|Publication number||USRE35697 E|
|Application number||US 08/425,390|
|Publication date||Dec 23, 1997|
|Filing date||Apr 20, 1995|
|Priority date||Jul 16, 1990|
|Publication number||08425390, 425390, US RE35697 E, US RE35697E, US-E-RE35697, USRE35697 E, USRE35697E|
|Inventors||Giorgio Grasso, Aldo Righetti|
|Original Assignee||Pirelli Cavi S.P.A.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (13), Non-Patent Citations (67), Referenced by (9), Classifications (11), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/552,918, filed Jul. 16, 1990 .Iadd.now abandoned.Iaddend..
1. Field Of The Invention
The present invention generally concerns a unit for amplifying light signals in optical fiber transmission lines, and more specifically, to such a unit which reduces interference and noise in such lines and which is connected between a pair of optical fibers.
2. Description Of The Prior Art
As known, in the optical fiber telecommunications field, owing to the unavoidable losses of light occurring inside optical fibers, a gradual attenuation of the signal always takes place along the path of the optical fibers.
For this reason, when signals have to be transmitted long-distances, it is necessary to use one or more amplifying units which are interposed along the path of the optical fibers at intervals of pre-fixed length.
A type of amplifying unit that at present is in widespread use provides for the use of an optical fiber amplifier which in operation is connected to the optical fibers so as to define, along the path of the latter, an input line through which the signals of light are transmitted to the amplifier itself, as well as an output line through which the amplified signals of light are transmitted in the direction of an optical receiver.
At the present state of the technique, the use of these optical fiber amplifiers gives rise to some drawbacks, deriving mainly from the fact that the amplifier receives not only and exclusively the useful signal to be amplified, but also different noise signals which are consequently amplified and introduced again into the output line.
It is found that a certain number of these noise signals come from the output line and are caused by a phenhomena of diffusion of light unavoidably arising inside the optical fibers.
More precisely, a part of the light forming the amplified signals gets lost as a result of a phenomenon of diffusion arisinq inside the optical fibers.
A part of the back-diffused light returns to the amplifiers and, therefore, is again amplified and introduced into the output line.
Moreover, it is to be considered that the amplifier, owing to its intrinsic nature, emits a certain quantity of noise signals which are introduced either into the input line or into the output line.
Owing to the above phenomena of diffusion, these noise signals partly come back to the amplifier where they mix with the useful signals which it is desired be transmitted.
As it can be understood from the above, the entry of noise signals into the amplifier and their consequent amplification result in interferences and beat phenomena that, for sufficiently high values (>15 dB) of gain of the amplifier, originate an "interferometric noise" of an amplitude greater that the known noise produced by the amplifier.
The above problem results in an undesired reduction of the signal-to-noise ratio between the useful signal and the noise downstream of the amplifier itself. This reduction in the signal/noise ratio tends to increase by increases in the gain of the fiber optical amplifier, as well as by increasing the number of amplifiers arranged along the path of fibers.
In this situation it is extremely difficult to have the useful signal sufficiently clear when it reaches a receiver placed at a long distance from the source of the signal itself.
From Japanese patents 52-155901 and 63-219186 and from "ELECTRONICS LETTERS", vol. 24, no. 1, Jan. 7, 1988, pages 36-38, it is known that in a laser or in an optical semiconductor amplifier there is the risk of instability and generation of oscillations due to the reflections at the amplifier ends.
In the above patents and article, in order to eliminate these reflections, it is taught to couple an optical isolator to the semiconductor laser, which prevents the light reflected by the coupling surfaces between the line fibers and these devices from reaching the lasers themselves.
In an active-fiber amplifier no interface surfaces are present between the line fibers and the amplifier because the line fibers are directly welded to the amplifier's active fiber. Therefore, the reflection phenomena are not generally expected.
It has, however, been discovered that in an active-fiber amplifier, in the absence of means for limiting reflections towards the active fiber, it is impossible to reach high amplification gain due to the occurrence of noise of the interferometric type as a result of beats between the direct and reflected signals in the line fibers themselves and in any event directed towards the active fiber. The presence of interferometric noise is of little importance in a semiconductor amplifier which has low gains and small construction sizes, whereas it becomes particularly important in an active-fiber amplifier capable of reaching very high gain and having an active fiber of considerable length generally in the range of some tens of meters, much greater than the coherence distance of the signal generating laser.
In an optical fiber amplifier the problem arises, therefore, of protecting the amplifying fiber against such noise sources and keeping the reflections towards the active fiber itself below critical values so as not to jeopardize the transmission quality, while maintaining high values of amplification gain.
The main object of the present invention is to solve the problems of the known technique, by realising an amplifying unit formed in such a way as to considerably prevent the entry of noise signals into the fiber optical amplifier.
This aim and other ones that will be better apparent from the present description, are substantially achieved by means of a unit for amplifying light signals in optical fiber transmission lines, comprising first isolator means for unidirectional light transmission interposed between said amplifier and the output optical fiber line to prevent the transmission of optical noise signals from said output line to the amplifier and second isolator means for unidirectional light transmission between the amplifier and the input line to prevent the transmission of noise signals from the amplifier to said input line.
Further characteristics and advantages will better appear from the detailed description of a preferred but not exclusive embodiment of a unit for amplifying signals of light in optical transmission lines, according to the present invention. Said description will be made hereinafter with reference to the attached sheet of drawings, supplied only by way of example, which in the single FIGURE shows a block diagram of an amplifying unit forming the object of the present invention arranged to operate along an optical fiber transmission line.
With reference to the FIGURE, reference numeral 1 generally indicates a unit for amplifying signals of light in optical fiber transmission lines according to the invention.
The amplifying unit 1 includes conventionally an optical fiber amplifier 2 arranged to be connected in use to at least an input optical fiber line 3 through which light signals emitted for instance by an optical transmitter 4 or, alternatively, coming from an amplifying unit like that shown and placed upstream of the same, are transmitted.
The amplifier 2 is also connected to an output optical fiber line 5 which convey the amplified light signal to an optical receiver 6 or, alternatively, to another amplifying unit like the shown one.
In accordance with the present invention, the amplifying unit 1 also includes first isolator means 7 for unidirectional light transmission interposed between the fiber optical amplifier 2 and the output optical fiber line 5 to prevent the transmission of optical noise signals from the output line to the amplifier. Moreover, second isolator means 8 for light transmission are interposed between the fiber optical amplifier 2 and the input 3 to prevent the transmission of noise signals from the amplifier 2 to the input line.
Preferably, the isolator means 7, 8 for unidirectional light transmission comprise at least a first optical isolator and at least a second optical isolator, respectively, both isolators having a low reflectivity. It is provided that the reflectivity of these optical isolators 7, 8 known per se, is lower by at least 10 dB with respect to the reflectivity due to Rayleigh scattering in the optical fibers forming the input 3 and output 5 lines.
The operation of the amplifying unit of the present invention will now be described.
In a known way, the amplifier 2 receives the light signals coming from the input line 3 and transmits the amplified signals in the direction of the output line 5.
Besides the aforementioned optical signals, the amplifier 2 also transmits, in a known way, its own noise signals, which tend to be introduced both into the input line 3 and into the output line 5.
Advantageously, the presence of the second optical isolator 8 immediately upstream of the amplifier 2 does not allow the entry of noise signals into the input line 3.
Absent such optical isolator 8, the entry of the amplifier noise signals into the input line 3 would originate, owing to the phenomena of diffusion arising inside the optical fibers, further noise signals, a part of which would again reach the amplifier 2 creating interferences of beats with the useful optical signals, i.e. those transmitted by the optical transmitter 4.
Advantageously, the presence of the first optical isolator 7 immediately downstream of the amplifier 2 additionally avoids noise signals reaching the amplifier 2 produced along the output line 5 as a consequence of the phenomena of diffusion of light arising inside the optical fibers. Absent the first optical isolator 7, these noise signals would be amplified and again introduced into the output line 5 together with the amplified useful signal, thus originating undesired interferences and/or beat phenomena.
From the above it is understood that the only signals that will reach the output line 5 are the amplified useful signals, together with the small noise signal, negligible among other things, produced by the amplifier 2.
The present invention achieves the objects of the invention. In fact, as demonstrated above, due to the presence of the optical isolators immediately upstream and downstream of the amplifier 2, the amplifying unit 1 forming the object of the present invention permits noticeable reduction, in comparison with known techniques, in the entry of noise signals into the output line 5 of the amplifier 2.
This invention increases the useful gain of the amplifier, as well as an improved transmission of the optical signals from a transmitter to a receiver remotely placed at a long distance one from the other.
While a particular embodiment of the present invention has been illustrated and described herein, changes and modification apparent to those skilled in the art may be made therein and thereto, but are included within the scope of the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4168427 *||Jun 14, 1978||Sep 18, 1979||Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated||Duplex optical communication system with reverse Rayleigh scattered power equalizer|
|US4596048 *||Apr 4, 1983||Jun 17, 1986||General Electric Company||Optically isolated contention bus|
|US4704741 *||Nov 12, 1986||Nov 3, 1987||Nec Corporation||Bidirectional optical communication system|
|US4879763 *||Feb 21, 1986||Nov 7, 1989||AT&T Bell Laboratories American Telephone and Telegraph Company||Optical fiber bidirectional transmission system|
|US4899043 *||Jul 15, 1988||Feb 6, 1990||Kokusai Denshin Denwa Kabushiki Kaisha||Fault monitoring system for optical fiber communication systems|
|US4900917 *||Jul 15, 1988||Feb 13, 1990||American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories||Polarization insensitive optical communication device utilizing optical preamplification|
|US4947134 *||Oct 30, 1987||Aug 7, 1990||American Telephone And Telegraph Company||Lightwave systems using optical amplifiers|
|US5007698 *||Aug 15, 1990||Apr 16, 1991||Fujitsu Limited||Optical fiber amplifier/multiplexer|
|DE2248370A1 *||Oct 3, 1972||Apr 11, 1974||Siemens Ag||Optischer zwischenverstaerker fuer ein nachrichtenuebertragungssystem|
|EP0314373A2 *||Oct 19, 1988||May 3, 1989||AT&T Corp.||Lightwave systems using optical amplifiers|
|JPH02291186A *||Title not available|
|SU221382A1 *||Title not available|
|WO1986007221A1 *||May 22, 1986||Dec 4, 1986||Pa Consulting Services Limited||Fiber optic repeater|
|1||"400 Mbits/s, 372 km Coherent Transmssion Experiment Using IN-Line optical Amplifiers" by Olsson et al. Electronics Letters, vol. 24, No. 1 pp. 36-38, Jan. 1988.|
|2||"Effect of Rayleigh Backscattering from Optical Fibers on DFB Laser Wavelengt Laser Diode Modulation and Noise" (1988) pp. 59, 250-255, 284 and 285 (No Month).|
|3||"Impact of Multiple Reflection Noise in Gbits/s Lightwave System With Optical Fiber Amplifiers"IEEE Review (Mar. 1989) pp. 107-110.|
|4||"Mutual Signal Gain . . . 1.54 um Wavelength" by Inoue et al. Electronics letters, vol. 25, No. 9, pp. 594-595, Apr. 1989.|
|5||*||400 Mbits/s, 372 km Coherent Transmssion Experiment Using IN Line optical Amplifiers by Olsson et al. Electronics Letters, vol. 24, No. 1 pp. 36 38, Jan. 1988.|
|6||*||CIC 18.05.1989, NTT Transmission Systems Laboratories, OCS89, No. 6673 pp. 13/36 21/26, vol. 89, No. 32.|
|7||CIC 18.05.1989, NTT Transmission Systems Laboratories, OCS89, No. 6673 pp. 13/36-21/26, vol. 89, No. 32.|
|8||*||CLEO vol. 11, (Apr. 24 28, 1989) Performance Characteristics of Erbium Doped Optical Fiber Amplifiers.|
|9||CLEO vol. 11, (Apr. 24-28, 1989)--Performance Characteristics of Erbium Doped Optical Fiber Amplifiers.|
|10||*||ECOC( 88) A Travelling Wave Optical Amplifier Module Y. Tamura and E. Nishimura (No Month).|
|11||ECOC('88) "A Travelling-Wave Optical Amplifier Module" Y. Tamura and E. Nishimura (No Month).|
|12||*||Effect of Rayleigh Backscattering from Optical Fibers on DFB Laser Wavelengt Laser Diode Modulation and Noise (1988) pp. 59, 250 255, 284 and 285 (No Month).|
|13||*||Electronic Letters 13th Apr. 1989 vol. 25 No. 8, pp. 499 501 Improved Sensitivity of 60 Video Channel FM SCM Receiver With Semiconductor Etc.|
|14||Electronic Letters 13th Apr. 1989 vol. 25 No. 8, pp. 499-501 Improved Sensitivity of 60 Video Channel FM-SCM-Receiver With Semiconductor Etc.|
|15||*||Electronics Letters (Sep. 28, 1989) vol. 25, pp. 1393 1394.|
|16||Electronics Letters (Sep. 28, 1989) vol. 25, pp. 1393-1394.|
|17||*||Electronics Letters(Jun. 10, 1982), vol. 18 No. 12, pp. 495 496.|
|18||Electronics Letters(Jun. 10, 1982), vol. 18 No. 12, pp. 495-496.|
|19||*||Electronics Letters(Mar. 31, 1988), vol. 24, No. 7, pp. 406 408.|
|20||Electronics Letters(Mar. 31, 1988), vol. 24, No. 7, pp. 406-408.|
|21||*||Electronics Letters(Sep. 10, 1987) vol. 23, No. 19, pp. 1026 1028.|
|22||Electronics Letters(Sep. 10, 1987) vol. 23, No. 19, pp. 1026-1028.|
|23||*||Electronics Letters, vol. 26, No. 10(May 10, 1990), pp. 669 671.|
|24||Electronics Letters, vol. 26, No. 10(May 10, 1990), pp. 669-671.|
|25||*||Fain Proceedings, Moscow vol. 172, pp. 79,80,110 no date.|
|26||*||IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology vol. 7, No. 8 (Aug. 1989) pp. 1234 1240.|
|27||IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology vol. 7, No. 8 (Aug. 1989) pp. 1234-1240.|
|28||*||IEEE Photonics Tech. Letters vol. 2 (Mar. 1990) pp. 211 213.|
|29||IEEE Photonics Tech. Letters vol. 2--(Mar. 1990) pp. 211-213.|
|30||*||IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 1 No. 3, (Mar. 1989) pp. 68 70.|
|31||IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 1 No. 3, (Mar. 1989) pp. 68-70.|
|32||*||Impact of Multiple Reflection Noise in Gbits/s Lightwave System With Optical Fiber Amplifiers IEEE Review (Mar. 1989) pp. 107 110.|
|33||*||Journal of Lightwave Technology, No. 7, No. 6, (Jun. 1989) pp. 888 895.|
|34||Journal of Lightwave Technology, No. 7, No. 6, (Jun. 1989) pp. 888-895.|
|35||*||Journal of Lighwave Technology, vol. LT 4 No. 5 (May 1986).|
|36||Journal of Lighwave Technology, vol. LT-4 No. 5 (May 1986).|
|37||*||Laser Focus/Electro Optics (May 1985) (pp. 133 135 and 138 144 Single Mode Directional Couplers by Tekippe et al.|
|38||Laser Focus/Electro Optics (May 1985) (pp. 133-135 and 138-144 "Single-Mode Directional Couplers" by Tekippe et al.|
|39||*||Laser Lichtverstarken und Oszillatoren, D. Ross, Akademische Verlagsquellschaft Frankfurt am Main 1966 (No Date).|
|40||Laser Lichtverstarken und-Oszillatoren, D. Ross, Akademische Verlagsquellschaft Frankfurt am Main 1966 (No Date).|
|41||*||Lexikon der Physik, 1969, pp. 31 32 (No Month).|
|42||Lexikon der Physik, 1969, pp. 31-32 (No Month).|
|43||*||Lightguide Digest 1988, No. 2, pp. 8 and 9 (No Month).|
|44||Lightguide Digest--1988, No. 2, pp. 8 and 9 (No Month).|
|45||*||Mutual Signal Gain . . . 1.54 um Wavelength by Inoue et al. Electronics letters, vol. 25, No. 9, pp. 594 595, Apr. 1989.|
|46||*||OFC 90 Jan. 22 26, 1990.|
|47||OFC '90 --Jan. 22-26, 1990.|
|48||*||OFC Conference (Feb. 1989) TUG7 Saturation induced crosstalk in high speed erbium doped amplifiers at 1.53 um ECOC 89 15th European Conference on Optical Communication Sep. 10 14, 1989, pp. 42 45 (No Month).|
|49||OFC Conference (Feb. 1989) TUG7 Saturation-induced crosstalk in high speed erbium-doped amplifiers at λ=1.53 um ECOC '89--15th European Conference on Optical Communication Sep. 10-14, 1989, pp. 42-45 (No Month).|
|50||*||OFC Tutorial Sessions (Feb. 1989) pp. 155 158) pp. 155 158; 193 194.|
|51||OFC Tutorial Sessions (Feb. 1989) pp. 155-158) pp. 155-158; 193-194.|
|52||*||OFCC Optical Society of America vol. 5, (Feb. 6 Sep. 1989).|
|53||OFCC Optical Society of America vol. 5, (Feb. 6-Sep. 1989).|
|54||*||Optical Amplifiers, OFC (Feb. 7, 1989), pp. 345, 363, 369, 370.|
|55||*||Optische Nachrichtenchik 1976, pp. 31 and 32 (No Month).|
|56||*||Patent Abstract of Japan, vol. 13, No. 8 JP A 63 219 186(Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Corp.), Jan. 1989.|
|57||Patent Abstract of Japan, vol. 13, No. 8 JP-A-63-219 186(Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Corp.), Jan. 1989.|
|58||*||Patent Anstract of Japan, vol 2, No. 33 pp. 12531 JP A 52 155 901(Nippom Denshin Denwa Kosha), Dec. 1977.|
|59||Patent Anstract of Japan, vol 2, No. 33 pp. 12531 JP-A-52 155 901(Nippom Denshin Denwa Kosha), Dec. 1977.|
|60||*||Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Optical Communications, vol. 3, pp. 42 45 by Righetti et al. An 11 Gbit/sec 260 km Transmission etc. Sep. 1989.|
|61||Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Optical Communications, vol. 3, pp. 42-45 by Righetti et al. "An 11 Gbit/sec 260 km Transmission etc." Sep. 1989.|
|62||*||Textbook Optics pp. 1234 1240 (No Date).|
|63||Textbook--Optics --pp. 1234-1240 (No Date).|
|64||*||Transmission of 12 Gb/s over 100 km Using an LD pumped Erbium doped Fiber Amplifier and a Ti:LINb03, Fujitsu Laboratories, Ltd. Date: Jul. 18, 1989.|
|65||Transmission of 12 Gb/s over 100 km Using an LD-pumped Erbium-doped Fiber Amplifier and a Ti:LINb03, Fujitsu Laboratories, Ltd. Date:-Jul. 18, 1989.|
|66||*||TUG 7 Saturation Induced Crosstalk in High Speed Erbium doped fiber amplifiers at 1.83 um.|
|67||TUG 7 Saturation Induced Crosstalk in High-Speed Erbium-doped fiber amplifiers atλ=1.83 um.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6353497||Mar 3, 2000||Mar 5, 2002||Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc.||Integrated modular optical amplifier|
|US6437906||Nov 22, 2000||Aug 20, 2002||Cisco Technology, Inc.||All-optical gain controlled L-band EDFA structure with reduced four-wave mixing cross-talk|
|US6501870 *||Mar 3, 2000||Dec 31, 2002||Lucent Technologies Inc.||System and method for reducing effects of optical impairments in optically amplified lightwave communication systems|
|US6714345||Apr 25, 2002||Mar 30, 2004||Corning Incorporated||Semiconductor optical amplifier providing high gain, high power and low noise figure|
|US7203429 *||May 7, 2001||Apr 10, 2007||Tyco Telecommunications (Us) Inc.||Optical transmission system using optical signal processing in terminals for improved system performance|
|US7336908 *||Sep 8, 2006||Feb 26, 2008||Tyco Telecommunications (Us) Inc.||Optical transmission system using optical signal processing in terminals for improved system performance|
|US20020176144 *||May 7, 2001||Nov 28, 2002||Bergano Neal S.||Optical transmission system using optical signal processing in terminals for improved system performance|
|US20070009265 *||Sep 8, 2006||Jan 11, 2007||Bergano Neal S||Optical Transmission System Using Optical Signal Processing in Terminals for Improved System Performance|
|EP1261086A1 *||May 25, 2001||Nov 27, 2002||Corning Incorporated||Semiconductor optical amplifier providing high gain, high power and low noise figure|
|U.S. Classification||385/24, 385/42, 398/147, 398/40, 385/32, 398/141|
|Cooperative Classification||H04B10/291, H04B10/2912|
|European Classification||H04B10/291, H04B10/2912|
|Jun 8, 2000||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CISCO PHOTONICS ITALY S.R.L., ITALY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PIRELLI CAVI E SISTEMI S.P.A. AN ITALIAN CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:010881/0755
Effective date: 20000215
|Sep 25, 2000||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Oct 20, 2004||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12