|Publication number||USRE32302 E|
|Application number||US 06/763,121|
|Publication date||Dec 9, 1986|
|Filing date||Aug 6, 1985|
|Priority date||Oct 25, 1982|
|Publication number||06763121, 763121, US RE32302 E, US RE32302E, US-E-RE32302, USRE32302 E, USRE32302E|
|Inventors||Stephen W. Almond, Phillip C. Harris|
|Original Assignee||Halliburton Company|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (22), Non-Patent Citations (57), Referenced by (34), Classifications (14), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a method of fracturing subterranean formations penetrated by a well bore utilizing carbon dioxide based fluids. More particularly, this invention relates to a method of fracturing a subterranean formation with a two-phase fluid.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The treatment of subterranean formations penetrated by a well bore to stimulate the production of hydrocarbons therefrom or the ability of the formation to accept injected fluids has long been known in the art. One of the most common methods of increasing productivity of a hydrocarbon-bearing formation is to subject the formation to a fracturing treatment. This treatment is effected by injecting a liquid, gas or two-phase fluid which generally is referred to as a fracturing fluid down the well bore at sufficient pressure and flow rate to fracture the subterranean formation. A proppant material such as sand, fine gravel, sintered bauxite, glass beads or the like can be introduced into the fractures to keep them open. The propped fracture provides larger flow channels through which an increased quantity of a hydrocarbon can flow, thereby increasing the productive capability of a well.
A traditional fracturing technique utilizes a water or oil-based fluid to fracture a hydrocarbon-bearing formation.
Another successful fracturing technique has been that known as "foam fracturing". This process is described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,980,136. Briefly, that process involves generation of a foam of a desired "Mitchell quality" which then is introduced through a well bore into a formation which is to be fractured. The composition of the foam is such that the Mitchell foam quality at the bottom of the well is in the range of from about 0.53 to 0.99. Various gases and liquids can be used to create the foam, but foams generally used in the art are made from nitrogen and water, in the presence of a suitable surfactant, the pressure at which the foam is pumped into the well is such that it will cause a fracture of the hydrocarbon-bearing formation. Additionally, the foam comes out of the well easily when the pressure is released from the well head, because the foam expands when the pressure is reduced.
Yet another fracturing technique has been that utilizing a liquified, normally gaseous fluid. U.S. Pat. No. 3,195,634, for example, discloses a method for treating a subterranean formation penetrated by a well bore with a composition comprising a liquid-liquid mixture of carbon dioxide and water. The carbon dioxide is present in an amount equivalent to from about 300 to about 1500 SCF at 80° F. and 14.7 psia per 42 gallons of water. The composition is injected into the formation under sufficient pressure to fracture the formation. The composition can include gelling agents and proppant materials. Upon pressure release at the well head, the liquid carbon dioxide vaporizes and flows from the formation.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,310,112 discloses a method of fracturing a subterranean formation penetrated by a well bore comprising introduction of a mixture of liquid carbon dioxide and a propping agent slurried in a suitable vehicle into the well bore at a pressure sufficient to fracture the formation. The liquid carbon dioxide is present in an amount sufficient to provide at least five volumes of carbon dioxide per volume of slurried propping agent. After injection of the liquid carbon dioxide containing the propping agent, the pressure on the well bore is released. The liquid carbon dioxide normally is heated sufficiently by the formation that upon pressure release, the liquid changes to a gas. A substantial portion of the carbon dioxide then leaves the well and forces or carries out with it an appreciable amount of the oil or aqueous vehicle utilized to transport the proppant.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,368,627 discloses a method of treating a formation penetrated by a well bore which consists essentially of injecting down the well bore a fluid azeotropic mixture which has a critical temperature sufficiently high or a critical pressure sufficiently low to remain a liquid at the temperature and pressure existing during injection and treatment of the formation. The fluid mixture has critical properties such that a substantial portion of the injected fluid is converted to a gas upon a release of the pressure applied to the liquid during injection into the formation. The fluid mixture consists essentially of carbon dioxide and at least one C2 to C6 hydrocarbon.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,664,422 discloses a method of treating a subsurface earth formation penetrated by a well bore comprising injection of a liquified gas together with a gelled alcohol into the formation at a pressure sufficient to fracture the formation. The liquified gas is returned from the formation by vaporization following pressure reduction on the well bore. The gelled alcohol is removed by vaporization during subsequent production from the well leaving only the broken gelling agent in the formation.
It would be desirable to provide a method by which a viscous fluid can be created from carbon dioxide and an aqueous fluid which is stable over a broad temperature range and is capable of carrying high concentrations of proppant into a subterranean formation.
The present invention relates to a method and fluids for forming fractures in subterranean formations penetrated by a well bore and transporting increased concentrations of proppant material into the formation penetrated by the well bore. The method and fluids permit increased penetration of the formation by the fluids together with low fluid leak-off to the formation and the ability to carry high concentrations of proppant material without proppant settling in the fracturing fluids. The fracturing fluids of the invention are stabilized liquid-liquid emulsions of liquified carbon dioxide and an aqueous fluid at surface conditions, and the emulsion is converted into a gas-in-liquid foam upon heating in the formation to a temperature above the critical temperature of the carbon dioxide. The fracturing fluids comprise from about 50 to in excess of 96 percent by volume carbon dioxide. The fracturing fluid contains a surfactant which stabilizes the emulsion and foam which is produced against breakdown and can include gelling agents for additional stability, proppant material and the like.
The emulsions and foams produced by the method of the present invention are characterized by a high quality, that is, the ratio of the carbon dioxide volume to the volume of the carbon dioxide and aqueous liquids in the fluid is very high and the emulsions and foams have a viscosity sufficient to transport significant concentrations of proppant material. The emulsion which is formed by practice of the present method has a very fine cell size distribution or texture which is sufficiently stable to support proppant material in concentrations up to a level in excess of about 15 pounds per gallon of emulsion.
In the practice of the present invention, a fracturing fluid is prepared by admixing, under suitable conditions of temperature and pressure, a quantity of liquified carbon dioxide with an aqueous liquid and a surfactant to form a stabilized liquid-liquid emulsion.
The liquified carbon dioxide is provided from a surface vessel at a temperature and pressure sufficient to maintain the liquid conditions of the normally gaseous carbon dioxide, such as for example, a temperature of about 0° F. and a pressure of about 300 psia. The liquid carbon dioxide is admixed with the aqueous fluid in an amount sufficient to provide a volumetric ratio of liquid carbon dioxide to aqueous fluid in the range of from about 1:1 to about 20:1. Preferably, the ratio is in the range of from about 2:1 to about 18:1. The foam formed from the emulsion will have a quality of from about 50 percent to in excess of about 96 percent. The term "quality" as used herein is intended to mean the percentage of the volume of carbon dioxide at the existing temperature and pressure within the formation to the volume of the carbon dioxide plus the volume of the aqueous fluid and any other liquid components present in the fracturing fluid.
The aqueous liquid can comprise any aqueous solution which does not adversely react with the constituents of the fracturing fluid, the subterranean formation or the hydrocarbons present therein. The aqueous liquid can comprise, for example, water, a potassium chloride solution, water-alcohol mixtures or the like.
The liquid carbon dioxide and aqueous liquid can be admixed in a pressurized mixer or other suitable apparatus. In one preferred embodiment, the carbon dioxide and aqueous liquid are admixed by turbulent contact at a simple "T" connection in the fracturing fluid injection pipeline to form the emulsion. The emulsion will have a temperature below about the critical temperature of the carbon dioxide. The liquid-liquid emulsion is stabilized by the addition of a quantity of a selected surfactant. The surfactant comprises cationic, anionic or nonionic compounds, such as for example, betaines, sulfated alkoxylates, alkyl quaternary amines or ethoxylated linear alcohols. The particular surfactant employed will depend upon the type of formation which is to be fractured. The surfactant is admixed with the emulsion in an amount of from about one-half to about 20 gallons per 1000 gallons of emulsion to provide a surfactant concentration of from about 0.05 percent to about 2.0 percent by weight. It is to be understood that larger quantities of the designated surfactants can be employed, however, such use is uneconomical. The surfactant, preferably, is admixed with the aqueous liquid prior to formation of the emulsion to facilitate uniform admixing.
The stabilized emulsion which is formed is characterized by a very fine cell size distribution or texture. The term "cell size" as used herein means the size of the gaseous or liquid carbon dioxide droplet which is surrounded by the aqueous fluid in the emulsion. The term "texture" as used herein means the general appearance of the distributed cells of gaseous or liquid carbon dioxide in the emulsion. The fine texture of the emulsion of the present invention permits the transport of high concentrations of proppant material. The fine texture of the emulsion also results in the formation of a foam having a smaller cell size than otherwise would be possible such as by conventional foam generation methods in which the foam is generated on the surface and pumped into the subterranean formation.
In one preferred embodiment, a gelling agent is admixed with the aqueous liquid prior to formation of the emulsion. The gelling agent can comprise, for example hydratable polymers which contain, in sufficient concentration and reactive position, one or more of the functional groups, such as, hydroxyl, cis-hydroxyl, carboxyl, sulfate, sulfonate, amino or amide. Particularly sutiable such polymers are polysaccharides and derivatives thereof which contain one or more of the following monosaccharide units: galactose, mannose, glucoside, glucose, xylose, arabinose, fructose, glucuronic acid or pyranosyl sulfate. Natural hydratable polymers containing the foregoing functional groups and units include guar gum and derivatives thereof, locust bean gum, tara, konjak, tamarind, starch, cellulose and derivatives thereof, karaya, xanthan, tragacanth and carrageenan.
Hydratable synthetic polymers and copolymers which contain the above-mentioned functional groups and which can be utilized in accordance with the present invention include, but are not limited to, polyacrylate, polymethacrylate, polyacrylamide, maleic anhydride methylvinyl ether copolymers, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyvinylpyrrolidone.
Various compounds can be utilized with the above-mentioned hydratable polymers in an aqueous solution to inhibit or retard the hydration rate of the polymers, and therefore, delay a viscosity increase in the solution for a required period of time. Depending upon the particular functional groups contained in the polymer, different inhibitors react with the functional groups to inhibit hydration. For example, inhibitors for cis-hydroxyl functional groups include compounds containing multivalent metals which are capable of releasing the metal ions in an aqueous solution, borates, silicates, and aldehydes. Examples of the multivalent metal ions are chrominum, zirconium, antimony, titanium, iron (ferrous or ferric), tin, zinc and aluminum. Inhibitors for hydroxyl functional groups include mono- and di-functional aldehydes containing from about 1 to about 5 carbon atoms and multivalent metal salts that form hydroxide. Multivalent metal salts or compounds can be utilized as inhibitors for the hydroxyl functional groups. Inhibitors for amides include aldehydes and multivalent metal salts or compounds. Generally, any compound can be used as an inhibitor for a hydratable polymer if the compound reacts or otherwise combines with the polymer to cross-link, form a complex or otherwise tie-up the functional groups of the polymer whereby the rate of hydration of the polymer is retarded.
As stated above, the functional groups contained in the polymer or polymers utilized must be in sufficient concentration and in a reactive position in interact with the inhibitors. Preferred hydratable polymers which yield high viscosities upon hydration, that is, apparent viscosities in the range of from about 10 centipoise to about 90 centipoise at a concentration in the range of from about 10 lbs/1000 gals. to about 80 lbs/1000 gals. in water, are guar gum and guar derivatives such as hydroxypropyl guar and carboxymethylguar, cellulose derivatives such as hydroxyethylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, and carboxymethyl-hydroxyethylcellulose, locust bean gum, carrageenan gum and xanthan gum. Xanthan gum is a biopolysaccharide produced by the action of bacteria of the genus Xanthonomas. The hydration of the polymers can be inhibited or retarded by various inhibitors present in the aqueous liquid. The reversal of the inhibition of such polymers by the inhibitors can be accomplished by a change in the pH of the solution or by heating the solution to an appropriate temperature, generally above about 140° F.
Examples of some of the inhibitors which can be utilized depending upon the particular polymer or polymers used in the aqueous liquid are sodium sulfite-sodium dichromate, aluminum sulfate, titanium triethanolamine chelate, basic potassium pyroantimonate, zinc chloride, iron chloride, tin chloride, zirconium oxychloride in hydrochloric acid solution, sodium tetraborate and glyoxal. The gelled aqueous liquid thus formed can be used to transport significant quantities of proppant material to the point of mixing with the carbon dioxide. The proppant material can comprise, for example, sand, graded gravel, glass beads, sintered bauxite, resin-coated sand or the like.
The proppant material is admixed with the gelled aqueous liquid prior to admixing with the liquid carbon dioxide. The admixing of the proppant material with the gelled liquid can be effected in any suitable mixing apparatus, such as for example, a batch mixer or the like.
The amount of proppant material admixed with the gelled aqueous liquid may be varied to provide the desired amount of proppant in the two-phase fluid introduced into the formation. The proppant material can be admixed with the aqueous liquid in an amount of from about zero pounds of proppant per gallon of aqueous liquid up to as many pounds of proppant material per gallon as may be pumped. Depending upon formation reservoir conditions, the amount of proppant material transported by the two-phase fluid within the subterranean formation generally can be in the range of from about 1/2 pound to about 15 pounds per gallon of two-phase fracturing fluid without a screen out occurring.
The fracturing fluid of the present invention is introduced into the well bore which penetrates the subterranean formation to be treated at a temperature below the critical temperature of the carbon dioxide and at a pressure above the critical pressure of the carbon dioxide. The initial viscosity of the liquid-liquid emulsion comprising the fracturing fluid is such that the fluid is easily pumped through the well bore, however, the viscosity of the fluid still is sufficient to support a significant quantity of proppant material.
As the fracturing fluid is introduced into the subterranean formation, the fluid slowly is heated to a temperature above the critical temperature of the carbon dioxide. Surprisingly, it has been found that when the stabilized liquid-liquid emulsion is heated to a temperature above the critical temperature of the carbon dioxide, the fluid maintains its viscosity and undergoes conversion into a foam. The foam as well as the emulsion is stabilized by the presence of the surfactant and the gelling agent present in the fracturing fluid. As the liquid carbon dioxide undergoes conversion to a gas, a slight increase in the volume of the carbon dioxide is found to occur. The term "gas" as used herein means a fluid at a temperature equal to or above the critical temperature of the fluid while maintained at any given pressure. Upon conversion of the stabilized liquid-liquid emulsion of the present invention to a foam, the foam is found to be substantially stabilized and it continues to transport the proppant material into the fracture formed in the subterranean formation by the foamed fracturing fluid with at least substantially the same effectiveness as a gelled liquid. The foam has been found to have a viscosity immediately after formation which is substantially the same as the viscosity of the liquid-liquid emulsion. Further, the foam substantially reduces any fluid leak-off to the formation that otherwise would occur is only a liquid fracturing fluid was utilized to treat the formation. The low fluid-loss characteristics of the fracturing fluid of the present invention results in a greater volumetric efficiency for a given volume and injection rate of the fracturing fluid in comparison to liquid fracturing fluids.
After the introduction of the full amount of the calculated or estimated volume of fracturing fluid necessary to fracture the formation and transport the proppant material, the well bore is shut-in for a period of time sufficient to permit stabilization of the subterranean formation. In one embodiment, the well is shut-in for a period of time to permit the formation to at least partially close upon the proppant material and stabilize the fracture volume. The shut-in period can be from several minutes to in excess of about 12 hours and, preferably, is in the range of from about 1 to 2 hours. After the subterranean formation has stabilized, the well is opened under controlled conditions and the pressure drop in the well bore causes the foam to break. The carbon dioxide gas then moves from the formation into the well bore and exits the well bore at the surface. The gas carries from the formation substantially all of the liquids present in the fracturing area which leaves the formation and well clean and ready for the commencement of production.
To further illustrate the method of the present invention, and not by way of limitation, the following examples are provided.
To illustrate the stability of the liquid-liquid emulsion, the following tests were performed. To 15 milliliters of aqueous fluid in a pressure vessel, 45 milliliters of liquid carbon dioxide is added to form a mixture. The mixture is maintained at a temperature of about 75° F. and a pressure of about 900 psig by nitrogen gas. This mixture is stirred for approximately one minute at 1,000 rpm. The time required for the liquid-liquid emulsion to separate into two layers then is determined. The time required for the separation to occur provides a relative indication of the stability of emulsion.
In the first test, the aqueous fluid in the emulsion comprised water. The emulsion separated into two clear layers in about six seconds.
In the second test, the aqueous fluid comprised a hydrated gelling agent in a ratio of 20 lb. of guar gum per 1,000 gallons of water. The liquid-liquid mixture formed an emulsion which rapidly dissipated to form a cloudy liquid which did not separate further after fifteen minutes.
In the third test, in accordance with the present invention, the aqueous fluid comprised water and a surfactant comprising an ammonium salt of a sulfated linear C12 to C14 alcohol ethoxylated with 3 moles of ethylene oxide in a ratio of 5 gallons surfactant per 1,000 gallons of water. The liquid-liquid mixture formed a fine textured emulsion together with some foam from the apparent entrainment of nitrogen gas utilized to provide the overpressure to maintain the 900 psig pressure. The emulsion and foam had a volume of about 90 milliliters and after 15 minutes has a volume of over about 80 milliliters.
In the fourth test a gelling agent comprising guar gum was added to a mixture comprising the same composition as the third test in a ratio of 20 lb. per 1,000 gallons of water. The liquid-liquid mixture formed a fine textured emulsion together with some foam. The emulsion and foam had a volume of over about 90 milliliters and, after 15 minutes, no apparent separation or reduction in volume occurred.
These tests clearly illustrate the substantial stability of the emulsion formed in accordance with the practice of the present invention. The stability of the foam formed in the tests also is an indication that the foam formed upon heating the carbon dioxide to a temperature above its critical temperature in the subterranean formation will have substantial stability.
A fracturing treatment is performed on a well in the Cotton Valley Sand Formation in Louisiana. The well is perforated at a level of about 6,900 feet. The formation has a permeability of about 1.0 millidarcy and a porosity of about 16 percent. The bottom hole temperature is about 200° F. The treatment was effected by pumping the fracturing fluid through a 27/8 inch tubing string positioned in the well bore.
A prepad of 4,000 gallons of two percent potassium chloride water gelled with 40 pounds of hydroxypropylguar per 1,000 gallons of water is introduced into the formation. The potassium chloride is used as a water treating agent to prevent clay swelling in the formation. A pad of 10,000 gallons of a liquid-liquid emulsion then is introduced into the tubing. The emulsion comprises 70 percent by volume liquid carbon dioxide with the remainder being two percent potassium chloride water together with 40 pounds of hydroxypropylguar and six gallons of an anionic surfactant per 1,000 gallons of water. The surfactant comprises an ammonium salt of a sulfated linear C12 to C14 alcohol ethoxylated with 3 moles of ethylene oxide. Fracturing fluid having the same composition as the pad fluid then is introduced into the tubing together with increasing quantities of a proppant comprising 20/40 mesh sand. A total of 20,000 gallons of emulsion is introduced into the tubing with a sand concentration increasing in four generally equal stages from 1 pound per gallon of emulsion to 4 pounds per gallon. This concentration is achieved by admixing the sand with the gelled 2 percent potassium chloride water in a blender and subsequently admixing the gelled fluid with the liquid carbon dioxide by passage through a "T" connector in the injection pipeline connected to the 27/8-inch tubing string. Thereafter, the tubing is flushed with sufficient gelled 2 percent potassium chloride water similar to the prepad to force the fracturing fluid into the formation.
The emulsion was introduced into the tubing at a rate of about 15 barrels per minute.
The well is shut-in for about 1 to 2 hours, after which it was vented to atmospheric pressure under controlled conditions. The gaseous carbon dioxide is allowed to flow out of the well and in excess of about 80 percent of the water introduced into the formation is returned with the carbon dioxide.
The well prior to the treatment in accordance with the present invention, was producing approximately two barrels of oil per day. After treatment, the well produced in excess of forty barrels of oil per day and after five months is still producing in excess of 30 barrels of oil per day.
A fracturing treatment is performed on a well in the Mancos Formation in Colorado. The well is perforated at a level of about 10,800 feet. The formation has a permeability of about 0.0005 millidarcy. The bottom hole temperature is about 250° F. The treating is effected by pumping the fluids down the annulus between 27/8-inch and 7-inch tubing positioned in the well bore.
A pad comprising a liquid-liquid emulsion comprising 70 percent by volume liquid carbon dioxide with the remainder comprising 2 percent potassium chloride water gelled with 40 pounds of hydroxypropylguar and stabilized with 8 gallons of the surfactant of Example I per 1,000 gallons of water. The fracturing fluid has the same composition as the pad fluid except that a proppant is admixed with the gelled water prior to formation of the liquid-liquid emulsion. The fracturing fluid is cleaned from the well bore with a flush fluid. The flush has the same composition as the pad fluid. The sequence of the fluids and the proppant concentrations are as indicated in the following Table. The proppant comprises sand of either 70/100 mesh or 20/40 mesh on the U.S. Sieve Series.
TABLE______________________________________ Typical Proppant Volume, Rate of Annulus Concen- Prop- (M Pumping, Pressure, tration pantFluid Gallon) (BPM) (PSI) (Lb/Gal) Size______________________________________PAD 30 48 4070 -- --Frac Fluid 10 47 5110 1.5 70/170PAD 20 48 4900 -- --Frac Fluid 20 48 5140 1 20/40Frac Fluid 20 48 5210 2 20/40Frac Fluid 30 47 5360 3 20/40Frac Fluid 30 42 5150 4 20/40Frac Fluid 40 42 5320 5 20/40Frac Fluid 131 38 4950 6 20/40Frac Fluid 131 38 5040 7 20/40Flush 131 38 4310 -- --______________________________________ 1 The liquid carbon dioxide is reduced from 70 percent to 67 percent by volume of the fluid.
The method of the present invention is capable of placing proppant into a formation at a concentration of in excess of 7 pounds per gallon of foam formed in the formation upon conversion of the liquid-liquid emulsion. Following the treatment, the well is shut-in for about 3 hours after which it is vented to the atmosphere. The gaseous carbon dioxide is allowed to flow from the formation and approximately 85 percent of the water introduced into the formation is returned within three days with the carbon dioxide.
Prior to the described treatment, the well was producing less than about 50 MCF of gas per day; and about a month after the treatment, the well stabilized at about 450 MCF of gas per day.
The terms "stable" or "stabilized" as used herein with regard to the emulsions and foams of the present invention means the physical and functional properties of the fluid remain substantially unchanged for a period of time sufficient to permit the described formation treatment to be effected.
While preferred embodiments of the invention have been described herein, changes or modifications in the method may be made by an individual skilled in the art, without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3100528 *||Feb 6, 1961||Aug 13, 1963||Big Three Welding Equipment Co||Methods for using inert gas|
|US3108636 *||May 1, 1961||Oct 29, 1963||Pacific Natural Gas Exploratio||Method and apparatus for fracturing underground earth formations|
|US3195634 *||Aug 9, 1962||Jul 20, 1965||Hill William Armistead||Fracturing process|
|US3310112 *||Mar 9, 1964||Mar 21, 1967||Dow Chemical Co||Well fracturing method|
|US3368627 *||Mar 21, 1966||Feb 13, 1968||Dow Chemical Co||Method of well treatment employing volatile fluid composition|
|US3396107 *||Mar 13, 1964||Aug 6, 1968||Producers Chemical Company||Composition for fracturing process|
|US3448044 *||Feb 15, 1968||Jun 3, 1969||Garrett Donald E||Pressure-foam fractionation|
|US3640344 *||Dec 2, 1968||Feb 8, 1972||Orpha Brandon||Fracturing and scavenging formations with fluids containing liquefiable gases and acidizing agents|
|US3664422 *||Aug 17, 1970||May 23, 1972||Dresser Ind||Well fracturing method employing a liquified gas and propping agents entrained in a fluid|
|US3710865 *||May 24, 1971||Jan 16, 1973||Exxon Research Engineering Co||Method of fracturing subterranean formations using oil-in-water emulsions|
|US3722595 *||Jan 25, 1971||Mar 27, 1973||Exxon Production Research Co||Hydraulic fracturing method|
|US3765488 *||Apr 6, 1972||Oct 16, 1973||Dow Chemical Co||Well treating method|
|US3799266 *||Aug 18, 1972||Mar 26, 1974||Exxon Production Research Co||Fracturing method using acid external emulsions|
|US3842910 *||Oct 4, 1973||Oct 22, 1974||Dow Chemical Co||Well fracturing method using liquefied gas as fracturing fluid|
|US3898165 *||Jun 11, 1973||Aug 5, 1975||Halliburton Co||Compositions for fracturing high temperature well formations|
|US3937283 *||Oct 17, 1974||Feb 10, 1976||The Dow Chemical Company||Formation fracturing with stable foam|
|US3954626 *||Sep 24, 1973||May 4, 1976||The Dow Chemical Company||Well treating composition and method|
|US3954636 *||Aug 30, 1973||May 4, 1976||The Dow Chemical Company||Acidizing fluid for stimulation of subterranean formations|
|US3980136 *||Apr 5, 1974||Sep 14, 1976||Big Three Industries, Inc.||Fracturing well formations using foam|
|US4156464 *||Jun 5, 1978||May 29, 1979||Canadian Fracmaster, Ltd.||Combined fracturing process for stimulation of oil and gas wells|
|US4212354 *||Mar 19, 1979||Jul 15, 1980||Service Fracturing Company and Airry, Inc.||Method for injecting carbon dioxide into a well|
|US4267887 *||Mar 24, 1980||May 19, 1981||Union Oil Company Of California||Method for acidizing high temperature subterranean formations|
|1||Article entitled "Energized Fracturing with 50% CO2 for Improved Hydrocarbon Recovery," Black & Langsford.|
|2||*||Article entitled Energized Fracturing with 50% CO 2 for Improved Hydrocarbon Recovery, Black & Langsford.|
|3||*||Carbon Dioxide A Multipurpose Additive for Effective Well Stimulation Bates No. 0447 0453.|
|4||*||Carbon Dioxide Engineering Bates No. 0420 0446.|
|5||Carbon Dioxide Engineering-Bates No. 0420-0446.|
|6||Carbon Dioxide-A Multipurpose Additive for Effective Well Stimulation-Bates No. 0447-0453.|
|7||*||Complaint, Defendant s Answer and Counterclaim and Plaintiff s reply to the counterclaim filed in Civil Action No. CIV 85 430R, United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.|
|8||Complaint, Defendant's Answer and Counterclaim and Plaintiff's reply to the counterclaim filed in Civil Action No. CIV-85-430R, United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.|
|9||*||Declaration of Lacy Clark Lance.|
|10||*||Halliburton Company Invoice Nos. 033340;033344;116114;186539;613751;618150;714098;715976;715986;716410;820054;820068;820397;820672;959937;900908;048069;069981;070030;194307;490871;731653;820065;822186;860145;909865;586274;956229;961361;994305;068480;085629;183219;715983;924621.|
|11||*||Increase Treatment Benefits with Western s CO 2 Service Bates No. 0454 0457.|
|12||Increase Treatment Benefits with Western's CO2 Service Bates No. 0454-0457.|
|13||*||Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending a Determination Upon Plaintiff s Application for Reissue of the Patent in Suit and Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff s Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending a Determination Upon Plaintiff s Application for Reissue of the Patent in Suit, both filed in Civil Action No. CIV 85 430R, United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.|
|14||Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending a Determination Upon Plaintiff's Application for Reissue of the Patent in Suit and Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending a Determination Upon Plaintiff's Application for Reissue of the Patent in Suit, both filed in Civil Action No. CIV-85-430R, United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.|
|15||*||Plaintiff s Answers to Defendant s First Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents.|
|16||Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's First Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents.|
|17||*||Sand Fracturing with Liquid Carbon Dioxide Bates No. 0798 0805.|
|18||Sand Fracturing with Liquid Carbon Dioxide-Bates No. 0798-0805.|
|19||*||SPE Paper No. 9705, Energized Fracturing with Fifty Percent Carbon Dioxide for Improved Hydrocarbon, Black & Langsford.|
|20||*||Stimulation Proposal ARCO Gas & Oil Co. H.S. Record WN 2 South Eunice Field Sec. 10 T22S R36E Lea Co. NM Bates No. 1133 1157.|
|21||Stimulation Proposal ARCO Oil & Gas Co. McDonald State #30 Lea County, NM, Bates No. 1101-1112.|
|22||*||Stimulation Proposal ARCO Oil & Gas Co. McDonald State 30 Lea County, NM (Bates Nos. 1113 1124).|
|23||*||Stimulation Proposal ARCO Oil & Gas Co. McDonald State 30 Lea County, NM, Bates No. 1101 1112.|
|24||*||Stimulation Proposal ARCO Oil & Gas State F DE 1 Lea County, NM, Bates No. 1184 1190.|
|25||*||Stimulation Proposal ARCO Oil and Gas, State F Lea County, NM, Bates No. 0976 0982.|
|26||Stimulation Proposal-ARCO Gas & Oil Co. H.S. Record WN #2 South Eunice Field Sec. 10-T22S-R36E Lea Co. NM Bates No. 1133-1157.|
|27||Stimulation Proposal-ARCO Oil & Gas Co. McDonald State #30 Lea County, NM (Bates Nos. 1113-1124).|
|28||Stimulation Proposal-ARCO Oil & Gas State "F" DE #1 Lea County, NM, Bates No. 1184-1190.|
|29||Stimulation Proposal-ARCO Oil and Gas, State "F" Lea County, NM, Bates No. 0976-0982.|
|30||*||The Use of Carbon Dioxide in Well Stimulation Work Bates No. 0656 0686.|
|31||The Use of Carbon Dioxide in Well Stimulation Work Bates No. 0656-0686.|
|32||*||Transcript of Deposition of Charles L. Smith, Agent for B. J. Titan, taken on May 8, 1985.|
|33||Transcript of Deposition of Charles L. Smith, Agent for B. J.-Titan, taken on May 8, 1985.|
|34||*||Transcript of Deposition of Phillip C. Harris.|
|35||*||Transcript of Lance taken on Mar. 25, 1985.|
|36||*||Transcript of Lawrence John Harrington taken on Jul. 1, 1985.|
|37||*||Treatment Recommendation for Kansas Nebraska Natural Gas in the Council Grove of the Hugoton Field, Bates No. 0840 0858.|
|38||Treatment Recommendation for Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas in the Council Grove of the Hugoton Field, Bates No. 0840-0858.|
|39||*||Treatment Report (Bates No. 1046).|
|40||*||Treatment Report (Bates Nos. 1058 1062).|
|41||Treatment Report (Bates Nos. 1058-1062).|
|42||*||Treatment Report (Bates Nos. 1191 1194).|
|43||Treatment Report (Bates Nos. 1191-1194).|
|44||*||Treatment Report (Bates Nos. 1195 1196).|
|45||Treatment Report (Bates Nos. 1195-1196).|
|46||*||Treatment Report, Bates No. 0983.|
|47||*||Treatment Report, Bates No. 0988 0992.|
|48||Treatment Report, Bates No. 0988-0992.|
|49||*||Treatment Report, Bates No. 1063.|
|50||*||Treatment Report, Bates No. 1169.|
|51||*||Treatment Report, Bates No. 1170.|
|52||*||Treatment Report, Bates No. 859 861.|
|53||Treatment Report, Bates No. 859-861.|
|54||*||Treatment Reports (Bates Nos. 0984 0987).|
|55||Treatment Reports (Bates Nos. 0984-0987).|
|56||*||Treatment Reports (Bates Nos. 1047 1050).|
|57||Treatment Reports (Bates Nos. 1047-1050).|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5002125 *||Aug 2, 1989||Mar 26, 1991||The Western Company Of North America||Fracturing process using a viscosity stabilized energizing phase|
|US5009797 *||Dec 13, 1989||Apr 23, 1991||Weyerhaeuser Company||Method of supporting fractures in geologic formations and hydraulic fluid composition for same|
|US5069283 *||Aug 2, 1989||Dec 3, 1991||The Western Company Of North America||Fracturing process using carbon dioxide and nitrogen|
|US5271466 *||Oct 30, 1992||Dec 21, 1993||Halliburton Company||Subterranean formation treating with dual delayed crosslinking gelled fluids|
|US5310002 *||Apr 17, 1992||May 10, 1994||Halliburton Company||Gas well treatment compositions and methods|
|US5358046 *||Oct 29, 1993||Oct 25, 1994||Marathon Oil Company||Oil recovery process utilizing a supercritical carbon dioxide emulsion|
|US5360558 *||Sep 28, 1992||Nov 1, 1994||The Western Company Of North America||Slurried polymer foam system and method for the use thereof|
|US5424285 *||Jan 27, 1993||Jun 13, 1995||The Western Company Of North America||Method for reducing deleterious environmental impact of subterranean fracturing processes|
|US5439059 *||Mar 8, 1994||Aug 8, 1995||Halliburton Company||Aqueous gel fluids and methods of treating subterranean formations|
|US5515920 *||Oct 27, 1994||May 14, 1996||Canadian Fracmaster Ltd.||High proppant concentration/high CO2 ratio fracturing system|
|US6260621 *||Sep 28, 2000||Jul 17, 2001||Nor Industries, Inc.||Process for fracing an oil or gas formation|
|US6410489||Dec 29, 1999||Jun 25, 2002||Bj Services Company Canada||Foam-fluid for fracturing subterranean formations|
|US6468945||Dec 29, 1999||Oct 22, 2002||Bj Services Company Canada||Fluids for fracturing subterranean formations|
|US6875728||Oct 30, 2001||Apr 5, 2005||Bj Services Company Canada||Method for fracturing subterranean formations|
|US6966379||Oct 10, 2003||Nov 22, 2005||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Methods of fracturing a subterranean formation using a pH dependent foamed fracturing fluid|
|US6986392||Mar 25, 2003||Jan 17, 2006||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Recyclable foamed fracturing fluids and methods of using the same|
|US7077219||Feb 18, 2005||Jul 18, 2006||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Foamed treatment fluids and associated methods|
|US7201227||Dec 20, 2004||Apr 10, 2007||Bj Services Company||Method and composition for treating a subterranean formation with splittable foams|
|US7205263||Oct 1, 2004||Apr 17, 2007||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Recyclable foamed fracturing fluids and methods of using the same|
|US7261159 *||Jun 14, 2005||Aug 28, 2007||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Perforating method|
|US7507694||Mar 12, 2004||Mar 24, 2009||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Surfactant-free emulsions and methods of use thereof|
|US7562708 *||Apr 12, 2007||Jul 21, 2009||Raytheon Company||Method and apparatus for capture and sequester of carbon dioxide and extraction of energy from large land masses during and after extraction of hydrocarbon fuels or contaminants using energy and critical fluids|
|US8025099 *||Dec 1, 2008||Sep 27, 2011||Gasfrac Energy Services Inc.||Water transfer system|
|US8030252||Apr 22, 2004||Oct 4, 2011||Halliburton Energy Services Inc.||Polymer-based, surfactant-free, emulsions and methods of use thereof|
|US9038725||Jul 10, 2012||May 26, 2015||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Method and system for servicing a wellbore|
|US20040200616 *||Mar 25, 2003||Oct 14, 2004||Jiten Chatterji||Recyclable foamed fracturing fluids and methods of using the same|
|US20050043188 *||Oct 1, 2004||Feb 24, 2005||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Recyclable foamed fracturing fluids and methods of using the same|
|US20050077047 *||Oct 10, 2003||Apr 14, 2005||Jiten Chatterji||Methods of fracturing a subterranean formation using a pH dependent foamed fracturing fluid|
|US20050202977 *||Mar 12, 2004||Sep 15, 2005||Shumway William W.||Surfactant-free emulsions and methods of use thereof|
|US20050202978 *||Apr 22, 2004||Sep 15, 2005||Shumway William W.||Polymer-based, surfactant-free, emulsions and methods of use thereof|
|US20060131021 *||Dec 20, 2004||Jun 22, 2006||Bj Services Company||Method and composition for treating a subterranean formation with splittable foams|
|US20060278392 *||Jun 14, 2005||Dec 14, 2006||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Perforating Method|
|EP0566394A1 *||Apr 15, 1993||Oct 20, 1993||Halliburton Company||Gas well treatment compositions and methods|
|WO1992014907A1 *||Feb 5, 1992||Sep 3, 1992||Western Co Of North America||Slurried polymer foam system and method for the use thereof|
|U.S. Classification||166/308.6, 507/922, 507/254, 507/240, 507/261|
|International Classification||E21B43/267, E21B43/26, C09K8/70|
|Cooperative Classification||E21B43/26, E21B43/267, C09K8/703|
|European Classification||E21B43/267, E21B43/26, C09K8/70B|
|May 5, 1988||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Apr 15, 1992||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|May 3, 1996||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12