Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUSRE36715 E
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 08/856,600
Publication dateMay 30, 2000
Filing dateMay 15, 1997
Priority dateFeb 2, 1993
Also published asCA2114471A1, CA2114471C, DE4402428A1, DE4402428C2, US5416626
Publication number08856600, 856600, US RE36715 E, US RE36715E, US-E-RE36715, USRE36715 E, USRE36715E
InventorsMichael G. Taylor
Original AssigneeNorthern Telecom Limited
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Optically amplified transmission systems
US RE36715 E
Abstract
In an optically amplified transmission system including a concatenation of optical amplifiers in the transmission path between an optical transmitter and a non-coherent receiver, the transmitter includes, in addition to a modulator for impressing data modulation, a polarisation state modulator for improving the signal-to-noise ratio at the detector.
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(13)
I claim:
1. An optical data transmission system employing non-coherent detection, the system including an optical transmitter optically coupled with a non-coherent optical receiver by an optical transmission path that includes a concatenation of optical amplifiers, wherein the transmitter includes a data modulator adapted to impress data modulation upon an optical signal transmitted by the transmitter to the receiver, and wherein the transmitter additionally includes a second modulator, which second modulator is optically in series with the first modulator and is adapted to modulate between a pair of substantially orthogonally polarised states the state of polarisation of the optical signal transmitted by the transmitter.
2. A data transmission system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the data modulator is adapted to impress data modulation in the form of intensity modulation.
3. A data transmission system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the second modulator is adapted to modulate at a frequency greater than that of said data modulation.
4. A data transmission system as claimed in claim 3, wherein the data modulator is adapted to impress data modulation in the form of intensity modulation.
5. A data transmission system as claimed in claim 3, wherein the second modulator is adapted to modulate at a frequency which is twice, or greater integral multiple of, the frequency of said data modulation.
6. A data transmission system as claimed in claim 5, wherein the data modulator is adapted to impress data modulation in the form of intensity modulation.
7. A data transmission system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the system includes a feedback control loop adapted to regulate the operation of a polarisation state adjuster located physically in series with the second modulator so as to minimise the component of the signal detected by the receiver that is at the same frequency as that of the modulation that is provided by the second modulator.
8. A data transmission system as claimed in claim 7, wherein the data modulator is adapted to impress data modulation in the form of intensity modulation. .Iadd.
9. An optical data transmission system employing non-coherent detection, the system including an optical transmitter having a first modulator adapted to impress data modulation upon an optical signal transmitted by the transmitter wherein the transmitter additionally includes a second modulator optically in series with the first modulator, the second modulator adapted to modulate the state of polarization of the optical signal transmitted by the transmitter between a pair of substantially orthogonally polarized states. .Iaddend..Iadd.10. The system of claim 9 wherein the first modulator is adapted to impress data modulation in the form of intensity modulation. .Iaddend..Iadd.11. The system of claim 9 wherein the second modulator is adapted to modulate at a frequency greater than that of said data modulation. .Iaddend..Iadd.12. The system of claim 9 wherein the first modulator is adapted to impress data modulation in the form of intensity modulation. .Iaddend..Iadd.13. The system of claim 11 wherein the second modulator is adapted to modulate at a frequency which is an integral multiple of the frequency impressed by the first modulator. .Iaddend..Iadd.14. The system of claim 13 wherein the first modulator is adapted to impress data modulation in the form of intensity modulation.
.Iaddend..Iadd.15. The system of claim 9 wherein the optical signal is amplified by at least one optical amplifier and wherein the system includes feedback circuitry to regulate the operation of the transmitter so as to minimize a component of the amplified signal that is at the same frequency as the modulation provided by the second modulator. .Iaddend..Iadd.16. The system of claim 7 wherein the first modulator is adapted to impress data modulation in the form of intensity modulation. .Iaddend..Iadd.17. An optical transmitter in an optical data transmission system employing non-coherent detection comprising means for transmitting an optical signal, a first modulator adapted to impress data modulation upon the optical signal, a second modulator optically in series with the first modulator and adapted to sweep the state of polarization of the optical signal between substantially orthogonally polarized states, and at least one optical amplifier for amplifying the transmitted optical signal. .Iaddend..Iadd.18. The system of claim 17 wherein the first modulator is adapted to impress data modulation in the form of intensity modulation. .Iaddend..Iadd.19. The system of claim 17 wherein the second modulator is adapted to modulate at a frequency greater than that of said data
modulation. .Iaddend..Iadd.20. The system of claim 17 wherein the first modulator is adapted to impress data modulation in the form of intensity modulation. .Iaddend..Iadd.21. The system of claim 19 wherein the second modulator is adapted to modulate at a frequency which is an integral multiple of the frequency impressed by the first modulator. .Iaddend..Iadd.22. The system of claim 21 wherein the first modulator is adapted to impress data modulation in the form of intensity modulation. .Iaddend..Iadd.23. The data transmission system of claim 17 wherein the system includes feedback circuitry to regulate the operation of the transmitter to minimize a component of the amplified signal that is at the same frequency as that of the modulation provided by the second modulator. .Iaddend..Iadd.24. The system of claim 23 wherein the first modulator is adapted to impress data modulation in the form of intensity modulation.
.Iaddend..Iadd.25. An optical transmitter in an optical data transmission system employing non-coherent detection comprising:
means for generating an optical signal;
a first modulator adapted to impress data modulation upon the optical signal;
a second modulator, optically in series with the first modulator, adapted to modulate the state of polarization of the optical signal transmitted by the transmitter; and
a polarization adjuster, operative to regulate the operation of the transmitter based on a feedback signal to improve the quality of the amplified optical signal. .Iaddend..Iadd.26. The transmitter of claim 25 wherein the polarization adjuster minimizes a component of the amplified signal that is at the same frequency as that of the modulation provided by the second modulator. .Iaddend..Iadd.27. A method for optically amplifying an optical signal transmitted by an optical transmitter comprising the steps of:
generating an optical signal;
modulating the optical signal by impressing data upon the signal;
modulating the optical signal by sweeping the polarization state of the optical signal between substantially orthogonally polarized states; and
amplifying the modulated optical signal. .Iaddend..Iadd.28. The method of claim 27 further comprising the step of providing a feedback signal to the transmitter for regulating operation of the transmitter to minimize a component of the amplified signal that is at the same frequency as that of the modulation provided by the second modulator. .Iaddend..Iadd.29. A method for optically amplifying an optical signal transmitted by an optical transmitter comprising the steps of:
generating an optical signal;
impressing data upon the optical signal;
modulating the state of polarization of the optical signal transmitted by the transmitter; and
regulating the operation the transmitter with a feedback optical signal to improve the quality of the amplified optical signal. .Iaddend.
Description

This application is a Reissue of Ser. No. 08/189,049 filed Jan. 3, 1994 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,416,626. .Iaddend.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In an optically amplified transmission system employing non-coherent detection the optical transmission path between an optical transmitter and a receiver at some remote location includes a concatenation of optical amplifiers distributed at spaced intervals along that transmission path. Each of the optical amplifiers has a gain medium which has a population inversion. A low power input to such an amplifier is amplified to a higher power as it propagates through the gain medium. The signal input to the amplifier interacts with the population inversion to produce stimulated emission, thereby resulting in signal amplification. Additionally however, the population inversion will produce some spontaneous emission which is broad-band in comparison with the signal, and this spontaneous emission will also be amplified both in this, and in succeeding amplifies. As a result, amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) arrives at the receiver together with the signal. It has been shown, for instance in a paper by N. A. Olsson entitled `Lightwave Systems with Optical Amplifiers`, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 7, No. 7, Jul. 1989, pp 1071-1082, that when the incoming signal is detected at the receiver, the ASE contributes a noise input as the result of signal-spontaneous beat interactions and a further noise input as the result of spontaneous-spontaneous beat interactions.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to achieving reduced ASE and a consequent improvement on the signal-to-noise ratio of the signal detected at the receiver.

According to the present invention there is provided an optical data transmission system employing non-coherent detection, the system including an optical transmitter optically coupled with a non-coherent optical receiver by an optical transmission path that includes a concatenation of optical amplifiers, wherein the transmitter includes a data modulator adapted to impress data modulation upon an optical signal transmitted by the transmitter to the receiver, and wherein the transmitter additionally includes a second modulator, which second modulator is adapted to modulate between a pair of substantially orthogonally polarised states the state of polarisation of the optical signal transmitted by the transmitter.

It may be noted that the use of a second modulator adapted to modulate between substantially orthogonally polarised states the state of polarisation of a data modulated optical signal transmitted by a transmitter has been previously described in U.S. Pat Nos. 4,965,857 and 5,023,494, but that disclosure is in the context of a system employing coherent (superheterodyne) detection. The coherent detection system described therein does not use optical amplifiers, and so is in no way concerned with any problems of ASE noise. Moreover the second modulator is specifically included to enable coherent detection, and so on the face of the document has no apparent relevance to systems employing non-coherent detection.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

There follows a description of optically amplified transmission systems embodying the invention in preferred forms. The description refers to the accompanying drawings in which FIGS. 1 and 2, are block diagrams of optical transmission systems embodying the invention in alternative preferred forms.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The optical transmitter system of FIG. 1 has a transmitter 10, at a remote location a non-coherent receiver 11 and, between the two, an optical fibre transmission part 12 that includes a concatenation of optical amplifiers 13, typically of the order of a hundred amplifiers. A preferred form of amplifier is an optical fibre amplifier incorporating a rare-earth dopant such as erbium. A preferred form of transmitter 10 incorporates an injection laser source 10a, a first modulator 10b supplied with data from a data input 14, and a second modulator 10c fed from an oscillator 15. Typically, but not necessarily, the fist modulator 10b is an intensity modulator. If the data is impressed as intensity modulation, the functions of laser source and intensity modulator may be combined in the same integer comprising an injection laser driven with both laser bias current and with data modulation current. The second modulator 10c is an optical state of polarisation modulator, and the amplitude of the output of the oscillator is sufficient to drive the second modulator so as to sweep its output between a pair of substantially orthogonally polarised polarisation states. A convenient form for such a polarisation modulator 10c is that of a lithium niobate phase shifter for which the state of polarisation of its optical input is arranged so that the input is divided substantially equally between its TE and its TM modes. Alternatively the modulator could, for instance operate by dividing the signal into two equal parts, frequency shifting one part by acoustic-optic modulation, and then arranging to recombine the two parts with orthogonal polarisation states.

It has generally been thought that ASE is unpolarised. Alternatively stated, it has generally been thought that the ASE power in the polarisation sate orthogonal to the polarisation state of the signal power is equal to the ASE power in the same polarisation state as that of the signal power. However we have now observed experimentally that in respect of a long system there is in fact more ASE power orthogonal to the signal than in the same polarisation state as that of the signal. It is believed that this is due to a small discrepancy in gain between the two polarisation states at each amplifier. This small discrepancy is then multiplied by the number of amplifiers in the system, thereby giving rise to what can amount to a considerable discrepancy in, for instance, the case of a system including about a hundred concatenated amplifiers. It has been found that, by modulating the polarisation state of the signal so as to make it spend time in both of any two substantially orthogonally polarised states, the ASE is reduced and also the signal power is incremented.

The signal-to-ASE ratio, and hence also the received signal-to-noise ratio, is thereby improved. Clearly in order to maximise the improvement the modulation should be at a rate that is much faster than the response time of the population inversion in the amplifiers. If the polarisation modulation is at a rate short compared with the time constant of the population inversion then, at a single amplifier, the shortfall from total elimination of the gain discrepancy between the two polarisation states at this amplifier is correspondingly small. However, so far as the whole system is concerned, account must also be taken of the number of amplifiers in the system because there is a corresponding shortfall at each of the other amplifiers, with consequent cumulative effect. Assuming a population inversion time in respect of an erbium doped fibre amplifier of about 10 ms, it is seen that the polarisation modulation frequency for a hundred amplifier system, should preferably be in excess of 100 Khz. The polarisation modulation does not have to be periodic.

In FIG. 1, the polarisation modulator 10c has been represented as being located at, and forming part of, the transmitter 10, but it will be evident that it could in principle equally well be located immediately before the first amplifier of the concatenation. However to locate it after the first amplifier, or even further downstream the concatenation would involve the penalty that it would exercise no effect upon the ASE generated by the amplifier upstream of it.

The system is liable to have some net polarisation dependent loss (PDL), and hence, if the polarisation modulator 10c is allowed to operate to modulate the signal down the transmission path 12 between any random pair of substantially orthogonally polarised states, there is a risk that this polarisation modulation may be detected at the receiver as amplitude modulation. One way of avoiding this risk is accomplished in the transmission system of FIG. 2.

This transmission system of FIG. 2 has the same arrangement of receiver 11, transmission path 12, and amplifiers 13 as the system of FIG. 1. Similarly its transmitter 20 includes the same three elements of laser source 10a and first and second modulators 10b and 10c as the transmitter 10 of the system of FIG. 1. Additionally, the transmitter 20 of FIG. 2 includes a polarisation state adjuster 20d powered from a driver 26 that forms part of a feedback control loop. The polarisation adjuster is driven by the feedback loop to minimise the amplitude modulation appearing at the receiver's detector that has the same frequency as that of the modulation applied to the polarisation modulator 10c. If the polarisation modulator takes the form of a lithium niobate phase shifter, the polarisation adjuster may conveniently take the same form.

At least in respect of a digital intensity modulation transmission system an alternative solution to the potential problem of the polarisation dependent loss (PDL) is to dispense with the adjuster and feedback control loop and instead to modulate the polarisation at a rate faster than the bit rate, preferably at twice, or greater integral multiple of, the bit rate.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4947134 *Oct 30, 1987Aug 7, 1990American Telephone And Telegraph CompanyLightwave systems using optical amplifiers
US4965857 *Sep 26, 1989Oct 23, 1990Siemens AktiegesellschaftMethod for synchronized polarization switching of an optical transmission signal of an optical transmission system having superheterodyne reception and an apparatus for the implementation of said method
US5023949 *Sep 20, 1989Jun 11, 1991Siemens AktiengesellschaftApparatus for generating an FSK-modulated optical signal having two different polarization conditions for an optical transmission system having an optical two-filter FSK super-heterodyne receiver
US5227908 *Jul 15, 1991Jul 13, 1993Nec CorporationOptical communication apparatus using intensity modulation
US5295013 *Mar 22, 1993Mar 15, 1994Nec CorporationOptical receiver of direct detection type
WO1991018455A1 *May 6, 1991Nov 28, 1991Bordoni Ugo FondazioneA multilevel coherent optical system
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1Olsson, "Lightwave Systems With Optical Amplifiers", Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 7, No. 7. pp. 1071-1082, Jul. 1989.
2 *Olsson, Lightwave Systems With Optical Amplifiers , Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 7, No. 7. pp. 1071 1082, Jul. 1989.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US6366373 *Nov 24, 1999Apr 2, 2002Luxn, Inc.Method of intrinsic continuous management data transmission in fiber optic communications
US7120364 *Jul 5, 2001Oct 10, 2006Jds Uniphase CorporationOptical modulator and method for polarization bit interleaving
US7203429 *May 7, 2001Apr 10, 2007Tyco Telecommunications (Us) Inc.Optical transmission system using optical signal processing in terminals for improved system performance
US7336908 *Sep 8, 2006Feb 26, 2008Tyco Telecommunications (Us) Inc.Optical transmission system using optical signal processing in terminals for improved system performance
US20120148260 *Dec 8, 2011Jun 14, 2012Fujitsu LimitedOptical transmitter and optical transmission method
Classifications
U.S. Classification398/184, 398/40, 398/156, 398/152, 398/162, 398/185
International ClassificationH04B10/02, H04B10/18, H04B10/142, H04B10/152, H04B10/06, H04B10/04, H04B10/135
Cooperative ClassificationH04B10/532
European ClassificationH04B10/532
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Apr 16, 2002ASAssignment
Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED, CANADA
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:012762/0799
Effective date: 20020404
Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED 8200 DIXIE ROAD BRAMPTON,
Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED 8200 DIXIE ROADBRAMPTON, O
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION /AR;REEL/FRAME:012762/0799
Apr 5, 2002ASAssignment
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, TEXAS
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:012745/0929
Effective date: 20020404
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK LIEN PERFECTION UNIT P.O. BOX
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED /AR;REEL/FRAME:012745/0929
Dec 23, 1999ASAssignment
Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION, CANADA
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NORTHERN TELECOM LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:010567/0001
Effective date: 19990429
Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION WORLD TRADE CENTER OF