|Publication number||USRE39051 E1|
|Application number||US 09/712,596|
|Publication date||Mar 28, 2006|
|Filing date||Nov 14, 2000|
|Priority date||Sep 15, 1997|
|Also published as||CN1204685C, CN1215284A, EP0902457A1, US5842154|
|Publication number||09712596, 712596, US RE39051 E1, US RE39051E1, US-E1-RE39051, USRE39051 E1, USRE39051E1|
|Original Assignee||Eni Technology, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (16), Non-Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (9), Classifications (10), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention relates to plasma generation equipment, and is particularly directed to an automatic RF matching network to match the impedance of a reactive plasma chamber or similar non-linear load to a constant impedance (e.g., 50 ohms) output of an RF generator or similar RF source. The invention is more particularly concerned with a fuzzy logic technique that is capable of controlling two, or more, tunable elements in the matching network using both the phase error signal and magnitude error signal associated with the matching network.
In a typical RF plasma generator arrangement, a high power RF source produces an RF wave at a preset frequency, i.e., 13.56 MHZ, and this is furnished along a power conduit to a plasma chamber. The RF power is also typically provided at a fixed, known impedance, e.g., 50 ohms. Because there is typically a severe impedance mismatch between the RF power source and the plasma chamber, an impedance matching network is interposed between the two. There are non-linearities in the plasma chamber which make it difficult to simply set the impedance match network at fixed positions for a plasma process. At the input to the matching network there is located a phase and magnitude error detector that produces two (or more) error signals representing the magnitude of impedance error and phase error. Magnitude error is the difference between the magnitude of the nominal input impedance (typically 50Ω and the magnitude of the actual input impedance. Phase error is the deviation between the phase at the nominal input impedance (typically zero degrees) and the phase at the actual input impedance. The error signals also indicate the direction or sign (+ or −) of the magnitude error and phase error.
The conventional matching network uses these two error signals to control two variable tuning elements: phase error being used to control one tuning element and magnitude error being used to control the other tuning element. The phase and magnitude error signals drive motors associated with variable capacitors or perhaps a tuning slug of a variable inductor. The error signals drop to a low or zero level when a matched condition has been achieved.
The conventional system has experienced difficulty in quickly achieving matched impedance under a number of conditions. One primary problem is that the current design does not address the fact that each tuning element affects both error signals. Because of this effect, the error signals may drive one or both of the tuning elements away from the match or tune point. This prolongs the tuning process, and causes slower, less reliable tuning. Another problem arises because the phase and magnitude error signals alone do not always provide enough information to drive the matching network to the tune point. This means that the matching network may have “lost conditions” where it will be unable to reach impedance match. A third problem is that the error signal produced by a given movement of a tuning element varies with the tuning element's position. In other words, if the tuning element is near the minimum end of its travel, a 10% change in position may produce a 50% change in error signal amplitude, but if the tuning element is near the maximum end of its travel, the same 10% change might produce only a 5% change in error signal amplitude. This will cause the control loop stability to vary depending upon the position of the tuning elements. However, at the present time, no practical system even tracks the tuning element (e.g., rotor) position as an input.
A cross-point approach to address the first-mentioned problem has been proposed previously, but still uses only a single error signal for each of two tuning elements. Another problem is that this approach requires a hard, fixed threshold rather than a gradual transition.
A lost-recovery approach has been proposed to address the second problem mentioned above, namely the “lost conditions” problem. In this approach the system detects that impedance match has been lost, and then moves the tuning elements to predetermined “lost recovery” positions, from which it can tune to a match. This approach wastes considerable time in recovering impedance match, and may not work with every load in the tuning range.
The industry does not seem to have recognized the third problem arising from the non-linearity of the error signal across its range. Also, the desirability of using more than one error signal to control each tuning element has not been recognized, nor has any process been proposed for combining multiple error signals to control each of the tuning elements associated with the impedance matching network.
Fuzzy logic has been employed as a control algorithm in many applications, and has the advantage of reducing a complex multi-dimensional treatment to a rather straight-forward algorithm based on a simple set of rules. Fuzzy logic is based on Fuzzy Set Theory, a branch of mathematics developed by Prof. Lofti A. Zadeh in the 1960's. Fuzzy logic provides a robust, non-linear and efficient approach to control by mapping inputs to outputs using a minimal amount of code. The basis for fuzzy logic and fuzzy controls has been explained in many places in the mathematical and engineering literature. Basically, the fuzzy logic control process can be described as a small number steps or stages. First, the process control engineer establishes a number of overlapping fuzzy sets, e.g., “high positive,” “medium positive,” “zero” or small, “medium negative,” and “high negative.” In the first stage, i.e., “fuzzification,” crisp, discrete input values are fuzzified, that is, they are converted into appropriate degrees of membership in overlapping fuzzy sets. Then, in a rule application stage, rules are applied to define the relation between the input variables and the output variables. These rules are provided in terms of a “fuzzy interference function” and represent a relation that should be intuitive to the process engineer. These can be a series of IF-AND-THEN statements, or can be constructed as a straightforward table, grid or matrix. An output or defuzzification stage converts the fuzzy variables to crisp output values that are applied as control values or signals to a control device, such as the rotor of a variable capacitor.
No one has previously considered employing fuzzy logic to the control the tuning of an impedance match network, and no one has previously appreciated that an application of fuzzy logic would resolve the three problems mentioned above.
It is an object of this invention to provide the scheme for controlling the tuning of an RF matching network that avoids the drawbacks of the prior art.
It is another object of this invention to provide automatic tuning of an RF matching network that avoids problems of single variable control of the tuning elements, “lost conditions” and non-linearity across the tuning range.
It is a further object to provide automatic tuning of the RF matching network which is fast and reliable, and which is easily implemented and adjusted.
According to an aspect of this invention, a fuzzy logic method is employed for tuning an RF matching network of the type having an input at which is applied RF power at a given frequency and at a given impedance, and an output which applies such power to an RF load having a non-constant impedance, such as an RF plasma chamber. The matching network has a phase-magnitude error detector providing a phase error signal and a magnitude error signal related respectively to the differences between nominal and actual input phase angle, i.e., Δφ and between nominal and actual impedance ΔZ. The matching network has at least a first variable impedance having a driven element for varying its impedance, and a second variable impedance having a driven element for varying its impedance. The fuzzy logic control technique involves the steps of supplying the phase and the magnitude error signals to a fuzzy logic controller, wherein each error signal has a magnitude and direction. Then the error signals are each applied to a fuzzy logic inference function based on membership in one or more fuzzy sets, which may be overlapping fuzzy sets. The value, i.e., the size and direction of each error signal enjoys membership in one, two, or more overlapping fuzzy sets. Fuzzy logic rules are applied to the phase and magnitude error signals according to the fuzzy sets for which said first and second error signals enjoy membership. A plurality of drive signal values are obtained, based on the fuzzy logic rules for each of the phase and magnitude error signals. The drive signal values are weighted according to respective fuzzy interference functions for which the error signals enjoy membership. Then the weighted drive signal values are combined to produce an output drive signal for the first variable impedance-device driven element. A similar process creates an output drive signal for the second variable impedance. According to the fuzzy logic rules, the phase and magnitude error signals are used jointly to obtain each of the output drive signals.
The fuzzy logic rules can be expressed as a matrix of N×M drive current values, where N is the number of fuzzy sets of said first error signal and M is the number of fuzzy sets of said second error signal. Here, to obtain each drive current value, there is a given set of rules applying the first error signal and the second error signal.
A fuzzy logic controller is provided according to another aspect of this invention for tuning an RF matching network, wherein the matching network is positioned between a source of applied RF power at a given frequency and at a given impedance, and an RF load, such as an RF plasma chamber, having a non-constant impedance. A phase-magnitude error detector produces a phase error signal and a magnitude error signal related respectively to the phase error and magnitude error in input impedance, as discussed earlier. The matching network also has at least a first variable impedance having a driven element for varying the impedance thereof and a second variable impedance having a driven element for varying the impedance thereof. The fuzzy logic controller has input means to receive the values of the phase and magnitude error signals. The controller applies these values of error signals to a fuzzy logic inference function based on a number of overlapping fuzzy sets. The values of error signals enjoy membership in one, two, or more overlapping fuzzy sets. Fuzzy logic rules are applied to the phase and magnitude error signals, with the rules depending on the fuzzy sets for which the error signals enjoy membership. Drive signal values are obtained according to the fuzzy logic rules for each fuzzy set for which the error signals enjoy membership. The drive signal values are weighted according to the respective fuzzy inference functions for the values of these error signals. Then the weighted drive signal values are combined to produce an output drive signal for the first variable impedance device driven element. Additional drive signal values are obtained based on additional fuzzy logic rules for each of the phase and magnitude error signals. Then these additional drive signal values are weighted according to additional respective fuzzy inference functions, and the weighted drive signal values are combined to produce an output drive signal for the second variable impedance device driven element.
The fuzzy logic controller quickly drives the turning elements to a matched impedance state, and avoids lost condition problems. The fuzzy logic controller can be implemented in hardware, or can be based on a programmed device such as a digital signal processor (DSP) or a microprocessor. The fuzzy logic controller function can operate in background, or can employ a separate hardware device to free the DSP for other functions such as signal processing, motor control, user interface, or other functions. A separate independent PC can be employed to carry out the fuzzy logic tuning.
Further enhancements in performance can be obtained by employing additional inputs. For example, tuning element positions can be used as inputs to linearize loop gain as a function of position. This can achieve higher overall loop gain and faster tuning speeds. A reduction or elimination of lost conditions can be achieved by using additional sensors, e.g., voltage and current at the RF plasma chamber, and then applying the detected levels as additional inputs to the fuzzy logic controller.
The improvements of this invention use fuzzy logic to provide a practical method to analyze multiple inputs and to produce signals which will drive multiple tuning elements. In a minimal system, the fuzzy controller inputs can consist of phase and magnitude errors, and the fuzzy outputs can consist of one or both of the drive signals for the tuning elements.
The invention can be easily extended to control of three or more variable tuning devices.
The above and many other objects, features, and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the ensuing description of a preferred embodiment, which is to be read in conjunction with the accompanying Drawing.
With reference to the Drawing figures, and initially to
A fuzzy logic controller 26 has inputs to receive the phase error signal Δφ and to receive the magnitude error signal ΔZ, and respective control signal outputs CS1 and CS2 for controlling respective first and second variable impedance devices within the unit 22. An optional third control signal output CS3 is shown in ghost lines. Additional sensors 28 can optionally provide the fuzzy logic controller 26 with additional input signals, e.g., time rate of change of phase error. The fuzzy logic controller can be a separate unit, but may also be incorporated into the housing of the impedance matching network 16. The operating codes, including the fuzzy logic rule matrix and fuzzy logic inference function algorithm can be stored in a memory device (not shown) of the controller 26. This memory device can be a programmable read-only memory, such as an E-PROM, capable of storing downloaded program codes, and providing for revision of the codes to optimize the tuning of the matching network 16. It is also possible to employ a “fixed match” arrangement, and use the error signals Δφ and ΔZ to control the frequency of the plasma generator 12.
The fuzzy logic controller 26 here accomplishes three operations on the input signals, which are here shown as the phase error signal Δφ, the impedance magnitude error signal ΔZ, and any additional error signals, e.g., from other sensors 28. The error signals are first applied to a fuzzification stage 29, where the error signals are applied to respective fuzzy inference functions 30, 32, 34. These functions here are shown as sequences of overlapping triangular or trapezoidal ramp functions, and will be explained in detail shortly. Then, in a rule evaluation stage 35, predetermined rules are applied, depending on the fuzzy sets in the fuzzification stage 29 to which each of the error signals enjoys membership. These can be expressed as IF-AND-THEN logic statements, such as IF the phase error is negative and large, AND IF the magnitude error is positive and medium, THEN apply a positive large drive signal as CS1 and apply a negative medium drive signal as CS2. The rules for all combinations of fuzzy set memberships of phase error and magnitude error can be considered as a matrix of N×M rules, where N is the number of fuzzy sets of phase error and M is the number of fuzzy sets of magnitude error. The several drive signal values obtained in the rule elevation stage 35 are then converted to discrete drive signal values CS1, CS2, CS3, etc., in a defuzzification stage 37.
In the fuzzification stage 29, ramp-shaped membership functions, or fuzzy inference functions 32 and 30 are employed, as shown in
In the defuzzification stage 37, a weighting factor is applied to the drive signal values that are obtained, based on the conditions of magnitude error positive medium, phase error negative medium; magnitude error positive medium, phase error zero; magnitude error zero, phase error negative medium; and magnitude error zero, phase error zero (for the example in FIGS. 3 and 4). These are weighted according to their respective membership values, and are combined for each drive signal CS1, CS2, CS3, etc. This results in bringing each of the tuning devices quickly to a tuned condition, and accounts for the effect of each device on the phase error and magnitude error signals. The amount of movement for each tuning device also depends on the size and sign (positive or negative) of the phase and magnitude error. Thus, this system avoided the major pitfalls of prior art impedance match networks, as mentioned previously.
The fuzzy logic tuning process of this invention achieves a good impedance match rapidly, without undue hunting and without encountering the problems noted above.
It is also possible to employ rule sets of three, or more, variables to control the impedance match net in a more complex environment. For example,
While the invention has been described above in respect to an embodiment of the invention, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to that precise embodiment. Rather, many modifications and variations will present themselves to persons skilled in the art without departure from the scope and spirit of the invention, which is defined in the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4375051 *||Feb 19, 1981||Feb 22, 1983||The Perkin-Elmer Corporation||Automatic impedance matching between source and load|
|US4485360 *||Jul 16, 1982||Nov 27, 1984||Cincinnati Electronics Corporation||Apparatus for and method of impedance matching|
|US4621242 *||Mar 19, 1984||Nov 4, 1986||The Perkin-Elmer Corporation||R.F. impedance match control system|
|US4864490 *||Apr 10, 1987||Sep 5, 1989||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Auto-tuning controller using fuzzy reasoning to obtain optimum control parameters|
|US4951009 *||Aug 11, 1989||Aug 21, 1990||Applied Materials, Inc.||Tuning method and control system for automatic matching network|
|US5053725 *||Sep 28, 1989||Oct 1, 1991||Leybold Ag||Circuit configuration for the automatic tuning of a matching network|
|US5187454 *||Jan 23, 1992||Feb 16, 1993||Applied Materials, Inc.||Electronically tuned matching network using predictor-corrector control system|
|US5195045 *||Feb 27, 1991||Mar 16, 1993||Astec America, Inc.||Automatic impedance matching apparatus and method|
|US5424691 *||Feb 3, 1994||Jun 13, 1995||Sadinsky; Samuel||Apparatus and method for electronically controlled admittance matching network|
|US5497063 *||Sep 16, 1993||Mar 5, 1996||Allen-Bradley Company, Inc.||Fuzzy logic servo controller|
|US5654679 *||Jun 13, 1996||Aug 5, 1997||Rf Power Products, Inc.||Apparatus for matching a variable load impedance with an RF power generator impedance|
|US5805649 *||Jun 30, 1995||Sep 8, 1998||Sgs-Thomsom Microelectronics S.R.L.||Phase-lock loop circuit with fuzzy control|
|US5842154||Sep 15, 1997||Nov 24, 1998||Eni Technologies, Inc.||Fuzzy logic tuning of RF matching network|
|US5889252 *||Dec 19, 1996||Mar 30, 1999||Lam Research Corporation||Method of and apparatus for independently controlling electric parameters of an impedance matching network|
|US5982099 *||Mar 29, 1996||Nov 9, 1999||Lam Research Corporation||Method of and apparatus for igniting a plasma in an r.f. plasma processor|
|DE19521387A1 *||Jun 13, 1995||Dec 19, 1996||Leybold Ag||Matching or adaptor network tuning method e.g. for HF plasma generation|
|1||Bannatyne, Ross, "Fuzzy Logic-A new approach to Embedded Control Solutions", Semiconductor Design Concept, 1992, pp. 1-4, (no month).|
|2||*||Bannatyne, Ross, Fuzzy Logic-A New Approach to Embedded Control Solutions, Motorola Ltd., East Kilbride, Scotland, 1992.|
|3||Fuzzy Logic and the Neuron Chip, Motorola Semiconductor Technical Data, pp. AL-55-AL-73, (no date).|
|4||*||Gesche et al., Translation of German Patent Document DE 195 21 387 A1, Dec. 19, 1996.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7376535 *||Oct 12, 2006||May 20, 2008||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy||Wideband matching circuit and method of effectuating same|
|US9011636 *||Mar 4, 2011||Apr 21, 2015||Tokyo Electron Limited||Automatic matching method, computer-readable storage medium, automatic matching unit, and plasma processing apparatus|
|US9196459 *||Mar 26, 2015||Nov 24, 2015||Reno Technologies, Inc.||RF impedance matching network|
|US9306533||Jun 9, 2015||Apr 5, 2016||Reno Technologies, Inc.||RF impedance matching network|
|US9370729 *||Jan 22, 2009||Jun 21, 2016||Proxeon Biosystems A/S||Flow control in high performance liquid chromatography|
|US20040267678 *||Jun 30, 2003||Dec 30, 2004||Gao Xiao M||Fuzzy logic impedance mismatch network for DSL qualification|
|US20110005304 *||Jan 22, 2009||Jan 13, 2011||Proxeon Biosystems A/S||Flow control in high performance liquid chromatography|
|US20110214811 *||Sep 8, 2011||Tokyo Electron Limited||Automatic matching method, computer-readable storage medium, automatic matching unit, and plasma processing apparatus|
|US20150200079 *||Mar 26, 2015||Jul 16, 2015||Reno Technologies, Inc.||Rf impedance matching network|
|U.S. Classification||702/106, 333/17.3, 706/8|
|International Classification||H01P5/08, H05H1/46, G05B13/02|
|Cooperative Classification||G05B13/0275, H05H1/46|
|European Classification||H05H1/46, G05B13/02C2|
|Apr 25, 2006||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Feb 22, 2007||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MKS INSTRUMENTS, INC., MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:ENI TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:018917/0392
Effective date: 20051214
|May 24, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|May 4, 2016||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, NEW YORK
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:MKS INSTRUMENTS, INC.;NEWPORT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:038663/0265
Effective date: 20160429
Owner name: BARCLAYS BANK PLC, NEW YORK
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:MKS INSTRUMENTS, INC.;NEWPORT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:038663/0139
Effective date: 20160429