|Publication number||USRE37181 E1|
|Application number||US 09/198,506|
|Publication date||May 22, 2001|
|Filing date||Nov 24, 1998|
|Priority date||Dec 9, 1988|
|Also published as||US4911843, USRE36651|
|Publication number||09198506, 198506, US RE37181 E1, US RE37181E1, US-E1-RE37181, USRE37181 E1, USRE37181E1|
|Inventors||David J. Hunniford, H. Forbes Davis|
|Original Assignee||U.S. Filter Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (29), Non-Patent Citations (36), Referenced by (23), Classifications (18), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Appl. Ser. No. 08/437,874, filed May 9, 1995 and Appl. Ser. No. 09/198,506, filed Nov. 24, 1998, and are each reissues of U.S. Pat. No. 4,911,843 (which issued from Appl. Ser. No. 07/281,747, filed Dec. 9, 1988 ) Appl. Ser. No. 09/198,506 is a Continuation of Appl. Ser. No. 08/437,874, now U.S. Pat. No. Re. 36,651.
This invention relates to a process for the removal or reduction of dissolved hydrogen sulfide, and reduction of BOD in sewer systems, municipal waste treatment plants and in other industrial waste applications.
It is known to add nitrates or nitrites to sewage to effect reduction in BOD and even to suppress the formation of hydrogen sulfide gas via bacterial action. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,300,404; 4,446,031; and 4,681,687.
It is also known to add nitrates to sewage in order to control objectionable odors. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,966,450; 4,108,771.
There have also been attempts to remove hydrogen sulfide directly from waste. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,680,127, the patentee adds amounts of glyoxal, or glyoxal in combination with formaldehyde or glutaraldehyde, in order to reduce or scavenge the amount of hydrogen sulfide in aqueous or wet gaseous mediums.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,501,668, the patentee utilizes polycondensation products produced by the condensation of acrolein and formaldehyde to eliminate hydrogen sulfide present in aqueous systems, such as waste water clarification plants. Merk also mentions benefits relating to corrosion prevention and deodorization.
In U.S. Pat. No. 3,959,130, the patentee decontaminates sewage systems, waste water treatment plants and other industrial waste applications containing hydrogen sulfide by adjusting the pH of the sewage of a value over 7.0 and bringing the sewage into contact with an ash product.
It has now been discovered that the addition of nitrate, via an aqueous sodium nitrate solution, to sewage systems, waste treatment plants and other industrial waste applications containing dissolved hydrogen sulfide will result in the elimination or substantial reduction of the hydrogen sulfide, as well as the elimination of other “minor” odors associated with other sulphur-containing compounds.
It is believed that the addition of nitrate provides an oxygen source which promotes the growth of naturally occurring bacteria which utilize in their metabolism the sulfur tied up as hydrogen sulfide. It has been demonstrated both in lab jar tests and in an actual sewage collection system test, that dosing sewage containing over 50 mg/L of dissolved hydrogen sulfide with a sodium nitrate solution reduces the dissolved hydrogen sulfide to less than 0.1 mg/L. Along with this phenomena a significant reduction in sewage biological oxygen demand, BOD, of up to about 70%, and overall “sweetening”, i.e., removal of other minor odors, of the sewage has been observed. These phenomena are believed to be the results of the biological process promoted by the nitrate addition.
More specifically, it has been found that 2.4 parts of nitrate oxygen (NO3—O) are necessary to remove 1 part dissolved sulfide (S2−). The source of nitrate to accomplish removal of the hydrogen sulfide is not specific, and aqueous solutions of both sodium nitrate and calcium nitrate appear to be suitable.
Because the necessary reaction is biochemical, it will not occur within a sterile solution, i.e., naturally occurring bacteria must be present. Moreover, the removal of hydrogen sulfide is not instantaneous. According to applicant's tests, an “incubation” period of about 8 to about 96 hours, and preferably about 24 to about 48 hours, is necessary to culture the bacteria, followed by about 1.5 to about 20 hours, and preferably about 3 to about 12 hours, for ongoing sulfide removal.
It has further been determined that the process in accordance with this invention achieves a significant reduction in sewage BOD due to the utilization of organic matter in the metabolism described.
Other objects and advantages will become apparent from the detailed description which follows.
The FIGURE is a schematic diagram representing a sewage system employed in the Example described herein.
Removal of dissolved hydrogen sulfide and a reduction in BOD in waste systems treated with sodium nitrate or calcium nitrate is believed to occur for the reasons described below.
The presence of dissolved hydrogen sulfide in sewage occurs as a result of a lack of dissolved oxygen. The addition of nitrate ions NO3 provides an oxygen source for certain bacteria already present in the waste or sewage to thrive.
The bacteria that grow as a result of the nitrate oxygen utilize the dissolved hydrogen sulfide as part of their metabolism. The dissolved hydrogen sulfide contains sulfur which the bacteria also require in their metabolism.
It is theorized that the biochemical reaction which occurs has the following half reactions:
Based upon the above it is calculated that 2.4 parts of nitrate oxygen (NO3—0) (NO3 —O) are necessary to remove 1 part of dissolved sulfide (S2−):
yields 2.4 lb lbs nitrate oxygen/lb sulfide.
This ratio of oxygen to sulfide has been confirmed in both bench and field tests.
The source of nitrate to accomplish the sulfide removal is not critical, and both aqueous solutions of sodium nitrate and calcium nitrate have been used successfully.
This reaction is biochemical and it will not occur within a sterile solution, i.e., naturally occurring bacteria in sewage must be present. Additionally, the sulfide removal is not instantaneous; tests have shown that an “incubation” period of 24-48 hours is necessary to culture the bacteria and thereafter 3-12 hours for ongoing sulfide removal. It is believed, however, that the incubation period may extend from about 8 to about 96 hours, and the ongoing removal period from about 1.5 to about 20 hours, depending on conditions.
The promotion of biological activity via nitrate addition as described also achieves a reduction in sewage BOD due to the utilization of organic matter in the metabolism described.
With reference to the FIGURE, sodium nitrate was added to a sewer system in Jacksonville, Florida at a master pump station, or feed point B, upstream of a second master pump station comprising a monitoring point A. The feed point B was at a point removed from an intersection C of the feed line and main sewage line, as indicated in the FIGURE.
The treated sewage continued to a downstream waste water treatment plant in Jacksonville, indicated as point D.
Average detention times (based on average daily flows, line sizes and lengths are as follows:
B→C 7 hours
C→A 3.3 hours
B→A 10.3 hours
In terms of the description provided above, the B→C distance and retention time of 7 hours constitutes the incubation period, coupled with the distance C→A and associated retention time of 3.3 hours comprises a total of 10.3 hours from addition of the nitrate station at point B to the monitoring at point A, thereby permitting sufficient time for the bacteria to culture.
The following table shows the change in dissolved hydrogen sulfide at point A, with addition of nitrate occurring at point B.
FEED · GPD
PPM AT POINT A
During the period of time, the average daily H2S at point B was 25-30 ppm.
It is readily apparent from the above chart that significant reduction in H2S was achieved over a nine day period of time, commencing about 24 hours after the addition of the sodium nitrate, with maximum reductions occurring after 48 hours.
Subjective sampling also indicated a significant reduction in sewage odors other than hydrogen sulfide.
It was also found that sewage BOD was also reduced or indicated as in the following table:
It will thus be appreciated that the present invention provides for the removal of significant amounts of existing dissolved hydrogen sulfide and a corresponding reduction in sewage BOD. By properly feeding sodium nitrate into the sewage or waste, odor and corrosion problems can also be substantially eliminated.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiment, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US221232||Nov 8, 1878||Nov 4, 1879||Improvement in processes and apparatus for deodorizing and disinfecting|
|US1701825 *||Dec 26, 1925||Feb 12, 1929||Koppers Co Inc||Gas-purification process|
|US1997252 *||Jan 2, 1931||Apr 9, 1935||Dorr Co Inc||Sewage sludge treatment|
|US3219576||Apr 20, 1962||Nov 23, 1965||Makabe Tomitaro||Method of clarifying night soil with bacteria|
|US3300404||Apr 23, 1964||Jan 24, 1967||Commercial Solvents Corp||Anaerobic treatment of organic industrial wastes in an artificial lagoon|
|US3401113||Jul 11, 1966||Sep 10, 1968||Petro Tex Chem Corp||Waste treatment process|
|US3502566||May 29, 1968||Mar 24, 1970||Great Canadian Oil Sands||Bacterial treatment of hot water process effluent discharge|
|US3607736||Mar 21, 1969||Sep 21, 1971||Kurita Water Ind Ltd||Method of treating organic waste water|
|US3639263||Jul 31, 1968||Feb 1, 1972||Nalco Chemical Co||Corrosion inhibition with a tannin, cyanohydrinated lignosulfonate, and an inorganic metal salt composition|
|US3867284 *||Oct 18, 1973||Feb 18, 1975||Kappe Associates Inc||Water treatment with nitrogen dioxide|
|US3930998||Sep 18, 1974||Jan 6, 1976||Sterling Drug Inc.||Wastewater treatment|
|US3959127||Mar 13, 1975||May 25, 1976||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy||Biodegradation of oil on water surfaces|
|US3959130||Jul 31, 1974||May 25, 1976||Heinrich Koppers Gesellschaft Mit Beschrankter Haftung||Process for decontaminating sewage containing cyanide|
|US3966450||Aug 12, 1974||Jun 29, 1976||Fmc Corporation||Animal waste odor treatment|
|US4098690||Mar 29, 1976||Jul 4, 1978||The University Of Illinois Foundation||Water purification process|
|US4108771||May 27, 1977||Aug 22, 1978||Weiss & Co.||Elimination of odors from organic wastes|
|US4115258 *||Jun 22, 1976||Sep 19, 1978||Kenneth Cecil Smith||Treatment of sewage|
|US4148726 *||Jun 22, 1976||Apr 10, 1979||Smith Kenneth C||Process for treatment of sewage in a gravity sewer|
|US4153547||Feb 6, 1978||May 8, 1979||Mclean John O||Use of acidified copper sulfate in hydrogen sulfide removal|
|US4297216||Jan 5, 1978||Oct 27, 1981||Hitachi, Ltd.||Method for treatment of biochemical waste|
|US4446031||May 4, 1982||May 1, 1984||Tioxide Group Limited||Sewage treatment composition its manufacture and use|
|US4501668||Dec 6, 1983||Feb 26, 1985||Degussa Aktiengesellschaft||Process for the elimination of hydrogen sulfide or iron sulfide from an aqueous system|
|US4505819||Jul 13, 1983||Mar 19, 1985||Unisearch Limited||Method for the anaerobic degradation of organic material|
|US4680127||Dec 13, 1985||Jul 14, 1987||Betz Laboratories, Inc.||Method of scavenging hydrogen sulfide|
|US4681687||Oct 20, 1986||Jul 21, 1987||Nalco Chemical Company||Use of alkali metal nitrites to inhibit H2 S formation in flue gas desulfurization system sludges|
|US4725405||Mar 27, 1987||Feb 16, 1988||First Brands Corporation||Organosiloxane-silicate copolymer antifreeze composition with nitrate corrosion inhibitor|
|US4760027 *||Apr 9, 1986||Jul 26, 1988||Combustion Engineering, Inc.||Microbiological desulfurization of gases|
|DE3414556A1 *||Apr 17, 1984||Oct 31, 1985||Rheinisch Westfaelische Wasser||Process for the biological removal of nitrate and/or nitrite from water|
|JPS57187099A *||Title not available|
|1||"Basic Research On Sulfide Occurrence and Control In Sewage Collection Systems", National Technical Information Service, a-5 (Feb. 28, 1969).|
|2||"Biochemical Oxidation of Polluted Lake Sediment with Nitrate-A new Lake Restoration Method", 1976.|
|3||"Methods For Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1974).|
|4||"Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater", 14th Ed., Amer. Pub. Health Assn., Wash. D.C., 499-509 1976,.|
|5||"Water Supply and Sewerage", Ernest W. Steel, Chapter 27, pp. 600-601 (4th Ed. 1960).|
|6||"Biochemical Oxidation of Polluted Lake Sediment with Nitrate—A new Lake Restoration Method", 1976.|
|7||Beardsley, C.W., et al., "Removal of Sewer Odors By Scrubbing With Alkaline Solutions", Sewage and Industrial Wastes, vol. 30, 220 (1958).|
|8||Bryan, A. C., "Experiences With Odor Control at Houston, Texas", Sew. & Ind. Wastes, 28, 1512 (1956).|
|9||Carpenter, W.T., "Sodium Nitrate Used to Control Nuisance", Water Works and Sew., 79, 175 (1932).|
|10||Eliassen, R., et al., "The Effect of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons on Hydrogen Sulfide Production", Sew. Works Jour., 21, 457 (1949).|
|11||Fales, A.L., "Treatment of Industrial Wastes from Paper Mills and Tannery on Neponset River", Jour. Ind. Eng. Chem., 21, 216 (1929).|
|12||Heukelekian, H., "Effect of the Addition of Sodium Nitrate to Sewage on Hydrogen Sulfide Production and B.O.D. Reduction", Sewage Works Journal 15(2):255-261 (1943).|
|13||Heukelekian, H., "Some Bacteriological Aspects of Hydrogen Sulfide Production from Sewage", Sew. Works Jour., 20, 490 (1948).|
|14||Lang, M., "Chemical Control Of Water Quality In A Tidal Basin", Journal WPCF, 1414-1416 (1966).|
|15||Lawrance, W.A., "The Addition of Sodium Nitrate to the Androscoggin River", Sew. and Ind. Wastes, 22, 820 (1950).|
|16||Leon S. Directo et al., "Pilot plant study of physical-chemical treatment", Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, 49(1),: 2,081-2,098; Oct. 1977.|
|17||Lorgan, G.P., et al., "Nitrate Addition for the Control of Odor Emissions from Organically Overloaded, Super Rate Trickling Filters", 33rd Ann. Purdue Ind. Waste Conf., West Lafayette, Ind., (1978).|
|18||McKinney, R.E., "The Role of Chemically Combined Oxygen in Biological Systems", Jour. San. Eng. Div., proc. Amer. Soc. Civil Engr., 82 SA4, 1053 (1956).|
|19||Painter, H.A., "A Review of Literature on Inorganic Nitrogen Metabolism in Microorganisms", Water Research, The Journal of the International Assocation on Water Pollution Research, vol. 4, No. 6, (1970).|
|20||Peter R. Willenbring et al., "Calcium Nitrate" (incomplete title), Oct. 1988 or earlier.|
|21||Poduska, R.A., "Operation, Control, and Dynamic Modeling of the Tennessee Eastman Company Industrial Wastewater Treatment System", 34th Ann. Purdue Indust. Waste Conf., Lafayette, Md. (1970).|
|22||Pomeroy, Johnston and Bailey, "Process Design Manual For Sulfide Control in Sanitary Sewage Systems", Oct. 1974.|
|23||Pomeroy, R.D., et al., "Feasibility Study on In-Sewer Treatment Methods", Municipal, Environmental Research Lab. Chapter 6, "Chemical Treatment", 77 (1977).|
|24||Pomeroy, R.D., et al., "Sulfide Occurrence and Control in Sewage Collection Systes", U.S. Environmental protection Agency, EPA 600/X-85-052, Cincinnati, Ohio (1985).|
|25||Pomery, R.D., "Controlling Sewage Plant Odors", Consulting Eng., Feb. 101 (1963).|
|26||Prakasam, T.B.S., et al., "Microbial Dentrification of a Wastewater Containing high Concentrations of Oxidized Nitrogen", Proceedings of the 31st Industrial Wste Conference, May 4-6, 1976, Purdue University.|
|27||Price, E.C., et al., "Sewage Treatment Plants Combat Odor Pollution Problems", Water and Sew. Works, 125, 10, 64 (1978).|
|28||R.R. Dague, "Fundamentals of Odor Control", Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, 44(4): 583-594: Apr. 1972.|
|29||Reid, G.W., et al., "Sewer Odor Studies", Sew. and Ind. Wstes, 28, 991 (1956).|
|30||Richard A. Poduska et al., "Successful storage lagoon odor control", Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, 53(3): 299,310; Mar. 1981.|
|31||Ryan, W.A., "Experiences with Sodium Nitrate Treatment of Cannery Wastes", Sew. Works Jour., 17, 1227 (1945).|
|32||Sanborn, N.H., "Nitrate Treatment of Cannery Waste", The Fruit Products Journal and American Vinegar Industry, (1941).|
|33||Santry, I.W., Jr., "Hydrogen Sulfide in Sewers", Jour. Water Poll. Control Fed., 35, 1580 (1963).|
|34||Santry, I.W., Jr., "Hydrogen Sulfide Odor Control Measures", Jour. Water Poll. Control Fed., 38 459 (1966).|
|35||Thistlethwayte, D.K.B., "The Control Of Sulphides In Sewerage Systems", Ann Arbor Science Publishers Inc., Chapter 13, "Corrective Measures For Existing Systems", 159 (1972).|
|36||William H. Moss et al., "Full-scale use of physical/chemical treatment of domestic wastewater at Rocky River, Ohio", Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, 49(11): 2.249-2,254; Nov. 1977.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7087172||Nov 4, 2003||Aug 8, 2006||Usfilter Corporation||Methods for reducing nitrate demands in the reduction of dissolved and/or atmospheric sulfides in wastewater|
|US7138049||Jul 7, 2005||Nov 21, 2006||Usfilter Corporation||Apparatus for reducing nitrate demands in the reduction of dissolved and/or atmospheric sulfides in wastewater|
|US7186341||Apr 24, 2006||Mar 6, 2007||Siemens Water Technologies Holding Corp.||Methods and apparatus for reducing nitrate demands in the reduction of dissolved and/or atmospheric sulfides in wastewater|
|US7255796||Jul 8, 2004||Aug 14, 2007||General Electric Company||Method of preventing hydrogen sulfide odor generation in an aqueous medium|
|US7285207||Jul 7, 2005||Oct 23, 2007||Siemens Water Technologies Holding Corp.||Methods and apparatus for reducing nitrate demands in the reduction of dissolved and/or atmospheric sulfides in wastewater|
|US7326340||Jun 9, 2005||Feb 5, 2008||Siemens Water Technologies Holding Corp.||System for controlling sulfide generation|
|US7553420||Sep 21, 2007||Jun 30, 2009||Siemens Water Technologies Corp.||Systems and methods for wastewater odor control|
|US7799215||Jun 30, 2009||Sep 21, 2010||Siemens Water Technologies Corp.||Wastewater treatment systems|
|US7799224||Jan 30, 2008||Sep 21, 2010||Siemens Water Technologies Corp.||Wastewater treatment methods|
|US7972532||May 15, 2009||Jul 5, 2011||Siemens Industry, Inc.||Composition for odor control|
|US8430112||Jul 13, 2010||Apr 30, 2013||Siemens Industry, Inc.||Slurry feed system and method|
|US8968646||Feb 21, 2012||Mar 3, 2015||Evoqua Water Technologies Llc||Synergistic methods for odor control|
|US20040173525 *||Nov 4, 2003||Sep 9, 2004||United States Filter Corporation||Methods and apparatus for reducing nitrate demands in the reduction of dissolved and/or atmospheric sulfides in wastewater|
|US20050224409 *||Jun 9, 2005||Oct 13, 2005||Usfilter Corporation||Method and apparatus for controlling sulfide generation|
|US20050242010 *||Jul 7, 2005||Nov 3, 2005||Usfilter Corporation|
|US20050242011 *||Jul 7, 2005||Nov 3, 2005||Usfilter Corporation|
|US20060006120 *||Jul 8, 2004||Jan 12, 2006||Zhuo Chen||Method of preventing hydrogen sulfide odor generation in an aqueous medium|
|US20060006121 *||Jul 8, 2005||Jan 12, 2006||Simpson Gregory D||Synergistic composition and method for odor control|
|US20060073112 *||Oct 1, 2004||Apr 6, 2006||Whitekettle Wilson K||Method of preventing hydrogen sulfide odor generation in an aqueous medium|
|US20060186040 *||Apr 24, 2006||Aug 24, 2006||Hunniford David J|
|EP2177233A1||Jun 5, 2003||Apr 21, 2010||Biomagic, Inc.||Methods of using odor control compositions|
|EP2184076A1||Jun 5, 2003||May 12, 2010||Biomagic, Inc.||Method of using odor control compositions in air|
|WO2004078661A1 *||Feb 9, 2004||Sep 16, 2004||United States Filter Corp|
|U.S. Classification||210/610, 210/916, 210/631, 435/264, 435/266|
|International Classification||C02F3/02, C02F3/34, C02F1/72|
|Cooperative Classification||Y02W10/15, Y10S210/916, C02F1/72, C02F2307/08, C02F3/025, C02F3/345, C02F2303/02|
|European Classification||C02F1/72, C02F3/02C, C02F3/34E|
|Sep 21, 1999||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: U.S. FILTER CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:U.S. FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC.;REEL/FRAME:010249/0310
Effective date: 19990826
|Sep 26, 2001||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Jan 14, 2003||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Sep 8, 2004||AS||Assignment|