|Publication number||USRE39658 E1|
|Application number||US 09/641,101|
|Publication date||May 29, 2007|
|Filing date||Aug 17, 2000|
|Priority date||Aug 1, 1997|
|Publication number||09641101, 641101, US RE39658 E1, US RE39658E1, US-E1-RE39658, USRE39658 E1, USRE39658E1|
|Inventors||Bengt A. Carlson, Werner A. Buck|
|Original Assignee||Belimo Air Control (Usa) Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (34), Non-Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (3), Classifications (3), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a Reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,039,304 which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/062,010 filed Aug. 1, 1997. A divisional U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 09/404,739 remains pending.
The present invention primarily pertains to control valves used to control the supply of hot or chilled fluid (especially water) to the heat transfer devices used in the heating/ventilation/air conditioning systems in buildings (commonly referred to as the HVAC system). These control valves are generally operated by actuators, which are connected to the temperature control system. The valves are modulated to any suitable intermediate position, so a flow rate that produces the desired temperature is supplied.
The flow capacity of the subject control valves must be selected so as to be suitable for each control object. Also, the flow characteristics of the valves must be compatible with the heat transfer characteristics of the control object. Basic ball valves or plug valves have a certain inherent flow characteristic not ideally suited for the above mentioned applications. Also, the flow capacity of such valves, as compared to the size of the valve, is very high. The use of reducing couplings and installing a valve with a smaller size than the basic pipe size tends to further distort the valve characteristics.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,193,580 describes a plug valve which has a special body shape. Among other things, there is brief mention in the patent of ports and seats with a specially shaped opening to give the valve desired flow characteristics. One advantage with the valve disclosed in the '580 patent is that the special opening or seat can be exchanged with another seat which has a differently shaped opening and therefore, gives the valve a different flow capacity and/or flow characteristics. This makes it possible to adapt the disclosed valve for a specific control object. However, in order to change the seats, the valve body has to be taken apart. Therefore, valves that are bolted together and easy to open are preferred, or even necessary, for practice of the disclosure. So called “three piece” ball valves are especially well suited. The three pieces are bolted together, providing easy access to the seats.
A significant disadvantage of the plug valve taught in the '580 patent is that the HVAC market is in general very price sensitive, and therefore relatively inexpensive “two piece” ball valves are often used. The two pieces of such valves are screwed together, and the threads are secured by an epoxy or similar substance. This makes it very difficult (indeed, practically impossible) to take the valve apart in order to exchange the seats. Specifically, if a “two piece” valve is taken apart and reassembled in the field, there is a risk that it may be tightened too little or too much. This will either cause leakage through the seats, or an excessive torque to operate the valve.
An important consideration is that the above mentioned specially shaped seat has to perform two functions. It must provide a tight shut-off when the valve is closed and also provide the desired flow characteristics, when the valve is operated between opened and closed. What is desired, therefore, is a control valve which is inexpensive to manufacture, which is quick and easy to install and change, and which has flow capacity and flow characteristics which can be easily changed without disturbing the integrity of the valve seal.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved control valve in which its flow capacity and flow characteristics can be easily changed, without having to take the valve apart. Thereby, the integrity of the valve seals will remain intact, and the time consuming operation of taking the valve apart and reassembling it is eliminated.
Another object of the invention is to separate the shut off (sealing) function of the valve from the function that determines the flow coefficient and flow characteristics.
A further object is that when a valve is replaced, the device that determines the flow coefficient and characteristics can be transferred to the new valve.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a control valve which is inexpensive to manufacture and which can be quickly and easily assembled.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a control valve which has flow capacity and flow characteristics which can be easily changed without disturbing the integrity of the valve seal.
To overcome the deficiencies of the prior art and to achieve the objects and advantages listed above, a ball valve is disclosed which is slightly modified so it can retain a disk which has a specially shaped opening. The disk is inserted into one of the connection ports of the valve, where it is fastened by a retaining ring or similar device known in the art. The surface of the disk that faces the valve advantageously is concave and corresponds to the spherical surface of the ball inside the ball valve. The disk is preferably mounted with its concave surface very close to the surface of the ball. The disk has an opening (which can be described as generally or essentially V-shaped, although the walls of the opening are not perfectly straight, but, rather, somewhat convex) which interacts with the hole through the ball in such a way that the desired flow coefficient and flow characteristics (typically “equal percent” although other flow characteristics may be desired and achieved) are accomplished, when the ball is turned between the closed and open position.
In another embodiment of the present invention the disk is spring loaded, so it rests upon the ball. This reduces any unwanted flow that passes between the disk and the ball, so essentially the entire flow through the valve is controlled by the opening in the ball and the opening in the disk.
A further embodiment comprises a control valve having a disc having a surface facing the ball, wherein the disc surface is concave as described above, wherein the ball valve has a reduced size port. In a reduced port ball valve the largest diameter of the hole through the ball is smaller than the largest diameter of the hole in the port and seat in the valve body. The reduced size port eliminates the risk that the disk moves into the hole through the ball, when the valve is fully open.
As an alternative, the concave side of the disk can be slightly cantered (one side thicker than the opposed side). This has the effect that the disk only partially rests upon the ball, so any unwanted flow between the disk and ball is minimized when the valve begins to open. The cantered shape makes it possible to use a full ported valve without the risk that the valve will lock up, so it no longer can be operated. (A full ported ball valve has a hole through the ball of the same diameter as the diameter of the port and seat in the valve body.)
The invention and its particular features and advantages will be better understood and its advantages will become more apparent from the following detailed description, especially when read in light of the attached drawings.
Although this description is written in terms of valves used in conjunction with fluid flow, especially liquid (i.e., water) flow in HVAC systems, it will be recognized that it is equally applicable to valves in a variety of applications, where modification of flow capacity and/or flow characteristics without the need for disassembly and reassembly of the valve is desired. Additionally, although this specification is written in terms of ball valves, it should be recognized that the invention, and principles relating thereto, is equally applicable to plug valves.
Moreover, it will be recognized that some or all of the attached drawings are schematic representations for purposes of illustration only and do not necessarily depict the actual relative sizes or locations of the elements shown. In addition, for the sake of convenience, not all elements are necessarily shown or numbered in all drawings.
It should be understood that at least four preferred embodiments are shown in
As shown in
A ball or plug 3 is mounted in the valve chamber and has an exterior surface and two ends and a fluid passageway 4 extending between the ends and through the plug 3. The plug also comprises an axis of rotation extending transverse to the direction of the fluid flow passageway 4. The plug 3 is rotatable about the axis of rotation for selectively turning the plug between an open position in which the fluid flow passageway 4 is disposed along the fluid flow path of valve 100. In the closed position the passageway 4 is disposed transverse to the fluid flow path of valve 100.
Referring in detail to
Disk 8, as taught by the present invention, has an opening 4 therein that is specially shaped to produce a desired flow capacity and flow characteristics. Disk 8 is inserted into the valve 100 and secured therein. In the preferred embodiment, and as best shown in
It should be understood that disk 8 is described as concave because it is desired that its exterior surface closely approximate the exterior surface of ball 3. This has been done for convenience only. It should be further understood that if the plug took on a different shape, then the disk would take on a corresponding different shape, but nonetheless a shape that closely approximated the shape of the plug.
In the disk 8 there is a specially shaped opening 10, which interacts with the hole 4 in the ball 3, so the desired flow characteristics is accomplished when the ball 3 is turned between the closed and open positions. In the preferred embodiment, shown in
In another preferred embodiment not shown in the drawings, the disk 8 could be mounted in the screw-in body 2. However, the position of the recess 15 is dependent upon how hard the screw-in body 2 is tightened. Therefore, the location of the recess 15 must be planned, so it ends up at a predetermined position when the screw-in body 2 is screwed in and tightened correctly. Of course, it is instead possible to use no key and recess and just mount the disk 8 positioned correctly.
In the simplest form of the invention, there is a slight clearance between the disk 8 and the curvature of the ball 3. However, the clearance should preferably be as small as the production tolerances allow. The smaller the clearance is, the better the rangeability will be (the unwanted flow through the clearance will compromise the rangeabliltiy of the valve, especially at first, when the valve begins to open. The smaller the unwanted flow, the better the rangeability will be).
Typically, as best shown in
An alternative solution is shown in FIG. 8. It uses a ball valve 106 with a reduced port. The hole 4 through the ball 3 has a smaller diameter than the smallest diameter of the disk 8. Therefore, the disk 8 can not fit into the hole 4 of the ball 3. A small reduction in the size of the hole 4 is enough.
The hole 4 can begin and end directly at the spherical surface of the ball 3. However, it is more advantageous if the ball 3 has a flat surface 20 at the end of the hole 4 where the disk 8 is located. The flat surface 20 should have an outside diameter approximately the same as the disk 8. A single flat surface 20 can be employed. However, two flat surfaces 20, 21 are shown in FIG. 8. This is preferred because it prevents the downstream seat 6 from closing ahead of the upstream seat 7. Also, the ball 3 will be symmetrical so it can be installed in any way. The flat surfaces 20, 21 increase the portion of the angular movement of the ball 3 over which the flow is controlled.
An additional alternative embodiment is shown in FIG. 6 and represented by reference numeral 102. It utilizes a disk 8 that is cantered because it is slightly thicker at one end 17. Because the disk 8 is slightly thinner at one end 18, and the movement of the disk 8 is very small, the thinner end 18 will not reach into the hole 4 in the ball 3, so when the ball 3 is turned back, the disk 8 will be pushed back out again by a “wedge” action. In the embodiment of
The fact that the disk 8 at at least one end 17 rests upon the ball 3 improves the rangeability of the valve (the clearance will be zero, so the unwanted flow at the start point will be minimal, where it is the most important). Preferably, there is a spring action between the disk 8 and the retaining ring 9. This can be accomplished by use of an O-ring 16.
The above text refers to “two piece” ball valves. However, the invention can also be applied to “three piece” ball valves, as well as plug valves. The valve 100, 102, 106 according to the invention offers at least the following advantages:
The above description is for the purpose of teaching the person of ordinary skill in the art how to practice the present invention, and it is not intended to detail all of those obvious modifications and variations of it which will become apparent to the skilled worker upon reading the description. It is intended, however, that all such obvious modifications and variations be included within the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims. The claims are meant to cover the claimed components in any arrangement which is effective to meet the objectives there intended, unless the context specifically indicates the contrary.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US915543||Nov 3, 1908||Mar 16, 1909||Daniel Billiard||Expansion-valve.|
|US1175328||Jul 17, 1914||Mar 14, 1916||Hiram T Rose Jr||Valve.|
|US1454222||Dec 24, 1920||May 8, 1923||Draggoo George W||Valve cock|
|US1622406||Nov 24, 1925||Mar 29, 1927||Christian Wilhjelm||Valve|
|US1972151||Feb 26, 1932||Sep 4, 1934||Crane Co||Controlled flow plug valve|
|US2115675||Oct 8, 1937||Apr 26, 1938||North American Fibre Products||Flow regulator|
|US2699555||May 18, 1949||Jan 18, 1955||Green Martin J||Drain fitting|
|US2707971||Sep 15, 1949||May 10, 1955||Harper Wyman Co||Gas valve|
|US3146792||Dec 11, 1963||Sep 1, 1964||Donnelly William H||Ball valve|
|US3386461||Jul 2, 1965||Jun 4, 1968||Texaco Canadian Ltd||Multi-port orifice valve|
|US3542337||Jul 29, 1968||Nov 24, 1970||Scaramucci Domer||Throttling valve with protected seals|
|US3542338||Jul 29, 1968||Nov 24, 1970||Scaramucci Domer||Throttling valve|
|US3563511||Jul 29, 1969||Feb 16, 1971||Saunders Valve Co Ltd||Flow control devices|
|US3707161||Sep 23, 1970||Dec 26, 1972||Crawford Douglas W||Variable choke valve|
|US3786837||Nov 26, 1971||Jan 22, 1974||Valspar Corp||Filling apparatus|
|US3880191||Mar 21, 1974||Apr 29, 1975||Baumann Hans D||Rotary multiport throttling valve|
|US3987819||Mar 17, 1975||Oct 26, 1976||Klaus Scheuermann||Mixing valve system|
|US4085774||Jul 19, 1976||Apr 25, 1978||Baumann Hans D||Anticavitation and low noise means for rotary valves|
|US4111229||Apr 1, 1977||Sep 5, 1978||Christian Timothy T||Controlling the fluid in a ball valve|
|US4111392||Jul 6, 1976||Sep 5, 1978||Braukmann Armaturen Ag||Valve, especially a radiator valve|
|US4130128||Jan 17, 1977||Dec 19, 1978||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Ball valve with orifice|
|US4161307||Aug 20, 1976||Jul 17, 1979||Itw Limited||Valves for vehicle heating systems|
|US4193580||Apr 1, 1977||Mar 18, 1980||Worchester Controls Ag||Plug valve|
|US4226263||Aug 14, 1978||Oct 7, 1980||Valve Concepts International||Erosion control trim in a control mechanism for a ball valve|
|US4271866||Apr 2, 1979||Jun 9, 1981||The Babcock & Wilcox Company||Drag ball valve including variable pressure reducing means|
|US4540025||Mar 28, 1983||Sep 10, 1985||Grove Valve And Regulator Company||Throttling ball valve|
|US4889163||Feb 5, 1987||Dec 26, 1989||Ab Tore J Hedback||Valve assembly|
|US4989833||Dec 21, 1989||Feb 5, 1991||Neles Oy||Method for changing the characteristic curve of a regulation valve under pressure and a regulation valve|
|US5074522||Mar 11, 1991||Dec 24, 1991||Worcester Controls Corporation||Ball valve having improved inherent rangeability|
|US5135019||Oct 9, 1989||Aug 4, 1992||Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap A.S.||Ball valve|
|US5509446||May 17, 1995||Apr 23, 1996||Rotatrol Ag||Ball valve or plug valve provided with an insert|
|US5551467||Aug 11, 1995||Sep 3, 1996||H-Tech, Inc.||Ball valve with controlled flow variation|
|US5593135||May 12, 1995||Jan 14, 1997||Asahi/America, Inc.||Precise throttling ball valve|
|US5937890 *||Jan 9, 1998||Aug 17, 1999||Griswold Controls, Inc.||Insert for flow throttling ball valves|
|1||Chapter entitled Heating, Ventilating and air Conditioning Control Systems, pp. 627-629, unknown source.|
|2||Flow Characteristics and Installed Flow Characteristics, pp. 166-167 unknown source.|
|3||Flow-Tek, Inc., Control Ball Series-Model VC Product Brochure.|
|4||Publication of Worcester Controls entitled, "Advanced Ball Control Valves for High Performance Throttling Applications" printed Feb. 1992.|
|5||Toyo, Auto Three-Flow Product Brochure.|
|6||Worcester Controls publication entitled "Advanced Ball Control Valves for High Performance Throttling Applications" printed Feb. 1992.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8403063 *||Oct 3, 2008||Mar 26, 2013||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Downhole ball mechanism with enhanced drift clearance|
|US8833384||Aug 6, 2012||Sep 16, 2014||Schneider Electric Buildings, Llc||Advanced valve actuation system with integral freeze protection|
|US20100084138 *||Apr 8, 2010||Peter Derek Walter Inglis||Downhole Ball Mechanism With Enhanced Drift Clearance|
|Sep 21, 2007||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Oct 1, 2007||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Sep 21, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12