|Publication number||USRE39146 E1|
|Application number||US 09/115,963|
|Publication date||Jun 27, 2006|
|Filing date||Jul 15, 1998|
|Priority date||Apr 2, 1990|
|Publication number||09115963, 115963, US RE39146 E1, US RE39146E1, US-E1-RE39146, USRE39146 E1, USRE39146E1|
|Inventors||Michel Schneider, Feng Yan, Jerome Puginier, Marie-Bernadette Barrau, Philippe Bussat, Eva Hybl, Daniel Bichon, Pascal Grenier|
|Original Assignee||Bracco International B.V.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (102), Non-Patent Citations (97), Classifications (9), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 07/695,343, filed May 3, 1991, now abandoned, which claims the benefit of EP 90810367.4, filed May 18, 1990. This application is also a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 07/775,989, filed Nov. 20, 1991, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,271,928, which claims the benefit of PCT/EP91/00620, filed Apr. 2, 1991, and EP 90810262.7, filed Apr. 2, 1990. This application also claims the benefit of EP 92810046.0, filed Jan. 24, 1992.
The present invention concerns stable dispersions or compositions of gas filled microvesicles in aqueous carrier liquids. These dispersions are generally usable for most kinds of applications requiring gases homogeneously disperscd in liquids. One notable application for such dispersions is to be injected into living beings, for instance for ultrasonic echography and other medical applications. The invention also concerns the methods for making the foregoing compositions including some materials involved in the preparations, for instance pressure-resistant gas-filled microbubbles, microcapsules and microballoons.
It is well known that microbodies or microglobules of air or gas (defined here as microvesicles), e.g. microbubbles or microballoons, suspended in a liquid are exceptionally efficient ultrasound reflectors for echography. In this disclosure the term of “microbubble” specifically designates hollow spheres or globules, filled with air or a gas, in suspension in a liquid which generally result from the introduction therein of air or gas in divided form, the liquid preferably also containing surfactants or tensides to control the surface properties and the stability of the bubbles. The term of “microcapsule” or “microballoon” designates preferably air or gas-filled bodies with a material boundary or envelope, i.e. a polymer membrane wall. Both microbubbles and microballoons are useful as ultrasonic contrast agents. For instance injecting into the bloodstream of living bodies suspensions of air-filled microbubbles or microballoons (in the range of 0.5 to 10 μm) in a carrier liquid will strongly reinforce ultrasonic echography imaging, thus aiding in the visualization of internal organs. Imaging of vessels and internal organs can strongly help in medical diagnosis, for instance for the detection of cardiovascular and other diseases.
The formation of suspensions of microbubbles in an injectable liquid carrier suitable for echography can be produced by the release of a gas dissolved under pressure in this liquid, or by a chemical reaction generating gaseous products, or by admixing with the liquid soluble or insoluble solids containing air or gas trapped or adsorbed therein.
For instance, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,446,442 (Schering), there are disclosed a series of different techniques for producing suspensions of gas microbubbles in a sterilized injectable liquid carrier using (a) a solution of a tenside (surfactant) in a carrier liquid (aqueous) and (b) a solution of a viscosity enhancer as stabilizer. For generating the bubbles, the techniques disclosed there include forcing at high velocity a mixture of (a), (b) and air through a small aperture; or injecting (a) into (b) shortly before use together with a physiologically acceptable gas; or adding an acid to (a) and a carbonate to (b), both components being mixed together just before use and the acid reacting with the carbonate to generate CO2 bubbles; or adding an over-pressurized gas to a mixture of (a) and (b) under storage, said gas being released into microbubbles at the time when the mixture is used for injection.
EP-A-131,540 (Schering) discloses the preparation of microbubble suspensions in which a stabilized injectable carrier liquid, e.g. a physiological aqueous solution of salt, or a solution of a sugar like maltose, dextrose, lactose or galactose, is mixed with solid microparticles (in the 0.1 to 1 μm range) of the same sugars containing entrapped air. In order to develop the suspension of bubbles in the liquid carrier, both liquid and solid components are agitated together under sterile conditions for a few seconds and, once made, the suspension must then be used immediately, i.e. it should be injected within 5-10 minutes for echographic measurements; indeed, because they are evanescent, the bubble concentration becomes too low for being practical after that period.
In an attempt to cure the evanescence problem, microballoons, i.e. microvesicles with a material wall, have been developed. As said before, while the microbubbles only have an immaterial or evanescent envelope, i.e. they are only surrounded by a wall of liquid Whose surface tension is being modified by the presence of a surfactant, the microballoons or microcapsules have a tangible envelope made of substantive material, e.g. a polymeric membrane with definite mechanical strength. In other terms, they are microvesicles of material in which the air or gas is more or less tightly encapsulated.
For instance, U.S. Pat. No. 4,276,885 (Tickner et al.) discloses using surface membrane microcapsules containing a gas for enhancing ultrasonic images, the membrane including a multiplicity of non-toxic and non-antigenic organic molecules. In a disclosed embodiment, these microbubbles have a gelatine membrane which resists coalescence and their preferred size is 5-10 μm. The membrane of these microbubbles is said to be sufficiently stable for making echographic measurements.
Air-filled microballoons without gelatin are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,718,433 (Feinstein). These microvesicles are made by sonication (5 to 30 kHz) of protein solutions like 5% serum albumin and have diameters in the 2-20 μm range, manly 2-4 μm. The microvesicles are stabilized by denaturation of the membrane forming protein after sonication, for instance by using heat or by chemical means, e.g. by reaction with formaldehyde or glutaraldehyde. The concentration of stable microvesicles obtained by this technique is said to be about 8×106/ml in the 2-4 μm range, about 106/ml in the 4-5 μm range and less than 5×105 in the 5-6 μm range. The stability time of these microvesicles is said to be 48 hrs or longer and they permit convenient left heart imaging after intravenous injection. For instance, the sonicated albumin microbubbles when injected into a peripheral vein are capable of transpulmonary passage. This results in echocardiographic opacification of the left ventricle cavity as well as myocardial tissues.
Recently, still further improved microballoons for injection ultrasonic echography have been reported in EP-A-324.938 (Widder). In this document there are disclosed high concentrations (more than 108/ml) of air-filled protein-bounded microvesicles of less than 10 μm which have life-times of several months or more. Aqueous suspensions of these microballoons are produced by ultrasonic cavitation of solutions of heat denaturable proteins, e.g. human serum albumin, which operation also leads to a degree of foaming of the membrane-forming protein and its subsequent hardening by heat. Other proteins such as hemoglobin and collagen were also said to be convenient in this process. The high storage stability of the suspensions of microballoons disclosed in EP-A-324.938 enables them to be marketed as such, i.e. with the liquid carrier phase, which is a strong commercial asset since preparation before use is no longer necessary.
Similar advantages have been recently discovered in connection with the preparation of aqueous microbubble suspensions, i.e. there has been discovered storage-stable dry pulverulent composition which will generate long-lasting bubble suspensions upon the addition of water. This is being disclosed in Application PCT/EP 91/00620 where liposomes comprising membrane-forming lipids are freeze-dried, and the freeze-dried lipids, after exposure to air or a gas for a period of time, will produce long-lasting bubble suspensions upon simple addition thereto of an aqueous liquid carrier.
Despite the many progresses achieved regarding the stability under storage of aqueous microbubble suspensions, this being either in the precursor or final preparation stage, there still remained until now the problem of vesicle durability when the suspensions are exposed to overpressure, e.g. pressure variations such as that occurring after injection in the blood stream of a patient and consecutive to heart pulses, particularly in the left ventricle. Actually, the present inventors have observed that, for instance in anaesthetised rabbits, the pressure variations are not sufficient to substantially alter the bubble count for a period of time after injection. In contrast, in dogs and human patients, typical microbubbles or microballoons filled with common gases such as air, methane or CO2 will collapse completely in a matter of seconds after injection due to the blood pressure effect. This observation has been confirmed by others: For instance, S. GOTTLIEB et al. in J. Am. Soc. of Echocardiography 3 (1990) 238 have reported that cross-linked albumin microballoons prepared by the sonication method were losing all echogenic properties after being subjected to an overpressure of 60 Torr. It became hence important to solve the problem and to increase the useful life of suspensions of microbubbles and membrane bounded microballoons under pressure in order to ensure that echographic measurements can be performed in vivo safely and reproducibly.
It should be mentioned at this stage that another category of echogenic image enhancing agents has been proposed which resist overpressures as they consist of plain microspheres with a porous structure, such porosity containing air or a gas. Such microspheres are disclosed for instance in WO-A-91/12823 (DELTA BIOTECHNOLOGY), EP-A-327 490 (SCHERING) and EP-A-458 079 (HOECHST). The drawback with the plain porous microspheres is that the encapsulated gas-filled free space is generally too small for good echogenic response and the spheres lack adequate elasticity. Hence the preference generally remains with the hollow microvesicles and a solution to the collapsing problem was searched.
This problem has now been solved by using gases or gas mixtures in conformity with the criteria outlined in the claims. Briefly, it has been found that when the echogenic microvesicles are made in the presence of a gas, respectively are filled at least in part with a gas, having physical properties in conformity with the equation below, then the microvesicles remarkably resist pressure >60 Torr after injection for a time sufficient to obtain reproducible echographic measurements:
In the foregoing equation, “s” designates the solubilities in water expressed as the “BUNSEN” coefficients, i.e. as volume of gas dissolved by unit volume of water under standard conditions (1 bar, 25° C.), and under partial pressure of the given gas of 1 atm (see the Gas Encyclopaedia, Elsevier 1976). Since, under such conditions and definitions, the solubility of air is .0167, and the square root of its average molecular weight (Mw) is 5.39, the above relation simplifies to:
In the Examples to be found hereafter there is disclosed the testing of echogenic microbubbles and microballoons (see the Tables) filled with a number of different gases and mixtures thereof, and the corresponding resistance thereof to pressure increases, both in vivo and in vitro. In the Tables, the water solubility factors have also been taken from the aforecited Gas Encyclopaedia from “L'Air Liquide”, Elsevier Publisher (1976).
The microvesicles in aqueous suspension containing gases according to the invention include most microbubbles and microballoons disclosed until now for use as contrast agents for echography. The preferred microballoons are those disclosed in EP-A324.938, PCT/EP91/01706 and EP-A-458 745; the preferred microbubbles are those of PCT/EP91/00620; these microbubbles are advantageously formed from an aqueous liquid and a dry powder (microvesicle precursors) containing lamellarized freeze-dried phospholipids and stabilizers; the microbubbles are developed by agitation of this powder in admixture with the aqueous liquid carrier. The microballoons of EP-A-458 745 have a resilient interfacially precipitated polymer membrane of controlled porosity. They are generally obtained from emulsions into microdroplets of polymer solutions in aqueous liquids, the polymer being subsequently caused to precipitate from its solution to form a fibrogenic membrane at the droplet/liquid interface, which process leads to the initial formation of liquid-filled microvesicles, the liquid core thereof being eventually substituted by a gas.
In order to carry out the method of the present invention, i.e. to form or fill the microvesicles, whose suspensions in aqueous carriers constitute the desired echogenic additives, with the gases according to the foregoing relation, one can either use, as a first embodiment, a two step route consisting of (1) making the microvesicles from appropriate starting materials by any suitable conventional technique in the presence of any suitable gas, and (2) replacing this gas originally used (first gas) for preparing the microvesicles with a new gas (second gas) according to the invention (gas exchange technique).
Otherwise, according to a second embodiment, one can directly prepare the desired suspensions by suitable usual methods under an atmosphere of the new gas according to the invention.
If one uses the two-step route, the initial gas can be first removed from the vesicles (for instance by evacuation under suction) and thereafter replaced by bringing the second gas into contact with the evacuated product, or alternatively, the vesicles still containing the first gas can be contacted with the second gas under conditions where the second gas will displace the first gas from the vesicles (gas substitution). For instance, the vesicle suspensions, or preferably precursors thereof (precursors here may mean the materials the microvesicle envelopes are made of, or the materials which, upon agitation with an aqueous carrier liquid, will generate or develop the formation of microbubbles in this liquid), can be exposed to reduced pressure to evacuate the gas to be removed and then the ambient pressure is restored with the desired gas for substitution. This step can be repeated once or more times to ensure complete replacement of the original gas by the new one. This embodiment applies particularly well to precursor preparations stored dry, e.g. dry powders which will regenerate or develop the bubbles of the echogenic additive upon admixing with an amount of carrier liquid. Hence, in one preferred case where microbubbles are to be formed from an aqueous phase and dry laminarized phospholipids, e.g. powders of dehydrated lyophilized liposomes plus stabilizers, which powders are to be subsequently dispersed under agitation in a liquid aqueous carrier phase, it is advantageous to store this dry powder under an atmosphere of a gas selected according to the invention. A preparation of such kind will keep indefinitely in this state and can be used at any time for diagnosis, provided it is dispersed into sterile water before injection.
Otherwise, and this is particularly so when the gas exchange is applied to a suspension of microvesicles in a liquid carrier phase, the latter is flushed with the second gas until the replacement (partial or complete) is sufficient for the desired purpose. Flushing can be effected by bubbling from a gas pipe or, in some cases, by simply sweeping the surface of the liquid containing the vesicles under gentle agitation with a stream (continuous or discontinuous) of the new gas. In this case, the replacement gas can be added only once in the flask containing the suspension and allowed to stand as such for a while, or it can be renewed one or more times in order to assure that the degree of renewal (gas exchange) is more or less complete.
Alternatively, in a second embodiment as said before, one will effect the full preparation of the suspension of the echogenic additives starting with the usual precursors thereof (starting materials), as recited in the prior art and operating according to usual means of said prior art, but in the presence of the desired gases or mixture of gases according to the invention instead of that of the prior art which usually recites gases such as air, nitrogen, CO2 and the like.
It should be noted that in general the preparation mode involving one first type of gas for preparing the microvesicles and, thereafter, substituting the original gas by a second kind of gas, the latter being intended to confer different echogenic properties to said microvesicles, has the following advantage: As will be best seen from the results in the Examples hereinafter, the nature of the gas used for making the microvesicles, particularly the microballoons with a polymer envelope, has a definitive influence on the overall size (i.e. the average mean diameter) of said microvesicles; for instance, the size of microballoons prepared under air with precisely set conditions can be accurately controlled to fall within a desired range, e.g. the 1 to 10 μm range suitable for echographying the left and right heart ventricles. This not so easy with other gases, particularly the gases in conformity with the requirements of the present invention; hence, when one wishes to obtain microvesicles in a given size range but filled with gases the nature of which would render the direct preparation impossible or very hard, one will much advantageously rely on the two-steps preparation route, i.e. one will first prepare the microvesicles with a gas allowing more accurate diameter and count control, and thereafter replace the first gas by a second gas by gas exchange.
In the description of the Experimental part that follows (Examples), gas-filled microvesicles suspended in water or other aqueous solutions have been subjected to pressures over that of ambient. It was noted that when the overpressure reached a certain value (which is generally typical for a set of microsphere parameters and working conditions like temperature, compression rate, nature of carrier liquid and its content of dissolved gas (the relative importance of this parameter will be detailed hereinafter), nature of gas filler, type of echogenic material, etc.), the microvesicles started to collapse, the bubble count progressively decreasing with further increasing the pressure until a complete disappearance of the sound reflector effect occurred. This phenomenon was better followed optically, (nephelometric measurements) since it is paralleled by a corresponding change in optical density, i.e. the transparency of the medium increases as the bubble progressively collapse. For this, the aqueous suspension of microvesicles (or an appropriate dilution thereof was placed in a spectrophotometric cell maintained at 25° C. (standard conditions) and the absorbance was measured continuously at 600 or 700 nm, while a positive hydrostatic overpressure was applied and gradually increased. The pressure was generated by means of a peristaltic pump (GILSON's Mlni-puls) feeding a variable height liquid column connected to the spectrophotometric cell, the latter being sealed leak-proof. The pressure was measured with a mercury manometer calibrated in Torr. The compression rate with time was found to be linearly correlated with the pump's speed (rpm's). The absorbance in the foregoing range was found to be proportional to the microvesicle concentration in the carrier liquid.
The invention will now be further described with reference to
Another readily accessible parameter to reproducibly compare the performance of various gases as microsphere fillers is the width of the pressure interval (ΔP) limited by the pressure values under which the bubble counts (as expressed by the optical densities) is equal to the 75% and 25% of the original bubble count. Now, it has been surprisingly found that for gases where the pressure difference DP=P25-P75 exceeds a value of about 25-30 Torr, the killing effect of the blood pressure on the gas-filled microvesicles is minimized, i.e. the actual decrease in the bubble count is sufficiently slow not to impair the significance, accuracy and reproducibility of echographic measurements.
It was found, in addition, that the values of PC and ΔP also depend on the rate of rising the pressure in the test experiments illustrated by
Although the very reasons why certain gases obey the aforementioned properties, while others do not, have not been entirely clarified, it would appear that some relation possibly exists in which, in addition to molecular weight and water solubility, dissolution kinetics, and perhaps other parameters, are involved. However these parameters need not be known to practise the present invention since gas eligibility can be easily determined according to the aforediscussed criteria.
The gaseous species which particularly suit the invention are, for instance, halogenated hydrocarbons like the freons and stable fluorinated chalcogenides like SF6, SeF6 and the like.
It has been mentioned above that the degree of gas saturation of the liquid used as carrier for the microvesicles according to the invention has an importance on the vesicle stability under pressure variations. Indeed, when the carrier liquid in which the microvesicles are dispersed for making the echogenic suspensions of the invention is saturated at equilibrium with a gas, preferably the same gas with which the microvesicles are filled, the resistance of the microvesicles to collapse under variations of pressure is markedly increased. Thus, when the product to be used as a contrast agent is sold dry to be mixed Just before use with the carrier liquid (see for instance the products disclosed in PCT/EP91/00620 mentioned hereinbefore), it is quite advantageous to use, for the dispersion, a gas saturated aqueous carrier. Alternatively, when marketing ready-to-use microvesicle suspensions as contrast agents for echography, one will advantageously use as the carrier liquid for the preparation a gas saturated aqueous solution; in this case the storage life of the suspension will be considerably increased and the product may be kept substantially unchanged (no substantial bubble count variation) for extended periods, for instance several weeks to several months, and even over a year in special cases. Saturation of the liquid with a gas may be effected most easily by simply bubbling the gas into the liquid for a period of time at room temperature.
Albumin microvesicles filled with air or various gases were prepared as described in EP-A- 324 938 using a 10 ml calibrated syringe filled with a 5% human serum albumin (HSA) obtained from the Blood Transfusion Service, Red-Cross Organization, Bern, Switzerland. A sonicator probe (Sonifier Model 250 from Branson Ultrasonic Corp, USA) was lowered into the solution down to the 4 ml mark of the syringe and sonication was effected for 25 sec (energy setting =8). Then the sonicator probe was raised above the solution level up to the 6 ml mark and sonication was resumed under the pulse mode (cycle=0.3) for 40 sec. After standing overnight at 4° C., a top layer containing most of the microvesicles had formed by buoyancy and the bottom layer containing unused albumin debris of denatured protein and other insolubles was discarded. After resuspending the microvesicles in fresh albumin solution the mixture was allowed to settle again at room temperature and the upper layer was finally collected. When the foregoing sequences were carried out under the ambient atmosphere, air filled microballoons were obtained. For obtaining microballoons filled with other gases, the albumin solution was first purged with a new gas, then the foregoing operational sequences were effected under a stream of this gas flowing on the surface of the solution; then at the end of the operations, the suspension was placed in a glass bottle which was extensively purged with the desired gas before sealing.
The various suspensions of microballoons filled with different gases were diluted to 1:10 with distilled water saturated at equilibrium with air, then they were placed in an optical cell as described above and the absorbance was recorded while increasing steadily the pressure over the suspension. During the measurements, the suspensions temperature was kept at 25° C.
The results are shown in the Table 1 below and are expressed in terms of the critical pressure PC values registered for a series of gases defined by names or formulae, the characteristic parameters of such gases, i.e. Mw and water solubility being given, as well as the original bubble count and bubble average size (mean diameter in volume).
From the results of Table 1, it is seen that the critical pressure PC increases for gases of lower solubility and higher molecular weight. It can therefore be expected that microvesicles filled with such gases will provide more durable echogenic signals in vivo. It can also be seen that average bubble size generally increases with gas solubility.
Aliquots (1 ml) of some of the microballoon suspensions prepared in Example 1 were injected in the Jugular vein of experimental rabbits in order to test echogenicity in vivo. Imaging of the left and right heart ventricles was carried out in the grey scale mode using an Acuson 128-XP5 echography apparatus and a 7.5 MHz transducer. The duration of contrast enhancement in the left ventricle was determined by recording the signal for a period of time. The results are gathered in Table 2 below which also shows the PC of the gases used.
From the above results, one can see the existence of a definite correlation between the critical pressure of the gases tried and the persistence in time of the echogenic signal.
A suspension of echogenic air-filled galactose microparticles (Echovist® from SCHERING AG) was obtained by shaking for 5 sec 3 g of the solid microparticles in 8.5 ml of a 20% galactose solution. In other preparations, the air above a portion of Echovist® particles was evacuated (0.2 Torr) and replaced by an SF6 atmosphere, whereby, after addition of the 20% galactose solution, a suspension of microparticles containing associated sulfur hexafluoride was obtained. Aliquots (1 ml) of the suspensions were administered to experimental rabbits (by injection in the jugular vein) and imaging of the heart was effected as described in the previous example. In this case the echogenic microparticles do not transit through the lung capillaries, hence imaging is restricted to the right ventricle and the overall signal persistence has no particular significance. The results of Table 3 below show the value of signal peak intensity a few seconds after injection.
It can be seen that sulfur hexafluoride, an inert gas with low water solubility, provides echogenic suspensions which generate echogenic signals stronger than comparable suspensions filled with air. These results are particularly interesting in view of the teachings of EP-A-441 468 and 357 163 (SCHERING) which disclose the use for echography purposes of microparticles, respectively, cavitate and clathrate compounds filled with various gases including SF6; these documents do not however report particular advantages of SF6 over other more common gases with regard to the echogenic response.
A series of echogenic suspensions of gas-filled microbubbles were prepared by the general method set forth below:
One gram of a mixture of hydrogenated soya lecithin (from Nattermann Phospholipids GmbH, Germany) and dicetyl-phosphate (DCP), in 9/1 molar ratio, was dissolved in 50 ml of chloroform, and the solution was placed in a 100 ml round flask and evaporated to dryness on a Rotavapor apparatus. Then, 20 ml of distilled water were added and the mixture was slowly agitated at 75° C. for an hour. This resulted in the formation of a suspension of multilamellar liposomes (MLV) which was thereafter extruded at 75° C. through, successively, 3 μm and 0.8 μm polycarbonate membranes (Nuclepore(D). After cooling, 1 ml aliquots of the extruded suspension were diluted with 9 ml of a concentrated lactose solution (83 g/l), and the diluted suspensions were frozen at −45° C. The frozen samples were thereafter freeze-dried under high vacuum to a free-flowing powder in a vessel which was ultimately filled with air or a gas taken from a selection of gases as indicated in Table 4 below. The powdery samples were then resuspended in 10 ml of water as the carrier liquid, this being effected under a stream of the same gas used to fill the said vessels. Suspension was effected by vigorously shaking for 1 min on a vortex mixer.
The various suspensions were diluted 1:20 with distilled water equilibrated beforehand with air at 25° C. and the dilutions were then pressure tested at 25° C. as disclosed in Example 1 by measuring the optical density in a spectrophotometric cell which was subjected to a progressively increasing hydrostatic pressure until all bubbles had collapsed. The results are collected in Table 4 below which, in addition to the critical pressure PC, gives also the ΔP values (see FIG. 1).
The foregoing results clearly indicate that the highest resistance to pressure increases is provided by the most water-insoluble gases. The behavior of the microbubbles is therefore similar to that of the microballoons in this regard. Also, the less water-soluble gases with the higher molecular weights provide the flattest bubble-collapse/pressure curves (i.e. ΔP is the widest) which is also an important factor of echogenic response durability in vivo, as indicated hereinbefore.
Some of the microbubble suspensions of Example 4 were injected to the jugular vein of experimental rabbits as indicated in Example 2 and imaging of the left heart ventricle was effected as indicated previously. The duration of the period for which a useful echogenic signal was detected was recorded and the results are shown in Table 5 below in which C4F8 indicates octafluorocyclobutane.
Type of gas
These results indicate that, again in the case of microbubbles, the gases according to the criteria of the present invention will provide ultrasonic echo signal for a much longer period than most gases used until now.
Suspensions of microbubbles were prepared using different gases exactly as described in Example 4, but replacing the lecithin phospholipid ingredient by a mole equivalent of diarachidoylphosphatidylcholine (C20 fatty acid residue) available from Avanti Polar Lipids, Birmingham, Ala. USA. The phospholipid to DCP molar ratio was still 9/1. Then the suspensions were pressure tested as in Example 4; the results, collected in Table 6A below, are to be compared with those of Table 4.
The above results, compared to that of Table 4, show that, at least with low solubility gases, by lengthening the chain of the phospholipid fatty acid residues, one can dramatically increase the stability of the echogenic suspension toward pressure increases. This was further confirmed by repeating the foregoing experiments but replacing the phospholipid component by its higher homolog, i.e. di-behenoylphosphatidylcholine (C22 fatty acid residue). In this case, the resistance to collapse with pressure of the microbubbles suspensions was still further increased.
Some of the microbubbles suspensions of this Example were tested in dogs as described previously for rabbits (imaging of the heart ventricles after injection of 5 ml samples in the anterior cephalic vein). A significant enhancement of the useful in-vivo echogenic response was noted, in comparison with the behavior of the preparations disclosed in Example 4, i.e. the increase in chain length of the fatty-acid residue in the phospholipid component increases the useful life of the echogenic agent in-vivo.
In the next Table below, there is shown the relative stability in the left ventricle of the rabbit of microbubbles (SF6) prepared from suspensions of a series of phospholipids whose fatty acid residues have different chain lengths (<injected dose: 1 ml/rabbit).
It has been mentioned hereinabove that for the measurement of resistance to pressure described in these Examples, a constant rate of pressure rise of 100 Torr/min was maintained. This is justified by the results given below which show the variations of the PC values for different gases in function to the rate of pressure increase. In these samples DMPC was the phospholipid used.
Rate of pressure increase (Torr/min)
A series of albumin microballoons as suspensions in water were prepared under air in a controlled sphere size fashion using the directions given in Example 1. Then the air in some of the samples was replaced by other gases by the gas-exchange sweep method at ambient pressure. Then, after diluting to 1:10 with distilled water as usual, the samples were subjected to pressure testing as in Example 1. From the results gathered in Table 7 below, it can be seen that the two-steps preparation mode gives, in some cases, echo-generating agents with better resistance to pressure than the one-step preparation mode of Example 1.
Mw of the
The method of the present invention was applied to an experiment as disclosed in the prior art, for instance Example 1 WO-92/11873. Three grams of Pluronic® F68 (a copolymer of polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene with a molecular weight of 8400), 1 g of dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol (Na salt, AVANTI Polar Lipids) and 3.6 g of glycerol were added to 80 ml of distilled water. After heating at about 80° C., a clear homogenous solution was obtained. The tenside solution was cooled to room temperature and the volume was adjusted to 100 ml. In some experiments (see Table 8) dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol was replaced by a mixture of diarachidoylphosphatldylcholine (920 mg) and 80 mg of dipalmitoylphosphatidic acid (Na salt, AVANTI Polar lipids).
The bubble suspensions were obtained by using two syringes connected via a three-way valve. One of the syringes was filled with 5 ml of the tenside solution while the other was filled with 0.5 ml of air or gas. The three-way valve was filled with the tenside solution before it was connected to the gas-containing syringe. By alternatively operating the two pistons, the tenside solutions were transferred back and forth between the two syringes (5 times in each direction), milky suspensions were formed. After dilution (1:10 to 1:50) with distilled water saturated at equilibrium with air, the resistance to pressure of the preparations was determined according to Example 1, the pressure increase rate was 240 Torr/min. The following results were obtained:
TABLE 8 Phospholipid Gas Pc (mm Hg) DP (mm Hg) DPPG air 28 17 DPPG SF6 138 134 DAPC/DPPA 9/1 air 46 30 DAPC/DPPA 9/1 SF6 269 253
It follows that by using the method of the invention and replacing air with other gases, e.g. SF6 even with known preparations a considerable improvements i.e. increase in the resistance to pressure may be achieved. this is true both in the case of negatively charged phospholipids (e.g. DPPG) and in the case of mixtures of neutral and negatively charged phospholipids (DAPC/DPPA).
The above experiment further demonstrates that the recognised problem sensitivity of microbubbles and microballoons to collapse when exposed to pressure i.e. when suspension are injected into living beings, has advantageously been solved by the method of the invention. Suspensions with microbubbles or microballoons with greater resistance against collapse and greater stability can advantageously be produced providing suspensions with better reproducibility and improved safety of echographic measurements performed in vivo on a human or animal body.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3615972||Apr 28, 1967||Oct 26, 1971||Dow Chemical Co||Expansible thermoplastic polymer particles containing volatile fluid foaming agent and method of foaming the same|
|US3650831||Mar 10, 1969||Mar 21, 1972||Armour Dial Inc||Method of cleaning surfaces|
|US3900420||Sep 14, 1972||Aug 19, 1975||Felix Sebba||Microgas emulsions and method of forming same|
|US3968203||Aug 26, 1969||Jul 6, 1976||Jerome G. Spitzer||Aerosol astringent composition|
|US4027007||Mar 13, 1973||May 31, 1977||Colgate-Palmolive Company||Antiperspirants formulated with borax|
|US4192859||Sep 29, 1978||Mar 11, 1980||E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.||Contrast media containing liposomes as carriers|
|US4224179||Aug 4, 1978||Sep 23, 1980||Battelle Memorial Institute||Process for the preparation of liposomes in aqueous solution|
|US4229360||Aug 4, 1978||Oct 21, 1980||Battelle Memorial Institute||Process for the dehydration of a colloidal dispersion of lipsomes|
|US4235871||Feb 24, 1978||Nov 25, 1980||Papahadjopoulos Demetrios P||Method of encapsulating biologically active materials in lipid vesicles|
|US4256251||Apr 3, 1979||Mar 17, 1981||Lawrence M. Smith||Surgical staplers and staple|
|US4265251||Jun 28, 1979||May 5, 1981||Rasor Associates, Inc.||Method of determining pressure within liquid containing vessel|
|US4276885||May 4, 1979||Jul 7, 1981||Rasor Associates, Inc||Ultrasonic image enhancement|
|US4316391||Nov 13, 1979||Feb 23, 1982||Ultra Med, Inc.||Flow rate measurement|
|US4370349||Sep 18, 1981||Jan 25, 1983||Imperial Chemical Industries Limited||Process for preparing freeze-dried liposome compositions|
|US4442843||Nov 17, 1981||Apr 17, 1984||Schering, Ag||Microbubble precursors and methods for their production and use|
|US4466442||Oct 13, 1982||Aug 21, 1984||Schering Aktiengesellschaft||Carrier liquid solutions for the production of gas microbubbles, preparation thereof, and use thereof as contrast medium for ultrasonic diagnostics|
|US4544545||Jun 20, 1983||Oct 1, 1985||Trustees University Of Massachusetts||Liposomes containing modified cholesterol for organ targeting|
|US4572203||Jan 27, 1983||Feb 25, 1986||Feinstein Steven B||Contact agents for ultrasonic imaging|
|US4657756||Sep 8, 1983||Apr 14, 1987||Schering Aktiengesellschaft||Microbubble precursors and apparatus for their production and use|
|US4681119||Apr 22, 1986||Jul 21, 1987||Schering Aktiengesellschaft||Method of production and use of microbubble precursors|
|US4684479||Aug 14, 1985||Aug 4, 1987||Arrigo Joseph S D||Surfactant mixtures, stable gas-in-liquid emulsions, and methods for the production of such emulsions from said mixtures|
|US4718433||Dec 5, 1985||Jan 12, 1988||Feinstein Steven B||Contrast agents for ultrasonic imaging|
|US4774958 *||Oct 1, 1987||Oct 4, 1988||Feinstein Steven B||Ultrasonic imaging agent and method of preparation|
|US4832941||Aug 14, 1986||May 23, 1989||Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Wissenschaften E.V||Contrast medium for ultrasonic examinations and process for its preparation|
|US4844882 *||Dec 29, 1987||Jul 4, 1989||Molecular Biosystems, Inc.||Concentrated stabilized microbubble-type ultrasonic imaging agent|
|US4859363||Jan 7, 1988||Aug 22, 1989||I.S.C. Chemicals Limited||Emulsions of perfluorocarbons in aqueous media|
|US4900540||Jun 20, 1983||Feb 13, 1990||Trustees Of The University Of Massachusetts||Lipisomes containing gas for ultrasound detection|
|US4927623||Jan 4, 1988||May 22, 1990||Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp.||Dissolution of gas in a fluorocarbon liquid|
|US4957656||Sep 14, 1988||Sep 18, 1990||Molecular Biosystems, Inc.||Continuous sonication method for preparing protein encapsulated microbubbles|
|US5049322||Dec 31, 1987||Sep 17, 1991||Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique (C.N.R.S.)||Process for the preparaton of dispersible colloidal systems of a substance in the form of nanocapsules|
|US5088499||Aug 20, 1990||Feb 18, 1992||Unger Evan C||Liposomes as contrast agents for ultrasonic imaging and methods for preparing the same|
|US5089181||Oct 30, 1989||Feb 18, 1992||Vestar, Inc.||Method of dehydrating vesicle preparations for long term storage|
|US5123414||Aug 26, 1991||Jun 23, 1992||Unger Evan C||Liposomes as contrast agents for ultrasonic imaging and methods for preparing the same|
|US5137928||Apr 24, 1991||Aug 11, 1992||Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft||Ultrasonic contrast agents, processes for their preparation and the use thereof as diagnostic and therapeutic agents|
|US5141738||Mar 18, 1991||Aug 25, 1992||Schering Aktiengesellschaft||Ultrasonic contrast medium comprising gas bubbles and solid lipophilic surfactant-containing microparticles and use thereof|
|US5147631 *||Apr 30, 1991||Sep 15, 1992||Du Pont Merck Pharmaceutical Company||Porous inorganic ultrasound contrast agents|
|US5149319||Sep 11, 1990||Sep 22, 1992||Unger Evan C||Methods for providing localized therapeutic heat to biological tissues and fluids|
|US5190982||May 26, 1992||Mar 2, 1993||Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft||Ultrasonic contrast agents, processes for their preparation and the use thereof as diagnostic and therapeutic agents|
|US5195520||Dec 12, 1991||Mar 23, 1993||Schering Aktiengesellschaft||Ultrasonic manometry process in a fluid by means of microbubbles|
|US5205287||Oct 1, 1992||Apr 27, 1993||Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft||Ultrasonic contrast agents, processes for their preparation and the use thereof as diagnostic and therapeutic agents|
|US5209720||Jun 18, 1991||May 11, 1993||Unger Evan C||Methods for providing localized therapeutic heat to biological tissues and fluids using gas filled liposomes|
|US5228446||Jun 18, 1991||Jul 20, 1993||Unger Evan C||Gas filled liposomes and their use as ultrasonic contrast agents|
|US5271928||Apr 2, 1991||Dec 21, 1993||Sintetica S.A.||Stable microbubbles suspensions injectable into living organisms|
|US5283067||Feb 11, 1993||Feb 1, 1994||Ciba-Geigy Corporation||Parenteral suspensions|
|US5312615||May 16, 1988||May 17, 1994||Bracco - Industria Chimica S.P.A.||Injectable opacifying composition containing liposomes of high encapsulation capacity for X-ray examinations|
|US5352436||Nov 22, 1993||Oct 4, 1994||Drexel University||Surfactant-stabilized microbubble mixtures, process for preparing and methods of using the same|
|US5364612||May 6, 1991||Nov 15, 1994||Immunomedics, Inc.||Detection of cardiovascular lesions|
|US5380411||Dec 2, 1988||Jan 10, 1995||Schering Aktiengesellschaft||Ultrasound or shock wave work process and preparation for carrying out same|
|US5380519||Sep 29, 1993||Jan 10, 1995||Bracco International B.V.||Stable microbubbles suspensions injectable into living organisms|
|US5393524||Jun 4, 1993||Feb 28, 1995||Sonus Pharmaceuticals Inc.||Methods for selecting and using gases as ultrasound contrast media|
|US5409688||Jun 5, 1992||Apr 25, 1995||Sonus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.||Gaseous ultrasound contrast media|
|US5413774||Dec 16, 1992||May 9, 1995||Bracco International B.V.||Long-lasting aqueous dispersions or suspensions of pressure-resistant gas-filled microvesicles and methods for the preparation thereof|
|US5425366||Jun 7, 1993||Jun 20, 1995||Schering Aktiengesellschaft||Ultrasonic contrast agents for color Doppler imaging|
|US5445813||Oct 12, 1993||Aug 29, 1995||Bracco International B.V.||Stable microbubble suspensions as enhancement agents for ultrasound echography|
|US5501863||Jan 17, 1995||Mar 26, 1996||Schering Aktiengesellschaft||Contrast media synthesized from polyaldehydes|
|US5529766||Mar 28, 1992||Jun 25, 1996||Nycomed Imaging As||Contrast agents|
|US5531980||Sep 30, 1994||Jul 2, 1996||Bracco International Bv||Stable microbubbles suspensions injectable into living organisms|
|US5536489||May 12, 1995||Jul 16, 1996||Molecular Biosystems, Inc.||Emulsions as contrast agents and method of use|
|US5536490||Mar 28, 1992||Jul 16, 1996||Nycomed Imaging As||Contrast agents|
|US5552133||Aug 12, 1994||Sep 3, 1996||Molecular Biosystems, Inc.||Method of making encapsulated gas microspheres useful as an ultrasonic imaging agent|
|US5556610||Nov 30, 1994||Sep 17, 1996||Bracco Research S.A.||Gas mixtures useful as ultrasound contrast media, contrast agents containing the media and method|
|US5558856||Jan 8, 1993||Sep 24, 1996||Nycomed Imaging As||Microbubble-generating contrast agents for ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging|
|US5567413||Jun 6, 1995||Oct 22, 1996||Nycomed Imaging As||Flexible amphiphilic microbubbles for ultrasound|
|US5567414||Jun 1, 1995||Oct 22, 1996||Bracco International B.V.||Stable microbubbles suspensions injectable into living organisms|
|US5593687||Dec 31, 1991||Jan 14, 1997||Schering Aktiengesellschaft||Aqueous dispersion containing liposomes|
|US5599523||Nov 22, 1994||Feb 4, 1997||Byk Gulden Lomberg Chemische Fabrik Gmbh||Echo contrast agent|
|US5601085||Oct 2, 1995||Feb 11, 1997||Nycomed Imaging As||Ultrasound imaging|
|US5639443||Mar 16, 1995||Jun 17, 1997||Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp.||Stabilized microbubble compositions|
|US5643553||Sep 26, 1995||Jul 1, 1997||Bracco International B.V.||Stable microbubbles suspensions injectable into living organisms|
|US5658551||Jun 1, 1995||Aug 19, 1997||Bracco International B.V.||Stable microbubbles suspensions injectable into living organisms|
|US5670135||May 22, 1995||Sep 23, 1997||Nycomed Imaging As||Ultrasonic contrast agent comprising carbohydrate particles|
|US5711933||Aug 10, 1994||Jan 27, 1998||Bracco International B.V.||Method of making polymeric gas or air filled microballoons for ultrasonic echography|
|US5716597||Jun 4, 1993||Feb 10, 1998||Molecular Biosystems, Inc.||Emulsions as contrast agents and method of use|
|US5730954 *||Oct 13, 1994||Mar 24, 1998||Schering Aktiengesellschaft||Preparation comprising cavitate- or clathrate-forming host/guest complexes as contrast agent|
|US5776429||Apr 30, 1996||Jul 7, 1998||Imarx Pharmaceutical Corp.||Method of preparing gas-filled microspheres using a lyophilized lipids|
|US5874062||May 19, 1995||Feb 23, 1999||Imarx Pharmaceutical Corp.||Methods of computed tomography using perfluorocarbon gaseous filled microspheres as contrast agents|
|CA1232837A||Apr 11, 1984||Feb 16, 1988||Schering Ag||Ultrasound contrast agent containing microparticles and gas micro-bubbles|
|CA1239092A||Apr 11, 1984||Jul 12, 1988||Schering Ag||Ultrasound contrast agents containing microparticles and gas micro-bubbles|
|CA2077383A1||Sep 2, 1992||Mar 4, 1993||Rainer Zotz||Echogenic particles, a process for their production and their use|
|DE4127442A1||Aug 17, 1991||Feb 18, 1993||Zentralinstitut Fuer Anorganis||Aq. dispersion of phospholipid(s) contg. fluorocarbon(s) - used as gas transporting media in diagnoses, and as an oxygen@ transporting substance e.g. a component of artificial blood|
|EP0131540A2||Jul 5, 1984||Jan 16, 1985||Schering Aktiengesellschaft||Contrast agent for ultrasounds and its preparation|
|EP0245019A2||Apr 29, 1987||Nov 11, 1987||Michael A. Davis||Low density contrast medium for diagnosis of pathologic conditions|
|EP0324938A1||Dec 6, 1988||Jul 26, 1989||Molecular Biosystems, Inc.||Concentrated stabilized microbubble-type ultrasonic imaging agent and method of production|
|EP0327490A1 *||Feb 1, 1989||Aug 9, 1989||Schering Aktiengesellschaft||Ultrasonic imaging agents, process for their preparation and their diagnostic and therapeutical use|
|EP0359246A2||Sep 13, 1989||Mar 21, 1990||Molecular Biosystems, Inc.||Continuous sonication method for preparing protein encapsulated microbubbles|
|EP0458079A2 *||Apr 25, 1991||Nov 27, 1991||Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft||Ultrasonic contrast agent, its preparation and application as diagnostic or therapeutic|
|EP0458745A1||May 14, 1991||Nov 27, 1991||BRACCO International B.V.||Polymeric gas or air filled microballoons usable as suspensions in liquid carriers for ultrasonic echography|
|EP0467031A2||May 13, 1991||Jan 22, 1992||Cavitation-Control Technology, Inc.||Medical-grade lipid-coated microbubbles, paramagnetic labelling thereof and their therapeutic use|
|EP0554213A1||Jan 19, 1993||Aug 4, 1993||BRACCO International B.V.||Long-lasting aqueous dispersions or suspensions of pressure-resistant gas-filled microvesicles and methods for the preparation thereof|
|GB1044680A||Title not available|
|GB2135647A||Title not available|
|NZ253115A||Title not available|
|WO1980002365A1||May 2, 1980||Nov 13, 1980||Rasor Ass Inc||Ultrasonic image enhancement|
|WO1984002838A1||Jan 26, 1984||Aug 2, 1984||Steven B Feinstein||Ultrasonic imaging technique|
|WO1985002772A1||Dec 20, 1984||Jul 4, 1985||Schroeder Ulf||Diagnostic and contrast agent|
|WO1988007365A2||Mar 30, 1988||Oct 6, 1988||David F Ranney||Biodadhesion drug carriers for endothelial and epithelial uptake and lesional localization of therapeutic and diagnostic agents|
|WO1989005160A1||Dec 2, 1988||Jun 15, 1989||Schering Aktiengesellschaft Berlin Und Bergkamen||Use of media containing bubbles in shock wave and ultrasonic therapy|
|WO1989006978A1||Feb 1, 1989||Aug 10, 1989||Schering Aktiengesellschaft Berlin Und Bergkamen||Ultrasonic contrast agents, process for producing them and their use as diagnostic and therapeutic agents|
|WO1989010118A1||Apr 10, 1989||Nov 2, 1989||Hemagen/Pfc||Improved emulsions of highly fluorinated organic compounds|
|WO1991009629A1||Dec 19, 1990||Jul 11, 1991||Unger Evan C||Liposomes as contrast agents for ultrasonic imaging|
|WO1991012823A1||Feb 19, 1991||Sep 5, 1991||Delta Biotechnology Limited||Diagnostic aid|
|WO1991015244A2||Apr 2, 1991||Oct 17, 1991||Sintetica S.A.||Stable microbubbles suspensions injectable into living organisms|
|1||""Freon" Fluorocarbons Properties and Applications," DuPont Technical Bulletin, pp. 1-11 (1964).|
|2||"Freon" DuPont Technical Bulletin, pp. 1-10 (1987).|
|3||"Lecithin" in Blakiston's Gould Medical Dictionary, 4th Ed., N.Y., McGraw-Hill, p. 749 (1979).|
|4||"Lecithin" in Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 26 Ed., Philadelphia, Saunders, p. 721 (1981).|
|5||"Lecithin" in Rompp Chemie Kexikon, p. 2474 (1989-92).|
|6||Amer Hearts Assn Monograph Circulation Part II vol. 72 No. 4 10/85 Abstracts of the 58<SUP>th </SUP>Scientific Sessions.|
|7||Barnhart et al., Invest. Radiol, 25, 162-164 (1990) "Characterics of Albunex".|
|8||Benita et al., Journal of Pharmaceutical Science, 73, pp. 1721-1724 (1984) "Characterization of Drug Loaded Polydilactide Microspheres".|
|9||Biochemistry/Ed. Stryer-2 Ed., San Francisco, Freeman, pp. 208-209 (1981).|
|10||Bleeker et al 1990 J. Ultrasound Med 9:461-471, 1990 pp 462-471 On the Application of Ultrsonic Contrast etc.|
|11||Bleeker et al J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87 (4) 4/90 pp 1792-1797 Ultrasonic characterization of Albunex(R) etc.|
|12||Bleeker, et al., 1990 J. Ultrasound Med., 9:461-471, (1999), "On the Application of Ultrasonic Contrast Agents . . . ".|
|13||Bleeker, et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 87 (4), Apr. 1990, pp. 1792-1797, "Ultrasonic characterization of Albunex(R) . . . ".|
|14||Bommer et al, Abstract of the 54 Scient. Session Circulation 64,-203, Abst. 770 (1981).|
|15||Chem Abs., vol. 102. No. 3, 21 (Jan. 1985), Maynard et al., "Ultrasonic absorption by liposomes".|
|16||Concise Encyclopedia Of Polymer Sci. and Engin., Wiley, pp. 12-13 (1990).|
|17||Crommelin et al., Liposomes as Drugs Carriers Symp., pp. 88-93 (1986) "Freezing and Freeze Drying of Liposomes".|
|18||Crommelin et al., Pharm. Res., pp. 159-163 (1984) "Stability of Liposomes on Storage . . . ".|
|19||de Gruyter, "Phospholipids", Concise Encyclopedia of Biochemistry, Berlin, pp. 348-349 (1983).|
|20||deJong et al Ultrasonics 1991 vol. 29 July pp 324-330 Principles and recent developments in ultrasound etc.|
|21||deJong et al Ultrasonics 1992 vol. 30 No. 2 pp 95-103 Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas etc.|
|22||deJong, et al., Ultrasonics, 1991, vol. 29 Jul., pp. 324-330, "Principles and recent developments in ultrasound".|
|23||deJong, et al., Ultrasonics, 1992, vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 95-103, "Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres . . . ".|
|24||*||Dupont Technical Bulletin (El Dupont De Nemours, Wilmington, DE) pp 1-10 (1987).|
|25||Edwards, et al. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 70, No. 3 (1983), "Scattering of focused ultrasound by spherical microparticles".|
|26||Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, 2nd ed., 10, p. 95, Wiley & Sons, (1987).|
|27||Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, pp. 164-169, Wiley & Sons, 1985.|
|28||Epstein et al J. Chem. Physics vol. 18, No. 11, 11/50 On the Stability of Gas Bubbles in Liquid-Gas Solutions.|
|29||*||Epstein et al., J. Chem. Physics Nov. 1990.|
|30||Epstein, et al., J. Chem. Physics, vol. 18, No. 11, pp. 1505-1509, Nov. 1950, "On the Stability of Gas Bubbles in Liquid-Gas Solutions".|
|31||Feinstein et al Am J of Physiologic Imaging 1:12-18 (1986) Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography etc.|
|32||Feinstein et al JACC vol. 16, No. 2 8/90:316-24 Safety and Efficacy of a New Transpulmonary Ultrasound etc.|
|33||Feinstein, et al., Am. J. of Physiologic Imaging, 1:12-18 (1986), "Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography . . . ".|
|34||Feinstein, et al., JACC, vol. 16, No. 2, 8/90:316-24, "Safety and Efficacy of a New Transpulmonary Ultrasound Agent . . . ", Amer. Hearts Assn. Monograph Circulation, Part II, vol. 72, No. 4, Oct. 1985, Abstracts of the 58<SUP>th </SUP>Scientific Ses.|
|35||Feinstein, J. of the Amer. Coll. of Cardiol, 8:251-253 (1986) "Myocardial Perfusion Imaging . . . ".|
|36||Fieser and Fieser, Organic Chemistry, 3rd ed. (1956) p. 847.|
|37||Fobbe et al Furtschr Rontgenstr 154.3 (1991)242-245 Farbkodierte Duplexsonographic und Ultra- etc.|
|38||Fobbe, et al., Furtschr Rontgenstr, 154.3 (1991) 242-245, "Farbkodierte Duplexsonographic und Ultraschallkontrast mittel . . . ".|
|39||Ganguly et al., "Structure of hollow polystyrene microspheres . . . " J. Microencapsulation, vol. 6, No. 2, 193-198 (1989).|
|40||*||Gardner et al., Arch Opthalmol. 106:1188-1189 (1988).|
|41||Gardner, et al., (1988), "A Survey of Intraocular Gas Use in North America," Arch. Ophthalmol., 106:1188-1189.|
|42||Gas Encyclopedia, Elsevier Publishier (1976), CCIF3.|
|43||Goldberg et al., Radiology, 177, pp. 713-717 (1990) "Hepatic Tumors . . . ".|
|44||Gregoriadis, Gregory, Liposome Technology, vol. I, "Preparation of Liposomes", CRC Press, pp. 172-177, 1984.|
|45||H. Fessi, et al., "Nanocapsule formation by interfacial polymer deposition . . . ," Int. J. Pharm., 1989, vol. 55, No. 1, pp. R1-R4.|
|46||Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients: Am. Pharm. Ass. 181-183 (1986).|
|47||Helzel, Fortschr. Rontgenste, 140, pp. 337-340 (1984) "Erste Erfahrurgen . . . ".|
|48||Henry-Michelland et al., Colloids and Surfaces, 14, pp. 269-276 (1985) "Lyophilization and Rehydration of Liposomes".|
|49||Jacobs, "Intraocular gas measurement using A-scan ultrasound," Current Eye Research, vol. 5, No. 8, 1986, pp. 575-578.|
|50||*||Jacobs, Current Eye Research, 5(8):575-578 (1986).|
|51||K. Makino, "Preparation and in vivo degradation properties . . . ," Chem. Pharm. Bull., (1985), vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 1195-1201.|
|52||K. Uno, et al., "A new method of preparing monocored . . . ," J. Microencapsulation, 1984, vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 3-8.|
|53||Keller et al, Circulation Res, 65, 458-467 (1989) "The Behavior of Sonicated Albumin . . . ".|
|54||Krause et al., International Journal of Pharmaceutics., 27, pp. 145-155 (1985) "Polylactic acid nanoparticle . . . ".|
|55||Levene et al, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 87 (Suppl) 69 (1990) "Characterization of Albunex . . . ".|
|56||*||Lincoff et al., Arch. Opthamology 98:1610-1611 (1980).|
|57||*||Lincoff et al., Arch. Opthamology 98:1646 (1980).|
|58||Lincoff, et al. "The Perfluorocarbon Gases in the treatment of Retinal Detachment," Ophthalmology, 90(5):546-551 (1983).|
|59||Lincoff, et al., "Intravitreal Expansion of Perfluorocarbon Bubbles," Arch. Ophthalmology, 98:1646 (1980).|
|60||Lincoff, et al., "Perfluoro-n-butane: A Gas for Maximum Duration Retinal Tamponade," Arch. Ophthalmology, 101:460-463 (1983).|
|61||Lincoff, et al., Intravitreal Longevity of Three Perfluorocarbon Cases, Arch. Ophthalmology, 98:1610-1611 (1980).|
|62||Mattrey et al., Radiology, 148, pp. 759-762 (Dec. 1982) "UHM Sound; Perfluoroctylbromide . . . ".|
|63||Meltzer et al Ultrasound in Med & Biol vol. 7, No. 4 pp 377-384 1981 Transmission of Ultrasonic Contrast etc.|
|64||Meltzer, et al., Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 377-384, 1981, "Transmission of Ultrasonic Contrast Through the Lungs".|
|65||Miller et al., J. Amer. Soc. Anesthesiol., 36 339-351 (1971) "Physicochemical Approaches . . . ".|
|66||Möhwald, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 41, 441-76 (1990) "Phospholipid and Phospholipid-Protein Monolayers At The Air/Water Interface".|
|67||Murrell et al, "Properties of liquids and solutions", Wiley, p. 276 (1982).|
|68||Nomura, et al., "US Contrast Enhancement of Hepatic Tumor with Helium Gas Microbubbles: A Preliminary Report," Jpn. J. Med. Ultrasonics, vol. 18, No. 5, 1991, pp. 444-450.|
|69||O'Hara et al., Journal of Membrane Science, 23 (1985) 1-9, "Preparation of ethylcellulose . . . ".|
|70||Ohta et al Jpn J Med Ultrasonics vol. 18 No. 4 (1991) Effect of the Contrast Agent and the Agitation Method etc.|
|71||Ohta, et al., Jpn. J. Med. Ultrasonics, vol. 18, No. 4 (1991), "Effect of the Contrast Agent and the Agitation Met."|
|72||Ophir et al Ultrasound in Med & Biol vol. 15 No. 4 pp 319-333 1989 Contrast Agents in Diagnostic Ultrasound.|
|73||Ophir, et al., Ultrasound in Med. &Biol., vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 319-333, 1989, "Contrast Agents in Diagnostic Ultras."|
|74||Ostro in Spektrum d. Wiss, 94-95, 98 (Marz 1987). "Liposomen . . . ".|
|75||Özer et al., Acta Pharm. Tech. 34, pp. 129-139 (1988) "Influence of Freezing and Freeze Drying on Stability of Liposome . . . ".|
|76||Park, et al., Journal of Chemical And Engineering Data, vol. 27, No. 3 (1982), "Solubility of Gases in Liquids. 14. Bunsen Coefficients for Several Fluorine-Containing Gases (Freons) Dissolved in Water at 298.15K".|
|77||Peters et al., Am. J. Ophthalmol. 100 pp. 831-839 (1985) "The non expansive, equilibrated concentration of perfuoropropane in the eye".|
|78||Puisieux et al., Bull. Soc. Pharm. Bordeaux, 123, pp. 111-126 (1984) "Les Liposomes . . . ".|
|79||Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences: Mack Publ. Comp., 295-298: 736; 1242-44 (1975).|
|80||Rompp Lex. Chemie. 8 Aufl. Stuttgart: Franckh; Bd. Z: Cm-G, (1981): Bd 3; H-L, (1983); Bd 4, M-Pk (1985) "Porositat".|
|81||Schlief Current Opinion in Radiology 1991, 3:198-207 Ultrasound Contrast Agents.|
|82||Schlief, Current Opinion in Radiology, 1993, 3:198-207, "Ultrasound Contrast Agents".|
|83||Schneider, et al., Investigative Radiol., 26(1), pp. S190-S191 (1991) "A New Ultrasound Contrast Agent Based on Biodegrabable Polymers Microballoon".|
|84||Schneider, et al., Investigative Radiol., 29(2), pp. S149-S151 (1991) "The Use of Polymers Microballoons as Ultrasound Contrast Agent . . . ".|
|85||*||Swanson, Pharmaceuticals in Medical Imaging; MacMillan Publishing, NY pp 682-687 (1990).|
|86||Swanson, pp. 682-687, "Chapter 22: Enhancement Agents for Ultrasound: Fundamentals," Pharmaceuticals In Medical Imaging, (1990).|
|87||Szoka et al, PNAS 75, pp. 4194-4198 (Sep. 1978) "Procedure for preparation of Liposomes . . . ".|
|88||Tomlinson, Int J. Pharm. Tech. & Prod. Mfr., pp. 49-57 (1983) "Microsphere Delivery Means . . . ".|
|89||Ulmius et al, Biochem., 21, p. 1553 (1982) "Molecular organization . . . ".|
|90||Violante et al Investigative Radiology vol. 26 Nov. Supp 1991 Particle-Stabilized Bubbles for Enhanced etc.|
|91||Violante, et al., Investigative Radiology, vol. 26, Nov. Supp 1991, "Particle-Stabilized Bubbles for Enhanced Organ Ultrasound Imaging".|
|92||Voigt et al., "Lzithine" in Lehrb. d. pharm. Tech. i, uberab. Aufl.-Weinheim; VCH, p. 367 (1979).|
|93||Wheatley et al, Biomaterials 11, pp. 713-717 (1990) "Contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound . . . ".|
|94||Widder et al AJR:147, 8/86 Microbubbles as a Contrast Agent for Neurosonography and Ultrasound- etc.|
|95||Widder, et al. AJR:147, Aug. 1986, "Microbubbles as Contrast Agent for Neurosonography and Ultrasound . . . ".|
|96||Zeghlouol et al, Journal de Chimie Physique, 83; 665-671 (1986) "NMR And Microcalorimetry Study Of The Solubility Of Certain Halons And Their Interaction with Human Serum Albumin".|
|97||Zhang, et al., J. East China Inst. Chem. Tech., 12(3) 343-345 (1986) "A Study on the Solubilities of F22 and C2F4 in Aqueous Solutions of HCI and NacI".|
|U.S. Classification||424/9.51, 600/441, 424/9.52, 600/458|
|International Classification||A61K49/00, A61B8/00|
|Cooperative Classification||A61K49/223, A61B8/481|
|Sep 1, 1998||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BRACCO INTERNATIONAL B.V., NETHERLANDS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BUSSAT, PHILIPPE;HYBL, EVA;BICHON, DANIEL;REEL/FRAME:009429/0178;SIGNING DATES FROM 19980810 TO 19980825
|Nov 9, 2006||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Sep 14, 2012||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BRACCO SUISSE S.A., SWITZERLAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BRACCO INTERNATIONAL B.V.;REEL/FRAME:028960/0100
Effective date: 20120912