|Publication number||USRE33621 E|
|Application number||US 07/246,260|
|Publication date||Jun 25, 1991|
|Filing date||Sep 19, 1988|
|Priority date||Oct 3, 1983|
|Publication number||07246260, 246260, US RE33621 E, US RE33621E, US-E-RE33621, USRE33621 E, USRE33621E|
|Inventors||Steve R. Lamb, Robert R. Moore|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (31), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (12), Classifications (6), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
.Iadd.This application is a continuation of our copending reissue application Ser. No. 828,453 filed Feb. 11, 1986, abandoned, which is a reissue application of U.S. Pat. No. 4,523,585, that issued on June 18, 1985 from application Ser. No. 538,120, filed Oct. 3, 1983 which is a contuation-in-part application of application Ser. No. 315,424 filed Oct. 27, 1981, entitled ANATOMIC FRACTURE BRACE FOR THE KNEE and now abandoned. .Iaddend.
This invention relates to a knee brace and particularly to a knee brace applied to a patient's knee subsequent a fracture of tibia or femur, or after operation on the knee or in other cases where knee flexion and extension is desired under a restricted and/or supported condition.
It has been found that the traditional immobilization of joints above and below a fractured bone results in undesirable consequences to the joints. While temporary stiffness of the immobilized joint and atrophy of the limb musculature are recognized as an inevitable consequence of such practice, often iatrogenic stiffness and swelling can constitute a severe complication and should be avoided if possible.
It has been discovered that the use of a brace at the site of the knee to allow a degree of motion to the knee joint while providing a connective support between the tibia and femur will substantially reduce the expected joint stiffness and muscle atrophy and will curtail pain and swelling that often accompanied removal of conventional casts which immobilized joints.
Because the knee is not a single-axis joint, the use of a bracing system with a single pivot axis caused pistoning of the leg and either failed to provide the support necessary or caused additional trauma prolonging recovery. Bracing devices employing more than one axis were developed in an attempt to follow the polycentric movement of the knee joint. Most prior art devices employ members with a gear tooth interconnection where two elongated elements each have a gear tooth end and proximately spaced pivotal axis pins interconnected by a connecting link. However, either because the true motion of the knee joint was not correctly understood or for reasons of simplicity, the devices devised did not follow the kinematic motion of the knee and the resultant motion for each element was essentially symmetrical or mirror-like in effect.
One prior art device employed a four-bar link concept which, however, was arranged in a symmetrical manner and essentially duplicated, with some enlargement, the mirror-like motion path common to the gear-type mechanisms.
In the authoritative publication, "Kinematics of the Human Knee Joint", IBM New York Scientific Center Report No. 320-2928, January 1968, the precise motion of the polycentric knee joint was described and defined. Computer aided synthesis was employed by Applicant to duplicate this motion in a mechanism. While exact duplication required mechanics of awkward design, the motion could be closely followed within practical limits by a four-bar linkage with assymetrical positioning of its linkage axes. The resultant motion did not have the mirror-image effect of prior art systems, but parodied the assymetrical motion of the human knee.
This invention is directed in particular to a four-bar linkage mechanism to achieve a polycentric motion that follows the actual motion of the human knee. The four-bar linkage mechanism is incorporatable into a bracing system for lateral restraint and vertical support of an injured or post operative leg, relieving the knee of aggravating stresses while permitting mobility to the knee and early ambulation of the patient. The linkage mechanism is designed for use in pairs, placed on each side of the patient's knee and located by a marking on the mechanism to specified points on each side of the patient's knee. The pair of linkage mechanisms are fixed in place by conventional means depending on the nature of the knee treatment. For example, in fractures of the tibia or femur, extension members of the linkage mechanisms are incorporated into the leg cast, which is modified to permit motion to the knee joint.
For less traumatic injuries or post-operative or phased treatments, the linkage mechanisms may be strapped or bound to the leg above and below the knee to provide the degree of support and restriction desired.
As noted, the linkage mechanism both restricts lateral displacements of the knee joint and permits a natural supportive motion to the knee. Compressive forces of the femoral condyle on the tibial plateau are relieved during ambulatory motion of the patient. Stiffness and muscle atrophy are prevented and the patient is able to assume a minimally restrictive ambulatory movement substantially earlier than previously allowed. The close conformity of the linkage motion to the actual motion of the knee prevents pistoning of the leg, particularly when cast, preventing undesirable dynamically applied stresses common to prior art systems.
These and other features will become apparent from a detailed description of the preferred embodiments.
FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of the preferred embodiment of the knee brace mechanism.
FIG. 2 is an end elevational view of the mechanism of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a side elevational view of an alternate embodiment of the knee brace mechanism.
FIG. 4 is a side elevational view of an additional alternate embodiment of the knee brace mechanism.
FIG. 5 is a schematic illustration of a brace mechanism located on a user's leg.
FIG. 6 is a diagrammatic illustration of the motion path of the subject knee brace mechanism in comparison with the actual motion of the knee and other prior art devices.
Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, the preferred brace mechanism designated by the reference numeral 10 is shown. The brace mechanism comprises a four-bar linkage system with its links specifically arranged to approximate the polycentric joint movement of the human knee. The brace mechanism 10 has two primary links, an upper extension link 12 which is constructed to extend up the patient's leg for anchoring and a lower extension link 14 which is directed down the patient's leg for anchoring. The precise length of the extensions is not critical and terminal pads 16 may be eliminated depending on the anchoring means employed. In most cases, the extension links will be anchored by incorporation into a leg cast, which after curing is cut at the knee joint to allow pivot at the knee.
The upper and lower extension links are crooked at their connective ends 18,20 to improve alignment of the motion centers of the brace mechanism with the corresponding motions of the knee while maintaining the natural placement and narrow width to the elongated extension links. The crooked ends are spaced from one another and interconnected by crossed connecting links 22 and 24. The crossed connecting links each have two spaced pivotal axes, 26' and 28', and 30' and 32', with interconnecting pivot pins 26, 28, 30 and 32, one connected to the upper extension link 12 and one connected to the lower extension link 14. Each extension link has two axes of connection, one for each connecting link. While the distance between pivotal axes on the two crossed connecting links are substantially equal, the distance "x" between the pivotal axes 26' and 28' on the upper extension link 12 is less than the distance "y" between the pivotal axes 30' and 32' on the lower extension link 14. This symmetrical arrangement of the pivot axes effects the peculiar motion desired. While the distance "x" is approximately 3/8 inch and the distance "y" is approximately 5/8 inch, the specific distance of each is variable allowing adaptations of the mechanisms to small or large bone structure or slight variations in motion, so long as the dimension between the axes on the upper extension link is less than the dimension between the axes on the lower extension link. When the extension links are aligned, the pivots are offset in approximately a .[.30°.]. .Iadd.45° .Iaddend.line from the vertical to optimize the angular displacement of the extension links on bending of the knee.
In the preferred embodiment, the connecting link 22 is plate-like in configuration to accommodate a variable stop to limit articulation of the brace mechanism. Included in the link is a guide slot 34 with slide stops 36 with a flat key face 37 which allows the stop to slide along the slot to restrict articulation at points desired by the attending physican, for example, when only a slight pivot to the knee can be permitted for a serious injury. The relatively large radius of the arc of the slot is designed to reduce stresses on the stops during use.
The degree of articulation permitted by the stops can be adjusted with the aid of an arrow marking 33 stamped on the elbow of the lower extension link 14 in conjunction with scale markings 35 stamped on the plate like connecting link 22. The scale markings indicate the degree of articulation from a vertical alignment of the upper extension link and the lower extension link.
Also located on link 22 are locating marking 39 comprising stamped arrows with a locating hole 38. The hole is used to position and align the extension links of a pair of the brace mechanisms alongside each side of the leg on the TKA (Trochanter, Knee, Ankle) axis with the hole positioned on the bone prominance of the femur which is located and premarked by the physician. The proximate placement of the outer brace mechanism of the pair on a patient is shown in FIG. 5.
Referring to FIG. 3, an alternate embodiment 40 of the brace mechanism is shown. The parts are substantially identical to the mechanism 10 of FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 with the two connecting links 42 and 44 identical in configuration. In this embodiment, no provision is made for a stop mechanism and the alignment means 46 comprises the intersecting point 46 of the back edges of the two connecting cross links when the extension links are aligned. Operationally, the movement is the same.
Referring to FIG. 4 a second alternate embodiment 48 of the brace mechanism is shown. The construction is similar to the embodiment 40 with the addition of a stop pin 50 to limit articulation to a vertical aligned position and a slide lock 52 to lock the brace mechanism in the aligned position. The stop pin 50 is threaded to the toe of the upper extension link 12 and projects therefrom to contact the edge of the modified connecting link 54. The connecting link 54 is modified to include a tab extension 56 which aligns with the upper extension link 12, when the two extension links are aligned. The slide lock 52 comprises a rectangular collar member which slides on the upper extension link 12 and can be lowered to encompass the tab extension 56. This embodiment is used when articulation of the leg at the knee is to be prevented and permitted only during brief periods of supervised exercise or manipulation.
Referring to FIG. 5 the brace mechanism 10 is schematically shown on one side of a user's leg 50. It is to be understood that the brace mechanism is used in pairs on either side of the leg for operational support. While a simple tape wrap 60 is shown retaining the mechanism against the leg, in most cases the mechanism would be largely covered by a leg .[.cost.]. .Iadd.cast .Iaddend.or orthopedic bracing, exposing only the linkage portion of the mechanism to permit the desired articulation.
In FIG. 6 the comparative instant centers of rotation of the human knee a-a', the invented asymmetrical four-bar link mechanism b-b', a prior art symmetrical four-bar link mechanism c-c', and a typical gear-type mechanism d-d' are shown. Progressing from a common .[.center.]..Iadd.centrodes.Iaddend., each of the dual .[.center.]. .Iadd.centrodes .Iaddend.diverge as the systems move from alignment (where the leg is straight) to an angled position (where the leg is bent). The non-mirror-like motion of the polycentric human knee and subject brace mechanism with their one curved and one straight trajectories are shown to differ substantially from the mirror-like motions of the prior art systems.
The conformity of motion of the brace mechanism to the actual motion of the knee is important not only for uniformity in the degree of support, but when the extension links are anchored within a cast, to prevent the links from pushing or pulling on the cast in position fashion, which will cause inherent stress on the site of injury.
While in the foregoing embodiments of the invention have been set forth in considerable detail for the purposes of making a complete disclosure of the invention, it should be apparent to those of skill in the art that numerous changes may be made in such details without departing from the spirit and principles of the invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2208275 *||Jun 25, 1937||Jul 16, 1940||Conner French J||Artificial knee|
|US2638605 *||Apr 23, 1951||May 19, 1953||Northrop Aircraft Inc||Anatomical knee|
|US2877033 *||Mar 16, 1956||Mar 10, 1959||Dreher Mfg Company||Artificial joint|
|US3785372 *||Jan 2, 1973||Jan 15, 1974||Craig W||Extension desubluxation hinge appliance|
|US3823424 *||Feb 28, 1973||Jul 16, 1974||Hanger J And Co Ltd||Artificial leg with stable link-type knee joint|
|US3826251 *||Jan 4, 1973||Jul 30, 1974||Ross C||Locking knee joint for orthopedic leg brace|
|US3827431 *||Apr 3, 1972||Aug 6, 1974||Pecorella I||Orthopedic appliance having detachable fastening means|
|US3885252 *||Apr 2, 1973||May 27, 1975||Nakajima Hirofumi||Device for uniting the thigh and lower leg|
|US3901223 *||May 28, 1974||Aug 26, 1975||Hanger & Co Ltd J E||Knee joints for leg irons|
|US3902482 *||May 28, 1974||Sep 2, 1975||Taylor George A||Mechanical joint for an orthopedic brace or prosthesis|
|US4136404 *||Mar 14, 1977||Jan 30, 1979||Lange Robert B||Athletic leg brace apparatus|
|US4145766 *||Dec 12, 1977||Mar 27, 1979||J. E. Hanger & Company Limited||Adjustable friction joint for an artificial knee|
|US4245629 *||Dec 13, 1978||Jan 20, 1981||Cummins Alfred B||Knee and elbow joint protector|
|US4256097 *||Dec 29, 1978||Mar 17, 1981||Willis Robert E||Orthopedic apparatus for protecting and supporting a bone joint|
|US4268923 *||Jan 17, 1980||May 26, 1981||Lamberto Staffieri||Thigh prosthesis|
|US4323059 *||Apr 16, 1980||Apr 6, 1982||Andre Rambert||Articulated splint for a knee joint|
|US4337764 *||Mar 2, 1981||Jul 6, 1982||United States Manufacturing Company||Adjustable motion brace|
|US4340041 *||Jan 24, 1980||Jul 20, 1982||Blanc Gmbh & Co.||Articulate splint for surgical purposes|
|US4361142 *||Aug 20, 1981||Nov 30, 1982||Northwestern University||Knee orthosis and joint construction therefor|
|US4372298 *||Jul 20, 1981||Feb 8, 1983||U.S. Manufacturing Co.||Knee brace|
|US4379463 *||Apr 13, 1981||Apr 12, 1983||Camp International, Inc.||Multicentric knee cage|
|US4407276 *||Jan 22, 1981||Oct 4, 1983||Medical Designs, Inc.||Brace for articulated limbs|
|US4463751 *||Dec 27, 1982||Aug 7, 1984||Bledsoe Gary R||Stabilizing knee hinge|
|US4493316 *||Mar 10, 1983||Jan 15, 1985||Donjoy, Inc.||Articulating knee stabilizer|
|US4506661 *||Apr 21, 1983||Mar 26, 1985||Foster Dean J||Balanced suspension knee brace|
|US4524764 *||Sep 6, 1983||Jun 25, 1985||Miller Harold E||Knee brace|
|US4554913 *||Nov 7, 1983||Nov 26, 1985||Scott Orthopedics, Inc.||Adjustable joint for a knee brace|
|DE841190C *||Nov 29, 1949||Jun 13, 1952||Robert Kellner||Unterschenkelkunstbein|
|DE1491569A1 *||Jan 14, 1966||Jul 31, 1969||Lammers Heinrich||Beinorthese|
|FR736141A *||Title not available|
|FR982500A *||Title not available|
|1||"Kinematics of the Human Knee Joint", IBM New York Scientific Center Report No. 320-2928, Jan. 1968.|
|2||*||Kinematics of the Human Knee Joint , IBM New York Scientific Center Report No. 320 2928, Jan. 1968.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5259832 *||Mar 6, 1991||Nov 9, 1993||Jeffrey H. Townsend||Multiaxis controlled motion knee brace with a four bar joint and method for producing same|
|US5372572 *||Sep 27, 1990||Dec 13, 1994||Tamagni Ag||Knee orthesis appliance|
|US5472410 *||Apr 22, 1994||Dec 5, 1995||Deroyal/Lmb, Inc.||Adjustable flexion and extension joint orthoses|
|US5545232 *||Feb 21, 1995||Aug 13, 1996||Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie Besitz-und Verwaltungs-Kommanditgesesll schaft||Device for mutual pivoting connection of parts of an orthopaedic apparatus|
|US5683353 *||Nov 29, 1995||Nov 4, 1997||Deroyal/Lmb, Inc.||Adjustable flexion and extension joint orthoses|
|US6390998 *||Mar 5, 1998||May 21, 2002||Kelvin Doyle||Hinge mechanism for a limb protector|
|US6669659||Feb 22, 2002||Dec 30, 2003||Andrew M. Dittmer||Portable foldable splint|
|US6749640 *||Nov 24, 2000||Jun 15, 2004||Heggemann Gmbh||Multiaxis joint, especially artificial knee joint|
|US7507215||Jul 10, 2006||Mar 24, 2009||Jri Development Group, Llc||Orthotic brace|
|US8728018||Mar 31, 2010||May 20, 2014||Top Shelf Manufacturing, Llc||Post operative hinge brace|
|US20100256543 *||Mar 31, 2010||Oct 7, 2010||Top Shelf, Inc||Post operative hinge brace|
|EP0790046A1 *||Jan 23, 1997||Aug 20, 1997||Albrecht GmbH||Joint support, particularly for the knee|
|U.S. Classification||602/16, 623/39, 602/26|