|Publication number||USRE39326 E1|
|Application number||US 09/728,000|
|Publication date||Oct 3, 2006|
|Filing date||Dec 1, 2000|
|Priority date||Jun 5, 1996|
|Also published as||US5845300|
|Publication number||09728000, 728000, US RE39326 E1, US RE39326E1, US-E1-RE39326, USRE39326 E1, USRE39326E1|
|Inventors||Ross Ward Comer, Adam Brett Stein, David Russell Williams, Jr.|
|Original Assignee||Microsoft Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (5), Non-Patent Citations (7), Referenced by (30), Classifications (7), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates generally to the field of computer-based applications requiring data entry and more particularly to the field of improving the data entry process by automatically completing a partially entered data item with a matching data item from a list of previously entered data items.
In the field of data processing systems, data is entered into databases for the purposes of rapid searching, retrieving or processing. Since its inception, the field of data processing has been bottle-necked by the time consuming and human-error prone process of data entry. Therefore, it is desirable to improve the efficiency and reliability of entering data into a database system. One method to achieve this objective is the use of automatic completion algorithms to assist in the data entry process. Automatic completion algorithms generally refer to the technique of comparing a partially-entered data item to a list of possible completed data items to find a suggestion for completing the partially-entered data item. Automatic completion algorithms improve the data entry process by increasing the speed and integrity of data entry. For instance, a user is only required to enter enough characters of a data item to uniquely identify a suggested completion. This results in increasing the speed of data entry by reducing the number of required key strokes. For larger data items, the savings in time can be quite noticeable. Concerning the increase in data integrity, by providing suggested completions, many of the human errors such as spelling errors and data anomalies can be eliminated from the process of data entry.
Data processing systems can take on many forms ranging from highly-formatted, custom or specialized database programs to a more generic, user-definable database, such as a spreadsheet application. Examples of the former include products such as inventory control systems, manufacturing tracking systems and accounts receivable/payable systems. An example of a more generic database is the “MICROSOFT EXCEL” computer spreadsheet program marketed by Microsoft Corporation.
Automatic data entry completion algorithms have appeared in various types of applications. For example, the help utility in “MICROSOFT WORD” for “WINDOWS 95”, version 7.0, provides an automatic completion feature for retrieving help information from a database. An alphabetically sorted list of predefined topics are available as an index into the information database. When entering a word or words describing the type of information required (i.e., entering “acc” to obtain information concerning “accented characters”) the automatic completion feature will search the list for a matching entry. If a suggested completion is identified, it will be displayed to the user.
Microsoft's “ACCESS” database program, version 7.0, is an example of a more generic, user definable database that provides an automatic completion feature to aid in defining database tables. The “Table Definition” interface consists of the predefined categories: Field Name, Data Type and Description. When entering data items into the Data Type category, a predefined list of suggested completions is examined to determine if a match for the data item being entered (partial data entry) exists. If a match is found, the matching data item is displayed as a suggested completion. Similar to Microsoft's “WORD” program, “ACCESS” relies on the characteristic of the data items conforming to a pre-defined list of possibilities.
For the other categories in the “Table Definition” interface of “ACCESS”, the data entries are user-definable as opposed to being selected from a pre-defined list. Here, no suggested completions are provided when entering data into these categories. Furthermore, once a database table has been defined, the user can enter data into the user-defined data categories of the database table. In this interface, “ACCESS” again does not provide an automatic completion feature.
A characteristic of each of the above-described automatic completion algorithm implementations is that they operate within a rigidly defined database structure. These implementations take advantage of the fact that the format and contents of the data being entered are known, and hence, a pre-defined list of suggestions can be utilized. Both of these implementations improve the efficiency and reliability of data entry in a fixed or structured database by allowing the use of an automatic completion algorithm. But, in more generic databases, such as a spread sheet, the user is at complete liberty to define the categories and types of data that can be entered. There is a need for a system to provide efficient and reliable data entry for user-definable database systems. Therefore, there is a need for a system for generating a list of completed data items in a generic database that allows the use of an automatic completion feature and hence, that provides a more efficient an reliable method for entering data into a generic database.
Implementing an automatic completion feature for the process of entering user-definable data posses several technically complicated issues. The implementation must be able to: (1) modify the selection list as new data items are entered and update the selection list when previously entered items are modified; (2) minimize the impact of the selection lists on system resources such as memory; and (3) minimize any delays in processing user inputs. Because entering user-definable data is a process requiring efficient and reliable data entry, there is a need for an automatic completion capability for generic, user-definable, data entry systems.
In view of the foregoing, there is a need for an automatic completion method that can be used for generic, spreadsheet type applications in which the structure of the database and the types of data entered can take on a multiplicity of formats. There is also a need for a method to dynamically generate a list of suggested completions that would be based on data items having an association with the data item being entered rather then utilizing a static list of predefined possible data items.
The present invention satisfies the above-described needs by providing an automatic completion of a partial data entry by examining a suggested completion list, which is generated upon the entry of the data item. The list of suggested completions is based on the contents of other data entries that are associated with the item being entered. The present invention allows for efficient and reliable data entry in a generic, user-definable, database application.
Generally, the present invention enhances the user interface of a data entry application for a database by providing suggested completions of partially entered data items from a dynamically generated list of possible completions. The operation of the present invention includes generating the completed data item list from data entries that are associated with the partial data entry, comparing the completed data item list to the partially entered data item, and automatically completing the entry of the data if a unique match is found. From the user's perspective, when an item is being entered into the database, associated entries within the database will be examined to determine if a matching entry has been previously entered. This examination will be performed by utilizing a character mask. Thus, when a user enters the first character of an item, if there is an item in the database that uniquely matches the first character, then the partial entry will be automatically completed and the user will have the opportunity to accept the suggested completion.
The implementation of the present invention is uniquely suitable for a generic database accepting user-definable data items. Furthermore, the present invention is an automatic completion system that is able to: (1) modify the completion list as new data items are entered and update the selection list when previously entered items are modified; (2) minimize the impact of the completion lists on system resources such as memory; and (3) minimize any delays in processing user inputs.
First, the present invention modifies the completion list as new data items are entered and updates the completion list when previously entered items are modified. This is accomplished by using a dynamic completion list that is defined by the context of the data within the database as opposed to pre-defined values. The completion list is generated from a set of data within the database that is associated with the data item being entered, and reflects the status of the database at the time the data item is being entered. The benefits associated with this aspect of the invention include: providing a completed data item list that is automatically updated to reflect the current contents of the database; providing a completed data item list that is not encumbered by extraneous data entries that have no relationship with the item being entered; and providing an automatic completion feature that is not restricted to the use of a limited list of possible completions (i.e., a predefined data set).
A unique aspect of the generation process includes defining which data items are associated with the data item being entered. In the context of a generic database, the present invention provides several methods to perform this process. Generally, data items that fall within the same category or a similar category to the data item being entered are considered to be associated data items. Therefore, an advantage of the present invention is the ability to define which data entries within a database are related to a data item being entered, to generate a list of suggested completions based on these associated data entries, and to provide a dynamic completion list which tracks the actual contents of the database.
Another aspect of the present invention is that the completed data item list can be filtered so that data items which do not benefit the automatic completion feature are eliminated from the list. This is especially beneficial in a generic database where the nature of the database allows for a mixture of data types within associated categories. For instance, a generic database may allow for numeric entries and text entries to be entered into the same database category. An example of such a category would be a library database, which combines the category that lists the name of the person a book is checked out to, and the category indicating the number of days that the book has been on the shelf without being checked out. The second category is used to determine if the book should be removed from the shelves and placed into the archives. In this scenario, the numeric entries for the days on the shelf could be filtered from the completed data item list. The benefits derived from this ability is that the list is not encumbered with extraneous numeric entries which could result in slowing down the list generation process, and the entry of numeric data will not trigger any automatic completions which could easily result in entering invalid data (i.e., having the entry “1” automatically complete to “100”). Therefore, another advantage of the present invention is the provision of a technique for filtering out non-useful items from the list of suggested completions in order to maximize the efficiency of an automatic completion feature.
Second, the present invention minimizes the impact of the completion lists on system resources such as memory by storing the completed data item list in a dynamic data structure. In contrast to a static data item list, a dynamic list does not require permanent memory resources. Once a data item has been entered into the database and accepted by the user, the memory occupied by the data item list can be released and reallocated to other resources. The efficient use of memory resources is necessary in a database system, and thus, the minimization of overhead memory is imperative. This is increasingly important in a generic database that does not have pre-defined data types, and therefore, can not obtain the benefit of using efficient memory storage schemes which take advantage of pre-defined data types. Advantageously, the present invention provides a list of suggested completions which makes efficient use of memory storage.
Third, the present invention minimizes any delays in processing user inputs by using a tiered technique to generate the completed data item list. This tiered technique includes generating the completed data item list one section at a time, allowing for input processing in between the generation of each section. In addition, a suggested completion can be provided to the user based on a partially generated list. This is beneficial because it provides virtually immediate feedback to the user and expedites the data entry process. Therefore, another benefit of the present invention is the generation of a list of suggested completions in a manner that minimizes the impact to data input processing and provides instantaneous responses to the user.
More specifically described, the present invention is an automatic completion feature that can be implemented in a spreadsheet application. When a user begins to edit a cell within a spreadsheet, a completed data item list is generated from the previously entered data items stored in cells associated with the edited cell. As the user enters characters into the cell, the completed data item list is searched for an entry corresponding to the partial data entry in the edited cell. If a qualifying match is found, then the data item is displayed as a suggested completion within the cell being edited. The user then has opportunity to accept the suggested completion and thereby accelerate the data entry process, to enter additional characters to define a new data entry in the spreadsheet, or to reject the suggested completion. By accepting the suggested completion, the benefit of increasing the speed of data entry is realized and the integrity of the entered data is assured (i.e., the data entry is in conformance with previously entered data). Therefore, it is a further advantage of the present invention to improve the efficiency and reliability of data entry in a spreadsheet by providing the ability for an automatic completion feature utilizing a list of completed data items stored in cells associated with a cell being edited.
These and other aspects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be more clearly understood and appreciated from a review of the following detailed description of the present invention and possible embodiments thereof, and by reference to the appended drawings and claims.
The present invention provides an automatic completion capability for generic databases containing user-defined data entries. The preferred embodiment of the present invention is represented by the “WINDOWS 95” version of the “MICROSOFT EXCEL” program, a spreadsheet program published by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash. Briefly described, the preferred program allows users to enter user-defined data into a generic database in an efficient and reliable manner. This is accomplished by providing an automatic completion feature which utilizes a dynamically generated completion list based on data items within the database that are associated with the data being entered.
Although the preferred embodiment will be generally described in the context of a program and an operating system running on a personal computer, those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention also can be implemented in conjunction with other program modules for other types of computers. Furthermore, those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention may be implemented in a stand-alone or in a distributed computing environment. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be physically located in different local and remote memory storage devices. Execution of the program modules may occur locally in a stand-alone manner or remotely in a client/server manner. Examples of such distributed computing environments include local area networks of an office, enterprise-wide computer networks, and the global Internet.
The detailed description which follows is represented largely in terms of processes and symbolic representations of operations by conventional computer components, including a processing unit (PU), memory storage devices for the PU, display devices, and input devices. Furthermore, these processes and operations may utilize conventional computer components in a heterogeneous distributed computing environment, including remote file servers, remote computer servers, and remote memory storage devices. Each of these conventional distributed computing components is accessible by the PU via a communications network.
The processes and operations performed by the computer include the manipulation of signals by a PU or remote server and the maintenance of these signals within data structures resident in one or more of the local or remote memory storage devices. Such data structures impose a physical organization upon the collection of data stored within a memory storage device and represent specific electrical or magnetic elements. These symbolic representations are the means used by those skilled in the art of computer programming and computer construction to most effectively convey teachings and discoveries to others skilled in the art.
For the purposes of this discussion, a process is generally conceived to be a sequence of computer-executed steps leading to a desired result. These steps generally require physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical, magnetic, or optical signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, or otherwise manipulated. It is conventional for those skilled in the art to refer to these signals as bits, bytes, words, data, flags, variables, parameters, objects, properties, tags, types, identifiers, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, points, records, images, files or the like. It should be kept in mind, however, that these and similar terms should be associated with appropriate physical quantities for computer operations, and that these terms are merely conventional labels applied to physical quantities that exist within and during operation of the computer.
It should also be understood that manipulations within the computer are often referred to in terms such as adding, comparing, receiving, sending, transmitting, replying, etc. which are often associated with manual operations performed by a human operator. The operations described herein are machine operations performed in conjunction with various input provided by a human operator or user that interacts with the computer.
In addition, it should be understood that the programs, processes, methods, etc. described herein are not related or limited to any particular computer or apparatus, nor are they related or limited to any particular communication network architecture. Rather, various types of general purpose machines may be used with program modules constructed in accordance with the teachings described herein. Similarly, it may prove advantageous to construct a specialized apparatus to perform the method steps described herein by way of dedicated computer systems in a specific network architecture with hard-wired logic or programs stored in nonvolatile memory, such as read only memory.
Referring now to the drawings, in which like numerals represent like elements throughout the several figures, aspects of the present invention and the preferred operating environment will be described.
The Operating Environment
The personal computer 10 includes a processing unit (PU) 14, such as the 80486 or “Pentium” microprocessors manufactured by Intel Corporation of Santa Clara, Calif. The personal computer also includes system memory 15 (including read only memory (ROM) 16 and random access memory (RAM) 17), which is connected to the PU 14 by a system bus 18. The preferred computer 10 utilizes a BIOS 19 (Basic Input/Output System), which is stored in ROM 16. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the BIOS 19 is a set of basic routines that helps to transfer information between elements within the personal computer 10. Those skilled in the art will also appreciate that the present invention may be implemented on computers having other architectures, such as computers that do not use a BIOS, and those that utilize other microprocessors, such as the “MIPS” or “POWER PC” families of microprocessors from Silicon Graphics and Motorola, respectively. Additionally, the present invention is not limited to computers that utilize ROM or RAM for system memory. Other technologies such as electronically programmable ROM (EPROM), ultraviolet light erasable and electronically programmable ROM (UVEPROM), electronically erasable and programmable ROM (EEPROM), FLASH and bubble memory may also be used.
Within the personal computer 10, various devices may be connected to enhance the utility and performance of the personal computer. A local hard disk drive 20 may be connected to the system bus 18 via a hard disk drive interface 21. A floppy disk drive 22, which is used to read or write a floppy disk 23, may be connected to the system bus 18 via a floppy disk drive interface 24. A CD-ROM drive 25, which is used to read a CD-ROM disk 26, may be connected to the system bus 18 via a CD-ROM interface 27. A user enters commands and information into the personal computer 10 by using input devices such as a keyboard 28, and/or pointing devices such as a mouse 29. Typically, these input devices are connected to the system bus 18 via a serial port interface 30 or a parallel port interface (not shown in FIG. 1). Other types of pointing devices (not shown in
The personal computer may be connected to a network of other computers or devices. A remote computer 11 in a networked environment is connected to a remote memory storage device 33. This remote memory storage device 33 is typically a large capacity device such as a hard disk drive, CD-ROM drive, magneto-optical drive or the like. The personal computer 10 may be connected to the remote computer 11 by a network interface 34, which is used to communicate over the local area network 12.
The personal computer 10 may also be connected to the remote computer 11 by a modem 35, which is used to communicate over the wide area network 13, such as the Internet. The modem 35 is connected to the system bus 18 via the serial port interface 30. The modem 35 also can be connected to the public switched telephone network (PSTN) or community antenna television (CATV) network. Although illustrated in
Although other internal components of the personal computer 10 are not shown, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that such components and the interconnection between them are well known. Accordingly, additional details concerning the internal construction of the personal computer 10 need not be disclosed in connection with the present invention.
Those skilled in the art will understand that program modules such as an operating system 36, application programs 37a-N, and data are provided to the personal computer 10 via computer-readable media. In the preferred computer, the computer-readable media include the local or remote memory storage devices, which may include the local hard disk drive 20, floppy disk 23, CD-ROM 26, RAM 17, ROM 16, and the remote memory storage device 33. In the preferred personal computer 10, the local hard disk drive 20 is used to store data and programs, including the operating system and programs.
The Operating System
The operating system 36, in conjunction with the BIOS 19 and associated device drivers, provides the basic interface between the computer's resources, the user, and the application program 37a. The operating system 36 interprets and carries out instructions issued by the user and/or application program(s). For example, when the user wants to load an application program 37a, the operating system 36 interprets the instruction (e.g., double clicking on the application program's icon) and causes the PU 14 to load the program code into RAM 17 from either the local hard disk drive 20, floppy disk 23, CD-ROM 26, or the remote memory storage device 33. Once the application program 37a is loaded into the RAM 17, it is executed by the PU 14. For larger programs, the operating system 36 causes the PU 14 to load various portions of program, or program modules, into RAM 17 as needed. In addition, several applications programs (37a-N) can be loaded into RAM at the same time. In this scenario, the operating system 36 will switch the PU 14 execution time between applications based on user requests, application program request, or by a time-sliced allotment of the processing time of PU 14.
The operating system 36 provides a variety of functions or services that allow an application program 37a to easily deal with various types of input/output (I/O). This allows the application program 37a to issue relatively simple function calls that cause the operating system 36 to perform the steps required to accomplish various tasks, such as displaying text on the monitor 31 (
From this brief description, it should be appreciated that operating systems, such as “WINDOWS 95” and “WINDOWS NT”, are quite complex and provide a wide variety of services that allow users and programs to utilize the resources available in the personal computer. Those skilled in the art will be familiar with operating systems and their various features, which include, but are in no means limited to, the specific messages and functions described above. For more comprehensive information regarding the “WINDOWS 95” and “WINDOWS NT” operating system and its interaction with programs, the reader may refer to any of a variety of publications, including the “Win32 Programmer's Reference” and “Advanced Windows” published by Microsoft Press.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention (herein after referred to as “AutoComplete”) is implemented in “MICROSOFT EXCEL” for “WINDOWS 95”, version 7.0. It should be understood that AutoComplete can readily be implemented in other applications running under other operating systems, such as Microsoft Corporation's “Windows 3.1”, IBM Corporation's “OS/2”, UNIX based operating systems and the operating system used in “MACINTOSH” computers manufactured by Apple Computer, Inc.
Each entry in a spreadsheet is located in a cell. A cell is defined as the region in a spreadsheet where a single column and a single row intersect. For example, column F and row 9 intersect at cell 114 in FIG. 3a and contains the data entry “Braves”. The user can move a cursor within a spreadsheet from one cell to another by entering cursor movement keys on the keyboard, by using a mouse or by using some other pointing device. The cell in which the cursor is present is referred to as the “active cell” and may be shown on the display in reverse video or as having a distinguishing border.
A brief description of AutoComplete as embodied within “MICROSOFT EXCEL” or “WINDOWS 95” is provided in conjunction with the display screens in
AutoComplete User Interface
The AutoComplete user interface in the preferred embodiment comprises eight functional areas: (1) Entering edit mode for an active cell; (2) Entering a partial data entry and finding a unique match; (3) Accepting a suggested completion; (4) Entering a partial data item over a suggested completion; (5) Entering a partial data entry and finding multiple matches; (6) Entering a partial data entry that disables further searches; (7) Obtaining a case conversion for a partial data entry; and (8) Entering a partial data entry where there are no associated cells. Each of these functional areas will be described with references being made to the user screens in
Entering edit mode for an active cell. Referring to
Entering a partial data entry and finding a unique match. In the edit mode, entering a partial data entry will cause a transition to the ATTEMPT AutoComplete state 230 and invoke a search of the list of completed data items to find a completed entry that uniquely matches the partial data entry.
Accepting a suggested completion. At this point the user can either accept the suggested completion, exit the edit mode, or enter an additional partial completion. The scenario in which the user accepts the suggested completion is illustrated in
Entering a partial data item over a suggested completion. Instead of accepting the suggested completion displayed in
Entering a partial data entry and finding multiple matches. Referring to
Entering a partial data entry that disables further searches. Under the conditions illustrated in
Obtaining a case conversion for a partial data entry. Now turning to
Entering partial data entry where there are no associated cells.
AutoComplete as a State Machine
The detailed operation of AutoComplete can be described in the form of a state machine. In general, a state machine is a means to illustrate the operation of a process by identifying the various unique states in which the process can exist, and identifying what events or circumstances will cause the process to transition between those states.
The AutoComplete process comprises 3 static states and 4 dynamic states.
These AutoComplete states include static states:
Three types of transitions exist for the AutoComplete state machine and include: User commands; Process events; and Background events. The User commands, indicated by [xxxxx], occur in response to actions taken by the user. The Process events, indicated by (xxxxx), occur automatically upon the completion of processing in a dynamic state. The Background events, indicated by (xxxxx) and drawn with dashed lines, occur during the idle time between user commands.
The AutoComplete user commands include:
The AutoComplete process events include:
The AutoComplete background process events include:
Upon entering the edit mode for an active cell, the AutoComplete process will initiate the performance of two functions. The first function is the generation of the list of completed data items associated with the active cell. In the preferred embodiment, the completed data item list will be generated in a tiered approach as a background process. The tiered approach consists of building the list of completed data items one level at a time where each level includes a specific number of associated cells. The second function is to identify and provide a suggested completion for a partial data entry.
Entering the [Edit] user command 650 causes the edit mode 200 to be entered as shown at point 205. The (Build Level 1) process command 700 is issued automatically upon entering edit mode and the BUILD Completion List state 210 is entered. In the BUILD Completion List state 210, the first level of the completed data item list is generated. In the preferred embodiment, the first level includes the 50 cells that are most closely associated with the active cell. As will be described later, this includes the associated cells that are physically closest to the active cell. If there are a limited number of data entries (i.e., less than 50), the first level of the completion list will include all of the associated entries. After the first level of the completion list has been generated, a (Complete) process event 710 is executed and a transition to the WAIT Partial Entry state 220 occurs. In the WAIT Partial Entry state 220, the application program waits for the reception of a user command.
If there is idle time between entering user commands in the WAIT Partial Entry state 220, and the completion list has not been fully generated, a (Build Next Level) background process event 720 will be issued resulting in a transition to the BUILD Completion List dynamic state 210. (Note, this event may also be issued in the DISPLAY Completion state 240.) When the next level of the completion list has been generated, a (Complete) process event 710 will be issued and a transition to the WAIT Partial Entry state 220 will occur (or a transition to the previous state). The (Build Next Level) background process event 720 will continue to be issued until the list of completed data items has been fully generated.
In the WAIT Partial Entry state 220, four user commands are accepted: [Partial Entry], [Disable AutoComplete], [Abort], and [Accept]. The cell 110 in FIG. 3a and the cell 112 in
In the ATTEMPT AutoComplete state 230, the partial data entry will then be used as a character mask to search through the list of completed data items for a unique match. A unique match exists if there is only one item in the completed data item list that begins with the same character or characters defining the partial data entry. A unique match is further defined as, given that an N character partial entry has been entered, if there is one and only one data item in the completed data item list that begins with these N characters, then that data item is a unique match. If more than one entry matches the first N characters, then a unique match does not exist.
The ATTEMPT AutoComplete state 230 can be entered prior to fully generating the list of completed data items. If this occurs, the search for a suggested completion will be limited to the completed data item list in its current state (i.e., the levels that have been generated). But, if updating the list of completed data items results in destroying the unique status of the partial data entry, the current AutoComplete suggestion remains intact until either the user accepts the data item or enters a subsequent partial entry.
As a result of entering the ATTEMPT AutoComplete state 230, one of three possible outcomes will be realized: (1) a unique match will be found; (2) no matches will be found; or (3) multiple matches will be found.
If a unique match is found, then a (Suggested Completion) process event 730 is issued, which results in a transition to the DISPLAY Completion state 240. Referring to
If no matches are found, the (No Completion) process event 740 is issued, which results in a transition to the DISABLE AutoComplete state 270. Examples of the scenario include
If multiple matches are found, the (No Suggestion) process event 750 is issued, which results in a transition back to the WAIT Partial Entry state 220. An example of this transition and the resulting display can be seen by referring to
The [Partial Entry] command 600, entered in the WAIT Partial Entry state 220, can also consist of multiple characters. This occurs when entering additional characters to distinguish a partial data entry from multiple matches. As an example, the character “h” can be appended to partial data entry “P” in
In contrast, if the character “i” is appended to the partial data entry “P” in
In the WAIT Partial Entry state 220, the [Disable AutoComplete] command 630 can also be entered. In the preferred embodiment, the [Disable AutoComplete] command 630 consists of moving the insertion point or cursor in the edit window. Other methods could also be utilized such as pressing a function key. Entering this command causes a transition to the DISABLE AutoComplete state 270.
The final two commands that can be entered in the WAIT Partial Entry state 220 are [Abort] 620 and [Accept] 610. Entering the [Abort] 620 command results in a transition to the CLEAR AutoComplete state 260, in which the pre-edited contents of the active cell will be restored. The (Exit Edit) process event 760 will then be issued and the edit mode 200 will be exited at point 295. Any partial data entries displayed prior to the [Abort] 620 command will be erased. Entering the [Accept] command 610 causes a transition to the STORE AutoComplete state 250 in which state the contents displayed in the active cell are stored and the (Exit Edit) process event is issued to exit the edit mode 200 at point 295. In the preferred embodiment, an [Accept] 610 can be issued by entering a carriage return or by using the key pad or mouse to change active cells. An [Abort] 620 can be issued by entering the [ESC] key. Other methods could also be used to implement these commands and are contemplated by the present invention.
The DISPLAY completion state 240, operates to display a suggested completion in the active cell. If the completion list is not fully generated, the (Build Next Level) background event 720 may be issued as described above. While in the DISPLAY completion state 240, the user can enter the [Partial Entry] 600, [Accept] 610, [Abort] 620 or [Disable AutoComplete] 630 commands.
Entering [Partial Entry] 600 in the DISPLAY Completion state 240 causes a transition to the ATTEMPT AutoComplete state 230. The completed data item list will then be examined for a unique match of the partial entry. As a result of entering the ATTEMPT AutoComplete state 230 from the DISPLAY Completion state 240, two possible outcomes can be realized: (1) a unique match will be found or (2) no matches will be found. Two examples illustrate these results. First, appending an “r” to the partial data entry “B” in
Entering [Accept] 610 in the DISPLAY Completion state 240 causes a transition to the STORE AutoComplete state 250. Entering this state from the DISPLAY Completion state 240 will invoke a case conversion if one is required. Entering [Abort] 610 in the DISPLAY Completion state 240 will have the same response as entering it in the WAIT Partial Entry state 220 discussed above.
Entering the [Disable AutoComplete] command 630 in the DISPLAY completion state 240 will cause a transition to DISABLE AutoComplete state 270. The contents of the active cell will be maintained; however, the portion of the data entry that had been displayed in reverse video will be changed to normal video to indicate that AutoComplete is disabled.
The DISABLE AutoComplete state 270 operates to eliminate the overhead of searching through the completed data item list when it is known that a match will not be found. For example, in
The DISABLE AutoComplete state 270 may also be entered if the completed data item list is empty. This situation will occur when the first data item in a new area is being entered or all other data items have been filtered out. In an embodiment which filters out numeric data items, editing a cell within a column of numbers will result in issuance of a (No Completion) 740 process event in the ATTEMPT AutoComplete state 230 and a subsequent transition to the DISABLE AutoComplete state 270.
In the DISABLE AutoComplete state 270, an [Abort] 620, [Accept] 610, or [Enable AutoComplete] 640 commands can be entered. The responses to the [Abort] 620 and [Accept] 610 commands are identical to the responses generated in the DISPLAY Completion state 240. Entering an [Enable AutoComplete] 640 command will cause a transition to the WAIT Partial Entry state 220. In the preferred embodiment, the [Enable AutoComplete] 640 command can take the form of back-spacing over or deleting the last entered character(s) that caused the (No Completion) 240 process event to be issued, or returning the insertion point to the end of the partial data entry. As an example,
The CLEAR AutoComplete state 260 can be entered from the WAIT Partial Entry state, the DISPLAY Completion state 240, or the DISABLE AutoComplete state 270 upon the execution of the [Abort] 620 command. The [Abort] 620 command operates to erase the data that is currently being displayed in the active cell and then exiting the edit mode 200. In addition, the contents of the active cell prior to entering the edit mode 200 will be restored.
In the STORE AutoComplete state 250, the data being displayed in the active cell is stored and the (Exit Edit) process event 760 is executed to exit the edit mode 200 at point 295. This process occurs independent of the prior state; however, when entering from the DISPLAY AutoComplete state 240, a case conversion may be performed on the suggested completion.
The case conversion algorithm is a unique aspect of the AutoComplete process and gives it the ability to handle data items with mixed upper and lower case characters. In general, the AutoComplete algorithm is case insensitive during the data entry process. But, when a suggested completion has been accepted, the AutoComplete process will adjust the capitalization of the data item to be consistent with matching entries. The purpose behind the case conversion is to provide consistency for the data items in the spreadsheet. If a data item is being entered in lower case, and a matching completed data item is found that is in upper case, then the matching item will be displayed as a suggested completion. The portion of the suggested completion that matches the partial data item (ignoring the capitalization) will be shown in normal video and in the capitalization that the partial data item was entered. The portion of the suggested completion that does not include the partial data item will be displayed in reverse video and in the capitalization that corresponds with the suggested completion. Accepting the suggested completion will result in adjusting the case of the partial entry to be the same as that of the suggested completion. But, if the user changes the insertion point or in some other way executes a DISABLE AutoComplete command 630, then accepting the data in the active cell will result in maintaining the case of the characters as displayed in the active cell.
Decision block 410 illustrates that for each user command received, other than an [Abort] 620 or [Accept] 610, the THEN branch is followed. For each user command invoking the THEN branch of process block 410, the AcceptedUnaltered flag is set to FALSE as shown in process block 420. If the user command results in producing a suggested completion (i.e., for [Partial Entry] 600 commands with unique matches), the THEN branch of decision block 430 will be followed and process block 440 will set the AcceptedUnaltered flag to TRUE. If the user command does not result in finding a suggested completion, then the ELSE branch of decision block 430 is followed. In either of these cases, processing will return to decision block 410 and the next user command will be processed.
Once the [Abort] 620 or [Accept] 610 commands are received, the ELSE branch of decision block 410 will be followed and decision block 450 will be entered prior to exiting the edit mode. If the received user command was an [Accept] 610 command, then the AcceptedUnaltered flag will be examined in decision block 460 to determine if a case conversion should be performed. If the AcceptedUnaltered flag in equated to TRUE, process block 480 will be entered to perform the case conversion; however, if the AcceptedUnaltered flag is equated to FALSE, then the current case displayed in the active cell will be maintained. In either case, the edit mode for the active cell will be exited at point 295. In summary, whenever a partial entry results in producing a suggested completion, a case conversion will occur upon a subsequent [Accept] 610 command. If the user enters any command other than [Accept] 610, then the case conversion will disabled until a subsequent suggested completion is produced.
BUILD Completion List
Turning now to
The first aspect in building the data item list is determining the particular data items that are associated with the active cell. The preferred embodiment utilizes a table determination algorithm to define the borders of a spreadsheet table. The algorithm defines a table as a set of data items surrounded by “white space” or empty cells. Ignoring certain exceptions such as text boxes, table headings, picture objects, and print area definitions, this algorithm defines a rectangular border that encompasses adjacent data items in the vertical horizontal and diagonal directions.
The process of determining the data items that are associated with an active cell can be accomplished in several ways. In the most liberal approach, all of the data items entered into a spreadsheet and any associated sheets could be considered to be associated with the active cell, and thus, become input into the data item list generation process. Although for some applications this may be a viable approach, the typical spreadsheet designer arranges associated data into columns. Hence, in the more restrictive approach, only data items in the same column and same table (using the term table as defined by the above algorithm) would be considered to be associated with the active cell. A further limitation would be to only include the block of data items that are in the same column as the active cell, encompass the active cell, and are bordered by white space. This is the approach that has been implemented in the preferred embodiment.
The second aspect in building the data item list involves applying filters to the list of associated data items. Several filtering mechanisms can be employed. A first filtering mechanism includes limiting the data items to alphabetical or alpha-numeric entries, and hence, excluding numeric entries. A second filtering mechanism is the elimination of duplicate data items from the data item list. Thus, if a data item has been entered in a column multiple times, sorting through the data item list will not be burdened by examining redundant data items. Other filtering mechanisms can include (a) limiting the data items to include only those items that have been entered more than once; (b) limiting the data items to only include data that conforms to certain formatting restrictions; and (c) limiting the data items to entries that exceed a certain number of characters. In the preferred embodiment, the filtering mechanism is limited to the elimination of duplicate data items.
In process block 302, the algorithm variables and parameters are initialized. The variable CUR is defined as the location of the active cell. The variables ABOVE and BELOW define the boundaries of the cells associated with the active cell. These variables are equated to the number of associated cells above and below the current cell respectively. The variable J identifies the number of cells that are to be included in the first tier or level 1 generation of the completion list. The variable K defines the number of cells included in subsequent tiers of the completion list. In the preferred embodiment the values of J and K are set to 50 and 20 respectively; however, other values for these variables can be selected and are contemplated by the present invention.
In decision block 304, the input parameter TIER is examined to determine which level of the completion list is being generated. If level 1 is being generated (TIER=1) then execution continues in process block 306. In this block two additional parameters are initialized. The START parameter is used to identify the location of the next associated cell to be included in the completion list. The parameter END is used to define the location of the last associated cell to be included in the completion list for the level being generated. In process block 306, these parameter are initialized for the first level. Thus, in the preferred embodiment the first level will include associated cells 1 to J, or the first 50 associated cells. If the TIER parameter is greater than 1 in decision block 304, then processing continues in block 308. If level 2 is being generated (TIER=2), process block 308 equates START to J plus 1 (51 in the preferred embodiment) and END is equated to START plus K. Thus, for level 2, the START and END variables are set up so as to examine the next K cells associated with the active cell (cells 51-70 in the preferred embodiment). For TIER N, cell (N−2)*20+51 and the following K−1 cells will be added to the completed data item list. Upon completion of process block 306 or 308 process block 310 will be entered.
Process block 310 initializes the INDEX variable by equating it to the value of START. INDEX is used as a counter to indicate when all of the cells for the current level have been read and is also used as a pointer in the list of completed data items to identify the location to store the next data item. Input parameter RANGE is used as a pointer to indicate the distance above and below the active cell where the next data item is to be retrieved. When entering edit mode for the active cell, the RANGE variable is equated to 1. The cells immediately above and below the active cell are at RANGE 1. The next two cells above and below the active cell are at RANGE 2. Thus, as data items are retrieved from associated cells, the RANGE variable is incremented. The value of RANGE must be retained between subsequent calls to the BUILD Completion List algorithm.
Process block 312 invokes the Retrieve Tier of Completed Data Items routine shown in FIG. 7b. This routine utilizes the variables RANGE, INDEX, ABOVE, BELOW, END, CUR, and STATUS in retrieving and building the next level of the completion list. Process block 314 applies the appropriate filters to the completed data item list. Process block 316 will sort the new filtered completed data item list in alphabetical order. Finally, exit block 318 returns the STATUS variable to the calling routine.
Continuing with the example shown in
In process block 324, if RANGE is less than or equal to ABOVE, then there are associated cells above the active cell. Execution then continues in process block 326 where the contents of the cell at the location of the active cell plus RANGE is loaded into the completed data item list at the location of INDEX. In addition, INDEX is incremented by 1. In decision block 324, if RANGE is greater than ABOVE, then there are no associated cells above the active cell and the ELSE branch will be followed. Whether or not process block 326 is executed, processing will continue at decision block 328. In decision block 328, if RANGE is less than or equal to BELOW, then there are associated cells below the active cell. Execution then continues in process block 330 where the contents of the cell at the location of the active cell minus RANGE is loaded in to the completed data item list at the location of INDEX. In addition, INDEX is incremented by 1. In decision block 328, if the value of RANGE is found to be greater than BELOW, then there are no associated cells below the active cell and the ELSE branch will be followed. Whether or not process block 330 is executed, processing will continue in process block 336. In process block 336, RANGE is incremented by 1 and processing returns to decision block 322.
Therefore, the overall affect of executing the THEN branch of decision block 322 is to obtain the next two completed data items associated with the active cell. In some instances, only one data item will be retrieved. This will be the case when the are no associated cells either above or below the active cell.
For the example provided in
In decision block 322 for the current example, RANGE is no longer less than or equal to ABOVE. But, RANGE is less than BELOW and INDEX is less than END. Therefore, processing will continue to execute through the THEN branch of decision block 322 and returning to process block 322 until either (1) RANGE is greater than both ABOVE and BELOW, or (2) INDEX is greater than END. In the first case, the list of completed data items is fully generated. Thus, in decision block 332, INDEX will be less than END causing process block 334 to be executed, equating STATUS to DONE. In the second case, additional levels must be generated. Thus, in decision block 332, INDEX will be greater than END resulting in returning STATUS equated to the value of TIER or the level that was generated.
For the simplified example illustrated in
The completed data item list will then be filtered in process block 314 to eliminate any surplus duplicated items. For example, the entry Braves appears in the list three (3) times. Two of these entries are considered surplus duplications and can be eliminated. After filtering, the filtered list of completed data items will contain the following entries:
Finally, the filtered list of completed data items will be sorted alphabetically in process block 316. The sorting process can be accomplished using sorting techniques familiar to those skilled in the art such as quick sort. The resulting completed data item list is shown below:
Referring now to
Entrance block 500 in
Returning to decision block 530, if no matches are found in the completed data item list, the ELSE branch of decision block 530 will be followed and process block 570 will be entered. In process block 570, a (No Completion) process command 740 will be executed and a transition to DISABLE AutoComplete state 270 will occur. Block 560 in
From the foregoing description, it will be appreciated that the present invention provides a method to improve the efficiency and reliability of data entry in a generic database by providing the ability for an automatic completion process utilizing a list of completed data items comprised of data associated with the item being entered. Although the present invention has been described as embodied in a spreadsheet application, it can be appreciated that the present invention can be utilized in any database storage or retrieval type application. Indeed, the present invention is not limited to any particular database or spreadsheet application.
The foregoing method of the present invention may be conveniently implemented in one or more program modules. No particular programming language has been indicated for carrying out the various tasks described above because it is considered that the operation, steps, and procedures described in the specification and illustrated in the accompanying drawings are sufficiently disclosed to permit one of ordinary skill in the art to practice the instant invention. Moreover, in view of the many different types of computers and program modules that can be used to practice the instant invention, it is not practical to provide a representative example of a computer program that would be applicable to these many different systems. Each user of a particular computer would be aware of the language and tools which are more useful for that user's needs and purposes to implement the instant invention.
The present invention has been described in relation to particular embodiments which are intended in all respects to be illustrative rather than restrictive. Those skilled in the art will understand that the principles of the present invention may be applied to, and embodied in, various program modules for execution on differing types of computers regardless of database application.
Alternative embodiments will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains without departing from its spirit and scope. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is described by the appended claims and supported by the foregoing description.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5495565 *||Jun 21, 1994||Feb 27, 1996||Wang Laboratories, Inc.||Integrated form document editor with form descriptor table, background bitmap, graphics editor and text editor, composite image generator and intelligent autofill|
|US5640577 *||Aug 22, 1995||Jun 17, 1997||Davox Corporation||Data processing system with automated at least partial forms completion|
|US5666502 *||Aug 7, 1995||Sep 9, 1997||Apple Computer, Inc.||Graphical user interface using historical lists with field classes|
|US5682538 *||Aug 12, 1994||Oct 28, 1997||Wall Data Incorporated||Automatic adaptive computer screen generation|
|US5745712 *||Dec 28, 1995||Apr 28, 1998||Borland International, Inc.||Graphical programming system and methods for assisting a user with creating screen objects on a screen device|
|1||*||EDGE, Personal Finance: Quicken Adds Over 100 Improvements, EDGE, v.3, n.121, p. 7(1), Sep. 14, 1992.|
|2||*||Microsoft Access for Windows '95, manufactured by Microsoft Corporation. It is Applicants understanding that this product provides automatic capability for selecting data entries from a pre-defined or fixed list. Based on the Copyright notice of 1989-1995 this reference may have been available for purchase more than 1 year prior to the filing date of Jun. 5, 1996. (4 pages).|
|3||*||Microsoft Money Version 3.0. Manufactured by Microsoft Corporation. It is Applicant's understanding that this product contains an automatic data entry feature, and has been available for purchase more than 1 year prior to the filing date of Jun. 5, 1996. (no pages).|
|4||*||Novell, Quattro Pro User Guide. p. 47-49, 1994.|
|5||*||Quicken Version 5 for Windows, manufactured by Intuit, Inc. It is Applicants understanding that this product provides an automatic entry for data items in a fixed data structure environment. Based on the Copyright notice of 1985-1995, this reference may have been available for purchase more than 1 year prior to the filing date of Jun. 5, 1996. (4 pages).|
|6||*||Smith, Do It Yourself Database, MacUser, v.9, n.11, p. 126(8), Nov. 1993.|
|7||*||Sullivan, Intuit's Upgrade Quickens Pace of Personal Finance, MacWeek, v.7, n.29, p. 52(2), Jul. 19, 1993.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7451397 *||Dec 15, 2004||Nov 11, 2008||Microsoft Corporation||System and method for automatically completing spreadsheet formulas|
|US7630980 *||Jan 21, 2005||Dec 8, 2009||Prashant Parikh||Automatic dynamic contextual data entry completion system|
|US7634463||Dec 29, 2005||Dec 15, 2009||Google Inc.||Automatically generating and maintaining an address book|
|US7685144 *||Dec 29, 2005||Mar 23, 2010||Google Inc.||Dynamically autocompleting a data entry|
|US7908287 *||Jan 19, 2010||Mar 15, 2011||Google Inc.||Dynamically autocompleting a data entry|
|US7941439||Mar 31, 2004||May 10, 2011||Google Inc.||Methods and systems for information capture|
|US7991784||Nov 20, 2009||Aug 2, 2011||Prashant Parikh||Automatic dynamic contextual data entry completion system|
|US8099407||Jan 17, 2012||Google Inc.||Methods and systems for processing media files|
|US8112437||Nov 2, 2009||Feb 7, 2012||Google Inc.||Automatically maintaining an address book|
|US8161053||Apr 17, 2012||Google Inc.||Methods and systems for eliminating duplicate events|
|US8234293||Sep 8, 2005||Jul 31, 2012||Microsoft Corporation||Autocompleting with queries to a database|
|US8249873||Aug 12, 2005||Aug 21, 2012||Avaya Inc.||Tonal correction of speech|
|US8275839||Mar 31, 2004||Sep 25, 2012||Google Inc.||Methods and systems for processing email messages|
|US8316035 *||Jan 16, 2008||Nov 20, 2012||International Business Machines Corporation||Systems and arrangements of text type-ahead|
|US8346777||Mar 31, 2004||Jan 1, 2013||Google Inc.||Systems and methods for selectively storing event data|
|US8359532||Apr 28, 2008||Jan 22, 2013||International Business Machines Corporation||Text type-ahead|
|US8386728||Sep 14, 2004||Feb 26, 2013||Google Inc.||Methods and systems for prioritizing a crawl|
|US8413069 *||Jun 28, 2005||Apr 2, 2013||Avaya Inc.||Method and apparatus for the automatic completion of composite characters|
|US8504349||Jun 18, 2007||Aug 6, 2013||Microsoft Corporation||Text prediction with partial selection in a variety of domains|
|US8631076||Jun 30, 2004||Jan 14, 2014||Google Inc.||Methods and systems for associating instant messenger events|
|US8725753||Sep 5, 2012||May 13, 2014||International Business Machines Corporation||Arrangements of text type-ahead|
|US8812515||Dec 20, 2007||Aug 19, 2014||Google Inc.||Processing contact information|
|US8943155 *||Feb 21, 2013||Jan 27, 2015||Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc||Workflow and in-context E-mail recipient handling|
|US8954420||Mar 31, 2004||Feb 10, 2015||Google Inc.||Methods and systems for improving a search ranking using article information|
|US20050131677 *||Dec 12, 2003||Jun 16, 2005||Assadollahi Ramin O.||Dialog driven personal information manager|
|US20060129929 *||Dec 15, 2004||Jun 15, 2006||Microsoft Corporation||System and method for automatically completing spreadsheet formulas|
|US20060156135 *||Dec 16, 2004||Jul 13, 2006||Marek Sikora||Tabbed form with error indicators|
|US20060167872 *||Jan 21, 2005||Jul 27, 2006||Prashant Parikh||Automatic dynamic contextual data entry completion system|
|US20060294462 *||Jun 28, 2005||Dec 28, 2006||Avaya Technology Corp.||Method and apparatus for the automatic completion of composite characters|
|US20130166663 *||Feb 21, 2013||Jun 27, 2013||Microsoft Corporation||Workflow and in-context e-mail recipient handling|
|International Classification||G06F17/27, G06F17/24|
|Cooperative Classification||G06F17/276, G06F17/246|
|European Classification||G06F17/27P, G06F17/24S|
|May 7, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Jul 26, 2011||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Dec 9, 2014||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034541/0001
Effective date: 20141014