|Publication number||USRE34070 E|
|Application number||US 07/534,732|
|Publication date||Sep 22, 1992|
|Filing date||Jun 7, 1990|
|Priority date||Jul 29, 1988|
|Publication number||07534732, 534732, US RE34070 E, US RE34070E, US-E-RE34070, USRE34070 E, USRE34070E|
|Original Assignee||Troxler Electronic Laboratories, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (21), Non-Patent Citations (5), Referenced by (16), Classifications (9), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention relates to measurement instruments requiring experimentally determined calibration curves, where minor variations in instrument characteristics necessitate individual calibration, and more particularly relates to a method and system which facilitates the calibration of such instruments.
Many types of measurement instruments rely upon experimentally determined calibration curves to convert the raw data which is read by the instrument into an accurate measurement reading. Typically, the calibration curve is derived by taking measurement readings with the instrument on several samples whose composition has been determined analytically, and then constructing a calibration curve which relates the experimentally determined measurement readings to the analytically determined composition values. Because of minor variations from one measurement instrument to another, a calibration curve is unique for a particular instrument, and it is therefore necessary for each measurement instrument to be calibrated individually. The present invention provides a method and system which greatly facilitates the calibration procedure. This invention is described herein in terms of the calibration of a neutron gauge designed for measuring the asphalt content of bituminous paving mixes. This invention can, however, be embodied in many different forms and can be used with other types and designs of instruments which employ experimentally derived calibration curves.
Lowery, et al. U.S. Pat. No. 3,492,475 discloses a portable nuclear gauge which utilizes a fast neutron source and a thermal neutron detector for determining the composition of a bulk material, such as a bituminous paving mix, placed in a sample pan. This type of gauge relies upon the neutron moderating characteristics of hydrogen atoms present in the composition for determining, for example, the amount of asphalt in a paving mix or the amount of moisture in a building material. For these determinations it is known that the amount of asphalt or the amount of moisture can be related to the hydrogen content of the material, and the hydrogen content of the material can be determined by subjecting the sample to radiation from a fast neutron source and detecting neutrons which have been slowed or thermalized as a result of interaction with the hydrogen nuclei present in the sample. The number of thermalized neutrons detected (counted) over a period of time is utilized in determining the hydrogen content of the sample.
In operating the gauge, it is first necessary to establish a standard count for calibration purposes. This is accomplished using a standard sample having a known hydrogen content, for example, a block of polyethylene. Then calibration curves are produced for the particular material being tested, by using carefully prepared samples having a known content of the hydrogen-containing material of interest (e.g. asphalt or moisture). After the calibration curves have been produced, unknown test samples can be placed in the gauge and counts are taken. By reference to the calibration curve, the corresponding content of the hydrogen-containing material for that count can be read.
A more recent model of this gauge has been produced by applicant's assignee embodying the principles of the Lowery patent and sold as the "Model 3241 Asphalt Content Gauge" by Troxler Electronic Laboratories, Inc. This gauge includes a microprocessor to facilitate calibration and computation of the sample asphalt content. Calibration can be made by taking gauge counts on two or more samples of known asphalt content. The microprocessor then constructs a calibration equation from these data points, and the gauge provides a direct readout of the percent asphalt, thus eliminating the necessity of calculations and reference to external calibration tables.
In order to obtain the most accurate measurements, the gauge must be calibrated each time the composition of the material is changed. This is because the number of counts recorded is only representative of the hydrogen atoms present in the sample. There is an assumption made when using a thermal neutron gauge that the differences in hydrogen count from sample to sample are because of changes in the amount of the substance of interest, such as moisture or asphalt content, and that all other factors are maintained substantially constant. The calibration is done when it is clear that the "other factors" are not going to be constant. Such changes may occur, for example, when using a new aggregate in the paving mix or a new source or grade of asphalt. A new aggregate may have a different average moisture content or a different intrinsic hydrogen content. In the case of asphalt, different sources of asphalt may have a different concentration of hydrogen. At a time when there is such a change, the gauge must be calibrated using carefully prepared samples of known concentrations of the hydrogen-containing material of interest.
As discussed above, the calibration procedure involves taking hydrogen counts with the gauge using several samples of known composition, and establishing a correlation, (e.g. an equation or a calibration curve) which can be used to obtain a percent asphalt reading from the hydrogen counts obtained from a test sample of unknown composition. The calibration procedure itself is not unduly complex, and is practical with a single gauge or where a relatively few gauges are involved. However, where a number of field gauges are used, as is frequently the case in many operations, the necessity of manually calibrating all the gauges becomes quite burdensome and time consuming. The gauges generally need to be taken out of the field and sent to a lab where samples of the new aggregate can be carefully mixed and tested to get a proper calibration. This involves the inconvenience of the loss of use of the gauges during the time they are being calibrated, and also the inconvenience of having to transport the gauges back and forth from the lab.
With the foregoing in mind, it is an object of the present invention to overcome the problems and disadvantages of the prior practices discussed above and to provide an improved system for calibrating gauges in a simpler and more time efficient manner without having to transport the gauges back to the lab.
The invention achieves the foregoing and other objects by providing an efficient system by which calibration data can be transferred to a plurality of field gauges, thereby avoiding the necessity of individually calibrating each gauge. The calibration data required by the gauges is obtained by a master gauge typically kept at the lab. This calibration data is easily transferred to the respective field gauges so that the field gauges are permitted to stay in the field.
The process essentially comprises providing a master instrument (e.g. a neutron gauge), and at least one field instrument (e.g. a neutron gauge). Since each instrument has different measurement characteristics, a cross relationship is established between the readings obtained from the master instrument when measuring a particular material and those detected by the field instrument when measuring the same material.
When a calibration is necessary, due to the use of a new material source for example, the conventional manual calibration procedure is carried out in the lab on the master gauge and master calibration constants are established for the particular material. Adjusted calibration constants, specific for a particular field gauge, are created by adjusting the master calibration constants based upon the previously established cross relationship between the master gauge and the particular field gauge. The adjusted calibration constants are used in the field gauge to obtain measurements on the new material.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the field gauges are specially equipped with means for storing the previously derived cross relationship between the master gauge and the field gauge, and means is provided in the field gauge for directly receiving master calibration constants obtained from the master gauge. The gauge is also equipped with means for applying the stored cross relationship to the newly obtained master calibration constants to create adjusted calibration constants specific for the particular field gauge. Thus whenever a calibration is necessary, such as when a new variation of asphalt is used, the master calibration constants are derived in the laboratory by the master gauge, and these newly derived master calibration constants are then distributed to the field gauges in use. The master calibration constants are loaded into each field gauge, and in each field gauge the master calibration data is adjusted based upon the unique cross relationship data which is stored in the field gauge. This is much easier and quicker than requiring individual calibration of each field gauge.
However, the calibration data transfer procedure of this invention can also be utilized in instruments which are not specially equipped for calibration data transfer, such as for example the asphalt content gauges noted earlier, which have been produced by applicant's assignee for many years. For use in these gauges, the master calibration constants are obtained in the laboratory on a master gauge and cross relationships between each field gauge and the master gauge are established in the manner noted above. Then the master calibration constants are adjusted for each field gauge using the previously derived cross relationships for each field gauge. This can be accomplished manually or preferably through the use of a computer. Then the adjusted calibration constants for each gauge are distributed to the respective field gauges and loaded into the appropriate field gauge for use in performing subsequent measurements. This permits the field units to stay in the field and avoids the time consuming process of individually calibrating each field gauge.
Some of the features and advantages of the invention having been stated, others will become apparent as the description proceeds, and taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a neutron gauge;
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of several sample pans filled with samples to be tested in the neutron gauge;
FIG. 3 is a front cross section view of the neutron gauge of FIG. 1 illustrating its basic components;
FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating the general relationship of thermal neutron counts to the asphalt content of a sample of asphalt-aggregate paving mix and graphically representing the calibration of a thermal neutron gauge;
FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating the basic procedures followed by the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating the detailed procedures pursuant to one embodiment of the present invention where specially equipped field gauges are employed; and
FIG. 7 is a flow diagram similar to FIG. 6 illustrating the detailed procedure of an alternate embodiment of the invention where standard field gauges are employed.
The present invention will now be described more fully with reference to the drawings, in connection with a particular type of neutron gauge designed for measuring the asphalt content of bituminous paving mixes. This invention can, however, be embodied in many different forms and can be used with other types and designs of instruments which use experimentally determined calibration curves. It should be understood therefore that the specific embodiments described herein are illustrative of how the present invention may be practiced, and that the invention is not limited to these specific embodiments.
A neutron gauge is generally indicated by the number 10 in FIG. 1 and comprises a generally rectangular housing 11 having a door 12 which provides access to a measurement chamber in which sample pans are placed for measurement. A control unit 14 is provided, including a keypad 15 for entry of data and for controlling the functions of the gauge, and a display 16, which may be of any suitable construction, such as a liquid crystal display. Referring to FIG. 2, there is shown several sample pans 17 containing samples of asphalt-aggregate paving mix. The sample pans are sized to fit into the measurement chamber of the neutron gauge. Referring to FIG. 3, a sample pan 17 is received within the interior of the gauge. Located in the upper interior portion of the gauge is a source 20 of fast neutrons. The source 20 may for example suitably comprise a Am-241:Be source. In the lower interior portion of the gauge beneath the sample pan are a series of detector tubes 21 for detecting neutrons which have been slowed or thermalized by interaction with hydrogen atoms present in the sample. The illustrated detectors 21 are He3 detector tubes but .[.an.]. .Iadd.any .Iaddend.suitable thermal neutron detector will suffice. The gauge also includes a data processor module 23 for controlling the gauge and counting of thermalized neutrons.
To operate the gauge, the sample pan is filled with a sample of material and inserted into the interior of the gauge. The door is shut and fast neutrons from the source 20 are emitted down through the sample in the sample pan 13. Hydrogen present in the sample interacts with the fast neutrons, producing moderated or slowed neutrons, and thermalized neutrons below a specified energy level are detected by detectors 21. The thermalized neutrons are counted for a predetermined period of time and a count is recorded in the data processor module 23. The data processor module 23 then correlates the number of counts to a moisture content or an asphalt content calibration to indicate the result.
The correlation between counts and asphalt content is unique for each gauge. This is because each fast neutron source 20 emits neutrons at its own particular rate and the detectors also have variations in efficiency and design from unit to unit. Therefore, each gauge must be calibrated in order that the data processor module 23 can convert the number of counts into a value for the asphalt content of the sample. To calibrate the gauge in accordance with conventional methods known in the art, several samples are carefully prepared with known asphalt contents and are used in the gauge to generate counts. The correlation can be done in several different ways. For example, as shown in FIG. 4 the relationship between observed counts and known asphalt content can be graphed. Then, a linear or other form of equation can be formulated to fit the data. Other ways include the creation of a "look up" table where the various asphalt contents are cross referenced with a number of counts.
Calibration is best and most easily accomplished in the lab. This way, the known sample mixtures can be carefully prepared and the most precise calibration can be obtained. However, if the user has a number of these gauges in use in the field, which is often the case, returning the gauges to a lab each time calibration becomes necessary is most inconvenient and would seriously interfere with the user's operations.
The present invention eliminates the necessity of returning field gauges to the lab for calibration by providing a system by which calibration data can be transferred from a lab-based master gauge to one or more field gauges. Illustrated in FIG. 5 is the general process of the system. The first step 31 is to establish a cross relationship which establishes the variance between the thermal neutron counts detected by the master gauge and the counts detected by the field gauge when measuring the same sample. This is accomplished by taking counts on various samples with both the master gauge and the field gauge. The composition of the samples is not critical, although it is desirable that the samples have a hydrogen content generally similar to that of the material which are to be measured during use of the gauge. Most desirably, several samples are used having a hydrogen content which spans the range of measurement of the gauge. For example, standard blocks of solid polyethylene or polyethylene/metal laminates such as that shown in commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 4,152,600 may be employed. The second step 32 involves performing a conventional calibration procedure with the use of the lab-based master gauge to obtain master calibration constants. This calibration procedure would be carried out whenever calibration is required, such as due to the use of a new type or variation of paving mix. In order for the master calibration constants to be usable in the field gauge, they must be adjusted or converted to take into account the differences in measurement between the field gauge and the master gauge. As indicated at 33 in FIG. 5, adjusted calibration constants are created by applying the previously derived cross relationship between the master gauge and field gauge to the master calibration constants to thereby obtain adjusted calibration constants specific for the particular field gauge. The final step 34 of the process is to use the adjusted calibration constants in the field gauge on the material to obtain measurements of the amount of the constituent of interest.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, the calibration data transfer procedure is used on gauges which are specially equipped to store the previously defined master gauge/field gauge cross relationship and to receive unmodified calibration constants from the master gauge and to internally adjust the constants based upon the stored master gauge/field gauge cross relationship to produce adjusted calibration constants which are specific for the particular field gauge and which can be used thereafter for determining percent asphalt based upon a thermal neutron count.
For this purpose, the data processor module 23 includes a stored calibration transfer procedure or subroutine which can be called whenever the calibration transfer procedure is to be run. This procedure permits manual entry of the master gauge/field gauge cross relationship by the operator and stores this data in memory for subsequent use. It also permits entry by the operator of the new master calibration constants, either manually or via a suitable transfer media such as magnetic disk or EPROM. Additional data, such as background readings, explained more fully below, can also be entered at this time. After entry of all needed data, the calibration transfer subroutine carries out a mathematical computation to adjust the master calibration constants based upon the stored master gauge/field gauge cross relationship to create adjusted calibration constants which are thereafter stored and used by the field gauge in converting thermal neutron counts into values for percent asphalt. The method and apparatus in accordance with this embodiment of the present invention is advantageous in that the calibration procedure is quite simple and is essentially automated. Since the master gauge/field gauge cross relationship is stored in the field gauge, accuracy is assured in converting or adjusting the master calibration constants to establish adjusted constants for the specific field gauge.
When the calibration data transfer procedure of the present invention is used with conventional thermal neutron gauges which are not specially equipped for receiving and internally storing the master gauge/field gauge cross relationship, the adjustment of the master calibration constants is performed before the calibration data is physically transferred to the field gauge. This may be suitably accomplished at the laboratory either manually or by a computer program which executes a procedure or subroutine similar to that described above. After adjusting the master calibration constants using appropriate master gauge/field gauge cross relationship, the adjusted calibration constants are then physically transferred to the appropriate field gauge. Depending upon the specific gauge and how it is designed to receive calibration data, the entry of the adjusted calibration data into the field gauge may be by manual entry or by other means, such as electronically.
The procedure in accordance with the first embodiment of the invention is illustrated in more detail in FIG. 6. The broad steps or operations described above with reference to FIG. 5 are shown in the broken line boxes and bear the same reference numbers. The more detailed steps or operations are shown in the solid line boxes. Thus, one step in establishing the master gauge/field gauge cross relationship includes taking a background reading on each of the master gauge and field gauges, as indicated at 41. The background readings are to eliminate the possible error for the day to day differences in the field and lab conditions and also the changes that occur over time in the source 20. The background reading is made by taking a count without any sample in the gauge. The master gauge original background reading is specified as MOBG and the field gauge original background is specified as FOBG. As earlier discussed, several samples are measured by the master and field gauges as indicated at 42 and a cross relationship is established as indicated at 43. Preferably, the cross relationship is established by selecting a minimum of five samples covering the range of percent asphalt used. The readings from the five samples are recorded as RM1, RM2, RM3, RM4, and RM5 for the master gauge and RF1, RF2, RF3, .[.PF4 .]. .Iadd.RF4 .Iaddend., and RF5 for the field gauge. A cross relationship between the two gauges can now be established by fitting the counts from one gauge against the other. Please note that only the linear form of this process is considered here, but this procedure can be performed with other equations. Thus,
R.sub.Mj =E.sub.1 +E.sub.2 R.sub.Fj
where j=1, 2 . . . 5. The cross relationship, which includes E1, E2, MOBG and FOBG, is stored in the field neutron gauge or more particularly the central processing module 23, as indicated at 44.
At subsequent times, when it is necessary to calibrate a field gauge, which is most often done when a different type or variety of material is used, calibration is performed using the master gauge. The master gauge is used to generate a background count on the empty gauge chamber as indicated at 45. The background count is specified as MBG. The master gauge is then used to test carefully prepared samples of a particular variety of the asphalt-aggregate paving mix, as indicated at 46, and the samples are used to generate master calibration constants as indicated at 47. A minimum of two samples are employed covering the range of asphalt used. This will give readings R1 and R2. The counts R1 and R2 are now used with the known asphalt content samples to establish the master calibration constants A1 and A2, using the relationship
%AC=A.sub.1 +A.sub.2 R.sub.M (1)
where RM is master gauge count and %AC is asphalt content.
The master calibration constants, which include A1, A2 and MBG, are then transferred and input into the field neutron gauge, or more particularly the central processing module 23 as indicated at 48. Then as indicated at 49, the field gauge creates adjusted calibration constants AA1 and AA2 by adjusting the master calibration constants A1 and A2 based on the cross relationship stored in the field gauge.
The following discussion explains how the adjusted calibration constants are derived. Using the equation
R.sub.M =E.sub.1 +E.sub.2 R.sub.F (2)
to account for any changes in the gauge counts since the time of cross calibration the stored background counts have to be used in the above equation, so
R.sub.M +(MOBG-MBG)=E.sub.1 +E.sub.2 [R.sub.F +-(FOBG-DBG)](3)
wherein DBG is the field gauge daily background count. RM is calculated Master Gauge count, and RF is the measured Field Gauge Count. Rewriting equation (3)
R.sub.M =E.sub.1 +E.sub.2 [R.sub.F +(FOBG-DBG)]+MBG-MOBG (4)
For simplicity let
R.sub.F *=R.sub.F +(FOBG-DBG)
R.sub.M =E.sub.1 +E.sub.2 R.sub.F *+F.sub.1
Substitute RM into equation 1 to get
%AC=A.sub.1 +A.sub.2 (E.sub.1 +E.sub.2 R.sub.F *+F.sub.1)
%AC=A.sub.1 +A.sub.2 E.sub.1 +A.sub.2 E.sub.2 R.sub.F *+A.sub.2 F.sub.1
%AC=(A.sub.1 +A.sub.2 E.sub.1 +A.sub.2 F.sub.1)+(A.sub.2 E.sub.2)R.sub.F *
AA1=A.sub.1 +A.sub.2 E.sub.1 +A.sub.2 F.sub.1
Finally, the constants stored in the Field Gauge are AA1 and AA2.
In use, daily background measurements specified as DBG are taken from the field gauge as indicated at 50 and the field gauge is used to obtain measurements of the asphalt content of an asphalt-aggregate paving mix as indicated at 51 such that
%AC=AA.sub.1 +AA.sub.2 (R.sub.F +FOBG-DBG)
The process of transferring the calibration to the standard gauges is substantially similar to the process described above, and is illustrated in FIG. 7. To avoid repetition, the procedures or steps shown in FIG. 7 which correspond to those previously described in FIG. 6 are identified with corresponding reference characters, with prime notation added. Basically, the fundamental difference in this procedure is that the adjusted calibration constants AA1, AA2 for the field gauge are produced outside of the field gauge (e.g. at the laboratory). Then the adjusted calibration constants AA1, AA2 (rather than the master calibration constants) are transferred to the field gauge as indicated at 48' in FIG. 7.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2564626 *||Mar 10, 1945||Aug 14, 1951||Macmahon Andrew M||Measuring device and method of measuring|
|US2951200 *||Oct 29, 1954||Aug 30, 1960||Bell Telephone Labor Inc||Calibration indicator|
|US3492479 *||May 2, 1966||Jan 27, 1970||Troxler Electronic Lab Inc||Apparatus for measuring hydrogenous material utilizing radioactive source|
|US3519821 *||Aug 15, 1966||Jul 7, 1970||Bolster Michael S||Method and apparatus for calibrating radiation detection and measurement instruments|
|US4079237 *||Nov 12, 1975||Mar 14, 1978||Unit Process Assemblies, Inc.||Card controlled beta backscatter thickness measuring instrument|
|US4152600 *||Oct 21, 1976||May 1, 1979||Troxler Electronic Laboratories, Inc.||Nuclear radiation moisture gauge calibration standard|
|US4155009 *||Apr 7, 1977||May 15, 1979||Unit Process Assemblies, Inc.||Thickness measurement instrument with memory storage of multiple calibrations|
|US4198677 *||Jan 30, 1978||Apr 15, 1980||Exxon Research & Engineering Co.||Method and apparatus for compensating a sensor|
|US4374326 *||Aug 15, 1980||Feb 15, 1983||Coal Industry (Patents) Limited||Method for determining the proportion of at least one material in a moving mixture of materials|
|US4571491 *||Dec 29, 1983||Feb 18, 1986||Shell Oil Company||Method of imaging the atomic number of a sample|
|US4671097 *||Jun 14, 1985||Jun 9, 1987||Oy Nokia Ab||Calibration system for the calibration of mass flow controllers|
|US4873655 *||Aug 21, 1987||Oct 10, 1989||Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System||Sensor conditioning method and apparatus|
|US4874950 *||Mar 30, 1988||Oct 17, 1989||Troxler Electronic Laboratories, Inc.||Asphalt content gauge with compensation for sample temperature deviations|
|DD160378A3 *||Title not available|
|DE2264674A1 *||Mar 30, 1972||Jan 23, 1975||Mannesmann Ag||Radiometric measuring of humidity in granules - using probe calibrated and checked against already calibrated probe|
|EP0353118A2 *||Jul 3, 1989||Jan 31, 1990||Troxler Electronic Laboratories, Inc.||Method and system for transferring calibration data between calibrated measurement instruments|
|GB2072349A *||Title not available|
|JPS60135842A *||Title not available|
|SU240118A1 *||Title not available|
|SU1008684A1 *||Title not available|
|SU1093985A1 *||Title not available|
|1||*||Illinois Department of Transportation Specification, Jan. 1987, pp. 5 6.|
|2||Illinois Department of Transportation Specification, Jan. 1987, pp. 5-6.|
|3||*||Troxler Electronic Laboratories, Inc., Brochure on the Troxler 3241 Asphalt Content Gauge, published by Jul. 1988, 2 pages.|
|4||*||Troxler Electronic Laboratories, Inc., Operations Manual for 3241 B Asphalt Content Gauge, 1985, pp. 20 22.|
|5||Troxler Electronic Laboratories, Inc., Operations Manual for 3241-B Asphalt Content Gauge, 1985, pp. 20-22.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5243546 *||Jan 10, 1991||Sep 7, 1993||Ashland Oil, Inc.||Spectroscopic instrument calibration|
|US5327770 *||Jun 8, 1992||Jul 12, 1994||Infrared Engineering Limited||Apparatus for sampling a material travelling past a sampling region|
|US5708593 *||May 20, 1996||Jan 13, 1998||Elf Antar France||Method for correcting a signal delivered by a measuring instrument|
|US6751576||Mar 8, 2001||Jun 15, 2004||Cognis Corporation||On-site agricultural product analysis system and method of analyzing|
|US6990743 *||Aug 29, 2002||Jan 31, 2006||Micron Technology, Inc.||Process for monitoring measuring device performance|
|US7003417||Jun 6, 2003||Feb 21, 2006||Invensys Systems, Inc.||Multiple calibration ranges stored in a process transmitter|
|US7194369||Jul 5, 2002||Mar 20, 2007||Cognis Corporation||On-site analysis system with central processor and method of analyzing|
|US7200950 *||Dec 2, 2005||Apr 10, 2007||Micron Technology, Inc.||Process for monitoring measuring device performance|
|US7406388||Sep 11, 2003||Jul 29, 2008||Southern California Edison||Calibration process management system and data structure|
|US20040040165 *||Aug 29, 2002||Mar 4, 2004||Bowes Steve W.||Process for monitoring measuring device performance|
|US20040249592 *||Jun 6, 2003||Dec 9, 2004||Invensys Systems, Inc.||Multiple calibration ranges stored in a process transmitter|
|US20060080851 *||Dec 2, 2005||Apr 20, 2006||Bowes Steve W||Process for monitoring measuring device performance|
|US20060100807 *||Dec 20, 2005||May 11, 2006||Invensys Systems, Inc.||Multiple calibration ranges stored in a process transmitter|
|US20060167643 *||Sep 11, 2003||Jul 27, 2006||Casto Curtis V||Calibration process management system and data structure|
|US20070143037 *||Feb 15, 2007||Jun 21, 2007||Lundstedt Alan P||On-site analysis system with central processor and method of analyzing|
|US20080312861 *||Jul 28, 2008||Dec 18, 2008||Southern California Edison Company||Calibration process management system and data structure|
|U.S. Classification||73/1.88, 702/91, 250/252.1|
|International Classification||G01D18/00, G01N23/02|
|Cooperative Classification||G01D18/008, G01N23/025|
|European Classification||G01N23/02B, G01D18/00C|
|Feb 24, 1993||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Feb 5, 1997||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Feb 22, 2001||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12