|Publication number||USRE32429 E|
|Application number||US 06/593,531|
|Publication date||Jun 2, 1987|
|Filing date||Mar 26, 1984|
|Priority date||Apr 12, 1976|
|Publication number||06593531, 593531, US RE32429 E, US RE32429E, US-E-RE32429, USRE32429 E, USRE32429E|
|Inventors||Marshall L. Spector|
|Original Assignee||Air Products And Chemicals, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (5), Non-Patent Citations (18), Referenced by (68), Classifications (18), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to improvements in the treatment of municipal sewage and/or industrial wastewater by the activated sludge process. It is particularly concerned with the control of operating conditions to enhance selective production and maintenance in the system of a highly active biomass essentially free from filamentous growth, where the attained sludge has favorable settling characteristics and is capable of substantial removal of phosphate values from the incoming wastewater.
2. Prior Art
The activated sludge process has been used for many years for the removal of biological oxygen demand (BOD) from wastewater. This process consists of maintaining an aeration basin in which wastewater is fed to a suspension of microorganisms to form a mixed liquor. The mixed liquor is aerated to furnish oxygen for the respiration of biomass which sorbs, assimilates and metabolizes the biological oxygen demand of the wastewater.
After a suitable period of aeration, the mixed liquor is introduced to a clarifier in which the biomass settles and the treated wastewater overflows into the receiving stream. A major portion of the settled biomass, which is concentrated at the bottom of the clarifier, is recycled to the aeration basin, and a minor portion purged in order to maintain the constant biosolids inventory within the system. This process has been extensively described in the literature and several of its modifications summarized in a special report on "Wastewater Treatment" by R. H. Marks contained in the June 1967 issue of POWER.
Despite the versatility and effectiveness of this process and its many modifications, there remains a major problem. It is the proliferation at times of high surface area and/or filamentous species, such as sphaerotilus, which do not settle adequately in the clarifier. Thus, one consequence of filamentous biomass is the inability to disengage the biomass from the treated wastewater.
Another problem is effectiveness of removal of phosphate values from the wastewater. There have been isolated instances recorded at various cities within the United States, i.e. Los Angeles, Calif.; .[.Tucson, Ariz.;.]. San Antonio, Tex.; and Baltimore, Md., wherein phosphate removal has been observed. The reasons for such removal are obscure and the process has been unable to be extrapolated to biological wastewater treatment plants in general. Thus, to date, there are no reliable or satisfactory methods in which the control of phosphate removal by biological action alone has been generally established.
There have been several modifications of the basic activated sludge process aimed at avoiding filamentous and/or high surface area species which result in a phenomenon known as "bulking". One method is to distribute the influent wastewater to different sections of the aeration basin order to spread out the oxygen demand. Another is to decrease the loading of BOD to the aeration basin. A third is to add poisons to the system in order to selectively kill off the high surface area filaments. Another is to temporarily make the system totally anaerobic and thus kill off the filamentous biomass which is composed largely of obligate aerobes. Another, reported in U.S. Pat. No. 3,864,246, is to maintain a high dissolved oxygen and high steady state BOD level in an initial liquid stage or its hydraulic equivalent in order to promote the selective growth of an active, nonfilamentous biomass which outgrows or precludes the development of filamentous species of higher surface area.
A number of techniques have been proposed in recent years aimed at modification of the conventional activated sludge process to effect or improve removal of nitrogen and/or phosphorous values. Among the various methods disclosed are those including nitrification-denitrification systems, one form of which is that described by Barnard, J. L., Water and Waste Engineering (1974) 33, and subject of South African Pat. No. 7205371. In this process, designated "Bardenpho", four completely mixed activated sludge basins are operated in series followed by a clarifier from which sludge is returned to the first basin. The first and third basins are operated under anoxic conditions, and receive mixed liquor containing nitrates and nitrites (NOx -) from the second and fourth basins in the series which are aerated. While periodic good removal of phosphorus and nitrogen in pilot plant operation is reported, when operating at fairly high influent retention time, the production of a dense, easily filterable sludge is not achieved.
None of the methods heretofore proposed are capable of both avoiding bulking biomass and effecting phosphate removal. It is, therefore, among the objectives of the present invention to provide a process which avoids proliferation of filamentous biomass by promoting the growth of a more desirable species which also is capable of removing phosphate values from influent wastewater. In addition, the process of the invention produces an active, dense biomass which concentrates readily in secondary clarification.
It has now been found that the desired selective production of species which are capable of removing phosphate values and producing a non-bulking biomass population of highly active, dense and rapidly settling microorganisms can be promoted and sustained by strictly maintaining anaerobic conditions during an initial stage where incoming wastewater and recycle sludge from secondary clarification are mixed. The result is that: (1) proliferation of undesired high surface area microorganisms, such as sphaerotilus, is avoided; and (2) substantial quantities of incoming BOD are sorbed from the incoming wastewater by microorganisms which have the capability of doing so under anaerobic conditions. It is hypothesized without being bound thereby, that the energy for active transport of BOD values to within cell walls is derived from hydrolysis of polyphosphates, and that those species most capable of storing polyphosphates will proliferate under these conditions.
The initial anaerobic zone, in accordance with one embodiment, is followed by an oxygenated aerobic zone, where the food sorbed in the anaerobic zone is oxidized, and where any remaining BOD is sorbed and oxidized. During this aerobic stage, the energy lost by hydrolysis of polyphosphates is recouped, and polyphosphate is reformed and stored within the aerated biomass, and phosphate values are thus removed from the mixed liquor.
In accordance with another embodiment, as will hereinafter appear, an anoxic zone for effecting denitrification, is interposed between the anaerobic and the oxygenated aerobic zone.
The nature of storage of phosphorus values within the biomass is such that only minor bleed back of phosphate occurs, thus permitting phosphorus values to be discarded from the system with waste activated sludge.
FIG. 1 of the accompanying drawings is a schematic and diagrammatic side view of a simplified system for practice of the invention; and
FIG. 2 is a similar view of a modified embodiment.
Referring to FIG. 1 of the drawings, a modified activated sludge treating facility is represented, provided with the usual inlet 11 for the wastewater to be treated. Typically, this wastewater is settled sewage from a primary sedimentation tank or clarifier (not shown) but primary sedimentation is not a necessary condition. The influent wastewater initially enters an anaerobic mixing zone A wherein it is stirred and admixed with recycled sludge settled in the sedimentation tank or clarifier 12 and recycled to zone A by line 13. A portion of the settled sludge from clarifier 12 is removed by line 14, while the purified supernatant liquid is sent to receiving streams or reservoirs with or without further treatment as need be.
As indicated, zone A is maintained under strictly anaerobic conditions. The terms "anaerobic" and "anoxic" are not clearly or consistently defined in the literature wherein these terms are used. For the purpose of the present patent application, the term "anaerobic" is defind as the state existing within a sewage treating zone which is substantially free of NOx - (i.e. less than 0.3 ppm and preferably less than 0.2 ppm expressed as elemental nitrogen) wherein conditions are maintained such that the dissolved oxygen concentration (DO) is less than 0.7 ppm and preferably less than 0.4 ppm. The term "anoxic," as employed in the present application, is defined as the condition existing within a sewage treating zone wherein BOD is metabolized by nitrates and/or nitrites in initial total concentrations higher than about 0.5 ppm expressed as nitrogen, and dissolved oxygen is at less than 0.7 ppm, preferably at less than 0.4 ppm.
To assure that zone A is maintained under anaerobic conditions, any one or more of the following steps may be followed. The vessel constituting zone A may be provided with a blanket of nitrogen, carbon dioxide or other inert gas at the liquid surface to avoid access thereto of atmospheric air; or a loose-fitting cover may be provided at or above the liquid surface, or a rigid cover may be provided above the liquid surface. Instead, or in addition thereto, nitrogen purge gas may be admitted into and bubbled up through the mixed liquor in zone A to strip any oxygen present. The latter option is illustrated in FIG. 1 by the line 15 introducing nitrogen into the bottom of zone A.
Wastewater normally contains little or no NOx - due to the reducing power of BOD in the presence of microorganisms in the influent. A potential source of NOx - is from recycle sludge from the secondary clarifier and recycle mixed liquor from the aerobic treatment zone from nitrifying biological systems, i.e. those which effect oxidation of ammoniacal BOD to NOx -.
The concentration of NOx - in the initial section of the anaerobic zone where the recycle sludge is mixed with incoming wastewater is maintained at less than 0.3 and preferably less than 0.2 ppm of NOx -, expressed as elemental nitrogen, by avoiding introduction of mixed liquor from the aerobic zone of the nitrifying system and controlling the NOx - content in the recycle sludge from the clarifier underflow. The NOx - concentration in the sludge recycle may be controlled by providing sufficient residence time in the clarifier and the sludge recycle system to permit adequate reduction of NOx - to elemental nitrogen by the oxygen demand of the biomass in the sludge recycle liquor.
While not necessarily limited thereto, zone A is preferably partitioned into two or more liquid treating sections to afford plug flow of the liquid through the anaerobic zone. It has been found that by the provision of physically partitioned sections or their hydraulic equivalent, there is better assurance of achieving the desired freedom from filamentous growth and thereby attaining development of dense sludge characteristics under even adverse conditions. Such adverse conditions, for example, include operating with low concentrations of BOD wherein high surface area biomass would have an advantage in competing for sorption of a sparse food supply. By liquid staging, bypassing of untreated BOD from the anaerobic zone is precluded.
In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, zone A is shown as partitioned into two sections or chambers 16 and 17, each equipped with stirring means 19. The liquid passes in approximate plug flow through the several sections of zone A and is discharged into an oxygenation zone designated B. While zone A is shown as having two partitioned sections 16 and 17, it will be understood that three or more such sections may be employed.
Zones A and B may be separate interconnected vessels, or a single basin of any desired construction may be utilized, provided with suitable means for partitioning zone A from zone B while permitting unidirectional flow of liquid from zone A to zone B without backmixing. Aeration of the liquid is effected in oxygenated zone B in known manner. Thus, as shown, compressed air may be admitted into the bottom of the oxygenated zone by spargers 20. If desired, instead of, or in addition to spargers, the oxygenated zone may be provided with mechanical aerators. Instead of air, oxygen of any desired purity may be admitted to zone B, in which event suitable means for covering all or part of the zone may be considered.
In practice, the dissolved oxygen content of zone B should be maintained above about 1 ppm and preferably about 2 ppm, to assure adequate oxygen presence for metabolism of BOD and for phosphate uptake.
As illustrated in FIG. 1, zone B is partitioned into two liquid treating sections 26 and 27, although it will be understood that a larger number of such sections may be employed, if desired. One reason for staging is that phosphate uptake is observed to be first order with respect to soluble phosphate concentration; thus low values of phosphate in the effluent are best obtained with a plug flow configuration.
In operating the system illustrated in FIG. 1, it is emphasized that the initial zone of contact and admixture of incoming wastewater with recycled sludge must be maintained under anaerobic conditions. It was unexpectedly found that under such conditions there is selective production of species of microorganisms which not only are capable of removing phosphate values, but that the obtained biomass is made of essentially nonfilamentous organisms producing a highly active, dense and rapidly settling sludge.
Production of filamentous microorganisms which are obligate aerobes is avoided since there proliferation is favored only under aerobic conditions. Under the anaerobic conditions maintained there is promoted the selective production and proliferation of a species of microorganisms capable of storing unusually high amounts of polyphosphate within their cell walls. This is done by permitting those species which are capable of hydrolyzing polyphosphate to provide energy for active transport to do so and, thus, have preferred access to influent BOD. Conversely, those species which would normally sorb food by active transport in which energy is derived from aerobic oxidation of BOD, are rendered relatively noncompetitive. The net effect is to promote proliferation of those species which can store polyphosphate during oxidation and hydrolyze polyphosphate during anaerobic feeding. Conditions which favor such microorganisms also promote relatively low sludge volume indices (Mohlmann), and relatively high zone settling velocities (ZSV). Species which assimilate and oxidize BOD most effectively ultimately dominate the biomass population. Thus, the method of this invention promotes the development of active, nonfilamentous, phosphorus-storing species to the competitive disadvantage of others. These species are capable of storing high amounts of phosphorus and proliferating in the system to the extent that the sludge has been observed to contain 6% phosphate values, expressed as elemental phosphorous on a dry basis. It has been discovered that a substantial portion of BOD is removed from the mixed liquor within the anaerobic stage described above, and further that polyphosphate is hydrolyzed as evidenced by release of soluble phosphate to the mixed liquor in the anaerobic zone.
After the initial anaerobic contact, the mixed liquor is subjected to aeration in zone B, to oxidize sorbed BOD and to complete removal and oxidation of any remaining BOD. During this period of aeration, the energy of oxidation is partially utilized for cell growth and partially utilized to energetically upgrade soluble phosphate values in the mixed liquor to stored polyphosphate within the cells of biomass. This phenomenon is observed in this aerated zone in that the concentration of soluble phosphate is rapidly reduced. After the aerobic stage, which results in both phosphate and BOD removal and stabilization, the mixed liquor can be discharged into the secondary clarifier, wherein the clear supernatant is discharged either to further treatment or directly to receiving waters.
In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, provision is made for denitrification of nitrogen values in the wastewater, while maintaining the desired production of nonfilamentous, dense sludge, with accompanying removal of phosphates, and without excessive extension of the overall treating time required. Thus, three separate treating zones are provided in the illustrated embodiment: an anaerobic zone C, followed by an anoxic zone D, and an aerobic oxygenated zone E. As in the embodiment previously described, the BOD-containing wastewater to be treated enters the modified activated sludge system of FIG. 2 by line 31, wherein it is admixed in initial treating basin or vessel 34 with recycled activated sludge returned from settler or clarifier 32. Vessel 34 is maintained under anaerobic conditions as heretofore defined; that is, precautions are observed to maintain during the initial treating stage in zone C substantially complete absence of dissolved oxygen as in the case of zone A. That is, the dissolved oxygen concentration is maintained below 0.7 ppm and preferably below 0.4 ppm.
In vessel or basin 34, the mixed liquor is stirred under strictly anaerobic conditions to permit as in the previous described embodiment incorporation of BOD values by organisms which are provided by the recycled activated sludge and thus give those species which can effect this transfer a preferential chance to obtain food and thus outgrow other species. Energy for the transfer is provided by the hydrolysis of polyphosphates contained in the biomass of the sludge recycle. In this manner, growth of species which preferentially store phosphate is encouraged. As before, substantial freedom from dissolved oxygen is assured by covering vessel 34 or otherwise preventing access thereto of atmospheric air and/or by stripping the liquor therein by bubbling nitrogen gas therethrough as indicated at 38.
As illustrated in FIG. 2, approximate plug flow is maintained in vessel 34 by partitioning that vessel for staged liquid flow through two or more physically separated or hydraulically distinct liquid stages.
From vessel or chamber 34 the mixed liquor passes into the anoxic treating zone D, represented at 35. This may be a separate vessel or may be part of a continuous treating basin suitably partitioned from the preceding zone C to permit concurrent unidirectional liquid flow without backmixing. Freedom from dissolved oxygen in zone D can be achieved as heretofore described for zone C. In FIG. 2, nitrogen gas is introduced into zone D through line 38 to strip the mixed liquor of any dissolved oxygen and prevent entry of oxygen from the atmosphere. From zone D, the mixed liquor next flows into and through the aerobic oxygenated zone E wherein it is aerated to oxidize BOD, including ammonia values and effect phosphate uptake. The oxidized mixed liquor from E flows into clarifier 32 wherein the supernatant purified liquor is separated from the settling sludge, a portion of the latter being returned in controlled amount to vessel 34 by line 33.
In anoxic zone D, nitrates and nitrites (NOx -) are admitted in concentrations higher than 2 ppm expressed as elemental nitrogen and are reduced to elemental nitrogen and discharged as such. To effect this purpose, a portion of the mixed liquor from the oxygenated zone E is returned to zone D by line 40. These nitrates and nitrites are formed in zone E by oxidation of nitrogen values (considered as ammonia) contained in the influent wastewater which entered the system by line 31. In the oxygenated zone E, the balance of the BOD is metabolized and the ammonia is oxidized to nitrites and ultimately, at least in part, to nitrates. The oxidized mixed liquor from the last stage of zone E is returned to an initial stage of Zone D, wherein the nitrate and nitrite content is brought into contact with incoming BOD. Care must be taken to avoid introduction of NOx - into the anaerobic zone (C).
By operating in accordance with the scheme illustrated in FIG. 2, not only is the selective production of nonfilamentous biomass with desired removal of phosphate obtained as in the embodiment of FIG. 1, but also substantial removal of nitrogenous nutrients is also achieved. Moreover, the desired removal of nitrogen values is effected without substantially prolonging the overall treating time requirements.
The amount of mixed liquor recycled from the oxygenated zone E to the anoxic zone D may, in practical operation, constitute from 100 to 400% of the raw influent volumetric flow entering the system through line 31. The amount of sludge recycled by line 33, as well as in the case of line 13 (FIG. 1), may be in the order of from about 10 to 50%, preferably 20 to 30% of the raw influent.
Oxygenated zone E is operated in substantially the same manner as zone B previously described. The treated liquor is passed from the oxygenated zone (B or E) to the clarifier. To assure good removal of BOD and effective nitrification, the aeration zone should be operated throughout at a minimum D.O. level of 1 ppm and preferably greater than 2 ppm. When higher dissolved oxygen levels at the discharge end of the oxygenated zone are required, they may be imposed without adverse effect on the system.
In the practice of the invention, the mixed liquor is passed in approximate plug flow through the entire treating system constituted by zones A and B in the embodiment of FIG. 1 or zones C, D and E in the embodiment of FIG. 2. It has been observed that the rate of denitrification varies directly with NOx - concentration when such concentration is below about 2 ppm and therefore, a plug flow configuration is preferred to attain low NOx - values in the effluent from zone D. Moreover, in the preferred practice, each of these zones, C, D and E, is operated in liquid staged pattern, each such treating zone being physically partitioned into two or more separate treating stages or their hydraulic equivalent, as determined by residence time distribution via tracer experiments (see Levenspiel, "Chemical Reaction Engineering," John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1962, pages 242-308).
The need for inclusion in the system of an anoxic zone for nitrogen removal will depend upon the content of ammonia values in the influent wastewater and the limitations imposed upon the permissible nitrogen content of the purified water effluent discharged. As a rule, without being necessarily limited thereto, the incorporation of the intermediate anoxic zone is generally indicated whenever the influent wastewater contains in excess of about 10 parts per million of ammonia nitrogen expressed as elemental nitrogen.
A system operating on the principle of the embodiment of FIG. 1 was tested over a period of several months in the treatment of municipal wastewater from Allentwon, Pennsylvania. The system employed an anaerobic zone of 6 liters subdivided by partitions into five equal stages (1.2 liters each) followed by an oxygenated zone of 10 liters subdivided by partitions into five equal stages (2 liters each) into which air was sparged. Nitrogen gas was sparged through the anaerobic zone, which was fitted with a loosely-sealed rigid cover. From the last stage of aeration, the oxidized mixed liquor was passed into a clarifier, from which a portion of the settled sludge was recycled to the initial anaerobic stage, in the amount of about 20% by volume of the wastewater influent. The results reported in Table 1 below are the averages over a period of ten days operation.
It will be seen from the reported results in Table 1 that a desirable sludge volume index was maintained, indicative of a dense, easily settling sludge, while more than 90% removal of phosphate was attained. BOD removal averaged as high as 95% or more.
The sludge retention time in the clarifier and sludge recycle was about 1.7 hours, which was adequate to effect reduction of NOx - from 11.26 ppm as estimated from the clarifier effluent, to 0.18 ppm in the sludge recycle liquor.
TABLE 1______________________________________ In In Fresh In sludge Clarified Influent Recycle Liquid______________________________________MLVSS mg/L 4082COD (filtered) 286influent, mg/LCOD (filtered) 48.88effluent, mg/LBOD5 (filtered) 127.4influent mg/LBOD5 (filtered) 5.72effluent mg/LInfluent detention 2.86time, hrs.Sludge recycle, % 20.73influentNominal residencetimeAnaerobic zone, hrs. 0.89Aeration zone, hrs. 1.48Phosphorus (as P) 6.1 3.85 0.44mg/LNH3 (as N) mg/L 18.35 0.82 0.43NO2 - (as N), mg/L 0.08 0.18 11.26ZSV, ft/hr 6.44SVI, ml/g TSS 69D.O. in anaerobic 0.29-0.32zone, mg/LD.O. in aerobic first 6.41zone, mg/LD.O. in aerobic last 6.16zone, mg/L______________________________________
The content of nitrates and nitrites (measured as NOx - nitrogen) in the five sections of the anaerobic zone remained below 0.16 mg/L. The phosphate concentrations expressed as mg P/L in the ten sections were respectively: 9.35, 12.87, 13.55, 13.63, 13.07, 6.64, 3,65, 1.78, 1.05 and 0.72. These values indicate phosphate release in the first five anaerobic sections and exponential phosphate uptake in the last five aerobic sections.
A system operating in accordance with the flow scheme of FIG. 2 was used in the treatment of municipal wastewater from Allentown, Pennsylvania. The system comprised three separate vessels providing an anaerobic zone (I) of 7.2 liters divided by partitions into three equal chambers of 2.4 liters each; an anoxic zone (II) of 3.6 liters divided by partitions into three equal chambers of 1.2 liters each; and an oxygenated zone (III) of 12 liters divided by partitions into four chambers respectively of 1.2, 2.4, 3.6 and 4.8 liters. Nitrogen gas was admitted to each chamber of the anaerobic and anoxic zones to maintain substantial freedom from oxygen. The mixed liquor from the last chamber of the aeration vessel (III) flowed into a clarifier from which the purified supernatant liquor was withdrawn, while a portion of the settled sludge was recycled to the first chamber of the anaerobic zone, in which it was contacted and mixed with the influent wastewater. The mixer liquor thus passed successively through the system in plug flow and in staged liquid sequence in each of the zones. A portion of the mixed liquor from the last chamber of the oxygenated zone (III) was withdrawn and recycled to the first chamber of the anoxic zone (II). Oxygen was supplied to the oxygenated zone by sparging air through the mixed liquor.
The operating conditions and results are reported in Table 2 below, based on the average over a week of operation.
The sludge retention time in the clarifier and sludge recycle was about 1.4 hours, which was adequate to effect reduction of NOx - from 4.85 ppm, as estimated from the clarifier effluent, to 0.07 ppm in the sludge recycle liquor.
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________ In (III-II) In fresh In sludge In clarified Internal In flow In flow feed recycle liquid Recycle I to II II to III__________________________________________________________________________MLVSS, mg/L 3399COD (unfil) influent, mg/L 258.5COD (fil) influent, mg/L 155.0BOD5 (fil) influent, 42.24(avg.) mg/LBOD5 (fil) effluent 2.07(avg.) mg/LSludge recycle, % influent 30.52Internal Recycle, III to II, 182.9% influentInfluent detention time hrs. 2.95Phosphates as P, mg/L 86.48 3.33 4.13 0.45 1.39 15.34 8.19% removedAmmonia Nitrogen as N, mg/L 97.03 13.51 2.34 0.40 0.69 8.58 4.88% removedNO2 - 61.34ogen as N, mg/L 0.7 0.07 4.85 5.51 0.06 1.29% removedSVI, (avg.) mL/g TSS 154.0SVI, stirred mL/g 51.79Zone Settling Velocity, ft/hr 4.40__________________________________________________________________________
The nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in each of the sections of the system reported in Table 2 is given in Table 3 below, together with the DO levels.
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________ ZONE I ZONE II ZONE IIISection 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10__________________________________________________________________________NO3 -, mg/L 0.05 0.05 0.06 2.1 1.69 1.29 2.23 3.71 5.21 5.51NH3 -- N, mg/L 10.43 10.04 8.58 5.32 5.05 4.88 3.92 2.44 1.16 0.69PO 4 -3 --P, mg/L 10.46 14.11 15.34 10.24 8.49 8.19 6.33 4.53 2.60 1.39DO, mg/L 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.43 0.35 0.43 7.47 7.14 5.29 3.54__________________________________________________________________________
The system provides favorable economics not only resulting from the savings in the cost of chemicals otherwise required to effect desired removal of phosphates, but also from the standpoint of the high rates of wastewater throughput per unit of liquid volume capacity, with excellent removal of BOD and COD values. Thus, even in instances or vicinities in which the phosphate content of the influent wastewater does not pose a problem, the system of the invention offers important economic advantages because of the high throughput rates. Embodiments of the type illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2 attain excellent results when operating on typical municipal wastewaters at an influent detention time in the order of about three hours at about 20° C. A somewhat higher influent detention time may be required in industrial wastewater systems wherein the soluble BOD is in excess of about 150 ppm. Existing activated sludge systems can be readily modified, at low cost, to operate in accordance with either of these embodiments.
Contributing importantly to the economic advantages of systems operating in accordance with the invention is the high density of the clarifier underflow liquid, indicative of good settling velocity and virtual absence of filamentous biomass (confirmed by microscopic examination). Thus, solids concentration in the clarifier underflow of 3.6% volatile suspended solids (VSS) was had in operations according to the invention, whereas conventional systems operate at about or below 1% VSS in the clarifier underflow. The thickened underflow and high zone settling velocities attained thus afford cost advantages even in areas where neither phosphorous removal nor nitrification is required. In addition, the systems of the invention attain reduction of phosphate (as P) in the influent wastewater to 1 ppm or less, reduction of influent BOD to less than 10 ppm, with complete removal of ammonia and reduction in total nitrogen values (as N) to less than 25% of that in the influent.
The system described in FIG. 2 may also be desirable where neither phosphate removal nor nitrification is required, because of the good sludge properties obtained. Another factor contributing to the advantages of the system is the savings in oxygen requirements where nitrification is required, since the oxygen in NOx - effects metabolism of BOD in the anoxic zone. Further, reduction of NOx - values in the mixed liquor entering the clarifier minimizes the release of nitrogen at that point. Thus, "floating sludge," caused by nitrogen release in the clarifier, commonly observed in nitrification effluents, is avoided.
The systems described in FIGS. 1 and 2 also have the advantage of producing a biomass that contains up to 6% or more of phosphorus by weight. Thus, a method is provided wherein a high phosphorus content can be attained. This may be advantageous for industrial use. An obvious application is enhanced fertilizer quality of waste biomass.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3764523 *||May 1, 1972||Oct 9, 1973||Union Carbide Corp||Nitrification of bod-containing water|
|US3939068 *||Feb 4, 1975||Feb 17, 1976||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Process for treating waste water containing cellulose nitrate particles|
|US3953327 *||Aug 29, 1974||Apr 27, 1976||Central Contra Costa Sanitary District||Sewage treatment process|
|US3964998 *||Apr 9, 1975||Jun 22, 1976||The South African Inventions Development Corporation||Improvements in and relating to waste water treatment|
|US3994802 *||Apr 16, 1975||Nov 30, 1976||Air Products And Chemicals, Inc.||Removal of BOD and nitrogenous pollutants from wastewaters|
|1||Barnard, "A Review of Biological Phosphorus Removal in the Activated Sludge Process," Water SA, vol. 2, No. 3, Jul. 1976.|
|2||Barnard, "Biological Phosphorus Removal in the Activated Sludge Process-Review and Proposals," Monthly Meeting of Institute of Water Pollution Control (SA Branch), Johannesburg, South Africa, Jul. 1975.|
|3||*||Barnard, A Review of Biological Phosphorus Removal in the Activated Sludge Process, Water SA, vol. 2, No. 3, Jul. 1976.|
|4||*||Barnard, Biological Phosphorus Removal in the Activated Sludge Process Review and Proposals, Monthly Meeting of Institute of Water Pollution Control (SA Branch), Johannesburg, South Africa, Jul. 1975.|
|5||Eckenfelder et al, "Progress in Water Technology, vol. I-Applications of New Concepts of Physical-Chemical Wastewater Treatment," Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn., Sep. 18-22, 1972.|
|6||*||Eckenfelder et al, Progress in Water Technology, vol. I Applications of New Concepts of Physical Chemical Wastewater Treatment, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn., Sep. 18 22, 1972.|
|7||Levin et al, "Metabolic Uptake of Phosphorus by Wastewater Organisms," J.W.P.C.F., vol. 37, No. 6, Jun. 1965, pp. 800-821.|
|8||*||Levin et al, Metabolic Uptake of Phosphorus by Wastewater Organisms, J.W.P.C.F., vol. 37, No. 6, Jun. 1965, pp. 800 821.|
|9||Martin et al., "Kinetics of Enhanced Phosphorus Removal in the Activated Sludge Process," University of Cape Town, Sep. 1975.|
|10||*||Martin et al., Kinetics of Enhanced Phosphorus Removal in the Activated Sludge Process, University of Cape Town, Sep. 1975.|
|11||McLaren et al., "Effective Phosphorus Removal from Sewage by Biological Means," Water SA, vol. 2, No. 1, Jan. 1976.|
|12||*||McLaren et al., Effective Phosphorus Removal from Sewage by Biological Means, Water SA, vol. 2, No. 1, Jan. 1976.|
|13||Milbury et al, "Effect of Dissolved Oxygen on Phosphorus Removal in Municipal Activated Sludge Treatment," Chem. Eng. Prog. Symposium Series, Water-1970, vol. 67, No. 107.|
|14||*||Milbury et al, Effect of Dissolved Oxygen on Phosphorus Removal in Municipal Activated Sludge Treatment, Chem. Eng. Prog. Symposium Series, Water 1970, vol. 67, No. 107.|
|15||Nicholls, "Full Scale Experimentation on the New Johannesburg Extended Aeration Plants," Water SA, vol. 1, No. 3, Oct. 1975.|
|16||Nicholls, "Workshop on New Aspects of Biological Treatment," Presented by Abwassertechnische Vereinigung, etc., Pretoria, South Africa, Feb. 24-26, 1975.|
|17||*||Nicholls, Full Scale Experimentation on the New Johannesburg Extended Aeration Plants, Water SA, vol. 1, No. 3, Oct. 1975.|
|18||*||Nicholls, Workshop on New Aspects of Biological Treatment, Presented by Abwassertechnische Vereinigung, etc., Pretoria, South Africa, Feb. 24 26, 1975.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5213681 *||Sep 9, 1991||May 25, 1993||T. Kruger, Inc.||Method for biologically removing nitrogen from wastewater|
|US5246585 *||Dec 9, 1992||Sep 21, 1993||Pieter Gerhard Jacobus Meiring & Water Research Commossion||Treatment of wastewater|
|US5248422 *||May 28, 1992||Sep 28, 1993||Neu Kenneth E||Process for treating wastewater to remove BOD and nutrients|
|US5288405 *||Jan 27, 1993||Feb 22, 1994||Piedmont Olsen Hensley, Inc.||Wastewater treatment with enhanced biological phosphorus removal and related purification processes|
|US5603833 *||Jan 13, 1995||Feb 18, 1997||Miller; Stanley D.||Biological removal of phosphorus and nitrogen from wastewater using a stressed contact zone and a luxury contact zone|
|US6214228 *||Sep 5, 1997||Apr 10, 2001||Kvaerner Technology & Research Limited||Liquid effluent treatment plant and process|
|US6235196 *||Oct 13, 1998||May 22, 2001||Alliedsignal Inc.||Biological wastewater treatment system|
|US6328892||Mar 16, 1999||Dec 11, 2001||Kvaerner Technology & Research Limited||Liquid effluent treatment process and plant|
|US6555002 *||Oct 5, 2001||Apr 29, 2003||Premier Wastwater International, Llc||Apparatus and method for wastewater treatment with enhanced solids reduction (ESR)|
|US6565750||Aug 31, 2001||May 20, 2003||O'brien & Gere Engineers, Inc.||Trickling filter system for biological nutrient removal|
|US6592757 *||Jan 30, 2001||Jul 15, 2003||O'brien & Gere Engineers, Inc.||Selector contact stabilization process and apparatus for wastewater treatment|
|US6605220 *||Nov 8, 2002||Aug 12, 2003||Premier Wastewater International, Inc.||Apparatus and method for wastewater treatment with enhanced solids reduction (ESR)|
|US6613229 *||Feb 16, 2001||Sep 2, 2003||Wastewater Technology, Inc.||Waste treatment method and apparatus with denitrification chamber|
|US6620322 *||Jun 21, 2002||Sep 16, 2003||Smith & Vesio Llc||Apparatus and methods for purifying a waste influent material|
|US6660163 *||Mar 2, 2001||Dec 9, 2003||Daniel Robert Miklos||Waste treatment with control over biological solids|
|US6676836 *||Apr 19, 2002||Jan 13, 2004||Mikkel G. Mandt||Surge anoxic mix sequencing batch reactor systems|
|US6706185||May 22, 2002||Mar 16, 2004||Kurita Water Industries Ltd.||Biological method of phosphorus removal and biological phosphorus-removing apparatus|
|US6830689||May 5, 2003||Dec 14, 2004||United States Filter Corporation||Process for removing phosphorus from wastewater utilizing a triple basin wastewater treatment system|
|US6833074||Sep 9, 2003||Dec 21, 2004||Daniel Robert Miklos||Waste treatment with control over biological solids|
|US6921486 *||Nov 14, 2002||Jul 26, 2005||Stephen Hough||Waste activated sludge anaerobic contact waste stream treatment process|
|US6982036||May 24, 2004||Jan 3, 2006||Ch2M Hill, Inc.||Chemically enhanced primary sludge fermentation method|
|US7001516||Nov 5, 2004||Feb 21, 2006||United States Filter Corporation||Process for removing phosphorus from wastewater utilizing a triple basin wastewater treatment system|
|US7105091||Nov 10, 2004||Sep 12, 2006||Advanced Treatment Sciences, Inc.||Waste treatment with control over biological solids|
|US7270750||Apr 7, 2006||Sep 18, 2007||Ecofluid Systems, Inc.||Clarifier recycle system design for use in wastewater treatment system|
|US7344643||Jun 30, 2005||Mar 18, 2008||Siemens Water Technologies Holding Corp.||Process to enhance phosphorus removal for activated sludge wastewater treatment systems|
|US7473364||Mar 7, 2007||Jan 6, 2009||Siemens Water Technologies Corp.||Multivalent metal ion management for low sludge processes|
|US7569147||Aug 31, 2006||Aug 4, 2009||Siemens Water Technologies Corp.||Screening of inert solids from a low-yield wastewater treatment process|
|US7569148||Aug 23, 2007||Aug 4, 2009||Siemens Water Technologies Corp.||Continuous membrane filtration and solids reduction|
|US7927493||May 12, 2008||Apr 19, 2011||Ch2M Hill, Inc.||Low phosphorus water treatment methods|
|US7931808||Jun 9, 2009||Apr 26, 2011||Siemens Water Technologies Corp.||Sequencing batch reactor with continuous membrane filtration and solids reduction|
|US7972507 *||Feb 21, 2008||Jul 5, 2011||Kwang Hoe Choi||Advanced wastewater treatment process using up and down aerobic/anaerobic reactors of channel type|
|US8105490||Apr 15, 2011||Jan 31, 2012||Ch2M Hill, Inc.||Low phosphorus water treatment systems|
|US8246829||May 8, 2008||Aug 21, 2012||O'regan Jr Patrick T||Systems and methods for water treatment and remediation|
|US8454830||Dec 8, 2009||Jun 4, 2013||Siemens Industry, Inc.||Apparatus and methods for control of waste treatment processes|
|US8623213||Mar 27, 2009||Jan 7, 2014||Siemens Water Technologies Llc||Hybrid aerobic and anaerobic wastewater and sludge treatment systems and methods|
|US8685247||Dec 2, 2010||Apr 1, 2014||Evoqua Water Technologies Llc||Systems and methods for nutrient removal in biological treatment systems|
|US8721887||Dec 7, 2010||May 13, 2014||Ch2M Hill, Inc.||Method and system for treating wastewater|
|US8801931||Sep 20, 2013||Aug 12, 2014||Evoqua Water Technologies Llc||Hybrid aerobic and anaerobic wastewater and sludge treatment systems and methods|
|US8808544||Aug 16, 2011||Aug 19, 2014||Evoqua Water Technologies Llc||Contact-stabilization/prime-float hybrid|
|US8845900||May 31, 2013||Sep 30, 2014||Evoqua Water Technologies Llc||Apparatus and methods for control of waste treatment processes|
|US8894855||Sep 20, 2013||Nov 25, 2014||Evoqua Water Technologies Llc||Hybrid aerobic and anaerobic wastewater and sludge treatment systems and methods|
|US8894856||Feb 24, 2011||Nov 25, 2014||Evoqua Water Technologies Llc||Hybrid aerobic and anaerobic wastewater and sludge treatment systems and methods|
|US8894857||Apr 21, 2011||Nov 25, 2014||Evoqua Water Technologies Llc||Methods and systems for treating wastewater|
|US9359236||May 2, 2014||Jun 7, 2016||Evoqua Water Technologies Llc||Enhanced biosorption of wastewater organics using dissolved air flotation with solids recycle|
|US9359238||Sep 20, 2013||Jun 7, 2016||Evoqua Water Technologies Llc||Hybrid aerobic and anaerobic wastewater and sludge treatment systems and methods|
|US9359239||May 12, 2014||Jun 7, 2016||Evoqua Water Technologies Llc||Hybrid aerobic and anaerobic wastewater and sludge treatment systems and methods|
|US20010045382 *||Jan 30, 2001||Nov 29, 2001||Nasr Sami M.||Selector contact stabilization process and apparatus for wastewater treatment|
|US20020040871 *||Oct 5, 2001||Apr 11, 2002||Premier Wastewater International, Llc.||Apparatus and method for wastewater treatment with enhanced solids reduction (ESR)|
|US20030136731 *||Apr 19, 2002||Jul 24, 2003||Mandt Mikkel G.||Surge anoxic mix sequencing batch reactor system|
|US20030173292 *||Mar 2, 2001||Sep 18, 2003||Miklos Daniel R.||Waste treatment with control over biological solids|
|US20040045898 *||Sep 9, 2003||Mar 11, 2004||Daniel Miklos||Waste treatment with control over solids|
|US20040094475 *||Nov 14, 2002||May 20, 2004||Stephen Hough||Waste activated sludge anaerobic contact waste stream treatment process|
|US20040222150 *||May 5, 2003||Nov 11, 2004||Hong Sun-Nan||Process for removing phosphorus from wastewater utilizing a triple basin wastewater treatment system|
|US20060027495 *||Aug 5, 2004||Feb 9, 2006||Hough Stephen G||Waste activated sludge anaerobic contact waste stream treatment process-recycle|
|US20060254966 *||Apr 7, 2006||Nov 16, 2006||Galland Karel V||Clarifier recycle system design for use in wastewater treatment system|
|US20070000836 *||Jun 30, 2005||Jan 4, 2007||Usfilter Corporation||Process to enhance phosphorus removal for activated sludge wastewater treatment systems|
|US20080240175 *||Sep 26, 2006||Oct 2, 2008||Bookham Technology Plc||Bragg Grating Reflection Strength Control|
|US20080302723 *||May 12, 2008||Dec 11, 2008||Ch2M Hill, Inc.||Low phosphorous water treatment methods and systems|
|US20090261027 *||Jun 9, 2009||Oct 22, 2009||Siemens Water Technologies Corp.||Sequencing batch reactor with continuous membrane filtration and solids reduction|
|US20100084337 *||Dec 8, 2009||Apr 8, 2010||Daniel Robert Miklos||Apparatus and methods for control of waste treatment processes|
|US20100101995 *||Feb 21, 2008||Apr 29, 2010||Kwang Hoe Choi||Advanced wastewater treatment process using up & down aerobic/anaerobic reactors of channel type|
|US20110089105 *||Mar 27, 2009||Apr 21, 2011||Siemens Water Technologies Corp.||Hybrid aerobic and anaerobic wastewater and sludge treatment systems and methods|
|US20110132836 *||Dec 2, 2010||Jun 9, 2011||Siemens Water Technologies Corp.||Systems and methods for nutrient removal in biological treatment systems|
|US20110203992 *||Feb 24, 2011||Aug 25, 2011||Siemens Water Technologies Corp.||Hybrid aerobic and anaerobic wastewater and sludge treatment systems and methods|
|US20110210049 *||Nov 2, 2009||Sep 1, 2011||O'regan Jr Patrick T||Water treatment systems with communication network links and methods|
|USRE45478||May 22, 2012||Apr 21, 2015||Evoqua Water Technologies Llc||Waste treatment with control over biological solids|
|EP0458760A1 *||May 10, 1991||Nov 27, 1991||FOSFLEX s.r.l.||A process and plant for the biological purification of sewage|
|WO2004000737A1 *||Jun 13, 2003||Dec 31, 2003||Smith & Vesio Llc||Apparatus and methods for purifying a waste influent material|
|U.S. Classification||210/605, 210/903, 210/630, 210/629, 210/623, 210/906|
|International Classification||C02F3/30, C02F3/34, C02F3/12|
|Cooperative Classification||C02F3/34, C02F3/1215, C02F3/308, C02F3/30, Y02W10/15|
|European Classification||C02F3/12A4, C02F3/30F, C02F3/34, C02F3/30|
|Mar 8, 1988||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Jun 17, 1991||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: I. KRUGER INC., A CORPORATION OF IL, ILLINOIS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:005732/0552
Effective date: 19910531