Home Oil Company Ltd. of Calgary, Alberta, Canada was the operator. This mud system was prepared with calcium chloride brine as the base fluid. The cuttings-carrying ability of this brine was increased by adding the "Bex" viscosifier of Chemical Additives Company at the rate of 11/2 pounds per barrel of mud, this material having as its active ingredient hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) in the ratio of about 50-75 percent by weight. HEC can be used by itself, but is more readily and completely utilized when added with the activator used in the "Bex" viscosifier, e.g., finely divided magnesia. For details see the disclosure of the copending application Ser. No. 101,123 of the same inventor, filed Dec. 23, 1970, now abandoned, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
To control fluid loss, a calcium lignosulfonate was added at the rate of about 5 pounds per barrel. This was in the form of "Brigeheal" fluid loss additive, again a product of Chemical Additives Company. It contains some finely divided magnesia and some inert calcium carbonate particles and is not reactive with those constituents of the present invention which limit the viscosity of the mud to a no gel strength and no structured viscosity system and inhibit the drilling fluid against hydration and swelling of drilled solids. It may be replaced by other fluid loss additives, when any such additive is necessary, which are non-reactive and do not so affect viscosity and hydration. For details see the aforementioned copending patent application.
The major portion of the cuttings from this well were removed by shaker screens. All cuttings and drilled solids were hauled away from the well site in an essentially dry state, i.e., they had not hydrated. Only a small portion of the drilled cuttings from this operation became entrained in the mud, and said entrainment was attributed to some unavoidable abrasion by the pump and bit. A desander and centrifuge were used to remove most of these entrained solids, and the balance, along with the concomitant calcium chloride, were allowed to rest in a settling pit. The solids settled out and the supernatant clear calcium chloride brine was pumped back into the circulating mud system. A typical set of mud properties, as freshly mixed, was as follows:
______________________________________Weight 10.8 pounds per gallonViscosity 36 seconds by Marsh Funnel Viscosimeter 6 cp plastic viscosity 3 cp yield pointGel Strength zero or 0/0 gels______________________________________
To have properties of inhibition, a base fluid should be
a. Primarily oil, as in a water-in-oil emulsion, or
b. Aqueous with one of the following:
600 parts per million (ppm) calcium or other divalent cation
200 ppm aluminum or other trivalent cation, e.g., chromium
1,500 ppm potassium chloride
5,000 ppm sodium chloride
200 ppm of a cationic surfactant such as coco amine or a quatenary ammonium compound.
Various combinations of these salts and cations may also be used with good results.
The above example is intended to be only illustrative, of course. Viscosity without structure or thixotropy may be obtained easily through the use of various gums or polymers known to furnish aqueous fluids the property of pseudoplasticity, or through the use of emulsions of either water-in-oil or oil-in-water or through the use of solutions such as sugar in water. It will be apparent, of course, that the calcium brine may be an aqueous solution of any of a number of other cationic salts and mixtures of such salts; sodium chloride may be used when a lower unit weight is acceptable, and zinc chloride may be used to make the brine when a very heavy mud is required. The salt not only furnishes the weighting material (which does not tend to precipitate when the mud is quiescent), but also typically furnishes the cations for inhibiting the mud against hydration of solid material.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2123282 *||Jan 20, 1936||Jul 12, 1938||Union Oil Co||Process for reconditioning drilling fluids|
|US2156333 *||Mar 6, 1937||May 2, 1939||Forbes Cross Matthew||Cleaning oil well drilling fluids|
|US2570947 *||Nov 5, 1945||Oct 9, 1951||Phillips Petroleum Co||Drilling fluids and methods of using same|
|US2800449 *||Mar 17, 1954||Jul 23, 1957||Marathon Corp||Drilling fluids for oil wells and additives therefor|
|US2919898 *||Aug 16, 1957||Jan 5, 1960||Phillips Petroleum Co||Treatment of well drilling mud|
|US2941783 *||Jul 15, 1957||Jun 21, 1960||Phillips Petroleum Co||Hydraulic earth boring and cyclone separation system|
|US3017351 *||Nov 6, 1958||Jan 16, 1962||Pan American Petroleum Corp||Shale hydration inhibitors for clear water drilling fluids|
|US3040821 *||Feb 17, 1958||Jun 26, 1962||Pan American Petroleum Corp||Drilling wells with clear water|
|US3081260 *||Mar 25, 1960||Mar 12, 1963||Pan American Petroleum Corp||Low solids drilling fluid|
|US3140747 *||Jul 27, 1960||Jul 14, 1964||Phillips Petroleum Co||Water-in-oil emulsion well fluid|
|US3289775 *||Jul 24, 1963||Dec 6, 1966||Gulf Oil Corp||Apparatus and method for treating drilling mud|
|US3308885 *||Dec 28, 1965||Mar 14, 1967||Union Oil Co||Treatment of subsurface hydrocarbon fluid-bearing formations to reduce water production therefrom|
|US3310125 *||Aug 29, 1963||Mar 21, 1967||Shell Oil Co||Method for increasing drilling rate|
|US3338320 *||Aug 3, 1964||Aug 29, 1967||Dow Chemical Co||Clear water drilling fluid|
|US3375886 *||Sep 24, 1963||Apr 2, 1968||Gulf Research Development Co||Method of treating abrasive-laden drilling liquid|
|US3500943 *||Jun 20, 1968||Mar 17, 1970||Shell Oil Co||Pressurized well drilling system|
|US3625889 *||Aug 28, 1969||Dec 7, 1971||Phillips Petroleum Co||Well completion fluids|
|US3637031 *||Dec 12, 1969||Jan 25, 1972||Standard Brands Chem Ind Inc||Drilling fluid and method of rotary drilling therewith|
|US3692125 *||Feb 23, 1971||Sep 19, 1972||Ruhle James L||Method of drilling oil wells|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US9790421||Apr 9, 2014||Oct 17, 2017||Ecolab Usa Inc.||Choline-based crosslinker compositions for fracturing fluids|
|International Classification||E21B21/06, C09K8/02|
|Cooperative Classification||E21B21/065, C09K8/02|
|European Classification||E21B21/06N2, C09K8/02|
|Nov 21, 1983||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: TEXAS UNITED CHEMICAL CORPORATION, A TX CORP.
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:BRINADD COMPANY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:004194/0293
Effective date: 19831110