|Publication number||USRE38231 E1|
|Application number||US 10/007,208|
|Publication date||Aug 26, 2003|
|Filing date||Nov 5, 2001|
|Priority date||Jun 9, 1998|
|Publication number||007208, 10007208, US RE38231 E1, US RE38231E1, US-E1-RE38231, USRE38231 E1, USRE38231E1|
|Inventors||William H. Fargason|
|Original Assignee||Fargason William H|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (13), Referenced by (7), Classifications (8), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to hunting blinds. Specifically, the invention is a hunting blind having an enclosed shelter, a vertical tube, and a vent at the bottom of the shelter, which permits the airflow through the blind to flow upward, expelling the occupant's scent high enough so that nearby animals will not smell it.
2. Description of the Related Art
Several inventors have devised other hunting blinds. However, most hunting blinds are designed primarily to fool the animal's eyesight, not their sense of smell. Conversely, the present invention is designed to disguise a hunter or wildlife observer from both the animal's eyes and its nose.
Some inventors use box-shaped blinds. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,018,857, issued to Roy P. Parham, describes a portable, enclosed, collapsible blind comprising hingedly connected panels. The blind is basically box-shaped with an open window in front, and a roof which folds out of the way to allow shooting to the rear. U.S. Pat. No. 4,186,507, issued to Arvil L. Stinnett, describes a blind comprising a collapsible frame covered with cloth.
Other inventors have taken additional steps to make their blinds look like part of the natural environment. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,794,717, issued to Edward O. Horsmann, describes a blind shaped like a bale of hay comprising tenting material covering a tubular frame. U.S. Pat. No. 4,798,019, issued to Patty A. Sury, describes a box-shaped blind having a tubular frame and fabric covering. The top is see through, and the sides have loops for holding surrounding vegetation to disguise the blind. Additionally, U.S. Pat. No. 5,371,966, issued to Rocky A. Hall, describes a cylindrical blind having walls resembling a tree trunk, windows on all sides, and a roof with channels to direct rain away from the windows.
A third style of blinds was designed to elevate the hunter out of an animal's line of sight. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,606,142, issued to Charles F. Reneau, describes an elevated blind without any cross-brackets between the legs, intended to make assembly easier. Another example is U.S. Pat. No. 4,719,716, issued to Tom H. Chrisley Jr., describes a cylindrical blind having windows facing all directions, mounted on a fixed or mobile stand in a manner allowing it to be raised or lowered.
Foreign patents related to tree stands include Austrian Pat. No. 54,220 and Swiss Pat. No. 348,230.
None of the above inventions and patents, taken either singularly or in combination, is seen to describe the instant invention as claimed. Thus a scent-free wildlife blind solving the aforementioned problems is desired.
The present invention is a hunting blind designed not only to hide a hunter from an animal's sight, but also from the animal's sense of smell. The blind comprises a completely enclosed room-type, shelter, having a small air vent at the bottom, and a reinforced flexible hose extending from the top of the blind to a height of approximately 30 feet. A preferred hose is 4 inches in diameter, corrugated, and wire reinforced. Such a hose will be free-standing, but can be lowered to facilitate moving the blind. Preferably, the bottom vent is approximately 4 inches in diameter. The blind includes a door and a plurality of windows, which are substantially airtight when closed, but which can be opened to allow entry/exiting, and to allow shooting from the blind.
When the above-described blind is placed in a field, the wind will create the appropriate airflow due to the air speed differentials between the top vent opening of the hose and its bottom vent opening. For purposes of example, the speed of the wind will be zero at ground level, because of the friction between the wind and the ground. For all distances from the ground low enough to be relevant to this discussion, windspeed will increase with increasing height. The wind is therefore travelling faster 30 feet from the ground, at the top of the flexible tube, than it is near ground level, at the lower air vent. It is well known in physics that, where fluid or gas flow is concerned, the pressure exerted on a surface by the fluid or gas is inversely proportional to the gas' speed. Therefore, the pressure exerted by the wind on the inside of the shelter at the bottom vent is greater than the pressure at the top of the tube. The resulting pressure difference forces air in through the bottom vent, and out through the top tube. The airflow carries the scent of the shelter's occupants out the top of the tube, high enough so that nearby animals will not smell the occupants.
Although the primary purpose of enclosing the blind is to allow the wind to create the necessary airflow, it has the added advantage of protecting the occupants from cold or wet weather.
Accordingly, it is a principal object of the invention to provide a wildlife blind which hides the occupants from the animal's sense of smell.
It is another object of the invention to provide a wildlife blind which bides the occupants from the animal's sight.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a wildlife blind which protects the occupants from cold or wet weather.
Still another object of the invention is to provide a portable wildlife blind.
It is an object of the invention to provide improved elements and arrangements thereof for the purposes described which is inexpensive, dependable and fully effective in accomplishing its intended purposes.
These and other objects of the present invention will become readily apparent upon further review of the following specification and drawings.
FIG. 1 is an environmental view of a scent-free wildlife blind according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a front elevational view of the scent-free wildlife blind, showing airflow through the blind.
FIG. 3 is a top plan view of the scent-free wildlife blind.
FIG. 4 is a side elevational view of the scent-free wildlife blind.
FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view of the scent-free wildlife blind.
Similar reference characters denote corresponding features consistently throughout the attached drawings.
Referring to FIG. 1, the present invention, a scent-free wildlife blind 10, comprises a room-like shelter 12, a tube 14 extending from the top of the shelter to a height of approximately 30 feet from the ground, and a small vent 16 in one side of the shelter close to ground level.
The shelter 12 includes a roof 46, floor 48, front 26, rear 18, and sides 28,30. The shelter 12 must be dimensionally suited to comfortably contain one or more hunters or wildlife observers, and their equipment. Preferably, it is also small enough to be easily portable. Some suggested dimensions are 4 feet long by 4 feet wide by 5½ feet high. Referring to FIG. 5, the rear 18 of the shelter has a door 20, which includes foam rubber strips along the edges 22, limiting air flow through the door when it is closed, to help maintain pressure differentials. Preferably, lock 24 prevents unauthorized access to the blind when it is unoccupied. Referring to FIGS. 3 and 4, the front 26 and sides 28,30 include windows 32,34,36, also having foam rubber strips along the edges 38 to limit air flow when the windows 32,34,36 are closed. The windows can be opened to allow shooting. One suggested embodiment is to hingedly attach the top of the windows 40 so that the window pivots into the shelter when opened.
A preferred and suggested material for the windows 32,34,36 is plexiglass. A suggested material for the remainder of the shelter is plastic, although other materials, such as wood, could certainly be used.
It is suggested that the shelter 12 include a carpeted shelf 41 below front window 34 inside the shelter, as illustrated in FIG. 4. Shelf 40 can serve to help steady a rifle for shooting.
Shelter 12 includes a vent 16 near the bottom of front 26, shown in FIG. 2, or side 28, shown in FIG. 4. The vent is preferably a 4 inch diameter opening.
Referring to FIGS. 1, 2, and 3, tube 14 is attached at end 42 to side 30 near the top. End 44 extends to a height of approximately 30 feet above the ground. The tube is preferably made from 4 inch diameter corrugated, wire reinforced flexible tubing. Such tubing will allow the tube to be free standing when the blind 10 is in use, but will allow the tube to be lowered for ease of transporting the blind 10.
FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate the airflow through the shelter 10. The proper airflow is created by the normal winds around the shelter. For purposes of discussion, the speed of the wind will be zero at ground level due to friction between the air and the ground. Windspeed will increase with increasing height for all heights close enough to the ground to be relevant to this discussion. It is well known in physics that the speed of a fluid or gas over a surface is inversely proportional to the pressure exerted by that gas over that surface. Therefore, because the wind is travelling faster at the top 44 of the tube 14 than at the bottom vent 16, the pressure exerted by the wind on the air inside the blind 10 is higher at vent 16 than at the top 44 of tube 14. This difference in pressure will cause air to flow into vent 16, upwards through shelter 12, into tube end 42, upwards through tube 14, and out through tube end 44, carrying the occupant's scent with it. The scent will exit the shelter 30 feet above the ground, where animals will be unable to smell it.
The inventor has tested two prototypes of his invention, and has observed animals coming within a few feet of the shelter while the inventor occupied the blind. The animals stayed nearby for over an hour, but left within a few minutes of when the inventor opened a window, releasing his scent.
It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, but encompasses any and all embodiments within the scope of the following claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US1123657 *||May 14, 1914||Jan 5, 1915||John H V Bache||Sanitary tent.|
|US3018857 *||Mar 25, 1959||Jan 30, 1962||Roy P Parham||Portable hunting blind|
|US4186507 *||Aug 24, 1977||Feb 5, 1980||Stinnett Arvil L||Portable duck blind|
|US4478234 *||Apr 30, 1982||Oct 23, 1984||Bester Anthony V||Collapsible frame for portable shelters|
|US4606142 *||Jan 22, 1985||Aug 19, 1986||Reneau Charles F||Elevated game blind|
|US4719716 *||Dec 29, 1986||Jan 19, 1988||Chrisley Jr Tom H||Round deer stand|
|US4794717 *||Feb 22, 1988||Jan 3, 1989||Horsmann Edward O||Hunting blind structure|
|US4798019 *||Feb 9, 1988||Jan 17, 1989||Sury Patty A||Portable blind|
|US5101604 *||Apr 12, 1991||Apr 7, 1992||Hot Hed, Inc.||Subterranean well welding habitat|
|US5371966 *||Aug 25, 1993||Dec 13, 1994||Hall; Rocky A.||Cylindrical hunting blind|
|US5749387 *||Jan 7, 1997||May 12, 1998||Thompson; Todd||Portable ice fishing hut|
|AT54220B *||Title not available|
|CH348230A *||Title not available|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8257648 *||Nov 22, 2011||Sep 4, 2012||Scott Elrod||System and method for reducing odors in a blind|
|US8663553||Sep 4, 2012||Mar 4, 2014||Scott Elrod||System and method for reducing odors in a blind|
|US20080164098 *||Jan 4, 2007||Jul 10, 2008||Groves John E||Method and apparatus for controlling human scent while deer hunting|
|US20100200034 *||Jul 18, 2008||Aug 12, 2010||Austen Miller||Ventilable Portable Structure Assembly|
|US20110005561 *||Jul 7, 2010||Jan 13, 2011||Noll Timothy P||Hunting blind|
|US20120063951 *||Nov 22, 2011||Mar 15, 2012||Scott Elrod||System and method for reducing odors in a blind|
|WO2013078282A3 *||Nov 21, 2012||Jun 11, 2015||Scott Elrod||System and method for reducing odors in a blind|
|U.S. Classification||135/93, 52/79.1, 43/1, 135/900, 135/901|
|Jun 6, 2007||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
Year of fee payment: 7
|Jun 6, 2007||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|May 15, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12