|Publication number||USRE36714 E|
|Application number||US 08/622,313|
|Publication date||May 23, 2000|
|Filing date||Nov 10, 1994|
|Priority date||Oct 18, 1989|
|Publication number||08622313, 622313, US RE36714 E, US RE36714E, US-E-RE36714, USRE36714 E, USRE36714E|
|Inventors||Karlheinz Brandenburg, James David Johnston|
|Original Assignee||Lucent Technologies Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (6), Non-Patent Citations (16), Referenced by (31), Classifications (3), Legal Events (7)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
.Iadd.This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/106,499, filed on Aug. 13, 1993, abandoned..Iaddend.
The present invention relates to coding of time varying signals, such as audio signals representing voice or music information.
Consumer, industrial, studio and laboratory products for storing, processing and communicating high quality audio signals are in great demand. For example, so-called compact disc (CD) digital recordings for music have largely replaced the long-popular phonograph records. More recently, digital audio tape (DAT) devices promise further enhancements and convenience in high quality audio applications. See, for example, Tan and Vermeulen, "Digital audio tape for data storage," IEEE Spectrum, October 1989, pp. 34-38. Recent interest in high-definition television (HDTV) has also spurred consideration of how high quality audio for such systems can be efficiently provided.
While commercially available CD and DAT systems employ elaborate parity and error correction codes, no standard presently exists for efficiently coding source information for high quality audio signals with these devices. Tan and Vermeulen, supra, note that (unspecified) data compression, among other techniques, can be used to increase capacity and transfer rate for DAT devices by a factor of ten over time.
It has long been known that the human auditory response can be masked by audio-frequency noise or by other-than-desired audio frequency sound signals. See, B. Scharf, "Critical Bands," Chap. 5 in J. V. Tobias, Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory, Academic Press, New York, 1970. While "critical bands," as noted by Scharf, relate to many analytical and empirical phenonomena and techniques, a central features of critical band analysis relates to the characteristic of certain human auditory responses to be relatively constant over a range of frequencies. Thus, for example, the loudness of a band of noise at a constant sound pressure remains constant as the bandwidth increases up to the critical band; then loudness begins to increase. In the cited Tobias reference, at page 162, there is presented one possible table of 24 critical bands, each having an identified upper and lower cutoff frequency. The totality of the band covers the audio frequency spectrum up to 15.5 kHz. These effects have been used to advantage in designing coders for audio signals. See, for example, M. R. Schroeder et al, "Optimizing Digital Speech Coders By Exploiting Masking Properties of the Human Ear," Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 66, pp. 1647-1652, December, 1979.
E. F. Schroeder and H. J. Platte, "MSC': Stereo Audio Coding with CD-Quality and 256 IT/SEC," IEEE Trans. on Consumer Electronics, Vol. CE-33, No. 4, November 1987, describes a perceptual encoding procedure with possible application to CDs.
In J. D. Johnston, "Transform Coding of Audio Signals Using Perceptual Noise Criteria," IEEE Trans. on Selected Areas in Communications, February 1988, pp. 314-434 and .[.copending application Ser. No. 292,598, filed Dec. 30, 1988;.]. .Iadd.U.S. Pat. No. 5,535,300, issued Jul. 9, 1996 on application Ser. No. 284,324, filed Aug. 2, 1994, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 109,867, Aug. 20, 1993, U.S. Pat. No. 5,341,457, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 962,151, Oct. 16, 1992, abandoned, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 844,967, Feb. 28, 1992, abandoned, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 292,598, Dec. 30, 1998, abandoned, .Iaddend.by J. L. Hall II and J. D. Johnston, assigned to the assignee of the present invention, there are disclosed enhanced perceptual coding techniques for audio signals. Perceptual coding, as described in the Johnston, et al paper relates to a technique for lowering required bitrates (or reapportioning available bits) in representing audio signals. In this form of coding, the masking threshold for unwanted signals is identified as a function of frequency of the desired signal. Then the coarseness of quantizing used to represent a signal component of the desired signal is selected such that the quantizing noise introduced by the coding does not rise above the noise threshold, though it may be quite near this threshold. While traditional signal-to-noise ratios for such perceptually coded signals may be relatively low, the quality of these signals upon decoding, as perceived by a human listener, is nevertheless high. In particular, the systems described in this paper and copending application use a human auditory model to derive a short-term spectral masking function that is implemented in a transform coder. Bitrates are reduced by extracting redundancy based on signal frequency analysis and the masking function. The techniques use a so-called "tonality" measure indicative of the shape of the spectrum over the critical bands of the signal to be coded to better control the effects of quantizing noise. As noted in the Johnston paper, supra, and the cited patent application Ser. No. 292,598, the masking effect of noise is dependent on the "tonelike or noiselike" nature of the signal. In particular, an offset for the masking threshold for each critical band is developed which depends on whether a "coefficient of tonality" for the signal in each critical band indicates that the signal is relatively more tonelike or noiselike. This coefficient of tonality is, in turn, conveniently derived from a measure of flatness of the spectrum of the signal over that critical band.
The present invention improves on the tonality based perceptual coding techniques described in the cited copending application Ser. No. 292,598. Because the frequency analysis typically involves determining spectral information at discrete frequencies ("frequency lines") within the audio spectrum, and because a number of these discrete frequencies will, in general, fall within each critical band, the processing described in the prior application Ser. No. 292,598 and the cited Johnston paper, illustratively grouped spectral values for frequencies within each critical band. That is, the spectral processing used to determine the tonality and masking threshold was typically accomplished on a critical-band-by-critical-band basis. The improvements made in accordance with aspects of the present invention permit grouping of values at discrete frequencies, but also include the use of a frequency-line-by-frequency-line analysis, rather than analysis on a spectrum-wide basis, in calculating the tonality metric values. This line-by-line calculation is advantageously based on a history of consecutive frames of the input power spectrum, rather than on the current frame alone. The present invention then advantageously determines improved estimates of perceptual thresholds on a line-by-line basis, rather than on a critical-band-by-critical-band basis. In appropriate cases, the critical band masking threshold can be used.
More particularly, the tonality estimate of the present invention advantageously uses a statistic of a plurality, typically two, of the previous time frames to predict the value of a given power spectrum frequency line in the current time frame. This process features the use of a Euclidian distance between the predicted line and the actual line in a present frame to estimate the tonality (or noisiness) of each spectral line. It proves convenient in these calculations to perform a normalization of the estimates using the predicted and actual values. These tonality estimates can then be combined, e.g., on a critical-band basis, to obtain an estimate of the actual tonality. This is done for each frequency to determine the noise-masking thresholds to be used in quantizing the frequency information to be finally coded for recording, transmission or other use.
A spreading operation known in the art, e.g., that is described generally in the Schroeder, et al paper, supra, is employed in an alternative implementation of certain aspects of the improved masking threshold determination process of the present invention. Spreading generally relates to the masking effect on a signal at a given frequency by signals separated in frequency from the given signal frequency. In the above cited prior application Ser. No. 292,598, and the Johnston paper, matrix processing is disclosed which involves signal spreading effects from signals many bark frequencies away. A bark is the term used to indicated a frequency difference of one critical band.
Other features and improvements of the present invention will appear from the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an overall system based on the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating the masking threshold processing employed in an illustrative embodiment of the coder in accordance with the present invention; and
FIG. 3 shows a detailed block diagram of a decoder that may be used in the system of FIG. 1.
To simplify the present disclosure, copending application, Ser. No. 292,598, filed Dec. 30, 1988, by J. L. Hall II and J. D. Johnston, assigned to the assignee of the present invention; J. D. Johnston, "Transform Coding of Audio Signals Using Perceptual Noise Criteria," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 6, No. 2, February, 1988; and International Patent Application (PCT) WO 88/01811, filed Mar. 10, 1988 by K. Brandenburg are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in their entirety herein.
Also incorporated by reference as set forth in its entirety herein is a proposal submitted by the assignee of the present application, inter alia, to the International Standards Organization (ISO) on Oct. 18, 1989 for consideration by the members of that body as the basis for a standard relating to digital coding. This document, entitled "ASPEC" will hereinafter be referred to as "the ISO Document".
Application Ser. No. 292,598 describes a perceptual noise threshold estimation technique in the context of the well-known transform coder. See also, for example, N. S. Jayant and P. Noll, Digital Coding of Waveforms--Principles and Applications to Speech and Video, especially, Chapter 12, "Transform Coding."
The application WO 88/01811 describes the so-called OCF coder that may be used as one alternative to the transform coder described in the Jayant, et al reference or the application Ser. No. 292,598.
FIG. 1 of the present application discloses the overall organization of a system incorporating the present invention.
In that figure, an analog signal on input 100 is applied to preprocessor 105 where it is sampled (typically at 32 kHz) and each sample is converted to a digital sequence (typically 16 bits) in standard fashion. Preprocessor 105 then groups these digital values in frames (or blocks or sets) of, e.g., 512 digital values, corresponding to, e.g., 16 msec of audio input. Other typical values for these and other system or process parameters are discussed in the ISO Document.
It also proves advantageous to overlap contiguous frames, typically to the extent of 50 percent. That is, though each frame contains 512 ordered digital values, 256 of these values are repeated from the preceding 512-value frame. Thus each input digital value appears in two successive frames, first as part of the second half of the frame and then as part of the first half of the frame.
These frames are then transformed in standard fashion using. e.g., the modified discrete cosine transform (MDCT) described in Princen, J., et al, "Sub-band Transform Coding Using Filter Bank Designs Based on Time Domain Aliasing Cancellation," IEEE ICASSP, 1987, pp. 2161-2164. The well-known short-term Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) in one of its several standard forms can be adapted for such use as will be clear to those skilled in the art. The set of 257 complex coefficients (zero-frequency, Nyquist frequency, and all intermediate frequencies) resulting from the MDCT represents the short-term frequency spectrum of the input signal.
The complex coefficients are conveniently represented in polar coordinate or amplitude and phase components, indicated as "r" and "phi," respectively, in the sequel.
While not shown explicitly in FIG. 1, the present invention advantageously utilizes known "pre-echo" and dynamic windowing techniques described, for example, in the above-referenced ISO Document. Other pre-processing techniques that can be included in the functionality represented by preprocessor block 105 in FIG. 1 include those described in the ISO Document.
Perceptual coder block 110 shown in FIG. 1 includes the perceptual masking estimation improvements of the present invention and will be described in detail below. Quantizer/Coder block 115 in FIG. 1 represents the above-mentioned transform or OCF coder and related coder functionality described in the incorporated application Ser. No. 292,598 and the ISO Document.
Block 120 in FIG. 1 represents the recording or transmission medium to which the coded output of quantizer/coder 115 are applied. Suitable formatting and modulation of the output signals from quantizer/coder 115 is included in the medium block 120. Such techniques are well known to the art and will be dictated by the particular medium, transmission or recording rates and other system parameters.
Further, if the medium 120 includes noise or other corrupting influences, it may be necessary to include additional error-control devices or processes, as is well known in the art. Thus, for example, if the medium is an optical recording medium similar to the standard CD devices, then redundancy coding of the type common in that medium can be used with the present invention.
If the medium is one used for transmission, e.g., a broadcast, telephone, or satellite medium, then other appropriate error control mechanisms will advantageously be applied. Any modulation, redundancy or other coding to accommodate (or combat the effects of) the medium will, of course, be reversed upon the delivery from the channel or other medium to the decoder. The originally coded information provided by quantizer/coder 115 will therefore be applied at a reproduction device.
More particularly, these coded signals will be applied to decoder 130 shown in FIG. 1, and to perceptual decoder 140. As in the case of the system described in application Ser. No. 292,598, some of the information derived by perceptual coder 110 and delivered via quantizer/coder 115 and medium 120 to the perceptual decoder 140 is in the nature of "side information." Such side information is described more completely below and in the ISO Document. Other information provided by quantizer/coder 115 via medium 120 relating to the spectral coefficients of the input information is illustratively provided directly to decoder 130.
After processing the side information, perceptual decoder 140 provides decoder 130 with the additional information to allow it to recreate, with little or no perceptual distortion, the original spectral signals developed in pre-processor 105. These recreated signals are then applied to post-processor 150, where the inverse MDCT or equivalent operations and D/A functions are accomplished (generally as described in application Ser. No. 292,598) to recreate the original analog signal on output 160. The output on 160 is in such form as to be perceived by a listener as substantially identical to that supplied on input 100.
With the overall system organization described above as background, and with the details of the incorporated application Ser. No. 292,598 as a baseline or reference, the improved process of calculating the threshold value estimates in accordance with the present invention will be described. The ISO Document should also be referred to for more detailed descriptions of elements of the present invention and for alternative implementations.
FIG. 2 is a flow chart representation of the processing accomplished in perceptual coder 110. Listing 1, attached, forms part of this application. This listing is an illustrative annotated FORTRAN program listing reflecting processing in accordance with aspects of the present invention relating to developing a noise masking threshold. A useful reference for understanding the FORTRAN processing as described herein is FX/FORTRAN Programmer's Handbook, Alliant Computer Systems Corp., July 1988. Likewise, general purpose computers like those from Alliant Computer Systems Corp. can be used to execute the program of Listing 1. Table 1 is a list of constants used in connection with the illustrative program of Listing 1.
While a particular programming language, well known to the art, is used in Listing 1, those skilled in the art will recognize that other languages will be appropriate to particular applications of the present invention. Similarly, constants, sampling rates and other particular values will be understood to be for illustrative purposes only, and in no sense should be interpreted as a limitation of the scope of the present invention.
FIG. 2 and Listing 1 will now be discussed in detail to give a fuller understanding of the illustrative embodiment of the present invention.
Function 200 in FIG. 2 indicates the start of the processing performed in determining the improved estimates of the masking thresholds in accordance with the present invention. Block 210 represents the initializing functions, using the absolute threshold values from Table 1, represented by block 220 in FIG. 2.
These initializing or startup operations are depicted explicitly in Listing 1 by the subroutine strt(). In this illustrative subroutine, threshold generation tables ithr and bval are set up first.
It should be noted that i is used, e.g., as the index for the critical bands, of the type described in the application Ser. No. 292,598, and has values from 0 to 25. The index i may be used with different ranges for other processing in other occurrences appearing in Listing 1.
In strt(), abslow is a constant assigned the indicated value to set the absolute threshold of hearing. rzotz is the desired sampling rate. rnorm is a normalization variable used in connection with the spreading function. openas is simply an operator used for opening an ascii file. db is a dummy variable used to calculate table entries.
The actual threshold calculation begins with the sub-routine thrgen. Its variables r and phi are, of course, the spectral coefficients provided by preprocessor 105 in FIG. 1. They are vectors having 257 values (zero frequency, the Nyquist frequency and all intermediate components).
Block 210 represents the initialization, using the absolute threshold information in Table 1 (shown in block 220 in FIG. 2).
The next step in calculation of the perceptual threshold is the calculation of the tonality t(j) of the signal energy within each critical band j. This operation is indicated by block 230 in FIG. 2. The tonality metric is determined in accordance with the program of Listing 1 by forming
dr(ω)=rt-1 (ω)-rt-2 (ω)
dφ(ω)=φt-1 (ω)-φt-2 (ω).
dr and dφ are the differences between the radius (r(ω)) and phase (φ(ω)) of the previous calculation block and the one two previous. The calculation is done on a frequency line by frequency line (ω) basis. Note that if the blocks are shortened by the dynamic windowing technique referred to in the ISO Document, the frequency lines are duplicated accordingly, so that the number of frequency lines remains the same. Additionally, the difference is multiplied accordingly in such a dynamic windowing context, so that it represents the (estimated) difference over one differently sized block.
From the dr and dφ values and the previous r and φ, the "expected" radius and phase for the current block are calculated:
where the ω and difference signals are again adjusted appropriately for the dynamic windowing, if present.
From these values and the actual values for the current spectrum, a randomness metric (c(ω))) is calculated: ##EQU1##
c values are used later to calculate the appropriate threshold in each critical band, through the calculation of t(j).
Next, the critical band energy calculation is made, as indicated by block 240 in FIG. 2.
The energy in each critical band is ##EQU2## and the summed randomness metric, C(j) is ##EQU3##
The C(j) are then converted to the tonality index, t(j) in two steps
tmp(j)=max(0.05, min(0.5. C(j))),
It is now possible to derive the unspread threshold values.
From the power and the tonality values, the unspread threshold uthr(j) is calculated. First, the proper value for the masking SNR (snrdb (j)), corresponding to frequency and tonality, is calculated in decibels:
snrdb (j)=max(max(24.5, 15.5+j)+5.5*(1.-t(j)), fmin(j))
where fmin is tabulated in the ISO Document and in Table 2 as an energy ratio, rather than in db. Table 2 also indicates critical band boundaries, expressed in terms of frequency lines for the indicated sampling rate. Then the ratio of masked noise energy to signal energy is calculated: ##EQU4## and the unspread threshold value is calculated:
The spread threshold (sthr) is calculated from the unspread threshold, the snr(j), and the critical band energies, (P(j), according to
where mask(i-j) is tabulated at the end of the ISO Document, and represents an example modified spreading function. Alternatively, the spreading may be accomplished using the function sprdgf(j, i) given in Listing 1.
After spreading, the spread threshold is compared to the absolute threshold, and the maximum substituted in the limited threshold, lthr(j). As noted in the Johnston paper cited above, this adjustment is made because it is not practical to specify a noise threshold that is lower than the level at which a person could hear noise. Any such threshold below the absolute level at which it could be heard could result in waste of resources. Thus the absolute threshold is taken into account by lthr(j)=max(thr(j), absthr(j)), where absthr(j) is tabulated at the end of the ISO document. Note that the absolute threshold is adjusted for actual block length.
Finally, the threshold is examined, after adjustment for block length factors, for narrow-band pre-echo problems. The final threshold, thr(j) is then calculated:
and othr is then updated:
The threshold lthr(j) is transferred to a variable named 1xmin(j) for use in the outer iteration loop described in the ISO Document.
A final step in the threshold calculation procedure calculates an entropy measure that is used to estimate the number of bits needed for the current signal block. This estimate is derived for use by the quantizer/coder 115 using ##EQU5##
This completes the perceptual threshold processes.
An output of the processing described above and in Listing 1 is a set of threshold values that the quantizer/coder 115 FIG. 1 employs to efficiently encode the input signal information for transmission or storage as described above.
While the preceding description of an illustrative embodiment of the present invention has referred to a particular programming language and type of processors, it will be recognized by those skilled in the art that other implementations will be desirable in particular cases. For example, in consumer products size requirements may dictate that high performance general purpose or special purpose microprocessors like those from AT&T, Intel Corp. or Motorola be used. For example, various of the AT&T DSP-32 digital signal processing chips have proved useful for performing processing of the type described above. In other particular cases, special purpose designs based on well-known chip design techniques will be preferably employed to perform the above described processing.
The tonality metric determined in the illustrative embodiment above using differences between the values of r(ω) and φ(ω) from the present block and the corresponding values from the two previous blocks. In appropriate cases, it may prove advantageous to form such a difference using only one prior value in evaluating these variables, or using a plurality greater than two of such prior values, as the basis for forming the expected current values.
Likewise, though values for certain of the variables described above are calculated for each spectral frequency line, it may prove to be an economical use of processing resources to calculate such values for less than all of such lines.
Aspects of the processing accomplished by quantizer/coder 115 and decoder 130 in FIG. 1 will now be described, based on materials included in the ISO Document.
The inputs to quantizer/coder 115 in FIG. 1 include spectral information derived by MDCT and other processing in accordance with functions represented by block 105 in FIG. 1, and outputs of perceptual coder 110, including the noise threshold information and perceptual energy information. Quantizer/coder 115 then processes this information and in doing so provides a bitstream to the channel or recording medium 120 in FIG. 1, which bitstream includes information divided into three main parts:
a first part containing the standardized side information, typically in a fixed length record;
a second part containing the scaling factors for the 23 critical bands and additional side information used for so-called adaptive window switching, when used; the length of this part can vary depending on information in the first part; and
a third part containing the entropy coded spectral values, typically in the form of the well-known two-dimensional Huffman code.
Typical apportionment for information provided by quantizer/coder 115 is summarized in Table 3.
__________________________________________________________________________PART I__________________________________________________________________________sync work (0110111) signals the start of the block 7 bitposition of parts 2 & 3 (bitsav) difference between the last bit of part 2 & 12 bit and the first bit of part 1word length selector for part 2 (cbtable) selects by a table a word length for 4 bit scaling factors for the 12 lower critical bands between 0..4 and for the higher critical bands between 0..3. Four combinations with a small expectation are unusednumber of big spectral values (bigvalues) number of pairs of spectral values that 8 bit coded with a two dimensional Huffman code, able to code values larger than 1 × 1 the so called small spectral valuesquantizer and global gain information (Gain) level differences between original and 7 bit quantized values in steps of 21Huffman codetable (iqfeld) values 0..3 select a 4 × 4, 8 × 8, 16 × 16 or 4 bit 32 × 32 codetable values > 3 select a 32 × 32 ESC-table when 31 is an ESC-character followed by (Huffman codetable-3) bits of linear transmitted part of the spectral value, that has to be added to the 31pre-emphasis (preflag) flag, that the higher part of the spectrum 1 bit quantized with a smaller quantizer step sizecritical band scaling stepsize (ps-scale) flag, whether the critical band scaling 1 bitr has a stepsize of 2 or 21block split (split-flag) flag, whether the block is split into 1 bit subblocks (dynamic windowing)0/1 codetable (count 1 table) selection of one of two possible codebooks 1 bit for the coding of small values (-1,0,1)DC-part of the signal (dc-value) 9 bit 55 bit__________________________________________________________________________
The following bits are dependent on the side information of part 1 (e.g. subblock information is only needed if coding in subblocks is actually selected)
______________________________________global gain for subblock 2 3 bitDC-value of subblock 2 9 bitglobal gain for subblock 3 3 bitDC-value of subblock 3 9 bitglobal gain for subblock 4 3 bitDC-value of subblock 4 9 bitscaling factors for the lower 12 *(0 . . . 4) 48 bit12 critical bandsscaling factors for the higher *(0 . . . 3) 33 bit11 critical bands 117 bit______________________________________
Huffman coded spectral values about 0 . . . 4000 bit
A part of the Huffman code is ordered in a two-dimenional array with the number of columns depending on the longest codeword of the Huffman codetable (5, 16, 18, 22 or 19 bits for ESC-tables). The number of rows is the size of part 3 divided by the number of columns. The codewords of the higher frequencies that can not be ordered into this rectangular array are fit into the remaining gaps.
Signs of values not equal to 0 follow the codeword directly.
When using the ESC-table, up to 4 msb+sign of the linear transmitted part follow the codeword directly the lsb+sign are filled in the gaps. ********+xxxxxxxxxxx**********+mmmmxxx***-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx** . . .
1. start of row 2. start of row 3. start of row 4. . . .
* bits of Huffman codeword ordered in the array
+ sign of the first spectral values
- sign of the second spectral values
m msb's of the linear part of an ESC-value
x gaps, filled by the rest of the Huffman code and the lsb's
The advantage of the array, which is sent in row by row order as the bitstream, is the restriction of error propagation to higher frequencies.
FIG. 3 shows a detailed block diagram of a decoder in accordance with aspects of the present invention. FIG. 3 shows a synchronization buffer 310 which acts to appropriately buffer input bitstreams arriving on input lead 305. Error correction is then effected in the part of the system represented by block 315. This block also provides for extraction of low frequency spectral coefficients.
Side information extracted in block 320 is demultiplexed from the other arriving information and is sentto either the Huffman coder 330 or the speech reconstruction functional elements 335. The actual coded spectral coefficient information is sent to the Huffman decoder itself. The decoder 330 is provided with a stored Huffman codebook equivalent to that maintained at the coder of FIG. 1. After the spectrum information is reconstructed, the MDCT synthesis (or other frequency synthesis operation) is applied to reverse the original frequency analysis performed preparatory to coding. Standard aliasing techniques are then applied to provide samples to be converted by digital-to-analog conversion and reproduction to acoustic or other analog signals.
______________________________________LISTING 1______________________________________c First startup routine subroutine strt( )c sets up threshold generation tables, ithr and bval real freq(0:25)/0.,100.,200.,300.,400.,500.,630.,770., 1 920.,1080.,1270.,1480.,1720.,2000.,2320.,2700., 1 315O.,3700.,4400.,5300.,6400.,7700.,9500.,12000.,15500., 1 25000./ common/thresh/ithr(26),bval(257,rnorm(257) common/absthr/abslow(257) common/sigs/ifirstc ithr(i) is bottom of crital band i. bval is bark indexc of each line write(*,*) `what spl will + - 32000 be →` read(*.*) abslev abslev = abslev - 96. abstow = 5224245.*5224245./exp(9.6*alog(10.)) ifirst = 0 write(*.*) `what is the sampling rate` read(*.*) rzotz fnyq = rzotz/2.c nyquest frequency of interest. ithr(1) = 2. i = 210 ithr(i) = freq(i - 1)/fnyq*256. + 2. i = i + 1 if (freq(i - 1) .It. fnyq) goto 10c sets ithr to bottom of cb ithr(i:26) = 257c now, set up the critical band indexing array bval(1) = 0c first, figure out frequency, then . . . do i = 2,257,1 fre = (i - 1)/256.*fnyqc write(*,*) i,frec fre is now the frequency of the line. convertc it to critical band number . . . do j = 0,25,1 if (fre .gt. freq(j)) k = j end doc so now, k = last CB lower than fre rpart = fre - freq(k) range = freq(k + 1) - freq(k) bval(i) = k + rpart/range end do rnorm = 1 do i = 2,257,1 imp = 0 do j = 2.257,1 imp = imp + sprdngf(bval(j),bval(i)) end do rnorm(i) = tmp end do rnorm = 1./rnormc do i = 1.257.1c write(*.*)i.bval(i), 10.*alog10(rnorm(i))c end do call openas(0.`/usr/jj/nsrc/thrtry/freqlist`.0) do i = 2.257,1 read(0,*) ii.db if (ii .ne. i) then write(*,*) `freqlist is bad.` stop end if db = exp((db-abslev)/10.*alog(10.))c write(*,*) i,db abslow(i) = abslow(i)*db end do abslow(1) = 1. write(*,*) `lowest level is `, sqrt(abslow(45)) return endc Threshold calculation program subroutine thrgen(rt,phi,thr) real r(257),phi(257) real rt(257) real thr(257) common/blnk/ or(257),ophi(257),dr(257),dphi(257) common/blk1/othr(257) real alpha(257),tr(257),tphi(257) real beta(257),bcalc(257) common/absthr/abslow(257) common/thresh/ithr(26),bval(257),rnorm(257) common/sigs/ifirst r = max(rt,.0005) bcalc = 1. if(ifirst .eq. 0) then or = 0). othr = le20 ophi = 0 dr = 0 dphi = 0 ifirst = 1 end ifc this subroutine figures out the new threshold valuesc using line-by-line measurement. tr. = or -dr tphi = ophi ÷ dphi dr = r -or dphi = phi - ophi or = r ophi = phi alpha = sqrt((r*cos(phi) - tr*cos(tphi)) 1 *(r*cos(phi) - tr*cos(tphi)) 2 + (r*sin(phi) - tr*sin(tphi)) 3 *(r*sin(phi) - tr*sin(tphi))) 4/(r + abs(tr) + 1.) beta alphac now, beta is the unweighted tonality factor alpha = r*rc now, the energy is in eachc line. Must spread. (ecch)c write(*,*) `before spreading` thr = 0 bcalc = 0cvdS1 cncall do i = 2.2257,1cvdS1 cncall do j = 2.257,1 glorch = sprdngf(bval(j),bval(i)) thr(i) = alpha(j)*glorch + thr(i) bcalc(i) = alpha(j)*glorch*beta(j) + bcalc(i)c thr is the spread energy. bcalc is the weighted chaos end doc if (thr(i) .eq. 0) thenc write(*,*) `zero threshold, you blew it`c stopc end if bcalc(i) = bcalc(i)/thr(i) if (bcalc(i) .gt. .5)bcalc(i) = 1. - bcalc(i)c that normalizes bcalc to 0-.5 end doc write(*.*) `after spreading` bcalc = max(bcalc,.05) bcalc = min(bcalc,.5)c bcalc is now the chaos metric, convert to thec tonality metric bcalc = -.45*alog(bcalc) ` .299c now calculate DB bcalc = max(24 5.(15.5 + bval))*bcalc + 5.5*(1. - bcalc) bcalc = exp((-bcalc/10.) * alog (10.))c now, bcalc it actual tonality factor, for powerc space. thr = thr*rnorm*bcalcc threshold is tonality factor times energy (with normalization) thr = max(thr,abslow) alpha = thr thr = min(thr,othr*2.) othr = alphac write(*,*) `leaving thrgen` return endc And, the spreading function function sprdngf(j,i) real i,j real sprdngfc this calculates the value of the spreading function forc the i'th bark, with the center being the j'thc bark temp1 = i - j temp2 = 15.8811389 + 7.5*(templ + .474) temp2 = temp2 - 17.5*sqrt(1. + (templ + .474)* (temp1 + .474)) if( temp2 .1e. - 100.) then temp3 = 0. else temp2 = temp2/10.*alog(10.) temp3 = exp(temp2) end if sprdngf = temp3 return end______________________________________
TABLE I______________________________________Absolute Threshold File -("freqlist" for start-up routine)______________________________________ 1 56 3. 111 16. 166 16. 221 50. 2 27. 57 4. 112 17. 167 16. 222 50. 3 18. 58 4. 113 17. 168 16. 223 50. 4 16. 59 5. 114 17. 169 16. 224 50. 5 10. 60 5. 115 17. 170 16. 225 50. 6 9. 61 5. 116 18. 171 17. 226 50. 7 8. 62 6. 117 18. 172 17. 227 50. 8 8. 63 6. 118 18. 173 17. 228 50. 9 8. 64 6. 119 18. 174 17. 229 50.10 8. 65 6. 120 18. 175 17. 230 50.11 8. 66 7. 121 18. 176 17. 231 50.12 7. 67 7. 122 18. 177 18. 232 50.13 7. 68 7. 123 18. 178 18. 233 50.14 7. 69 8. 124 17. 179 18. 234 60.15 7. 70 9. 125 17. 180 18. 235 60.16 7. 71 10. 126 16. 181 18. 236 60.17 7. 72 10. 127 16. 182 19. 237 60.18 7. 73 10. 128 16. 183 19. 238 60.19 7. 74 10. 129 16. 184 19. 239 60.20 7. 75 10. 130 15. 185 19. 240 60.21 7. 76 10. 131 15. 186 19. 241 60.22 7. 77 10. 132 15. 187 20. 242 60.23 7. 78 10. 133 15. 188 21. 243 60.24 7. 79 10. 134 14. 189 22. 244 60.25 6. 80 10. 135 14. 190 23. 245 60.26 5. 81 11. 136 13. 191 24. 246 60.27 5. 82 11. 137 12. 192 25. 247 60.28 5. 83 11. 138 12. 193 26. 248 60.29 5. 84 11. 139 12. 194 27. 249 60.30 5. 85 11. 140 12. 195 28. 250 60.31 4. 86 12. 141 12. 196 29. 251 60.32 4. 87 12. 142 12. 197 30. 252 60.33 4. 88 12. 143 12. 198 31. 253 60.34 4. 89 12. 144 13. 199 32. 254 60.35 4. 90 12. 145 13. 200 33. 255 60.36 3. 91 12. 146 14. 201 34. 256 60.37 3. 92 13. 147 14. 202 35. 257 60.38 3. 93 13. 148 14. 203 36.39 3. 94 13. 149 14. 204 37.40 2. 95 13. 150 14. 205 38.41 2. 96 13. 151 14. 206 39.42 1. 97 13. 152 14. 207 40.43 1. 98 14. 153 14. 208 41.44 1. 99 14. 154 14. 209 42.45 1. 100 14. 155 14. 210 43.46 0. 101 14. 156 15. 211 44.47 0. 102 15. 157 15. 212 45.48 0. 103 15. 158 15. 213 46.49 0. 104 15. 159 15. 214 47.50 0. 105 15. 160 15. 215 48.51 0. 106 15. 161 15. 216 49.52 2. 107 16. 162 15. 217 50.53 2. 108 16. 163 15. 218 50.54 2. 109 16. 164 15. 219 50.55 3. 110 16. 165 15. 220 50.______________________________________
TABLE 2______________________________________table of critical bands and fmin(used at 48 kHz sampling frequency)The upper band edge is set to 20 kHz (line 214 at blocklength 256, line 428 at block length 512)The following table is used at block length 512. The tablefor block length 256 can easily be calculatedfrom the table for 512 block length. The tables for othersampling rates can also be calculated from thislist.cb start width fmin______________________________________ 1 0 4 .007 2 4 4 .007 3 8 4 .007 4 12 4 .007 5 16 4 .007 6 20 4 .007 7 24 4 .007 8 28 4 .01 9 32 4 .0110 36 4 .0111 40 6 .0112 46 6 .014413 52 8 .022514 60 8 .0415 68 12 .062516 80 12 .0917 92 16 .0918 108 20 .0919 128 26 .122520 154 30 .122521 184 38 .1622 222 50 .202523 272 70 .2524 342 86______________________________________
______________________________________17 1716 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 1616 1616 16 16 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 1417 1717 17 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 1616 1616 16 16 16 16 16 17 16 17 17 17 17 17 1418 1717 17 17 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 1616 1616 16 16 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 1418 1717 17 17 17 17 16 17 16 16 16 16 16 16 1616 1616 16 16 16 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 17 1318 1817 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 16 17 17 16 17 1617 1717 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 1418 1817 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 1717 1717 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 18 1418 1817 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 1717 1717 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 1418 1818 18 18 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 1717 1717 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 1419 1818 18 18 18 18 17 17 18 17 17 17 17 17 1717 1717 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 18 1319 1918 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 17 18 17 17 17 1717 1717 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 18 1415 1515 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 1414 1414 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 13 14 14 14 8______________________________________
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US28276 *||May 15, 1860||Bedstead-fastening|
|US28488 *||May 29, 1860||Eataet-machiite|
|US3420742 *||Oct 16, 1964||Jan 7, 1969||Dairy Technics Inc||Milk fermenting product and method of making same|
|US4972484 *||Nov 20, 1987||Nov 20, 1990||Bayerische Rundfunkwerbung Gmbh||Method of transmitting or storing masked sub-band coded audio signals|
|US5285498 *||Mar 2, 1992||Feb 8, 1994||At&T Bell Laboratories||Method and apparatus for coding audio signals based on perceptual model|
|US5535300 *||Aug 2, 1994||Jul 9, 1996||At&T Corp.||Perceptual coding of audio signals using entropy coding and/or multiple power spectra|
|1||"Critical Bands", Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory, J. V. Tobias, Chapter 5, B. Scharf, Academic Press, New York, 1970.|
|2||"Digital audio tape for data storage", IEEE Spectrum, Oct. 1989, pp. 34-38, E. Tan and B. Vermeulen.|
|3||"MSC: Stereo Audio Coding With CD-Quality and 256 kBIT/SEC", IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. CE-33, No. 4, Nov. 1987, pp. 512-519, E. F. Schroeder and H. J. Platte.|
|4||"Optimizing digital speech coders by exploiting masking properties of the human ear", Journal of Acoustical Society of America, vol. 66 (6), Dec., 1979, pp. 1647-1652, M.R. Schroeder et al.|
|5||"Sub-band Transform Coding Using Filter Bank Designs Based on Time Domain Aliasing Cancellation," IEEE ICASSP, 1987, J. Princen et al., pp. 2161-2164.|
|6||"Transform Coding of Audio Signals Using Perceptual Noise Criteria", IEEE Journal On Selected Areas In Communications, vol. 6, No. 2, Feb. 1988, pp. 314-323, J. D. Johnston.|
|7||*||Critical Bands , Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory , J. V. Tobias, Chapter 5, B. Scharf, Academic Press, New York, 1970.|
|8||*||Digital audio tape for data storage , IEEE Spectrum , Oct. 1989, pp. 34 38, E. Tan and B. Vermeulen.|
|9||*||FX/FORTRAN Programmer s Handbook , Alliant Computer Systems Corp., Jul. 1988.|
|10||FX/FORTRAN Programmer's Handbook, Alliant Computer Systems Corp., Jul. 1988.|
|11||*||MSC: Stereo Audio Coding With CD Quality and 256 kBIT/SEC , IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics , vol. CE 33, No. 4, Nov. 1987, pp. 512 519, E. F. Schroeder and H. J. Platte.|
|12||*||N. S. Jayant and P. Noll, Digital Coding of Waveforms Principles and Applications to Speech and Video, Chapter 12, Transform Coding , 1987.|
|13||N. S. Jayant and P. Noll, Digital Coding of Waveforms--Principles and Applications to Speech and Video, Chapter 12, "Transform Coding", 1987.|
|14||*||Optimizing digital speech coders by exploiting masking properties of the human ear , Journal of Acoustical Society of America, vol. 66 (6), Dec., 1979, pp. 1647 1652, M.R. Schroeder et al.|
|15||*||Sub band Transform Coding Using Filter Bank Designs Based on Time Domain Aliasing Cancellation, IEEE ICASSP , 1987, J. Princen et al., pp. 2161 2164.|
|16||*||Transform Coding of Audio Signals Using Perceptual Noise Criteria , IEEE Journal On Selected Areas In Communications , vol. 6, No. 2, Feb. 1988, pp. 314 323, J. D. Johnston.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6424939 *||Mar 13, 1998||Jul 23, 2002||Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V.||Method for coding an audio signal|
|US6654716 *||Oct 19, 2001||Nov 25, 2003||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson||Perceptually improved enhancement of encoded acoustic signals|
|US6766293 *||Mar 13, 1998||Jul 20, 2004||Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Foerderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V.||Method for signalling a noise substitution during audio signal coding|
|US6915264||Feb 22, 2001||Jul 5, 2005||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Cochlear filter bank structure for determining masked thresholds for use in perceptual audio coding|
|US7080253 *||Jul 8, 2005||Jul 18, 2006||Microsoft Corporation||Audio fingerprinting|
|US7240207 *||Jul 8, 2005||Jul 3, 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Fingerprinting media entities employing fingerprint algorithms and bit-to-bit comparisons|
|US7333930||Mar 14, 2003||Feb 19, 2008||Agere Systems Inc.||Tonal analysis for perceptual audio coding using a compressed spectral representation|
|US7478045 *||Jul 15, 2002||Jan 13, 2009||M2Any Gmbh||Method and device for characterizing a signal and method and device for producing an indexed signal|
|US8082279||Apr 18, 2008||Dec 20, 2011||Microsoft Corporation||System and methods for providing adaptive media property classification|
|US8170882||Jul 31, 2007||May 1, 2012||Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation||Multichannel audio coding|
|US8223985||Apr 22, 2009||Jul 17, 2012||General Electric Company||Masking of pure tones within sound from a noise generating source|
|US8412340 *||Jul 14, 2008||Apr 2, 2013||Advanced Bionics, Llc||Tonality-based optimization of sound sensation for a cochlear implant patient|
|US8914124||Mar 13, 2013||Dec 16, 2014||Advanced Bionics Ag||Tonality-based optimization of sound sensation for a cochlear implant patient|
|US8983834||Feb 28, 2005||Mar 17, 2015||Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation||Multichannel audio coding|
|US9311922||Feb 5, 2015||Apr 12, 2016||Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation||Method, apparatus, and storage medium for decoding encoded audio channels|
|US9454969||Mar 3, 2016||Sep 27, 2016||Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation||Multichannel audio coding|
|US9520135||Mar 3, 2016||Dec 13, 2016||Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation||Reconstructing audio signals with multiple decorrelation techniques|
|US20040267522 *||Jul 15, 2002||Dec 30, 2004||Eric Allamanche||Method and device for characterising a signal and for producing an indexed signal|
|US20050289065 *||Jul 8, 2005||Dec 29, 2005||Microsoft Corporation||Audio fingerprinting|
|US20050289066 *||Jul 8, 2005||Dec 29, 2005||Microsoft Corporation||Audio fingerprinting|
|US20070140499 *||Feb 28, 2005||Jun 21, 2007||Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation||Multichannel audio coding|
|US20080031463 *||Jul 31, 2007||Feb 7, 2008||Davis Mark F||Multichannel audio coding|
|US20080195654 *||Apr 18, 2008||Aug 14, 2008||Microsoft Corporation||System and methods for providing adaptive media property classification|
|US20090264960 *||Jul 14, 2008||Oct 22, 2009||Advanced Bionics, Llc||Tonality-Based Optimization of Sound Sensation for a Cochlear Implant Patient|
|US20100042406 *||Mar 4, 2002||Feb 18, 2010||James David Johnston||Audio signal processing using improved perceptual model|
|US20100272285 *||Apr 22, 2009||Oct 28, 2010||General Electric Company||Masking of pure tones within sound from a noise generating source|
|USRE39080||Aug 13, 2002||Apr 25, 2006||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Rate loop processor for perceptual encoder/decoder|
|USRE40280||Oct 12, 2005||Apr 29, 2008||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Rate loop processor for perceptual encoder/decoder|
|EP1914722A1||Feb 28, 2005||Apr 23, 2008||Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation||Multichannel audio decoding|
|EP2065885A1||Feb 28, 2005||Jun 3, 2009||Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation||Multichannel audio decoding|
|EP2224430A2||Feb 28, 2005||Sep 1, 2010||Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation||Multichannel audio decoding|
|Apr 5, 2001||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, TEX
Free format text: CONDITIONAL ASSIGNMENT OF AND SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. (DE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:011722/0048
Effective date: 20010222
|Oct 14, 2003||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Dec 6, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., NEW JERSEY
Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK), AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:018590/0287
Effective date: 20061130
|Nov 16, 2007||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Sep 23, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Mar 7, 2013||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CREDIT SUISSE AG, NEW YORK
Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.;REEL/FRAME:030510/0627
Effective date: 20130130
|Oct 9, 2014||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC., NEW JERSEY
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG;REEL/FRAME:033949/0531
Effective date: 20140819