Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUSRE39861 E1
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 10/893,795
Publication dateSep 25, 2007
Filing dateJul 19, 2004
Priority dateJun 23, 1997
Fee statusPaid
Publication number10893795, 893795, US RE39861 E1, US RE39861E1, US-E1-RE39861, USRE39861 E1, USRE39861E1
InventorsGary D. Hodgen
Original AssigneeDuramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Methods of extended use oral contraception
US RE39861 E1
Abstract
A method of female contraception involves administering a combination of estrogen and progestin for 60-110 consecutive days in which the daily amounts of estrogen and progestin are equivalent to about 5-35 mcg of ethinyl estradiol and about 0.025 to 10 mg of norethindrone acetate, respectively. The advantages include less menstrual bleeding, less patient anemia, less total exposure to medication, higher compliance rates and more lifestyle convenience for patients.
Images(6)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(12)
1. A method of extended female contraception that reduces the number of menstrual periods per year, which comprises orally monophasicly administering to a pre-menopausal female a combination of estrogen and progestin for 60-110 84 consecutive days in which the daily amounts of estrogen and progestin are equivalent to about 5-35 30 mcg of ethinyl estradiol and about 0.025 to 10 0.25-1.5 mg of norethindrone acetate, respectively, following followed by non-administration administration of a placebo for a period of 3-10 5-8 days, wherein the combination of estrogen and progestin and the placebo are packaged together in a kit, and wherein the method of female contraception reduces the number of menstrual periods per year to four when the method is practiced for at least one year.
2. The method of claim 1 in which the daily amount of estrogen is equivalent to about 10 to 20 mcg of ethinyl estradiol.
3. The method of claim 2 in which the daily amount of progestin is equivalent to 0.25-1.5 mg of norethindrone acetate.
4. The method of claim 3 in which the combination is administered for at least 80 consecutive days.
5. The method of claim 4 in which the estrogen is ethinyl estradiol.
6. The method of claim 5 in which the progestin is norethindrone acetate.
7. The method of claim 1 in which the daily amount of progestin is equivalent to 0.25-1.5 mg of norethindrone acetate.
8. The method of claim 1 in which the combination is administered for at least 80 consecutive days.
9. The method of claim 1 in which the estrogen is ethinyl estradiol.
10. The method of claim 1 in which the progestin is norethindrone acetate.
11. The method of claim 1 in which the daily amount of estrogen is up to 30 mcg of ethinyl estadiol.
12. The method of claim 9 in which the progestin is levonorgestrel.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The ovarian/menstrual cycle is a complex event characterized by an estrogen rich follicular phase and, after ovulation, a progesterone rich luteal phase. Each has a duration of approximately 14 days resulting in an intermenstrual interval of about 28 days. The endometrial tissue responds to the changes in hormonal milieu.

The onset of menstruation is the beginning of a new menstrual cycle and is counted as day 1. During a span of about 5 to 7 days, the superficial layers of the endometrium, which grew and developed during the antecedent ovarian/menstrual cycle, are sloughed because demise of the corpus luteum in the non-fertile menstrual cycle is associated with a loss of progesterone secretion. Ovarian follicular maturation occurs progressively resulting in a rise in the circulating levels of estrogen, which in turn leads to new endometrial proliferation.

The dominant ovarian follicle undergoes ovulation at mid-cycle, generally between menstrual cycle days 12 to 16 and is converted from a predominantly estrogen source to a predominantly progesterone source (the corpus luteum). The increasing level of progesterone in the blood converts the proliferative endometrium to a secretory phase in which the tissue proliferation has promptly abated, leading to the formation of endometrial glands or organs. When the ovulated oocyte is viably fertilized and continues its progressive embryonic cleavage, the secretory endometrium and the conceptus can interact to bring about implantation (nidation), beginning about 6 to 8 days after fertilization.

If an ongoing pregnancy is to be established via implantation, the embryo will attach and burrow into the secretory endometrium and begin to produce human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG). The HCG in turn stimulates extended corpus luteum function, i.e. the progesterone production remains elevated, and menses does not occur in the fertile menstrual cycle. Pregnancy is then established.

In the non-fertile menstrual cycle, the waning level of progesterone in the blood causes the endometrial tissue to be sloughed. This starts a subsequent menstrual cycle.

Because endometrial proliferation serves to prepare the uterus for an impending pregnancy, manipulation of hormones and of the uterine environment can provide contraception. For example, estrogens are known to decrease follicle stimulating hormone secretion by feedback inhibition. Under certain circumstances, estrogens can also inhibit luteinizing hormone secretion, once again by negative feedback. Under normal circumstances, the spike of circulating estrogen found just prior to ovulation induces the surge of gonadotropic hormones that occurs just prior to and resulting in ovulation. High doses of estrogen immediately post-coitally also can prevent conception probably due to interference with implantation.

Progestins can also provide contraception. Endogenous progesterone after estrogen is responsible for the progestational changes of the endometrium and the cyclic changes of cells and tissue in the cervix and the vagina. Administration of progestin makes the cervical mucus thick, tenacious and cellular which is believed to impede spermatozoal transport. Administration of progestin also inhibits luteinizing hormone secretion and blocks ovulation in humans.

The most prevalent form of oral contraception is a pill that combines both an estrogen and a progestin, a so-called combined oral contraceptive preparation.

Alternatively, there are contraceptive preparations that comprise progestin only. However, the progestin-only preparations have a more varied spectrum of side effects than do the combined preparations, especially more breakthrough bleeding. As a result, the combined preparations are the preferred oral contraceptives in use today (Sheth et al., Contraception 25:243, 1982).

Whereas the conventional 21 day pill packs with a 7 day “pill free” or placebo interval worked well when oral contraceptives were of higher dosage, as the doses have come down, for both the estrogen and progestin components, bleeding problems have increased in frequency, especially in the early months of oral contraceptive use, but even persistently so in some patients.

Since the advent of combined estrogen-progestin medications as oral contraceptives, there has been a steady downward adjustment of the daily estrogen dosage. Concurrently, where exposure to the progestin component has also been lowered, reduced androgenicity has remained an ongoing priority. Together these adaptions in formulation have been presented in a variety of regimens, both monophasic and multiphasic. Each have their own advantages and disadvantages. All-in-all, today's oral contraceptives are much safer with regard to the incidence and severity of estrogen-linked clotting disorders as well as the suggested cumulative impact of more “lipid friendly” progestins that maintain the potentially advantageous high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in circulation.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,390,531 teaches a triphasic regimen in which each phase uses about 20-40 mcg ethinyl estradiol, phases 1 and 3 use 0.3-0.8 norethindrone and phase 2 doubles the amount of the norethindrone. These three phases consume 21 days of a 28 day cycle. European published application 0 226 279 states that this regimen is associated with a high incidence of breakthrough bleeding and substitutes a three phase oral contraceptive regimen using a relatively low amount of ethinyl estradiol (10-50 μg) and a relatively high amount of norethindrone acetate (0.5-1.5 mg) in each phase provided that the amount of estrogen in any two phases is never the same. A “rest” phase of about 7 days is used in this regimen.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,098,714 teaches an osmotic, oral dosage form. One “pill” is administered per day but the administration is, in effect, polyphasic. The dosage form is constructed such that it provides an initial pulse delivery of estrogen and progestin followed by prolonged delivery of estrogen.

European published patent application 0 253 607 describes a monophasic contraceptive preparation containing units having 0.008-0.03 mg of ethinyl estradiol and 0.025-0.1 ng of desogestrel (or equivalent) and a regimen where the preparation is administered over a 23-25 day period, preferably 24 days, followed by a 2-5 day pill-free period. The object of this regimen is to provide hormonal replacement therapy and contraceptive protection for the pre-menopausal woman in need thereof by supplying a low dose of an estrogen combined with a “very low dose of a progestogen.”

In 1989, the accumulating data from the evolution of oral contraceptive pill formulations containing only 20-35 μg of estrogen per day spurred the Food and Drug Administration's Fertility and Maternal Health Drugs Advisory Committee to recommend indication of low dose oral contraceptives for healthy, non-smoking women even during the perimenopausal years, such as, for instance, ages 35-50. In Japan, oral contraceptives are being evaluated for safety and efficacy, as well as social acceptability, for the first time.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,552,394 describes a method of female contraception which is characterized by a reduced incidence of breakthrough bleeding after the first cycle involves monophasicly administering a combination of estrogen and progestin for 23-25 consecutive days of a 28 day cycle in which the daily amounts of estrogen and progestin are equivalent to about 5-35 mcg of ethinyl estradiol and about 0.025 to 10 mg of norethindrone acetate, respectively and in which the weight ratio of estrogen to progestin is at least 1:45 calculated as ethinyl estradiol to norethindrone acetate.

In establishing a estrogen-progestin regimen for oral contraceptives, two principal issues must be confronted. First, efficacy must be maintained and second, there must be avoidance of further erosion in the control of endometrial bleeding. In general, even the lowest dose oral contraceptive products commercially available have demonstrated efficacy but the overall instances of bleeding control problems has increased as the doses were reduced, as manifest both in breakthrough bleeding (untimely flow or spotting) or withdrawal amenorrhea during the “pill free” week (expected menses).

It is the object of the present invention to provide a new estrogen-progestin combination and/or regimen for oral contraceptive use which maintains the efficacy and provides enhanced control of endometrial bleeding. The regimen enhances compliance by involving fewer stop/start transitions per year and also results in less blood loss in patients with anemia. Having fewer menstrual intervals can enhance lifestyles and convenience. This and other objects of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a method of female contraception which is characterized by a reduced number of withdrawal menses per year. More particularly, it relates to a method of female contraception which involves administering, preferably monophasicly, a combination of estrogen and progestin for 60-110 consecutive days followed by 3-10 days of no administration, in which the daily amounts of the estrogen and progestin are equivalent to about 5-35 mcg of ethinyl estradiol and about 0.025-10 mg of norethindrone acetate, respectively.

DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION

In accordance with the present invention, a women in need of contraception is administered a combined dosage form of estrogen and progestin, preferably monophasicly, for 60 to 110 consecutive days, preferably about 80-90 days, followed by an administration free interval of 3 to 10 days, preferably about 5-8 days, in which the daily amounts of estrogen and progestin are equivalent to about 5-35 mcg of ethinyl estradiol and about 0.025 to 10 mg of norethindrone acetate, respectively. On a schedule of 84 days administration followed by 7 pill free days, there are only four treatment and menstrual cycles per year.

The preferred estrogen and progestins are ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone acetate although other estrogens and progestins can be employed. The weight ratio of these two active ingredients is at least 1:45 and preferably at least 1:50. The preferable amount of ethinyl estradiol is about 10-20 mcg and the preferable amount of the norethindrone acetate is about 0.25-1.5 mg. Other estrogens vary in potency from ethinyl estradiol. For example, 30 mcg of ethinyl estradiol is roughly equivalent to 60 mcg of mestranol or 2,000 mg of 17 β-estradiol. Likewise, other progestins vary in potency from norethindrone acetate. Thus, 3.5 mg of norethindrone acetate is roughly equivalent to 1 mg of levonorgestrel or desogestrel and 3-ketodesogestrel and about 0.7 mg of gestodene. The values given above are for the ethinyl estradiol and the norethindrone acetate and if a different estrogen or progestin is employed, an adjustment in the amount based on the relative potency should be made. The correlations in potency between the various estrogens and progestins are known.

Other useable estrogens include the esters of estradiol, estrone and ethinyl estradiol such as the acetate, sulfate, valerate or benzoate, conjugated equine estrogens, agnostic anti-estrogens, and selective estrogen receptor modulators. The estrogen is administered in the conventional manner by any route where it is active, for instance orally or transdermally. Most estrogens are orally active and that route of administration is therefore preferred. Accordingly, administration forms can be tablets, dragees, capsules or pills which contain the estrogen (and preferably the progestin) and a suitable pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

Pharmaceutical formulations containing the progestin and a suitable carrier can be solid dosage forms which includes tablets, capsules, cachets, pellets, pills, powders or granules; topical dosage forms which includes solutions, powders, fluid emulsions, fluid suspensions, semi-solids, ointments, pastes, creams, gels or jellies, foams and controlled release depot entities; and parenteral dosage forms which includes solutions, suspensions, emulsions or dry powder comprising an effective amount of progestin as taught in this invention. It is known in the art that the active ingredient, the progestin, can be contained in such formulations in addition to pharmaceutically acceptable diluents, fillers, disintegrants, binders, lubricants, surfactants, hydrophobic vehicles, water soluble vehicles, emulsifiers, buffers, humectants, moisturizers, solubilizers, preservatives and the like. The means and methods for administration are known in the art and an artisan can refer to various pharmacologic references for guidance. For example, “Modern Pharmaceutics”, Banker & Rhodes, Marcel Dekker, Inc. 1979; “Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmaceutical Basis of Therapeutics”, 6th Edition, MacMillan Publishing Co., New York 1980 can be consulted.

The pharmaceutical formulations may be provided in kit form containing at least about 60, and preferably at least about 84 tablets, and up to 110 tablets, intended for ingestion on successive days. Preferably administration is daily for at least 60 days using tablets containing the both the estrogen and the progestin and then for at least 3 days with placebo.

In order to further illustrate the present invention, specific examples are set forth below. It will be appreciated, however, that these examples are illustrative only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.

EXAMPLE 1

A study is carried out at a fully accredited animal research facility which complies through its animal care and use committee with the review standards set forth in the National Institute of Health's “Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals”, the Public Health Services' “Principles for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals”, and the United States Department of Agriculture's Implementation Regulations of the 1985 Amendments for the Animal Welfare Act.

Ten adult female cynomolgus monkeys (macaca fasicularis) having regular presumably ovulatory menstrual cycles (28.9±3.1 days for the month prior to study entry) are selected. Their duration of spontaneous menses is 3.4±1.4 days. Mean body weight of the monkeys is 4.9±1.1 kg (X±SEM). They are housed individually in a controlled environment (12 hours of light and 23° C.). Their diet is a commercial primate food (Purina, St. Louis, Mo.) with water ad libitum.

The monkeys are divided at random into two groups (N=5 each). The studies begin with spontaneous menstruation in a pretreatment control cycle. At the onset of the next spontaneous menses, alternatively, they are assigned to receive on cycle day one an ultra low dose oral contraceptive for either 60 consecutive days, followed by 3 non-treatment days or 84 consecutive days, followed by a 7 non-treatment days. These regimens are continued through three treatment cycles. The study concludes with each group of primates being followed during a post-treatment spontaneous ovarian menstrual cycle.

Femoral blood is collected daily and the serum frozen for subsequent RIA of estradiol, progesterone, FSH and LH in the pretreatment and post-treatment cycles and every 3rd day during all three treatment cycles, except daily through the “pill free” interval. Bleeding profiles are kept by daily vaginal swabs, indicating spontaneous menstruation, withdrawal bleeding, breakthrough bleeding, or withdrawal amenorrhea. Breakthrough bleeding is defined as detectable blood in the vagina outside of the first 8 days after the last dose of oral contraceptive or the onset of spontaneous menses in non-treatment cycles.

Since the objective is to test an ultra low dose oral contraceptive, the medication is adjusted to fit the smaller (than human) body weight of these laboratory primates. The dose of ethinyl estradiol is 1.2 μg/day, while the dose of norethindrone acetate is 0.06 mg/day. This “in-house” reformulation is achieved by grinding to powder a commercially available monophasic pill (Loestrin 1/20, Parke Davis, Morris Plains, N.J.), which originally contained 1 mg of norethindrone acetate and 20 μg of ethinyl estradiol per tablet, contained in a conventional 21 day pack along with 7 iron-containing placebos.

In terms of comparison to human dose equivalents, the daily dose received by the monkeys (with a monkey's body weight about 5 kg and a woman's at 50 kg) is about 12 μg of ethinyl estradiol and 0.6 mg of norethindrone acetate. Thus, this ultra low dose oral contraceptive formulation presented a 40% reduction in daily estrogen-progestin exposure as compared to one of the lowest estrogen dose combination oral contraceptives commercially available today in America or Europe. Taking into account that when a continuous 84 day ultra low dose regimen plus a 7 dy pill free interval was used, versus the traditional 21+7 day protocol, that there would be 63 more doses on an annualized basis, still the exposure to medication was reduced by more than 26% yearly, compared to the commercial product Loestrin 1/20.

EXAMPLES 2-5

The example 1 procedure is repeated using the following combinations of estrogen and progestin:

Example Estrogen Progestin Treatment Days
2 mestranol levo- 84
norgestrel
3 17-beta- 3-keto- 110
estradiol desogestrel
4 ethinyl desogestrel 80
estradiol
5 mestranol gestodone 60

Application of the compounds, compositions and methods of the present invention for the medical or pharmaceutical uses described can be accomplished by any clinical, medical, and pharmaceutical methods and techniques as are presently or prospectively known to those skilled in the art. It will therefore be appreciated that the various embodiments which have been described above are intended to illustrate the invention and various changes and modifications can be made in the inventive method without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4145416Sep 27, 1977Mar 20, 1979Schering, A.G.Estradiol and estriol derivatives
US4390531 *Aug 10, 1981Jun 28, 1983Syntex Pharmaceuticals International Ltd.Method of contraception using peak progestogen dosage
US4962098Apr 20, 1989Oct 9, 1990Warner-Lambert CompanyGraduated estrogen contraceptive
US5098714 *Nov 16, 1989Mar 24, 1992Alza CorporationOsmotic, oral dosage form for fertility control
US5108995 *Apr 26, 1990Apr 28, 1992Jencap Research Ltd.Repeating cycles of unit dosage of combination of estrogen and progestin; contraceptive
US5208225Oct 22, 1991May 4, 1993Warner-Lambert CompanyCompositions containing fixed combinations
US5552394Jul 22, 1994Sep 3, 1996The Medical College Of Hampton RoadsEthinyl estradiol and norethindrone acetate
US5756490 *Mar 30, 1995May 26, 1998Schering AktiengesellschaftEstrogen and gestagen
US6500814Sep 3, 1998Dec 31, 2002Wyeth PharmaceuticalsHormonal contraceptive
US20030018018Jul 10, 2001Jan 23, 2003Medical College Of Hampton RoadsMixture of ethinyl estradiol and norethindron acetate
US20030139381Dec 4, 2002Jul 24, 2003Barr Laboratories, Inc.Oral contraceptives to prevent pregnancy and diminish premenstrual symptomatology
US20040220152May 3, 2004Nov 4, 2004Ben-Maimon Carole S.administering dosage form containing mixture of estrogen and progestin
US20040222123May 6, 2003Nov 11, 2004Barr Laboratories, Inc.Kit for pharmaceuticals
US20040251301May 5, 2003Dec 16, 2004Niemann Amy C.Device for calculating anticipated days for menstruation
US20050051454Sep 2, 2004Mar 10, 2005Coe Matthew T.Case with pill receiving sleeves for storing and dispensing pills
US20050064031Nov 8, 2004Mar 24, 2005Klaus StockemannCombination contraceptive, kits that contain the latter, and a method that uses the latter
US20050143359Jul 16, 2004Jun 30, 2005Bell Robert G.Methods of hormonal treatment utilizing contraceptive regimens with continuous estrogen administration
USRE36247Oct 13, 1995Jul 6, 1999Woco Investments, Ltd.Method of hormonal treatment for menopausal or post-menopausal disorders involving continuous administration of progestogens and estrogens
USRE37838Feb 15, 2000Sep 10, 2002Schering AktiengesellschaftComposition for contraception
EP0253607A1Jul 13, 1987Jan 20, 1988American Home Products CorporationCombination dosage form for premenopausal women
EP0911029B1Jun 15, 1998Apr 17, 2002Medical College Of Hampton RoadsUltra low dose oral contraceptives with less menstrual bleeding and sustained efficacy
WO1993017686A1Mar 2, 1993Sep 16, 1993Schering AgEstrogen/progestin/antiprogestin method and kit for oral contraception and regulating menses
WO1997006807A2Aug 16, 1996Feb 27, 1997Schering AgContraceptive combined preparation, kits containing the same and contraceptive method using this combined preparation
WO1998004246A2Jul 23, 1997Feb 5, 1998American Home ProdTriphasic contraceptive method and kit comprising a combination of a progestin and estrogen
WO2000038691A1Dec 8, 1999Jul 6, 2000Ortho Mcneil Pharm IncTriphasic oral contraceptive
WO2004080442A1Jul 24, 2003Sep 23, 2004Andrew Joseph FriedmanExtended transdermal contraceptive regimens
WO2005032558A1Sep 30, 2004Apr 14, 2005Janssen Pharmaceutica NvExtended triphasic contraceptive regimens
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1"Headaches: OCs are 'guilty by association'," Contraceptive Technology Update 14(7):109-112, Thomson American Health Consultants (1993).
2Adams Hillard, P.J., "Oral contraception noncompliance: The extent of the problem," Adv. Contracep. 8(Suppl. 1):13-20, Kluwer Academic Publishers (1992).
3 *Cachrimanidou et al., Contraception, 48, 205-216 (1993).
4Coffee, A., "Hormone-Based Contraception: The Extended Cycle Regimen," Supplement to Drug Topics, pp. 3-15, Advanstar Communications, Inc. (Jan. 2004).
5 *Davies et al., Contraception, 46(3), 269-278 (1992).
6Dickey, R.P., "Oral Contraception: Realizing the Promise by Overcoming the Pitfalls," Individualizing Oral Contraceptive Therapy, OBG Management Supplement, pp. 2-6, Watson Pharma, Inc. (Oct. 2000).
7 *Facts and Comparisons, chapter 3, pp. 108b-108e (1985).
8Goldzieher, J.W., "Use and Misuse of the Term Potency with Respect to Oral Contraceptives," J. Reproductive Med. 31:533-539, The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, Inc. (1986).
9Hipkin, L., Col., "The Induction of Amenorrhoea," J.R. Army Med. Corps 138:15-18, Royal Army Medical Corps (1992).
10King, R.J.B., and Whitehead, M.I., "Assessment of the potency of orally administered progestins in women," Fertility and Sterility 46:1062-1066, Elsevier for the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (1986).
11Koetsawang, S., et al., "A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Six Combined Oral Contraceptives," Contraception 25:231-241, Elsevier (1982).
12Kornaat, H., et al., "The Acceptance of a 7-Week Cycle with a Modern Low-Dose Oral Contraceptive (Minulet(R))," Contraception 45:119-127, Elsevier (1992).
13 *Kovac et al. The British Journal of Family Planning, 19: 274-275 (1994).
14Kuhl, H., "Comparative Pharmacology of Newer Progestogens," Drugs 51:189-215, ADIS International Ltd. (1996).
15 *Loudon et al., British Medical Journal,2, 487-490 (1977).
16Mashchak, C.A., et al., "Comparison of pharmacodynamic properties of various estrogen formulations," Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 144:511-518, The C.V. Mosby Co. (1982).
17Miller, L., and Notter, K.M., "Menstrual Reduction With Extended Use of Combination Oral Contraceptive Pills: Randomized Controlled Trial," Obstet. Gynecol. 98:771-778, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins (Nov. 2001).
18Phillips, A., et al., "A Comparison of the Potencies and Activities of Progestogens Used in Contraceptives," Contraception 36:181-192, Geron-X, Inc. (1987).
19Piper, J.M., and Kennedy, D.L., "Oral Contraceptives in the United States: Trends in Content and Potency," Intl. J. Epidemiology 16:215-221, Oxford University Press (1987).
20Rosenberg, M.J. and Waugh, M.S., "Oral contraceptive discontinuation: A prospective evaluation of frequency and reasons," Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 179:577-582, Mosby, Inc. (1998).
21Shearman, R.P., "Oral contraceptive agents," Med. J. Australia 144:201-205, Australasian Medical Publishing (1986).
22Sheth, A., et al., "A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Two Combined and Two Progestogen-Only Oral Contraceptives," Contraception 25:243-252, Elsevier (1982).
23Sulak, P.J., "Should your patient be on extended-use OCs?" Contemporary OB/GYN 48:35-46, Thomson Medical Economics (Sep. 2003).
24Sulak, P.J., et al., "Acceptance of altering the standard 21-day/7-day oral contraceptive regimen to delay menses and reduce hormone withdrawal symptoms," Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 186:1142-1149, Mosby, Inc. (Jun. 2002).
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7615545Aug 17, 2007Nov 10, 2009Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Oral contraceptives to prevent pregnancy and diminish premenstrual symptomatology
US7772219May 3, 2004Aug 10, 2010Teva Women's Health, Inc.administering dosage form containing mixture of estrogen and progestin
US7858605Dec 6, 2007Dec 28, 2010Teva Women's Health, Inc.Oral contraceptives to prevent pregnancy and diminish premenstrual symptomatology
US8338396May 24, 2010Dec 25, 2012Teva Women's Health, Inc.Oral contraceptives to prevent pregnancy and diminish premenstrual symptomatology
US8415332Aug 17, 2007Apr 9, 2013TEVA Woman's Health, Inc.A female is administered an estrogen and a progestin for a period of greater than 30 or 31 consecutive days to provide contraceptive and non-contraceptive benefits; reduce bleeding problems; multiphase adminstering with variation in dosage; ethinyl estradiol
US8450299Jun 8, 2012May 28, 2013Teva Womans's Health, Inc.Methods of hormonal treatment utilizing ascending-dose extended cycle regimens
US8680084Aug 30, 2012Mar 25, 2014Teva Women's Health, Inc.Oral contraceptives to prevent pregnancy and diminish premenstrual symptomatology
Classifications
U.S. Classification514/178, 514/170, 514/182, 514/843
International ClassificationA61K31/56
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Oct 27, 2010FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
May 19, 2010ASAssignment
Effective date: 20090422
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:DURAMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:024402/0984
Owner name: TEVA WOMEN S HEALTH, INC., NEW JERSEY
Owner name: TEVA WOMEN S HEALTH, INC.,NEW JERSEY
Oct 30, 2007CCCertificate of correction
Sep 9, 2005ASAssignment
Owner name: BARR LABORATORIES, INC., NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL;REEL/FRAME:016513/0189
Effective date: 20041227
Owner name: DURAMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BARR LABORATORIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:016500/0815
Effective date: 20041213