|Publication number||USRE38632 E1|
|Application number||US 09/627,652|
|Publication date||Oct 19, 2004|
|Filing date||Jul 28, 2000|
|Priority date||Oct 25, 1995|
|Publication number||09627652, 627652, US RE38632 E1, US RE38632E1, US-E1-RE38632, USRE38632 E1, USRE38632E1|
|Inventors||Keith R. Schmidt, Conrad G. Grembowicz, Alan L. Ferguson|
|Original Assignee||Caterpillar Paving Products Inc|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (39), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (26), Classifications (10), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention relates generally to an apparatus for controlling the propulsion of a paver and, more particularly, to an apparatus for controlling the propulsion of a paver utilizing a microprocessor based system.
Asphalt pavers include a hopper for receiving paving material and a conveyor system for transferring the paving material from the hopper for discharging on the roadbed. Screw augers spread the material on the roadbed in front of a floating screed, which is connected to the paving machine by pivoting tow or draft arms. The screed functions to format and compact the paving material distributed by the augers, ideally leaving the finished road with a uniform, smooth surface.
Such machines may be propelled by using several types of ground engaging traction devices, e.g., rubber wheels or endless metal (or rubber) belts that are disposed on opposite sides of the machine. The steering of a belted type machine is carried out by creating a differential speed between the oppositely disposed ground engaging traction devices.
Unfortunately, such machines that use differential speed steering develop several problems. Once such problem is that the machine does not track straight when it is desired that it do so. Another problem is that the desired turn radius of the machine varies with the travel speed of the machine. Thus, it becomes difficult for the operator to control the machine with a high degree of consistency—a crucial element for asphalt paving.
Another problem of typical pavers is the reliance on analog circuitry to control the propulsion. As is well known, analog circuitry is inflexible and does not allow for customization of machine performance as does programmable digital circuitry.
Finally, another problem of many pavers is the use of the mechanical braking system to stop the machine. Such mechanical braking system are typically used in conjunction with the hydrostatic drive system. However, because rarely does the mechanical braking system act in concert with the hydraulic system, abrupt breaking or wearing of the mechanical brakes may occur.
The present invention is directed to overcoming one or more of the problems as set forth above.
In one aspect of the present invention, an apparatus for controlling the propulsion of a machine having a hydrostatic system that drives a plurality of ground engaging traction devices is disclosed. An electronic controller receives a desired travel speed signal and a steering angle signal, determines a desired rotational speed of the orthogonal engaging traction devices to steer the machine at the desired steering angle, and produces command signals indicative of the desired rotational speeds. An electrohydraulic device receives command signals and responsively controls the speed of the ground engaging traction devices to the desired speed to cause the machine to steer at a desired turning radius that is independent to the actual speed of machine travel.
For a better understanding of the present invention, reference may be made to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 illustrates a side view of an asphalt paver;
FIG. 2 illustrates an electronic control system for a hydrostatic drive system of the paver;
FIG. 3 illustrates a high level block diagram of steering and propelling control method; and
FIG. 4 illustrates a high level block diagram of a pump calibration routine.
Referring now to the drawings, FIG. 1 illustrates a paver 100. The paver 100, as shown, is of the crawler track type having endless metal belts. However, those well skilled in the art can appreciate that the present invention is applicable to a paver of the rubber tire type. The paver 100 has a chassis 110 through which dual feed conveyors carry paving material, such as asphalt material, from a feed hopper 120 located at the front of the layer 100. Spreader augers 125, also referred to as spreading screws, are disposed transversely to and at the rear of the chassis 110. The augers 125 distribute the asphalt material transversely to the direction of travel of the paver 100. The material is spread over the desired width of a strip of pavement. The thickness and width of the pavement is established by the material-compacting, screed assembly 105. As shown, the screed assembly 105 is attached to the chassis 110 by a pair of draft arms 130. Preferably, the screed assembly 105 includes a main screed 135 and an extendable or extension screed 140. The main screed 135 is formed in two sections, one on each side of the center line of the paver. The extension screed 140 is mounted to each of the main screed sections.
An electronic control system 200 for an hydrostatic drive system 205 of the paver 100 is shown in FIG. 2. The hydrostatic drive system 205 includes an internal combustion engine 207 that drives two variable displacement hydraulic pumps 210,215. The swashplate of each pump is actuable by a displacement actuator 220,225. Preferably, each displacement actuator includes a directional solenoid 230,225 that controls the output flow and direction of the respective pump, i.e., either forward or reverse. Each pump 210,215 provides high pressure fluid to a variable displacement motor 240,245, which includes a displacement solenoid 250,255 that is used to actuate the displacement of the respective motor. The motors 240,245 are used to provide the necessary torque in order to propel the machine via the right and left set of tracks. A plurality of spring applied, fluid released service brakes 257 are additionally provided.
The electronic control system 200 includes a microprocessor based controller 260 that includes system memory. The controller 260 receives various sensing signals and controls the displacement of the pumps 210,215 and motors 240,245, and the actuation of the brakes 257 in order to regulate the speed and steering of the machine.
A speed dial 275 is provided for the operator to set the maximum travel speed of the machine based on the engine speed. Accordingly, a speed dial sensor 280 produces a maximum travel speed signal that is proportional to the rotational position of the speed dial 275.
A propel lever 265 is provided for the operator to indicate a desired direction of machine travel, e.g, forward, reverse, or neutral. The propel level 265 additionally controls the acceleration or de-acceleration of the machine by indicating the desired percent of maximum travel speed. Accordingly, a proper level sensor 270 produces a propel signal that is indicative of the desired direction of machine travel and desired percent of maximum travel speed in response to the relative position of the position of the propel lever 265.
A speed range switch 281 is provided for the operator to select a desired speed range, e.g., travel, pave and maneuver. Because the preferred drive system is a hydrostatic drive system, the speed range is set by controlling the displacement of the hydraulic motors 240,245 (although a variable ratio reduction gearing could also be used). Accordingly, a speed range signal is produced in response to the position of the speed range switch 281.
A brake pedal 285 is provided for the operator to “quickly” decelerate or slow the machine.
The brake pedal 285 is intended to be operated by the feet to allow the operator's hands to be “free”. Accordingly, a brake pedal position sensor 290 produces a braking signal having a magnitude that is proportional to the relative position of the brake pedal 285.
Finally, a steering wheel 293 is provided for the operator to steer the machine. Accordingly, a steering sensor 295 produces a steering angle signal that is representative of the desired steering angle of the machine. For example, the steering sensor 295 may sense the rotational position of the steering wheel 293 or, in the case of a rubber tired machine, the steering sensor 295 may be responsible to the steering angle of the steering wheels. Although a steering wheel is shown, it will become apparent to those skilled in the art that a set of levers, pedals, a joystick assembly, or the like may equally be used.
An engine speed sensor 296 produces an engine speed signal in response to the rotational speed of the engine 207. A right track sensor 297 produces a right track signal in response to the rotation of the right track. A left track sensor 299 produces a left track signal in response to the rotation of the left track. Preferably, the track sensors 297,299 are mounted integral to the respective motors 240,245 to monitor the rotation of the respective track drive gear. Thus, the track sensors produce a pulse for each occurrence of a passing tooth of the respective track drive gear.
The controller 260 utilizes arithmetic units to control various processes according to software programs. Typically, the programs are stored in read-only memory, random-access memory or the like. One such process is a braking control method that is discussed below.
The service brakes 257 and the hydrostatic drive system 205 are used as the primary braking system for the machine. For example, the controller 260 reduces the displacement of the pumps 210 in production to the amount of brake pedal depression to slow the machine. Once the machine stops, the controller 260 applies the service brakes 257 to hold the machine stationary. However, the service brakes 257 will be applied when the machine speed is zero or a predetermined time period after the brake pedal is fully depressed, the proper lever 265 is in neutral, or the speed dial 275 is at zero speed.
Another such process is shown with reference to FIG. 3, which shows a high level block diagram of a steering and propelling control method 300. Advantageously, the steering control method 300 provides for the machine to track “straight” and also provides for the machine to turn with a constant radius that is independent to travel speed or engine speed.
A multiplication block 305 receives the propel, braking, and maximum speed signals and produces a desired travel speed signal in response to the product of the received signals.
A software look-up table routine 310 receives the steering angle, speed range, and directional signals, and selects a turning radius value that is indicative of a desired turning radius.
For example, the software look-up table routine may include a separate “map” for the forward and reverse travel directions. Moreover, each map may include several curves that are programmable to provide for different steering or handling characteristics. For example, each curve represents a desired turning radius as a function of the desired steering angle for a predetermined speed range. Note, the software look-up table may be equally substituted with a set of empirical equations used to calculate the turning radius value as a function of the desired steering radius, travel direction and speed range.
A decision block 315 determines whether the turning radius value represents a “straight ahead” or “turning” movement of the machine. If a turning movement is desired a track speed calculation routine 320 receives the desired travel speed signal and the turning radius value, and determines the right and left (or inner and outer) track speeds. For example, the outer and inner track speeds are calculated as follows:
Turn Radius Equations
Vdesired=the desired machine travel speed;
R=the turning radius value; and
G=The gage of the machine, i.e., the width between the track centers.
The turns radius calculations shown above are valid for all turns. However, it is preferable to compare the calculated track speed values with low and high speed limits to compensate for hydraulic component deficiencies.
In general, speed control of hydraulic motors at very low speeds is poor. During very slow speed maneuvering, the calculated track speeds (for a given radius) can yield speeds that are two slow for the motors to achieve; thereby, adversely effecting machine steering. To prevent this type of condition, the inner track speed is limited to a minimum limit. Consequently, if the calculated inner track speed is too low of a value, the inner track speed is set to a minimum value and the outer track speed is recalculated. This prevents the machine steering characteristics from deteriorating at low travel speeds.
Slow Speed Calculations
Similarly, during high speed operations, the calculated track speeds (for a given radius) may be too high for the motors to achieve; thereby, adversely effecting machine steering. To prevent this type of condition, the outer track speed is limited to a maximum limit. Consequently, if the calculated outer track speed is too high, the outer track speed is limited to the maximum value and the inner track speed is re-calculated. This prevents machine steering characteristics from deteriorating at high travel speeds.
High Speed Calculation
Further, it is desirable for the maximum travel speed of the machine to be as high as possible to minimize travel time. Track speed, however, must be limited to maintain desired steering characteristics and correct for track to track component tolerances and environmental conditions, e.g., machine load, temperature, terrain, etc. Advantageously, the present invention utilizes an adaptive or adjustable maximum track speed limit, which is automatically adjusted during machine operation. This provides for a particular machine to operate at a maximum travel speed that is responsive to the machine operating conditions, rather than provide preset limits based on “worst case” production tolerances.
During high travel speeds, the track speeds are monitored and compared to desired track speeds. If the actual track speed is less than the desired speed, the control determines if the track speed is at the maximum track speed limit. The control then adjusts the maximum track speed limit accordingly. Moreover, the control compares the pump command signal magnitudes produced by the PID controllers to a PID limit value to determine if the track speeds can be increased under present machine conditions. If so, the maximum track speed limits for both tracks are increased. However, if not, the maximum track speed limits are decreased.
Adaptive Speed Calculations
In the summary, the track speed calculation routine 320 calculates a desired speed for each track, which maintains a constant turning radius (at a desired steering angle)—irregardless of the machine travel speed.
A software look-up routine 325 receives signals representative of the calculated outer and inner track speeds and retrieves a pump command signal magnitude for each pump. Accordingly, feedback controllers 330,335 receives the pump command signals and deliver the signals to the respective pump solenoids in order to control the flow of fluid to the respective motors. For example, each feedback controller receives signals representative of the desired and actual track speeds, compares the track speeds to each other, and adjusts the respective pump command signal magnitude in order to control the actual track speed to the desired track speed. The feedback controllers 330,335 may use well known proportional plus integral control strategies to produce the respective pump command signals having sufficient magnitudes to accurately regulate the track speeds.
Adverting, back to decision block 315, if a straight-ahead movement is desired, then an adjustment routine 340 is called. The adjustment routine 340 receives the track signals associated with the left and right tracks, compares the number of pulses associated with each signal to one another, and adjusts the pump command signal of the left pump to equalize the track rotations. For example, if the left track is found to have traveled a greater distance than the right track, then the left pump command signal magnitude is decreased. Alternately, if the right track is found to have traveled a greater distance than the left track, then the left pump command signal magnitude is increased. Consequently, the adjustment routine 340 provides for the machine to track straight by equalizing the track rotation of the left and right tracks. Note, it is unimportant which track rotation is corrected, as the right pump command can equally be modified.
Preferably, the adjustment routine bases the adjustments over the entire distance that the machine is tracking straight, rather than making the adjustments over a predetermined time period. This means that the error between the track rotations are continually updated to provide for accurate adjustments.
The above routine is equally applicable to rubber tired machines. For example, to assist the steering of a rubber tired machine, the powered wheels may be controlled with a differential speed to enhance the steering characteristics.
Additionally, the above described control accounts for engine underspeed conditions while the machine is turning. For example, the maximum speed signal is produced in response to a map function where the magnitude of the maximum speed signal is determined in response to the engine speed. Preferably, the maximum speed signal is variable up to a maximum value that corresponds to a minimum engine speed. Thus, during a turning condition (which loads the engine causing the engine speed to droop), the map function causes the desired machine travel speed to be at a value low enough so as to not “kill” the engine, and yet maintain the desired turning radius.
Referring now to FIG. 4, a high level block diagram of a pump calibration routine 400 is shown. The pump calibration routine 400 is used to calibrate the pump command signal to a calibration track speed. The pump calibration routine 400 may be required in the event that the hydraulic components are not “matched”, which could result in undesirable speed transients while the machine accelerates from a zero speed to a desired speed. The flow diagram represents the calibration for the right pump 215, for example; however, the calibration for the left pump 210 is identical.
First, a calibration track speed is read from system memory (block 405), and a pump command signal having a magnitude associated with the calibration track speed is delivered to the right pump solenoid 235 (block 410). The right track speed signal which is indicative of the actual track speed is received (block 415), and compared to the calibration track speed (block 420). If the actual and calibration track speeds are not equal, then the magnitude of the pump command signal is adjusted accordingly, e.g., either positively or negatively. Once the actual and calibration track speed are equal, then the current magnitude of the pump command signal is stored for the calibration speed. Accordingly, the calibration routine is performed for each pump independently so that the associated pump command signal will provide for an accurate track speed. Note that, the calibration routine can be controlled to simultaneously calibrate each pump. Once the pumps have been calibrated, the values are stored and utilized until the hydraulic components are repaired or replaced.
Thus, while the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the preferred embodiment above, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various additional embodiments may be contemplated without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
As described, the present invention is particularly suited to control the propulsion (including steering) of an asphalt paver. In order to be more operator friendly than typical asphalt pavers, the control apparatus associated with the present invention utilizes a steering wheel and a brake pedal, as commonly found in an automobile. Thus, the control apparatus is easier to use than traditional pavers, which use a plurality of levers or pedals that to control the track speed and steering of the machine.
Additional advantages include: the track speed calculation routine, which provides for the actual turn radius of the machine to be independent to machine speed to simulate the steering “feel” of an automobile; the track adjusting routine, which provides for the machine to track straight; the under-speed routine, which limits the pump displacement to provide for a minimum allowable engine horsepower; and the calibration routine, which provides for automatic calibration of the pumps to minimize speed transient problems that occur while the machine is accelerating from a zero speed to the desired speed.
Other aspects, objects and advantages of the present invention can be obtained from a study of the drawings, the disclosure and the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3477225 *||Jun 14, 1967||Nov 11, 1969||Caterpillar Tractor Co||Hydrostatic transmission control system|
|US3803841 *||Jul 10, 1972||Apr 16, 1974||Caterpillar Tractor Co||Steering actuated motor displacement control valve|
|US3908374 *||Aug 28, 1974||Sep 30, 1975||Caterpillar Tractor Co||Hydrostatic drive arrangement|
|US4080850 *||Sep 2, 1975||Mar 28, 1978||Caterpillar Tractor Co.||Controls for combined hydrostatic and multiple speed range transmission units with automatic speed control and braking functions|
|US4096694 *||Jul 5, 1977||Jun 27, 1978||Caterpillar Tractor Co.||Control system for a fluid drive|
|US4161865||Jan 27, 1978||Jul 24, 1979||Caterpillar Tractor Co.||Steering control with hydraulic follow-up|
|US4175628 *||Jul 10, 1978||Nov 27, 1979||Eaton Corporation||Steering control system for dual path hydrostatic vehicle|
|US4185521 *||Nov 14, 1977||Jan 29, 1980||Caterpillar Tractor Co.||Hydraulic control system for a hydrostatic-mechanical transmission|
|US4193323 *||Oct 25, 1977||Mar 18, 1980||Caterpillar Tractor Co.||Controls for combined hydrostatic and multiple speed range transmission units with automatic speed control and braking functions|
|US4203293 *||Oct 25, 1977||May 20, 1980||Caterpillar Tractor Co.||Controls for combined hydrostatic and multiple speed range transmission units with automatic speed control and braking functions|
|US4310078 *||May 1, 1980||Jan 12, 1982||International Harvester Company||Drive system, controlling braking system therefor, and safety lock controlling both|
|US4315555||Oct 22, 1979||Feb 16, 1982||Grad-Line, Inc.||Electro-hydraulic steering system|
|US4399886 *||Dec 9, 1980||Aug 23, 1983||Sundstrand Corporation||Controls for variable displacement motor and motors|
|US4420991 *||Mar 26, 1981||Dec 20, 1983||Zahnradfabrik Friedrichshafen, Ag||Drive system for track-laying vehicle|
|US4527649 *||Apr 18, 1983||Jul 9, 1985||Mauldin Herbert N||Paver steering apparatus|
|US4541497 *||Sep 13, 1982||Sep 17, 1985||Caterpillar Tractor Co.||Control mechanism for operating a tractor|
|US4702358 *||Oct 10, 1986||Oct 27, 1987||Caterpillar Inc.||Clutch brake steering control|
|US4736811 *||May 22, 1987||Apr 12, 1988||Caterpillar Inc.||Steering control system|
|US4754824 *||Jan 27, 1987||Jul 5, 1988||Ab Hagglund & Soner||Method and apparatus for steering a vehicle|
|US4914592 *||Dec 3, 1987||Apr 3, 1990||Trw Inc.||Apparatus for controlling a steering-by-driving system|
|US5099938||Oct 25, 1990||Mar 31, 1992||Aisin Seiki Kabushiki Kaisha||Rear wheel steering apparatus for vehicles|
|US5101919 *||Aug 15, 1990||Apr 7, 1992||Avco Corporation||Steering system for tracked vehicles|
|US5162707 *||Oct 24, 1990||Nov 10, 1992||Fmc Corporation||Induction motor propulsion system for powering and steering vehicles|
|US5208751||Jul 8, 1991||May 4, 1993||Dr. Ing. H.C.F. Porsche Ag||Active four-wheel steering system for motor vehicles|
|US5249422 *||Dec 20, 1991||Oct 5, 1993||Caterpillar Inc.||Apparatus for calibrating the speed of hydrostatically driven traction motors|
|US5249639||Jul 24, 1992||Oct 5, 1993||Caterpillar Inc.||Steering control arrangement|
|US5445234 *||Feb 16, 1994||Aug 29, 1995||General Motors Corporation||Dual drive transmission|
|US5487437 *||Mar 7, 1994||Jan 30, 1996||Avitan; Isaac||Coupled differential turning control system for electric vehicle traction motors|
|US5489005||Nov 23, 1994||Feb 6, 1996||Caterpillar Inc.||Electro-hydraulic steering system|
|US5497692||Mar 2, 1995||Mar 12, 1996||Caterpillar Inc.||Electrohydraulic steering system|
|US5520262||Apr 28, 1995||May 28, 1996||Caterpillar Inc.||Electrohydraulic steering system|
|US5535840 *||Jun 30, 1994||Jul 16, 1996||Kabushiki Kaisha Komatsu Seisakusho||Steering system for use in a track-laying vehicle|
|US5553517||Jul 15, 1994||Sep 10, 1996||Caterpillar Inc.||All wheel drive torque control lever override|
|US5569109 *||Jun 27, 1994||Oct 29, 1996||Kabushiki Kaisha Komatsu Seisakusho||Geared steering device for crawler vehicle and control system therefor|
|US5590041 *||Jul 29, 1994||Dec 31, 1996||Vermeer Manufacturing Company||Track trencher steering system and process|
|US5611405 *||Feb 20, 1996||Mar 18, 1997||Kabushiki Kaisha Komatsu Seisakusho||Turning speed control system for use in a track-laying vehicle|
|US5787374||Oct 25, 1995||Jul 28, 1998||Caterpillar Paving Products, Inc.||Propulsion control apparatus and method for a paver|
|US5805449||May 12, 1995||Sep 8, 1998||Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.||Vehicle motion control system|
|EP0885798A1||May 19, 1998||Dec 23, 1998||Deere & Company||Steering control for tracked vehicles|
|1||Section 260, Steering and Brakes Manual (month and year are not available).|
|2||Steering System of John Deere 800 Series Track Tractors, Dr. Sanjay I. Mistry & Yifei R. Hou, 1998 (month is not available).|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7311172 *||Feb 28, 2005||Dec 25, 2007||Noell Mobile Systems & Cranes Gmbh||Straddle carrier with power steering|
|US7715964 *||May 10, 2005||May 11, 2010||Trimble Navigation, Ltd.||Very low speed vehicle control algorithm operating in the spatial domain|
|US7762360||Feb 20, 2007||Jul 27, 2010||Fabio Saposnik||Vehicle calibration and trajectory control system|
|US7784568 *||Sep 18, 2008||Aug 31, 2010||Freeport-Mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc.||Method and apparatus for controlling tracked vehicles|
|US7848860||Feb 20, 2007||Dec 7, 2010||Fabio Saposnik||Machine loss-of-control detector and shutdown system|
|US7942604 *||Sep 28, 2007||May 17, 2011||Volvo Construction Equipment Ab||Propulsion and steering system for a road milling machine|
|US7967099 *||Jun 19, 2008||Jun 28, 2011||Caterpillar Paving Products Inc.||Method and arrangement of a plurality of propel pumps in a hydrostatically driven compactor|
|US8002073 *||Jan 8, 2009||Aug 23, 2011||Kanzaki Kokyukoki Mfg. Co., Ltd.||Hydraulic drive working vehicle|
|US8061459 *||Jan 17, 2006||Nov 22, 2011||GM Global Technology Operations LLC||Traction control method for a tracked vehicle|
|US8602680 *||Jun 23, 2006||Dec 10, 2013||Wacker Neuson Produktion GmbH & Co., KG||Soil compacting device with automatic or operator-intuitive adjustment of the advance vector|
|US8944719||Nov 9, 2012||Feb 3, 2015||Caterpillar Paving Products Inc.||Tracking of machine system movements in paving machine|
|US9592733 *||Oct 29, 2015||Mar 14, 2017||J. C. Bamford Excavators Limited||Working machine|
|US20040133331 *||Nov 10, 2003||Jul 8, 2004||Sauer-Danfoss (Neumunster) Gmbh & Co. Ogh||System and method for automatic holding of a predetermined course on a vehicle|
|US20060124381 *||Feb 28, 2005||Jun 15, 2006||Noell Mobile Systems & Cranes Gmbh||Straddle carrier with power steering|
|US20070179698 *||Jan 17, 2006||Aug 2, 2007||Oehme Clifford H||Traction control method for a tracked vehicle|
|US20070225891 *||Feb 20, 2007||Sep 27, 2007||Fabio Saposnik||Vehicle calibration and trajectory control system|
|US20070239328 *||Feb 20, 2007||Oct 11, 2007||Fabio Saposnik||Machine loss-of-control detector and shutdown system|
|US20090260911 *||Jan 8, 2009||Oct 22, 2009||Takeaki Nozaki||Hydraulic Drive Working Vehicle|
|US20090314571 *||Jun 19, 2008||Dec 24, 2009||Caterpillar Paving Products Inc.||Method and arrangement of a plurality of propel pumps in a hydrostatically driven compactor|
|US20100021234 *||Sep 28, 2007||Jan 28, 2010||Willis Paul E||Propulsion and steering system for a road milling machine|
|US20100065345 *||Sep 18, 2008||Mar 18, 2010||Autonomous Solutions, Inc.||Method and apparatus for controlling tracked vehicles|
|US20100120578 *||Nov 7, 2008||May 13, 2010||Hichem Bouguerra||Drive and steering control system for an endless track vehicle|
|US20100303546 *||Jun 23, 2006||Dec 2, 2010||Wacker Neuson Se||Soil Compacting Device with Automatic or Operator-Intuitive Adjustment of the Advance Vector|
|US20110093171 *||Nov 26, 2010||Apr 21, 2011||Fabio Saposnik||Machine loss-of-control detector and shutdown system|
|US20130103272 *||Jul 6, 2010||Apr 25, 2013||Volvo Construction Equipment Ab||Horsepower control system of a hybrid excavator and control method therefor|
|US20160121721 *||Oct 29, 2015||May 5, 2016||J.C. Bamford Excavators Limited||Working machine|
|U.S. Classification||701/41, 701/42, 180/6.7, 180/6.32, 701/50|
|International Classification||F16H37/14, B62D11/00, B62D11/22|
|Jul 28, 2000||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CATERPILLAR PAVING PRODUCTS INC., MINNESOTA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FERGUSON, ALAN L.;GREMBOWICZ, CONRAD G.;SCHMIDT, KEITH R.;REEL/FRAME:011017/0245
Effective date: 20000727
|Jan 25, 2005||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Dec 28, 2005||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Dec 22, 2009||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12