|Publication number||USRE36782 E|
|Application number||US 08/668,318|
|Publication date||Jul 18, 2000|
|Filing date||Jun 26, 1996|
|Priority date||Nov 11, 1983|
|Publication number||08668318, 668318, US RE36782 E, US RE36782E, US-E-RE36782, USRE36782 E, USRE36782E|
|Inventors||Ian J. Brown, John M. Bird, Ian L. McDougall, David Black|
|Original Assignee||Oxford Medical Limited|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (56), Non-Patent Citations (60), Referenced by (15), Classifications (6), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
.Iadd.This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/336,235, filed Apr. 11, 1989 now abandoned and a Reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 4,587,504 on May 6, 1986. .Iaddend.
The invention relates to a magnet assembly and particularly to a magnet assembly suitable for use in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging.
In recent years, the technique of NMR imaging has been developed to enable parts of the human body to be imaged. NMR relies on the property of certain atoms in the body to resonate (by processing) at a particular frequency when exposed to a strong magnetic field. By imposing mutually orthogonal magnetic gradients across the body spatial discrimination can be obtained. An example of NMR apparatus is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,021,726.
In order to carry out these NMR imaging techniques, it is necessary to provide a high strength, uniform magnetic field within a working volume .Iadd.having both radial and axial dimensions .Iaddend.usually defined by the bore of the magnet. A typical field strength for the bore magnetic field is 2.0 T. .Iadd.A typical uniformity is on the order of about at least 400 to normally better than about 100 parts per million or about 0.04% to better than 0.01%. .Iaddend.One of the problems with conventional magnet assemblies for generating such a field is that a large external magnetic field is generated at the same time which is potentially hazardous. It is therefore desirable to shield the magnet assembly to limit this external field.
Currently, external magnetic fields are contained by using iron shielding either forming part of the magnet assembly, or within a room housing the magnet assembly such as by placement of iron sheets on the walls of the room.
Iron shielding is cumbersome and expensive. For example, in order to prevent the external magnetic field exceeding 5.0 Gauss beyond a radius of 5 meters requires 3 tons of iron for a magnet assembly generating a 1.5 kG bore field, while up to 40 tons of iron is required to shield a magnet assembly generating a 20 kG bore field. Clearly, the engineering required to support such large amounts of iron is expensive and furthermore the nearer the iron is to the magnet assembly, the more the bore field itself can be distorted. This is particularly undesirable in the case of magnet assemblies used for NMR imaging where a closely controlled uniform bore field is essential.
An alternative method for shielding magnets has been to juxtapose coils of wire around the magnet as for example shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,671,902. In this case, however, the coils used to shield the magnet have produced small, local magnetic fields and this requires complex calculations to determine the field at a particular radius and then to design a coil to provide a suitable shielding field. Furthermore, this prior art arrangement is designed to shield magnets which produce comparatively low strength bore fields in contrast to the field strength with which the present invention is concerned. A further problem for which the prior art does not provide a solution is that it is commonly necessary, particularly with NMR imaging, to change the strength of the bore magnetic field. Such a change will cause changes in the external field and this will require complex modifications to the various shielding coils. For example, it may be necessary not only to change the exciting currents passing through the shielding coils but also the number of turns and positions of the coils relatively to the magnet.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,333,162 also discloses a small scale shielding arrangement. This arrangement provides no further assistance to someone trying to solve the problems outlined above for a number of reasons. Firstly, this arrangement of coils could never be used for NMR work because of rotation of the principal field vector in the bore, therefore the device as described could not be copied or scaled up directly. Secondly the device is dealing with magnetic fields very much less than those necessary for NMR. We estimate that the bore field of the largest coil in the Hz component would be about 460 Gauss while at distances of between 20 and 30 cms the fringe field would in any case be less than the earths field. We require a magnet assembly where preferably the fringe field very close to the surface of the assembly is reduced to something of the order of magnitude of the earths field and a device which is open at the ends for patient access.
In accordance with the present invention we provide a magnet assembly comprising a first superconducting coil assembly for generating a first magnetic field; and a second superconducting coil assembly for generating a second magnetic field, the second superconducting coil assembly being electrically connected in series with the first superconducting coil assembly, wherein the first and second superconducting coil assemblies each generate, in use, magnetic fields whose corresponding components are of substantially the same order of magnitude, the assemblies being arranged such that a resultant, uniform magnetic field is generated in a working volume, and the second magnetic field opposes the first magnetic field externally of the magnet assembly.
This invention provides a self-contained magnet assembly which does not require additional external shielding devices and in addition can generate a useful (ie. high strength), uniform magnetic field in the working volume. As explained above, in the past, although shielding using coils has been proposed, these coils have produced small external magnetic fields whereas with the invention the second superconducting coil assembly not only provides a shielding field but also contributes significantly to the resultant magnetic field in the working volume. The uniformity arises by virtue of balancing to zero the higher order field terms of both coil assemblies. .Iadd.Balancing of the Field terms can be performed in accordance with the computerized iterative approaches described in, for example, Axially Symmetric Systems for Generating and Measuring Magnetic Field, Part I by M. W. Garrett, Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 22, No. 9, September 1951, pages 1091-1107; Thick Cylindrical Coil Systems for Strong Magnetic Fields With Field or Gradient Homogeneities of the 6th to 20th Order, by M. W. Garrett, Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 38, No. 6, May 1967, pages 2563-2586; Great Britain Patent 2,070,254 by Hanley; and Solenoid Magnet Design, by Montgomery, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1969, section 8.5 and 8.6. .Iaddend.In .[.principle, it is possible to balance.]. .Iadd.one approach the invention balances .Iaddend.the first and second coil assemblies separately so that each provides a uniform field and when these two are superpositioned the result is also uniform. The resultant magnetic field in the working volume is thus due to the difference in zero order terms between the fields generated by the two coil assemblies. This leads to a considerable increase in control of the uniformity of the bore magnetic field.
A further important advantage of the invention is that the two superconducting coil assemblies are electrically connected in series. This means that when the strength of the bore magnetic field is changed by changing the current flowing through the first superconducting coil assembly the second magnetic field will automatically change by an amount sufficient so that the same degree of shielding is achieved. In other words, the shielding system is linear.
Superconducting coil assemblies are used in order to achieve the strength and the high degree of precision of magnetic field which is required for NMR imaging. The superconductive condition of the coils is achieved by cooling the coils to very low temperatures of the order of 4.2 K. using conventional cryogenic or refridgeration techniques. The coils are preferably operated in persistent mode in or to avoid field noise.
We have found that the overall size of our new magnet assembly including the cooling apparatus, is only a little greater than for a conventional unshielded magnet.
The self-shielded or self-contained magnet assembly is particularly advantageous in enabling substantial site arrangement and installation costs to be avoided. Furthermore, the shield constituted by the second superconducting coil assembly can be designed and constructed with great accuracy and will not reduce the uniformity of the magnetic field in the working volume. Indeed, the shield field contributes to the control of magnetic field in the working volume. In addition, more shielding is possible than would be practicable with the conventional iron containment methods.
Normally, the direction of electrical current through the second superconducting coil assembly will be opposite to the current direction in the first superconducting coil assembly.
In the simplest form of magnet assembly according to the invention, the first and second coil assemblies each comprise a single coil, the two coils being electrically connected in series.
Preferably, one or both of the first and second coil assemblies comprises a plurality of coaxial coils arranged symmetrically about a mid-plane of the magnet assembly normal to the coil axis.
One of the problems with using two superconducting coil assemblies is that considerable stresses are developed in use. These stresses can be considerably reduced by placing the second superconducting coil assembly in such a way that the field values within the coil windings are generally as for an unscreened magnet. Then the operating forces in the windings are increased only by the increased current necessary to provide the net magnetic field within the working volume.
Typically, where both the first and second assemblies comprise pluralities of coils the two axes and the two mid-planes will be coincident. This makes it particularly straight forward to obtain uniformity of the resultant magnetic field in the working volume (ie. the bore of the assembly). In addition the coils of the second superconducting coil assembly will have a larger internal radius than the external radius of the coils of the first superconducting coil assembly. A special feature of using concentric coils is that .[.it is possible to balance.]. orders between the first coil assembly (magnet) and the second coil assembly (shield) .Iadd.are balanced .Iaddend.so that, if considered independently, the magnet and the shield would not provide uniform fields and the uniformity is only achieved when the two are operated together.
In one example, the first and second superconducting coil assemblies each comprise six superconducting coils, the coils constituting the first superconducting coil assembly being arranged radially inwardly of the coils constituting the second superconducting coil assembly, and all the coils being arranged coaxially and symmetrically about a common mid-plane normal to the coil axis.
The degree of shielding particularly in the axial direction achieved by the magnet assembly described will normally be sufficient for normal practical purposes. In some cases, however, it may be convenient additionally to provide a further shield of magnetic material arranged around at least the first superconducting coil assembly. In particular this will reduce further the radial fringe field. For example this further shield could be positioned around the second superconducting coil assembly or preferably between the first and second coil assemblies. Preferably the further shield is provided adjacent to the coil or coils of the second superconducting oil assembly. This may most conveniently be achieved by constructing a former supporting the second superconducting coil assembly as the further shield.
Conveniently, the further shield is made of iron. This can enable the amount of expensive superconductor in the second coil assembly to be reduced. We believe that a significant reduction can be achieved by using only 6000 kg of iron for a 1.5 T bore field.
Further shielding may be achieved, if necessary, by providing additional coil assemblies positioned adjacent to each end of the working volume, the further coil assemblies being arranged to oppose the resultant magnetic field generated by the first and second superconducting coil assemblies at these positions. These further coil assemblies will normally be resistive coils since the field required is relatively small. This also allows the diameters of the coils to be made large without requiring a large cryostat. The further coils could, however, be superconducting and in this case they could be electrically connected in series with the first and second superconducting coil assemblies.
Some examples of magnet assemblies according to the invention and of NMR apparatus incorporating such magnet assemblies will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is an exploded, partly cut away perspective view of one example of a magnet assembly;
FIG. 2 illustrates graphically the positions of the superconducting coils of the magnet assembly shown in FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram illustrating the electrical connections between the superconducting coils illustrated in FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 illustrates the variation of field strength with distance from an origin defined by the intersection of the axis and mid-plane of the magnet assembly for both an unshielded magnet assembly and the assembly shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 5 illustrates the coil arrangement for a second example of a magnet assembly;
FIGS. 6A and 6B are schematic end and side views of a third example of a magnet assembly; and,
FIG. 7 is a block diagram of NMR apparatus incorporating a magnet assembly as shown in FIG. 1.
FIG. 1 illustrates in exploded and partly cut away form a magnet assembly 1. The magnet assembly 1 comprises an inner, cylindrical former 2 made of a glass fibre epoxy composite defining the working volume of the magnet assembly constituted by a bore 3 having an axis 4. Positioned radially outwardly of the former 2 is a cylindrical, aluminium former 5 coaxial with the axis 4. The former 5 carries three pairs of coils A,A'-C,C' arranged symmetrically about a mid-plane 6 of the assembly normal to the axis 4 (FIG. 2). Each of the coils A-C is formed from a superconductive conducting material which typically comprises fine strands of alloy Type II superconductor, a matrix of good normal conductor in which the superconductor strands are embedded in the form of a regular array, and a surface electrical insulation to cope with energisation and fault mode voltages. The position and number of turns of each coil will be described later. Each of the pairs of coils A,A'-C,C' is wound separately, one being positioned radially inwardly of the other. The coils are embedded in a wax composition and then surrounded by a clamping ring (not shown). In addition each pair of coils is positioned between respective pairs of annular ribs 5A, 5B etc of the former 5. The purpose of the wax composition and the ribs is to prevent significant movement of the windings of the coil in use since any small movement will be accompanied by the generation of a small amount of heat leading to breakdown of the superconductive condition (known as quenching). In view of the close spacing of the coils A-C, the former 5 must be constructed to accommodate large forces between adjacent coils which, in the axial direction, can amount to some 200,000 Kg. In addition, the former 5 must be as light as possible to reduce the overall weight of the magnet assembly and be as near to a right cylinder as possible.
A second, aluminium former 7 is mounted radially outwardly of the former 5. The former 7 carries 6 shielding coils D-F (FIG. 2) arranged symmetrically about the mid-plane 6 of the magnet assembly in a manner to be described below. The coils D-F are mounted between respective pairs of ribs 7F 7E of the former 7 in a way similar to the coils A,A'-C,C'. Clamping rings (not shown) and wax are also used to reduce movement of the coil windings. The clamping rings are particularly important because counter-running currents in the two sets of coils cause very large radial forces to develop.
In order that the windings of the coils A-F can achieve their superconductive condition it is necessary to cool the windings to about 4.2 K. This is the boiling point of helium and thus the two formers 5, 7 are positioned within a helium can defined by an outer cylindrical wall 8 and an inner wall having a central cylindrical portion 9 and a pair of radially outer, cylindrical portions 10 (only one of which is visible in FIG. 1). The portions 9, 10 are integrally connected by annular web portions 11. The helium can is closed by a pair of ring members 12. The wall 8, portions 9, 10, 11 and ring members 12 are all made of stainless steel. Liquid helium is supplied to the helium can via an inlet 13 mounted in a turret 14.
Cylindrical, aluminium radiation shields 15, 15' are mounted coaxially, radially outwardly and inwardly respectively about the helium can to define an evacuated space 16 between the shields 15,15' and the helium can. The shields 15,15' are cooled by contact with helium through the agency of a heat exchanger (not shown) in the turret 14 which extracts heat from the radiation shields 15, 15' and passes it to the cold helium gas that has been boiled from the helium can.
Further aluminium radiation shields 17,17' are mounted coaxially, radially outwardly and inwardly respectively about the shields 15, 15' to define an evacuated space 18. In use, liquid nitrogen is supplied to a cooling tube (not shown) wound around the shields 17, 17' and connected to blank ports 19 of the turret 14. Finally, a cylindrical, stainless steel outer casing 20 is mounted coaxially about the shield 17 to define a vacuum space 21. Pairs of aluminium end plates 22-24 are provided to close the ends of the spaces 16, 17, 21 while a pair of end rings 25 are mounted to the inner shield 17'. Only one of each pair of plates and rings is shown in FIG. 1.
To minimise the heat load, the various shields are supported by a system of glass rods (not shown) mounted in corresponding attachment plates. These rods when configured as a three dimensional array of struts will support a 4000 kilogram magnet at the expense of a heat leak of no more than 0.04 watts.
In use, the helium can is filled with liquid helium which will be at 4.2 K. As the liquid helium boils, the gas produced will pass into the heat exchanger in the turret 14 which will cool the shields 15,15' to a temperature of about 40° K. The boiling of the liquid helium maintains the wall of the helium can at 42° K. Liquid nitrogen being present in the cooling tubes (not shown) maintains the shields 17,17' at a temperature of about 77 K. This jacket of liquid nitrogen together with the vacuum contained within the spaces 16, 18, 21 help to maintain the temperature of the helium can at 4.2 K.
The spaces 16, 18 21 are connected through valves (not shown) within the turret 14 to the atmosphere to enable the spaces to be evacuated.
The arrangement of the coils A-F may best be understood by considering the field at the center of a set of circular, coplanar coils arranged on the surface of a cylinder. This field is proportional to the radius for each ampere of current through the coils. If the bore field is Bo and the field of a point outside the magnet assembly is Bf, then for the magnet (M) constituted by the inner coils A,A'--C,C' and the antimagnet (A) constituted by the coils D-F we have:
Bo M /Bf M =R1
Bo A /Bf A =R2
For complete cancellation of the external field at a given point, we require ##EQU1##
The total effective magnetic field in a bore due to both arrays of coils is thus:
Bo M +(-Bo A)=Bo M (1-R2 /R1)
Thus a fully screened system requires more current than an unscreened magnet assembly for a fixed bore field. The effect of this increase in current is to increase the forces to which the conductor is subject in the coil winding and this is dealt with in the manner previously described.
The radial and axial positions of the coils A-F are chosen so that the field within the bore 3 is at a selected value and is substantially uniform throughout the bore. In addition, the coil sizes and positions are such that the field strength externally of the magnet assembly does not exceed a specified value. The position of each coil A-F can be characterised by four measurements. These are indicated in FIG. 2. These comprise the inner radius a1, the outer radius a2, the distance parallel to the axis 4 of the nearest part of the coil from the mid-plane 6 (b1) and the furthest distance from the mid-plane 6 (b2). It will be appreciated from FIG. 2 that the coils A-F all have a rectangular cross-section.
Table 1 below illustrates how for coils of different diameter the bore field and fringe field changes. In each case, the coil is assumed to have 1,432,664 amp turns with a radius of a cms. The bore field is B0 while the fringe field at a radius of 400 cms in the mid-plane of the coil is designated Br while the fringe field at a distance of 400 cms from the centre of the coil along the axis of the coil is designated Bz. The fringe fields are represented by their z components ie. the components parallel with the axis of the coils.
TABLE 1______________________________________a cm B0 Gauss Br Gauss Bz Gauss______________________________________40 22504 12.89 21.4950 17994 21.49 34.3860 15000 31.52 48.7170 12865 45.85 65.9080 11250 61.61 84.5390 10000 80.22 106.01100 9001 104.6 127.5______________________________________
An inner coil is now chosen, for example a coil with a radius of 60 cms, and an outer coil is then selected which is as close as possible radially to the inner coil but which has a slightly reduced strength so that the fringe fields match. For example, if the main magnet is taken to have a radius of 60 cms it will produce a bore field of 15,000 Gauss and a mean fringe field of 40.1 Gauss (see Table 1). A shield coil having a radius of 80 cms will by itself produce a bore field of 11,250 Gauss and a mean fringe field of 7.31 Gauss. The shield coil will be run in the opposite sense to the main coil. In order to balance the fringe fields so that they cancel it is necessary to reduce the number of amp turns in the shield coil by 40.1/73.1 ie. to 786,560 amp turns. The shield coil will thus then produce a bore field of 6176 Gauss and a mean fringe field of 40.1 Gauss. Thus, the net bore field will be 15,000-6176=8823 Gauss and a net mean fringe field of zero.
An example of the dimensions of a set of coils suitable for use with the magnet assembly shown in FIG. 1 is given in Table 2 below.
TABLE 2______________________________________ No Length Turns wire per sq per cm of coil cross pair a1 a2 section b1 b2 (m)______________________________________Inner(A) 62.00 66.00 19.6 63.90 86.48 14351Coils(A') 66.03 68.73 34.4 63.90 86.48 17706(B) 65.50 66.88 19.2 24.37 40.97 3652(B') 66.88 68.63 34.4 24.37 40.97 8523(C) 65.76 67.14 19.2 3.52 16.60 2889(C') 67.14 68.73 34.4 3.52 16.60 6061OuterD 98.38 101.62 -19.3 12.46 18.52 4775CoilsE 98.38 101.62 -19.3 46.85 55.03 6447F 98.38 101.62 -19.3 104.77 126.91 17430______________________________________
In this table, all distances apart from the length of wire are in centimeters. The minus signs before the number of turns of the coils D-F indicate that current passes through these coils in the opposite direction to that of the other coils.
This particular arrangement can produce a 2.0T bore field having a very high homogeneity and a field stability of <0.1 ppm per hour. A field of 2.0T is obtained using a current of 429 Amperes.
The electrical connections between the coils is illustrated in FIG. 3. A power supply 26 is connected via a switch 27 and a protection resistor 28 of 0.5 ohms in parallel with the coils D-F. Each set of coils D-F is connected in series with the coils A, A'-C, C'. Additional 0.5 ohm protection resistors 29, 30 are positioned in parallel with all the coils A, A'-C, C' and the coils B, B'-C, C' respectively.
The effectiveness of the outer set of coils D-F on shielding the magnet assembly can be seen from FIG. 4. With an unshielded magnet producing a bore field of 15 kG, an external field having a strength of 10G will be experienced at a distance of 10 meters from the mid-plane 6 of the magnet assembly and up to 7.5 meters from the axis 4 of the magnet assembly as is illustrated by a line 31 in FIG. 4. A dashed line 32 indicates the position where the external field strength has dropped to 5G. In contrast to this, lines 33, 34 illustrate the positions where the external field strength has dropped to 10G and 5G respectively with the magnet assembly shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.
FIG. 5 illustrates an alternative coil geometry in which the inner coils A, A'-C, C' have been replaced by two pairs of coils 35, 36. Each coil 35 has 4098 turns and each coil 36 has 2000 turns. The coils D-F have been replaced by a single solenoid 37 having 4400 turns positioned 100 cms from the axis 4 and extending to 64 cms on either side of the mid-plane 6.
In general, the assembly shown in the previous figures is sufficiently shielded but in some cases it may be desirable to provide some extra shielding. One way in which this may be achieved is illustrated in FIGS. 6A and 6B. In this example, the magnet assembly 1 which is the same as that shown in FIG. 1, is surrounded by four rectangular iron plates 38 positioned parallel with the axis 4. A pair of resistive coils 39 are positioned transversely to the axis 4 at positions spaced from the ends of the bore 3. Typically, each coil 39 will have a diameter of three meters, have 50 turns and be powered from separate power supplies (not shown) by a current of between 100 and 150 A.
This arrangement results in more improved shielding without affecting the bore field significantly. Furthermore, where the magnet assembly is to be used in NMR imaging apparatus the coils 39 do not impede access to the bore 3 for a patient.
An improved form of assembly to that shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B may be obtained by constructing the former 7 from iron. In this way, the iron plates 38 of FIG. 6A are incorporated into the magnet assembly 1 thus producing a very compact construction in which the shielding effect of the coils D-F is considerably enhanced.
One of the most important applications of the magnet assembly described is in NMR imaging apparatus. FIG. 7 illustrates in block diagram form such apparatus which is otherwise of a conventional form. The apparatus comprises the magnet system 1 incorporating a power supply (not shown). The inlets to the helium can and the space 18 are connected to suitable supplies whose operation is controlled by a cryogenic control system 40 of a conventional type.
The former 2 carries a number of gradient coils so that different gradients of magnetic field can be set up through the bore 3 to enable NMR imaging experiments to be carried out. These gradient coils are not superconducting coils and are also of a conventional form. They are driven by respective power drivers 41 controlled from control logic 42 via a waveform generator 43. Coils (not shown) for generating and receiving RF energy are also mounted on the former 2, the RF transmitter being connected to an amplifier 44 which is connected to a spectrometer 45. The RF receiver which detects the NMR signal is also connected to the spectrometer 45. The generation of RF pulses is controlled by the control logic 42 which is connected to the spectrometer 45. NMR data from the spectrometer 45 passes to a data acquisition system 46 which is controlled by the control logic 42. Data from the system 46 then passes to processing logic logic 47.
The overall control of the system is provided by a computer 48 which is connected via a conventional RS 232 interface to an operator input station 49. Information for the computer is stored in a disc drive 50 while the results of the imaging experiments are passed by the computer to a display system 51 which can display "slices" through the patient's body on a monitor 52.
In use, a patient lies inside the bore 3 extending along the axis 4 of the assembly which is conventionally termed the Z direction.
Table 3 below illustrates typical dimensions of a conventional unshielded magnet assembly and the magnet assembly shown in FIG. 1 for comparison. The figures relate to a 1.5 T bore field with a 1 meter diameter bore.
TABLE 3______________________________________ Axial Length Diameter (Meters) (Meters) Height M Mass Kg______________________________________Unshielded 2.1 2.2 2.8 7500Shielded 2.3 2.3 2.9 8900______________________________________
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2156079 *||Dec 17, 1936||Apr 25, 1939||Gen Electric||Electrical discharge device|
|US3199021 *||Dec 19, 1960||Aug 3, 1965||Varian Associates||Apparatus for improving the homogeneity of a magnetic field|
|US3210610 *||Sep 23, 1963||Oct 5, 1965||Westinghouse Electric Corp||Apparatus for electrically insulating the turns of superconducting coils|
|US3256464 *||May 13, 1963||Jun 14, 1966||Nat Res Corp||Process for operating plural superconductive coils|
|US3265939 *||Sep 20, 1963||Aug 9, 1966||Nat Res Corp||Superconductive coil having a ferromagnetic layer thereon|
|US3283277 *||Nov 21, 1963||Nov 1, 1966||Westinghouse Electric Corp||Superconducting solenoid formed from a niobium-base alloy of varying composition|
|US3287630 *||Mar 2, 1964||Nov 22, 1966||Varian Associates||Apparatus for improving the uniformity of magnetic fields|
|US3333162 *||Jan 23, 1964||Jul 25, 1967||Arbuthnot Iii Guy L||Solenoid actuator|
|US3394330 *||Jan 16, 1967||Jul 23, 1968||Rca Corp||Superconductive magnet construction|
|US3406333 *||Apr 7, 1966||Oct 15, 1968||Varian Associates||Scanned intensity magnet having field homogeneity correction coils in common with its scanning coils|
|US3419904 *||May 5, 1966||Dec 31, 1968||Varian Associates||Superconductive solenoid having winding segments additionally energized for gradient control|
|US3450952 *||Aug 30, 1965||Jun 17, 1969||Varian Associates||Superconducting magnet apparatus|
|US3469180 *||Mar 22, 1965||Sep 23, 1969||Varian Associates||Apparatus for improving the homogeneity of a magnetic field|
|US3495162 *||May 19, 1967||Feb 10, 1970||Varian Associates||Pulsed gyromagnetic resonance spectrometer employing an internal control sample and automatic homogeneity control|
|US3564398 *||Jul 18, 1969||Feb 16, 1971||Varian Associates||Magnetic field homogenizing coil sets having spatial independence and spectrometer means using same|
|US3566255 *||Mar 6, 1959||Feb 23, 1971||Varian Associates||Apparatus for improving the homogeneity of magnetic fields|
|US3577067 *||May 11, 1966||May 4, 1971||Varian Associates||Persistent mode superconductive orthogonal gradient cancelling coils|
|US3671902 *||May 25, 1971||Jun 20, 1972||Gen Electric||Shielded inductive device|
|US3818396 *||Apr 9, 1973||Jun 18, 1974||Us Navy||Super stable superconducting coil|
|US4021726 *||Sep 4, 1975||May 3, 1977||National Research Development Corporation||Image formation using nuclear magnetic resonance|
|US4038622 *||Apr 13, 1976||Jul 26, 1977||The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Energy Research And Development Administration||Superconducting dipole electromagnet|
|US4231008 *||Nov 29, 1978||Oct 28, 1980||European Atomic Energy Community||Coil for the production of homogeneous magnetic fields|
|US4310799 *||Oct 15, 1979||Jan 12, 1982||National Research Development Corporation||Coil winding for quadrupolar fields|
|US4362993 *||Aug 5, 1980||Dec 7, 1982||Picker International Limited||Imaging systems|
|US4385277 *||Nov 25, 1980||May 24, 1983||The Oxford Instruments Group Limited||Topical nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer and method|
|US4398149 *||Feb 2, 1981||Aug 9, 1983||Varian Associates, Inc.||NMR Probe coil system|
|US4398167 *||Sep 30, 1982||Aug 9, 1983||International Business Machines Corporation||Limited angle electric rotary actuator|
|US4409579 *||Jul 9, 1982||Oct 11, 1983||Clem John R||Superconducting magnetic shielding apparatus and method|
|US4456881 *||Jan 18, 1982||Jun 26, 1984||Technicare Corporation||Gradient-coil apparatus for a magnetic resonance system|
|US4484814 *||May 18, 1983||Nov 27, 1984||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Superconductive magnet|
|US4490675 *||Jun 10, 1982||Dec 25, 1984||Bruker Analytische Messtechnik Gmbh||Electromagnet for use in NMR tomography|
|US4509011 *||Apr 30, 1982||Apr 2, 1985||Tokyo Shubaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Nuclear magnetic resonance diagnostic apparatus|
|US4509030 *||Jul 5, 1984||Apr 2, 1985||General Electric Company||Correction coil assembly for NMR magnets|
|US4595899 *||Mar 18, 1985||Jun 17, 1986||The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University||Magnetic structure for NMR applications and the like|
|US4612505 *||Jun 8, 1984||Sep 16, 1986||U.S. Philips Corporation||Nuclear magnetic resonance apparatus|
|US4617516 *||Sep 6, 1983||Oct 14, 1986||General Electric Company||Axial magnetic field gradient coil suitable for use with NMR apparatus|
|US4621236 *||Feb 11, 1985||Nov 4, 1986||Field Effects, Inc.||Cylindrical electromagnet for an NMR imaging system|
|US4623864 *||Apr 15, 1985||Nov 18, 1986||Yokogawa Hokushin Electric Corporation||Magnetic field production coil for nuclear magnetic resonance imaging apparatus|
|US4639672 *||Oct 10, 1984||Jan 27, 1987||U.S. Philips Corporation||Nuclear magnetic resonance apparatus|
|US4646024 *||Nov 2, 1983||Feb 24, 1987||General Electric Company||Transverse gradient field coils for nuclear magnetic resonance imaging|
|US4701736 *||Feb 1, 1985||Oct 20, 1987||Oxford Magnet Technology Limited||Magnet assembly having a plurality of nested coaxial coils|
|US4724412 *||Aug 3, 1987||Feb 9, 1988||General Electric Company||Method of determining coil arrangement of an actively shielded magnetic resonance magnet|
|US4737716 *||Feb 6, 1986||Apr 12, 1988||General Electric Company||Self-shielded gradient coils for nuclear magnetic resonance imaging|
|US5539367 *||May 2, 1994||Jul 23, 1996||General Electric Company||Superconducting gradient shields in magnetic resonance imaging magnets|
|DE2146071A1 *||Sep 15, 1971||Mar 22, 1973||Foerster Inst Dr Friedrich||Anordnung zum erzielen eines von magnetischen stoerfeldern freien raumes|
|DE2646467A1 *||Oct 14, 1976||Apr 20, 1978||Siemens Ag||Superconducting coil set for measurements - has four leads used for all coils allowing different combinations of coil connections|
|DE2951018A1 *||Dec 19, 1979||Feb 11, 1982||Wilfried H Dr Bergmann||Spin-echo measurement at eigen temp. of specimen - using superconducting coil screened by second enclosing superconducting coil|
|DE3123493A1 *||Jun 13, 1981||Dec 30, 1982||Bruker Analytische Messtechnik||Elektromagnet fuer die nmr-tomographie|
|EP0067933B1 *||Apr 8, 1982||Feb 20, 1985||Bruker Analytische Messtechnik GmbH||Electromagnet for nmr tomography|
|EP0138270A2 *||Oct 5, 1984||Apr 24, 1985||Philips Electronics N.V.||Nuclear magnetic resonance apparatus|
|FR1416691A *||Title not available|
|GB1285694A *||Title not available|
|GB2070254A *||Title not available|
|GB2156079A *||Title not available|
|JPH05290293A *||Title not available|
|NL8303533A *||Title not available|
|1||"Gyroscan T5--Breakthrough in MR Performance", Philips Medical Systems 11 pages.|
|2||"Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Medicine and Biology", Peter G. Morris, OMT data (acknowledged Feb. 1984) for conventional MRI magnets quoted in Morris (OUP, 1986).|
|3||"possible"--Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, 1973.|
|4||A. Echarri, M. Sacchetti & M. Spadoni, "Comments on Minimum Volume Simple and Compensated Superconducting Coils", The Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 42, No. 6, Jun. 1971, pp. 801-805.|
|5||*||A. Echarri, M. Sacchetti & M. Spadoni, Comments on Minimum Volume Simple and Compensated Superconducting Coils , The Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 42, No. 6, Jun. 1971, pp. 801 805.|
|6||A.J. Stevens et al., "Quench Protection Studies On CBA Magnets" IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. NS-30, No. 4, Aug. 1983, pp. 3369-3371.|
|7||*||A.J. Stevens et al., Quench Protection Studies On CBA Magnets IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science , vol. NS 30, No. 4, Aug. 1983, pp. 3369 3371.|
|8||B. Girard et M. Sauzade, "Calcul Des Solenoides Compenses Due 6'eme Ordre A Volume De Bobinage Minimum", Nuclear Instruments And Methods 25, 1964, pp. 269-284.|
|9||*||B. Girard et M. Sauzade, Calcul Des Solenoides Compenses Due 6 eme Ordre A Volume De Bobinage Minimum , Nuclear Instruments And Methods 25, 1964, pp. 269 284.|
|10||*||Ballou and Moses, IEE Transactions on Magnetics,, vol. MAG 11, No. 2, Mar. 1975, pp. 497 499.|
|11||Ballou and Moses, IEE Transactions on Magnetics,, vol. MAG-11, No. 2, Mar. 1975, pp. 497-499.|
|12||Chapters 6 and 8 of "NMR Imaging In Biomedicine" by Mansfield and Morris, 1982.|
|13||*||Chapters 6 and 8 of NMR Imaging In Biomedicine by Mansfield and Morris, 1982.|
|14||Charles E Roos, Howard T. Coffeey, Kenneth R. Efferson, "Superconducting Magnets" Technology And Systems Engineering, pp. 115-127.|
|15||*||Charles E Roos, Howard T. Coffeey, Kenneth R. Efferson, Superconducting Magnets Technology And Systems Engineering , pp. 115 127.|
|16||Charles E. Roos, "Superconducting Magnets", pp. 115-127, Section 9 of text by C.L. Partain et al., Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, W.B. Saunders, 1983.|
|17||*||Charles E. Roos, Superconducting Magnets , pp. 115 127, Section 9 of text by C.L. Partain et al., Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, W.B. Saunders, 1983.|
|18||David Coffey et al., "The 11.7 T Solenoid of the Hyperon Bubble Chamber", Nuclear Instruments and Methods 150 (1978), pp. 377-385.|
|19||*||David Coffey et al., The 11.7 T Solenoid of the Hyperon Bubble Chamber , Nuclear Instruments and Methods 150 (1978), pp. 377 385.|
|20||David Coffey, "The 11.7T Solenoid Of The Hyperon Bubble Chamber" 2107 Nuclear Instruments & Methods vol. 150, No. 3, (Apr. 1978) pp. 377-385.|
|21||*||David Coffey, The 11.7T Solenoid Of The Hyperon Bubble Chamber 2107 Nuclear Instruments & Methods vol. 150, No. 3, (Apr. 1978) pp. 377 385.|
|22||*||Gyroscan T5 Breakthrough in MR Performance , Philips Medical Systems 11 pages.|
|23||*||Herve Saint Jalmes and Jacques Taquin, Optimization of homogeneous electromagnetic coil systems: Application to whole body NMR imaging magnets , Rev. Sci. Instrum 52 (10), Oct. 1981, pp. 1501 1508.|
|24||*||Herve Saint Jalmes and Jacques Taquin, Systems: Application to whole body NMR imaging magnets , Rev. Sci. Instrum , 52(10), Oct. 1981, pp. 1501 1508.|
|25||Herve Saint-Jalmes and Jacques Taquin, "Optimization of homogeneous electromagnetic coil systems: Application to whole-body NMR imaging magnets", Rev. Sci. Instrum 52(10), Oct. 1981, pp. 1501-1508.|
|26||Herve Saint-Jalmes and Jacques Taquin, "Systems: Application to whole-body NMR imaging magnets", Rev. Sci. Instrum, 52(10), Oct. 1981, pp. 1501-1508.|
|27||*||J.E.C. Williams et al., Magnet system of the 500 MHz NMR spectrometer at the Francis Bitter National Magnet Laboratory: 1. Design and development of the magnet, Rev. Sci. Instrum , 52(5), May 1981, pp. 649 656.|
|28||J.E.C. Williams et al., Magnet system of the 500 MHz NMR spectrometer at the Francis Bitter National Magnet Laboratory: 1. Design and development of the magnet, Rev. Sci. Instrum, 52(5), May 1981, pp. 649-656.|
|29||J.E.C. Williams, "Aspects of the Design of NMR Magnets For Analysis And Imaging", pp. 667-672, Proceedings of the Ninth International Cryogenic Engineering Conference, Kobe, Japan May 11-14 1982.|
|30||*||J.E.C. Williams, Aspects of the Design of NMR Magnets For Analysis And Imaging , pp. 667 672, Proceedings of the Ninth International Cryogenic Engineering Conference , Kobe, Japan May 11 14 1982.|
|31||J.K. Ballou et al., "External Field Reduction of Superconducting Energy Storage Solenoids", IEEE Transactions on Magnets, vol. MAG-11, No. 2, Mar. 1975, pp. 497-499.|
|32||*||J.K. Ballou et al., External Field Reduction of Superconducting Energy Storage Solenoids , IEEE Transactions on Magnets , vol. MAG 11, No. 2, Mar. 1975, pp. 497 499.|
|33||K.A. Muething, D.O. Edwards, J.D. Edwards, J.D. Feder, W.J. Gully, and H.N. Scholz, "Small solenoid with a superconducting shield for nuclear magnetic resonance near 1mK", Rev. Sci. Instrum. 53(4), Apr. 1982, American Institute of Physics, pp. 485-490.|
|34||*||K.A. Muething, D.O. Edwards, J.D. Edwards, J.D. Feder, W.J. Gully, and H.N. Scholz, Small solenoid with a superconducting shield for nuclear magnetic resonance near 1mK , Rev. Sci. Instrum. 53(4), Apr. 1982, American Institute of Physics, pp. 485 490.|
|35||K.E. Robins, et al., "Superconducting Magnet Quench Protection For Isabelle", IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. NS-24 No. 3, Jun. 1977, pp. 1318-1319.|
|36||*||K.E. Robins, et al., Superconducting Magnet Quench Protection For Isabelle , IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science , vol. NS 24 No. 3, Jun. 1977, pp. 1318 1319.|
|37||K.J. Best and B. Rothe, "A multiple purpose 7TNbTi split coil superconducting magnet system for Mossbauer spectroscopy and susceptibility measurements at various temperatures".|
|38||*||K.J. Best and B. Rothe, A multiple purpose 7TNbTi split coil superconducting magnet system for Mossbauer spectroscopy and susceptibility measurements at various temperatures .|
|39||Katsumi Kose et al., "NMR-CT Scanner", 1983, pp. 669-676.|
|40||*||Katsumi Kose et al., NMR CT Scanner , 1983, pp. 669 676.|
|41||Leon Kaufman et al, "Resonance Imaging In Medicine", Igaku-Shoin, 1981 4 pages.|
|42||*||Leon Kaufman et al, Resonance Imaging In Medicine , Igaku Shoin, 1981 4 pages.|
|43||Martin N. Wilson, "Superconducting Magnets", Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1983, Chapter 9, Section 9.8.|
|44||*||Martin N. Wilson, Superconducting Magnets , Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1983, Chapter 9, Section 9.8.|
|45||Milan Wayne Garrett, "Axially Symmetric Systems for Generating and Measuring Magnetic Fields Part I", Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 22, No. 9, Sep. 1951, pp. 1091-1107.|
|46||*||Milan Wayne Garrett, Axially Symmetric Systems for Generating and Measuring Magnetic Fields Part I , Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 22, No. 9, Sep. 1951, pp. 1091 1107.|
|47||Milan Wayne Garrettt, "Thick Cylindrical Coil Systems For Strong Magnetic Fields With Field or Gradient Homogeneities of the 6th to 20th Order", Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 38, No. 6, May 1967, pp. 2563-2586.|
|48||*||Milan Wayne Garrettt, Thick Cylindrical Coil Systems For Strong Magnetic Fields With Field or Gradient Homogeneities of the 6th to 20th Order , Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 38, No. 6, May 1967, pp. 2563 2586.|
|49||*||Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Medicine and Biology , Peter G. Morris, OMT data (acknowledged Feb. 1984) for conventional MRI magnets quoted in Morris (OUP, 1986).|
|50||Peter Burglund and Matti Savelainen, "A Superconducting Magnet For Whole Body NMR-Imaging", pp. 673-676.|
|51||*||Peter Burglund and Matti Savelainen, A Superconducting Magnet For Whole Body NMR Imaging , pp. 673 676.|
|52||Peter G. Morris, "Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Medicine and Biology", Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, pp. 189-215, 253-255, 1986.|
|53||*||Peter G. Morris, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Medicine and Biology , Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, pp. 189 215, 253 255, 1986.|
|54||*||possible Webster s New Collegiate Dictionary, 1973.|
|55||Solenoid Magnet Design, "The Magnetic and Mechanical Aspects of Resistive and Superconducting Systems", Bruce Montgomery, 1969 pp. 1-311.|
|56||*||Solenoid Magnet Design, The Magnetic and Mechanical Aspects of Resistive and Superconducting Systems , Bruce Montgomery, 1969 pp. 1 311.|
|57||*||Solid State Devices Manual, 1975, RCA Corp., pp. 242 243.|
|58||Solid-State Devices Manual, 1975, RCA Corp., pp. 242-243.|
|59||Teruo Noguchi, "High Homogenious Field Superconducting Magnet", Sep. 1, 1976, pp. 241-251, vol. 11, No. 6 No translation.|
|60||*||Teruo Noguchi, High Homogenious Field Superconducting Magnet , Sep. 1, 1976, pp. 241 251, vol. 11, No. 6 No translation.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6369464 *||Jul 2, 1999||Apr 9, 2002||Bruker Ag||Active shielded superconducting assembly with compensation of magnetic field disturbances|
|US7286033 *||Jun 12, 2002||Oct 23, 2007||Japan Science And Technology Corporation||Ferro-magnetic force field generator|
|US7317369 *||Aug 31, 2005||Jan 8, 2008||Bruker Biospin Gmbh||Superconductor magnet coil configuration|
|US7538649 *||Jan 16, 2007||May 26, 2009||Hitachi, Ltd.||Superconducting electromagnet|
|US7560929||Aug 14, 2006||Jul 14, 2009||Fonar Corporation||Ferromagnetic frame magnet with superconducting coils|
|US8054077||Jun 17, 2009||Nov 8, 2011||Fonar Corporation||Ferromagnetic frame magnet with superconducting coils|
|US8395468||Jan 4, 2007||Mar 12, 2013||University Of Utah Research Foundation||High field strength magentic field generation system and associated methods|
|US8712706 *||Dec 1, 2010||Apr 29, 2014||Nanalysis Corp.||Method and apparatus for producing homogeneous magnetic fields|
|US20040119568 *||Jun 12, 2002||Jun 24, 2004||Osamu Ozaki||Ferro-magnetic force field generator|
|US20070008055 *||Aug 31, 2005||Jan 11, 2007||Bruker Biospin Gmbh||Superconductor magnet coil configuration|
|US20070216506 *||Jan 16, 2007||Sep 20, 2007||Takeshi Nakayama||Superconducting electromagnet|
|US20080036463 *||Aug 14, 2006||Feb 14, 2008||Fonar Corporation||Ferromagnetic frame magnet with superconducting coils|
|US20090256663 *||Jun 17, 2009||Oct 15, 2009||Fonar Corporation||Ferromagnetic frame magnet with superconducting coils|
|US20090302984 *||Jan 4, 2007||Dec 10, 2009||Stephenson James C||High field strength magentic field generation system and associated methods|
|US20110137589 *||Jun 9, 2011||Nanalysis Corp.||Method and apparatus for producing homogeneous magnetic fields|
|International Classification||G01R33/3815, G01R33/421|
|Cooperative Classification||G01R33/421, G01R33/3815|
|Nov 20, 1998||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: OXFORD MEDICAL LIMITED, CANADA
Free format text: CERTIFICATION OF INCORPORATION ON CHANGE OF NAME NO. 1675071, DATED SEPTEMBER 1,1989; CERTIFACTION OF INCORPORATION ON CHANGE OF NAME NO. 1675071, DATED JANURARY 22, 1991;ASSIGNOR:OXFORD ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:009646/0186
Effective date: 19910122
Owner name: OXFORD MEDICAL LIMITED, ENGLAND
Free format text: (INVALID RECORDING) DOCUMENT RE-RECORDED TO SEPARATE 2 CHANGE OF NAME DOCUMENTS INADVERTENTLY RECORDED AS ONE.;ASSIGNORS:OXFORD MAGNET TECHNOLOGY LIMITED;OXFORD ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:009600/0026;SIGNING DATES FROM 19890901 TO 19910122
|Mar 29, 1999||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: OXFORD ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, SCOTLAND
Free format text: CERTIFICATION OF INCORPORATION ON CHANGE OF NAME NO. 16750771 DATED SEPTEMBER 1 1989 CERTIFICATION OF INCORPORATION ON CHANGE OF NAME 1675071 DATED JANUARY 22, 1991;ASSIGNOR:OXFORD MAGNET TECHNOLOGY LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:009646/0216
Effective date: 19890901