|Publication number||USRE32093 E|
|Application number||US 06/597,582|
|Publication date||Mar 18, 1986|
|Filing date||Apr 9, 1984|
|Priority date||May 26, 1971|
|Publication number||06597582, 597582, US RE32093 E, US RE32093E, US-E-RE32093, USRE32093 E, USRE32093E|
|Inventors||Thomas E. Hale|
|Original Assignee||General Electric Company|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (15), Non-Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (7), Classifications (13), Legal Events (1)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This is a continuation, of application Ser. No. 909,699 filed May 25, 1978, now abandoned; which in turn is a division of reissue application Ser. No. 577,584, filed May 15, 1975, which is reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 3,736,107. .Iaddend.
This invention relates to a high-strength, coated cemented carbide product and to process for its preparation.
Cemented carbides are well known for their unique combination of hardness, strength and wear resistance and are accordingly extensively used for such industrial applications as cutting tools, drawing dies and wear parts. It is known that the wear resistance of cemented carbides may be enhanced by the application of a thin coating of a highly wear-resistant material, such as, for example, titanium carbide, and such coated cemented carbides are finding increasing commercial utility for certain cutting tool and machining applications. However, the increased wear resistance of such coated products has been at the sacrifice of the strength of the substrate which is substantially reduced after coating.
Because of its high hardness, wear resistance and low reactivity with a wide variety of metals, aluminum oxide has excellent potential as a tool material, and this potential has to some extent been realized with a variety of aluminum oxide cutting materials that are commercially available. The principel drawback to the more widespread use of aluminum oxide tools in their low strength which rarely exceeds 100,000 p.s.i., using the standard transverse rupture or bend test. This compares with a strength of from 200,000 to 300,000, or even more, for cemented carbide cutting tools. The low strength of aluminum oxide tools limits their use to cutting applications where the tool is not highly stressed, such as in finishing cuts. The low strength of aluminum oxide also precludes the use of such materials in certain types of insert shapes which encounter high stresses when locked in a toolholder.
It is an object of this invention to provide a hard, wear-resistant material which combines the extremely high wear resistance of aluminum oxide with the relatively high strength and hardness of cemented carbide.
It is an additional object of this invention to improve the wear resistance of cemented carbides without substantially reducing their strength. It is still an additional object of this invention to provide a process for producing a firmly adherent, nonporous, dense coating of aluminum oxide on a cemented carbide substrate.
The foregoing and other objects of this invention are achieved by the vapor deposition under carefully controlled conditions of an alpha aluminum oxide coating of from 1-20 microns thickness on a cemented carbide substrate. The product contains a cemented carbide substrate and a fully dense alpha aluminum oxide coating firmly and adherently bonded to the substrate. In addition, there is present a very thin, intermediate nonmetallic layer .[.of cobalt-, iron-, or nickel aluminate.]., which acts to metallurgically bond the coating to the substrate. The coated product has a wear resistance substantially equivalent to aluminum oxide base cutting materials and a transverse rupture strength of at least 150,000, in most cases greater than 200,000 pounds/sq. inch. At very high cutting speeds, greater than about 1,500 surface ft./minute in some applications, possibly higher in others, the higher heat resistance of solid aluminum oxide may result in higher wear resistance. But in all cutting tests other than those above these levels, the wear resistance of the present coated products has proven to be substantially as high as aluminum oxide cutting materials.
While the broad range of coating thicknesses useful in the invention is from 1-20 microns, most coating thicknesses are preferably less than 15 microns. As will be shown in more detail below, certain applications require even narrower ranges within these limits, e.g. 1-3 microns has proven optimum for machining high temperature alloys and for milling applications; 6-12 microns has proven optimum for steel machining.
The process of the invention comprises passing an aluminum halide, water vapor and hydrogen gas over the carbide substrate at a temperature of from 900°-1250° C., the ratio of water vapor to the hydrogen gas being maintained between about 0.025 and 2.0, and preferably between 0.05 and 0.20.
There have previously been references in the literature of attempts or suggestions to coat a variety of substrates with aluminum oxide. However, insofar as is known, the coating of a cemented carbide substrate with aluminum oxide to produce a fully dense and adherent coating has never previously been disclosed. Nor has the unusual combination of properties exhibited by the present products been previously attainable in either coated or uncoated cutting tool materials. The products ot the invention are remarkable in several respects. Their strength as compared with comparable known coated cemented carbide materials is considerably higher and their cutting performance is superior in terms of tool life at intermediate and higher cutting speeds. The basis for the foregoing statements will become apparent from the discussion and test results set forth below.
The term cemented carbide as used herein means one or more transitional carbides of a metal of Groups IVb, Vb, and VIb of the Periodic Table cemented or bonded by one or more matrix metals selected from the group iron, nickel and cobalt. A typical cemented carbide contains WC in a cobalt matrix or TiC in a nickel matrix.
Because of the demanding requirements normally placed upon a cemented carbide cutting material, the properties of any coating, the manner in which it is bonded to the substrate and its effect on substrate strength are extremely critical. The coating layer must have high integrity in terms of density and smoothness--porosity or nonuniformity cannot be tolerated. The coating must also be firmly and adherently bonded to the cemented carbide substrate to prevent spalling or separation in use. In addition, the coating must not reduce the strength of the cemented carbide substrate significantly. The products of the present invention have been extensively tested and have been found to satisfy all of the foregoing requirements. The coatings are uniform and fully dense, they are firmly bonded to the substrate and the coated composite retains a high proportion of its strength, usually greater than 85% of the transverse rupture strength of the uncoated substrate. The achievement of these characteristics in the coated product is believed to be quite unexpected, particularly in view of the substantial strength reductions known to result from the addition of wear-resistant coatings to cemented carbide substrates. The coated materials of the invention also produce a surface finish in machining operations which appears to be fully equivalent in quality to solid aluminum oxide cutting materials, the latter being known to produce the best surface finishes.
The outstanding properties of the aluminum oxide-coated product of the invention depend upon careful control of the process parameters. The process involves the use of a gaseous mixture of hydrogen, water, and an aluminum halide such as aluminum trichloride. Carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide may be optionally added. The primary overall deposition reaction is:
3H.sub.2 O+2AlCl.sub.3 →Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 +6HCl
The most important ingredients in the gaseous reaction mixture are therefore water vapor and aluminum chloride vapor. However, the aluminum chloride vapor can be formed in several ways during the deposition reaction, as for example by heating solid AlCl3 powder or by passing chlorine gas over aluminum metal. The water vapor is most conveniently formed by reacting hydrogen with carbon dioxide in the deposition chamber to form carbon monoxide and water vapor by the water gas reaction:
H.sub.2 +CO.sub.2 ⃡CO+H.sub.2 O
The amount of water vapor formed in this manner depends upon the temperature and the initial concentrations of hydrogen, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and water vapor in the input gas stream. In order to form a good quality coating of desirable thickness in the temperature range of 900°-1250° C., the ratio of water to hydrogen gases present, after the water gas reaction, should be between about 0.025 and 2.0.
Hydrogen has been found to be necessary in the vapor deposition process to obtain a dense, adherent coating. Hydrogen appears to insure oxidation of the aluminum at the carbide surface. Oxidation in the reaction zone above the carbide substrate creates a condition known as dusting--which must be avoided. The absence of hydrogen creates a porous coating which is not fully dense. Thus the three necessary ingredients of the process are aluminum halide vapor, water vapor and hydrogen. In its preferred form, the process includes the use of aluminum chloride vapor, hydrogen and carbon dioxide, the latter reacting with H2 to form water vapor.
The amount of water vapor present, after the reaction of known input concentrations of H2 and CO2 and CO and H2 O if used, can be calculated using the following equation: ##EQU1## where a=1-K; K=the equilibrium constant for the water gas reaction;
b=(CO)i --(H2 O)i +K(H2)i +(CO2)i +2(H2 O)i); and
c=.Iadd.-K.Iaddend.((H2)i (CO2)i +(H2)i (H2 O)i+(H2 O)i (CO2)i +(H2 O)i 2)
The parentheses denote the concentration of the gaseous species enclosed within the terms of partial pressure, and the subscripts f and i denote the final or equibrium concentrations and the initial or input concentrations, respectively. The amount of H2 present, and thus the H2 O/H2 ratio, can then be determined from the relationship:
(H.sub.2).sub.f =(H.sub.2).sub.i +(H.sub.2 O).sub.i -(H.sub.2 O).sub.f
A series of coated products were prepared in accordance with the invention by passing aluminum chloride vapor, hydrogen and carbon dioxide over cemented carbide inserts. The examples were prepared at various input gas compositions and at various final H2 O/H2 concentrations. In all cases, deposition was at 1050° C. and a 45-minute deposition cycle was used with 2-3 grams of aluminum chloride and an aluminum chloride generator temperature of about 200° C. The use of more AlCl3 shifts the desired H2 O/H2 ratio to a higher value and vice versa. The coatings were deposited on a cemented carbide substrate having the following composition in percent by weight: WC-72, Co-8.5, TiC-8, TaC-11.5. Table I bellow shows the effect of gas composition on coating thickness. When coating with both higher and lower ratios of H2 O/H2 (i.e. outside range of about 0.025 to 2.0), it wasn't possible to get a coating of sufficient thickness, i.e., >1 micron. Coating quality was good for all examples having more than 1 micron thickness coating. Coating quality was judged to be good if the coating could withstand an adherency test consisting of sliding the coated insert under a diamond brale indentor of the same type used for the Rockwell hardness test using a load of 2 kilograms on the diamond. If the coating resisted spalling or crumbling during this test, it was judged to have good quality. If it did not, it was judged to have poor quality.
TABLE I__________________________________________________________________________ Water gas reaction equilibrium CoatingInput gas partial pressures partial pressures (H.sub.2 O)+ thicknessExample(H.sub.2) (CO.sub.2) (CO) (H.sub.2 O) (H.sub.2)+ (H.sub.2 O)+ (H.sub.2)+ (microns)__________________________________________________________________________1 .978 .022 .000 .000 .956 .0217 .023 <12 .960 .040 .000 .000 .921 .0391 .043 21/23 .850 .150 .000 .000 .713 .137 .192 64 .750 .100 .150 .000 .665 .085 .127 65 .050 .[..850.]..Iadd..100.Iaddend. .[..100.]..Iadd..850.Iaddend. .000 .042 .0085 .205 36 .600 .400 .000 .000 .323 .277 .857 37 .450 .250 .300 .000 .307 .143 .466 98 .400 .600 .000 .000 .123 .277 2.26 <19 .100 .700 .200 .000 .019 .081 4.26 <110 .975 .000 .000 .025 .975 .025 .026 1__________________________________________________________________________
The nature of coating obtained was determined by using X-ray diffraction analyses and optical microscopy. X-ray analyses showed the coating to be alpha Al2 O3. At the higher deposition temperatures (greater than 1150° C.), significant amounts of the compound .[.W3 CO3 C.]. .Iadd.W3 Co3 C .Iaddend.began to form due to reaction of the substrate carbide with the coating atmosphere. Optical microscopy revealed a gray, translucent coating of Al2 O3 that was fully dense and well bonded to the substrate in those examples in which the coating quality was found to be good. A very thin (less than 1 micron) layer of another nonmetallic compound.[., cobalt aluminate (CoAl2 O4).]. .Iadd.formed by oxidation of the substrate (a titanium-containing oxide phase).Iaddend., was present between the Al2 O3 layer and the cemented carbide substrate. The presence of this thin layer is necessary to achieve the proper bond strength between the coating and the substrate, that is, a bond strength sufficient to pass the adherency test set forth above. In those cases in which no observable intermediate nonmetallic layer was present, the coated inserts did not pass the above described adherency test. For this reason, .[.a cobalt (iron, or nickel) aluminate.]. intermediate layer is believed necessary to a good quality coating.
The preferred temperature range for deposition of the coating is 900° C. to 1250° C. At lower temperatures, the deposition rate becomes very low and the coating is poorly bonded to the substrate. At higher temperatures, excessive reaction occurs between the coating atmosphere and the cemented carbide substrate, weakening the bond between the coating and the substrate and lowering the strength of the overall composite body.
The strength of the Al2 O3 coated cemented carbide composite was measured (as were all strength measurements disclosed herein), using a slightly modified standard transverse rupture test (ASTM No. B4066-63T), that included three roll loading and a span-to-thickness ratio of 3.5 to 1. Using a deposition temperature of 1050° C. and a cemented carbide substrate of the nature set forth in the first ten examples in Table I above, the average strength of bars having coating thicknesses of from 5-7 microns (the preferred thickness for this substrate in terms of wear resistance) was 241,000 p.s.i. This represents only a slight reduction (11%) from the 270,000 strength value obtained from the uncoated cemented carbide substrate.
In the following Table II, the metal cutting performance of coated inserts prepared in accordance with this invention is shown and compared with the corresponding performance of uncoated inserts. Examples 11 through 17 were 1/2"×1/2"×3/16" disposable cutting inserts, coated with .[.Al2 O3 at 1050° C..]. by the vapor deposition technique disclosed above for Examples 1 through 10. A range of coating thicknesses of from 1-10 microns was used. These inserts were then used ot machine SAE 1045 steel, 190 BHN hardness, at 700-1000- and 1500-surface-feet-per-minute speeds, 0.010 inch per revolution feed, and 0.100 inch depth of cut. The cutting times to a flank wear of 0.010 inch are shown in Table II, along with the crater wear depth at the 0.010 flank wear time. The transverse rupture strengths are also given. For comparison purposes, the cutting performance and strengths of the uncoated substrate material, Examples 18 and 19, a commercially available solid aluminum oxide base (89% Al2 O3, 11% TiO) insert--Examples 20-22--and a TiC coated cemented carbide insert--all run under the same conditions--is also shown in Table II.
TABLE II__________________________________________________________________________ Coating Cutting Time to Crater depth Transverse thickness speed, .010 flank at .010 rupture strengthExample (microns) s.f.p.m. wear (min.) flank wear (p.s.i.)__________________________________________________________________________11 Al.sub.2 O.sub.4 coating on cemented carbide.sup.1 1 700 9 .003" 260,00012 " 4 700 32 .002" 250,00013 " 7 700 51 .001" 235,00014 " 10 700 51 .008" 210,00015 " 7 1,500 .sup.2 4.2 .sup.3.0003" 235,00016 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 coating on cemented carbide.sup.4 7 1,500 17 .007" 175,00017 " 12 1,000 26 .003" 160,00018 Uncoated carbide.sup.1 700 4 .004" 270,00019 " 1,000 5 .010" 230,00020 Solid Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 700 51 .001" 90,00021 " 1,000 30 .002" 90,00022 " 1,500 .sup.2 4.5 .sup.3.0002" 90,00023 TiC coating on cemented carbide.sup.1 5 700 18 .011" 175,00024 " 5 1,000 4 .011" 175,000__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.1 72% WC, 8% TiC, 11.5% TaC, 8.5% Co. .sup.2 To .004" wear. .sup.3 At .004" flank wear. .sup.4 71% WC, 12.5% TiC, 12% TaC, 4.5% Co.
It can be seen that the cutting performance of the cemented carbide tool material is very substantially improved by the Al2 O3 coating and that this improvement is substantially greater than a TiC coating on the same substrate. It is also evident that the amount of improvement obtained is dependent upon coating thickness up to a value of about 7 microns and that some evidence of performance decline occurs at 10 microns. At the optimum thickness value of 7 microns for this substrate, the performance of the Al2 O3 coated tool was equivalent to that of the solid Al2 O3 tool at all three speeds tested. The strength of the Al2 O3 coated inserts was, however, considerably higher than solid Al2 O3 and higher than the strength of the same substrate with a TiC coating.
It should be noted that, because of strength limitations, it has not been feasible to use solid aluminum oxide cutting materials in disposable cutting inserts of the type used in pin-type holders. These inserts have a centrally disposed hole for the reception of a pin which locks the insert in place. The strength of such inserts must be sufficient to resist the locking stresses. The strength of the present coated materials is sufficiently high to enable their use in such inserts. The present invention therefore makes possible the use of an insert, in such applications, having a higher wear resistance than any comparable insert presently available.
The following Table III shows the performance of the coated inserts of the invention in cutting a high temperature nickel-base alloy, specifically Inconel 718 in the solution-aged condition (BHN 390 hardness). The results, Example 25, are compared with the performance of an uncoated cemented carbide of the same composition (Example 26), and in addition with a commercial solid aluminum oxide tool (Example 27). The inserts were of the negative-rake disposable type (indexable and invertible) and were 1/2"×1/2"×3/16". The cemented carbide substrate for Examples 25 and 26 was 94% WC and 6% Co. The substrate was coated with Al2 O3 .[.at 1050° C..]. by vapor deosition process described above in connection with Examples 1 through 10.
TABLE III__________________________________________________________________________ Coating Time to thickness .020" flankExampleInsert type (microns) wear (min.) Comments__________________________________________________________________________25 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 coating on cemented carbide 2.5 8.526 Uncoated cemented carbide 5.427 Solid Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 <1 Rapid edge breakdown.__________________________________________________________________________
The performance of the insert coated with 2.5 microns of Al2 O3 was significantly better than that of the uncoated cemented carbide insert of the same substrate composition. From tests with other coating thicknesses, it has been determined that the optimum thickness for this kind of machining (i.e., high temperature alloys) is in the 1-3 micron range. Thicknesses greater than 3 microns in these tests decreased tool life. The superior strength of the Al2 O3 coated tools is amply demonstrated by the rapid falure of the solid Al2 O3 tool in Example 27, whereas no breakage or chipping was observed in the Al2 O3 coated tools, Examples 25.
The foregoing is a description of illustrative embodiments of the invention, and it is applicant's intention in the appended claims to cover all forms which fall within the scope of the invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3110571 *||Jul 1, 1958||Nov 12, 1963||Du Pont||Ceramic material bonded to metal having refractory oxide dispersed therein|
|US3261673 *||May 17, 1963||Jul 19, 1966||Norton Co||Oxide coated articles with metal undercoat|
|US3564683 *||Jun 13, 1968||Feb 23, 1971||Bodem Johann||Cutting of deposit forming steel and cutting tools for such steels|
|US3565643 *||Mar 3, 1969||Feb 23, 1971||Du Pont||Alumina - metalline compositions bonded with aluminide and titanide intermetallics|
|US3732655 *||Jun 22, 1972||May 15, 1973||Daniel Aronson||Suspended building construction|
|US3736107 *||May 26, 1971||May 29, 1973||Gen Electric||Coated cemented carbide product|
|US3837836 *||May 26, 1972||Sep 24, 1974||American Cyanamid Co||Herbicidal composition and method of using 4-alkyl-amino-3-nitroquinolines|
|US3914473 *||Mar 12, 1973||Oct 21, 1975||Gen Electric||Method of making a coated cemented carbide product|
|US3967035 *||May 15, 1975||Jun 29, 1976||General Electric Company||Coated cemented carbide product|
|US3977061 *||Sep 10, 1974||Aug 31, 1976||Sandvik Aktiebolag||Cutting insert and method of making the same|
|US4018631 *||Jun 12, 1975||Apr 19, 1977||General Electric Company||Coated cemented carbide product|
|US4019873 *||Jun 3, 1976||Apr 26, 1977||Fried. Krupp Gesellschaft Mit Beschrankter Haftung||Coated hard metal body|
|US4046517 *||May 30, 1975||Sep 6, 1977||Ltd. Dijet Industrial Co||Cemented carbide material for cutting operation|
|US4052530 *||Aug 9, 1976||Oct 4, 1977||Materials Technology Corporation||Co-deposited coating of aluminum oxide and titanium oxide and method of making same|
|GB819086A *||Title not available|
|1||Campbell et al, "Vapor-Phase . . . Materials", J. of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 96, No. 5, (Jun. 1949) pp. 318-333.|
|2||*||Campbell et al, Vapor Phase . . . Materials , J. of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 96, No. 5, (Jun. 1949) pp. 318 333.|
|3||Hinterman, "Laminate . . . Tools", Swedish Patent Application, filed May 28, 1970, Ser. No. 7379.|
|4||*||Hinterman, Laminate . . . Tools , Swedish Patent Application, filed May 28, 1970, Ser. No. 7379.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4892792 *||Aug 12, 1988||Jan 9, 1990||Gte Laboratories Incorporated||A1N coated silicon nitride based cutting tools|
|US4965140 *||Jun 14, 1988||Oct 23, 1990||Gte Laboratories Incorporated||Composite coatings on refractory substrates|
|US5487625 *||Nov 30, 1993||Jan 30, 1996||Sandvik Ab||Oxide coated cutting tool|
|US5654035 *||Sep 22, 1995||Aug 5, 1997||Sandvik Ab||Method of coating a body with an α-alumina coating|
|US7195817||Sep 29, 2003||Mar 27, 2007||General Motors Corporation||Diamond coated article and method of its production|
|US20050069709 *||Sep 29, 2003||Mar 31, 2005||Lev Leonid C.||Diamond coated article and method of its production|
|USRE44870||Aug 8, 2008||Apr 29, 2014||Sandvik Intellectual Property Ab||Aluminum oxide coated cutting tool and method of manufacturing thereof|
|U.S. Classification||428/336, 428/698, 428/926, 428/932, 427/248.1, 427/255.19|
|International Classification||C23C30/00, C23C16/40|
|Cooperative Classification||C23C30/005, C23C16/403, Y10T428/265|
|European Classification||C23C16/40D, C23C30/00B|
|Oct 30, 1987||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CARBOLOY INC., A DE. CORP.
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:004811/0365
Effective date: 19870925