|Publication number||USRE39325 E1|
|Application number||US 09/948,870|
|Publication date||Oct 3, 2006|
|Filing date||Sep 7, 2001|
|Priority date||Dec 31, 1992|
|Publication number||09948870, 948870, US RE39325 E1, US RE39325E1, US-E1-RE39325, USRE39325 E1, USRE39325E1|
|Inventors||Donald W. Bryan|
|Original Assignee||Bryan Donald W|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (24), Referenced by (34), Classifications (5), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation-in-part application of my application Ser. No. 08/232,371, filed Apr. 25, 1994, for SPINAL FIXATION APPARATUS AND METHOD now U.S. Pat. No. 5,498,262 issued Mar. 12, 1996, which was a continuation-in-part application of Ser. No. 07/999,005 filed Dec. 31, 1992 for LUMBAR SPINE FIXATION APPARATUS AND METHOD now U.S. Pat. No. 5,306,275 issued Apr. 26, 1994.
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to medical instrumentation for achieving spinal fusion and, more particularly, to a novel, highly adaptive, and interchangeable component system and method for fixation of the lumbar spine and lumbosacral spine to aid the fusion of these spinal regions.
2. The Prior Art
The spine is a flexible, multi-segmented column that supports the upright posture in a human while providing mobility to the axial skeleton. The lumbar spine serves the functions of encasing and protecting vital neural elements and provides structural support for the body by transmitting the weight of the body through the pelvis to the lower extremities. Since there are no ribs attached to the lumbar spine, it has a relatively wide range of motion.
The spine is made up of bone, intervertebral discs, synovial joints with their articular cartilage, synovial capsules and, as part of the back, is surrounded by supporting ligaments, muscle, fascia, blood vessels, nerves, and skin. As in other areas of the body, these elements are subject to a variety of pathological disturbances: inflammation, trauma, neoplasm, congenital anomalies, disease, etc. In fulfilling its role in the back, the spine can be subjected to significant trauma which is assumed to play a dominant role in the etiology of low back pain, Trauma frequently results in damage at the upper end of the lumbar spine, where the mobile lumbar segments joint the less mobile dorsal spine. Excessive forces on the spine can not only produce life-threatening traumatic injuries, but may contribute to an increased rate of degenerative change. Degenerative changes tend to develop in the lower lumbar intervertebral discs, most commonly in the third decade. Osteoarthritis produces changes in the facet joints by middle age.
Certain severe cases of spine anomalies, such as a congenital scoliotic spine, or scoliosis developed as the result of diseases as cerebral palsy or muscular dystrophy, require surgery and instrumentation to correct or at least lessen the anomalous spine curvature. If exterior brace treatment has failed or a large progressive curve has developed without treatment, surgery can be used to diminish the curve. Severe scoliosis that goes untreated can cause deformities of the ribs that restrict the lung and later cause serious breathing problems, heart disease, or severe back pain.
One of the methods used to treat disabling pain, neurological compromise, or deformity produced by any of the above noted pathological conditions is fusion. The earliest spinal fusion techniques were basically posterior interlaminar fusions. Subsequently, later techniques led to the evolution of posterolateral techniques that allow a larger area for bone grafting and fusion. The relatively high rate of unsatisfactory results with traditional fusion techniques led to the evolution of lumbosacral fusion involving the use of hardware or instrumentation in an attempt to achieve stability and thus fusion or correction of deformity and stability followed by fusion. Internal spinal fixation increases rigidity and results in a high rate of fusion. This increased fusion rate and decreased pseudarthrosis rate gives better results and can significantly reduce postoperative pain and time for convalescence. Spinal fixation using instrumentation also allows correction of deformities and maintenance of that correction during consolidation by fusion. The primary considerations of the indications for spinal instrumentation are the magnitude of instability, the plane of deformity, and the available intact anatomy.
The past decade or two has seen an extensive development of internal devices for the lumbar and lumbosacral spine fixation. The following patents are typical of the patents in this field: Edwards (U.S. Pat. No. 4,569,338) teaches a sacral fixation screw having an aperture in the top for the engagement of a hook. Steffee (U.S. Pat. No. 4,648,388) teaches an apparatus for imposing a force on the spinal column. Howland et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,653,481) teach a spine fixation system having a plurality of screw clamp assemblies inserted through the pedicle and vertebral body and affixed to a rigid rod. Steffee (U.S. Pat. No. 4,719,905) teaches an apparatus including a rod, a plurality of clamps, and a plurality of fastener assemblies for securing the rod to a spinal column. Puno et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,805,602) teach an apparatus for the internal fixation of the spine, the apparatus including two sets of implants each consisting of a rod and a plurality of vertebral anchors. Heinig et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,887,595) teach a plate and screw system for maintaining the relative position of the spinal bodies of a spinal column. Sherman (U.S. Pat. No. 4,887,596) teaches a pedicle screw for use in internal fixation of the spin. Gotzen et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,944,743) teach an implantable fixation device having a support bar with jaw supports threadedly engaged to the support bar. Gaines, Jr. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,950,269) teaches a rod and fastener apparatus for connecting the rod to the vertebra of a spinal column. Krag et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,987,892) teach a pedicle screw and rod apparatus for spinal fixation. Cotrel (U.S. Pat. No. 5,005,562) teaches an implant for spinal fixation, the implant including a rod and pedicle screws and hooks mountable to the rod. Howland (U.S. Pat. No. 5,030,220) teaches an implantable spinal fixation system that uses a pedicle screw to secure the longitudinal rods to the spine. An improved locking system maintains the structural integrity of the construct. Cozad et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,074,864) teaches a mid-line clamp assembly for use in posterior spinal fixation. The clamp assembly includes inferior and superior clamp halves that are slideably interconnected. The clamp halves are engageable about the longitudinal rods. Asher et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,084,049) teach a pair of corrective devices for securement to a spinal column. Each corrective device includes a spine plate having a plurality of openings for receiving a fastener to connect the spine plate to a vertebra. Tsou (U.S. Pat. No. 5,122,131) teaches an orthopedic device for secure mechanical coupling to an elongated surgical rod. Dubousset (U.S. Pat. No. 5,147,360) teaches an osteosynthesis device for correction of spinal curvature wherein anterior and posterior rods are affixed to the vertebral bodies to apply the necessary corrective forces to the spinal column. Cotrel (U.S. Pat. No. 5,154,719) teaches an implant for osteosynthesis, the implant being in the form of a screw having a rod-receiving head. Mathews (U.S. Pat. No. 5,171,279) teaches a percutaneous fusion technique using superfascial internal fixation. Schlapfer (U.S. Patent No. 5,190,543) teaches a pedicle screw having a slotted head for receiving a support rod. Mehdian (U.S. Pat. No. 5,217,497) teaches an implant for fixing one segment of a spinal column to another segment, the implant being in the form of a screw having a slotted head to which a support rod is anchored. Krag et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,219,349) teaches a device for use in the controlled alignment of a fractured spine in conjunction with the Vermont Spinal Fixator. Ashman (U.S. Pat. No. 5,242,445) teaches an eyebolt having two shell-like portions for engagement to a spinal rod. Vignaud et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,261,907) teaches an interconnecting device able to lock two spinal osteosynthesis fasteners. Wagner (U.S. Pat. No. 5,334,203) teaches a medical construct using surgical rods and connectors. The connector includes a plate with a pair of double hook bolts to secure the plate to the surgical rods. Yuan et al. (U. S. Pat. No. 5,352,225) teach a dual-tier spinal clamp locking and retrieving system. Jeanson et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,360,429) teach a device for straightening, fixing, compressing, and elongating the cervical spine. Lahille et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,380,325) teaches a consolidated rod and plural members such as pedicular screws and vertebral claws. Acromed Corp. (European Patent Application Publication Number 0 553 424 A1) teaches a plurality of screw-like fasteners mounted to individual vertebrae and interconnected by a longitudinal rod.
The most common rationale for using such devices is to reduce the incidence of pseudarthrosis after bone grafting. Another rationale (typically for trauma management) is to maintain intervertebral alignment to protect the neural elements until healing occurs. Yet another rationale is to provide fixation for correction of severe anomalous spine curvature due to severe scoliosis or other deformity which threatens life or health.
One of the early fixation methods involved the placement of screws obliquely across each facet joint involved in the grafting. However, the pseudarthrosis rate for this procedure was unacceptably high. Numerous other types of devices that variously include plates, wires, rods, bolts, hooks, and screws have evolved since that time and have resulted in a plethora of devices and instrumentation apparatus for use by the orthopedic surgeon to accomplish spinal fixation. Some of these fixation apparatus and methods require multiple adjustments to the longitudinal rods in order to adapt to specific anatomy. Although not provided by all these devices, the ideal spinal fixation apparatus would provide internal alignment and fixation not just in any one of various planes of movement, but in a full, three-dimensional construct where subject fixation apparatus is simplified, low profile, and easily manipulated and adjusted by the surgeon to allow for anatomy variations, while at the same time providing an extremely rigid construct upon tightening of connection points.
As shown herein before, numerous patents have been issued for various types of spine fixation devices. These devices employ different mechanical apparatus for enabling the surgeon to selectively adjust the alignment of the patient's spine and then to secure that alignment with the spine fixation device. Most of these devices are relatively difficult to adjust and require undue surgical time in their implantation. Further, due to the wide variation in spinal dimensions and availability of suitable attachment sites, most devices have limited application. Further still, these devices do not allow the surgeon to easily manipulate and position the bone screws prior to final tightening of the device.
Another characteristic inherent in prior art spinal fixation apparatus are the manipulation restrictions due to screw thread configuration. Generally, prior bone screw thread configurations have been either single thread pitch (number of threads per unit of length) over the entire length of the bone screw, which requires that the clamping device be engaged from the beginning of the threading process, or other complex configurations involving set screws, or other devices which are either cumbersome to adjust and tighten or cause undue disruption of the cancellous bone tissue. Bone screws of differing thread pitch have an advantage that final positioning is not required until just prior to final tightening of the device, but still have the disadvantage of, due to the discrepancy in the thread pitch, causing the bone screw to create undue coaxial pressure on the lattice-like cancellous tissue of the bone, thereby increasing possible shearing or undue disruption of bone tissue.
A further characteristic of prior bone screw configurations is that the thread angle of the top surface of the thread is not orthogonal relative to the axis of the screw, thereby lessening gripping strength. Specifically, increasing the angle of the thread surface proximal to the bone screw head such that the angle is nearly orthogonal relative to the bone screw axis, correspondingly decreases the lateral forces imposed by that thread on bone tissue by the tightening process.
In view of the foregoing, it would be a significant advancement in the art to provide a spinal fixation apparatus and method that was highly interchangeable, simplified, and would increase the ease of installation and adjustment while decreasing the total time required for surgical implantation and fixation. It would also be an advancement in the art to provide a spinal fixation apparatus and method that would utilize a multi-diameter threaded bone screw of the same thread pitch for all diameters, such that, upon tightening, would have no net increase in axial pressure on the cancellous bone tissue due to thread pitch variance. An even further advancement in the art would be to provide a bone screw with a modified thread configuration such that the top surface of the thread is nearly orthogonal to the axis of the bone screw, thereby decreasing the lateral pressure on the cancellous bone tissue, subsequently lessening the likelihood of shearing upon tightening. Such a novel spinal fixation apparatus and method is disclosed and claimed herein.
This invention relates to a novel spinal fixation apparatus and method and includes specially designed C-clamps, cross-link plates, stem clamps, bone screws, and longitudinal rods—all of which are used for spinal fixation. The various components are designed to be interchangeable, highly adaptable, and easily manipulated by the surgeon at time of implantation. The bone screws provide greater gripping strength and ease of implantation.
It is, therefore, a primary object of this invention to provide improvements in spinal fixation apparatus.
Another object of this invention is to provide improvements in the method for fixation of a spine for fusion.
Another object of this invention is to provide a spinal fixation apparatus that has interchangeable components, is greatly simplified, and has infinite capability to locate bone screws in any orientation without the necessity of bending the longitudinal rods thereby also allowing the use of more biocompatible materials, such as titanium, which exhibits less image interference (scatter) on a CT scan.
Another object of this invention is to provide bone screws and C-clamps that can be used on either the left or right side of the longitudinal rod, as well as directly on the longitudinal rod when situation dictates.
Another object of this invention is to provide a cross-link plate with a squared cross-section at its midriff to allow the cross-link plate to be bent or twisted to adapt to specific anatomy and increase ease and accuracy of implantation.
Another object of this invention is to provide a C-clamp which possesses two opposing indentations for secure accommodation of a manipulation tool during implantation and tightening of the various components of the construct.
Another object of this invention is to provide a bone screw with first and second threaded sections of different diameters but with the same thread pitch.
Another object of this invention is to provide a bone screw that can be positioned prior to tightening without creating undue coaxial forces on the cancellous bone tissue.
Another object of this invention is to provide a bone screw thread configuration that supplies greater gripping strength due to the top surface of the thread being nearly orthogonal relative to the axis of the bone screw.
These and other objects and features of the present invention will become more readily apparent from the following description in which preferred and other embodiments of the invention have been set forth in conjunction with the accompanying drawing and appended claims.
The invention is best understood from the following description with reference to the drawing wherein like parts are designated by like numerals throughout and taken in conjunction with the appended claims.
The underlying rationale for spinal fusion is to (a) restore the integrity of the spine or to replace missing bone stock, i.e., fracture, tumor, infection; (b) produce an arthrodesis that will suppress undesired movement between two or more bony elements that are the source of pain; and (c) maintain correction of spinal deformity or to prevent progression of deformity. In general, this arthrodesis is produced by using a bone graft that will heal and mature thereby binding the involved elements intimately. Arthrodesis requires in most instances a period of immobilization to achieve this end. Importantly, the key factor in predicting successful fusion is the amount of instability; that is, if instability is moderate and bone stock good,the proportion of easy primary fusion will increase. This goal is readily accomplished using the unique apparatus and method of this invention.
Since fusion is performed in the region of the unstable spinal segment that one wants immobile, the use of the internal fixation apparatus increases rigidity and gives a higher rate of fusion. This resultant increased fusion rate and decreased pseudarthrosis rate gives better results and can ease postoperative management regimens. Therefore, spinal instrumentation allows correction of deformity and rigid fixation of that correction during consolidation by fusion.
The unique spinal fixation apparatus and method of this invention enables the surgeon to securely immobilize the desired number of lumbar vertebrae thereby providing a stable condition for the ingrowth of bone tissue to achieve true spinal fixation. Importantly, the spinal fixation components of this invention are configured to reduce, if not eliminate, the incremental movement of micromotion between the various components. The angular orientation of the bone screw placement is designed to achieve optimal fixation between the device and the vertebrae to which it is affixed. The bone screws are specifically designed pass through the C-clamp without engaging the threads of the C-clamp while tapping into the pedicle, thereby allowing the surgeon to more accurately position and adjust the apparatus prior to tightening. The pedicle screw is anchored securely through pedicle into the vertebral body and simultaneously secures the C-clamp to engage the side arm portion of the stem clamp or the longitudinal rod in a tight, non-release fashion. This invention also provides the surgeon with greater ease of implantation of the fixation apparatus thereby decreasing the operative trauma and the postoperative convalescence.
My innovative spinal fixation apparatus centers around at least one longitudinal rod to which a plurality of bone screw and C-clamp combinations and stem clamps are attached. More than one longitudinal rod cam be employed in assembling the construct of my invention and in such circumstances cross-link plates are provided to lend structural support between the two longitudinal rods. The C-clamp is configured to be slideably mounted to the longitudinal rod and securely anchored thereto by being clamped together upon threaded engagement by the bone screw. The bone screw is configured with a first, distal set of threads having a first, smaller diameter and a second, proximal set of threads having a second, larger diameter. The thread pitch for the first set of threads is identical to the second set of threads. The C-clamp has a lower jaw having threads therein which correspond to the second set of threads on the bone screw. This feature allows the bone screw to be passed through the C-clamp and into threaded engagement with the underlying bone without engaging the C-clamp. However, once the bone screw has been suitably engaged into the bone the surgeon is then able to securely engage the C-clamp with the bone screw thereby securely engaging the C-clamp to either the longitudinal rod or the side arm of the stem clamp while tightly affixing the same to the bone. The identical thread pitch on both sets of threads of the bone screw means that as the bone screw engages and tightens the C-clamp, the continued axial movement of the bone screw into the bone is at the identical rate as prior to engagement of the C-clamp. This means that there is negligible change in the axial distance travelled by the bone screw during each rotation of the bone screw thereby effectively eliminating the gouging or disruption of the adjacent bone structure that would otherwise occur if one were using a prior art bone screw having a first thread pitch for the bone portion of the bone screw and a second thread pitch for engagement with the C-clamp. The end result is that my innovative bone screw not only secures the C-clamp securely against the longitudinal rod or the side arm of the stem clamp but it also is simultaneously sealed more snugly into the underlying bone thereby significantly reducing the possibility of micromotion between the bone screw and the bone. This in turn significantly reduces postoperative pain and speeds healing.
Importantly, the overall dimensional profile of the construct created from my innovative bone screw, C-clamp, stem clamp, and longitudinal rod combination is lower or, more specifically, implantable closer to the spine where it is thereby able to more securely hold the spine in the orientation determined by the surgeon. Further, the low profile means that there is a significant reduction in the moment arm as represented by the distance between the bone of the spine and the longitudinal rod. Reducing this moment arm significantly lowers the bending forces imposed on the bone by the forces resisted by the longitudinal rods.
Another important feature provided by the various components of the construct of my invention is that the surgeon is provided with an infinite selection of angles by which the bone screw can be directed into the bone. This feature is particularly advantageous in that the pedicle orientation varies from patient to patient and even between the different vertebra on the same spine. Angular selection for the direction of insertion of the bone screw is provided by the fact that the stem camp is rotatable a full 360° about the longitudinal rod while the C-clamp is likewise rotatable a full 360° about either the stem or side arm of the stem clamp or the longitudinal rod. Accordingly, the surgeon is able to selectively rotate both the stem clamp and the C-clamp to thereby achieve the preselected angular orientation of the bone screw into the underlying bone structure.
In addition to the foregoing features by my invention, I also provide a bone pin system for temporarily securing the spinal fixation apparatus in position on the spine to permit me to analyze the construct and its spinal placement through the use of X-ray analysis. Once X-ray analysis has shown that all of the elements of the construct are properly positioned it is a simple procedure to merely replace each bone pin with a bone screw.
Possibly the most important feature of the innovative spinal fixation apparatus of my invention is that the entire construct can be mounted to the spinal column with the bone screws properly placed prior to the final tightening of the various C-clamps and stem clamps. This final tightening procedure is readily accomplished in the absence of unacceptably altering the final orientation of the construct and without imposing distortional stresses on the construct.
Referring now to
Construct 10 is assembled from two lengths of stem clamps, stem clamps 30a-30b and stem clamps 70a-70d, in combination with cross-link plates 20a and 20b, C-clamps 60a-60h, and bone screws 50a-50h, all of which will be discussed more fully hereinafter. Stem clamps 30a and 30b are each affixed to the respective lower end of longitudinal rods 12 and 14 and provide the mechanical structure for enabling C-clamps 60a and 60h along with their respective bone screws, bone screws 50a and 50h to secure these elements to the sacrum 92. Correspondingly, stem clamps 70a-70d in combination with C-clamps 60b-60g and bone screws 50b-50g, respectively, provide the necessary securement of longitudinal rods 12 and 14 to vertebra 94a-94c, respectively. Cross-link plates 20a and 20b provide the necessary bridging mechanism between longitudinal rods 12 and 14 by being clamped thereto by stem clamps 70a-70d, respectively, when stem clamps 70a-70d are secured to longitudinal rods 12 and 14, respectively. Stem clamps 30a-30b and stem clamps 70a-70d are identical with the exception of length of the respective side arm and could thereby accommodate an additional cross-link plate 20 should the situation dictate.
It is important to emphasize at this juncture that the versatility of construct 10 is significantly enhanced by the fact that bone screws 50a-50h are capable of being directed in any preselected angular orientation into the particular underlying bone structure of spine 90. For example, the proper angular orientation of bone screws 50d and 50e is achieved by rotating the respective longitudinal rod 12 and 14 to bring side arm 13 and 15 into the desired placement relative to spine 90. Correspondingly, C-clamps 60d and 60e are rotated about side arms 13 and 15 respectively, to correctly orient the angular position of bone screws 50d and 50e, respectively, with spine 90. Similarly, C-clamps 60a-60c and 60f-60h are rotatable a full 360° about the respective stems of stem clamps 30a, 30b, and 70a-70d while stem clamps 30a, 30b, and 70a70d are also rotatable a full 360° about longitudinal rods 12 and 14, respectively. This feature allows the surgeon to have an infinite choice for the angular orientation of the respective bone screws, bone screws 50a-50c and 50c-50g.
Referring now to
Bone screw 50 is configured with a bolt head 56, an enlarged neck 54, a collar 49 and shaft 52 extending downwardly therefrom. Neck 54 is threaded with threads 55 while shaft 52 is threaded with threads 53. Collar 49 is characterized by the absence of threads and has an outer circumference that approximates the outer circumference of threads 53. Bone screw 50 terminates downwardly in a blunt tip 51 at its distal end. Transverse throughbore 66 of C-clamp 60 is sufficiently large to allow the smaller diameter of threads 53 and collar 49 to pass freely through transverse throughbore 66 and, particularly, threads 67 of lower jaw 63 in a nonbinding relationship. I have found that the smooth profile of collar 49 is particularly useful in that it minimizes any tendency for threads 53 to bind with threads 67 during the final stages of mounting bone screw 50 into C-clamp 60. Their tendency toward thread binding occurs due to slight angular offsets that may occur upon the final assembly of bone screw 50 into C-clamp 60. Collar 49 thereby provides a smooth surface against which threads 67 can not bind.
The larger diameter threads 55 on neck 54 also pass through the portion of transverse throughbore 66 in upper jaw 61 freely in a nonbinding relationship until engaging threads 67 in lower jaw 63. The diameter and pitch of threads 55 are configured to threadedly engage threads 67 to bring bolt head 56 into abutment against upper jaw 61. Further tightening of bone screw 50 will simultaneously engage bone tissue (not shown) while forcing the closing of upper jaw 61 downwardly against lower jaw 63. Accordingly, side arm 74 or longitudinal rods 12 or 14 residing in lateral throughbore 64 will be securely engaged by this clamping action of C-clamp 60. Importantly, the thread pitch is identical for all of threads 53, 55, and 67.
The multiple diameter configuration of bone screw 50 as to neck 54 and shaft 52 increases flexibility in installation and adjustment while decreasing the total time required for surgical implantation and fixation by allowing the surgeon to partially position bone screw 50 in the pedicle of the vertebra 94 or sacrum 92 (FIG. 1), creating multiple elements of construct 10, then returning to each bone screw 50 or side arm clamps 30 and 70 (
Bone screw 50 includes a unique thread configuration of the top surface of thread 53 in that it is undercut or nearly orthogonal to axis 57 of bone screw 50 as shown by angle 59. The bottom surface of thread 53 resides at an acute angle 58. This latter angle more nearly approximates the angular surfaces of threads 55. During the tightening of bone screw 50 into the pedicle bone and subsequent clamping with C-clamp 60, the top surface of thread angle 59 serves to decrease the lateral pressure on the cancellous bone tissue in which bone screw 50 is implanted, thereby increasing the gripping capability while decreasing likelihood of disruption of cancellous bone tissue. In essence, this top surface acts to undercut and thereby more securely embed threads 53 into the bone structure.
With specific reference to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Construct 10 is affixed to spine 90 by a very straightforward procedure. Specifically, all of the holes to receive bone screws 50a-50h are sited and then selectively reamed. Thereafter, longitudinal rod 12 having the predetermined length and diameter is selected. Stem clamp 30b is attached to the end thereof and C-clamp 60h is mounted to stem 74 (FIGS. 5A and 5B). Bone screw 50h is then embedded in sacrum 92 to loosely hold stem clamp 30b and longitudinal rod 12 to sacrum 92. During this procedure, longitudinal rod 12 is oriented upwardly out of the surgical incision (not shown). The surgeon has previously slipped the preselected number of stem clamps 70 on longitudinal rod 12. Bone pin 100 is then passed through C-clamp 60e and inserted in the pedicle within vertebra 94c to loosely hold C-clamp 60e to spine 90. Longitudinal rod 12 is then slidingly adjusted to pass through throughbore 64 of C-clamp 60e. In this manner, longitudinal rod 12 is oriented relative to spine 90. The next step is for the intervening stem clamps 70c and 70d to be mounted to spine 90 using C-clamps 60f and 60g in combination with a plurality of bone pins 100. Longitudinal rod 14 is also positioned on spine 90 following the identical procedure used for longitudinal rod 12.
With most of the elements of construct 10 held in place on spine 90 through the use of a plurality of bone pins 100 the surgeon is able to use X-ray techniques to accurately determine the correct placement of construct 10 as well as bone screws 50. This is particularly advantageous since bone screws 50 have yet to be mounted to spine 90. Once it has been determined that all elements of construct 10 are suitably positioned on spine 90 the surgeon is readily able to secure construct 10 to spine 90 in this predetermine position by simply removing and replacing one by one each of bone pin 100 with a bone screw 50. Thereafter, cross-link plates 20 are mounted to stem clamps 30 and 70 and final securement thereof is accomplished by tightening bolt 80 therein. Importantly, cross-link plates 20a and 20b are suitably shaped as described hereinbefore and then mounted between the respective pairs of stem clamps 70a-70d by having bolts 80 (
With each of bone screws 50a-50d in place along with stem clamps 30a and 30b and stem clamps 70a-70d, the surgeon is now ready to make any final adjustment to construct 10 and then suitably tighten all of these elements as needed to achieve the desired fixation of spine 90 with the spinal fixation apparatus of construct 10 without imposing undesirable forces on spine 90. Specifically, if one has ever attempted to achieve final tightening of two moveable elements through the use of a set screw system, one has experienced the fact that the act of tightening almost always results in a rotational movement being imparted by the set screw against the element being engaged by the set screw. To compensate for this notorious characteristic of a set screw, it is customary for the operator to adjust the orientation of the movable element so that when the set screw has been suitably tightened (and has thereby rotated the element to, hopefully, its final position) the element will be set at its desired position. Precise final alignment of the two elements using the prior art set screw system is, therefore, a matter of experience coupled with extensive trial and error. However, with respect to the spinal support system provided by construct 10 presented herein, such a final fixation system for the various components of construct 10 is unnecessary. In particular, it is poor medical practice to implant a spinal fixation device in a patient in such a way as to impose unacceptable forces on the spine as a result of the final position setting of the components in the spinal fixation device. Construct 10 eliminates all of these problems by the unique design of its components. Stem clamps 30 and 70 impart absolutely no rotational forces against the particular element engaged thereby. Additionally, the clamping action of C-clamps 60 involve the constriction of the respective rod elements in the absence of any rotational forces being imposed on the rod element. As further assistance and security during tightening, two opposing indentations 68a and 68b on C-clamp 60 (
Construct 10 provides numerous advantages in the art of spine fixation in that it readily allows the surgeon to adapt the final configuration to any anatomical condition encountered on spine 90. Specifically, the combination of stem clamps 30 and 90 in conjunction with C-clamps 60 provides the surgeon with unlimited ability to direct the placement of bone screw 50 at any angle in both the sagittal plane and the coronal plane. Further, stems 34 and 74 permit significant translational placement of bone screw 50. These features are very advantageous since the entry angle as well as the entry point for bone screw 50 will vary from position to position on spine 90. The end result is that I have effectively eliminated the need to bend or shape longitudinal rods 12 and 14. The only bending or contouring required during the surgical procedure is that of cross-link plate 20. This shaping is easily accomplished by clasping each of eyelets 24 and 25 in the jaw of a suitable tool and applying the necessary bending/twisting forces on shank 22.
In summary, construct 10 provides a distinct advantage to the surgeon (not shown) in that it allows the surgeon to create any suitable spatial relationship between construct 10 and spine 90 for the purpose of packing bone graft (not shown) therebetween while at the same time providing a very strong, rigid, spinal support system. This advantage is possible through the use of the innovative clamping system involved in stem clamps 30 and 70. Not only do these clamping devices provide a very solid linkage between components in construct 10, but they also provide a highly advantageous degree of assembly flexibility in assembling construct 10. Specifically, bone screws 50a-50h are almost never secured to spine 90 in a direction that is perpendicular to a plane represented by the axis of longitudinal rod 12 and side arm 13, for example. The ideal placement of bone screws 50a-50h is almost always at some angular offset so that the various components of construct 10 are particularly useful in that they accommodate the precise placement of bone screws 50a-50h regardless of the respective angular orientation. Further, once in place, the entire spinal support apparatus of construct 10 is then securely affixed in the final configuration to thereby provide a rigid spinal support system for spine 90. This latter feature is important and is made possible by the various elements that constitute construct 10.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4887595 *||Jul 29, 1987||Dec 19, 1989||Acromed Corporation||Surgically implantable device for spinal columns|
|US4920959||Apr 6, 1987||May 1, 1990||Ulrich Witzel||External fixture for osteosynthetis|
|US4998936 *||Jul 29, 1988||Mar 12, 1991||Mehdian Seyed M H||Apparatus for use in the treatment of spinal disorders|
|US5030220||Mar 29, 1990||Jul 9, 1991||Advanced Spine Fixation Systems Incorporated||Spine fixation system|
|US5122131||Mar 14, 1991||Jun 16, 1992||Tsou Paul M||Orthopaedic device for mechanical coupling to a surgical rod|
|US5129900 *||Jul 24, 1990||Jul 14, 1992||Acromed Corporation||Spinal column retaining method and apparatus|
|US5154719||Feb 19, 1991||Oct 13, 1992||Societe De Fabrication De Materiel Orthopedique - Sofamor||Implant for a device for osteosynthesis, in particular of the spine|
|US5171279||Mar 17, 1992||Dec 15, 1992||Danek Medical||Method for subcutaneous suprafascial pedicular internal fixation|
|US5190543||Nov 25, 1991||Mar 2, 1993||Synthes (U.S.A.)||Anchoring device|
|US5217497||Jul 3, 1991||Jun 8, 1993||Mehdian Seyed M H||Apparatus for use in the treatment of spinal disorders|
|US5219349||Feb 15, 1991||Jun 15, 1993||Howmedica, Inc.||Spinal fixator reduction frame|
|US5242445||Dec 5, 1991||Sep 7, 1993||Danek Medical, Inc.||Split eyebolt for spinal rod|
|US5261907||May 15, 1992||Nov 16, 1993||Vignaud Jean L||Interconnecting device able to lock spinal osteosynthesis fasteners|
|US5282862 *||Dec 3, 1991||Feb 1, 1994||Artifex Ltd.||Spinal implant system and a method for installing the implant onto a vertebral column|
|US5344422 *||Dec 10, 1992||Sep 6, 1994||Synthes (U.S.A.)||Pedicular screw clamp|
|US5352225||Jan 14, 1993||Oct 4, 1994||Yuan Hansen A||Dual-tier spinal clamp locking and retrieving system|
|US5360429||Feb 19, 1993||Nov 1, 1994||Jbs Societe Anonyme||Device for straightening, fixing, compressing, and elongating cervical vertebrae|
|US5380325 *||Nov 5, 1993||Jan 10, 1995||Biomat||Osteosynthesis device for spinal consolidation|
|US5437669 *||Aug 12, 1993||Aug 1, 1995||Amei Technologies Inc.||Spinal fixation systems with bifurcated connectors|
|US5498262 *||Apr 25, 1994||Mar 12, 1996||Bryan; Donald W.||Spinal fixation apparatus and method|
|US5674221 *||Oct 23, 1995||Oct 7, 1997||Orthopaedic Innovations, Inc.||External fixator with improved clamp and methods for use|
|US5676665 *||Jun 23, 1995||Oct 14, 1997||Bryan; Donald W.||Spinal fixation apparatus and method|
|US5716355 *||Apr 10, 1995||Feb 10, 1998||Sofamor Danek Group, Inc.||Transverse connection for spinal rods|
|EP0553424A1||Nov 25, 1992||Aug 4, 1993||Acromed Corporation||Spinal column retaining apparatus|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7611526||Aug 3, 2005||Nov 3, 2009||K Spine, Inc.||Spinous process reinforcement device and method|
|US7658753||Feb 9, 2010||K Spine, Inc.||Device and method for correcting a spinal deformity|
|US7708765||Aug 3, 2005||May 4, 2010||K Spine, Inc.||Spine stabilization device and method|
|US8002801||Mar 17, 2010||Aug 23, 2011||K Spine, Inc.||Adjustable spinal implant device and method|
|US8016860||Sep 13, 2011||K Spine, Inc.||Device and method for correcting a spinal deformity|
|US8043345||Oct 25, 2011||K Spine, Inc.||Device and method for correcting a spinal deformity|
|US8114158||Jul 8, 2008||Feb 14, 2012||Kspine, Inc.||Facet device and method|
|US8162979||Jun 5, 2008||Apr 24, 2012||K Spine, Inc.||Medical device and method to correct deformity|
|US8167912||May 1, 2012||The Center for Orthopedic Research and Education, Inc||Modular pedicle screw system|
|US8357182||Mar 26, 2009||Jan 22, 2013||Kspine, Inc.||Alignment system with longitudinal support features|
|US8357183||Jan 22, 2013||Kspine, Inc.||Semi-constrained anchoring system|
|US8518086||Jun 17, 2010||Aug 27, 2013||K Spine, Inc.||Semi-constrained anchoring system|
|US8828058||Sep 1, 2010||Sep 9, 2014||Kspine, Inc.||Growth directed vertebral fixation system with distractible connector(s) and apical control|
|US8920472||Apr 18, 2013||Dec 30, 2014||Kspine, Inc.||Spinal correction and secondary stabilization|
|US8926669||Mar 28, 2008||Jan 6, 2015||The Center For Orthopedic Research And Education, Inc.||Modular polyaxial pedicle screw system|
|US9011491||Jan 9, 2012||Apr 21, 2015||K Spine, Inc.||Facet device and method|
|US9113959||Sep 10, 2014||Aug 25, 2015||K2M, Inc.||Spinal correction and secondary stabilization|
|US9168071||Sep 15, 2009||Oct 27, 2015||K2M, Inc.||Growth modulation system|
|US9173681||Dec 20, 2012||Nov 3, 2015||K2M, Inc.||Alignment system with longitudinal support features|
|US9247966||Mar 28, 2012||Feb 2, 2016||The Center For Orthopedic Research And Education, Inc.||Modular pedicle screw system|
|US9333009||Jun 1, 2012||May 10, 2016||K2M, Inc.||Spinal correction system actuators|
|US9358044||Dec 20, 2012||Jun 7, 2016||K2M, Inc.||Semi-constrained anchoring system|
|US9408638||Jan 29, 2016||Aug 9, 2016||K2M, Inc.||Spinal correction system actuators|
|US9451997||Mar 18, 2015||Sep 27, 2016||K2M, Inc.||Facet device and method|
|US9468468||Nov 21, 2011||Oct 18, 2016||K2M, Inc.||Transverse connector for spinal stabilization system|
|US9468469||Sep 17, 2013||Oct 18, 2016||K2M, Inc.||Transverse coupler adjuster spinal correction systems and methods|
|US9468471||Sep 17, 2013||Oct 18, 2016||K2M, Inc.||Transverse coupler adjuster spinal correction systems and methods|
|US20060036259 *||Aug 3, 2005||Feb 16, 2006||Carl Allen L||Spine treatment devices and methods|
|US20060058790 *||Aug 3, 2005||Mar 16, 2006||Carl Allen L||Spinous process reinforcement device and method|
|US20080234757 *||Aug 3, 2007||Sep 25, 2008||Jacofsky Marc C||Modular pedicle screw system|
|US20080262556 *||Mar 28, 2008||Oct 23, 2008||Jacofsky Marc C||Modular polyaxial pedicle screw system|
|US20090012563 *||Oct 11, 2007||Jan 8, 2009||Nas Medical Technologies, Inc.||Spinal fixation devices and methods|
|US20090254097 *||Apr 4, 2008||Oct 8, 2009||Isaacs Robert E||System and device for designing and forming a surgical implant|
|US20100094291 *||Oct 9, 2008||Apr 15, 2010||Delbello Damon||Clamp For A Medical Implant And A Method For Using The Same|
|U.S. Classification||606/86.00A, 606/264, 606/261, 606/250|
|Feb 20, 2007||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Apr 11, 2011||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Sep 7, 2011||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|