Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUSRE40786 E1
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 09/586,747
Publication dateJun 23, 2009
Filing dateJun 2, 2000
Priority dateMar 16, 1984
Publication number09586747, 586747, US RE40786 E1, US RE40786E1, US-E1-RE40786, USRE40786 E1, USRE40786E1
InventorsPaul R. Burnett, John E. van Hamont, Robert H. Reid, Jean A. Setterstrom, Thomas C. Van Cott, Deborah L. Birx
Original AssigneeThe United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
IMMUNOSTIMULAnts COMPOSITION COMPRISING IMMUNOGENIC SUBSTANCE ENCAPSULATED IN POLYLACTIDE-CO-GLYCOLIDE MATRIX; vaccine for HIV-1
US RE40786 E1
Abstract
This invention relates to parenteral and mucosal vaccines against diseases caused by intercellular pathogens using antigens encapsulated within a biodegradable-biocompatible microspheres(matrix).
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(14)
1. An immunostimulating composition comprising encapsulatingencapsulated microspheres comprised of (a) a biodegradable-biocompatible poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolideaspoly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) as the bulk matrix produced by a solvent evaporation process wherein the molecular weight of the copolymer is between 4,000 to 100,000 daltons and (b) an immunogenic substance consisting of a conformationally native subunit of chronic intracellular pathogen which, in the course of natural infection with that pathogen, is exposed to the host immune system on the surface of free pathogen and/or pathogen-infected cells.
2. The immunostimulating composition described in claim 1 wherein the immunogenic substance is an antigen and the antigen is pre-encapsulated into a conformationally stabilizing hydrophilic matrix consisting of an appropriate mono, di- or tri-saccharide or other carbohydrate susbstancesubstance by lyophilization prior to its final encapsulation into the PLG microsphere by a solvent extraction process employing acetonitrile as the polymer solvent, mineral oil as the emulsion's external phase, and heptane as the extractant.
3. The immunostimulating compositionscomposition described in claimsclaim 1 or 2 wherein the immunogenic substance is a native (oligomeric)HIV-1 envelope antigen that is conformationally stabilized by the polymer matrix and serves to elicit in animals the production of HIV specific cytotoxic T lumphocyteslymphocytes and antibodies preferentially reactive against native HIV-1 envelope antigen.
4. The immunostimulating compositionscomposition described in claim 3 wherein the amount of said immunogenic substance within the microcapsule comprises between 0.5% to 5.0% of the weight of said composition.
5. The immunostimulating compositions describecomposition described in claim 4 wherein the relative ratio between the amount of the lactide:glycolide components of said matrix is within the range of 52:48 to 0:100.
6. The immunostimulating compositionscomposition described in claim 5 wherein the molecular weight of said copolymer is between 4,000 to 50,000 daltons.
7. A vaccine consisting of a blend of the immunostimulating compositions described in claims 5 or 6 composition of claim 5.
8. The immunostimulating compositionscomposition described in claim 5, employed as a parentallyparenterally administered vaccine wherein the diameter size range of said vaccine microspheres lies between 1 nanometer and 20 microns.
9. The immunostimulating compositionscomposition described in claim 5, employed as a mucosal vaccine wherein the size of more than 50% (by volume) of said vaccine microspheres is between 5 microns to 10 microns in diameter.
10. A composition in accordance with claim 1 wherein the microspheres further contain a pharmaceutically-acceptable adjuvant.
11. A vaccine consisting of a blend of the immunostimulating compositions described in claims 5 or composition of claim 6.
12. The immunostimulating compositionscomposition described in claim 6 employed as a parentallyparenterally administered vaccine wherein the diameter size range of said vaccine microspheres lies between 1 nanometer and 20 microns.
13. The immunostimulating compositionscomposition described in claim 7 employed as a parentallyparenterally administered vaccine wherein the diameter size range of said vaccine microspheres lies between nanogramnanometer and 20 microns.
14. The immunostimulating compositionscomposition described in claim 6 employed as a mucosal vaccine wherein the size of more than 50% (by volume) of said vaccine microspheres is between 5 microns to 10 microns in diameter.
Description
II. CROSS REFERENCE

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/242,960, filed May 16, 1994, pending; which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/867,301 filed Apr. 10, 1992, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,417,986 which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/805,721 filed Nov. 21, 1991; now abandoned, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/690,485 filed Apr. 24, 1991, now abandoned; which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/521,945 filed May 11, 1990, now abandoned. Additionally, this application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/446,149 filed May 22, 1995, pending; which in turn is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 06,590,308 filed Mar. 16, 1984, now abandoned.

I. GOVERNMENT INTEREST

The invention descried herein may be manufactured, licensed and used by or for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties to us thereon.

III. FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to parenteral and mucosal vaccines against diseases cause by intracellular pathogens using antigens encapsulated within biodegradable-biocompatible microspheres(matrix).

IV. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Most infections by viruses and other intracellular pathogens are countered in the human host by a combination of humoral (antibody) and cellular (lymphocyte and phagocyte) immune effectors. Although the precise identity of immune effectors capable of protecting the host against some chronic intracellular pathogens (e.g. HIV-1) remains unknown, attempts to develop preventive and therapeutic vaccines still focus on the induction of appropriate humoral and cellular immune responses. Furthermore, since most human viral pathogens (including HIV-1) are transmitted across mucosal surfaces, it is important that vaccines induce such responses locally (at the mucosal surface) as well as systemically and that they are durable for long-term protection.

The issues of durability and mucosal immunogenicity have been previously addressed by encapsulating vaccine antigens in appropriately-sized biodegradable, biocompatible microspheres made of lactide/glycolide copolymer (the same materials used in resorbable sutures). It has been shown that such microspheres can be made to release their load in a controlled manner over a prolonged period of time and can facilitate the interaction of their contents with the local immune system when administrated mucosally.

In the case of HIV-1 infection, there is insufficient information at this time regrading the virus and its interactions with the human immune system to permit the rational design of a preventive vaccine. However, it has been noted that many candidate HIV vaccines tested to date fail to elicit antibodies capable of neutralizing wild-type HIV-1 or binding to native HIV-1 proteins, fail to induce a substantial population of effector cells capable of destroying HIV-1-infected cells, and fail to induce significant responses at mucosal surfaces. A possible approach to overcoming these problems (applicable to both HIV-1 and other chronic intracellular pathogens) is to identify a native protein, accessible to the immune system on the surface of both free virus and infected cells, and present it to the immune system (systemic and mucosal) encapsulated in microspheres to protect and augment its immunogenicity.

V. DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 indicates controlcytotoxic T lymphocyte induction in mice immunized with rgp 160; and

FIG. 2 indicates “Native”/denatured rgp 120 (IIIB) Binding Ratios.

V. DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a novel pharmaceutical composition, a microcapsule/sphere formulation, which comprises an antigen encapsulated within a biodegradable polymeric matrix, such as poly(DL-lactide co glycolide) (PLG), wherein the molecular weight of the PLG is about 4,000 to 100,000 daltons and wherein the relative ratio between the lactide and glycolide component of the PLG is within the range of 52:48 to 0:100, and its use, as a vaccine, in the effective induction of antiviral immune responses comprising both virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and antibodies reactive against native viral antigens. In the practice of this invention, applicants found that when a complex (oligomeric) native envelope protein of HIV-1 was encapsulated in PLG microspheres, it retained its native antigenicity and function upon its release in vitro. Furthermore, when used as a vaccine in animals, this product elicited HIV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and antibodies reactive with native (oligomeric) HIV-1 envelope protein.

The following examples illustrate the invention:

EXAMPLE 1

Materials and Methods

Immunogens, Non-CD4-binding, baculo-expressed, recombinant gp 160IIIB (rgp 160) was obtained from MicroGeneSys (Meriden, Conn.). CD4-binding, oligomeric gp 160 CDC451 (o-gp 160) was obtained from Advanced BioScience Laboratories (Kensington, Md.).

Microencapsulation of immunogens: PLG microspheres ranging from 1 nanometer to 20 um in diameter and containing a 0.5 to 1.0% antigen core load were prepared by a solvent extractive method. 0.5 to 5.0% by weight antigen core load could also be used. The solvent extraction method involves dissolving the viral antigen and sucrose (1:4 ratio w:w) in 1 ml of deionized water. This solution is flash frozen and lyophilized. The resulting antigen-loaded sucrose particles are resuspended in acetonitrile and mixed into PLG copolymer dissolved in acetonitrile. This antigen-polymer mixture is then emulsifyed into heavy mineral oil, transferred into heptane and mixed for 30 min to extract the oil and acetonitrile from the nascent spheres. The spheres are harvested by centrifugation, washed three times in heptane and dried overnight under vacuum. Microsphere size was determined by both light and scanning electron microscopy. The antigen core load was determined by quantitative amino acid analysis of the microspheres following complete hydrolysis in 6N hydrochloric acid.

Analysis of immunogen spontaneously released from microspheres in vitro by binding to soluble CD4 and recognition by HIV-positive patient serum. PLG microspheres loaded with native (oligomeric) gp 160 were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4 (PBS), incubated at 37 C. for 3 h, and then at 4 C overnight. The microspheres were then sedimented by centrifugation (2 min at 200×g), the supernatants harvested, and the released gp 160 assayed for binding to CD4 and recognition by HIV-positive patient serum by surface plasmon resonance (described below). A sample of the stock protein used for microencapsulation was assayed for comparison.

Immunization of animals. HIV-seronegative, 8-10 week old NZW rabbits were immunized intramuscularly with rgp 160- or o-gp 160-loaded PLG microspheres suspended in PBS or with alum-adjuvanted rgp 160 in PBS. Groups receiving rgp 160-loaded microspheres (n=2) were primed with 50 ug of immunogen on day 0 and boosted with 25 ug on day 42. Groups receiving o-gp 160-loaded microspheres (n=3) were primed with 70 ug of immunogen on day 0 and boosted with 35 ug on day 56. Groups receiving alum-adjuvanted rgp 160 (n=2) got 85 ug of immunogen on days 0, 7, and 28.

BALB/c mice were immunized subcutaneously with rgp 160-loaded PLG microspheres suspend in PBS or with alum-adjuvanted rgp 160 in PBS. The mice in all groups (n=4) received 10 ug of immunogen on days 0 and 21.

Determination of the ratio of antibody binding to “native”/denatured rgp 120IIIB measured by surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Real-time binding interactions between ligand (gp 120 covalently linked to a biosensor matrix) and ligate (Abs in solution) were measured using surface plasmon resonance (BIAcore, Pharmacia Biosensor, Piscataway, N.J.). “Native”rgp 120(IIIB) (Genentech, South San Francisco, Calif.) or reduced, carboxymethylated (denatured) rgp 120(IIIB) (Genentech) was covalently linked to the biosensor dextran matrix. Sera and mAbs were diluted in HBS running buffer (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 3.4 mM EDTA, 0.05% (BIAcore) surfactant P20, pH 7.4) and injected through the dextran matrices at a flow rate of 5 ul/min. The binding value of each serum or mAb was measured in resonance units (RU), and the “native”/denatured gp 120 ratios were determined by dividing the corresponding RU values and correcting for small differences in matrix concentration. Control included an HIV-positive patient serum and mAb 1c1.

Assessment of HIV-specific cell-mediated immunity in immunized mice by secondary CTL assay. The spleens of BALB/c mice immunized on days 0 and 21 were harvested and single cell suspensions prepared aseptically in complete RPMI medium on day 35. The cells were then pooled within experimental groups (n=4), underlay with ficoll, centrifuged 30 min at 450×g (RT), washed, and resuspended in complete RPMI medium. Following a 1 h stimulation with peptide p18 (1 uM) at 37° C., the cell suspensions were diluted with complete RPMI supplemented with 2ME (1:1000) and transferred to flasks for a 6 day incubation at 37° C. After 2 days, recombinant IL-2 (10 u/ml) was added to all flasks. On day 6, P815 target cells were pulsed with peptide p18 (1 uM) or with nothing (control) in PBS supplemented with 0.1% BSA. 3×10A6 target cells were labelled with 300 uCi of 51Cr, washed, and plated out with the effector cells at effector:traget (E:T) ratios of 45:1, 15:1, 5:1, and 1.7:1. After a 6 h incubation at 37° C., the supernatants were harvested and counted, and % specific lysis was calculated.

Results

Comparison of the native (oligomeric) gp 160 prior to microencapsulation and following spontaneous release from PLG microspheres showed the two to be essentially indistinguishable in terms of their binding to CD4 and recognition by HIV-positive patient serum. (Table 1). This retention of conformation-dependent binding shows that structure of the antigen is not appreciably altered by the microencapsulation process.

FIG. 1 shows the data from a cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) assay performed on the speen cells of mice which had had been previously immunized with either HIV-1 envelope protein encapsulated in PLG microspheres (dark squares) or the same protein administered in a conventional way with alum adjuvant (dark diamonds). These data indicate that microencapsulation of HIV-1 envelope protein in PLG microspheres results in a vaccine that induces significantly greater anti-HIV CTL activity than does alum-adjuvanted vaccine. The open symbol groups represent controls run to assure that the activity being measured is virus-specific.

FIG. 2 shows the results of an assay designed to measure the relative binding of antibodies to native vs denatured viral protein. These data show that rabbits immunized with a non-native HIV-1 protein encapsulated in PLG (#5 and 6) develop antibodies which show greater binding to denatured (vs native) protein (indicated by a ratio<1). On the other hand, rabbits immunized with a native HIV-1 protein encapsulated in PLG microspheres (#10-12) develop antibodies which show greater binding to native viral protein (indicated by ratio>1). This retention of each proteins antigenicity constitutes an additional piece of evidence that the structure of antigens loaded in PLG microspheres are preserved.

EXAMPLE 2

Materials and Methods

This experiment was similar to that described in Example 1 except for the method of microencapsulation employed.

Microencapsulation of immunogens: PLG microspheres ranging from 1 to 15 um in diameter and containing a 0.5 to 1.0% antigen core load were prepared by a solvent evaporation method. The solvent evaporation method involves emulsifying the viral antigen dissolved in deionized water into poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) polymer dissolved in methylene chloride. This emulsion is mixed into 0.9% polyvinyl alcohol and stirred. After 10 min of stirring, 0.35 l of water is added and gentle mixing is continued for 1.5 h. The resulting spheres are harvested by centrifugation, washed three times in distilled water, and dried overnight under vacuum. Microsphere size was determined by both light and scanning electron microscopy. The antigen core load was determined by quantitative amino acid analysis of the microspheres following complete hydrolysis in 6N hydrochloric acid.

Results

Analysis of spontaneously released antigen showed it to retain its CD4 binding capacity. Its native antigenicity (recognition by the serum of an HIV-positive patient) was only slightly less than that of the antigen prior to encapsulation and following spontaneous release from microspheres produced by a solvent extraction method (Table 1).

The results of immunizing animals with either non-native (denatured) or native oligomeric gp 160 in PLG microspheres produced by a solvent evaporation method were essentially indistinguishable from those obtained using microspheres produced by a solvent extraction method (example 1). Microencapsulated antigen induced significantly greater CTL activity than antigen administered in a conventional alum-adjuvanted formulation. Furthermore, preservation of the structure of PLG-microencapsulated antigens is supported by the findings of preferential binding of antibodies elicited by microspheres loaded with denatured antigen to denatured gp 120 (FIGS. 2, 3, and 4)(FIG. 2, nos. 3 and 4) and the preferred binding of antibodies elicited by microspheres loaded with native (oligomeric) antigen to native gp 120 (FIGS. 2, 7-8)(FIG. 2, nos. 7 and 8).

TABLE 1
BIA (released o-gp160)
Capture o-gp160-451 (stock vs microsphere-released)
on tvc 391 fc3/fc4 sCD4 (4 mg/m)
1 ul/min flow rate foe o-gp160 ini.: 5 ul/min for all others
ligate RU HIV+/sCD4 (RU ratio)
gp120-MN 1:10 3286
HIV+ 1:100 54
NHS 1:100 3
HIV+ pool 1:100 47
o-gp160 (tvc281) 1772
HIV+ 3259 1.84
tvc281 1848
NHS −36
tvc281 1762
HIV+ pool 2597 1.47
tvc281-PLG-EV 3342
HIV+ 4594 1.37
tvc281 3222
NHS 7
tvc281 3210
HIV+ pool 3336 1.04
tvc281-PLG-EX 1855
HIV+ 3760 2.04
tvc281 1839
NHS 2
tvc281 1850
HIV+ pool 2745 1.48
gp120-MN 1:10 2914
HIV+ 1:100 14
NHS 1:100 −2
HIV+ pool 1:100 14
tvc281 1099
HIV+ 1083 0.99
tvc281 1022
HIV+ pool 1395 1.36
tvc281-PLG-EV 1595
HIV+ 1322 0.83
tvc281 1535
HIV+ pool 1781 1.16

In view of the above it will be seen that the objects of the invention are achieved. As various changes could be made in the above materials and methods without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description shall be interpreted as illustrative and not limiting.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3540444Jan 15, 1968Nov 17, 1970Scherer Corp R PPlastic ampoule for use with hypodermic injector
US3773919Oct 8, 1970Nov 20, 1973Du PontPolylactide-drug mixtures
US3788315Apr 20, 1971Jan 29, 1974S LaurensDisposable cutaneous transjector
US4166800Jul 31, 1978Sep 4, 1979Sandoz, Inc.Processes for preparation of microspheres
US4384975Jun 13, 1980May 24, 1983Sandoz, Inc.Process for preparation of microspheres
US4389330 *Oct 6, 1980Jun 21, 1983Stolle Research And Development CorporationDispersion, solvent extraction
US4530840Jul 29, 1982Jul 23, 1985The Stolle Research And Development CorporationAntiinflammatory microparticles in suspension
US4542025Apr 30, 1984Sep 17, 1985The Stolle Research And Development CorporationInjectable, long-acting microparticle formulation for the delivery of anti-inflammatory agents
US4585482May 25, 1984Apr 29, 1986Southern Research InstituteSustained release of chloride dioxide
US4622244Aug 23, 1984Nov 11, 1986The Washington UniversityProcess for preparation of microcapsules
US4637905Apr 11, 1985Jan 20, 1987Batelle Development CorporationDissolving polylactide in solvent-nonsolvent system; vaporization of solvent
US4675189Feb 8, 1985Jun 23, 1987Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc.Microencapsulation of water soluble active polypeptides
US4798786May 6, 1982Jan 17, 1989Stolle Research And Development CorporationLiving cells encapsulated in crosslinked protein
US4835139May 19, 1987May 30, 1989Debiopharm S.A.Process for increasing the antagonistic effect of peptidic compounds on hormone-dependent diseases
US4863735Oct 2, 1986Sep 5, 1989Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyBiodegradable polymeric drug delivery system with adjuvant activity
US4897268Aug 3, 1987Jan 30, 1990Southern Research InstituteDrug delivery system and method of making the same
US4938763Oct 3, 1988Jul 3, 1990Dunn Richard LBiodegradable in-situ forming implants and methods of producing the same
US4941880Dec 12, 1988Jul 17, 1990Bioject, Inc.Pre-filled ampule and non-invasive hypodermic injection device assembly
US5000886May 26, 1987Mar 19, 1991American Cyanamid CompanySilicone-hardened pharmaceutical microcapsules and process of making the same
US5019096Oct 14, 1988May 28, 1991Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New YorkInfection-resistant compositions, medical devices and surfaces and methods for preparing and using same
US5059187May 4, 1990Oct 22, 1991Dey Laboratories, Inc.Method for the cleansing of wounds using an aerosol container having liquid wound cleansing solution
US5064413Nov 9, 1989Nov 12, 1991Bioject, Inc.Needleless hypodermic injection device
US5075109Mar 18, 1988Dec 24, 1991Southern Research InstituteAdministering in encapsulated form
US5102872Aug 12, 1988Apr 7, 1992Cetus CorporationProtein conjugated to polyoxyethylene mixed with time-releasing human serum albumin, encapsulated in poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microcapsules; treating shipping fever and other stress related diseases in cattle
US5129825Oct 10, 1989Jul 14, 1992Discko John JrDental syringe and capsule for use therewith
US5133701Oct 15, 1990Jul 28, 1992Sang In HanDisposable pressure wound irrigation device
US5236355Oct 5, 1990Aug 17, 1993American Cyanamid CompanyApparatus for the treatment of periodontal disease
US5278202Dec 23, 1991Jan 11, 1994Atrix Laboratories, Inc.Polymers biodegradable by enzyme hydrolysis
US5290494Jul 16, 1992Mar 1, 1994Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas SystemDissolving independently-gelling single polylactide enantiomer in solvent, casting solution in mold, cooling to form gel capable of retaining shape of mold upon removal therefrom and handling thereof, drying
US5360610Mar 15, 1993Nov 1, 1994Southern Research InstituteMethod for stimulating nerve fiber growth
US5384133Jun 29, 1993Jan 24, 1995Innovata Biomed LimitedInhalants, controlled release
US5407609May 17, 1993Apr 18, 1995Southern Research InstituteEmulsification, solvent extraction
US5417986Apr 10, 1992May 23, 1995The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The ArmyVaccines against diseases caused by enteropathogenic organisms using antigens encapsulated within biodegradable-biocompatible microspheres
US5429822Mar 13, 1992Jul 4, 1995Cambridge Scientific, Inc.Biodegradable bursting release system
US5500228Nov 26, 1990Mar 19, 1996American Cyanamid CompanyPhase separation-microencapsulated pharmaceuticals compositions useful for alleviating dental disease
US5538739Jan 18, 1991Jul 23, 1996Sandoz Ltd.Sustained release formulations of water soluble peptides
US5639480Jun 6, 1995Jun 17, 1997Sandoz Ltd.Sustained release formulations of water soluble peptides
US5643605Jun 2, 1995Jul 1, 1997Genentech, Inc.Polylactide or polylactide-glycolide copolymer
US5648096Jun 22, 1994Jul 15, 1997Schwarz Pharma AgBiodegradable
US5650173Oct 3, 1996Jul 22, 1997Alkermes Controlled Therapeutics Inc. IiPreparation of biodegradable microparticles containing a biologically active agent
US5688530Jun 6, 1995Nov 18, 1997Novartis AgAcromegaly; breast cancer
US5693343May 16, 1994Dec 2, 1997The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The ArmyMixing acetonitrile solutions of antigen-sucrose matrix and glycolide-lactide copolymer, then emulsification with an oil and centrifuging yields microspheres containing encapsulated antigen for orally administered vaccines
US5762965Feb 9, 1996Jun 9, 1998The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The ArmyVaccines against intracellular pathogens using antigens encapsulated within biodegradble-biocompatible microspheres
US5811128Sep 7, 1993Sep 22, 1998Southern Research InstituteMethod for oral or rectal delivery of microencapsulated vaccines and compositions therefor
US5814344Jun 6, 1995Sep 29, 1998Southern Research InstituteMethod for delivering bioactive agents into and through the mucosally associated lymphoid tissues and controlling their release
US5820883Jun 6, 1995Oct 13, 1998Southern Research InstituteAdministering two separately microencapsulated active agents; first agent causes primary immune response, second agent is released in pulsating manner to potentiate response
US5853763Jun 6, 1995Dec 29, 1998Southern Research InstituteMethod for delivering bioactive agents into and through the mucosally-associated lymphoid tissue and controlling their release
EP0052510B2Nov 17, 1981Oct 19, 1994Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc.Microencapsulation of water soluble polypeptides
WO1992022654A1 *Jun 10, 1992Dec 12, 1992Microgenesys IncVaccine and treatment method of human immunodeficiency virus infection
WO1995011010A1 *Oct 13, 1994Apr 27, 1995Genentech IncMethods and compositions for microencapsulation of antigens for use as vaccines
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1Biotechnology News, Aug. 22, 1997, vol. 17, No. 20, Topical DNA vaccine elicits immune response.
2Brown, A hypothetical model of the foreign antigen blinding site of Class II histocompatibility molecules, Nature, vol. 332, Apr. 28, 1988, pp. 845-850.
3Brown, Wonder Drugs' Losing Healing Aura, The Washing Post, Jun. 26, 1995, A section.
4Cassels, et al., Analysis of Escherichia coli Colonization Factor Antigen I Linear B-Cell Epitopes, as Determined by Primate Responses, following Protein Sequence Verification, Infection and Immunity, Jun. 1992, pp. 2174-2181, vol. 60, No. 6.
5Evans, et al. Purification and Characterization of the CFR/1 Antigen of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Infection and Immunity, Aug. 1979, pp. 738-748, vol. 25.
6Gilding, Biodegradable polymers for use in surgery-polyglycolic/poly (ac c acid) homo-and copolymers: 1, Polymer, vol. 20, Dec. 1979, pp. 1459-1464.
7Hall, et al., Purification and Analysis of Colonization Factor Antigen 1, Coli Surface Antigen 1, and Coli Surface ANtigen 3 Fimbriae from Enterotoxigenic Escherichis Coli, Journal of Bacteriology, Nov. 1989, pp. 6372-6374, vol. 171, No. 11.
8Jeyanthi, et al., Novel, Burst Free Programmable Biodegradable Microspheres For Controlled Release of Polypeptides, Proceedings Int. Symp. control Release Bioact. Mater. (1996) pp. 351-362/.
9Jordi, et al., Analysis of the first two genes of the CSI fimbrial operon in human enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli of serotype 0139: H28, FEMS Microbiology Letters 80, (1991) pp. 265-270.
10Karjalainen, et al., Molecular Cloning and Nucleotide Sequence of the Colonization Factor Antigen I Gene of Escherichia coli, Infection and Immunity, Apr. 1989, pp. 1126-1130, vol. 57.
11Maister, First Oral AIDS Vaccine Trials Near, BioWorld Today, Tuesday, Apr. 19, 1994, p. 4.
12McConnel, et al., Antigenic homology within human enterotoxigenic Esherichia coli fimbrial colonization factor antigens: CFA/I, coli-surface-associated antigens (CS)1, CS2, CS4 and CS17, FEMS Microbiology Letters 61 (1989) 105-108.
13Perez-Casal, et al., Gene Encoding the Major Subunit of CS1 Pili of Human Enterotoxigenic Escherichia Coli, Infection and Immunity, Nov., 1990, pp. 3594-3600, vol. 58, No. 11.
14Rognan, et al., Molecular Modeling of an Antigenic Complex Between a Viral Peptide and a Class I Major Histocompatibility Glycoprotein, Proteins Structure, Function and Genetics 13 70-85 (1992).
15Romagnoli, et al. Peptide-MHC Interaction: A Rational Approach to Vaccine Design, Inter, RE. Immunol. 6, 1990, 00 61-73.
16Setterstrom, Controlled Release of Antibiotics From biodegradable Microcapsules For Wound Infection Control, Chemical Abstracts, 1983, pp. 215-226.
17Tan, et al., Mapping the Antigenic Epitopes of Human Dihydrofolate Reductase by Systematic Synthesis of Peptides on solid Supports, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 265, No. 14, Issue of May 15, pp. 8022-8026 (1990).
18Van der Zee, Efficient mapping and characterization of a T cell epitope by the simultaneous synthesis of multiple peptides, Eur. J. Immunol. 1989, 19: 43-47.
19Wang, et al., Influence of formulation methods on the in vitro controlled release of protein from poly (ester) microspheres Journal of Controlled Release, 17 (1991) 23-32.
20Yan, Characterization and morphological analysis of protein-loaded poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles prepared by watewr-in-oil-in-water emulsion technique, Journal of Controlled Release, 32 (1994) 231-241.
21Yeh, A novel emulsification-solvent extraction technique for production of protein loaded biodegradable microparticles for vaccine and drug delivery, Journal of Controlled Release 33 (1995) 437-445.
Classifications
U.S. Classification424/499, 424/455, 424/488, 424/426, 424/486, 424/422
International ClassificationA61K9/16, A61K9/00, A61K38/00, C07K14/245, C07K14/195, A61K9/50
Cooperative ClassificationA61K9/5031, C07K14/245, A61K38/00, A61K9/1647
European ClassificationC07K14/245, A61K9/16H6D4, A61K9/50H6D
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Feb 20, 2009ASAssignment
Owner name: ARMY, UNITED STATES, MARYLAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BURNETT, PAUL R.;VAN HAMONT, JOHN E.;REID, ROBERT H.;ANDOTHERS;REEL/FRAME:022293/0134;SIGNING DATES FROM 19960715 TO 19960823