Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUSRE33668 E
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 07/507,278
Publication dateAug 20, 1991
Filing dateMar 22, 1990
Priority dateFeb 10, 1981
Fee statusPaid
Publication number07507278, 507278, US RE33668 E, US RE33668E, US-E-RE33668, USRE33668 E, USRE33668E
InventorsJohn E. Gray
Original AssigneeOtis Elevator Company
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Detection device having energy transmitters located at vertically spaced apart points along movable doors
US RE33668 E
In the entranceway between an elevator car and a floor are two oppositely sliding doors. The approach of these doors is controlled by a detection system that senses the presence of objects between the doors. This system includes, on each door, a plurality of emitters which are vertically spaced apart the door edge, for radiating noncollimated light towards the edge of the other door. At the top and bottom portions of each door edge there is a sensor which can receive the radiation from the emitters on the other door edge. The emitters on each door edge are sequentially turned on and the sensors on the opposite door edge provide a corresponding signal as they are turned on, unless an obstruction is in the way, causing the detection system to generate a signal that thus indicates than an object is between the doors.
Previous page
Next page
I claim:
1. A method for detecting the presence of an object in the path of a closing sliding door, characterized by:
sequentially activating energy transmitters as the door closes, to transmit energy .[.between.]. .Iadd.from .Iaddend.vertically spaced apart points along one of the two vertical edges of the area closed by the door to a detector on the second of said edges, an imaginary line between the detector and each transmitter decreasing as the door closes and being at an angle greater than 0 but less than 90 degrees to the direction in which the door slides;
sensing the transmitted energy with the detector for producing an output signal in response to the energy;
sensing the output from the detector when the energy is transmitted from each energy transmitter and providing a door stop signal when there is no output from the detector when each energy transmitter is activated.
2. A detection system for detecting the presence of an object in the path of a closing sliding door, characterized by:
a plurality of energy transmitters located at vertically spaced apart points on one vertical edge of the area into which the door slides to a closed position;
a second vertical edge on said area that is substantially parallel to said one edge, the distance between said one edge and said second edge decreasing as the door closes;
an energy detector capable of providing an output signal in response to the energy transmitted by each transmitter, and is located on said second vertical edge at a position at which an imaginary straight line between the detector and each transmitter is at an angle greater than 0 but less than 90 degrees to an imaginary line defining the direction in which the door slides;
means for activating the transmitters sequentially as the door closes;
means for providing a door control signal when a transmitter is activated and an output signal is not produced by the detector each energy emitter and energy detector having relative motion towards each other as the door closes.

This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 06/755,966, filed on July 16, 1985, now abandoned.Iadd., which in turn is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 421,769, filed Apr. 26, 1982, now abandoned.Iaddend..


1. Technical Field

This invention relates to equipment for sensing that an object is in a defined space, in particular, a doorway, such as an elevator car doorway.

2. Background Art

In elevators it is common to use one or more sliding doors and to open and close them automatically. Consequently, often equipment is used that detects the presence of an obstructing body, namely a passenger, between the doors just prior to and during their automatic closure to control equipment to prevent the doors from closing more and, preferably, reopen them.

One such device puts a light beam in a path transvere the door opening and uses a sensor to detect an interruption of the light beam, which would occur if an obstruction is between the door. Then, upon sensing an interruption, the sensor issues a signal to the door control mechanism to alter the normal operation of the doors, preferably reopen them.

In usual practice that device has an array of light sources disposed on one side of the doorway, producing parallel light beams at different levels, and a corresponding array of photo-sensitive detectors arranged on the other door, for sensing those light beams, thus creating a system which can sense objects of different heights between the door. For maximum sensitivity, the light beams are generally collimated by a lens to ensure that each sensor is responsive to one light source.

This arrangement, although generally satisfactory, has a disadvantage: because the light beams are spaced apart from each other, objects between the beams are not sensed. For instance, an arm extended horizontally may fail to be sensed.

The sensitivity could, of course, be improved, for instance, by spacing the parallel beams more closely together, in effect, providing substantially contiguous light beams. But, that would be costly to implement, and, to maintain sensitivity, the light beams would need to be highly collimated to prevent stray light fron one sensor from reaching an adjacent--the wrong--sensor, as that could blind the sensor. The large number of photodetectors and their optical systems for beam collimation that would be needed would, of course, add significantly to cost. Mirrors may be used to extend the path length of a light beam from its source so that the beam traverses the door opening a number of times prior to striking a photodetector. But, while that reduces the number of detectors required, it also reduces the intensity of the light beam reaching each detector; thus, in the end, increasing the demands on beam optics.

Consequently, the simple array of spaced apart parallel beams has been widely accepted as being the best compromise of safety, efficiency and cost.


According to the invention, the area in which a sliding door moves is monitored for the presence of objects, as the door closes, through the use of energy emitters and detectors located along the vertical perimeter of the area. The emitters are sequentially operated, and if the energy path between the emitter and the detector is broken, a signal is provided to alter door operation. The emitters and detectors are arranged so that the sliding door moves is monitored for the presence of objects, as the door closes, through the use of energy emitters and detectors located along the vertical perimeter of the area. As the door closes, the emitters are sequentially operated, and if the energy path between the emitter and the detector is broken, a signal is provided to alter door operation. The emitter and detectors are arranged so that the light paths pass diagonally across the area. As the area gets smaller--as the door closes--the area traversed by each path shifts vertically and the paths compress, which increases the detection resolving power and sensitivity.

According to one aspect of the invention, energy emitters may be located vertically along one edge of the door, and detectors may be located at the top and bottom of the stationary surface opposite the door. Therefore, as the door closes, the path between each energy emitter and detectors shifts vertically. As a result, substantially all of the area is monitored as the door closes.


FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an arrangement of emitters and sensors disposed, according to the invention, or adjacent cooperating elevator doors.

FIG. 2 shows the arrangement of FIG. 1 as the doors approach each other.

FIGS. 3, 4 and 5 show other arrangements of sensors and emitters according to the invention.

FIG. 6 is a functional block diagram of an electrical control system for controlling operation of the emitters and detectors according to the present invention.


In FIGS. 1 and 2 there is a first elevator door 10 and a second elevator door 20. These doors, shown in an open position in FIG. 1, slide to open and close, and, as they close, the closure edge 11 of door 10 touches the closure edge 21 of door 20.

A plurality of elements, made up of emitters 12 and 22 and sensors 13 and 23, define a first "array" and a second "array" on the closure edges 11, 21.

The first array is comprised of the emitters 12 that are spaced apart from each other along the edge 11 and the sensors 13 that are at the top and bottom of the edge 11.

The second array, on the adjacent closure edge 21 (on door 20) is comprised of the remaining emitters 22 and sensors 23, which are on the edge 21.

The emitters may be light bulbs, LED devices or any radiation emitting device; for example, an infrared emitter that is modulated, so that its emitted radiation is distinguishable from background radiation of the surroundings.

Likewise, the sensors may be any device that is sensitive to the radiation of the emitters; yet, adapted to be insensitive to radiation other than from the emitters. Thus, the sensors may be photodiodes, phototransistors or the like, and these may be gated in synchronization with a modulated emitter for improved sensitivity.

The radiation from the emitters is not collimated, unlike related prior techniques that use lights and detectors in matched pairs, where collimation is required for good sensitivity. Consequently, each sensor actually receives radiation in a plurality of paths, each extending between the sensor and one of the emitters, as FIG. 1 shows.

In FIGS. 1 and 2, the plurality of radiation paths that extend between emitters and sensors are shown; each path is distinguished there by an alphabetic index that is indicative of the sensor, and a numeral that is indicative of the emitter at the ends of the path. From FIG. 2 it is apparent that these paths criss-cross, defining a network in space, the gap between the door closure edges 11 and 21, and that the space between these paths is smaller than in the prior art devices.

Electronic control circuitry for this purpose is well known. For instance, FIG. 6 shows a circuit that is provided whereby each emitter on opposite door edges is energized to emit radiation in a first sequence, and each sensor is monitored in a second sequence so that one emitter is energized and one sensor is monitored, at any time. For example, each of the emitters 12 is energized in sequence while one of the sensors 23 is monitored; then each of emitters 22 is energized sequentially while one of sensors 13 is monitored. After that, each of emitters 12 are again sequentially energized while the other (the second of the sensors 23) is monitored. Then the emitters of sensors 22 are again sequentially energized while the other (the second sensor 13) is monitored. The exact sequence is not important, although, in a preferred, basic operation, each emitter and a sensor combination that define a radiation path therebetween is respectively energized and monitored repetitively many times per second in some sequence. In FIG. 6, a clock 51 controls a shift register 52, which counts the clock pulses, on line 51a, producing a binary output at 52a. The binary output is provided to a decoder 53 which supplies, over the lines 53a, 53b, emitter drive and enable signals to emit drive systems EDS associated with the emitters 12 and 22. Each EDS contains a driver unit DR for powering each emitter that is operated by an enable signal EN and activation signal AS. The EN signal, which is supplied to a detector control DC, also activates a gate 57 which is connected to the output of an amplifier 58, which receives the detector (e.g., 23) output. As the register counts up, each emitter 12 (on one door) is activated, along with the detectors 23 (on the opposite door). Then the emitters 23 on the other door and the opposed detector 13 are activated in the same sequential manner. Once all the emitters are activated, the register is reset to zero by a RESET signal and the process then repeats. The repetitive process takes place as many times as the doors close. A destruction in the path between an emitter and detector will produce an output from the gate 57. The viewing angle of each detector relative to an emitter changes as the door edges move closer, and, as a result, the entire field between the moving doors is viewed. The output OUT from each DC unit is supplied to a LOGIC unit. It receives the EN signal and produces a DOOR CONTROL signal, to stop or reverse the door, if there is coincidence between an OUT signal and the EN signal, which indicates the presence of an object in the path of the doors.

Each path is thus monitored for obstruction once in an overall sequence, and, because the sensor does not receive radiation from other emitters and no other emitter is activated, the sensor is highly sensitive to the obstruction. For maximum sensitivity, the sensitivity of the sensors may be adjusted in synchronization with the energization of the emitters, since each path involves a unique combination of sensor and emitter. For example, the gain of an amplifier receiving a signal from sensor 13 may be higher when one emitter 22 is activating path C7 than when another emitter 22 is activating path A6.

With reference to FIG. 2, it shows the embodiment of FIG. 1, but when the doors are in a more nearly closed position, it will be seen there that the flux density in space of the radiation paths increases as the doors approach each other.

In its simplest form, the invention includes embodiments such as those shown in FIGS. 3, 4 and 5. Yet, those skilled in the art will recognize that because emitters are available at low cost in comparison with sensors, there are many possible geometric arrangements within the scope of the invention.

It is desirable, to produce a signal, that only one combination of sensor and emitter are active at any time; but, a combination of sensors and emitters may also be selected for simultaneous activity. For example, at the same time that an emitter on one edge and a sensor on the other edge are operative, a sensor on that one edge and an emitter on the other edge may be operative.

The circuits required to construct embodiments according to the invention may use multiplex techniques which are known to those skilled in the art from the foregoing.

Other modifications to the embodiment of the invention that have been described will be obvious to those skilled in the art, yet within the scope of the invention.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3746863 *Mar 15, 1972Jul 17, 1973Exotron Ind LtdLight curtain control for a switch
US3805061 *Apr 23, 1973Apr 16, 1974Tyco Laboratories IncObject detecting apparatus
US3805064 *Apr 27, 1972Apr 16, 1974Kornylac CoRadiation sensitive intrusion detection system
US3825745 *May 21, 1973Jul 23, 1974Electronics Corp AmericaObject detecting system
US3970846 *Aug 15, 1974Jul 20, 1976Xenex CorporationPresence detecting system with self-checking
US4063085 *Nov 3, 1975Dec 13, 1977Cometa S. A.Method of and apparatus for electronic scanning
US4247767 *Oct 16, 1978Jan 27, 1981Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, As Represented By The Minister Of National DefenceTouch sensitive computer input device
US4266124 *Aug 10, 1979May 5, 1981Data Instruments, Inc.Photoelectric object detector system
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5149921 *Jul 10, 1991Sep 22, 1992Innovation Industries, Inc.Self correcting infrared intrusion detection system
US5378861 *Feb 16, 1993Jan 3, 1995Otis Elevator CompanyAutomatic setting of the parameters of a profile generator for a high performance elevator door system
US5387768 *Sep 27, 1993Feb 7, 1995Otis Elevator CompanyElevator passenger detector and door control system which masks portions of a hall image to determine motion and court passengers
US5410149 *Jul 14, 1993Apr 25, 1995Otis Elevator CompanyOptical obstruction detector with light barriers having planes of light for controlling automatic doors
US5567931 *Oct 25, 1994Oct 22, 1996Otis Elevator CompanyVariable beam detection using a dynamic detection threshold
US5583334 *Nov 14, 1994Dec 10, 1996Erwin Sick Gmbh Optik-ElektronikMethod and apparatus for the detection of defective light transmitters and/or receivers of a light grid for detecting objects in a surveillance area
US5641951 *Aug 31, 1995Jun 24, 1997Otis Elevator CompanyElevator door safety device
US5644111 *May 8, 1995Jul 1, 1997New York City Housing AuthorityElevator hatch door monitoring system
US5696362 *Jan 27, 1997Dec 9, 1997Otis Elevator CompanyFor detecting an obstruction in an elevator doorway
US5698824 *Aug 2, 1995Dec 16, 1997Memco LimitedLift installation with primary and secondary transmitter receiver means
US5844180 *Jun 28, 1996Dec 1, 1998Inventio AgEquipment for the production of elevator shaft information
US5955854 *May 5, 1995Sep 21, 1999Prospects CorporationPower driven venting of a vehicle
US6169379 *Jun 4, 1999Jan 2, 2001Prospects CorporationPower driven venting of a vehicle
US6279687 *Oct 1, 1999Aug 28, 2001Otis Elevator CompanyMethod and system for detecting objects in a detection zone using modulated means
US6344642Nov 4, 1996Feb 5, 2002Sensotech Ltd.Door control apparatus
US6386326 *Jul 10, 2001May 14, 2002Otis Elevator CompanyMethod and system for detecting objects in a detection zone using modulated means
US6411202Mar 4, 1998Jun 25, 2002Sensotech Ltd.Vehicle sensor apparatus
US6547042 *Aug 23, 2000Apr 15, 2003Airdri LimitedGap scanning
US6615953 *Aug 8, 2000Sep 9, 2003Herman Steinweg Gmbh & Co. Kg BaumaschinenfabrikConstruction hoist with optical monitoring device
US6631788 *Mar 12, 2002Oct 14, 2003Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaElevator system with safety installation
US6693273May 2, 2000Feb 17, 2004Prospects, Corp.Method and apparatus for monitoring a powered vent opening with a multifaceted sensor system
US6936984Aug 24, 2001Aug 30, 2005Lear CorporationMethod and system for detecting the position of a power window of a vehicle
US6962239May 7, 2003Nov 8, 2005Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaSliding door system with optical detector for safe door opening and closing
US7130244Dec 24, 2003Oct 31, 2006Eli GalDevice and method for adaptive ultrasound sensing
US7286901Jun 18, 2002Oct 23, 2007Crane Co.Method and system for accomplishing product detection
US7446302 *Jul 8, 2005Nov 4, 2008Automated Merchandising Systems, Inc.Optical vend-sensing system for control of vending machine
US7472437 *Apr 21, 2003Jan 6, 2009Hill-Rom Services, Inc.Hospital bed obstacle detection device and method
US7476860 *Nov 16, 2005Jan 13, 2009Optex Co., Ltd.Outdoor active infrared detection apparatus with adjustable drive frequency
US7565222 *Jan 15, 2004Jul 21, 2009Fawn Engineering CorporationEconomical optical system to provide reasonable assurance of completed vend or vendible items from vending machines
US7742837Jan 22, 2008Jun 22, 2010Automated Merchandising Systems Inc.Optical vend-sensing system for control of vending machine
US8258944Dec 31, 2008Sep 4, 2012Hill-Rom Services, Inc.Hospital bed obstacle detection device and method
US8502663Aug 31, 2012Aug 6, 2013Hill-Rom Services, Inc.Hospital bed obstacle detection apparatus
US8510990 *Feb 26, 2009Aug 20, 2013Sensotech Inc.Presence detector for a door assembly
US8544524Jun 21, 2011Oct 1, 2013Won-Door CorporationLeading end assemblies for movable partitions including sensor assemblies, movable partition systems including sensor assemblies and related methods
US8548625Jan 23, 2007Oct 1, 2013Crane Merchandising Systems, Inc.Optical vend sensing system for product delivery detection
US20100319256 *Feb 26, 2009Dec 23, 2010Uri AgamPresence detector for a door assembly
US20130263511 *May 31, 2013Oct 10, 2013Sensotech Inc.Adaptive ultrasound detecting system for a door assembly
EP0620891A1 *Sep 28, 1993Oct 26, 1994Prospects CorporationImproved obstruction detection system for a vehicle window
EP0642706A1 *Mar 17, 1994Mar 15, 1995Prospects CorporationPower driven venting of a vehicle
WO1997017520A1Nov 4, 1996May 15, 1997Uri AgamDoor control apparatus
WO2006017183A2 *Jul 8, 2005Feb 16, 2006Automated Merchandising SystemOptical vend-sensing system for control of vending machine
U.S. Classification250/221, 187/317
International ClassificationG01V8/20, E05F15/00, B66B13/26
Cooperative ClassificationE05Y2900/104, G01V8/20, B66B13/26, E05F2015/0043, E05F15/0026
European ClassificationE05F15/00B6B, B66B13/26, G01V8/20
Legal Events
May 19, 2000FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
May 14, 1996FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
Jun 27, 1992FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4