|Publication number||USRE36706 E|
|Application number||US 08/601,411|
|Publication date||May 23, 2000|
|Filing date||Feb 14, 1996|
|Priority date||Nov 7, 1988|
|Also published as||US5286976|
|Publication number||08601411, 601411, US RE36706 E, US RE36706E, US-E-RE36706, USRE36706 E, USRE36706E|
|Inventors||Barrett E. Cole|
|Original Assignee||Honeywell Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (34), Non-Patent Citations (18), Referenced by (26), Classifications (10), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The field of the invention is in a high sensitivity two-level microstructure infrared bolometer array which can produce absorptance levels of greater than 80% and also achieve high IR sensitivity over a wavelength range from 8-14 microns.
This invention is an improvement on co-pending application Ser. No. 887,495, filed Jul. 16, 1986, entitled "Thermal Sensor", and assigned to the same assignee as the present invention. The teachings of the co-pending application are incorporated herein by reference. In the co-pending application the invention is directed to a pixel size sensor of an array of sensors, for an infrared microbridge construction of high fill factor, made possible by placing the detector microbridge on a second plane above the silicon surface carrying the integrated components and bus lines. The improvement in the present invention is directed to a structure which increases the sensitivity.
FIGS. 1 and 2 are front and top views of a microstructure design according to the invention.
FIG. 3 is a graphical plot of overall absorptance vs. wavelength of the device over a selected wavelength including 8-14 microns.
FIG. 4 shows graphically the transmittance, absorption and reflectance of the resistive layer.
FIG. 5 shows graphically absorption vs. air gap thickness.
FIG. 6 shows absorption of entire structure vs. metal absorber thickness.
FIG. 7 shows measured optical properties of Si3 N4.
A cross section view of the two-level microbridge bolometer pixel 10 is shown in FIG. 1. The device 10 has two levels, an elevated microbridge detector level 11 and a lower level 12. The lower level has a flat surfaced semiconductor substrate 13, such as a single crystal silicon substrate. The surface 14 of the substrate has fabricated thereon conventional components of an integrated circuit 15 such as diodes, bus lines, connections and contact pads (not specifically shown), the fabrication following conventional silicon IC technology. The IC is coated with a protective layer of silicon nitride 16.
The elevated detector level 11 includes a silicon nitride layer 20, a thin film resistive layer 21, preferably a vanadium or titanium oxide (such as V2 O3, TiOx, VOx), .[.i.e..]. .Iadd.sometimes hereinafter referred to as .Iaddend.ABx a silicon nitride layer 22 over the layers 20 and 21 and an IR absorber coating 23 over the silicon nitride layer 22. The thin absorber coating (approximately 20A thick) may be of a nickel iron alloy, often called permalloy. Downwardly extending silicon nitride layers 20' and 22' deposited at the same time as layers 20 and 22 during the fabrication make up the sloping supports 30 .Iadd.and 30' .Iaddend.for the elevated detector level. The cavity or gap 26 (approximately 1-2 microns high) between the two levels is ambient atmosphere. During the fabrication process, however, the cavity 26 was originally filled with a previously deposited layer of easily dissolvable glass or other dissolvable material until the layers 20, 20', 22 and 22' were deposited. Some other easily dissolvable materials are quartz, polyimide and resist. Subsequently in the process the glass was dissolved out to provide the thermal isolation cavity or air gap (i.e., the air gap actually may be in operation, a vacuum gap). In FIG. 1 the horizontal dimension, as shown, is greatly foreshortened. That is, the height of FIG. 1 is exaggerated in the drawing compared to the length in order to show the details of the invention.
FIG. 2 is a top plan view of the elevated detector level 11. This drawing is made as though the overlying absorber coating 23 and the upper silicon nitride layer 22 are transparent so that the resistive thin film layer 21 can be shown. In one preferred embodiment the material for the resistive layer 21 is a vanadium oxide, preferably V2 O3. Vanadium oxides have very strong changes in resistance with temperature allowing high sensitivity microbolometer operation. It also has a low reflectance to IR in the 8-14 micron range. In the preferred embodiment at this time.Iadd., .Iaddend.the V2 O3 is operated in its semiconductor phase. Its deposition is preferably by the process of ion beam sputter which permits the deposition of very thin layers such as 50-75 .[.mm.]. .Iadd.nm.Iaddend.. This material was thus selected for its low IR reflectance together with a relatively high temperature coefficient of resistance (TCR). The ends of the resistive paths 21a and 21b are continued down the slope area 30 embedded in 20' and 22' to make electrical contact with contact pads 31 and 32 on the lower level.
FIG. 2 also shows nitride window cuts 35, 36 and 37 which are opened through the silicon nitride layers 20 and 22 to provide access to the phos-glass beneath for dissolving it from beneath the detector plane. The sloping supports may be of the necessary length is provide adequate support and thermal isolation for the upper level 11.
Although the description is basically in terms of individual detector pixels, the invention is directed for use to an x,y array assembly of adjoining pixels forming an imaging or mosaic detector array. Each pixel assembly may cover an area about 50 microns on a side, as an example.
Referring again to FIG. 1 a sequence of fabrication steps for the upper level is described. Following the deposition of the silicon nitride layer 16 in fabricating the lower level 12, a thin film layer 18 of reflective material, such as a metal film like Pt or Au, is deposited. The construction of the upper level can then commence. The detectors presently being described are intended for use in the 8-14 micron IR wavelength. The reflective layer 18 is on the lower plane 12. The vertical distance between reflective layer 18 and upper level 11 is chosen so the reflected IR from layer 18 returned upwardly has interference properties such that significant absorption is achieved for a wide range of wavelengths (8-14 microns) .[.and air gap spacing between the reflector and the detector structure.]..
A layer of phos-glass or other easily soluble material in the range of about 1-2 microns thick is deposited and the slopes 30 and 30' are thoroughly rounded to eliminate slope coverage problems. The upper level silicon nitride base layer 20 is then deposited, the resistive film 21 is deposited, connections down the slope to lower plane contact pads are made, and a silicon nitride passivation layer 22 covers the layers 21 and 20. A thin metal absorber coating 23 (about 15-40A) is deposited on top of the upper level. The slots 35, 36 and 37, earlier mentioned are made and the phos-glass is dissolved from beneath the detector plane. As earlier described, by depositing Pt, Au or other reflecting thin film 18 on the substrate before the stack is formed, it is possible to reflect transmitted radiation reaching the reflecting film back to the absorber coating.
The optical properties of the total structure are achieved by careful selection of optical materials with the proper optical and electrical properties. The top film must reflect little radiation and generally transmit a significant percentage of the non-absorbed radiation through to the reflected light at a nodal position in the film determined by the air gap distance. .Iadd.Stated otherwise, the air gap distance is determined so that the reflected light is at a nodal position in the film. .Iaddend.An additional constraint on the absorbing film is that to be compatible with the total structure, the absorbing material must be very thin (and hence have a low mass).
To optimize the absorption in the structure, the thickness of all the absorbing layers and the air gap distance must be controlled. The absorbing films in the present device consist of .[.ABx.]. .Iadd.ABx .Iaddend., .[.SIN.]. .Iadd.SiN.Iaddend., and the thin absorbing metal described above. In practice, the .[.ABx.]. .Iadd.ABx .Iaddend.and .[.SIN nitride.]. .Iadd.SiN .Iaddend.thicknesses are chosen by electrical and physical requirements. Both have absorption levels ranging from 10-20% in the spectral region of interest (FIGS. 4 and 7). A combination of these materials produces an absorption of no more than about 30% in the 8-14 micron region. This absorption level is very close to ideal, however, for use with a Pt reflective layer and an air gap which intensifies the field in the absorbing film, it is possible to achieve absorptances in excess of 80% (FIG. 5) in this configuration. The use of a thin absorbing metal which in the standard design provides 50% absorption, here is used to fine tune the absorption for maximum effect. FIG. 6 shows the small absorption improvements that can be achieved by using this metal film.
In this two-level structure, the low thermal mass structure 11 is separated from the .[.Pt/substrate.]. .Iadd.Pt substrate .Iaddend.layer by an air gap. The interference properties of this reflected radiation are such that significant absorption is achieved .[.by.]. .Iadd.for .Iaddend.a wide range of wavelengths .[.and air gap spacing between the Pt reflector and the detector structure.]..
For this optical interference to occur in the detector, it is necessary to avoid other films in the detector structure which reflect IR. The use of ABx which has both a high TCR and a low IR reflectance (FIG. 4) ideally meets these requirements. Thus the merging of this absorption phenomenon into a detector structure which has a detector material processing both a high TCR and low reflectance permits this interference effect to occur.
There is a substantial degree of variability of detector absorptance with air gap in the structure. Referring to the table below which shows wavelength in nanometers in the left column vs. air gap in microns across the top it can be seen that with an air gap of only 0.5 micron the detector absorptance varies widely with wavelength and it is not very high. With air gaps of 1-2 microns and especially at 1.5 microns the absorptance is relatively high across the desired wavelength spread.
TABLE 1______________________________________DETECTOR ABSORPTANCE Air Gap (microns)Wavelength (NM) .5 .75 1.0 1.5 2.0______________________________________ 8000 .89 .91 .9 .84 .76 9000 .84 .88 .86 .8110000 .76 .82 .84 .84 .8211000 .69 .77 .8 .82 .8212000 .66 .74 .79 .83 .8413000 .64 .78 .85 .93 .9414000 .56 .72 .83 .95 .9815000 .47 .64 .77 .92 .99______________________________________
The effect of gap thickness on the absorptance vs. wavelength in the regions of interest are further displayed graphically in FIG. 5. It can be seen in the curve of 1.5 microns gap thickness that at 8 microns the absorptance of the structure is climbing rapidly towards 90% and more, and that it remains relatively high out to about 14 microns. The curve for a gap of 2 microns shows that at IR wavelengths of 14 microns the absorptance is better and well above 90%. In measuring the data for FIG. 5 the absorber film 23 was not included in the stack structure.
Referring now to FIG. 6 there is shown graphically how the overall absorption of the film structure varies across the IR wavelength of 8-14 microns as the thickness of the metal absorber film is increased to 3 .[.mm.]. .Iadd.nm .Iaddend.and to 5 .[.mm.]. .Iadd.nm.Iaddend.. In this film stack design the Si3 N4 layer 22 is 250 .[.mm.]. .Iadd.nm.Iaddend., the resistive film 21 is 75 nm and the Si3 N4 film 20 is 100 nm with an air gap of 1.5 microns and a reflective Pt layer 18 of 50 nm. This curve for 3 nm shows absorptance>90% between 8 and 14 microns.
The measured optical properties of reflectance R, transmissivity T, and absorptance A of the silicon nitride layers 20 and 22 (800A thick) are shown in FIG. 7 with percent of signal shown on the ordinate axis and IR wavelength along the abscissa. It can be seen that the transmissivity at 8 microns (about 90) and at 14 microns (about 80) is quite high and that the reflectance R at both 8 and 14 microns is well under ten.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3484611 *||May 16, 1967||Dec 16, 1969||Hitachi Ltd||Infrared detector composed of a sintered body of vanadium pentoxide and vanadium oxide|
|US3619614 *||Dec 19, 1969||Nov 9, 1971||Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd||An infrared intensity detector|
|US3629585 *||Dec 30, 1969||Dec 21, 1971||Philips Corp||Immersed bolometer using thin film thermistors|
|US3693011 *||Feb 2, 1971||Sep 19, 1972||Hughes Aircraft Co||Ion implanted bolometer|
|US3851174 *||May 4, 1973||Nov 26, 1974||Ibm||Light detector for the nanosecond-dc pulse width range|
|US3896309 *||May 21, 1973||Jul 22, 1975||Westinghouse Electric Corp||Radiation detecting device|
|US4009516 *||Mar 29, 1976||Mar 1, 1977||Honeywell Inc.||Pyroelectric detector fabrication|
|US4029962 *||Jun 23, 1975||Jun 14, 1977||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Arrays for infrared image detection|
|US4067104 *||Feb 24, 1977||Jan 10, 1978||Rockwell International Corporation||Method of fabricating an array of flexible metallic interconnects for coupling microelectronics components|
|US4115692 *||May 4, 1977||Sep 19, 1978||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Solid state readout device for a two dimensional pyroelectric detector array|
|US4169273 *||Jun 26, 1978||Sep 25, 1979||Honeywell Inc.||Photodetector signal processing|
|US4239312 *||Nov 29, 1978||Dec 16, 1980||Hughes Aircraft Company||Parallel interconnect for planar arrays|
|US4286278 *||Aug 16, 1979||Aug 25, 1981||Honeywell Inc.||Hybrid mosaic IR/CCD focal plane|
|US4317126 *||Apr 14, 1980||Feb 23, 1982||Motorola, Inc.||Silicon pressure sensor|
|US4354109 *||Apr 17, 1981||Oct 12, 1982||Honeywell Inc.||Mounting for pyroelectric detecctor arrays|
|US4365106 *||Mar 4, 1980||Dec 21, 1982||Pulvari Charles F||Efficient method and apparatus for converting solar energy to electrical energy|
|US4378489 *||May 18, 1981||Mar 29, 1983||Honeywell Inc.||Miniature thin film infrared calibration source|
|US4463493 *||Sep 24, 1982||Aug 7, 1984||Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Method for making mask aligned narrow isolation grooves for a semiconductor device|
|US4472239 *||Jul 8, 1983||Sep 18, 1984||Honeywell, Inc.||Method of making semiconductor device|
|US4691104 *||Jun 12, 1985||Sep 1, 1987||Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.||One-dimensional pyroelectric sensor array|
|US4750834 *||Oct 5, 1987||Jun 14, 1988||D.O.M. Associates, Inc.||Interferometer including stationary, electrically alterable optical masking device|
|US4803360 *||Sep 25, 1987||Feb 7, 1989||U.S. Philips Corp.||Infrared radiation detector with flanged semiconductor window|
|US5010251 *||Jan 11, 1990||Apr 23, 1991||Hughes Aircraft Company||Radiation detector array using radiation sensitive bridges|
|US5017784 *||May 29, 1990||May 21, 1991||Savin Corporation||Thermal detector|
|US5021663 *||Oct 15, 1990||Jun 4, 1991||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Infrared detector|
|US5455421 *||Aug 13, 1985||Oct 3, 1995||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Infrared detector using a resonant optical cavity for enhanced absorption|
|DE2253214A1 *||Oct 30, 1972||May 22, 1974||Siemens Ag||Einrichtung zur messung einer temperaturstrahlung|
|JPH0341305A *||Title not available|
|JPH01136035A *||Title not available|
|JPS58131525A *||Title not available|
|JPS60119426A *||Title not available|
|JPS61170626A *||Title not available|
|JPS61195318A *||Title not available|
|WO1991016607A1 *||Apr 24, 1991||Oct 31, 1991||Commonwealth Of Australia, The Secretary Department Of Defence||Semiconductor film bolometer thermal infrared detector|
|1||*||A. Tanaka, et al., Infrared Linear Image Sensor using a Poly Si pn Junction Diode Array, 33 Infrared Phys., 229 231, and 234 236, 1992.|
|2||A. Tanaka, et al., Infrared Linear Image Sensor using a Poly-Si pn Junction Diode Array, 33 Infrared Phys., 229-231, and 234-236, 1992.|
|3||*||H. Elabd & W.F. Kosonocky, Theory and Measurements of Photoresponse for Thin Film Pd 2 Si and PtSi Infrared Schottky Barrier Detectors with Optical Cavity, 43 RCA Review, 569 588, 1982,|
|4||H. Elabd & W.F. Kosonocky, Theory and Measurements of Photoresponse for Thin Film Pd2 Si and PtSi Infrared Schottky-Barrier Detectors with Optical Cavity, 43 RCA Review, 569-588, 1982,|
|5||*||K.C. Liddiard, Thin Film Resistance Bolometer IR Detectors II, Infrared Phys., vol. 26, No. 1, 43 49, 1986.|
|6||*||K.C. Liddiard, Thin Film Resistance Bolometer IR Detectors, Infrared Phys., vol. 24, No. 1, 57 64, 1984.|
|7||K.C. Liddiard, Thin Film Resistance Bolometer IR Detectors, Infrared Phys., vol. 24, No. 1, 57-64, 1984.|
|8||K.C. Liddiard, Thin-Film Resistance Bolometer IR Detectors--II, Infrared Phys., vol. 26, No. 1, 43-49, 1986.|
|9||*||Kurt Peterson & Anne Shartel, Micromechanical Accelerometer Integrated with MOS Detection Circuitry, IBM Research Facility, 1980, pp. 673 675.|
|10||Kurt Peterson & Anne Shartel, Micromechanical Accelerometer Integrated with MOS Detection Circuitry, IBM Research Facility, 1980, pp. 673-675.|
|11||*||Suzuki, et al, An Infrared Detector Using Poly Silicon p n Junction Diode, Tech Digest of 9th Sensor Symposium, 71, 72, and 74, 1990.|
|12||Suzuki, et al, An Infrared Detector Using Poly-Silicon p-n Junction Diode, Tech Digest of 9th Sensor Symposium, 71, 72, and 74, 1990.|
|13||*||Thin Film Resistance Bolometer IR Detectors II, K.C. Liddiard, Infrared Phys., vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 43 49, 1986.|
|14||*||Thin Film Resistance Bolometer IR Detectors, K.C. Liddiard, Infrared Phys., vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 57 64, 1984.|
|15||Thin-Film Resistance Bolometer IR Detectors II, K.C. Liddiard, Infrared Phys., vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 43-49, 1986.|
|16||Thin-Film Resistance Bolometer IR Detectors, K.C. Liddiard, Infrared Phys., vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 57-64, 1984.|
|17||*||W.F. Kosonosky, et al., 160 244 Element PtSi Schottky Barrier IR CCD Image Sensor, vol. Ed 32, No. 8, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 1564 1573, Aug., 1985.|
|18||W.F. Kosonosky, et al., 160×244 Element PtSi Schottky-Barrier IR-CCD Image Sensor, vol. Ed-32, No. 8, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 1564-1573, Aug., 1985.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6441374 *||Jul 24, 2000||Aug 27, 2002||Nec Corporation||Thermal type infrared ray detector with thermal separation structure for high sensitivity|
|US6541772||Dec 26, 2000||Apr 1, 2003||Honeywell International Inc.||Microbolometer operating system|
|US6559447||Dec 26, 2000||May 6, 2003||Honeywell International Inc.||Lightweight infrared camera|
|US6621083 *||Dec 29, 2000||Sep 16, 2003||Honeywell International Inc.||High-absorption wide-band pixel for bolometer arrays|
|US6661010||Nov 15, 2002||Dec 9, 2003||Honeywell International Inc.||Microbolometer operating system|
|US6667479||Jun 1, 2001||Dec 23, 2003||Raytheon Company||Advanced high speed, multi-level uncooled bolometer and method for fabricating same|
|US6924485 *||Oct 1, 2002||Aug 2, 2005||Nec Corporation||Infrared ray detector having a vacuum encapsulation structure|
|US7145143||Dec 31, 2003||Dec 5, 2006||Honeywell International Inc.||Tunable sensor|
|US7365326||Jan 17, 2003||Apr 29, 2008||Honeywell International Inc.||Camera having distortion correction|
|US7442933||Feb 2, 2006||Oct 28, 2008||Lin Alice L||Bolometer having an amorphous titanium oxide layer with high resistance stability|
|US7622717||Nov 24, 2009||Drs Sensors & Targeting Systems, Inc.||Pixel structure having an umbrella type absorber with one or more recesses or channels sized to increase radiation absorption|
|US7746236||Jun 29, 2010||Honeywell International Inc.||Fire detection system and method|
|US7842533||Jan 7, 2009||Nov 30, 2010||Robert Bosch Gmbh||Electromagnetic radiation sensor and method of manufacture|
|US8314769||Nov 20, 2012||Honeywell International Inc.||High performance detection pixel|
|US8502147||Oct 4, 2011||Aug 6, 2013||Flir Systems, Inc.||Microbolometer detector layer|
|US9250135||Mar 13, 2012||Feb 2, 2016||Honeywell International Inc.||MWIR sensor for flame detection|
|US20030062480 *||Oct 1, 2002||Apr 3, 2003||Nec Corporation||Infrared ray detector having a vacuum encapsulation structure|
|US20030197124 *||Jan 17, 2003||Oct 23, 2003||Honeywell International Inc.||Camera having distortion correction|
|US20040084308 *||Nov 1, 2002||May 6, 2004||Cole Barrett E.||Gas sensor|
|US20040217264 *||Dec 31, 2003||Nov 4, 2004||Wood Roland A.||Tunable sensor|
|US20080272921 *||May 1, 2007||Nov 6, 2008||Honeywell International Inc.||Fire detection system and method|
|US20090014657 *||Sep 13, 2007||Jan 15, 2009||Honeywell International Inc.||Infrared fire detection system|
|US20090140147 *||Dec 3, 2007||Jun 4, 2009||Skidmore George D||Pixel structure having an umbrella type absorber with one or more recesses or channels sized to increase radiation absorption|
|US20090321637 *||Dec 31, 2009||Honeywell International Inc.||Camera having distortion correction|
|US20100171190 *||Jan 7, 2009||Jul 8, 2010||Robert Bosch Gmbh||Electromagnetic Radiation Sensor and Metod of Manufacture|
|WO2013052701A1||Oct 4, 2012||Apr 11, 2013||Flir Systems, Inc.||Microbolometer detector layer|
|U.S. Classification||250/349, 250/342, 250/338.1, 250/338.4|
|International Classification||G01J5/20, H01L27/16|
|Cooperative Classification||H01L27/16, G01J5/20|
|European Classification||G01J5/20, H01L27/16|
|Aug 2, 2001||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Jun 30, 2005||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12