|Publication number||USRE32905 E|
|Application number||US 07/229,737|
|Publication date||Apr 11, 1989|
|Filing date||Aug 3, 1988|
|Priority date||Oct 20, 1980|
|Publication number||07229737, 229737, US RE32905 E, US RE32905E, US-E-RE32905, USRE32905 E, USRE32905E|
|Original Assignee||Equatorial Communications Company|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (9), Non-Patent Citations (200), Referenced by (109), Classifications (7), Legal Events (6)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
.Iadd.This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 795,868, filed Nov. 7, 1985, now abandoned, which is a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 4,555,651..Iaddend.
Reference is made to my related Disclosure Document No. 82,906 filed July 25, 1979 in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
There is a widespread belief in the satellite communications industry that it is impossible to receive a useable signal from the typical communications satellite (broadcasting at 4 GHz with orbital spacing of 4 degrees) using small diameter (on the order of 2 feet) dish antennas and receivers having average noise figure (on the order of 2 dB).
Two primary problems and a host of minor problems give support to this view. The lack of directivity of small diameter antennas is one significant problem. Typically, geostationary satellites are spaced in orbits 4 degrees apart. The 9 degree half-power beamwidth of the typical 2 foot dish antenna at 4 GHz results in the reception of signals from adjacent satellites as well as the satellite of interest. The 9 degree beamwidth also results in a lower antenna gain at the desired frequency than that available with large diameter dishes. For example, a 2 foot dish at 4 GHz has an antenna gain of around 26 dB, while a 16 foot dish has an antenna gain of around 44 dB. At 4 GHz an antenna gain of 26 dB is too low to permit satisfactory detection of standard radio transmissions.
The second problem is the limit imposed by official regulatory bodies such as the United States' Federal Communications Commission (FCC), on satellite signal flux densities incident on the earth's surface in order to protect terrestrial communications links. When standard satellite modulation techniques (e.g. QPSK, FSK, BPSK, or PCM) are used at the permitted levels the signal level received when using a 2 foot dish antenna is far below the receiver thermal noise floor.
Other problems include the high cost of a system capable of handling a variety of data rates, intermittently used by any one of a large number of users, all requiring quick access time. Additionally, use of small modulation bandwidths, i.e. low data rates, may result in obliteration of data by such effects as carrier drift and phase and amplitude noise.
In the past, efforts to overcome these problems have focused on antenna or receiver design. The larger the antenna diameter, the larger the signal collecting area, therefore, the lower the signal levels which may be satisfactorily received. However, with increased antenna size, there is a corresponding cost increase. Likewise, development of precision antennas (i.e., antennas having precise shape, diameter and surface characteristics at the intended operating frequency) enhances antenna performance but also raises system costs. Focus in receiver design has been directed toward obtaining low noise contribution, also resulting in higher system costs.
The present invention solves the above problems by use of novel apparatus employing spread spectrum techniques as a means to enhance the effective gain and selectivity of the system without resort to the above special antenna designs or extra low noise figure receivers.
Spread spectrum techniques, as used in the invention, permit data signals to be extracted from the noise using small diameter antennas. In the present invention the system transmits a binary stream of data: a binary one is represented by a first sequence of binary states or elements called chips, a binary zero is represented by a second sequence of chips. The basic unit of data (in this case the data bit) is constructed from not one signal condition at a point in time but, instead, from a specific sequence of signal conditions or elements over a period of time. Hence, a single bit of information is spread or converted into a spectrum of signal conditions or elements (hereinafter referred to as the "spreading signal"). The spreading signal is at a frequency much greater than the data frequency or rate. The spreading signal has a specified length in time. Each cycle of the spreading signal waveform during that period corresponds to an element of the spreading signal. Each element may take on one of two different states. Therefore, a spreading signal comprises a corresponding number of elements, each having a specified state.
Data are, therefore, transmitted in spread spectrum format by using one spectrum of elements (or spreading signal) to represent a ones bit, and a different spectrum of elements (or spreading signal) to represent a zeros bit. For example, a ones bit may be represented by a first binary sequence of elements, and a zeros bit represented by a different second binary sequence of elements.
Another view of this process is to operate on each data bit before transmitting using a given pattern of inversions, the pattern being known to the receiver equipment. Thus, each bit can be transformed or "chipped" into smaller time increments, each increment having a frequency spectrum that is spread much wider in frequency than the original data bit.
In the preferred embodiments, the above spread signal is relayed via geostationary satellite to a remote station, where it is compared against a local reference. The local reference is the same spreading signal that was used at the transmitting station to place the data in the spread spectrum format While the invention is described in connection with an earth satellite communications system, it will be appreciated that the principles of the invention are applicable to other power limited communications systems, including terrestrial microwave systems, for example.
The above comparison process is called "despreading." Despreading may be performed before or after demodulation. When the proper spreading signal is present in the received waveform, a data bit is recovered by the remote station receiver.
In the despreading operation, the elements of the local reference are compared against the corresponding positions in the received waveform where the spreading signal elements, if present, should be. For each match of a local reference element with a spreading signal element in the received waveform, there is obtained what will hereinafter be referred to as a "despread signal component." Random noise will also be present.
When these despread signal components and noise are summed (or integrated) over the spreading signal time period, a total "energy level" is obtained which reflects the degree to which the received waveform matches the local reference. The higher the energy level, the closer the match and vice versa. In other words, instead of an element-by-element detection process, an energy detection is performed by integrating the ensemble of element matches and mis-matches obtained over the time period of the spreading signal. A decision whether a data bit has been received is then based on the above-received energy level. Note that upon integration, the random noise present will average out. Hence, the despread signal component is enhanced while the noise component is reduced. This is known in the spread spectrum art as process gain and is defined as equaling BWRF 34 RINFOR where BWRF equals the bandwidth of the transmitted signal, determined by the frequency of the spreading signal, and RINFOR equals the frequency of the data.
In the preferred embodiments of the invention the spreading signal comprises a pair or more of selected binary sequences or codes having a specific number and sequence of elements called "chips", each chip corresponding to a "one" or "zero" state within the spreading signal. Each sequence of chips corresponds to a one or a zero within the data being transmitted. The signal conditions which implement the "chip" states may take the form of any of the various standard satellite modulation formats (e.g. Quadriphase Shift Keying (QPSK), Frequency Shift Keying (FSK), or Pulse Code Modulation (PCM)). In the preferred embodiments Binary Phase Shift Keying (BPSK) is used. As such, the phase of the carrier is unaltered or is shifted by 180 degrees depending upon the chip state being sent.
For purposes of illustration assume that the spreading signal is a sequence of one's and zero's 256 elements in length. Each element is called a chip. In the invention, the chips of the spreading code (signal) are transmitted by shifts in carrier phase: one phase state for a chip corresponding to a ones state and another phase state for a chip corresponding to a zeros state. The data to be sent are therefore spread, bit by bit, using the 256 chip spreading code sequence. The spread data are then transmitted, chip-by-chip, to the receiving station. At the receiving station the received transmission is despread and demodulated.
In a noise-free system, for each bit of information spread and transmitted, all 256 chips will be correctly received. Therefore, when on the receiving end the total energy level corresponding to a perfect match is received within the code period, it can be said, to a certainty, that a bit of information was transmitted and has been received. However, in the typical small dish antenna system the typically low signal levels present prevent all of the transmitted chips from being correctly received, which in turn precludes a perfect match. The decision of whether a bit has been transmitted is based on a total integrated energy level of all of the chips which were used to spread the bit. A decision based on noise-corrupted information has associated with it a parameter called the bit error rate. The bit error rate is defined as the probability that a bit was not correctly received. The bit error rate for a given power level may be selected as a function of the number of chips per bit. The invention uses statistical or averaging techniques to make bit, byte (group of bits), and frame (group of bytes) decisions to achieve desired bit error rates and does not require that all chips for each code be correctly received before a "bit received" decision is made. The number of chips used to spread each bit affects the bit error rate, as does conditioning a bit received indication upon the tentative reception of a minimum energy level. By varying the above decision thresholds, characteristics and other parameters, a choice of bit error rates may be achieved for each size of receiving antenna.
In the present invention a trade-off between satellite bandwidth and earth station antenna size is permitted to allow a user population of remote ground stations to operate with different data rates and antenna sizes by varying the number of chips per bit. The longer the code length, the greater the number of chips or energy level upon which the decision may be made. Likewise, by requiring that a minimum number of bits be received before treating the already-received bits in a byte as valid, the bit error rate may be further enhanced. Thus it may be seen that in the present invention the choice of the number of chips per bit, number of codes used, thresholds of bit decisions, and the degree of correlation between the codes all combine to permit a variety of data rates and antenna sizes, including very small antennas, to be included in the same flexible network and to avoid interference to or from other satellites or earth stations.
The spreading of the transmitted signal minimizes interference into other systems. The despreading of the received signal minimizes interference into the system described in the present invention. Given these interference properties the size of the earth station antenna may be made arbitrarily small by making the code length arbitrarily long.
The spreading of the data in the time domain dictates that the examination of the received signal at the receiving end be synchronized in time. In other words the matching or despreading of the received signal with the local reference code must coincide by chip (i.e. timing with respect to each phase change), by bit (i.e. timing of the start and end of the spreading code sequence), by byte (i.e. timing of the grouping of the transmitted bits); by frame (i.e. timing of the grouping of the transmitted bytes), and so on. Otherwise, where time synchronization is not maintained the signal components which contribute to the threshold levels looked for will be severely degraded or nonexistent. When the system is in time synchronization, the transitions of the receiver internal clock (which controls the timing of the reference code) coincide with the phase transitions of the received signal, the start of a spreading code coincides with the start of the reference code, and so on.
The process of spreading the data unit being transmitted allows a receiver to reject all those signals which are not in the proper spread format. In this manner, signals from adjacent satellites may be rejected by the small antenna receiving station. According to the literature, the level (M) of an interfering signal which the spread spectrum receiver may successfully reject is calculated as follows. Given a minimum signal to noise ratio required at the output of despreading portion of the receiver=(S/N)out, a process gain of Gp, and system losses=Lsys :
M=Gp -(Lsys +(S/N)out).
For example, a system having Gp =36 dB, Lsys =2 dB, and (S/N)out =10 dB, would have an interference margin M=24 dB. Thus a significant level of interference may be rejected by a spread spectrum system, provided that enough chips per bit are used, thereby effectively compensating for the wide beamwidth of a small diameter antenna. In this example, Gp of 36 dB requires approximately 4000 chips per bit.
The above benefits of spread spectrum process gain are dependent upon the orthogonality or near orthogonality between the interfering signal and the desired signal. Orthogonally occurs when there is no agreement (or cross correlation) between two signals. Where cross correlation is significant, system performance will be degraded.
Another view of the effect of spread spectrum techniques upon the desired signal and interfering signal is that spread spectrum maps a narrow bandwidth signal into a wide bandwidth. When such spread signal is despread by the same spreading code the original narrow bandwidth signal is recovered. Since any interference present at this despreading is not in proper spread form, it will be mapped into a wide bandwidth. Hence, the wide bandwidth interference may be removed and the narrow bandwidth desired signal retained, by using a sufficiently narrow bandpass filter.
In accordance with the teachings of the present invention, the problems in providing low-cost satellite ground stations employing small antennas are overcome by the discovery that spread spectrum techniques can be effectively applied to satellite communications systems. The invention recognizes that such systems are power limited rather than bandwidth limited and thereby trades off bandwidth for simplicity and low-cost in the ground stations, thereby making practical a small antenna earth station.
In the preferred embodiments of the invention, the spreading codes may take on the followiong characteristics. A unique set of codes may be assigned to each class of receivers. A class might include all receivers serving subscribers to a new service, or receivers serving a brokerage network.
Within each set of codes one code corresponds to a ones bit while a different code (which may be the inverse of the ones code) corresponds to a zeros bit.
A single sync code may be used for all classes of receivers if warranted. The sync signal is used to maintain all receivers in time synchronization.
The length and composition of each code is selected for minimum cross correlation among the various codes for the different classes of receivers. Code length is also a function of the sensitivity of the particular receiving station.
In each code sequence, for best results, the number of chips having a ones state is approximately equal to the number having a zeros state. Typically, chips are related to the bandwidth of the spread spectrum signal and to the data rate as follows. Chip frequency equals internal receiver clock frequency. Clock frequency equals the maximum rate at which the spreading code BPSK modulates the transmitted signal. Bandwidth of the transmitted spread spectrum signal equals approximately twice the chip frequency depending on shaping applied. If the chip rate is chosen to be fixed, the data rate is determined by the number of chips in the spreading code:
chip rate÷number of chips per bit=data rate.
In summary, spread spectrum techniques are used in the invention to first spread a lower frequency data signal (narrow bandwidth) into a higher frequency spread signal (wide bandwidth). This spread signal is used to BPSK modulate the carrier frequency which is then relayed to remote stations through a geostationary satellite. These remote stations have differing receiving capabilities which include small or portable dish antenna systems. Each remote station has a reference code unique to the class of stations to which it belongs. Such code is used to despread the incoming signal, resulting in the rejection of all but that data intended for the particular station. The despread data are then conveyed to the user.
The invention comprises two related communications systems: a one-way transmission network, and a two-way transmission network. The one-way system entails a transmission by a sending-station to one or more receiving stations via geostationary satellite. See FIG. 1. There is a one-way flow of information, with the sending-central station 14 transmitting a time division multiplexed (TDM) spread spectrum signal 2 to the geostationary satellite 3 which then relays the signal 12 to the receiving-remote stations (only three such stations are shown in FIG 1 as an example, in practice the number may be much larger) 4. Unlike standard TDM, the time division format used in the invention transmits data on a "next available time slot" basis. For each class of receiving-remote stations 4 there is a unique code set assigned.
The two-way transmission network, see FIG. 2, involves a two-way flow of information. This involves a doublehop transmission, i.e., two transmissions through the satellite: one remote station 4A communicates with another remote station 4 by transmission 22, 23 via satellite 3 to a central station 14 which then retransmits 2, 12 via the same satellite 3 to the desired remote station 4. It will be noted that the same satellite is employed in different frequency bands for the inbound and outbound links. Also, it will be appreciated that a particular site will typically have a transmitter station 4A and a receiving station 4. Also, as in FIG. 1, while only two stations 4 and 4A, respectively, are shown, in practice there can be a very large number of such stations. The antenna 21 is also a small antenna such as antenna 5 described in connection with receiving stations 4. In practice, two antennas or a single antenna with a diplexer can be used, or a single antenna may be switched between transmitting and receiving modes.
Due to the FCC requirement that earth transmissions to a particular satellite may not interfere with adjacent satellite positions, a minimum antenna diameter is required for the remote station"transmitting" antennas 21. For example, for a transmitting frequency of 6 GHz, a minimum antenna diameter of four feet may be required to prevent interference with adjacent satellites.
The retransmission 2, 12, or "out-bound" link, is the one-way transmission system described previously, see FIG. 1. The first transmission links 22, 23, or "inbound" links, are code division multiplexed (CDM) spread spectrum signals, in which each signal is one of a pair of coded sequences of chips with one member of the pair representing ones bits and the other zeros bits. Each inbound transmitter station has a different pair of sequences (codes). The central station 14 in the two-way network differs from that in the one-way network in that it has the additional capability of receiving and despreading CDM spread spectrum signals transmitted by the remote stations 4A via the satellite 3. In order to do this the central station 14 maintains a bank of receives 273, see FIG. 3, through which are circulated the CDM reference codes for all remote stations 4, 4A in the system.
The use of CDM in the inbound link permits a large number of mutually unsynchronized remote stations to access the same transmission channel. The CDM technique as employed in the inbound link is necessary because of the lack of coordination among the remote transmitting stations 4A. Use of CDM in the inbound link has the advantage of permitting a remote station 4A to transmit intermittently, continuously, or at some other rate without affecting the timing or characteristics of the transmissions from other remote stations.
The spreading codes used in the inbound link 22, 23 and the outbound link 2, 12 differ. The outbound codes are shorter in length and are unique to a class of remote stations. Stations within a class are differentiated by minimal addressing within the bit stream. The inbound codes are significantly longer and are unique to individual remote stations. Among the reasons for a longer inbound code are: (1) the need for a higher processing gain to compensate for the low signal levels which result when a small diameter antenna 21 is used to transmit from the remote station 4A to satellite 3; (2) the low power of a small transmitter designed to be low in cost and low in amount of interference with terrestrial microwave networks operating in the same frequency band; and (3) the larger number of uncorrelated codes available with a longer code length (as required by the CDM format utilized).
The one-way transmission network comprises a central station 14, a geostationary satellite 3, and remote stations 4. The central station 14 comprises user input links 11, an intelligent data concentrator/encoder 10A, and a transmitter 17. The geostationary satellite 3 comprises a transponder system which receives signals from the central station 14 at one frequency, for example 6 GHz, and translates, amplifies and transmits the signal at a different frequency, for example 4 GHz, to the remote stations 4. The remote stations 4 receive the satellite-relayed transmission 12 from the central station 14 using small diameter dish antennas 5. The received signal is then detected by either of two processes. The first process requires that the received signal be first despread using the local reference code, then demodulated, while the second process involves first the demodulation of the received signal, then the despreading of the demodulated waveform.
Despreading involves the multiplication of the incoming signal with the reference code. There are at least two reference codes used by each receiver: a ones bit code, and a zereos bit code. The ones bit code may be independent of the zeros bit code, or it may be the inverse (polarity) of the zeros bit code. In addition, a code may be altered to contain more than a single bit of information For example, assume that a remote station was initially set up to detect 256 chips per bit information but due to equipment improvement has improved signal to noise ratio sufficient to handle 64 chips per bit information. There are at least two options available to increase the data rate handling capability of the station: (1) reassign codes to the station, this time 64 chips long, or (2) break the existing code up into sections, with each section corresponding to a bit of information.
As to the latter option, a code portion unchanged could correspond to a ones bit and a code portion imnverted (polarity) could correspond to a zeros bit.
Generally, one set of reference codes will be assigned to a class of receivers.
Alternatively, several sets of codes may be used for each class of remote stations, with one set reserved for data being transmitted, another set reserved for administrative matters, and so on. The code length is determined by the size of the smallest antenna used by the remote stations in a class so that all can receive the data. Synchronization information may be conveyed to the remote stations in one of several ways. One method is to include a sync character within the data itself, but at a fixed interval of time. Or, if necessary, a separate sync bit in a code common to all receivers may be used. Where a sync bit code is used code length is chosen so that the remote station receiver with the smallest antenna may receive the sync signal and thus be maintained in a synchronized condition.
Demodulation involves the detection of the modulation form used by the central station 14. In the second method of detection, as described above, the demodulation converts the BPSK signal into pulse form at the chip frequency rate for later despreading. In the first method of detection, the demodulator detects the presence or absence of the baseband waveform in the previously despread signal.
Referring to FIG. 1, data are received by the central station 14 via input user links 11 such as modems. The data may be received at a variety of rates including 75 baud and 1200 baud. The data concentrator 10, in conjunction with microprocessor 212, which can be a general purpose microprocessor, extracts from the data or the source of the data, the identity of the remote station or stations 4 to which the data are to be sent. The data concentrator 10 accumulates and arranges the data into bit and byte formats. In like manner the data concentrator 10 arranges data from the other input links 11. The data are then sent to the transmitter for transmission on a prioritized or first-in first-out basis, character-by-character or by blocking into packets with address headers.
Thus as data comes in from the various users it is accumulated. As soon as a byte of data for a particular user has been accumulated the byte of data is ready to be transmitted or formed into packets. The byte to be transmitted is routed out of the data concentrator 10 to a delay buffer 18. The delay buffer 18 is controlled by a clock 18A and is activated whenever a sync code or sync character is to be inserted in the data stream.
As the data are routed through the delay buffer 18, the microprocessor 212 retrieves from storage the address to which the particular data are to be sent as well as the key for the spreading code for the class of stations to which the addressed station belongs. The microprocessor 212 then causes the spreading code to be generated in the code generator 16, whose output is used to multiply 20 the data stream emerging from the delay buffer 18. The microprocessor 212, code generator 16, and delay buffer 18 are all controlled by a common clock 18A to ensure proper time synchronization of the data spreading and insertion of the sync code or character.
Thus the data concentrator 10 receives the parallel inputs from the input user links 11, accumulates the data into bit and byte forms, then sends the data along in serial form for spreading (multiplication 20 by a spreading code), and then transmission to the remote stations 4.
At the transmitter 17 the spread, formated data BPSK modulates an RF carrier. The modulated signal is then translated up to the carrier frequency and then transmitted to the remote stations 4 via geostationary satellite 3.
The remote stations 4 receive the spread data stream using small diameter dish antennas 3 and continuously compare the spread data stream with the sync code (if the systems uses a sync code) as well as the data codes of the class to which the particular remote station belongs. Time synchronization at the remote stations 4 is achieved on a chip, bit, byte and frame level.
Chip synchronization entails the aligning of the clock waveform (which controls the receiver reference codes) with the chip frequency waveform. In other words, the frequency of the receiver clock must match the chip rate and the transitions of each waveform phase must coincide. In the preferred embodiment Tau-dither synchronization is used. In this embodiment the despreading spreading waveform is alternately made to be early by a fraction of a chip length and then late by the same amount. Small differences between the two then provide the steering information to make "early" equal to "late". When despreading is performed before demodulation, Tau-dithering is performed on the bit to an accuracy of one quarter to one-eighth of a chip, thereby achieving bit and chip synchronization at the same time. In the special case when no separate sync code is used, a unique sync character is inserted within the data stream to indicate byte sync and the start of either fixed or variable length packets.
Referring briefly to FIG. 3, when a sync code is used, frame synchronization (the proper positioning of the receiver reference codes with respect to the start of each bit code in the incoming signal, as well as to the start of the incoming sync code) is accomplished by framing sync circuitry 161, described below in greater detail. A simplified implementation of the one-way transmission network is the case where a single spreading code is used to communicate both data and sync characters. In such case, time lock is first achieved--that is, matching the internal reference code with the incoming chip stream by sliding the internal reference in time relative to the incoming chip stream until a match is detected. Once the internal reference code is approximately aligned with the corresponding code sequence in the incoming data stream a reference point is established and Tau-dither techniques are used to maintain reference with the incoming streams. Thus, bit sync and chip sync are achieved simultaneously, followed by continuing tracking.
In this simplified implementation, the sync signals are unique characters imbedded within the data stream occurring at intervals indicating the start of either fixed or variable length packets. Therefor, the incoming chip stream must first be despread before time synchronization may be performed. Therefore, before byte and frame sync may be performed, the incoming chip stream must be despread, chip and bit sync must be achieved, and the despread data must be demodulated. After demodulation, the examination of the data stream for the sync character is performed within the microprocessor or by a special interface chip programmed to seek a given bit pattern. A more detailed description of the synchronization process in the above single-code implentation will be provided below.
When the looked-for spread data are present in the received signal, the output of the despreading circuitry 139 is demodulated and integrated 68, and the energy level in the separate detectors (corresponding to ones, zeros, and sync data) is evaluated. The microprocessor 190, which can be a general purpose microprocessor, examines these outputs to determine whether a sufficient energy level is present to indicate the reception of a bit. This threshold energy level is determined by the required bit error rate.
When a certain minimum number of bits have been received (for example, five bits out of an eight-bit byte), there is good reason to believe that a byte of data was sent and the bit decision threshold can be changed to achieve an improved statistical estimation. When there are missing bits and the minimum number of bits have been received, the microprocessor 190 lowers the energy level threshold, reexamines the output energy level, and makes a best-guess of the missing bits which will complete the byte of data.
The despread data are then converted into RS-232 or other standard format and converted to the remote station user via printer 191 or other Input/Output (I/O) device.
As implemented, the one-way aspect of the invention has many advantages. First, the central station data concentrator 10, see FIG. 1, format permits the transmitting of codes of differing lengths. With a chip rate assumed fixed by the internal clock of the system, the code length assigned to a particular class of stations determines the rate at which data may be transmitted to that class. However, since the transmitted stream is time division multiplexed, codes of differing lengths may be intermixed within the data stream without interfering with the overall timing of the system. Typical transmitted data rates range from 45 baud to "facsimile bursts" in the megahertz range. As to the latter data rate, a facsimile burst would entail no spreading of the data because such rates would be used for stations with sufficiently large receiving antennas such that use of spread spectrum techniques would be unnecessary. The microprocessor 212 would sense that no spreading was required and permit the data to be passed through the multiplier 20 unaffected.
Second, microprocessor control (microprocessor 212) of the data concentrator 10 and the data spreading 20, 16 permits a large degree of flexibility in interleaving separate data streams within the overall transmission.
Third, since the microprocessor 212 maintains a record of the remote stations to which data from a particular user input is to be addressed, the sender need not know the spreading code of those remote stations. Nonetheless, addressing of a particular station within the class of stations served by a particular user may be accomplished if desired by minimal addressing within the data bit stream.
Fourth, the ability of the central station 14 to accommodate a variety of data rates permits the use of statistical multiplexing techniques to select formats and sequencing to achieve the most efficient use of the communication channel.
Fifth, as conditions change (e.g. addition of or change in character of the remote stations in a class) modifications of codes and formats may be easily implemented by reprogramming the microprocessor 212 external memory.
Sixth, since the remote stations are microprocessor controlled (microprocessor 190, which can be a general purpose microprocessor) each remote station 4 may be reprogrammed, by transmissions from the central station 14, to accept different codes of differing lengths, for example, when an increase in satellite transmitter power levels permit fewer chips per bit or when a more stringent bit error rate leads to a requirement for more chips per bit.
Seventh, the use of spread spectrum in the system allows small dish antenna stations to be successfully employed without exceeding regulatory imposed spectral power density limitations and without interference to or from terrestrial or geostationary interference sources.
Eighth, since each remote station can be separately addressed through the spreading code used, packet type formats or special preambles could be avoided. However, should preamble formats or packet addressing be required for certain stations, such formats may be implemented in bit form and sent as regular data without affecting reception of data by other nonpreambleusing stations.
Ninth, the invention, as implemented, is power rather than bandwidth limited. Should the process gain of the system be insufficient to overcome a particular interference source, the system carrier frequency could be reassigned, the chip rate may be altered, or the code sequence modified.
Finally, because the system utilizes a small portion of the transponder bandwidth of the geostationary satellite 3, a number of similar channels utilizing different carrier frequencies within the transponder bandwidth may be implemented to expand the capacity of the transponder up to the limits of the available transponder power. However, the preferred embodiment utilizes a single outbound channel with all or a substantial fraction of the transponder power being concentrated within that channel.
The two-way network utilizes the "outbound" link 2, 12 which comprises the one-way transmission network, see FIG. 1, but adds an "inbound" link 22,23, as well as capacity in the central station to receive long code length CDM transmissions from remote stations 4A. Thus, at each remote station site, both a transmitting station 4A and a receiving station 4 are provided The central station 14 is also given the capability of monitoring and recording system usage by each remote station.
The two-way network permits simultaneous CDM transmission to other remote stations 4 via the central station 14 by any or all remote stations 4A. Each remote station 4A uses the same frequency, and does not require TDM hardware. The network uses the higher antenna gain provided by the large dish 270 of the central station 14, in conjunction with high process gain provided by use of long spreading code lengths, to compensate for the low signal levels being transmitted by the remote station small dish antennas 21.
In addition the retransmission of the information by the central station 14 to the intended remote stations 4 via the "outbound" link is at a power level much greater than that available from direct transmission by the remote station 4A.
The transmission capability 230, FIG. 3, which is added to each remote station, spreads the data provided by the remote station user using a spreading code having a length of a thousand or more chips. The spread data are then transmitted, without sync codes or characters, using a small diameter dish antenna 21, on a CDM basis. In the preferred embodiment the transmitting antenna 21 is a minimum of 4 feet in diameter to meet regulatory beamwidth limitations. Timing synchronization for spreading of the data is derived from the receiver section of the remote station 4.
At the central station 14 banks of despreading receivers 273 are maintained. To minimize equipment costs, despreading receivers are maintained for only a subset of all expected inbound transmitting stations. This subset is periodically changed to assure reception of all inbound transmissions. Each receiver 273 is assigned a code corresponding to one remote station in the system. As with the receivers in the remote stations of the one-way network, these despreading receivers 273 are constantly monitoring the signals received by the large dish antenna 270. Typically, the number of remote stations will be very large, therefore the bank of despreading receivers 273 will circulate only a portion of the possible spreading codes corresponding to the remote stations that may be transmitting at any given moment. However, the number of despreading receivers is selected statistically in light of the expected data traffic so that the delay between a remote station transmission and detection of such transmission by the central station 14 is kept small. As the various remote station codes are circulated through the despreading receiver bank 273, the occurrence of a match of despreading code with the received data stream will cause the particular receiver in the bank to retain that despreading code until the particular transmission has been concluded.
Because of differences in location of each remote station, gradual changes in satellite orbit, changes in the rotation of the earth, and other factors, there is a distinct and different time delay associated with the transmission from each remote station. In one implementation of the invention the necessary timing corrections are done at the central station 14 in setting the timing of the circulation of a particular code in a despreading receiver 273. In another implementation, each remote station maintains its own time delay correction factor and adjusts the timing of its transmission with respect to the received sync pulses and chip positions.
Included in the despread data from a remote station transmission is the address of the remote station to which the data are to be sent. Once the data are despread by the despreading receiver 273 they are treated as if they were data in the one-way network, supra, and processed by the data concentrator 10. Microprocessor 212 retrieves the spreading code for the desired remote station. The data concentrator 10 arranges the data into bit, byte, and frame formats. The data are then spread 20 according to the addressed receiver code, on a prioritized or first-in first-out basis, and then transmitted 17, see FIG. 3, via geostationary satellite 3 to the desired remote station.
FIG. 1 is a simplified functional block diagram of the system level operation of as one-way transmission network embodiment according to the invention.
FIG. 2 is a simplified functional block diagram of the system level operation of a two-way transmission network embodiment in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 3 is a functional block diagram of the system level interaction of the various components of the transmission networks in accordance with the present inventions.
FIG 4 is a block diagram of the despreading circuitry.
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of the demodulation and energy detection circuitry.
FIG. 6 is a block diagram of the chip, bit and frame synchronization circuitry.
FIG. 7 is an illustration of the correlation response when two identical code sequences are compared to each other at different degrees of coincidence.
FIG. 8 is a block diagram of the central station input/output and data concentrator circuitry.
FIG. 3 illustrates the functional interrelationship between the various elements of the one-way and two-way transmission networks. Reference to more detailed figures will be made and more detailed description furnished when certain elements of special significance are being described. Although one combination of elements from which the invention may be implemented is described, there are numerous other combinations which may implement the invention equally well.
The selection of the spreading code length was influenced by: receiving antenna (5) size, receiver noise figure, transponder (3) power, bandwidth of the transmitted signal, the required bit error rate, the number of unique codes required, the data rate, and the chip rate selected, among other factors.
For the preferred embodiment of the outbound link, remote stations having 2 foot dish antennas are assigned 256 chips per bit spreading codes, and remote stations having 4 foot dish antennas are assigned 64 chips per bit spreading codes.
Remote stations having 16 foot dish antennas do not require the use of spread spectrum techniques.
For the inbound link, all remote stations 4A transmit using 4 foot dish antennas 21, 2048 chip per bit spreading codes, and signal levels of generally under one watt of power.
The code length per bit (outbound only) is 256 chips long, in order to keep the 2 foot dish remote stations (the least sensitive receiving stations) in lock. In the special case where a single code is used to transmit both data and sync information, the sync information takes the form of a sync character imbedded within the data stream.
A sync code or character is sent at a fixed interval, for example, once every 512 bits, where each bit is assumed to be in the longest code being used or, once every tenth of a second. A frame is selected to equal the sync code interval. The chip rate is selected to be 2.4576 MHz. The chip rate, frame interval and sync interval therefore all occur at fixed times. The data rate, however, is a function of the spreading code length selected. Therefore for 2 foot antenna remote stations data rate will be 2.4576 MHz÷256 chips per bit, or 9600 in bits per second. On the other hand when a 4 foot remote station is addressed data rate will be 2.4576 MHz÷64 chips per bit, or 38,400 bits per second. As is generally true of all codes utilized in this system, the codes selected are orthogonal or near orthogonal to one another, and each has a near equal number of ones and zeros.
It will be understood that the fixed chips rate of 2.4576 MHz is not critical. The spreading code lengths are chosen to provide low error rates for the signal levels obtained with present state of the art receiver noise figures. If higher error rates can be tolerated or if different receiver noise figures are present, the spreading code lengths should be changed accordingly.
In the preferred embodiment the geostationary satellite 3 is used to relay transmissions between the centrqal station 14 and remote stations 4 and vice versa. The heart of the satellite is a transponder which receives signals 2 at a nominal 6 GHz frequency and which retransmits 12 such signals at a nominal 4 GHz frequency. The maximum radiated power permitted to be transmitted by the transponder is set by FCC regulation and is -149 dBW per square meter per 4 KHz band. The effective isotropic irradiated power (EIRP) transmitted by the geostationary satellite 3 in the preferred embodiment of the invention is 20 to 32 dbW. For a chip rate of 2.4576 MHz the bandwidth of the signal relayed by the geostationary satellite 3 is approximately 4.9 MHz. The power of the transmitter may be increased to 32 dBW in the same 4.9 MHz bandwidth without exceeding the flux density limits. Since the typical bandwidth of a satellite transponder is 36 MHz, it is clear that the relayed signal is power rather than bandwidth limited.
Referring now to FIGS. 3, 4, 5 and 6, the receiving circuitry of the remote stations 4 will be described. The receiver front end (pre amp) 61 is of standard design for the reception of signals in the 3.7 GHz to 4.2 GHz range.
The signal out of the front end pre-amplifier 61 assumed to be 4000 MHz is mixed-down to the first IF frequency (786 MHz in this example) in mixer 63. The mixing frequency is derived by multiplying the L.O. 79 frequency (856 MHz in this example) by four.
After amplification in the first IF 64 the signal is mixed-down to a frequency of 70 MHz in mixer 63A. The mixing frequency is supplied by L.O. 79. After amplification in the second IF 64A, the signal is mixed-down to 10.7 MHz in mixer 63B. The mixing frequency is supplied by L.O. 79A.
The resulting 10.7 MHz baseband signal from mixer 63B may then be processed to recover the spread spectrum data. As described earlier, one of two methods may be used: the signal may be first despread then demodulated, or it may be demodulated first then despread.
In the preferred embodiment despreading is preferred first. Referring to FIGS. 3 and 4 the circuitry is shown. Despreading is performed first by despreading circuitry 139, then demodulation and energy detection are performed by demodulation circuitry 68. Despreading is essentially the multiplication of the received signal out of mixer 63B with the spreading codes assigned to the particular remote station.
Despreading circuitry comprises, FIG. 4, a mixer bank 65 (56, 57, 58, 59, 56A, 57A, 58A, 59A), and circulating registers 51 (124,126,124A, 126A). The circulating registers 51 receive the data and sync reference spreading codes from the microprocessor 190, and circulate them according to clocks φ1 on line 101, and φ2 on line 102, provided by the chip sync circuitry 103, and commands from the microprocessor 190, which may be a general purpose microprocessor. The microprocessor controls the time at which the registers 51 begin circulation of the codes such that the start of the code sequence of the local reference codes will be synchronized in time with the start of the code sequence for each incoming bit.
Register 124 circulates the ones bit data code and outputs that code to mixer 59. Inverter 125 inverts (polarity) the ones bit code to derive the zeros bit code, and then routes it to mixer 58. Similarly, register 126 circulates the +sync code and outputs the code to mixer 57. Inverter 127 inverts (polarity) the +sync code to derive the -sync code, and then routes it to mixer 56.
Registers 124A and 126A circulate the data and sync codes in accordance with a Tau-dithered clock φ2 on line 102 in cooperation with chip sync circuit 103 and microprocessor 190, for the purpose of obtaining bit and chip sync. These operations will be discussed in greater detail below.
An alternative method of despreading is to use a single circulating register, with the code being circulated and the timing of such circulation under microprocessor 190 control. For example, in a system where a sync code is used in addition to the data codes, the sync code may be inserted into the register periodically only when a sync is expected to appear, while at all other times the data codes are circulated.
When the output of mixer 63B (FIG. 3) is multiplied in the mixer bank 65 by the signals from the circulating registers 51, despreading occurs. When a spread spectrum signal is multiplied by the properly synchronized spreading code, the result is the original unspread signal. Therefore if the signal out of mixer 63B is fbaseband g(m), where g(m) is the spreading operator, the product (fbaseband) g(m)×g(m) will equal fbaseband, whenever the spreading code g(m) is present in the received signal. Thus it may be seen that if the spreading code for a ones bit is present in the received signal, a baseband frequency will be output from mixer 59. Likewise if a +sync spreading code is present in the received signal a baseband frequency will be output from mixer 57. Similar results are obtained from mixers 58 and 56. Mixers 56A, 57A, 58A and 59A accept Tau-dithered codes from registers 124A and 126A in cooperation with chip sync circuit 103 and microprocessor 190 for the purpose of obtaining bit and chip sync. These operations will be discussed in greater detail below. When the looked-for spreading code is not present in the received signal, the output of the mixer will be a wideband signal which may be removed by filtering.
From a time domain point of view it may be seen that in mixer bank 65 the reference codes shift the phase of the L.O. 63B signal. For each chip of the code there is an associated phase shift. In the received signal the spreading code will have shifted the carrier phase, with each chip of the spreading code corresponding to some phase shift. When the received signal spreading code and the receiver reference code match, the phase shifts associated with each chip counteract each other and restore the original baseband signal. Hence, the output of the mixer bank 65 will be the baseband frequency of unshifted phase n chips in length, where n equals the code length. On the other hand, if the codes were not the same, the output from the mixer bank 65 will be n chips of baseband frequency having differing phases. It may be seen that if a phase detector were used to demodulate the waveform for each case, the result, where the codes match, would be a dc level n times that corresponding to an in-phase phase detector output for one chip. On the other hand, in the unmatched case, the output would tend toward zero (for near uncorrelated codes) or toward a negative level (for negatively correlated codes).
Level detection of the despread signal occurs in the demodulation circuitry 68, FIG. 5. Demodulators 49 examine the signals output from the mixer bank 65 for each of the lines: ones data 52, zeros data 53, +sync 54, and -sync 55. The output of each demodulator 49 is accumulated over a bit period by integrators 122, 123, 131 and 130.
Demodulators may take various well-known forms: a phase detector, a squaring loop detector or a Costas-loop detector.
Integration of the demodulator 49 outputs over the code period produces an equivalent energy level and allows noise to average out. Typically in small dish antenna receiving systems the received signal level is very low. This results in less than a perfect match between reference code and received spread data codes. Therefore the energy level actually obtained from the integrators 122, 123, 131 and 130 may not equal the expected maximum level, although all chips were sent. As previously described, statistical techniques are employed to determine the minimum level output from the integrators 122, 123, 131 and 130 which may be treated as a received bit and thereby achieve the minimum required bit error rate.
This bit threshold decision process is implemented using comparators 132, 134, 135 and 137. Each comparator compares its integrator output with a threshold level (set to achieve a certain bit error rate). A positive output (i.e., that the level has been exceeded) from a comparator is treated as "hard" data. As mentioned above, since the low signal levels received often prevent a perfect match between reference code and spread data code which results in energy levels below threshold, a "soft data" record must be maintained. In the preferred embodiment comparators 133 and 136 implement one of the numerous methods to derive soft data. Essentially the levels of the integrators for the ones bit and the zeros bit are compared, and the greater level is deemed to indicate reception of that type of bit. Similarly soft sync is derived for the sync signal.
In the special case where all remote stations 4 in the system are assigned a single code for transmission of both data and sync information, there is no need for a hard/soft bit designation. Because, in this case, all that is transmitted is intended to be received by each remote station 4, a continuous stream of bits may be assumed. These bits consist of either data bits or filler bits. Since a bit is necessarily present for every bit position, the soft data and sync despread outputs may be looked to directly to decide whether the bit was a one or a zero.
The outputs of comparators 132 through 137 are sent to the microprocessor 190 for processing and storage, see FIG. 3. (Hard "+" sync data on line 138 is also sent to the framing sync circuitry 161, FIG. 6 for use there.) The microprocessor 190 maintains a record of the hard and soft data received, and even treats hard data as tentative until a minimum number of hard tenative bits have been received. This enhances the system bit error rate. If after a byte period several bits remain undetected, the microprocessor 190 will examine the soft data record for the missing bits. The microprocessor 190 "infers" that a byte of data was transmitted after it has tentatively received a minimum number (usually 5) of bits. The microprocessor lowers the bit decision threshold when it looks to the soft data or soft sync record for the missing bits and makes a best-guess as to the correct bit state. In this manner the transmitted data is statistically recovered from the despread and demodulated received signal.
A second method of data recovery is to demodulate first. Carrier lock is essential, however, if the modulation is to be properly detected. One implementation could consist of a phase detector which compares the incoming received signal with a voltage controlled reference. The phase detector output is used to correct the voltage controlled reference so that the reference tracks the carrier frequency deviations. The output of the phase detector also yields phase changes caused by BPSK modulation. These phase changes are the transmitted spread spectrum data stream. This data stream is then multiplied by the local reference code to despread the signal and yield the original data.
However, demodulation before despreading in small antenna receiving systems is difficult to implement due to the very low signal to very low signal to noise ratios present. At such low levels carrier lock is difficult to maintain especially when interference is present. cl Framing Synchronization
Proper time synchronization is essential to the satisfactory operation of the spread spectrum system. The framing synchronization circuit 161, FIG. 6 ensures that the frame timing maintained by the microprocessor 190 coincides with the framing timing of the received signal. Recall that a frame is defined as equaling the sync interval and that a sync character (or code) is sent periodically, for example once every tenth of a second, or once every 512 bits, where each bit is assumed to be in the longest code being used. By maintaining frame sync, it is ensured that the proper ordering of the received bits into bytes and packets is obtained.
Since a sync code is sent at a chip rate which is a multiple of 64, the frequency with which the sync bit is sent is a modulo 64 signal. That is, a binary synchronous counter, counting at a rate equal to the system chip rate, if started when a sync pulse is received and stopped when a subsequent sync pulse is received, will always show a multiple of 64. Therefore all of the binary counter outputs corresponding to values less than 64 will be zero, while some value equal to and greater than 64 will be nonzero. On the other hand, if the binary counter were started at some time other than at the time a sync bit was received, its outputs for values less than 64 will be nonzero at a point in time when a subsequent sync bit is received. Note that, given the precise chip rate of 2.4576×106 chips per second, a sync every tenth of a second is also a modulo 64 signal.
In the preferred embodiment, n-bit synchronous counter 162 counts the internal clock φ1 (i.e. the chip frequency) on line 101 from the chip sync circuitry 103. Counter 162 is initialized, in other words, the count is started from zero, when an out-of-sync signal 166 is received from NAND gate 165 and when a hard +sync level is received on line 138 from the demodulation circuitry 68. So long as the out-of-sync 166 indication is present, the counter 162 will reinitialize until sync is obtained.
The out-of-sync signal 166 is initiated only after counter 164 counts a small number, less than 10, of "no-sync" indications from NAND gate 163. NAND gate 163 monitors all outputs of synchronous counter 162 corresponding to values less than or equal to some multiple, m, of 64, wheren m<n.
AND gate 167 monitors synchronous counter 162 outputs corresponding to values greater than the multiple of 64 chosen above. For example, if a sync period were selected to be one tenth of a second, counter 162 would be a 16 bit synchronous counter. Outputs corresponding to values of 32×64 (2048) or less would be monitored by NAND gate 163, and outputs having values greater than 2048 are monitored by AND gate 167. At the precise clock rate of the system, 245,760 MHz a tenth of a second period corresponds to 245,760 chips per period. Therefore, all counter 162 outputs monitored by NAND gate will be zero and all outputs monitored by AND gate 167 will be one whenever a sync singal is received, and if the count was started upon receipt of the last sync signal.
Likewise the out-of-sync indication 166 is not initiated until a minimum number of non-modulo 64 counts are produced by the counter 162 as relayed to counter 164 by NAND gate 163. This is to prevent momentary interruptions from disrupting the system operation.
In the special case where a single data code is common to all remote stations 4 in the network sync characters are embedded in the data bit stream. Framing sync may therefore be performed within the microprocessor 190, thereby obviating the need for framing sync circuit 161 in this special case.
The chip synchronization circuit 103, FIG. 6 aligns the internal clock φ1 on line 101 with the received chip stream 82, FIG. 5. Chip synchronization is attained when zero to one and one to zero transitions in the internal clock φ1 coincide with the actual or theoretical chip transition points in the received chip stream 82. A theoretical chip transition point is the point in time at which a chip state transition would occur if a chip state were changing from one value to another. By maintaining chip sync efficient despreading is achieved, hence process gain is maintained at near theoretical levels.
There are several methods of chip synchronization, of which the Tau-dither tracking method will be discussed here.
In the preferred embodiment of the invention the Tau-dither method is used, FIG. 6. This method involves the incremental shift of the internal clock φ1 which controls the circultion of the local reference codes in circulating registers 51. Here the triangle-shaped correlation characteristic of the code sequences used in the system provides the directivity for control of clock φ1 synchronization. FIG. 7 illustrates the effect of a clock shift upon correlation depending upon whether the clock φ1 is advanced or retarded with respect to the received chip sequence.
When the clock φ1 is in a retarded state, an incremental shift of the clock which tends to advance the clock position will result in an increased amplitude of the correlation. On the other hand, if the clock φ1 is in an advanced state, an incremental shift of the clock which tends to advance the clock position will result in a decreased amplitude of the correlation. By comparing the direction of these amplitude changes with respect to the waveform which generated the incremental shifts in the first place, a correction voltage may be derived to adjust the internal clock φ1 to exact synchronization with the received chip stream.
In one embodiment, low frequency oscillator 300 produces the waveform which causes the incremental shift in the clock φ1 VCO (voltage controlled oscillator) 304 generates the clock frequency φ1. lThe incremental phase modulator 302 receives the VCO 304 output and causes an incremental phase change in the clock φ1 according to the low frequency oscillator 300 output. This phase-shifted form of φ1 is output on line 102 and henceforth will be referred to as φ2. This Tau-dithered clock φ2 is then used with circulating registers 124A and 126A. As with the registers 124 and 126, registers 124A and 126A also circulate data and sync codes. The circulating codes are mixed with the incoming signal from mixer 63B using mixers 56A, 57A, 58A and 59A: the ones code from register 124A is mixed in mixer 59A, the zeros code from inverter 125A is mixed in mixer 58A, the +sync code from register 126A is mixed in mixer 57A, and the -sync code from inverter 127A is mixed in mixer 56A. However, because clock φ2 is Tau-dithered, the resulting output from mixers 56A, 57A, 58A and 59A is a Tau-dithered despread data and sync signal. These Tau-dithered signals are detected using energy detectors 49A in demodulating circuitry 68, see FIGS. 3 and 4. The outputs of the energy detectors are combined to form a spreading code correlation stream on line 82. In practice, when the inverse of the ones code (or +sync) is used for the zeros code (or -sync), a separate energy detect need not be performed on both despread lines. Therefore, in such case the Tau-dither despreading and energy detection may be performed satisfactorily without the use of mixers 58A and 56A as well as the energy detectors 49A on lines 53A and 55A. However, when distinct codes are used in "1", "0", +sync and -sync circulating registers, mixers and detectors for each must be provided. The output stream 82 contains the correlation amplitude changes due to the incremental clock φ1 position shifts. Band pass filter 305 extracts the amplitude component. The low frequency signal 300 is compared with the correlation amplitude change in phase detector 301. After filtering by low pass filter 303, the resulting correction signal 306 is applied to adjust the VCO 304 frequency. In this manner the received chip stream is constantly compared with the clock φ1 and chip signal corrections are constantly implemented.
An alternative implementation to chip sync 103 is to place VCO 304 and incremental phase modulator 302 under microprocessor (190) control (dotted lines, FIG. 6). In such an embodiment the microprocessor 190 evaluates the signals from the energy detectors 49A on line 82. In accordance with correlation response levels, see FIG. 7, found on line 82, the microprocessor 190 adjusts the amount and direction of phase shift imparted to the φ2 clock by the incremental phase modulator 302, as well as the frequency of VCO 304. Use of a microprocessor 190 to control the VCO 304 and incremental phase modulator 302 response provides added flexibility in the implementation of the Tau-dither sync method.
In the special case where a single data code is common to all remote stations 4 in the network, the synchronization circuitry differs from the more general case above. Based on the assumption that there is a continuous bit stream, a time lock operation is first performed.
Time lock synchronization involves first a bit synchronization operation. Bit synchronization requires that the internal reference code be compared to the incoming data stream at a rate greater than the data stream rate. The reference code is "raced along" the data stream by the internal clock until a correlation indication is obtained. See FIG. 7. At such point, the bit position is approximately defined.
To reduce hardware costs, the process of "racing" the code along the data stream may be accomplished using a single circulating register (e.g. register 124A) under microprocessor (190) control. The internal clock which controls the internal code circulating rate is under microprocessor (190) control and is derived from the system master clock, VCO 304. The microprocessor 190 causes the clock to "race" with respect to the incoming data stream until a positive correlation is obtained, on line 82 for example. This "racing" of the clock is obtained using a "bit-stealing" operation where the VCO (304) frequency is decreased by "stealing" bits from the VCO (304) output. By increasing the number of bits stolen, the clock frequency is increased. By decreasing the number of bits stolen the clock frequency is decreased.
Once the approximate sync is obtained, Tau-dither bit and chip sync, as previously described, see FIG. 6, is performed. By use of the Tau-dither chip synchronization method synchronization within one eighth to one fourth of a chip is obtained.
After chip sync is achieved the despread signal is demodulated 49, using a Costas demodulator, for example. The resulting data is sent to the microprocessor 190.
At this point the microprocessor 190, performs the framing sync operation by scanning the data for the unique sync character which is embedded within the data at periodic intervals. In order to ensure that a detected sync character is not a fortuitous combination of bits due to the arrangement of the data, the microprocessor 190 will verify that sync characters are present at the next several sync intervals, for a small number of intervals less than ten.
Referring to FIGS. 1, 3, and 8, the central station 14 will now be described. The data concentrator (10) portion of the central station 14 comprises RS-232 Electrical Signal Level Changers 210, Universal Asynchronous Receive/ Transmit parallel to serial devices (UART) 211 and microprocessor 212, which may be a general purpose microprocessor. See FIG. 8.
Data from up to 144 different sources (e.g. input links 11) are accepted by the RS-232 level changers 210. The data are then transformed from parallel form to a serial bit stream by the UART devices 211. A UART 211 device is examined by the microprocessor 212 whenever it sends a UART attention flag to the microprocessor 212. The attention flag tells the microprocessor 212 that the UART 211 has begun to receive data. When the microprocessor 212 encounters a UART 211 which is full, it transfers the contents of that UART 211 into the byte buffer 214. Associated with the UART 211 is the source of the data from which the microprocessor, by examining its external memory, EPROM 213, may derive the identity of the remote station to which the data is to be sent and the spreading code key to be used. The spreading code key is then stored in RAM 214 until the data in the byte buffer 214 are sent to the delay buffer 18 and thence to the multiplier 20.
As the data are routed to the multiplier 20, the microprocessor 212, using the spreading code key from RAM 214, causes code generator 16 to generate the desired spreading code. This spreading code is then routed to multiplier 20 where it is used to spread the incoming data.
A sync character is inserted at periodic intervals, for example, every tenth of a second. At this point the delay buffer 18 accumulates the incoming data while the microprocessor 212 causes the code generator 16 to output the sync spreading code or character to the multiplier 20. When the sync code or character has been inserted into the bit stream, spreading of the data is resumed.
Note that the multiplier 20 is essentially an exclusive-OR gate (XOR). Therefore, as the spreading code is applied to one input of multiplier 20 and the data applied to the other, a "ones" data bit results in an output of an unaltered ones bit spreading code.
If the data are zeros bits, the output will be the inverse (polarity) of the ones bit spreading code, or the zeros bit spreading code. (Recall that the zeros bit spreading code is chosen in the preferred embodiment to be the inverse (polarity) of the ones spreading code. The same is true for the +sync and -sync spreading codes.)
If there are no data to be encoded, a filler character is sent to keep the remote stations 4 in a locked condition.
Once the data have been spread, they are applied to balanced modulator 215 which causes the 70 MHz local oscillator signal 216, applied to the other multiplier input, to be BPSK modulated. Note that the local oscillator 216 is controlled by a crystal maintained under environmentally controlled conditions, thereby promoting excellent long term stability of the 70 MHz subcarrier frequency. Modulation is performed at a high frequency level for ease of up-conversion. The output of the balanced modulator 215 is then frequency translated to the nominal 6 GHz carrier frequency, amplified, and transmitted, using a large dish antenna 8 to the geostationary satellite 3.
As described in the system level description of the two-way transmission network, supra, the two-way network utilizes the one-way transmission network for the second hop, or "outbound link", FIG. 1, and adds remote station code division multiplex (CDM) transmission capability 230 to the remote stations, as well as CDM receiving capability 231 at the central station 14 for the first hop, or "inbound link", of the double hop transmission. One remote station 4A may thus communicate with another remote station or stations 4 by routing the transmission through the central station 14 via satellite 3, see FIG. 2. The central station 14 receives the CDM transmission from the sending station 4A, despreads it, then respreads it with the addressed station spreading code, and then transmits the respread data in TDM form through the geostationary satellite 3 to the addressed remote station 4.
Referring to FIG. 3, the transmitter circuitry 230, added to give a remote station CDM transmission capability, is shown. This circuitry is basically a BPSK or FSK transmitter, but with a frequency synthesized carrier source 243, 244, 235 and 236, as wwll as spread spectrum encoding 30, 239. Data, clocks and controls are provided by the receiver section of the remote station.
The frequency synthesized carrier frequency is derived by dividing the VCO 235 output by a scaling factor (frequency selector 243) selected by the microprocessor 190. The frequency selector 243 comprises a programmable counter. The output of the frequency selector 243 is then compared in XOR gate 244 against a reference signal derived from the internal receiver clock φ1. The output of XOR gate 244 is then filtered in low pass filter (LPF) 236 and applied to adjust the scaled VCO 235 frequency to coincide with the reference frequency. This permits the frequency synthesized carrier to track the receiver clock φ1 even when the two are at different frequencies.
The microprocessor 190 controls the timing of the application of the data to the multiplier (XOR gate) 239 as well as the timing and generation of the spreading code 30.
The spreading code used is unique to each remote station. In the preferred embodiment the code length is selected to be 2048 chips. The code corresponding to a ones bit is different from that for a zeros bit. The code generator comprises a combination of shift registers, selected outputs of which are exclusive-OR'ed and reintroduced into the shift register input. The number of ones chips is approximately equal to the number of zeros chips in each code.
Transmission from the remote station transmitter circuitry 230 is simultaneous with respect to inbound transmissions of other remote stations. The timing of these transmissions is based upon the received sync signals transmitted by the central station 14 on the outbound link. In this way the timing sync problem at the central station despreading receiver bank 273 has a common reference point from which correction factors for distance and earth rotational shift may be calculated. These correction factors are implemented at the central station 14.
Simultaneous transmissions by the remote stations require non-interfering codes. This, plus the need for greater process gain, dictates the choice of code length of a thousand chips or more as well as orthogonal or near orthogonal codes.
To summarize, the add-on transmitter circuitry 230 receives data, under microprocessor 190 control, from a remote station user I/O terminal 191. The microprocessor 190 causes the code generator 30 to generate the remote stations's two 2048 chip CDM codes, as well as adjusts the frequency selector 243 which sets the carrier frequency. XOR gate 239 multiplies the data with the spreading codes, all under microprocessor 190 control. The output of XOR gate 239 modulates the frequency synthesized carrier in balanced modulator 234. The output of the balanced modulator is then frequency translated 233 to the desired frequency and transmitted via geostationary satellite 3 to the central station 14 using a 4 foot diameter dish antenna 21.
Referring to FIG. 3, the central station receiving circuitry 231 allows the station to receive signals from all remote stations 4A served by the geostationary satellite 3. With chip rate for the system selected to be approximately 2.45 MHz, the null-to-null bandwidth of one channel is 2×2.45 MHz=4.9 MHz. In addition, each channel may accommodate 2045÷2=1024 users assuming two codes per user. (The number of orthogonal codes is approximately equal to code length.). Theoretically, the central station 14 would be capable of receiving approximately 11×1024=11.264 different remote station transmissions. (Assumes 36 MHz transponder bandwidth and signals positioned 1.2×R center-to-center spacing where R equals chip rate. This spacing is the closest practical bandwidth before encountering serious intersymbol interference.)
In the preferred embodiment, the bandwidth chosen per channel is 4.9 MHz (2×2.45 MHz), thereby permitting six or seven channels within the 36 MHz bandwidth of a standard satellite transponder, with one of those channels reserved for the outbound link. Therefore, the central station 14 should be capable of receiving data from at least 5×1024=5120 different remote stations per 36 MHz transponder.
Signals received by the 60 foot receiving antenna 270 of the central station 14 are first mixed (271) down to nominal 70 MHz IF frequency. The signal is then separated into the five transponder channels by L.O./mixer combinations 272. Associated with each L.O. mixer output is a bank of despreading receivers 273. See FIG. 3. Each despreading receiver is loaded with the code sequence of a different potential transmitting remote station 4A. The number of despreading receivers per channel cannot economically be made equal to the total number of remote stations using a channel, therefore the incoming signal is compared to only a portion of the possible codes at one time. The remaining codes are cycled into the despreading receiver 273 on successive cycles of the search. The number of receivers 273 in the bank are selected statistically in light of the expected traffic patterns and acceptable acquisition period. Typically there are 256 despreading receivers in a bank, and acquisition time takes a maximum of 15 to 30 seconds.
Associated with each code sequence is a unique timing correction factor. The timing correction factor is a function of the particular remote station location, and, to a lesser extent, daily shifts in the geostationary satellite 3 position. In loading a particular code into a despreading receiver, the microprocessor 212 implements the correction factor by delaying the start of the spreading sequence by the appropriate amount. By assigning the timing correction task to the central station 14, the need for each remote station to maintain correction capability is eliminated. Additionally, unauthorized use of a remote station, e.g., after a theft, will be prevented should the station be moved from its designated location.
When a despreading receiver 273 detects a matching spreading code in the incoming data stream, it retains the code in its circulating register and waits for additional transmissions.
As in the remote station spreading circuitry 139, described supra, the incoming signal is despread and detected. The noise averages out and the signal components accumulate additively. Each bit accumulation is examined to see if the required threshold is exeeeded. If a certain number of hard data bits are received, the microprocessor 212 will examine the soft data information for the best decision on the missing bits.
After despreading, the data are treated as are data from a terrestrial source 11. The despread data contains address and raw data information. As with data received from a terrestrial source, the data concentrator 10 and microprocessor 212 serialize and spread the data for retransmission to the addressed remote station 4.
The microprocessor 212 also maintains a record of the system usage by each remote station.
Referring to FIGS. 2 and 3, the operation of the two-way transmission network will be described. At the remote station 4A the user inputs data on I/O device 191, including designation of the remote station to which the information will be sent. Microprocessor 190 routes the data to XOR gate 239 and at the same time causes code generator 30 to generate the remote station 4A CDM spreading codes. The data are spread in synchronization with the system sync timing. The spread data are then transmitted CDM 22 to the geostationary satellite 3 using a 4-foot dish antenna 21. The geostationary satellite 3 receives the transmission and relays 23 the signal to the central station 60-foot dish 270. The central station receiving circuitry 231 matches the signal with a local reference code obtained from memory and circulated in a despreading receiver 273. The reference code which matches the signal identifies the remote station from which the signal was transmitted. The data and address information are despread and the data respread in the addressed station's spreading code. The spread information is transmitted Time Division Multiplexed, 2, 12 Binary Phase Shift Keying via the geostationary satellite 3 to the addressed remote station 4. The addressed remote station 4 detects the data intended for it in the transmitted stream. The data are first despread, then demodulated to yield the transmitted data. Chip sync 103 maintains chip and bit synchronization, and frame sync 161 maintains code and frame alignment. The microprocessor 190 forms the despread data into bytes and then, with appropriate controls, outputs the data 191 to the user.
In the special case where a single code contains both sync and data information, time lock is first obtained by racing the internal reference code along the incoming chip stream and observing the despread output for a positive correlation indication. Once time lock or bit sync is obtained, Tau-dither techniques are used to fine-tune the positioning of the first chip of the incoming bits with the first chip of the internal reference code. After chip sync is obtained, the despread data are demodulated. The microprocessor extracts the sync character from the demodulated data and adjusts the system timing accordingly.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3596002 *||Oct 24, 1969||Jul 27, 1971||Telefunken Patent||System for transmitting binary-coded data|
|US3761813 *||Mar 17, 1972||Sep 25, 1973||Thomson Csf||Method of telecommunication via satellite and systems using this method|
|US4030033 *||Jun 13, 1975||Jun 14, 1977||Lowell Technological Institute Research Foundation||Method and apparatus for transmitting messages to and from remote locations|
|US4114155 *||Jul 30, 1976||Sep 12, 1978||Cincinnati Electronics Corporation||Position determining apparatus and method|
|US4135156 *||Jun 20, 1974||Jan 16, 1979||Sanders Associates, Inc.||Satellite communications system incorporating ground relay station through which messages between terminal stations are routed|
|US4164628 *||Mar 17, 1978||Aug 14, 1979||International Telephone And Telegraph Corporation||Processor for multiple, continuous, spread spectrum signals|
|US4172257 *||Jul 14, 1977||Oct 23, 1979||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Ground station antenna for satellite communication systems|
|US4291409 *||Jul 18, 1978||Sep 22, 1981||The Mitre Corporation||Spread spectrum communications method and apparatus|
|US4426712 *||May 22, 1981||Jan 17, 1984||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Correlation system for global position receiver|
|1||"A Comparison of Pseudo-Noise and Conventional Modulation for Multiple-Access Satellite Communincations", Blasbalg, IBM Journal of Res. & Dev., vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 241-255, Jul. 1, 1965.|
|2||"A Family of SHF Tactical . . . Terminals", Lawton et al., IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. AES-6, No. 2, pp. 137-146, Mar. 1, 1976.|
|3||"A Novel Concept for a Satellite-Based Maritime Search and Rescue System", Weinburg, et al., IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. OE-2, No. 3, pp. 274-285, Jul. 1, 1977.|
|4||"A Processing Satellite Transponder . . . Mobile Users", Viterbi, Proceedings of 4th Intern. Confer. on Digital Satellite Comm., Montreal, pp. 116-174, Oct. 23, 1978.|
|5||"A Spread Spectrum Technique . . . Communications", Cooper et al., 27th Annual Conference IEEE Vehicular Technology Group, pp.98-103, Mar. 16, 1977.|
|6||"Air-Ground, Ground-Air . . . A Satellite", Blasbalg, H. et al., IEEE Transactions on Aerospace & Electronic Systems, vol. AES-4, No. 5, pp. 774-791, Sep. 1, 1968.|
|7||"An Analysis of Domestic & Foreign Small Earth Station Markets", Ginty, Office of Telecommunications Report, Apr. 1, 1976.|
|8||"Antenna Engineering Handbook", Jasik, Ed., First Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, pp. 1-2; 1-3, Jan. 1, 1961.|
|9||"Antenna Performance Standards", FCC, Appendix D to FCC Docket 81-704, Sep. 1, 1978.|
|10||"Antenna Theory and Design", Stutzman, et al., John Wiley & Sons, pp. 29-30, Jan. 1, 1981.|
|11||"Antennas", Kraus, McGraw-Hill Book Company, pp. 343-346, Jan. 1, 1950.|
|12||"Anti-Jamming Characteristics of GPS/GDM", Hemesath et al., National Telecommunications Conference, vol. III, pp. 41.6-1 to 41.6-5, Jan. 1, 1976.|
|13||"Applications of the Spread-Spectrum Signals from the NOVA Satellites", Prozeller, Proceedings of the National Aerospace Symposium, Springfield, pp. 93-100, Jan. 1, 1979.|
|14||"Aximuth Correlator for Synthetic Aperture Radar", Arens, NASA Tech. Briefs, pp. 22-23, Mar. 1, 1979.|
|15||"Cellular Land-Mobile Radio: Why Spread Spectrum?", Cooper et al., IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 17-24, Mar. 1, 1979.|
|16||"Central Control Facility for a Satellite Communication System", Blasbalg, et al., IBM Tech. Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 22-24, Jun. 1, 1967.|
|17||"Commercial U.S. Satellites", Bargellini, IEEE Spectrum, pp. 30-37, Oct. 1, 1979.|
|18||"Communicating by Satellite", Laskin, Report of the 20th Century Fund Task Force of Intern'l Satellite Communications, Jan. 1, 1969.|
|19||"Communication Satellite Processing Repeaters", Huang et al., Proc. IEEE, vol. 59, No. 2, 1971.|
|20||"Communications Satellite . . . AMPA Experiment", Durrani et al., Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 15-19, Jan. 1, 1980.|
|21||"Communications Satellite Systems", Martin, Prentice Hall, Inc., pp. 142-147, 189, 358-359, 365-367, Jan. 1, 1978.|
|22||"Communications", Jane's Spaceflight Directory, pp. 246-249.|
|23||"Compatibility of Video and Data Signals . . . Channel", Gallois, et al., IEEE Trans. on Broadcasting, vol. BC-33, No. 3, pp. 70-76, Sep. 1, 1987.|
|24||"Comsat Technical Review", vol. 8, No. 2, Forcina et al., Fall 1978, pp. 421-453, Sep. 1, 1978.|
|25||"Cost-Effective Data Communications . . . Earth Stations", Parker, IEEE Journ. on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. SAC-3, No. 3, pp. 449-456, May 1, 1985.|
|26||"Cryptology and the Origins of Spread Spectrum", Kahn, IEEE Spectrum, pp. 70-80, Sep. 1, 1984.|
|27||"Current and Future Communication Satellite Technology", Morrow, Intern'l Astronautical Federation, 26th Congress, Lisbon, Sep. 21, 1975.|
|28||"Data Encryption Standard", National Bureau of Standards, Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 46, Jan. 15, 1977.|
|29||"Declaratory Order" re Blanket Licensing of Earth Stations, FCC, FCC No. 3588, Apr. 9, 1986.|
|30||"Defense Satellite Communications System", LaVean, Progress in Astronautics & Aeronautics, vol. 41, MIT Press, Jan. 1, 1975.|
|31||"Digital Communications by Satellite", Spilker, Prentice Hall, Inc., pp. 190, 191, Jan. 1, 1977.|
|32||"Digital Data Satellite Systems", Mcmanamon et al., International Conference on Communications, in Minneapolis, Jun. 17, 1974.|
|33||"Digital Satellite Communications", Ha, Macmillan, 1986, Distributed by Howard W. Sam & Co.), pp. 11, 81, 529-562, Jan. 1, 1986.|
|34||"DYNAC: A Low-Cost Data/Voice Communications Network", Salamoff, et al., Telecommunications, pp. 71-76, Aug. 1, 1979.|
|35||"Evolution of Antenna Sidelobe Regulation", Uyttendaele, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. BC-32, No. 4, pp. 85-88, Dec. 1, 1986.|
|36||"Extension of Satellite Services through Low Cost Earth Stations", Kiesling et al., AIAA 7th Satellite Communication Conference, Apr. 1, 1978.|
|37||"Frequency Modulation Theory-Application to Microwave Links", Fagot et al., Pergamon Press, 1961, Jan. 1, 1961.|
|38||"Front-to-Back Coupling Factor for Large Earth-Station Antennas", Wilkinson, Microwave Journal (U.S.A.), vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 47-49, Jul. 1, 1976.|
|39||"GPS Clear/Acquisition Code Spectral Properties", Holmes, National Telecommunications Conference, Conference Record vol. III, pp. 41.7-1 to 41.7-5.|
|40||"Information Transmission via Satellite", Herter et al., Springer-Verlag, pp. 36,37,44,57,58 62-71, Jan. 1, 1979.|
|41||"Interactive Networking with a Satellite", Olson et al., Data Communications, Apr. 1, 1986.|
|42||"Ku-Band Satellite Data Networks Using Very Small Aperture . . . Protocols", Raychaudhuri, et al., Int. Jour. of Satellite Comm., vol. 5, pp. 195-212, Jan. 1, 1987.|
|43||"Low Cost Satellite Data Transmission Networks Using Demand Assigned TDMA", Husted et al., IEEE Conference Proceedings, pp. 8-15, Oct. 1, 1978.|
|44||"Mark IV Terminal Final Report", Hughes Aircraft Report, Erdle, Apr. 1, 1965.|
|45||"McGraw Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology", Encyclopedia, Jan. 1, 1977.|
|46||"Memorandum Opinion and Order", FCC, FCC 84-487; 35150 CC Docket No. 81-704; Adopted: Oct. 17 1984, Jan. 9, 1985.|
|47||"Micro Earth Stations As Personal Computer Accessories", Parker, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 72, No. 11, pp. 1526-1531, Nov. 1, 1984.|
|48||"Microprocessor-Controlled Spread-Spectrum Demodulator", Padgett et al., EASCON '76, pp. 58A-58G, Jan. 1, 1976.|
|49||"Military Satellite Communications, History and Status as of 1974", Vreeburg, National Aerospace Laboratory Report, Amsterdam, Dec. 3, 1974.|
|50||"Modulation Techniques for Multiple Access to a Hard-Limiting Satellite Repeater", Schwartz, et al., Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 54, No. 5, pp. 763-777, May 1, 1966.|
|51||"Multiple Access to a Hard Limiting Communications Satellite Repeater", J. M. Aein, Spread Spectrum Techniques, Jan. 1, 1976.|
|52||"Multiple-Access and Modulation Techniques in the Fixed Satellite Service", CCIR 708, CCIR Report 708 Recommendations and Reports of the CCIR, Jan. 1, 1978.|
|53||"Multiple-Access Communications for Computer Nets", Schwartz, et al., Ch. 8 of Computer-Communication Networks, Prentice-Hall, Jan. 1, 1973.|
|54||"NAVSTAR Global Positioning System (GPS)", Parkinson, National Telecommunications Conference, Dallas, Conf. Rec. vol. 3, pp. 41.1-1 to 41.1-5, Nov. 29, 1976.|
|55||"New Sidelobe Envelopes for Small Aperture Earth Stations", Janky et al., IEEE Trans. on Broadcasting, vol. BC-22, No. 2, pp. 39-44, Jun. 1, 1976.|
|56||"Optimum Satellite Home Receiving Antenna Size at C Band", Sion, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. BC-33, No. 1, pp. 23-26, Mar. 1, 1987.|
|57||"Pictorial Microwave Dictionary", Young, et al., Rider Publications, No. 188, pp. 10-11, Jan. 1, 1956.|
|58||"Radio Wave Propagation and Antennas, An Introduction", Griffiths, Prentice-Hall, Inc., pp. 289-290, Jan. 1, 1987.|
|59||"Radiodetermination Satellite Services and Standards", Rothblatt, Artech House, Norwood, MA, p. 36, Jan. 1, 1954.|
|60||"Reception via the Syncom . . . Parabolic Antenna", Leavitt, et al., U.S. Naval Research Lab. NRL Memo Report 1617, May 17, 1965.|
|61||"Satellite Communications Reference Data Handbook", Defense Communications Agency '84, pp. 4-24,-25;5-33,-35;6-64;7-46,-96, Aug. 1, 1984.|
|62||"Satellite Communications Reference Data Handbook", Defense Communications Agency, pp. 1-10; 6-4,6-5;6-20;6-21;6-22;6-23, Jul. 1, 1972.|
|63||"Satellite Communications to Mobile Platforms", Lebow et al., Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 59, No. 2, Feb. 1, 1971.|
|64||"Satellite Communications", Gagliardi, Lifetime Learning Publications, pp. 20-23, Jan. 1, 1984.|
|65||"Satellite Micro Earth Stations-A Small Investment with Big Returns", Parker, Data Communications, pp. 97-104, Jan. 1, 1983.|
|66||"Satellite News Gathering: An Overview", Uyttendaele, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. BC-32, No. 4, pp. 74-84, Dec. 1, 1986.|
|67||"Shuttle Orbiter Ku-Band . . . Horn", Iwasaki et al., Interim Report, NASA, CR-160316, Aug. 1, 1979.|
|68||"Sky-hooks, Fish-Warmers . . . Communications", Rudge, et al., IEEE Proc., vol. 132, Pt. F., No. 1, pp. 1-12, Feb. 1, 1985.|
|69||"Some Factors that Influence EHF SATCOM Systems", Ricardi, Conference Rec. of Electronics & Aerospace Systems Conf., Arlington, vol. 3, pp. 617-622, Oct. 9, 1979.|
|70||"Spread Spectrum Acquisition and Tracking Performance for Shuttle Communication Links", Alem et al. IEEE Transactions on Comm., No. COM 26, No. 11, 11/1/78.|
|71||"Spread Spectrum and the Radio Amateur", Rinaldo, W4RI, QST, Nov. 1, 1980.|
|72||"Spread Spectrum and Time Division Multiple Access Satellite Communications", Mohanty, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. COM-25, No. 8, pp. 810-815, Aug. 1, 1977.|
|73||"Spread Spectrum Application on State-of-the-Art Equipments", Cohn, Lecture by Assoc. Dir., Advanced Programs, Magnavox Res. Lab, pp. 5-1,5-2.|
|74||"Spread Spectrum Communication . . . Mobile Service", Ormondroyd et al., IEEE International Conf. on Land Mobile Radio, pp. 273-287, Sep. 4, 1979.|
|75||"Spread Spectrum Communications-Myths and Realities", Viterbi, IEEE Publ., pp. 11-18, Jan. 1, 1979.|
|76||"Spread Spectrum Multiple . . . a Satellite", Kochevar, IEEE Transactions on Communications", vol. COM-25, No. 8, pp. 853-856, Aug. 1, 1977.|
|77||"Spread Spectrum Systems", Dixon, First Ed. Wiley-Interscience Publication, pp. 6, 140, 265-269.|
|78||"Spread Spectrum Techniques for the Space Shuttle", Batson, Nat'l Telecommunications Conference, Nov. 27-29, 1979, vol. 1, pp. 54.4.1-54.4.5.|
|79||"Spread-Spectrum . . . Allocation", Telecommunication Journal, vol. 45-I, Jan. 1, 1978.|
|80||"Subjective Evaluation of . . . and Military Users", Campanella et al., IEEE Transactions on Comm. Technology, vol. Com-18, No. 5, pp. 663-672, Oct. 1, 1970.|
|81||"Systeme integre de . . . SINTAC-C2", Milosevic, Proceedings of the Intern. Confer. on Electronic Navigational Aid Systems for Aircraft, Paris, pp. 253-268, Jan. 1, 1977.|
|82||"Systems for Telecommunication by Satellite", Pares, et al., ED. Masson, pp. 78-79 (in French), Jan. 1, 1978.|
|83||"TATS-A Bandspread Modulation . . . Satellite Communication", Drouilhet et al. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace & Electronic Systems, pp. 126-132, Jan. 1, 1969.|
|84||"Technical Considertion of Small Fixed, Mobile and Transportable Satellite System", U.S. Dept. of Commerce/Office of Tellecommunications Report 77-115, pp. 1, 25, 31, 32, 33, 53, Mar. 1, 1977.|
|85||"Techniques for Modulation by Spreading of the Spectrum", CCIR 651, Comite Consultatif Int'l des Radiocommunications, Report 651, vol. 1, Jan. 1, 1978.|
|86||"Telecontrol Technology in Astronautics", Hartl, Springer-Verlag, pp. 155-161, Jan. 1, 1977.|
|87||"The Effect of Hard Limiting . . . Jamming Environment", Konop, National Telecommunications Conference, Dallas, Conf. Record, vol. III, pp. 41.5-1 to 41.5-5, Jan. 1, 1976.|
|88||"The History & Future of Commercial Satellite Communications", Pritchard, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 22-37, May 1, 1984.|
|89||"The Lincoln Experimental Satellites LES-8 and -9", Sarles, et al., IEEE Electronics & Aerospace Systems Convention EASCON-77 Record, pp. 21-1A to 21-1U, Sep. 26, 1977.|
|90||"The Low-Cost Low- Capacity Earth Terminal", Cuccia et al., Microwave Syst. News, vol. 5, pp. 19,20,22,26,30,31,36-40,42, Jun. 1, 1975.|
|91||"The Spread Spectrum Controversy", Buckingham, Electronics & Power, pp. 222,224, Mar. 1, 1980.|
|92||"The Use of PCM in Satellite Communications", Nymoen, TELEKTRONIKK, Nr. 4, pp. 233-239, Jan. 1, 1971.|
|93||"Towards the Intelligent Bird", Evans, Int. Journal of Satellite Communications, vol. 3, pp. 203-215, Jul. 1, 1985.|
|94||"User Equipment for the NAVSTAR Global Positioning System", Jacobson, National Telecommunications Conference, Conf. Record, vol. 3, pp. 41.4-1 to 41.4-5, Nov. 1, 1976.|
|95||"VSAT Networks -An Overview", Maggenti, et al., Int. Journal of Satellite Communications, vol. 5, pp. 219-225, Jan. 1, 1987.|
|96||"Wide Bandwidth Communications" L. S. Schwatz Space/Aeronautics, Dec. 1963.|
|97||*||A Comparison of Pseudo Noise and Conventional Modulation for Multiple Access Satellite Communincations , Blasbalg, IBM Journal of Res. & Dev., vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 241 255, Jul. 1, 1965.|
|98||*||A Family of SHF Tactical . . . Terminals , Lawton et al., IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. AES 6, No. 2, pp. 137 146, Mar. 1, 1976.|
|99||*||A Processing Satellite Transponder . . . Mobile Users , Viterbi, Proceedings of 4th Intern. Confer. on Digital Satellite Comm., Montreal, pp. 116 174, Oct. 23, 1978.|
|100||*||A Spread Spectrum Technique . . . Communications , Cooper et al., 27th Annual Conference IEEE Vehicular Technology Group, pp.98 103, Mar. 16, 1977.|
|101||*||Air Ground, Ground Air . . . A Satellite , Blasbalg, H. et al., IEEE Transactions on Aerospace & Electronic Systems, vol. AES 4, No. 5, pp. 774 791, Sep. 1, 1968.|
|102||*||An Analysis of Domestic & Foreign Small Earth Station Markets , Ginty, Office of Telecommunications Report, Apr. 1, 1976.|
|103||*||Antenna Engineering Handbook , Jasik, Ed., First Edition, McGraw Hill Book Company, pp. 1 2; 1 3, Jan. 1, 1961.|
|104||*||Antenna Performance Standards , FCC, Appendix D to FCC Docket 81 704, Sep. 1, 1978.|
|105||*||Antenna Theory and Design , Stutzman, et al., John Wiley & Sons, pp. 29 30, Jan. 1, 1981.|
|106||*||Antennas , Kraus, McGraw Hill Book Company, pp. 343 346, Jan. 1, 1950.|
|107||*||Anti Jamming Characteristics of GPS/GDM , Hemesath et al., National Telecommunications Conference, vol. III, pp. 41.6 1 to 41.6 5, Jan. 1, 1976.|
|108||*||Applications of the Spread Spectrum Signals from the NOVA Satellites , Prozeller, Proceedings of the National Aerospace Symposium, Springfield, pp. 93 100, Jan. 1, 1979.|
|109||*||Aximuth Correlator for Synthetic Aperture Radar , Arens, NASA Tech. Briefs, pp. 22 23, Mar. 1, 1979.|
|110||*||Cellular Land Mobile Radio: Why Spread Spectrum , Cooper et al., IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 17 24, Mar. 1, 1979.|
|111||*||Central Control Facility for a Satellite Communication System , Blasbalg, et al., IBM Tech. Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 22 24, Jun. 1, 1967.|
|112||*||Commercial U.S. Satellites , Bargellini, IEEE Spectrum, pp. 30 37, Oct. 1, 1979.|
|113||*||Communicating by Satellite , Laskin, Report of the 20th Century Fund Task Force of Intern l Satellite Communications, Jan. 1, 1969.|
|114||*||Communication Satellite Processing Repeaters , Huang et al., Proc. IEEE, vol. 59, No. 2, 1971.|
|115||*||Communications , Jane s Spaceflight Directory, pp. 246 249.|
|116||*||Communications Satellite . . . AMPA Experiment , Durrani et al., Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 15 19, Jan. 1, 1980.|
|117||*||Communications Satellite Systems , Martin, Prentice Hall, Inc., pp. 142 147, 189, 358 359, 365 367, Jan. 1, 1978.|
|118||*||Compatibility of Video and Data Signals . . . Channel , Gallois, et al., IEEE Trans. on Broadcasting, vol. BC 33, No. 3, pp. 70 76, Sep. 1, 1987.|
|119||*||Comsat Technical Review , vol. 8, No. 2, Forcina et al., Fall 1978, pp. 421 453, Sep. 1, 1978.|
|120||*||Cost Effective Data Communications . . . Earth Stations , Parker, IEEE Journ. on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. SAC 3, No. 3, pp. 449 456, May 1, 1985.|
|121||*||Cryptology and the Origins of Spread Spectrum , Kahn, IEEE Spectrum, pp. 70 80, Sep. 1, 1984.|
|122||*||Current and Future Communication Satellite Technology , Morrow, Intern l Astronautical Federation, 26th Congress, Lisbon, Sep. 21, 1975.|
|123||*||Data Encryption Standard , National Bureau of Standards, Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 46, Jan. 15, 1977.|
|124||*||Declaratory Order re Blanket Licensing of Earth Stations, FCC, FCC No. 3588, Apr. 9, 1986.|
|125||*||Defense Satellite Communications System , LaVean, Progress in Astronautics & Aeronautics, vol. 41, MIT Press, Jan. 1, 1975.|
|126||*||Digital Communications by Satellite , Spilker, Prentice Hall, Inc., pp. 190, 191, Jan. 1, 1977.|
|127||*||Digital Data Satellite Systems , Mcmanamon et al., International Conference on Communications, in Minneapolis, Jun. 17, 1974.|
|128||*||Digital Satellite Communications , Ha, Macmillan, 1986, Distributed by Howard W. Sam & Co.), pp. 11, 81, 529 562, Jan. 1, 1986.|
|129||*||DYNAC: A Low Cost Data/Voice Communications Network , Salamoff, et al., Telecommunications, pp. 71 76, Aug. 1, 1979.|
|130||Edward F. Prozeller, "Applications of the Spread-Spectrum Signals to the NOVA Satellites," Proceedings of the National Aerospace Symposium, Springfield, 1979, pp. 93-100.|
|131||*||Edward F. Prozeller, Applications of the Spread Spectrum Signals to the NOVA Satellites, Proceedings of the National Aerospace Symposium, Springfield, 1979, pp. 93 100.|
|132||*||Evolution of Antenna Sidelobe Regulation , Uyttendaele, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. BC 32, No. 4, pp. 85 88, Dec. 1, 1986.|
|133||*||Extension of Satellite Services through Low Cost Earth Stations , Kiesling et al., AIAA 7th Satellite Communication Conference, Apr. 1, 1978.|
|134||*||Frequency Modulation Theory Application to Microwave Links , Fagot et al., Pergamon Press, 1961, Jan. 1, 1961.|
|135||*||GPS Clear/Acquisition Code Spectral Properties , Holmes, National Telecommunications Conference, Conference Record vol. III, pp. 41.7 1 to 41.7 5.|
|136||*||Information Transmission via Satellite , Herter et al., Springer Verlag, pp. 36,37,44,57,58 62 71, Jan. 1, 1979.|
|137||*||Interactive Networking with a Satellite , Olson et al., Data Communications, Apr. 1, 1986.|
|138||International Telecommunications Union (ITU) Radio Regulations (1982) Appendix 30 of Annex 8 definition of "beamwidth".|
|139||*||International Telecommunications Union (ITU) Radio Regulations (1982) Appendix 30 of Annex 8 definition of beamwidth .|
|140||ITU Radio Regulations (1982), Part A, Chapter 1, Article 8, P60 definition of "Earth Station".|
|141||*||ITU Radio Regulations (1982), Part A, Chapter 1, Article 8, P60 definition of Earth Station .|
|142||Kenichi Tsukamoto, "SSRA Satellite Communications System," Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Space Technology & Science, Tokyo, Japan, May 17-22, 1971, pp. 765-774.|
|143||*||Kenichi Tsukamoto, SSRA Satellite Communications System, Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Space Technology & Science, Tokyo, Japan, May 17 22, 1971, pp. 765 774.|
|144||*||Ku Band Satellite Data Networks Using Very Small Aperture . . . Protocols , Raychaudhuri, et al., Int. Jour. of Satellite Comm., vol. 5, pp. 195 212, Jan. 1, 1987.|
|145||*||Low Cost Satellite Data Transmission Networks Using Demand Assigned TDMA , Husted et al., IEEE Conference Proceedings, pp. 8 15, Oct. 1, 1978.|
|146||*||Mark IV Terminal Final Report , Hughes Aircraft Report, Erdle, Apr. 1, 1965.|
|147||*||McGraw Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology , Encyclopedia, Jan. 1, 1977.|
|148||*||Memorandum Opinion and Order , FCC, FCC 84 487; 35150 CC Docket No. 81 704; Adopted: Oct. 17 1984, Jan. 9, 1985.|
|149||*||Micro Earth Stations As Personal Computer Accessories , Parker, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 72, No. 11, pp. 1526 1531, Nov. 1, 1984.|
|150||*||Microprocessor Controlled Spread Spectrum Demodulator , Padgett et al., EASCON 76, pp. 58A 58G, Jan. 1, 1976.|
|151||*||Military Satellite Communications, History and Status as of 1974 , Vreeburg, National Aerospace Laboratory Report, Amsterdam, Dec. 3, 1974.|
|152||Mitsuo Yokoyama, et al., "SSRA Communication Experiment Via ATS-1," Journal of the Radio Research Laboratories, vol. 21, No. 104, Japan, 1974, pp. 93-160.|
|153||*||Mitsuo Yokoyama, et al., SSRA Communication Experiment Via ATS 1, Journal of the Radio Research Laboratories, vol. 21, No. 104, Japan, 1974, pp. 93 160.|
|154||*||Modulation Techniques for Multiple Access to a Hard Limiting Satellite Repeater , Schwartz, et al., Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 54, No. 5, pp. 763 777, May 1, 1966.|
|155||*||Multiple Access and Modulation Techniques in the Fixed Satellite Service , CCIR 708, CCIR Report 708 Recommendations and Reports of the CCIR, Jan. 1, 1978.|
|156||*||Multiple Access Communications for Computer Nets , Schwartz, et al., Ch. 8 of Computer Communication Networks, Prentice Hall, Jan. 1, 1973.|
|157||*||Multiple Access to a Hard Limiting Communications Satellite Repeater , J. M. Aein, Spread Spectrum Techniques, Jan. 1, 1976.|
|158||*||NAVSTAR Global Positioning System (GPS) , Parkinson, National Telecommunications Conference, Dallas, Conf. Rec. vol. 3, pp. 41.1 1 to 41.1 5, Nov. 29, 1976.|
|159||*||New Sidelobe Envelopes for Small Aperture Earth Stations , Janky et al., IEEE Trans. on Broadcasting, vol. BC 22, No. 2, pp. 39 44, Jun. 1, 1976.|
|160||*||Optimum Satellite Home Receiving Antenna Size at C Band , Sion, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. BC 33, No. 1, pp. 23 26, Mar. 1, 1987.|
|161||*||Pictorial Microwave Dictionary , Young, et al., Rider Publications, No. 188, pp. 10 11, Jan. 1, 1956.|
|162||*||Radio Wave Propagation and Antennas, An Introduction , Griffiths, Prentice Hall, Inc., pp. 289 290, Jan. 1, 1987.|
|163||*||Radiodetermination Satellite Services and Standards , Rothblatt, Artech House, Norwood, MA, p. 36, Jan. 1, 1954.|
|164||*||Reception via the Syncom . . . Parabolic Antenna , Leavitt, et al., U.S. Naval Research Lab. NRL Memo Report 1617, May 17, 1965.|
|165||*||Satellite Communications , Gagliardi, Lifetime Learning Publications, pp. 20 23, Jan. 1, 1984.|
|166||*||Satellite Communications Reference Data Handbook , Defense Communications Agency 84, pp. 4 24, 25;5 33, 35;6 64;7 46, 96, Aug. 1, 1984.|
|167||*||Satellite Communications Reference Data Handbook , Defense Communications Agency, pp. 1 10; 6 4,6 5;6 20;6 21;6 22;6 23, Jul. 1, 1972.|
|168||*||Satellite Communications to Mobile Platforms , Lebow et al., Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 59, No. 2, Feb. 1, 1971.|
|169||*||Satellite Micro Earth Stations A Small Investment with Big Returns , Parker, Data Communications, pp. 97 104, Jan. 1, 1983.|
|170||*||Satellite News Gathering: An Overview , Uyttendaele, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. BC 32, No. 4, pp. 74 84, Dec. 1, 1986.|
|171||*||Shuttle Orbiter Ku Band . . . Horn , Iwasaki et al., Interim Report, NASA, CR 160316, Aug. 1, 1979.|
|172||*||Sky hooks, Fish Warmers . . . Communications , Rudge, et al., IEEE Proc., vol. 132, Pt. F., No. 1, pp. 1 12, Feb. 1, 1985.|
|173||*||Some Factors that Influence EHF SATCOM Systems , Ricardi, Conference Rec. of Electronics & Aerospace Systems Conf., Arlington, vol. 3, pp. 617 622, Oct. 9, 1979.|
|174||*||Spread Spectrum . . . Allocation , Telecommunication Journal, vol. 45 I, Jan. 1, 1978.|
|175||*||Spread Spectrum Acquisition and Tracking Performance for Shuttle Communication Links , Alem et al. IEEE Transactions on Comm., No. COM 26, No. 11, 11/1/78.|
|176||*||Spread Spectrum and the Radio Amateur , Rinaldo, W4RI, QST, Nov. 1, 1980.|
|177||*||Spread Spectrum and Time Division Multiple Access Satellite Communications , Mohanty, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. COM 25, No. 8, pp. 810 815, Aug. 1, 1977.|
|178||*||Spread Spectrum Application on State of the Art Equipments , Cohn, Lecture by Assoc. Dir., Advanced Programs, Magnavox Res. Lab, pp. 5 1,5 2.|
|179||*||Spread Spectrum Communication . . . Mobile Service , Ormondroyd et al., IEEE International Conf. on Land Mobile Radio, pp. 273 287, Sep. 4, 1979.|
|180||*||Spread Spectrum Communications Myths and Realities , Viterbi, IEEE Publ., pp. 11 18, Jan. 1, 1979.|
|181||*||Spread Spectrum Multiple . . . a Satellite , Kochevar, IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. COM 25, No. 8, pp. 853 856, Aug. 1, 1977.|
|182||*||Spread Spectrum Systems , Dixon, First Ed. Wiley Interscience Publication, pp. 6, 140, 265 269.|
|183||*||Spread Spectrum Techniques for the Space Shuttle , Batson, Nat l Telecommunications Conference, Nov. 27 29, 1979, vol. 1, pp. 54.4.1 54.4.5.|
|184||*||Subjective Evaluation of . . . and Military Users , Campanella et al., IEEE Transactions on Comm. Technology, vol. Com 18, No. 5, pp. 663 672, Oct. 1, 1970.|
|185||*||Systeme integre de . . . SINTAC C2 , Milosevic, Proceedings of the Intern. Confer. on Electronic Navigational Aid Systems for Aircraft, Paris, pp. 253 268, Jan. 1, 1977.|
|186||*||Systems for Telecommunication by Satellite , Pares, et al., ED. Masson, pp. 78 79 (in French), Jan. 1, 1978.|
|187||*||TATS A Bandspread Modulation . . . Satellite Communication , Drouilhet et al. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace & Electronic Systems, pp. 126 132, Jan. 1, 1969.|
|188||*||Technical Considertion of Small Fixed, Mobile and Transportable Satellite System , U.S. Dept. of Commerce/Office of Tellecommunications Report 77 115, pp. 1, 25, 31, 32, 33, 53, Mar. 1, 1977.|
|189||*||Techniques for Modulation by Spreading of the Spectrum , CCIR 651, Comite Consultatif Int l des Radiocommunications, Report 651, vol. 1, Jan. 1, 1978.|
|190||*||Telecontrol Technology in Astronautics , Hartl, Springer Verlag, pp. 155 161, Jan. 1, 1977.|
|191||*||The Effect of Hard Limiting . . . Jamming Environment , Konop, National Telecommunications Conference, Dallas, Conf. Record, vol. III, pp. 41.5 1 to 41.5 5, Jan. 1, 1976.|
|192||*||The History & Future of Commercial Satellite Communications , Pritchard, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 22 37, May 1, 1984.|
|193||*||The Lincoln Experimental Satellites LES 8 and 9 , Sarles, et al., IEEE Electronics & Aerospace Systems Convention EASCON 77 Record, pp. 21 1A to 21 1U, Sep. 26, 1977.|
|194||*||The Low Cost Low Capacity Earth Terminal , Cuccia et al., Microwave Syst. News, vol. 5, pp. 19,20,22,26,30,31,36 40,42, Jun. 1, 1975.|
|195||*||The Spread Spectrum Controversy , Buckingham, Electronics & Power, pp. 222,224, Mar. 1, 1980.|
|196||*||The Use of PCM in Satellite Communications , Nymoen, TELEKTRONIKK, Nr. 4, pp. 233 239, Jan. 1, 1971.|
|197||*||Towards the Intelligent Bird , Evans, Int. Journal of Satellite Communications, vol. 3, pp. 203 215, Jul. 1, 1985.|
|198||*||User Equipment for the NAVSTAR Global Positioning System , Jacobson, National Telecommunications Conference, Conf. Record, vol. 3, pp. 41.4 1 to 41.4 5, Nov. 1, 1976.|
|199||*||VSAT Networks An Overview , Maggenti, et al., Int. Journal of Satellite Communications, vol. 5, pp. 219 225, Jan. 1, 1987.|
|200||*||Wide Bandwidth Communications L. S. Schwatz Space/Aeronautics, Dec. 1963.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5073900 *||Mar 19, 1990||Dec 17, 1991||Mallinckrodt Albert J||Integrated cellular communications system|
|US5077754 *||Mar 20, 1990||Dec 31, 1991||Kabushiki Kaisha Kenwood||Tau-dither circuit|
|US5274626 *||Feb 2, 1990||Dec 28, 1993||Nec Corporation||Earth station capable of carrying out communication without a control station|
|US5297162 *||Jun 4, 1993||Mar 22, 1994||Motorola, Inc.||System and method for bit timing synchronization in an adaptive direct sequence CDMA communication system|
|US5301354 *||Feb 8, 1993||Apr 5, 1994||Motorola, Inc.||Satellite based global paging system|
|US5339330 *||Oct 24, 1991||Aug 16, 1994||David D. Otten||Integrated cellular communications system|
|US5343305 *||Oct 25, 1991||Aug 30, 1994||Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.||Multiple addressing facsimile system|
|US5359624 *||Jun 7, 1993||Oct 25, 1994||Motorola, Inc.||System and method for chip timing synchronization in an adaptive direct sequence CDMA communication system|
|US5454009 *||Jan 13, 1994||Sep 26, 1995||Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.||Method and apparatus for providing energy dispersal using frequency diversity in a satellite communications system|
|US5537397 *||Jun 7, 1994||Jul 16, 1996||Aloha Networks, Inc.||Spread aloha CDMA data communications|
|US5594780 *||Jun 2, 1995||Jan 14, 1997||Space Systems/Loral, Inc.||Satellite communication system that is coupled to a terrestrial communication network and method|
|US5619525 *||Jun 6, 1995||Apr 8, 1997||Globalstar L.P.||Closed loop power control for low earth orbit satellite communications system|
|US5623269 *||Feb 2, 1995||Apr 22, 1997||Space Systems/Loral, Inc.||Mobile communication satellite payload|
|US5625639 *||Oct 19, 1994||Apr 29, 1997||Nec Corporation||Spread spectrum method for transmitting an information signal as a radio signal at a high speed|
|US5634190 *||Jun 6, 1995||May 27, 1997||Globalstar L.P.||Low earth orbit communication satellite gateway-to-gateway relay system|
|US5640386 *||Jun 6, 1995||Jun 17, 1997||Globalstar L.P.||Two-system protocol conversion transceiver repeater|
|US5649318 *||Mar 24, 1995||Jul 15, 1997||Terrastar, Inc.||Apparatus for converting an analog c-band broadcast receiver into a system for simultaneously receiving analog and digital c-band broadcast television signals|
|US5657323 *||Jul 24, 1995||Aug 12, 1997||Motorola, Inc.||Method and apparatus for signal transmission in a communication system|
|US5664006 *||Jun 7, 1995||Sep 2, 1997||Globalstar L.P.||Method for accounting for user terminal connection to a satellite communications system|
|US5697050 *||Dec 12, 1996||Dec 9, 1997||Globalstar L.P.||Satellite beam steering reference using terrestrial beam steering terminals|
|US5734962 *||Jul 17, 1996||Mar 31, 1998||General Electric Company||Satellite communications system utilizing parallel concatenated coding|
|US5745084 *||Oct 13, 1995||Apr 28, 1998||Lusignan; Bruce B.||Very small aperture terminal & antenna for use therein|
|US5745485 *||Jun 19, 1996||Apr 28, 1998||Aloha Networks, Inc.||Dual code multiple access for wireless data networks|
|US5758260 *||Aug 23, 1995||May 26, 1998||Globalstar L.P.||Satellite beam steering reference using terrestrial beam steering terminals|
|US5758261 *||Mar 3, 1997||May 26, 1998||Globalstar L.P.||Low earth orbit communication satellite gateway-to-gateway relay system|
|US5787336 *||Nov 8, 1994||Jul 28, 1998||Space Systems/Loral, Inc.||Satellite communication power management system|
|US5797082 *||Jan 9, 1997||Aug 18, 1998||Terrastar, Inc.||Communication receiver for receiving satellite broadcasts|
|US5802445 *||Jul 13, 1995||Sep 1, 1998||Globalstar L.P.||Methods and apparatus for providing user RF exposure monitoring and control in a satellite communications system|
|US5812538 *||Jan 3, 1997||Sep 22, 1998||Globalstar L.P.||Multiple satellite repeater capacity loading with multiple spread spectrum gateway antennas|
|US5812932 *||Nov 17, 1995||Sep 22, 1998||Globalstar L.P.||Mobile satellite user information request system and methods|
|US5826170 *||Mar 3, 1997||Oct 20, 1998||Space Systems/Loral, Inc.||Satellite communication power management system|
|US5859874 *||May 9, 1994||Jan 12, 1999||Globalstar L.P.||Multipath communication system optimizer|
|US5867109 *||Apr 17, 1997||Feb 2, 1999||Globalstar L.P.||Satellite repeater diversity resource management system|
|US5875180 *||Feb 6, 1997||Feb 23, 1999||Globalstar L.P.||Satellite telephone interference avoidance system|
|US5884142 *||Apr 15, 1997||Mar 16, 1999||Globalstar L.P.||Low earth orbit distributed gateway communication system|
|US5896558 *||Dec 19, 1996||Apr 20, 1999||Globalstar L.P.||Interactive fixed and mobile satellite network|
|US5918157 *||Mar 18, 1997||Jun 29, 1999||Globalstar L.P.||Satellite communications system having distributed user assignment and resource assignment with terrestrial gateways|
|US6134423 *||Dec 23, 1997||Oct 17, 2000||Globalstar L.P.||Satellite communications system having gateway-based user RF exposure monitoring and control|
|US6201961||Sep 13, 1996||Mar 13, 2001||Globalstar L. P.||Use of reference phone in point-to-point satellite communication system|
|US6233463||Feb 9, 1998||May 15, 2001||Globalstar L.P.||Automatic satellite terrestrial mobile terminal roaming system and method|
|US6240124||Nov 2, 1999||May 29, 2001||Globalstar L.P.||Closed loop power control for low earth orbit satellite communications system|
|US6243409||Jul 15, 1997||Jun 5, 2001||Novatel, Inc.||Global navigation satellite system receiver with blanked-PRN code correlation|
|US6253080||Jul 8, 1999||Jun 26, 2001||Globalstar L.P.||Low earth orbit distributed gateway communication system|
|US6272316||Jun 3, 1998||Aug 7, 2001||Globalstar L.P.||Mobile satellite user information request system and methods|
|US6272325||Sep 18, 1998||Aug 7, 2001||Globalstar L.P.||Method and apparatus for considering user terminal transmitted power during operation in a plurality of different communication systems|
|US6272339||Sep 28, 2000||Aug 7, 2001||Globalstar L.P.||Global mobile paging system|
|US6301476||Aug 7, 2000||Oct 9, 2001||Globalstar L.P.||Satellite communication service with non-congruent sub-beam coverage|
|US6304996||Mar 8, 1999||Oct 16, 2001||General Electric Company||High-speed turbo decoder|
|US6418147 *||Jan 21, 1998||Jul 9, 2002||Globalstar Lp||Multiple vocoder mobile satellite telephone system|
|US6463279||Nov 17, 1999||Oct 8, 2002||Globalstar L.P.||Channel frequency allocation for multiple-satellite communication network|
|US6473597||Apr 12, 2000||Oct 29, 2002||Thomas M. Johnson||Method and apparatus for modeling transmitter bandwidth for telecommunications analysis|
|US6516437||Mar 7, 2000||Feb 4, 2003||General Electric Company||Turbo decoder control for use with a programmable interleaver, variable block length, and multiple code rates|
|US6535544 *||Aug 31, 1999||Mar 18, 2003||Andrzej Partyka||Frequency hopping system for intermittent transmission|
|US6587687||Oct 21, 1996||Jul 1, 2003||Globalstar L.P.||Multiple satellite fade attenuation control system|
|US6590889||Mar 3, 1999||Jul 8, 2003||Gte Internetworking Incorporated||Data communications system and hybrid time-code multiplexing method|
|US6594792||Apr 28, 2000||Jul 15, 2003||General Electric Company||Modular turbo decoder for expanded code word length|
|US6625204||Apr 23, 1999||Sep 23, 2003||Aloha Networks, Inc.||Synchronization and bit detection in a single spreading sequence SAMA receiver|
|US6654357||Jun 25, 1998||Nov 25, 2003||Globalstar L.P.||Satellite repeater diversity resource management system|
|US6661996||Jul 14, 1998||Dec 9, 2003||Globalstar L.P.||Satellite communication system providing multi-gateway diversity to a mobile user terminal|
|US6700920||Sep 14, 1999||Mar 2, 2004||Andrzej Partyka||Frequency hopping system for intermittent transmission|
|US6715120||Apr 28, 2000||Mar 30, 2004||General Electric Company||Turbo decoder with modified input for increased code word length and data rate|
|US6728293||Sep 14, 1999||Apr 27, 2004||Andrzej Partyka||Hopping pattern generation method in frequency hopping system for intermittent transmission|
|US6731223||Jan 15, 2000||May 4, 2004||Andrzej Partyka||Meshed telemetry system|
|US6735440||Apr 6, 2001||May 11, 2004||Globalstar L.P.||Low earth orbit distributed gateway communication system|
|US6870875||Sep 30, 1999||Mar 22, 2005||Andrzej Partyka||Transmission of urgent messages in frequency hopping system for intermittent transmission|
|US6894975||Jan 15, 2000||May 17, 2005||Andrzej Partyka||Synchronization and access of the nodes in a communications network|
|US6925105||May 1, 2000||Aug 2, 2005||Andrzej Partyka||Overhead reduction in system for intermittent transmission|
|US6940452||Sep 29, 2003||Sep 6, 2005||Northrop Grumman Corporation||Reducing co-channel interference in satellite communications systems by antenna re-pointing|
|US6967974||Sep 28, 2000||Nov 22, 2005||Andrzej Partyka||Transmission of urgent messages in telemetry system|
|US7142521||Mar 13, 2002||Nov 28, 2006||Transcore Link Logistics Corporation||Wireless packet data distributed communications system|
|US7209495||Nov 21, 2005||Apr 24, 2007||Andrzej Partyka||Urgent messages and power-up in frequency hopping system for intemittent transmission|
|US7224713||Dec 20, 2000||May 29, 2007||Andrzej Partyka||Telemetry system with authentication|
|US7236508 *||Sep 28, 2001||Jun 26, 2007||The Directv Group, Inc.||Application of complex codes to maximize feeder link utilization|
|US7346284 *||Dec 19, 2006||Mar 18, 2008||Nortel Networks Limited||Method and apparatus for encoding optical power and non-payload data in an optical signal|
|US7376105 *||Sep 5, 2002||May 20, 2008||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Source coding for interference reduction|
|US7492811 *||Jan 17, 2007||Feb 17, 2009||Alereon, Inc.||Method and system for fast acquisition of ultra-wideband signals|
|US7590083||Jun 12, 2006||Sep 15, 2009||Transcore Link Logistics Corp.||Wireless packet data distributed communications system|
|US8335515||Mar 9, 2012||Dec 18, 2012||Thiss Technologies Pte Ltd||Radio network assignment and access system|
|US8699505||Jan 15, 2003||Apr 15, 2014||Qualcomm Incorporated||Dynamic channelization code allocation|
|US8723651||Jun 21, 2011||May 13, 2014||Intelleflex Corporation||Variable rate preamble detection using ratiometric methods|
|US8731118||Jun 21, 2011||May 20, 2014||Intelleflex Corporation||Data clock recovery loop jam set using subcarrier frequency estimate|
|US8755425 *||Feb 10, 2011||Jun 17, 2014||Comtech Ef Data Corp.||Method and system for transmission of identification via metadata for repeating relays using spread-spectrum technology|
|US8774329 *||Jun 21, 2011||Jul 8, 2014||Intelleflex Corporation||Variable length correlator|
|US8774710||Jun 21, 2011||Jul 8, 2014||Intelleflex Corporation||Dynamic signal detection threshold|
|US8824607||Jun 21, 2011||Sep 2, 2014||Intelleflex Corporation||Subcarrier frequency acquisition and complex derotation to baseband|
|US8913647||Apr 15, 2014||Dec 16, 2014||Comtech Ef Data Corp.||Embedded meta-carrier with code progression message reassembly|
|US9088346||Feb 12, 2014||Jul 21, 2015||Comtech Ef Data Corp.||System and method for a broadcast recovery carrier channel for static and dynamic carrier systems|
|US9183418||Jun 21, 2011||Nov 10, 2015||Intelleflex Corporation||Half bit correlator combining for data demodulation|
|US9224016||Jun 21, 2011||Dec 29, 2015||Intelleflex Corporation||Automatic gain control and baseband preintegration to reduce computation requirements at lower data rates|
|US9230141||Jun 21, 2011||Jan 5, 2016||Intelleflex Corporation||RSSI estimate on variable length correlator output|
|US9361488||Jun 21, 2011||Jun 7, 2016||Intelleflex Corporation||Single or dual complex subcarrier downconversion|
|US20020089956 *||Mar 13, 2002||Jul 11, 2002||Hans-Christian Haugli||Wireless packet data distributed communications system|
|US20020122468 *||Jan 12, 2001||Sep 5, 2002||Terion, Inc.||Quasi orthogonal hybrid walsh-PN codes for CDMA application in HF modems|
|US20030115533 *||Sep 5, 2002||Jun 19, 2003||Asada Haruhiko H.||Source coding for interference reduction|
|US20030224798 *||Jan 15, 2003||Dec 4, 2003||Serge Willenegger||Dynamic channelization code allocation|
|US20040028411 *||Aug 7, 2002||Feb 12, 2004||Ses-Americom, Incorporated||System and method for transmitting high-bandwidth signals over a satellite communications system|
|US20040092228 *||Nov 4, 2003||May 13, 2004||Force Charles T.||Apparatus and method for enabling use of low power satellites, such as C-band, to broadcast to mobile and non-directional receivers, and signal design therefor|
|US20060268738 *||Apr 22, 2004||Nov 30, 2006||Goerke Thomas E||Radio network assignment and access system|
|US20070008916 *||Jun 12, 2006||Jan 11, 2007||Hans-Christian Haugli||Wireless packet data distributed communications system|
|US20070122162 *||Dec 19, 2006||May 31, 2007||Nortel Networks Limited||Method and apparatus for encoding optical power and non-payload data in an optical signal|
|US20070286272 *||Jan 17, 2007||Dec 13, 2007||Alereon, Inc.||Method and system for fast acquisition of ultra-wideband signals|
|US20120002701 *||Jan 5, 2012||Comtech Ef Data Corp.||Method and System for Transmission of Identification via Metadata for Repeating Relays using Spread-Spectrum Technology|
|US20120002760 *||Jan 5, 2012||Intelleflex Corporation||Variable length correlator|
|CN1049314C *||Jun 25, 1993||Feb 9, 2000||Cd无线电公司||Radio frequency broadcasting systems and methods using two low-cost geosychronous satellites|
|EP0493904A2 *||Dec 10, 1991||Jul 8, 1992||AT&T Corp.||Method and apparatus for reducing effects of multiple access interference in a radio receiver in a code division multiple access communication system|
|EP0584617A2 *||Aug 6, 1993||Mar 2, 1994||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Data transmission system by satellite|
|WO1994029985A1 *||Jun 3, 1994||Dec 22, 1994||Motorola Inc.||A communication method for an adaptive direct sequence cdma communication system|
|WO1999038336A2 *||Dec 23, 1998||Jul 29, 1999||Globalstar, L.P.||Multiple vocoder mobile satellite telephone system|
|WO1999038336A3 *||Dec 23, 1998||Oct 28, 1999||Globalstar Lp||Multiple vocoder mobile satellite telephone system|
|U.S. Classification||370/320, 370/324, 375/130, 455/13.2|
|Jan 8, 1993||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: GTE SPACENET SATELLITE SERVICES CORPORATION, VIRGI
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:EQUATORIAL COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:006369/0437
Effective date: 19920820
|Nov 6, 1998||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: GE CAPITAL SPACENET SERVICES, INC., VIRGINIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GE CAPITAL SPACENET SATELLITE SERVICES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:009564/0219
Effective date: 19981102
|May 28, 1999||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CAHILL WARNOCK STRATEGIC PARTNERS FUND, AGENT, MAR
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:INTERLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., A DELAWARE CORP.;REEL/FRAME:009980/0096
Effective date: 19990524
|Jun 10, 1999||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: GE CAPITAL SPACENET SATELITE SERVICES, INC, VIRGIN
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:GTE SPACENET SATELLITE SERVICES CORP.;REEL/FRAME:010018/0350
Effective date: 19941107
|Jul 19, 1999||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CAHILL, WARNOCK, STRATEGIC PARTNERS FUND, L.P. A
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:INTERLINK COMMUNICATIONS INC. A DELAWARE CORP.;REEL/FRAME:010095/0931
Effective date: 19990618
|Oct 8, 1999||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: INTERLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CAHILL, WARNOCK, STRATEGIC PARTNERS FUND, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:010288/0457
Effective date: 19990827