|Publication number||USRE38008 E1|
|Application number||US 09/995,870|
|Publication date||Feb 25, 2003|
|Filing date||Nov 29, 2001|
|Priority date||Oct 9, 1986|
|Publication number||09995870, 995870, US RE38008 E1, US RE38008E1, US-E1-RE38008, USRE38008 E1, USRE38008E1|
|Inventors||Paul G. Abrams, Robert W. Schroff, Alton C. Morgan, Jr.|
|Original Assignee||Neorx Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (23), Non-Patent Citations (37), Referenced by (39), Classifications (15), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending application Ser. No. 917,176, filed Oct. 9, 1986 now abandoned.
1. Technical Field
The present invention generally relates to methods for enhancing targeting of antibodies, antibody fragments, peptide hormones and steroid hormones, and conjugates thereof. More specifically, methods are disclosed employing blocking antibodies, fragments, hormones and other targeting agents, and conjugates thereof to reduce cross-reactive and nonspecific binding of specific antibodies, hormones and other targeting agents to non-target cells.
2. Background Art
Antibodies are proteins that have a binding site that is specific for a particular determinant, e.g., antigen or epitope, and other portions that bind to normal tissues in a nonspecific fashion. There are several immunological concepts, all related to antibody binding, that require definition.
Target-specific binding: Binding of the antibody, whole or fragment, hormones, other targeting agents or conjugate thereof, through the antibody's binding site, to the epitope recognized by said antibody on cells expressing said epitope's or hormone's receptor, where said cells are the desired target of the antibody, whole or fragment, or hormone, other targeting agent, or conjugates thereof.
An example of target-specific binding is binding of the antibody, whole or fragment, or conjugate thereof, to tumor cells where the antibody in question can also bind specifically to normal cells. The component of binding to the tumor cells is target-specific. Another example is binding of bombesin, or gastrin-releasing peptide, to small cell lung carcinoma.
Cross-reactive binding: Binding of the antibody, whole or fragment or hormone, other targeting agent or conjugate thereof, through the antibody's binding site, to the epitope recognized by said antibody on cells expressing said epitope or hormone receptor, where said cells are not the desired target of the antibody, whole or fragment, or hormone or conjugate thereof.
An example of cross-specific binding is binding of the antibody, whole or fragment, or conjugate thereof, to normal lung by antibody binding site to the same or structurally homologous epitope as is present on a tumor cell. The component of binding to the normal lung cells by the antigen-binding site of the antibody is cross-reactive. Another example is the binding of bombesin, or gastrin-releasing peptide, to normal cells in the stomach or pancreas.
Nonspecific binding: Binding of an antibody, whole or fragment, or hormone or conjugate thereof, through some mechanism other than the antigen-recognition binding site of the antibody or hormone, to cells other than the target cells.
An example of nonspecific binding is the uptake of antibody into the liver and spleen due to binding of the antibody by its Fc receptors onto cells in these organs.
A second example would be binding of mannose present in the ricin of antibody-ricin conjugate to mannose receptors on liver cells.
Specific antibody: Antibody that binds to epitope on desired target cells through its antigen-recognition sites. Specific antibodies may also bind to epitope or structural homolog present on non-target cells.
Irrelevant antibody: Antibody that does not bind to target cells by means of its antigen-recognition sites, but may bind to non-target and target cells through non-specific mechanisms, e.g., Fc portion of antibody binding to Fc receptors on cells in reticuloendothelial system (RES).
Blocking antibody: Antibody that inhibits the non-specific binding of pharmaceutically active specific antibody. Blocking antibodies may include irrelevant antibody or pharmaceutically inactive specific antibody or fragments or combinations thereof. The latter may also be called “cold-specific” antibody.
Pharmaceutically active antibody: Antibody that is diagnostically or therapeutically effective.
The use of antibodies are carriers for radionuclides and cytotoxins has been a goal of cancer of diagnosis and treatment since Pressman et al. showed that 131Ilabeled rabbit anti-rat kidney antibodies localized in the kidney after intravenous injection (Pressman, D., Keighly, G. (1948) J. Immunol. 59:141-46). Just a few years later, Vial and Callahan reported a dramatic, complete response in a patient with widely metastatic malignant melamoma treated with 131I-antibodies raised against his own tumor (Vial, A. B. and Callahan, W. (1956), Univ. Mich. Med. Bull. 20: 284-86). In the 1960s, Bale and co-workers demonstrated that labeled antibodies to fibrin, which is often deposited in rapidly growing tumors, could localize in rat, dog and human tumors (65% of 141 patients) (Bale, W. F., et al. (1960) Cancer Res. 20:1501-1504 (1960); McCradle, R. J., Harper, P. V., Spar, I. L., et al., (1966) J. Nucl. Med. 7:837-44; Spar, I. L., Bale, W. F., Manack, D., et al. (1969) Cancer 78:731-59; Bale, W. F., Centreras, M. A., Goody, E. D. (1980) Cancer Res. 40:3965-2972). Several years later, Chao et al. demonstrated selective uptake of antibody fragments in tumors (Chao, H. F., Peiper, S. C., Philpott, G. W., et al. (1974) Res. Comm. in Chem. Path. & Pharm. 9:749-61).
Monoclonal antibodies (Kohler, G. and Milstein, C. (1975) Nature 256:495-97) offer advantages over the polyclonals used in these studies because of their improved specificity, purity and consistency among lots. These factors, plus their wide availability, have let to improved clinical applications of antibodies and their conjugates.
Even with monoclonals, however, most antibodies to human tumors have some normal tissue cross-reactivity. Compared to tumors, these cross-reactive sites may equally or preferentially bind injected antibody or conjugate and thus adsorb a substantial portion of the administered dose, especially if these sites are concentrated in well-perfused organs. If the antibody is conjugated to a toxin agent, there may be toxicity to the normal tissues that could be dose-limiting. Therefore, reducing normal tissue binding of the antibody or conjugates without adversely affecting their tumor localization would be advantageous.
Also needed in the art are methods to improve the targeting of immunoconjugates to tumor cells. Most immunoconjugates are produced by chemically linking an antibody to another agent. Another possibility is creating a fusion protein. The antibody itself, the process of linking, or the conjugated agent itself may cause decreased localization of the tumor due to nonspecific or cross-reactive binding.
Also needed in the art is a method to improve delivery of cytotoxins or biologic response modifiers (BRMs) to tumors using antibodies as carriers, while minimizing toxicity.
Also needed in the art are similar methods to improve delivery of cytotoxins or biologic response modifiers (BRMs) to tumors using hormones or other targeting agents as carriers, while minimizing toxicity.
Also needed in the art is a method to decrease formation of antiglobulins to injected antibody or immunoconjugates as there may be inhibition of binding or even toxicity when the same antibody is injected at a later time.
All of these issues can be addressed by the described methods that reduce cross-reactive and nonspecific binding of antibody and antibody conjugates, and are equally applicable to any substance that has a nonspecific uptake site or whose receptors are shared by non-target cells.
The methods of the present invention reduce cross-reaction and/or nonspecific binding of specific antibodies and hormones when administered to diagnose, stage, evaluate or treat diseases such as cancer in humans. The characteristic or specificity makes antibodies potentially useful agents for targeting defined populations of cells such as tumor cells that express tumor-specific (expressed uniquely by tumor cells) or tumor-associated (expressed by tumor cells and by a subpopulation of normal cells) antigens. The clinical utility of these specific antibodies, however, is compromised by the phenomenon of cross-reactive and nonspecific binding.
One method of markedly diminishing nonspecific uptake is to remove a nonspecific binding portion of the antibody, leaving the antigen binding portion [e.g., F(ab)′2′, Fab or Fv]. Fragments may accumulate more rapidly onto the tumor cell than whole antibody due to their smaller size, which facilitates egress from the circulation across blood vessel and capillary walls into the tumor bed. This does not usually compensate for the decreased serum half-life of the fragments resulting in decreased tumor accumulation compared to whole antibody. Thus there exists a need to prolong serum half-life of fragments in order to take advantage of their more rapid accumulation in target cells and, therefore, to improve localization into a tumor. Additionally, nonspecific binding of specific antibodies into normal organs needs to be decreased.
Generally, a major obstacle to the successful clinical use of antibodies and conjugates thereof has been inadequate delivery to target cells. This has been assessed both by immunohistochemistry on frozen sections of tumors removed after antibody administration (Oldham, R. K., Foon, K. A., Morgan, A. C., et al. (1984) J. of Chem. Oncol. 2(11):1234-44; Abrams, P. G., Morgan, A. C., Schroff, C. S. (1985) In: Monoclonal Antibodies and Cancer Therapy (Deisfeld and Sell, Eds.), Alan R. Liss Inc., pp. 233-36) or by calculating the percent of the radiolabeled antibody dose per gram in the tumor (Murray, J. L., Rosenblum, M. G., Sobol, R. E., et al. (1985) Cancer Res. 45: 2376-81; Carrasquillo, J. A., Abrams, P. G., Schroff, R. W. et al. (submitted); Epenetos, A. A., Mather, S., Gwanowska, M., et al. (1982) Lancett II:999-1004; Larson, S. M., Carrasquillo, J. A., Krohn, K. A., et al. (1983) J. Clin. Investigation 72:2101-2114 (1983). There was clear evidence in the former studies of increased antibody localization in tumor with higher doses of specific antibody. The quantitative studies with radiolabeled antibody have shown 0.0001%-0.0004% of the injected dose/gram localizing to tumor (Carrasquillo, ibid.).
Radiolabeling of antibodies permits the quantitative assessment of percent accretion into tumors and normal organs and disappearance from the blood and the whole body. This serves as a paradigm for the biodistribution and kinetrics of antibodies and immunoconjugates. Conjugated or labeled peptides or steroid hormones provide an analogous strategy.
Studies with radiolabled antibodies have demonstrated that part of the problem causing low tumor accumulation is the localization of radiolabeled antibody in other organs, such as liver, spleen, marrow, lung or kidney. The prior art is replete with examples of increasing mass of specific antibody to improve tumor localization (e.g., Abrams, ibid.; Murray, ibid.; Carrasquillo, ibid.; Epenetos, ibid.; Larson, ibid.) The present invention uses irrelevant antibody to adsorb to these nonspecific sites, thus obviating the requirement for large doses of unconjugated specific antibody required in the prior art. One advantage of this strategy is that unconjugated irrelevant antibody does not compete for specific sites on target cells with conjugated specific antibody. Another advantage is that irrelevant antibody skews the immunological response to the patient away from the specific antibody (vide infra).
One measure of decreased adsorption of specific antibody onto nonspecific sites is prolonged serum half-life of the antibody. Another unexpected result of pre-administering isotype and subclass matched whole irrelevant immunoglobulin is the prolonged serum half-life, reduced nonspecific adsorption and improved tumor detection with fragments of specific antibody.
The prior art recognizes the problem of localizing specific antibody and fragments and conjugates thereof due to nonspecific and cross-reactive binding to non-target epitopes, e.g., Murray, ibid. Yet, the solution employed has been to lump together the problems of nonspecific and cross-reactive uptake and to use a single strategy—co-administration of large masses of specific unconjugated antibody—to overcome the problems. The present invention not only distinguishes these problems, but also offers different solutions to each: (1) the use of irrelevant antibody (immunoglobulin) to reduce nonspecific and cross-reactive binding of specific antibody, and (2) the administration of unconjugated specific antibody to bind to cross-reactive sites prior to the administration of conjugated specific antibody. The latter solution applies equally to steroid and peptide hormones.
Since antibodies are proteins, in most cases of non-human origin, the spectre of human antiglobulin and anti-idotype has been raised (Oldham, ibid.; Abrams, ibid.; Murray, ibid.; Carrasquillo, ibid.; Epenetos, ibid.; Larson, ibid.). This invention demonstrates that the co-administration of large masses of irrelevant antibody can skew the antiglobulin response toward the irrelevant antibody and not the specific antibody so that, along with either the same or a second irrelevant antibody, the same target-specific antibody can be injected again and localize in tumor sites without significant formation of antiglobulins to the specific antibody.
Despite their increased specificity, monoclonal antibodies thus far have not been entirely tumor-specific, but rather recognize tumor-associated antigens. When their cross-reactivity is predominantly to one organ that can be selectively perfused, the present invention provides methods for targeting specific antibody conjugates by selective direct infusion of unconjugated specific antibody into a vessel feeding a normal organ known to concentrate conjugated antibody by cross-reactive binding. For a therapeutic conjugate, the reduction in toxicity is a substantial advantage.
Conjugates of specific antibody may localize in non-specific sites due to the molecule linked to the antibody rather than the antibody itself. The protein toxins (e.g., ricin, abrin, diphtheria toxin, pseudomonas toxin) can bind to mammalian cells through particular portions of these molecules. This property has prompted a large effort to eliminate their nonspecific binding capability while preserving the potency of the toxin. According to the methods of the present invention, detoxified protein toxins, when conjugated to nonspecific antibody, can reduce binding of the specific antibody-toxin conjugate to nonspecific sites. this methodology reduces whole organism toxicity and permits the administration of large doses of the specific toxin conjugate.
The method of the present invention is for enhancement of delivery to target cells of antibodies or fragments thereof or other receptor-mediated delivery systems, such as peptide, specific for a population of cells of a mammal. The method comprises the steps of administering to said mammal an adequate dosage of blocking antibodies or fragments thereof or other receptor-mediated delivery systems, such as peptide, and administering to said mammal an effective dosage of said antibodies or fragments thereof or other agents that target a defined population of cells via receptors, such as hormones, specific for said population of cells, the blocking antibodies or fragments thereof or other targeting agents capable of nonspecific and/or cross-reactive binding to non-target cells. The antibody fragments of either the blocking antibodies or the specific antibodies are selected from the group consisting of F(ab)′, F(ab)′2, Fab, Fv and mixtures thereof.
In a preferred embodiment, the target cells are characterized by having tumor-associated antigen. Both the blocking antibodies and the specific antibodies may be either monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies. Furthermore, the specific antibodies and fragments thereof may be conjugated to cytotoxins, radionuclides or biological response modifiers.
The administration of the blocking antibodies is preferably done prior to the administration of the specific antibodies; alternatively, such blocking antibodies may be administered simultaneously with the specific antibody. The effective dosage of the antibodies or fragments thereof specific for a said population of cells is either diagnostically effective or therapeutically effective. The preferred mammal of the methods disclosed herein is man.
An additional preferred embodiment of the methods disclosed herein is for enhancement of the localization of antibodies or fragments thereof specific for a cross-reactive antigen contained within a mammal's tissue or organ. This method comprises the steps of directly perfusing said tissue or organ with an adequate dosage of blocking antibodies or fragments thereof and then administering systemically to the mammal an effective dosage of said antibodies or fragments thereof specific for said antigen contained within said tissue or organ that is also present or target cells.
A related aspect of the present invention discloses a method for reducing within a mammal the production of anti-immunoglobulin directed against antibodies or fragments thereof specific for a population of target cells. This method comprises the steps of administering to said mammal in adequate dosage of blocking antibodies or fragments thereof capable of stimulating the production of anti-immunoglobulin directed against said blocking antibodies or fragments thereof and administering to said mammal a therapeutically effective dosage of said antibodies or fragments thereof specific for said target cells, wherein said therapeutically effective dosage is smaller than said adequate dosage of blocking antibodies or fragments thereof.
An irrelevant antibody may be matched with a specific antibody by species, isotype and/or subclass and is administered, usually in several-fold or greater quantities, to patients prior to the injection of the specific antibody or specific antibody conjugates. Alternatively, such matching may not be necessary. The prior art has demonstrated improved tumor localization of whole antibody with increasing doses of specific antibody. These results were assessed with either trace-labeled specific antibody or by immunohistochemistry following antibody administration (Oldham, ibid.; Abrams, ibid.; Murray, ibid.; Carrasquillo, ibid.). In the former, the unlabeled, specific antibody was usually given simultaneously with the labeled preparation. The underlying concept involved providing sufficient mass of antibody to attach to nonspecific sites, leaving more specific antibody available to bind to tumor. There was some reduction of labeled antibody in nonspecific sites (e.g., liver), and a marked increase in serum half-life of the radiolabeled whole immunoglobulin (Carrasquillo, ibid.). There is, however, the potential for competition for specific binding at the tumor size by the labeled and unlabeled antibody. If the label is used symbolically to represent any agent conjugated to antibody, competition of unlabeled antibody for the tumor antigen at the most accessible (perivascular) sites will compromise the delivery of that agent to the tumor. In addition, a percentage of the labeled antibody, when injected simultaneously, behaves as a true tracer and deposits in normal nonspecific and cross-reactived sites.
The method described herein uses irrelevant antibody (blocking antibody) to reduce the nonspecific uptake, without competing for the tumor antigen, preferably administered prior to specific antibody (see Example I). The positive results observed by pre-administering irrelevant antibody were not expected since human gammaglobulins, in large (>1 gm) quantities, failed to show any decreased localization of radiolabeled antibody into nonspecific sites (Carrasquillo, ibid.).
Further, the method described herein is applicable to fragments of specific antibody as well as to whole specific antibody. The method also has been shown to increase the serum half-life of fragments.
Particularly unexpected was the prolonged serum half-life in the initial phase of serum clearance achieved by using whole irrelevant antibody prior to specific antibody fragments. This was surprising since it was assumed that the nonspecific binding sites on antibody would be eliminated by creating fragments devoid of the Fc portion of the molecule. This method is useful for reducing non-specific binding of specific antibody, whole for fragment, or conjugates of such antibody, whole or fragment, with radionuclides, drugs, toxins, biologic response modifiers or differentiating agents.
Normal tissues may contain an epitope, or structural homolog of an epitope, expressed on the target cell. Several methods to reduce localization to non-target tissues are presented herein. For normal tissues equally or more accessible than tumors to specific antibody, unconjugated specific antibody (blocking antibody) is administered prior to conjugated specific antibody (see Example II). The antigen sites on normal tissues, such as blood vessels or liver, will first bind the previously injected, unconjugated whole antibody. In one embodiment, the blocking antibody is bivalent (whole or F(ab′2) and the conjugated antibody is monovalent (Fab′, Fab or Fv). This approach taken advantage of the higher antigen affinity of the bivalent molecules and thus reduces the competition of the subsequently administered, conjugated monovalent species for the cross-reactive sites.
The precise doses of the cold-specific antibody and the timing of administration will be dependent upon the size of the patient, the quantitative normal tissue expression of the antigen or epitope, the relative accessibility of tumor compared to normal tissue sites, and the purpose for which the entire procedure is being performed. For example, a modest degree of nontumor targeting may be acceptable in a therapeutic study as long as toxicity is tolerable, but less acceptable in an imaging mode where false positives could be a problem.
The dose of the cold-specific antibody can be approximated by administering increasing doses of the cold-specific antibody prior to biodistribution studies with a labeled antibody or labeled conjugate. When normal tissue sites that show evidence of uptake of the radiolabeled antibody or conjugate with no cold-specific antibody are no longer visualized, than an adequate dose of the cold-specific antibody will have been reached. Alternatively, a greater interval may be allowed between the given does of cold-specific antibody and the subsequent administration of conjugated specific antibody to permit greater permeation of the cold-specific antibody into normal tissues.
Another approach is to determine the serum half-life of an irrelevant antibody or fragment and preadminister sufficient cold-specific antibody or fragment to raise the half-life of the conjugated antibody to fragment close to the half-life of the irrelevant antibody. This would be indirect evidence that a normal tissue antigen “sink” was completely or largely saturated.
An additional method of determining the appropriate dose has been described by Eger et al. Using data obtained from patients receiving the 9.2.27 antibody, they constructed a mathematical model that, by regression analysis, could predict a dose of antibody that would saturate the “antigen sink” in normal tissues.
Once determined for a particular antigen-antibody system, the does and schedule can be calculated on a body surface area or weight basis for the particular antibody.
Within a wide range, however, the administration of more than a normal tissue dose will have little effect on the delivery of the conjugated antibody to the tumor. The major considerations are saturation of the more accessible tumor sites and affinity differencies between unconjugated, “cold” antibody and the conjugate. If the conjugate has substantially less affinity, too large a dose of unconjugated antibody will compete off the conjugate and thus efficacy—therapeutic or detection—will be reduced.
A second method for reducing cross-reactivity with normal tissues that contain the cross-reactive associated antigen involves directed prior or co-administration of unconjugated antibody (see Example III). Generally, venous or arterial access is achieved through percutaneous catheterization. For example, the renal articles or veins may be catheterized to perfuse the kidneys selectively. Alternatively, a catheter may be placed into an appropriate vessel (e.g., hepatic artery for liver) at he time of surgery. The unconjugated antibody is injected by the catheter to contact the antigen sites of the normal organ with the “first pass” of antibody. The antibody may be whole or fragmented. Either simultaneously or thereafter, the conjugated antibody is injected into the mammal's general circulation. Binding of the specific conjugated antibody to the previously perfused sites in the normal organs is reduced, thus increasing the availability of the conjugated specific antibody for the target cells. The also results in reduced toxicity to the cross-reactive, non-target organ by the specific conjugated antibody.
A third method involves either peripheral vein or directed infusion as described above. Instead of using unconjugated antibody as the blocking antibody, a conjugate of antibody and detoxified cytotoxin or BRM is infused where the detoxification (i.e., reduced toxicity) process preserves the sites of recognition and/or binding by normal cells (see Example IV). In a preferred embodiment, the detoxified agent is either free or bound to the nonspecific antibody, and the detoxified conjugate is injected prior to the administration of specific antibody conjugate and, if necessary, may be administered as a constant infusion.
In another method, where the tumor to be treated is localized in an organ or a limb, conjugated antibody is injected via directed catheter into the organ or limb following peripheral blockage of cross-reactive and nonspecific sites with unconjugated specific and/or deeoxified, conjugated irrelevant and/or unconjugated irrelevant antibody.
An additional method provides for injection of unconjugated specific antibody via catheter or other means of directing the first administration of the antibody to a defined organ that contains the cross-reactive antigen where the tumor to be treated is disseminated outside of the organ. Unconjugated irrelevant antibody and/or detoxified, conjugated, nonspecific antibody are injected by peripheral vein. Conjugated specific antibody is then injected intravenously.
Irrelevant antibody is administered prior to or simultaneously with specific antibody or specific antibody conjugate. The irrelevant antibody may be administered in higher doses than the specific antibody. In one preferred embodiment, the irrelevant antibody is whole immunoglobulin and the specific antibody is an antibody fragment (see Example V). In another preferred embodiment, the ratio of specific to nonspecific antibody body ranges from about 1:1 to about 1:100 and is preferably 1:5. In another preferred embodiment, the nonspecific antibody is whole immunoglobulin and the specific antibody is Fab or Fv. The basis for this strategy is that the higher dose and use of whole, not fragment, of the irrelevant antibody is more likely to evoke an immunological response than the lower dose and less immunogenic fragments of specific antibody.
When a patient develops antiglobulins that bind to the irrelevant antibody but not the specific antibody, the same irrelevant antibody may be administered in a subsequent dose ahead of specific antibody to adsorb the circulating antiglobulin and in higher doses to block nonspecific sites in normal tissues. Any antiglobulins to irrelevant antibody that cross-react with specific antibody would be complexed and deposited in the kidney or reticuloendothelial system, depending on the size of the complex. Most importantly, conjugated specific antibody given subsequently would not be complexed, but would be free to bind to target cells. Alternatively, a second irrelevant antibody that is not recognized by the antiglobulin response may be substituted in subsequent injections. A combination of irrelevant antibodies may also be used.
Monoclonal antibody (Mab) NR-2AD is a murine IgG2a immunoglobulin that was designed as an anti-idiotype that bound to a single patient's B-cell lymphoma and to no other human tissue. MAb 9.2.27 is a murine IgG2a antibody that recognizes the 250 Kilodalton glycoprotein/proteoglycan melanoma-associated antigen. Both were scaled up by in vitro cell culture, purified by column chromatography, and tested for purity and sterility to meet the draft guidelines for injectable monoclonal antibodies from the Office of Biologics, Food & Drug Administration (“Points to consider in the manufacture of injectable monoclonal antibody products intended for human use in vivo: Revised draft of Jun. 11, 1984”). MAb 9.2.27 was digested with pepsin and the F(ab)′2 fragment purified from residual intact antibody.
NR-2AD 50 mg was diluted in normal saline and injected intravenously into patient 8501.08 who had metastatic malignant melanoma. One hour later, 2.5 mg Tc-99 m labeled 9.2.27 F(ab)′2 was administered intravenously. The patient's blood was withdrawn and counted with a Tc-99 m standard. Surprisingly, the serum half-life (t½) of the labeled F(ab)′2 was 17 hours. The average serum t½ of the labeled 9.2.27 F(ab)′2 for patients receiving NR-2AD was 12 hours compared to 6 hours for those who did not receive NR-2AD prior to the labeled fragment. The patient's tumor was visualized by gamma camera imaging and then excised. Another unexpected result was the detection of a tumor that weighed only 0.25 gm.
The effect of reducing cross-reactive uptake of a radiolabeled monoclonal antibody preparation was assessed in the context of a diagnostic imaging clinical trial. The patient (#8501.22) examined in the study was a 32-year-old-male with a metastatic melanoma lesion in the left posterior portion of the neck. The lesion consisted of a tumorinvolved lymph node measuring 2×2 cm.
The patient received two schedules of radiolabeled antibody three days apart. The first schedule of antibody consisted of two doses: a 50 mg dose of non-radiolabeled intact irrelevant antibody (NR-2AD) administered intravenously followed 1 hour later by a 2.5 mg dose of Tc-99 m radiolabeled Fab fragment of a MAb 9.2.27. The localization of radiolabeled within the patient was assessed by gamma camera imaging over a 7 hour period. The second schedule was identical, except that 7.5 mg of non-radiolabeled F(ab)′2 fragment of 9.2.27 was administered 5 minutes prior to the radiolabeled Fab preparation. The 50 mg dose of intact irrelevant antibody was administered in both schedules, in order to reduce nonspecific uptake of the radiolabeled antibody into normal tissues. The non-radiolabeled target specific F(ab′)2 preparation was administered for the purpose of reducing cross-reactive uptake of the radiolabeled antibody by non-target tissues.
The results of the study showed that omission of the non-radiolabeled target-specific antibody (9.2.27 F(ab′)2 was accompanied at 7 hours post-infusion by uptake of radiolabeled antibody into non-target tissue, specifically spleen, bone marrow and kidney. The known tumor site was not imaged. Pre-infusion of the non-radiolabeled target-specific antibody (9.2.27 F(ab′)2 was accompanied at the same time point by uptake in the kidney, but no demonstrable uptake in the spleen, bone marrow or other normal organs. This result was unexpected since the marrow and spleen uptake had previously been assumed to be nonspecific. In addition, the known tumor in the neck was clearly visible, confirming that blocking cross-reactive binding sites by prior infusion of non-radiolabeled target-specific antibody both reduced non-target tissue localization and increased tumor localization of the radiolabeled target-specific antibody.
Patient 8501.29 was a 49-year-old Caucasian male who presented with melanoma on his back that then spread to lymph nodes under his arm. At the time of imaging with the 99 mTc-labeled antibodies, the patient had presumed disease in the right axilla (recurrent), questionable small subcutaneous metastases on his arm and back, and diffuse hepatic involvement, as evidenced by CT scan and elevated hepatic transaminases.
The purpose of the text in this patient was to determine if the cold-specific antibody blocked normal tissue accumulation of the labeled antibody in an antigen-binding site (i.e., epitope specific) manner. Two antibodies, NR-ML-05 and 9.2.27, that each recognized distinct epitopes of the 250 Kd. glycoprotein/proteoglycan melanomaassociated antigen were chosen for this study.
For the first procedure, the patient received irrelevant antibody NR-2AD (NRX 900.00), cold-specific 9.2.27 (NRX-112), and then radiolabeled NR-ML-05 (NRX 118.03) so that the cold-specific blocker and the labeled antibody recognized distinct epitopes of the same antigen. Gamma camera imaging 4 and 8 hours after injection revealed hepatic metastases, an axillary chain of nodes, but also images of marrow (sternum and pelvis) and spleen. A repeat procedure was identical but substituted NR-ML-05 (NRX 118) as the cold-specific blocker for the 9.2.27 used in the first procedure. Gamma camera imaging revealed the same sites of disease, but this time with the absence of marrow (sternum and pelvis) and splenic uptake of the label.
This example, using the same patient as his own control, demonstrated conclusively that the cold-specific antibody blocked uptake of the labeled specific antibody into normal organs in an epitope-specific manner.
Percutaneous catheterization of the celiac and/or pancreatoduodenal arteries is performed through the femoral artery. MAb NR-CO-1 that reaches with colon carcinoma and cross-reacts with normal pancreas is labeled with Tc-99 m. Unlabeled NR-CO-1 F(ab)′2 fragments (10 mg) are injected by 10 minute infusion through the catheter followed by a normal saline flush (directed infusion). At the end of the directed infusion, the labeled NR-CO-1 (2.5 mg) is injected by peripheral vein. Omitting the directed infusion results in increased localization in the pancreas of the subsequently administered, labeled antibody, indicating that the directed infusion can selectively reduce binding of conjugates in organs containing cross-reactive antigen.
Pseudomonas exotoxin (PE) and diphtheria toxin (DT) are bacterial proteins that interfere with protein synthesis in cells by ADP-ribosylation of elongation factor-2 (EF-2). DT binds to nicotinamide at glutamic acid in position 148 in the molecule. Substitution of aspartic acid in this position (DTASP) reduces the activity of DT to 1% of the native molecule, but does not affect its binding to cells. PE is thought to have a “pocket” for binding to its substrate that contains a tyrosine (position 481) and glutamic acid (position 553). Iodination of tyrosine 481 (PEtyrl) is expected to result in >50% loss in activity of PE (PEtyrl) but retention of its binding ability.
NR-2AD (irrelevant immunoglobulin) is reacted with 25 mM dithiothreitol and PEtryl or DTASP with SMPB [succinimidyl(4-p-maleimidophenyl) butyrate], and the unreacted reagents are removed. The derivatized antibody and toxin are mixed together, producing NR-2AD-S-C-PEtryl or NR-2AD-S-C-DTASP (detoxified conjugates) that are purified by column chromatography, 20-500 mg of the detoxified conjugates is administered intravenously prior to administration of NR-ML-05-S-C-PE or NR-ML-05-S-C-DT (specific toxin conjugates). NR-ML-05 is a murine monclonal antibody that recognizes a 250 kilodalton glycoprotein/proteoglycan human melanoma-associated antigen.
The prior administration of the detoxified conjugates is expected to reduce specific conjugate binding in normal nonspecific sites (nonspecific has two components in this example, viz, the nonspecific binding of the irrelevant immunoglobulin part of the conjugate and the nonspecific binding of the modified toxin). The specific toxin conjugate is then injected intravenously in doses two times or greater than could be given without the blockade of non-specific sites with detoxified conjugates. Additionally, unconjugated NR-2AD and unconjugated NR-ML-05 are given prior to the specific toxin conjugates. These methods permit the administration of higher doses of potent immunoconjugate for increased localization and improved tumor reduction.
The effect of co-administration of an irrelevant monoclonal antibody (NR-2AD) on subsequent antiglobulin development to a specific MAb (9.2.27) was assessed in the context of a diagnostic imaging trail. Sixteen patients with metastatic malignant melanoma received 1 to 25 mg doses of Tc-99 in radiolabeled 9.2.27 monclonal antibody of fragments thereof, preceded by 5 minutes by doses of 7.5 to 9 mg of non-radiolabeled 9.2.27 or fragments thereof. Thus, patients received total doses of 10 mg of the 9.2.27 antibody and its fragments. One hour prior to administration of the specific antibody, 50 mg doses of a non-radiolabeled intact irrelevant antibody (NR-2AD) was administered to 11 of 16 patients.
Serologic evidence of an antiglobulin response was evaluated using a solid-phase, enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) employing either the target-specific (9.2.27) or irrelevant (NR-2AD) antibody as the capture antigen. Serum specimens were evaluated from time points ranging from 2 weeks to over 6 months following treatment. Six of the eleven patients evaluated receiving NR-2AD demonstrated evidence of an antiglobulin response to the irrelevant NR-2AD antibody of greater magnitude than that which was obtained in the upper 95th percentile of 60 healthy controls. In the same group of eleven patients, only one person demonstrated an antiglobulin response to the target-specific 9.2.27 antibody above the 95th percentile of the healthy control population.
These data indicate that prior administration of a 5-fold excess of an irrelevant MAb preparation resulted in antiglobulin responses, in those individuals who developed an antiglobulin response, which was skewed toward the irrelevant rather than the target-specific MAb.
Patient #8501.08 in the 99 mTc imaging trail of melanoma received two imaging procedures within a one-week period with the 9.2.27 melanoma-specific antibody and the NR-2AD irrelevant antibody. The patient returned after 8 months and was repeat imaged with the NR-ML-05 melanoma specific antibody and the NR-2AD antibody. At that time, the patient had developed a 19-fold increase in antiglobulin directed to the NR-2AD antibody. After premedication with 50 mg diphenhydramine, the patient received NR-2AD41 mg diluted in normal saline slowly over 60 minutes. He then received 10 mg NR-ML-05 cold-specific antibody followed by NR-ML-05 Fab labeled with 99 mTc. The labeled antibody showed no evidence of altered biodistribution and successfully targeted known subcutaneous and liver tumors.
By contrast, studies in normal guinea pigs immunized with murine monoclonal antibodies and imaged with either the same or an irrelevant 99 mTc-labeled antibody demonstrated that the presence of specific antiglobulin altered biodistribution of labeled antibody. Administration of a radiolabeled antibody to which antiglobulin was reactive resulted in biodistribution of the radiolabeled to liver and spleen. If the circulating antiglobulin was not specific for the radiolabeled antibody, then biodistribution was indistinguishable from biodistribution in the non-immunized animal.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that, although specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4331647||Mar 3, 1980||May 25, 1982||Goldenberg Milton David||Tumor localization and therapy with labeled antibody fragments specific to tumor-associated markers|
|US4348376||Mar 3, 1980||Sep 7, 1982||Goldenberg Milton David||Tumor localization and therapy with labeled anti-CEA antibody|
|US4361544||Mar 3, 1980||Nov 30, 1982||Goldenberg Milton David||Tumor localization and therapy with labeled antibodies specific to intracellular tumor-associated markers|
|US4414148||Apr 14, 1982||Nov 8, 1983||Sanofi||Anti-cancer drugs for the treatment of melanomas and method for preparing thereof|
|US4444744||Sep 3, 1982||Apr 24, 1984||Goldenberg Milton David||Tumor localization and therapy with labeled antibodies to cell surface antigens|
|US4454106||Jun 7, 1982||Jun 12, 1984||Gansow Otto A||Use of metal chelate conjugated monoclonal antibodies|
|US4460561||Sep 8, 1982||Jul 17, 1984||Goldenberg M David||Tumor localization and therapy with labeled antibodies specific to intracellular tumor-associated markers|
|US4472371||Jan 6, 1982||Sep 18, 1984||Summa Medical Corporation||Radiolabeled antibody to anti-tumor associated antigen and process|
|US4579840||Aug 12, 1983||Apr 1, 1986||Immunetech Pharmaceuticals||Method of blocking immune complex binding to immunoglobulin Fc receptors|
|US4624846||Jul 24, 1984||Nov 25, 1986||Immunomedics, Inc.||Method for enhancing target specificity of antibody localization and clearance of non-target diagnostic and therapeutic principles|
|US4665897||May 25, 1984||May 19, 1987||Lemelson Jerome H||Composition and method for detecting and treating cancer|
|US4671256||May 25, 1984||Jun 9, 1987||Lemelson Jerome H||Medical scanning, monitoring and treatment system and method|
|US4676980||Sep 23, 1985||Jun 30, 1987||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Department Of Health And Human Services||Target specific cross-linked heteroantibodies|
|US4681760||Apr 17, 1985||Jul 21, 1987||The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University||Method of conferring immunotolerance to a specific antigen|
|US4689311||Sep 30, 1985||Aug 25, 1987||Rhode Island Hospital||Screening antibodies for capacity to deliver toxin to target cells|
|US4724213||May 24, 1985||Feb 9, 1988||Northwestern University||Murine hybridoma Lym-1 and diagnostic antibody produced thereby|
|US4731244||Nov 13, 1985||Mar 15, 1988||Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation||Monoclonal antibody therapy|
|US4735210||Jul 5, 1985||Apr 5, 1988||Immunomedics, Inc.||Lymphographic and organ imaging method and kit|
|US4797475||Jul 17, 1985||Jan 10, 1989||The Regents Of The University Of California||Method and composition for isolating white cell elements|
|US4921690||Apr 12, 1988||May 1, 1990||City Of Hope||Method of enhancing the biodistribution of antibody for localization in lesions|
|EP0063988A1||Apr 9, 1982||Nov 3, 1982||Sanofi S.A.||Anticancer medicaments containing a ricin A-chain associated with an antimelanoma antibody, and process for their preparation|
|EP0222617A2||Nov 12, 1986||May 20, 1987||Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation||Monoclonal antibody therapy|
|WO1985000522A1||Jul 27, 1984||Feb 14, 1985||Milton David Goldenberg||Method for enhancing target specificity of antibody localization and clearance of non-target diagnostic and therapeutic principles|
|1||Abrams et al., "Localization and Biodistribution Studies of a Monoclonal Antibody in Patients with Melanoma", Monoclonal Antibodies and Cancer Therapy, 233-236 (1985).|
|2||Badger et al., "Experimental Radioimmunotherapy of Murine Lymphoma with 131I-labeled Anti-T-Cell Antibodies", Cancer Research, 46, 6223-6228 (1986).|
|3||Badger et al., "Experimental Radioimmunotherapy with I-131-Antibody Against a Differentiation Antigen", J Nucl Med, 26, Abstract 279, p. 67 (1985).|
|4||Bancroft et al., "Manual of Histological Techniques", Publisher is Churchill Livingstone, NY, p. 200 (1984).|
|5||Carrasquillo et al., "Radioimmunodetection of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma with 111In-Labeled T101 Monoclonal Antibody", The New England Journal of Medicine, 315, 673-680 (1986).|
|6||Casellas et al., "Human Melanoma Cells can be Killed in Vitro by an Immunotoxin Specific for Melanoma-Associated Antigen p. 97", Int J Cancer, 30, 437-443 (1982).|
|7||DeNardo et al., "Evidence of a Saturable Hepatic Receptor for Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies", J Nucl Med, 26, Abstract 277, p. 67 (1985).|
|8||Epenetos et al., "Targeting of Iodine-123-Labeled Tumour-Associated Monoclonal Antibodies to Ovarian, Breast, and Gastrointestinal Tumours", The Lancet, 999-1004 (Nov. 6, 1982).|
|9||Ettinger et al., "Phase I-II Study of Isotopic Immunoglobulin Therapy for Primary Liver Cancer", Cancer Treatment Reports, 66, 289-297 (1982).|
|10||Foon et al., "Effects of Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia", Blood, 64, 1085-1093 (1984).|
|11||Gilliland et al., "Antibody Directed Cytotoxic Agents: Use of Monoclonal Antibody to Direct the Action of Toxin A Chains to Colorectal Carcinoma Cells", PNAS USA, 77, 4539-4543 (1980).|
|12||Halpern et al., "Radioimmunodetection of Melanoma Utilizing In-111 96.5 Monoclonal Antibody: A Preliminary Report", Radiology, 155, 493-499 (1985).|
|13||Hetzelberger et al., "Idiotypic Suppression: III. Induction of Unresponsiveness to Sensitization with Anti-Idiotypic Antibody: Identification of the Cell Types Tolerized in High Zone and in Low Zone, Suppressor Cell-Mediated, Idiotype Suppression", Eur J Immunol, 8, 839-846 (1978).|
|14||Hwang et al., "Dynamic Interaction of 111Indium-Labeled Monoclonal Antibodies with Surface Antigens of Solid Tumors Visualized in Vivo by External Scintigraphy", JNCI, 76, 849-855 (1986).|
|15||Kanellos et al., "Studies of Methotrexate-Monoclonal Antibody Conjugates for Immunotherapy", JNCI, 75, 319-329 (1985).|
|16||Koizumi et al., "Multicompartmental Analysis of the Kinetics of Radioiodated Monoclonal Antibody in Patients with Cancer", J Nucl Med, 27, 1243-1254 (1986).|
|17||Koopman et al., "Suppression of in Vitro Monoclonal Human Rheumatoid Factor Synthesis by Antiidiotypic Antibody", J Clin Invest, 72, 1410-1419 (1983).|
|18||Larson et al., "Localization of 131I-Labeled p 97-Specific Fab Fragments in Human Melanoma as a Basis for Radiotherapy", J Clin Invest, 72, 2101-2114 (1983).|
|19||Larson et al., "Use of I-131 Labeled, Murine Fab against a High Molecular Weight Antigen of Human Melanoma: Preliminary Experience", Radiology, 155, 487-492 (1985).|
|20||Letvin et al., "Use of Radiolabeled Monoclonal Anti-B1 Antibody for B Lymphocyte Imaging in Rhesus Monkeys", Nucl. Med. Biol., 14, 99-105 (1987).|
|21||Meeker et al., "A Clinical Trial of Anti-Idiotype Therapy for B Cell Malignancy", Blood, 65, 1349-1363 (1985).|
|22||Miller et al., "Treatment of B-Cell Lymphoma with Monoclonal Anti-Idiotype Antibody", The New England Journal of Medicine, 306, 517-522 (1982).|
|23||Murray et al., "Radioimmunoimaging in Malignant Melanoma with 111In Labeled Monoclonal Antibody 96.5"Cancer Res, 45, 2376-2381 (1985).|
|24||Ohkawa et al., "Selective in Vitro and in Vivo Growth Inhibition Against Human Yolk Sac Tumor Cell Lines by Purified Antibody Against Human alpha-Fetoprotein Conjugated with Mitomycin C via Human Serum Albumin", Cancer Immunol Immunother, 23, 81-86 (1986).|
|25||Ohkawa et al., "Selective in Vitro and in Vivo Growth Inhibition Against Human Yolk Sac Tumor Cell Lines by Purified Antibody Against Human α-Fetoprotein Conjugated with Mitomycin C via Human Serum Albumin", Cancer Immunol Immunother, 23, 81-86 (1986).|
|26||Oldhan et al., "Monoclonal Antibody Therapy of Malignant Melanoma: In Vivo Localization in Cutaneous Metastasis After Intravenous Administration", J Clin Oncology, 2, 1235-1244 (1984).|
|27||Order et al., "Phase I-II Study of Radiolabeled Antibody Integrated in the Treatment of Primary Hepatic Malignancies", Int. J. Radioation Oncology Biol. Phys., 6, 703-710 (1980).|
|28||Order, "Monoclonal Antibodies: Potential Rule in Radiation Therapy and Oncology", Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., 8, 1193-1201 (1982).|
|29||Pastan, I., et al., "Recombinant Toxins for Cancer Treatment", Science, 254, (1991), 1173-1177.|
|30||Press et al., "Monoclonal Antibody 1F5 (Anti-CD20) Serotherapy of Human B Cell Lymphomas", Blood, 69, 584-591 (1987).|
|31||Ramakrishnan et al., "Immunological and Biological Stability of Immunotoxins in Vivo as Studied by the Clearance of Disulfide-Linked Pokeweed Antiviral Protein-Antibody Conjugates from Blood", Cancer Research, 45, 2031-3036 (1985).|
|32||Rosen et al., "Radioimmunodetection and Radioimmunotherapy of Cutaneous T Cell Lymphomas Using an 131I-Labeled Monoclonal Antibody: An Illinois Cancer Council Study", Journal of Clinical Oncology, 5, 562-573 (1987).|
|33||Rowland et al., "Antitumor Properties of Vindesine-Monoclonal Antibody Conjugates", Cancer Immunol Immunother, 19, 1-7 (1985).|
|34||Stashenko et al., "Characterization of a Human B Lymphocyte-Specific Antigen", The Journal of Immunology, 125, 1678-1685 (1980).|
|35||Tagliabue et al., "Improvement of Tumor Cell Detection Using a Pool of Monoclonal Antibodies", Hybridoma, 5, 107-115 (1986).|
|36||Thielemans et al., "Strategies for Production of Monoclonal Anti-Idiotype Antibodies Against Human B Cell Lymphomas", J Immunology, 133, 495-501 (1984).|
|37||Weinstein et al., "Monoclonal Antibodies in the Lymphatics: Toward the Diagnosis and Therapy of Tumor Metastases", Science, 218 1334-1337 (1982).|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7132398||May 6, 2003||Nov 7, 2006||Dendreon Corporation||Method of treatment of hemorrhagic disease using a factor VIIa/tissue factor inhibitor|
|US7329640||Sep 12, 2006||Feb 12, 2008||Dendreon Corporation||Method of treatment of hemorrhagic disease using a factor VIIa/tissue factor inhibitor|
|US7381560||Jul 25, 2001||Jun 3, 2008||Biogen Idec Inc.||Expression and use of anti-CD20 antibodies|
|US7422739||Jul 25, 2001||Sep 9, 2008||Biogen Idec Inc.||Anti-CD20 antibodies|
|US7682612||Nov 9, 1999||Mar 23, 2010||Biogen Idec Inc.||Treatment of hematologic malignancies associated with circulating tumor cells using chimeric anti-CD20 antibody|
|US7744877||Sep 11, 2002||Jun 29, 2010||Biogen Idec Inc.||Expression and use of anti-CD20 Antibodies|
|US8206711||Dec 2, 2009||Jun 26, 2012||Biogen Idec Inc.||Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia using anti-CD20 antibodies|
|US8329172||Aug 18, 2007||Dec 11, 2012||Biogen Idec||Combination therapies for B-cell lymphomas comprising administration of anti-CD20 antibody|
|US8557244||Jul 28, 2000||Oct 15, 2013||Biogen Idec Inc.||Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkins lymphoma with anti-CD20 antibody|
|US8821873||Oct 3, 2013||Sep 2, 2014||Biogen Idec Inc.||Treatment of diffuse large-cell lymphoma with anti-CD20 antibody|
|US9023356||Mar 14, 2008||May 5, 2015||Ludwig Institute For Cancer Research Ltd||Treatment method using EGFR antibodies and SRC inhibitors and related formulations|
|US9072798||Feb 17, 2010||Jul 7, 2015||Ludwig Institute For Cancer Research Ltd.||Specific binding proteins and uses thereof|
|US9090693||Jan 24, 2008||Jul 28, 2015||Dana-Farber Cancer Institute||Use of anti-EGFR antibodies in treatment of EGFR mutant mediated disease|
|US9283276||Aug 14, 2008||Mar 15, 2016||Ludwig Institute For Cancer Research Ltd.||Monoclonal antibody 175 targeting the EGF receptor and derivatives and uses thereof|
|US9296785||Apr 16, 2010||Mar 29, 2016||Wake Forest University Health Sciences||IL-13 receptor binding peptides|
|US9296821||Jun 15, 2012||Mar 29, 2016||Biogen Inc.||Combination therapies for B-cell lymphomas comprising administration of anti-CD20 antibodies|
|US9504744||Jun 20, 2014||Nov 29, 2016||Biogen Inc.||Treatment of diffuse large-cell lymphoma with anti-CD20 antibody|
|US20020187100 *||Oct 19, 2001||Dec 12, 2002||David Rizzieri||Anti-tenascin monoclonal antibody therapy for lymphoma|
|US20020197255 *||Jul 25, 2001||Dec 26, 2002||Idec Pharmaceuticals Corporation||Therapeutic application of chimeric and radiolabelled antibodies to human B lymphocyte restricted differentiation antigen for treatment of B cell lymphoma|
|US20030021781 *||Jul 17, 2001||Jan 30, 2003||Idec Pharmaceuticals Corporation||Therapeutic application of chimeric and radiolabelled antibodies to human B lymphocyte restricted differentiation antigen for treatment of B cell lymphoma|
|US20030082172 *||Mar 14, 2002||May 1, 2003||Idec Pharmaceuticals||Therapeutic application of chimeric and radiolabeled antibodies to human B lymphocyte restricted differentiation antigen for treatment of B cell lymphoma|
|US20030147885 *||Sep 11, 2002||Aug 7, 2003||Idec Pharmaceuticals Corporation||Therapeutic application of chimeric and radiolabeled antibodies to human B lymphocyte restricted differentiation antigen for treatment of B cell lymphoma|
|US20030206903 *||May 19, 2003||Nov 6, 2003||Idec Pharmaceuticals Corporation||Combination therapies for B-cell lynphomas comprising administration of anti-CD20 antibody|
|US20040266672 *||May 6, 2003||Dec 30, 2004||Vlasuk George P||Method of treatment of hemorrhagic disease using a factor VIIa/tissue factor inhibitor|
|US20060115862 *||Nov 16, 2005||Jun 1, 2006||Duke University||Anti-tenascin monoclonal antibody immunoassays and diagnostic kits|
|US20060127311 *||Nov 16, 2005||Jun 15, 2006||Duke University||Radiation dosimetry and blocking antibodies and methods and uses therefor in the treatment of cancer|
|US20060257317 *||May 2, 2006||Nov 16, 2006||Duke University||Combination therapy in the treatment of cancer|
|US20070010449 *||Sep 12, 2006||Jan 11, 2007||Dendreon Corporation||Method of treatment of hemorrhagic disease using a factor VIIa/tissue factor inhibitor|
|US20080038261 *||Aug 18, 2007||Feb 14, 2008||Biogen Idec Inc.||Combination therapies for b-cell lymphomas comprising administration of anti-cd20 antibody|
|US20080089893 *||Jul 25, 2001||Apr 17, 2008||Idec Pharmaceuticals Corporation||Therapeutic application of chimeric and radiolabelled antibodies to human b lymphocyte restricted differentiation antigen for treatment of b cell lymphoma|
|US20080145875 *||Feb 21, 2008||Jun 19, 2008||Duke University||Anti-tenascin monoclonal antibody immunoassays and diagnostic kits|
|US20090074760 *||Apr 9, 2008||Mar 19, 2009||Grillo-Lopez Antonio J||Use of chimeric anti-cd20 antibody as in vitro or in vivo purging agent in patients receiving bmt or pbsc transplant|
|US20100047167 *||Oct 26, 2009||Feb 25, 2010||Duke University||Combination therapy in the treatment of cancer|
|US20100080769 *||Dec 2, 2009||Apr 1, 2010||Biogen Idec Inc.||Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia using Anti-CD20 Antibodies|
|US20100092475 *||Mar 14, 2008||Apr 15, 2010||Terrance Grant Johns||Treatment method using egfr antibodies and src inhibitors and related formulations|
|US20100166744 *||Jan 24, 2008||Jul 1, 2010||Wong Kwok-Kin||Use of anti-egfr antibodies in treatment of egfr mutant mediated disease|
|US20110165159 *||Mar 18, 2011||Jul 7, 2011||Biogen Idec Inc.||Use of chimeric anti-cd20 antibody as in vitro or in vivo purging agent in patients receiving bmt or pbsc transplant|
|US20110217231 *||Dec 20, 2007||Sep 8, 2011||Duke University||Anti-tenascin monoclonal antibody therapy for lymphoma|
|EP2946786A1||Mar 8, 2007||Nov 25, 2015||Wake Forest University Health Sciences||Soluble monomeric Ephrin A1|
|U.S. Classification||424/138.1, 424/179.1, 424/1.11, 424/141.1, 424/181.1, 424/180.1, 424/178.1|
|International Classification||C07K16/30, A61K38/00, A61K47/48|
|Cooperative Classification||A61K38/00, A61K47/48623, C07K16/3053|
|European Classification||A61K47/48T4B30L, C07K16/30L|
|Nov 19, 2002||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: IDEC PHARMACEUTICALS CORP., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NEORX CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:013520/0745
Effective date: 20021112
|Feb 3, 2004||CC||Certificate of correction|