Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUSRE33728 E
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 07/081,716
Publication dateOct 29, 1991
Filing dateAug 4, 1987
Priority dateNov 24, 1981
Fee statusPaid
Publication number07081716, 081716, US RE33728 E, US RE33728E, US-E-RE33728, USRE33728 E, USRE33728E
InventorsRobert R. Dean, Warren S. Letzsch, Jean L. Mauleon
Original AssigneeTotal Engineering And Research Company
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method for catalytically converting residual oils
US RE33728 E
Abstract
A process for converting residual oil comprising vacuum bottoms in the presence of a cracking catalyst of high surface area and comprising an ultrastable zeolite is described. More particularly, a conversion process particularly contributing to producing cycle oil and gasoline boiling range products with reduced carbon deposition in combination with a relatively high regeneration temperature operation of at least 1350 F. and above, and a short contact time riser hydrocarbon conversion operation contributing to reducing slurry oil product in favor of lower boiling products is described. A fluid cracking catalyst comprising a special ultrastable crystalline zeolite of high silica to alumina ratio provides hydrothermal stability of acceptable tolerance in the environment employed.
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(19)
We claim:
1. A method for .[.upgrading.]. .Iadd.increasing conversion to liquid products of .Iaddend.a residual oil portion of crude oil boiling above 600 F. comprising metallo-organic compounds which comprises contacting .Iadd.a feed containing .Iaddend.said residual portion of crude oil boiling above 600 F. .Iadd.said feed having a Conradson carbon content above about 2.5 weight percent .Iaddend.with a catalyst consisting of from 20 to 80 wt. % of an ultrastable faujasite crystalline zeolite dispersed in a .[.silica-clay.]. matrix .[.for a time at a temperature particularly selective for conversion of the residual portion of crude oil to products of gasoline, light cycle oil and gasoline forming gaseous components, and
recovering said products comprising gasoline and light cycle oil.]. .Iadd.selected from the group consisting of: silica-clay, silica-alumina, clay, silica, alumina and mixtures thereof,
at a temperature above about 950 F. to provide a ratio of volume percent of light cycle oil to heavy cycle oil of in excess of 1.03 at essentially constant conversion and recover said light cycle oil and heavy cycle oil .Iaddend..
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the .Iadd.light .Iaddend.cycle oil comprises two member rings produced at the expense of producing of cycle oils of higher member rings.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the ultrastable faujasite zeolite .Iadd.is .Iaddend.of a pv 0.5-3 microns size .[.is distributed in a matrix material selected from; a kaolin clay-silicon oxide binder material; silica-alumina, clay, silica, alumina and a high surface area amorphous material providing active cracking sites.]..
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the catalyst comprises the ultrastable faujasite crystalline zeolite in an amount within the range of 30 to 50 wt. %.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the ultrastable crystalline zeolite component of the catalyst is prepared under conditions to provide a high surface area material, a silica/alumina ratio of at least 3 and a unit cell size less than 24.65 Angstroms.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein conversion of the residual portion of the crude oil is accomplished for a time less than 3 seconds at an elevated temperature sufficient to achieve substantially instantaneous vaporization of the charged residual oil in atomized condition upon contact with high temperature catalyst particles.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the temperature of the catalyst is at least equal to the feed pseudo-critical temperature and residual oil feed comprises metalloorganic components boiling above 1025 F.
8. The method of claim .[.7.]. .Iadd.6 .Iaddend.wherein .[.the catalyst elevated.]. .Iadd.said high .Iaddend.temperature .Iadd.of said catalyst particles is .Iaddend.achieved by burning hydrocarbonaceous deposits of said residual oil conversion .Iadd.and .Iaddend.increases in response to the feed Conradson carbon content at catalyst regeneration temperatures in the range of 1350 to 1600 F.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the ultrastable faujasite crystalline zeolite is prepared to provide high surface area zeolite with a silica/alumina ratio of at least 5 and a unit cell size of about 24.5 Angstroms or less.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein an atomizing diluent material is used with the residual oil feed comprising one or more materials selected from steam, CO2, light normally gaseous hydrocarbons comprising C3 minus materials in cooperation with atomizing spray nozzles.
11. The method of claim 10 wherein the conditions are selected to insure a relatively dilute phase suspension contact between catalyst particles and atomized oil feed for vaporized conversion transfer through a riser conversion zone as a particle concentration in the range of 2 to 10 pounds per cubic foot and a vapor residence time within the range of 0.5 to 3 seconds.
12. The method of claim 1 wherein the residual oil portion of crude oil comprises high boiling Conradson carbon producing materials and metal contaminants.
13. The method of claim 1 wherein the residual oil conversion operation is effected at a temperature in the range of about 950 F. up to about 1400 F. and at a temperature equal to or above the feed pseudo-critical temperature.
14. A method for catalytically converting residual oils comprising vacuum bottoms which comprises,
converting said residual oil with a catalyst consisting of about 30-50 wt. % of ultrastable faujasite crystalline zeolite dispersed in a matrix material of clay and silica binder providing active cracking sites,
said catalytic conversion effected at said residual oil pseudo-critical temperature for a time in the range of 0.5 to 3 seconds in a riser reaction zone, and
recovering a product selectively of said catalytic conversion particularly comprising gasoline and light cycle oils comprising largely two member rings separately from catalyst particles comprising hydrocarbonaceous deposits of said conversion.
15. The method of claim 14 wherein the separated catalyst comprising hydrocarbonaceous deposits is regenerated in a sequence of separate catalyst regeneration zones of increasing temperatures in the direction of catalyst flow permitting effecting the residual oil conversion at a temperature in the range of 950 to 1400 F.
16. The method of claim 15 wherein the sequence of catalyst regeneration steps removes residual carbon on the catalyst to below 0.25 wt. %.
17. The method of claim 14 wherein the zeolite comprises less than 0.5 wt. % Na2 O and a higher surface area than a rare earth exchanged faujasite crystalline zeolite. .Iadd.18. The method of claim 1 wherein said catalyst is regenerated at a temperature above about 1350 F. .Iaddend. .Iadd.19. The method of claim 18 wherein said matrix consists of kaolin clay and silica. .Iaddend. .Iadd.20. The method of claim 1 wherein said contacting time is less than 5 seconds and said temperature for conversion is in the range of 950 F. to about 1400 F.
.Iaddend. .Iadd.21. The method of claim 1 wherein said matrix has active cracking sites. .Iaddend. .Iadd.22. A method for increasing conversion to liquid products of a residual oil portion of crude oil feed boiling above 600 F. said method comprising:
(a) contacting said feed having a Conradson carbon content above about 2.5 weight percent with a catalyst consisting of from 20 to 80 wt. % of an ultrastable Y zeolite dispersed in a matrix said contacting (i) providing an increase in production of light cycle oil relative to heavy cycle oil to provide a ratio of volume percent of said light cycle oil to said heavy cycle oil in excess of 1.03 at essentially constant conversion and (ii) producing carbonaceous deposits on said catalyst; and
(b) regenerating said catalyst by combusting said carbonaceous deposits in the substantial absence of hydrothermal deactivation of said catalyst wherein at least a portion of said regeneration occurs at a temperature of at least about 1350 F. .Iaddend. .Iadd.23. The method of claim 22 wherein said matrix is selected from the group consisting of silica-clay, silica-alumina, clay, silica, alumina, and mixtures thereof. .Iaddend. .Iadd.24. The method of claim 22 wherein said residual oil portion comprises components boiling above 1050 F. .Iaddend. .Iadd.25. The method of claim 24 wherein at least a portion of said regenerating is accomplished at a regenerator temperature of between about 1350 F.
and about 1600 F. .Iaddend. .Iadd.26. The method of claim 11 wherein said ultrastable Y zeolite has a silica/alumina ratio of at least 3 and a unit cell size less than 24.65 Angstroms. .Iaddend. .Iadd.27. The method of claim 22 wherein a diluent material is used with the residual oil portion said diluent material comprising a material selected from the group consisting of steam, CO2, light normally gaseous hydrocarbons comprising C3 minus materials, and mixtures thereof in cooperation with spray nozzles. .Iaddend. .Iadd.28. The method of claim 22 wherein said regenerating removes said carbonaceous deposits on said catalyst to below about 0.25 weight percent. .Iaddend. .Iadd.29. The method of claim 23 wherein said matrix has active cracking sites. .Iaddend. .Iadd.30. The method of claim 22 wherein said contacting of the residual oil and catalyst is effected at a temperature in the range of about 950 F. to about 1400 F. .Iaddend. .Iadd.31. The method of claim 22, wherein said contacting of the residual oil and catalyst is effected at a temperature equal to or above the crude oil pseudo-critical temperature. .Iaddend. .Iadd.32. In a method for upgrading an oil feed containing residual oil boiling above 600 F. wherein said residual oil is contacted with a cracking catalyst the improvement comprising:
providing an increase in production of light cycle oil compared to heavy cycle oil and yield a ratio volume percent of light cycle oil to heavy cycle oil in excess of about 1.03 at essentially constant conversion and an increase in conversion to C3 and heavier liquid products by contacting said residual oil with a catalyst which maintains an equilibrium surface area in excess of 65 m2 /gm wherein said catalyst comprises 20 to 80 wt. % ultrastable Y zeolite on a matrix and recovering said light cycle oil and heavy cycle oil. .Iaddend. .Iadd.33. The method of claim 32 wherein carbonaceous deposits are formed on said catalyst by contacting said residual oil and said catalyst containing said deposits is regenerated by combusting said carbonaceous deposits at a temperature of at least about 1350 F. and wherein said equilibrium surface area is at least about 105 m2 /gm. .Iaddend. .Iadd.34. The method of claim 32 wherein said catalyst is contacted with said residual oil at a temperature of at least about 950 F. .Iaddend. .Iadd.35. The method of claim 32 wherein said matrix is selected from the group consisting of silica-clay, silica-alumina, clay, silica, alumina and mixtures thereof. .Iaddend. .Iadd.36. The method of claim 35 wherein said matrix has active cracking sites. .Iaddend. .Iadd.37. The method of claim 35 wherein carbonaceous deposits found on said catalyst when said catalyst contacts said residual oil are combusted at a temperature of at least about 1350 F. to provide a regenerated catalyst. .Iaddend. .Iadd.38. The method of claim 35 wherein said catalyst is contacted with said residual oil at a temperature equal to or above the pseudo-critical temperature of said crude oil. .Iaddend. .Iadd.39. The method of claim 32 wherein said contacting is effected at a temperature between about 950 F. and 1400 F. and produces carbonaceous deposits on said catalyst, said catalyst containing said deposits being regenerated by combusting said deposits to provide a regeneration temperature in the range of about 1350 F. to 1600 F. .Iaddend. .Iadd.40. The method of claim 39 wherein said regeneration temperature is at least about 1400 F. .Iaddend. .Iadd.41. The method of claim 22 wherein at least a portion of said regeneration occurs at a temperature of at least about 1400 F. .Iaddend.
Description

.Iadd.This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 798,031, filed 11-13-85, now abandoned, which is a Reissue application Ser. No. 06/324,450 now U.S. Pat. No. 4,415,438. .Iaddend.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Fluid catalytic cracking has undergone many changes since its inception in the early 1940's. One of the recent process advances in fluid catalytic cracking has been the advent of zeolite catalysts usage which has prompted many process design modifications. Feed-stocks, however, have changed very little up to recent years, being comprised of mostly atmospheric and vacuum gas oils. However, with the economic need of the industry to process poorer quality crude oils, and a need at the same time to maintain high gasoline yields, the ability to effect conversion of poor quality feed stocks in a FCCU process is now of significant importance.

The present invention is directed to extending the processed boiling range of crude oil feedstocks to include substantially all of the atmospheric bottoms, a residual or reduced crude portion thereof and comprising vacuum tower bottoms by catalytically cracking such materials in a selective process more fully discussed below that converts a highly atomized-vaporized mixture of the feed components at a relatively high temperature with an ultrastable crystalline zeolite catalyst herein identified.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,287,048 particularly identifies an ultrastable "Y" type crystalline zeolite and its method of preparation in the following manner. "Stabilized" or ultrastable Y-type zeolites are well-known. They are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,293,192 and 3,402,996 and the publication Society of Chemical Engineering (London) Monograph Molecular Sieves, page 186 (1968) by C. V. McDaniel and P. K. Maher, the teachings of which are hereby incorporated by reference. In general, "ultrastable" refers to a Y-type zeolite which is highly resistant to degradation of crystallinity by high temperature and steam treatment and is characterized by a R2 O content (wherein R is Na, K or any other alkali metal ion) of less than 4 weight percent, preferably less than 1 weight percent and a unit cell size less than 24.5 Angstroms and a silica to alumina mole ratio in the range of 3.5 to 7 or higher. The ultrastable form of Y-type zeolite is obtained primarily by a substantial reduction of the alkali metal ions and the unit cell size reduction. The ultrastable zeolite is identified both by the smaller unit cell and the low alkali metal content in the crystal structure.

As is generally known, the ultrastable form of the Y-type zeolite can be prepared by successively base exchanging a Y-type zeolite with an aqueous solution of an ammonium salt, such as ammonium nitrate, until the alkali metal content of the Y-type zeolite is reduced to less than 4 weight percent. The base exchanged zeolite is then calcined at a temperature of 1000 F. to 1500 F., for up to several hours, cooled and thereafter again successively base exchanged with an aqueous solution of an ammonium salt until the alkali metal content is reduced to less than 1 weight percent, followed by washing and calcination again at a temperature of 1000 to 1500 F. to produce an ultrastable zeolite Y. The sequence of ion exchange and heat treatment results in the substantial reduction of the alkali metal content of the original zeolite and results in a unit cell shrinkage which is believed to lead to the ultra high stability of the resulting Y-type zeolite. The particle size of the zeolites is usually in the range of 0.1 to 10 microns, more particularly in the range of 0.5 to 3 microns.

Suitable amounts of the ultrastable Y-type zeolite in the catalyst of the present invention include from about 10 to about 80 weight percent, preferably from about 30 to about 50 weight percent, based on the total catalyst.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The catalytic cracking or conversion of heavy oil feeds comprising atmospheric tower bottoms vacuum gas oils plus resid, residual oil, reduced crudes, and topped crudes, shale oil, coal liquefaction oil products and tar sands oil products all of which comprise components boiling above 1000 F. or 1050 F. are best catalytically converted in a highly vaporized-atomized contact phase of the oil feed with select fluid catalyst particles of a composition herein identified. The heat necessary to substantially completely vaporize-atomize all of the high boiling oil feed is contributed by a relatively high regenerator temperature operation of at least about 1350 F. and preferably above 1400 F. completed in the substantial absence of hydro-thermal damage to the catalyst. The more conventional zeolite cracking catalysts comprising relatively large amounts of one or more rare-earth exchanged faujasite zeolites are susceptible to considerable hydro-thermal deactivation under high temperature regeneration conditions above about 1400 F. and required to remove relatively large amounts of hydrocarbonaceous materials deposited during residual oil cracking operations.

It is observed through commercial experience of catalytically cracking heavier and heavier feed stocks that there is a marked tendency for the regenerator temperature to rise to higher levels as the quality of the feed stock deteriorates. (Heavier and lower quality feed stocks for the purposes of this discussion refers to the inclusion of high boiling residual oils of high Conradson carbon in the feed).

It is also observed that if the regenerator temperature is restrained by means not usually employed in conventional gas oil cracking such as providing steam coils in the regenerator, external catalyst coolers and/or other means employed by some operators, the selectivity of the hydrocarbon conversion reaction shifts in the direction of producing undesirable large amounts of coke and liquid products referred to as "cycle oils". Cycle oils are liquid products comprising large quantities of condensed ring aromatics. The condensed ring aromatics are two, three, four and larger six carbon member rings. The cycle oils comprising largely two member rings referred to as light cycle oils (LCO) are commercially marketable as middle distillate. Cycle oils comprising largely three and a greater number of condensed rings such as found in some heavy cycle oils and particularly slurry oils are of low commercial worth and are usually only marketed as bunker fuel.

On the other hand, it is observed in commercial catalytic cracking of the heavier feed stocks comprising residual oils that if the tendency for the regenerator temperature to rise to a higher level is not restrained then the undesirable reaction to selectivity described above does not occur. That is, at higher regenerator temperatures and at temperatures generally above those employed commercially for gas oil cracking, above 1350 F., coke production is equal to or lower than that observed in conventional gas oil cracking, and the production of condensed ring aromatics larger than two member rings is discouraged.

It is observed in a study of catalysts suitable for converting high boiling residual oils, that contrary to many of the teachings in the prior art, a high surface area crystalline zeolite such as an ultrastable crystalline zeolite, commercially identified by Davison Chemical Co. as Z-14US, is a highly stable and effective conversion catalyst at the high regeneration temperatures required when processing high boiling residual oil type feeds despite its relatively low fresh catalyst activity. More importantly, when the processing concepts of this invention are pursued, it is further observed that the high surface area ultrastable crystalline zeolite contributes to a significant reduction in deposition of hydrocarbonaceous material, improves light cycle product yield at the expense of heavier cycle oils and provides a product selectivity generally richer in gasoline and gasoline forming components than is achieved with a more conventional rare-earth exchanged zeolite such as CREY at comparable fresh feed conversion levels.

It is further observed that the commercially available high activity zeolitic catalysts comprising rare earth exchanged zeolites, experiences a serious surface area decline. This surface area decline is viewed to be due to hydro-thermal instability under the conditions of the preferred unit operating mode. As the surface area progressively decays, it is further observed that product selectivity shifts in the direction of increased heavy cycle oil production and particularly cycle oils of ring structures greater than 2 member rings, increased gas production comprising H2, C1 's and C2 's and more importantly a reduced gasoline production.

The outer or exterior surface such as provided by a high surface area ultrastable zeolite is found to be very effective in providing accessible and available active cracking sites to affect the now experienced substantial molecular weight reduction of high molecular weight components in a slurry oil to more desirable lower molecular weight components. The hydrothermal stability of an ultrastable crystalline zeolite catalyst prepared as herein identified and briefly discussed is found to be superior to that of a rare-earth exchanged "Y" faujasite referred to as CREY and used to form catalyst particles for cracking hydrocarbon feed materials. The ultrastable zeolite containing catalysts maintain significantly higher surface areas equilibrium catalysts at high regeneration temperatures than obtained with a CREY catalyst. A matrix or base material with a relatively high amorphous surface area which provides active cracking sites may be employed with the ultrastable zeolite in lieu of more catalytically inert matrix materials and contribute to the cracking of high boiling cycle oil components obtained in a reduced crude cracking operation. However, unlike cracking with an amorphous cracking catalyst, the ultra stable hydrogen form of zeolite herein discussed do the desired cracking or conversion of high molecular weight hydrocarbon components with a substantial reduction in coke and gas production. This observed difference in product selectivity when employing an ultrastable crystalline zeolite in lieu of CREY for reduced crude cracking is unexpected and not previously predictable. Thus the cracking of high boiling residual oils comprising metallo-organic components boiling above 1025 F. benefits in several significant ways herein identified when employing the ultrastable form of crystalline zeolites in catalyst compositions providing high surface area particle compositions.

It is, therefore, concluded that to more successfully crack high boiling range feed stocks comprising residual oil of high Conradson carbon value and to obtain desired product selectivity requires at least two fundamental operation conditions:

1. High regenerator temperatures which means a high catalyst temperature at the point of oil catalyst contact.

2. A high surface area catalyst that can maintain a high surface area exceeding that obtainable with CREY containing catalysts under the conditions of high, above 1400 F., regeneration temperatures.

A catalyst composition satisfying the above operating parameters and found to be suitable for the specific conversion of high boiling residual oil containing feed stocks is a catalyst comprising an ultrastable crystalline zeolite as herein described. This particular crystalline zeolite, sieve or crystalline aluminosilicate is industrially referred to as an ultrastable sieve or crystalline zeolite. Compared to the state of the art rare earth exchanged zeolite (CREY) containing catalyst, the ultrastable sieve containing catalyst is of a relatively low activity but high surface area catalyst as measured in the fresh catalyst state. This catalyst is described in various patents briefly referred to herein. The ultrastable zeolite containing catalysts have been discussed in the literature for application in the more conventional clean feed gas oil cracking operations but because of its low relative activity compared to rare earth containing zeolites and relatively high cost has not received industry acceptance. However, it has been found that when applied to residual oil cracking operations, the ultrastable zeolite catalyst becomes superior catalysts, by providing and producing a profound improvement in cracking selectivity over the state of the art higher activity rare earth exchanged zeolite containing catalyst. This is illustrated in the commercial results presented in Table I, wherein cracking data is presented comparing performance of the ultrastable sieve containing catalyst to a rare earth exchanged zeolite containing catalyst.

.Iadd.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING .Iaddend.

The drawing is a graphical representation of the contraction of an ultrastable crystalline zeolite obtained during calcination under different temperature conditions. It is observed that this contraction is substantially less than that obtained when subjecting a CREY catalyst composition to similar conditions.

DISCUSSION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS

A class of zeolite containing catalysts particularly suitable for use in the residual oil conversion process of this invention is one comprising an ultra stable crystalline zeolite commercially identified as Z-14US. The preparation of an ultrastable crystalline zeolite discussed above is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,287,048, and referenced material including U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,293,192 (1966) and 3,402,966, the subject matter of which is incorporated herein by reference.

The ultrastable sieve or crystalline zeolite described in the above identified referenced material and U.S. patents are characterized by a significant (1-1.5%) decrease in the unit cell dimensions of the parent sodium zeolite. This contraction is caused by extraction of aluminum cations from the crystalline zeolite in the manufacturing process. This has been shown to be true by McDaniel and Maher in their book entitled "Zeolite Chemistry and Catalysis", page 320 by FIG. 17 and reproduced for inclusion herewith as the drawing. In this drawing the shaded area identifies the unit cell contraction area for ultrastable zeolites of different silica to alumina ratio.

To be a suitable ultrastable crystalline zeolite component of the catalyst for use in the process of this invention, the zeolite SiO2 /Al2 O3 ratio is greater than 3 and the unit cell size or lattice constant is less than 24.65 Angstroms. In particular embodiment, the ultrastable zeolite will have a SiO2/Al2 O3 ratio of at least 5 with a unit cell size of about 24.5 Angstroms or less. A high sodium content zeolite, matrix components and residual oil feed are known to deactivate a cracking catalysts zeolite crystalline structure relativity rapidly so it is important to reduce the sodium content of these materials and particularly the finished zeolite sodium content to at least 1 weight percent or less. Various techniques for achieving this low sodium content are discussed in the literature. Preferably the residual Na2 O on the zeolite structure is below 0.5 weight percent.

The cracking activity level of an ultrastable crystalline zeolite is less than a rare earth exchanged zeolite such as CREY. Thus it requires considerably more ultrastable zeolite than CREY to form catalyst particles of the same degree of activity. This high addition has been considered heretofore as not suitable for use in hydrocarbon conversion operations of lower regenerator temperatures.

Modern high activity FCC catalysts are reported to contain in the range of 15-40% of a rare earth type Y zeolite. In a conventional rare-earth zeolite catalyst employed in an FCC unit processing gas oils and operating with regenerator temperatures generally maintained below 1400 F. and more usually not above 1350 F. or less requires using for the same activity level an ultrastable crystalline zeolite catalyst comprising from 60-160% of the ultrastable zeolite. Obviously, no catalyst could contain more than 100% of any component. A catalyst particle of such high zeolite content presents formidable problems to the catalyst suppliers and manufacturer to produce such a catalyst composition with suitable physical attrition resistant or hardness properties for use in a circulating fluid catalytic cracking system.

At relatively high regenerator temperatures in the range of 1350 F.-1600 F. and required in the high temperature conversion of residual oils an ultrastable crystalline zeolite catalyst obtained as above provided is found to give an equilibrium activity that is equal to or exceeds that of a rare-earth type Y sieve (CREY) containing catalyst and provides a higher equilibrium surface area without encountering undesired coke and liquid product selectivity as herein identified. It has also been found that at a high oil feed--catalyst suspension mix temperatures at least equal to the pseudo critical temperature of the feed and characterized by regenerated catalyst temperatures at or above 1350 F. the heavy or high boiling multi ring components in the oil feed are more readily converted thermally and catalytically to lower boiling desired products by the high surface area ultrastable zeolite catalyst in modern catalytic cracking facilities.

A commercial test of the ultrastable hydrogen form of crystalline zeolite containing catalyst herein identified provides the data shown in Table I. In this operation where the regenerator was operating over 1400 F., the ultrastable zeolite containing catalyst actually out-performed a CREY catalyst. That is, lower coke yields were observed and there is a substantial drop in the heavy cycle oil yield and its gravity. Extra light cycle oil and gasoline is produced at the expense of coke and heavy cycle oil with liquid C3 plus yield increased significantly and all factors resulting in economic gain.

              TABLE I______________________________________COMMERCIAL CRACKING PERFORMANCEType Zeolite in Catalyst*              Z-14US**   C--RE--Y______________________________________CAT ADDN's #/Bbl. FEED              .34       .4FEED RATE, B/D     18.070    18.000FEED CON. CARBON, Wt. %              2.5       2.5Rx. TEMP. F.              982       974REGEN. DENSE PHASE TEMP.              1.413     1.402F.CONVERSION, VOL. % 80.8      80.1C2 - YIELD, SCFB              312       324ALKYL FEED, VOL. 5 (C3 -C4)              26.7      26.1GASOLINE, VOL. %   58.1      55.7LCO, VOL. %        12.8      10.1SLURRY, VOL. %     6.4       9.8TOTAL LIQUID YIELD 104.0     101.7C3 + VOL. %COKE, Wt. %        5.6       6.4MICRO ACTIVITY     60        70CATALYST SURFACE AREA              105       65M2 /gm______________________________________ *Catalysts contained approximately same amount of zeolite promoter (Wt. basis) when new. **Z14US refers to ultrastable zeolites.

The reduction in heavy cycle oil product and increased light cycle oil product obtained as above-identified was surprisingly unexpected when compared to the results obtained with a rare-earth exchanged crystalline zeolite (CREY) containing catalyst. Both forms of zeolite catalysts were supported by a relatively inactive matrix material. The increase in equilibrium surface area indicates that substantially more zeolite is present in the equilibrium catalyst comprising the ultrastable hydrogen form zeolite containing catalyst.

              TABLE II______________________________________Catalyst Sieve Type         US         RE--YMatrix Type   Low surface Area/ActivityEquil. S.A.   105        65______________________________________

The large surface area of the ultrastable zeolite is apparently very effective in providing active accessible cracking sites to cause the experienced molecular weight reduction in the slurry oil. Unlike cracking with amorphous cracking catalysts, it is observed that the ultrastable hydrogen zeolites do this cracking with less or a lower coke and gas production. The data provided in Table I clearly indicates that the equilibrium activities of the two catalysts, ultrastable zeolite and rare earth exchanged zeolite, after exposure to regenerator temperatures of about 1400 F., were quite similar in activity even though the CREY catalyst started with 3-4 times the activity of the ultrastable zeolite catalyst. At even higher regenerator temperatures, the benefits obtained by using the ultrastable catalyst are expected to be even greater.

The following conclusions are reached in view of the above with respect to the fluid catalytic cracking of residual oil with an ultrastable crystalline zeolite catalyst.

1. High catalyst temperatures at point of oil catalyst contact, vis-a-vis, high regenerator temperatures are necessary to more completely vaporize the high boiling residual oil feed stock.

2. Failure to adequately vaporize-atomize the feed encourages poor cracking selectivity i.e., encourages high coke make, high cycle oil production, particularly cycle oils rich in ring structures greater than 2 member rings, high gas make and low gasoline production. The poor performance attributed when the feed is inadequately vaporized is likely due to the "coke shut off" of the active catalyst sites by the portion of the feed not vaporized.

3. As the residual oil content of the feed stock increases the catalyst high temperature at point of oil contact (vis-a-vis high regenerator temperature) must be permitted to rise to a higher optimum level in order to encourage more nearly complete vaporization of the feed if undesirable cracking selectivity is to be avoided.

4. Utilization of catalysts containing rare earth exchanged zeolites is inconsistent with high temperature regeneration despite their inherent relatively high initial activity, because of rapid surface area decay and rapid loss of activity in high temperature regeneration environment.

5. Ultrastable sieve or crystalline zeolite containing catalysts despite their relatively low fresh catalyst activity equilibrate in a commercial cracking process when cracking residual oil at desired high temperature conditions at acceptable catalyst activity levels and retain a desired high surface area. This high surface area equilibrium leads to desirable cracking selectivity i.e., high yields of gasoline and gasoline forming components, increased yields of cycle oils containing two member rings produced at the expense of cycle oils containing higher member rings with substantially less coke make and a reduced gas production.

The ultrastable zeolite may be supported by any one of a different member of support materials or matrices. For example, matrices other than an inactive kaolin-clay silicon oxide binder combination can be used to hold or include the ultrastable hydrogen exchanged crystalline zeolite. In fact, any of the known prior art or conventional catalyst matrix materials can be used. Such materials would include synthetic silica-alumina, clay, silica or alumina binders or any combination thereof. The finished catalyst will preferably contain not less than 20 wt % or more than 80% of an ultrastable hydrogen form of crystalline zeolite herein identified.

The ultrastable crystalline "Y" zeolite catalyst preferably employed by this invention for cracking high boiling residual oils may be used however, in conjunction with a metal entrapment material or metals sink for accumulation thereof. The finished catalyst will preferably contain not less than 20 wt % or more than 80% of an ultrastable hydrogen form of crystalline zeolite herein identified.

The catalytic cracking or conversion of high boiling hydrocarbons comprising Conradson carbon producing materials are best catalytically converted in a highly vaporized-atomized condition during contact with the high surface area zeolite containing catalyst herein particularly defined by employing contact temperature conditions provided by hot regenerated catalyst at least equal to the feed pseudo-critical temperature. Thus the catalyst regeneration temperature will increase above 1350 F. during combustion of deposited carbonaceous material as the residual oil feed Conradson carbon value increases even though the ultrastable zeolite catalyst composition employed in the conversion process of this invention contributes to a reduction in coke make. Thus when processing vacuum gas oils comprising the resid portion of the crude oil, regeneration temperatures above 1350 F. and up to as high as 1600 F. or more can be experienced as carbonaceous deposits increase in response to the feed Conradson carbon content.

The catalytic conversion operation of this invention is preferably one of relatively short vaporized hydrocarbon contact with the special catalyst composition comprising from 20 to 80 wt % of ultrastable crystalline zeolite as a dispersed catalyst phase in a riser contact zone wherein the hydrocarbon residence time in contact with catalyst particles can be restricted to within the range of 0.5 to 5 seconds and more usually in the range of 1 to 3 seconds. This dispersed catalyst phase-vaporized hydrocarbon contact may be implemented in substantial measure by the use of an atomizing diluent material with the high boiling hydrocarbon feed. Diluent materials suitable for this purpose include steam, CO2, light normally gaseous hydrocarbons comprising C3 minus material or a combination thereof in an amount which will reduce the high boiling feed partial pressure and achieve desired atomized-vaporized dispersion contact of hydrocarbon feed with high temperature catalyst particles. Atomization of the feed may be substantially implemented by use of appropriate spray nozzles. Thus the operating parameters to achieve an optomized contact between feed and catalyst particles also include feed exit velocities in excess of 10 feet per second to achieve atomized spraying of the feed with or without diluent material across a riser reactor cross section for intimate contact with hot catalyst particles charged thereto.

The above identified operating parameters are intended to also accelerate the mixture relatively uniformly within the feed vaporization section of a riser reactor in a minimum time frame and thus enhance rapid heat transfer from hot catalyst particles to charged feed preferably atomized and thus prevent localized enhanced catalyst to oil ratios contributing to a dense catalyst bed phase. That is, the operating conditions and methods for implementing are selected to ensure a relatively dilute phase suspension contact between catalyst particles and atomized oil feed for vaporized conversion transfer through a riser conversion zone. Such dilute catalyst phase operations include catalyst particle concentrations in the range of 2 to 10 pounds per cubic foot and preferably not above about 5 pounds per cubic foot.

The catalyst hydrocarbon feed suspension formed as above provided is passed through a riser contact zone for a hydrocarbon contact time less than about 5 seconds before discharge therefrom at a temperature sufficiently elevated to maximize recovery of vaporized hydrocarbon material separately from catalyst particles.

In a more particular and specific aspect the present invention is directed to the catalytic conversion of high boiling residual oils comprising vacuum gas oils containing high boiling Conradson carbon producing materials employing a special ultrastable crystalline zeolite containing catalyst at a temperature equal to or above the feed pseudo-critical temperature in preferably a riser contact zone for a hydrocarbon residence time in the range of 0.5 to about 5 seconds and more usually not above about 3 seconds.

Thus as the end boiling point of the hydrocarbon feed or the Conradson carbon level thereof increases so also will the catalyst regeneration temperature generally increased in response to increased deposited carbonaceous material removed by combustion and contributing to high temperature regeneration and conversion of the feed according to the concepts of this invention. However, as discussed above, employing the ultrastable zeolite catalyst provides a lower coke yield than obtained with the rare earth zeolite catalyst thus contributing measurably to the advantages of the processing concepts of this invention as herein described.

Depending on the feed hydrocarbon to be converted, its boiling range and Conradson carbon contributing factor, the hydrocarbon conversion operation may be effected at a temperature in the range of 950 F. up to about 1400 F. or at a temperature equal to or above the feed pseudo-critical temperature employing a reactor pressure from about atmospheric pressure up to about 100 psig but generally not above about 50 psig.

The riser cracking operation of this invention may be employed in conjunction with the catalyst regeneration arrangement of copending application Ser. No. 169,086, filed July 15, 1980 (now U.S. Pat. No. 4,332,674), the subject matter of which is incorporated herein by reference thereto. That is, the apparatus and operating concepts of the above identified application and the methods of implementation except as particularly modified by employing an ultrastable crystalline zeolite containing catalyst, as herein provided, may be employed with considerable advantage in protecting the activity and selectivity characteristics of the ultrastable crystalline zeolite catalyst particularly when reducing residual coke on the ultrastable zeolite catalyst to less than about 0.25 wt. %.

Having thus generally described the method and concepts of this invention and discussion specific embodiments in support thereof, it is to be understood that no undue restrictions are to be imposed by reasons thereof except as defined by the following claims.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3140249 *Jul 12, 1960Jul 7, 1964Socony Mobil Oil Co IncCatalytic cracking of hydrocarbons with a crystalline zeolite catalyst composite
US3140251 *Dec 21, 1961Jul 7, 1964Socony Mobil Oil Co IncProcess for cracking hydrocarbons with a crystalline zeolite
US3140252 *Feb 10, 1964Jul 7, 1964Socony Mobil Oil Co IncHydrocarbon conversion with crystalline acid-metal aluminosilicates
US3293192 *Aug 23, 1965Dec 20, 1966Grace W R & CoZeolite z-14us and method of preparation thereof
US3402996 *Dec 19, 1966Sep 24, 1968Grace W R & CoIon exchange of crystalline zeolites
US3650988 *Sep 15, 1969Mar 21, 1972Grace W R & CoHydrocarbon conversion catalysts
US3767566 *Dec 8, 1971Oct 23, 1973Standard Oil CoCatalytic petroleum conversion process
US3781197 *Jan 10, 1972Dec 25, 1973Gulf Research Development CoProcess for cracking hydrocarbons containing hydrodesulfurized residual oil
US3891540 *Apr 2, 1974Jun 24, 1975Mobil Oil CorpCombination operation to maximize fuel oil product of low pour
US3894930 *Sep 4, 1973Jul 15, 1975Standard Oil CoCatalyst comprising ultrastable aluminosilicates and hydrocarbon conversion processes employing same
US3926780 *Oct 15, 1973Dec 16, 1975Union Oil CoHydrocarbon conversion process utilizing stabilized zeolite catalysts
US3929672 *Oct 15, 1973Dec 30, 1975Union Oil CoAmmonia-stable Y zeolite compositions
US3944482 *Apr 10, 1974Mar 16, 1976Gulf Research & Development CompanyProcess for the cracking of high metals content feedstocks
US3994800 *Feb 19, 1975Nov 30, 1976W. R. Grace & Co.Catalytic cracking with catalyst of improved Y zeolite
US4054539 *Nov 28, 1973Oct 18, 1977Standard Oil Company (Indiana)Catalyst comprising ultrastable aluminosilicates and hydrocarbon-conversion processes employing same
US4058484 *Sep 9, 1976Nov 15, 1977Filtrol CorporationAmmonium faujasite zeolites
US4066533 *Nov 26, 1976Jan 3, 1978Ashland Oil, Inc.Separation of catalyst from effluent of a fluidized catalytic hydrocarbon conversion process
US4097410 *Jun 23, 1976Jun 27, 1978Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Hydrocarbon conversion catalyst containing a CO oxidation promoter
US4098680 *Dec 22, 1976Jul 4, 1978Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Method of regenerating a cracking catalyst
US4164465 *Feb 3, 1978Aug 14, 1979Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Hydrocarbon cracking with catalyst containing a CO oxidation promoter in ultra-stable zeolite particles
US4179409 *Nov 9, 1977Dec 18, 1979Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Hydrocarbon cracking catalyst
US4200520 *Jan 30, 1978Apr 29, 1980Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Catalytic cracking process
US4212771 *Aug 8, 1978Jul 15, 1980Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Method of preparing an alumina catalyst support and catalyst comprising the support
US4215015 *Feb 2, 1979Jul 29, 1980Uop Inc.High octane FCC catalyst
US4239615 *Dec 19, 1979Dec 16, 1980Uop Inc.High octane FCC process
US4239654 *May 31, 1979Dec 16, 1980Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Hydrocarbon cracking catalyst and process utilizing the same
US4242237 *May 31, 1979Dec 30, 1980Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Hydrocarbon cracking catalyst and process utilizing the same
US4259212 *Sep 28, 1979Mar 31, 1981Exxon Research And Engineering Co.Octane improvement cracking catalyst
US4267072 *Aug 6, 1979May 12, 1981Standard Oil Company (Indiana)Catalytic cracking catalyst with reduced emission of noxious gases
US4276150 *Nov 5, 1979Jun 30, 1981Standard Oil Company (Indiana)Fluid catalytic cracking of heavy petroleum fractions
US4280898 *Nov 5, 1979Jul 28, 1981Standard Oil Company (Indiana)Fluid catalytic cracking of heavy petroleum fractions
US4287048 *Mar 17, 1980Sep 1, 1981Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Cracking process with catalyst of combined zeolites
US4289606 *Mar 19, 1980Sep 15, 1981Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Hydrocarbon cracking with mixture of zeolites Y and ZSM-5
US4292169 *Jan 8, 1979Sep 29, 1981Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Hydrocarbon conversion with zeolite catalyst in metals-absorbing matrix
US4298459 *Nov 5, 1979Nov 3, 1981Standard Oil Company (Indiana)Fluid catalytic cracking of heavy petroleum fractions
US4299687 *Nov 14, 1979Nov 10, 1981Ashland Oil, Inc.Carbo-metallic oil conversion with controlled CO:CO2 ratio in regeneration
US4299733 *May 8, 1980Nov 10, 1981Uop Inc.High octane FCC catalyst
US4305808 *Apr 14, 1980Dec 15, 1981Mobil Oil CorporationCatalytic hydrocracking
US4308129 *Nov 12, 1980Dec 29, 1981Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Octane improvement cracking catalyst
US4316794 *Mar 6, 1980Feb 23, 1982Mobil Oil CorporationDirect conversion of residual oils
US4325813 *Jul 30, 1980Apr 20, 1982Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals CorporationProcess for production of high octane gasoline from catalytic cracking unit
US4331533 *Jul 15, 1980May 25, 1982Dean Robert RMethod and apparatus for cracking residual oils
US4332674 *Jul 15, 1980Jun 1, 1982Dean Robert RMethod and apparatus for cracking residual oils
US4336160 *Jul 15, 1980Jun 22, 1982Dean Robert RMethod and apparatus for cracking residual oils
US4347122 *Nov 14, 1979Aug 31, 1982Ashland Oil, Inc.Carbo-metallic oil conversion with liquid water
US4354923 *Nov 14, 1979Oct 19, 1982Ashland Oil, Inc.Carbo-metallic oil conversion with liquid water, ballistic separation and controlled CO:CO2 ratio during catalyst regeneration
US4407714 *May 13, 1981Oct 4, 1983Ashland Oil, Inc.Process for cracking high-boiling hydrocarbons using high pore volume, low density catalyst
US4414098 *Jul 30, 1981Nov 8, 1983Ashland Oil, Inc.Upgrading carbo-metallic oils with used catalyst
US4415438 *Nov 24, 1981Nov 15, 1983Dean Robert RMethod for catalytically converting residual oils
US4457833 *Sep 29, 1982Jul 3, 1984Ashland Oil, Inc.Process and catalyst for the conversion of carbo-metallic containing oils
US4480047 *Apr 7, 1983Oct 30, 1984Ashland Oil, Inc.High performance catalysts for carbometallic oil conversion and their manufacturing and use
GB2063294A * Title not available
GB2085861A * Title not available
WO1982003225A1 *Mar 19, 1981Sep 30, 1982Wayne H BeckImmobilization of vanadia deposited on catalytic materials during carbo-metallic oil conversion
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1Habib, Jr. et al., "Commercial Performance of Octane-Enhancing Fluid Cracking Catalysts", 1985, Davison Catalagram No. 72.
2 *Habib, Jr. et al., Commercial Performance of Octane Enhancing Fluid Cracking Catalysts , 1985, Davison Catalagram No. 72.
3 *Habib, Jr., Optimize Catalysts Replacement Rate When Cat Cracking Resid, 1982, Davison Catalagram No. 65.
4Johnson et al., "New Oil Era Prompts Unique Resid Refinery", Mar. 22, 1982, Oil an Gas Journal.
5 *Johnson et al., New Oil Era Prompts Unique Resid Refinery , Mar. 22, 1982, Oil an Gas Journal.
6Magee et al., "A Look at FCC Catalysts Advances", Sep. 1979, Hydrocarbon Processing.
7Magee et al., "Formation of High Octane Gasoline by Davison Zeolitic Fluid Cracking Catalysts", 1978, Davison Catalagram No. 57.
8Magee et al., "Octane Catalysts Contain Special Sieves", May 27, 1985, Oil and Gas Journal.
9 *Magee et al., A Look at FCC Catalysts Advances , Sep. 1979, Hydrocarbon Processing.
10 *Magee et al., Formation of High Octane Gasoline by Davison Zeolitic Fluid Cracking Catalysts , 1978, Davison Catalagram No. 57.
11 *Magee et al., Octane Catalysts Contain Special Sieves , May 27, 1985, Oil and Gas Journal.
12Molecular Sieves: Papers read at the Conference held at the School of Pharmacy, University of London, Society of Chemical Industry, 1968, "New Ultra-Stable Form of Faujasite", by McDaniel et al., p. 186.
13 *Molecular Sieves: Papers read at the Conference held at the School of Pharmacy, University of London, Society of Chemical Industry, 1968, New Ultra Stable Form of Faujasite , by McDaniel et al., p. 186.
14Pine et al., "Prediction of Cracking Catalyst Behavior by a Zeolite Unit Cell Size Model", 1984, Journal of Catalysis, 85, pp. 466-476.
15 *Pine et al., Prediction of Cracking Catalyst Behavior by a Zeolite Unit Cell Size Model , 1984, Journal of Catalysis, 85, pp. 466 476.
16Ritter et al., "A Look at New FCC Catalysts for Resid", Jul. 6, 1981, Oil and Gas Journal.
17Ritter et al., "Cat Cracker LCO Yield Can Be Increased", May 28, 1984, Oil and Gas Journal.
18Ritter et al., "Fluid Cracking Catalysts to Enhance Gasoline Octane", 1985, Davison Catalagram No. 72.
19 *Ritter et al., A Look at New FCC Catalysts for Resid , Jul. 6, 1981, Oil and Gas Journal.
20 *Ritter et al., Cat Cracker LCO Yield Can Be Increased , May 28, 1984, Oil and Gas Journal.
21 *Ritter et al., Fluid Cracking Catalysts to Enhance Gasoline Octane , 1985, Davison Catalagram No. 72.
22Scherzer et al., "Ion-Exchanged Ultrastable Y Zeolites. 3. Gas Oil Cracking Over Rare Earth-Exchanged Ultrastable Y Zeolites", 1978, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 17, No. 3, pp. 219-223.
23 *Scherzer et al., Ion Exchanged Ultrastable Y Zeolites. 3. Gas Oil Cracking Over Rare Earth Exchanged Ultrastable Y Zeolites , 1978, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 17, No. 3, pp. 219 223.
24 *Thiel, Davison 1982 Survey of Residuum Fluid Catalytic Cracking in the United States, 1983, Davison Catalagram No. 66.
25Tolen, "Burst of Advances Enhance Cat Cracking", Mar. 30, 1981, Oil and Gas Journal.
26 *Tolen, Burst of Advances Enhance Cat Cracking , Mar. 30, 1981, Oil and Gas Journal.
27Uytterhoeven et al., "Studies of the Hydrogen Held by Solids. VIII. The Decationated Zeolites", Jun. 1965, The Journal of Physical Che.
28 *Uytterhoeven et al., Studies of the Hydrogen Held by Solids. VIII. The Decationated Zeolites , Jun. 1965, The Journal of Physical Che.
29 *Wallendorf, Resid Processing in the FCC with Resid Cracking Catalysts, 1979, Davison Catalagram No. 58.
30Zandona, "Heavy-Oil Project Pushed at Complex Refinery", Mar. 22, 1982, Oil and Gas Journal.
31 *Zandona, Heavy Oil Project Pushed at Complex Refinery , Mar. 22, 1982, Oil and Gas Journal.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5254788 *Sep 10, 1991Oct 19, 1993Stone And Webster Engineering CorporationProcess for the production of olefins from light paraffins
US7128827Jan 14, 2004Oct 31, 2006Kellogg Brown & Root LlcIntegrated catalytic cracking and steam pyrolysis process for olefins
US7144498 *Jan 30, 2004Dec 5, 2006Kellogg Brown & Root LlcSupercritical hydrocarbon conversion process
US7381320Aug 30, 2004Jun 3, 2008Kellogg Brown & Root LlcHeavy oil and bitumen upgrading
US7491315Aug 11, 2006Feb 17, 2009Kellogg Brown & Root LlcDual riser FCC reactor process with light and mixed light/heavy feeds
US7820034Oct 26, 2010Kellogg Brown & Root LlcDiluent from heavy oil upgrading
US20050150817 *Jan 14, 2004Jul 14, 2005Kellogg Brown And Root, Inc.Integrated catalytic cracking and steam pyrolysis process for olefins
US20050167333 *Jan 30, 2004Aug 4, 2005Mccall Thomas F.Supercritical Hydrocarbon Conversion Process
US20060042999 *Aug 30, 2004Mar 2, 2006Kellogg Brown And Root, Inc.Heavy Oil and Bitumen Upgrading
US20070090021 *Dec 5, 2006Apr 26, 2007Mccall Thomas FSupercritical hydrocarbon conversion process
US20080035527 *Aug 11, 2006Feb 14, 2008Kellogg Brown & Root LlcDual riser FCC reactor process with light and mixed light/heavy feeds
WO2005074440A2 *Nov 10, 2004Aug 18, 2005Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Supercritical hydrocarbon conversion process
WO2005074440A3 *Nov 10, 2004Dec 29, 2005Kellogg Brown & Root IncSupercritical hydrocarbon conversion process
Classifications
U.S. Classification208/120.15, 208/120.01, 208/164, 208/160, 208/139, 208/161
International ClassificationB01J29/08, C10G11/05
Cooperative ClassificationB01J29/08, C10G11/05
European ClassificationC10G11/05, B01J29/08
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Nov 3, 1992ASAssignment
Owner name: STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, MASSACHUS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:TOTAL ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:006335/0912
Effective date: 19920825
Dec 2, 1994ASAssignment
Owner name: STONE & WEBSTER ENGNEERING CORPORATION, MASSACHUSE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TOTAL ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:007247/0125
Effective date: 19920825
May 1, 1995FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
Jun 11, 2001ASAssignment
Owner name: STONE & WEBSTER PROCESS TECHNOLOGY, INC., TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:011855/0951
Effective date: 20010517
Owner name: STONE & WEBSTER PROCESS TECHNOLOGY, INC.,TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP.;REEL/FRAME:011855/0951
Effective date: 20010517