|Publication number||USRE36603 E|
|Application number||US 08/700,090|
|Publication date||Mar 7, 2000|
|Filing date||Aug 20, 1996|
|Priority date||Oct 13, 1989|
|Publication number||08700090, 700090, US RE36603 E, US RE36603E, US-E-RE36603, USRE36603 E, USRE36603E|
|Inventors||Wolfgang D. Pohl, Conrad W. Schneiker|
|Original Assignee||International Business Machines Corp.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (12), Referenced by (18), Classifications (22), Legal Events (1)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application .Iadd.is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/440,597, filed May 11, 1995, now abandoned, which was filed as a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 5,210,714, which issued May 11, 1993, from application Ser. No. 07/674,264, filed Mar. 25, 1991, which .Iaddend.is a division of application Ser. No. 07/421,207, filed Oct. 13, 1989, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,043,577.
The present invention relates to a distance-controlled tunneling transducer for use in a direct storage unit, having a plurality of tunnel tips arranged facing a recording medium. In particular the invention teaches improved gap control means for implementation in micromechanical techniques. The invention is also applicable to low-voltage field-emission environments where the gap dimension is somewhat larger in the tunneling regime. Therefore, where in the following description reference is made to tunneling phenomena, those skilled in the art will be able to easily apply what is said to field-emission phenomena as well.
In the tunneling regime, the tip/surface distance typically is less than 2 nm, and in the field-emission environment, that distance is considered to be on the order of 20 nm. Small local deviations from planarity of the surface of the recording medium, say on the order of tenths of a nanometer, may result in relatively large changes of the tip current, inparticular in the tunnel regime, where the dependence of the tunneling current on the tip-to-surface distance is exponential. Because of the fact that the operating distances in tunneling as well in in field-emission environments are so small, it may even happen that the tip crashes into a surface it and thus suffers damage, unless some measure is taken to maintain the tip-to-surface distance essentially constant. In conventional tunneling microscopes, this problem is solved by means of a feedback loop operating from the tip distance above the surface, with the aim of keeping the tip current constant. It will be obvious to those skilled in the art that in view of the relatively large velocity with which surface asperities may be encountered as the tip scans across the surface of the recording medium, and because of the possibly abrupt change in tip-to-surface distance, a very fast response of the feedback loop is required.
Recently, direct access storage devices have been proposed which operate on the principle of the scanning tunneling microscope. The basic reference in this area is EP A-0 247 219. The reference teaches a storage unit comprising an array of tunnel tips arranged at a tunnel distance from the surface of a recording medium which is capable of permitting digital information to be written or read the variations of the tunneling current. The tunnel is maintained by means of a feedback loop, and the idea of integrating the control circuitry of that feedback loop on the tunnel tip array is mentioned. No details of the circuitry nor of the way the integration can be achieved are, however, given.
A scanning tunneling microscope realized in micromechanical techniques is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,520,570. A semiconductor chip has slots etched into it in a pattern resulting in a plurality of tunnel tips to be formed that are hinged by stripes of semiconductor material to the main body of the chip. Again in this reference, an area is provided on the semiconductor chip to contain control circuitry associated with the tunnel tip, in casu a transistor acing as an impedance transformer.
While it is acknowledged that the idea has occurred to integrate the tunnel tip feedback loop into the semiconductor chip on which the tunnel tip is formed, it has turned out that conventional control circuitry for scanning tunneling microscope and field emission microscope applications is by far too complex and, hence, too bulky to be installed on the semiconductor chip if the chip is to carry a plurality of tips arranged in a small array.
As a possible alternative, one may requires that both the array of tips and the use of the recording medium be sufficiently flat, for instance within 0.1 nm over the area to be scanned, to allow for global gap width control averaging over the currents of all tips. Such a requirement would, however, impose undesirable constraints with regard to precision of manufacturing and alignment, as well as to the choice of materials for the recording medium.
A primary object of the present invention is to solve this problem by foregoing the idea of perfect feedback regulation, i.e. with zero error. Instead, an open loop circuit is provided which compensates for distance variations though less completely, but which is sufficiently simple to be easily integrated into a multiple-tip scanner head. The achievable reduction in distance variation as result of variation of the tip-to-surface distance typically is a factor of from 30 to greater 100. The result is relaxed manufacturing tolerance requirements with regard to flatness of the recording medium to values that can easily be maintained.
Details of an embodiment of the invention will hereafter be described by way of example having reference to the attached drawings.
FIG. 1 is a top plan view onto a section of an array of tunnel tips;
FIG. 2 is an enlarged cross-section of the tunnel region along line A--A of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of the tunnel tip, showing the different positions of the cantilever beam during operation;
FIG. 4 is a circuit diagram of the circuitry associated with the tunnel tip;
FIG. 5 is a graph used in the determination of the operating point of the circuitry of FIG. 4;
FIG. 6 is a section of the graph of FIG. 5 having a larger scale;
FIG. 7 shows a characteristic of the control circuitry in accordance with the parameters chosen; and
FIG. 8 shows another characteristic of the control circuitry in accordance with the parameters chosen.
While the invention will be described in connection with the electrostatic deflection of a cantilever beam as conventionally used in micromechanical arrays, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that the invention is also applicable to piezoceramic scanners.
FIGS. 1 and 2 show the contemplated arrangement of the elements of the transducer in accordance with the invention in a semi-schematical way. Referring to FIG. 1, there is shown a section of the transducer 1 with three tunnel tips 2', 2", 2"' out of a plurality of tunnel tips (or field-emission tips) arranged in an array. The tunnel tips are attached to cantilever beams 3',3",3"' respectively which are formed, e.g. by etching from body 4, FIG. 2, of transducer 1 as an integral part thereof. Transducer 1 is mounted to a conventional xyz-drive 5 which provides lateral deflection as well as coarse approach and adjustment of the average distance between tunnel tip 2 and the oppositely disposed surface 6, by keeping the total tunneling current essentially constant. Surface 6 may actually be the surface of a sample to be inspected by means of a scanning tunneling. However, since the present invention is intended particularly for use in with information storage devices, for the purposes of this description surface 6 will be assumed to be the surface of a recording medium 7. The medium 7 may comprise, for example, a magnetizable material. Since the funnel effect requires the surface opposite by the tunnel tip to be electrically conductive, any nonconductive materialized as the recording medium may be provided with a very thin conductive coating.
Each of the cantilever beams can be deflected electrostatically by application of voltages U1 and U2, respectively, between an electrode 8', 8", 8"' on cantilever beam 3', 3", 3"' and a counter-electrode 9 at the bottom of the recess 10 etched into body 4 underneath each cantilever beam, and between the electrode 8 and the surface 6 of the recording medium 7. This deflection is used to control the width of the tip-to-surface gap, in particular during operation in the tunneling mode.
Arranged on body 4 of transducer 1 are electric circuit elements 11 through 17 which eve to control the deflection of the cantilever beams 3 in the array and to create the tunneling currents across the gaps between the tuned tips and the surface 6 of the common recording medium 7. FIG. 3 is an enlargement of a portion of FIG. 2 to better show the relevant z-coordinates, distances and voltages. In its home position, i.e., in a voltageless state, cantilever beam 3 assumes a position designated in FIG. 3 as zCB a distance Z1 from counter-electrode 9 the surface of the counter-electrode being located at ZBOT, and at a distance Z2 from the surface 6 of recording medium 7 which is located at ZS. In the home position of tunnel tip 2, and considering that the tip has a height dimension ZP, its apex is located at ZTIP, i.e. a gap width ZG away from surface 6.
Application of voltages U1, U2 between electrode 8 on cantilever beam 3 and surface 6 causes the cantilever beam 3 to deflect by a distance ΔZ to a new position ZCB0. The voltages required for deflecting cantilever beam 3 are provided by circuitry comprising a field-effect transistor 11 connected between supply line 12 and electrode 8 on cantilever beam 3. Field-effect transistor 11 acts as a constant current source which is set by means of a the line 13. Counter electrode 9 is part of supply line 12 and is at a constant potential U0. Hence the deflection voltages are U1 =U0 -U1, U2 =Ut.
When tunnel tip 2 is far from surface 6, i.e. gap ZG is large, then the resistance across the tunnel gap R1 →∞, U1 →0, U2 →U0. As cantilever beam 3 becomes most deflected towards surface 6 of recording medium 7: ΔZmax .tbd.B(U0 /ZP)2, where it is assumed that ZG <ZP. The term B will be explained below.
When tip 2 gets closer to surface 6 so that tunneling current It becomes finite, i.e. larger than the avoidable leakage current of field-effect transistor 11, which is typically <100 pA, then the voltage ratio U1 /U2 increases resulting in a retraction of cantilever beam 3. Thus, any increment in z3, that is, for example, some surface roughness, produces a much smaller decrease of ZG.
FIG. 4 is a circuit diagram a the unit cell, viz. for the electronic circuitry associated with one cantilever beam 3. The tunneling current It flowing across the tip-to-surface gap, i.e. through the tunnel resistance Rt, is monitored by means of a load resistance 14 (RL) which is chosen such that RL <Rt under operating conditions. The signal USIG occurring across load resistance 14 is provided via lines 15 and 16. A load capacitance 17 (CL) introduces some inertia into the compensation process characterized by a time constant τL =Rt CL. Hence, information-carrying variations passing tip 2 within a time shorter than the time constant τL are not compensated, giving rise to a large variation in USIG. The performance of the scheme is described by the ZG (ZS) characteristic quasi-static conditions (with reference to τL). Therefore, RL and CL are ignored in this part of the discussion. Further ignored are the stray capacitance C1 between cantilever beam 3 and supply line 12, and the stray capacitance C2 between cantilever beam 3 and counterelectrode 9, because they are negligible compared to load capacitance CL. Without loss of generality, it can be that ZCB0 =0, hence, ZS <0. Under these conditions ZG (ZS) can be derived from the following set of relations:
ZG =-ZP -ZS +ΔZ 
ΔZ≅B[(U1 /Z1)2 -(U2 /Z2)2 ]
Z1 =ZBOT -ΔZ 
Z2 =-ZS +ΔZ 
U1 =U0 -U2 [ 5]
U2 =U1 =I1 R1 [ 6]
R1 =Rt0 exZ.sbsp.G [ 7]
B=εε0 I4 /4Et3, 
with εε0 =dielectric constant (≅0,8 pF/m), E=elastic modulus, l=length and t=thickness of the cantilever beam 3, respectively, and Rt0 ≅40 kω, κ≅1010 m-1.
Equations  through  cannot be solved analytically for ZG but the derivative can be determined easily: ##EQU1##
With the parameters chosen below, and at realistic operating conditions in the tunneling mode, ZG <Δ-Z<Z1,2 such that Z1 ≅zBOT and Z2 ≅Zp ; further U1 -≅U0 <U2 =Ut, the quantity A becomes:
A≅-2κBU0 Ut /ZBOT 2 [ 11]
For a numerical calculation, the following values have proven appropriate: ε=1; ε0 =8×10-12 F/m; 1=200 μm; t=2 μm; E=1011 N/m2 (silicon, quartz); zBOT =ZP =3 μm. With these values and a projected width w=200 μm of the cantilever beam, a spring constant of C*=4,5 N/m results which is sufficient to prevent mechanical instabilities due to interfacial forces. The first elastic resonance of the cantilever beam occurs at >100 kHz which is much better than in present-day scanning tunneling microscopes. The deflection parameter becomes:
B=0,4×10-20 m3 /V2 [ 12]
Assuming operation at Ut =0.5 V, then A≅100. Since A>1, one may ignore the 1 in the denominator of equation , hence ##EQU2##
Equation  means that a 10 nm variation in surface height results in no more than a 0.1 nm on change in tunnel gap width.
For very small and very large tunnel gap widths, the above-given set of equations is easily solved for zS (ZG). There is no reduction effect to be expected: ##EQU3##
FIG. 5 depicts the linear and almost linear relations calculated in accordance with Equation . The dashed lines designated a, b, and c, having a slope of -1, and being mutually parallel-displaced by the amounts ΔZmax, and 2 ΔZmax, respectively, arc the calculated asymptotes to the curve zS (ZG) represented in a semi-quantitative way by the solid curve d. The operating point is to be chosen on the horizontal plateau (of the width 2 ΔZmax) between dashed lines a and b. Since the voltage U1 is generally kept small, the operating point will preferably be chosen near the right-hand end of the plateau.
For this purpose, the tunneling current from a few selected cells can be fed into a regular feedback control circuit. This measure assure that the overall system settles approximately at the operating points of the individual elements. The quantitative behavior of the response curve may be obtained by numerical integration of Equation .The initial setting of the parameters may be chosen as follows:
ZG =O, Rt =Rt0, U2 =It Rt0 <U1 =U0, ΔZ=B(U0 /Zp)2, zs =ΔZ.
The resulting characteristics are shown in FIGS. 6 through 8. FIG. 6 depicts the relevant section of curve d in FIG. 5, namely the relation of tunnel gap width versus sample position, for three values of the tunneling current, viz. 0.1 nA, 1 nA, and 10 nA, at a larger scale. FIG. 7 shows the corresponding relation between dZG /dzS versus Ut which is independent It. It can be seen that dZG /dzS =0.01 in the operating range around Ut =0.5 V. FIG. 8 relates the gap width to the tunneling voltage for the three values 0.1 nA, 1 nA and 10 nA of the tunneling current It.
It will be apparent from the foregoing description that variations in tunneling current occurring fast as compared to the time constant τL of the RL -CL circuit are not compensated for by the current stabilizer comprising field-effect transistor 11. Small asperities on the surface 6 of the recording medium 7 (topography) as well a local changes in workfunction of the recording material, therefor, will show up in full strength in the tunneling current It. They create a voltage signal USIG across load resistance RL 14 can be wed for further processing of the stored information
While the present invention is not directed to the storage medium per se, it seems in order to briefly introduce a storage medium capable of recording variations of the tunneling current. A suitable storage medium may, for example, comprise a thin layer of silicon dioxide on top of a silicon substrate. The oxide is prepared to have a plurality of trapping sites of about 2.4 eV depth. Electrons emitted from a tunnel tip can be stably trapped at such sites at room temperature (cf. D. J. Dimaria in Pantelides (Ed.) "The Physics of SiO2 and is Interfaces", Pergamon 1978, p. 160 et seq.). This mechanism qualifies for write/read applications.
On conventional storage disks, the storage locations are arranged in concentric circles or tracks about a single common center. By contrast, on the storage medium proposed for we in connection with the present invention, the storage locations are arranged in a plurality of identical groups, with all storage positions in any one group being arranged in concentric circles or tracks about the group's own center, and with all centers being arranged in an ordered array on the recording surface of the stage medium. The concentric circles or tracks of storage locations of each group form a "microdisk" with a diameter of less than 0.1 mm. Even with several hundred "microdisks" per recording surface, the area required for a given storage capacity is much smaller than required in any other known storage devices.
The storage medium just described may be attached to the free end of an elongated pizoceramic bendable tube, such as the one known from EP-A-0 247 219, the other end of which is rigidly anchored. Closely adjacent the recording surface at the free end of the tube is mounted the transducer of the present invention with each tunnel tip of its array of tunnel tip being aligned with one of the microdisks. Each tunnel tip faces, and is spaced closely adjacent to, the recording surface on the storage medium. The distance (in the nanometer range) between each tunnel tip ad the recording surface is at the beginning individually adjusted so that each tip normally is at the same preselected tunneling distance from the recording surface 6.
By successively energizing electrode pairs attached to the tube, the free end of the tube and, hence, the recording surface is forced to move in a circular orbit. The diameter of this orbit will vary according to the potential differential that is selected. Thus, the recording surface at the free end of the piezoceramic tube can be caused to move in any one of a plurality of concentric orbits relative to the tunnel tips of the transducer array. As a result, each tip will scan that one of the plurality of concentric circles of tracks of its microdisk corresponding to the selected orbit diameter of the tube. Digital information is written into and/or read out of the storage medium by varying the tunneling current flowing across the gap between the tunnel tip and recording surface.
Recording, therefore, involves addressing and moving a selectable one of the tips 2 in the array of transducer 1 and concurrently energizing the electrode pairs surrounding the tube to a potential corrsponding to an orbit diameter that permits access to a desired one of the concentric tracks on the associated microdisk.
It will be clear to those skilled in the art that several other recording media, as well as other known schemes for the mutual displacement of transducer and/or tunnel tips and recording medium may be employed to achieve the desired result. The important point is that with all those schemes the control circuitry necessary to compensate the variations in the distance between each individual the tunnel tip and the surface of the recording medium is integrated on the transducer.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4668865 *||Mar 5, 1986||May 26, 1987||International Business Machines Corporation||Scanning tunneling microscope|
|US4806755 *||Oct 1, 1987||Feb 21, 1989||International Business Machines Corporation||Micromechanical atomic force sensor head|
|US4831614 *||Mar 13, 1987||May 16, 1989||International Business Machines Corporation||Direct access storage unit using tunneling current techniques|
|US4906840 *||Jan 27, 1988||Mar 6, 1990||The Board Of Trustees Of Leland Stanford Jr., University||Integrated scanning tunneling microscope|
|US4912822 *||May 8, 1989||Apr 3, 1990||Stanford University||Method of making an integrated scanning tunneling microscope|
|US4998016 *||Jun 28, 1990||Mar 5, 1991||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Probe unit, driving method thereof, and scanning device for detecting tunnel current having said probe unit|
|US5043577 *||Oct 13, 1989||Aug 27, 1991||International Business Machines Corporation||Distance-controlled tunneling transducer|
|US5053995 *||Jan 23, 1990||Oct 1, 1991||Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.||Tunnel current data storage apparatus having separate lever bodies|
|US5150392 *||Sep 9, 1991||Sep 22, 1992||International Business Machines Corporation||X-ray mask containing a cantilevered tip for gap control and alignment|
|JPH02260668A *||Title not available|
|SU1536441A1 *||Title not available|
|WO1991000592A2 *||Jun 14, 1990||Jan 10, 1991||Univ Leland Stanford Junior||Method and apparatus for storing digital information in the form of stored charges|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6901800 *||Sep 20, 2004||Jun 7, 2005||Robert Bosch Gmbh||Differential in-plane tunneling current sensor|
|US7233517||Oct 14, 2003||Jun 19, 2007||Nanochip, Inc.||Atomic probes and media for high density data storage|
|US7260051||Dec 17, 1999||Aug 21, 2007||Nanochip, Inc.||Molecular memory medium and molecular memory integrated circuit|
|US7598723 *||Feb 14, 2006||Oct 6, 2009||Clemson University||Method and apparatus for detecting resonance in electrostatically driven elements|
|US8384372||Oct 5, 2009||Feb 26, 2013||Clemson University||Non-linear electrical actuation and detection|
|US20020138301 *||Mar 22, 2001||Sep 26, 2002||Thanos Karras||Integration of a portal into an application service provider data archive and/or web based viewer|
|US20050035289 *||Sep 20, 2004||Feb 17, 2005||Andreas Niendorf||Differential in-plane tunneling current sensor|
|US20050243660 *||Dec 3, 2004||Nov 3, 2005||Rust Thomas F||Methods for erasing bit cells in a high density data storage device|
|US20060255790 *||Feb 14, 2006||Nov 16, 2006||Clemson University||Method and apparatus for detecting resonance in electrostatically driven elements|
|US20070006455 *||Jul 8, 2005||Jan 11, 2007||Nanochip, Inc.||Methods for forming high density data storage devices with read/write probes with hollow or reinforced tips|
|US20070008864 *||Jul 8, 2005||Jan 11, 2007||Nanochip, Inc.||Patterned media for a high density data storage device|
|US20070008866 *||Jul 8, 2005||Jan 11, 2007||Nanochip, Inc.||Methods for writing and reading in a polarity-dependent memory switch media|
|US20070070685 *||Oct 14, 2003||Mar 29, 2007||Rust Thomas F||Atomic probes and media for high density data storage|
|US20070165444 *||Feb 2, 2007||Jul 19, 2007||Nanochip, Inc.||Devices and methods of detecting movement between media and probe tip in a probe data storage system|
|US20070268808 *||May 15, 2007||Nov 22, 2007||Nanochip, Inc.||Cantilever including a fulcrum to actuate a probe tip for use in systems and methods of probe data storage|
|US20080175033 *||Jan 19, 2007||Jul 24, 2008||Nanochip, Inc.||Method and system for improving domain stability in a ferroelectric media|
|US20090129246 *||Nov 12, 2008||May 21, 2009||Nanochip, Inc.||Environmental management of a probe storage device|
|US20100039729 *||Aug 14, 2008||Feb 18, 2010||Nanochip, Inc.||Package with integrated magnets for electromagnetically-actuated probe-storage device|
|U.S. Classification||365/151, 365/153, 365/217, 365/118, 250/306, 369/126|
|International Classification||G11B9/08, G11B5/012, G11B9/00, G11B5/00|
|Cooperative Classification||B82Y10/00, G11B9/08, G11B9/14, G11B5/00, G11B9/1445, G11B5/012, G11B9/1454|
|European Classification||B82Y15/00, B82Y10/00, G11B9/14M2B2, G11B9/14, G11B9/14M2B4|