|Publication number||USRE36912 E|
|Application number||US 09/083,667|
|Publication date||Oct 17, 2000|
|Filing date||May 22, 1998|
|Priority date||Dec 29, 1995|
|Also published as||CN1124439C, CN1206453A, DE69630895D1, DE69630895T2, EP0883779A1, EP0883779A4, EP0883779B1, US5613453, WO1997024558A1|
|Publication number||083667, 09083667, US RE36912 E, US RE36912E, US-E-RE36912, USRE36912 E, USRE36912E|
|Inventors||John L. Donovan|
|Original Assignee||Abc-Naco Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (22), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (29), Classifications (21), Legal Events (17)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention relates to a method and apparatus for containing, controlling and suppressing the detonation of explosives, particularly for the explosion working of metals, and for the disposal of unwanted explosive and toxic materials.
Explosives have many useful industrial applications including surface hardening of austenitic manganese alloy steels, surface deposition coating, welding of metallic components, compression molding of components from powders and granular media, and disposal of unwanted explosive or toxic materials.
The prior art reflects many attempts to contain the explosion process for the suppression of noise, shock and noxious polluting explosion products.
Hampel U.S. Pat. No. 5,419,862 discloses a large explosion chamber in which an explosive work piece is introduced in through an air lock into a vacuum chamber where it is detonated, and after detonation the explosion products are allowed to escape into the atmosphere. The chamber is mechanically secured by anchor rods to a foundation.
Gambarov, et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,100,783 discloses a cylindrical containment vessel, split along its diameter for separation, and openable for the insertion of large work pieces such as railway frogs, stone crusher wear parts and the like. After insertion of a work piece and explosive charge, the chamber is closed and locked and the explosive detonated by a built-in detonating device. The explosion combustion products are allowed to exhaust to the atmosphere through an air valve.
Deribas U.S. Pat. No. 4,085,883 and Minin U.S. Pat. No. 4,081,982 disclose spherical containment vessels with a bottom opening through which a work piece incorporating an explosive is introduced through an elevator means, and continuous feed wire electrodes are used to make contact with an electrically initiated detonator when the work piece is in place. The latter patent also discloses means for introducing an internal liquid spray after the explosion for the purpose of neutralizing toxic by-products of the explosion.
Smirnov, et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,079,612 discloses a roughly hemispherical containment vessel mounted on a concrete foundation with a shock-absorbing work table for supporting the work piece and explosive material, which are detonated through electric ignition wires leading through openings in the containment vessel to the outside.
A different approach is disclosed by Paton, et al. U.S. Pat. No. 3,910,084 in which multiple closed-end pipes are disposed radially around a central column in which the explosion is initiated, with the shock waves dampened by internal baffles within the tubes. Access is gained to the chamber through a removable top cover plate.
Klein, et al. U.S. Pat. No. 3,611,766 discloses a vertical explosion chamber incorporating a cushioned work table for supporting the work piece and explosive charge, and an internal shock-mounted mechanical dampening means consisting of a steel grate for absorbing the explosive pressure waves. Klein U.S. Pat. No. 3,464,249 discloses a similar containment vessel, in this case spherical, with a bottom covering of loose granular material such as sand which supports the work piece and explosive charge. The explosion products are discharged through a vertical pipe containing a noise silencer, and the entire assembly is supported by shock absorbing means in a reinforced brick or concrete pit for the further suppression of shock and noise.
All of the above prior art devices represent improvements over the methods first used for explosion hardening of manganese steel rail components which involved placing the explosive-covered work piece in an open field, or at the bottom of an open pit such an abandoned gravel pit, and setting off the explosion in the open air with resultant noise, dust, disturbance and contamination of the environment. In addition, the uncontrolled use of explosives required great amounts of space, posed substantial danger to equipment and personnel, and had the undesirable effect of demolishing the ignition leads, the work piece support surface, and everything else within the immediate vicinity of the explosion.
It is therefore the principal object of the present invention to provide an improved method and apparatus for containing, controlling and suppressing the effects of explosive detonations used for industrial purposes. The purpose of the invention is to provide a containment device which can contain and suppress each explosion so that it poses no hazard to surrounding plant and equipment, or to the environment.
A further object is to provide such a method and apparatus which permits rapid and convenient charging and removal of work pieces, thereby achieving much higher rates of production than have been possible using prior art devices and techniques. A related object is to provide an explosive containment vessel which can be constructed inexpensively of common materials using conventional welding techniques but which is sturdy enough to withstand months and years of continuous use without deterioration. A related object is to provide such a device in which inexpensive consumable materials, such as silica sand and pea gravel, are used as damping and shock absorbing agents, rather than complex and expensive internal springs, metal grates, and the like.
Another object is to provide an explosion containment chamber which is readily opened from one end to allow charging and removal of work pieces by conventional means such as a forklift truck, and to allow easy entrance and exit by maintenance personnel. A further object is to provide quick and efficient removal of gaseous explosion by-products after detonation so that maintenance personnel can immediately enter the chamber to remove the treated work piece and put another in place for the next operation.
Still another object is to provide an internal ignition system in which the electrical leads for the detonation initiation system are protected from blast effect and are reusable for a great number of explosion cycles, rather than being destroyed and having to be replaced after each cycle.
Another principal object of the invention is to provide a means of quickly removing and treating the gaseous explosion by-products by passing them through a scrubber system, so that operating personnel can re-enter the chamber immediately while the scrubber continues to process the products of the previous explosion as a new work piece and explosive charge are being readied. Also, it is an object of the scrubber system to further dampen and suppress shock and noise from each detonation by virtue of the extended travel path of the explosion products as they pass through the scrubber.
Finally, a particularly important object of the invention is to provide a simple and inexpensive means for absorbing the unused energy of the explosion, for instantaneously reducing temperatures and pressures within the chamber, while at the same time suppressing dust and particulate matter in the explosion by-products.
The improved explosion chamber of the invention comprises an elongate double-walled steel explosion chamber anchored to a concrete foundation, and having a double-walled access door for charging new work pieces, and a double-walled vent door for discharging the products of the explosion. The double walls of the chamber, access door and vent door are filled with granular shock damping material such as silica sand, and the floor of the chamber is covered with granular shock-damping bed such as pea gravel.
Along the outside of the chamber are steel manifolds from which a linear array of vent pipes penetrates the double walls of the chamber, with each pipe terminating in a hardened steel orifice through which the explosion combustion products pass.
Within the chamber, plastic polymer film bags containing water are suspended from steel wires over the explosive material, and at each end of the chamber. Electrical igniter lead wires enter the chamber through a steel hood having a downward-facing access opening positioned in a protected location below the surface of the granular bed, but accessible by an operator for quickly attaching an electrical blasting cap.
The access and vent door are interlocked with the electrical igniter to block ignition unless both doors are positively shut. When the doors are opened after a detonation, a vent fan is positioned to exhaust explosion combustion products from the chamber and to draw fresh air in through the access door. The manifolds and vent door discharge into a scrubber for further cooling and environmental treatment of the gaseous combustion products.
The method of operation of the invention comprises the steps of placing an explosive work piece through the access door and onto the granular bed, suspending plastic bags containing an amount of water approximating the weight of explosive, attaching an electrical blasting cap to the igniter lead wires, closing the access and vent door, electrically detonating the explosive, immediately opening both access and vent door, and using fan means for exhausting the combustion products of the detonation from the chamber in preparation for inserting the next explosive work piece.
The gaseous combustion products exiting the manifolds and vent discharge are then cooled and environmentally treated in a scrubber before being released to the atmosphere.
In the drawings,
FIG. 1 is a cut-away perspective view of .[.access door 6 end of.]. the improved explosion containment chamber of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a cut-away partial perspective view of the opposite end of the chamber of FIG. 1, including a scrubber for cleaning the gaseous explosion products before venting them to the atmosphere;
FIG. 3 is a partial sectional plan view of the explosion chamber of the preceding figures;
FIG. 4 is a partial sectional side elevation of the explosion chamber of the preceding figures;
FIG. 5 is a reduced-scale sectional plan view of the full length of the explosion chamber of the preceding figures showing a railroad track work piece in place for explosion hardening treatment;
FIG. 6 is a sectional end elevation showing the access door 6 end of the explosion chamber of the preceding figures;
FIG. 7 is a sectional end elevation showing the vent door 7 end of the explosion chamber of the preceding figures, with a piece of rail trackwork in place for treatment; and
FIG. 8 is an enlarged partial sectional end elevation of the ignition wire entry point into the explosion chamber of the preceding figures.
Turning to the drawings, FIG. 1 is a sectional perspective of the improved explosion chamber of the present invention. The chamber comprises an inner casing 1 having a ceiling, floor, side walls and ends, being fabricated of sheet steel using conventional welding techniques. Surrounding the inner casing 1 are a plurality of spaced circumstantial flanges or ribs 2 over which a welded sheet steel outer casing 3 is constructed so that the ribs 2 cause the outer casing 3 to be spaced from the inner casing 1 and leaving a gap which is then filled with a granular shock-damping material .Iadd.4.Iaddend.. In the preferred embodiment, the inner and outer metal casings are constructed of three-quarter inch thick sheet steel separated by circumferential steel I-beam ribs 2 spaced every two feet. All seams are continuous-welded. According to the invention, the space between the inner and outer casing 3 is filled with a firm, granular shock-absorbing material, preferably silica sand.
The explosion chamber is anchored by bolts or other suitable means (not shown) to a reinforced concrete foundation 5. In the preferred embodiment shown, the inside dimensions of the explosion chamber are: eight feet high, six feet wide, and fifty feet long. The reinforced concrete foundation 5 is preferably at least four feet thick.
As one of the major advantages of the invention, the internal dimensions of the chamber allow an operator to enter, stand up and work easily, and its length permits long pre-welded sections of railroad trackwork to be inserted and explosion-hardened, which was not possible in prior art explosion chambers.
The chamber is provided with two doors, an access door 6, and a vent door 7. Both doors are constructed of double-walled welded steel similar to the chamber walls, and each is hinged to open in an inward direction. The door jambs are constructed so that each door fits in a sealing relationship so that increased pressure within the chamber causes the door to seal tighter against its frame. The volume within the double-walled doors is also filled with shock-damping material, preferably silica sand.
The floor of the chamber is preferably covered with a bed 8 of granular shock-damping material, preferably pea gravel, to a uniform depth of about one foot, thereby forming a support surface for the work piece and explosive to be detonated.
To initiate ignition of the explosive, electrical wire firing leads 9 penetrate the chamber through a pressure-sealed opening 10 and emerge through a welded sheet steel shield box or hood 11 having a downward-facing opening positioned below the surface of the granular shock-damping material. To prepare the work piece and charge for detonation, a suitable electric detonator cap 12 is inserted into the explosive charge and the ends of its wire leads 13 are routed over to the firing wire hood 11. The pea gravel is scooped away to expose the ends of the firing wire leads 9, the leads are twisted together to complete the firing circuit, and then the pea gravel is swept back over the detonator cap leads 13 to again surround and enclose the open end of the hood 11. While the detonator cap leads 13 are substantially disintegrated by the explosion, the firing wire leads 9 remain protected under the hood 11 and may be re-used repeatedly.
As a principal feature of the invention, shock suppression means are provided for the chamber in the form of a plurality of vent pipes disposed along the centerline of each interior side wall of the chamber, with each vent pipe communicating through the chamber double wall into an elongated steel manifold 15 means extending alongside the chamber on each side and terminating in a discharge outlet 16. In the preferred embodiment each manifold 15 is ten inches square and is fabricated by continuous-seam welding from one-half 2 inch steel plate. The ribs 2 consist of eighteen-inch I-beam sections spaced at two foot intervals. The vent pipes 14 are of two inch diameter steel tubing, and like the ribs 2 are spaced at two foot intervals. Where it connects to the inner wall of the chamber, each vent pipe is fitted .[.at.]. with a hardened steel orifice 17 three-quarters of an inch in diameter. In the preferred embodiment, the fifty-foot chamber has twenty-four vent pipes 14 and orifice 17 per side, for a total of forty-eight vent pipes 14 and orifice 17 in all.
Within the chamber, square corners are avoided because of the tendency of explosives to exert unusually high pressures at such critical points. Therefore, a fillet piece 18 is welded into each corner to break the 90° square corner into two 45°, which has the effect of rounding the corner and eliminating stress-raising corners or pockets which would otherwise impose undesirable destructive forces on the corner welds.
In the preferred embodiment of the invention, additional sound suppression is obtained by coating the exterior surfaces of the outer chamber and manifold 15 with a polyurethane rigid foam coating 20 of known composition to a depth of at least four inches. The entire foam-covered structure is further enclosed in an enclosure such as a sturdy wooden shed (not shown) having screened ventilating slots to permit free circulation of air.
To open and close the access and vent door 7, double-acting hydraulic cylinders 19 are provided. As a further feature of the invention, important safety objectives are realized by providing each door with sensor means 21 as part of an electrical interlock (not shown) between the access door 6, vent door 7 and ignition means, whereby the access door 6 must both be in a closed and sealed position before the ignition means can be energized. In this way it is impossible to inadvertently detonate an explosive charge prematurely before the doors are fully closed, the result of which would be substantial destruction and damage to equipment such as the vent fan 22, not to mention the risk of bodily injury to operating personnel in the vicinity of the access door 6.
In the preferred embodiment the chamber ceiling is fitted with a welded I-beam for use as a trolley to insert and remove particularly long lengths of steel trackwork or other work pieces of a similar shape.
Another principal feature of the invention is the provision for each explosion of .[.a.]. liquid-filled energy absorption modules disposed roughly along the interior centerline of the chamber. These devices serve to cool the gaseous explosion products, and to suppress dust and debris in the chamber after each explosion.
In the preferred embodiment, the energy absorption devices are simple self-sealing polyethylene bags filled with water and hung on hanger wires 25 approximately along the center line of the chamber above and around the work piece and explosive charge. It has been discovered that commercially available "Zip-Lock" brand sandwich bags, six by eight inches in dimension and 0.002 inches (two mils) thick are satisfactory for this purpose. While water is preferable, any suitable energy-absorbing vaporizable material can also be used.
According to the invention, the volume of water placed in the chamber for each explosion is selected to be approximately equal in weight to the amount of explosive to be detonated. This volume of water is distributed among several bags which are then hung in a staggered array approximately along the center line of the chamber in the vicinity of the explosive. Preferably, the water bags 24 are hung on the hooked ends of nine-gauge steel rods .[.are.]. welded to the ceiling of the chamber.
By using the water-filled energy absorption means, it has been found that the instantaneous theoretical pressure of the explosion is reduced by more than half, and the introduction of moisture into the chamber at the moment of detonation and thereafter has a beneficial effect of suppressing dust and cooling the explosion products instantly. In contrast to explosions without the use of the water-filled bags, the perceived impact and noise of the explosion is substantially reduced, and operating personnel are .[.enabled.]. .Iadd.able .Iaddend.to enter the chamber immediately after each detonation to remove one work piece and replace it with the next.
It has also been found in practice that the beneficial effects of the water bags 24 are enhanced if an additional water bag 26 is placed at each end of the chamber, away from the work piece, approximately four feet from the access door 6, and twelve feet from the vent door 7, although other spacings are satisfactory also.
In practice, using the water bags 24 in the manner of the invention results in the complete vaporization of both the water and the polyethylene bags, serving to absorb and suppress the undesired shock of the explosion, while leaving behind virtually no debris or residue. After each explosion, the access door 6 can be opened immediately, and all that can be seen are wisps of water vapor which are swept out the vent door 7 in the manner described further herein.
According to another important feature of the invention, all gaseous explosion by-products are quickly exhausted from the chamber in a controlled manner. After each explosion, the vent door 7 and access door 6 are simultaneously opened, the vent fan 22 is energized, and the gaseous explosion products from the chamber are drawn through the vent door 7 opening while the atmosphere in the chamber is replaced with fresh air drawn through the open access door 6. In practice, using the method and apparatus describe, it has been found that the access and vent door 7 may be immediately opened after each explosion, thereby permitting operating personnel to enter the chamber immediately after each explosion to remove the treated work piece and replace it with the next.
Another major feature of the present invention is that all gaseous explosion products are controllably discharged and directed into a suitable environmental treatment means such as a scrubber 27. In the illustrated embodiment, a water-spray scrubber 27 of conventional construction is used to receive the discharge from both side-mounted manifold 15, and from the vent fan 22 as well, so that no gaseous explosion products escape to the atmosphere untreated. In addition, the tortuous path offered by the scrubber 27 creates a further level of advantageous shock and noise suppression.
To permit the refilling of gaps in the chamber walls caused by settling of the shock damping silica sand, a bin or hopper 28 is provided above the chamber with spaced openings 29 through which sand may move to replace lost volume as the sand in the walls settles or compacts with each detonation. It has been found that despite such compaction, the use of silica sand (as opposed to masonry sand) does not result in any diminishing of the shock-damping effect.
Despite the immense destructive forces of each explosive detonation, the chamber of the present invention, with its vent pipes 14 and energy absorbing liquid modules, has been found in practice to diminish the surplus destructive energy of each explosion to a point where the trolley beam 23 is virtually unaffected. Similarly, the depending wires for hanging the energy absorption water bags 24 are virtually unaffected after each blast. This allows the chamber to be used continuously, with a productive output of as many as 10 or 12 explosions per hour, which is an order of magnitude greater than permitted by any of the explosion chambers of the prior art, or by conventional open-pit explosive techniques.
In practice, with the preferred embodiment described, the method and apparatus of the present invention has been successfully utilized to safely detonate explosive charges in a wide range of sizes, ranging from two to fifteen pounds of C2 plastic explosive (also know as PETN), with minimal amounts of shock, noise and adverse effect on the environment. Surprisingly, it has been found that business office operations in an adjoining office building only two hundred feet away from the explosion chamber can be conducted in a completely normal manner, with the explosions being indistinguishable from the ordinary background noise of the office environment.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3408432 *||Aug 20, 1965||Oct 29, 1968||Guenter W. Tumm||Apparatus and method for coating, molding and hardening work pieces|
|US3464249 *||Nov 25, 1966||Sep 2, 1969||Beteiligungs & Patentverw Gmbh||Method of and apparatus for explosive treatment of metals|
|US3485075 *||Oct 18, 1967||Dec 23, 1969||Ryabukha Alexandr Yakovlevich||High energy forming vacuum chamber|
|US3611766 *||Jan 21, 1969||Oct 12, 1971||Krupp Gmbh||Detonation chamber for explosive working of metals|
|US3800715 *||Feb 28, 1973||Apr 2, 1974||W Boller||Bomb recovery and shield apparatus|
|US3903814 *||Nov 13, 1974||Sep 9, 1975||Olin Corp||Method for destruction of pyrotechnic waste|
|US3910084 *||Mar 21, 1974||Oct 7, 1975||Bushtedt Jury Petrovich||Apparatus for explosive working of metals|
|US3915104 *||Nov 1, 1974||Oct 28, 1975||Raytheon Co||Incinerator wall and door structure|
|US4079612 *||Sep 28, 1976||Mar 21, 1978||Polikarp Polikarpovich Smirnov||Arrangement for explosion treatment of materials|
|US4081982 *||Oct 12, 1976||Apr 4, 1978||Vladilen Fedorovich Minin||Plant for explosion working of materials|
|US4085883 *||Sep 22, 1976||Apr 25, 1978||Andrei Andreevich Deribas||Installation for explosive treatment of materials|
|US4100783 *||Feb 14, 1977||Jul 18, 1978||Vitaly Stepanovich Gambarov||Installation for explosion machining of articles|
|US4174624 *||Jul 26, 1978||Nov 20, 1979||Shrum Lorne R||Tank for explosive forming|
|US4248342 *||Sep 24, 1979||Feb 3, 1981||King Paul V||Blast suppressive shielding|
|US4325309 *||Sep 17, 1979||Apr 20, 1982||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Blast suppressive shielding|
|US4686911 *||Apr 4, 1986||Aug 18, 1987||Dts, Inc.||Blast suppression device|
|US4781145 *||Jul 25, 1986||Nov 1, 1988||Amlinsky Roman A||Detonation deposition apparatus|
|US4836079 *||Jan 11, 1988||Jun 6, 1989||Cube Overseas Trading Ltd||Bomb blast inhibitor and method of bomb blast inhibition|
|US5339666 *||May 18, 1993||Aug 23, 1994||Nkk Corporation||Apparatus for generating a detonation pressure|
|US5419862 *||May 27, 1992||May 30, 1995||Hampel; Heinrich||Process for the low-pollution operation of an explosion device and suitable explosion device for implementing this process|
|US5495812 *||May 5, 1992||Mar 5, 1996||Bowas-Induplan Chemie Ges.M.B.H.||Plant for incinerating explosive substances|
|US5792978 *||May 27, 1997||Aug 11, 1998||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy||Barge strike explosive clearance system|
|1||Palamarchuk et al., "Shock Waves and Their Suppression by Foam in Explosive Treatment of Welded Joints", Avtom Svarka 1 (Dialog search abstract only), Jan. 1995.|
|2||*||Palamarchuk et al., Shock Waves and Their Suppression by Foam in Explosive Treatment of Welded Joints , Avtom Svarka 1 (Dialog search abstract only), Jan. 1995.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6354181 *||Dec 9, 1999||Mar 12, 2002||John L. Donovan||Method and apparatus for the destruction of suspected terrorist weapons by detonation in a contained environment|
|US6431094 *||Feb 13, 2001||Aug 13, 2002||Advanced Environmental Technology, Inc.||Reactive waste deactivation facility and method|
|US6644165||May 23, 2002||Nov 11, 2003||Nabco, Inc.||Explosion containment vessel|
|US6647851||Jan 11, 2002||Nov 18, 2003||Demil International, Inc.||Method for suppressing ejection of fragments and shrapnel during destruction of shrapnel munitions|
|US6705242||Jan 8, 2002||Mar 16, 2004||Ch2M Hill Constructors, Inc.||Method and apparatus for hermetically sealing openings of an explosion containment chamber|
|US7398720 *||Mar 22, 2005||Jul 15, 2008||National Institute Of Advanced Industrial Science And Technology||Blasting method|
|US7418895||Dec 23, 2003||Sep 2, 2008||Demil International, Inc.||Purging an airlock of an explosion containment chamber|
|US7506568||Nov 5, 2004||Mar 24, 2009||Nabco, Inc.||Sealed upscale total containment vessel|
|US7700047||Jun 6, 2007||Apr 20, 2010||Ch2M Hill Constructors, Inc.||System and method for treatment of hazardous materials, e.g., unexploded chemical warfare ordinance|
|US7703370 *||May 6, 2005||Apr 27, 2010||Lockheed Martin Corporation||Apparatus and method for inhibiting inadvertent initiation of a munition|
|US7765910||Feb 12, 2009||Aug 3, 2010||Nabco, Inc.||Sealed upscale total containment vessel|
|US7913571||Feb 28, 2006||Mar 29, 2011||Kobe Steel, Ltd.||Apparatus for estimating residual life of blasting vessel, method of estimating residual life, and blasting facility|
|US8002047||Aug 23, 2011||Rohm And Haas Company||Method and apparatus for deflagration pressure attenuation|
|US8006600||Mar 6, 2006||Aug 30, 2011||Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho||Multiple blasting treating method|
|US8042446||Mar 6, 2006||Oct 25, 2011||National Institute Of Advanced Industrial Science And Technology||Pressure-resistant vessel and blasting facility having the same|
|US8387503 *||Jul 20, 2007||Mar 5, 2013||Tda Armements S.A.S.||Pyrotechnic device for destroying ammunitions|
|US8621973||Jun 11, 2011||Jan 7, 2014||American Innovations, Inc.||Portable explosion containment chamber|
|US20050022656 *||Dec 23, 2003||Feb 3, 2005||Donovan John L.||Purging an airlock of an explosion containment chamber|
|US20070151437 *||Mar 22, 2005||Jul 5, 2007||National Institute Of Advanced Industrial Science And Technology||Blasting method|
|US20090044690 *||Nov 5, 2004||Feb 19, 2009||Nabco, Inc.||Sealed upscale total containment vessel|
|US20090081928 *||Mar 6, 2006||Mar 26, 2009||National Inst Of Adv Industrial Science And Tech.||Blasting treating method|
|US20090095146 *||Mar 6, 2006||Apr 16, 2009||National Institute Of Advanced Indust Sci & Tech||Pressure-resistant vessel and blasting facility having the same|
|US20090158977 *||Feb 12, 2009||Jun 25, 2009||Nabco, Inc.||Sealed Upscale Total Containment Vessel|
|US20090277655 *||Nov 12, 2009||Decourcy Michael S||Method and apparatus for deflagration pressure attenuation|
|US20090308235 *||Jul 20, 2007||Dec 17, 2009||Tda Armements Sas||Pyrotechnic device for destroying ammunitions|
|US20100064926 *||May 6, 2005||Mar 18, 2010||Melin Roger W||Apparatus and method for inhibiting inadvertent initiation of a munition|
|WO2003058157A1||Dec 30, 2002||Jul 17, 2003||Demill International, Inc||Method and apparatus for hermetically sealing openings of an explosion containment chamber|
|WO2003060420A1||Dec 30, 2002||Jul 24, 2003||Demil International, Inc||A method for suppressing ejection of fragments and shrapnel during destruction of shrapnel munitions|
|WO2005024336A2||May 5, 2004||Mar 17, 2005||Ch2M Hill, Inc.||System and method for treatment of hazardous materials, e.g., unexploded chemical warfare ordinance|
|U.S. Classification||110/237, 72/56, 110/346, 86/50|
|International Classification||F42B3/00, F42B33/00, B21D26/08, B21J5/04, B30B5/00, B21D26/02, A62D3/00, C21D1/06, F42D5/04, F23G7/00, F42B33/06, F42D5/045, F23N5/24|
|Cooperative Classification||F42D5/045, F42B33/06|
|European Classification||F42D5/045, F42B33/06|
|Jul 3, 2000||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ABC-NACO INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DONOVAN, JOHN L.;REEL/FRAME:010942/0252
Effective date: 20000623
|May 17, 2001||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ING FURMAN SELZ INVESTORS III LP, NEW YORK
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ABC - NACO, INC.;REEL/FRAME:011806/0126
Effective date: 20010502
|Jun 20, 2001||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ILLINOIS
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ABC-NACO INC.;REEL/FRAME:011911/0224
Effective date: 20010502
|Sep 26, 2001||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ING FURMAN SELZ INVESTORS III LP, NEW YORK
Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ABC-NACO INC.;REEL/FRAME:012188/0826
Effective date: 20010502
|Jan 10, 2002||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ABC-NACO INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: DOCUMENT ID NO.;ASSIGNOR:ING FURMAN SELZ INVESTORS III LP;REEL/FRAME:012831/0579
Effective date: 20010502
|Jan 17, 2002||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ABC-NACO INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:012520/0600
Effective date: 20011227
|Feb 12, 2002||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ABLECO FINANCE LLC, NEW YORK
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:TCF RAILCO INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORP.;REEL/FRAME:012621/0753
Effective date: 20020114
|Jun 6, 2002||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ABC-NACO INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DONOVAN, JOHN L.;REEL/FRAME:012958/0075
Effective date: 20010910
|Jun 7, 2002||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MERIDIAN RAIL INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORP., ILLINOIS
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:TCF RAILCO INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORP.;REEL/FRAME:012937/0913
Effective date: 20020123
|Jun 12, 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DONOVAN EDH & TRACKWORK SOLUTIONS INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MERIDIAN RAIL INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORP.;REEL/FRAME:014154/0887
Effective date: 20030417
|Nov 19, 2004||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Nov 19, 2004||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
Year of fee payment: 7
|Jan 10, 2008||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: UNITRAC RAILROAD MATERIALS, INC., VIRGINIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DONOVAN ENTERPRISES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:020353/0063
Effective date: 20070917
|Sep 25, 2008||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Jul 20, 2012||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: UNITRAC RAILROAD MATERIALS, INC., VIRGINIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DONOVAN EDH AND TRACKWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:028604/0576
Effective date: 20111114
|Jul 25, 2012||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: PROGRESS RAIL SERVICES CORPORATION, ALABAMA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:UNITRAC RAILROAD MATERIALS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:028639/0078
Effective date: 20111115
|Oct 8, 2014||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DONOVAN, JOHN L., ILLINOIS
Free format text: LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:MERIDIAN RAIL INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORP. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TCF RAILCO INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORP.);REEL/FRAME:033914/0411
Effective date: 20020806
Owner name: DEMIL INTERNATIONAL, INC., COLORADO
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DEMIL INTERNATIONAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:033913/0930
Effective date: 20020806
Owner name: DEMIL INTERNATIONAL, INC., AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DEMIL INTERNATIONAL, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:033915/0188
Effective date: 20030326
Owner name: DEMIL INTERNATIONAL, INC, ALABAMA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DONOVAN, JOHN L.;REEL/FRAME:033914/0964
Effective date: 20020807
Owner name: CH2M HILL DEMILITARIZATION, INC., COLORADO
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:DEMIL INTERNATIONAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:033917/0794
Effective date: 20060202