|Publication number||USRE39049 E1|
|Application number||US 10/375,341|
|Publication date||Mar 28, 2006|
|Filing date||Feb 27, 2003|
|Priority date||Jul 28, 1992|
|Publication number||10375341, 375341, US RE39049 E1, US RE39049E1, US-E1-RE39049, USRE39049 E1, USRE39049E1|
|Inventors||Larry J. Black, George J. Cullinan|
|Original Assignee||Eli Lilly And Company|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (50), Non-Patent Citations (110), Referenced by (14), Classifications (21), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/920,933, filed on Jul. 28, 1992, now abandoned.
This invention relates to the discovery that a group of 2-phenyl-3-aroylbenzothiophenes is useful in the prevention of bone loss.
The mechanism of bone loss is not well understood, but in practical effect, the disorder arises from an imbalance in the formation of new healthy bone and the resorption of old bone, skewed toward a net loss of bone tissue. This bone loss includes a decrease in both mineral content and protein matrix components of the bone, and leads to an increased fracture rate of, predominantly, femoral bones and bones in the forearm and vertebrae. These fractures, in turn, lead to an increase in general morbidity, a marked loss of stature and mobility, and, in many cases, an increase in mortality resulting from complications.
Bone loss occurs in a wide range of subjects, including post-menopausal women, patients who have undergone hysterectomy, patients who are undergoing or have undergone long-term administration of corticosteroids, patients suffering from Cushing's syndrome, and patients having gonadal dysgensis dysgenesis.
Unchecked, bone loss can lead to osteoporosis, a major debilitating disease whose prominent feature is the loss of bone mass (decreased density and enlargement of bone spaces) without a reduction in bone volume, producing porosity and fragility.
One of the most common types of osteoporosis is found in post-menopausal women affecting an estimated 20 to 25 million women in the United States alone. A significant feature of post-menopausal osteoporosis is the large and rapid loss of bone mass due to the cessation of estrogen production by the ovaries. Indeed, data clearly support the ability of estrogens to limit the progression of osteoporotic bone loss, and estrogen replacement is a recognized treatment for post-menopausal osteoporosis in the United States and many other countries. However, although estrogens have beneficial effects on bone, given even at very low levels, long-term estrogen therapy has been implicated in a variety of disorders, including an increase in the risk of uterine and breast cancer, causing many women to avoid this treatment. Recently suggested therapeutic regimens, which seek to lessen the cancer risk, such as administering combinations of progestogen and estrogen, cause the patient to experience regular withdrawal bleeding, which is unacceptable to most older women. Concerns over the significant undesirable effects associated with estrogen therapy, and the limited ability of estrogens to reverse existing bone loss, support the need to develop alternative therapy for bone loss that generates the desirable effects on bone but does not cause undesirable effects.
Attempts to fill this need by the use of compounds commonly known as antiestrogens, which interact with the estrogen receptor, have had limited success, perhaps due to the fact that these compounds generally display a mixed agonist/antagonist effect. That is, although these compounds can antagonize estrogen interaction with the receptor, the compounds themselves may cause estrogenic responses in those tissues having estrogen receptors. Therefore, some antiestrogens are subject to the same adverse effects associated with estrogen therapy.
The current invention provides methods for inhibiting the loss of bone without the associated adverse effects of estrogen therapy, and thus serves as an effective and acceptable treatment for osteoporosis.
The 2-phenyl-3-aroylbenzothiophene compounds that are the active component in the formulations and methods of this invention were first developed by C. David Jones and Tulio Suarez as anti-fertility agents (see U.S. Pat. No. 4,133,814, issued Jan. 9, 1979). Certain compounds in the group were found to be useful in suppressing the growth of mammary tumors.
Jones later found a group of related compounds to be useful for antiestrogen and antiandrogen therapy, especially in the treatment of mammary and prostatic tumors (see U.S. Pat. No. 4,418,068, issued Nov. 29, 1983). One of these compounds, the compound of formula I wherein X is a bond, R and R1 are hydroxyl, and R2 is a piperidino ring, was clinically tested for a brief time for the treatment of breast cancer. That compound is called raloxifene, formerly keoxifene.
This invention provides new methods for the treatment of bone loss comprising administering to a human in need of treatment an effective amount of a compound of formula I
X is a bond, CH2, or CH2CH2;
R and R1, independently, are hydrogen, hydroxyl, C1-C6-alkoxy, C1-C6-acyloxy, C1-C6-akoxy-C2-C6-acyloxy, R3-substituted aryloxy, R3-substituted aroyloxy, R4-substituted carbonyloxy, chloro, or bromo;
R2 is a heterocyclic ring selected from the group consisting of a pyrrolidino, piperidino, or hexamethyleneimino;
R3 is a C1-C3-alkyl, C1-C3-alkoxy, hydrogen, or halo; and
R4 is C1-C6-alkoxy or aryloxy; or
a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
The invention also provides pharmaceutical formulations for inhibiting bone loss comprising a compound of formula I, wherein R, R1, R2, and X are as defined above in an amount that increases or retains bone density, together with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
The current invention concerns the discovery that a group of 2-phenyl-3-aroylbenzothiophenes (benzothiophenes) of formula I are useful in the treatment of osteoporosis. The benzothiophenes of formula I inhibit the loss of bone that results from a lack of endogenous estrogen such as occurs in women following cessation of menstruation due to natural, surgical, or other processes. The reduction of bone density and mass that more rarely occurs in men is also tied to the loss of hormonal regulation and is therefore also a target for therapy according to the methods of the current invention.
The benzothiophenes of formula I are a series of nonsteroidal compounds that exhibit high affinity for conventional estrogen receptors in primary sex target tissues. However, they elicit minimal estrogenic responses in those tissues, and actually serve as potent antagonists of natural estrogens such as estradiol. In contrast to the report of Feldmann, S. et al., “Antiestrogen and antiandrogen administration reduce bone mass in the rat”, Bone and Mineral, 7:245 (1989), the benzothiophenes of formula I are able to antagonize classical estrogenic responses in primary sex target tissues without significantly reducing bone density when given to intact or estrogen treated animals, and they prevent bone loss in estrogen deficient animals. This dichotomy indicates selective agonist/antagonist actions on specific target cells which would appear to be highly desirable in treatment of the menopausal syndrome. Accordingly, the real benefit of the current discovery is that the benzothiophenes of formula I inhibit the loss of bone but do not elicit significant estrogenic responses in the primary sex target tissues. Thus, the current invention provides a method of inhibiting bone loss comprising administering to a human in need of treatment an amount of a compound of formula I that inhibits bone loss but does not significantly affect the primary sex target tissues. This combination of features allows for long-term treatment of the chronic ailment with a diminished risk of developing the undesirable effects of customary estrogen replacement therapy.
The biological action of the benzothiophenes of formula I is complex and may be unrelated to the detectable presence of the parent compound in the blood. Following oral administration of a preferred benzothiophene of this invention, raloxifene (raloxifene hydrochloride), to human subjects in the clinic, the parent compound was not detected in the serum of those subjects. It was determined that following oral administration, the compound was extensively conjugated to the glucuronidated form and cleared quickly from the bloodstream. Although no biological endpoints were measured in the human recipients, there was concern that the compound was not bioavailable.
Experiments were undertaken to address the bioavailability issue in laboratory animals where biological activity could be assessed. The animal studies indicated that raloxifene was maximally active in inhibiting both uterine uptake of tritiated-estradiol and the normal uterotrophic response to estradiol even under conditions where raloxifene was extensively conjugated in the plasma of the animals. Moreover, the conjugate, isolated from the urine of human subjects treated with raloxifene, displayed significant antiestrogenic/antiuterotrophic activity when administered intravenously to rats, and inhibited the interaction of tritiated-estradiol with rat uterine estrogen receptors in a manner similar to the parent compound. These studies suggested the conjugated compound may have been converted to the parental form at the site of action, presumably by the action of β-glucuronidase. Such conversion may contribute to the activity of the compound. β-Glucuronidase is fairly ubiquitous and is thought to be active in the resorption process of bone remodeling, and would presumably be available for converting the conjugated compound to the parental form if required for activity. Therefore, conjugation of the benzothiophenes of formula I is not considered to be necessarily detrimental to their bioavailability as an inhibitor of bone loss.
Thus, the method of treatment provided by this invention is practiced by administering to a human in need of inhibition of bone loss, a dose of a compound of formula I or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, that is effective to inhibit bone loss. A particular benefit of this method is that it avoids potentially harmful and unacceptable estrogenic side effects. The inhibition of bone loss contemplated by the present method includes both medical therapeutic and/or prophylactic treatment, as appropriate.
The method also includes the administration of a compound of formula I given in combination with estrogen. The term estrogen as used herein refers to any compound which approximates the spectrum of activities of the naturally acting molecule which is commonly believed to be 17β-estradiol. Examples of such compounds include estriol, estrone, ethynyl estradiol, Premarin (a commercial preparation of conjugated estrogens isolated from natural sources—Ayerst), and the like. Again, due to the selective agonist/antagonist properties of the compounds of the formula I, this combination provides for the full benefits of estrogen therapy without the concomitant adverse effects associated with estrogen therapy alone.
The general chemical terms used in the description of a compound of formula I have their usual meanings. For example, the term “C1-C3-alkyl” includes such groups as methyl, ethyl, propyl, and isopropyl.
The term “C1-C6-alkoxy” includes such groups as methoxy, ethoxy, propoxy, butoxy, pentyloxy, and hexyloxy and also includes branched chain structures such as, for example, isopropoxy and isobutoxy.
The term “C1-C6-acyloxy” includes methanoyloxy, ethanoyloxy, propanoyloxy, butanoyloxy, pentanoyloxy, hexanoyloxy, and the like and also includes branched chain structures such as, for example, 2,2-dimethylpropanoyloxy, and 3,3-dimethylbutanoyloxy.
The term “C1-C6-alkoxy-C2-C6-acyloxy” contemplates, for example, methoxyethanoyloxy, methoxypropanoyloxy, methoxybutanoyloxy, methoxypentanoyloxy, methoxyhexanoyloxy, ethoxyethanoyloxy, ethoxypropanoyloxy, ethoxybutanoyloxy, ethoxypentanoyloxy, ethoxyhexanoyloxy, propoxyethanoyloxy, propoxypropanoyloxy, propoxybutanoyloxy, and the like.
It should also be understood that as used herein, references to alkyl and alkoxy structures also include cycloalkyl and cycloalkoxy groups where the number of carbons within the structure is at least 3.
The terms “R3-substituted aryloxy” and “R3-substituted aroyloxy” include such groups as phenyloxy, thienyloxy, furyloxy, naphthyloxy, benzoyloxy, thienoyloxy, furoyloxy, naphthoyloxy, and the like, where the R3 substitution group may be hydrogen, hydroxyl, C1-C3-alkyl, C1-C3-alkoxy, or halo.
The term “R4-substituted carbonyloxy, where the R4 substitution group may be C1-C6-alkoxy or aryloxy, includes carbonate structures such as methoxycarbonyloxy ethoxycarbonyloxy, propoxycarbonyloxy, butoxycarbonyloxy, pentyloxycarbonyloxy, hexyloxycarbonyloxy, phenyloxycarbonyloxy, thienyloxycarbonyloxy, furyloxycarbonyloxy, and naphthyloxycarbonyloxy.
Preferred methods of this invention comprise the use of compounds of formula I wherein R and R1 are other than hydrogen, alkoxy, aryloxy, chloro, or bromo and therefore represent ester and carbonate configurations. Other preferred methods include the use of formula I compounds wherein R and R1 are the same as one another. Certain R2 groups also demonstrate preferable characteristics when used in the methods of this invention. For example, preferred methods of this invention include the use of formula I compounds wherein R2 is piperidino or pyrrolidino, especially piperidino. A further preferred subgroup of the preferred piperidino and pyrrolidino compounds include compounds wherein R and R1 are other than hydrogen and, in particular, those wherein R and R1 are hydroxyl.
All of the compounds used in the methods of the current invention can be made according to established procedures, such as those detailed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,133,814 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,418,068. In general, the process starts with a benzo[b]thiophene having a 6-hydroxyl group and a 2-(4-hydroxyphenyl) group. The starting compound is protected, alkylated, and deprotected to form the formula I compounds wherein R and R1 are both hydroxy. The formula I compounds that are ethers, esters, and carbonates may then be formed if desired. Examples of the preparations of such compounds are provided in the U.S. patents discussed above. Specific preparations of yet other derivatized compounds useful in the current invention are outlined in the Preparations sections below. Modifications to the above methods may be necessary to accommodate reactive functionalities of particular substituents. Such modifications would be both apparent to, and readily ascertained by, those skilled in the art.
The compounds used in the methods of this invention form pharmaceutically acceptable acid and base addition salts with a wide variety of organic and inorganic acids and bases and include the physiologically acceptable salts which are often used in the pharmaceutical chemistry. Such salts are also part of this invention. Typical inorganic acids used to form such salts include hydrochloric, hydrobromic, hydroiodic, nitric, sulfuric, phosphoric, hypophosphoric and the like. Salts derived from organic acids, such as aliphatic mono and dicarboxylic acids, phenyl substituted alkanoic acids, hydroxyalkanoic and hydroxyalkandioic acids, aromatic acids, aliphatic and aromatic sulfonic acids, may also be used. Such pharmaceutically acceptable salts thus include acetate, phenylacetate, trifluoroacetate, acrylate, ascorbate, benzoate, chlorobenzoate, dinitrobenzoate, hydroxybenzoate, methoxybenzoate, methylbenzoate, o-acetoxybenzoate, naphthalene-2-benzoate, bromide, isobutyrate, phenylbutyrate, β-hydroxybutyrate, butyne-1,4-dioate, hexyne-1,4-dioate, caprate, caprylate, chloride, cinnamate, citrate, formate, fumarate, glycollate, heptanoate, hippurate, lactate, malate, maleate, hydroxymaleate, malonate, mandelate, mesylate, nicotinate, isonicotinate, nitrate, oxalate, phthalate, teraphthalate, phosphate, monohydrogenphosphate, dihydrogenphosphate, metaphosphate, pyrophosphate, propiolate, propionate, phenylpropionate, salicylate, sebacate, succinate, suberate, sulfate, bisulfate, pyrosulfate, sulfite, bisulfite, sulfonate, benzene-sulfonate, p-bromophenylsulfonate, chlorobenzenesulfonate, ethanesulfonate, 2-hydroxyethanesulfonate, methanesulfonate, naphthalene-1-sulfonate, naphthalene-2-sulfonate, p-toluenesulfonate, xylenesulfonate, tartarate, and the like.
In addition, some of the formula I compounds may form solvates with water or organic solvents such as ethanol. These solvates are also contemplated for use in the methods of this invention.
The pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salts are typically formed by reacting a compound of formula I with an equimolar or excess amount of acid. The reactants are generally combined in a mutual solvent such as diethyl ether or benzene. The salt normally precipitates out of solution within about one hour to 10 days and can be isolated by filtration or the solvent can be stripped off by conventional means.
Bases commonly used for formation of salts include ammonium hydroxide and alkali and alkaline earth metal hydroxides, carbonates and bicarbonates, as well as aliphatic and aromatic amines, aliphatic diamines and hydroxy alkylamines. Bases especially useful in the preparation of addition salts include ammonium hydroxide, potassium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, calcium hydroxide, methylamine, diethylamine, ethylene diamine, cyclohexylamine and ethanolamine.
The pharmaceutically acceptable salts generally have enhanced solubility characteristics compared to the compound from which they are derived, and thus are often more amenable to formulation as liquids or emulsions.
The current invention also provides useful pharmaceutical formulations for inhibiting bone loss comprising a formula I compound plus one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients. Pharmaceutical formulations can be prepared by procedures known in the art. For example, the compounds can be formulated with common excipients, diluents, or carriers, and formed into tablets, capsules, suspensions, powders, and the like. Examples of excipients, diluents, and carriers that are suitable for such formulations include the following: fillers and extenders such as starch, sugars, mannitol, and silicic derivatives; binding agents such as carboxymethyl cellulose and other cellulose derivatives, alginates, gelatin, and polyvinyl pyrrolidone; moisturizing agents such as glycerol; disintegrating agents such as agaragar, calcium carbonate, and sodium bicarbonate; agents for retarding dissolution such as paraffin; resorption accelerators such as quaternary ammonium compounds; surface active agents such as cetyl alcohol, glycerol monostearate; adsorptive carriers such as kaolin and bentonire; and lubricants such as talc, calcium and magnesium stearate, and solid polyethyl glycols.
The compounds can also be formulated as elixirs or solutions for convenient oral administration or as solutions appropriate for parenteral administration, for instance by intramuscular, subcutaneous or intravenous routes. Additionally, the compounds are well suited to formulation as sustained release dosage forms and the like. The formulations can be so constituted that they release the active ingredient only or preferably in a particular part of the intestinal treat, possibly over a period of time. The coatings, envelopes, and protective matrices may be made, for example, from polymeric substances or waxes.
The particular dosage of a compound of formula I required to treat or inhibit bone loss according to this invention will depend upon the severity of the disease, its route of administration, and related factors that will be decided by the attending physician. Generally, accepted and effective doses will be from about 0.1 to about 1000 mg, and more typically from about 200 to about 600 mg. Such dosages will be administered to a subject in need of treatment from once to about three times each day, or more often as needed to effectively inhibit the bone loss process.
It is usually preferred to administer a compound of formula I in the form of an acid addition salt, as is customary in the administration of pharmaceuticals bearing a basic group such as the piperidino ring. It is also advantageous to administer such a compound by the oral rote to an aging human (e.g. a post-menopausal female or a male showing evidence of bone loss by X-ray analysis). For such purposes the following oral dosage forms are available.
In the formulations which follow, “Active ingredient” means a compound of formula I.
Hard gelatin capsules are prepared using the following:
Ingredient Quantity (mg/capsule) Active ingredient 0.1-1000 Starch, NF 0-650 Starch flowable powder 0-650 Silicone fluid 350 centistokes 0-15
The ingredients are blended, passed through a No. 45 mesh U.S. sieve, and filled into hard gelatin capsules.
Examples of specific capsule formulations containing raloxifene that have been made include those shown below:
Starch flowable powder
Silicone fluid 350 centistokes
Ingredient Quantity (mg/capsule) Raloxifene 5 Starch, NF 108 Starch flowable powder 225.3 Silicone fluid 350 centistokes 1.7
Formulation 4: Raloxifene Capsule
Ingredient Quantity (mg/capsule) Raloxifene 10 Starch, NF 103 Starch flowable powder 225.3 Silicone fluid 350 centistokes 1.7
Formulation 5: Raloxifene Capsule
Starch flowable powder
Silicone fluid 350 centistokes
The specific formulations above may be changed in compliance with the reasonable variations provided.
A tablet formulation is prepared using the ingredients below:
Ingredient Quantity (mg/tablet) Active ingredient 0.1-1000 Cellulose, microcrystalline 0-650 Silicone dioxide, fumed 0-650 Stearate acid 0-15
The components are blended and compressed to form tablets.
Alternatively, tablets each containing 0.1-1000 mg of active ingredient are made up as follows:
(as 10% solution in water)
Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose
The active ingredient, starch, and cellulose are passed through a No. 45 mesh U.S. sieve and mixed thoroughly. The solution of polyvinylpyrrolidone is mixed with the resultant powders which are then passed through a No. 14 mesh U.S. sieve. The granules so produced are dried at 50°-60° C. and passed through a No. 18 mesh U.S. sieve. The sodium carboxymethyl starch, magnesium stearate, and talc, previously passed through a No. 60 U.S. sieve, are then added to the granules which, after mixing, are compressed on a tablet machine to yield tablets.
Suspensions each containing 0.1-1000 mg of medicament per 5 mL dose are made as follows:
Ingredient Quantity (mg/5 ml) Active ingredient 0.1-1000 mg Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose 50 mg Syrup 1.25 mg Benzoic acid solution 0.10 mL Flavor q.v. Color q.v. Purified water to 5 mL
The medicament is passed through a No. 45 mesh U.S. sieve and mixed with the sodium carboxymethyl cellulose and syrup to form a smooth paste. The benzoic acid solution, flavor, and color are diluted with some of the water and added, with stirring. Sufficient water is then added to produce the required volume.
Illustrative compounds that can be used in the formulations and methods of this invention are shown in Table 1.
R and R1
—OC(O)CH2 OCH 3
—OC(O)CH2 OCH 3
In the following Preparations, the compound numbers correspond to those given in Table 1
Raloxifene, 6-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)benzo[b]thien-3-yl-4-[2-(piperidin-1-yl)ethoxyphenyl]methanone hydrochloride, (5.1 g, 10 mmol) was suspended in 250 mL of dry tetrahydrofuran (THF) and 7.1 g (70 mmol) of triethylamine, and approximately 10 mg of 4-(N,N-dimethylamino)pyridine were added. The suspension was cooled in an ice bath and placed under an atmosphere of nitrogen. 4-Fluorobenzoyl chloride (4.75 g, 30 mmol), dissolved in 20 mL of dry THF, was slowly added over a twenty minute period. The reaction mixture was stirred and allowed to slowly warm to room temperature over a period of eighteen hours. It was then filtered, and the filtrate was evaporated to a gum in vacuo. The crude product thus obtained was dissolved in a small volume of chloroform and chromatographed (HPLC) on a silica gel column eluted with a linear gradient of solvent, starting with chloroform and ending with a mixture of chloroform-methanol (19:1 (v/v)). The fractions containing the desired product as determined by thin layer chromatography (silica, chloroform-methanol (9:1)) were combined and evaporated to a gum. The final product was crystallized from ether to give 3.21 g of compound 1.
PMR: consistent with the structure FDMS: m/e=717 M+
Elemental Analysis for C42H33F2NO6S: Theor: C, 70.29; H, 4.60; N, 1.95 Found: C, 70.05; H, 4.60; N, 1.89 Mol. Wt.: 717.
Compound 1 (5.15 g, 7.18 mmol) was dissolved in 25 mL THF, and 150 mL ether was added. Dry HCl gas was bubbled into the solution, and a white gummy precipitate formed. The liquid was removed by decanting, and the residue was crystallized from ethyl acetate with a small amount of ethanol added to effect solution. The product was filtered, washed with ether, and dried to give 4.41 g of Compound 2 as a white powder.
PMR: consistent with the structure
Elemental Analysis for C42H34ClF2NO6S: Theor: C, 66.88; H, 4.54; N, 1.86 Found: C, 66.59, H, 4.39; N, 1.60 Mol. Wt.: 753.5.
The title compound was prepared using procedures analogous to those in Preparation 1, but using cyclopropylcarbonyl chloride, except that the product was not crystallized. Yield=2.27 g.
PMR: consistent with the structure FDMS: m/e=610 M+
Compound 4 was prepared from Compound 3 as described in Preparation 2.
Compound 5 was prepared using the method of Preparation 1, but starting with n-butanoyl chloride, to give 4.12 g of final product as an oil.
PMR: consistent with the structure FDMS: m/e=614 (M+1)
Compound 5 (4.12 g) was dissolved in ethyl acetate (50 mL), and a solution of HCl in ether was added until the precipitation stopped. The liquid was decanted off, and the white, gummy residue was triturated with diethyl ether and filtered. The residue was dried to give 1.33 g of Compound 6.
PMR: consistent with the structure
Elemental Analysis of for C36H40ClNO6S: Theor.: C, 66.50; H, 6.20; N, 2.15 Found: C, 66.30; H, 6.28; N, 1.98 Mol. Wt.: 650.24.
Compound 7 was prepared using the procedure of Preparation 1, but using 2,2-dimethylpropanoyl chloride.
Compound 8 was Prepared from Compound 7, as described in Preparation 2.
FDMS: m/e=641 (M-HCl-1)
Elemental Analysis of C38H44ClNO6S: Theor.: C, 67.29; H, 6.54; N, 2.07 Found: C, 67.02; H, 6.54; N, 1.90 Mol. Wt.: 678.29.
Compound 9 was prepared using the procedures of Preparation 1, but with 3,3-dimethylbutanoyl chloride.
Compound 10 was prepared from Compound 9 as described in Preparation 2.
FDMS: m/e=669 (M-HCl-1)
Elemental Analysis of C40H48ClNO6S: Theor.: C, 68.02; H, 6.85; N, 1.98 Found: C, 67.75; H, 6.83; N, 2.04 Mol. Wt.: 706.35.
Compound 11 was prepared from the free base using a procedure similar to that of Preparation 2.
FDMS: m/e=710 (M-HCl-1)
Elemental Analysis of C44H40ClNO6S: Theor.: C, 70.81; H, 5.39; N, 1.88 Found: C, 71.10; H, 5.39; N, 1.94 Mol. Wt.: 746.33.
Compound 12 was prepared from the appropriate acid chloride as described in Preparation 1.
FDMS: m/e=682 (M+1)
Element Analysis of C42H35NO6S: Calc: C, 73.80; H, 5.14; N, 2.05 Found: C, 73.27; H, 5.27; N, 1.94 Mol. Wt.: 681.8.
Compound 13 was prepared in a manner analogous to that described in Preparation 1, except that n-butylchloroformate was used in place of the acid chloride. Yield=6.13 g in form of oil.
PMR: consistent with structure FDMS: m/e=674 (M+1)
Compound 13 was converted to the hydrochloride salt in a manner analogous to that described in Preparation 6.
PMR: consistent with structure
Elemental Analysis of C38H44ClNO8S: Calc: C, 64.26; H, 6.24; N, 1.97 Found: C, 63.97; H, 6.34; N, 1.98 Mol. Wt.: 710.29.
This compound was prepared in a manner analogous to that described in Preparation 13, but using the appropriate acyl ester. Yield=3.59 g of final product as a tan amorphous powder.
PMR: consistent with structure FDMS: m/e=713 (M+)
Compound 15 was converted to the hydrochloride salt in a manner analogous to that described in Preparation 6.
PMR: consistent with structure
Elemental Analysis of C38H44ClNO8S: Calc: C, 67.24; H, 4.84; N, 1.87 Found: C, 66.94; H, 4.96; N, 1.84 Mol. Wt.: 750.27.
Compound 17 was prepared as described in Preparation 1 using the appropriate acid halide. Yield=3.5 g of a white amorphous powder.
PMR: consistent with structure FDMS: m/e=781 (M+)
Elemental Analysis of C50H39NO6S: Calc: C, 76.80; H, 5.03; N, 1.79 Found: C, 76.53; H, 5.20; N, 1.53 Mol. Wt.: 781.94.
Compound 18 was prepared as described in Preparation 1 using the appropriate acid halide. Yield=3.61 g of a gummy solid.
PRM: consistent with structure FDMS: m/e=618 (M+1)
Compound 19 was prepared from 3.5 g of Compound 18 as described in Preparation 2. Yield=1.65 g of amorphous white powder.
PMR: consistent with structure FDMS: m/e=618 (M+1)
Elemental Analysis of C34H36NO8S: Calc: C, 62.43; H, 5.55; N, 2.14 Found: C, 62.23; H, 5.63; N, 2.15.
The following nonlimiting examples illustrate the methods and formulations of this invention.
In the examples illustrating the methods, a model of post-menopausal osteoporosis was used in which effects of different treatments upon femur density were determined.
Seventy-five day old female Sprague Dawley rats (weight range of 225 to 275 g) were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Portage, Mich.). They were housed in groups of 3 and had ad libitum access to food (calcium content approximately 1%) and water. Room temperature was maintained at 22.2°±1.7° C. with a minimum relative humidity of 40%. The photoperiod in the room was 12 hours light and 12 hours dark.
One week after arrival, the rats underwent bilateral ovariectomy under anesthesia (44 mg/kg Ketamine and 5 mg/kg Xylazine (Butler, Indianapolis, Ind.) administered intramuscularly). Treatment with vehicle, estrogen, or a compound of formula I was initiated on the day of surgery following recovery from anesthesia. Oral dosage was by gavage in 0.5 mL of 1% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC). Body weight was determined at the time of surgery and weekly thereafter and the dosage was adjusted with changes in body weight. Vehicle or estrogen treated ovariectomized (ovex) rats and non-ovariectomized (intact) rats were evaluated in parallel with each experimental group to serve as negative and positive controls.
The rats were treated daily for 35 days (6 rats per treatment group) and sacrificed by decapitation on the 36th day. The 35 day time period was sufficient to allow maximal reduction in bone density, measured as described herein. At the time of sacrifice, the uteri were removed, dissected free of extraneous tissue, and the fluid contents were expelled before determination of wet weight in order to confirm estrogen deficiency associated with complete ovariectomy. Uterine weight was routinely reduced about 75% in response to ovariectomy. The uteri were then placed in 10% neutral buffered formalin to allow for subsequent histological analysis.
The right femurs were excised and scanned at the distal metaphysis 1 mm from the patellar groove with single photon absorptiometry. Results of the densitometer measurements represent a calculation of bone density as a function of the bone mineral content and bone width.
The results of control treatments from five separate experiments are accumulated in Table 2. In summary, ovariectomy of the rats caused a reduction in femur density of about 25% as compared to intact vehicle treated controls. Estrogen, administered in the orally active form of ethynyl estradiol (EE2), prevented this loss of bone in a dose dependent manner, but it also exerted a stimulatory action on the uterus resulting in uterine weights approaching that of an intact rat when administered at 100 μg/kg. Results are reported as the mean of measurements from thirty rats ±the standard error of the mean.
In these studies, raloxifene also prevented bone loss in a dose dependent manner; however, only minimal increase of uterine weight over the ovariectomized controls was present in these animals. The results of five assays using raloxifene are combined in Table 3. Accordingly, each point reflects the responses of thirty rats and depicts a typical dose response curve for raloxifene in this model. Results are reported as the mean + the standard error of the mean.
170 ± 3
127 ± 5
(0.5 mL CMC oral)
220 ± 4
545 ± 19
(0.5 mL CMC oral)
EE2 100 μg/kg, oral
210 ± 4
490 ± 11
171 ± 3
127 ± 5
(0.5 mL CMC oral)
222 ± 3
540 ± 22
(0.5 mL CMC oral)
raloxifene 0.01 mg/kg, oral
176 ± 3
150 ± 5
raloxifene 0.10 mg/kg, oral
197 ± 3
196 ± 5
raloxifene 1.00 mg/kg, oral
201 ± 3
199 ± 5
raloxifene 10.00 mg/kg, oral
199 ± 3
186 ± 4
Raloxifene was administered alone or in combination with ethynyl estradiol. Rats treated with raloxifene alone had uterine weights which were marginally higher than the overiectomized controls and much less than those of ethynyl estradiol treated rats, which approached those of the intact controls. Conversely, raloxifene treatment significantly reduced bone loss in ovariectomized rats, and when given in combination with ethynyl estradiol it did not appreciably reduce the protective effect of the estrogen on bone density. The results are shown in Table 4.
162 ± 4
142 ± 18
(0.5 mL CMC oral)
219 ± 5
532 ± 49
(0.5 mL CMC oral)
EE2 100 μg/kg, oral
202 ± 6
450 ± 17
EE2 100 μg/kg +
204 ± 2
315 ± 10
raloxifene 0.10 mg/kg, oral
EE2 100 μg/kg +
200 ± 5
250 ± 21
raloxifene 1 mg/kg, oral
165 ± 8
116 ± 6
(0.5 mL CMC oral)
220 ± 4
605 ± 69
(0.5 mL CMC oral)
EE2 100 μg/kg, oral
215 ± 11
481 ± 24
raloxifene 1 mg/kg +
197 ± 7
263 ± 17
EE2 100 μg/kg, oral
raloxifene 1 mg/kg
198 ± 11
202 ± 5
The ability of raloxifene to inhibit bone loss was compared to that of tamoxifen (SIGMA, St. Louis, Mo.). Tamoxifen, a well known antiestrogen currently used in the treatment of certain cancers, has been shown to inhibit bone loss (see for example, Love, R., et al. 1992 “Effects of tamoxifen on bone mineral density in post-menopausal women with breast cancer”, N Eng J Med 326:852; Turner, R., et al. 1988 “Tamoxifen inhibits osteoclast-mediated resorption of trabecular bone in ovarian hormone-deficient rats”, Endo 122:1146). A relatively narrow range of doses of raloxifene and tamoxifen was administered orally to ovariectomized rats as in the previous example. Although both of these agents displayed the ability to prevent reduction of femur density while evoking only modest uterotrophic activity, as identified by gains in uterine weight (Table 5), a comparison of several histological parameters demonstrated a marked difference between the rats treated with these agents (Table 6).
Increases in epithelial height are a sign of estrogenicity of therapeutic agents and may be associated with increased incidence of uterine cancer. When raloxifene was administered as described in Example 1, only at one dose was there any statistically measurable increase in epithelial height over the ovariectomized controls. This was in contrast to the results seen with tamoxifen and estrogen. At all doses given, tamoxifen increased epithelial height equal to that of an intact rat, about a six-fold increase over the response seen with raloxifene. Estradiol treatment increased epithelial height to a thickness greater than intact rats.
Estrogenicity was also assessed by evaluating the adverse response of eosinophil infiltration into the stromal layer of the uterus (Table 6). Raloxifene did not cause any increase in the number of eosinophils observed in the stromal layer of ovariectomized rats while tamoxifen caused a significant increase in the response. Estradiol, as expected, caused a large increase in eosinophil infiltration.
Little or no difference was detectable between raloxifene and tamoxifen effects on thickness of the stroma and myometrium. Both agents caused an increase in these measurements that was much less than the effect of estrogen.
A total score of estrogenicity, which was a compilation of all four parameters, showed that raloxifene was significantly less estrogenic than tamoxifen.
171 ± 5
126 ± 17
(0.5 mL CMC oral)
208 ± 4
490 ± 6
(0.5 mL CMC oral)
EE2 100 μg/kg, oral
212 ± 10
501 ± 37
raloxifene 1 mg/kg, oral
207 ± 13
198 ± 9
tamoxifen 1 mg/kg, oral
204 ± 7
216 ± 18
(0.5 mL CMC oral)
(0.5 mL CMC oral)
EE2 100 μg/kg, oral
raloxifene 1 mg/kg
tamoxifen 1 mg/kg
Other compounds of formula I were administered orally in the rat assay described in Example 1. Table 7 reports the effect of a 1 mg/kg dose of each compound in terms of a percent inhibition of bone loss and percent uterine weight gain.
of Bone Lossa
aPercent inhibition of bone loss = (bone density of treated ovex animals − bone density of untreated ovex animals) − (bone density of estrogen treated ovex animals − bone density of untreated ovex animals) × 100.
bPercent uterine weight gain = (uterine weight of treated ovex animals − uterine weight of ovex animals) − (uterine weight of estrogen treated ovex animals − uterine weight of ovex animals) × 100.
Fracture rate as a consequence of osteoporosis is inversely correlated with bone mineral density. However, changes in bone density occur slowly, and are measured meaningfully only over many months or years. It is possible, however, to demonstrate that the formula I compounds, such as raloxifene, have positive effects on bone mineral density and bone loss by measuring various quickly responding biochemical parameters that reflect changes in skeletal metabolism. To this end, in a current test study of raloxifene at least one hundred-sixty patients are enrolled and randomized to four treatment groups: estrogen, two different doses of raloxifene, and placebo. Patients are treated daily for eight weeks.
Blood and urine are collected before, during, and at the conclusion of treatment. In addition, an assessment of the uterine epithelium is made at the beginning and at the conclusion of the study. Estrogen administration and placebo serve as the positive and negative controls, respectively.
The patients are healthy post-menopausal (surgical or natural) women, age 45-60 who would normally be considered candidates for estrogen replacement in treatment for osteoporosis. This includes women with an intact uterus, who have had a last menstrual period more than six months, but less than six years in the past.
Patients who have received any of the following medications systematically at the beginning of the study are excluded from the study: vitamin D, corticosteroids, hypolipidemics, thiazides, antigout agents, salicylates, phenothiazines, sulfonates, tetracyclines, neomycin, and antihelmintics. Patients who have received any estrogen, progestin, or androgen treatment more recently than three months prior to the beginning of the study; patients who have ever received calcitonin, fluoride, or bisphosphonate therapy; patients who have diabetes mellitus; patients who have a cancer history anytime any time within the previous five years; patients with any undiagnosed or abnormal genital bleeding; patients with active, or a history of, thromboembolic disorders; patients who have impaired liver or kidney function; patients who have abnormal thyroid function; patients who are poor medical or psychiatric risks; or patients who consume an excess of alcohol or abuse drugs.
Patients in the estrogen treatment group receive 0.625 mg/day and the two raloxifene groups receive dosages of 200 and 600 mg/day, all groups receiving oral capsule formulations. Calcium carbonate, 648 mg tablets, is used as calcium supplement with all patients taking 2 tablets each morning during the course of the study.
The study is a double-blind design. The investigators and the patients do not know the treatment group to which the patient is assigned.
A baseline examination of each patient includes quantitative measurement of urinary calcium, creatinine, hydroxyproline, and pyridinoline crosslinks. Blood samples are measured for serum levels of osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, raloxifene, and raloxifene metabolites. Baseline measurements also include examination of the uterus including uterine biopsy.
During subsequent visits to the investigating physician, measurements of the above parameters in response to treatment are repeated. The biochemical markers listed above that are associated with bone resorption have all been shown to be inhibited by the administration of estrogen as compared to an untreated individual. Raloxifene is also expected to inhibit the markers in estrogen deficient individuals as an indication that raloxifene is effective in inhibiting bone loss from the time that treatment is begun.
Subsequent longer term studies can incorporate the direct measurement of bone density by the use of a photon absorptiometry and the measurement of fracture rates associated with therapy.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4133814 *||Sep 17, 1976||Jan 9, 1979||Eli Lilly And Company||2-Phenyl-3-aroylbenzothiophenes useful as antifertility agents|
|US4185108 *||Sep 15, 1978||Jan 22, 1980||Westwood Pharmaceuticals Inc.||Antiosteoporotic agents|
|US4380635||Dec 16, 1981||Apr 19, 1983||Eli Lilly And Company||Synthesis of acylated benzothiophenes|
|US4418068 *||Dec 16, 1981||Nov 29, 1983||Eli Lilly And Company||Antiestrogenic and antiandrugenic benzothiophenes|
|US4729999 *||Oct 12, 1984||Mar 8, 1988||Bcm Technologies||Antiestrogen therapy for symptoms of estrogen deficiency|
|US4894373 *||Jan 12, 1988||Jan 16, 1990||Bcm Technologies, Inc.||Antiestrogens and their use in treatment of menopause and osteoporosis|
|US4970237 *||Feb 14, 1989||Nov 13, 1990||Yale University||Use of clomiphene to increase bone mass in premenopausal women|
|US5011853||Jan 26, 1990||Apr 30, 1991||Washington University||Compounds for treatment of cholinergic neurotoxins|
|US5075321||Feb 24, 1988||Dec 24, 1991||University Of Pennsylvania||Methods of treating diseases characterized by interactions of IgG-containing immune complexes with macrophage Fc receptors using antiestrogenic benzothiophenes|
|US5118667||May 3, 1991||Jun 2, 1992||Celtrix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.||Bone growth factors and inhibitors of bone resorption for promoting bone formation|
|US5208031||Jul 29, 1991||May 4, 1993||Kelly Patrick D||Sexual lubricants containing zinc as an anti-viral agent|
|US5393763||Jan 12, 1994||Feb 28, 1995||Eli Lilly And Company||Methods for inhibiting bone loss|
|US5395842||Dec 2, 1991||Mar 7, 1995||Endorecherche Inc.||Anti-estrogenic compounds and compositions|
|US5441947||Aug 25, 1993||Aug 15, 1995||Eli Lilly And Company||Methods of inhibiting vascular restenosis|
|US5445941||Jun 21, 1993||Aug 29, 1995||Eli Lilly And Company||Method for screening anti-osteoporosis agents|
|US5457116||Oct 15, 1993||Oct 10, 1995||Eli Lilly And Company||Methods of inhibiting uterine fibrosis|
|US5457117||Oct 26, 1994||Oct 10, 1995||Eli Lilly And Company||Method for inhibiting bone loss using 6-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-benzo[B][2-(piperidin-1-yl)ethoxyphenylimethanone hydrochloride|
|US5461065||Oct 15, 1993||Oct 24, 1995||Eli Lilly And Company||Methods for inhibiting endometriosis|
|US5462949||Dec 21, 1993||Oct 31, 1995||Eli Lilly And Company||Methods of inhibiting fertility in women|
|US5464845||Nov 30, 1993||Nov 7, 1995||Eli Lilly And Company||Methods for lowering serum cholesterol|
|US5468773||Jun 13, 1994||Nov 21, 1995||Eli Lilly And Company||Methods for inhibiting bone loss and cartilage degradation using wortmannin and its analogs|
|US5472962||Nov 11, 1992||Dec 5, 1995||Teikoku Hormone Mfg. Co., Ltd.||Benzothiophene derivative|
|US5478847||Mar 2, 1994||Dec 26, 1995||Eli Lilly And Company||Methods of use for inhibiting bone loss and lowering serum cholesterol|
|US5482949||Mar 19, 1993||Jan 9, 1996||Eli Lilly And Company||Sulfonate derivatives of 3-aroylbenzo[b]thiophenes|
|US5510370||Mar 6, 1995||Apr 23, 1996||Eli Lilly And Company||Parathyroid hormone and raloxifene for increasing bone mass|
|US5534527||Apr 14, 1995||Jul 9, 1996||Eli Lilly And Company||Methods for inhibiting bone loss by treating with aroylbenzothiophenes and estrogen|
|US5567713||Jan 9, 1995||Oct 22, 1996||Eli Lilly And Company||Hypoglycemic agents|
|US5591753||Jan 28, 1994||Jan 7, 1997||Eli Lilly And Company||Combination treatment for osteoporosis|
|US5624940||Jun 30, 1995||Apr 29, 1997||Eli Lilly And Company||Aqueous solution inclusion complexes of benzothiophene compounds with water soluble cyclodextrins, and pharmaceutical formulations and methods thereof|
|US5629425||Sep 19, 1994||May 13, 1997||Eli Lilly And Company||Haloalkyl hemisolvates of 6-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-3-[4-piperidinoethoxy)-benzoyl]benzo[b]thiophene|
|US5641790||Apr 14, 1995||Jun 24, 1997||Eli Lilly And Company||Methods of use for inhibiting bone loss and lowering serum cholesterol|
|US5646137||Aug 20, 1996||Jul 8, 1997||Eli Lilly And Company||Combination treatment for osteoporosis|
|US5731327||Jun 6, 1995||Mar 24, 1998||Eli Lilly And Company||Synthesis of 3- 4-(2-aminoethoxy)benzoyl!-2-aryl-6-hydroxybenzo b!thiophenes|
|US5747510||Jan 27, 1997||May 5, 1998||Eli Lilly And Company||Pharmaceutical unit dosage formulations|
|US5811120||Mar 26, 1997||Sep 22, 1998||Eli Lilly And Company||Solid orally administerable raloxifene hydrochloride pharmaceutical formulation|
|US5972383||Jun 1, 1998||Oct 26, 1999||Eli Lilly And Company||Solid orally administerable raloxifene hydrochloride pharmaceutical formulation|
|US6087378||Sep 1, 1999||Jul 11, 2000||Eli Lilly And Company||Pharmaceutical formulations and applications thereof for the treatment of estrogen deprivation syndrome|
|US6096781||Nov 4, 1998||Aug 1, 2000||Eli Lilly And Company||2-arylbenzo[B]thiophenes useful for the treatment of estrogen deprivation syndrome|
|US6156786||Nov 4, 1998||Dec 5, 2000||Eli Lilly And Company||2-aryl-3-aroylbenzo[b]thiophenes useful for the treatment of estrogen deprivation syndrome|
|US6395769||May 12, 2000||May 28, 2002||Eli Lilly And Company||2-arylbenzo[b]thiophenes useful for the treatment of estrogen deprivation syndrome|
|US6458811||Mar 10, 1997||Oct 1, 2002||Eli Lilly And Company||Benzothiophenes formulations containing same and methods|
|US6713494||Aug 25, 1997||Mar 30, 2004||Eli Lilly And Company||Amorphous benzothiophenes, methods of preparation and methods of use|
|EP0062505A1||Apr 1, 1982||Oct 13, 1982||Eli Lilly And Company||A process for preparing acylated benzothiophenes|
|EP0068563A2 *||Jun 16, 1982||Jan 5, 1983||THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY||Heterocyclic acetic acid compounds and compositions for treating bone diseases|
|EP0605193A1||Dec 22, 1993||Jul 6, 1994||Eli Lilly And Company||Use of benzothiophenes for treatment of hypercholesterolaemia|
|GB2097788A||Title not available|
|NO304924B1||Title not available|
|WO1993010113A1||Nov 11, 1992||May 27, 1993||Teikoku Hormone Mfg. Co., Ltd.||Novel benzothiophene derivative|
|WO1993010741A2||Dec 1, 1992||Jun 10, 1993||Endorecherche Inc.||Sex steroid activity inhibitors|
|WO1998010113A1||Sep 8, 1997||Mar 12, 1998||Institut Français Du Petrole||Method for manufacturing self-hardening steel wire, reinforcing wire and application to a flexible duct|
|1||*||"Tamoxifen Trial Restricted", Scrip No. 1702 Mar. 20, 1992, p. 22.|
|2||Ammann, P., R. Rizzoli, D. Slosman, and J. P. Bonjour. 1992. Sequential and precise in vivo measurement of bone mineral density in rats using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. J. Bone Miner. Res. 7:311-316.|
|3||Banks PK, Meyer K, Brodie AM H. Regulation of Ovarian Steroid Biosynthesis by Estrogen During Proestrus in the Rat. Endocrinology 1991;129(3):1295-1304.|
|4||*||Beall, et al., Calcif Tissue Int. 36: 123-125 (1984).|
|5||Black LJ, Jones CD, Falcone JF. Antagonism of Estrogen Action with a New Benzothiophene Derived Antiestrogen. Life Sciences 1983;32:1031-1036.|
|6||Black, L. J., C. D. Jones, J. H. Clark, and J. A. Clemens. 1982. LY 156758: A unique anti-estrogen displaying high affinity for estrogen receptors, negligible estrogenic activity and near-total estrogen antagonism in vivo. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2:279.|
|7||Bucolo, G., and H. David. 1973. Quantitative determination of serum triglycerides by the use of enzymes. Clin. Chem. 19:476-482.|
|8||Buzdar AU, Marcus C, Holmes F, Hug V, Hortobagyi G. Phase II Evaluation of LY156758 in Metastatic Breast Cancer. Oncology 1988;45(5):344-345.|
|9||Cells and Materials, Supplement 1, 1991, The Aged Rat Model for Bone Biology Studies, pp. 1-192.|
|10||Chao, Y., E. E. Windler, G. C. Chen, and R. J. Havel. 1979. Hepatic catabolism of rat and human lipoproteins in rats treated with 17-alpha-ethinyl estradiol. J. Biol. Chem. 254:11360-11366.|
|11||Chou Y, Iguchi T, Bern H. Effects of Antiestrogens on Adult and Neonatal Mouse Reproductive Organs. Reprod Toxicol 1992;6(5):439-46.|
|12||Clemens JA, Bennett DR, Black LJ, Jones CD. Effects of a New Antiestrogen, Keoxifene (LY156758), on Growth of Carcinogen-Induced Mammary Tumors and on LH and Prolactin Levels. Life Sci 1983;32(25):2869-2875.|
|13||Consensus Conference. Osteoporosis. 1984. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 252:799-802.|
|14||Cummings, S. R. 1991. Evaluating the benefits and risks of postmenopausal hormone therapy. Am J. Med. 91 (Suppl. 5B): 14S-18S.|
|15||Cypriani B, Tabacik C, Descomps B, Crastes DP A. Role of Estrogen Receptors and Antiestrogen Binding Sites in an Early Effect of Antiestrogens, The Inhibition of Cholesterol Biosynthesis. J. Steroid Biochem 1988;31(5):763-771.|
|16||Cypriani B, Tabacik C, Descomps B. Effect on Estradiol and Antiestrogens on Cholesterol Biosynthesis in Hormone-Dependent and Independent Breast Cancer Cell Lines. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, ser Mol. Cell Res 1988:972(2):167-178.|
|17||Daniel CW, Silberstein GB, Strickland P. Direct action of 17beta-estradiol on mouse mammary ducts analyzed by sustained release implants and steroid autoradiography. Cancer Res 1987;47(22):6052-57.|
|18||De Launoit Y, Veilleux R, Dufour M, Simard J, Labrie F. Characteristics of the biphasic action of androgens and of the potent antioproliferative effects of the new pure antiestrogen EM-139 on cell cycle kinetic parameters in LNCaP human prostatic cancer cells. Cancer Res 1991;51(19):5165-5170.|
|19||de Winter FR and Steendijk R; The effect of a low-calcium diet in lactating rats; observations on the rapid development and repair of osteoporosis: Calcif. Tiss. Res.; vol. 17, 1975, pp. 303-316.|
|20||Donati, R. J., P. V. Harper, A. Hughes, and R. V. Hay. 1990. Serum cholesterol- and apoprotein B-lowing effects on cis-tamoxifen. Arteriosclerosis. 10:822A.|
|21||Dukes M, Chester R, Yarwood L and Wakeling AE; Effects of a non-steroidal pure antioestrogen, ZM 189, 154, on oestrogen target organs of the rat including bones; Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 141, 1994, pp. 335-341.|
|22||*||FDC Reports T&G 11, Mar. 30, 1992.|
|23||*||Feldman, et al., Bone and Mineral 7, 245-254 (1989).|
|24||Fisher B, Costantino JP, Redmond CK, Fisher ER, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM, et al., Endometrial cancer in tamoxifen-treated breat cancer patients: findings from the national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project (NSABP) B-14; Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 86, No. 7, Apr. 6, 1994, pp. 527-537.|
|25||Fornander T et al., Adjuvant tamoxifen in early breast cancer: occurrence of new primary cancers; The Lancet; Jan. 21, 1989, pp. 117-120.|
|26||Furr BJA and Jordan VC; The pharmacology and clinical uses of tamoxifen; Pharmac. Ther., vol. 25, 1984, pp. 127-205.|
|27||Gallagher A, Chambers TJ, and Tobias JH, The estrogen antagonist ICI 182, 780 reduces cancellous bone volume in female rats; Endocrinology, vol. 133, 1993, pp. 2787-2791.|
|28||Gierthy JF, Lincoln DW II, Roth KE, Bowser SS, Bennett JA, Bradley L and Dickerman HW. Estrogen-stimulation of postconfluent cell accumulation and foci formation of human MCF-7 breast cancer cells. J. Cell. Biochem 1991;45(2):177-187.|
|29||Gordon, T., W. B. Kannel, M.C. Hjortland, and P.M. McNamara. 1978. Menopause and coronary heart disease: The Framingham Study. Ann. Int. Med. 89:157-161.|
|30||Gottardis MM, Jordan VC. Antitumor actions of keoxifene and tamoxifen in the n-nitrosomethylurea-induced ray mammary carcinoma model. Cancer Res 1987;47(15):4020-4024.|
|31||Gottardis MM, Ricchio ME, Satyaswaroop PG, Jordan VC. Effect of steroidal and nonsteroidal antiestrogens on the growth of a tamoxifen-stimulated human endometrial carcinoma (EnCa101) in athymic mice. Cancer Res 1990;50(11):3189-3192.|
|32||Gray JM, Ziemian L. Antiestrogen binding sites in brain and pituitary of ovariectomized rats. Brain Res 1992;578(1-2):55-60.|
|33||Hubert J-F, Vincent A, Labrie F. Estrogenic activity of phenol red in ray anterior pituitary cell in culture. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 1986;141(3):885-891.|
|34||Janssens JP, Billiet G, Bonte J, and De Loecker W, Effects of daily anti-estrogen treatment on uterine growth and progesterone receptor concentrations in adult rat uterus; Anticancer Research, vol. 4, 1984, pp. 157-162.|
|35||Jones, C. D., T. Suarez, E. H. Massey, L. J. Black, and F. C. Tinsley. 1979. Synthesis and anti-estrogenic activity of [3,4-dihydro-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-napthalenyl] [4-(2-pyrrolidinyl) ethoxy]-phenyl] methanone, methanesulfonic acid salt. J. Med. Chem.22:962-966.|
|36||*||Jones, et al., J. Med. Chem., 27, 1057-1066 (1984).|
|37||Jordan VC and Gosden B, Inhibition of the uterotropic activity of estrogens and antiestrogens by the short acting antiestrogen LY117018, Endocrinology, vol. 113, No. 2, 1983, pp. 463-468.|
|38||Jordan VC, Biochemical pharmacology of antiestrogen action; Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 36, No. 4, 1984, pp. 245-275.|
|39||Jordan VC, Gottardis MM. Tamoxifen-stimulated growth of human endometrial carcinoma. New York Acad. Sci 1991;622:439-446.|
|40||Jordan VC, The strategic use of antiestrogens to control the development and growth of breast cancer; Cancer Supplement, vol. 70, No. 4, Aug. 15, 1992, pp. 977-982.|
|41||Jordan VC. Laboratory studies to develop general principles for the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer with antiestrogens: problems and potential for future clinical applications. Breast cancer res. Treat 1983;3(Suppl):73-86.|
|42||*||Jordan, et al., Breast Cancer Research Treatment, 10: 31-35 (1987).|
|43||Jordan, V. C., K. E. Allen, and C. J. Dix. 1980. Pharmacology of tamoxifen in laboratory animals. Cancer Treat. Rep. 64:745-759.|
|44||Judd, H. L., D. R. Meldrum, L. J. Deftos, and B. E. Henderson. 1983. Estrogen replacement therapy: Indications and complications. Ann. Int. Med. 98:195-205.|
|45||Kalu, D. N. 1991. The ovariectomized rat model of post-menopausal bone loss. Bone Miner. 15:175-192.|
|46||Kalu, D. N., C. C. Liu, E. Salerno, B. Hollis, R. Echon, and M. Ray. 1991. Skeletal response of ovariectomized rats to low and high doses of 17beta-estradiol. Bone Miner. 14:175-187.|
|47||Katz, J, Finlay, TH, Banerjee S, Levitz M. An Estrogen-Dependent Esterase Activity in MCF-7 Cells. J. Steroid Biochem. 1987;vol. 26, No. 6:687-692.|
|48||Kessel B, Hsueh AJW. Keoxifene (LY 156758) inhibits follicle-stimulating hormone induced differentiation of cultured rat granulosa cells. Life Sci 1987;40(11):1089-1097.|
|49||Kimmel, DB, Animal models for in vivo experimentation in osteoporosis research: Osteoporosis; Chapter 33, pp. 671-690, 1996.|
|50||Kleinberg DL, Todd J, Babitsky G. Inhibition by estradiol of the lactogenic effect of prolactin in primate mammary tissue: reversal by antiestrogens LY 156758 and tamoxifen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1983;80:4144-4148.|
|51||Knecht M, Brodie AM H., Catt KJ. Aromatase inhibitors prevent granulosa cell differentiation: an obligatory role for estrogens in luteinizing hormone receptor expression. Endocrinology 1985;117(3):1156-1161.|
|52||Knecht M, Tsai-Morris CH, Catt KJ. Estrogen Dependence of Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Expression in Cultured Rat Granulosa Cells. Inhibition of Granulosa Cell Development by the Antiestrogens Tamoxifen and Keoxifene. Endocrinoloby 1985;16:1771-1777.|
|53||Kurl, R. N., and N. M. Borthwick. 1980. Clomiphene and tamoxifen action in the rat uterus. J. Endocrinol. 85:519-524.|
|54||Labrie F, Poulin R, Simard J, Zhao HF, Labrie C, Dauvois S et al. Interactions between estrogens, androgens, progestine, and glucocorticoids in ZR-75-1 human breast cancer cells. Ann. New York Acad. Sci 1990;595:130-148.|
|55||Labrie F, Simard J, Poulin R, Hatton A-C, Labrie C, Dauvois S et al. Potent antagonism between estrogens and androgens on GCDFP-15 expression and cell growth in the ZR-75-1 human breast cancer cells. Ann. New York Acad. Sci 1990;586:174-187.|
|56||Liehr JG, Folse DS, Roy D. Lack of effectiveness of antiestrogens RU 39,411 or keoxifen in the prevention of estrogen-induced tumors in Syrian hamsters. Cancer Lett 1992;64(1):23-29.|
|57||Lindsay R et al., Long-term prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis by estrogen; The Lancet; May 15, 1976, pp. 1038-1040.|
|58||Lindstrom TD, Whitaker NG, Whitaker GW. Disposition and metabolism of a new benzothiophene antiestrogen in rats, dogs and monkeys. Xenobiotica 1984;14(11):841-847.|
|59||*||Love, et al., The New England Journal of Medicine 326, No. 13, 852-856 (1992).|
|60||Love, R. R., D. A. Wiebe, P. A. Newcomb, L. Cameron, H. Leventhal, V. C. Jordan, J. Feyzi, and D. L. DeMets. 1991. Effects of tamoxifen on cardiovascular risk factors in post-menopausal women. Ann. Intern. Med. 115:860-864.|
|61||Love, R. R., L. Cameron, B. L. Connell, and H. Leventhal. 1991. Symptoms associated with tamoxifen treatment in postmenopausal women. Arch. Intern. Med. 151:1842-1847.|
|62||Luthy IA, Begin D, Labrie F. Mediation by the androgen receptor of the stimulatory and antiandrogenic cations of 17beta-estradiol on the growth of androgen-sensitive shionogi mammary carcinoma cells in culture. Endocrinology 1988;123(3):1418-1424.|
|63||Ma, P. T. S., T. Yamamoto, J. L. Goldstein, and M. S. Brown. 1986. Increased mRNA for low density lipoprotein receptor in livers of rabbits treated with 17-alpha-ethinyl estradiol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 83:792-796.|
|64||Marcus R, Secondary Forms of Osteoporosis; Disorders of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, 1992, Chapter 38, pp. 889-904.|
|65||Mariotti A, Durham J, Frederickson R, Miller R, Butcher F, Mawhinney M. Actions and interactions of estradiol and retinoic acid in mouse anterior prostate gland. Biol. Reprod 1987;37(3):1023-1035.|
|66||Martinoli MG, Veilleux R, Pelletier G. Effects of triiodothyronine, dexamethasone and estradiol-17beta on GH mRNA in rat pituitary cells in culture as revealed by in situ hybridization. Acta Endocrinol 1991;124(1):83-90.|
|67||Matthews, K. A., E. Meilahn, L. H. Kuller, S. F. Kelsy, A. W. Cagguila, and R. R. Wing. 1989. Menopause and risk factors for coronary heart disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 321:641-646.|
|68||McArdle CA, Schomerus E, Groner I, Poch A. Estradiol regulates gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor number, growth and inositol phosphate production in alphaT3-1 cells. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol 1992;87(1-3):95-103.|
|69||Meisel RL, Dohanich GP, McEwen BS, Pfaff DW. Antagonism of sexual behavior in female rats by ventromedial hypothalamic implants of antiestrogen. Neuroendocrinology 1987;45(3):201-207.|
|70||Moon LY, Wakley GK, Turner RT. Dose-Dependent Effects of Tamoxifen on Long Bones in Growing Rats: Influence of Ovarian Status: Endocrinology 1991; 129(3):1568-74.|
|71||Neubauer BL, Best KL, Clemens JA, Gates CA, Goode RL, Jones CD, Laughlin ME, Shaar CJ, Toomey RE, Hoover DM. Endocrine and Antiprostatic Effects of Raloxifene (LY156758) in the Male Rat. The Prostate 1993; 23:245-262.|
|72||Neubauer BL, Biser P, Jones CD, Mariotti A, Hoover DM, Thornton T et al. Antagonism of androgen and estrogen effects of guinea-pig seminal vesicle epithelium and fibromuscular stroma by keoxifene LY-156758. The Prostate 1989;15(3):273-286.|
|73||Ortmann O, Emons G, Knuppen R, Catt KJ. Inhibitory actions of keoxifene on luteinizing hormone secretion in pituitary gonadotrophs. Endocrinology 1988;123(2):962-968.|
|74||Ortmann O, Sturm R, Knuppen R, Emons G. Weak estrogenic activity of phenol red in the pituitary gonadotroph: re-evaluation of estrogen and antiestrogen effects. J. Steroid Biochem 1990;35(1):17-22.|
|75||Osborne CK, Hobbs K, Clark GM. Effect of estrogens and antiestrogens on growth of human breast cancer cells in athymic nude mice. Cancer Res 1985;45(2):584-590.|
|76||Overgaard, K., M. A. Handen, S. B. Jensen, and C. Christiansen. 1992. Effect of salcatonin given intranasally on bone mass and fracture rates in established osteoporosis: A dose-response study. Br. Med. J. 305:556-561.|
|77||Peterson SL, Barraclough CA. Suppression of spontaneous LH surges in estrogen-treated overiectomized rats by microimplants of antiestrogens into the preoptic brain. Brain Res 1989;484(1-2):279-289.|
|78||Poulin R, Baker D, Labrie F. Androgens inhibit basal and estrogen-induced cell proliferation in the ZR-75-1 human breast cancer cell line. Breast Cancer Res. Treat 1988;12(2):213-225.|
|79||Poulin R, Labrie F. Stimulation of cell proliferation and estrogenic response by adrenal C<SUB>19</SUB>-Delta5-steroids in the ZR-75-1 human breast cancer cell line. Cancer Res 1986;46(10):4933-4937.|
|80||Poulin R, Merand Y, Poirier D, Levesque C, Dufour J-M, Labrie F. Antiestrogenic properties of keoxifene, trans-4-hydroxytamoxifen, and ICI 164384, a new steroidal antiestrogen, in ZR-75-1 human breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. Treat 1989;14(1):65-76.|
|81||Richards J, Imagawa W, Balakrishnan A, Edery M, Nandi S. The lack of effect of phenol red or estradiol on the growth response of human, rat, and mouse mammary cells in primary culture. Endocrinology 1988;123(3):1335-1340.|
|82||Riggs, B. L. 1991. Overview of osteoporosis. West. J. Med. 154:63-77.|
|83||Sanders M, Levinson Al, Schreiber AD. Hormonal modulation of macrophage clearance of IgG sensitized cells. Clin Res 1987;35(3):268-275.|
|84||Sikes, RA, Thomsen S, Petrow W, Neubauer BL, Chung LWK. Inhibition of Experimentally Induced Mouse Prostatic Hyperplasia by Castration or Steroid Antagonist Administration. Biology of Reproduction 1990;43:353-362.|
|85||Simard J, Labrie F. Adrenal C<SUB>19</SUB>-5-ene steroids induce full estrogenic responses in rat pituitary gonadrotrophs. J Steroid Biochem May 1987;26(5):539-546.|
|86||Simard J, Labrie F. Keoxifene shows pure antiestrogenic activity in pituitary gonadotrophs. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 1985;39:141-144.|
|87||Snyder BW, Beecham GD, Winneker RC. Studies on the mechanism of action of danazol and gestrinone (R2323) in the rat: evidence for a masked estrogen component. Fertil. Steril 1989;51(4):705-710.|
|88||Snyder BW, Beecham GD, Winneker RD. Danazol suppression of luteinizing hormone in the rat: evidence for mediation by both androgen and estrogen receptors. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med 1990;194(1):54-57.|
|89||Staels, B., J. Auwerx, L. Chan, A. von Tol, M. Rosseneu, and G. Verhoeven. 1989. Influence of development, estrogens, and food intake on apolipoprotein A-I, A-II and E mRNA in rat liver and intestine. J. Res. 30:1137-1145.|
|90||Sundstrom SA, Komm BS, Xu Q, Boundy V, Lyttle RC. The stimulation of uterine complement component C3 gene expression by antiestrogens. Endocrinology 1990;126(3):1449-1456.|
|91||Szego, C., and S. Roberts. 1953. Steroid action and interactions in uterine metabolism. Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 8:419-468.|
|92||Thomas T, Kiang DT. Additive growth-inhibitory effects of DL-alpha-difluoromethylomithine and antiestrogens on MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 1987;148(3):1338-1345.|
|93||Tsai P-S, Uchima F-D A., Hamamoto ST, Bern HA. Proliferation and differentiation of prepubertal mouse vaginal epithelial cells in vitro and the specificity of estrogen-induced growth retardation. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol 1991;27 A(6):461-468.|
|94||*||Turner, et al., Endocrinology, 122, No. 3, 1146-1150 (1988).|
|95||*||Turner, et al., Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 2, No. 5, 449-456 (1987).|
|96||U.S. Appl. No. 10/446,210, filed May 27, 2003, Black et al.|
|97||Veldhuis JD, Azimi P, Juchter D, Garmey J. Mechanisms subserving the bipotential actions of estrogen on ovarian cells; studies with a selective anti-estrogen, LY 156758, and the sparingly metabolizable estrogen agonist, moxestrol. J. Steroid biochem 1986;24(5):977-982.|
|98||Veldhuis JD, Rodgers RJ, Furlanetto RW. Synergistic actions of estradiol and the insulin-like growth factor Somatomedin-C on swine ovarian (granulosa) cells. Endocrinology 1986;119(2):530-538.|
|99||Wakeling AE, Valcaccia B, Newboult E, Green LR. Non-steroidal antioestrogens-receptor binding and biological response in rat mammary carcinoma and human breast cancer cells. J. Steroid biochem 1984;20(1):111-120.|
|100||Wakeling AE, Valcaccia B. Antioestrogenic and antitumor activities of a series of non-steroidal antioestrogens. J. Endocrinol 1983;99(3):455-464.|
|101||Wakley GK and Turner RT. Sex Steroids and the Regulation of Bone Volume in the Rat. Cells & Material Supplement. 1991, vol. 1, pp. 85-91.|
|102||Walsh, B. W., I. Schiff, B. Rosner, L. Greenberg, V. Ravnikar, and F. M. Sacks. 1991. Effects of post-menopausal estrogen replacement on the concentrations and metabolism of plasma lipoproteins. N. Engl. J. Med. 325:1196-1204.|
|103||Welshons WV, Rottinghaus GE, Nonneman DJ, Dolan-Timpe M, Ross PF. A sensitive bioassay for detection of dietary estrogens in animal feeds. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest Oct. 1990;2(3):268-273.|
|104||Wiebe, D. A., and J. T. Bernert. 1984. Influence of incomplete cholesterylester hydrolysis on enzymatic measurements of cholesterol. Clin. Chem. 30:352-356.|
|105||*||Williams, et al., Bone and Mineral 14, 205-220 (1991).|
|106||*||Williams, et al., Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 6(1991).|
|107||Windler, E. E. T., P.T. Kovanen, Y Chao, M.S. Brown, R. J. Havel, and J. L. Goldstein. 1980. The estradiol-stimulated lipoprotein receptor of rat liver, J. Biol. Chem. 255:10464-10471.|
|108||Wronski, T. J., and C.-F. Yen. 1991. The ovariectomized rats as an animal model for postmenopausal bone loss. Cells Mater. (Suppl.1):69-74.|
|109||Wronski, T. J., C.-F. Yen, K. W. Burton, R. C. Mehta, P. S. Newman, E. E. Soltis, and P.P. DeLuca. 1991. Skeletal effects of calcitonin in ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology. 129:2246-2250.|
|110||Wronski, T. J., M. Cintron, A. L. Doherty, and L. M. Dann. 1988. Estrogen treatment prevent osteopenia and depresses bone turnover in ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology. 123:681-686.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7454805||Oct 24, 2005||Nov 25, 2008||Hill-Rom Services, Inc.||Hospital bed|
|US7926131||Jul 22, 2009||Apr 19, 2011||Hill-Rom Services, Inc.||Hospital bed|
|US8151387||Jan 26, 2011||Apr 10, 2012||Hill-Rom Services, Inc.||Hospital bed frame|
|US8367105||Nov 10, 2004||Feb 5, 2013||Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.||Compressed solid dosage form manufacturing process well-suited for use with drugs of low aqueous solubility and compressed solid dosage forms made thereby|
|US8367106||Jul 7, 2006||Feb 5, 2013||Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.||Compressed solid dosage form manufacturing process well-suited for use with drugs of low aqueous solubility and compressed solid dosage forms made thereby|
|US8597666||Oct 28, 2011||Dec 3, 2013||Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.||Compressed solid dosage form manufacturing process well-suited for use with drugs of low aqueous solubility and compressed solid dosage forms made thereby|
|US9009893||Mar 15, 2012||Apr 21, 2015||Hill-Rom Services, Inc.||Hospital bed|
|US20040167170 *||Feb 24, 2004||Aug 26, 2004||Cohen Fredric J.||Methods of preventing breast cancer|
|US20060096029 *||Oct 24, 2005||May 11, 2006||Osborne Eugene E||Hospital bed|
|US20060099252 *||Nov 10, 2004||May 11, 2006||Ilan Zalit|
|US20060106010 *||Jun 13, 2005||May 18, 2006||Black Larry J||Methods for inhibiting bone loss|
|US20090313758 *||Jul 22, 2009||Dec 24, 2009||Menkedick Douglas J||Hospital bed|
|US20110159084 *||Apr 2, 2009||Jun 30, 2011||Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd.||Raloxifene pharmaceutical formulations|
|US20110162145 *||Jan 26, 2011||Jul 7, 2011||Osborne Eugene E||Hospital bed frame|
|U.S. Classification||514/333, 514/422, 514/448, 514/578, 514/443|
|International Classification||A61K31/00, A61K31/40, A61K31/55, A61K31/4535, A61K31/425, A61K31/445|
|Cooperative Classification||A61K31/445, A61K31/55, A61K31/40, A61K31/4535, A61K31/425|
|European Classification||A61K31/4535, A61K31/55, A61K31/425, A61K31/445, A61K31/40|
|Jul 26, 2006||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Jan 2, 2007||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Jun 9, 2009||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, INDIANA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DRAPER, MICHAEL W.;REEL/FRAME:022793/0604
Effective date: 20090609
|Sep 8, 2009||CC||Certificate of correction|